HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-06-16 Swisher Soils Report Release ZCDepartment of Land Conservation and Development
635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150
Salem, Oregon 97301-2540
Phone: 503-373-0050
Fax: 503-378-5518
www.oregon.gov/LCD
Soil Assessment Completeness Review
In accordance with OAR 660-033-0045(6)(a), the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) finds that this soils assessment is complete and consistent with reporting requirements for agricultural soils capability. The county
may make its own determination as to the accuracy and acceptability of the soils assessment. DLCD has reviewed the soils assessment for completeness only and has not assessed whether the parcel qualifies as agricultural land as defined in OAR 660-033-0020(1) and 660-033-0030.
Hilary Foote
June 16, 2021
The department will consider soil assessments under OAR 660-033-0030 to be
complete if they meet the following standards: (1) General information, to include: (a) Title of the report: ‘Soil Assessment for Two 40-acre Parcels, Bend Oregon’
(b) Person making request for soils assessment; Dave Swisher, Trustee Don swisher Trust (c) Names of soil scientist/classifier conducting the field work and preparer of the report, along with their certification numbers; Andy Gallagher, ARCPACS CPSSc/SC 03114
(d) Land use case file number (if available); Not stated (e) County in which the assessment was conducted; Deschutes (f) Location of the project site, including the township, range, section and tax lot numbers; Taxlots 100 & 600 in Township 17S, Range 13E, Section 18.
(g) Present zoning designation; EFU
(h) Current land use; Habitat (i) Parcel acreage: 80 acres; evaluated: 80 acres evaluated. (j) A description of the purpose of the assessment. Plan Amendment and Zone Change
(2) Previous Mapping or Background: The soil scientist/classifier shall provide a copy of the applicable and most current National Cooperative Soil Survey map(s) provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on the Web Soil Survey, with the area of investigation outlined on the map(s). The scale of the map(s) shall be identified and a list of the map units under investigation shall be listed. The applicable
Page 2 of 4
interpretations and minor components (inclusions) for the map units for which the
investigation is being made shall also be provided. Table 1A & 1B and Figure 2, page 7. NRCS identified soils are Gosney-Rock Outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes (capability class 6, 7 & 8) and Deskamp-Gosney complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes (capability class 6 & 7).
(3) Methods Used by Soil Scientist/Classifier: The soil scientist/classifier shall describe the methodologies used for the preparation of the report and shall include the following: (a) The level of order of survey used in the field survey, scale and type of maps
used for field investigations, number of sample locations and observation
points all confirming or disagreeing with the NRCS mapping units. The survey shall be one or more level of order higher than the NRCS survey as described in the NRCS Soil Survey Manual, 1993. Note that an Order 1 survey is more detailed than an Order 2 or greater survey. Order 1 survey
(b) The date(s) of the field investigation; September 30, 2020
(c) The methods used for observations (backhoe, auger, shovel, etc.) and methods used for documentation (for slope, color, pH, etc.); Soil borings, slope gradients as measured by DEM and clinometer, moist soils determined using Munsell color chart, as described on page 2.
(d) The number and location of borings either shown on an aerial photograph base
map of the parcel or provided in a table with latitude and longitude coordinates. In conducting Order 1 soil surveys, the scale of the base maps used for the survey needs to be large enough to enable the identification of polygons of soil map units as consociation map units. Soil map units identified as a complex,
association, or undifferentiated group should be avoided as this defeats the
purpose of an Order 1 survey. If, however, the soils are so intermingled that they cannot be mapped at a reasonable scale so as to identify consociation map unit polygons, then there should be sufficient sampling and documentation of the complex to demonstrate this soil component distribution. A percentage of
each member of the complex will used in determining area of extent and the
reported percentages will be based on this sampling and its documentation, including soil profile descriptions, boring locations and, where useful, photographs. 82 boring locations are identified in Figure 5A and Figure 5B on pages 11 and 12. Coordinates are provided on pages 18 and 19.
(e) Geomorphic and vegetation correlations supporting the interpretation of land
capability classes of soils that differ from those in the official soil survey information; and Provided on page 2. (f) A notation of any limitations encountered during the field investigation, such as soil depth, drainage, slope or inaccessibility. No limitations were
identified (page 2).
