The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-02-17 247-22-000123-PA, 22-124-ZC Application MaterialsMeqan Norris From: Sent: lo: Subject: RECEIVET} FEB r 7 20n Deschutes County CDD ICAUTION] This email WAS NOT sent by a Hayden Homes employee. Do not click on links or openattachments from this sender unless you are expecting them and know their content is safe. Call the sender toverifu! Hi Megan, The Record lD is the file number (247-22-OOO123-PA and 247-22-000124-ZC). You will not need to reference the invoicenumber. I believe the attached instructions may be missing a step. I just went through the steps in e-permitting to make apayment, and after you pull up the correct application (by searching for it by Record #), you will then ili.k ery*"nt andthen Fees, I circled the missing step in the screenshot below. You will need to click the blue pay Fees text to progress tothe next screen. Record 24V -22 - A0012 5 - PA: Plen Arnendment - lncluding Goal Exception or UGB Expansion Record Status: Pending Reccrd lnfolSchedule lnspections v feyrnents v Custom Component Fees Aud rey Stuart < Aud rey.Stuart@deschutes.org > Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:50 AM Megan Norris RE: HB 4079 - Submittal Outsterdfng; DatE lnuoicc l{umber*?f!6t2gz2 4528L4 trotnl r{rtrfrndfng fiaes: $9,ZS.OO This will then take you to this screen Amount $9.728.CI0 Pay Fees 1 For: Bend Urban Growth Boundary Expansion and RM Bend Comprehensive plan Designation Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (changing the Bend UGBlocation and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designation from Rural ResidentialException to Urban Growth Boundary) and Zone dhange from MUA10 to UA HB 4079 - Gity of Bend Affordabte Housing pilot program fTAYDEN HOMES APPLICATION NARRATIVE Submitted To: City of Bend Deschutes County February 2022 PROJECT TEAM Applicant: Hayden Homes 2464 SW Glacier Place, Suite 1 10 Redmond, OR 97756 (616) 52e-5691 Attn: Megan Norris Forurard Planning Manager Givil Engineer & Surveyor: H.A.McCoy Engineering & Surveying, LLC 1 18 SW Lake Road Redmond, Oregon 97756 (541) 923-7554 Attn: Hayes McCoy H.A. M"COY {1ffit Blackmore Plannin ILC Planning Gonsultant: Blackmore Planning and Development Services, LLC 19454 Sunshine Way Bend, OR97702 (541) 419-1455 Attn: Greg Blackmore AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, L Traffic Engineer: Transight Consulting, LLC 61271Splendor Lane Bend, OR (458) 202-5565 Attn: Joe Bessman TRAN S IEi HT a (}INGINIIRING dksuntqyrNc. ttc trCtNEULTlNfS,"c 'l Table of Contents l. lntroductio Summary of Proposal Background / Purpose of Request Abbreviations and Terms of Art ll. Applications, Attachments and Exhibi lll. Procedural overview; Appricable substantive criteria 5 A. Procedural OverviewB Relevant substantive Approval standards and criteria1. State of Oregon 1 A. B. c. 4 2 a. b. c. d. Desch OAR 660-039 - Affordable Housing pitot program OAR 660-024-0070 - UGB Adjustments oAR 660-015 - statewide planning Goals and Guidelines OAR 660-012 - Transportation planning utes Countya. Deschutes county code - Tifle 23 comprehensive planb. Deschutes County Code - Tiile 1g - County Zoningc. Deschutes county code - Tifle 1gA - Bend urbanizable Area (UA) Districtd. Deschutes County Code - Tifle 22 - Development Procedures City of Benda. Development code - chapter 4.6 Land Use District Map andText Amendmentsb. Development code - chapter 4.1 Development Review and Proceduresc. Comprehensive Plan 3 lV. Findings of F A. Property LocationB. OwnershipC. Legal DescriptionD. Existing ZoningE. Site DescriptionF. Vicinity and Surrounding UsesG. Public Meeting and NoticeH. Lot of Recordl. Application Acceptance V. Discussion; Conclusions - Sfafe of Oregon HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Program 660-039 UGB Adjustments - OAR 660-024 Conformance with Statewide Planning Goals Conformance with the Transportation Planning Rule Vl. Discussion; Gonclusions - Deschutes 23 Title 23 - Comprehensive Plan Title 18 - County Zoning Title '19A - Bend Urbanizable Area (UA) District Title 22 - Development Procedures Ordinance Vll. Discussion; Conclusions - City of Bend 42 Development Code - Chapter 4.6 Land Use District Map and Text Amendments Development code - chapter 4.1 Development Review and Procedures Comprehensive Plan vilt. A. B. c. D. A. B. c. c. A. B. c. Summary and Gonclus I. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Hayden Homes, in cooperation with the City of Bend, seeks to expand the Bend Urban Growth Boundary ("UGB") by adding 35.52 acres of land to its eastern edge, in an effort to provide affordable housing. The subject property was selected by the City of Bend in 2018 as the preferred site in an application to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) for the Oregon HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project. The City (and the subject property in particular) was selected for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project in November 2018. The current proposal (Bend UGB Expansion / RM Bend Comprehensive Plan Designation / UA Zone) is the 1st land use application step to implement a project that will result in 347 housing units, including 108 affordable housing units. Subsequent to this application/review, additional City of Bend applications needed to implement Oregon HB 4079 - the Affordable Housing Pilot Program include: . TSP Amendment / Alignmento Master Plano Annexation. Land Division. Site Plan (for the multi-unit development and park) B. BACKGROUND / PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST The current proposal is a necessary step to implement Oregon HB 4079, the Affordable Housing Pilot Project. ln 2016, the Oregon Legislature passed HB 4079, which formed a pilot program aimed to help cities build affordable housing. The program allows selected cities to add new housing units on lands currently outside their urban groMh boundaries (UGBs) without going through the normal UGB expansion process. The law directed the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) to set up a process to select two pilot projects. The selected cities would be able to use an expedited UGB process, if at least 30 percent of the newly built housing is affordable and the newly added land is protected for this use for at least 50 years. LCDC adopted for the pilot program process and project requirements in OAR 660-039. ln June 2018 the City of Bend submitted an application for the Affordable Housing Pilot Project (utilizing the subject property) and in November 2018 LCDC selected the City of Bend for the Pilot Project. C. ABBREVIATTOA'S AND TERMS OF ART This narrative utilizes various terms of art such as "Urban Growth Boundary," among others. While a concerted effort has been made to ensure that these terms and their associated acronyms are defined in context, the following list of terms and acronyms provides a more immediate reference: "BDC'means City of Bend Development Code "City" or'The City" means the City of Bend, Oregon "COlD" means the Central Oregon lrrigation District "County" or'The County" means Deschutes County, Oregon "DCZO" means Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance "DLCD" means the Oregon Depadment of Conservation and Development 'DOGMI' means the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral lndustries "EDCO" means Economic Development of Central Oregon "EFU" means Exclusive Farm Use "EFU-TRB" means Exclusive Farm Use - Tumalo / Redmond / Bend Subzone "HB 4079" means Oregon House Bill 4079, which was passed in 2016 "LCDC" means Land Conservation and Development Commission 'MUAI0" means Deschutes County Multiple Use Agriculture "OAR" means Oregon Administrative Rules "ODOT" means Oregon Department of Transportation "ORS" Oregon Revised Statutes OAR Oregon Administrative Rules "PD" means Planning Department "RM" means City of Bend Residential Medium Density Zone "RS" means City of Bend Residential Standard Density Zone "TIA" meahs Transportation lmpact Analysis Page 2 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion "TPR" means Transportation Planning Rule 'TSP' means Transportation System Plan "UGB" means Urban Growth Boundary Page 3 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion il.lications Attachments and Exhibits A. City of Bend Authorization Form B. Deschutes County UGB Expansion Application Form C. Deschutes County Zoning Map Application Form D. Ownership Deed E. Title Report F. Public Meeting Documentation G. Concept Plan H. City of Bend Resolution 3271 l. HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot program Application J. HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Program Selection/Approval Letter K. Avion Water Company Will Serve Letter L. City of Bend Sewer Analysis M. Traffic Study N. Bend La Pine School District Letter O. Library District Letter P. Bend Park District Letter Page 4 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Procedural Overv licable Substantive Criteria A. PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW Pursuant to statutory authority and implementing regulations, a local government may adjust a UGB at any time. The Land Conservation and Development Commission ("LCDC") has adopted administrative regulations, which implement the statutory authority for UGB expansions, and which serve as criteria for UGB expansion decisions of a City and County. Additionally, the City of Bend and Deschutes County each have local ordinances that provide standards and criteria for UGB amendments within their respective jurisdictions. All UGB modifications must be made according to the applicable state and local criteria. State of Oregon approval criteria and standards that govern a HB 4O7g Affordable Housing Pilot Project UGB expansion are included in: . OAR 660-039 - Affordable Housing pilot programo OAR 660-024 Urban Growth Boundarieso Oregon Statewide Planning Goals. Oregon Transportation Planning Rule County approval criteria and standards for a UGB amendment, a Comprehensive plan Map Amendment and Zone Change are included in: o Goals and policies of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan. Criteria and standards of the Deschutes County Procedure Ordinanceo Criteria and standards of the Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance City approval criteria and standards for a UGB expansion and Comprehensive plan Map Amendment are included in: . Goals and policies of the City of Bend Comprehensive plano Criteria and standards of the Bend Development Code All relevant substantive criteria are addressed in Sections V-Vll, where all criteria are followed by discussions, responses and conclusions. Page 5 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion lv.Findin s of Fact A. PROPERTY LOCATION The property is located between Hwy 20 (to the north) and Bear Creek Road (to the south), east of the City of Bend. The property is identified as 21455 Hwy 20 and it is listed as Tax Lot 1500 on the Deschutes Tax Assessor's Map 17-12-35 B. OWNERSHIP The property is owned by Porter Kelly Burns Landholdings LLC as documented by the Deed (Exhibit D) and the Title Report (Exhibit E). C. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The property description is identified on the Ownership Deed (Exhibit D) D. EXISTING ZONING The subject property located in Deschutes County and zoned Multiple Use Agriculture ("MUA10"). Page 6 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion E. S'TE DESCRIPTION The property is 35.32 acres in size and generally rectangular in shape. lt is abutted by major roadways; Highway 20 (a principle arterial) to the north and Bear Creek Road (a rural collector) to the south. The property abuts the Bend City Limits and Urban Growth Boundary to the west and is situated approximately .25 miles from Ward Road (a rural arterial), to the east. A Central Oregon lrrigation District ("CO|D") canal traverses theproperty along the western property edge and there are two irrigation water storageponds on the site. The site has been developed with a home and outbuildings. Vegetation on the property consists primarily of weeds, annual grasses, sagebrush, scatter juniper trees and clusters of coniferous trees surrounding the dwelling and two ponds on the property. Page 7 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion F. VICINITY AND SURROUNDING USES An image of the zoning of the general vicinity is included below: ? u. ir.i # ., 14. :li r a-'t "j'(.-' -+ r--r.l ,*!:lt i. I :r ',4: 1E I'l:l Tl'1lil fqg The subject property is located between Highway 20 to the north and Bear Creek Road to the south. The western edge boarders the Bend UGB. At the northwest corner of the property is a triangular property that is zoned Urbanizable Area ("UA"). This property is located within the Bend UGB, but it is not annexed into the City of Bend. The remainder of the western edge of the property abuts Residential Standard Density ("RS") zoned land within the Bend UGB and City Limits, that has been developed with residential lots and single-family homes. To the north (across Hwy 20) are 3 Exclusive Farm Use - Tumalo/Redmond/Bend ("EFU-TRB") zoned tax lots that are developed with single- family homes and/or undeveloped; these properties do not appear to be engaged in farm use. To the east are 2 MUA-10 zoned tax lots that are developed with single- family homes; these lands do not appear to be engaged in farm use. To the south (across Bear Creek Road) are 3 EFU-TRB zoned tax lots; these properties are developed with single-family dwellings and one of the tax lots may be engaged in farm use. Page 8 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion t'"ll:1,11;'r t-t, G. PUBLIC MEETING AND NOTICE Notification of a public meeting for the proposal was mailed to surrounding property owners on November 29,2021 and the meeting was held on December 16,2021. The notification and the meeting were completed as prescribed in Section 4.1.215 of the Bend Development Code. Details of the mailed notification, meeting exhibits, a list of attendees, and meeting notes are included as Exhibit F to the proposal. The applicant understands that the City of Bend Planning Division and Deschutes County Planning Division will send and publish notices of the application as required by the Bend Development Code, Deschutes County Code and/or Statutory requirements. H. LOT OF RECORD Pursuant to Deschutes County file 247-16-000317-ZC / 31g-PA, the property is a lot of record. L APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE City of Bend and Deschutes County Applications, are submitted to both the City of Bend and Deschutes County with this document. lt is anticipated that upon submittal, City and County Staff will review the materials for completeness. ln the event of an incomplete application, it is anticipated that the application will be deemed complete when the applicant addresses any incomplete items, submits a complete application, and pays any and all required application fees. Page 9 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion V. Discussion; Gonclusions - State of The proposed UGB expansion, UGB (County) and RH (City) Comprehensive Plan designations, and Zone Change from MUA10 to UA are specifically for HB 4079, the Oregon Affordable Housing Pilot Project, which is intended to provide a streamlined process. The Affordable Housing Pilot Project is established in OAR 660-039 and as detailed in that section, the UGB expansion process is exempt for a significant number of State regulations. A. OAR 660.039 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING PILOT PROJECT 660-039-0090 Subsequent Events (1) Upon selection by the commission as provided in OAR 660-039-0080(4), thequalifying city shall: Response: At its November 16,2018 meeting, LCDC selected the City of Bend (and the subject property) for the Affordable Housing Pilot Project. The actions at this point are "subsequent" to the approval; therefore the current application is a necessary step to implement HB 4079 and address the requirements of this section. (a) ln concert with the county in which the urban growth boundary is located, amend the urban growth boundary to include the pilot project site, and identify the provisions of law and rules pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030 relating to urban growth boundary amendments that are not applied to allow the pilot project site to be included within the urban growth boundary; Response: The applicant has been working in cooperation with City and County Staff, towards implementation of the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The current application, which will ultimately amend the Bend Urban Growth Boundary to include the 35.52 acre pilot project site, establish a RM City Comprehensive Plan Designation, and change the zoning from MUA 10 to UA, is the 1st official planning action being submitted to carry out the Concept Plan. Below is a summary of 660-039-0030 which addresses the HB 4079 provisions to which the pilot project is exempted from. All other applicable provisions are addressed thereafter and throughout this narrative. 660-039-0030 Compliance with Goals, Sfafufes, Administrative Rules (1) Regarding the pilot project site, a qualifying city submitting a pitot project nomination is exempt from compliance, and the commission is not required to selecf a pilot project that complies, with: (a) ORS 1974.320; Page 10 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion (b) The Land Need or Boundary Location provisions of Goar 14; (c) Goals 3,4,6, A,9,10, 12, 19, and 1g; (d) Goal 1.1, except that portion applicable to the impact of development of the pitotproiect site upon existing and ptanned public faciliiies within the-qualifying city,surban growth boundary; (e) Goal 75, unless the land is within the Wiltamette River Greenway Boundary; (f) Goals 16, 17, and 18, unless the land is within a coasfa/s horelands houndary; or (g) Any administrative rules implementing, clarifying, or interpreting fhese goals. Applicant Response.' (2) A qualitying city submitting a pitot project nomination is required to makefindings showing compliance, and the commission is required'to select a pilotproject that complies with: (a) Goal 5, regarding resources located on the project site; and (b) Goal7. (3) Notwithstanding section (1), a quatifying city may not bring high-value farmlandwithin its urban growth boundary to imptement a pitot project. (b) Annex the pilot project site to the qualifying city within two years of theacknowledged urban growth boundary amendmenl; Response: The applicant has been meeting regularly with City Staff and plans tosubmit an Annexation Application to the City of Bend concurrent with a Master plan Application, both of which happen after this UGB Expansion / Comprehensive plan MapDesignation and Zone Change review. Given the subsequent Annexation Applicationtimelines and requirements, it is expected that the Annexation can and will occur withinthe 2 years of the approved UGB Expansion; in conformance with the requirements ofthis section' lt is understood that conditions of approval, provisions of the Annexation Agreement, a development agreement, and/or other restrictions may be imposed on theproperty to ensure conformance with this requirement. (c) Adopt plan and zone designations for the pilot project site thatauthorize development of the concept plan included in ttre application; Response: The current application proposes to 1) expand the Bend UGB by 35.52 acres, 2) apply an UGB County Comprehensive Plan designation to the prop-erty, 3) apply a Residential Megium Density (RM) City designation to the property, anO +;change the zone from MUA10 to MU. Annexation cannot occur until.a Master plan isapproved, which will be based upon the established Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The benefit of the UA zone, allows for the City established Master Plan and Annexationprocess to be utilized on the subject property, which is a well-defined and efficientprocess; noted below are the BDc 4.7.900 Annexation provisions: Page 11 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion 4.9.700 Zoning of Annexed Areas. The Bend Comprehensive Plan map provides for the future City zoning classifications of all property within the City's Urbanizable Area (UA) District. On the date the annexation becomes effective. the UA District will cease to apply and the zoning map will be automatically updated with the zoning district that implements the underlvinq Comprehensive Plan map desiqnation. The current applications, with the subsequent requirements of a Master Plan and Annexation will ensure conformance with this provision. (d) Adopt measures ensuring that affordable housing developed on the pilot project site remains affordable for a period of at least 50 years after the selection of the pilot project site; and Response: As established in City of Bend Resolution 3271,ltem Q (Exhibit H): The City has adopted applicable Comprehensive PIan policies (Policies 5-20 and 5-21) that require that guaranfees be in place to ensure affordable housing units will meet affordability requirements for nof /ess than 50 years, phasing requirements for affordable housing units and specified threshold definitions for affordable housing units at 80% of AMI (for dwelling units for sale) and 60% of AMI (dwelling units for rent), unless the city provides support for housing at other levels of affordability. Because the sfafe pilot project rules require affordability at 80% AMI for dwellings for sale of rent and the project as proposed by this developer meets that state criteria and proposes a new model of developer- financed needed housing, the City is supportive of dwelling units for rent at 80% AMI. The applicant agrees to the HB 4079 affordability requirements for a period of at least 50 years and anticipates implementation of the requirements of this section through the subsequent Master Plan, Annexation, Subdivision and/or Site Planning review processes. ln the event additional surety is necessary with this UGB Expansion / Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change, the Applicant anticipates a condition of approval, language in the Annexation Agreement, and/or deed restriction could be imposed to ensure compliance with this standard. (e) lssue permits for development on the pilot project site only after annexation of the site to the qualifying city and adoption of measures ensuring that housing developed on the pilot project site will continue to be used to provide affordable housing for a period of at least 50 years after the selection of the pilot project site. Response: After this UGB Expansion occurs, it is anticipated that permits for development would only be issued after a Master Plan is approved and Annexation occurs. Furthermore, development will require Land Division approval and Site Plan Page 12 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion review (for the multi-unit development). Through the noted (and required) City of Bend review procedures, it is anticipated that assurances will be imposed to ensure 50 years of atfordability. (2) For a post-acknowledgement plan amendment or land use regulation change under OAR chapter 660, division 18 that proposes amendments with any effect upon existing comprehensive plan designations or provisions that impact residential development, or land use regulations that impact residential development, the qualifying city may not, for a period of 50 years after approval of the pilot project by the commission, consider the existence of housing units existing or approved on the pilot project site when making findings regarding theproposed amendment. Response: This provision applies to future PAPAs and/or land use regulation changes; it does not apply to the current application. (3) The qualifying city for the pilot project site selected by the commission may not plan or zone the site to allow a use or mix of uses not authorized by the commission unless the qualifying city, in concert with the county, withdraws thepilot project site from the urban growth boundary and rezones the site pursuant to law, statewide land use planning goals and land use regulations implementing the goals that regulate allowable uses of land outside urban growth boundaries. Response: The Concept Plan (Exhibit G) provides residential units, including multi-unit developments, detached single-family homes and townhouses. The Concept Plan does not include any uses that are not authorized by the Commission; therefore the provisions of this section do not apply. CONCLUSION - As detailed above, the proposal complies with the applicable provisions of OAR 660-039. B. OAR 660.024 - URBAN GROWTH BOUNDAR'ES 660-024-0020 Adoption or Amendment of a UGB (1) All statewide goals and related administrative rules are applicable when establishing or amending a UGB, except as follows: Response: While this section of the OARs would necessitate that the all statewide goals and related administrative rules are applicable (unless excepted in this section), the special provisions of OAR 660-039-0030 (above) establish a number of additional goals and related administrative rules to which the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project is exempted. All applicable goals and administrative rules are addressed in this narrative. lflwhen an exemption or exception is established, it is noted in this narrative. (a) The exceptions process in Goal 2 and OAR chapter 660, division 4, is Page 13 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion not applicable unless a local government chooses to take an exception to a particular goal requirement, for example, as provided in OAR 660-004- 0010(1); Response: The proposal is for an UGB Expansion, a UGB County designation, a RM City of Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and a Zone Change from MUA10 to UA, specifically for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Program. While the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Program provides exemptions from a number of goals and/or rules, the current proposal is not requesting an exception from any applicable Goal requirement. (b) Goals 3 and 4 are not applicable; Response: The applicant understands that Goals 3 and 4 are not applicable to UGB expansions; furthermore OAR 660-039-0030 establishes that the HB 4079 project is exempt from Goals 3 and 4. (c) Goal 5 and related rules under OAR chapter 660, division 23, apply only in areas added to the UGB, except as required under OAR 660-023-0070 and 660- 023-0250; Response: The City of Bend conducted an assessment of Goal 5 when selecting the property for the HB 4079 submittal. As established in City of Bend Resolution 3271: N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the National Wetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance 92-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current proposal is for UGB Expansion, a City and County Comprehensive PIan Map Amendment, and a Zone Change, which will ultimately accommodate the Concept PIan (Exhibit G). The City of Bend has found that the Concept Plan and forthcoming City of review procedures (including Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Page 14 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Plan) will ensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the current proposal is also consistent with Goal 5. Therefore, the proposal complies with this provision. (d) The transportation planning rule requirements under OAR 660-012-0060 need not be applied to a UGB amendment if the Iand added to the UGB is zoned as urbanizable land, either by retaining the zoning that was assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary or by assigning interim zoning that does not allow development that would generate more vehicle trips than development allowed by the zoning assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary; Response: The proposal includes 35.52 acre expansion to the Bend UGB, the establishment of a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan Designation, and a Zone Change from MUA10 to UA on the property. Until a Master Plan and Annexation occur, the property will be established with an Urbanizable Area zone, which is a zone that does not allow any more trips than the current MUA10 zone. Therefore, the TpR requirements of OAR 660-012-0060 need not be applied. Furthermore, OAR 660-039- 0030 establishes that the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is exempt from Goal 12 and its implementing rules. (e) Goal 15 is not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is within the Willamette River Greenway Boundary; (f) Goals 16 to 18 are not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is within a coastal shorelands boundary; Response: The project is not within the Willamette River Greenway Boundary or a coastal shore boundary; therefore Goals 15, 16, 17 and 18 are not applicable. Furthermore, OAR 660-039-0030 establishes that the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is exempt from these Statewide Planning Goals and implementing rules. (g) Goal 19 is not applicable to a UGB amendment. Response: The applicant understands that Goals 19 is not applicable to a UGB amendment. Furthermore, OAR 660-039-0030 establishes that the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is exempt from Goal 19. (2) The UGB and amendments to the UGB must be shown on the city and countyplan and zone maps at a scale sufficient to determine which particular lots orparcels are included in the UGB. Where a UGB does not follow lot or parcel lines, the map must provide sufficient information to determine the precise UGB location. Response: The City and County have extensive documentation of the current Bend UGB, and the maps, sizes and scales accompanying the current proposal provide sufficient specificity and details to understand, assess, and determine the precise location of the property and the current UGB Expansion area. Page 15 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion 660-24-0040 - 660-024-0067 . Response: The provisions of these sections all relate to land need and/or boundary location assessment. OAR 660-039-0030 specifically notes that the HB 4079 lands are exempt from land need or boundary location provisions of Goal 14 (and its implementing rules); therefore the proposal is exempt from these sections. 660-024-0070 - UGB Adjustments (1) A local government may adjust the UGB at any time to better achieve the purposes of Goal 14 and this division. Such adjustment may occur by adding or removing land from the UGB, or by exchanging land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB. The requirements of section (2) of this rule apply when removing land from the UGB. The requirements of Goal 14 and this division [and ORS 197.2981 apply when land is added to the UGB, including land added in exchange for land removed. The requirements of ORS 197.296 may also apply when land is added to a UGB, as specified in that statute. lf a local government exchanges land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB, the applicable local government must adopt appropriate rural zoning designations for the land removed from the UGB prior to or at the time of adoption of the UGB amendment and must apply applicable location and priority provisions of OAR 660-024-0060 through 660-020-0067. Response: The majority of the provisions of Goal 14, along with the referenced sections of ORS 197.298, and ORS 197 .296 address need and/or boundary location. Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is exempt from need and/or boundary location provisions. (2) A local government may remove land from a UGB following the procedures and requirements of ORS 197.764. Alternatively, a local government may remove land from the UGB following the procedures and requirements of 197.610 to 197.650, provided it determines:... Response: The proposal does not include the removal of land from the Bend UGB; therefore this section does not apply. (3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government considering an exchange of land may rely on the land needs analysis that provided a basis for its current acknowledged plan, rather than adopting a new need analysis, provided:... Response: The provisions of this section apply to UGB adjustments and/or exchanges that include both the addition and the subtraction of land from a UGB. The current proposal is for an expansion only; therefore the provisions of this section do not apply. 660-024-0075 - Airport Economic Development Pilot Program... Response: The proposed UGB Expansion is for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Page 16 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Project, it is not for the Airport Economic Development Pilot Program; therefore this section does not apply. 660-024-0080 - LCDC Review Required for UGB Amendments A metropolitan service district that amends its UGB to include more than 100 acres, or a city with a population of 2,500 or more within its UGB that amends the UGB to include more than 50 acres shall submit the amendment to the Gommission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650 and OAR 660-025-0175. Response: The proposal will expand the Bend UGB by 35.52 acres; The proposal will not expand the UGB by more than 50 acres; therefore the amendment does not need to be provided to the Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650 and OAR 660-025-0175. CONCLUSION - As detailed above, the proposal complies with the applicable provisions of OAR 660-024 - Urban Growth Boundaries. C. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS Pursuant to OAR 660-024-0020, any adoption or amendment of a UGB must be consistent with the statewide planning goals and related administrative rules, except as follows: (a) The exceptions process in Goal 2 and OAR 660, division 4, is not applicable unless a local government chooses to take an exception to a particular goal requirement, for example, as provided in OAR 660-004-0010(1); (b) Goal 4 is not applicable; (c) Goal 5 and related rules under OAR 660, Division 23, apply only in areas that are on a local government's acknowledged Goal 5 inventory; (d) Goal 8 is not applicable; (e) The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule requirements under OAR 660-012- 0060 are satisfied if impacts are not significant. As detailed in the Traffic Report prepared by Transight Consulting, LLC the findings conclude that the proposed urban growth boundary UGB) reconfiguration can be approved on the transportation sysfem without creating any adverse impacts. (f) Goals 15-19 apply to specific geographies in the State and no lands in Lake County are within the stated geographic applicability of these Goals. Respecting the exceptions noted above (and addressed earlier) and the exemptions of OAR 660-039-0030, the Statewide Planning Goals are applied to the proposed UGB Expansion, as documented below. Page 17 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Goal 1 - Citizen lnvolvement Response: Goal 1 states that the planning process must involve the citizenry generally, and more specifically calls for any adopted comprehensive plan to include a stiategy which clearly defines the processes by which the public will be involved in the on-going planning process. Consistency with this goal requires that a system of citizen outieach, notification, and public meetings or hearings be established to review quasi-judicial and legislative land use actions. Both the City of Bend and Deschutes County have adopted procedural requirements for amending the UGB, along with comprehensive plan Map and Zoning Map amendments. As these procedural requirements are part of the acknowledged comprehensive plans of both Deschutes County and the City of Bend, applications processed under their auspices are by implication consistent with Goal 1. For these reasons, the proposal is consistent with the Statewide planning Goal 1. Goal 2 - Land Use Planning Response: Goal 2 is the primary framework upon which all other planning goals rest. lt requires that local governments establish a comprehensive plan and implementing measures to govern the uses of land within their jurisdiction and which may be urbanized in the future. lt also requires that land use decisions be made "based on anadequate factual basis." Evaluation of a particular proposal in terms of Goal 2 is based on two important considerations: 1. the local government's own land use plan, and 2. the extent to which the proposal is consistent with that plan or other applicable planning framework. Goal 2 also sets forth criteria for allowing an exception to other statewide planning goals; however such an exception is not requested in this case, as theproposal is to expand the Bend UGB through the procedures established for the implementation of HB 4079 and required by Goar 14, Urbanization. The City of Bend and Deschutes County both have acknowledged comprehensive plans as required by Goal 2. These plans are implemented by zoning codes, growth management mechanisms, and/or other environmental regulations, all of which have been acknowledged for Goal consistency purposes. Furthermore, both implementation programs include decision-making criteria, which require that proposals demonstrate compliance with applicable review criteria for all land use decisions. The current proposal includes comprehensive evaluation of the proposal in terms of all applicable elements of the City and County comprehensive plans, as well as the statutes and administrative rules governing urban growth boundaries. The proposed UGB expansion and associated map amendments are for a property that has been reviewed and considered by both the City of Bend and LCDC (in their approval of the HB 4O7g Affordable Housing Pilot Project, Exhibit I - Application and Exhibit J - Approval Letter). The submittal relies upon evidence in the record that includes an analysis of housing needs of the City of Bend and the subject property's ability to accommodate the needs. ln summary, sufficient evidence has been provided to demonstrate that the UGB Page 1B of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion expansion and associated map amendments can be reviewed and approved through planning processes and policy frameworks that are appropriate under Goal2, and the decision to expand the Bend UGB, designate lands RM, and rezone to UA (to accommodate the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project) has an adequate factual base. For this reason and because the proposal is based on acknowledged comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances, it is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2. Goal 3 - Agricultural Land Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 3. Goal 4-ForestLand Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 4. Goal 5 - Natural Resources Response: The City of Bend conducted an assessment of Goal 5 when selecting the property for the HB 4079 submittal. As established in City of Bend Resolution 3271: N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the NationalWetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance 92-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion, a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and a Zone Change from MUA 10 to UA, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The City has found that the Concept Plan and forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal is also consistent with Goal 5. Page 19 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Goal 6 - Air, Water, and Land Resource Quality Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 40Zg - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 6. Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Hazards Response: The City of Bend conducted an assessment of Goal 7 when selecting the property for the HB 4079 submittal. As established in City of Bend Resolution 3271: O. The Council continues to find that the proposal satisfies Goal 7 because the City has considered the risks of the natural hazard wildfire in the evaluation of theBend Pilot Project Site. There are other natural hazards such as floods and landslides that are not addressed here because the Bend Pilot Project Site is nota location where such hazards might occur. The Bend Comprehensive plan Policy 11-5 requires the City to adopt strategies to reduce wildfire hazard onlands inside the City and included in the Urban Growth Boundary. Thesestrategies may include the application of the lnternational Wildlahd-Urban lntefface Code or equivalent with modifications to allow buffers of aggregateddefensible space, or similar tools, as appropriate. prior to approval of development on the Bend Pilot Project Site, the proposal must demonstrate compliance with Statewide Planning Goals including Goal 7, as designated bythe Planning Director, under BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. BaJed on theConcept Plan and the requirements in the Bend Development Code for compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, the City finds that the RevisedConcept Plan complies with Goal 7. The current proposal is for UGB Expansion, a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and a Zone Change from MUA 10 to UA, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The City has found that the Concept Plan and forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensure compliance with Goal 7, thus the proposal is also consistent with Goal 7. Goal 8 - Recreational Needs Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 8. Goal 9 - Economic Development Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 9. Page 20 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Goal 10 - Housing Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 10. Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 11, except that portion applicable to the impact of development of the pilot project site upon existing and planned public facilities within the qualifying city's urban growth boundary. Goal 11 requires local governments to establish public facilities plans in order to provide for the "timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development." This Goal is primarily implemented by the City of Bend, which has adopted public facilities plans and standards. As documented in Secfion lV - Findings of Fact of this narrative, the HB 4079 Application Submittal (Exhibit l), the Avion Water Company Will Serve Letter (Exhibit K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L), and the Traffic Study, prepared by Transight Consulting LLC (Exhibit M), the subject property is able to be served by public water, sanitary sewer, and transportation systems, and the Applicant is committed to making the extensions needed to provide/extend the noted facilities and services. Once the property brought into the UGB, the applicant will undertake all required steps to update the TSP, along with the necessary planning, designing and extending of services (as required through the Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan processes), to accommodate the Concept Plan and the ultimate development of the site. The proposal is consistent with the current public facilities master plans and it has been shown that the property can be provided public facilities and services, concurrent with development. The proposal is therefore consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 11. Goal 12 -Transportation Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 12. Goal 13 - Energy Conservation Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 13. Goal 14 - Urbanization Response: Goal 14 requires that all cities develop an urbanization framework as part of their comprehensive plan, appropriate implementing measures, and to periodically review the supply of land within the urban growth boundary. The current proposal is a unique project that will implement HB 4079 and provide affordable housing in Bend. Page 21 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion The project is intended to be a streamlined process, and given LCDC's approval of the City of Bend for the project (and the subject property in particular) there is not a need for additional "Need" or "Boundary Location" assessment. Therefore, the only applicable administrative rules that implement Goal 14 are those established in OAR 660-024 that are not related to need or location. A complete review of the applicable section were addressed above and as noted therein, the proposal complies with the requirements. Furthermore, the proposal includes a Concept Plan that has been authorized by both the City and DLCD, urbanization policies have been adopted as part of Bend's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan and (as documented below), and the proposal is consistent with the Bend Comprehensive Plan. For these reasons, the current proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal14 CONCLUSION - As detailed above, the proposal complies with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals D.OREGOA/ TRANSPO RTAT I O N P LAN N I N G RU LE SECT'ON 660.01 2.0060 PLAN AND LAND USE REGULATION AMENDMENTS Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the HB 4079 - Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 12 and the rules implementing it. Page 22 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion VI Discussion Conclusions - Deschutes Cou The County has adopted standards and criteria that govern changes to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Ordinance and Procedures Ordinance; these criteria are set forth below, with responses and conclusions following. A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan is a statement of issues, goals and policies meant to guide land use in the County. As noted in the Preamble, Vision and Use of this Plan section of the document, the Comprehensive Plan is a tool for addressing changing conditions, markets and technologies. lt can be used in multiple ways, including: o To strengthen communication with the public.. To guide public decisions on land use policy when developing land use codes, such as zoning or land divisions. o As a basis for the development of public programs and budgets. o As a basis for the measurement and evaluation of changes in the physical, social, environmental or economic makeup of the County. Modifications of the Plan itself may result from this process.. To promote inter-government coordination, collaboration and partnerships. The Comprehensive Plan does not prioritize one goal or policy over another. lmplementation of the plan requires flexibility, because the weight given to the goals and policies will vary based on the issue being addressed. The Plan is not intended to be used to evaluate specific development projects. lnstead, the Plan is a 20-year blueprint to guide growth and development The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan is organized into five chapters: Chapter 7 Comprehensive Planning Chapter 2 Resource Management Chapter 3 Rural Growth Management Chapter 4 Urban Growth Management Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections The Comprehensive Plan establishes a set of policies at the end of each chapter. The Applicant has consulted with the Deschutes County Planning Department in the preparation of this application and in identifying the relevant Comprehensive Plan Policies. As described below, the proposed Bend UGB Expansion, County UGB Comprehensive Plan designation, Bend RM Comprehensive Plan designation, and zone change from MUA10 to UA conforms to the relevant Deschutes Comprehensive Plan policies. ln the event that the Planning Director or other interested party believes that additional goals or policies are relevant and warrant discussion, the applicant will supplement the record with written documentation of conformance, as necessary. Page 23 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Chaoter 1 Com ensive Plannino Section 1.1 lntroduction The lntroduction Section provides background information, a purpose statement, summary data, a legal framework of the Comprehensive Plan, information about Statewide Planning Goals, a history of the planning commission, a summary of the plan development process, and information regarding future updates. This section does not include any goals or policies to which an applicant must assess consistency. Section {.2 Community lnvolvement This section describes the Community lnvolvement program in Deschutes County. The Goals and Policies of this section strive to provide an active and open community involvement program. The current application is being processed in accordance with the procedures in the adopted Zoning and Development Procedures Ordinances, which are consistent with the Goals and Policies of this section, as well as all applicable State Statutes and Rules. Processing the application in accordance with the adopted procedures will ensure consistency with the Goals and Policies of this Section. Section 1.3 Land Use Planning This section details land ownership in Deschutes County, jurisdictional authority within the County, Comprehensive Plan designations, zoning, and intergovernmental coordination. As it relates to the current application, this section requires that land use decisions be made, "based on an adequate factual basis". The Zoning Ordinance and Development Procedures Ordinance have been adopted to ensure decisions are based upon a factual basis. The current application is being processed in accordance with the procedures in the adopted Deschutes County Zoning and Development Procedures Ordinances, which are consistent with the Goals and Policies of this section, as well as all applicable State Statutes and Rules. Processing the applications in accordance with the adopted procedures will ensure consistency with the Goals and Policies of this Section. Ghapter 2 Resource Manaqement Section 2.1 lntroduction The lntroduction Section of Chapter 2 provides background information, a purpose statement, and key resource management issues of Deschutes County. This introduction section does not include any goals or policies, thus contains no elements to assess consistency with. Section 2.2 Agncultural Lands The proposal does not impact any agricultural lands; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. Section 2.3 Forest Lands The proposal does not impact any forest lands; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. Page 24 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Section 2.4 Goal5 Overview This section provides background information of Goal 5 resources in Deschutes County and establishes methods for preservation and protection of such resources. As noted in the City of Bend Resolution 3271 (Exhibit H), the subject property contains 2 water storage ponds that may be Goal 5 resources and/or potential wetlands. N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the National Wetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance 92-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion, a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and a Zone Change from MUA 10 to UA, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The Concept Plan provides a park in the areas of the potential Goals 5 Resource (wherein the resource could be preserved, if needed) and the City has found that the forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal and subsequent review process will provide consistency with intent of this section. Section 2.5 Water Resources This section provide background information of Goal 5 Water Resources in Deschutes County and establishes methods for preservation and protection. As noted above and in the City of Bend Resolution 3721 (Exhibit H), the subject property contains 2water storage ponds that may be Goal 5 Water Resources and/or potential wetlands. Page 25 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the National Wetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance g2-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds ate a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion, a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and aZone Change from MUA 10 to UA, that will ultimately accommodatethe Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The Concept Plan provides a park in the areas of thepotential Goals 5 Resource (wherein the resource could be preserved, if needed) and the City has found that the forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensuie compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal and subsequent review process will provide consistency with intent of this section. Section 2.6 Wildlife This section provide background information of Wildlife Resources in Deschutes County and establishes methods for preservation and protection. As noted in above and in the City of Bend Resolution 3721 (Exhibit H), the subject property contains 2water storage ponds that may be Goal 5 Water Resources and/or potential wetlands, and may provide wetland habitat. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion, a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and aZone Change from MUA 10 to UA, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The Concept Plan provides a park in the areas of thepotential Goals 5 Resource (wherein the resource could be preserved, if needed) and the City has found that the forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal and subsequent review process will provide consistency with intent of this section. Section 2.7 Open Spaces, Scenic Views and Sites The proposal does not impact any lands that have been designated open space, scenic views or sites; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. Page 26 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Section 2.8 Energy Resources While none of the Goals or Policies of this section are relevant to the current review, the Background of this section notes: A prime method of managing land for energy conseruation is to design communities to be compact and walkable, so as to limit the need for automobiles and conserue foss/ fuel. For a rural county, fhese types of transportation related energy savrngs are timited. lnstead the County can focus on other conseruation measures. The proposal provides 35.52 acres of land that are intended for urban residential development. The proposed UGB Expansion, associated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change will locate much needed urban land for residential development in a location that has been vetted by the State (LCDC - Exhibit J) and the City of Bend (Exhibit l). As detailed in the HB 4079 Application, factors that were considered when selecting the HB 4079 site included ability to extend water, sewer, and transportation systems to the area, along with transit availability. The site abuts the Bend UGB, and the Concept Plan includes a park, pedestrian facilities, multi-use paths and a transit stop. Through subsequent review processes (Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan) the proposed project will facilitate a compact development design and manage land for energy conservation, which is consistent with this section. Section 2.9 Environmental Quality This section identifies methods for improving environmental quality and generally focuses on setting a good example, through County actions and by providing information to the community on a variety of environmental issues. The Goals and Policies of this Section are not relevant to the current review. Section 2.10 Surface Mining The proposal does not impact any surface mining lands; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. Section 2.11 Gultural and Historic Resources The proposal does not impact any cultural or historic resources; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. Ghapter 3 Rural Growth Manaqement Section 3.1 lntroduction Section 3.2 Rural Development These sections provide background information, purpose statements, and discuss growth potential in Deschutes County. These sections do not include any goals or policies, thus contains no elements to assess consistency with. Section 3.3 Rural Housing The property is currently designated Rural Residential Exception Area and zoned MUA10. The text of this section and the resultant policies focus on the important balance between protecting rural values and protecting property rights; establishing that Page27 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion too much development can lead to the destruction of the qualities that bring people to Deschutes County, while too many restrictions keep out people who would choose a rural lifestyle. The current proposal impacts 35.52 acres of land in a Rural Residential Exception Area, it will place the property in the Bend UGB, with a UGB County Comprehensive Plan designation, and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, and rezone it from MUA10 to UA; the proposal will ultimately allow for urban residential development. The current Bend UGB lies on the west side of the subject property and, with this proposal, the line will move east approximately 1,300 feet. Given that the proposal will change the zone from MUA10 to UA, it will maintain a rural residential nature until the property is annexed into the City; therefore the majority of the policies of this section do not apbly to the current proposal. The relevant policies are noted below: Goal 2 Support agencies and non-profits that provide affordable housing. Policy 3.3.6 Support Gentral Oregon Regional Housing Authority and other stakeholders to meet the housing needs of ail Deschutes Gounty residents.a. Assist as needed in coordinating and implementing housing assistance programs.b. Support efforts to provide affordable and workforce housing in urban growth boundaries and unincorporated communities. Response: The current proposal is an effort that was directed by the City of Bend, it was supported by Deschutes County (attachment to the HB 4079 Application - Exhibit l), and it has been authorized by LCbb (Exhibit J). The developer, City, County and DLCD are all stakeholders with an interest in meeting housing needs for Deschutes County residents. The HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is intended to address affordable housing and it will provide affordable housing opportunities in the Bend UGB. Pursuant to the text of these policies, the proposal should be supported by Deschutes County. Section 3.4 Rural Economy The proposal does not impact any rural economic lands; therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable or relevant. Section 3.5 Natural Hazards This section identifies potential natural hazards in Deschutes Countyi establishing priorities of:1. Wildland Fire2. Severe Winter Storm3. Flooding4. Volcanic Eruptions5. Earthquake The potential natural hazards of the site are similar other properties within the area, Page 28 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion including lands in the Bend UGB. None of the Goals and Policies of this section are applicable or relevant for discussion. Section 3.6 Public Facilities and Services This section identifies water, sewer, police, fire, health, solid waste, social services, schools and libraries as public facilities and services necessary for Deschutes County residents and properties. Goal I Support the orderly, efficient and cost-effective siting of rural public facilities and services. Policy 3.6.9 New development shall address impacts on existing facilities and plans through the land use entitlement process. Applicant Response: As documented in Secfion lV - Findings of Fact of this narrative, the HB 4079 Application Submittal (Exhibit l), the Avion Water Company Will Serve Letter (Exhibit K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L) and the Transportation Report prepared by Transight Consulting (Exhibit M), the subject property is able to be served by public water, sanitary sewer, and transportation systems. The applicant is committed to making the extensions needed to provide/extend the noted facilities and services. Once the property brought into the Bend UGB, the applicant will undertake all required steps to update the TSP, along with the necessary planning, designing and extending services (as required through the Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan processes) to accommodate the Concept Plan and the ultimate development of the site. The proposal is consistent with the current public facilities master plans and it has been shown that the property can be provided public facilities and services, concu rrent with development. Regarding police, fire, health, solid waste, social services, schools and libraries, these services are supported by a tax base that will be increased when the property is annexed into the City and developed, in addition to user fees for some services. There is an existing tax system and user fees structure that is established for UGB Expansion areas. Furthermore, the Bend La Pine School District and the Library District have indicated their ability to serve the lands (Exhibits N and O). As detailed above, the overall project can and will address impacts on existing facilities and services through the comprehensive land use entitlement process, which includes bringing the property into the Bend UGB, Master Planning, Annexation, Land Division, and Site Planning (as needed). Therefore, the proposal and subsequent review requirements ensure consistency with this policy. Policy 3.6.11 Where possible, locate utility lines and facilities on or adjacent to existing public or private right-of-ways and to avoid dividing farm or forest lands. Response: As shown on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and detailed in Secfion lV - Findings of Fact, the subject property abuts a grid street system in the City of Bend and Page 29 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Deschutes County, wherein utilities, facilities and streets are able to be extended and provided within rights-of-way, consistent with this policy Section 3.7 Transportation The Deschutes County Transportation planning program has been summarized and incorporated into the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan ("TSP"), which was adopted by Ordinance 2012-005. The TSP encompasses all modes of transportation throughout Deschutes County and strives to ensure a variety of modal choices to serve all employment and residential needs, based upon population forecasts and land use patterns. Below are the goals and policies of the TSP that are relevant to the current proposal. COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Goal I 1. Achieve an efficient, safe, convenient and economically viable transportation and communication system. This system includes roads, rail lines, public transit, air, pipeline, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Deschutes Gounty transportation system shall be designed to serve the existing and projected needs of the unincorporated communities and rural areas within the County. The system shall provide connections between different modes of transportation to reduce reliance on any one mode. Policy I t.t.Deschutes County shall protect approved or proposed transportation project sites through: a. Access control measures; b. Review of future large development and transportation projects that significantly affect the County's transportation system; c. Requirement of conditions of approval on developments and transportation projects that have a significant effect on the County's transportation system. Response: The subject property is currently within Deschutes County (outside of the City), it will continue to be in Deschutes County (outside of the City of Bend) until annexation occurs. Furthermore, with and subsequent to annexation, the County will continue to have the opportunity to review and comment on development applications (including the Master PIan, Land Division and Site Plan). The project is supported by a Traffic Report that has been prepared by Transight Consulting LLC (Exhibit M). As detailed in the Traffic Report, the public transportation system, including City facilities, County Facilities and ODOT facilities, are all forecast to operate in accordance with the applicable design and mobility standards. Overall, the submitted materials, along with Page 30 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion the future development review process (and opportunity to comment and participate) will ensure consistency with the policy elements of this section. 1.2 The lead agency for review of transportation projects in Deschutes Gounty shall be: a. Deschutes County for projects completely outside UGBs;b. The affected city for projects within its UGB; andc. The state of oregon, Deschutes Gounty and affected cities onprojects involving state- owned facilities that are both inside and outside of a UGB. Response: The property is, and will continue to be abutted by ODOT, County and City facilities. lt is anticipated that alljurisdictions will review the current proposal, along with the future Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan applications, consistent with this policy. Goal 2 2. The Deschutes Gounty TSP shall be continually updated in a timely fashion in order to ensure the transportation system serves the needs of County residents, businesses, and visitors. 2.2. T ransportation Projects d. Transportation or development projects that require a pran text amendment or a conditional use permit may be required to fulfill conditions or implement mitigation measures before approval is granted. Mitigation and conditions may include, but are not limited to:... Deschutes County acknowledges that land use designations have a significant impact on the overall transportation system and any alterations shall be completed with consideration to traffic impacts on the Gounty road system and consistency with the TpR. Response: While the current UGB Expansion, RM City of Bend Comprehensive Plan Designation and UA Zone will not increase impacts onto the transportation system, subsequent development will. All subsequent development applications will be reviewed in conformance with the applicable rules and procedures, which will ensure consistency with this policy. Furthermore, the project is supported by a Traffic Report that has been prepared by Transight Consulting LLC (Exhibit M). As detailed in the Traffic Report for the Concept Plan, the public transportation system, including City facilities, County Facilities and ODOT facilities, are all forecast to operate in accordance with the applicable design and mobility standards. Furthermore OAR 660-039-0030 specifically establishes that Goal 1 2, and its implementing measures (which include the TPR) do not apply to the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. Overall, the Page 31 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion submitted materials, along with the future development review processes will ensure consistency with the policy elements of this section. Goal 3 3 The transportation plan and facilities of Deschutes Gounty shall be coordinated with the plans and facilities of incorporated cities within Deschutes County, adjacent counties and the State of Oregon. 3.1. Deschutes Gounty shall notify ODOT concerning: All land use proposals or actions that would create access onto a state highway or add more than 100 ADT to any Gounty road intersection with a state highway; Any proposed land use or development within 500 feet of a state highway or public use airport within the County; and Require ODOT road approach permits. Response: The applicant has coordinated with the City of Bend, Deschutes County and ODOT representatives regarding the current proposal and subsequent development applications. ODOT will provide comments to the City and County through this land use process. Furthermore, through the future land use review processes (Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan), the City of Bend will provide notice to ODOT of the applications, consistent with these policy provisions. ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PLAN Goal 4 Establish a transportation system, supportive of a geographically distributed and diversified economic base, while also providing a safe, efficient network for residential mobility and tourism. Policies 4.4 Deschutes Gounty shall consider roadway function, classification and capacity as criteria for plan map amendments and zone changes. This shall assure that proposed land uses do not exceed the planned capacity of the transportation system. Response: While the current UGB Expansion, RM City of Bend Comprehensive Plan Designation, and UA Zone will not increase impacts onto the transportation system, subsequent development will. All subsequent development will be reviewed in conformance with the applicable rules and procedures. The project is supported by a Traffic Report that has been prepared by Transight Consulting LLC (Exhibit M). As Page 32 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion a b. c. 4 5 detailed in the Traffic Report for the Concept Plan, with the planned improvements, the public transportation system, including City facilities, County Facilities and ODOT facilities, are all forecast to operate in accordance with the applicable mobility standards. Overall, the submitted materials, along with the future development review processes will ensure consistency with the policy elements of this section. ACCESS MANAGEMENT Goal 5 Maintain an access management system adequate to protect the quality and function of the arterial and collector street system. Policies 5.1 Deschutes County shall designate access and land uses appropriate to the function of a given road. Response: The current proposal does not include any new access, however the subsequent development applications will. Nonetheless, Policy 5.1 notes that the County shall designate land uses appropriate to the function of the road. The current proposal will not add any trips, thus the UA land use designation is appropriate, given the function of the surrounding transportation system. Furthermore, as detailed on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and the Traffic Report (Exhibit M), with future development, the applicant plans to make substantial upgrades to the surrounding transportation system. The planned improvements will ensure adequacy of the transportation system, improving Hwy 20 to ODOT Standards, Bear Creek Road to City of Bend Minor Arterial Standards and providing a north/south Collector road (per City of Bend Standards) through the middle of the site. Given the proposal, the Concept Plan and the future development review applications that will be required, the proposal is consistent with this Policy and Goal. FU NCTIONAL CLASSI FICATION Goal 6 6. Designate access and land uses appropriate to the function of a given road. Policies 6.1 Deschutes County shall: a. Goordinate the Gounty Transportation System plan with the transportation system plans of the cities of Bend, La Pine, Redmond and Sisters. The County shall emphasize continuity in the classification of roads and appropriate design standards for roads that link urban areas with rural areas outside the urban growth boundaries. The County and affected city shall agree on the functional classification and design standards of Gounty roads within the proposed UGB area. Page 33 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion b. Request the transfer of, or an agreement to transfer with specific timelines and milestones, jurisdiction of County roadways within the urban growth boundaries to their respective cities at the time of annexation. Gounty policy also directs that any developer of property who proposes annexation and who has frontage on a road that does not meet city standards shall have the primary responsibility for upgrading the road to applicable city specifications. Roads shall be upgraded prior to or at the time of annexation, or the developer shall sign an agreement with the city to upgrade the road, at the time of development. Transfer of road jurisdiction shall require the approval of both the county and affected city in accordance with the provisions in ORS 373.270.c. Future roads outside of city limits but within Urban Growth Boundaries shall have right- of-way dedications sufficient to meet the relevant city standards, but the road shall be constructed to Gounty standards. The Gounty will support a developer who chooses to build the road to the full urban standards of the relevant city instead of to County standard. Response: While changes to the transportation system are not proposed at this time, based upon conversations with the city, the County and oDoT, the applicant anticipates that Hwy 20 will be constructed to ODOT Standards and Bear Creek Road will be constructed to City of Bend Minor Arterial Standards. The improvements are planned to be implemented after the property is included in the Bend UGB and with the Master Plan, Annexation, and the Land Division processes. The proposal, in addition to the subsequent City of Bend review procedures that will be required for development will ensure consistency with these Goal and Policy provisions. Section 3.8 Rural Recreation The proposal does not impact any rural recreation areas; therefore the provisions of this Section are not applicable or relevant. Section 3.9 Destination Resorts The proposal does not impact any destination resort areas; therefore the provisions of this Section are not applicable or relevant. Section 3.10 Area Specific Plans and Policies The proposal does not impact any of the referenced area specific plans or policies; therefore the provisions of this Section are not applicable or relevant. section 3.11 Newberry Gountry: A Plan for southern Deschutes Gounty The proposal does not impact the defined Newberry Country; therefore the provisions of this Section are not applicable or relevant. Chapter 4 Urban Growth Management Section 4.1 lntroduction This section addresses cities that have Urban Growth Boundaries and Urban Reserve Areas, in addition to locations around the County that contain urban levels of Page 34 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion development. This section notes that a major emphasis of Oregon's land use planning program directs new development into urban areas, which is achieved through the useof Urban Growth Boundaries and Urban Area Reserves (UGBs are contain linds thatare anticipated to urbanize over a 2}-year period / (URAs, represent an additional 10 to30 year land supply). As noted throughout this narrative, the site has been selected for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project, which was submitted by the City of Bend, supported byDeschutes County, and approved by the State (LCDC); ifre Rrop-erty abuts the Urban Growth Boundary. This section does not include any goals or policies, thus contains no elements to assess consistency with. Section 4.2 Urbanization First providing a background, population statistics i metrics, this section goes on to notethe following about the City of Bend UGB: The Bend City Council and the Board of County Commissioners approved a leEislative amendment to the Bend I,JGB in September 2016. The atdoptedamendment added 2,380 acres of land intended to satisfy a 2}-year land need for needed housing, employment, and pubtic uses Figure 4.1 Deschutes County 2030 Estimated Population from 2008 to 2028. The adopted UGB amendment a/so safisfied the terms of a 2010 Remand Orderfrom the Oregon Land Conseruation and Development Commission (1 1-REMANDzA4T\AL ACKNOW- 001795). ln addition to URAs and UGBs, this Chapter also addresses a specific need for LargeLot lndustrial Land in Deschutes County. Providing background, the approval proc6ss, and procedures for management. Relevant Goals and Policies are addressed below. Goals and Policies Goal I Goordinate with cities, special districts and stakeholders to support urban growth boundaries and urban reserye areas that provide anorderly and efficient transition between urban and rural lands. Policy 4.2.1 Participate in the processes initiated by cities in Deschutes Gounty to create and/or amend their urban growth boundaries. Response: While not initiated by a City, the current review requires that the County (as a review authority) coordinate with the City of Bend (another review authority) in their'review of the proposal. Reviewing the applications in accordance with the Deschutes Couniy adopted procedures and in concert with the City of Bend will ensure consistency Page 35 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion with this policy Goal 2 Goordinate with cities, special districts and stakeholders on urbangrowth area zoning for lands inside urban growth boundaries but outside city boundaries. Policy 4.2.4 Use urban growth area zoning to coordinate rand use decisions inside urban groMh boundaries but outside the incorporated cities. Policy 4.2.5 Negotiate intergovernmental agreements to coordinate with citles on land use inside urban growth boundaries and outside the incorporated cities. Policy 4.2.6 Develop urban growth area zoning with consideration of the type, timing and location of public facilities and services provision consistent with city plans. Policy 4.2.7 Adopt by reference the comprehensive plans of Bend, La Pine, Redmond and Sisters, as the policy basis for implementing land use plans and ordinances in each city's urban growth boundary. Response: The City and the County have established a process and agreements to effectively administer lands that are within the Bend UGB, but outside of the City limits. The proposal to expand the Bend uGB, designate the property RM on the Bend Comprehensive Plan, and rezone it to UA, will allow for an efficient review and coordination of this and future land use application, because with the UA Zone it will use the same process that has been established for all lands in the recently approved Bend expansion areas. The proposed plan and design is consistent with these policies. Section 4.3 Unincorporated Communities Section 4.4 La Pine Section 4.5 Sunriver Section 4.6 Terrebonne Community Plan Section 4.7 Tumalo Gomrnunity Plan Section 4.8 Resort Communities Rural Service Centers Section 4.9 Rural Service Genters Response: The proposal does not impact any unincorporated community, La Pine, Sunriver, Terrebonne, Tumalo, Resort Communities or Rural Service; therefore the provisions of these Sections are not applicable or relevant. Ghapter 5 Supplemental Sections This chapter provides supplemental elements and information, none of which are directly applicable to the current proposal. Page 36 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion B. DESCHUTES COUNTY CODE TITLE 18. ZONING ORDINANCE: CHAPTER 1 8.1 36 AMENDMENTS 1 . SECTION 18.136.010, AMENDMENTS DCC Title 18 may be amended as set forth in DGG 18.136. The procedures for text or legislative map changes shall be as set forth in DGC 22.12. A request by a property owner for a quasi-judicial map amendment shall be accomplished by filing an application on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be subject to applicable procedures of DGG Title 22. Response: As detailed below, the proposal conforms to the applicable provisions of DCC 18.136 and DCC 22.20 (included in Subsection D below). As detailed in the review of DCC - Title 22, it is anticipated that the County will review the application in accordance with all applicable procedures of DCC 22.20. Given compliance with this DCC 18.136, and anticipated compliance with the review procedures of DCC 22.20 (which are carried out bv the Countv), the proposal comolies with this section 2. SECTION 18.136.020, REZONING STANDARDS The applicant for a quasi-judicial rezoning must establish that the public interest is best served by rezoning the property. Factors to be demonstrated by the applicant are: A. That the change conforms with the Gomprehensive Plan, and the change is consistent with the plan's introductory statement and goals. Response: A review of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan was included above. As detailed in that section, the proposal is consistent with the applicable goals an policies of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan, along with the introductory statement. Based upon the findings and conclusions detailed in section Vl.A above, the proposal complies with this approval criterion. B. That the change in classification for the subject property is consistent wlth the purpose and intent of the proposed zone classification. Response: As detailed in DCC 19A.01 .010 Purpose, Applicability and Definitions of the UA Zone. A. Fwrpose. The Urbanizable Area (UA) District is intended to preserue large areas of undeveloped or rural land for future urhan development prior to annexation. The UA District promotes the livability, stability, safety and improvement of the City of Bend hy allowing order[y development consistent with the Bend Comprehensive Plan.B. Applicability. The provisions of the UA District apply to all land inside the Urban Growth Boundary but outside the city limits, exceptfor the land withdrawn from the Page 37 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion City of Bend by the County by City Resolution 2459. The City of Bend is responsiblefor administering Title 19A using the Bend Development code (BDc). The UA District will automatically be removed upon annexation to the City, and thezoning that implemenfs fhe Bend Comprehensive Plan designation for the propertywill apply.C. Area and Master Planning. The City has the authority fo process Area Plans under BDC Chapter 4.1, Development Review and Procedures and BDC Chapter 4.6, LandUse District Map and Text Amendments (Type IV process) and Master Ptans under BDC Chapter 4.5, Master Planning and Alternative Developments and BDC Chapter4'6, Land Use District Map and Text Amendments (Type III process) in the IIA Districtprior to annexation. However, development of the propefi with the uses authorizedby the Area or Master Plan may only occur after annexation.D. Definitions. The following definitions apply to DCC Title 19A in addition to thedefinitions in the tsDC. "Urhan Growth Boundary PGB)' means the urban growth boundary as adopted by the City and County and acknowledged by the State, as seffodh in the Bend Comprehensive Plan and as shown on the Bend Comprehensive Plan map. "Urbanizable Area (UA) District" means the unincorporated area insidethe Urban Growth tsoundary PGB) hut outside the city limits, except for the land withdrawn from the city of Bend hy the county by city Resolution 2459. The proposal will change the zone from MUA10 to UA, as it will be situated in the Bend UGB. The proposed zone change allows efficient development which can utilize the planning program that has been established between the City and Deschutes County for lands that are situated within the UGB, but outside of the CityLimits. The overall development process will require Master Plan Approval and Annexation, prior to development. The property, location, and overall intent of the application is consistent with the purpose and intent of the UA Zone; thus in conformance with this approval criterion. G. That changing the zoning will presently serve the public health, safety and welfare considering the following factors: 1. The availability and efficiency of providing necessary public services and facilities. Response: Given the allowed uses in the UA Zone, changing the zone from MUA10 to UA will not result in any new impacts or necessitate any new public services or facilities. Nonetheless, changing the zone from MUA10 to UA will allow for the larger development process to begin, it will provide a path for Master Planning, Annexation and ultimately for development of the property in the City of Bend, consistent with the Concept Plan. Through the overall development process, public facilities plans need to provide for the "timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development." This requirement is primarily implemented by the City of Bend, which has adopted public facilities plans and standards. As documented in Secfion lV - Findings of Fact of this narrative, the HB 4079 Application Submittal (Exhibit l), the Avion Water Will Serve Letter (Exhibit K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L) and the Transportation Report, prepared by Transight Consulting (Exhibit M), the subject property is able to be served by public Page 38 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion water, sanitary sewer, and transportation systems, and the Applicant is committed tomaking the extensions needed to provide/extend the noted facilities and services. Oncethe property brought into the UGB, the applicant will undertake all required steps to update the TSP, along with the necessary planning, designing and extending services(as required through the Master PIan, Annexation, Land Division and Site plan processes), to accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and the ultimate development of the site. The proposal is consistent with the current public facilitiesmaster plans and it has been shown that the property can be provided public facilities and services, concurrent with development. The proposal is therefore consistent withthis approval criterion 2. The impacts on surrounding land use will be consistent with the specific goals and policies contained within the Comprehensive Plan. Response: Changing the zoning from MUA 10 to UA will not change the use of the land or generate any new impacts that may be experience by surrounding lands. Furthermore, if and when development occurs on the property (after Mast,er planning, Annexation, Land Division and Site plan, as needed) the project,s impacts onsurrounding properties will be consistent with the goals and policies of the DeschutesCounty Comprehensive Plan and the City of Bend Comprehensive plan. All applicableDeschutes County Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies were address in section Vl.A above and as detailed therein the application complies with the applicableComprehensive Plan elements. Therefore the proposal complies with this approval criterion. D. That there has been a change in circumstances since the property was last zoned, on a mistake was made in the zoning of the property in question. Response: Throughout the adoption and roll-out of the HB 4079 project, the state documented that a high number of Oregonians, particularly low income Oregonians, were paying more than 30% of their income on housing. Amongst the challenging housing environment, Oregon State Legislators passed 4 housing bills in 20rc . HB 4079 Affordabte Housing pilot project. HB 4143 Tenant protectionso SB 1533 Inclusionary zoning and construction excise taxr SB 1573 Limit voter approval of city annexations The premise of the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project is to understand potential impacts, if UGB rules are relaxed, and if relaxing the rules will bring in land (to the UGB) that would not otherwise be urbanized, and if the lower cost of such land wili allow a set- aside for affordable housing to become feasible. The passing of HB 4079, the adoption of the implementing rules in OAR 060-03g, and the selection of the City of Bend (and the subject property) all constitute changes that Page 39 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion have occurred since the property was last zoned MUA10. The noted changes justify the zone change from MUA10 to UA. 3. SECTION 18.136.030, RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO REZONE Response: While the applicant understands that the provisions of this section provide the Board of County Commissioners the ability to include conditions, given the effortfrom the State and the City of Bend, along with the proposal's clear conformance with all applicable provisions, it is not anticipated that a resolution of intent to rezone will be necessary or imposed. 4. SECTION 18.136.040, RECORD OF AMENDMENTS. AII amendments to the text or map of DCG Title 18 shall be filed with the County Glerk. Response: The proposal includes amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map, which are Maps of DCC Title 18. lt is anticipated that upon approval the amended maps will be filed with County Clerk. D. 1 PROCEDURES ORDINANCE - TITLE 22 OF THE DESCHUTES CODE, DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES ORDINANCE. 22.20.010 Action On Land Use Action Applications COUNTY A. Except for comprehensive plan amendments and zone changes and other instances where a hearing is required by state law or by other ordinanceprovision, the Planning Director may decide upon a land use action application adrninistratively either with prior notice, as prescribed under DCC22.20.020 orwithout prior notice, as prescribed under DGG 22.20.030or he may refer the application to the Hearings Body for hearing. The Planning Director shall take such action within 30 days of the date the application is accepted or deemed accepted as complete. This time limit may be waived at the option of the applicant. B. The Planning Director's choice between or among administrative or hearing procedures to apply to a particular application or determination shall not be an appealable decision. C. Zone change and plan amendment applications shall be referred to a hearing before the Flearings Body. Response: The proposal includes a UGB Expansion, a County UGB designation, a City of Bend RM designation, and a Zone Change from MUA 10 to UA; it is expected that the application will be processed with a hearing before a Hearings Officer and final decision by the Board of County Commissioners. lt is expected that the hearing will be held in accordance with the provisions of DCC 22.24 and the decision made and noticed in accordance with the provisions of DCC 22.28. Page 40 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Vll. Discussion; Gonclusions - City of Bend As noted throughout this narrative, the proposal includes an expansion to the Bend UGB and the establishment of a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation on the subject property. The City of Bend has a Comprehensive Plan and Development Code, which apply to the application. A review of the applicable City of Bend provisions is included below. Furthermore, Oregon law requires documenting compliance with the Oregon Statewide Planning Goals and documenting how the proposal will not conflict with other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. All applicable State requirements have been addressed above (in Secfion V). Applicable provisions of the County have been addressed in Section V/ above, and all applicable provisions of the City are addressed below. A. CITY OF BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.6.100 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures for legislative and quasi-judicial amendments to this code, the Bend Comprehensive Plan, the Bend Gomprehensive Plan Map and the Land Use District Map. These will be referred to as "map and text amendments." Amendments may be necessary from time to time to reflect changing community conditions, needs and desires, to correct rnistakes, or to address changes in the law. Response: The proposal involves the expansion of the Bend UGB and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation on the property. The proposal impacts a single privately owned property; therefore the application is appropriately processed via the quasi-judicial review procedures of the Bend Development Code. This Chapter of the Bend Development Code addresses the application type that is submitted. This section of the Chapter contains a purpose statement, but does not contain any development standards or approval criteria. 4.6.200 Leqislative Amendnrents. A. Applicability, Procedure and Authority. Legislative amendments generally involve broad public policy decisions that apply to other than an individual property owner. These include, without limitation, amendments to the text of the Gomprehensive Plan and ffi?p, Development Gode and changes in the Zoning Map not directed at a small number of properties... Response: The proposed expansion of the Bend UGB and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation directed at a single, privately owned property. The proposal does not involve a broad public policy decision and the application is only directed at one property. Given the size, scale, and anticipated impacts of the proposal, the application is not a legislative amendment and this section does not apply. Page 41 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion 4.6.300 Quasi-Judicial Amendments. A. Applicability, Procedure and Authority. Quasi-judicial amendments generally refer to a plan amendment or zone change affecting a single or limited group of - properties and that involves the application of existing policy to a specific factual setting. Quasi-judicial amendments shall follow the Type lll procedure, asgoverned by BDC Chapter 4.1, Development Review and Procedures, using thestandards of approval in subsection (B) and/or (G) of this section, as applicable. Based on the applicant's ability to satisfy the approval criteria, the applicant may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. Response: The proposal involves the expansion of the Bend UGB and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation on the property, affecting only one property. The review involves the application of existing policy to a specific factual setting; therefore, according to this section, the proposal is to be reviewed via the Type lll Quasi-Judicial Review process. B. Criteria for QuasiJudicial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments. The applicant shall submit a written narrative which explains how the approval criteriawill be met. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following criteria: Approval criterion #'!. Approval of the request is consistent with the relevant Statewi de P an ni ng Goals th at are des gnated by the P an ni ng Di rector or des nee Response: A comprehensive reviews of the Statewide Planning Goals was addressed in Secfion V - Dr'scussion; Conclusrbns - Sfafe of Oregon above. The goals and responses detailed in that section are incorporated herein by reference. As detailed in that section, the proposal conforms to all applicable Statewide Planning goals and thus with this City of Bend approval criterion. Approval Crlterion #2. Approval of the request is consistent with the reteva Planni nt policies of the Gomprehensive Plan that are designated by the Director or des ee; Response: This criterion addresses consistency with the relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As detailed in the section titled Format of the Ptan, described in the Preface of the Comprehensive Plan, the term "policy" has a specific meaning; apolicy is a statement of public policy. As described on Page P-5 of the Preface: "These statements of Poticy shalt be interpreted to recognize that the actual implementation of these policies wilt be accomplished by land use regulations such as the city's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and the like." Page 42 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion The Comprehensive Plan establishes a set of policies at the end of each chapter. The Applicant has consulted with the City of Bend Planning Department in the design of the project, the preparation of this application, and the identification of the Comprehensive Plan Policies that are relevant for discussion. As described below, the proposed expansion of the Bend UGB and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation on the property conforms to all relevant Comprehensive Plan policies. ln the event that the Planning Director or other interested party believes that additional policies are relevant for discussion, the Applicant will supplement the record with written documentation of consistency, as necessary. Relevant Policies of the Go]mprehensive Plan Chapter 1 - Plan Managenrent and Gitizen lnvolvement General Policy Guidance 1-1 The Goals stated within this Gomprehensive Plan are intended to be guiding and aspirational; they are not regulatory policies. The Policies in the Comprehensive Plan are intended to provide standards for the Gity in adopting land use regulations, and compliance with the implementing regulations shall be deemed in compliance with the Comprehensive Flan. Response: This policy provides general direction regarding the Comprehensive Plan, Goals, Policies, and implementing regulations. As documented throughout this narrative, the proposal conforms to all applicable implementing regulations; therefore the application is consistent with this policy. Urban Planning Coordlnation '!-3 Growth in the tsend Area shall be managed through the cooperative efforts of the Gity of Bend and Deschutes County. Response: The current proposal is intended to accommodate growth in the Bend Area As detailed throughout this narrative, the proposal requires submittal to and review by both the city of Bend and Deschutes county; consistent with this policy. Development within the Urban Growth Boundary 1-6 New developn'lents shall pay to extend planned sewer, water, and transportatlon faci!ities to and through the property if the development occurs prior to the scheduled construction of those facilities shown in the capital improvernent plan. Response: While the current application does not include any "development", future applications, including Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division, and Site Plan, will include development. As documented on the Concept Plan, the applicant plans to extend sewer, water, and transportation facilities to and through the property. Page 43 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Furthermore, the application is supported by a Will Serve letter from Avion WaterCompany (Exhibit K), a Sewer Analysis from the City of Bend (Exhibit L) and a TrafficReport from Transight Consulting LLC (Exhibit M). dollectively, these documents showthat there is (or will be, with the planned improvements) adequate capacity, that theproperty can be served by facilities with development, and that the applicant will extendsaid facilities to and through the property, consistent with this policy.' implementation ofthe Concept Plan (Exhibit G) will be further review and analyzed through thesubsequent Master Planning, Annexation and Land Division procesr"i. tt" currentsubmittal packet, along with the subsequent City review processes will ensureconsistency with this Policy. Citizen Involvement 1'16 The City witl use other mechanisms, such as, but not limited to,meetinEs with neighhorhood groups, planning commission hearings,design workshops, and public forums, to proiide an opportunity for allthe citizens of the area to participate in the planning process. Response: Prior to this submittal, informational meetings were held before the CityCouncil and the abutting neighborhood associations. Furthermore, the applicant heldthe Public Meeting required under BDC 4.1.215 prior to submittal (Exhibit F), and thisreview process will involve a public hearing before a Hearings Officer and the CityCouncil (along with the Deschutes County Board of County -Commissioners). Theestablished review procedures ensure consistency with this Comprehensive plan Policy. Chapter 2 - Natural Features and Open Space 2'1 The city will inventory and maintain a tist of natural features andopen space lands that are important to the community. Response: As noted in the City of Bend Resolution 3721, the subject property contains2 water storage ponds that may be resources and/or weflands. Page 44 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the NationalWetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes county, pursuant to Deschutes County ordinance g2-04b and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. when the Bend pilot Project site containing the ponds is annexed into the city, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion and a RM Bend Comprehensive plan designation, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The Cityhas found that the Concept Plan and forthcoming City of Bend review procedures wiilensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal is also consistent with intent of thispolicy. The forthcoming process will result in a review, which will determine whether thestorage ponds are important to the community. lf so, it is expected that they well beestablished / listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Conformance with this policy will occurwith the forthcoming Master Planning effort and/or Annexation. 2'2 The city and Eend Fark and Recreation District shatt share theresponsibility to inventory, purchase, and manage public open space,and shall be supported in its efforts hy the city and county. fne bityrecognizes fhe Park and Recreation District as the urban serviceprovider of parks within the IIGB, Response" As documented on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the proposal includes apark, whereupon the storage ponds are located. ln the event that the storage ponds are determined to be important to the community (through the Master Plan and Annexationprocesses), they could be preserved, as the area of the ponds will ultimately become apark, that will be owned and maintained by the Park District, consistent with this policy. 2'6 Maior roci< owtcrops, stands of trees, or other prominent naturalfeatures identified in the Comprehensive Ptan shatt be prese ryed as arneans of retaining the visual character and quality of the community. Response: Through the Master Plan and Annexation process, in the event that thestorage ponds are determined to be important to the community, they will be listed and Page 45 of 6'1 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion preserved in accordance with this policy. Determination of the importance will occur with the subsequent Master Plan and Annexation Process. Wetlands and Riparian Areas 2-25 Wetland areas that are significant Goal 5 resources fo be protected tkrowgtt the city's riparian corridor standards are those areas listed and mapped in the Comprehensive PIan. Response: As noted in the City of Bend Resolution 3271, the subject property contains 2waler storage ponds that rnay be resources and/or wetlands. N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contalns two ponds identified on the National Wetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance 92-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5. The current submittal is for UGB Expansion and a RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation, that will ultimately accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G). The City has found that the Concept Plan and forthcoming City of Bend review procedures will ensure compliance with Goal 5, thus the proposal is also consistent with intent of this section. The forthcoming process will result in a review of the planned development, which will determine whether the storage ponds are a wetland. lf the ponds are determined to be a wetland and/or required to be preserved, it is expected that the ponds would be established / listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Conformance with this policy will occur with the forthcoming Master Planning effort andior Annexation. Chapter 3 - Community Gonnections Parks and Recreation Facilities Page 46 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion 3-7 Sifes for small neighborhood parks are not shown on the Land Use Plan Map, but the city shall encourage private or public parties to develop small neighborhood parks. Response: The property does not contain any City recognized historic sites, mapped parks or trails, or school district sites; therefore the policies of this chapter are generally not relevant to the current application. Furthermore, the Concept Plan design includes a substantial park, which is encouraged by this policy. Chapter 4 - Population and Eemographics Applicant Response: This chapter addresses City requirements for the City when calculating population and demographic data. The policies of this chapter are not relevant to the current application. Chapter 5 - lTousing 5-g The City and County will support public and private non-profit and for-profit entities that provide affordable housing in Central Oregon. Response: The proposal is the initial planning step to develop an affordable housing development ion Central Oregon. According to this policy, the proposal should be supported. 5-12 To promote complete neighborhoods and the integration of other supportingl uses, the City will employ a master planning process for trarge developmenf srfes which are 20 acres or greater. The master plan process will offer two options for approval: 1) applying clear and objective standards or 2) applying discretionary standards for more flexibility. Response: Subsequent to ihe UGB Expansion, the applicant intends on proceeding though the required Master Planning process for the subject property, consistent with this policy. 5-20 When affordable housing development is required by City policy or code or to meet eligibility criteria for a City incentive program or a policy requirement, affordable housing means housing with a sa/es price or rental amount that is within the means of a household that may occupy moderate- and low-income housing, Unless otherwise specified, affordable housing must meet one of the thresholds defined below. Nothing in this policy prevents the city from providing support for housing at other levels of affordability. o In the case of dwelling units for sale, affordable means housing in which the mortgage, amortized interest, taxes, insurance, and condominium or association fees, if any, constitute no more than 30 Page 47 of 6'1 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion percent of such gross annual household income for a for a family at 80% of the area median income, based upon most recent HttDlncome Limits for the Bend Metropolitan Statistical Area (Bend MsA). o ln the case of dwelling units for rent, affordabte means housing for which the rent and utilities constitute no more than J0 percent-of such grross annual household income for a famity at 60% of the arearnedian incorne, based upon most recent HUD lncome Limits for theBend MSA. Response: The proposal is a required step for the development of the HB 4OTg Affordable Housing Pilot Projeci. City of Bend Resolution 3271 establishes thefollowing related to affordabiiity: O I1" City has adopted applicable Comprehensive Plan policies (policies S-20 and5-21) that require that guarantees be in place to ensure affordabb trousing unitswill meet affordability requirements for not less than F0 years, phasingrequirements for affordable housing units and specifieOitrresnlld defi-nitions foraffordable housing units at 80% of AUI 6or Owetting units for sale) and OO*" ot AMI (dwelling units for rent, unless the city provides support for housing at other lerels of affordability. tsecause the state pilot project rules require affordability at 800/o AMI for dwellings for sale or rent and the project as proposed by this developer meets that state criteria and proposes a new model of developer- financed needed housing, the City is supportive of dwelling units for rent at 80o/o AMI, The applicant plans to develop the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) which will provide affordable housing" The applicant plans on providing affordable housing in accordancewith the HB 4079 requirements and City of Bend Resolution 3271. Doing so will ensure consistency with this policy. 5-2't ln arder to ensure the continued affordability of affordable howsing that has lteen committed by a property owner or required bythe City, tke City rrtay: o Specity a minimum number of years that affordability must be maintained; o Reqwire an applicant to demonstrate how affordabitity will be ensured throughout the specified period, including addressing how units will be rnade available to households meeting the targeted incorne level, resale/recapture for ownership units, and/or rent rncreases for rental units, as applicable; o Establish phasing reqwirements for construction of affordable howsing units; Page 48 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion o Condition land use approvals to implement affordable housing requirements; o Require restrictive covenants, deed restrictions, and/or related instrumenfs as deemed necessary by the City; and/or CI Reqwire ather rneasures deemed necessary by the City. Response: Consistent with the HB 4079 requirements, the applicant plans to maintain affordability for at least 50 years through deed restrictions. Furthermore, as detailed on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the applicant plans to construct affordable housing units in early phases and consistently throughout the development so that the minimum 30% ratio required by HB 4079 is always exceeded. The applicant anticipates that the measures to ensure affordabiiity will be established through the Master Plan, Annexation, and/or Land Division processes. Residenti al G om pati bi I ity 5-27 Private cavenants and deed restrictions recorded hereafter that support compacti urban form, higher densifies and better access fo affordable housing are encouraged as supportive of City policy, Response: The proposal will ultimately result in a covenant or restriction that will support affordable housing; therefore the proposal is encouraged. 5-3? f?esidenfie/ areas will offer a wide variety of housing Upes in locations besf suifed to a range of housing types, needs and preferences. Response: As detailed on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the design includes a variety of housing types, including rnulti-unit, detached single-family homes, and townhouses; consistent with this policy. Tra n s po rtati o n co n n ectiv ity 5-gE Medium-and high-density residential developments should have good aecess to transit, K-I2 public schoo/s where possible, commercial services, employment and public open space to provide the maximum access to the highest concentrations of population. Response: The proposal includes placing a RM Comprehensive Plan designation on the property. As detaileci in the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), City of Bend Resolution 3271 (Exhibit H), ancl as a requirernent of the HB 4079 project, the site can and will be made accessible to a transit stop served by a fixed transit corridor with at least 8 weekday trips in each direction, within Yt mile distance via a sidewalk or pedestrian walkway. Furthermore, the design includes a 4 acre park and a multi-use tail along the western property line. The property is also within .40 miles of Commercial and Mixed-Use zones that are developed with commercial services and employment opportunities. Regarding Page 49 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion schools, the site is within 1.5 miles of Bear Creek Elementary and Pilot Butte Middle School, and within 2 miles of Bend High School and the application is support by a letter from the Bend La Pine School District (Exhibit N), indicting there ability and willingness to serve the subject property. For the aforementioned reasons, the site is suited for the RM Comprehensive plan designation and the proposal is consistent with this policy. Public utilities and services 5-4E All residential areas will be provided with community water andsewer services and other facilities necessary for safe, heatthful, convenient urban living consistent with the density of development. 5'49 Residential development shall be coordinated with other land use elements and csmrnwnity facilities which are consistent with projected housing densffies. 5'50 Electric power, telephone, and cable TV distribution and seruice lines shall be located underground in new developments. 5-51 lsew sfreet names shall be unique within the county. Response: As detailed on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the Avion Water Will Service Letter (Exhibii K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L), and the Traffic Report (Exhibit M), the site can be provided with water, sewer and other services and facilities While not applicable to the current UGB Expansion and RM Comprehensive Plan designation, these policies will be implemented through the subsequent Master plan, Annexation, and Land Division processes. The City procedures to implement the Concept Plan will ensure consistency with these policies. Chapter 6 - Economy Response.' The proposal does not impact any economic lands, therefore the policies of this section are not relevant. C h a pter 7 - T ra n s po rtati o n Sysfems I Equity The City of Bend believes that we thrive when all individuals, from alt parts of our City, have affardafale and eqwitahle access to a futt range of transportation choices to rneet their daily needs, including, but not timited to, employment,housing, healthcare, education, recreation, and shopping. The City recognizes that the transportation system has historically underserued some community members, and that their needs require particular attention as transportation investments, programs, anel seruices are prioritized and funded. Those Page 50 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion populations historically underserued by the transportation system include but arenot limited to: people who cannot or choose not to drive (inctuding children);persons with disabilities; people who cannot afford a motor vehicle; peopte tivingin areas where there are concentrations of impoverished and/or minoritypopulations; and groups that have been subjected to racism and/or discrimination. The City defines transportation equity as being achieved when all community members, with respect to age, race, disability, gender, income and tocation in the City have access to safe, comfortable, affordable, and retiabte transportation chorces to meet their daily transportation needs, Transportation equity helps ensure that disparities are reduced and access to daily needs and key destinations are fairly provided. Response,' While not directly appliable to the current proposal, the property will have access to Hwy 20, to Bear Creek Road, and to Livingston Drive. As depicted on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and as required by HB 4079, the site will provide for and/or be in close proximity to a transit stop with at least 8 weekday trips, a park will be provided, and the area is in close proximity to commercial amenities to the west. Furthermore, the area is and will continued to be served by the Bend La Pine School District, who have provided documentation of the ability and willingness to serve the area (Exhibit N). While the policies of this section are not applicable, the fact that the project will provide affordable housing, the location of the UGB Expansion and planned amenities will contribute to an equitable transportation system, consistent with the intent of this section. Transit Transit is a critical tool for maximizing the equity and efficiency of the City's transpartation systern, Recogrnizing the importance of an effective transit system, the City will cantinue to closely coordinate with transit seruice providers. 7-34 ln coordination with the City's public transportation providers and oommunity members, including those who have been historically undersewed in trar^tsi't, the City will work to improve and prioritize the avaitabiiitty of all forms af transportation and transportation technologies by establishing mobility hubs and reducing reliance on Hawthorne Station. 7-35 ln order to increase transportation options and support existing and planned land uses, the Gity will work with its public transportation provider to improve ffte efficiency and effecffveness of existing seruices in Bend; expand seruices to unalerserued areas; and support regional systems that encourage residents of nearby communities to travel to Bend by public transit" Page 51 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Response: While not directly applicable to the current proposal, it is noted that HB 4079 requires that the development provide for a transit stop with at least 8 weekday trips; through the overall development project, the applicant will ensure that such requirements are met. While the policies of this section are not applicable to the current application, the fact that the project will provide Affordable Housing and will contribute to transit system, the project is consistent with the intent of this section and the above noted policies. Funding The City's Transportation Flan defines capitat projects and programs that meetongoing operation and maintenance needg add system capacity; improve safety; increase transit, pedestrian and bicycle mobitity; support new growth; and meeiongoing operating and maintenance needs. V-60 Funding for transportation infrastructure in expansion areas, as identified in the 20'/,6 urban growth boundary pGB) expansion, will be determined either before or upon area plan andlor master plan approval {atnfess exempted). Funding must be estabtished prior to, or concurrently with, an nexation. Tra nsportation and i nfrastructu re fu nd i ng agreements will be memorialized for each expansion area property or properties in a development agreement as part of master plan or area plan approval andlor annexation. City/private developer cost sharing may be based on the foltrowing: o Adequate resources are provided for ongoing maintenance, aperation, and preservation of new infrastructure, including technology; o Construction and modernization of existing infrastructure is to City standards and specifications; @ The investment in transportation infrastructure helps so/ye existing transportation safety, capacityt, and/or other apparent functlonal rssue within the existing City limits; o There is an opportunity for local, sfafe and/or federal grants to leverage'the private investrnents and provide partnerships; o Affier factors as determined hy the City Manager. Response: Subsequent to brining the property into the Bend UGB, the applicant willproceed to the fi/aster Plan and Annexation Application processes. Through those processes and consistent with the policies of this section, the applicant will finalize and memorialize the financing plan for the project. The current proposal, along with the City required Master Plan and Annexation procedures will ensure conformance with these policies. Page 52 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Chapter 8: Public Facilities and Services Sewer Collection Facilities 8'1 All new development within the City Limits shoutd be connected toCity sewer. 8-8 The preference of the City is to serve development through gravity conveyance and use of the Water Reclamation Facility. 8-9 lf lift sfafions are required to serue new development, regionalpump stations shall be relied upon to the extent practicabte yersus individual or smaller lift stations. Response: These policies are implemented via the approval criteria of BDC Chapters 4.9 Annexations, 4.5 Master Planning and Development Alternatives,4.2for Site plan Review and 4.3 for Land Divisions. The applicant has prepared a Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and provided a Sewen Analysis from the City of Bend (Exhibit L). The Concept plan and the Sewer Analysis document that sewer can be extended to the development site consistent with these policies. With the subsequent applications, the applicant will extend sewer mains and laterals, in accordance with city standards. The Concept Plan in addition to the adopted Development Code requirements which implement these policies, will ensure that overall project is consistent with thesepolicies. Water Facilities and Sysfems E-15 The city af Bend is the provider of water service for the city,s seruice area under Statewide Planning Goal 11. E-l6 Avian water company is the provider of water service for its franchise area under Statewide Planning Goal 11 and pursuant to the franchise aglreement befuveen the city and Avion adopted under Ardinanee SUS 15'i4, as amended. 8-18 withln the wrban planning area, public and private water sysfems shalt be consistent with city standards and specifications for construction and seryice capabilities. Applicant Response: The subject property is within the Avion Water Company service area and these policies are irnplemented via the approval criteria of BDC Chapters 4.g Annexations, 4.5 iMaster Planning and Development Alternatives,4.2 for Site Plan Review and 4.3 for Land Divisions. The applicant has prepared a Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and provided a Will Serve Letter from Avion Water Company (Exhibit K). The Concept Plan and the will serve letter document that water can be extended to the development consistent with these policies. With the subsequent applications, the applicant will extencl water mains and laterals, in accordance with City Standards. Page 53 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion The Concept Plan, in addition to the adopted Development Code requirements which implement these policies will ensure that overall project is consistent with these policies Storm Drainage Facilities and Sysfems 8-29 The city shall reduce the quantity of runoff and discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable by integrating stormwater runoff controls into new development and redevelopment land use decfsions. Controls may be required to minimize illicit discharges orpollutants of concern, 8-30 The City shatl implement and enforce requirements for an erosion and sediment control program for public and private construction and post-co n str u cti o n activ ities. 8-37 As part of site approval, or as a condition on tentative maps, as necessary, the City shall require permanent stormwater pollution control sife desrgn or treatment measures or sysfems and an ongoing method of maintenance over the life of the project. E-38 The eig skall minimize particulate matter pollution through controls over new and redevelopment (including erosion and sediment controls an grading, qwarrying, vegetation removal, construction, and demolition), industrial processes, parking lots and other activities that pose a threat to water quality. E-39 The elg shall require the following stormwater protection ffieasures for all new development and redevelopment proposals during the planning, project review, and permitting processes; Response: These policies are implemented via the approval criteria of BDC Chapters 4.9 Annexations, 4.5 lVlaster irlanning and Development Alternatives,4.2 for Site Plan Review and 4.3 foi- Land Divisions. The adopted Development Code requirements implement these policies and the associateci developnrent appiication (for the subject property); therefore the overall proposal is consisient with these policies. Chapter 9: Community Appearance Response: The policies of tl'ris section are implemented through the design and development standards of the Development Code. All design requirements will be reviewed with the subsequent Master Plan, Land Division and Site Plan applications, which will ensure consistency with the policies of this chapter. Page 54 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Chapter 10: Natural Forces Response: The proposal does not impact air quality, noise, energy conservation, natural hazards, steep slopes, or wildfire risks; therefore the policies of this chapter are not relevant to this review. Chapter 11 - Growth Management Policies for Land Use and Transportation 11-6 Medium and high-density residential development should have good access to transit, fr<-12 public schoo/s where possib/e, commercial services, employment and public open space to provide the maximum access to highest concentrations of population. Response: The proposal includes placing a RM Comprehensive Plan designation on the subject property. As detailed in the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), City of Bend Resolution 3271 (Exhibit H), and as a requirement of the HB 4079 project, the site can and will be made accessible to a transit stop served by a fixed transit corridor with at least 8 weekday trips in each direction, within Tomile distance via a sidewalk or pedestrian walkway. Furthermore, the design includes a 4 acre park and a multi-use trail along the western property line. The property is also within .40 miles of Commercial and Mixed-Use zones to the west that are developed with commercial services and employment opportunities. Regarding schools, the site is within 1.5 miles of Bear Creek Elementary and Pilot Butte Middle School, and within 2 miles of Bend High School. Furthermore, the application is support by a letter from the Bend La Pine School District (Exhibit N), indicting there ability and willingness to serve the subject property. For the aforementioned reasons, the site is suited for the RM Comprehensive Plan designation and the proposal is consistent with this policy. '!1-g Developments at the edge of the urban area shall be designed to provide connectivity to existing and future development adjacent to the urban area. Response: The subject property is at the eastern edge of the Bend Urban Area. As shown on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the design includes connectivity along Hwy 20, Livingston Drive, and Bear Creek Road. Subsequent the UGB Expansion and RM designation, the Concept Plan will be implemented through the Master Planning Process, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan review procedures. The purpose of HB 4079, the Concept Plan and the City of Bend Review requirements will ensure consistency with this policy. 11-13 As areas tt'rat are currently beyond Bend's existing Urban Growth Boundary PGts) are wrhanized, the city, property owners, developers and all applicable service dr'stncts shall work cooperatively to develop Page 55 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion appropriate plans for extensions and connections of the transportation system, including but not limited to: roads, sidewalks, trails and/or public transportation. The objective of this planning effort will be to ensure that the new areas promote and facilitate the development of urban land use densifies and systems that will fulfill the goals and objectives of the T ra n s portati s n Sysfern P I a n. Response: As cietailed on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), along with the Avion Water Company Will Serve tetter (Exhibit K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L), the TransiEht Consulting Traffic iReport (Exhibit M), along with comments from COID, ODOT, BPRD anrl COIC, the Concept Plan includes connections and extensions of public facilities, utilities and services to and through the subject property. Subsequent to the UGB Expansion and RM designation, the Concept Plan will be implemented through the Master Planning Process, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan review procedures. The purpose of HB 4079, the Concept Plan and the City of Bend Review requirements will ensure consistency with this policy. 11-19 The City of Bend shall work with Deschutes County and the Bend Parks and Recreation District (where applicable) to acquire, devetop and maintain fhose secfions of trails that are located outside of the Bend llGB, but are inside a uRA, and are part of a trail plan or map that has been adopted by the city of Bend. Response: Throughout the HB 4079 Application process and to date, the Applicant has work in cooperation with the City of Bend, Deschutes County and BPRD to identify a park, along with a trail system throughout the site. Subsequent to approval, the applicant plans to finaiize the plan of reservation / preservation of the park / open space, which will occur through the Master Plan and Annexation processes, along with the Land Division process. The Concept Plan and the City of Bend Review requirements will ensure consistency with this policy. 11-21 Transportation facilities currently located on rural lands shatt not be constructed to an wrban standard until the area is brought into the ltGB. Response: Transportation Facility improvements are noted on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), however the applicant does not plan to make improvements or construct any facilities until the property is brought into the UGB, Master Planned, Annexed and received approval of a Land Division. The proposal and subsequent development review procedures will ensure consistency with this policy. Policies far Resialential llreas and Neighborhoods (See related policies in e hapten S, htousing.l 1't-34, {Wedium-and high-density residential developments should have good access to transit, K-I2 public schoo/s where possible, commercial seryrces, ernplayntern't, and public open space to provide the maximum ascess to the highest csncentrations of population. Page 56 of 61 Hayden Homes - ilB 4079 UGB Expansion Response: The proposal includes placing a RM Comprehensive Plan designation on the subject property. As detailed in the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), City of Bend Resolution 3271 (Exhibit H), and as a requirement of the HB 4079 project, the site can and will be made accessible to a transit stop served by a fixed transit corridor with at least 8 weekday trips in each direction, within Ya mile distance via a sidewalk or pedestrian walkway. Furthermore, the design includes a 4 acre park and a multi-use trail along the wesiern property line. The property is also within .40 miles of Commercial and Mixed-use zones to the west that are developed with commercial services and empioyment opportunities. Regarding schools, the site is within 1.5 miles of Bear Creek Elementary and Pilot Butte Middle School, and within 2 miles of Bend High School. Furthermore, the application is support by a letter from the Bend La Pine School District (Exhibit N), inciicting there ability and willingness to serve the subject propefty. For the aforementioned reasorls, the site is suited for the RM Comprehensive Plan designation and the proposal is consistent with this policy. General UGB Expansion Policies The fallowing policies are intended as local policy suidance to evaluating alternative future UGB expansions in the context of meeting state laws and administrative rules and halancing the factors established in sfafe regulations. The ernphasrs on "guidance" above recognizes that the City will define goals and evaluation criteria to be applied for each unique UGB expansion process. "11-69 The City will consider the value of balancing and distributing UGB expansions geographically around the city consisfent with Sfafe of Oregon laws and rules to distribute the benefits (and impacts) of growth and to provide more options for new neighborhoods, 1n-70 The City will utilize new growth in expansion areas as a strategy to help rnake existing neighborhoods, centers, corridors, and employment districts rrside the bsundary more "complete" by: diversifying the housing mix; provicling focal eornmercial sewices and jobs; increasing transportation connectivity; and providing needed public facilities such as parks and schaols. 11-7'l The ei$ will take into consideration the context of land beyond a sinEle t/GB expansron to inforrn the type and intensity of uses that are appropriate in each potential expansion area. 11-73 The City will consider the relative ability of proposed expansion areas to address ffre city's affordable housing needs in balancing the socrai and ecsnomie cor?sequences of bringing alternative expansion areas into its urban grawth boundary. Page 57 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Response: These policies are intended to address boundary location analyses of UGB Expansions. The HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Program is specifically exempt from the need and boundary location provisions of state rules (OAR 660-039-0030). lt therefore follows that the guidance of these policies is not relevant to the current proposal. Furthermore, in the City's selection of the subject property for the HB 4079 Affordabie Housing Pilot Projeet, the City has determined that the site conforms to the policies of this section, to the extent applicable. Specdlc Expansion Area PoJicies Respoetsel These policies afrply to lands already in the UGB, thus are not applicable to the proposed UGB Expansion. Approval Criterion #3. The property and affected area is presently provided witt't adequate publie facilities, services and transportation networks to suppart the wse, or swch facilities, services and transportation networks are anfted to be provided concurren with the of the Response: The current UGB Expansion proposal and RM Comprehensive Plan designatioit wiil not result in ar^ry new development, thus will not create any impacts. Nonetheless, the proposal wiii allow for the development process to begin, it will provide a path for Master Planning, Annexation and ultimately for development. Through the overall development process, public facilities plans need to provide for the "timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development." This requirement is primarily implemented by the City of Bend Master Plan and Land Division Requirements, along with the adopted public facilities plans and standards. As documented in Secfion lV - Findings of Fact of this narrative, the HB 4079 Application Submittal (Exhibit l), the Avion Water Company Will Serve Letter (Exhibit K), the City of Bend Sewer Analysis (Exhibit L) and the Transportation Report, prepared by Transight Consulting (Exhibit M), the subject property is able to be served by public water, sanitary sewer, and transportation systems. Furthermore, the Applicant is committed to making the extensions needed to provide/extend the noted facilities and services. Once the property brought into the UGB, the applicant will undertake all required steps to update the TSP, along with the necessary planning, designing and extending of services (as required through the Master Plan, Annexation, Land Division and Site Plan processes), to accommodate the Concept Plan (Exhibit G) and the ultimate development of the site. The proposal conforms to the current public facilities master plans and it has been shown that the property can be provided public facilities and services, concurrent with development. The proposal is therefore consistent with this approval criterion Regarding services (schools, parks, fire and police), upon development the property will be within the incorporated area of the City of Bend, the Bend La Pine School District boundary, and the Bend Park and Recreation District boundary. Page 58 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Schools: The Bend-La Pine School District regularly completes Facilities Plans that ensure capacity is provided throughout the District service area. The District has provided a letter indicating the ability and willingness to serve the property (Exhibit N), and upon establishment of the RM designation, all future Site and Facilities planning efforts will accurately account for the needs of the site. Parks: -1-he subject property is located within the BPRD's boundaries. The Park District has a Comprehensive Plan to ensure park capacity is provided throughout the District service area. As documented on the Concept Plan (Exhibit G), the proposal adds a substantial park to the area and the Park District has indicated their support of the project (attachment to the HB 4079 Application - Exhibit l) Fire anci Folice Protection: Subsequent to Annexation and when the site is developed, it will be located within the City of Bend, which is served by City Police and Fire Departmenis. Development will result in an increased property tax base, which will be directed to the City's General Fund and allocated to provide police and fire services throughout the City. The combirration r:f the built faciiities, public facilities plans, and the Development Code requirernents for clevelopment ensure that adequate public facilities are currently provided or vrrill be provided concurrent with development, in conformance with this approval criterion" Appnova! Griterion #4" Hvidence of change in the neighborhood or comrnunity or a mistake or lnconsistency in the Comprehensive Plan or fl-and tJse District Map regarding the property that is the subject of the application; and Response: Throughout the adoption and roll-out of the HB 4079 project, the state documented that a high nurnber of Oregonians, particularly low income Oregonians, were paying more than 30% of their income on housing. Amongst this housing environment, Oregon State Legislators passed 4 housing bills in 2016: . HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. HB 4143 Tenant protectionso SB 1533 lnclusionary zoning and construction excise tax. SB 1573 Limit voter approval of city annexations The premise of the Affordable Housing Pilot Project is to understand potential changes, if UGB rules are relaxed to bring in land that would not othenrrrise be urbanized, and if the lower cost of such land will aliow a set-aside for affordable housing to become feasible. The passing of HB 4079, the adoption of the implementing rules in OAR 660-039, and the selection of the Ciiy of Bend (and the subject property) all constitute changes that have occurred since the property was last zoned, which justify the UGB Expansion and the RM Bend Comprehensive Plan designation. Page 59 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Approval Griterion #5 Approval of the request is consistent with the rovisions of Tran rtation Planni Rule Gom rance. Response: Pursuant to OAR 660-039-0030, which implements the Affordable Housing Pilot Project, the proposal is exempt from Goal 12 and the rules implementing it. Page 60 of 61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion Vlll. Summa and Conclusion Based on the above discussion as well as the Exhibits included with this application packet, the Applicant has documented that the request to expand the Bend UGB by 35.52 acres, establish a Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan designation of UGB, a Bend Comprehensive Plan designation of RM, and rezone the property from MUA 10 to UA conforms to the applicable approval criteria of Deschutes County and the City of Bend. Because the proposal conforms to all applicable criteria and standards, the applicant respectfully requests that the City and County approve the applications as proposed. Page 61 of61 Hayden Homes - HB 4079 UGB Expansion uoouDlgn trnvelope lu: Ots3U544F-//Ul- 1-4688-Ets1,6-A7CAlBDA97D9 Lasf Reyrsed Date: 02/03/2021 Exhibit APlanning Division City of Bend (541) 388-5580 planning@bendoregon. gov 710 NW Wall Street, Bend OR gZZ03 This submittal form is to be completed as part of your application with the City of Bend. Download this form before completing fillabte fields, then upload with your application through the Online permit Ce nter at www"be ndoregpn. govip erm itcente r.. AUTHORIZATION FORM rAlve hereby authorize Blackmore Planning and Development *t:::t t* to act on my/our beharf with the Applicant's Ciiy of Bend, for any permit activity related to Name 21455 Hwy 20 / 1712350001500 Address and/or Map and Tax Lot # This authorDation is valid untilterminated in writing. 