HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-09-13 L Fancher CommentsLiz Fancher
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subiect:
Attachments:
Liz Fancher
Monday, September 13, 2021 10:18 AM
Kyle Collins
Dave Swisher
Response to Opponent Comments - 247-21-000616-PA and -000617-ZC
response to opponents 2021-09- 1 3.pdf
Kyle:
Would you please include the attached document in the record of Files 247-21,-00O516-PA and -000617-ZC? Would you
please send me an e-mail copy of the staff report when it is ready or let me know when it is available for review on
Accela. Mail from the County is taking three days to get to my mailbox.
Thank you I
Liz (Fancfier
Liz Fancher, Attorney
2465 NW Sacagawea Ln
Bend, OR 97703
541-385-3057 (telephone)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is confidential. This information is
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). lf you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
by return email and you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution (other than to the addressee(s)),
copying or taking of any action because of this information is strictly prohibited.
1
BEFORE THE PLANNING DIVISION OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
APPLICANT: Dave Swisher
APPLICANT'S
ATTORNEY:Liz Fancher
2465 NW Sacagawea Lane
Bend, Oregon 97703
Phone: 541-385-3067
E-ma i I : hz@lizfancher. com
PROPBRTY OWNER:Don Swisher Trust
Dave Swisher, Successor Trustee
Carolyn J. Swisher Trust
Dave Swisher, Successor Trustee
MacCloskey Revocable Trust
Craig and Jane I. MacCloskey. Trustees
(co-owner of Tax Lot 600 only)
SUBJECT PROPERTY:Tax Lot 100, Assessor's Map l7-13-l8C ("Tax Lot 100")
Tax Lot 600, Assessor's Map 17-13- l8 ("Tax Lot 600")
REQUEST An application to change the designation of the subject
property from Agriculture to Rural Residential Exception
Area (RREA) and to change the zoning of the subject
property from Exclusive Farm Use - Tumalo/Redmond/
Bend subzone (EFU-TRB) to Multiple Use Agricultural
(MUA-10) as the subject property does not qualify as
"Agricultural Land" pursuant to State Law and
administrative rules.
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO NEIGHBOR COMMENTS
A.Location: The location of the subject properties is marked as TL 100 and TL 600 on the
following aerial photograph. The owners of two small properties (about 2.5 acres each),
Conrad and Higham, filed comments opposing approval of the requested zone change
and plan amendment. Their properties are located southeast of the subject property on
Peterman Lane and Parker Lane in the Classic Estates subdivision. These roads are
shown on the aerial photograph, below.
Zone Change/Plan Amendment - Swisher Page I of5
Irt;-rlrlt:
| | ar*b
],iIJN I CIPA L! lhrnp.rnr
I
I
=3't.
i..:rfrbrr FF.
iitn F,r:t'ldtr
Itt
6
B.
C.
D
Zoning: The zoning of the Classic Estates lots is MUA- I 0, the same zoning proposed by
the applicant for TL 100 and 600. Deschutes County has not applied a WA overlay zone
to this property to protect wildlife. Protections for wildlife must be sanctioned by the
County's Goal 5 ESEEs and WA or similar wildlife overlay zoning to be relevant to
review of this application.
Road Impacts: Access to Classic Estates lots is provided by Peterman Lane and Parker
Lane. Traffic associated with new development of the subject property will not rely on
either road for access. Impacts to the greater area arterial street network will be
negligible as shown by the traffic impact analysis filed with the land use applications.
Classic Estate Subdivision: A copy of the Classic Estates subdivision plat is included to
illustrate the lot pattern and roads established by it.
Zone Change/Plan Amendment - Swisher Page 2 of5
E.Properties Owned by Opponents: The following photographs are aerial photographs
that show the setting of the properties owned by opponents Conrad and Higham. The
northwest corner of the Conrad property touches the southeast corner of TL 100.
Conrad Residence
Swisher ZC & PA
N
A0 .10 €0 lEo
---l
E5
Zone Change/Plan Amendment - Swisher Page 3 of5
The Higham property does not adjoin the subject properties. Its northwest corner is
approximately 700 feet from the southeast corner of TL 100. There are two developed single-
family home lots between it and TL 100.
Higham Residence
Swisher ZC & FA
N
A0 8! tEo 320
-t
Zone Change/Plqn Amendment - Swisher Page 4 of 5
F'Development Under EFU-TRB Zoningz Tax Lots 100 and 600 are legal lots of record.
Each, based on its poor soil conditions, should qualify to be divided into two nonfarm
parcels with a nonfarm dwelling on each of the tax lots. Such divisions would allow a
total of four nonfarm dwellings on the subject property. The subject property willnot
remain vacant land even if this application is denied.
Water for Homes and Irrigation: The applicant has shown that the subject property
can obtain water service from Avion Water System as shown by Exhibit F and G of the
application materials we filed with Deschutes County Planning.
Purpose of EFU ZoninglLand Use Planning: The purpose of EFU zoning, as stated by
Statewide Goal 3, is "to preserve and maintain agricultural lands." The term
"AgriculturalLand" is defined by Goal 3. The subject properties do not meet the
definition of "Agricultural Land." As a result, they may be zoned MUA-10, azoning
district that allows low-density rural residential development. The MUA- l0 zone has
been acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission as being
compliant with the Statewide Goals that protect the community from urbanization of rural
lands that formerly occurred in "sagebrush subdivisions."
Location of City of Bend UGB and Airport: The density of development allowed by
the proposed plan amendment and zone change is not urban development. Instead, the
MUA-10 zone has been determined, through the land use planning process, to be a
zoning district that is both an appropriate zone for nonagricultural land and one that does
not allow urban development. Nonetheless, the subject property is only approximately
1.25 miles east of the City of Bend's UGB and approximately one-half mile fron-r the
Bend Airport. The relatively large lot sizes required by the MUA-10 zone will preserve
this land for future urban development. If the City makes the logical decision to expand
its boundaries toward the Bend Airport, a location that is an employment area of the
community, the subject properties will likely remain suitable for redevelopment given
their size.
Unsuitability for Farm Use: The letter filed by the Conrads states that there is rock at
the surface of their property which adjoins the subject property. They express concern
that "extreme measures" will be required to build foundations for homes on the subject
property. This comment confirms the results of the applicant's soils study. The study
shows that a vast majority of the subject properties are comprised of rock and Class VII
soils that do not meet the definition of "Agricultural Land" provided by Statewide Land
Use Planning Goal 3.
F
G.
H.
I
Zone Change/Plan Amendment - Swisher Page 5 of5