(4) Results, Findings, and Decisions: The soils report shall describe how the level of
Page 3 of 4
order of survey used in this investigation differs from that used by NRCS in the
original soil survey. The soils report shall also include: (a) An overview of the geology or geologic setting, describing sources of parent material, bedrock and related factors; (Page 2) (b) A description of the landforms and topography, confirming the
relationship of landforms to soil mapping units; (Page 2)
(c) A description of on-site and adjacent hydrology, including surface and subsurface features, intermittent versus perennial, floodplain and floodways and other related information; (Page 2) (d) A description of the revised soil mapping units with their range of
characteristics, explaining how and why they differ from NRCS soil mapping.
The soils report shall include a summary of soil variability incorporating significance of preceding weather (above or below average), where known and crops and natural vegetation present; and (Page 2-4) (e) A tabulation of all previous and revised soil mapping units complete with their
acreages and land capability classification. Table 1A and Table 1B, page 4. (5) Summary or Conclusion: The soils report shall contain a section reiterating the purpose of the investigation, explaining the significance of the revised soil mapping and describing any other significant issues related to the report’s purpose. Provided
on pages 5 and 6.
(6) References: This section may list any manuals or publications utilized or referenced by the report. Provided on page 6.
(7) Attachments: Other informational materials provided as attachments, such as
maps, figures or appendices shall include the following and shall be printed on 8 ½ x 11” wherever possible: (a) Vicinity map at a scale of 1:48,000 or smaller showing the project location;
Figure 1, page 6
(b) The NRCS soils map generated from Web Soil Survey at a scale of 1:20,000 or larger outlining the project site; Figure 2, page 7 (c) Site condition map (aerial photo) at a scale of 1:5,000 or larger outlining the project site and showing the location of site investigations (borings) and other
relevant features; Figure 3, page 8
(d) Topography map at a scale of 1:24,000 or larger outlining the project site; Figure 3, page 8 (e) Assessor’s map at a scale of 1:5,000 or larger outlining the project site; Figure 4A and 4B, page 9 and page 10
(f) Revised soils map of the project site at a scale of 1:5,000 or larger; Figure
5A and 5B, page 11 and 12 (g) Soil profile descriptions and site observation notes; Pages 2-4. Boring notes
Page 4 of 4
pages 13-17
(h) Representative soil profile descriptions of any soil type identified in the project area that is not described or identified in the published soil survey for the area mapped.
(8) Soils reports shall be submitted electronically to the department to
hilary.foote@state.or.us, accompanied by a Soils Assessment Submittal Form. Payment of a non-refundable administrative fee of $625 should be sent by check.
Soil Assessment for Two 40-acre Parcels,
Bend Oregon
For: Dave Swisher and Don Swisher
November 2, 2020
By: Andy Gallagher
CPSSc/SC 03114
SOIL ASSESSMENT REPORT
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. TITLE: Soil Assessment for two 40-acre parcels Bend, Oregon.
B. LANDOWNER: Don Swisher Trust, c/o Dave Swisher, Trustee, 250 BW
Franklin Ave, Suite 401, Bend, Oregon 97703.
C. SOIL SCIENTIST AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER:
Andy Gallagher ARCPACS CPSSc/SC 03114
D. LAND USE CASE FILE NUMBER:
E. COUNTY: Deschutes County, Oregon.
F. LOCATION: Tax lot 100 and 600 Sec. 18., T. 17 S., R. 13E., W.M.
G. PRESENT ZONING: Exclusive Farm Use.
H. CURRENT LAND USE: Natural Habitat
I. PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: Many decisions about land use and zoning
are based on soil maps. This property was previously mapped at 1:20,000
scale, which is generally too small a scale for detailed land use planning and
decision making. This Order -1 soil survey and soil assessment is done to
provide the percentages of soils by land capability classes for proposed
rezone to MUA-10 that is currently zoned EFU.
2. PREVIOUS MAPPING / BACKGROUND
This property was previously mapped by the USDA-SCS Soil Survey of the
Deschutes County Area and compiled by NRCS into the Web Soil Survey.