2 zz re Date DocuSlgned by: fovlw fuw"s L/3L/2022 | 6:28:1-9 AM Ps Property Owner Name g re Date To the best of my knowledge, all statements and information contained in this application and attached exhibits are true and correct. I authorize City of Bend staff and/or Hearings Body to enter the property for inspection of the site in conjunction with e application (LArCa ?. €O,tr$ -rl$il\rN *ofl\eS ,lzs l?zProperty Owner Name sig Date by: F*#er Eurns Povlw fun*s L/3L/2022 I 6:28:19 AM Psr Property Owner Name Date PLAN - Authorization Form Page 1 af 2 Crora?. ?r,tr.nt - r**$fN l\ovtE5 Propefty Owner Name Feirler Burns \\ Accommodation lnformation for People with Disabilities To obtain this information in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, etc- please contact the Planning Division at planning@bendoregon.gov or (541 ) 388-5580; Relay Users Dial 7-1-1.EI lu: trb3u544r--/ GF 1 -46ts8-6tsU6-A / (;A1 BUA9 / Ugtr) o Exhibit B and C C$MMUNITY DEVTLOPMTNT P LAN /ZO N E/T EXT AM E N D M E NT ZONE MAP AMENDMENT: FEE: PLAN MAP AMENDMENT: FEE: TEXT AMENDMENT: FEE: Applicant's Name (print):Hayden Homes / Megan Norris P h o n e : t_919)529-5091__ Mailing Address 2464 SW Glacier Place, Suite 110 City/State/Zip Redmond, OR 97756 Property Owne/s Name (if different;' Porter Kelly Burns Landholdings LLC Phone: ( ) Mailing Add 5691 MIRAMAR DR City/State/Zip:FRISCO, rX750U Property Description: Township 17 Range 12 Section 35 Tax Lot 15w Lot of Record? (state reason):yes - established in 247-16-0O0317-ZC / 31g-PA Current Zon MUAlO Prooosed Zonins: uA Current Plan Designati onRural Residential roposed Designation UGB Applicab'le State Goals 1.2, 5.7. 11 14 Exceotion Prooosed? Yes x No Size of Affected Area: 35.32 Acres INSTRUCTICI NS FOR COMPLETI NG TH IS APPLICATION: Complete this application forrn including the appropriate signatures. lf color exhibits are submitled, black a:nd white copies with captions or shading delineating the color areas shall also be provided. lnclude a detailed statement describing the proposal and how it meets all requirements of the appropr,iate State rules and statutes, and County codes and Comprehensive Plan policies. Text amendment applications must include the proposed language and the basis for the change. lf multiple properlies are involved in this application, then identify each property on a separate page and follow with the property owners'signatures. Submit the correct application fee. Submit a copy of the current deed(s) for the property(ies). A PR.E.APPLI t5 REQUTRED FOR l\LL AMENDMENTS 1 2 3. 4. 5. Applicant's Signatur ate Property Own er's Signatu re Agent's Name (if applicable): elackmore Plannin Phone: (_S4$419=i4Si- Mailing {6ldrg55; 194544 Sunshine Way City/State/Zip Bend/ORl97702 *lf this application is not signed by the property owner, a letter authorizing signature by the applicant must be attached. By signing this application, the applicant understands and agrees that Deschutes County may require a deposit for hearings officers'fees prior to the application :being deemed complete; and if the application is heard by a hearings officer, the applicant will be responsible for the actual costs of the hearings officer. 1 1 7 NW Lafayette Avenue. Benil, Oregon 97703 | P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005 $ (S+t)388-6575 @ rdd@rdescnutes.o!'g @ rrvi;'-w.deschutes.or'gicd , tlz\ lzzTTWWZT-T6:28:19 AM Rev 5/18 Exhibit D AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: NikkiC. Hatton Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt 121 I SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1900 Portland, Oregon 97204-3795 DESCruTES OOUI{TY OFFICIRL RECORDS NR]ICY ELNilKENSIIIP, OOUIITY CI.ERK 2000-l?7?l lllll $o oo 09/13/2008 ll : 16:01 f,l'l Dh-D Cntrl gtn:l lll 110.00 ltt.00 110.00 t5,00 J d f UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED, ALL TAX STATEMENTS SHALL BE SENT TO: Mr. and Mrs. H. Porter Burns 61886 Bunker Hill Court Bend, OF.97702 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED H. PORTER BURNS, Granror, conveys to PORTEWKELLY BURNS LANDHOLDINGS, LLC, Grantee, all of his right. title and interest in the following described real property situated in the County of Deschutes and State of Oregon free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein: That portion of tlre Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW % SE %) of Section 35, Township l7 South. Range I2 East, of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, lying South of U.S. Highway 20, also referred to as tlre Bend Burns Highway. Tax Account No. I 19047 Tax Map No. l7-12-35-00-1500 This property is free from liens and encumbrances, except for covenants, conditions, restrictions andlor easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. This conveyance is made by Grantor and accepted by Grantee subject to the exceptions of record in Deschutes County, Oregon. to the extent valid and subsisting and affecting the properfy conveyed. The true consideration for this conveyance is $-0- BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, TJNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTTONS 5 TO I l. CHAPTER 424. OREGON LAWS 2007. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF I - STATUTORY BARGAIN & SALE DEED PDX/l l 5286/14809g/LBR/258:385, I THE PROPERry DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE LINIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.OIO OR 2I5.OIO, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL. TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFTNED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, ORS 195.300, I95.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO ll, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007. tExecuted this J day of 5"2008. GRANTOR: . Porter Burns STATE OF OREGON ) counryos/Anr,/Tt i "' This instrument was acknowledged before me tlris ltau1 of by H. Porter Burns. ,!b- ', ',2008, IjXtr,.:u-{ N ARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Comnrission Expires:?/sz /aa t/ 2 _ STATUTORY BARGAIN & SALE DEED PDX/l r 5386n 48099/LBR/2582385. I Exhibit E Western Date Prepared Effective Date: Charge: Order No.: Revision #3: PUBLIC RECORD REPORT FOR NEW SUBDIVISION OR LAND PARTITION TH|S REPORT tS TSSUED By THE ABOVE-NAMED COMPANY ('THE COMPANY") FOR THE EXCLUSTVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING CUSTOMER: Hayden Homes Phone No.: (800)923-6607 January 26,2022 January 18,2022 / 05:00 PM $300.00 wT0231357 Revised report to update legal and vesting The information contained in this report is furnished to the Customer by Western Title & Escrow Company (the "Company") as an information service based on the records and indices maintained by the Company for the county identified below. This report is not title insurance, is not a preliminary title report for title insurance, and is not a commitment for title insurance. No examination has been made of the Company's records, other than as specifically set forth in this report ("the Report"). Liability for any loss arising from errors and/or omissions is limited to the lesser of the fee paid or the actual loss to the Customer, and the Company will have no greater liability by reason of this report. This report is subject to the Definitions, Conditions and Stipulations contained in it. REPORT A. The Land referred to in this report is located in the County of Deschutes, State of Oregon, and is described as follows: As fully set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. B. As of the Effective Date, the tax account and map references pertinent to the Land are as follows As fully set forth on Exhibit "8" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. C. As of the Effective Date and according to the Public Records, we find title to the land apparently vested in As fully set forth on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. D. As of the Effective Date and according to the Public Records, the Land is subject to the following liens and encumbrances, which are not necessarily shown in the order of priority: As fully set forth on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT "A" (Land Description) Parcel 1 A portion of lands described in Document2008-37771, Deschutes County Official Records, located in the Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35, Township 17 South, Range 12 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Bend, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Traditions East; thence along the West line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35, North 0'35'33" West 524.00 feet to the South right of way line of US Highway 20; thence along said South right of way line North 89'50'12' East 675.18 feet; thence South 0'18'26" West 456.22teeL; thence South B9'41'34" East 80.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 16.00 feet; thence South 89'41'34' East 60.00 feet;thence South 0'18'26" West 16.00 feet;thence South B9'41'34" East 160.00 feet; thence North 0'18'26" East 16.00 feet; thence South 89"41'34" East 50.00 feet; thence South 0"18'26" West 16.00 feet;thence South B9'41'34" East 160.00 feet;thence North 0'18'26" East 16.00 feet;thence South 89"41'34" East 60.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 59.00 feet; thence South B9'41'34" East 85.77 feet to the East line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35; thence along said East line South 0'38'15" East 145.02 feet;thence North 89'41'34" West 88.16 feet;thence South 0'18'26" West 6.00 feet;thence North 89"41'34" West 60.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 6.00 feet; thence North B9'41'34" West 510.00 feet; thence South 0'18'26" West 27.00 feet; thence North 89"41'34" West 80.00 feet; thence North 0'18'26" East 26.78 feet; thence on a nontangential curve to the left with a radius of 160.00 feet, a length of 66.78 feet, a central angle of 23"54'51", and a chord that bears South 75'22'20" West 66.30 feet; thence on a curve to the right with a radius of 240.00 feet, a length of 112.65 feet, a central angle of 26'53'31", and a chord that bears South 76'51'40" West 111.61 feet; thence North 89'41'34" West 413.49 feet to the West line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35 and the East line of said Traditions East; thence along said line North 0"52'02" West 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel2: A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter (SW1/4 SE1/4) of Section 35, Township 17 South, Range '12 East of the Willamette Meridian being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 35, Township 17 South, Range 12 East, W.M.; thence N00"40'13"W 30.00 feet along the West line of Said SW1/4 SE1/4 to the true point of beginning being located on the Northerly right of way line for Bear Creek Road; thence continuing N00'40'13"W 690.79 feet along the West line of said SW1/4 SE1/4 to a point located on the current City of Bend Urban GroMh Boundary Line; thence N28"47'13"E 598.87 feet along said Urban Growth Boundary Line to the Southerly right of way line of U.S. Highway 20; thence N89'50"12"E 1030.08 feet along said Southerly right of way line to the East line of said SW1/4 SE1/4; thence S00'38'15" E 1225.72 feet along the East line of said SW1/4 SE1/4 to the Northerly right of way line of Bear Creek Road; thence N89"41'34"W 1324.04 feet along said Northerly right of way line to the true point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: A portion of lands described in Document2008-37771, Deschutes County Official Records, located in the Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35, Township 17 South, Range 12Easl, Willamette Meridian, City of Bend, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Traditions East; thence along the West line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35, North 0'35'33" West 524.00 feet to the South right of way line of US Highway 20; thence along said South right of way line North 89'50'1 2" East 675.1 8 feet; thence South 0" 1 8'26" Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT "A' (Land Description) (continued) West 456.22feeL; thence South B9'41'34" East 80.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 16.00 feet; thence South 89'41'34" East 60.00 feet;thence South 0'18'26" West 16.00 feet; thence South 89'41'34" East 160.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 16.00 feet; thence South B9'41'34" East 50.00 feet;thence South 0"18'26" West 16.00 feet; thence South 89"41'34" East 160.00 feet;thence North 0"18'26" East 16.00 feet;thence South 89"41'34" East 60.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 59.00 feet; thence South B9'41'34" East 85.77 feet to the East line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35; thence along said East line South 0"38'15' East 145.02 feet; thence North B9'41'34" West 88.16 feet; thence South 0"18'26" West 6.00 feet; thence North 89"41'34" West 60.00 feet; thence North 0"18'26" East 6.00 feet; thence North 89"41'34" West 510.00 feet; thence South 0'18'26" West 27.00feet; thence North 89"41'34" West 80.00 feet;thence North 0"18'26" East 26.78 teet; thence on a nontangential curve to the left with a radius of 160.00 feet, a length of 66.78 feet, a central angle of 23"54'51' , and a chord that bears South 75"22'20" West 66.30 feet; thence on a curye to the right with a radius of 240.00 feet, a length o'f 112.65 feet, a central angle of 26'53'31", and a chord that bears South 76"51'40" West 111.61 feet; thence North 89'41'34" West 413.49 feet to the West line of said Southwest One-Quarter of the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 35 and the East line of said Traditions East; thence along said line North 0o52'02'West 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Ver.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT'B" (Tax Account and Map) APN/Parcel lD(s) 119047 and275632 as wellas Tax/Map lD(s) 1712350001500 and 1712350001501 Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Ver.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT "C' (Vesting) Hayden Homes, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company as to Parcel 1, Porter/Kelly Burns Landholdings, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company as to Parcel 2 Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Ver.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 1 2 EXHIBIT "D'' (Liens and Encumbrances) Regulations, including levies, liens, assessments, water and irrigation rights and easements for ditches and canals of the Central Oregon lrrigation District. The existence of roads, railroads, irrigation ditches and canals, telephone, telegraph and power transmission facilities. Rights of the public to any portion of the Land lying within the area commonly known as Bear Creek Road. Reservations, as disclosed in State Deed, Recording Date: May 18, 1916 Recording No.: 18-449 5. Easement(s) and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Power & Light Company, its successors and assigns Recording Date: March 29,1946 Recording No: 72-296 6. Easement(s) and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, its successors and assigns Recording Date: August 18, 1951 Recording No: 128-383 7. Easement(s) and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Power & Light Company, a corporation, and Central Electric Co-op, its successors and assigns Recording Date: October 21,1981 Recording No: 349-254 8. Easement(s) and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document Granted to: U.S. West Communications, its successors and assigns Recording Date: February 3, 1999 Recording No: 1999-5629 9. Easement(s) and rights incidentalthereto, as granted in a document Granted to: U.S. West Communications, lnc Recording Date: April 19, 1999 Recording No: 1999-19004 Public Record Repoft for New Subdivision or Partition (Ver.20161024) 3 4 Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT "D" (Liens and Encumbrances) (continued) 10. Encroachment as disclosed by survey, 11. Encroachment as disclosed by survey, 2002306 MichaelA. Hoffman August 29,2002 Fences Adjacent Property 2002306 MichaelA. Hoffman August 29,2002 Gravel road Easterly portion of subject property Project Number: Prepared by: Dated: Encroachment: Onto: Project Number: Prepared by: Dated: Encroachment: Onto: 12. Fences, as disclosed by survey, 13. Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 lrrigation canal and irrigation ditches, as disclosed by survey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 Location of Southerly right of way line of Highway 20 per 1931 establishment and approximate location ofthe Southerly right of way line of Highway 20 per 1971 establishment, as disclosed by sr.ey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 Access road to residence, as disclosed by suruey, 14. 15. Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 16.Approximate location of Bear Creek Road, as disclosed by suruey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Western Title & Escrow ComPanY Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT'D" (Liens and Encumbrances)' (continued) 17. Road named the E.A. Richardson Road per crook cgynty 4cJ309 dated May 5, 1909, road width being 60 feet f'ing gdie-ei """f' .iO" of the seciion line, as disclosed by survey' 1B 19. 20 21 22 23. Road named the w.R. willkenson Road per crook county 4cJl89 dated January 2, 1908' road width t"i"g 60 f""t, said rouO n"ing unimproved' as disclosed by survey' Proiect Number: 2002306 Pre'oared bv: MichaelA' Hoffman oaibo: August 29, 2002 Telephone lines, as disclosed by survey' Proiect Number: 2002306 Pre'oared bv: MichaelA' Hoffman Datbd: August 29, 2002 U.G. fiber optic sign, as disclosed by survey' Project Number: Prepared bY: Dated: Project Number: Prepared bY: Dated: 2002306 MichaelA. Hoffman August 29,2002 2002306 MichaelA. Hoffman August 29,2002 Telephone pedestals, as disclosed by survey' Proiect Number: 2002306 Pietared bv: MichaelA' Hoffman oailo: - August 29, 2002 Power poles, as disclosed by survey' Proiect Number: 2002306 Prepared bY: MichaelA' Hoffman Dated: August 29,2A02 Gas lines, as disclosed bY surveY' Project Number: 2002306 Prepared bY: MichaelA' Hoffman Dated: August 29,2002 Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT "D" (Liens and Encumbrances) (continued) 24. Guy anchors, as disclosed by survey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 25. Gas vault, as disclosed by survey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 26. Water lines, as disclosed by survey, Project Number: 2002300 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 27. Edges as pavement, as disclosed by survey, Project Number: 2002306 Prepared by: MichaelA. HoffmanDated: August 29,2002 fl ntentionally Deletedl Intentionally Deleted] Conditions of Approval Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recording Date: January 18,2019 Recording No.: 2019-01892 31. IntentionallyDeleted] Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) 28 29 30 Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 EXHIBIT ''D" (Liens and Encumbrances) (continued) Note: Property taxes for the fiscal year shown below are paid in full FiscalYear: Amount: Levy Code: Account No Map No.: FiscalYear: Amount: Levy Code: Account No Map No.: 2021-2022 $6,594.04 1017 119047 1712350001500 2021-2022 $1,382.22 1017 275632 1712350001501 Please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 DEFINITIONS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definitions. The following terms have the stated meaning when used in this report: (a) "Customer": The person or persons named or shown as the addressee of this report. (b) "Effective Daie": The effective date stated in this report. (c) "Land": The land specifically described in this report and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. (d) "Public Records": Those records which by the laws of the state of Oregon impart constructive notice of matters relating to the Land. 2. Liability of Company. (a) This is not a commitment to issue title insurance and does not constitute a policy of title insurance. (b) The liability of the Company for errors or omissions in this public record report is limited to the amount of the charge paid by the Customer, provided, however, that the Company has no liability in the event of no actual loss to the Customer. (c) No costs (including without limitation attorney fees and other expenses) of defense, or prosecution of any action, is afforded to the Customer. (d) ln any event, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: ('l ) Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records. (2) Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. (3) Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the Public Records. (4) Discrepancies, encroachments, shortage in area, conflicts in boundary lines or any other facts which a survey would disclose. (5) (i) Unpatented mining claims; (ii) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (iii) water rights or claims or title to water. (6) Any right, title, interest, estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in this report, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (7) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the Public Records at the effective date hereof. (8) Any governmental police power not excluded by 2(d)(7) above, except to the extent that notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the Public Records at the effective date hereof. (9) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters created, suffered, assumed, agreed to or actually known by the Customer. 3. Report Entire Gontract. Any right or action or right of action that the Customer may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the subject matter of this report must be based on the provisions of this report. No provision or condition of this report can be waived or changed except by a writing signed by an authorized officer of the Company. By accepting this form report, the Customer acknowledges and agrees that the Customer has elected to utilize this form of public record report and accepts the limitation of liability of the Company as set forth herein. 4. Charge. The charge for this report does not include supplemental repo(s, updates or other additional services of the Company. Western Title & Escrow ComPanY Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY "CUSTOMER'' REFERS TO THE RECIPIENT OF THIS REPORT' CUSTOMER EXPRESSLY AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF LOSS WHICH COULD ARISE FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS iN, ON THE COMPANY'S NEGLIGENCE IN PRODUCING, THE REQUESTED REPORT, HEREIN "THE REPORT.' CUSTOMER RECOGNIZES THAT THE FEE CHARGED IS NOMINAL IN RELATION TO THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY WHICH COULD ARISE FROM SUCH ERRORS OR OMISSIONS OR NEGLIGENCE. THEREFORE, CUSTOMER UNDERSTANDS THAT THE COMPANY IS NOT WILLING TO PROCEED IN THE PREPARATION AND ISSUANCE OF THE REPORT UNLESS THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY IS STRICTLY LIMITED. CUSTOMER AGREES WITH THE PROPRIETY OF SUCH LIMITATION AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS THE LIMITATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS AND THE LIMITATIONS WILL SURVIVE THE CONTRACT: ONLY MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT AS THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT ARE WITHIN ITS SCOPE. ALL OTHER MATTERS ARE OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE REPORT. CUSTOMER AGREES, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE REPORT AND TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY, ITS LICENSORS, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, RESELLERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS AND ALL OTHER SUBSCRIBERS OR SUPPLIERS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES, AND SUBCONTRACTORS FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, CAUSES OF ACTION, LOSSES, COSTS' DAMAGES AND EXPENSES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S FEES, HOWEVER ALLEGED OR ARISING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE ARISING FROM BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE, ERRORS, OMISSIONS' STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY, EQUITY, THE COMMON LAW, STATUTE OR ANY OTHER THEORY OF RECOVERY, OR FROM ANY PERSON'S USE, MISUSE, OR INABILITY TO USE THE REPORT OR ANY OF THE MATERIALS CONTAINED THEREIN OR PRODUCED, SO THAT THE TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY AND ITS AGENTS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES' AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL NOT IN ANY EVENT EXCEED THE COMPANY'S TOTAL FEE FOR THE REPORT. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THE FOREGOING LIMITATION ON LIABILITY IS A TERM MATERIAL TO THE PRICE THE CUSTOMER IS PAYING, WHICH PRICE IS LOWER THAN WOULD OTHERWISE BE OFFERED TO THE CUSTOMER WITHOUT SAID TERM. CUSTOMER RECOGNIZES THAT THE COMPANY WOULD NOT ISSUE THE REPORT BUT FOR THIS CUSTOMER AGREEMENT, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN FOR THE REPORT, TO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND THAT ANY SUCH LIABILITY IS CONDITIONED AND PREDICATED UPON THE FULL AND TIMELY PAYMENT OF THE COMPANY'S INVOICE FOR THE REPORT. THE REPORT IS LIMITED IN SCOPE AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, TITLE OPINION, PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT, TITLE REPORT, COMMITMENT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE, OR A TITLE POLICY, AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AS SUCH. THE REPORT DOES NOT PROVIDE OR OFFER ANY TITLE INSURANCE, LIABILITY COVERAGE OR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS COVERAGE. THE REPORT IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE TO THE PROPERTY' THE COMPANY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS AS TO THE REPORT'S ACCURACY, DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE REPORT, ASSUMES NO DUTIES TO CUSTOMER, DOES NOT INTEND FOR CUSTOMER TO RELY ON THE REPORT, AND ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY IOSS OCCURRING BY REASON OF RELIANCE ON THE REPORT OR OTHERWISE' Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Partition (Ver.20161024) Western Title & Escrow Company Public Record Report for New Subdivision or Land Partition Order No. WT0231357 IF CUSTOMER (A) HAS OR WILL HAVE AN INSURABLE INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY, (B) DOES NOT WISH TO LrMtT LTABTLTTY AS STATED HERETN AND (C) DESIRES THAT ADDITIONAL LIABILITY BE ASSUMED BY THE COMPANY, THEN CUSTOMER MAY REQUEST AND PURCHASE A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER, OR A COMMITMENT TO ISSUE A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN AS TO THE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE OR STATUS OF TITLE. CUSTOMER EXPRESSLY AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES IT HAS AN INDEPENDENT DUTY TO ENSURE AND/OR RESEARCH THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE COMPANY OR ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE PURCHASED. NO THIRD PARTY IS PERMITTED TO USE OR RELY UPON THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE REPORT, AND NO LIABILITY TO ANY THIRD PARTY IS UNDERTAKEN BY THE COMPANY. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COMPANY, ITS LICENSORS, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, RESELLERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS, AND ALL OTHER SUBSCRIBERS OR SUPPLIERS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, OR LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, INCOME, SAVINGS, DATA, BUSINESS, OPPORTUNITY, OR GOODWILL, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, NON-OPERATION OR INCREASED EXPENSE OF OPERATION, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR DELAY, COST OF CAPITAL, OR COST OF REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY IS BASED ON BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTIES, FAILURE OF ESSENTIAL PURPOSE, OR OTHERWISE AND WHETHER CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE, ERRORS, OMISSIONS, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE OR ANY OTHER CAUSE WHATSOEVER, AND EVEN IF THE COMPANY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES OR KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE POSSIBILITY FOR SUCH DAMAGES, END OF THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY Public Record Repod for New Subdivision or Partition (Yer.20161024) Lasf Revised Date: 03/01/2021 Planning Division City of Bend (541) s88-5580 planning@bendoregon.gov 710 NW Wall Street, Bend OR 97703 This submittal form is to be completed prior to your application with the City of Bend. Download this form before completing fillable fields, then upload with your application through the Online Permit Center at www" bendoreqon.qov/perm itcenter. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE PUBLIC MEETING FORM The Bend Development Code (BDC) states that Neighborhood Associations, as recognized by the BDC, must be included in decisions about proposed land use changes within their boundaries. Applicants submitting any of the below development applications are required to present their project proposal at a public meeting prior to submitting the application to the City of Bend Planning Division. The presentation must be made at either a regular or special Neighborhood Association meeting or a meeting hosted by the applicant. This form verifies the compliance with the public meeting requirements outlined in BDC Chapter 4.1.215.A-8. Appticant: Hayden Homes Check the application type(s) requested: A Bend Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment d Zoning Map Amendment A Master Plan n Conditional Use Permit E Subdivision tr A Site Plan Review for new development or an alteration/addition to one or more buildings containing a total of 10,000 sq. ft. or more. Meeting Date, Time & Location:December 16, 2021 Neighborhood Association(s):Larkspur & Mountain View Project Location 21415 and 21455 Hwy 20 I 17-12-35 Tax Lots 1501 and 1500 Project Description: Notice is being provided for a series of applications that will accommodate a master planned development, including 198 detached single-family homes,41 attached single{amily homes, 108 multifamily dwelling units, and 4+ acres park and open space. The applications to be addressed in this Public Meeting include the following: Urban Growth Boundary Expansion / Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment / Transportation System Plan Map Amendment lZone Change / Master Plan lLand Division PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Page 1 of 2 Lasf Revised Date: 03/01/2021 Check each of the following items presented at the meeting: f, lttlap depicting the location of the subject property proposed for development. d nvisual description of the project including a site plan, tentative subdivision plan and elevation drawings of any structures if applicable. E l, description of the nature of the use including but not limited to, sizes and heights of structures, proposed lot sizes, density, etc. gl tne expected or anticipated impacts from the development. d Nny mitigation proposed by the applicant to alleviate the expected/anticipated impacts. d nn opportunity for the public to provide comments. Applicants are encouraged to reconcile as many public concerns as possible prior to submitting their application. lf any of the above items are not applicable to the proposal, please state why: Concerns Stated at Meeting See attached meeting chat. eK-1211712022 Applicant Signature Neighborhood Association Representative Signature Applicant Signature Neighborhood Association Representative Signature PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Date ,1212012021 Date Date Date Page 2 of 2 Accommodation lnformation for People with Disabilities To obtain this information in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, etc. please contact the Planning Division at planning@bendoregon.gov or (541) 388-5580; Relay Users DialT-1-1.6 Lasf Revised Date: 03/01/2021 Check each of the following items presented at the meeting: A Map depicting the location of the subject property proposed for development. d nvisual description of the project including a site plan, tentative subdivision plan and elevation drawings of any structures if applicable. A A description of the nature of the use including but not limited to, sizes and heights of structures, proposed lot sizes, density, etc. Zl tne expected or anticipated impacts from the development. d nny mitigation proposed by the applicant to alleviate the expected/anticipated impacts. d nn opportunity for the public to provide comments. Applicants are encouraged to reconcile as many public concerns as possible prior to submitting their application. lf any of the above items are not applicable to the proposal, please state why: Concerns Stated at Meeting See attached meeting chat. Applicant Signature Date Neighborhood Association Representative Signature Date eK-- Applicant Signature (^.,r o fi*J MigF bo rn';od Associ ation Re p rese ntative S i g natu re 1211712022 Date MVNA 12117121 Date PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Page 2 of 2 Accommodation lnformation for People with Disabilities To obtain this information in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, etc. please contact the Planning Division at planning@bendoregon.gov or (541) 388-5580; Relay Users Dial 7-1-1 .H t8=09:32 From Greg Blackmore : Greg Blackmore - g reg@btackmo replanning. com t8=12:Qt From Lestie 0'Meara : Lestie 0'Meara 22omeara@gmail.com From David Morman : David Morman d.morman@bendbroadband.com From tamara holcomb : Tamara Holcomb tjshotcomb@yahoo,com From Sue : Susan Sullivan Larkspurlandusecommittee@gmall.com From Jan Hitdreth : Jan Hitdreth jhifdreth@bendcabte.com From Sue : John Mowat jgmowa@gmail.com From Megan Norris : Megan Norris, Hayden Homes From Megan Norris : mnorris6hayden-homes,com From Carol Elwood, MVNA : Carol Etwood, L8 L8 18 L8 18 18 18 18 t2:19 12220 12=25 t2=26 12:38 =39=67 =39=29 =42:45carolandperry@gmail. com, MVNA 18:45:30 From Sue : R0UTE FOR C0NSTRUCTION TRAFFIC?18:45:48 From tamara holcomb: do you have a time horizon for the steps 18:45:57 From Sue : Thank you! ! !'1.8t46:0@ From Leslie 0'Meara : Is the sewer lnitiatty managed with thetift system and then at some point does a sewer line to the city getbuilt? ff so where would that go? t8;46=0Q From Jan Hitdreth : Witl the park have a pond? L8:46r45 From doug : f want to comment on Highway 20 accesst8:46t54 From Turbty Cutpher : It was noted that Bear Creek is lntended as the main vehicle traffic corridor, Any intentions to complete a sidewalk west to 27th? t8=47;02 From David Morman : I understand the park site wilt be managed by Bend Parks and Rec. But you made no mention about plans forthe existing surface water in the canal and ponds. What has been your coordination with Parks and the Irrigation District? Any further t hought s ? 18t47:@9 From Jan Hitdreth : are you going to save the mature trees onthe property, especially on the NW area above th park 18:47=L3 From Carol Elwood, MVNA: Bend has too many housing "deserts". The master plan process is a good time to include neighborhood commercial. It's wishful thinking to ask peopte to walk across HWy 20 safely for commercial services. 0nce again this witt bea car-dependent neighborhood. t8=47=35 From Carol Elwood, MVNA: Would like to hear range afloatsizes and projected prices. t8:47:48 From JoanLandsberg she/her : Very concerned about trafflc on Livingston and especiatly on Quail Run., which is where much Livingston traffic exits to Bear Creek. With cars parked on both sides of Quail Run, the street is only wide enough for 1 way cartraffic. What measures will be made to reduce traffic on Livingston and on Quait Run? t8=48t04 From David Morman : The plans to not promote vehicle traffic on Livingston is appreciated. When do you anticipate Livingston eastof Bartlett Lane being widened on Landsystems Nursery property to standard width? 18:48:39 From David Morman : How can affected neighbors understand howthis development witl affect the inevitabte development of the Landsystems Nursery property? White currently zoned for slngle-famityresidential housing, the nursery property witt be surrounded by apartments and other multi-family housing units. It is untikely to retain its current zoning. It would be hetpfut to have a broader understanding of what the development of the nursery property and other remaining open land surrounding our neighborhood may look likein the future in order the better evaluate this current proposat. 18:56:53 From Jan Hildreth : which part of the canat witl be piped 18159:31 From Carol Elwood, MVNA : I meant Lot sizes 19:01:15 From Carol Elwood, MVNA: Where are the other commercial amenities, other than north side of HU|Y 20? l9z@3217 From Jan Hitdreth : What are the plans of Landsystems? t9:07;@A From Turbly Cutpher I Witl the Barttett Ln sidewalk be extended east to the new development so one can access the park? 19:09:48 From Sue; Is atl the documentation you presented available on the City of Bend website? If so, can you give us the project n umbe r? 19:10:16 From tamara holcomb: would there be a centratized community mail delivery 19:13:04 From Joanlandsberg she/her : Wilt those very narrow lots have the same set back requirements as are required for elsewhere in the city? 19:16;51" From Steve: ARe there any units more than 2 stories? t9:22:@B From tamara holcomb : I would appreciate an opportunity to tatk with the traffic planner - as a resident on Bear Creek, \^/e are going to be impacted significantly and have some insights to share L9t22:23 From Lestie 0'Meara : Thank you! 19:22:37 From tamara holcomb : Thank You! 19:22:39 From doug : Thx! 1-9;22;46 From Joe Bessman (Traffic Engineer) : j oegtransightconsulting " com (503) 997-4473 19:23:@0 From tamara holcomb : got it - thx joe Exhibit F PUBLIC MEETING NOTIFICATION Notice: Notice is being provided for a series of applications that will accommodate a master planned development, including 198 detached single-family homes, 41 attached single-family homes, 108 multifamily dwelling units, and 4+ acres park and open space. The applications to be addressed in this Public Meeting include the following: . Urban GroMh Boundary Expansiono Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment. Transportation System Plan Map Amendment. Zone Changer Master Plano Land Division Prior to the submittal of the land use applications, an informational meeting will be held according to the provisions of Section 4.1.215 of the Bend Development Code. Time, Date, and Location of Meeting: The meeting will be held on Thursday, December 16,2021, at 6:00 pm. The meeting will be held on-line via ZOOM. To participate: o Before the scheduled meeting date, sign up and download the Zoom application on your computer, tablet, or smart phone at zoom.us. Zoom allows you to sign up for free. o To participate in the meeting at the scheduled time, type the following link into your web browser using the device with the downloaded Zoom application. httos: / / usO 6w eb.zo om.us / j / 87 54417 67 7 5 o You can also participate on via telephone by calling into (253) 215 8782 / Meeting lD: 875 4417 6775, however you will need to be on-line to view the visual presentation. Property Location: The property is located between Hwy 20 and Bear Creek Road, east of the City of Bend. The property is identified as 21415 and 21455 Hwy 20 and it is listed as Tax Lots 1501 and 1500 on the Deschutes County Tax Assessor's Map 17-12-35. Gontact: Blackmore Planning and Development Services, LLC / greg@blackmoreplanning.com ffi"$i___ ILEGEND@)sreerutt ow tos sr rz4 lNrerL-'- 1 ISNGEFSTYMMLMETFlUNTg%*^"'*,,^***%rwuowtototunst%"u"'*"-'P*u"'-J .r^cro" o*ue.2 a @r$@AREA SUMMAFYBULDABLEAREADEDtrATED ROWFBGATNN TFACT22.21 ACRES10.04 ACRES0.77ACRESPARK& POND 4,O8AC8ESTOTAUGROSS 37.lOACNESDEVELOPMENT SUI\,IIVARYOEIACHEDSNGLEFAMLY 198LOTS IgSUNTSATTACHEO SNGLE FAMLY 4,I LOTS 41 UNIISMULTFAMILY 12 BLDG IO8 UNITSTOTAL 347UN[ISZONE UNIIS GROSSACRES GBOSSOENSITY STANDARDnNf u7 37.10 9.4UNII/ACRE 7.3-21.7i-uL9:->33iaSCALE: 1 =10OP1.2JOB NO.20- I Or63tFIqj-1l6BIiBtii3OC)l-':.43Ii1 B AFFOFD€E FEMA !N FPHASE 22.94 ACFES177A71 SF7II- -L@esEflg a----III TIg:t_gq-a- -LOSLSTs€flA-I-LVNGSTON DRXE-IIIIIItIIIIIEiTII EI9oUoIz-^u6LIotHa.rH =o?: =lzF]E HIH(t64OUz><dmt ..orl zfill 6>PHASING AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PLAN ll/29121,2:31 PM Mail - Greg Blackmore - Outlook HB 4079 Pilot Project Neighborhood Meeting Greg Blackmore <greg@blackmoreplanning.com> Mon 1112912021 2:31PM To: LarkSpur LandUse <larkspurlandusecommittee@gmail.com>; carolandperry@gmail.com <carolandperry@gmail.com>; rolakatherine9@gmail.com <rolakatherine9@gmail.com> Cc: Megan Norris <mnorris@hayden-homes.com> I t attachments (5 MB) Public Meeting - Notice.pdf; Hi Sue, Katherine and Carol - Please find attached a Public Meeting Notice for the Hayden Homes I HB 4079 project, which is located near your Neighborhood Association Boundaries. Mailed notices are being sent to you and surrounding property owners today. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Greg Blackmore Blackmore Planning and Development Services, LLC 541.419.1455 bMlcnnor@bffinring-@nn NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. lf you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. From : LarkSpur Land Use <larkspurlandusecommittee@ gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 18,2021 1:01 PM To: Megan Norris <mnorris@hayden-homes.com> Cc: Greg Blackmore <greg@blackmoreplanning.com>; rolakatherineg@gmail.com <rolakatheri ne9 @ g mai l.com> Subject: Re: HB 4079 Pilot Project Neighborhood Meeting Hello Megan, Either day works for me; I am copying Katherine Rola who will be taking over the land use role for our neighborhood to make sure she is also available. We have found that we have better turnout for neighborhood meetings if they are held in the evening. I hope that works for you. I have been meaning to get back to you to thank you for your presentation at our general meeting. I know it's tough with a limited time schedule to present all the good information you have to share, so I am sure this upcoming meeting format with more open discussion will work better for you. Sue Sullivan https://outlook.office.com/mail/sentitems/id/AAMkADhhYzQ5NTBhLV/YxZjYtNDU4YS05MjEzLfZiN2VIMzY2ODZINQBGAAAA AAD24ZzVNZegRYL2HPX... l/2 11129/21,2:31PM Mail - Greg Blackmore - Outlook On Thu, Nov 18, 2021aL12:36 PM Megan Norris <mnorris@hayden-.hames-csm> wrote: Hi Sue - Makayla Oliver shared your contact information with me. I know we recently presented to your group. We are required to host our own neighborhood meeting and we would like to get this set for either the evening of December 1Sth or 16th. Can you please let me know which of these dates work for you? We ideally want to get this scheduled before the holidays. Megan Norris I Forward Planning Manager Th M ank nega you ffi iiid[t$e0u?rfftt @ fI/TYDEN HOMES Gell: 916-529-5691 E -mail : mnorris@hayden- hoEles Jqqn Larkspur Land Use Chair fih FPlsce SGS DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL 62765 POWELL BUTTE HWY BEND, OR97701. CLEAVENGE& DOUGLAS CLARK & JANE MARIE 21450 HWY 20 BEND, OR977OL RALSTON, IACOB T & DAYNA W 23040 E HWY 20 BEND, OR97701 PITNER GREGORY& KACIE 618 NE SHIRLEY CT BEND, OR977OL EVELYN VAN DYKE REV TRUST ET AL VAN DYKE, EVELYN NKATTEE ETAL 62077 DANTILI RD BEND, OR977Ot ROCH,IEAN-MARC ET AL 27379 LIVINGSTON DR BEND, OR97701. ROSSO LIVING TRUST 1997 ROSSO, IOHN M & LORNA C TTEES 2T391 LIVINGSTON DR BEND, OR97701. ]ANET K HILDRETH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST HILDRETH, JANET K TRUSTEE 62044 WITHERSPOON PL BEND, OR97701. ROBSON, DANIEL & HABLE, KRISTINE 27379 BARTLETT LN #UNIT 1 BEND, OR 97701-7800 IOHNSON, JACOB R & DANIELS, IILLIAN K 21368 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR 97701 DOGFISH INVESTMENTS LLC 27770 SE CURRIN RD ESTACADA, OR 97023 ENGLISH,GARY S 21.336 HWY 20 E BEND, OR 97701 BLANCHARD, LANCE M &ANGIE M 3115 NE CORONA LN BEND, OR 97701 ENGLISH,GARY S 21.336 E HWY 20 BEND, OR97702 DAVID & CYNTHIA MORMAN TRUST MORMAN, DAVID A & CYNTHIA I TTEES 27352 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR977OL WEINMANN, NICHOLAS & DANA 21383 LIVINGSTON DR BEND, OR 97701. NICHOLLS, MEREDITH I 21.395 LIVINGSTON DR BEND, OR97701. BRUSH, MELISSA J 62040 WITHERSPOON PL BEND, AR97707 PRASEK ELIZABETH & LARRYJAMES 1617 MYRTLEWOOD LN NICEVILLE, FL3257B CRAWFORD, ONIE A 21364 NE BARTLETT LN BEND, OR97701. EARLY BRONCO LLC ET AL c/o BoB HrNES (A) 2284 CALYOUNG RD EUGENE, OR 97401 CROSSWINDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX B45O BEND, OR 97708 DE LOS ANGELES,RAYMOND I IR & CHERIE 617 NE SHIRLEY CT BEND, OR977OT MARIA FIDELIA MARCOULIER TRUST MARCOULIE& MARIA FIDELIA TTEE 21390 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97701. MORRIS, JAREN C &TIANA R 2T356 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR977OL DELAMARTER, TWYLA J & GARTH S 277 NE CONIFER #123 CORVALLIS, OR 97330 WALKE& KIRK W & TERRI H 62048 WITHERSPOON PL BEND, OR977OT HEPP,GAVINM&EMILYA 21380 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR 97701 LEWIS, BEAU I & ELISA M 2T372 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR977OL FITTERER,IEFFE & MYERS, SANDMA 21360 BARTLETT LN BEND, OR977OL ROBSON, CLIFFORD P &VICKY 2TL2O MERRITT CT BEND, OR97702 LOWERY, THOMAS ARTHUR & BARBARA ANN 6201.0 DANTILI RD BEND, OR977OI BABCOCK DENNIS & BABCOCK KENNETH 20260 MOONLIGHT CT BEND, OR97702 WARREN, TONY R &VALERIE A 2L359 BARTLETT LN BEND, AR97701 MENDIOLA" JEREMY M & SARAH E 21.378 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97702 DOROTHY R SULLIVAN TRUST SULLIVAN, DOROTHY R TTEE 21405 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR977OT LELAND & SHIRLEY LANDERS TRUST LANDERS, SHIRLEY J TRUSTEE 1460 NW LEXINGTON BEND, OR 97703 EASTWOOD, COURTNEY ANN ET AL 27539 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97701" SAVAGE, ANDREW R & CAMBRIA E 2T362 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97701. RIVES, BENIAMIN P 6200l DANTILI RD BEND, OR 97701 BRISTOW JAMES C & PIREZ, EYLENE 6201.8 DANTILI RD BEND, OR977OI PORTER KELLY BURNS LANDHOLDINGS LLC 5691 MIRAMAR DR FRISCO, TX 75034 EASTSIDE BEND LLC ATTN: GARY G MILLER 721 BREA CANYON #7 DIAMOND BAR, CA 97789 LYLE W &IUDY L HICKS LIVING TRUST HICKS, LYLE W &IUDY L TTEES 2473NE SALVIAWAY BEND, OR97701 KRAME& KIMBERLY & CHRISTIFER 21380 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97701. HAROLD K MARKEN REV TRUST ETAL MARKEN,HAROLD K CO-TTEE ETAL 2L495 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR97701. CRAIG A CHRISTIANSEN REV TRUST ET AL CHRISTIANSEN, CRAIG A & CHRISTY L TTEES PO BOX 5651 BEND, OR 97708 PERE2 LLC 475 SNEAD DR N KEIZER, OR 97303 NATHAN A SEVERSON SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST C/O CAPITAL FIRST TRUST COMPANY TTEE 234W FLORIDA ST #4OO MILWAUKEE,WI S32O4 SHRODE, RICHARD L 22820 ALFALFA MARKET RD BEND, OR977OL MOSTEK LAWRENCE J & DEBRA ] 620T4 DANTILI RD BEND, OR97701. Owner Agent InCareOf Address CityStZip EASTSIDE BEND LLC 721 BREA CANYON #7 DIAMOND BAR, CA 9T789 FUERSTENAU,IUSTIN TYLER & MCKENZIE LEIGH 62006 DANTILI RD BEND, OR977OL BLALACK ANDRE L &AMANDA K 6LT37 BENHAM RD BEND, OR97702 BRUGGEMAN, SUSAN A ETAL 2T425 BEAR CREEK RD BEND, OR977OT MARSDEN,IOHN H III ETAL 6T048 PARRELL RD BEND, OR97702 O'MEARA, LESLIE 62073 DANTILI RD BEND, OR 97701, SCHUMACHER, WHITNEY & LEIBY, NICHOLAS 62005 DANTILI RD BEND, OR977OL 2004 soJKA FAMILYTRUST SOIKA, DOUGLAS A & TERI A TTEES 2520 OLDHAM CIR OXNARD, CA 93035 Mountain View Neighborhood Assoc Carol Elwood L917 NE Higher Ground Ave. Bend, OR97701' Larkspur Neighborhood Assoc Sue Sullivan 2660 NE Hwy 20, #61.0-93 Bend, OR97701. Lasf Revrsed Date: 03/01/2021 Planning Division City of Bend (541) 388-5580 planning@bendoregon. gov 710 NW Wall Street, Bend OR 97703 This submittal form is to be completed prior to your application with the City of Bend. Download this form before completing fillable fields, then upload with your application through the Online Permit Center at www.bendoreoon -oov/oermitcenter VERIFIGATION OF COMPLIANCE PUBLIC MEETING FORM The Bend Development Code (BDC) states that Neighborhood Associations, as recognized by the BDC, must be included in decisions about proposed land use changes within their boundaries. Applicants submitting any of the below development applications are required to present their project proposal at a public meeting prior to submitting the application to the City of Bend Planning Division. The presentation must be made at either a regular or special Neighborhood Association meeting or a meeting hosted by the applicant. This form verifies the compliance with the public meeting requirements outlined in BDC Chapter 4.1.215.A-B. ticant: Hayden Homes Check the application type(s) requested: A Bend Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Q Zoning Map Amendment A Master Plan n Conditional Use Permit E Subdivision ! A Site Plan Review for new development or an alteration/addition to one or more buildings containing a total of 10,000 sq. ft. or more. Meeting Date, Time & Location December 16, 2021 App Neighborhood Association (s). Larkspur & Mountain View Project Locati on,21415 and 21455 Hwy 2O / 17-12-35 Tax Lots 1501 and 1500 Project Description: Notice is being provided for a series of applications that will accommodate a master planned development, including 198 detached single{amily homes, 41 attached single{amily homes, 108 multifamily dwelling units, and 4+ acres park and open space. The applications to be addressed in this Public Meeting include the following: Urban GroMh Boundary Expansion / Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment / Transportation System Plan Map Amendment I Zone Change / Master Plan / Land Division PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Page 1 of 2 Lasf Revised Date: 03/01/2021 Check each of the following items presented at the meeting: Z Map depicting the location of the subject property proposed for development. d n visual description of the project including a site plan, tentative subdivision plan and elevation drawings of any structures if applicable. E X description of the nature of the use including but not limited to, sizes and heights of structures, proposed lot sizes, density, etc. Z the expected or anticipated impacts from the development. d Any mitigation proposed by the applicant to alleviate the expected/anticipated impacts. d Xn opportunity for the public to provide comments. Applicants are encouraged to reconcile as many public concerns as possible prior to submitting their application. lf any of the above items are not applicable to the proposal, please state why: Concerns Stated at Meeting See attached meeting chat. 1211712022 Applicant SlEnature Date .1212012021 N e i g h bo rhood Associ ation Representative S ig natu re Date Applicant Signature Date Neighborhood Association Representative Signature Date PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Page 2 of 2 Accommodation Information for People with Disabilities To obtain this information in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, etc. please contact the Planning Division at planning@bendoregon.gov or (541) 388-5580; Relay Users Dial 7-1-1.6 t8:,09:32 From Greg Blackmore : Greg Blackmore - g reg@btackmo replanning. com t8=12:01 From Leslie 0'Meara : Lestie 0'Meara 22oneara@gmail.com 18:1-2:19 From David Morman : David Morman d.morman@bendbroadband.com t8:1-2t20 From tamara holcomb : Tamara Holcomb tjshotcomb@yahoo.com'J.8:12:25 From Sue : Susan Sullivan Larkspurlandusecommittee@gmait. com t8=12=26 From Jan Hitdreth : Jan Hitdreth jhifdrethGbendcable.com 18:12:38 From Sue r John Mowat jgmowa@gmail.com 18:39:07 From Megan Norris : Megan Norris, Hayden Homes 18:39:29 From Megan Norris : mnorris@hayden-homes.com t8=42:45 From Carol Elwood, MVNA : Carol Elwood, ca rolandpe rry@gmail. com, MVNA 18:45:30 From Sue : R0UTE FOR C0NSTRUCTI0N TRAFFIC? 18:45:48 From tamara holcomb : do you have a time horizon for the steps 18:45;57 From Sue ; Thank you ! ! ! 'J"8246:@@ From Leslie 0'Meara : Is the sewer initially managed with thetift system and then at some point does a sewer line to the city get buitt? If so where would that go? tB:46=A0 From Jan Hildreth : Witt the park have a pond? 1,8:46245 From doug : I want to comment on Highway 20 access t?r46:54 From Turbly Cutpher : It was noted that Bear Creek is intended as the main vehicte traffic corridor, Any intentions to complete a sidewalk west to 27th? tB;47:@2 From David Morman : f understand the park site witt be managed by Bend Parks and Rec, But you made no mention about plans for the existing surface water in the canal and ponds. What has been your coordination with Parks and the Irrigation District? Any further t houghts ? !8t47:@9 From Jan Hitdreth: are you going to save the mature trees on the property, especially on the NW area above th park 18:47:i-3 From Carol Elwood, MVNA : Bend has too many housing "deserts"" The master plan process is a good time to include neighborhood commercial" It's wishful thinking to ask people to walk across ilWy 2A safely for commercial services. Once again this wilt be a car-dependent neighborhood. 18:4-7135 From Carol Elwood, MVNA: Would like to hear range afloat sizes and projected prices. tB:47:4.8 From Joanlandsberg she,/her : Very concerned about traf f ic on Livingston and especially on Quait Run., which is where much Livingston traffic exits to Bear Creek. With cars parked on both sides o.f Quail Run, the street is only wide enough for 1 way cartraffic, What measures will be made to reduce traffic on Livingston and on Quail Run? t8=48:A4 From David Morman : The plans to not promote vehicle traffic on Livingston is appreciated. When do you anticipate Livingston eastof Bartlett Lane being widened on Landsystems Nursery property to standard width? 18:48139 From David Morman : How can affected neighbors understand howthis development will affect the inevitable development of the Landsystems Nursery property? White currently zoned for single-family residential housing, the nursery property witt be surrounded by apartments and other multi-family housing units, It is unlikety to retain its current zoning. It would be hetpful to have a broader understanding of what the development of the nursery property and other remaining open land surrounding our neighborhood may took like in the future in order the better evaluate this current proposal, 18:56:53 From Jan Hitdreth : which part of the canat witt be piped 18:59:31 From Carol Elwood, MVNA : I meant Lot sizes 19:0L:15 From Carol Elwood, MVNA: hJhere are the other commercial amenities, other than north side of HWY 20? 19:@3:!7 From Jan Hitdreth : What are the plans of Landsystems? !9:,@7:A0 From Turbly Cutpher : Witt the Bartlett Ln sidewalk be extended east to the new development so one can access the park? 19:09:48 From Sue: Is all the documentation you presented available on the City of Bend website? If so, can you give us the project numbe r? tgt1"At16 From tamara holcomb : would there be a centratized community mait delivery tgtL3tAA From Joanlandsberg she/her : Witt those very narrow lots have the same set back requirements as are required for elsewhere in the city? 19:16;51 From Steve: ARe there any units more than 2 stories? t9:22;AB From tamara holcomb : I would appreciate an opportunity to tatk with the traffic planner - as a resident on Bear Creek, we are going to be impacted significantly and have some insights to share t9;22:23 From Leslie 0'Meara : Thank you! 19t22t37 From tamara holcomb : Thank You! t9:22t39 From doug : Thx! t9t22;46 From Joe Bessman (Traffic Engineer) : joegtransightconsulting. com (503) 997-4473 19t23:@O From tamara holcomb : got it - thx joe Lasf Revr'sed Date: 03/01/2021 Check each of the following items presented at the meeting: 6 ltttap depicting the location of the subject property proposed for development. Z Xvisual description of the project including a site plan, tentative subdivision plan and elevation drawings of any structures if applicable. E n description of the nature of the use including but not limited to, sizes and heights of structures, proposed lot sizes, density, etc. d tne expected or anticipated impacts from the development. d Any mitigation proposed by the applicant to alleviate the expected/anticipated impacts. d Rn opportunity for the public to provide comments. Applicants are encouraged to reconcile as many public concerns as possible prior to submitting their application. lf any of the above items are not applicable to the proposal, please state why: Concerns Stated at Meeting: See attached meeting chat. Applicant Signature Date Neig h borhood Association Representative S ig natu re Date 1211712022 Applicant Signature Date f^..t O fi,-,,"{MVNA 12t17t21 NffiFbo rrr'ood Associ atio n Rep rese ntative S i g n atu re PLAN - Verification of Compliance Public Meeting Form Date Page 2 of 2 Accommodation lnformation for People with Disabilities To obtain this information in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, etc. please contact the Planning Division at planning@bendoregon.gov or (541) 388-5580; Relay Users Dial 7-1-1. 8177871 SF128213 SF2.94ACRESPHASE 2]6AFTOFNE NilIAL!N6J.IIIIITIII?---IP7IIEtI_e_ _LoSLSFEFAqIIE8riIIIExhibit G@.$ir@LEGENDQ)"nonr*., ^t*tmo 6r r24 lNre)f ',. : lsilcEFMyM6Dbr04uNrEV//////)atNsPrcEMrxmN772,**o*,^,o'ung%uut,o*.,^r*uun,-] ,urcson orn.- e r*&s]@As:9is3r€9R<9:d>i6AREA SUMMAFYBULDmIETEEAOEDtrATEO ROWNFEATNN RCT22.21 ACRES10.&ACBES0.77 ACRESPARK& POND 4.O8ACNESTOTAUGROSS 37,1OACRESDEVELOPMENT SU/\4I\,IABYoErlcHEoEfrGfErer"rry rssLots rssuNrsATTACHED SNGLE FAIVLY 41 LOrc 41 UNIISMULTFAI\4ILY 12 BLDG 108 UNIISTOTAL 347UNIISZONE UNIIS GROSSACRES GROSSDENSIry STANOARDRt\4 U7 37,10 9.4UN!T/ACRE 7.*21,7SCALE: 1'= 1@\I3L_rLJOB NO.20-r0rP1.2MFrt?t&q_ _ _ rcM:utrot1I+Uzazi<i I>: d> =a { 6rtY-a? *v 9t I. a! VZ t I{ 5:i-ibH z! Ad :* d iq q lI)tl@dt gtrl 2*t o-EIXI?La H.i t ot?lF EIE 5+(5zz6<T2OUz><onO4U<U-ocrPHASING AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PLAN Exhibit H FIRST AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 3271 A RESOLUTTON AMENDTNG RESOLUTTON NO. 3f 33 (A RESOLUTTON rN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF BEND'S APPLICATION FOR A PILOT PROGRAM FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNDER HB 4079) AND PROV|DTNG FOR TMPLEMENTATTON OF A REVTSED CONCEPT PLAN Findings A. The Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 4079 in 2016, creating a pilot program to provide an adequate supply of land within urban growth boundaries that is dedicated to affordable housing, encourage the development of affordable housing on land dedicated to affordable housing, and protect land dedicated to affordable housing from conversion to other uses before or after the development of affordable housing ('HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project"). B. On August 15, 2A18, by Resolution 3133, the City of Bend nominated a pilot project ("Bend Pilot Project") on a site of approximately 35 acres, located on the eastern border of Bend's urban growth boundary ('UGB') at21455 Highway 20, in Deschutes County, Oregon ("Bend Pilot Project Site"), owned by private owners. The Concept Plan for implementation of the Bend Pilot Project was attached as Exhibit A. Resolution 3133 stated that if selected for the Pilot Project, the City would implement the Concept Plan. C. The City submitted the Bend Pilot Project for selection by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission ("Commission") for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. D. On November 16,2018, the Gommission selected the City of Bend's Affordable Housing Pilot Project Proposal and made a preliminary decision to approve the application from the City of Bend, which allows the City to use a non-traditional UGB expansion process to increase the supply of affordable housing in Bend. E. On August 2,2019, the Department of Land Conservation and Development ("DLCD") issued its final order approvlng the Bend affordable housing project. The final order provided that it is subject to judicial review under ORS 183.484 as an order in other than a contested case upon filing of a petition for judicial review within 60 days of the order. lt was not appealed. F. Since that tirne, the original developer listed the pilot site for sale. ln 202A, Hayden Homes secured the parcel and has begun a revised feasibility study. Their due diligence has shown that the Pilot can be developed by Hayden Homes with limited subsidy using a different approach. Hayden intends to develop both the affordable and market rate housing themselves. ln order to feasibly complete the Pilot, Hayden Homes has proposed 345 units total, with 138 of those units qualifying as affordable under the Pilot rules. City staff, in consultation with the staff at DLCD (the agency that staffs the Commission), has been working with Hayden Homes to revise the project consistent with Resolution No. 3271 Page 1 of6 Resolution 3133 and the intent and purpose of HB 4079 and the implementing regulations. The site plan and phasing plan ("Revised Concept Plan") are attached as Exhibit B. G. Hayden Homes is a production builder based in Redmond, Oregon. Hayden Homes has built over 20,000 homes throughout the Northwest, including in Bend, Hayden Homes also operates a non-profit arm which builds affordable housing, called First Story. This uncommon organizational structure provides oppor-tunity for this development team to perform all work "in house," without contracting with any external firms. ln turn, this will allow Hayden Homes to control the timeline, including that of the affordable units, alleviating some of the risk inherent in the previous model. Hayden Homes intends to minimize external subsidy for this Pilot which is an innovative method of producing housing that is affordable. Because of this, not all the homes considered affordable under the Pilot will meet Bend's definition of Affordable Housing, as subsidy is traditionally needed to reach that level of affordability. There is tremendous demand in Bend for housing both at the traditional affordability threshold as well as for the leveljust above- termed "middle income housing" in Bend. Middle income houslng is also in short supply and production of this housing ls a Council goal. Thus, Bend is interested in supporting the pilot, despite a limited amount of Affordable Housing as defined by the Bend Municipal Code, because of the opportunity to innovate with affordability at scale with limited subsidy, as well as Council's goal to produce more middle income housing in Bend. H. The Bend Pilot Project Site is adjacent to the existing urban growth boundary of Bend and meets the other requirements for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project, including that the site is currently accessible or can be made accessible to a transit stop served by a fixed transit corridor with at least eight weekday trips in each direction, within three-quarters mile distance via sidewalk or pedestrian walkway, The City of Bend is the provider of urban services for sanitary sewer, fire protection and streets and roads for the Bend Pilot Project Site. The owner and/or developer wilt be required to complete the public facility and infrastructure necessary to provide these public facilities and services as set forth in the Revised Concept Plan and as required by the Bend Development Code during development review. Once infrastructure is complete, the project site can be reasonably provided with public facilities and services and the City of Bend has the capacity and financial resources to serve development on the Bend Pilot Project Siie as proposed in the Revised Concept Plan. J. Avion Water Company will be the provider of urban services for domestic water for the porlion of the Bend Pilot Project Site south of Highway 20. The owner and/or developer will be required to complete the public facility and infrastructure neoe$sary for provision of domestic water. Once infrastructure is complete, Avion Water Company has the capacity and financial resources to serve the development on the Bend Pilot Project Site as proposed in the Revised Concept Plan, and as dernonstrated by the Letter of lntent to Serve included in the project application. K. Bend Parks and Recreation District will be the provider of urban parks and recreation services for the Bend Pilot Project Site and has the capacity and financial resources to serve the Bend Pilot Project Site. L. