Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-09-01 L. Fancher - OLU Employee Parking1 Chenelle Hale From:Liz Fancher <liz@lizfancher.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 1, 2021 10:34 AM To:William Groves Cc:Kameron DeLashmutt; Kameron DeLashmutt; Katzaroff, Kenneth Subject:RE: 507-SP OLU Parking Attachments:20210901 OLU Emp Parking v2.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Will: How about a condition of approval that we provide two additional parking spaces (we expect there will be 2 employees for housekeeping which requires one parking space; we propose two which is enough at the hotel rate for up to four employees; at the motel rate, only one parking space is required for the manager) in the approximate area shown by Kam on the attached plan. The spaces would be located on a driveway proposed by the OLU site plan. The idea of this approach is to meet all parking needs for the OLU site plan on the OLU site plan. Thank you, Liz Fancher Liz Fancher, Attorney 2465 NW Sacagawea Ln Bend, OR 97703 541-385-3067 (telephone) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is confidential. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution (other than to the addressee(s)), copying or taking of any action because of this information is strictly prohibited. From: William Groves <William.Groves@deschutes.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:59 AM To: Liz Fancher <liz@lizfancher.com> Subject: 507-SP OLU Parking Liz, You include a proposed finding: DCC 18.116.030(D) does not include a category for OLUs. Subsection (D)(2) includes hotels and motels and sets different requirements for each. In previous OLU applications for the Caldera and Tetherow destination resorts, 2 a requirement of one parking space per OLU was imposed. We believe the same requirement should be applied here. These uses certainly require worker parking in addition to the guest parking a 1 space/unit. In the Tetherow example, housekeeping worker parking was provided elsewhere on the site. I’m assuming that housekeeping will be located in the clubhouse complex. Do you have a suggestion on how to provide a finding for this proposal? Could we simply condition this application to make clear that these structures will not be usable or counted as OLUs until the worker parking is provided in a subsequent public process? Thanks, Will Will Groves | Senior Planner | CFM Deschutes County Community Development 117 NW Lafayette Ave | Bend, Oregon 97708 Tel: (541) 388-6518 | Mail: PO Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708 Let us know how we’re doing: Customer Feedback Survey Disclaimer: Please note that the information in this email is an informal statement made in accordance with DCC 22.20.005 and shall not be deemed to constitute final County action effecting a change in the status of a person's property or conferring any rights, including any reliance rights, on any person.