The NRCS soil map of this parcel (Figure 2) shows:
1) 58C Gosney-Rock outcrop-Deskamp complex, 0 to 15 percent
slopes
2) 38B Deskamp-Gosney complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes
The Land Capability Class of these soils by soil series is shown in Table 1A and
1B.
Don Swisher Trust 2 Red Hill Soils
3. METHODS
A. LEVEL ORDER OF SURVEY USED IN THIS FIELD SURVEY: This current
soil investigation is a high intensity (Order-1) soil survey. It is used as a basis
for making the soil classification and soil map for this parcel. A total of six soil
borings are used to document the soils on this parcel. Four soil borings were
made on the parcel to revise the soil map. Soil borings and observations of
rock outcrops average one observation/boring per acre. These two lots were
mapped at the same time, so the numbering of borings is not sequential for
each lot and all borings and observations are included in this report.
B. DATES OF FIELD INVESTIGATIONS: Field work was done on September
30, 2020.
C. FIELD METHODS: Methods used for observation included soil borings from
soil pits to classify soils. Slope gradients were measured with digital elevation
model and compared to observations on the ground with a clinometer. Soil
colors were determined moist, using a Munsell Color Chart. Borings locations
and property corners were recorded with a GPS receiver and compiled into a soil
map following processing with GIS software. Percentages of revised soil map
unit areas were calculated from the revised map using GIS software.
D. LIMITATIONS ENCOUNTERED: None.
4. RESULTS:
A. GEOLOGY OVERVIEW: The geology of the survey area volcanic ash over
hard basalt. Soils formed in volcanic ash.
B. LANDFORMS AND TOPOGRAPHY: Gently rolling lava plains with low
pressure ridge and collapsed lava tube features.
C. SITE HYDROLOGY: Soils observed are somewhat excessively drained.
E. Geomorphic and vegetation correlations supporting the interpretation of
land capability classes of soils that differ from those in the official soil
survey information. The site has western Juniper, sagebrush, rabbit brush
and bunch grasses. Ecological Group Juniper shrubby pumice flat and
Juniper shrubby lava blisters.
F. DESCRIPTION OF REVISED SOIL MAP UNITS
Revised Soil Map Units
Soils on this parcel are revised and reclassified based on high intensity soil
mapping. The soils found here are remapped as Gosney-Rock Outcrop Complex
Don Swisher Trust 3 Red Hill Soils
Capability Class 7 and Deskamp ashy sandy loam Class 3 irrigated and 6 non-
irrigated
GR Gosney-Rock Outcrop Complex
Capability Class 7
These soils are mapped together in a complex because both components are
Capability Class 7 or greater, and it was not practical to map them separately.
These soils are estimated to be about 25 percent Rock Outcrop and 75 percent
Gosney. They have lower productivity than NRCS map unit 38B because they
do not contain a mappable area of Deskamp soils that were mapped separately.
The productivity reported in Table 2 for Gosney-Rock Outcrop are 20 percent
less than the 58C map unit to account for more shallow and very shallow soils in
the GR map unit in the revised map unit. Based on the observations here the
map unit is about 40 percent very shallow soils, 35 percent Gosney soils and 25
percent rock outcrops.
Gosney (0 to 15 percent slopes)
Description: Gosney series consists of shallow 10 to 20 inches to hard basalt
bedrock, somewhat excessively drained soils on lava plains. These soils have
rapid permeability. They formed in volcanic ash over hard basalt bedrock.
Slopes are 0 to 15 percent. The mean annual precipitation is less than 12 inches,
and the mean annual temperature is about 45 degrees F.
Capability Class: 7
Soil Variability: Depth to bedrock is from surface exposures of bedrock to 20
inches depth. There may be small inclusions of soils like Deskamp that are
moderately deep (>20 inches). Many of the pedons are sandy skeletal family.
This unit includes very shallow soils <10 inches.
Very shallow phase 0-15 percent slopes
Description: this component of the complex is less than 10 inches to basalt.
Capability Class: 7
Soil Variability: Depth to bedrock is from 1 to 10 inches. This soil is a very
shallow soil that is similar to Gosney but shallower. It has lower available water
holding capacity and an estimated 40 percent lower productivity.