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains a Central Oregon lrrigation District canal, which the irrigation district may require to be piped concurrent with or subsequent to development. Bend Development Code, 4.9.500.A.9. requires an application for annexation to include a signed statement from the applicant confirming the applicant has met with the irrigation district to discuss the proposed annexation, that the irrigation district reviewed the layout and design of the proposed development for any impacts on irrigation district conveyance facilities and had the opportunity to recommend reasonable protections for such facilities consistent with the irrigation district's adopted rules and regulations, system improvement plans and/or development policies, and the extent to which any identified issues have been resolved or if they have not yet been resolved, a timeline to resolve anY issues. M. Regarding the Affordable Housing Pilot Project Site, the City is exempt from compliance with Oregon Land Use Goals 3 (Agricultural Lands), 4 (Forest Lands), 6 (Air, Water and Land Resources Quality), 8 (Recreational Needs), I (Economic Development), 10 (Housing), 12 (Transportation), 13 (Energy Conservation), 15 (Willamette River Greenway), 16 (Estuarine Resources), 17 (Coastal Shorelands), 18 (Beaches and Dunes), and 19 (Ocean Resources), from the land need or boundary location provisions of Goal 14 (Urbanization), and Goal 11 (Public Facilities and Services), except that portion applicable to the impact of development of the pilot project site on existing and planned public facilities within the City's urban growth boundary, pursuant to OAR 660-039- 0030. N. The Council continues to find the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on ihe NationalWetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance 92-045 and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project Site containing the ponds is annexed into the City, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal 5. BDC 4.6.900.8 .1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. The Central Oregon lrrigation District has turned off the water supply to the ponds and it may be unlikely that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site, but that remains to be finally determined. lf found to be a significant Goal 5 resource, they must be preserved. The Revised Concept Plan proposes 4 acres of Park space to be dedicated to the Bend Park and Recreation District. Based on the provision of open space and parks, and trail connections, and the requirement that further analysis be done to determine whether the ponds are a significant resource, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 5' O. The Council continues to find that the proposal satisfies Goal 7 because the City Resolution No. 3271 Page 3 of 6 has considered the risks of the natural hazard wildfire in the evaluation of the Bend Pilot Project Site. There are other natural hazards such as floods and landslides that are not addressed here because the Bend Pilot Project Site is not a location where such hazards might occur, The Bend Comprehensive Plan Policy 11-5 requires the City to adopt strategies to reduce wildfire hazard on Iands inside the City and included in the Urban Growth Boundary. These strategies may include the application of the lnternational Wildland-Urban lnterface Code or equivalent with modifications to allow buffers of aggregated defensible space, or similar tools, as appropriate. Prior to approval of development on the Bend Pilot Project Site, the proposal must demonstrate compliance wiih Statewide Planning Goals including Goal 7, as designated by the Planning Director, under BDC 4,6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. Based on the Concept Plan and the requirements in the Bend Development Code for compliance with the Staiewide Planning Goals, the City finds that the Revised Concept Plan complies with Goal 7. P. The City is committed to expanding opportunities for and encouraging development of affordable housing. The City has implemented a number of measures to support the development of affordable housing that also support the application for the Bend Pilot Project, including: . density bonus for affordable units,r BX€IT'lption from systern development charges for affordable housing,r prop€Fty tax exemption for low income housing units,. a construction excise tax,. accessory dwelling units allowed in any zone without many constraints,. parking requirement reduction for affordable housing of one on-site parking space per affordable housing unit,. duplexes allowed in low density residential zones,o attached residential units (townhomes) allowed in Standard Density Residential zones,. all commercial zones allow new residential use as part of a mixed-use development,r cottage-style housing allowed in the Standard Density (RS) and Medium Density (RM) zones. Further, the City has implemented code requirements requiring a greater mix and density of housing through master planning properties 20 acres in size or larger, requiring affordable,housing in areas of development in newly expanded urban growth boundary areas, and requiring development at 60% of the minimum density standard for master plans in the RM zone, as part of the urban growth boundary expansion. The City has a process to declare City-owned property surplus and sells the property for the price the City paid plus costs, for affordable housing development. Q. The City has adopted applicable Comprehensive Plan policies (Policies 5-20 and 5-21) that require that guarantees be in place to ensure affordable housing units will meet affordability requirements for not less than 50 years, phasing requirements for affordable housing units and specified threshold definitions for affordable housing units at 80% of AMI (for dwetling units for sale) and 60% of AMI (dwetling units for rent, unless the city provides support for housing at other levels of affordability. Because the state pilot project rules require affordability at 80% AMI for dwellings for sale or rent and the project as proposed by this developer meets that state criteria and proposes a new model of developer- financed needed housing, the City is supportive of dwelling units for rent at 80% AMI. R, The City has awarded over $8 million through its prior limited and current full system development charge exernption, process to surplus real property, and competitive disbursement of the construction excise tax revenue to build or preserve 513 affordable housing units. The City has used $6 million Community Development Block Grants and $3 million Neighborhood Stabilization funding from the federal government to build or preserve 418 affordable housing units. $. As the Bend Pilot Project was selected by the Commission, OAR 660-039-0090 prevents the Cig from planning or zoning the Bend Pilot Project Site to allow a use or mix of uses not authorized by the Commission unless the City, in conced with Deschutes County, withdraws the Bend Pilot Project Site from the Bend urban growth boundary and rezones the site pursuant to law, statewide land use planning goals and land use regulations implementing the goals that regulate allowable uses of land outside urban growth boundaries. Based on these findings, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.Based on its selection as a HB 4A79 Affordable Housing Pitot Project city with a population over 25,000, the City will. A. lmplement the attached Revised Concept Plan, consistent with the requirements of the Bend Development Code; and B. Annex the Bend Pilot Project Site within two years of an acknowledged urban growth boundary amendment to include the Bend Pilot Project Site, when it can be annexed consistent with the requirements of the Bend Development Code. Section 2 The City, as the provider of urban services to the Bend Pilot Project Site for sanitary Sewer, fire protection, streets and roads, and a portion of the domestic water continues to support the Bend Pilot Project selection for the HB 4A79 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. Section 3.It is expected that Cascade East Transit (CET), operated by Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council, can serve the Bend Pilot Project Site with transit as required by the Affordable Housing Pilot Project requirements and as described above in Finding D, but in the event there are additional costs related to serving the Bend Pilot Project Site consistent with the Revised Concept Plan, CET, the City, and the Resolution No. 3271 Page 5 of 6 Section 4 developers or owners of the Bend Pilot Project Site will work together onoptions for providing transit service and pedestrian walkway connections to transit sites, which may include deveroper and/or owner funding by agreement or condition of approvalfor a development application. T,his arnended Resolution provides for implementation of a Revised concept Plan for the already approved pirot project, and updates the Find'ings. All other provisions of Resolution 3133, not inconsistent with these changes, remain in effect. Adopted by motion of the Bend city council on september 1,2o21 YES: Mayor Sally Russell NO: none Mayor Pro Tem Gena Goodman Campbell Councilor Barb Carnpbell Gouncilor Melanie Kebler Cou ncilor Anthony Broadman Councilor Megan Perkins Councilor Rita Schenkelberg Sally l, Mayor ATTEST: ristie, City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM; A.rs, City ey -*;l l,u4J,Hc sHgiig s&^F! -firyg *ItoH,Of,HM{ffituFbuJuJEt$tEdr!a$t!rti?81CE?tt$tat{ f "SEot!.1it$seFci+:i!*tqfgiln*ra$EttLq9$ffagltrFFgEkL:Ege[$s!irET*gI-ir!uSxqrilrtt::;lLrlbBblE!Tg!Eft$rPFIIF"d HFHr; -li"r art!i -.,- -li 1lFNdEfr LOfiMT:2I{55 HIGHWAY20g!!AnHAYOEN HOMEgsUgovrSroNFREIIMINARYLOTIAYOUTOPT]ON 7ffiwIzo!-t{ N}s(II(Jl-€loOiJ'x5l!al nRe-Fo+91 =6^PFrii4-u m 6 - luQ-la.-) - 23=Ja4liil-i33:19,;irItli:1ts1l:l!lBIe 6li:ilfl:!ritl4tlr!ll,i1j;:i4fii,,l{ll?iiu€il!IIIt.r!t!ifIIiI$Id,frfi'{,l:tA;EIS'olII€frI\IIIjInIIIIitbt;Ith6-ffik-^1gp-I{-IIIIIItI;lr!l1I'!III!lt*tnI@FcpftigcturIttdE*''cs*dEcc_3,>ncIiE!gIdst.iI;-lIttEIItLI-lttJ_t.FfFqgc26c:.6iIIIiII-l-i,gfil..,r ,rt lrl) j' llii:,r r'::liii.., \'.l L t irl;: ; ' 'SUEDIV]SIONPSOJECI lOCATlOlli21 455 HIGHWAY209!LEIILHAYDEN HOMES9dET T'ILE:PRELIMINARYLOT LAYOUTOPTION 7o-u--{{ea HB 4079 Application HB 4079 Pilot Program Complete Application Form City Name: Bend Background The HB 4079 Pilot Program aims to boost affordable housing by allowlng cities to develop affordable and market rate housing on lands currently outside urban growth boundaries (UGBs) without going through the normal UGB expansion process. Official program rules and more materials are available at https : //www.oreson.gov/LCD/Paees/H B40T9pilotproera m.aspx Application lnstructions To submit a complete HB 4079 application, fill out this form and attach the attachments listed on the final page. Submit the documents in PDF form (ideally, as a single PDF)to gordon.howard@state.or.us by 11:59 PM, June t,2OI8. lf you wish to confirm receipt by the deadline, pleose submit your application no later than noon on June 7, 2078. The department will review this application for completeness and may request additional information. Note: During project selection, certain project elements may receive extra consideration by the commission; see OAR 660-03e-0080(2xb). lf you have questions, please contact us - we are eager to help you apply. Questions/Contact Gordon Howard Com munity Services Division M anager gordon. howard @state. or. us (s03) 3e4-0034 r3{a Page 1 of 30 HB 4079 Application Section 1 - Project Summary City Name: Bend Applicant lnformation City Name (Applicant) Bend Contact Person {Name and Title} Carolyn Eagan Contact Phone 54t-693-2L30 Contact E-Mail ceaga n @ bendoregon.gov Proposed Housing Numbers, Affordability and Density xCity of Bend has specific comprehensive plan definitions of affordable housing. The 80 - !2O% AMI range will be referred to as "submarket rate" housing for purposes of this pilot. We anticipate many of the homes listed in the 100- I2O% category will be built for 80-tOO% AMI once infrastructure costs have been finalized. Site acreage 35,32 Dwelling units per gross acre 16 Total number of units (per OAR 660-039-0010(4)) (includes manager units)994 Number of affordable housing units (per OAR 660-039-0010(1) and (2))185 Number of units for households below 30% of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size Number of units for households at 30-60To of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size 185 Number of units for households at 60-80Yo of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size Number of units for households at 8O-10OY, of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size Number of units for households at 100-120% of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size 175x Number of units for households above I2O% of Area Median lncome, adjusted for family size 25 Existing City Efforts to Provide Affordable and Needed Housing Housing Measures Adopted by City (from totals in Section 3)Points Claimed For affordable housing measures adopted t2 For needed housing measures adopted 19 Page 2 of 30 HB 4079 Application For alternative housing measures adopted 6 37Total Points Claimed City Name: Bend Page 3 of 30 HB 4079 Application Section 2 - Project Details City Name: Bend Housing Provided Unit Type, Tenure, and Percent of Median lncome Designation ln the table below, insert the following information: o List the unit type (e.g., single-family, multi-family, townhome, duplex, triplex, manufactured dwelling, etc.)o List the total number of buildings of each type (example, L townhome building may have 4 units, 1 single-family dwelling will have 1 unit) o lndicate the tenure type (rent or own). lf there are a mix of tenure types, but the same building type, enter the information on separate rows (see example below for townhomes) o lndicate the income limitations of the proposed units (see OAR 660-049-0010(1) for requirements) Unit Type* Number of Buildings* Total Number of Units* Tenure Type Available to households at percent of area median income as adjusted for family size 7o J o€ J Below ?o% AMI 3O%to 60% AMI 6O%to 80o/o AMI 8O%to L20% AMI Other Market Rate Other Exomple: townhome I 32 32 16 L6 townhome I 32 0 16 16 multifomily 2 20 20 10 L0 Single family attached 63 63 25 38 38 25 Multi-family 19 322 322 185 r37 Neighborhood Commercial 23,000 sq.ft. Manager's Unit(s)9 9 Total by Column 82 394 347 38 185 175 25 9 Page 4 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend Property Cha racteristics Location Street Address: Township: L7 21455 Hwy. 20 Range: 12 Section: 35 Taxlot(s): 1500 Property Size and Zoning Acres: 35.32 Comprehensive Plan Designation: (not to exceed 50 ocres) N/A Number of Lots/Parcels:1 Zoning Designation MUA-10 (current) * Deschutes County maps have not been updated, ordinance 20L7-0O8 attached as Attachment l- Adjacent Land Uses/Zoning North of site: South of site: East of site: West of site: EFUTRB - in process of zone change to MUA-10 EFUTRB/ UA EFUTRB RS/ UA Project Elements Dwelling units per gross acre (must be at least 7 - see OAR 660-039-0020(81) Number of residential buildings 82 Number of non-residential buildings Number of residential units 394 Number of mixed-use buildings 1 (incl. in MF count) Developable acres 26.56 Constrained acres 8,76 Explanation of development constraints (e.g., wetlands, steep slopes, buffer from adjacent and nearby farm and forest uses on farm and forestlands) *note: development constroints will olso be shown on the concept plon Pond and surrounding acreage are undergoing wetlands determination at Oregon Department of State Lands, comprising 6 acres of the constrained acreage. An additional2.T6 acres are constrained through inclusion of 100' buffer to EFU land to the East of development. Public Facilities and Services (see requirements in OAR 660-039-0040) ls sanitary sewer presently at site? ls domestic water presently at site? 2 No X T Yes T X Page 5 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend ls the site within a fire protection district? ls the site served by streets and roads? ls the site served by mass transit? ls the site served by parks and recreation? The existing sewer system is 670' from the NW corner of lf no, what is the proximity of existing sewer to the site? the property. lf no, what is the proximity of domestic water to the site? lf no, what is the proximity of fire protection to the site? lf no, what is the proximity of streets/roads to the site? lf no, what is the proximity of mass transit to the site? lf no, what is the proximity of parks and recreation? For any public facilities not currently at the site, describe how the public facilities and services will be provided to the site, including capacity and financial resources. Please note the requirements and considerations in OAR 660-039- 0040, especially for transit. A sewer lift station will be constructed as part of phase 1 development. Cost is estimated at approximately $250,000 - 5500,000 and will be borne by the developers. The existing sewer and water services have capacity once the lift station is installed. Transportation improvements are phased with the development and total infrastructure costs are budgeted at 521"5,000 per acre, not including parks acreage. Transit is located within % miles of site with 8 fixed route trips in each direction daily. To ensure high quality transit service, developer intends to build an additional transit stop within the property to ensure all affordable units have access to nearby transit in accordance with pilot rules. Project Amenities *oll common oreos and amenities accessible to residents of morket rote units must be equolly occessible to residents of affordoble housing units n T T T X X X X X Separate Community Building X Community Room in Residential Building Structured Car Parking # Spaces Surface Car Parking # Spaces 499 Underground Car Parking # Spaces Common Laundry Room Common Kitchen Common Restrooms (other than Community Room) ll there be a use or rental fee for these spaces? lf yes, explain below X X X u X T Playground Garden Plots ln-Unit Storage Secure Outdoor Storage Space Secure Bicycle Storage/Pa rking Other: Commercial No X Click here to enter text. Page 6 of 30 Yes HB 4079 Application Arethereotheramenitiesthatwill bedevelopedaspartoftheproject? tf yes,explainbelow A 6 acre park with a trail connecting to the existing park system will be part of the development. The trail connects to US 20 via the west side of the development. The trail will eventually cross Hwy 20 and connect to Big Sky Park at 2L690 Neff Road. lf approved by LCDC, developer intends to include community gardens in a portion of the 100' buffer. Additionally, a transit stop will be constructed on site. City Name: Bend Provision of Affordable Housing ls the project a mixed income project? Yes X No Number of affordable housing units:Number of market rate units:200 185 Rental/Sale Price of Housing Units Describe the prices at which the affordable housing units will be rented or sold to eligible tenants and buyers. The rents of the affordable homes will be set to be affordable to families making no more than 60% of Area Median lncome (AMl). ln Bend in 201-8, for a family of 4 occupyinga2 bedroom home, that is a maximum rent of Sg+O per month. The neighborhood will provide a mix of home sizes and prices, from studio to three bedrooms, both affordable and market rate. The affordable homes will be available to families or individuals making no more than 60% AMl. Rents will be determined annually according to Housing and Urban Development (HUD) area median income limits for the Bend-Redmond Metropolitan StatisticalArea, abiding by HUD rent limits. The current year income table is attached as Attachment 2. Additionally, since the affordable homes will be constructed by Housing Works, Central Oregon's Regional Housing Authority, the homes will be eligible for place-based vouchers, when available, and will abide by the current fair market rent calculations. Rents are determined based on both family size and family income. Both factors are analyzed annually for compliance with HUD rules. ln fact, if a family qualifies for a home but makes only 40% of AMl, their rent will be set at the appropriate range for their family size based on actual gross income. Based on HUD's income and rent limits in 20L8, a family of 3 making 4O% of AMI who rents a 2 bedroom house would pay a maximum rent including utilities of $OzZ per month. The property is owned by Porter Kelly Burns (PKB), a private LLC contracting with our Regional Housing Authority, Housing Works. Pacwest Builders will be the development firm, and is owned by Jim Yozamp, partial owner of Porter Kelly Burns. This parcel will create 394 units of market rate and affordable housing. The affordable homes in this development will include both rental and homeownership units, The majority of rental units will be offered to residents earning 60% of AMI or under. Bend's Housing Needs Analysis and subsequent planning documentation demonstrate that this is the income sector most in need of housing. An additional 2 acres owned by PKB adjacent to the pilot site was included with the City of Bend's most recent UGB expansion in201-6, referred to as the East Highway 20 Expansion Area, aka "the triangle." That site has not yet been annexed and will be master planned along with the HB 4079 pilot site. The City included the East Highway 20 Page 7 of 30 HB 4079 Application city Name: Bend Expansion area in the 2016 UGB Expansion based on PKB's commitment to developinglOO% of the housing units on the triangle as deed restricted affordable housing (See Policy 1.1.-64, Bend Comprehensive Plan). PKB also has a memorandum of understanding with Housing Works to develop affordable housing on the triangle site since that time. (Attachment 3) The HB 4079 pilot site, plus the triangle, will benefit from the existing relationship of the development teams in helping provide a solution to Bend's housing crisis. City of Bend and our private sector partners envision the East Bend expansion as the continuation of a complete neighborhood, complementing existing amenities nearby, while enhancing services and providing much needed housing for our most underserved residents. Bend's pilot site is unique, hosting a substantial park site with natural features such as a large pond that supports wildlife and recreation. Perhaps most importantly, the site hosts both market rate homes and homes designed for residents making less than 60% AMl. Our goal is to provide complete integration of both natural features and constructed amenities within each section of the neighborhood to achieve balance. The shared vision for this neighborhood is best reflected in some of our most attractive existing neighborhoods, those with both the highest and lowest incomes living together, the integration of outdoor recreation opportunities, and proximity to services, amenities, and employment. Describe the prices at which the market rate housing units will be rented or sold to eligible tenants and buyers. ln addition to the 60% AMI homes, there will be a variety of housing provided at submarket price levels of 80 - LzO% of AMl. This includes both single family and multi-family models in a variety of types. The highest priced, market-rate homes will be single family lots facing the future park, which will not be deed restricted in any way. Sale of these properties are slated for the first phase of construction and will support the development of phase L of the affordable properties as well as the considerable infrastructure that is required to be completed as part of phase 1. lnfrastructure must be completed prior to any certificate of occupancy issuance, and the costs are high to get the first 30 affordable homes under construction. Total infrastructure costs for the development, which will all be accrued in phase L,are$215,000 per acre, or 56,235,000 in total. Any infrastructure costs related to the Park are not included in this budget item. There will be approximately 180 homes available for families making 80 - t2O% of AMI The reason this application distinguishes homes above 80% AMI as market rate is due to our clear comprehensive plan policy definitions of affordable housing. The submarket rate homes are not below Bend's comprehensive plan definition of affordable and thus are considered "submarket rate" for purposes of this application and the comprehensive plan. However, they will also carry a deed restriction to guarantee affordability for a term of at least 50 years, in compliance with the pilot rules. These homes meet another great need in Bend, as identified in the Housing Needs Analysis and additional planning work: so called "missing middle" housing. ln the most recent UGB expansion, Bend identified a shortage of missing middle homes, including duplexes, triplexes, attached townhomes, etc. The submarket rate, missing middle homes included in the pilot will help us meet this need by addressing not only an income range in need of additional housing, but a housing type that is in short supply. (See Landscape Report, Bend 2030 and ECONorthwest, Attachment 4) Describe how the market rate housing supports the development of affordable housing. This may include financial, political, or other information. Page 8 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend The City of Bend strives for mixed income development as a model for affordable housing whenever feasible. Studies have demonstrated that children from lower-income families benefit by moving to higher-income areas (See "lmpacts of Neighborhoods on lntergenerational Mobility: Childhood Exposure Effects and County-Level Estimates," Chetty and Hendren, Harvard 20L5). Thus, the City's goal has been and will continue to be, to facilitate a mixed- income development, with the highest practicable percentage of deed-restricted affordable housing. ln the case of the East Bend expansion area, the developers will bear all related infrastructure improvement costs. This is expected to cost 56,325,000 and is incorporated into the development pro forma. City of Bend began significant feasibility discussions with three separate landowners and developers, and due to the exceptionally tight affordable housing margins and the comprehensive vetting process, was able to screen out two developers who were unable to demonstrate the financial feasibility of developments at an otherwise eligible property under the pilot rules. One of the City's priorities is to develop affordable housing with the same quality given to market rate housing: infrastructure requirements are the same, external facades are subject to the same standards. Pacwest Builders was able to commit to the pilot with a significant land donation and a quality neighborhood design that would complement the existing nearby neighborhoods. The City of Bend asks that developers of affordable housing abide by the state standards that allow for reasonable operating expenses for the business operations, ensuring the business retains viability and long-term effectiveness. Effective property management and resident services are a critical component of vibrant and integrated affordable housing design. City of Bend required developers to find a management partner skilled in post-construction affordable housing management, and Pacwest will partner with Epic Property Management to fulfill this need. Epic is a subsidiary of Housing Works, allowing for communication during the design and construction phase between developer and manager, streamlining compliance barriers and allowing for ease in eventual management. Choices made in the design and construction phase that can seem insignificant can grow to large issues if property management is not consulted, so having an integrated agency is ideal. (For example, discount sink fixtures may be discounted because replacement parts are so expensive or difficult to find-property management often knows this before the developer does!) The inclusion of commercial space on site was seen as a benefit to the community and development for a variety of reasons. First, the commercial space is envisioned as a neighborhood amenity, both in scale and impact, The space is aligned with the neighborhood and not the highway to exemplify this. The overall design of the neighborhood lends itself to walkability and proximity of services. The commercial space is envisioned as an additional amenity for the entire neighborhood, proximate to both the affordable and market homes. The project team has discussed reserving some of the space for a non-profit service provider or a child care business, two industries in demand for many residents of all incomes. Beyond the supportive service option, neighborhood amenities will provide additional character to the area and will help reduce vehicle miles traveled by providing amenities on site. Finally, the inclusion of the 6 acre park supports the development of the affordable housing in a number of ways: political, social, financial, and environmental. Sale of the 6 acres will allow Pacwest to proceed with the first phase of the development by providing capital to aid in the land and infrastructure costs, The existing neighborhood will be further benefitted by the development of a trail along the existing canal, adjacent to the "triangle," which will eventually cross Hwy 20 and connect to Big Sky Park. We believe that the inclusion of open space in the form of a park and trail network will benefit the development and the community. When the City of Bend underwent the traditional Urban Growth Boundary expansion recently, the pond on site was highlighted by a variety of existing neighbors as an amenity to the current neighborhood to the west. This area is a "search area" within our Parks and Recreation District's boundaries-meaning it is currently underserved by existing parks facilities. Due to the Page 9 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend possibility of wetlands on site, despite the fact that the pond was created by irrigation water, the City and developer together initiated a wetlands determination process with the Department of State Lands. The development team, with full support of the City, determined that provision of a recreational and gathering space on site would provide significant benefit to residents of the existing neighborhood to the west, as well as to the future residents of the pilot site, regardless of the outcome of the wetlands determination. Explain why the development of a project similar to the proposed pilot is unlikely to be developed within the existing urban growth boundary. This may include, but is not limited to, land costs, redevelopment or remediation costs, site availability, or physical constraints. The proposed development is unlikelyto be developed within the City's existing UGBforallof the above reasons, the lack of large, undeveloped sites, and because land in the UGB has already been planned and zoned for satisfying Goals 9 and 10. The HB 4079 pilot provides unique opportunity due to the pilot rules allowing up to 50 acres. There are currently no available parcels within City of Bend of similar size with comparable zoning. The City takes official notice of its 2016 ComprehensivePlan,andallofthePlan'sappendiceshere,someofwhicharereferredtointhisfinding. TheCity recently completed an updated buildable lands inventory (BLl), housing needs analysis (HNA), and economic opportunities analysis (EOA) in 2016. The City used this data and analysis to inform an Urbanization Report (20L6'), which found the City needed to amend the Bend UGB to accommodate additional land for needed housing and economicopportunities. AllofthelandplannedandzonedintheUGBisintendedtomeetoneoftheCity'sneeds for housing, and needsfordifferenttypesof employment land. Changingthe plan designation and zoningon eithera single or group of properties would be challenging, to demonstrate the need for affordable housing, as proposed on the site, would provide greater public benefits than the existing plan designation and zoning. Access to capital is a significant barrier to this type of development happening within the existing UGB due to the need for infrastructure. The increasing cost of building or replacing water, sewer and transportation infrastructure is not unique to Bend. However, the impact of the cost increase is felt more acutely for two reasons: the fast paced population growth and the recent UGB expansion. Two of the biggest obstacles to new development in the current UGB, with land already planned and zoned for housing, are sewer collection infrastructure and transportation infrastructure. ln the case of the HB 4079 pilot site, removing the cost of land means that the developer has more budget availability to dedicate to sewer and transportation infrastructure, allowing for donation of land to affordable housing. The scale of the development allows for absorption of cost of the infrastructure across the market rate units, which is not feasible in smaller developments when similar infrastructure improvements and requirements are necessa ry. Although City of Bend is prioritizing planning in opportunity and expansion areas with infrastructure capacity, the true cost of bringing the lands online is significant nonetheless. lnfrastructure estimates for this pilot site are approximately S0.ZSS million, compared to a minimum of 571 million for any of the expansion or opportunity areas identified in the recent UGB expansion. Additionally, the location of Oregon State University - Cascades was finalized since the adoption of Bend's Housing Needs Analysis in 2016. OSU - Cascades anticipates bringing an additional 5000 students to Bend, along with additional staff and faculty, that were not accounted for in the HNA (HNA is attached in Attachment 5). The City Council recently approved several land use decisions, including several amendments to the Bend Development Code, Page L0 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend and a master plan for the expansion of the OSU-Cascades Campus on land to the north of its current site on Chandler Avenue (See City file nos. PZ-18-0004 and P718-0005). Phasing Describe how the project will be phased (see requirements in OAR 660-039-0070). lf the project will not be phosed, enter n/o. Page 11 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend The phasing plan ensures affordable homes will be constructed consecutively with market rate homes. This is ensured by Bend Code 4.2.800 Development in Accordance with Permit Approval. A. Final Approvals. Development shall not commence untilthe applicant has received all of the appropriate land use and development approvals including but not limited to: Site Plan Review Approval, Design Review Approval, Minimum Development Standards Review Approval, grading permits and building permits. Construction of public improvements shall not commence until the City has approved all required public improvement plans (e.9., utilities, streets, public land dedication, etc.). The City may require the applicant to enter into an agreement (e,g., for phased developments and developments with required off-site public improvements), and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with BDC 4.2.700, Bonding and Assurances for All Developments. B. Phased Development. Phasing of development may be approved with a Site Plan Review application, subject to the following standards and procedures: 1. A proposed phasing plan shall be submitted with the Site Plan Review application. 2. The proposal shall include a time schedule for developing a site in phases, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than five years from the date of final approval without reapplying for Site Plan Review. 3. Approval of a phased site development proposal requires satisfaction of all of the following criteria: a. The public facilities required to serve each phase are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase; b. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that are required as part of the approved underlying development proposal; and c. An application for phasing may be approved after Site Plan Review approval as a modification to the approved plan, in accordance with BDC Chapter4.1, Development Review and Procedures. [Ord. NS- 2251.,20t51 The intent of the phasing plan within the East Bend subdivision may not be obvious. The true development costs are severely front loaded with significant commitment secured in phase 1-. Some of the costs that will be accrued by the development team include the cost of a sewer lift station, which is currently estimated at 5250,000-5500,000, as well as a significant road network, sidewalk, and highway improvements costing 521-5,000 per acre, not including the park site, for a totalof 56,235,000. Some of the potentialcosts are still estimated such as potential off-site improvements to Highway 20 and the 27th corridor. Despite open conversations with Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of Bend, further analysis must occur prior to confirmation of offsite development costs. At the time of master plan and site plan submittal requirements underthe City's Development Code 4,7, atraffic analysis will be conducted and reviewed to confirm what offsite mitigations would be required, if any, for the development's impact to the Page 12 of 30 HB 4079 Application city Name: Bend existing vehicular and multi-model transportation system. Thus, the wisest approach is to plan for the potential of significant off-site transportation improvements, and be ready to move if fewer transportation improvements are determined necessary. The City of Bend is also preparing for the possibility of competitive state affordable housing funding. With limited gap funding available, our affordable housing developer, Housing Works, and the City of Bend, are preparing for the worst case scenario. Housing Works has a reputation statewide as one of the most creative financing agencies around, and they have utilized nearly every tool available for nearly every type of housing concept. Regardless, there is nearly always a need for additional"gap" financing for developments of this scale. Planning for a front loading of infrastructure cost borne by Pacwest as well as the possibility of no state funding for a period of time allows certainty that even in the worst case the development will proceed according to plan. lf Housing Works receives funding as anticipated, the affordable homes will be completed ahead of the attached phasing schedule. The traditional method employed by Housing Works involves rolling a portion of funding from completion of one development in to the "gap" of the next, so that the loan term is short and interest payments are minimized, while construction is continuous and labor is maintained. Whenever possible, Housing Works will employ these methods, streamlining the development as well as minimizing the possibility of delay. Having a committed development team in place, with land ownership secured, and site design with preliminary review, ensures that ourteam willbe readyto go upon annexation. we will complete the neighborhood within the required timeline. Due to the significance of these investments, the first phase of affordable housing units will meet the pilot program requirement while the later phases will exceed the 30% threshold. Availability of Affordable Housing for 50 Years Explain how the City shall ensure all affordable housing units are rented/sold to qualifying households, and how the affordable housing on the site will continue to be available as affordable housing for 50 years. Examples are in the rule at OAR 660-039-0020(6Xm). The Department believes a deed restriction is the option most likely to succeed. Bend has been guaranteeing affordability in a variety of ways for well over a decade. The City typically employs deed restrictions, and has also used restrictive covenants and comprehensive plan designations, ln the HB 4079 pilot site, the City plans to use a combination of deed restrictions and comprehensive plan designations to ensure that the affordability requirements are met for a minimum 50 years, and likely longer. This City is currently working with a variety of landowners undergoing annexation in other locations who have committed to providing affordable housing, and these processes parallel the expected HB 4079 annexation process in many respects. City of Bend currently has over 500 deed restricted homes that will provide the basis for our process with the HB 4079 site. City of Bend tailors deed restrictions based on the type of program, level of subsidy, and benefit to the developer and City. Forms of current deed restrictions include: 1. Those tied to funding (Affordable Housing Fund, CDBG)2. Systems Development Charges (SDC) exemptions 3. Annexations (through 2016 UGB expansion) Page 13 of 30 HB 4079 Application city Name: Bend 4. Surplus property 5. Special projects (HB 4079) ln each case, staff presents to City Council the option providing the greatest protection to future residents of the home, while ensuring no undue burden on developer. Thus, it's a weighing of benefit versus risk under the law. Surplus properties and annexations typically hold the longest deed restriction. ln most cases these lots maintain permanent affordability. The shortest restrictions currently come with SDC exemptions which are currently written with a 5 year affordability period. Because Bend has been working with our own funds and policies for over a decade, we have been able to refine our processes and have worked with the development team involved in the HB 4079 project, as well as with the funding sources listed as potential funding for this project, to ensure the restrictions are allowable under the guidelines issued for each source. Legal counsel forthe developers, syndicators, funders, and other associated parties are all familiar with our processes, timelines, and language, and have brought numerous deals to close using identical frameworks. ln the case of HB 4079 projects, the City will ensure that deed restriction language guaranteeing affordability is in place for each of the affordable parcels, as well as in each of the submarket rate parcels, for a minimum of 50 years. Management of Site and Adjacent Uses Describe how the City will enforce the prohibition on vacation and short term rentals on the site (see OAR 550-039- 0070(6)). A code amendment has been drafted to specifically prohibit short term rentals in the East Bend subdivision. This code amendment will be adopted concurrently with annexation. All short term rentals in the City of Bend are required to obtain a land use permit and an operating license. As part of the application process, staff will determine whether a property is prohibited from obtaining the land use permit based on the code restriction forthe HB 4079 lands, and will not process an application for a short term rental in this a rea. Describe buffering from adjacent and nearby farm and forest uses on lands zoned for farm and forest use (see OAR 660-039-0050 for requirements), and any impacts on adjacent farm and forest practices, and impact on fire protection, if adjacent to forest practices. The buffer will be comprised primarily of natural vegetation and features, ln portions of the buffer, subject to LCDC's approval, community gardens will be created and irrigated to provide additional transition between the pilot site and the land to the East. Describe how any Goal 5 or Goal 7 requirements will be met (see OAR 660-039-0050 for requirements; show locations on concept map in Section 5). FINDING: Goal 5 requires cities in Oregon to protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. For the purpose of preparing this findings, the City takes official notice of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan, including its Goal 5 inventories, available for review online at http://www.deschutes.orelsites/default/files/fileattachments/communitv development/paee/11797lcomprehensiv e plan all chapters.pdf. Page 14 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend ThesitehasonepotentialGoal5resource:anirrigationpondlocatedinthesouthwestquarterofthesite. Asshown on the site plan, the development proposed under HB 4079 is focused to the northwest quarter and east half of the site. The potential wetland is an irrigation pond with water from a Central Oregon lrrigation District (COID) canal. The site has no identified historic resources located on it per the County's inventory of Historic Resources (See County's Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5, Section 5.9). The site has no Goal 5 surface mining resources per the County's inventory of mineral and aggregate resources (See County's Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5, Section 5.S). The site itself is not on the County's inventory of significant mineral and aggregate resources. The site also is not located within or has any area identified as Goal 5 wildlife habitat (See Deschutes County Combining Zone map, available online at https://weblink.deschutes.orelpublic/O/doc/5454/Paee1.aspx. With respect to the potential Goal 5 wetland resource, the proposed development will be focused to the northwestern quarter and eastern half of the site that will provide a sufficient buffer to prevent any impacts of the development on this wetland. Based on this finding, the City concludes that the proposal will be consistent with Goal 5. compf iance with Statewide Planning Goal7, Areas subject to Natural Hazards FINDING: Goal 7 requires cities to protect people and property from natural hazards, For the purpose of addressing this finding, the City takes official notice of the County's Comprehensive Plan, available online at the address cited under the previous finding. Section 3.5, Natural Hazards, of Chapter 3, Rural Growth Management. The site is not located within a Flood Plain Zone, either partially or entirely, according to the County's Zoning Map: https://weblink.deschutes.orelpublic/O/doc/89598/Paee1.aspx. The site is also not located within a mapped floodplain that is identified on one of the National Flood lnsurance Program maps. The site has no inventoried and mapped natural hazards that have been incorporated in the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan. Section 3 - Housing Measures Adopted by City For measures you have adopted, insert a web link to the pertinent parts of your city's code and the number of points you are claiming. Cities must have adopted measures totaling at least 3 points of affordable housing measures, and at least 12 points overall. Cities may apply for up to 6 points of credit for alternative measures. Affordable Housing Measures refer to OAR 660-039-0060(3)(a) for details NOTE: City of Bend is in process of code changes moving affordable housing measures to a different section of the code. ln case this presents challenges for reviewers, the code amendments are attached for review as Attachment 5 Page 15 of 30 Measure Citation and Link(s) to Code or Documentation Points Claimed Density Bonus (max 3 points) 3 points - Density bonus of at least 2O%o, no additional design review 1 point - Density bonus with additional design review BDC 2.1.600 and 3.6.200(C) http ://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Bend/?BendDCNT.html 3 Systems Development Charges (max 3 points) 3 points - At least 75% reduction on SDCs for affordable housing 1" point - Defer SDCs to date of occupancy for affordable housing BDC 12.10.120 (C) http ://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Bend/?BendDCNT.html 3 Property Tax Exemptions 3 points - Property tax exemption for low income housing 3 points - Property tax exemption for non-profit corp. low income housing 3 points - Property tax exemption for multi-unit housing Multi-unit housing exemption: Bend Resolttion2436, adopted 2003 Link to recent resolution: http ://bend.granicus.com/MediaPlaver.php?view id:9&clip id:420&meta id:22331 3 Other Property Tax Exemptions lFreeze 1 point - Property tax exemption for housing in distressed areas 1 point - Property tax freezes for rehabilitated housing Note: Rehabilitated housing freezes are scheduled for adoption in fall, 2018. No resolution has been adopted to date. lnclusionary Zoning 3 points - Code imposing inclusionary zoning Construction Excise Tax 3 points - Code imposing construction excise tax Bend Code 9.40.010 - 9.40.050 http ://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Bend/?BendDCNT.htmt 3 Total Points Claimed for Affordable Housing Measures (must be at least 3) t2 HB 4079 Application Needed Housing Measures refer to OAR 660-039-0060(3)(b) for details City Name: Bend Page 16 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend Measure Citation and Link(s) to Code or Documentation Points Claimed Accessory Dwelling Units (max 3 points) 3 points - ADUs allowed in any zone without many constraints 1- point - ADUs with more constraints BDC2.t.200 and BDC 3.6.200(8) http ://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Bend/?BendDCNT.htmt 3 Minimum Density Standard (max 3 points) 3 points - Minimum density standard at leastT0% of maximum 1 point - Minimum density standard at least 50% of maximum Limitations on Low Density Housing Types 3 points - No more than 25% of residences in medium density to be detached L point - No detached residences in high density zones 1- point - Maximum lots for detached homes medium/high zones <5,000 sq ft BDC Table 2.1.200 http ://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Bend/?BendDCNT.html L Mu ltifamily Off-street Parking Requirements (max 3 points) 3 points - s1 parking space/unit for multi- unit dwelling and <0.75 spaces/unit for units within one-quarter mile of high frequency transit 1 point - < 1 parking space/unit in multi- unit dwellings BDC Table 3.3.300 http ://www.codepublishing.com/OVBend/?BendDCNT.htmt 3 Under Four Unit Off-street Parking Requirements 1 point - < 1 space/unit required for detached, attached, duplex, triplexes Duplex and Triplex if only 1 bedroom units Table 3.3.300 L Amount of High Density Zoning Districts (max 3 points) 3 points - At least L5% of all residential land is zoned for high density 1 point - At least 8% of all residential land is zoned for high density Duplexes in Low Density Zones (max 3 points) 3 points - Duplexes are allowed in low density zones 1- point - Duplexes are allowed on corner lots in low density zones BDC Table 2.1.200 3 Page 17 of 30 Attached Units Allowed in low Density Zones 1 point - Attached residential units allowed in low density zones Townhomes are allowed in RS Table 2.1.200 ! Residential Street Standards 3 points - Allowed minimum local residential street width 28 feet or less BDC 3.4.200, Table D 3 HB 4079 Application Needed Housi n g M ed su res, co nti n ued Alternative measures promoting needed or affordable housing per OAR 660-039-0060{2) City Name: Bend Mixed-Use Housing 3 points - At least 50% of commercial zoned land allows residentia I All of the commercial zoned lands allow mixed use; BDC 2.2.200; BDC 2.3.200 3 Low Density Residential Flexible Lot Sizes 1 point - Minimum lot size in low density zones is 25%+ less than the minimum lot size corresponding to maximum density Cottage Housing 1 point - Allows cottage housing BDC 4.5.600 L Vertical Housing 1 point - Allows vertical housing Note: Vertical housing is scheduled for adoption in fa11,2018. No resolution has been adopted to date. Total Points Claimed for Needed Housing Measures Measure Citation and Link(s) to Code or Documentation Points Claimed Describe Measure(s): Encouraging a greater mix and diversity of housing through master planning larger properties. 2.1.1000.C. Housing Mix Standards in the RM District. ln order to ensure a mix of housing types that meets the City's overall housing needs, in addition to minimum and maximum density standards in BDC 2.1.600, at least 50 percent of the total housing units in residential developments on any property or combination of properties between three acres and 20 acres in the RM District shall be 3 Page 18 of 30 two- and three-family housing, attached single-family townhomes, andf or multifamily residential housing units. The standards of BDC 4.5.200(E) apply to properties of 20 acres in size and greater. Describe Measure(s): Suplus city owned property for development of affordable housing. 1.50.040: City Surplus Lot for affordable housing. When appropriate, City of Bend surpluses City-owned property through a competitive RFP process, for the price the City paid for the lot and associated expenditures. 3 HB 4079 Application Total Points Claimed Section 4 - Development Team City Name: Bend Affordable (at least 3)12 Needed 19 Alternative (up to 6)6 Total (must be at least 12)37 Development Team Members City Name (Applicant) Bend Contact Person (Name and Title) Carolyn Eagan Property Owner(s) Porter and Kelly Burns Landholdings LLC Contact Person (Name and Title) Jim Yozamp- Partner Contact Phone 54I-693-2L30 Contact E-Mail ceaga n @ bendoregon.gov Contact Phone s41.-408-0824 Contact E-Mail jimy@ pacwesthomes.com Page 19 of 30 HB 4079 Application Developer(s) Pacwest Builders LLC Contact Person (Name and Title) Jim Yozamp - Owner Spencer Williams - Architect Contractor(s) Pacwest Builders LLC Contact Person (Name and Title) Jim Yozamp - Owner Project Owner (rental portion/post-completion) Housing Works and Market rate - TBD Contact Person (Name and Title) Keith Wooden, Real Estate & Facilities Director (Housing Works) Property Manager (post-completion) Epic Property (Housing Works)-affordable homes Market rate TBD Contact Person (Name and Title) David Brandt (Housing Works) Market rate TBD Other Role {describe} Legal Counsel Contact Person (Name and Title) Bill Hopp -- Attorney Other Role (describe) Engineering Contact Person (Name and Title) Matt Brown City Name: Bend Contact Phone 54r-408-0824 Contact E-Mail iimv@ pacwesthomes.com spencerw@ pacwesthomes,com Contact Phone 541.-408-0824 Contact E-Mail jimy@ pacwesthomes.com Contact Phone 54t-323-7 412 ( Keith Wooden-- Housing Works) 541-408-08 24 (Jim Yoza m p) Contact E-Mail kwooden @ housins-wo rks.org i imv@ pacwesthomes.com Contact Phone 541,-923-7018 - Housing Works Contact E-Mail dbra ndt@ housi ng-works.ors Contact Phone 541-388-3605 Contact E-Mail Bill@cwhopp.com Contact Phone 54L-408-0824 Contact E-Mail mattb@ pacwesthomes.com Page 20 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend Development Team Capacity 1' Listthe most recent projects (a maximum of ten) undertaken by membersof the developmentteam (it is not expected the complete team will have worked on a project together). Project Name Name of Development Team Member and Role in Project Project Description (sale/rent, target population, affordable/market, etc). Status (e.g. occupied, constructed, permitted, terminated) American Lane Jim Yozamp - Team Leader Commercial development in Bend involving numerous building developed in phases. Some occupied, some under construction River Canyon Estates Matt Brown - Owners Rep/prev. licensed civil engineer 450 market lot - 90 acre residential development Constructed Tetherow Matt Brown - Owners Rep/prev. licensed civil engineer 200 lot market resort development outside Bend City limits Constructed Longhorn Ridge Phases 2&3 Jim Yozamp - Team Leader Took over the last two phases of a market rate residential development in Prineville, OR Constructed Powers-Blakely Duplexes Jim Yozamp - Team Leader Multi-family duplex project in Bend, OR Constructed Moonlight - Daggett Townhomes Keith Wooden - Real Estate Director 53 units of phased affordable family housing in Bend. Developed in partnership with City of Bend.Constructed Village Meadows Keith Wooden-Real Estate Director 42 affordable housing units in La Pine and 48 affordable units in Sisters plus amenities. Both developments include a variety of unit types. City of Bend provided limited partnership for environmental review. Under Construction Page 21" of 30 Putnam Pointe Keith Wooden-Real Estate Director 5 story mixed use development in Bend developed by Housing Works in partnership with City of Bend. Now houses the Visitor's Center and serves as an anchor to Bend's downtown.Completed HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend 2. ls there any aspect of any member of the Development Team's financial condition that would indicate any adverse conditions that might materially impair the completion of the pilot project? No. 3' Has the City or designated Development Team Lead managed similarly comprised development teams? Explain Yes. The City of Bend has chosen to partner with private and quasi-governmental entities to complete the development. The private development team will be led by Jim Yozamp, owner of Pacwest Builders, The Housing Works team will be led by Keith Wooden, Real Estate Director. Both have extensive experience with comparable projects and are highly regarded in Central Oregon and across the state for their varied experience and ability to move projects to completion. Housing Works is arguably the most accomplished Regional Housing Authority in the Northwest. ln addition to assisting over 2000 households annually in finding housing, they manage a real estate portfolio valued at over $70 million with over 900 units of housing at 27 scattered sites throughout Central Oregon. Housing Works and City of Bend have a long history of collaboration, including surplus land development, financing single family and multi-family construction, condominium and mixed use construction, tax credit properties, and participation on the City's various committees including the Residential Technical Advisory Committee during the most recent UGB expansion, the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and Citywide Transportation Advisory Committee. Pacwest Builders is a design/build residential and commercial contractor led by Jim Yozamp. pacwest has in house team members with experience developing large residential developments, commercial projects, and in-house architecture. Pacwest has approximately 3 other master planned communities or commercial centers of similar scope and scale that have been completed or are in process. Members of the Pacwest team have been involved in a wide variety of similarly scoped projects including Tetherow, River Canyon Estates, and a wide variety of custom homes, commercial centers, and multi-family properties. Pacwest is one of the most accomplished and respected builders in Central Oregon, regularly selected for "best of' awards at the annual Central Oregon Builder's Association Tour of Homes. 4. Explain the Development Team's experience with projects of this type, scale and scope. lf the team's experience is limited, explain how other partners will be engaged to mitigate the limitation. The development teams in place and committed to this neighborhood have vast experience building both affordable and custom luxury homes, commercial areas, large resorts, market rate multi-family, and nearly everything in Page 22 of 30 HB 4079 Application city Name: Bend between. The development team will be providing housing based both on a solid framework of experience as well as some pilot methods that can help inform Bend's housing policy for many years. Additionally, City of Bend has in place a wide variety of policy tools and practices to help streamline the development of affordable housing and to ensure that the housing is provided as efficiently as possible. The availability of construction financing, expedited permitting, a staff experienced with large scale master planning and annexation, and the intricacies of affordable housing finance at the state and federal level, ensure that this development has the best advantage available. All teams have solid history of development of similar or greater size and scope. City of Bend has 4 - 5 master planned projects of similar size in planning or development currently. We are also undertaking annexations of larger areas through the traditional UGB expansion process at this time. Within the past 6 months, City of Bend has permitted the Oregon State University Cascades master plan, expected to serve 5000 students, as well as the St. Charles Hospital System expansion. Pacwest has been involved in similar and larger developments of both residential and commercial properties, including Tetherow, Longhorn Ridge, River Canyon Estates, and the Powers-Blakely Duplexes. These projects include single family, multi family, commercial, and more. Housing Works has a history of similar developments throughout Central Oregon, including the Moonlight-Daggett townhomes, Putnam pointe, the parks at East Lake, and Cook Crossing. Housing Works will be constructing multi-family for this pilot, though they have experience with mixed use, single family, and single family attached developments as well. Housing Works also manages Epic Properties, a non-profit property management company specializing in affordable housing. 5. Describe the Development Team's history of leading construction development projects of a similar or larger size and scope (such as single-family versus multi-family, new construction versus rehabilitative construction)? Describe. lf the team's experience is limited, explain how other partners will be engaged to mitigate the limitation. As mentioned previously, the development teams possess a strong skillset, grounded in extensive experience that is highly relevant. Both of the development teams, as well as the City of Bend, have great interest in seeing this pilot to completion with quality, integrity, and full compliance. We are thrilled for the opportunity to present this application to the Commission and hopefully, for the further opportunity to demonstrate the strength of a decade of public- private partnership in affordable housing in Bend. We hope this pilot will showcase what we have learned and help municipalities in Oregon overcome potential barriers to creating safe and stable housing opportunities for our residents. http://www. pacwesthom es.com/ https ://housi ns-wo rks.orsla bout/ Page 23 of 30 HB 4079 Application Section 5 - Project Need and Financing City Name: Bend Project Need Provide a one to two page narrative on how the pilot project will serve identified populations in need of affordable housing, including: (a) household cost burden in the region (as determined by HUD); (b) conversion of manufactured home parks in the region; and (c) availability of government-assisted housing in the region. Support the narrative with relevant data. The City of Bend is at a criticaljuncture in providing affordable housing to a rapidly growing population (L8% population growth between 2010 and 2Ot6). Using 2015 data, the City of Bend needs over 4,700 housing units for all households earning less than 80% of Area Median lncome (AMl), as shown in Exhibit 6. There are just over 37,300 households in the city. This means that nearly L3% of all households in Bend need housing that they can afford. ln addition housing needed for those households earning lower incomes, the housing need in Bend extends to households headed by adults younger than 25 years old and older than 65 years old and households that identify as being Hispanic' Moreover, the predominant single family residential development in Bend does not provide small housing units appropriate for our population's needs. We have too few studio apartments and one bedroom apartments. The unit mix in the pilot project development will help alleviate this shortage by providing a mix of unit sizes and types with a focus on attached single family and multi-family, two of the most needed types of housing in Bend today. This situation has worsened each year since 2015 as housing continues to be underbuilt and therefore rents and sale price increase in double digit percentage each year. The total need for units (that are not being built bythe public sector nor the private sector) combined with the demonstrated increase in cost-burdened households is the root of the affordable housing need. Page 24 of 30 HB 4079 Application Exhibit 6. Affordable Housing Costs and Units by lncome Level, Bend, 2015 }"i*urinq Av*ll;bie City Name: Bend I 5:.!i:i ::tL:, :I :Eri' !a :ie ii:' r': ra rri. ;r i !, -; ,l ,:!-:dtr:.1 {,.rt 'r.'r': i r a,r ,! e ri.,r.,:;. *i,.r : i r :.:r. l.-d LLrEi,.i :r ',r .a:: t, - .:? L.j ' Houring Drficit Loss t!:an s10.000 s?o,ffi s14.99? srs.ffi $24.999 975.t&ggp.lc9 tr+0.ffi s:4?.9!f s!s*.ttr o' r+fe t25.0& $3s,0m gSc.tro*4,9q7 549"999 574.?99 Household lncome Soruce: tiS Oensus Eureau. ACS 51ear estirndtes 201-1-?015. (a) Cost Burden The lack of housing units at the lowest income levels means that a greater number of households are cost-burdened because those households must pay more for housing than they can afford. Put another way, these households are spending 30% or more of their monthly household income to pay for housing, and competing for units with those earning between 60% - I25% of AMl. The situation is most dire for renters, in Deschutes County 27% of renters are severely cost burdened, spending over 5O% of their income on rent. 60% of all renters are cost burdened, spending more than 30% of their gross income on rent. Since 201L, according to the American Community Survey (ACS)there has been a steady increase in the number of cost burdened households at all income levels in Bend. (b) Conversion of manufactured home parks City of Bend implemented a manufactured home park closure ordinance in 2006 to ensure protection for some of our City's most vulnerable residents (Attachment 6). Due to this ordinance and later refinements, the closure of parks in the City went from 7 in the 2 years prior to the ordinance to 0 since the ordinance was passed. City of Bend additionally worked with CASA of Oregon in 2013 to assist with the conversion of the Century Drive mobile home park to resident ownership. This park is adjacent to the newly designated Oregon State University Cascades campus in one of the most desirable areas of the City. Residents of the park feared eviction due to potential private sale, and because of assistance from Bend's affordable housing fund as well as a partnership with CASA of Oregon, the park was converted to resident ownership. The City has recently undertaken an inventory process, in collaboration with Deschutes County, to ensure that we have updated information and inventory on each of the parks within our City. This information will help us be prepared for future events that could otherwise lead to displacement. (c) Availability of government assisted housing in region .2,t441,286 -/1 0 476-322 2,n, l,8|t Page 25 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend There are no publicly owned housing developments in Deschutes County. Therefore the City of Bend, since 2004, has been using deed restrictions and other means to hold privately developed housing (rental and owned) in the affordable supply of housing. Despite continued attention the dire affordable housing need, the need for government-assisted housing greatly exceeds the current supply, City of Bend has assisted in constructing or preserving over 900 units of deed restricted affordable housing, with approximately 180 additional units in the pipeline. Our newest efforts to continue to build affordable housing are through the disposition city-owned surplus property. But low cost land alone will not meet the need for government assisted housing. The City of Bend faces infrastructure costs of approximately SSOO- 400 million to make serviceable our newly approved UGB expansion areas. Recent federal requests for assistance have not been approved, and the State of Oregon does not have enough funds to cover that amount of infrastructure for one region. The State affordable housing funding is allocated in such a way that Bend is likely to receive funding for fewer than 50 units each year. Most of the state surplus properties that are available are required to be sold at fair market value, which limits the possibility that affordable housing can be built there in a time of great demand for land. ln short, Bend, along with many other jurisdictions, the demand for affordable housing that reduces cost burden on households vastly outstrips demand. Project Financing Provide a one to four page narrative and/or spreadsheet explaining the proposed sources and likelihood of project financing, including the extension of public facilities and services to the project. Project financing will be provided by a number of sources, some of which will not be final until the project has commenced. Additionally, financing will occur in phases as the project is built out. lnitial financing for the first phase of the project will be in the form of private equity from the developer, sale of premium lots and submarket rate homes, and the proceeds from the sale of certain lands to the Bend Parks and Recreation District. Phase 1of the project consists of constructing premium lots around the public park portion of the project as wellas constructing a correlating amount of submarket rate homes. lt is anticipated that the premium lots will have the greatest profit margins, and therefore provide adequate funding for subsequent phases of the project. Financing for the construction and sale of the premium lots will be provided by private equity and the proceeds from the sale of the park land. Construction of the submarket rate homes will be provided by private equity, the proceeds from the sale of the park land, and other sources mentioned below. Financing for subsequent phases of the project will come from proceeds of the sales of the premium lots and submarket rate homes constructed in Phase 1of the project. Park Sale: The project currently includes the development of a public park that will consist of two ponds, grass, and other improvements developed by the Bend Parks and Recreation District ("BPRD"). BPRD is going to purchase the land that will compose the park at a purchase price to be determined by an appraisal to be provided by a qualified appraiser. BPRD has committed to purchase the land for the public park. The remaining variable is the purchase price, Page 26 of 30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend Affordable Homes: Housing Works, as the regional housing authority for the Central Oregon region, has financed and developed over 900 affordablehousingunitsinourservicearea,withmorethan500ofthoselocatedwithintheCityofBend, Bydefinition, below market rate housing developments cannot be financed and constructed without public or charitable subsidy. Throughout its 40 year history, Housing Works has successfully accessed and utilized virtually every form of subsidy available for the development and operation of affordable housing. The affordable housing component of City of Bend Affordable Housing Pilot Program proposes to develop a minimum of 189 below market rate units which will be affordable to households with an average income no greater than 6O%of the Area Median lncome' The proposal is divided into three phases of 30 units, 66 units and 93 units. lt is assumed that the project sponsor will donate the finished lots where the affordable units will be constructed at zero or substantially below market cost. Each phase of affordable housing will be financed utilizing a combination of local and State/Federal sources of subsidy. For the larger phases, Housing Works will utilize 4% Low lncome Tax credits combined with Housing Works' own tax exempt bonds. ln combination with the 4% tax credits, Housing Works will request funds from the City of Bend's Affordable Housing Fee proceeds as well as SDC waivers. ln addition, Housing Works will apply for gap financing through the State of Oregon's GHAP (General Housing Account Program) which is funded with real estate document fees. With the recent increase in recording fees, the GHAP program is projected to expand substantially over the next three years, The 4% tax credit is considered "non-competitive" in that its typically available year around and not tied to a particular grant cycle. With the expansion of the GHAP program, it is expected to be more readily available for gap financing of 4% tax credit projects going forward. Finally, these developments produce enough operating income that they will also carry some amount of conventional mortgage and construction financing debt. These phases may also qualify for funding under the State's Local lnnovation and Fast Track program (LIFT)which could be available to subsidize the most affordable units within the phases. For the smaller phase, Housing Works may rely on the more competitive 9% Low lncome Tax Credit with smaller gap funding from GHAP, federal HOME program and/or Oregon Housing Tax Credit program, as wellas localsubsidies from the City of Bend. Housing Works is confident that the Bend's Affordable Housing Pilot Program proposal is well positioned to compete for these resources because of its strategic location and design characteristics. Developer: The developer will provide private financing as needed. The developer's financing will consist of private contributions, financing, and private equity contributions as appropriate. The amount of private financing is uncertain at this time for several reasons, the most obvious being that the purchase prices of the park land and potential availability and rates of construction financing. That said, the developer has access to significant capital and there should be no issues obtaining private financing as needed. Public Financing: Page27 of30 HB 4079 Application City Name: Bend Public Financing in the City of Bend may be available through the City's Affordable Housing Fund or Community Development Block Grant funds. Both are competitive processes and are not guaranteed, however, Housing Works has received funding from both sources previously and would be considered a competitive applicant. Page 28 of 30 HB 4079 Application city Name: Bend Section 6 - Concept Plan lMap Please attach the following in PDF format. 1. A map of the site 2. Current land use designations and zoning of site and surrounding land within a minimum half-mile radius 3. Generalized land uses and public facilities on the site, including: a. the number, type, and location of affordable housing units; b. the number, type, and location of market rate units, if any; c. the development phasing of the housing, and the entire project; d. the proposed network of streets and other transportation facilities designed to connect with existing street facilities and serve all modes of personal transportation, including mass transit; e. the location of parks, open space, and recreational facilities, if any; f. a map of public facilities, including sanitary sewers, domestic water, and fire protection; g. a topographic map showing any areas with slopes of greater than 25To, if any; h. buffering from adjacent and nearby farm and forest uses on farm and forest lands; and i. the location of any natural resources on the pilot project site requiring analysis and protection under Statewide Planning Goal 5, or mitigation of hazards under Statewide Planning Goal 7. @ CITY OF BEND B 4079 APPLIGATION SECTION 6 - CONCEPT PLAN/MAP 1. MAP OF THE SITE Location Map D 35.32 ACRE SITE @ CITY OF BEND Map of Site CITV OF BEND 2. CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING 17 Gity of Bend Gurrent Land Use Designations i-i=i:+' ta E] B eay t{fiil3 Utt{n Gierth Bq{ndnry - ToffiEiip LrnGi ' Soclio6 Linot - Rlikods E]] upn,tu nrnis ot Spocist tnh16il RiYcr Co{i{lor A.g.t. SFqcitl Pb!${d OirlriltE {.*, agjtiEit ft"r!HE!.s .:i iIg;Ci ] c*,.;*wrn:.a! {rtiiFrtrr.;:: :::rj-.j c* . cevr,eeclrir .jtf iEBu {i. - c{g-vFF:'at t!1r!tEt} ] cl - ec'wrn::it- \Er&-&:q*?r[' :.' i:i - :!:;:.Jslgral flFrFRtt 'r- . *.ls:91 t?itt llilrT I,F, r*{H.J$frqit piqr r€ l*.{F$tilFi+Yri[frt {a r*xEG('lE,?tBC{il =: *J . tltxt3 URE+I - lal . [+?(EF f{r.{'ri;{4Fi-€$ - Fr qJL:r:FlL;u1iE5 : F: - l+tn:Sig'3tlA: tit i: F0rlr{cs ItH ' ltE::!*tJlirL illte^! -,:;H t*f;*:a RL - RFS l 'lillll :-?!t:J !']r'd l?€115{Tr ntJ. ltiS Fti rlAl !+i1A\ t,Fii,'U tlF:;gl" B5 - nil :€Filrrt t:nAAir gttirFdE0 trE!,*rTy i&! ,iURrrCt tta,ti,s -sff :.lfl. RftpgfjrA]- *_rtrj8BA}{ Lt1.,tf:llssf Liif* . Lciuti ALbl Rtsie{E rirf *.r't r$ cqtti-I t tff! idi f i5, ut l;al* ,,' i, ;i : lta!.ufrcldtGd tldnlo Flfi 6i0rby ' U4fiF Bna!F*:;q-{ @r }lrf lx rlrr-prJ.d. @ CITY OF BEND Deschutes County Current Land Use Designations Layers TransparencY: 3516 i,j ,,, {.,'l il* !':i .. :,' ig,Transit Stalions r lcily Umits ;&+i Comprehensive Plan ;Zoning - Convenlional Housing tidlZonino - Limited Use *see Attachment 1, resolution changing zoning to MUA-10 R3'r' ; ' &- '.+- rl-.. .: :i t' .. a)':. Descfrules County GIS I -g{-F @ CITY OF BEND 3. GENERAL IZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIE S A. NUMBER, TYPE AND LOCATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS HIGHWAY 20 FUTURE CONNECTION TO OCONNC)R WAY DR NIT A. 30-60% AMI 185 Multi-family rental units 4 Manager units RIC,' ADMIN o ctg e{ GItlG' s ?ut(.t I @ CITY OF BEND 3. GENERALIZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES B. NUMBER, TYPE AND LOGATION OF MARKET RATE UNITS HIGHWAY 20 FUTURE CONNECTION TO OCONNOR WAY LIVINGSTON DR 3bA 81-120% AMt 137 Multi-family sub-market rate rental units 5 Manager units 38 Single-family attached units for sale Above 120%AMl 25 Single-family attached units for sale 3c-3.? R€C/ ADMIN .\!Tot, N at IJ6 CITV OF BEND 3. GENERALIZED LAND USE S AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 2D-3.r 3C-3.7 ito o o ol o 2B-3.6 3C.3.fi 2g-3-13 C. THE DEVELOPMENT PHASING OF THE HOUSING, AND ENTIREPROJECT HIGHWAY 20 FUTURE TO OCONNOR WAYt__ 1-7 ACRE PARCEL w/ OWNER TO BE DEVELOPED AS AFF I Phase 1 17'6 Acres '29 affordable units + 1 manager - 29 sub-market rate units + 1 manager - 25 premiumsingle-family attached units Start shortly after annexation is complete. The first phase would include the three story portion of the affordable housing that fronts Highway 20, the park,including the path that borders the canal, and the premium single-family tots ihat uact< up to the park space. Allproposed connections to existing streets and the pump station-sewer connection would be part of phase 1. Phase 2 9'6Acres-65affordable+1manager-15sub-marketrate+1manager-38single-familyattachedlots Start within 1B months of annexation. The second phase would build out the four story mixed-use part of the affordable housing as well as thestanda-rd single family lots. Also included would be over 23,000 sf of "Neighborhood Commercial,, on the mainfloor of the 4-story buildings. Phase 3 8.5 Acres - 91 affordagF. * 2 managers - 96 market rate + 3 managersStart within 1B month of Phase 2 completion. The third and final phase of development would include the market rate multi-family housing in the center of thelot as well as the southernmost portion of affordable housing on the East side of thL pioperty. @ CITY OF BEND 3. GENERALIZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES D. PROPOSED NETWORK OF STREETS AND OTHERTRANSPORTATION FACI LITIES HIGHWAY 20 IN-RIGHTOUT_.. €_.5,1 TO BEAR CREEK RD I Major Goltector B0' R.o.w. - 52'pavement width - B'pranter - 6'sidewarks (both sides)t Residential Local Multi-Family 60' R.o.w. - 32'pavement width - 7' pranter - 5'sid-ewarks (both sides) Residential Local Single Family 60'R.O.W. - 28' pavement width - 9'[lanter _ 5'sideilralks (both sides) Parking BUS STOP I uJJJ J Fz UJo -@luE FUTURE CONNECTION TOOCONNORWAY CITY OF BEND 3. GENERALIZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIE S E. LOCATION OF PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES HIGHWAY 20 FUTURE CONNECTION TOOCONNORWAY LIVINGSTON DR i .,:1'1..,i1:.i:-ji ! :::Park Phase 1 of the project would include the development of a 6 acre park that wouldencompass an existing pond and would follow the canal up the Western edge of theproperty. Within this overall park complex, a path would follow the canal serving as aconnection between existing trail systems and the "Big Sky Sports Complex" to-tne ruortnEast. This park would be open to all residents as well-as the community'as a whole. pEc/ _l I I I I I I I CITY OF BFND 3.G ENERALIZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FAGILITIES F. MAP OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 3,634.04'3,62S.35' 3,638.32' FUTURE CONNECTION -TO OCONNOR WAY cMH006514 3,841.2CI' (LlD) 3,637.36' (1NVERT) iDro;stF Fg) s,lo'ttto(Doz i]g) m€.)l{) F fv(\Il.)oooz GIol (o Fio <> BEAR CREEK RD r<r PreSSUre Sewer r{- Gravity Sewer HIGHWAY 20 E 1,029.8355 HCdt ttslit AGE FUMP STATION IPED TO CMHOO6514 625.28 r-r DomesticWater CITY OF BEND G. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING ANY AREAS WITH SLOPES OF GREATER THAN 25% "i**t .,?-.F. l it; -I\ :-* ta,J t..,1 F,1t:TJ 7 i)rtJririlEi l!({ F}tl ARI]EL.#f SAM J.JER T'T Ei FF. HOUSI .] tr ACRE I PED AS iLlt-ldtAr' ,638.3.: TU RE t:,3r'{ l,i EiTt il !.J OIJ.X.NHfiR fi'4 $J(Il tn it r Cril(-J(:J7 E5:.:0 D3E'11",,1 i^3:3 I €j:.:-bfur=a;'.. :r.EE, CITY OF BEND 3. GENERALIZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES H. BUFFERING FROM ADJACENT AND NEARBY FARM AND FOREST USES ON FARM AND FOREST LANDS HIGHWAY 20 FUTURE CONNECTION TO OCONNOR WAY 1,7 ACRE PARCEL w/ SAME OWNER TO BE DEVELOPED AS AFF- HOUSING- LIVINGSTON 2D-3.r 3A.3.2 3c-3.4 sdt a0d' ?A,3'q-?B-3.6 3C-3.7 qt ato(' q tl) o l? o.9 3c-3.n c;u 2B-3.r3 100' E.F.U. Buffer Since the property shares a common border with E.F.U. land to the East, a 100' wide buffer is to be provided for the full length of the property. Although this space will remain undeveloped per the terms of the program, the area could provide space for low-impact community gardens with raised beds, providing an area for residents of all ages from all walks of life and income level in the community to grow food, which is often not an option with medium-high density affordable housing. Creating an agricultural based community use area seems like an appropriate transitional space between the multi-family development and the E.F.U. area. @ CITY OF BEND 3. GENERAL IZED LAND USES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES I. LOCATION OF ANY NATURAL RESOURCES REQUIRING ANALYSIS AND PROTEGTION OR MITIGATION I Freshwater lrrigation Pond HB 4079 Application Section 7 - Supporting Documents Please attach the following in pDF format. Documentation the site does not include high-value farmland. (Attach the information submitted with youraccepted final pre-application, supplemented if necessary.) Draft language of amendments to the city's comprehensive plan and regulations that would be required toimplement the final application. A resolution of support adopted by the city stating if the pilot project is selected, the city will implement theconcept plan and annex the site within two years of an acknowledged Urban Growth Boundary amendment toinclude the site. 4. A resolution of support for the pilot project from the county government. 5' A resolution of support for the pilot project from any special district providing urban services to the site forsewer, water, fire protection, parks, recreation, streets and roads, or mass transit. 6' A signed and notarized statement from all owners of the site consenting to all aspects of the final applicationand agreeing to designation of the site as a pilot project. 7 ' A signed statement from all members of the development team, acknowledging their commitment toparticipate in the project. City Name: Bend 1.. 2 3 r r YYVg trVl ttrg!ggV tttl'ra ,gagV tqt !tatgarVr Zoning change for property EFU-TRB to MUA_I0 I,EGAL SEL Recorded in Deschutes CountY Nancy Blankenship, CountY Clerk Commlssloners' Journal cJ2017 -766 1110712017 1:59:46 PM ffi lllllilllllllllllllllllllllllll _ -,---o v !*r.ry vrrrJ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON An Ordinance Arnending Deschutes County Code * Title 18, the Deschutes County ZaningMap, to r< Change the Zone Designation on Certain properry * ORDINANCE NO. 20l Z_00gfrom Exclusive Farm Use (EFU-TRB) to Irauitipie * Use Agricultural (MUA-10) * WHEREAS, I(elly Porter Burns Landholdings, LLC applied for a zone change to the Deschutescounty code ("DCC). ^Title 18, zoning Map, to rezon" "",iuin property froff. pxclusive Farm use _Tumalo/Redrnond/Bend Subzone ("EFU-TRB"; to Multiple use Agricultural (,,MUA-10,,); and WHEREAS, after notice was given in accordance with applicable law, public hearing was held onseptember 27,2016 before the Deschutes county Hearings officer, and on November zz, 2016 the Hearingsofficer recommended approvar of the ptan Amendment and aZonechange; and WHEREAS, after notice was given in accordance with applicable law, a de novo public hearing washeld on June 5,2017 before the Board of county commissioners (;,board,,); ani WHEREAS, on this satne date, the Boald adopted ordinance 2017-007,amending DCC Title 23,thecounty comprehensive Plan, changing the plan designation of the property rrom -agriculture to RuralResidential Exception Area; and WHEREAS a change to the Deschutes counfy zoning Map is necessary to implement the arnendmentadopted in Ordinance 2017-007; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINSas follows: section l' AMENDMENT. Dcc Title_18, Zoning Map, is amended to change the zone designationfrom Exclusive Fann u.s3 !"!FIj") to Multiple.use Agricuiiural'1;'MuA-10") for certaTn properry depicted onthe map set forth as Exhibit "A," attached and incorpo-rated by reference herein, and described in Exhibit,,B,,,incorporated by reference herein. Section 2' FINDINGS. The Board adopts as it findings Exhibit "E," attached to ordinance 2017-007. Section 3' EMERGENCY' This ordinance being necessary for the preservation of the public peace,health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and trris ordinance takes effect on its passage. PAGE 1 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 2017.008 Dated this or NorcrrJ,xr.2017 ATTEST: Secretary Date of 1't Reading: I day of AJ,r,l*_rvr&rr*2017. Date of 2"d Reading: -Lauv or Ir)A unlyr ,2017 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUT'ES COUNTY, OREGON TAMMY ANTHONY DeBONE,Chair PHILIP Commissioner Commissioner Tammy Baney Anthony DeBone Philip G. Henderson )A Effective date day of Alaucrnlur , Record of Adoption VoteYes No Abstained Excused 2017 PAGE 2OF 2 - ORDINANCENO. 20I7.OO8 otr Ed.Utr0z NE HAMPTON LN F(.) UJtIa Uz zooIouUIF3 toUozuo;oe.cuz od.zoa Uz NE CORONA LN DR Legend -l_J Subject Property'17-12-35-OO-01500 Bend Urban Growth Boundary Zoning EFUTRB - Tumalo/Redmond/Bend Subzone MUAl0 - Multiple Use Agricultural i:l.tt: I unnto - UrbanArea Reserve 10Ac. Min. HWY 20 BEAR CREEK RD PROPOSED ZONING MAP Porter Kelly Burns Landholdings, LLC 21455 Highway 20, Bend Exhibit "A' to Ordinance 2017-OOB EFUTRB MUAIO BOARD OF COUNIY COMI/ISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON Tammy Baney, Chair Anthony DeBone, Vice-Chair Phil Henderson, Commissioner ATTEST RecordingSecretary Dated this LN otrftrz o o-aco c)oNI e)oooI(o I sf6t ctzo * g)<t(0 o.(! =ocoN @C'C)I o(\t ,=ttExIJJ co EGo(E I May 18,2O17 6.m UARIO Zone Ghange From EFU Tumalo/Redmond/Bend (EFUTRB) To Multiple Use Agricultural (MUA10). MUAlO EFUTRB UARIO \ Packet Pg.2O3 200 800 Effective 6.n LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARC'EL OF LA}iD BEING A FORTION OF THE SOL:THIVEST ONE.QUARTER OF THE SOLITHEASTONE.QT:ARTER iSWl# SEI,J.U OF SECTION 35. TOI\{VSHIP I? SOLJTH. RA*\GE I.] EAST OF THEWILLAT'IETTE I'!ERIDL{\ BEI}fc i\,IoRE PARTICULARLYDESCRIBED As FoLLo\\,s: COT\.I}.IE}ICT}IG AT THE SOUTHIVEST COR}TER OF THE SIVIJ{ OF THE SEIi'4 OF SECTIO}I 35. TI?S.RI:E. \v.]II-: THE}JCE I{OOE.[O'I.1''W _ JO.OO FEET ALONC THE 1VEST LNE Or SAID SWI,'-I SEI/.I TO THETRLIE POINT OF BEGt\\T:\i6 BErl\IG LOCATED ON THE }iORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-IVAY LI\-E FORBEAR CREEK ROAD: THE}ICE CONTINL'ING }fOO*40'I]''W - 690.?9 FEET ALO)JG THE WEST Li}i'E OFSAID SWII+ SEII.I TO A PONT LOC'ATED ON THE CL'RRNT CITY OF BEND URBAN GROWTHBOLi}fDARY LI}$E: THENC'E Nf,8'4?'IJ"E - 598.8? FEET ALONG SAID L?RBA}I GROWTH BOLNDARYLNE TO THE SOLTHERLY RIGHT.OF.IVAY LII{E FOR U,S. HI6H\VAY ]O: T}IENCE N89'50"I:*E _ IO3O.O8 FEET ALO}iG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT.OF-IVAY LI\.*€ TO THE EAST LIifE OF SAID S\1iI,/.ISEI''.I: THENCE SOO+38'I5"E _ I:]5.?.? FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID S1VI/4 SEII4 TO THE]iORTHERLY RIGHT'OF-WAY LFIE FoR BEAR CREEK ROAD: THE).i(:E Ns9c.lt.j.l..$r - tjl4,O.t FEET.{LO.\-G SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT.oF.WAY La.'E To THE TRL:E POINT oF BEGN]fNG. PARCEL CO).ITAINS APPROXIIVIATELY 35"3.:4 AC'RES STiBJECT TO ALL EASEIUE:\*TS. RESTRIC'TIONS.AND RIcHTS-oF-wir.Y oF RECORD pERTArliINc To THE AB()\T DESC.RIBED LA\:DS. Packet P9.204 rI6 GDoNI (Dcloc,I(o I ItN Gtz -9L ;sf(0 ooo6 (g EDo €ooa o(\to :=pgxIIJ co Eso(s Page 1 of 1 - EXI{IBIT "8" TO ORDTNANCE No. 20tZ-008 HB 4079 Pilot Program Pre-Application Background ln 20t6, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 4079 (HB 4079). HB 4O7g aims to boost affordable housing by allowing two cities to develop affordable and market rate housing on lands currently outside urban growth boundaries (UGBs) without going through the normal UGB expansion process. LCDC has adopted rules to implement HB 4079. The rules, a webinar explaining the program, and more materials are available at https://www.oreson.sov/LcD/Pases/H B4O79pi lotprosra m.aspx Please review the on-line materials carefully before completing this pre-application. lf you have questions, please contact us - we are eager to help you apply. To be eligible for the program, you must submit a pre-application. After receiving pre-applications, DLCD staff will contact each applicant to request any missing information and to provide advice on submitting a complete and competitive final application. The pre-application process is a chance for cities to indicate interest in the program and to obtain input from the Department. We understand proposals may change between the pre-application and full application. Note: At least 30% of the total proposed housing units must be affordable. Affordable housing units must be affordable to households earning no more than 80% of the area median income, or no more than 100% of area median income for spaces in manufactured dwelling parks. To Pre-Apply To pre-apply, fill out the form below and attach the three attachments listed on page 3, creating a single PDF. Submit that PDF to gordon.howard@state.or.us by 11:59 PM,@ November 1, 2017 (new deadline). Questions/Contact Gordon Howard Principal Urban Planner gordan.howard@state.or. us (9711673-0e64 HB 4079 Pilot Program Pre-Application - Poge 7 Pre-Application The answer fields will expand as you type; it is fine for this form to expand to multiple pages. Site City applying CITY OF BEND, OREGON (s41) 6e3-2130 ntact phone Carolyn Eagan, Economic Develo pment Department Director ntact person name and title @bendoregon.gov tact e-mail THE FOLLOWING TABLES LIST THE SITES AND OWNERS OF THESE SITES THAT THIS CITY IS CONSIDERINGIN A FINAL APPLICATION UNDER THIS PILOT PROGRAM. Table 1: Proposed sites with rocation, contact information, and pran designation/zoning Table 2: Property site data including size, water rights, soils, and presence of high value famland N 1 2 e 4 4 6 N 1 2 .3 4 5 b Sile umber Site umber General description of site location (attach site map) and name of site owner High value farmland when irrlgatod? Yes - 10 acres Nore Nore Nore None None Siie size (Acres) 35.32 36.65 't20 88.56 10 10 Name Address PorterKellyBurns/Pacwest 2.l45SHighway20 Central Oregon lnioation DistJict .61291 Ward Road 'CCCC LLC 62955,6285b Skvine Ranch RdEarlyBronco LLC 62385 HambyRoadPacwest 2j420HighwaV20 Always ldle Too Llc/Pacwest 62225 Hamby Road Map and Tax Lot # 1 7-1 2-35 TL 1500 18-'12-02 TL 1000 17-1 1-23 TL 503; 17-11-24-lL600,700 17-12-35 -rL 1200, 1201 17-12-35 TL 900 17-12-35TL 1202 Plan Designation/zoning Aqriculture/EFUTRB Aqriculture/EFUTRB Urban Area Reserve/Surface Mining (SM) Aqriculture/EFUTRB Urban Area Reserve/UAR1 0 Urban Area Reserve/UAR1 0 Map and Tax Lot# plan Designationzoning 17-12-35 TL 15OO Aqricutture/EFtjTRB18-1242fL rcOO Aqricutture/EFUTRB 17 -1'l-23 Tl 5O3i 17-t 1-24 TL 600, 700 Urban Area Reserve/Surface Mininq (S[4)17-12-35fL 1200,1201 Asricutture/EFUTRB 17-12-35 TL 900 Urban Area Reserve/UAR1o17-1245fLp02 UrbanArea Reserve/UAR1o Water Rights (Acres) '10 1.8 0 0 u.c 0 Soil Mapping U nits 36A. 58c 364, 58c 72C,157C 58C 364, 58c 58C Total acreage (must be 50 or less): See adjacent tables Final site will be 50 acres or less in size when proposed Project Housing units rf the City of Bend ts a lowed to move forwa rd W ith the pilot project,it WI work co a bo tive ly withaffordablra e housrng providers and the and owne to meet or exceed the m ntm um densiti of 7 unitswithes peracre30percentbengaffordable.The precise I nd use mtx nd n um ber of tota a nd fford bitsaa eunsnotknownnOWbutthecityhASpreparedmatflxofdifferentlandusemtxesWhchconsisterentWiththeoveralpolicydirectionprovidednChapter11(Growth M nagement)of theComprehensivePlan The m atIIX il ustrates that a WI de VAriety of I nd use destgn ations a plied to a 50-a ite develpcres ped aScompletecommunitv"wh ich blend lower,med um,a nd h rgh density plan designat ons with sma I s excee d the m tntmum re q u rementsmountsofcommercialandopnpacewilmeetandmoreikely, a HB 4079 Pilot Program pre-Application - poge 2 Th e mtnt mum dens itv ra nges of 7 u nits per gross acre with a m ntm um of 30%affo rda bte can be met orexceededwitharangeofntitlementoptionswiththeexceptionofaloWEr-dens itv tn le-fam ilvdodessgmnantsiteignconcept.Table 3 illustrates sIX differen t site develo nt dthepmescenarosan estimatesacreagesnnghts-of-way Res identta Sta nda rd RS Restdentia M d um RM t,ResidComrciat, e ntta Hieh (RH),me a nd open Space al totali ng 50 acres.The site co ncept ts briefly descn bed high lightoverasiteto theconcept 3 Use Table 4 details the anticipated minimum and maximum number of units of each scenario based onregulatory minimum and maximum densities of each plan designation. Table 4 sums these, calculatesaverages, and estimates the percentage of affordable units at Jifferent percentages between 30-40percent' Assuming the rule requires a minimum of 350 units (7-acre minimum density over 50 acres),and 105 affordable units (30% of total units), Table 4 demonsirates that all scenarios except scenario Awould exceed the minimums established through the pilot project. Small amounts of commercial usemay be desirable to serve the pilot project site depending on the exact location and its suitability forcommercial uses given the surrounding area both inside the current UGB and the pilot project site. lnaddition, the site will be subject to the city's Master Planning regulations, which require ten percent ofthe site to be in some form of public or private open space. Scenaio B o E RS UnilsMin Max74 13538 6932 5886 15760 11020 37 RM Units RH Unlts Min 59 67 74 111 Max '174 195 195 109 217 326 Min 65 174 27s '109 98 Max 't29 344 538 215 '194 aoq scenario Total Housing Unils Total Min HU Totat Max Hu199 438279 609371 791232 480292 s2o338 771 Avetage Scenaio HU Average Max/Min Jt6 444 581 356 376 554 Estimated Aflordable Units by % 300/0 '133 174 107 1't3 166 35% 111 155 203 132 194 40% 127 174 142 150 222 AwEqe Total UnitsAwEge Min. Unlts % Affordable Min. Units 7 Units/acre x50 acres 438 275 96 350 Awraqe Afordable: o/o Alfordable L,nits: 153 350/o 105 This initial approach to site planning is closely tied to the approach to the project. lf allowed to moveforward with an application, the city's approach will engage a number of property owners and affordablehousing providers to create a customized proposal to meet or exceed the minimum requirements, find a"sweet spot" between property owner and affordable housing provider financial constraints and desires,and address the context of the site itself and its location and zurrounding uses. what is clear from thisinitial entitlement testing in Table 2, is that blends of housing types represented through differentacreages of plan designations can exceed density and affordability minimums with the minimum level ofaffordability (30%l' This approach allows the city and its partners to "reverse engineer,, entitlement tomatch the financial and experiential strengths of different affordable housing providers while stillproducing a UGB expansion which has a variety of use types to enhance the surrounding area. Scenario A B c D E F Acres ROW 11 11 11 11 11 Plan RS 19 10 8 22 15 RM RH83989 1355105 Commercial 5 8 5 J 5 OpenSpace G/ossAcres Site Concept 5 5 E 5 5 50 50 50 50 50 Focus on single family and medium densily complete community on an equal blend of densities and commercial on a high densityand medium density on singlefamily,medium and hish density blendonsinglefamilyandmediumdensityhousing above data in Tables 3 and 4, along with response to previous question. benumrProposed nd of market ratetype ifunits,Estimany thewithated,nformation atknown this HB 4079 Pilot Program pre-Application _ poge 3 Potential development partner(s) Public facilities and services ame(sl of company and contact nformation for deve lopepartners,if known at this tim ( r(s),housing sponsors,and other projectepleasecontactpotentiapartnerspriortosubmittingth!s pre- opment partners who have been contacted and dnglefalydevelo expresse an interest tn thts proposa cover bothmpersandmulti-famtly devel Thrkh ope rs.e m u Iti-fam ilv developers that would pote tailWOwittheCityonthtsprojectaretwoexperienced,nt v h done knowledgeable nd s uccessfu orga ntzations hoavemultipleaffordablehousingprojects,incl dtng W develope u tax credit fu nded projects.These tworsarePacificCrestAffordableHousItrg,and CenH ou tra Orego n Regio na Housrng Auth ority,dbaoustngWorks Both of these entities a lso have expe flence withworkedh single familv development,as do two other developewitextensivelynthepast,ildi P rs WEungartnersforAffordableHousndBendrHumanityTheselasttwohavedng,a Area Ha bitatoneseveralsubdtvlstondevelopmentsnrtnershipofstnglefamilvhomeh pa with the City forownersrpopportunittesforworkingfames.B ildingrdbleHousinghasalrkedU Partn rs forsoWOextensivelyonprojectsWherethprovidenfrastructureandtheactualbitdi ey the la nd and theungottheWOrkforcetargetedhousestsdbyoneprivatehomebuitders.of these partn rs have expressed an nterest fa mil n WO rktng with the city on this project,and iltarwiththeconceptofmixed-i nco lkabl a re VErYmeWAandnclustveneighborhoods. following lists the public facility providers for the areas the city is considering for this UGB proposal7' Fire protection: Deschutes county Fire protection District No. 22. Streets: City of Bend and Deschutes County3. Transit: Cascades East Transit4. Domestic Water: Avion Water Company or City of Bend5. Sanitary Sewer: City of Bend6. Parks and Recreation: Bend parks and Recreation District water, n how thebriefly pilot site willproject be withprovided blicpu andfacilities services,streets fireprotection,and includingmassroads,transit,domestic san itary sewers,a dnparks,recreation Iistandprovidersanyspeciawhdistrictsowouldeprovidservice nty; fY, essit 42,1-,na 6d5,rea due east of aBend dn ab thut Bende UG The srea ud easte Bof nd reathFiree reaalnProtectioDidystrictNo(See 1 above nd ithW n the se cervt reaa of the ionAv WaternCompaNo.v (See Streets41.ud east Bof nde are nude ther sdjurictio ofn eschD utes Cou thethattm CitynytsprovementtoehesdroaWIsbilnesethngdsroautorbannstards.da eseThsta droandardsreafoundncha3rof,4pte het dBen Develo mentp Code rd seweRegangr collectio a EWnwern,interce r lne tspto under constructio n tn 27th street nea sBend'rneaste bounda a dn has been HB 4079 Pilot program pre_Applicotion _ page 4 ed to maccom ateod het ectedexp hgrowt n east end and In th osen areasRston.expa rd ncegarksrecentlyludedingpanad tn the UGrecreat Bthron,e reas east ofcRe Bendreatio are anDlreistrict.withtnady th eCascadesEast Bend PTransarks naitcddET)provi tes nsraitrtpa servicofCET'as 7th25Routeslong Street6and tn wh ichBend,ts owever, rvice; 3ite is oocatedn the west st ed of Be dn nad abuts the aCityls tssittselongalso western and noocated rtwithihernn boundathe ries.bounda of thery Frre P nrotectio Distrprovided ct Athe teWArbyofnyCitynBed service uWOwater btdservtcescurrentnotlyavalalebitantothesewersite.rY to Ththisarea alsoCETCity dproviesidesprovtransitservlcetontCehralrouhRogutesOregon3Communind2LCoWhtyichtharelegeeroutescocc)closest to the cccc LLcespropertiarenota properties Hbua thetting ccccofsegmentliShevPanRrkadowhichareaMtatashdysenWashinservigtocehWDrivecuichisrrentlyapproximateloenmvilsohutnadeastofSite3 Attachments - prease attach the fotowing documents in pDF form 1. Map of site : ilil;ili:::l:]t"o use designations and zoning of site and surrounding rand within a minimum3 fi;r"lfi;ffi:|,'::,:::ffiJi:gj:i:'*"TiililT,:, that the site does not inc,udeshould vou require assistance with ihis documentad;;;*,il:tlable on Qleeo-[..rExpJsrer This should include:a' A soils map from the usDA Natural Resources conservation service or Soirs conservation serviceand corresponding soils capabilitfcrarr. rnrorr.iio-n-'tr", *" web soils survey should not besubmitted unress maps puotisnei oeror" o"cemi,"i r,' ,iirare unavailabre.b' lf outside the willamettl utr[u,i".u.mentation the rand dqes,not incrude land growing specifiedperennials in the most recent aeriar_photog'oh;;;;;;grrcurturar stabirization andconservatiox service of the UniteJr,r* o"l"r;;:il:iirricurture taken prior to oecember s,2007' specified perennialt ,'""niitto'e grown for market or research purposes incruding, but llt j I[g;il:',",'J,:t:::,i""#:;'' rruits, ,,,,, .i,,,i'., .,"", or vineyardsi,i'"* incrudingc. lf west of th, conjunction y,,r, q:Ji[l,lXl|i1l31:;:?::r11,T on whetherthe tract was used ind '?[ffi::;T1";::ii:i;ii;11f.#ffi; illl,,"" rarm use zone or mixed rarm and(A) Within the place of use for'a',irrr"a ov tiJ;;;="r"J;ff'ilHil[icate or decree for the use of water ror irrigation(B) wittrin the boundarie, or a-listrict, as defined in oRS 540.505; or(c) wittrin the boundaries of a Jiting oistrict r".r"o ,"aer oRS chapter 55L.e' Documentation the rand contains tess tiran rive .;";;;.;;;; in wine grapes.t ffi;T""$:l:t tn" rtna it noiin ,i""".turiu" rr* ur! ron-" r. "n erevation between 200 andbetween.","'J;Jiu';"',";fi:::il,:H:j'ffill**"* tt t and 2e2 5 a"s.";.;a a srope(A) The southern oregon uiti.uttur.t area as described in 27 c.F.R. g.L7g;(B) The Umpqua Va,ey viticurtrr.r rr", as described in 2.7 c.F.R.9.g9; or(c) The Wi'amette vaitey viticJti-rrl ,rea ", d;r;ri;;; in r, ,.r.^. r.no.c' ffiT::l:lilffi il',;::l ff;"",'.,,'iu" r",m ,,J.*" ,"0 no more than 3,000 reet above15 percent, and located within: rn 67'5 and 292'5 degrees and a slope b"*;; zero and HB 4079 pitot program pre_Apptication _ poge s (A) The portion of the columbia Gorge viticultural area as described in 27 c.F.R.g.178 that iswithin the State of Oregon; (B) The Rogue Vailey viticurturar area as described in 27 C,F.R.9.132;(c) The portion of the columbia Valley viticultural area as described in 27 c.F.R.9,74 that iswithin the State of Oregon; (D) The portion of the walla walla valley viticultural area as described in 27 c,F.R. 9.91 that iswithin the State of Oregon; or (E)The portion of the snake River Valley viticultural area as described in 27 c.F.R. 9.20g that iswithin the State of Oregon. 4.optionaI:Anyadditionalmaterialsrequiredfor(underthefull application)that you wish the Department to review at this ti;;;;;;te, local measuresadopted to encourage affordable and needed housing within its existing urban growthboundary. Response to #4 - Optional on october 13,20L7 the city of Bend responded to the Governor's Request for lnformation (RFl) onworkforce housing' Attached is the city of Bend response to that request. The attached documentoutlines the full extent of the efforts of the city of Bend to continue to invest in affordable housing andthe challenges that we face. HB 4079 Pilot Program pre-Applicotion _ page 6 EFUTRB @suit ot"porenliat site HIGH VALUE tr Transit Stop SOILS (if irrigated) r: ::::::r Transit Route E---T ZZn Zoning . . EFU - TUMALO /. . .. REDMOND / BEND SUBZONE URBAN AREA .:.]J':= RESERVE lOACRE Site Suitability Map 1 @ - Collections System i---l uce 36A JbtJ Transit Stop 3/4 Mile Buffer ECONOMIC DEVE LOPM ENT 0 1,000TaxlotsETMIN250500 Feet o Dale: 1012012017 : i:: R :j:..: ....: i .1' ::: ".. .'.:... ffiffim ::-::': T ii,'.r,',i1 srituot" Potentiar Site HIGH VALUE Ll Transit Stop SOILS (if irrigated) . Transit Route --. - Collections System i----i ucs 27A [."rl aon Zoning EFU - TUIVALO / REDI\/OND / BEND SUBZONE MULTIPLE IJSE AGRICULTURAL URBAN AREA RESERVE lOACRE O Site Suitability Map 2 368 Transit Stop 3/4 lvlile 'l 1,400 ECONON4tC D EVE LOPM ENTTaxlotsiles*n-Es Buffer MIN 350 700 Feet o Date. 1012012017 @ srit^ot.potenriat site HIGH VALUE I Transit Stop SOILS (if irrigated) - Transit Route - Collections System i---'i uoe l.''Flsoe EIJ',l#,stop 3/4 Mire Deschutes County Zoning f nuner- REsIDENIAL f sunrncE MtNtNG rHEslHfflfo"".MIN O 27A 36A Site Suitability Map 3 @ 1,000 ECONOMTC DEVELOPMENTTaxlots250500 Feet o Dale:1012012017 CITY OF BENDOctober 12,2017 Dear Governor Kate Brown, 710 NW WALL STREET PO Box 431 BEND, oR 97709 541-388-5505 TEL Relay Users Dial 7-1-1 541-385-6676 fax bendoregon. gov MAYOR Casey Roats MAYOR PRO TEM Sally Russell CITY COUNCILORS Justin Livingston Bill Moseley Bruce Abernethy Nathan Boddie Barb Campbell CITYMANAGER Eric King Attached you wiil find responses to your Request for rnformation (RFr) toassist.the Regional.solutions agencies to ne6iunJeistand theopportunities and obstacles to developing workforc" r,ousing. As you arefamiliar, the city of Bend has been d&ebping ;,oii; breaking affordabrehousing programs since we became a Huo initr"r.nt commun ig in2a04. we adopted oregon's first construction Excise Tax in 2oo6.since then, thecity has invested over g14 miilion in rocaily generated funds. Those locardollars have leveraged an additional $7TI\ii; St t"-;;d Federatfunds and!1ol4in private equity. unfortunately, even when combined with our HUDCDBG funding, this reverof funding is not;;dy ";;;irr ano the citycontinues to face an affordable holsing crisis. ' -"--iz The reasons for the affordabre housing crisis range from increasing randprices to the rack of an adequate num6er or ouiulis ano oevelopers withthe necessary experience and desire to construct rroio"ne housingprojects. These same issues read to a shortate oi*oikror"" housing. we believe we are uniquery positioned to.provide high quarity responses tothis RFI and to the up.coming nrn. ouroE.uou* or'*J"rience risted aboveis one reason. Mgre importanfly, ourAffordane Housi,ig prog* is housedin our Economic Deveropment oepart#;t. il;il;r'' coordination withemployers to meet the housing needs.of glgiqumniovu* is very high.Finally, workforce housing haibeen identifred ",l'iJp'irority of ourregional econom ic deveropment orga n ization rEbcdiJnd our roca reconomic advisory board, Bend Ec6nomic Deverofi;;iRouirory Board. we are pleased to provide this information and rook forward to respondingto the formalrequest for proposalwhen issued. Sincerely, 4 Casey Roats, Mayor CITY OF BEND WORKFORCE HOUSING INITIATIVE ResporrrsE To GoveRruoR's RFI ocToBER 13,2017 What is the workforce housing need in your community? The City of Bend is at a criticaljuncture in providing workforce housing to a rapidly growing population. The City of Bend needs 5,060 housing units for all households earning less than 125% of Area Median lncome (AMl). There are just over 37,300 households in the city. This meansthat nearly 14o/oof all households in Bend need housing that they can afford. The total need for units combined with the demonstrated increase in cost-burdened households is the root of the workforce housing need. ln early 2017 EcoNorthwest analyzed the number of units needed at each income level in Bend1. Using the most recently published data, EcoNorthwest determined that the City of Bend needs 4,738 housing units for households earning 60% of AMI or less. For households earning between 60% of AMI and 125o/o of AMl, the target income range for this initiative, the City of Bend is missing 322 housing units but because of the need at the lowest income level, the number of needed work force housing units is much larger. The lack of housing units at the lowest income levels means that a greater number ofhouseholds are cost-burdened because those households must pay more for housing than they can afford. Put another way, these households are spending 30o/o or more of their monthly household income to pay for housing, and competing for units with those earning between 60% - 125% of AMl. This greatly reduces the housing units available for households earning between 60% and 125o/o of AMl. Because of the demand for units at 125% and below, the provision of additional supply for households up to 125% will help filter units to lower incomes as well. Exhibit 6. Affordable Housing Costs and Units by lncome Level, Bend, 2015 ill:rr:ing Avai!;i:rir: tj-r. i.r rt.:1.: .: ..:; .;t-'-4! .,,!.1,, .!J 1"..-r:i,,,5'. -!! :..,:-::.: i.,:-r ;,. j;t cl{--!tE.*ii ri' :.':-.". ;r.':,o. rtl' e!lrr!:'tt :r ;.-. _;!-i'.,':t'=,: Houu'ng Dcftcit | *:.il :qlt :!.r l . ;..]11 it;::, : Less tlan 5!0.ff0$10.000 5!4.999 515.mS s?4,cai s25,oto $34.9!9 $35.{*- 5d?.9?9 5sC.'SC t74.9!9 tr?5.re* $99.9ct 51tr3C* *',5C.*g!99.99? *i r.r€ Household lncome Source. (lS Census BureaLr, A0S 5 year estimates 2011-201tr n':: 1,+i : .: -'f ':'! ''.' ; r' . . "?.1401,ZU .1i!2 2"nt 1.4, 1 See Landscape Report Bend 2030 (February 2017) ECONorthwest - City of Bend | 2 Further proving the need for additional units is the steadily increasing cost burden onhouseholds at all income levels in Bend. The most recent figures show that S7o/o of renters earning 125% of AMI or less and more than 52% of homeowners earning lessthan 125o AMI are cost burdened in Bend. This burden has increased steadily iince 2011 with the most dramatic increases at income levels of 80 - 125% AMl. The tabledisplays data from the American Community Survey (ACS) for Bend and shows theproportion of households, by household income, spending 30o/o or more of their income on housing costs. Housin Costs as a Perce of Household lncome, all Households in Bend source: American community survey, Table B25106for 2011 through 2016 The recent EcoNorthwest analysis confirms the analysis completed in the Housing Needs Analysis prepared in 2016 for the City of Bend's Urban Growth Boundary HUD MFlfor Bend MSA 1 627 21 076 $59,700 201 Total households (HH): Owne d HH: 33,939 17 30,413 36,093 2011 $65,500 2012 $ 66,400 2013 $59,700 2014 2015 $62,400 $59,400 32,379 20,434 33,526 19,829 37,021 21,592 Less than $20,000: 30 percent or more $20,000 to $34,999: 30 percent or more $35,000 to $49,999: 30 percent or more $50,000 to $74,999: 30 percent or more $75,000 ore more: 30 percent or more 1,574 87% 1,903 45% 3,242 48% 3,944 27% 7,170 19% 2,147 87% 2,465 59% 2,328 47% 5,007 36% 8,269 13% 2,169 83% 2,469 62% 1,409 42% 2,953 35% 7,562 7% 1,342 92% 1,915 56% 2,899 34% 3,671 28% 9,927 7% 1,536 1 00% 2,956 67% 2,377 47% 3,735 28% 10,024 7% Renter-occu 3, d HH: 16,106 13,786 1 697 15,007 111945 1 57% 4,109 24% 9,976 3% 82% 2,931 36% Less than $20,000: 30 percent or more $20,000 to $34,999: 30 percent or more $35,000 to $49,999: 30 percent or more $50,000 to $74,999: 30 percent or more $75,000 ore more: 3,026 97% 5,233 74% 1,704 27% 2,449 26% 2,685 5% 2,872 87% 3,022 81% 1,861 s6% 1,666 6% 1,997 7% 3,233 84% 3,859 71% 2,269 44% 1,900 8% 2,469 3% 2,909 97% 2,475 89% 3,794 35% 2,336 16% 2,552 17% 2,492 95% 3,178 84% 2,613 58% 2,552 35% 2,599 11% 89% 3,051 83% 4,420 20% 2,739 1s%30 or more 1,71 1 00% 2 City of Bend | 3 expansion2. The HNA showed that the City needed approximately 4,563 housing units for households earning less than 125% of AMl. As evidenced by the data, City of Bend has a great need for both rental and homeownership units for our workforce. What are the barriers to development in your community? The main barrier to development of work force housing in Bend is the need for capital. The current workforce housing crisis is market driven. The price of land and the attendant development costs (primarily infrastructure) that come with preparing that land for building is the major barrier. Other barriers to development in Bend include but are not limited to the rate of increase in demand for transportation, sewer and water infrastructure, increases in permit fees because the City does not have General Fund dollars to subsidize fees, and increases in labor costs. The increasing cost of building or replacing water, sewer and transportation infrastructure is not unique to Bend. However, the impact of the cost increase is felt more acutely for two reasons: the fast paced population growth and the recent Urban GroMh Boundary expansion. Fast paced population growth is explained in depth in the response below to the unique challenges question. One of the biggest obstacles to new development in the current UGB, with land already planned and zoned for housing, is sewer collection infrastructure. The City has several projects in process, including construction of a southeast interceptor (SEl) to provide capacity for collection and transport of waste water to the City's water reclamation facility (WRF). The City is working to update the sewer collection public facility plan in 2017 to include projects needed to serve those areas recently added to the UGB and to modify the design and the location of two interceptors to better serve the lands inside the Bend UGB. The same is true for streets, sidewalks, bike lanes and transit service. The City is working to update the Transportation System Plan in 2017 and 2018 to include projects needed to serve those developable areas inside the current UGB and areas recenfly added to the UGB. Anecdotally, a builder has stated that she would like to build a 1,300 square foot house for a median income/workforce housing family, but once the cost of land, permits, System Development Charges, and infrastructure are added in, she will lose money unless she builds at least a 1,700 square foot home that is targeted to incomes in the 150% lo 200o/o of AMl. 2 See Bend Housing Needs Analysis: Bend's Growth to 2028 (2016) Angelo Planning Group and City of Bend City of Bend | 4 The cost of providing and expanding water infrastructure is not affecting the costs ofbuilding in Bend at this time. The cost to provide additional sewer collection andtransportation capacity are affecting the costs of developing new housing. ls your community or organization ready to participate in a pilot program? Yes' We have dedicated staff and, m.ore importantly, political will from the Bend CityCouncil to pursue and implement a pilot program. The City of Bend has been preparing to participate in this pilot program since 2006when we adopted the State's first construction excise tax (Cfr;, oir Affordable HousingFee. Since 2006 the City has invested nearly $14M in locally generated funds to builddeed restricted affordable housing. These units are deed restricted for households withan income range from 60% of AMI to 100% of AMl. The City created the Affordable Housing Fee after it became a HUD entiflementcommunity in 2004_and quickly identified that federal housing and social service dollarsavailable through Community Development Block Grants lCbACy would not besufficient to address the identified housing need. The City has construction funding mechanisms in place to take some burden (and thecost of money) out of the equation for these types of development, but land costs andinfrastructure costs are a significant barrier. The City of Bend fras itre capacity in thelocal building community, and that community has a nistory of working with the City tocreate affordable home ownership units targeted to families at mediai income. Presently there al9 a dozen projects in the pipeline that will come to the city for eitherCDBG funds or Affordable Housing Fee funds in the next year or two. All of thoseprojects could immediately take advantage of additional Siate funds. This will allow usto use our local funds and locally allocated federal funds for even more projects. ltwould also allow projects to be built faster so that units are available for families in ashorter amount of time. What do you see as the unique challenges and opportunities related to workforcehousing in your area? ls your communlty already pursuing some solutions? Land and housing prices have been rising steadily in the last five years. Since 2012, themarket price of homes for sale in Bend has increased by an auerage of nearly 14o/o peryear3. The median sales price for a lot in Bend has increased by $iOt,OOO or 173%between 2nd quarter of 2012 and 2nd quarter of 2017a. ln addition, average rent for a 2-bedroom apartment in Bend has increased an average of 12o/o per year between 2013and 20165. 3 See page 5, Landscape Report Bend 2030 (2017) - www.bend2030.ore.4 See MLSCO Bend Area 2OL7-eZ available at www.coar.ors. s see Exhibit 2, Landscape Report Bend 2030 (zorz) - www.bendzogo.ore City of Bend | 5 One of the factors influencing the increase in housing and land prices is the recent rapidgrowth in Bend's population, as mentioned above as a barrier to development. After aslow down during the recent recession, population growth has picked up again. Overthe last six yeers, Bend's population has grown Oy S,t" and seen an increase of almost7,000 people6. Recent estimates from the Census Bureau indicate a more significantincrease in population, with Bend's population growing by 1g% over this surj periodT. Vo.9 recently, population growth has been increasing even faster. Between 2013 and2016, the population in AenO grew by 12.2% according to the Census. This is significantnot just due to the sheer number of new residents but-also because housing construction has not kept pace. Between 2013 and 2016, the city of Bend issued 3,792housing unit permits (multifamily and single family). That's just ah 11.2o/o increase inthe number of housing units. More importantly this slow paie of construction followsnearly four years of -no.multifamily housing unit construction in Bend. Thus, our pace ofgroMh plus years of minimal building leaves us far behind the demand. During this same time period, the City approved and adopted a variety of policy andcode changes to address the deteriorating housing situation. The City adopted multiple amendments to the Bend Development Code (BDC) to createmore opportunities for developing housing. The most recent update came alongside theUrban Growth Boundary adoption which allowed for denser development in sp6cificgeographic areas of Bend referred to as "Opportunity Areas," with ihe specific goal ofincreasing development, especially for workforce housing. ln addition to allowirig denserdevelopment in Opportunity Areas, the City Council adopled a number of changis tothe Residential Districts of the Bend Development Code to allow for more typeJ ofhousing, such as duplexes and triplexes in the City's Standard ResidentiarjnSy Zone.Before that update, at the request of the City's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, !!9 City changed the development code to allow for more Accessory Dwelling Units(ADUs), cottage developments, and created a density bonus. ln addition to the recent changes, the City of Bend has adopted every code changesuggested by the Department of Land Conservation and Developmeht tnat ttredepartment identified to encourage the development of a greatei number of housingunits. Last month, the City Council directed staff to review two more changes to thedevelopment code to allow duplexes, triptexes, and now fourplexes'in the City's RS,Standards ResidentialZone. ln addition, the City is considering a reduction in openspace for 20+ unit developments with the goal of allowing more multi-family units to bebuilt. This commitment to creating the environment for more units to be buiit is a result 6 see estimates of Bend's population from the Population Research center: https://www.pdx.edu/prclannual-population-estimates. 7 see census Bureau estimates of population through American Factfinder: https://factfi nder.census.eov/faces/nav/isf/paees/i ndex.xhtm l. City of Bend | 6 of changes made in 2016 that allowed cottage developments and instituted a densitybonus for housing developments that included affordable housing units. lf you drivethrough the intersection of Revere Ave and Wall Street in Bend today, you'll see anexample of a housing development that took advantage of the new density bonus, andprovides a for-profit developer the opportunity to construct 6 affordable units within themarket rate development. The City Council did not stop at creating a local fund, and adopting new development codes that encourage affordable housing. Over the last 24 months the Bend CiiyCouncil has donated 15 acres of city-owned tand to affordable housing development, adopted a System Development Charge deferral program for all multifamily complexesand created a System Development Charge exemption for deed restricted affordable housing units. Staff continue to work with City Council to identify more city-ownedparcels to be able to continue to donate land for deed restricted affordable housingprojects. The City of Bend will continue to develop and pursue new solutions and build upon existing programs. For example there are Neighborhood Stabilization program (ruSey funds available that we are waiting for OHCS to release, as soon as they ire availabie,we will use the funds as a loan to acquire land and then when the loan is repaid, usethose funds to create a new down payment assistance program. We continue to watch what other communities are doing to create employer assisted housing programs and hope to have funds dedicated to a new employer-assisted housing program in thecoming years. Are there identified project sites and developers working on feasibility? lfapplicable, provide financial analysis about funding gaps and provide lenderfeedback about the project(s). Yes. ln the City of Bend we have at least two annual RFP processes, one for our CDBGfunds and another for our local Affordable Housing Fee funds. Affordable Housingproviders and builders are aware of these two funding cycles and know that they willhappen each year. Therefore, there are always projects in the pipeline and developersworking on project feasibility. More recently the City has initiated two new RFP processes. The first is for SDC exemptions. The secold is for city-owned land donated for affordable housing units. As mentioned above, the Bend City Council has identified over 5 acres for affordible housing developments (in addition to the 15+ acres of city property dedicated toaffordable housing in last five years). ln our area affordable housing providers are currently putting together projects for these parcels. lf we are successful in obtaining funding through the Governor's RFI (or RFP), we expect to have developers ready to build in short order. We have very good relationships with local affordabie developers City of Bend | 7 and are successfully facilitating the entry of experienced for-profit developers in to the deed restricted affordable realm. Due to our historic funding cycles, strong relationships with developers, and our successful execution of RFP processes, the City of Bend could easily identify projects for funding that would be built in the next two years. The additional state funding would likely bring larger pieces of property into our affordable housing mix because developers could overcome the significant infrastructure costs. Release of the NSP fund (noted above) would add more funds available for infrastructure immediately. Finally, the City of Bend is preparing to submit a pre-application to DLCD for an UGB expansion under the HB 4079 pilot program that will create 30% of units on that property as affordable. Pending the success of that application, State funds and loans would be used to build infrastructure and housing on that UGB expansion. Related to financial analysis and funding gaps: no developer in Central Oregon has been able to construct affordable workforce units with only one source of funding (whether private investment, tax credits, or the City's funds). Our workforce communities require between 2 and 12 sources of funding. City of Bend routinely receives funding applications totaling exponentially more in requests than we can fund We believe additional capital is needed at nearly every stage of development, and that there is far more interest in building affordably than there is available funding. Many discussions with developers previously helped us identify that one of the largest needs is "first money in." Thus, we intentionally structured our Affordable Housing Fee to be flexible enough to provide capital at the stage each developer most needed-from concept to completion. Developers routinely tell us that our localfunding, and the flexibility it provides, is the critical piece allowing developments to move fonruard. How would you apply the draft tools to address workforce housing needs in a community in Oregon? Bend would use funding received either through grants or loans for the two most basic cost barriers to workforce housing: land acquisition and infrastructure costs. As an option Bend would use its localAffordable Housing Fee (Construction Excise Tax) to fund a portion of the actual construction costs. This is a proven method utilized on past projects that can reduce the cost of a house by up to $20,000 (our no- or low-interest loans take the cost of money out of the development). With land costs at zero and infrastructure costs covered, homes could be developed for just the cost of building, approximately $175,000 for three bedroom two bath 1500 square foot home, which would be affordable to families in the 80% AMI range and above - your defined income level for work force housing. a Who would you partner with? City of Bend | 8 As in past projects Bend would partner on single family units with local builders and our local Habitat for Humanity affiliate. For multi-family projects Bend would partner with the local housing authority, Housing Works, and local for profit affordable housing developers. City of Bend is fortunate to have an array of development partners: non- profit, public, and private, to help us meet our goals. What resources would you use to leverage the maximum state resources on the table? a To maximize funding, the City will leverage city owned property, an approved HB 4O7g UGB expansion, our federally allocated CDBG funds, our locally generated Affordable Housing Fee funds, and our SDC funds. lf additional leverage were needed to securegrants and loans from the Governor's Office, the Bend City Council would likely consider leveraging other sources of funding which include but would not be limited to our sewer and water utility rates and our permit fees. What other tools would be most helpful to you in addressing this initiative? Areyou aware of success stories in Oregon or other states? There are several tools that would assist with the funding and the construction of work force housing units in the City of Bend. The first few would make funds immediately available in Bend and many other communities to fund workforce housing developments and projects:o Eliminate the State portion of the Construction Excise Tax and remove the restrictions on how the money must be used so that local communities can invest their own money rather than sending a portion to the Stateo Direct OHCS to allocate the title fee funds that have been collected through a more open and transparent process and target funding collected from communities back to those communities. Direct OHCS to release its hold on the NSP program income funds so that local communities can invest those in affordable housing projects - which includes infrastructure and land acquisition The next few would make more land available for development of work force housing projects.o Develop a quicker process for agencies to surplus state owned property for workforce housing and reduction/waiver of costs associated with purchase of that propertyo Develop more State resources for major transportation, sewer, and water infrastructure projects. Continue to identify ways to increase flexibility for the LIFT program.. ldentify funds for a more robust statewide Housing Trust Fund like the one in Washington State City of Bend | 9 The remaining suggestions will bring more households into the home buying market, bring more builders and developers into the market and help communities have a better understanding of their workforce housing needs.. Create more State homebuyer assistance programs.o Certify every city in Oregon for the Mortgage Credit Certificate program. Contract with EcoNorthwest or other qualified entity to provide an abbreviated housing needs analysis for cities in Oregono Develop builder and developer incentives to participate in workforce housing projects such as an exemption or waiver of mandated building permits or tax incentives.o Reinvest homeownership bond proceeds in more loan and grant resources for first time buyers With Economic Development as a target of this initiative, how would you engage employers in addressing the workforce needs of their employees? How would the proposed housing project assist an employer in retaining jobs or creating jobs? The Bend Economic Development Advisory Board which advises the Bend City Council, listed "maintaining a talented workforce" as one of their top priorities for the next two years. The Board spoke with the City Council earlier this year and agreed with other city committees that housing is a top priority for employers in all industries in the City of Bend. We also had a large community discussion about housing led by Bend 2030. The Bend 2030 process considered employer sponsored housing. The idea has gained traction and it seems as though this conversation will continue to take shape over the next couple of months and years. To date we have had many employers inquire about housing for their employees. Many employers report that finding housing is a major barrier for recruiting new employees from out of the area. St. Charles Medical Systems, the region's hospital system, reports that they have difficulty recruiting for positions at all salary levels due to the availability and affordability of housing in Bend. lt is more difficult to recruit if not impossible for St. Charles' lower salaried positions. ln the past staff at the City of Bend have discussed home buyer assistance programs with our local school district and other larger employers. We will continue to have these discussions. Depending on the final Request for Proposal requirements, the grant money offered for workforce housing could be used for a revolving down payment assistance program. This would allow $1M in state grant to be used repeatedly as the down payment assistance is paid back over time. Every project that we build assists employers in Bend. From artists to teachers, employees are finding stable housing in the single family and apartment units that our partners build. The City of Bend only has 23 employers with more than 50 employees. Most have between 9 and 13 employees with a few exceptions. No traded sector City of Bend | 10 employer in Bend would have the capacity to take on an employer sponsored housing project which makes the public coordination of housing resources that much more imperative. Please provide any other insights you think would be helpful in crafting this RFP. With the 2016 adoption of the UGB expansion, the City adopted a number of changes to the Bend Comprehensive Plan. ln particular, the City adopted a housing mix for the planning period of 2014-2018 that included a significant increase in attached single family and multi-family housing. Going forward, the Council has allocated land to plan designations and zones so that 55% of future units can be single family detached, 10% will be single family attached, and 35% of future units can be multi-family attached. Using this housing mix, the City ensured that land was planned and zoned in the current UGB, in the Opportunity Areas, and in the UGB Expansion Areas so that more land was available for the development of single family attached and multi-family attached housing. City of Bend | 11 2. Draft of language of amendments to city's comprehensive plan Amend Chapter 11, Specific Expansion Area Polices. East Highway 20- HB 4079 Pilot Program Property: 11-132 This area is being added to the urban growth boundary under HB 4079 passed by the Oregon Legislature in 2016, which created a pilot program to provide an adequate supply of land within urban growth area boundaries dedicated to affordable housing, to encourage the development of affordable housing on such land and to protect land dedicated to affordable housing from conversion to other uses before or after the development of affordable housing. 11-133. ln 2018, the City nominated a pilot project on a site of approximately 35 acres, located on the eastern border of Bend's urban growth boundary, south of Highway 20 (21455 Highway 20), owned by private owners ("southern property" or "area"). The City of Bend's submission was selected by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. 11-134 Master planning is required for this area of approximately 35 acres. The master plan will also include an adjacent parcel of approximately 2 acres owned by the same LLC, which was previously included in the UGB in 2019 (See Policy 11-6a) through the 2014-2016 UGB Remand process. 11-135 The area shall provide for a mix of affordable and market rate housing units. The area is generally identified in Figure 1 1-4 [to be provided if selected]. The specific area identified in Figure 11-7 may provide for up to a total of 394 housing units, to include 189 affordable housing units (rental units or owner occupied housing units at B0% or less AMI as set forth below), 180 mid-range affordable units (80-120% of AMI), and 25 market rate units. The 189 affordable housing units and 180 mid-range affordable units must meeting the following: Affordable for the 189 affordable housing units means affordability as defined in Housing Policy 5-20. All the affordable and mid-range affordable units must have guarantees, in a form acceptable to the City, in place to ensure that affordable housing units will meet the affordability requirements for not less than 50 years and meet Housing Policy 5-21. . Planning and phasing requirements for the affordable and mid-range affordable housing units shall be established, in a form acceptable to the City 1 1-136 The master plan shall provide a mix of densities, transitioning from the lowest density (PF) to the highest (MN) from the SW to the NE corners of the property, in response to existing zoning patterns and to respond to solar access for the units. The residential plan densities should include approximately 8.5 acres of PF (Public o a Facilities), 23 gross acres of RM (Residential Urban Medium Density), and 3.5 gross acres of MN (Mixed Use Neighborhood). 11-137 The master plan shall include greenspace throughout the neighborhood to connect transportation linkages (streets, bikeways, sidewalks and paths) to nearby shopping, transit and employment areas. The master plan may allow a community garden subject to site plan approval. 11-138 The street, path and bikeway network shall provide connectivity through this area, connect to existing abutting local roads, and provide opportunities for connections to adjacent undeveloped land inside the UGB. The transportation network shall be consistent with the Bend Development Code, Chapter 4.7 and the City's Transportation System Plan. 1 1-139 ' The master plan may include approximately 6 acres for a community or neighborhood park site to be acquired and owned by the Bend Parks and Recreation District, which may include a large pond (as determined by the Parks District, the owner and COID) with trails, a seasonal restroom, and other park amenities and possibly parking, as further identified in the site plan, and developed during a public design process with the Parks District. The developer shall conduct any necessary wetland analysis under State Planning Goal 5 prior to annexation or development approval as required by the City. Coordination with Bend Park and Recreation district is required in order to address provision and ownership of parks andior trails within this area. All other irrigation district water rights must be removed and transferred from the property consistent with city code and Central Oregon lrrigation District policy. ' lf the pond is not able to be maintained as a park's feature and/or the acreage does not become a park, the approximate 6 acres may be developed consistent with the pilot project program, which requires a minimum of 30% affordable housing as set forth in Policy 11-135, and it will be zoned RM. 11-140 The master plan shall provide a 100' buffer the full length of the property from the adjacent EFU land, so long as adjacent land is zoned exclusive farm use, forest zone, or mixed farm and forest zone. This buffer may be developed if Deschutes County approves a plan amendment and zone change that changes the adjacent property from EFU to non-resource land. 11-141 Coordination with other special districts and utility providers is required within this area. 11-142 Consistent with the HB 4079 Pilot Program, which is aimed at boosting affordable housing by allowing cities to develop affordable and market rate housing on lands currently outside the UGB without going through the normal UGB expansion process, development shall be consistent with the Resolution adopted by the City Council to implement the program. 3. City of Bend Resolution of Support RESOLUTION NO. 3133 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF BHND'S APPLIGATION FOR A PILOT PROGRAM FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION FOR AFFORDABLE HOU$ING UNDER HB 4079 Findings A. The Oregon Legislature passed House Bill4079 in 2016, creating a pilot program to provide an adequate supply of land within urban growth boundaries that is dedicated to affordable housing, encourage the development of affordable housing on land dedication to affordable housing, and protect land dedicated to affordable housing from conversion to other uses before or after the development of affordable housing ('HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project"). B. The City of Bend nominated a pilot project ("Bend Pilot Project") on a site of approximately 35 acres, located on the eastern border of Bend's urban groMh boundary at21455 Highway 20, in Deschutes County, Oregon ("Bend Pilot Project Site"), owned by private owners. The Concept Plan for implementation of the Bend Pilot Project is attached as Exhibit A. If selected for the Pilot Project, the City will implement the Concept Plan. C. The City is submitting the Bend Pilot Project for selection by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Gommission ("Commission") for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. D. The Bend Pilot Project Site is adjacent to the existing urban growth boundary of Bend and meets the other requirements for the HB 4A79 Affordable Housing Pilot Project, including that the site is currently accessible or can be made accessible to a transit stop served by a fixed transit corridor with at least eight weekday trips in each direction, within three-quarters mile distance via sidewalk or pedestrian walkway. E. The City of Bend is the provider of urban services for sanitary sewer, fire protection and streets and roads for the Bend Pilot Project Site, The owner and/or developer will be required to complete the public facility and infrastructure necessary to provide these public facilities and services as set forlh in the Concept Plan and as required by the Bend Development Code during development review. Once infrastructure is complete, the project site can be reasonably provided with public facilities and services and the City of Bend has the capacity and financial resources to serve development on the Bend Pilot Project Site as proposed in the Concept Plan. F. Avion Water Company will be the provider of urban services for domestic water for the portion of the Bend Pilot Project Site south of Highway 20. The owner and/or developer will be required to complete the public facility and infrastructure necessary for provision of domestic water. Once infrastructure is complete, Avion Water Company has the capacity and financial resources to serve the development on the Bend Pilot Project Site as proposed in the Concept Plan, Resolution No. 3133 Page 1 of5 and as demonstrated by the Letter of lntent to Serve included in the project application. G. Bend Parks and Recreation District will be the provider of urban parks and recreation services for the Bend Pilot Project Site and has the capacity and financial resources to serve the Bend Pilot project Site. H. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains a Central Oregon lrrigation District canal, which the irrigation district may require to be piped concurrent with or subsequent to development. Bend Development Code,4,9.500.A.9. requires an application for annexation to include a signed statement from the applicant confirming the applicant has met with the irrigation district to discuss the proposed anneiation, that the irrigation district reviewed the layout and design of the proposed development for any impacts on irrigation district conveyance facilities and had the opportunity to recommend reasonable protections for such facilities consistent with the irrigation district's adopted rules and regulations, system improvement plans and/or development policies, and the extent to which any identified issues have been resolved or if they have not yet been resolved, a timeline to resolve any issues. L Regarding the Affordable Housing Pilot Project Site, the City is exempt from compliance with Oregon Land Use Goals 3 (Agricultural Lands), 4 (Forest Lands), 6 (Air, Water and Land Resources Quality), B (Recreational Needs), g (Economic Development), 1 0 (Housin g), 12 (Transportation), 1 3 (Energy C-onservation), 15 (Willamette River Greenway), 16 (Estuarine Resources), 17(coastal shorelands), 18 (Beaches and Dunes), and 1g (ocean Resources), from the land need or boundary location provisions of Goal 14 (Urbanization), and Goal 11 (Public Facilities and Services), except that portion applicable to the impact of development of the pilot project site on existing and planned public facilities within the City's urban growth boundary, pursuant to OAR 660-039- 0030. J. The Council finds the Bend Pilot Project Site satisfies Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 5. The Bend Pilot Project Site contains two ponds identified on the National Wetlands lnventory, which is the inventory of wetland habitat for Deschutes County, pursuant to Deschutes County Ordinance g2-04S and Deschutes County Development Code 23.112.040.3. When the Bend Pilot Project site containing the ponds is annexed into the city, and before development is approved, the Developer must engage in the required analysis to determine whether the ponds are considered significant under Goal S. BDC 4.6.300. 8 .1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c. i. The ponds on the Bend Pilot Project Site are filled with water under Central oregon lrrigation District water storage rights. The concept plan proposes maintaining one pond and the water storage rights, and transferring the pond andrelated water rights, and an area around the pond to Bend Parks and Recreation District, to preserve the pond and provide park and open space to the Bend Pilot Project Site. The Concept Plan therefore preserves the ponds if necessary under Goal 5. lf the ponds are not a significant Goal 5 resource and the Bend Parks and Recreation District does not preserve the ponds in a park, the Concept Plan proposes building additional housing on the site. Based on the Concept Plan and the requirements in the Bend Development Code for compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals and planning for continued use of water storage rights in the pond(s), the City finds that the Concept Plan complies with Goal 5, K. The Council finds that the proposal satisfies Goal 7 because the City has considered the risks of the naturalhazard wildfire in the evaluation of the Bend Pilot Project Site. There are other natural hazards such as floods and landslides that are not addressed here because the Bend Pilot Project Site is not a location where such hazards might occur, The Bend Comprehensive Plan Policy 11-5 requires the City to adopt strategies to reduce wildfire hazard on lands inside the City and included in the Urban Growth Boundary. These strategies may include the application of the lnternational Wildland-Urban lnterface Code or equivalent with modifications to allow buffers of aggregated defensible space, or similar tools, as appropriate. The 100-foot buffer from EFU lands will also serve as a wildfire butfer of aggregated defensible space, with appropriate natural terrain or potentially a low intensity community garden as shown on the Concept Plan. Prior to approval of development on the Bend Pilot Project Site, the proposal must demonstrate compliance with Statewide Planning Goals including Goal7, as designated by the Planning Director, under BDC 4.6.300.8.1 or 4.5.200.D.3.c.i. Based on the Concept Plan and the requirements in the Bend Development Code for compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, the City finds that the Concept Plan complies with Goal 7. L. The City is committed to expanding opportunities for and encouraging development of affordable housing. The City has implemented a number of measures to support the development of affordable housing that also support the application for the Bend Pilot Project, including: . density bonus for affordable units,r BXernption from system development charges for affordable housing,o property tax exemption for low income housing units,o a construction excise tax,I accessory dwelling units allowed in any zone without many constraints,. maximum lot size of 5,000 square feet for detached homes in medium and high density residential zones,r ? flraXimum of one parking space per unit or bedroom for multi-unit dwellings,. one space per unit for single bedroom duplex and triplex units,. duplexes allowed in low density residential zones,e attached residential units (townhomesi allowed in Standard Density Residential zones,. allowed minimum local residential street width of 28 feet or less,. all commercialzones allow new residential use as pafi of a mixed-use development,. cottage-style housing allowed. Further, the City has implemented code requirements encouraging a greater mix Resolution No. 3133 Page 3 of 5 and diversity of housing through master planning properties 20 acres in size or larger, requiring affordable housing in areas of redevelopment in the central city and development in newly expanded urban growth boundary areas, and requiring development at 70% of the minimum density standard in areas selected forlnfill development as part of the urban growth boundary expansion. The City has a process to declare City-owned propefty surplus and sells the property for the price the city paid plus costs, for affordable housing deveropment. M. The City has adopted applicable Comprehensive Plan policies that require that guarantees be in place to ensure affordable housing units will meet affordability requirements for not less than 50 years, phasing requirements for affordable housing units and specified threshold definitions for affordable housing units at 80% of AMI (for dwelling units for sale) and 60% of AMI (dwelling units for rent). N. The City has awarded over $8 million through its prior limited and current full system development charge exemption, process to surplus real property, and competitive disbursement of the construction excise tax revenue to build orpreserve 513 affordable housing units. The City has used $6 million Community Development Block Grants and 93 million Neighborhood Stabilization funding from the federal government to build or preserve 418 affordable housing units. O, lf the Bend Pilot Project is selected by the Commission, OAR 660-039-0090 prevents the City from planning or zoning the Bend Pilot Project Site to allow a use or mix of uses not authorized by the Commission unless the City, in concert with Deschutes County, withdraws the Bend Pilot Project Site from the Bend urban growth boundary and rezones the site pursuant to law, statewide land use planning goals and land use regulations implementing the goals that regulate allowable uses of land outside urban growth boundaries. P. lt is expected that the Commission will review applications and select a city to proceed with the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project by the end of 2A18. Based on these findings, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.Staff is directed to finalize and submit the application for the Bend pilot Project site, including the proposed concept plan, for selection as the HB 4479 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. Section 2,lf the Bend Pilot Project is selected as the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project city with a population over 25,000, the City will: A. lmplement the concept Plan, consistent with the requirements of the Bend Development Code; and B. Annex the Bend Pilot Project Site within two years of an acknowledged urban growth boundary amendment to include the Bend pilot project site, when it can be annexed consistent with the requirements of the Bend Development Code. The City, as the provider of urban services to the Bend Pilot Project Site for sanitary sewer, fire protection, streets and roads, and a portion of the domestic water supports the Bend Pilot Project application for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. It is expected that Cascade East Transit (CET), operated by Central Oregon lntergovernmental Council, can serve the Bend Pilot Project Site with transit as required by the Affordable Housing Pilot Project requirements and as described above in Finding D, but in the event there are additional costs related to serving the Bend Pilot Project Site consistent with the concept plan, CET, the City, and the developers or owners of the Bend Pilot Project Site will work together on options for providing transit service and pedestrian walkway connections to transit sites, which may include developer and/or owner funding by agreement or condition of approval for a development application. Adopted by motion of the Bend City Council on August 15,2018 Section 3. Section 4. ATTEST: R APPROVED Resolution No. 3133 Page 5 of 5 YES:Sally Russell Bruce Abernethy Bill Moseley Justin Livingston Barb Campbell h e, City Recorder NO: none Sa , Mayor Pro Tem OR Mary 4. Deschutes County Resolution of S pport For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution in support of the City of Bend's + Application for a Pilot Program for Urban * Growth Boundary expansion for Affordable !i Housing-under HB 4079 RESOLUTION NO. 20 T8.029 WHEREAS, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 4079 in 2016, creating a pilot program to provide an adequate supply of land within urban growth boundaries that is dedicated to affordable housing encourage the development ofaffordable housing on land dedication to affordable housing, and protect land dedicated to affordable housing from conversion to other uses before or after the development of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, among the State's public policy goals are ensuring that affordable housing developed through the initiative continues to be affordable for a period of at least 50 years; and WHERBAS, this program is being managed by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD); and WHEREAS, increasing affordable housing is regional priority as well a top priority for the Bend City Council; and WHEREAS, the City of Bend nominated a pilot project ("Bend Pilot Project") on a site of approximately 50 acres, locateton the easffiorder of Bend's urban growthAoundtyat?ttss Highway 20, 21420 Hwy 20, and possibly including a portion of 62225 Hamby Road in Deschutes County, Oregon ("Bend Pilot Project Site"), owned by private owners; and, WHEREAS, The Bend Pilot Project is competing to be selected for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. If selected, the City of Bend intends to include the Bend Pilot Project Site within the urban growth boundary of Bend, for annexation into the City of Bend, and development as needed affordable housing; and Pnce I on 2 RssoturroN 2018-029 WHEREAS, the application also requires a resolution of support for the pilot project adopted by the governing body of the county (Deschutes County) in which the pilot project site is located; una WHEREAS, the City has represented that it intends to submit the application for the pilot project to DLCD by August 17,2018; and WHEREAS, the City and Deschutes County must work together to follow state land use laws for completion of a urban growth boundary expansion if the City's application is selected by DLCD; and, WHEREAS, a decision by the State is expected to occur in fall2018; now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: --EIIAFI.]. That Deschutes County directly supports the submission of the Application by the City of Bend to the DLCD and generally supports those actions necessary to expand the City of Bend Urban Growth Boundary if the Bend Pilot Project is selected by DLCD. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shallbe effective upon adoption. Dated this ttr Jof U.n a-2018 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON lce Chair TAMMY sstoner G Recording Secretary Pncp 2orZ ResolurroN 2018-029 5. Bend Parks and Recreation District Resolution of Support BMPRD RESOTUTION NO. 414 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CIW OF BEND'S APPTICATION FOR A PILOT PROGRAM FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNDER HB 4079 WHEREAS, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 4079 in 2015, creating a pilot program to provide an adequate supply of land within urban growth boundarles that is dedlcated to affordable housing, encourage the development of affordable housin! on land dedication to affordable housing, and protect land dedicated to affordable housing from conversion to other uses before or after the development of affordable housing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Bend nominated a pilot project ("Bend Pilot Project") on a site of approxirnately 50 acres, located on the eastern border of Bend's urban growth boundary at 21455 Highway 20,2L42A Hwy 20, and possibly a portion ot62225 Hamby Road in Deschutes County, Oregon ("Bend Pilot Project Site"), owned by private ownersl and, WHEREAS, the Bend Pilot Project is competing to be selected for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. lf selected, the Bend Pilot Project Site will be included within the urban growth boundary of Bend, for annexation into the city of Bend, and development as needed affordable housing; and, WHEREAS, the Bend Metro Park and Recreation District (the "District") is an Oregon Special District that provides park and recreation services under ORS chapter 266.The District,s mission is to strengthen community vitality and foster healthy, enriched lifestyles by providing exceptional park and recreation services; and, WHEREAS, the Bend Pilot Project Site is within the District's boundary and the District is the provider of park and recreation services to the pilot project site. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Bend Park and Recreation District resolves to support the City of Bend's Pilot Project nomination for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. ADOPTED by the Board of Directors on this 19th day of June zOLg. KE*/""utU Brady Fuller, ggr/O Vice - Chair Attest: ,/j, t Don Horton, Executive Secretary 5. Central Oregon lntergovernmental Council - Gascades East Transit Resolution of Support Council Board Resolution # 300 8CI[ilctt Everywhere Central Oregon Works A resolution recognizing that Cascades East Transit is the transit service provider within thecity of Bend, which is the location of a proposed Affordable Housing Pilot Project being submitted by the City of Bend to the Oregon Department of Land Conversation and Development (DLCD) and supporting the City of Bend's application for that Affordable Housing Pilot Project. WIIEREAS, Cascades East Transit (CET) provides transportation services across Central Oregon; WIIEREAS, CET connects people to places through high-quality bus service which include fixed- routes within Bend, intercity service throughout Central Oregon, recreational shuttles, and rural dial-a-ride service for the public and dial-a-ride service for qualifying persons with disabilities and seniors who qualifr as low-income; WHEREAS, access to reliable and affordable transit is an important choice for commuters and Central Oregonians to have; WHEREAS, the City of Bend is competing to be selected for an Affordabte Housing Pilot Project program managed by DLCD; WHEREAS,the land specified in the City proposal is a privately-owned site of approximately 50 acres, located on the eastern border of Bend's urban growth boundary at21455 Highway 20 and 21420 Highway 20, and a portion of 62225 Hamby Road in Deschutes County, Oregon ('oBend Pilot Project Sites") identified on Attachment A; WHEREAS, The Bend Pilot Project is competing to be selected for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project for a city with a population over 25,000. If selected, the city of Bend intends to include the Bend Pilot Project Site within the urban growth boundary of Bend, for annexation into the City of Bend, and development as needed affordable housing. WHEREAS, the application requires the City to provide an official resolution or other action of the governing body providing mass transit stating that, if selected mass transit service with at least eight weekday trips in each direction within three-quarters of a mile of the project site, will be provided concurrently with the development of affordable housing units; WHEREAS, CET expects there will be no fiscal or operational impact to CET services as aresult of the City being selected as a recipient of this Pilot Project. In the event that mass transit or dial-a- ride service changes will be required to serve the subject properties, CET witl work with the City on service options and potential funding strategies. 334 NE llau'tlror.ne Avenue, Bend, OR 97701 (541) 548-8163 -Fax: (54t) 923-24t6 of6ce Locations: Bend, I(anrath Falls, Lakei'iew, La pine, Ma{ras, pr.inevi}le, Redmoncl WHEREAS, the application is due July 2, 2018, or a later date as approved by the State, and a decision by the State is expected to occur before the end of2018; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. Central Oregon lntergovernmental Council in its role as the transportation service provider for Bend, operating as Cascades East Transit, supports the Bend Pilot Project nomination for the HB 4079 Affordable Housing Pilot Project. This Resolution adopted this 7ft day of June, 2018 Signed: d tLtt-^)-J"l"^. Attest: l.d Wayne Fording, Charr Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council 1 Karen Friend, Executive Director Central Oregon Intergovemmental Council Avion Water Go lnc. is a privately owned company, not a special district. There is no ON \ /A.O IhIC 60813 Parrell Rd . Bend, OR 97702. Ph: 541-382-5342 . fax: 541-382-5390 . Email: avion@ayionweter.com May 16,2018 Ref: A proposed subdivision of 21455 Hwy 20 Bend, Oregon 97701. Also known as tax lot: 1712350001500. To Whom lt May Concern Avion Water Company, Inc. is willing and able to serve potable water to the above described property, provided all requirements by Avion Water Company are met and all monies due are paid in accordance with Avion's approved tariff. Avion Water Company, lnc. can provide a fire flow of 1500 GPM al a 20 PSI residual. Sincerely, Mike Heffernan Engineering Department Avion Water Company, lnc. 6. Property Owner's Statement LtN tlf )lfri:iER's At, lrt DAvnT 0F,, cfjfi $It HT sr*'r'l.;qlt' l'ru,l -'\\t..uuttty of L.-I{}r'Ilnrr I, H- Fnr1cr Brrns. hr-.ing +lul3.su,om, dtposc and s:ry tfli{; FklffErtrK-$lly Eurns I*nd Holdittgs, T.'[,c is a manager rnlrnnged. t]rcgnn lirnitr:d liahility u.Jmp$nl'. 2, I. r.8.(:, 4-Fsrte.I'.{tetly ftrrrns l-asd I lrrldingE- LLt] oorisr,ntc tu all aspe*r\ rltthr: fin_rl HI] 4fi?g Aprrlic;itirrn being' subinittcd t+ tfre t-irntl fluns*naEinr: :u:ql Flcvc!+prn*fif (l*nrmlssicn on he**'- of,dre [lit3'ef Eend. 5. FsrterJHellv tlrrrns Land I luldings, L.{-f-. or+,*s r+rtnin real prr,pqrt,v tFlfft is rhe suhjert EtiEttr +rf the final I lB 4f)?g I'lfnt Fruj.cct Applicacion b+i1g silbrnjued trr the Land f,j+nservidti#r: sfld tl:vcl$Fgl€flt (l(nnmissian +u hchull $f the fity nf F!+nd, 6' P$rit:*l(tJIl llrrn:s La*d H+kirng's; Ll{l f€il"tJrsr iir?rsf,1rrfs {s clg: irfirrgrn{:fltr-ir$Ed re*{ PrnFefly b+ing desigriill$d ns a -pllnr lrrtfrct-" I FlERlrTlY FJEc["rlRlt TITATTHE AE{JV[1$T{TEMEN'f"!5 TRUE TLr.l,$l[l Hnsr fiII fuIY KNOWI'rirrfiE. AN* I}I,:I.',EF" ,,.\NIJ TttAT I UNDEI.S'AN!-} TT I$ },'I\I]I' FT}R UsE l l J s5, I arxr tire Mnnag*r *f, nl*rt*rrKelly Burrr* i.r-rnd Hntdings, E.LC. ! rnafte ttris $ilidavit irt my '{--!e as tlre il'tarLagr:r of Fnrteri'Keily- Burns Land r rrildinps. AS HUltlIrN{'F,I}l {.fJilR'r AT{!:} $ sitj_1 I !)utcd: L!_Lt I ? c.Ea, 3oE ft. IlJt:(:T TO flEhrtl3'y FtlR. flEggft.y_ L- IJ- FOtr ?'fiR tllrfih5; SUBSCftttilih AfiD S$f$ttN TO bcf+re rnei!r! fiin ft'otar_"v'liir tfie $taie *t" , ,3o ig- II L,t.sllEl{fictfr H$!|A*H U{TilU Htrr{-ry iS * leEA4!Hl$ llI CEflglrii:iltft ErFriGE '^hn* 1. tB20 t-AhlFJO\4rltElt'S r\Ft;ttr]Al'!.f OF iltlNlit1NT I I 7. Development Team Statement - Pacwest Builders PACWEST BUILDERS, LLC'S.AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT AND COMMITMENT TO PARTICIPATE STATE OF OREGON County of Deschutes I, James M. Yozamp, being duly sworn, depose and say that: l. Pacwest Builders, LLC is a rnanager managed, Oregon timited liability company. 2. I am the Manager of Pacwest Builders, LLC. 3. I make this affidavit in my role as the Manager of Pacwest Builders, LLC. 4, Pacwest Builders, LLC hereby commits to participate in the City of Bend's HB 4079 affordable housing project if the City of Bend is selected for a pilot project under House Bill 4079. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT I UNDERSTAND IT IS MADE FOR USE AS EVIDENCE IN AND IS SUBJECT 201 8. TO PENALTY FOR Y. Dated: M,Y SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me on 5 20&. ) ) ) ss. Notary Public for the State of Oregon PACWEST BUILDERS, LLC'S AFFIDAVIT I I 7. Development Team Statement - Housing Works HOUSING WORKS' AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT A}ID COMMITMENT TO PARTICIPATE STATE OF OREGON County of Deschutes U Dated: llu gu ,y /f , zors ) ) ) ss, I, David Brandt, being duly sworn, depose and say that: l. I am the Executive Director of the Central Oregon Regional Housing Authority, an Oregon public body corporate and politic, doing business as Housing Works. 2. I make this aflidavit in my role as the Execufive Director of the Central Oregon Regional Housing Authority, an Oregon public body corporate and politic, doing business as Housing Works. 3. Housing Works hereby commits to participate in the City of Bend's HB 4079 affordable housing project if the City of Bend is selected for a pilot project under House Bill 4079. I IIEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT I UNDERSTAND IT IS MADE FORUSE AS EVIDENCE IN COURT AND IS SUBJECT TO FOR PEzuURY. SUBSCRIBED AltD SWORN TO before me on DAVID BRA}{DT 2ol & Public forthe State of Oregonffi -#[#ffifl#h\W @Hntgstoil No' o5ot23rvErmlwtreg lovErSERzt' l@ HOUSING WORKS'AFFIDAVIT I I Exhibit J regon Department of Land Conservation and Development Katc llrrxvrr. C()vern{rr 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, Oregon 9790 t -254A Phone: 503-323-0050 Fax: S03-328-5518 www,oregon.gov/LCD August 26,2019 Sally Russell, Mayor City of Bend 710 NW Wall Srr.eet Bend, OR 97703 The affordable housing covenant docurnent guarantees that matel 50% of the of the area median income. The covenant document also guarantees that the itycovenants will retnaln ln place for 50 years. RE: Approval of Bend Affordable llousing pilot project (order 001904) Dear Mayor Russell, lhante152, oregon Laws 20ll,authorized the Land conservation and DevelopmentCommission to adopt adminishative rules allowing the commission to choose an affordablehousing^pilot project. Based upon the rules adopt; tt the comrnission in oregon AdrninistrativeRules (.oan) chapter 660 Division 39, the city of BenJ submitted . pr"d; projecr, a 35-acreexpansion of the Bend urban growth boundarylucB) to allow construction oiuppro*irnately400 dwelling units,. approxirnately half of whictr *ouid be affordable to households eamin g60%or less of area median income. At its November 16,2018 meeting, the commission considered applications authorized bychapter 52, oregon Laws 2016 ano oRR 660 Division 39 from ttf city ore*na and the city ofRedmond' After hearing ptesentations fi'om both cities, una r"ui"*ing tlhe apptication materialsand the director's staff repoft, the cotnmission made u p..iirrinury decision to approve theapplication frorn the City of Bend. subsequent to this preliminary approval, pursuant to oAR 660-03g-00g0(3) the departrnent hasreceived, from the city of-Bend, specific information regarding the foln and content ofprovisions ensuring that affordabli housingdeveloped Jn ttre site continues to be used to provideaffordable housing for a period of at least 5o yrur* ufter the selection of the pilot project site, anclthe proposed comprehensive plan and zoning designations for the pilot pro.;J"l rit". rr*departrnent finds that the city;s submission ii sati#actorylo "nrore that the city of Bend intendsto irnplement the project as presented to the commission. will The.proposed comprehensive plan amendment, which will be irnplemented with appropriatezoning at a later date, specifies the nahrre of the development, and is consistent with the number Augtrst 26,2019 Page 2 ofZ and types of units proposed by the city of Bend in its pilot project application' as well as ilcluding r.qoir*rr,,.,ii, f* od"" space that are consistent with the application' Therefore, the deparlment is pleased to issue this final order approving the Bend affordable This final order is subject to judicial review under ORS 183'484 as an order in other than a contested case upon fiting of a peritior i"i:Ji.*r review within 60 days of the date of the order please feel free to contact DL.D Regional Representative, scott Edelman, at 541-318-7921'or ut *.ott."O.t*un@rioiJo..u* if you hive uny qt"ttions or need further assistance' housing pilot Project. , Department of Land Conservation and Development SincerelY, cc: Lynne McConnell, Affordable HousingManagero City of Bend Carolyn nusun, ;;o;;; O"ryrop-*t Director' City of Bend RussellGrayson,CommunityDevelopmentDirectoroCityofBendgti" ffing, iitY M*uger, CitY of Bend ftl*V Winters, City Attorn3y' gity of Bend ennltte Liebe, RST Coordinator inCo (Edelman, Howard, Williamson' Young) Exhibit K tl14rorrr_ -\a-p\al-ErFL co rrrC-l 60813 Parrell Rd . Bend, OR 97702. Ph: 541 -382-5342 . fax: 541-382-5390 . Email: avion@avionwater.com September 21,2021 Ref: 21415 and 21455 Hwy 20, Bend, Oregon 97701. Also known as tax lots 17 12350001 501 and 1 712350001 500. To Whom lt May Concern: Avion Water Company, lnc. is willing and able to serve potable water to the above-described properties, provided all terms, conditions and requirements by Avion Water Company are met and all monies due are paid in accordance with Avion's approved tariff. This approval is good for one year. Sincerely, Mike Heffernan Engineering Department Avion Water Company, Inc. Exhibit L Crv oF BEND Er.rclrueeRtNc DMSpN UluryAVAtLABtLry Meuo - Bnstc GeRlncRrePRSWA202107161 Date: Project Site: Tax Lot: Contact: October 7,2021 21455 Hwv20 1 712350001500 Jordan Emerich jordan@ham-engr.com (541)923-7554 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL The property is addressed as214SS Hwy 20 on two tax lots, 1Z12350001500 and 171235001501Thedevelopment is located south of 20, north of Bear Creek Rd , east of Livingston Dr and liesHwyhalf within City of Bend jurisdictional limits and half in Deschutes county jurisdiction. There isprocessing house bill legislation that will allow the property to be annexed into City of Bend limits asan affordable housing pCIect. The property is approximately 36.93 acres in size l The property is zoned Urbanizable Area and is served by Avion water. The lots are curren'yoccupied by one single family dwelling. The proposlo oeueropment *orio like to subdivide the twotax lots' The current prop-osed ptan details t'e creaiion or rg'g singre-family units, 10 duplex units,and 129 Tripler/Murti-famiry units. The proposed site pran is srrownin nwr. r Figure 1.' Proposed Site plan ? :I { .l1 -l .t 'l .t 1 1 I I I lil"b-D.".":t-orment Engineer Dept. city of Bend - community Deveropment Departmentoffice: 541-388-5s80 Ext 4 emait: comdevenq@oenJoieqon.qov website: wwwbendoreqon.qov Page 1 of4 summary of Proposed Flow Rates: The- proposed rates are calculated for 1gg sFD,s, 10Duplexes' and 129 TriplevMultLfamily unitr. n[v-i,iJrl'change of use beyond this calcutation wi'require a new Sewer Analysis. ' "'r 'vrvr v l Sewer: 29.01 gpm Water: Avion I :li+4 i Manhole cMH007121 Manhole cMH006514 a il::: a::i it3.6 I -1 II : i j I l i: Ed Figure2.- Sewer ft f"O"lirg Lcations LOCATIMODNELIG oNs fr l l SEWER ANALYStS Flow Rate: Single Family Dwelling: ^ 17.88 gpm = 198 EDU's (1 EDU each) at 130 "gpdDuplex Unit: . .1,91_gpr = 20 EDU's (2 EDU each) at 130 .gpd Multi-Family: 9.32 gpm = 103.2 EDU's (0.g EDU per unit) at 130 *gpd Total: 921.2 EDU's = 29.01 gpm*Collection System Master plin Rates Private Deveropment Enoineer Dept. city of Bend - community Deveropment Departmentoffice: 541-388-sseo e*t-a et"il'-*-"ru"i"n-oiio"iioL* website: www.bendoreoon.qov Page2of 4 Existing Gonditions:o The propertyls not served by city of Bend s,,"1"1and assumed to be on a septic system' o There i. "n,ajn.h pvc gruuid';in ceniratty tocateo west of the property within Livingston Dr.o There is an B.nch pvc gravity main northwest of the property across Hwy 20 within NE Providence Dr' . r,-. ..^^L ^r{ha nrnnaFtrr rruifhin Bear Creek Rd o There is an 8-inch PVC gravity main southwest of the property within Be Tfr:il:tsis was performed f9r conduit caPacitv'.manhole Flow was moOetei at downstream manhole CMH007121 sewer system n".ltinti"nt capacity for the proposal' freeboard, and pump station capaglV unO CftlH006514' See Figure 2' lne AnticiPated Mitigations:for the ProPosed site develoPment'These Points Below are the anticiPated mitigation requirements of mitigation can be modified uPon the filing and review of the land use application ,?S there maY be components that change or that were discussed in the burden of Proof and maY not have been brought to the City's attentio n. The site develoPment is anticiPated to have the following mitigation Permit. requirements: Mitigafionl:ThedevelopmentmayeitherconnecttoCMHOOTI21orcMH00654l (connectio" it ,,..".r.,or" crrnHo din'l-irrttrequire "r'o6oi permit). The deveropment must construct one of the following options: option/;Extendgr?Vlty.Tai":l'9T-?]thermanholethroughthesubdivisiontoSerye each tax rot in the suooiirision. The gravity'r;ir ;;st be eitended at minimum grade and to city of Bend .d;;;;J;. in"-ruin-;;;i oe rocated in ure citv of Bend Risht of wav or within " zo+ooiJ"*"ieasement."r't"i"o over the main. Finar a'gnments of the,sewer main and il;;ti;;; oimant.'e"s-;ir;; determined with the rnfrastructure plansbasedon!1a];ft;;y-g'tvitqiti"ii"s'nlimainextensionsmustbedonetn'.ig;;ii"i c nignt ot wuv (t ntrastructu re) Permit. option2;lfgravitymainscan,tbeextendedthroughoutthesubdivision,thenthe deveropment wi, o"'Jrro*"J to con-stlutl-u iitt slation at the row point of the subdivision and exten;';'f"*" main troi.'eif'ei manhole io t'" tift station' The lift station must meet c*y oj a."l.d ,9"T *J *uit be located within the Citv of Bend Right of way. ftie fitt station tttt ;;:;; io i9*" the development area' The force main will trave to'ire"iCity of geniitanJarOs' me main must be located in the CitvofBendRightofWayo-rwithina2O-footSewereasementcenteredoverthe,rin. Final alignments of tt.,e sewer;;';'ttd locations of manholes will be determined with *," inliurtru.tur" prans'our"o on final review by city Engineering' A' main exrensions ;;;iE oon" '..,ifr; ftt c Righf of wav (tntrastructure) yi3fl X1trj;|:iiff :"r"':"'1ilil1ft"ilffi:1's;il''J'-[3fr"l1/:'mrTse""f fl X'ii::'::;?'fi ; the city of Bend nig';t;iw;y rt "ppr""o ilv tt " c'tvergi*"i to deviate outside the Right of way, the sewe*niin rrrt 6: *-'ill:loiniinu,o zo-tooi"tl-*"ilut"t"nt centered over the main. wider easements may oe requirlj';;,t ;"o"rig" d;pih oi*r" main' Finaralignments Private Development Engineer Dept' City of Bend - Community Development Department office: 541-388-5580 Ext 4 ?'i]ii''l#1"""*on"to"*fu lt* website: www bendoreqon'oov serving the ProPertY' This approvar is varid for six (6) months from date of signature. 11." r?r use application is not submitted within o *"r,fl't, of thedate oitign"tute' this apirovatshall be considered void' Rio Johnson, Engineering Associate riohnson@bendoreoon'oov (541) 693-2188 abandonment DeveloPment is served by Avion water service. It is the responsibilitY of the aPPlicant or land owner to verifY the size and location of all laterals WRITTEN BY: DATE . tolT /2021 APPROVED BY: Dustin Elmore,PE,Assistant CitY Engineer of the sewer main and rocations of manhores wil be determined with the rnfrastructure plans based on finar review by c*y Engin"";ing. nrr ruin ""t"n-.ion. must be done through a Tier 3 nighf ot Way (l nfrastructure) Permit' Mitigation3; A' new tax rots must be served by a singre sewer raterarthat meets city of Bend standards. The siie and rocation otir," i"tlrurr wit 6e oii"rrin"d during the Right of way Permit Review. Mitigation4: The existing propefy is assumed to be on a septic system. The septic system must be abandoned to meet ttre oepartr"""t of Environr"niur'ouarity and Deschutes county standards. The deveropment ,r.t gJi " p"irit trrrougt'','oescrrutes county for septic system ANALYSIWATER S RATIO ALROVAPPOFNUD Private Development Engineer Dept' City of Bend - Community Development Department ffice: 54.1-388_5580 Ext4 ?ilIii,:#'ir"u"*oo"nooooon.itou website: www bendoreqon qov Page 4 of 4 Transportation Element Parkside Place Master Plan An Affordable Housing Pilot Project (HB 4079) Bend, 0regon January 2022 t TRAN S IEi HTtrtrNSULTl NG,rr" Transporlalion Engineering and Planning Servlces Transight Gonsulting, LLC Bend,Oregon Engineer of Record: Joseph W. Bessman, PE Phone: 503-997-4473 Email: ioe@transiEhtconsultin4com 70661:i OPE@N I w.i-ffi Executive Summory TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... Community Master P|an................ Project Area Plan 6 7 7 7Annexation Agreement lntroduction ..........13 Project Background House Bill 4079 .13 t4 t4 15 15 L7 L7 t7 18 T9 28 30 34 36 Bend Development Code........ Site Description Report Organization ............ HB 4079 Annexation Plan ........... Annexation Process Transportation Facilities Report ............ US 20 lntersection Mitigation Proportionate Share Contributions Parkside Place Area Plan Major Community Master Plan ................ Turn Lane Assessment... Transportation System Plan Amendment 40 Transportation Cost Allocations & Funding Mechanisms................. .............43 Transportation Cost Allocations Code Compliance 43 48 48 49 54 Community Master P|an................ Transportation Planning Rule Project Findings and Recommendations Poge 3 ..57 Executive Summary APPENDICES Appendix A: Traffic Count Data Appendix B: SeasonalAdjustment Factors (On-Site ATR Method) Appendix C: Crash Summary Worksheets Appendix D: ODOT CARS Crash Records Appendix E: Description of LOS Methods and Criteria Appendix F: Year 2021 Existing Traffic Conditions Operational Worksheets Appendix H: Year 2030 Without Project Traffic Conditions Operational Worksheets Appendix l: Year 2030 With Project Traffic Conditions Operational Worksheets Appendix J: Proposed Site Layout and Phasing Poge 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fxee {.Jiiye Srir*mory EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report addresses the transportation elements to support the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion, annexation and development of the House Btl 4079 lands (HB 4079, also referred to as "Parkside Place") located in eastern Bend between the US 20 and SE Bear Creek Road corridors (see Figure 1-1). The triangular portion of these lands that are within the current UGB are included within Comprehensive Plan Policy 1L-64 for the East Highway 20 lands, with the remainder included as an Affordable Housing Pilot Project consistent with Policies 5-20 and 5-21 of the Housing Chopter of the Comprehensive Plan. m#ffic iffig sl :t 6 ; dF. *"1 t f, -t I .l t rl t.t*tr {ita I I @/*F*l *l ar #H ,tlll 'hl $q*l$vl.: ;..f ).. l, tQ.;:,, a : j : ! a ! I Yn nfl,ur'ift o &":' ri. *t'", r't F ;k ': -FITY LtM *a 3rrI I lF- t Ilr- 3:l t #aI !:ll ii J:t' ,1 t'.j;F r?F t-t Figure 1-1. Location of House Bill 4079 Lands Source: Deschutes County DIAL The transportation elements required for this project and addressed in this report include a Community Master Plan for the proposed Parkside Place development, and fulfillment of the requirements in the City's Development Code for a formal Transportation lmpact Analysis. The text of the House Bill and subsequent clarification from DLCD exempt this project from the long-range planning requirements within the Transportation Planning Rule. Highlights from each of the applicable elements are summarized below. !;ntte { Executive Summary COvvuruITY MASTER PLAN One purpose of the Community Master Plan is to ensure site connectivity and extension of transportation infrastructure, demonstrating how urbanization of the property can be supported with adequate transportation infrastructure. The transportation element of this master plan is a long-range review of the City's supporting roadways and intersections, with the analysis modeling and timelines consistent with the City's on-going Transportation System Plan. The key outcomes of the transportation element of the Community Master Plan are as follows: Urbanization of these lands will require the extension of supporting multimodal transportation infrastructure. This will include frontage improvements along NE Bear Creek Road and US 20, and completion of a multimodal connection along the Livingston Drive corridor. A north-soulh Collector connection between NE Bear Creek Road and US 20 is identified within the community master plan. This road balances connectivity between these two major roadway facilities that is generally lacking east of 27th Street, and with the proposed right-in, right-out access onto US 20 the new Collector will help guide travel toward Bear Creek Road. A planned roundabout at the US 20/Hamby Road - Ward Road intersection will be constructed by ODOT in spring 2022that will help reduce area travel speeds, address a critical regional safety issue, and will support "U-turn" maneuvers for traffic using the right-out to return to Bend. A multiuse pathway is proposed south of US 20 providing adequate separation between area residents and visitors and the highway system. This path extends south along the canal lateral alongside the new park lands, as well as along the SE Bear Creek Road frontage, US 20, and the proposed Collector. MRsrrR Pnru The entirety of the East US 20 lands are under single property ownership; this will allow the street network shown within the master plan to support development of the entirety of the site, including the Urban Growth Boundary expansion area. The layout of the site provides an orderly extension of utilities, streets, and supporting infrastructure to support the property and connect into the existing Urban Growth Boundary lands to the west. AlvTTxRTION AGREEMENT There are several transportation needs surrounding the subject property along the US 20 corridor and along NE 27th Street. To address these impacts with the City of Bend, ODOT, and Deschutes County an annexation agreement is being prepared that will outline the specific improvements required to support this affordable housing pilot project. The allocation of various transportation costs are outlined in Table l_-1. a a a a Poge 7 Transportation Cost Recommended Cost Allocation Method Frontage lmprovements Frontage improvements will be required with development of the adjacent project phase. These improvements may also extend beyond the frontage for tapering/transitional purposes. The design will need to consider the transitions to the east and west of the project that may best be accommodated through taper striping of the improved section. As SE Bear Creek Road is a Minor Arteriolthat supports regional travel needs and will require full pavement structural improvements with the % street improvement, partial SDC credits are requested. Adjacent lntersection lmprovements Adjacent intersection improvements will include the right-in, right-out Collector connection to US 20, the Collector connection to SE Bear Creek Road, and the local street extension of Livingston Drive. Full turn lane improvements to the US 20 and Bear Creek Road connections will be required as soon as the connections are made to ensure adequate safety and driver expectation on these high-speed rural roadways. Costs for these treatments will be fully funded by the proiect. Off-Site lntersection lmprovements Off-site impacts occur to the US 20 corridor at the SE Purcell Boulevard and SE 27th Street intersections. Similar to other recent annexations, given the scale and uncertainty of improvements it is recommended that a pro-rata fee be provided to ODOT with subsequent plats. Transportation SDCs All development will be responsible for its share of Transportation SDCs. These fees will be payable to the City of Bend but may then be applied by the City as reimbursables to offset completed transportation improvement projects. The City's transportation SDCs are based on weekday p.m. peak hour trips and are subject to annual and programmatic escalation. Affordable housing is typically exempt from transportation SDCs. Executive Summory Table 1-1. Su of Recommended Cost Allocation Method To support the development of the affordable housing pilot project to address a critical shortage within the City of Bend, the following is requested: a Development of the parks and trail system along US 20 and the canal lateral is intended to support a broader trail network along the east side of Bend linking the COID canal system with Big Sky Park. lt is requested that the development, City, ODOT and Bend Parks and Recreation work collaboratively to create this trail system through and abutting the subject property, in a manner that will allow the Park District to extend it across Hwy 20, such as an extension to the east to cross US 20 at the planned Hamby Road roundabout. Extension of Livingston Drive west of the subject property lacks adequate right-of-way to rely on this route as a local connection. lt is instead proposed that multimodal connections be completed to provide a low-stress route outside of the major roadway corridors. The City of Bend's approved Transportation GO Bond identifies multimodal improvements along the SE Bear Creek Road corridor that extend across the subject property. lt is recommended that these improvements be prioritized along with the roundabout at Purcell Boulevard to enhance the use of this corridor. Coordination will be required with ODOT as part of the US 20 access permit application. As identified within this report, this highway connection is proposed as a right-in, right-out connection and will require a right-turn deceleration lane. A Transportation System Plan amendment will be required to add the new Collector road through the property, along with a a a Page 8 Executive Summary identifying a Principol Arterialalong US 20 and the extension of a Minor Arteriolalong Bear Creek Road.o The designated centerline striping that allows passing along the SE Bear Creek Road frontage should be removed and replaced with solid double-yellow striping, and the new streetscape design should support a 35 mph urban environment as included in the proposed cross-section. A summary of the overall mitigation measures is provided in Figure 1-2. Page 9 Executive Suffmst\/rflI{,4Pedestrian CrossingRight-in, Right-Out OnlyAccess lntersectionwith Left-Tum Lanes; ; Bridge/CulvertPhasing and Mitigation PlanMF-1/R-1 (108Aff. Rental Units i 27 Market{.ate For-Sale Units):. Construct Multiuse PalhwayAlong US 20 to Collector. Extend Collector from US 20 to Livingston Drive. Obtain permits from ODOT and construct a pork-chop island torestrict US 20 to RIRO only. Construct an eastbound right-turn deceleration lane along US 20. Construct Livingston Drive conneclion west and place bollards onwestern property boundary. Coordinate with BPRD to complete sidewalks in Litchfleld Park site. Coordinale with ODOT to complete the missing US 20 sidewalksand a pedestrian crossing. Obtain secondary access to Bear Creek RoadR-2 (44 Market{ate For€ale Units):. Extend the Collector south to Bear Creek Road. lmprov€ the Bear Creek Road frontage to 3/4 street standards withan eastbound left-tum lane onto the Collector. Coordinate with CET to design a transit pad and shelter along thepark frontageRA (30 Market*ate For-Sale Units)r. Extend ths multiuse path along US 20 and complete the Coll€ctorfrontageR-4 {27 Market-Rate For€ale Units):. Extend the multiuse path along US 20R€ (15 Afr. For€ale Units / 25 tlarket-Rate For€ale Unitrs):. Complete the Collector frontage (eastern landscape/sidewalk)R6 (15 Afr. For-Sale Units / 25 Market-Rate For-Sal€ Units):. Complete the Collector frontage (eastern landscape/sidewalk)R.7 (31 tilarket.Rat€ For€ale Units)r. Complete the Collector frontage (eastern landscape/sidewalk). Complete the Bear Creek Road 3/4 street frontage with a left-lurnlane onto the local street, and complete the local street intersections,tFqry-d;?'--lGk I sEtund"ls.l1b,r..lLLegendLocal StreetI PrincipalArterialMultiuse PathwayI MinorArterialE Missing Walkwayr Collector0 Transit StopFigure 1-2. Summary ofTransportation Mitigation Measures and Phasing.oo("0il-Yrage JU Executive Summary Our team appreciates the support and assistance provided throughout this process to date by the City and ODOT. We trust that the enclosed materials provide the respective agencies with the necessary information to review this land use application and from this identify the appropriate transportation terms and conditions to incorporate into the annexation agreement. Additional details on each of these elements are summarized within this report. Page 77 ilFilTRgffiU€f:|Bfttr lntroduction INTRODUCTION Hayden Homes is proposing to expand the Urban Growth Boundary, annex, master plan, and subsequently develop the East Highway 20 Area identified in the City of Bend's Comprehensive Plan and/or approved as part of the HB 4079 Aff ordable Housing Pilot Program . This new community includes a mix of affordable and market-rate residential products consistent with the House Bill 4079 requirements for this affordable housing pilot project. Pno:rcr BRct<cRoutrto On November 1"6, 20L8 the state's Land Conservation and Development Commission selected the City of Bend's proposal to be a pilot location for a new affordable housing program, allowed under House Bill 4079. The goal of this program is to encourage local governments to provide an adequate supply of affordable housing, facilitated by an expedited process for UGB expansion and annexation. The land associated with the City of Bend's proposal is a 37.1,-acre parcel located on the east side of Bend, south of US 20 (tax lot 1712350001500), as shown in Figure 2-1. rt ffi$L il .l.ii+*+t ,*?,t .Lt*, t,r'i 1,**r , f; .aI r'"-i . : 'l l : : ']rt,-j : I,tt , :'eqga:et*i !'t1 t;':t!l: Jj r€Y E._f-t ' lE *rF a t. .* .t..4 ,i I ,t tt.rtl ..,1.. Figure 2-1. Site Vicinity Map. (Source: Deschutes County Online Mopping) Through multiple planning applications, the City of Bend's Comprehensive Plan will be updated to expand the Urban Growth Boundary consistent with the HB 4079 master plan that was most recently approved by the City via City of Bend Resolution No. 327t.The nature of the House Bill 4079 pilot project makes the development process unique as it provides additional requirements on these lands to serve in their intended function. UIlilSSm*0A Page 1j Introduction Housr Brrr 4079 Oregon Administrative Rule 660-039 contains the detailed requirements for the Affordable Housing Pilot Project. ln forwarding its application for the program, the City of Bend has agreed to the requirements listed herein. Section -0090 explains the process subsequent to selection as a Pilot City: (1) Upon selection by the commission os provided in OAR 660-039-0080(4), the quolifying city sholl: (a) ln concert with the county in which the urban growth boundory is located, omend the urbon growth boundary to include the pilot project site, and identify the provisions of low and rules pursuont to OAR 660-039-0030 reloting to urbon growth boundory omendments that are not opplied to ollow the pilot project site to be included within the urbon growth boundory; (b) Annex the pilot project site to the quolifying city within two years of the ocknowledged urban growth boundary omendment; (c) Adopt plon ond zone designotions for the pilot project site that authorize development of the concept plon included in the application; Pursuant to selection as a pilot city, the City of Bend is required to expand the Urban Growth Boundary, annex the site, and adopt appropriate zoning designations for the parcel to be developed with affordable housing. Additionally, many standard requirements for annexation and development have been excluded for the project site, referred to in section (a) above. OAR 660-039-0030 states: (7) Regarding the pilot project site, o qualifying city submitting a pilot project nomination is exempt from complionce, ond the commission is not required to select a pilot project that complies, with: (a) ORS 797A.320; (b) The Land Need or Boundary Locotion provisions of Goal 1-4; (c) Goals 3,4, 6,8,9, 10,1-2, 13, ond 79; (d) Goal L7, except that portion applicoble to the impoct of development of the pilot project site upon existing and plonned public focilities within the qualifying city's urbon growth boundary; (e) Goal 75, unless the land is within the Willomette River Greenway Boundary; (f) Gools L6, L7, ond 78, unless the land is within a coastol shorelonds boundary; or (g) Any administrotive rules implementing, clarifying, or interpreting these gools. Related to transportation, the HB 4079 lands are excluded from compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). Brruo DrvrlopvtENT CoDE The overall application process for the HB 4079 lands will need to comply with City of Bend requirements as contained within Bend Development Code 4J.400 and 4.7.500. This will require the preparation of a Transportation Facilities Report (TFR) and a formal Transportation lmpact Analysis (TlA). The master plan process will adhere to the requirements for a Community Master Plan. Page 14 lntroduction Srrr DrscRrPTroN The 37.1-acre site contains lands that are both currently within and outside of the Bend UGB. A'J-.77 acre triangular parcel at the northwest corner is situated within the UGB, zoned Urbanizable Area (UA) and designatedResidentialHighDensity(RH).Thelarger35.32acreparcelissituatedoutsideoftheUGBand is currently zoned Multiple Use Agriculturol 7}-Acre Minimum (MUA-10). The overall development site is surrounded on the north, east, and south sides by Exclusive Form Use and MUA-L0 land. The west side of the site borders the City limits and the urban growth boundary. This area is made up of residential neighborhoods, churches, and a nursery. The site is bordered on the north by US 20 and on the south by SE Bear Creek Road. As shown in Figure 2-1 there are no existing roads that extend through the site. One road, SE Livingston Drive, connects to the site on the west side, but is separated from the parcel by an irrigation canal. RrpoRr OneRrutzATroN This document is intended to address all transportation policies and requirements for a UGB expansion, TSP amendment, annexation, and master plan for the HB 4079 lands. As documented throughout this report, the proposal meets the requirements of the HB 4079 Pilot Project, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the City's Development Code. This chapter also includes a formal Transportation lmpact Analysis (TlA) to address the City's Development Code requirements within Bend Development Code 4.7. alignment of roads, trails, and pathways through the site and includes standard cross-sections for all the roadways in the area. Mechanisms to support Master Plan (and the overall Area Plan) development. annexations, Bend Development Code for Community Master Plans. Poge 15 AfrilHH$'M:TION FI*AN. Trq n spo rtoti o n I m pa ct Ano lysi s HB 4079 UGB EXPANSION AND ANNEXATION PLAN This section of the report details the HB 4079 UGB Expansion and Annexation Plan. This section of the report contains the Transportation lmpact Analysisl. UGB ExpRITISION PROcESS o CountV approval criteria and standards for a UGB expansion, a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change are included in: r Deschutes County Code - Title 23 Comprehensive Plan r Deschutes County Code - Title 18 - County Zoning r Deschutes County Code - Title L9A - Bend Urbanizable Area (UA) District o Deschutes County Code - Title 22 - Development Procedures City approval criteria and standards for a UGB expansion and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment are included in: o Development Code - Chapter 4.6 Land Use District Map and Text Amendments r Development Code - Chapter 4.L Development Review and Procedures o Comprehensive Plan ArrrrurxRroN PRocESS Bend Development Code 4.9 outlines the requirements to annex property within the Urban Growth Boundary into City Limits. This process will specifically include rezoning of the included lands to their new urban designations. The UGB expansion areas are specifically required to prepare an area and/or master plan for annexation. Pursuant to OAR 660-039, compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 12 has been exempted from this process. Mruon CovvIuITIITY MASTER PLAN Community Master Plan Process City of Bend requirements for a (Major) Community Master Plan are contained within BDC 4.5.200 as the property exceeds 20 acres and deviations from Code standards are proposed. The purpose of this section is stated as providing a complete neighborhood with varied housing options, services, and amenities needed for daily living, including schools, parks, and retail services within convenient walking or biking distance. Within the Community Master Plan process a Transportation Analysis consistent with Bend Development Code 4.7 is required, as well as various provisions related to multimodal connectivity: 1 Pursuant OAR 660-039 (The Affordable Housing Pilot Program) the Transportation Planning Rule requirements are not applicable. Poge 17 Tra nsportotio n I m pa ct An a lysi s o Access to commercial goods and services within a half-mile radius from all points along the master plan perimeter (or as deemed reasonable). o Multimodal connections provided consistent with the City's TSP, BPRD Comprehensive Plan, and continuity with adjacent trail systems. e Consistency with the housing densities identified within the Growth Management section of the Comprehensive Plan (as identified in the annexation section) . 10 percent of the land must be designated public or private open space or trails. Unlike an institutional and employment master plan, a Transportation Parking and Demand Management Plan (BDC 4.8) is not required for a Community Master Plan. lndividual land use applications within the master plan will address parking and multimodal provisions as part of separate future site plan applications. TnRruspoRTATroN Fecurr rs Rrponr Development Code 4.7.400 outlines the requirements for a Transportation Facilities Report {TFR). This is the precursor to the formal Transportation lmpact Analysis (TlA), providing a description of the surrounding transportation characteristics and deficiencies. The Transportation Facilities Report was submitted to the City on December 8,202'J, and these contents are provided under separate cover. Page 78 Tro n spo rtati on I m pa ct Ana lysi s TnRruspoRTATloN I wt pRcr AruRlvsts A formal TlA, as outlined in Development Code 4.7.500, applies the estimated trip generation to the existing transportation system and forecasts future conditions with and without the project for comparison, assessing the functionality of designated study intersections. Study Area The City of Bend requires that the study area include the following intersections: o All site accesses; r All adjacent roadways and intersections; and e All off-site major intersections affected by 50 or more trips per lane group within one-mile of the site. Based on the trip assignment within the Transportation Facilities Report, the following are included as "Study Intersections" : 1. US 20lSE Purcell Blvd 2. US 20lSE 27th St 3. US 20/Right-in, Right-out Collector 4. US 20lNE Hamby Rd-SE Ward Rd 5. SE Livingston Dr/Site Access 6. SE 27th SI/SE Bear Creek Rd 7. SE Bear Creek Rd/SE Quail Run Pl 8. SE Bear Creek Rd/Collector 9. SE Bear Creek Rd/East Access L0. SE Bear Creek Rd/SE Ward Rd Study Analysis Years Consistent with City policy, analysis study years include 202L existing conditions, build-out year conditions without the project, and build-out year conditions with the project. Although the project includes a UGB expansion, Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, and zone change, the administrative rules that implement House Bill 4079 specifically exempt the project from a Transportation Planning Rule analysis (year 2040) that would otherwise be required. lt is expected that the project will include a five- to ten- year build-out timeframe (depending on market conditions), so the project build-out year was conservatively assumed to occur in 2030. Study Time Periods As required by City Code, the operational analysis assessed conditions during the weekday p'm. peak hour, which is the hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. with the highest volume of entering traffic. All City transportation planning, to include the City's Transportation System Plan, City transportation System Development Charge methodology, and ODOT design hour analysis, focus on the weekday evening commute period, as this reflects the highest overall Citywide travel period. Page 79 Tra n sportati o n I m pa ct Ana ly sis Traffic Counts BDC 4.7.500(AXaXa) requires that traffic counts be no more than 12 months old from the date the Transportation Facilities Report is submitted. However, there have been several anomalies between COVID, the non-peak seasonal period, and weather impacts. Accordingly, this analysis is based on traffic counts collected in October 20L8, October 20t9, and supplemented with late November 2O2I counts for calibration purposes. All three sets of counts include information at the critical US 2\/27th Street intersection, as summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1. aJS 20l27th Street Peak Hour Traffic Count Comparison Despite the slight seasonal variations, the traffic counts show very little change over the past three years, with the current 2O2Itraffic volumes lower than those in counts collected in 2018 and 2019. Accordingly, the traffic study relies on the higher available traffic counts but does not apply any growth rates to bring these counts to a current analysis year, as the existing volumes are similar to but slightly lower than the pre-COVID data. Additional review of the traffic counts show that the 27th Street corridor is supporting higher traffic volumes than US 20. They also show higher flows along 27th Street toward the south and higher volumes on US 20 toward the east. During the peak hours, truck percentages are low throughout the study area and generally comprise L%lo 3% of the overall traffic flow. The counts show negligible bicycle activity throughout the study area, with moderate pedestrian activity (14 to 35 pedestrians observed at the US 2o/27rh Street intersection during the peak hour). ODOT requires that intersections under their jurisdiction, such as all of those along the US 20 corridor, to study the 3oth highest hourly volume. The procedure for approximating the 30th highest hour within a given year is summarized in their analysis procedures for development review and planning applications, and all traffic counts are required to be factored to replicate these conditions. This is typically correlated to a summer weekday condition within the area. ODOT has several permanent traffic count stations within and outside of Bend. Count station 09-005 is located along US 20 just east of the Powell Butte Highway. While this is the closest station, its location between Bend and Burns is not reflective of the urban area and would not be appropriate to apply along the 27th Street corridor or other study area intersections. Count Station 09-009 is located along US 97 near the Revere Avenue interchange but reflects more of the urban recreational trends of the area which are much less pronounced than in rural highway corridors. A summary of the adjustment factors is provided in Table 3-2. Count Date US 20Volume tbidirectionall 27th Street Volume {bidirectional} TotalVolume (Total Entering Vehiclesl West of 27th St East of 27th St North of us 20 South of us 20 April L8,2018 L,796 1,599 1,939 t,892 3,613 October L5,2Ot9 L,870 1,558 2,059 1,868 3,774 November 30,2O2L L,742 L,449 2,044 1,9r9 3,576 Page 20 Tra nsportoti on I m pa ct Ano lysi s Table 3-2. ODOT Seasonal ustment Factors Based on ATR The seasonal adjustment factors summarized in Table 3-2 show the peak highway travel months of July and August, with winter traffic volumes on the urban highways that are approxim ately 25% lower in the winter months. Table 3-3 summarizes the dates of each of the traffic counts and the adjustment factors applied to replicate base year conditions. Seasonal adjustments are not applied to City facilities as these experience less seasonal variation and the adopted performance standards instead consider "typical" rather than ODOT's 30th highest hourly conditions. Table 3-3. Traffic Count ustments Bold: Higher traffic count applied within the traffic analysis' Using these traffic counts, the adjusted design hour traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 3-1 and reflect the individual intersection peaks which varies between intersections. Nov DecJulAugsepOctAprMayJunJanFebMar LO6%108%LI7%L20%10I%too%L00%I24%I20%ITT%tog%127% Total Adjustment Annual Factor Seasonal FactorCount Datelntersection 1.01.0 1.0October L5,2019NE Hamby Rd/ NE Neff Rd 1.081.0 1.08October t5,2Ot9us20/ SE Purcell Blvd 1.081.0 1.11 1.08 x.17 April 18,2018 October L5,2Ot9 November 30,202t 20/ 27thSt US SE 1.081.0 1.0E 1.08 October 25, 2018 October t5,2Ot9 us 2ol NE Hamby Rd-SE Ward Rd 1.01.0 1.0 1"0 October t5,20t9 June 9, 2021 SE Purcell Blvd/ SE Bear Creek Rd 1.01.0 1.0December 11, 2018 November 30,?OZL sE 27th St/ SE Bear Creek Rd 1.01.0 1.0November 30,2O2ISE Quail Run Pll SE Bear Creek Rd 1.01.0 1.0October L5,2Ot9SE Ward Rd/ SE Bear Creek Rd Poge 27 Trd n spo rtotio n I m pa ct An a lysi s k,',.o o, t{E larrr.-''ldils f,r c NE PTIRCELL BLVOi HWy 20 O g,ffif* t o t ^e3 vg a r, -%" r* 566i:n*',!-'r l4E 7 ;t z ? EI n bc !rvfiotltn i]r Rd \lJl "f n 3 I 6erto ",@o (tf 5 "t-a C .g NE 2?IH STIfllt/Y 20 I nrnocoueero* o RO g€ARCFEEK RDTqJAl-RTJNPL o o 8C o RD BB ND o RO t-56 + 9?6 €wqttr s rag 56 263 ttt 10c 4 tttzra.f !065-l> erl ilrt m* r*rt t6f t-|{6 fig 3r3 711 r8S 160 a3f t6$ (ttI ft t t rez* +5,Ct Irrj q3{ {> rr} t2t {- /ta3 €ttqir 13 {1 At 6!{56d*t' No Volume (Not a Through Connection) t6n a- 6t €* r59 tfi) 68(tiI t 30 rrst 6g {> s1 ql 5. Sa 584ttn! lC? + tc {r 113 r!0.+ {r 112 119 $ {- ttX n,i a6 .+ ral tr {- 3a €t 3r tg rr tl trt a7 16l racl" Page 22 Figure 3-1. Year 2021 Design Hour Volumes, Weekday PM Peak Hour Annexotion Plon Traffic Operations and Performance Standards All traffic operations summarized within this report were prepared in compliance with City of Bend, Deschutes County, and ODOT methodologies based on the location of the intersection and the relevant roadway authority. The operations analysis requirements and standards vary by agency; the City bases its system adequacy on the control type, surrounding environmental characteristics, and the delay and queuing characteristics averaged across the peak hour. Deschutes County assesses adequacy based on intersection delay during the peak fifteen-minute period of the evening commute hour, and ODOT requires an assessment of peak 15-minute conditions on Central Oregon highways during the summer. The impact of these varying standards, along with various agency-specific calibration factors, is that the City accepts higher delays and congestion on its transportation system before improvements are triggered. A summary of the study intersections, the roadway authority, and applicable performance standards are provided in Table 3-4. This table assumes unsignalized intersection control for the new intersections that will be created with the development on SE Bear Creek Road and the right-in, right-out Collector connection to US 20. Table 3-4. Su of lntersection Performance Standards lntersection Control Type Adopted Performance StandardlntersectionRoadway Authority ODOT Signalized v/c ratio < 0.851,: US20/ SE Purcell Blvd Signalized v/c ratio < 0.852: US2O/ sE 27th st ODOT ODOT Minor Street Stop Controlled v/c ratio < 0.85 (US 20) vf cratio < 0.95 (Access) 3: US 20l Right-in, Right-out Collector Minor Street Stop Controlled v/c ratio < 0.85 (US 20) v/c ratio < 0.95 (Hamby Rd) 4: US20/ NE Hamby Rd - SE Ward Rd ODOT Minor Street Stop Controlled Delay < 50 seconds 5: Livingston Drive/ Site Access (Roadway Extension) City of Bend City of Bend Signalized v/c ratio < L,05: SE 27th St/ SE Bear Creek Rd Delay < 50 seconds7: SE Bear Creek Rd/ SE Quail Run Pl City of Bend Minor Street Stop Controlled Minor Street Stop Controlled Delay < 50 seconds8: SE Bear Creek Rd/ Collector City of Bend City of Bend Minor Street Stop Controlled Delay < 50 seconds9: SE Bear Creek Rd/ East Access Minor Street Stop Controlled Level of Service "D"10: SE Ward Rd/ SE Bear Creek Rd Deschutes County Poge 23 Annexation Plon The operational analysis of the vehicular system was prepared using Synchro Version 10 analysis software implementing the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition methodologies. Overall signalized intersection volume-to-capacity ratios are reported using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition. The technical appendices contain the operations analysis worksheets for each of the scenarios presented within this report. Existing Year 2O2L Traffic Conditions The purpose of the existing conditions analysis is to help identify improvement priorities by informing current operational needs. This analysis is also used to help plan system improvements and identify overall travel patterns and system trends, as well as to calibrate the analysis models. The seasonally adjusted design hour volumes presented above were assessed throughout the transportation network based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations that are in place. Signal timing data for each of the signalized intersections was obtained from ODOT and incorporated into the analysis. The resulting traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3-2 and the analysis results are shown in Table 3-5. Tra nsportation Operations This analysis shows that only one of the study intersections does not currently meet the adopted performance standards with other intersections operating near their acceptable limit: The US 20/SE Purcell Boulevard intersection currently operates with a v/cratio of 0.81, which is just below ODOT's mobility target of 0.85. The US \O/SE 27th Street intersection operates above ODOT's mobility target. The minor street northbound and southbound approaches at the US 20/NE Hamby Road-SE Ward Road intersection operate with high delays and nearly at their carrying capacity. A single-lane roundabout is planned by ODOT for this intersection with construction already started on the temporary detour route and full completion anticipated in 2022. Year 2030 No-Build Traffic Conditions The build-out year conditions analysis without the project is presented to provide the basis for comparison to "With Project" conditions. This provides an understanding of area transportation needs that are attributable to the proposed affordable housing development. These conditions consider the regional traffic growth and any approved developments within the vicinity that impact the study area intersections. Growth Forecasts Growth forecasts were prepared using a macro-level travel demand model-based approach to develop growth rates at the study intersections, This travel demand model is the same forecasting process (and travel demand modeling information) as applied within the City's Transportation System Plan and the US 97 Parkway Plan. The regional travel demand models identify current and projected population (by housing types) and employment (by category) forecasts by individual zones (Transportation Analysis Zone, or TAZ) throughout the City. Existing census data is used to help calibrate the model's trip generation parameters. These TAZ areas are connected by roads, with information input on roadway classification, number of lanes, speeds, and intersection types. Trips within the model distribute throughout the a a Page 24 Annexotion Plan roadway network based on overall travel times, providing estimates of weekday daily and weekday p.m peak hour trip forecasts. The model-based growth rates show long-range area growth rates that range from t% to 3% annually, with a breakdown by corridor as follows: o US 20 (Purcell Boulevard to SE 27th Street): L% annualgrowth o US 20 (SE 27th Street to SE Ward Road): 2/o annual growth o SE Bear Creek Road (SE 27th Street): !.6To annual growth o SE Bear Creek Road (SE 27th Street to SE Ward Road): 2.8%o annual growth Review of ODOT's future growth forecasts from the TransGlS site shows slightly differing trends for US 20. This data shows a 2/o annual growth rate for US 20 west of 27th Street and L% annual growth toward the east. lt is unclear if these forecasts account for the UGB expansion lands that will increase volumes on the Ward-Hamby corridor, particularly the NE Edge (Petrosa) and DSL (Steven's Ranch) lands. ln addition to regional growth, there were five specific projects identified that impact the study area intersections: r BP-19-0L79: Home2 Suites Hotel e BP-17-6618: Big Sky Village o BP-17-0559: Kayla Crossing o BP-17-4422: Coltages at Bear Creek o Bonaventure Bear Creek Multifamily While some of these projects are fully built-outtoday, due to the inclusion of traffic counts from2019, trips from these developments were added to the transportation network. Tra nsportation I m provements The ODOT planned roundabout at the US 2O/Hamby Road-SE Ward Road intersection was assumed to be fully completed within the 2030 analysis. ln addition, discussions with ODOT staff indicated that a pedestrian crossing of US 20 within the Benson - Dalton area is funded through the All Roads Traffic Safety (ARTS) program. No other improvement projects were identified for inclusion within the analysis. Tra nsportation Operations The operations analysis shows that the US 20/Purcell Boulevard intersection will exceed ODOT's mobility target in this scenario, and the single-lane roundabout safety improvement will dramatically improve the high delays on the north-south approaches of the Ward-Hamby intersection. While the new roundabout will operate with much lower minor-approach delays, this configuration will result in added delays to the highway movements, operating nearly attheir mobilitytarget in 2030. ln addition, the US 2o/27rh Street intersection will continue to exceed adopted standards, operating just below capacity. Page 25 Annexotion PlqnTable 3-5. Traffic ConditionsBOLD: Performance standard not metPM10: 5E Ward Rd/SE BearCreek Rd9: SE Be6r Creek Rd/East Access8: SE Bear Creek Rd/Colledor7: SE Bear Creek Rd/SE Quail Run Pl6: sE 27rh st/SE Bear creek Rd5: Livingston Drive/Site Access4: US 20/NE Hamby - SE Ward Rd(Roundobout in 2030)3: US 20/collector2:U520/sE 27rh Stf: US 20/SE Purcell BlvdlnleBedionLevel ofSeruice "D"Delay < 50 secondsDelay< 50 secondsDelay< 50 secondsv/c ratio < 1.0Through Street Connection(No Standards)v/c ratio < 0.85 (US 20)v/c ratio < 0.95 (Hamby Rd){stop-sign & roundabout)v/c ratio < 0.85 (US 20)v/c ratio < 0.95 (Access)v/c ratio < 0.85v/c ratjo < 0.85Pedormance SbndardEB LTR: BWB LTR: BnlanlaSB LR: ABNB LTR: FSB LTR| FnlaDcrosExlstldg Traff ic ConditlonsEB LTR: 11.8WB LTR: 12.1SB LR:9.1L7.7NB LTR: >50.0SB LTR: >50.052.631.3Delay {seclEB LTR: 0.17WB LTR: 0.08SB LR: 0.060.48NB LTR: 0.76SB LTR:0.660.E90.81v/c RatloEB LTR: 25'WB LIR: 25'SB tR: 25'EB L: 105'EB TR:95'WB L: 50'WB TR: 115'NB L: 35'NB TR: 210'SB L: 35'SB TR: 285'NB LTR: 125'EB L:25'WB L: 25'SB LTR: 100'E8 L 35s',EB TR: 390'WB Lr 230'WB TRi 240'NB tr 200'NB TR: 210'SB L: 165'58 T: 400'SB R: 145'EB L: 240'EB TR: 425'WB L:35,WB TR: 450'Ng L: 95'NB TR: 24S'S8 L: 105'SB T: 225'SB R: 155'95th PercentileQueueEB LTR: BWB LTR: Bn/aSB LR: AEB LTR: CWB LTR: BN8 LTR: ASB LTR: AEcLO52030 No-Build conditionsEB LTR: 13.3WB LTR:13.6SB LR: 9.419.1EB LTR: 17.0WB LTR: 12.0NB LTR] 8.3SB LTR: 7.859.133.5Delay (sec)EB LTR: 0.24WB LTR:0.11SB LR: 0.080.s6EB LTR: 0.78WB LTR: 0.63NB LTR: 0.18SB LTR:0.210.98o.91v/c RatloEB LTR: 25'WB LTR: 25'5B LR: 25'EB L: 115'EB TR: 110'WB L: 55'WBTR:125'NB L: 40'NB TR: 265'SB L: 35'SB TR: 305'EB:225'WB:125'NB:25'58: 25'EB L: 380'EB TR: 450'WB L: 260'WB TR: 265'NB L: 230'NB TR: 270'SB L: 230'SB T: 460'SB R: 175'EB L: 325'EB TR: 485'WB L: 40'WB TR: 545'NB L; 105'NB TR: 295'SB t: 135'SB T: 245'SB R: 170'95tn P€.