Rock Outcrop (0 to 15 percent slopes)
Description: This is a large proportion of the map unit and represents areas
where bedrock is at the surface often times standing several feet about the
general grade, and in places where suspected lava tubes collapsed the rock out
crops are rimrock
Capability Class: 8
Soil Variability: In places rocks are an inch or two below the surface but mainly
are surface exposed and are detectible in aerial photographs.
Dk Deskamp
Description: Moderately Deep somewhat excessively drained soils with rapid
permeability on lava plains. They formed in ash and have hard basalt at 20 to 40
Don Swisher Trust 4 Red Hill Soils
inches. Slopes are 1 to 15 percent. The A and AB horizon are loamy sand. The
2B is loamy sand and gravelly loamy sand. The NRCS soil survey mapped
Deskamp and Gosney in a complex described as 50% Deskamp and 35%
Gosney. In this Dk unit I broke out the Deskamp component of the former
complex based on much more detailed soil sampling than the NRCS soil survey.
Capability Class: 3 irrigated and 6 non-irrigated
Soil Variability: There are inclusions of rock outcrop and of deep soils with
sandy skeletal family. Any rock outcrop I observed in the field was delineated
from the Deskamp unit, but because not all rock outcrops could be resolved at
the one boring per acre average soil observation given the brushy conditions.
Table 1A: Lot 600. PREVIOUS AND REVISED SOIL MAPPING UNITS WITH
LAND CAPABILITY CLASS.
Previous
Map
Symbol
Revised
Map
Symbol
Soil Series Name
Capability
Class
(subclass)
nonirrigated
Previous
Map*
Revised Map
Ac -%- Ac -%-
38B -- Deskamp-Gosney complex,
0 to 8 percent slopes
6 and 7
36.8
92 0 0
58C -- Gosney-Rock outcrop-
Deskamp complex, 0 to 15
percent slopes
6, 7 and 8
3.2
8
0 0
-- Dk Deskamp 6
0
0 7.2 18
-- GR Gosney-Rock Outcrop
Complex
7 and 8
0
0 32.8 82
*Soils that were previously mapped as components of a complex that are mapped as consociations in
revised map.
Table 1B: Lot 100. PREVIOUS AND REVISED SOIL MAPPING UNITS WITH
LAND CAPABILITY CLASS.
Previous
Map
Symbol
Revised
Map
Symbol
Soil Series Name
Capability
Class
(subclass)
non-irrigated
Previous
Map*
Revised Map
Ac -%- Ac -%-
38B -- Deskamp-Gosney complex,
0 to 8 percent slopes
6 to 7
40
100 0 0
-- Dk Deskamp 6
0
0 4.7 12
-- GR Gosney-Rock Outcrop
Complex
7 and 8
0
0 35.3 88
*Soils that were previously mapped as components of a complex that are mapped as consociations in
revised map.
Don Swisher Trust 5 Red Hill Soils
Total Range Production from NRCS Websoil survey and estimates based soil
percentages in revised soil map units
Soil Map Unit Total annual range production pounds per acre
Unfavorable year Normal year Favorable year
38B 700 900 1100
58C 411 558 705
Dk 700 900 1100
GR1 315 441 567
1
Estimated based on percentage of soils within consociation
Total range production is the amount of vegetation that can be expected to grow
annually in a well-managed area that is supporting the potential natural plant
community. It includes all vegetation, whether or not it is palatable to grazing
animals. It includes the current year's growth of leaves, twigs, and fruits of woody
plants. It does not include the increase in stem diameter of trees and shrubs. It is
expressed in pounds per acre of air-dry vegetation. In a normal year, growing
conditions are about average. Yields are adjusted to a common percent of air-dry
moisture content. The productivity provided for Dk map unit is from Websoil
survey for the Deskamp soil and that provided for the GR map unit is based on
40% shallow soils, 35% Gosney and 25% rock outcrop.
Lot 600 based on previous NRCS map has a weighted average annual
productivity of 884 pounds per acre in a normal year. Based on the revised
Order-1 map the annual productivity is 440 pounds per acre.