@ntileQueueEB LTR: BWB LTR: BSB tR: ASB LR: ASB LR: AcEB LTR: CWB LTR: BNB LTR: ASB LTR: ANBR:CEcLOS2030 With Projed Traflic Condition5EB tTR: 13.7WB LTR: 14.0SB LR: 9.3SB LR: 9.5SB LR: 9.82r.1EB LTR: 19.6WB LTR:13.0NB LTR: 8.7SB LTR: 8.0NB R: 17.663.534.4Delay (sec)EB LTR: 0.26WB LTR:0.12SB LR: 0.02SB LR: 0.075B LR: 0.090.59EB LTR: 0.82WB LTR: 0.65NS LTR:0.19SB LTR: 0.22NB R: 0.101.050.92v/c RatioEB LTR: 50'WB LTR: 25'SB LR: 25'SB LR: 25'SB LR: 25'EB L: 110'EB TR: 130'WB t: 60'WB TR: 160'NB L: 45'NB TR: 290'SB L: 35'SB TR: 305'EB: 250'wB:125'NB:25'SS:25'NB R: 25'EB L: 365'EB IR: 490'W8 L: 250'WB TRr 275'NB t: 255'NB TR: 315'SB Lr 31dSBT: 460SB R: 175'EB L: 335'EB TRi 510'WB L:45'WB TR: 550'NB Li 105'NB TR: 295'SB L: 145'SB T; 245'SB R: 170'95$ Perc€ntileQueqePoge 26 Annexation Plon(B.,:,,e06PU flP,,Yn r0rd XFIuo5€t\ *NFJtit$ lalFc ltlo-zE!:'irl"i'r'Jer!>tS lcN'g"qli! 3-tc,+!ui,l qlnrFf lsprill lllrrl.; 'i, p,U n,a.fr0tad !t'u ufns .hqRsuhrde .iirlIl:,rlr,***t-61fr<-r06es7lmt^lil,$..),rl,tt67<- 47&€tgrrsltr74319t6.e +tacc'G itTH STIlflrY 20I nnocouecroa[E PTJffgELT N.YDIowmnoHWV MoDNOHfit#-*aoNDooffi+ <-6rg+5!nfmtasrsr.l6C5.->dleqli$aNo Volume(Not a ThroughConnec{ion)tli7t+r3t 1001 77<- t[5rst75eearso.f,r1,,72(tlt+ t4ltla.9rts*lit + <- r{o'tg7 + <ts t{Oarl\,lli9c<- .et2nt57 ..>sat2030 No-Build Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Peak HourC}G PUNCELL IL\€l#8oF€ z'TH ST.'HWY Sanno colrEgron..us 20Ow#,f"ocooROOOarrt6&.+rorlts {& t79+asfrsorr3t6Ilat16Itr273 W tX.r1.,rrla,1a€tsr!nE5.+t61<-tma$e..)'tm+637srlreo!6eB+aoarl*I+5203*tr5ii(Not a ThroughConnection)No Volumeql,|r8t tml r/60a(t1)rrq,ls+€wtr06+fi72(r&4+9ea.ltil<- 20.50(t18+r53lts!1.S.,.,|'r3Ibrzgr4rtt,3<- rianr5!2sr!n.l50+rtiTr;+45Gs2030 With Proiect Traffic volumes, Weekday PM Peak HourFigure 3-2. Future Year 2030 Study Area Traffic Volumet Weekday PM Peak HourPoge 27 Annexotion PIan Year 2030 With Project Traffic Conditions The 2030 with project traffic analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate with the inclusion of the proposed development in the build-out year 2030. lt includes the traffic volume forecasts from the year 2030 no-build analysis and adds in the site-generated trips as described within the Transportation Facilities Report. The resulting volumes are shown in Figure 3-2. Table 3-5 summarizes the traffic operations. This analysis assumes that SE Bear Creek Road is improved with a three-lane cross-section as presented within the Master Plan for the HB 4079 project, and also assumes that these public street connections only include a single southbound shared left- and right-turn lane with stop-sign control. As discussed with agencies, the Collector connection to US 20 is limited to right-in, right-out movements only. Tra nsportation Operations Key findings of the 2030 'With Project" operational analysis are as follows a With the addition of site-generated traffic there are incremental increases in congestion along the US 20 corridor at the Purcell Boulevard and SE 27th Street intersections. Similar to "without project" conditions, these intersections will exceed ODOT mobility targets with the SE 27th Street intersection operating beyond its carrying capacity. The right-turn only access to US 20 operates at a Level of Service "C" during the peak evening commute period in 2030. The approach experiences very limited queuing. The southbound connections to SE Bear Creek Road operate with very low delays due to the limited conflicting volume on the corridor. The single-lane approaches and stop-sign control will meet the build-out year needs. Queues are very limited at these approaches, and turn bays could be designed with a minimum of 75-feet of left-turn storage. Due to the configuration of Livingston Drive and lack of right-of-way to improve the corridor it was assumed in this analysis that this connection will be restricted to emergency and pedestrian and bicycle access only at this time. The connection should be fully opened to vehicular traffic when the road is improved to City standards along the adjacent nursery property. Bollards may provide a more permeable treatment rather than gates, and it is recommended that the connection be signed to indicate that the road is intended to serve as a through street in the future. a a a Tunru LRrur Assrssurrur Left-turn and right-turn lane warrants were reviewed at each of the proposed accesses to the HB 4079 property to assess the safety of these future public intersections. Left-Turn Lane Warrants Turn lane warrants are reviewed based on guidance within the ODOT Transportation Planning and Analysis Unit's publicationAnolysis Procedures Manuol. Left-turn lane warrants are based on the posted roadway speed, bidirectional traffic volume, and percentage of the total volume turning left. The left-turn lane warrants are essentially a cost-benefit calculation of the safety benefits provided by separating through and turning traffic versus the construction costs. Figure 3-3 illustrates the left-turn lane warrants for the proposed SE Bear Creek Road access for the 2030 total traffic conditions during the weekday p.m. Poge 28 UIg6 ECf(soJ>bg) o-.Ea9ar(--(u r->J ES U) t- )Jo-f 9)- hE, REdoo- Annexation Plon peak hour. Left-turn lane warrants do not apply to the US 20 access as it will be limited to right-in, right- out movements only. 1000 800 500 400 2 0 l0 20 30 4C 50 Left-Turn Volume (Design Hour Volumes) 60 Figure 3-3. ODOT Left-Turn Lane Warrant Review of SE Bear Creek Road accesses Year 2030 Total Traffic Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour. As shown in the figure, SE Bear Creek Road meets the volume criteria for the installation of a left-turn into the site at the Collector intersection. Despite not meeting the left-turn lane warrants at the eastern access, with the proposed streetscape section a left-turn lane will be provided at this location as well. While not assessed within this figure, review of the traffic volumes at the Quail Run intersection with SE Bear Creek Road west of the site includes higher left-turning and through volumes and would easily meet the left- turn lane warrants. Right-Turn Lane Warrants The purpose of a right-turn lane is to improve safety and capacity of a roadway by reducing the speed differential between through vehicles and decelerating vehicles. Within an urban environment, facility design considerations should include the increased pedestrian crossing distance across the major roadway, higher resultant through speeds, and right-of-way/streetscape. Right turn lanes are typically reviewed based on the ODOT methodology for rural highways; as such, discretion and engineering judgement is required in applying these criteria to the transitioning SE Bear Creek Road corridor. The forecast traffic volumes at the site accesses during the weekday p.m. peak hour were reviewed under year 2030 total traffic conditions during the design hour. As shown in Figure 3-4, the proposed access on US 20 meets the criteria for right-turn lanes into the site. Generally, within the urbanizing area right-turn lanes are not recommended at any locations; with the rural and undeveloped area that surrounds the site and the higher-order classification of the Collector connection the deceleration lane is recommended as it would reduce the potential for rear-end collisions, 0 - '- -'- ' t,.':,' IIIII Bear Creek/ East Access (Not Warranted)Bear Creek/ Collector (Warranted) Page 29 Annexation PIan Right Turn Lane Criteriono 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 8000')ocF77ooJE €:600it; !16= soodbOi A 4ooIntrH .FJoE 3oo$Etia6 '=' 2oo dE 1oo '\ 0 rlcnotc Right-Turn Volume (.vph) \ \ \4smph \ >45 mph US 2Ol Collector (Not Warranted) US 2Ol East Access (Not Warranted) US 2Ol Collector (Warranted) Figure 3-4. ODOT Right-Turn Lane Warrant Review, Year 2030 TotalTraffic Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour. US 20 ITTERSECIION MITIGATION The operational analysis shows that the primary off-site impacts occur along the US 20 corridor, and these impacts occur with or without the affordable housing project. As these needs have been documented within prior studies to include the recent Transportation System Plan (see Figure 3-5) and recently approved Area Plans/Master Plans for Stevens Ranch and SEAP, the site was specifically designed to focus vehicular access onto the SE Bear Creek Road corridor. This corridor includes two full-access connections to Bear Creek Road in comparison to the single right-in, right-out access onto US 20. Poge 30 Annexotion Plan c.€,2 US 20 Operational ldentiff and construct lmprovements from improvements that enhance 1sth Street to east mobility along the corridor,UGB including at ths US 20/NE 27th Street intersection Connectivity/ $10,000,000 Capacity $1,000,000 (Contribution to ODOT project) City Pr0portionatc CostTotal CostDcscrrion/Location Figure 3-5. City of Bend Transportation System Plan. As required by House Bill 4079 the project will be served by fixed-route transit. While it is expected that routing changes will occur in the future to directly serve the property (and transit stops are being constructed along the Collector to support this future service), in the initial project phases transit service will be provided from the SE 27th Street corridor. Sidewalks are not connected to this corridor today along SE Bear Creek Road, US 20, or Livingston Drive. As a near-term solution it is recommended that the project complete the pedestrian connection along SE Livingston Drive. With the planned piping of the canal lateral, a walkway connection can be provided to the Livingston Drive corridor, where sidewalks are present west to the roadway terminus at the BPRD property. lt is expected that collaboration with BPRD will enable this project to construct some type of interim asphalt pathway that extends to the Benson Way corridor, connecting to the retail uses to the west. Preliminary discussions with ODOT have indicated that another potential interim connection may be possible along the US 20 frontage. ODOT has an 8O-foot right-of-way along the highway, which would support the needed 910-foot sidewalk or pathway across the adjacent nursery extending to the sidewalks that end east of Dalton Street. ODOT plans to initiate a corridor plan for US 20, but an expected outcome will be a sidewalk or pathway regardless and it may be possible to prioritize this through quick-fix funding sources. ODOT will also consider pedestrian crossing locations to link to the retail uses to the north, though the specific location for this crossing is not yet known due to the adjacent vertical curves and merge that occurs near Dalton Street. The City has identified the SE Bear Creek Road corridor for improvements through the Transportation GO Bond, including sidewalk infill along the corridor to include the HB 4079 property (these will be constructed by the development as part of its required frontage improvements and will not be funded through the GO Bond). Accordingly, while the site currently does not provide any connections west, there are preliminary plans to provide walking and cycling facilities along all three corridors that link the site to the current urban area. Additional discussions will need to occur as part of the annexation process to help identify the priority for the specific connections and what type of funding options or cost sharing may be required of the HB 4079 lands. Table 3-6 summarizes the off-site improvement needs within the study area Page 37 lntersection lmprovement Need/ Estimated Cost Responsibilityl Recommendation No improvements proposed as part of development or within the City's recently adopted TSP other than as part of a US 20 corridor plan. us20/ SE Purcell Blvd Capacity lmprovements or development/i m provement of parallel routes (such as Dean Swift Road) Development of parallel routes such as Purcell Blvd, Hamby Road No improvements proposed as part of development or within the City's recently adopted TSP other than as part of a us 20 corridor plan. us20/ NE 27th St Fully funded roundabout planned in2022by ODOT and Deschutes County. us20/ NE Hamby Rd-SE Ward Rd Single-Lane Roundabout Annexotion Plan Table 3-5. Summa of Off-Site I Needs Consistent with SEAP and Stevens Ranch, mitigation for these highway impacts is proposed as a pro-rata payment to ODOT. The overall impact of the project equates to $124,050.52, or 5359.57 per unit. The summaries of this total amount are detailed below. US 20/SE Purcell Boulevard lntersection The US 20/SE Purcell Boulevard intersection does not meet ODOT's mobility targets today and the demand is expected to exceed the capacity by the horizon year 2030 with or without the proposed development. The project shows a minor change in the intersection performance, with a difference from the project only changing the v/c ratio by 0.01. The only identified project within the City's Transportation System Plan is the need for an overall US 20 corridor plan, which lacks any specific details on this intersection. The signalized intersection already contains a full five-lane section along US 20 and a three-lane section along Purcell Boulevard, which also widens to include an auxiliary southbound right-turn lane. Additional mitigation options are limited at this location, and the most effective treatment will be the development and improvement of parallel routes, such as the SE Bear Creek Road corridor. Pro-rata contributions at this intersection were premised on a 52.5M improvement cost. The proportion of added trips of the year 2030 total traffic results in a I.8% impact at the intersection (544,81712 US 20/NE 27th Street lntersection The US 20/NE 27th Street intersection was the only location within the study area that operates over its adopted performance target under current conditions. By 2030 the intersection is forecast to operate at its physical carrying capacity, and with the project it shows an increase in the v/c ratio of 0.07. The NE 27th Street corridor is highly constrained, and volumes are expected to increase with the completion of the northern connection to Empire Avenue and the UGB expansion areas that are situated along the route. The City's Transportation System Plan notes that north-south corridors east of US 97 are limited by existing development patterns, the railroad, and Pilot Butte, precluding the opportunity for 2 69 peak hour trips of 3,849 total trips, or tJ9% of the est, 52,500,000 project (544,816.84) Page 32 Annexation Plon new corridors. The Eagle Road and Ward-Hamby corridors have seen significant travel increases as growth continues to move east and as congestion increases on the SE 27th Street corridor. The solution identified within the TSP in acknowledgement of the over-capacity conditions is "further use of demand-management strategies, targeted widening or intersection improvements, or adoption of alternative mobility standards." The City identifies 5500,000 in near-term funding to improve traffic signal coordination or implement signal timing strategies that prioritize signal green time for transit vehicles and trucks. Neither of these strategies is expected to address the over-capacity conditions and modifying signal priority could create further reductions in performance. With the intersection already widened to what is considered a "built-out" condition improvements will need to be reviewed as part of a more holistic assessment, likely as part of a corridor plan that expands to include adjacent and parallel routes. lmprovement options could include review of access to the adjacent retail centers to reduce the reliance on the traffic signal, or improvements to the Neff Road, Ward Road, and Bear Creek Road corridors. The layout of the HB 4079 project includes a new Collector that bisects the property, not because this single-block connection is needed to support build-out of the project, but rather with the longer-term view that this Collector can be extended south to Stevens Road and tie in with the Eubanks Road Collector. This was originally intended to extend farther south of the Stevens Ranch property and connect with the SEAP Collector, but this extension was disconnected as part of the City-led Area Plan. Ultimately, an Urban Reserve study, if for no purpose other than to assess the alignment of future Collectors and Arterials should be completed by the City to help guide area development patterns in coordination with Deschutes County. Pro-rata contributions were based on estimates prepared through SEAP showing an overall intersection improvement cost of 52.5M. The proportion of added trips from the site compared with the total entering volume results in a 3.2% impact at the US 2o/27th Street intersection (579,233)3. US 20/NE Hamby Road-SE Ward Road Intersection Due to the historical safety issues discussed inthe Roadwoy Sofety section of the Transportation Facilities Report, a roundabout has been approved for the US 2O/HambV - Ward intersection. Deschutes County is partnering with ODOT to complete this roundabout in the spring of 2022, with construction of the construction detour and staging area already underway. While the intersection meets the adopted mobility targets under the existing conditions, the analysis shows that the minor-street approaches operate at Level of Service "F" with four- to five-vehicle queues during the peak hours. This poor performance, coupled with the two recent fatalities and additional severe injury crashes led to a Roadway Safety Audit that identified a near-term need for a roundabout to help transition from the rural to urban highway section. 3 134 peak hour trips of 4,228 total trips, or 3.77% of the 52,500,000 project identified in SEAP (579,233.68). Poge 33 Annexotion PIan A memorandum was prepared as part of the safety audit summarizing the operations and forecasts for this intersection. The findings reported: "The US 20/Ward-Hamby Road intersection hos a historicolly poor sofety performance and is o high priority locotion for improvements. A single-lone roundabout will operote well within County ond ODOT performonce thresholds if installed todoy. The long-term forecasts vary in terms of whether east-west or north-south growth will dominote through the 2040 horizon. The travel demond modeling is expected to better reflect locolized land use plons and shows that a single-lane roundobout con occommodate 2040 demands albeit with increosing deloys ond queuing on the eostbound approach. The risk is that if growth in travel patterns along US 20 continue ot historicol levels odditionol improvements may be required. However, with a roundobout even with these high long- term delays there will continue to be o significont reduction in the higher severity turning and angle collisions, which is the primory impetus for the improvement." The operational analysis conducted within this report identified similar findings. While the installation of a roundabout will immediately reduce northbound and southbound delays, it adds delay to the higher- volume highway movements. By 2030 (only eight years after installation) the intersection operates with a v/c ratio of O.82, which is just below the adopted mobility target. ODOT's investment in new infrastructure typically requires a more stringent design standard as identified within the Highway Design Manual, to ensure thatthe investment made can support beyond 20-years of growth. However, as a safety project the smaller single-lane roundabout will result in better safety performance. lt is recommended that ODOT adopt alternate mobility targets at this location to recognize the acceptance and tolerance of higher delays as a trade-off to the improved safety within a single-lane design. PnoponroNATE SHRnr CoNrRt euroNs City Code contains a provision for proportionate share contributions at off-site intersections that operate acceptably through the study horizon to avoid small development triggering significant improvements. There are no known locations within the study area that have an established pro-rata fee, and the mitigation strategy proposed as part of this plan addresses both the impacts of the land development and regional needs that extend beyond the project impacts, and so should be exempted from these payments. Page 34 MASTER P1AN Areo Plan PARKSIDE PLACE MASTER PLAN This section of the report details the Concept Plan for the Parkside Place Master Plan. This section summarizes guiding area land use and transportation policies and introduces a framework plan for the vehicular and multimodal system that supports the planned land uses. Review of applicable plans and policies is provided within the Transportation Facilities Report that was submitted under separate cover. The following summarizes the key outcomes of this review and the overallArea Plan and streetscape sections. The Master Plan incorporates several multimodal strategies to support the plans and policies outlined within the project literature review. This includes the following measures to comply with adopted plans and policies: r Provision of a centrally located transit stop near the primary internal intersection. The transit stop is planned to include a concrete pad with a shelter, bench, illumination, and informational signage showing the estimated service times. o lncorporation of a multiuse pathway system along the north, west, and southern edges of the project, and along the central north-south collector. These pathways connect the site to the surrounding street system and form the identified BPRD trail system. Not only do these provide a transportation purpose, but they also serve as an on-site neighborhood amenity with long-term BPRD plans to connect north to Big Sky Park and south to Hansen Park, where it will then connect with BPRD's trail system along the COID canal that links west to the Larkspur and Deschutes River Trails. r Designation of a Collectorwithin the site along the route connecting SE Bear Creek Road to US 20. This designation recognizes the limited access connection to the US 20 corridor while providing a low-stress cycling and walking route to connect the major roadways. o A local street network is shown that provides connections to the urban lands west of the project site and to the future urbanizable lands to the east. The connections shown comply with the City's block spacing requirements and also provide connection points for utility services. o Tentative improvements are shown west of the site along the Livingston Drive route. This section extends through lands owned by BPRD, and together with BPRD staff is planned to provide a walking/cycling route that connects to the NE 27th Street corridor outside of the surrounding major streets. Until improvements are made west of the subject property (expected with development of the nursery site) this route is not suitable as a vehicular connection and should be limited to pedestrian and cyclists with removable bollards. . SE Bear Creek Road's frontage is largely unimproved east of SE 27th Street, and a narrow canal bridge is located immediately west of the property boundary. The streetscape design provides a long-range vision for this entire corridor consistent with the pavement width of improved sections to the west. o Two full-access connections are shown onto SE Bear Creek Road. As the lowest-classification abutting street that is capable of supporting the types and levels of traffic generated by the site, this route will serve as the primary access with the intent of reducing travel along the more constrained US 20 corridor. There are planned improvements to the SE Bear Creek corridor through the City's Transportation GO Bond. Figure 4-1 illustrates the Concept Plan for Parkside Place showing the location of planned street connections in all directions. Page 36 Aree Flan,.,1.IIrli,ffiffi4ffiffil'![:1k"n'qrrr:rnst,t"si,!,.at:'t,ibr.^attl?,;-' rrl .-.;t. :LIlrltil* : 'i1: -{*id#r-i+lisiteBPRDPercelPARK.5 .",Minor Arterialm CollectorFigure 4-1-. Proposed Area PlanLegendI PrincipalArterialLocal StreetMultiuse PathwayMissing Walkwayl,L.Qu-a.;rf*:rltrl- I' r'rpi:-L - J l----+,iIih '' '-tr.'n ,.*$*IOI{LYRight-in, Right-Out OnlyAccess lntersectionwith Left-Turn LanesPage 37Transit StopBridge / Culvert Area Plan PRoposgo Srne rr Secrorus To support the Master Plan and modal needs within this area, modified City street sections were developed. This includes a revised design for the US 20 corridor that will include a multiuse pathway along the southern right-of-way, a modified Minor Arteriol design for Bear Creek Road that will include a multiuse pathway along its northern edge, and a Collector that will link Bear Creek Road and US 20. Each of these major streets supports the City's desired low-stress cycling network, and each includes curb and gutter treatments to transition this area from its current rural character to a more urban design. Specific features that have been incorporated into these streetscape designs include the following: r 100-foot right-of-way section along US 20 per the City's Arteriolrequirements, see Figure 4-2. r No widening of US 20 is proposed, and the right-in, right-out connection will be enforced through a channelized median at the access to maintain freight clearances along US 20. r The proposed multiuse pathway along US 20 will provide ideal separation from the higher-speed and heavy truck volumes. This will also provide separation for snow storage/plowing.r The Bear Creek Road streetscape was updated to match with the 52-foot section constructed toward the west, as shown in Figure 4-3. This section shows a desired 35 mph speed that will be subject to a speed study (and may require additional improvements to the west).r The Collector provides a Low-Stress route through the site connecting US 20 and SE Bear Creek Road. With the road bordering the park site the pathway was included along the western boundary. This right-of-way width is adequate to also support transit stops, as shown in Figure 4- 4. The designation of the north-south street as a two-lane Collector was based on the intended functional role of the street within the context of the new neighborhood. This street is intended to support north- south connections, but within the planning horizon this road will only provide a single-block length connection. ln addition, as the street will be limited to right-in, right-out movements at its connection to US 20, additional pavement width for left-turn lanes is unnecessary. The layout of the neighborhood does not support any direct residential driveway access onto the Collector, so the provision of continuous bicycle lanes are intended to serve as an extension into the site from the SE Bear Creek Road corridor. The multiuse pathway along its western edge will connect into the park and a planned transit stop that will be sited for future service to this area by Cascades East Transit. While these sections do not show local streets or alleys, all local streets and alleys will follow the City's currently adopted standards and specifications that include a 32-foot pavement width and parking along both sides for local streets and a 20-foot alley width. As no changes are requested these cross-sections are not illustrated but are included within this plan by reference. Page 38 Area Plqn Faure Slwkter wtulonhg. c'uro. GuLet ltadgcaps trd 8d0en lgy Othots) lilI f, 8-Feet 12-Feet t Irl 4o-Foot Pavement 100-Fe€t i l9-Feet '1o-Feet @Ud@SttpdWqprftryla/OdF, & + 23-F66t 8-Feet ROW Figure 4-2. Proposed US 20 Cross Section (Multiuse Pathway along Frontage) t7-Fet inl ROW ROW I t 12-Feet & ohli n9 & 6-Feetl0-Feet 13-Fst ROW Figure 4-3. Proposed Bear Creek Road Cross Section (Multiuse Pathway along Frontage). GFeet I 2'l 12-Feet 12-F€et 52-Foot Pavem€nt 100-F€et I t I,l.* 38-Foot Pavement 80-Feat lelif,l| ,o-r""t I rz.s-r""t .*i,l 11-Feet nl ROW Figure 4-4. North-South Col/ector Cross-section (pathway is located along the west and borders the park). Pqge 39 12.5'Feet ROW Area Plan TnnruspoRTATroN Sysrrv Pmru Avrruovrrur A Transportation System Plan amendment is required as part of this project to extend the classified roads to and through the site. These changes include the addition of a north-south Collector roadway that bisects the site, connecting US 20 to SE Bear Creek Road. As an Urban Growth Boundary expansion site the City has not previously planned infrastructure to support urban development of this site. The need for a new Collector road between SE Bear Creek Road and US 20 is not driven by this particular project, as the single-block length of a new Collector does not provide a functional purpose at this time and does not carry sufficient volume to warrant this classification, particularly with the limited right-in, right-out connection to US 20. However, the designation is desired by the City as there are no other streets providing this north-south connection between SE 27th Street and Ward - Hamby, leaving a one- mile spacing appropriate for Arteriolsbut double the City's desired distance for Collectors. As shown toward the north in Figure 4-5 (and farther south through the Stevens Ranch property) the Eagle Road and Eubanks Street Collector provides this desired %mile spacing and as these lands are brought into the UGB in the future it is expected that this corridor will form a long-term roadway extension, Current development patterns and previously annexed lands outside of the subject J: Future Collector roporbo Major Arterial Extension Proposed New Collector Minor Arteial Extension oa , Future llector ! Figure 4-5. City of Bend Functional Classification Map showing the exclusion of the H84079 property. 3 aat' H property may preclude this route from serving as a continuous north-south connection, requiring some type of "jog" in the alignment at Neff Road as shown. For this project, the only TSP amendments requested are the extension of SE Bear Creek Road as a Minor Arterlol across the property frontage, the inclusion of US 20 as a Major Arteriol along the northern frontage, and the new north-south Collector. Consistent with the designation of Eagle Road and Eubanks Street, this new Collector will also be part of the City's low Cycling Stress network. r tattatDait Page 40 Area Plan The extension of the current Major and Minor Arteriol classifications of US 20 and SE Bear Creek Road follow a logical pattern and provide continuity along the urbanizing lands. SE Bear Creek Road forms a connection between SE Franklin Avenue east to US 20, meeting the TSP description as streets that "serve through traffic ond provide connections to highways, or span ocross highways to creote continuous cross' town travel." As a State facility, US 20 is separately classified within the Oregon Highway Plan as a Statewide Highway and Freight Route, and it retains a Federal Functional Classification as an Urbon Other Principal Arterial between Bend and Burns. The specific criteria to site a Collector street within the City's recently adopted Transportation System Plan is related the following factors: . Typical weekday daily volume between 1.,500 and 9,000 vehicles . Typical spacing of Tz mile . Trip lengths that are less than L mile r Two- to three-lane cross-sections . Bicycle lanes or other bikeway treatments required r Sidewalks or multiuse pathways are required r Generally, no parking is allowed unless approved (typically parking bays are required) The proposed Collector will meet all of these siting criteria, though extending only through the subject property the daily traffic volume will be around 1,100 daily trips at the higher-volume southern portion of the street, with this value increasing within the typical Collector range when connected south. As shown in Figure 4-4, the proposed cross-section for this roadway will include a two-lane facility with multimodal infrastructure that will provide the lowest possible Level of Traffic Stress rating of "1", with low-stress options for cyclists on the street or on the multiuse pathway. While the House Bill 4079 lands are specifically exempted from the Transportation Planning Rule, the addition of a new Collector and extension of arterials would typically trigger the TPR. As these are changes to the functional classification of existing or planned facilities, this would be considered a significant impact. As outlined within OAR 660-12-0060(2), the inclusion of these new Major Streets serves as a measure being put into place to remain consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards of the facilities (bringing these to an urban standard with an urbanizing area), with the roadway improvements being funded through this project in cooperation with the local government as defined within the annexation agreement. Accordingly, while exempted from the TPR this plan continues to remain in compliance with these requirements while also meeting the City's goals as stated within the Transportation System Plan. Poge 41 TRANSPORTATION COST ALLOCATIONS & FUNDING MECHANISMS Tronsportation Cost Allocations ond Funding Mechonisms TRANSPORTATION COST ALLOCATIONS & FUNDING MECHANISMS This section describes the potentialfunding mechanisms to support the urbanization of the Parkside Place affordable housing develoPment. TnnruspoRTATIo N Cosr AllocRtt oltts The purpose of this section is to separate out the costs of transportation improvements. Each of the major transportation cost components of the project are outlined below along with a recommended method of cost allocation in Table 5-1. Table 5-1. Summary of Transportation Cost Allocations Additional details on these elements are provided below. Frontage lmprovements preliminary discussions with ODOT have indicated that improvements to the highway should include a 10- foot wide asphalt multiuse pathway built at the southern edge of the dedicated right-of-way to maximize its spacing from the highway corridor. No highway widening is planned, but with the findings of this report Transportation Cost Recommended Cost Allocation Method Frontage lmprovements Frontage improvements will be required with development of the adjacent project phase. These improvements may also extend beyond the frontage for tapering/transitional purposes. The design will need to consider the transitions to the east and west of the project that may best be accommodated through taper striping of the improved section. As SE Bear Creek Road is a Minor Arterialthat supports regional travel needs and will require full pavement structural improvements with the % street tm roveme rtial SDC credits are uested Adjacent lntersection lmprovements Adjacent intersection improvements will include the right-in, right-out Collector connection to US 20, the Collector connection to SE Bear Creek Road, and the local street extension of Livingston Drive. Full turn lane improvements to the US 20 and Bear Creek Road connections will be required as soon as the connections are made to ensure adequate safety and driver expectation on these high-speed rural roadways. Costs for these treatments will be ful funded the ro ct Off-Site lntersection lmprovements Off-site impacts occur to the US 20 corridor at the SE Purcell Bou levard and SE 27th Street intersections. Similar to other recent annexations, given the scale and uncertainty of improvements it is recommended that a pro-rata fee be ded to ODOT with uent ts Transportation SDCs All development will be responsible for its share of Transportation SDCs' These fees will be payable to the city of Bend but may then be applied by the City as reimbursables to offset completed transportation improvement projects. The City's transportation SDCs are based on weekday p.m. peak hour trips and are subject to annual and programmatic escalation. Affordable housin ts exem from trans rtation SDCs Page 43 Tronsportotion Cost Allocations and Funding Mechanisms highlighting that the right-turn lane warrants are met discussions with ODOT will be needed to understand whether this treatment matches the planned urbanizing environment. lf the right-turn deceleration lane is desired by ODOT the costs for this improvement will be provided by the development and there is no available reimbursement mechanism through the City or ODOT despite its required Collector status. ln addition, the design will need to include the right-in, right-out pork chop island with an adequate design to prevent U-turns around the raised island. Frontage improvements along the SE Bear Creek Road corridor are more extensive than those along US 20. The City requires that the frontage be improved to a% street standard for annexation, and that the pavement be brought up to the City's structural standards (which it likely does not meet). This is expected to require a full removal of the current asphalt section, additional base depth and re-compaction, followed by placement of the full curb-to-curb pavement width excluding only planters and sidewalks on the south side of the street. Given that this road is a Minor Arterialit is requested that the City work with the team through the annexation process to allow this improvement to be a partially SDC-creditable project. While not included within the City's or County's adopted Transportation System Plan, initial discussions with staff indicated that the north-south road connecting US 20 to SE Bear Creek Road would be classified as a Collector. The upgraded design requirements increase construction costs for this road, the required right-of-way width, and prevents direct driveway accesses. The original site plan has been modified to accommodate these changes, and the Collector will be constructed adjacent to each phase or sooner if dictated by fire and emergency access needs. Adjacent Intersection I mprovements The following intersection improvements have been identified bordering the Parkside Place project: a At the Collector connection with US 20 a right-in, right-out connection will be constructed to ODOT standards. This design of the "pork-chop" island will be coordinated with ODOT to meet accessibility needs, connect the adjacent trail system with an accessible and visible crossing, and as a public street intersection will include illumination. lf desired by ODOT, the warranted eastbound right-turn deceleration lane will be constructed along US 20 at the Collector intersection. With the multiuse pathway crossing this will provide a location for vehicles to queue while yielding to trail users, or to decelerate outside of the travel lane. Specific design needs will be coordinated with the City and ODOT with the initial development phase. The public street connections to SE Bear Creek Road will be constructed with a single-lane stop- sign controlled southbound approach. The intersections will include overhead illumination, and pathway crossing treatments to increase visibility in both directions. The accessible ramps will be built to accommodate the increased pathway width at the crossings, and striping and signage will also be provided. The SE Livingston Drive connection will be created with the adjacent project phase but will include bollards to prevent vehicular access until the local street is improved to Quail Run Place (or Benson Way) with a standard street width. This connection will support pedestrian and cyclist access only, with signage indicating that the road is intended to be connected in the future, a a a Page 44 Tronsportotion Cost Allocations ond Funding Mechonisms Off-Site lntersection lmprovements The following identifies the mitigation measures proposed to address off-site impacts of the project: a a a a ln coordination with BPRD, a Livingston Drive pedestrian and bicycle connection will be provided across the future Litchfield Park site to the west, forming a complete pedestrian connection west to the 27th Street corridor. Costs to complete this walkway should be coordinated with BPRD to obtain Parks SDC credits, as any future park development will be required to provide a walkway along the future road extension. On-going discussions and coordination with ODOT is needed to explore whether an opportunity to extend the planned US 20 multiuse pathway across the site frontage to connect with sidewalks that are 910 feet west of the site. This primarily involves sidewalks across the adjacent nursery site and could include latecomer agreements or other reimbursement mechanisms that would be triggered with future urban development for any incurred costs. To address impacts to the State Highway System a pro-rata fee should be provided to ODOT consistent with the methodology adopted for SEAP and Stevens Ranch that identify a SL0M price for future US 20 corridor improvements, with S2.5M identified for the US 2o/27rh Street improvements (and similar costs assumed for the US 20/Purcell Boulevard intersection). While the HB 4079 project is specifically exempted from the TPR, this methodology provides a consistent approach with other UGB expansion areas and any funds should be prioritized toward extension of the multiuse pathway west of the site boundary to connect with the sidewalks in place east of Dalton Street. Total ODOT pro-rata payments totaling 5124,050.52 should be made to ODOT to mitigate US 20 impacts in accordance with the following calculations: o A3.2% impact at the US21/27th Street intersection ($79,233)4 o At.8% impact at the US 20/Purcell Boulevard intersection (544,8I71s Payment to ODOT should be provided through the City of Bend as part of future plats/site plan review with payments provided as an SDC supplement. The specific timing of payment (or improvements)will be identified within the annexation agreement. Transportation SDCs Transportation SDC payments should be provided to the City of Bend based on the City's methodology in place when building permits are obtained and subject to annual (or programmatic) increases. As of December t, 2Ot7 the City of Bend has exempted all affordable housing projects that provide deed restrictions that maintain the property as affordable housing for households with income at or below 80% of the Area Median lncome (AMl). The project plans to construct L08 Affordable apartment units and 30 single family (for sale) Affordable homes, thereby exempting these from payment of Transportation SDC fees (totaling about $823,400 in 4 134 peak hour trips of 4,228 total trips, or 3.17% of the 52,500,000 project identified in SEAP (579,233,68). s 69 peak hour trips of 3,849 total trips, or L79% of the est. 52,500,000 project (544,815.84) Poge 45 Transportotion Cost Allocotions and Funding Mechonisms exempted SDC revenue). The remaining units are expected to generate St.0ZV6 based on the current SDC rate schedule, with this revenue realized by 2O27 assuming that construction and occupancy of units begins in 2023 as shown in Figure 5-2. co E 6 168 single-family detached homes at 58,543 each (51.,+3S,224) and 41 duplex/triplex units at 54,394 each (S180,1s4). S: >l s2 5r S1 So Nq d (f) rY).i Figure 5-2. Estimated Transportation SDC Revenue (excludes affordable housing units) ooo{/! ()NoN rN d !ONoN ; 6 Ha do 00(t1 c; I floN oo NNor{ oeo i! N Poge 46 €gWIffi Code Complionce CODE COMPLIANCE This section describes how this report addresses the applicable transportation related regulations and codes for City annexation, community master planning, and relevant sections of the Transportation planning Rule related to modifications (and extension) of roadway functional classifications. The UGB expansion will not generate new trips, thus City and County Code provisions related to the UGB Expansion are not addressed herein. Crrv ATTEXATIoN Bend Development Code 4.9 outlines the requirements to annex property within the Urban Growth Boundary into City Limits. The purpose of this section is to provide criteria by which land can be annexed into the city in an efficient manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, while also providing a complete range of public services and facilities. BDC 4.9.600 details the approval criteria. The portions of this code addressing transportation are summarized below in italics with responses shown in standard font. Sections 4.9.600(AX5) and 4.9.600(AX6) address irrigation district water rights and have not been included below. BDC 4.9.600(A) The City Council mqy approve, or approve with conditions, the proposed annexation application if oll of the following criteria are met: 3. The proposal demonstrates how the annexed territory is capoble of being served by public focilities ond services with adequate capacity as determined by the City, including sanitory sewer collection, domestic woter, transportation, schools, and parks, consistent with the City's adopted public focitity plons, transportdtion system plon, ond applicoble district plons, either os provided in on applicable orea or moster plon or by demonstrating how such public facilities ond services will be provided in an orderly, efficient and timely monner. Response: Because the City has not yet adopted a Transportation System Plan that includes these lands, this application demonstrates the infrastructure needed to comply with the House Bill provisions as provide a functional transportation system with the orderly extension of streets. While the project is exempted from the Transportation Planning Rule, this application generally conforms with the TPR requirements. This analysis shows the necessary off-site transportation improvements, multimodal connections, and roadway functional classifications necessary to support City land use goals (including those for parks). 4. The proposal demonstrates how public facility ond service impocts, including os applicable: on- and off-site improvements, construction ond modernizotion of existing infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwoter, tronsportotion) to City standards and specifications, ond impacts to existing infrostructure inside the City's current city limits, will be adequately mitigated through an annexation agreement or other funding mechanism approved by the City Council prior to onnexotion. The City will use the standards and criteria of BDC Chapter 4.7, Transportation Analysis, for analysis and mitigation of transportation impacts. Response: The previously submitted Transportation Facilities Report directly addresses all transportation analysis criteria identified within BDC 4.7.400, and the included Transportation lmpact Analysis (TlA) within this document addresses the additional requirements within BDC 4.7.500. {O0884509;1} Code Compliance 7. The proposol demonstrates thot approval of the onnexation ond zoning districts thot implement the underlying Bend Comprehensive Plon mop designations is consistent with the provisions of BDC 4.6.600, Tronsportation Plonning Rule Complionce. Response: While exempted from the specific TPR requirements this report generally addresses the Transportation Planning Rule by providing an analysis that is consistent with the build-out year of the project (2030) rather than the 2040 analysis that would otherwise be required. Despite this, no changes would be anticipated to the overall findings and recommendations. This report integrates and extends the adopted Low-stress Cycling Network recommendations and integrates with the land use objectives with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The proposal demonstrates how rights-of-way will be improved to urban standords os determined by the City, including rights-of-way in cherry stem annexotions. Response: The Master Plan section of this report includes roadway cross-sections for US 20, SE Bear Creek Road, and a typical low traffic street local street. These cross-sections depict lane widths, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and landscaped areas to demonstrate how the rights-of-way will be improved and extended to serve the subject property. CoIv IvI u ITI ITY MASTER PLAN The Master Plan falls under the category of Community Master Plan, and as such must meet the requirements listed in Bend Development Code section 4.5.200(D), which includes the following related to transportation: L.c. The community moster plon complies with BDC Chopter 4.7. Tronsportotion Analysis BDC Chapter 4.7 requires both a Transportation Facilities Report and a Transportation lmpact Analysis for a Master Plan. BDC 4.7.4OO(C\ lists the contents of a TFR: 1.. Description of the Development. Response: The proposed development is described in detail along with a site plan under the Transportation lmpact Analysis portion of this report. Plans were developed by Hayden Homes and coordinated with the City through the HB 4079 process. 2. Trip Generation. Response: Trip Generation estimates are detailed in the Transportation Facilities Report. With the residential uses planned trip generation estimates for show 2,68L weekday daily trips, with 259 trips impacting the weekday p.m. peak hour. Trip generation estimates were prepared and scoped with the City, Deschutes County, and ODOT to validate the study area and assumptions prior to initiating the analysis included herein. 3. Tronsportotion and Parking Demand Monogement (TPDM) Plan Response: A TPDM is not required for a Community Master Plan; each of the individual uses will provide adequate parking to accommodate their needs. Poge 49 Code Complionce 4. Major lntersections. Response: Major intersections are indicated in the Project Study Area Figure in the Transportation lmpact Analysis section. 5. Trip Distribution Response: TripDistributionisillustratedinFigureL3oftheTransportationFacilitiesReport. Trucktraffic to and from the site will utilize the higher order arterial and collectors surrounding the site illustrated in the Functional Classification Map, with minimaltravel on local streets. 6. Tronsportation Facilities Evaluation. a. The existing tronsportation system infrastructure serving the site within the study areo. The evaluation must include any future funded tronsportation system elements included in the City's opproved five-yeor Copital lmprovement Program, Stotewide Tronsportation lmprovement Progrom or other opproved funding plan. Response: The existing system is thoroughly described in the Transportation Facilities Report. This includes a description of the pedestrian system, cycling system, transit system, and vehicular system. The future analysis includes the construction of a single-lane roundabout at the US 20/NE Hamby Road-SE Ward Road intersection. b. The following right-of-way informotion along the frontage of the proposed development: i. Compliance with the required right-of-way width for the roodway clossification. ii. Compliance with the required street widths. iii. Complionce with the required right-of-woy or edsement width for alltroil ond occess corridors. iv. Complionce with the required street frontoge elements including curbs, bike facilities, pork strips, sidewalks, drivewoys ond driveway oprons, os well os curb romps. All opplicoble elements shall be accessible per the City of Bend Stondords and Specifications. Response: As outlined in the report, US 20 provides bicycle lanes but no pedestrian walkways and SE Bear Creek Road is built to County standards and does not include multimodal facilities or adequate roadway width. Right-of-way information is detailed in the cross-section diagrams for the particular road segments in the Area Plan section and demonstrates how urban transportation services can support the proposed development. c. The following occess information: i. Legal occess and recorded eosements for all driveway ond access systems serving the site. For oll driveways and new intersections creoted by the development, intersection sight distonce meosurements must be provided for oll movements into ond out of the proposed accesses. Field meosurements should be used wherever possible, olthough plon measurements from civil drawings may be utilized, particularly for planned intersections or driveways. Meosurements need to occount for vertical ond horizontol curvature, grddes, landscaping, and right-of-woy limitations. Sight distance measurements shall Page 50 Code Compliance comply with City of Bend Stondards and Specificotions for the posted speed of the rood or os opproved by the City Engineer. ii. For orteriol ond collector street occesses ond new street connections document the location of all existing drivewoys ond street connecting points within 300 feet of the frontoge of the property. Provide a drivewoy conflicting movement diogrom ond assessment showing overlapping conflicts with neorby existing driveways ond street intersections. Response: Specific access will be addressed at the time of development application for each of the individual phases. lntersection sight distance information is provided within the TFR but will be supplemented as roadway frontage improvements occur and traffic control is modified to support the master plan. d. The following on-site circulotion ond/or street plan occess informotion: i. The proposed street loyout ond determine if it matches the Tronsportdtion System Plan ond if it motches into abutting and nearby approved development street layouts, abutting ond nearby moster plans or speciol planned areos and requirements of this code and provides for logical orderly development of odjoining properties. ii. Truck circulation and entry/egress assessment including routing, turning movement, and delivery needs for all truck and emergency service vehicles. tdentify any proposed special truck accommodations for freight service. iii. Necessory public dccess, shared eccess, and shored parking edsements are in ploce or will be required to be in place. Response: The proposed street layout is illustrated in the included Master Plan and is being designed to allow for necessary access to the major roadway system, connectivity and circulation, and service, emergency, and delivery access. The roadway cross-sections outline how right-of-way will be provided in compliance with and as an extension to the adopted Transportation System Plan. e. The following existing and plonned wolking, biking and transit facilities and infrostructure serving the site from eoch access point (driveway or street) of the proposed development onto and olong the tronsportotion system for o distonce of one- quarter mile: i. Locotion of all sidewolks, curb ramps, bike lanes, poths, crosswalks, pedestrian signol heads, push buttons, related signoge, striping, and tronsit facilities along with pedestrian paths of trovel between the transit facility and the site ond to the buildings on the site. ii. Barriers, deficiencies ond high-pedestrian demond land uses including schools, parks, parking, senior housing focilities, ond tronsit focilities. Response: Report. Primary pedestrian and biking facilities are described within the Transportation Facilities f. Truck circulation and entry/egress including routing, turning movement, ond delivery needs for alt truck and emergency service vehicles. ldentify ony proposed speciol truck a cco m mod otio n s fo r f rei g ht se rvi ce. Poge 51 Code Compliance Response: Truck circulation has been accounted for in the proposed street layout designs contained in this report. lnternal circulation will be addressed with each individual phase's development application. BDC section 4.7.500(B) lists the required contents of a Transportation lmpact Analysis: L. Study Areo. Response: The study area that was determined through extensive coordination between the City of Bend, Deschutes County, and ODOT. The study area is illustrated within Figure 3-1. 2. Study Analysis Years. Response: The study analysis years are explained and listed in the Transportation lmpact Analysis section under Study Analysis Years. Analysis years include current conditions and the 2030 horizon year. 3. Study Time Periods. Response: The system has been studied for the weekday p.m. peak hour of traffic as required by code 4. Traffic Counts. o. Counts must be taken Tuesdoy through Thursday; b. Counts may need to be adjusted as required by the City Engineer to reflect seosonol, schools, or other variations in traffic; c. unless approved by the City Engineer, counts must be no more than 72 months old from the dote of development application submittal; d. Additionql hours of classified turning movement counts moy be required bosed on City Engineer direction for the following:i. To determine compliance with traffic signal or all-woy stop wqrronts; or ii. To determine the extent of over-capocity conditions. e. Counts must include possenger cors, trLtcks, bikes and pedestrions. If high pedestrian and/or bike troffic is expected to be generated by the proposed development, os determined by the City Engineer, the Transportotion lmpoct Analysis must consider improvements ond connectivity to existing ond proposed facilities. Response: Traffic counts at the study intersections were collected between 2019 and 202L due to COVID- related issues and other anomalies. Counts were conducted on midweek weekdays, and on dates that are not expected to be impacted by variations in traffic. Required seasonal adjustments were applied to highway intersections. Traffic counts included cars, trucks, bikes and pedestrians. 5. Future Traffic Forecasts. a. Troffic Forecost for Proiects ond Proiect Phasing. i. Traffic forecost shall include all projects within the study orea thot hove received approvals for development (master plons, land divisions, site plans, conditionol use permits, and similar approvals). They sholl be identified, ond their traffic generation included as cumulative troffic in the study. Proposed projects in the study oreo thot have been submitted to the City for processing, but not yet approved, moy olso be included at the discretion of the City Engineer. The City Engineer will also specify on annuol growth rote to be applied to existing volumes to occount for other general troffic growth in and around the study area. Page 52 Code Complionce ii. For phased developments, the troffic forecasts for the year of completion of each phase sholl be calculated to be field counts plus troffic from projects within the study areo that hove received approvols for development (approved moster plans, lond divisions, site plans, conditionol use permits, ond similar opprovals), plus on annuol growth factor which would factor the existing counts up to the onolysis year. b. Build-Out Studies for Bend Comprehensive Plan Amendments ond Zone Changes.i. Troffic projections for build-out scenarios must utilize the current transportation model used by the City or other approved model as approved by the City Engineer. The opplicont's Engineer shall use the model projections post processed using NCHRP 255 os the basis for determining turning-movement volumes for the required intersection onalysis. A monual assignment of the project troffic odded to the build-out troffic may typically be used to determine total future traffic, as opproved by the City Engineer. Response: Future traffic forecasting was based on the travel demand modeling described in the Growth Forecasting section of this report. This includes review of macroscopic travel demand modeling forecasts to obtain area growth rates and the inclusion of approved development trips. 6. OperationsAnalysis Methodology. Response: All traffic operations summarized within this report were prepared in compliance with City of Bend, Deschutes County, and ODOT methodologies based on the location of the intersection and the relevant roadway authority. Analysis methodologies are described in the section of the report titled Traffic Operations and Performance Standards and illustrated at the specific intersections in Table 3-4. 7. Arterial and Collector Left Turn, Median Refuge, and Right Turn Lane Assessment. Response: The section of the report titled Turn Lane Assessment describes the process used in determining the appropriateness of these design elements throughout the project area. 8. Safety Review. d. For the study orea or those locations required by the City Engineer, document ond review crosh data from the ODOT Crash Analysis ond Reporting Section (ODOT-CARS). Crash data can be requested directly from ODOT or the Bend Urbon Areo Metropolitan Planning Organizotion. Crosh doto must provide o five-yeor history of ODOT reported croshes and must be presented in tabular and uosh diogrom form. Crash data must include the following information: i. Crash histories ond o colculated tash rate; ii. Crash potterns (was there an identifiable pattern to the croshes), crash types, and crash patterns affecting proposed development trips; and iii. Whether ony location within the study areo is included within published safety studies, such os the Oregon Department of Transportation Safety Priority lndex System lists, ODOT Safety Action PIon, or the City's Arteriol and Collector Multimodal Sofety Study. b. Projects are considered to have significant impacts for purposes of BDC 4.7.600 if there is a crash pattern, one or more fotalities or severe injury crashes, one or more reported croshes per 1-,000,000 entering vehicles, or if it is included within o published sofety study. Poge 53 Code Complionce Response: A safety review of the crash history at the study intersection is contained in the Roadway Safety section of the Transportation Facilities Report, including a table detailing crash history, characteristics, and crash rates. 9. Wolking, Biking and Transit Friendly Developments. d. Public ond Private Schools (K-72), Colleges and lJniversities. Provide an onalysis of walking, biking and tronsit facilities olong and dr;,oss arterial and collector roodwoys which accommodote safe, accessible and convenient dccess to and from the school. Elementary schools sholl anolyze the facilities within one mile of the school. All other schools, colleges ond universities sholl analyze the focilities within 7.5 miles of the school. b. All Other uses. Provide on onalysis of wolking, biking ond tronsit focilities, including street crossings ond occess woys, which occommodote safe, occessible ond convenient occess from within new residentiol oreos, plonned developments, shopping centers, and commerciol districts ond residentiol areas, parks, shopping centers ond tronsit focilities within one- quarter of o mile of the development. Residential developments must also provide the anolysis to elementory schools within one mile and all other schools, colleges and universities within 7.5 miles of the development. c. Projects are considered to have significant impacts for purposes of BDC 4.7.600 if: i. A project fails to provide accessible and sofe pedestrion ond bike connections (i.e., curb extensions, pedestrian refuges, striping and/or signage) to schools, residentiol areos, porks, shopping oreds, transit facilities ond odiacent streets; or ii. The project disrupts existing or planned biking or wolking focilities or conflicts with the adopted Bend lJrban Areo Bicycle and Pedestrion System Plon. Response: Primary pedestrian and biking facilities are illustrated in Figure 4-1, which shows low stress traffic routes including trails and pedestrian crossings. The project provides a complete low-stress cycling network surrounding and bisecting the subject property. 