Lot 100 based on NRCS map has a weighted average annual productivity of 900
pounds per acre in a normal year. Based on the revised Order-1 map the annual
productivity is 494 pounds per acre.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS:
Soils were remapped in a high intensity (Order-1) soil survey on two 40-acre
parcels Lots 100 and 600 that are currently zoned EFU. Previously this area was
mapped as a soil complex that included soils that ranged from Land Capability
Class 3 irrigated to Class 8. In the revised map soil the Deskamp soils (Class 3
irrigated and 6 nonirrigated are mapped as a consociation and the Gosney, rock
outcrop and very shallow soils mapped as a complex in which all three
components are either Capability Class 7 or 8. The soils in both of these 40 acre
parcels are predominantly shallow and ashy-skeletal and rock outcrops Land
Capability Class 7 and 8.
Revised Order -1 Mapping is based on soil pits, surface observations of rocks,
aerial photo interpretation and GPS location of features. Borings demonstrated
somewhat excessively drained soils that included areas of shallow soils 12 to 20
inches deep that are moderately rapid to rapid permeability. The sampling
intensity averages one observation per acre with boring distributions of higher
Don Swisher Trust 6 Red Hill Soils
intensity in areas of more variability and lower intensity in areas of lower
variability.
6. REFERENCES:
Soil Survey of Deschutes County Area\NRCS Websoilsurvey.
Websoilsurvey NRCS
7. MAPS AND ATTACHMENTS:
a. Figure 1. Vicinity Map (1:100,000 scale).
b. Figure 2. Previous Soil Map (NRCS Websoilsurvey)
c. Figure 3. Topographic Map and Site Condition Map (contour lines from Digital
elevation model
d. Figure 4A and 4B. Assessors Map
e. Figure 5A and 5B. Revised Soil Map of the Project Site and location of Soil Borings
f. Soil Profile Notes and Site Observation Notes Attachment 1.
g. GPS coordinates Attachment 2.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map (1:100,000 scale parcel at blue balloon)
Don Swisher Trust 7 Red Hill Soils
Figure 2. NRCS Soil Map Data Layer on aerial image. Lot 600 North 40
Acres, Lot 100 South 40 acres.
NRCS Soil Map Legend
Capability Class
SYMBOL Name nonirrigated
38B Deskamp-Gosney complex 6 and 7
58C Gosney, Rock Outcrop, Deskamp Complex 6, 7 and 8
Don Swisher Trust 8 Red Hill Soils
Figure 3. Topographic map and soil condition map of the study area
(Contour interval 10 ft).
0200400600800 1000 1200 1400
0
200
400
600
800
3420
3420
3440
3460
Don Swisher Trust 9 Red Hill Soils
Figure 4. Assessor’s map the tract under consideration.
Don Swisher Trust 10 Red Hill Soils
Don Swisher Trust 11 Red Hill Soils
Figure 5A: Revised Soil Map of the Lot 600 Project Site and soil boring
locations
0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
0
200
400
600
800 Dk
GR
DkDk
Revised Soil Legend of Property
Symbol Map unit Capability Class
GR Gosney-Rock Outcrop 7 and 8
Dk Deskamp 6- not irrigated
Don Swisher Trust 12 Red Hill Soils
Figure 5: Revised Soil Map of the Lot 100 Project Site and soil boring
locations
0200400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
0
200
400
600
800 Dk
Dk
Soil Soil Upper Lower Coarse
Boring Name Horizon Depth Depth Color Fragments Texture Notes
(IN) (IN)
1 V shallow A 0 9 10YR3/2 loamy sand
R 9 basalt
2 Gosney A 0 10 10YR3/2 stony loamy sand
R 10
3 Rock outcrop 70 x 70 feet
4 Deskamp A 0 10 10YR3/2 loamy sand
A2 10 15 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw1 15 40 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 40 basalt
5 V shallow A 0 6 10YR3/3 loamy sand
R 6 basalt
6 Rock outcrop basalt
7 Rock outcrop basalt
8 Deskamp A 0 20 loamy sand
Bw 20 25 loamy sand
R 25 basalt
9 Rock outcrop basalt 4 ft above grade
10 V shallow A 0 6 10YR3/3
R 6 basalt
11 Rock outcrop basalt 5 ft above grade
12 Deskamp A 0 10 10YR3/2 loamy sand
A2 10 15 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw1 15 36 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 36 basalt
13 Rock outcrop basalt
14 Gosney A 0 10 10YR3/2 stony loamy sand
R 10 basalt
15 Gosney A 0 3 10YR3/3 loamy sand
A2 3 20 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 20 basalt
16 V shallow A 0 3 10YR3/2 loamy sand
3 basalt
17 Deskamp A 0 10 10YR3/2 loamy sand
Bw 10 22 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 22 basalt
18 Rock outcrop basalt
19 Rock outcrop basalt 2 ft above grade
Soil Soil Upper Lower Coarse
Boring Name Horizon Depth Depth Color Fragments Texture Notes
(IN) (IN)
20 Rock outcrop basalt connects to #19
21 Deskamp A 0 10 10YR3/2 loamy sand
Deep Phase A2 10 16 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw1 16 48 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 48 basalt
22 Gosney A 0 18 10YR3/2 loamy sand
18 basalt
23 Rock outcrop basalt southern edge
of #19 and #20
24 Gosney A 0 19
R basalt rock outcrop
on two sides
25 V. shallow A 0 4
R 4 basalt
26 Gosney 0 10 10YR3/3 loamy sand
10 basalt
27 Deskamp A 0 12 10YR3/2 loamy sand
Bw 12 31 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 31 basalt
28 Rock outcrop basalt
29 Rock outcrop basalt
30 Gosney A 0 19
R 19 basalt rock outcrop
to north of pit
31 Rock outcrop basalt pressure ridge
32 Deskamp A1 0 6 10YR3/3 gravelly loamy sand
A2 6 20 10YE3/3 gravelly loamy sand
Bw 20 40 10YR4/3 stony loamy sand
R 40 basalt
33 Rock outcrop basalt pressure ridge
34 Rock outcrop basalt pressure ridge
35 Rock outcrop basalt
36 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
deep Bw 8 21 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bkqm 21 41 10YR4/4 loamy sand 20% weakly cemented nodules
R 41
37 Rock outcrop basalt
38 Very shallowA 0 6 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Soil Soil Upper Lower Coarse
Boring Name Horizon Depth Depth Color Fragments Texture Notes
(IN) (IN)
R 6
39 Gosney A1 0 7 10YR3/2 stony loamy sand
A2 7 14 10YR3/3 stony loamy sand
R 14 basalt
40 Rock outcrop basalt
41 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw 8 35 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 35
42 Rock outcrop basalt 20 ft north of #41
43 Gosney A 0 17 10YR3/3 loamy sand
R 17 basalt
44 Gosney A 0 10 10YR3/3 loamy sand
A2 10 20 10YR3/3 gravelly loamy sand
R 20 basalt
45 Rock outcrop basalt
46 Rock outcrop basalt
47 V. Shallow A 0 7 10YR3/3 loamy sand
R 7 basalt
48 Rock Outcrop basalt
49 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw 8 20 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bkqm 20 32 10YR4/4 loamy sand 20% weakly
R 32 basalt
50 Rock outcrop basalt 5 ft above grade
51 v shallow A 0 6 10YR 3/3 very stony loamy sand
R 6 basalt
52 Rock outcrop basalt 3 ft above grade
53 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw 8 31 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 31 basalt
54 Rock outcrop basalt
55 Rock outcrop basalt
56 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw 8 24 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bq 24 31 10YR4/3 weakly cemented nodules
R 31 basalt
Soil Soil Upper Lower Coarse
Boring Name Horizon Depth Depth Color Fragments Texture Notes
(IN) (IN)
57 v shallow A 0 5 10YR 3/3 very stony loamy sand
R 5 basalt
58 Rock outcrop basalt from 57 to fence
59 Rock outcrop basalt standing 6 ft above grade
60 Gosney A 0 9 10YR 3/3 loamy sand
A2 9 20 10YR 3/3 stony loamy sand
R 20 basalt
61 Rock outcrop basalt 100 ft to SE includes piles
62 Deskamp A 0 10 10YR3/2 loamy sand
deep AB 10 24 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bq1 24 41 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bq2 41 basalt
63 V shallow A 0 2 10YR4/3 loamy sand
2 basalt
64 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw 8 21 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bq 21 31 10YR4/3 weakly cemented nodules
R 31 basalt
65 Rock outcrop basalt 100 ft to south east
66 Rock outcrop basalt ridge extends NW and NE
67 Deskamp A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Bw1 8 24 10YR4/3 loamy sand
Bw2 24 37 10YR4/3 stony loamy sand
R 37 basalt
68 Rock outcrop basalt
69 Gosney A1 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand outcrop field extends 100 ft SE
A2 8 18 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 18 basalt
70 v shallow A 0 4 10YR3/3 loamy sand
R 4 basalt
71 Gosney A 0 8 10YR3/3 loamy sand
A2 8 18 10YR4/3 loamy sand
R 18 basalt
72 Rock outcrop basalt
73 Rock outcrop basalt
74 v shallow A 0 5 10YR3/3 loamy sand
Soil Soil Upper Lower Coarse
Boring Name Horizon Depth Depth Color Fragments Texture Notes
(IN) (IN)
R 5
75 Gosney A 0 18 10YR3/3 loamy sand
R 18 basalt
76 Gosney A 0 12 loamy sand
R 12 basalt
77 Rock outcrop basalt
78 Rock outcrop basalt
79 Rock outcrop basalt rimrock 12 ft high
80 Rock outcrop basalt rimrock from 79 to 80
81 Rock outcrop basalt
82 Rock outcrop basalt
boring latitude longitude
1 44.09871 -121.218286
2 44.09952 -121.218319
3 44.099835 -121.218457
4 44.100028 -121.218442
5 44.10095 -121.218037
6 44.101623 -121.217891
7 44.101472 -121.216981
8 44.101555 -121.216961
9 44.102067 -121.217192
10 44.102686 -121.217003
11 44.102541 -121.217032
12 44.103165 -121.216819
13 44.103507 -121.217916
14 44.103507 -121.217747
15 44.104235 -121.217897
16 44.104695 -121.217776
17 44.105757 -121.217709
18 44.105472 -121.217046
19 44.105428 -121.216754
20 44.104715 -121.216426
21 44.104603 -121.216729
22 44.103882 -121.216277
23 44.104853 -121.216166
24 44.103173 -121.215889
25 44.103612 -121.215384
26 44.104112 -121.215439
27 44.104627 -121.215332
28 44.104718 -121.215332
29 44.104543 -121.214817
30 44.104833 -121.214562
31 44.104987 -121.214281
32 44.104713 -121.213871
33 44.104632 -121.214137
34 44.1046 -121.213686
35 44.105155 -121.213722
36 44.105058 -121.213552
37 44.104332 -121.213746
38 44.104172 -121.213734
39 44.104252 -121.214709
40 44.104233 -121.215834
41 44.104107 -121.216294
42 44.104127 -121.216252
43 44.104188 -121.217146
44 44.104357 -121.217696
45 44.10402 -121.217396
46 44.103333 -121.217516
boring latitude longitude
47 44.103077 -121.217097
48 44.102003 -121.216369
49 44.101682 -121.216249
50 44.101495 -121.215927
51 44.100833 -121.215701
52 44.10072 -121.214946
53 44.100568 -121.215021
54 44.100418 -121.214281
55 44.100398 -121.213552
56 44.100417 -121.213726
57 44.100153 -121.213816
58 44.09978 -121.213829
59 44.099695 -121.214002
60 44.099682 -121.213609
61 44.09979 -121.214766
62 44.100072 -121.214612
63 44.100243 -121.215446
64 44.100192 -121.215877
65 44.09992 -121.216176
66 44.10041 -121.215889
67 44.100263 -121.217129
68 44.10052 -121.217537
69 44.099108 -121.217977
70 44.098587 -121.217717
71 44.098585 -121.217711
72 44.1098382 -121.216729
73 44.098402 -121.216531
74 44.09855 -121.215226
75 44.098502 -121.214312
76 44.098478 -121.213734
77 44.098692 -121.214582
78 44.098925 -121.215081
79 44.0992 -121.215073
80 44.098453 -121.216202
81 44.103168 -121.213804
82 44.102095 -121.213799