70. Proportionote Share Contribution. Provided proportionote shore calculotions in compliance with BDC 4.7.700. Proportionote Shore Contribution. Response: These are discussed within the section of the report titled Proportionate Share Contributions. TRRmspoRTATtoN PlRru trt t ltlc Rulr The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) implements Statewide Planning Goal 12, the overall purpose of which is to encourage a safe, efficient, and multimodal transportation system. Pursuant to OAR 650-030-0030(1Xc), the House Bill 4079 project is specifically exempted from the Transportation Planning Rule but follows the same general approach as other expansion areas albeit with a nearer build- out horizon year. The project also seeks to amend the Transportation System Plan with extension of US 20 as a Principal Arteriol, the extension of SE Bear Creek Road as a Minor Arterial, and the addition of a Collector bisecting the property on the Bend TSP Map, as suggested by staff. The following describes how this process complies with the intent of the Transportation Planning Rule despite its exemption: r The project was coordinated with impacted agencies, to include City of Bend, ODOT, Deschutes County, BPRD, and Cascades East Transit. Poge 54 Code Compliance r The project assessed safety and operational conditions throughout the identified study area based on adopted agency impact thresholds and requirements. o The project identified locations along the US 20 corridor that do not meet adopted mobility targets. Similar to other recent projects, a pro-rata payment is recommended to help fund the pending corridor plan, needed sidewalk infill, and a pedestrian crossing between Benson Way and Dalton Street. r Surrounding streets are being improved from County to City standards as part of the annexation agreement. This includes extension of the Bear Creek Road Minor Arterial, US2O PrincipolArterial, and the new north-south Collector that bisects Parkside Place. Similar to the process used to obtain TPR compliance, this report will be provided to the affected transportation providers for review and comment, and we will amend mitigation measures and their associated timing as required through these agreements. Poge 55 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Fi ndings a nd Recom me ndotions PROJECT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This transportation assessment prepared for the HS 4079 lands is a pilot project that seeks to expedite affordable housing by lessening the regulatory barriers associated with expanding the UGB, rezoning and annexation. This report incorporates the land use elements identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan and identifies the transportation infrastructure necessary to support this plan. This plan was coordinated with Cascades East Transit and Bend Parks and Recreation District, along with affected agencies including ODOI Deschutes County, and the City of Bend. ln support of the adopted agency goals, it is recommended that the specific transportation elements identified in the Master Plan section of this report be incorporated as part of the Special Planned District. This should include a summary of the identified roadway cross-sections, roadway connections, and the recommended multimodal connections along with mitigation measures and their timing. To satisfy the intent of the Transportation Planning Rule requirements and demonstrate that the development of the HB 4079 lands can be supported with adequate transportation infrastructure, it is recommended that the Roadway Mitigation Plan (see Figure 7-1) be incorporated into the annexation agreement. lt is recommended that this follow the phased mitigation plan as outlined in Table 7-1. The incorporation of the recommendations of this plan will comply with City Code (and the Transportation Planning Rule, despite being exempted), and also address City Annexation, Community Master Plan, and Transportation lmpact Analysis requirements. Key findings of this report and the preceding Transportation Facilities Report are as follows: a A criticaltransportation issue with development of the Parkside Place Master Plan will be extending urban transportation services to the subject property given the rural roadways that surround the site. lmproving the surrounding streets to the identified cross-sections will improve their safety and functionality. The proposed development plan includes a multiuse pathway along SE Bear Creek Road, the canal lateral, US 20, and the Collector. These paths will form a BPRD trail section that, in the future, through BRPD efforts, will connect Big Sky Park to the north with Hansen Park to the south. The proposed pathways across the subject property will provide the lowest level of traffic stress ranking possible that is suitable for walkers and cyclists of all ages and abilities. A transit stop is proposed along the park frontage that will include access from the multiuse pathway system. Transit service does not currently extend to these rural lands, but the intent of providing this infrastructure is to support its future routing. The project should collaborate with BPRD to construct a pedestrian connection along the Livingston Drive right-of-way within the future Litchfield Park Site west of the development, This sidewalk will complete the walkway connection with Benson Way, US 20, and the SE 27th Street corridors, providing direct access to transit and commercial services along a non-arterial route. SE Livingston Drive provides a nearly complete local street connection to the property but is unsuitable for use as a vehicular connection until additional improvements are completed by the adjacent nursery site. ln the interim it is recommended that the connection be provided through Parkside Place site but restricted with bollards to support easy access for pedestrians and cyclists. This will also prevent construction access along this street. a a a a Page 57 F i nd i n q s a nd Recom me ndati ons a On-going discussions are occurring with ODOT to identify whether completion of the 91O-foot section of missing sidewalks along US 20 can be prioritized by ODOT. The Parkside Place project will be contributing a total of 5124,050 (5359.57 per unit) to ODOT as a fee-in-lieu payment for impacts to the US 20 corridor, and it is recommended that these funds be earmarked toward a pedestrian crossing between Benson Way and Dalton Street and these missing sidewalks. The City of Bend's approved Transportation GO Bond project identifies sidewalk infill along SE Bear Creek Road extending through the subject property. lt is recommended that staff and the City Council work to prioritize these improvements to support the Parkside Place development. There are high levels of traffic congestion along the US 20 corridor today. The development of the site provides the primary access onto SE Bear Creek Road where reserve capacity is available. A right-in, right-out connection to US 20 is proposed, with movements restricted by a raised "pork-chop" island. The planned US 20/Ward-Hamby roundabout will support U-turns for trips back into Bend. Left-turn lanes are proposed at both public street accesses onto SE Bear Creek Road as part of the recommended roadway cross-section, and a right-turn deceleration lane onto the Collector is warranted along US 20. These improvements will be provided when the connections are made. Any work within the ODOT right-of-way will require submittal and approval of plans to ODOT for issuance of a permit. The future street connections onto SE Bear Creek Road should include a single shared left/right- turn lane controlled with a stop-sign. The design of the intersections (and the US 20 Collector connection) will need to include accommodations for the multiuse pathway along the SE Bear Creek Road frontage. a a o o A summary of transportation improvements is provided in Table 7-L, and Figure 7-1 illustrates the recommended transportation mitigation measures. Page 58 F i nd i n gs a nd Recom me nd ations Table 7-1. Summary of Transportation Cost Allocations Transportation Cost Recommended Cost Allocation Method Frontage lmprovements Frontage improvements will be required with development of the adjacent project phase. These improvements may also extend beyond the frontage for tapering/transitional purposes. The design will need to consider the transitions to the east and west of the project that may best be accommodated through taper striping of the improved section. As SE Bear Creek Road is a Minor Arteriolthat supports regional travel needs and will require full pavement structural improvements with the % street improvement, partial SDC credits are requested. Adjacent lntersection lmprovements Adjacent intersection improvements will include the right-in, right-out Collector connection to US 20, the Collector connection to SE Bear Creek Road, a local street connection to SE Bear Creek Road, and the local street extension of Livingston Drive. Full turn lane improvements to the US 20 and Bear Creek Road connections will be required as soon as the connections are made to ensure adequate safety and driver expectation on these high- speed rural roadways. Costs for these treatments will be fully funded by the proiect. Off-Site lntersection lmprovements Off-site impacts occur to the US 20 corridor at the SE Purcell Boulevard and SE 27th Street intersections. Similar to other recent annexations, given the scale and uncertainty of improvements it is recommended that a pro-rata fee be provided to ODOT with subsequent plats and that this be earmarked toward completion of pedestrian connections along the US 20 corridor. Transportation SDCs All development will be responsible for its share of Transportation SDCs. These fees will be payable to the City of Bend but may then be applied by the City as reimbursables to offset completed transportation improvement projects. The City's transportation SDCs are based on weekday p.m. peak hour trips and are subject to annual and programmatic escalation. Affordable housing is typically exempt from transportation SDCs. Page 59 F i nd i ngs o nd Recomme nd otions'+ ,rLocal StreetI Principal ArterialMultiuse PathwayI MinorArterial- Missing Walkway- Collector@ Transit StopFigure 7-1. Summary of Recommended Transportation Mitigation MeasureslBbl etundr:jF.:tPedestrian CrossingRight-in, Right-Out OnlyAccess lntersectionwith Left-Turn Lanesr;ir;.r,] Bridge / CulvertPhasing and Mitigation PlanMF.1/R.1 (108 Atr Rental Unit6 / 27 Market.Rate For-Sate Unitsl:. Construct Multiuse Pattrway Along US 20 to Collector. Extend Collector from US 20 to Livingston Drive. Obtain permits from ODOT and construct a pork-chop island torestrict US 20 to RIRO only. Construcl an easlbound right-turn deceleration lane along US 20. Construcl Livingston Drive connection west and place bollards onwestern property boundary. Coordinate with BPRD to complete sidewalks in Litchfield Park site. Coordinate with ODOT to complete the missing US 20 sidewalksand a pedestrian crossing. Obtain secondary access to Bear Creek RoadR-2 (44 Market-Rate For-Sale Units):. Extend the Collector south to Bear Creek Road. lmprove the Bear Creek Road frontage to 3/4 street standards withan eastbound left-turn lane onto the Collector. Coordinate with CET to design a transit pad and shelter along thepark frontageR-3 (30 Market-Rate For-Sale lJnlts):. Exend the multiuse path along US 20 and complete the CollectorfrontageR4 (27 Market-Rate For-Sale Units):. Extend the multiuse path along US 20R-5 (15 Alf. For€ale Units / 25 lrarket-Rate For€ale Units):' Complele the Collector fontage (eastern landscapelsidewatk)R-6 (15 Atr For€ale UniE / 25 ltilarket{ate For€ale Units):. Complete the Collector frontage (eastern landscape/sidewalk)R-7 (31 Market-Rate For-Sal€ Units):. Complet€ the Collector frontage (eastern landscape/sidewalk). Complele the Bear Creek Road 3/4 street frontage with a left{urnlane onto the local street, and complete lhe local street interseclionf;-a'..,r"$-,oI0It YPdge 60 Findings ond Recommendqtions Thank you for the opportunity for our team to work collaboratively with multi-agency staff in bringing this affordable project forward. We trust that this Transportation Report adequately addresses the various transportation elements to support the UGB expansion, proposed land use designations and zones, master plan, TSP amendments, annexation, and preparation of an annexation agreement. Please contact me with any questions or comments at (503) 997-4473 or via email at ioe@transightconsulting.com. Poge 67 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Oelr provldod by K.Ill{'com 503-5grl-4224 N/S slrest E/W streot Clty, State Slte Notos Location Slart Date Slart Time Weather Sludy lD # 44.051353 - -121.263526 Tuesday, November 30, 2021 04:00:00 PM NE 27th St Bear Creek Rd Bend OR Peak 15 illn Slarl PHF (1s-Mln lnt) 04:45:00 PM 0.94 -D-N r Southbound NE 27th Sr Heavy Vehicle 0.8% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I0 159 880 67 1 Peds 0 ts Bicycl6sU-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 0 .EHEt':509oo d E!5UU >trRoI 116 65 60 oEo)L 27th at Bear Creek Peak Hour Summary 04:1 5 PM to 05:1 5 PM 3ooao Right Thru Lelt U-Turn 66 62 43 0 Io9E:EFdoB *BgN;Aoos 1 Peds 0 {- U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicyclos I252664300 Heavy Vehicle 1.3% NE 27th St Northbound :,1 I 1ir/r'(; )l[ii i),,.,).'1 lllt itt:,i.i.\(jtrii, i!I:i.,i Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Norlhbound Lett Thru Right Ulurn 52 664 30 2 Southbound Thru Right 880 159 Left 67 Uturn I Left 1l6 Eastbound Thru Right Ulurn 65600 Weslbound Left Thru Right Uturn 4362660 NB 748 SB 1107 EB 241 WB 171 Entering Leaving NB SB EB WB 985 A47 273 162 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1.9% O.90/" 10.0% 0.0v"3.0% 0.5% 1.9"/" 0.0%0.0% 0.0% s.3% 0.0%4.7./" 0.0% 3.0% 0.0%1.3% 0.8% 0.A% 23%0,8% 0.9% 1.5v" 3.1./" PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedestrians o Lett Northbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Soulhbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0100 Left 0 Westbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Sum 'I NB WB in Crosswalk SB EB 01 Sum Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound NE 27th St Left Thru Right Uturn 35630 Soulhbound NE 27rh Sr Lett Thru Right Uturn 47790 Eastbound Bear Creek Rd Lefl Thru Right Uturn 3750 Westbound Bear Crsek Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 2590 1HR Sum 15 Min Sum 04:05:00 PM 0149 1 46890 13 4 7 0 6460 04:'10:00 PM 45320 5 77 10 0 7560 4550 538 04:45100 PM s/tBgo 172€O 53r 0450100 PM g6nag 576 0455100 PM t675t 605 ?,l.8 05:15:00 PM 0245'l 3 85 '13 0 13 2 4 0 1 740 576 2247 05:20:00 PM 34740 9 54 15 0 I 13 9 0 1360 537 2241 05:25:00 PM 43340 78270 12470 1 440 522 2244 05:30:00 PM 23530 964180 'll 6 5 0 0uct 501 2200 05:35:00 PM 44640 460'120 15 I 7 0 2350 498 2202 05:40:00 PM 54420 5 64 11 0 14770 I 450 498 2202 05:45:00 PM 04730 1171190 7420 2130 509 2174 05:50:00 PM 24320 4 59 13 0 5630 1450 486 2113 05:55:00 PM 138 10 34250 11 420 3070 434 2031 tuii r: lljrln!,1'1,{l:i (ri! 1'{1:lrifr lIli; lliil i'l,Jrrr t'ltjril hrllrl.hl(ri!11 ln i (irlti:j, ;l.rr, i lii,l (ril' rlilihlir ; iii,li i,i:) ,.1:; /1 !:l ,').1 '1., :t) :11 lri' i,i. :at'l (.: .1 iJ; iillr):f i (11{!lri i: li/, ii: iri ' ||: .lj i{l lir ,rrii i tjiit: i l');ri l.i,tl li:li il, 1rj La l). 'lr: '1. it ir: lrl 1tl 0l l ll t:ll ii 1", ritl,t .:l : :iil l ,1r l.i 'l :',, xl:lPlill!ltl rl lilll (r1.,(rlrliJii,, l:1,'l ' lr'i :ri l: i: ,l i;, rfl ,i:i ,.\..1!,.; , l't:'1.' :'i.l'r, O.la Provldod by K.DN.oom 5011.594-4224 N/S strst E/W street Clty, Stats Site Notos Location Slart Dato Slart Time Weather Study lD # 44.054789 - -12't.263745 Tuesday, Novombst 30, 2021 04:00:00 PM NE 27th St NE Hwy 20 Bend OR Psrt t5lfln $an PHF lnt) 06i00:00 PM 0.97 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Soulhbound Thru Right 756 262 Lefl 167 Uturn 0 Easlbound Thru Right Uturn 481 127 0 Left 312 Northbound Left Thru Right Uturn 180 490 168 0 Lett 198 Thru Right Uturn 550 NB SB 838 1185 EB WB 920 633 EnteringWestbound Leaving 1081 a57 822 816 NB SB EB WB Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.6% r.0% 2.4% 0.0%0.6% 0.9% 1.5% 0.0%0.0% 1.2v" 0.a./" 0.0%1.0% 2.9./o 0.0./. 0.0%1 .2% 1.0% 0.8% 2j%0.9% 0.6% 1.9% 1.3% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedeslrians Northbound Left Thru Right 010 Uturn 0 Soulhbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0'1 00 Left Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 100 Left 0 Westbound Thru Right Uturn 000 Sum NB I in Crosswalk SB EB WB 122 Sum 14 All Vohicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound NE 27th St Left Thru Right 21459 Uturn 0 Left 10 Soulhbound NE 27th St Thru Right Ulurn 66260 Lett 19 Thru 35 Eastbound NE Hwy 20 Right Uturn 10 0 Westbound NE Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 1525 10 '15 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 2141190 15 74 13 0 263480 72240 04:10:00 PM '16 24 11 0 1039170 273960 214540 825 05:00:@PM 1755lV9 1465!90 is2+40 916 8618 05:06:00 PM 2t27140 re47190 rEg460 91rt 3518 06:10:00 PM 11{g120 lt6480!920 A57g 05:15:00 PM 838150 1874200 2440130 222430 902 3538 05:20:00 PM 13 40 16 0 13 59 '11 0 234990 13 34 2 0 898 3512 05:25:00 PM 1224100 16 50 11 0 2743140 222340 837 3497 05:30:00 PM 132680 2063170 2644140 173170 424 3508 05:35:00 PM 9 43 16 0 14 61 16 0 223650 10 11 3 0 7AA 3450 05:40:00 PM '13 31 9 0 1752200 2550120 15 26 4 0 806 3446 05:45:00 PM 644180 457'150 242590 201860 770 3412 05:50:00 PM 1426130 '11 61 11 0 123270 13 25 11 0 760 3360 05:55:00 PM 18 30 15 0 12 33 '10 0 112260 10940 666 3229 -D-N Southbound NE 27rh Sr .\r Heavy Vehicle '1.0% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I262 756 167 0 Peds 1 BicyclesU-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles n 0 IcoEO;cN -: >-!D_8.=:*u I,zi oI 312 481 127 27th at Hwy 20 Peak Hour Summary 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM Right 55 380 198 -oo€z€Fr8iisIrBa s Nottq,o- ooaN Thru Left 1 U-Turn 0 Peds 9 <- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles t0 180 490 168 I Heavy Vehicle 1.2% NE 27rh St Northbound ililj i ilrliii trlrii irrlr,liil i: i' !| i;l:lrj ir-tiLlli tj$:t;1 iiii' ll.llii|I li,illri:ii I i: (rliii l:t{rl| hlit lii!1i1!tl (i;ii lr!.r i:11r Ii,,r'irriaiiii {iiil t,iiltJl! {.i)t ].i.jljIl I li/r,i : tit i l: lr,li rrrll i i, rlll ;r'lii i i;r,'li i i.r I r; l:1 i: : t!) :{lt !t.) ,il i.i: i::,' I I ,,rl ;i|l tt., ."1! ti' I rl r;:l i i.,\ i,. | ,_irl lll, '.i.'/ r'i l: rl ri .:') .:l i ;ti\' .:1 1 irl ,.iil ,11 ., .i, .ti i.l I ili ":) .. ,ir ;'i: il tli iil _rl lral i,',' ,ir, :ilri 'i, ,.r: rlll' I :ll I iil ,.:rl r ,,1 :llr t1 i ]" it,' r,i (il itl ii r!: ii arl i'l I l1l1 i:1 i,/l irl;i;. (l1l:i'i,1!iNi lil Itiili: {ii{il!, lril ".\,rr' l. 'li: l.l' lll llir lj ) 1r :'t ,; j ,t, , :1. irr.l ti, : ir' Datr Provldod by K.Dl,l.com 603-594-4224 N/S stret E/w slreet City, Slata Site Notes Locatlon Slarl Dats Start Time Weather Sludy lD # 44.053262 -121.263538 Tuesday, Novembst 30, 2021 04:00:00 PM NE 27th St Llvlngslon Dr Bend OFI PHF (1s-Mln 04:50100 FM 0.94 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Northbound Thru Right Uturn Soulhbound Lefl Thru Flight Uturn 58 1009 7 00 Left 4 767 66 Eastbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 4 0 13 0 Westbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 500880 Enlering Leaving 1072 NB 837 SB NB SB 859 EB 111074 17 WB 138 WB 124 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 1.3% 0.o% 0.0%0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%0.o% 0,0% 0.0% 0.oo/"0,0% 0.0% 0.0./. 0.0%1.2% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0%1.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedestrians Left 0 Northbound Thru Right Uturn'1 00 Southbound Lefl Thru Right Uturn 0000 Lsft 0 Eastbound Thru Bight 00 Uturn o Left Westbound Thru Right Uturn 000 Sum I NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WB 0l0 Sum AllVehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound NE 27th St Left Thru Right Utum 06480 Southbound NE 27rh St Left Thru Right Uturn 48200 Left Eastbound Livingston Dr Thru Right Uturn 0 Westbound Livingston Dr Left Thru Right 5 1 11 Uturn 0 15 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 06790 4890'l 2010 5060 04:10:00 PM 14640 178 10 0000 I 0 10 0 ctJ 04;50:00 PMI t 7.6 4 O 6020 5060455:00P!rlossto 5gl 20/15 05:00:00PMlO 7x A 0 787A 548 2067 05:15:00 PM 15530 3 103 2 0 0000 4040 517 2056 05:20:00 PM 16850 48920 1 o20 3070 518 2058 05:25:00 PM 04350 0683'l 0100 '1 060 503 2044 05:30:00 PM 03950 47't00 1010 '1 080 458 2004 05:35:00 PM 05740 190'1 0 0100 4050 439 2008 05:40:00 PM 05860 775 10 0000 4060 450 2008 05:45:00 PM 05830 68500 1000 6080 487 2010 05:50:00 PM 04640 26000 '1 010 4070 449 195'1 05:55:00 PM 05330 16200 0020 5070 425 1912 -D-N Southbound NE 27rh Sr Heavy Vehicle 1.0% EY DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I071009 58 0 Peds 0 BicyclesU-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 0 ;s-6:5s! E -sf ,$E; EI 4 27th at Livingston Peak Hour Summary 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM Bight Thru Left U-Turn 88 -oo-€ :.Ez ='Od6c o ?oo-::c 900 0 oito too.qo 0 13 50 0 Peds 0 <- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 4 767 66 Heavy Vehicle 1.2% NE 27th StNorthbound ilrt li)\nl:|.{, rlrir l:1, I4j i|rr i;ll;t/i|lilIi i ('J)/1"1 rtirl li,t Li ir/'.' .(Lr, ,rr; (ti i!l {r) 1.1 at' !t'l' 'i1;l iii:: l::,: .i ti ,! ! :,1 I I 'I ,:| r"1l , r{r iiJ: I .:l l0l l; j,l i if i I !l ,t' '',i |:| Lt I r 1il rt: |:: L!' i, it irl i]' iii i ii i 1 ) l,jilill ',i r,i l.i l.; 1i. r /rl ,,1;ij) t.1;l .!i; i(rill r1.i(Jict ii I it),tpl,iill!t'1il ll tli:l r. i' rjl;j ,tt,, : "1]llr iJ iii il: irl{01,:'r lilltlil l, !}i l. j1.r (iiri' jl;iLriNr l l,lriI Ur,t llrlIt': ]ir, i ioiitl,iitiil|]l,,11 (rlt l:ii:(ltrt; 'jiil llii :.1 l,il!l,ir r, l{i iiiir f ist(nor li lii,ll Oalr Provldod by K.D.N,aom 509.504-4224 N/S strsst E/W street City, State Site Notes Location Starl Dale Slart Time 44.05146 - -'t21.25925 Tuesday, Novembet 30, 2021 04:00:00 PM tD# Bear Creek nd Quail Run Pl Bend OR PHF (1s-MIn lnt) 15 MIn Stift 04:30:00 PM 0.95 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Southbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 10580 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 4910701 Westbound Left Thru Right Ulurn 0 113 I 0 NB SB 059 EB 157 WB 122 Entering Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0"/" 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0%2.0% 3.7% o.ov" 0.0%0.0% 2.70/o 11.1% 0.0%NaN 0.0% 3.2./" 3.3V"NaN 3,4% 1.7% 3.7% PHV- Bicycles Northbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Uturn 0 Southbound Lefl Thru Right 000 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 0 Left Westbound Right Uturn 00 Thru '1 Sum 1 NB 0 WB in Crosswalk SB EB 40 Sum 4 All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Left 0 Norlhbound Bear Crosk Rd Thru Right Uturn 000 Southbound Bsar Creek Rd Uturn 0 Lefl Thru Right 004 Left Eastbound Ouail Run Pl Thru Right Uturn 800 Westbound Quail Run Pl Left Thru Right Uturn 0900 t5 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 0000 0020 2600 0900 otil 20 85 04r35i00 01000 84or0e989 05:10:00 PM 0000 0060 1700 09 10 79 333 05:15:00 PM 0000 0010 2600 0 10 3 0 75 327 05:20:00 PM 0000 1020 5 13 0 0 0051 73 330 05:25:00 PM 0000 1040 61200 0600 7A 335 05:30:00 PM 0000 0000 6600 0061 75 317 05:35:00 PM 0000 0020 21301 0800 74 320 05:40:00 PM 0000 0060 21400 0410 72 3'18 05:45:00 PM 0000 0030 71000 o200 75 305 05:50:00 PM 0000 0030 4700 0610 70 301 05:55:00 PM 0000 1060 4900 0o41 68 297 -D-N '$ Southbound Bear Creek Rd Heavy Vehicle 0.0% DATA NETWORK I Bicycl6s Right Thru Left U-Turn 0 58 0 I Peds 4 Bicycl€s 1 Right 9 Thru 1 13 *-NEC;r5938.: EE9u6i doI U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 27th at Quail Run Peak Hour Summary 04:'10 PM to 05:10 PM 49 rop€9=sE8; Pgo =cs,!oo- ;9 107 oqtto0- oaao Lett 0 0 U-Turn 0 Peds 0 +- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles n 0 0 Heavy Vehicle NaN Bear Creek Rd Norlhbound Norlhbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Leaving NB SB 058 EB 172 WB 108 l. il)(i))iril iil itlil:r riiiril i 'lii,illlt,|tr 1r.ii,t il 1c) l) ii) i1l lCj l) , lli itl ilr i!l j iir I raL ill iI {il!: I i)ilricl 1' (rl 1l :. l1l :ll {, irl rl !ti ir ;litl i,,iiil. ill ll rNl 1t ir' ! itl {l: ti iql i,a! iir f,l ) il, ill lll iiiiii 1.j i1' ili il j {t}l ;:r 1!iirllr i:'1,/,i; i 11IrI itilLr t'1,{ j lrillll"l,I(!ix;I 1,r'r a: | ':,t i| .,4,. ol ll ,,1,1 .r i ril g)!i,rlr,l!i!i lil irill l,itlll!, ir riir ] llirl Ill.rlrlr,l ii li!l i lrliiirllllLltl l, li//:i I rrt.ril:irrri lti li i.i,:' l:lrr irlr : ./ r: irtr: lij !! i fll l.iil:l oatr Provldod by K'D,N.aom 103-5944224 N/S street E/W street City, Stats Site Notos Location Slart Oate Slart Time Weather Sludy lD # 44.054875 - -121.263686 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 04:00:00 PM NE 27th St Hwy 20 Bsnd OR Ps!tst5 ltln stafi PHF Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Northbound Thru Right Uturn 439 165 0 Southbound Thru Right Uturn 77't 313 1 Lefl 160 Left 184 Easlbound Left Thru Right Uturn 289 552 149 0 Weslbound Thru Right Uturn 407 60 0 Left 184 NB SB EB WB 764 1269 990 651 NB SB EB WB 1104 789 880 901 Entering Leaving Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.6./. 1.Ao/o 1.A% 0,0%0.0% 0.97. 1.0% 0.0%1.4% 2.20/0 13% 0.0%33% 3.2./. 0.0% o.ov"1.60/0 0.8% I.ao/" 2.9v"1.46/o 1.50/" 1.90/" 1.7!" PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedostrians Left Norlhbound Right Ulurn 00 Thru 0 Southbound Left Thru Right 010 Uturn 0 0 Lsit Eastbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Westbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 0000 Sum NB in Crosswalk SB EB WB 6 5 '16 Sum 35 All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound NE 27rh Sr Left Thru Right 18 41 11 Ulurn 0 Left Southbound NE 27rh Sr Thru Right Uturn 50220 Easlbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 1849100 Weslbound Hwy 20 Thru Right Uturn 31 40 Left 13 15 Min Sum '1 HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 't4 38 t5 0 '14 53 30 0 2769100 19 29 7 0 04:10:00 PM 12 48 '11 0 't3 64 19 0 13 60 2 0 134220 904 04:15:00 PM 1733140 1668350 2952160 122520 943 04:20:00 PM 1828160 1739200 2567110 15 35 4 0 913 04:25:00 PM 11 35 11 0 560380 2232140 153150 893 0st0100 PrM {3{?2to 94s 8040 05:t5:00 P[ 05:30:00 PM 13 36 '16 0 951200 275090 10 11 3 0 862 3622 05:35:00 PM 1'1 3'1 15 0 '10 43 22 0 283660 213650 805 3581 05:40:00 PM 10 38 16 0 '13 61 31 0 2247180 153380 831 3592 05:45:00 PM 1252120 1951140 2642120 112660 859 3578 05:50:00 PM 123790 1647240 3146100 10 22 3 0 862 3546 05:55:oo PM 6 28 'r1 0 1643260 18 36 9 0 92530 740 3487 -D-N r Soulhbound NE 27rh Sr Heavy Vehicle 0.8% EY DATA NETWORK I Blcycles Right Thru Left U-Turn 1 313 771 184 Peds 6 <- BicyclesU-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 bqoE-5x oo:- E EF5tl oI 289 27th at Hwy 20 Peak Hour Summary 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM Bisht 60 IoD€= 6+a:.< 6 F xENA@s 552 rooEQ) !oo(t o Thru 407 149 Lett 184 0 U-Turn 0 Peds 8 <- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicyctes I0 160 439 165 0 Heavy Vehicle 1.6% NE 27th St Northbound :lr.i i .:i!l)!i rlrrii ti \': i'l llr ;'iii:l (,jl jii tl \ lttl: ;li.ril 1.ji,l i irilii:j.rLl' I I.i{ 1: lr ill :1:. i lrl l,; i' :'' ,irr i,1 .t. lt, ltr li L l i .: t., ,.lr i' ,] r!l , :.. "j: 'i rl ',1: l)) ril i)' (rj lt' l il ;; ;.lil, l:r ':l : lr:: 1:l ,i ri l. i:l:;1ilr.trlll,lr,i'1,'j i :ll ril til ilri l'i r!iriI lr'l lrl ,iil i{il ,.i: 'i' I .4, r.l iiJ -J jtitl, ri ti l: I .''j :t.' i, I ;,r11 illi j1-1!jlrlr,!'il {lj'i: ri,:l;it: lii.lti:,iiiir Iil l.l, lriri: lJ, rjr't,.iii{iii ; 1ri il :'1 !'1., ,rl,irl l .,1.1:lu Drta Provl&d by K.D'Nrom 50$594-4224 N/S strost E/Wstrst City, State Sits Notes Location Slart Date Slart Time Weathsr Study lD # 44.065768 - -12'1.243613 Tussday, October 15, 2019 04:00:00 PM Hamby Rd Nelt Rd Bend OR PHF 5-Min Poak lg tiln Stan 05:10:00 PM 0;83 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Northbound Left Thru Right Uturn 26 131 22 0 Southbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 58 102 47 0 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 64 186 23 0 Westbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 7106340 Entering NB SB EB WB 179 207 273 147 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%1,7% 2.9% O.Oo/" 0.O 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0%0,0% 0.o% 2.9% 0.0%0.0% 1.9% 0.4% 0.7%3.0% 0.40/o 0.0% 0A% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedeslrians Northbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Left 0 Soulhbound Thru Right Uturn 000 2 Left Uturn 0 Eastbound Thru Right 10 Weslbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Sum NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WB 000 Sum All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound Hamby Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 2'1200 Lett 2 Southbound Hamby Rd Thru Right Uturn 630 Eastbound Nefi Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 4620 Westbound Netf Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 1 11 2 0 tc Min Sum ,1 HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 'I '11 0 0 0461 31420 'I 910 04:10:00 PM 3900 6740 6 13 2 0 07't0 162 04:15:00 PM 03 10 1 9 13 4 0 2't620 0600 177 04:20:00 PM 1 049 39'1 0 5't220 0 11 2 0 183 04:25:00 PM 21400 8430 0 0720 177 04:30:00 PM 2410 4720 211 00 0700 151 04:35:00 PM 3 15 0 0 3710 2't420 0540 144 08110:00 PM 1 o 5769 oaTg 208 716 o5{5:00PMl 2 I 0 10 11 11 0 r1070 u7 738 06:20:00 PM 5840 2400 u4 750 05:40:00 PM 0810 8920 41020 o400 '181 AO2 05:45:00 PM 1720 4630 21220 035'1 164 791 05:50:00 PM 51340 6700 'r930 0920 155 799 05:55:00 PM 037 6620 01 10 1 00 13 1 158 775 .D-N ' Southbound Hamby Rd Heavy Vehicle 1.9% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I047 102 58 0 Peds 0 ts BicyclesU-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 0 s$E -i5; ooE50t F829U> o- 64 '186 Hamby Rd at Neff nd Peak Hour Summary 04:40 PM to 05:40 PM Right Thru Lett U-Turn 34 IoD€= $493389e!;s o !tc)I .Ito(:-ao r06 7 0 Peds 0 +- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 26 131 22 0 Heavy Vehicle 0.0% Hamby Rd Norlhbound Leaving NB 132 SB EB WB 229 179 266 lrl 'ir,';'(.rrl iii '/.',.1:l !l iirr ) it!9.)(, rjili t:t,tat. (i,.iiiiiilrlil l,{li'j, ,'ijlrl L i t] i I i tl i, '!'lr jil ':l ;{r t :ir 1!11 I f) ii il .i :, :, l: /, t.l ,ll r!i lr: ilr l:l :r, Jl i:: iil hl il ,lrirj ',1.;; ii I ii,l: ,ltii 1 lililir) .il tll ll iii :ii r i il :al 'i' ii' if 'lli,i' I Itrrr r/, l') irrlil;l ,t' .ul !l iil (il: ri l,,rli:l (rr,l r':'ilLlr, llri ::r iifll.ii)!:r::|.lii;ii il Ii4l.l.irlrjlilliiii,. L;i.iJ1i r lilir hj!i ixlitljlii;..1 {tl,:illjilrirj t.'l itj:r:.;ljli:)il irl.ri:l,l pil Dala Provldod by K.D.il.oom 5011.69,0'4224 N/S street E/W street Clty, Stats Site Notes Location Slart Dats Slart Time Weather Study lD # 44.051346 - -121.26867 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 04:00:00 PM Purcell BIvd Bear Creek Rd Bend OR PHF s.Min lnq PeaF 15 llln St rt 08:00:00 PM 0.88 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Nonhbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 29 162 24 0 Soulhbound Left Thru Right Uturn 40 275 122 0 Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 218 55 0 Lott 127 Westbound Left Thru Right Uturn 57 200 20 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.40/0 0.0% 0.0%0.0% o.ov" 0.00/" 0.0%0.0% 1.0% 0.0"/" 0.0%0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.7%0.3% 0.0% 0,6./. 0.0% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedestrians Ulurn 0 Northbound Lett Thru Right 010 0 Left Soulhbound Thru Right 20 Uturn 0 Lett o Eastbound Right Ulurn 01 Thru 'I Left 0 Weslbound Thru Right Uturn 'I 00 Sum 6 NB in Crosswalk SB EB WB 001 Sum 2 AllVehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Left Norlhbound Purcell Blvd Thru Right 192 Uturn 0 Left Southbound Purcell Blvd Thru Right Uturn 21 11 0 Left 5 Eastbound Bear Creek Rd Thru Right Uturn '16 4 0 Weslbound Bear Creek Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 4 19 4 0 '15 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM s 16 4 0 517150 10 16 8 0 51720 04:10:00 PM 3 14 0 0 2 1A 11 0 161930 4't620 04:15:00 PM 1 10 5 0 1 '18 9 0 '12 1460 51730 329 04:20:00 PM 00 13 1 322120 8 15 4 0 6 15 '1 0 309 04:25:00 PM 'l 17 10 4 16 1'1 0 13 13 4 0 41220 303 04:30:00 PM 5 16 1 0 220120 9 15 5 0 1900 297 5 914 1287 E 2?r0 8 ol4 2a 4 o ola 5 €4r 1261sTt 1290 05:35:00 PM 210 10 1 24 15 0 0920 1 '1 15 0 0 319 1325 05:40:00 PM 31730 41780 22070 512 10 307 1313 05:45:00 PM 211 20 'l 21 40 62340 3 13 3 0 291 1303 05:50:00 PM 21020 221 90 '10 20 7 0 2910 287 1301 05:55:00 PM 03 13 1 1'16 100 521 00 0612 1 277 1289 .D-N Southbound Purcell Blvd s Heavy Vehicle 0.2% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Lett U-Turn I122 275 40 0 Peds 0 ts BicyclesU-Turn Leit Thru Right Bicycles 0 1 .E:tr:Yfogooo*65 ,!t E'-oioI 127 Purcell BIvd at Bear Creek Bd Peak Hour Summary 04:35 PM to 05:35 PM Right Thru Left U-Turn 20 200 -o9@:EFo--o9 *BgP;A\le ;e 214 ooEo(L 1lo6-a 55 0 Peds 1 +- U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 29 162 1 Heavy Vehicle 0.0% Purcell Blvd Norlhbound Enterlng Leaving NB 215 SB EB WB 437 400 277 NB SB EB WB 387 309 351 282 i.,, ii .: iirr ','ti!'.1 (r)rfti ..,!t:Vi i,: rlI "tl l,' ),1.1: i11 t:i : ,l 1r) 0l irli!liti:(iillJrl i;, tt ri i i, i,l (Jl it rlIJ r lrl ti ll,i 0l {!l i!' ,:l 1r I i'\ ,,i ill I i:, 1i1 'ri ,J' (!l r iti rll' ii ; lji:' i!i it, 'lij (ili:i,i,:{lrl 1ii'll i,.lilflt'rl I 0l..1trl.itrr!r lJil 'rillrl ::{!ll) .il lrltlr ,: l"t'' il i rl:,1 ';1'; ti i lrl ,i L'. . 'rl t: :i) il ."lr' I {l (ririr,ljl{r1rr li !ii'1 (JIi,,rl1Il,l; lri I tril t.iillrlr i iti {ilri1ll.;LrLrl; liil (i!,it'lirLrli 'lii l:i tr;' tl, L|' lrl :, 1,i it. rlir l' tt r,) .l:, .,, if, lr.lit l "lil: '., 1') ,il. j11tj Dal. Provlrtod by K-D,l|,com 509.89f4224 N/S stret E/W street City, State Sits Notos Location Slart Dats Slart Time 44.054915 - -121.26869'1 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 04:00:00 PM NE Purcetl Blvd tD# Hwy 20 Bend OR Poak l5 lmn strrt PHF lnt) 04:30:00 FM 0.97 P€ak-Hour Volumss (PHV) Left Thru Right Uturn 96 186 56 0 Left Thru Right Uturn 109 214 252 0 Northbound Soulhbound Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 977 88 1 Leit 277 Weslbound Thru Right 904 56 Left 92 Uturn 0 NB SB EB WB 338 575 1343 1052 Leaving NB SB EB WB 394 519 '1253 1142 Entering Percent Heavy Vehicles 2.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.9% 2,4./. 0.0%0.4% 2.4/" 1.1V" 0.O./"0.0% 2s% 0.0% 0.0"/"0.9% 1A% 1.9% 2.2./o 0.8% 0.4% 2.5% 2.0% PHV- Bicycles PHV - P€destrians Norlhbound Left Thru Right 000 Uturn 0 0 Left Southbound Thru Right Uturn 300 Left 0 Eastbound Thru Right Ulurn 000 Weslbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 02'1 0 Sum NB I in Crosswalk SB EB WB '13 1 6 Sum 29 AllVehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Lett 7 Northbound NE Purcell Blvd Thru Right 128 Uturn 0 Letl 12 Southbound NE Purcell Blvd Thru '19 Right Uturn 140 Eastbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 084t0 Weslbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 67560 t5 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 81260 6 13 21 0 0 76 11 0 10 88 2 0 04:'10:00 PM 101920 1214240 127860 95530 742 04:15:00 PM '10 16 8 0 6 13 20 0 208090 78050 772 04:30f00PMl lt 19 4 I 1223270 2SA2gO 66080 8e8 04:35:00 PMI 7 ts 8 0 97530 826 04;40:00 PMI 5 14 7 o 8{9170 2Bg5f0 17840 s49 05:20:00 PM 72480 521170 297040 97430 829 3296 05:25:00 PM 71830 1121200 244960 970s0 804 3279 05:30:00 PM 6 14 I 0 723140 147960 46630 756 3236 05:35:00 PM 5260 4 15 22 0 '18 66 8 0 10 73 4 0 718 3189 05:40:00 PM '122090 10 17 15 0 327990 45730 74a 3178 05:45:00 PM 91230 1315130 2267s0 55500 723 3137 05:50:00 PM 69120 6 18 '16 0 158650 25070 722 3114 05:55:00 PM 5 '11 2 0 512120 206770 85730 660 3041 -D-N r Southbound NE Purcell Blvd Heavy Vehicle 1.4% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I3252214 109 0 Peds 13 ts BicyclesU-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 1 o E-- 3!3!aFEr Iul> o:c 277 977 0 oo(l, l Purcell at Hwy 20 Peak Hour Summary 04:20 PM to 05:20 PM 1'ooaf) Right Thru Lett U-Turn 56 904 92 0 I@€= 6 =aJ.< E3xENdN;s Peds g I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 96 '186 56 0 Heavy Vehicle 0.9% NE Purcell BlvdNorthbound i; I i-i/il:il (itirii l1|i.l iri 1, tl I I frr t, ,,l 1. I i,t1 lii:.iil {rrlritj lllrltl it;i,l:ilil.l$ lilJl {i)tl:ij1.it{i q,lliliiiiirl t'ilr1,iill,,tr, {!t:iirl;iilirl iil rj i!l:, l J.lr i hlil riiiiril:. []:r:i 1.tl:il') i:l ,l '' ,l 'iii.) '1i,. ,,i:, l:i ri j lf ilr;l i l,; i:i t.itr rlri .i, '' il ':: ,) l it 11 ':: liir :,; l..i:t : ill :;tr) at' l !) I I irlri iar Ol t, t,1:, rl: il, i:lt! 1 it')t' til:t. i:ir 1l t) t:t'.. t'i.; ittr)"t rrirll:i lxl iN itl 11. l.l ri i lii lii i lii ri{ rt i1 ltl ii,'" rii ; I irl 1iliitir1i!!lc:ii.j i:t :::t rol i:, If , ,t, t ll: I r' I i,i iilt: til r ,; i1, t:., ,, ;,,r ]] t:1, .rlr i:; i!: ': i.1.t.ri : i 1ri:, . il.l,l1l lil liiil Dalr Provldod by K.Dil.com 50t.59{.4224 N/S street E/W street Clty, State Slte Notos Location Slart Date Start Time Weather Sludy lD # 44.051278 - -121.243415 Tuesday, October'15, 2019 04:00:00 PM Ward Rd Beat Cteek Rd Bend OR P6aI 15 illn Stlrt PHF (1s.Min 04:10:00 PM 0.87 Peak-Hour Volumss (PHV) Norlhbound Left Thru Right Uturn 316270 Southbound Thru Right Uturn 157 32 0 Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 37420 Lett Lett 16 Left Thru Right Uturn 9 32 10 0 SB EB WB 202 95 51 Westbound Entering NB 100 Leaving NB 208 SB EB WB 88 95 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.o./. 0.o% 14.3% 0,0%0.0./" 1.9% 0.0% 0.0%0.0./. 5.4% o.ov" 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%1.06/o ls% 2.1./" 0.0./.1A% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedestrians 0 Left Uturn 0 Norlhbound Thru Right '1 0 Southbound Left Thru Right Ulurn 0100 Left Easlbound Right UturnThru 2 Weslbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Sum I NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WA 000 Sum 0 All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Nonhbound Ward Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 4400 Southbound Ward Rd Left Thru Right Ulurn 1 't5 3 0 Left Easlbound Bear Crsek Rd Thru Right Uturn 120 westbound Bear Creek Rd Uturn 0 Left Thru Right 120 tc Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 0500 1 15 6 0 3230 200 04J0:00 PM 2310 t1630 9310 116 04:15:00 PM 3I10 41380 0310 1?"5 04e0:00 F!8t10 21660 16 trto0 129 05:'10:00 PM 4700 0't230 '1 220 0000 '108 435 05:15:00 PM 2810 0 'tl 6 0 2140 1 '1 00 111 429 05:20:00 PM 3820 0io 'l 920 1000 105 424 05:25:00 PM 4700 01420 0340 1310 113 429 05:30:00 PM 071 21000 1330 0 00 105 423 05:35:00 PM 800 0860 '1 b 0 4 100 104 423 05:40:00 PM 26'10 0281 1930 0000 98 427 05:45:00 PM 4800 11400 008 0000 105 427 05:50:00 PM 1 025 0 10 3 0 1520 0'1 00 99 424 05:55:00 PM 1600 o'1220 0420 0400 97 416 .D-N r Southbound Ward Rd Heavy Vehicle 'l.5% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Lett U-Turn 32 157 13 0 I Peds 0 Bicycles 0 Bight 10 Thru 32 Letl I U-Turn 0 <- EEi EEI!0R 3 U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles n 16 42 Watd Rd at Bear Crcek Rd Peak Hour Summary 04:10 PM to 05:10 PM oq!to)o- .Uooao -oDE:gFd o9 *Bg Yteoe Peds 0 I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles I03182 Heavy Vehicle 1.0% Ward Rd Nonhbound I 11 :"iDlll (i ))Nii i,r!'l ilr,r lili'lr (i,|'it ,'irl;l lill l'r'.,,rilrt ;r'!,1 i rli, /rriiili) li ri{ I ftli r 11;rliFr ltl {!)1ri:rltiljr tiil hi;l lii,,l.ri,t l'1y',1i: 1rl,,iillilillri, lill I i :l t.l ,1 IIil ;l llr' i!l $: il: lrl .i 1\ ial ill ,1, :li:r ;;1, it' lfl ;] ir il r tt, l {, l .,1 1: il ri , lr. t' ,l,,i .rl ,irl t:ri r^l il' r-il 1l rl i,.' rll 1rl,,ll 1r' i iil E] '"lirl' I i; ,', 11 ),|:) '..1) tiNl,, I iirlr, I lill ''.1:,. iiitl,l i)l (rii1 ill:,Irio) I lJi bli, l.liti!J1):: rii rll:!lll1rIict ; l,.i til.tl :111:i Drta Provl.!.d by K.D.N.com 501t 594.4224 N/S strest E/w slreet City, State Sito Notes Localion Slart Date Start Time Weather Study lD # 44.055309 - -121.243449 Tuesday, October 15, 20'19 04:00:00 PM Wad Rd Hwy 20 Bend OR PHF (1s.Mln lnt) 15 il[n Starl 05:05:00 PM 0.95 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Southbound Left Thru Right 6 45 6l Uturn 0 Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 494 71 0 Lett 113 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 6.7./" 0.0%16.7!"1.4r"0.ov"0.ov"0.9% 3.2% 1.40k 0.0%4.O"h 4.9v" o.Ov" 0.0%2.4r/o 1.8% 2.7% 4.5./.2.1./" 0.6% 43% 3.6./. PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedeslrians Left 0 Norlhbound Thru Right Uturn 000 Southbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Easlbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 0000 Westbound Left Thru Right 020 Uturn 0 Sum NB in Crosswalk SB EB WB 000 Sum 0 Time 04:00:00 PM Northbound Ward Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 0210 Southbound Ward Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 1250 Eastbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 731 60 Westbound Hwy 20 Lett Thru Right Uturn 73030 t5 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 1 20 0940 941 40 83030 04:10:00 PM o250 0530 43860 10 34 3 0 3'17 04:15:00 PM 0320 2750 641 60 84230 347 06:05;00 PM 231 t0 328 1355 05:10:00 PM r6ao 124850 103310 a42 136S 06:16n0PM 0811 0r380 1147e0 63820 g6it 1380 05:20:00 PM 1650 0970 94220 22330 369 1368 05:25:00 PM 0230 0640 94050 82820 352 1357 05:30:00 PM 0460 2240 0629 1 523 10 299 1342 05:35:00 PM 0350 2560 63230 631 30 292 1320 05:40:00 PM 1040 2440 11 36 5 0 23020 286 '13'19 05:45:00 PM 2540 0870 64570 131 00 319 1312 05:50:00 PM 05'1 0 1630 10 47 3 0 2't280 315 1304 05:55:00 PM 0330 0340 33050 72000 292 1272 -D-N "s Southbound Ward Rd Heavy Vehicle 1.8ol. EY DATA NETWORK I Bicyclss Right Thru Left U-Turn I061 45 0 Peds 0 BicyclesU-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 2 2'l 410 75 *r9 A.i o:' E;55tu\ oI 113 Ward at Hwy 20 Peak Hour Summary 04:20 PM io 05:20 PM Right Ioo€= 6 =a:.< r 3 xEre(Is 494 oq!q)IL 'o(Dooo Thru 71 0 Lett U-Turn 0 Peds 0 <- I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles I0134'l 30 u Heavy Vehicle 2.4.k Ward Rd Northbound Northbound Thru Right Ulurn 41300 Westbound Left Thru Right Uturn 75 4't0 2'l 0 Entering Leaving Left 13 NB 84 SB 112 EB WB 678 506 NB 191 SB EB WB 175 484 530 rjrrl t l,rli l,T:. , i-.1 {r )) ii, i:rl {.o,lui, i li)il l!)ll:l:lrllilir : lrt {ilrlri"1'jlrl!, Iri (illlti{ltlrs,'l}l (!lijlr{.ilir|l lli ir)l,1nr{iii'l Ii Ifll:iri.rllli| lri {i}11 1;i!l{rirl i lii ] 11;rrr;,1,1X;11;, 1Y, 1rl:iirlriirilr ii jiil l ,t) i tir is' i: sl t" is! il i1 t,., il1 il ,lj iq 1j ltl itl 1i iii iij ,.: !,: il l ,cl /: iil itl .:l ifl irj' /t :it' l: t) irr rl., ,' t,.' :: . i) ;;ir,r .til l:))...,ir. rlll ,!, ,, ti ,l lrl. . |)' t, ,i; Ii ilr 1 ttii .: tl " l' | :ij 't i1 ,'l / ,':t : t: :'', , \, Llr tl t:. t,,t iri \x) l'l ,;i ;, i+) ,t: I ,il rtl ::1 't:: I i:lii it l :::fii:l :: {r:rl r'i; lr{rr ,. l.): ti ::1,r1 ,, ii a,, ',: i;l DalE provldod by K.D'lt con 508.594-4224 N/S streot E/Wslr€t City, Ststo Sile Notes Location Slart Date Slart Tlme Weather Study lD # 44.051344 - -121.263578 Tuesday, December 1 1, 2018 04:00:00 PM sE 27th st NE Bear Crcek Rd Bend OR PHF s.Min lnt) Peak 15 UloStart 05:05:00 PM 0.97 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Northbound Left Thru Right Uturn 37 529 31 0 Southbound Left Thru Right Uturn 75 907 159 1 Left 108 Easlbound Thru Right Uturn 69560 Left 28 Weslbound Thru Right Uturn Entering NB SB EB 597 1142 233 WB 14962590 Leavlng NB SB EB WB 991 697 258 175 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5.4% 0s% 0.0% o.ook 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% o.o%0,0% 2.96/0 0.o% O.OV"0.0% 0,0% 1.7r/" o.ov"1.2% 0.6% 0.9% 0.70/0 0.7% 0.9% 0.8./. 1J% PHV- Bicyclss Norihbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 0 Left Southbound Thru Right Uturn 000 Easlbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Left 0 Weslbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Sum 0 NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WB 030 Sum 3 All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Lett 6 Northbound sE 27th St Thru Right 51 5 Uturn 0 Southbound sE 27rh Sr Left Thru Right Uturn 3 70 16 0 Eastbound NE Bear Creek Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 9250 L€ft 4 westbound NE Bear Creok Rd Right Ulurn 80 Thru 15 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 0131 1 57A121 7360 3940 04:10:00 PM 0330 1 6 67 16 0 12840 4640 504 04:15:00 PM 136 10 778140 10940 3770 499 08:05:00 PM 348e0 570180 3938 544 2097 05:10100 PM 111500 77110s .1 580 slg 2112 05r15:00 PM 43820 t0 8!l r1 0 13460 3480 545 2121 05:20:00 PM 13880 271 70 1'l 8 7 0 4 4 10 0 533 2097 05;25:00 PM 23421 5 60 11 0 9680 4730 509 2070 05:30:00 PM '1 3921 447140 12 t0 6 0 260 468 2049 05:35:00 PM 0340 1 57781 1 0 2760 456 2057 05:40:00 PM 33560 75780 12420 3450 450 202A 05:45:00 PM 24020 11 58 9 0 '1'1 I 3 0 7100 467 2004 05:50:00 PM 147 10 74430 11 240 01 20 431 1964 05:55:00 PM 33500 351 80 6430 4380 413 191 1 -D-N r Southbound sE 27rh Sr Heavy Vehicle 0.6% EY DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Lsit U-Turn 0 159 907 75 Peds 0 +- Bicycles a>9E5i Pic;5O o.86 E 60>ul.o >ulz<iI U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles Bear Creek Bd at SE 27th St Peak Hour Summary 04:20 PM to 05:20 PM 108 69 56 Right 59 62 28 *zpm€of 6ggd e,3o=dE^o5y-e-!r;Ye a)o!tq)(L .Itooao Thru Left U-Turn 0 Peds 0 +- U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles tU37 529 3'1 0 Heavy Vehicle 1.2% sE 27th st Northbound ( l,ri li;, : ilit i'\t)il (r )jrii ::rlt'r l (l}r 1"1011rtr, i !Lit !:, ,. l:; 1l i ::!,, r!l l r'1r, ,1i i i i iti lt, ti lt ,: ,'.1 | rt r Li: il ril l i:' '.11 1t ,t itl ,;, t'.t, !) lrl, ; .) :r ;lrj :lir tl ' ii .ril ,il 'i: i{' i:,) .l I l i r :l i r !. i., .l {i ! Ii ,rl (r, ',1 at :, ttl :' {i, ti ir' :'rl ',i it d, ':\ tr rit itl tl i il i.itlri ,a": i.r ,, it. 1t: {11 )i/'. (0li: {+l11l,ii h)1ril.lrilrit lirli rl l:l:rlil {rIli:0iIr,l !t,il ir 11..1ri,r, lri loit rr;il)iiiI ilir'r lrIl,,lrilltxr'lriti {olil l:l rjil,)i lt lirr lull;I:1ri{!lI lil;r'r lili,li:$lt,li, Ii, I tjl,:,ii "lri/ 1i; '', :, ,l.ti rll ri ,r:j, .i il -D-N 'f Southbound Hamby Rd Heavy Vehicle 4.4% DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn I05961t50 Peds 1 +-Bicycles 0 Right 21 Thru 350 Lett '106 U-Turn 0 +- U-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 E+ o:- E!--;E 3dr >U> d I 92 426 oo!oo- Hamby Rd at Hwy 20 Peak Hour Summary 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM oaao a.oo€=qgg FsEfd.os71 1 Peds 0 I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 17 50 33 0 Heavy Vehicle 7.0% Hamby Rd Northbound Nonhbound Leit Thru Right Uturn 1750330 Soulhbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 1561590 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 92 426 71 0 (l)ri iir lr,jirt i 'rl 'r Datr Provldod by K.D.ll,com 508'504-4224 N/S slreet E/W strest City, State Sile Notss Localion Slart Date Slart Time Wealhsr Sludy lD # 44.0553 - -121.243475 Thursday, October 25, 2018 04:00:00 PM Hamby Rd Hwy 20 Bend OR Poat 15 Mln St rt PHF lntl 04:90:00 PM 0.92 tli,l:14!i(rl.l!illlili,r!t' lri ii l:ii.'] :r.,i:.: I ''l''i li ltillri ti,l rli ,'lilr' Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Westbound Letl tuo Right Uturn 21 0 Thru 350 Entering NB SB EB WB 100 '135 589 477 Leaving NB SB EB WB 234 163 426 474 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4.7to 4.9./o 0.0% 0.0%7.0% 4A% 4.4"/6 4.6%4.6% 1.8% 4.7% 5.7./o11.4% 4.0% 9.1% 0,0%6.7% 6.6% 1.70/" 0.0%1.1% 5.4% 2.8./. 0.0./" PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedsslrians Northbound Leit Thru Right Uturn 0000 Soulhbound Left Thru Flight Ulurn 0000 Eastbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0010 Westbound Lett Thru Right LJturn 0000 Sum 1 NB 0 WB in Crosswalk SB EB 'l 0 Sum 1 All Vehicl6 Volumes Time Left Northbound Hamby Rd Thru Right Uturn Southbound Hamby Rd Lett Thru Right Uturn Eastbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn Weslbound Hwy 20 Left Thru Right Uturn 15 Min Sum lHR Sum szB833 g4 0 05:00:00 PM 'I 00 0'1 20 93940 52420 296 1285 05:05:00 PM 3610 4630 93870 62630 302 1274 '10 39 5 0 533 10 312 129005:'10:00 PM 1330 o750 05:15:00 PM 2320 1 7 11 0 93670 72020 33'l 1293 05:20:00 PM 420 0630 83220 43620 3'19 1283 05:25:00 PM 0330 1640 52560 32300 286 1262 0380 42850 72770 276 124105:30:00 PM 430 63730 63520 241 122405:35:00 PM 0250 2430 05:40:00 PM 'l 130 1540 431 20 32630 256 1194 05:45:00 PM 2060 0560 82630 52230 275 1178 05:50:00 PM 410 0161 62850 12000 244 1 146 05:55:00 PM 0 ,1 00 2930 0726 1 52730 244 1128 r'l iij (,1 i l' tl ./. 1,.ilj:i' '4', ii., irl ltl t) ill r9) \i ii, rl, . li '':. i,, i,.l: 'J"ll :::,, r:tiii4r i,r:ii,l t) i .". iillll i:l 1i :rl (rirltlrl,jlrIul (lfrl i illlrli: itiil 1 f, il.lrr (iril i{lrjt,rl0 ('iiirrl:1.1{!lI r; ,1; ,"' ll' I 1l ,:',t i, itl L,: il.ij l ir; i", r rl ill tlt;\1 i! lr);' ,r' iii (nllriii'iirli' l,irl ilt ., lDIt r,iijlrl!' I llir ri, Li (tilllj,rill1r 'li'i :'l lrl lt 1r, - irl ,1'l tt .i i ir il.l i; !ri i:'lit i ;,f,,,;ji :nri! f i'1,?rii j Drta Provldod by K.D.ldcom 803-584.4224 N/S street E/w strset City, State Site Notes Location Start Date Slart Tlme Weather Sludy lD # 44.065776 - -121-243622 Thursday, December 20, 201 I 04:00:00 PM Hamby Rcl Neff Rd Bend OR Peak 15 MIn Stir| PHF (1s-Min 04:50:00 FU 0.93 Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Easlbound Thru Flight Uturn 341 109 0 Weslbound Lefl Thru Flight Uturn 21 345 13 011 Left WB 379 NB 63 Entering SB EB '16 461 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0,0% 0.0% 8.3/" 0.o%0.0./" 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.o% 0.37. 2.8% 0.0%0.0./. 0.0% 0.0% 0.o%1.6% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0%2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% PHV- Bicycl€s PHV - Pedestrians 0 Left Northbound Right Ulurn 00 Thru 0 Southbound Left Thru Right Uturn 0000 Left 0 Easlbound Thru Right Uturn '1 0 Westbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 0010 Sum NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WB 105 Sum 6 All Vehicle Volumes Time 04:00:00 PM Norlhbound Hamby Rd Lefl Thru Right Uturn 8100 Left Southbound Hamby Rd Thru Right Uturn 000 Left 0 Eastbound Nefi Rd Thru Right Uturn 120 Weslbound Nefi Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 22800 15 Min Sum lHR Sum 04:05:00 PM 2000 1000 1 19 5 0 421 00 04:10:00 PM 0401 3 '1 10 o22120 02900 201 04:'15:00 PM 1 050 2000 02890 02900 200 04:20:00 PM 0000 0000 0620 0 l't 0 0 04:25:00 PM 2000 0000 0 15 6 0 0500 12'l 04:30:00 PM 3020 0000 1 '10 3 0 21230 04:35:00 PM 1020 0020 0 16 7 0 13700 130 04:40:00 PM 3 0 7010 0020 12070 5 43230 179 2A 04:66:00 PM 6to 2322c 227 728 05:00:00 pM gt o a32rO 2{t 741 05:45:00 PM 4000 0020 0 22 11 0 422 10 231 917 05:50:00 PM 6000 01 20 02050 0336 1 220 913 05:55:00 PM 1 0a.11'l 0 1'1450 02300 '190 882 -D-N f Soulhbound Hamby Rd Heavy Vehicle 0.0% EY DATA NETWORK I Bicycles Right Thru Left U-Turn 7 4 0 Peds 1 +- BicyclesU-Turn o :a o)!cii; oo* 6ot F829u> oI Left 1 1 Hamby Rd at Nefi Bd Peak Hour Summary 04:45 PM lo 05:45 PM Right Thru Left U-Turn 345 IoD€= egg 9eos Thru Right Bicycles 341 oa€o,L .Uooa(r 109 21 Peds 0 I U-Turn Left Thru Right Bicycles 0 48 3 12 Heavy Vehicle 1.6% Hamby Rd Northbound Norlhbound Southbound Lett Thru Right Uturn 5470 Leaving Left 48 Thru Right Uturn NB 134 SB EB WB 27 400 3583120 iir ilriii r )l,l I I r!i1l iilr i{!I.1' , li1lill,1)r' l:ii't ii i)j ill tlr i.ij '!: !l Li' lrl ll 1: ii .il ll lil ll I '1,,1 -1, . til 1rl t", 'l il i1 :lt: ti t1l :!;: ill Lil D; !ll io ll iii l1 i t1 /lri: . lrli) 1' 1rl:j i'l tl i :a: f i,: :lliri) i1l 0r " rt \')t I I I1:r :,l '"' l,l "'l l,l ir: I "1.:l I ',l 'i": : ir1rl ! I lJ'l l', l,'; 1,, i,t I iri 1l ' il, ii ,ol(,I t,11:j({rii {tlliilljriii| ilii :' (olrr'rltit{rii i lri t., [lii,ri.rlrit]r li4tl] i til,,t1,rt,rui ri,l :' iilri:'i.;tlf rljlt :: 'r' lill IiIrI: {l|1:iiir:'! irl.llil..Ilc, I Data Prcvldod by K.Dl{.coft 503-594-4224 N/S street E/W street City, Slato Site Notes Location Start Date Slart Time Weather Study lO # 44.051297 - -121.243426 Tu€sday, October 09, 2018 04:00:00 PM Warcl Rd Beat Creek Rd Bend OR PHF (15-Min ht) 15 Mln Slarl 05:05:00 Pl, 0.92 -D-N Southbound Ward RdrHeavy Vehicle 0.9% EY DATA NETWORK I Bicyclos Right Thru Left U-Turn I147161140 Peds 1 F Bicycles oAoEl<5i!oo o E9b ,E E'-c0R E U-Turn Lett Thru Right Bicycles 0 22 46 42 0 Beat Creek Rd at Ward Bd Peak Hour Summary 04:40 PM to 05:40 PM 0 2 34 7 0 oo! L !ooao Right Thru Left U-Turn IaD@:8Fo- og *89Yrooo Peds 0 <- I U-Turn Left Thru Bight Bicycles I03169IJ0 Heavy Vehicle 0.9% Ward Rd Northbound Enlering Leaving NB 113 SB 222 EB 110 WB 43 NB SB 210 93 EB 112 WB Peak-Hour Volumes (PHV) Left Northbound Thru Right Uturn 69 13 0 Southbound Thru Right 161 47 Lett 14 Uturn 0 Eastbound Thru Right Uturn 46420 Left Lett 7 Westbound Thru Right Uturn 3420 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 1.40/" o.o./" 0.0%1.2./"0.oa o.o./"o.o./"0.oo/" 2.2/" 0.0% o.o.a 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.9./. 0.9% 0.9% 0.0%1 .0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.4% PHV- Bicycles PHV - Pedestrians 0 Left Northbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Left 0 Southbound Thru Right 10 Uturn 0 0 Lefi Eastbound Right Uturn 00 Thru 0 Left 0 Weslbound Thru Right Uturn 000 Sum 1 NB 0 in Crosswalk SB EB WB 100 Sum 1 Time 04:00:00 PM Norlhbound Ward Rd Lett Thru Right Uturn 312 10 Southbound Ward Rd Uturn 0 Left Thru Right 0 11 2 Eastbound Bear Creek Rd Left Thru Right Uturn 3510 Westbound Bear Creek Rd Uturn 0 Left Thru Right 031 I5 Min Sum 1HR Sum 04:05:00 PM 2300 2 11 5 0 0300 21 00 04:10:00 PM o200 0 13 6 0 2550 '1 600 111 04:15:00 PM 7810 21720 o230 o400 115 04:20:00 PM 3910 11420 0110 0041 123 04:25:00 PM 5400 0o12 1 2220 1 400 'I 16 04:30:00 PM 2500 1 11 5 0 'I 330 0200 103 04:35:00 PM 3700 2'1340 'r630 0300 '108 05:0br00 PM 11280 36r0 t18 474 06:10:00 PM 4819 1tli30 o200 127 480 05:15i00 PM 180t 11340 'I 310 132 47A 05:40:00 PM 4700 0 11 2 0 0 l0 5 0 0100 138 483 05:45:00 PM 2 1 0 1 19 3 0 1330 0210 126 477 05:50:00 PM '1 310 3 13 'l 0 0310 1110 106 469 05:55:00 PM 1400 0520 0620 0'l 10 88 454 t,1 i:l ,l ')) r tjl ti irl i!l ,1,i,, i!t .cl ,Jl ,] l,iil .i fl li hl {1' ir,i il '' {, it, lri I !!l 1'l i:: .l 1. l iir l!l lrl it 11. ,i rir .: / {iii:;1iii(t!i: li:l1 {il;lir liittls i. liii 0i l l;iiirati, l,.li,;! (-lil t,li;lr:lrt I lrl, {ilir(il;ilrT{t i lJr :l , llt j llil ilt. i;irl,; iil i:1!:lllillr rilri 0lrrtll"ilitl) i I,1t (il!i.1ll{rio'il l\i (ril.ltrlrl{rifi li{L : :i' itl I :. : i0 Iir,ttt it,l.:l.i), :l; 1r,, ,lifi :1.i. '1t\11 ritirr Appendix B Seasona I Adjustment Factors ATR 09-009: 0.23 miles south of Revere Avenue lnterchangeYear20202019201.820172016MinMaxAvg 3 YrsAdj FactorJan109979380928010994L27%FebtLg8296959782Ltg95L24%Mar9698LOzLOz9995L02x00L20%Apr109ro710910578109LA7May93LLTLTIL13to7931131X0tog%JunL20Ltgt17119tL71I7t20118Jult25tLgL18L20Ltg118L25119LOO%Augtzs118118LtgL20118L25119IOO%sep116LL2TLITLItt4111116LtzLO6%Oct118tLz109L10ttL109118111to8%Nov10199ro2LO210599105ta2Lt7%DecLO2100971019696toz99!20%78IOL%Ltt% Appendix C Crash Ana lysis Worksheets Ja n u ary 2015 th rough Decem be r 2OL9 dude@u. P ,e dSt' J *+ (" d' ,.r e" SE Bear Creek Road/ SE 27th Street (January 2015 through Doc€mber 2019) cn.hssdry6ybdb I ! CEsh everlty t, I!, t,t t i- '5 3 ! ! c€shes by Day l. i,t, rs,3i;'t cBshesby Hour tr ! a::SEE colllslonTyp€ !, ToblOc.upant lnlodes Cn hEdbm..lcb.dG cEsherBy FacllltyType ii:lll lZi ! LlthtCondltlons ! TEficcontrcl Devl.e t ! lnwlv€d V€hlcl€ Type t,, !' O o o tuI. {. - TopCEsh Caus€s i: !!6 3ii a i;Y I AlFault Dilver fue !r= rTil- "r'.1.{"jr"...4"-l..Jo{.r trrcdclffi{d SaferyEqulpment Us€ !1 lnv€stlgatlng Agency I i IIEIlrrTIT crash TyF t. jr E, ili 3Ee iii Drut Us€o I1tf l.!, i: Cnshes AyYear !.i, mr(dMRdu. SE Bear Creek Road/ SE Pettigrew Boulevard (January 2015 lhrough December 2019) cGh Sltllaq by D& rd tn. Cnsh Sevedty lb l" t, d' c".-.f, dn .d d .t d'trr f lnvolved DilftrGender I i t. !F cEshes by Day :E3i!;; lnve*lFtlngAgency J ! colllslonType I! i t's "!ii!! At-Fault Drlver Ag€ !61 iiiFrF+ ;r ."rJ"r".r""d'..fu ""_o-.tr"r'-s" s" .d" "" d' d' v Total occupant hJudet I lishtConditlons I j 5 cnshes By FacllltyType!til: i: I :igiiii*i*i:;iiliiiu o Drus useo !1-school zoneo O - lnwlwd Dilwr Resldence t i satetyEqulpment use T ;t t: i. Number of v.hlcles lnvolved T II . lnvolved Vehl.l€lvpe t: Top CErh Causes I.Irjsi;* !; i5- !,:- :; Fg FF IilrI $ €?g! E3 e" i !i E" Cnshes !yYear t: t; bb erF&@d -F:@oq!- !i- ,oot"rJ./ $ "J J{d f cEsh€s 8y Fa.llltyTypc!i- i t!iiii!: j:i;eqiiiii;i: 5:E-. ; r!". g SE Bear Creek Road/ SE Ward Road {Jahuqry 2015 through Dec€mber 2019) cmshes by Month I t !:lis!r;!ii; colllrlonlvpe t! cEshesby Hour N.i,t !i Crash Tyr i: rli iis i!l !!1 t- cEshesby Day r1L !: !3ilIi:IiEJ Cnsh S€verlty Total Occupant lnluies t- i. o 7 lI lnwlved Dilwr Gender !i- Ilght Condltlons I ia hfflccontrol Devlce I I lnvolwd vehlcl€lypo I , schoolzon€o At-Fault Drlver Atei:ffi ".f :c""'..e'",t"."r,r1C-.1-$"-J ,,s uc- $' p+ d' e" + Salery Equlpment U3€ t- luts lnvesilgatlng Agency 0I ia o DrutUs€o TopChihcaus€s t, 5' f I E :EI i;it!:?: t Appendix D Description of LOS Methods and Criteria Description of LOS Methods and Criteria Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various level of service ftom "A" to "F' . Signalized I ntersections The six level-of-service grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table 1. Additionally, Table L identifies the relationship between level of service and average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Table 1. Level of Service Definitions ized lntersecti Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle A Very low average control delay, less than L0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Average control delay is greater than L0 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a level of service A, causing higher levels of average delay. c Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. lndividual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. lndividual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle. This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally (but not always) indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. lndividual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. lt may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values. level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) LOS A <10.0 seconds LOS B >10 and <20 seconds LOS C >20 and <35 seconds LOS D >35 and <55 seconds LOS E >55 and <80 seconds LOS F >80 seconds Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for nalized Intersections U nsigna lized I ntersections Unsignalized intersections include two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections. The HCM 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides models for estimating control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table 3. A quantitative definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections is presented in Table 4. Table 3. Level of Service Criteria for U ized lntersections level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A r Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation.. Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. B r Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenienceo Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. c . Many times there is more than one vehicle in queue, r Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so D o Often there is more than one vehicle in queue o Drivers feel quite restricted. E e Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement.r There is almost always more than one vehicle in queue. r Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. F r Forced flow. r Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Secondsl LOS A <10.0 seconds LOS B >10.0 and < 15.0 seconds >15.0 and < 25.0 secondsLOS C LOS D >25.0 and < 35.0 seconds LOS E >35.0 and < 50.0 seconds LOS F >50.0 seconds Table 4. Level-of-Service Criteria for Un alized lntersections It should be noted that the level-of-service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less stressful than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, while drivers on the minor-street approaches to unsignalized intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is considered that the control delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for all-way stop- controlled intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at two-way stop-controlled intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through movements. For two-way stop-controlled intersections the overall intersection level of service remains undefined; level of service is only calculated for each stop-controlled minor street lane. ln the performance evaluation of two-way stop-controlled intersections it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOEs) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue lengths, and 95th percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor-street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. The potential for making such inappropriate decisions is likely to be particularly pronounced when the HCM level-of-service thresholds are adopted as legal standards, as is the case in many public agencies. Throughout this report multiple intersection metrics are presented, including delay, level of service, and the overall volume-to-capacity ratio. These metrics are compared to adopted agency performance standards (or mobility targets in the case of ODOT facilities) and combined with safety information and field observations to identify appropriate mitigation measures or intersection control configurations. Appendix E Existing Traffic Conditions Operationa I Worksheets Queues 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwy 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j I A I LI JF+r Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) lnternalLink Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity {vph} Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 287 0.80 36.1 0,0 36.1 112 #241 95 040 16.2 0.0 16.2 25 m33 100 242 0 0 0 0.39 1064 0.77 26.1 0.0 26.1 360 #48 1?25 99 0.49 39.9 0.0 't00 201 0 0 0 0,49 250 0.81 60.9 0.0 60.9 161 244 569 374 0 0 0 0.67 112 0,61 46.7 0.0 46.7 61 105 221 4.71 55.0 0.0 55.0 147 222 590 378 0 0 0 0.58 260 0.49 20.4 0,0 20.4 91 153 1179 0.70 23.0 0.0 23.0 315 423 599 1687 eoo 54 95 150 390 1 275 185 0 0 0 0,61 381 0 0 0 275 556 0 0 0 0.470.77 0 0 0 0.74 0 0 0 0.70 i; # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page'l HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwy 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j \{+-a t r L + t Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) \ 278 278 1750 5,0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1662 0.12 217 +T. 1055 1 055 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1,00 3210 1.00 3210 t 92 92 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1661 0.18 311 +T- 976 976 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.99 1.00 31 99 1.00 31 99 56 56 1750 T. 186 186 1 750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.97 1,00 1671 1.00 1671 t 109 109 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 662 0,31 537 + 214 214 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1733 1.00 1733 il 252 252 1 750 5.0 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1441 1.00 1441 BB B8 1750 56 56 1750 \ 96 96 1 750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1627 0,38 654 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/h$ Heaw Vehicles {%) 0.97 287 0 287I 0.97 1 OBB 5 1174 0.97 1 006 3 1 061 0.97 5B 0 0I 2 }Yo 0.97 192 11 239 1o/o 0.97 260 47 213 6 J 2o/o 0.97 91 0 0 13 0.97 95 0 95 13 0.97 112 0 112 1 0.97 5B 0 0 1 0o/o 0.97 oo 0 99 6 2o/o 0.97 221 0 221 0o/o 1o/oAo/o 2% 1o/o 0o/o 3Yo Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) p NA 48 pm+pt 3 8 25.4 25.4 0.23 5.0 2.5 NA 6 NA 2 m+pt 5 2 69.5 69.5 0.63 5.0 2.5 57.7 57.7 0.52 5.0 5.2 pm+pt 1 6 54.2 54.2 0.49 5.0 2.5 47.4 47.4 0.43 5.0 5.2 NA 19.6 19.6 0.18 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 7 4 25.6 25.6 0.23 5.0 2.5 19.7 19.7 0.18 5.0 2.5 pm+0v 5 4 36.8 36.8 0.33 5.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 361 c0.12 c0.38 0.80 23.0 1.00 11.1 34,1 c I 683 0.37 236 0.02 0.17 0.40 15.9 1.10 0.7 18.1 B 1378 0.33 0.77 26.7 0.79 3.5 24.6 c 24.0 c 202 0.03 0.09 0.49 34.9 1.00 1.4 36.3 D 297 c4.14 185 c0.03 0.'11 0.61 35.5 1.00 4.7 40.1 D 310 0.13 547 0.06 0.09 0.39 28.0 1.00 0.3 28.3 c 0.70 19.6 1.00 2.4 22.0 c 24.4 c 0.81 43.4 1.00 14.3 57.6 E 51.6 D 0.71 42.5 1.00 7.1 49.5 D 38.5 D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c Critical Lane Group 29.3 0.81 1 10.0 85.8% 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service c 20.0 E Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwv 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour T \{+-\ t r L I Jts Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/tr) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/hfln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive 0n Green Sat Flow, veh/h t 278 278 0 1,00 1.00 +T- 1055 1 055 0 92 92 0 1.00 1.00 \ 96 96 0 1.00 1.00 T" 186 186 0 t 109 109 0 1.00 1.00 1750 112 0.97 0 186 0.05 't667 + 214 214 0 1.00 No 1736 221 0,97 1 324 0.19 1736 88 BB 0 0.99 't.00 56 56 0 0.97 1.00 56 56 0 0.99 1,00 252 252 0 0.98 1,00 976 976 0 1750 287 0.97 0 340 0,10 1667 1.00 No 1723 1 OBB 0.97 2 1655 0.54 3054 1730 91 0.97 1 138 0.54 255 1750 oq 0.97 0 267 0.03 1667 1.00 No 1709 1006 0,97 3 1500 0.32 3113 1750 5B 0.97 0 86 0.32 179 1723 99 0.97 2 197 0.05 1641 1,00 No 1736 192 0,97 1 238 0.19 1277 1750 5B 0.97 0 72 0.19 386 1723 260 0.97 2 418 0.19 1423 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 287 Grp Sat Flow(s),vel/t/ln 1667 Q Serve(g_s), s 9,1 CycleQClea(g-c),s 9.1 Prop ln Lane 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 340 ViC Ratio(X) 0.85 Avail Cap(c-a), veh/h 454 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 Upstream Filte(l) 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 lncr Delay {d2}, s/veh 9.7 lnitial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 o/oile Back0fQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),stueh 30.0 21.7 16.4 32,9 32,8 37.8 583 1637 27.9 27.9 887 0.66 887 1.00 1.00 17.9 3.8 0.0 11.0 21.7 c 596 1673 27.9 27.9 0.15 906 0,66 906 1.00 1,00 17.9 3.7 0.0 11.3 95 1667 3.1 3.1 '1.00 267 0.36 300 0.67 0.6s 16.0 0,4 0.0 1.2 525 1624 30.7 30.7 782 0.67 782 0.67 0,69 29.7 3.2 0.0 13.2 539 1669 30.7 30.7 0.11 804 0.67 804 0.67 0.69 29.7 3.r 0.0 13.6 99 1641 5.0 5.0 1.00 197 0.50 197 1.00 1.00 36.3 1.5 0.0 2.2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A 250 1662 15.8 15,8 0.23 310 0.81 363 1.00 1.00 42.8 10.3 0.0 7.4 112 1667 5.0 5.0 1.00 186 0.60 186 1.00 1.00 38.5 4.7 0.0 f.0 221 1736 13.0 13.0 324 0.68 379 1.00 1.00 41.7 3.5 0.0 5.9 45.2 D 260 1423 17.4 17A 1.00 418 0.62 463 1.00 1,00 33.8 1.9 0.0 6.2 53.1 43.2 D 35.7 Ln LOS Approach Vol, vel/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS c CBCCD D D 1466 23.3 c 1 159 31.5 c 349 48.8 D 593 40.7 D Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting {Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g-c+11), s Green Ext Tjme (p_c), s 9.9 5.0 7.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 64.6 5.0 54.0 29.9 15.6 0.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 25.5 5.0 24.0 19.4 0.8 16.5 5.0 19.0 11.1 03 58,0 5.0 42.4 32.7 6.8 25.5 5.0 24.4 17.8 0.6 1 HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 31.3 c Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j-{,{A t LI J Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio ControlDelay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th {ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) lnternal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced vlc Ratio 307 0.90 54.3 0.0 54.3 196 #355 150 359 0 0 0 0.86 793 0.80 34.5 0,0 34,5 291 #387 1225 988 0 0 0 0.80 196 0,80 68.7 0.0 68.7 133 #229 532 0.60 41,1 0,0 41.1 177 238 1261 809 0 0 0 0,66 170 0,85 72.6 0.0 72.6 g1 #198 175 200 0 0 0 0,85 643 0.76 35.4 0.0 35,4 117 208 1209 197 0.70 42.9 0.0 42.9 92 #164 52.9 0.0 52.9 291 #400 571 333 0.58 13.9 0,0 13,9 47 141 150 577 0 0 0 0.58 820 0,90 375 278 0 0 0 0.71 927 0 0 0 0.88 200 263 0 0 0 0.75 855 0 0 0 0.75 l(.:ll.r )"1,|' r; i!:l;,,r # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j \t l(+ta t t I I J+- Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow {oerm) t 289 289 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1646 0.95 1 646 +T. 596 596 1 750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 31 55 1,00 3155 149 149 1750 t 184 184 1750 5.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1614 0.95 1614 +T. 444 440 1750 5.0 0,95 1.00 1,00 0.98 1.00 3172 1.00 3172 60 60 1750 160 160 1 750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0,95 1 645 0.14 241 439 439 1750 5.0 0.95 0,99 1,00 0,96 1,00 31 '10 '1.00 31 10 165 165 1750 185 1B5 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 '1662 0.20 353 771 771 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 3292 1.00 3292 313 313 1 750 5.0 1.00 0.96 1,00 0.85 1,00 1421 1.00 1421 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl, Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heaw Vehicles (%)1Yo 2o/o 1o/o 3o/o 3Yo 0,94 307 0 307 B 0.94 159 0 0 6 0,94 196 0 196 6 0.94 64 0 0 8 0o/o 0,94 176 0 0 5 0.94 333 178 155 16 1 1o/o 0.94 634 19 774 0,94 468 10 522 0.94 170 0 170 16 0.94 197 0 197 5 0.94 820 0 820 0.94 467 35 608 2o/o1o/o 2o/o 0o/o 1o/o Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) NA 6 Prot 1 NA 2 33.8 33.8 0.31 5.0 5.2 Prot 5 22.7 22.7 0.21 5.0 2.5 16.7 16.7 0.15 5.0 2.5 27.8 27.8 0.25 5.0 2.5 28.8 28.8 0.26 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 7 4 41.0 41.0 0.37 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 3 B 38.0 38.0 0.35 5.0 2.5 4 NA I NA Perm 30.3 30.3 4 30.3 0.28 5.0 2.5 30.3 0.28 5.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 339 c0.1 9 0.91 42.6 0.70 20.6 50.6 D 969 c0.25 0.80 35.0 0.83 5.0 34.2 c 38.8 D 245 0.12 0.80 45.0 1.00 16.4 61.4 E 801 0.16 0.65 36.8 1.00 4.1 40.9 D 46.4 D 200 0.07 0.22 0.85 28.4 1.64 26.0 72.5 E 814 0.20 258 c0.07 0.21 0.76 26.0 1.00 12.1 38.1 D 906 c0.25 0.91 38.5 1.00 12.3 50.8 D 44.5 D 391 0.11 0.40 32.4 1.00 0.5 32.9 c 0.75 37.2 0.84 3.4 34.9 C 42.7 D HCM 2000 Conhol Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c CriticalLane Group 42.9 0,89 1 10.0 87.60/o '15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service D 20.0 E Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j +\{+-a t t L + JF Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/tr) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach AdjSat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow. vehlh t 289 289 0 1.00 1.00 1736 307 0.94 1 337 0.07 1654 149 149 0 0,99 1.00 1736 159 0.94 1 213 0.11 648 t 184 184 0 1.00 1.00 160 160 0 1.00 1.00 165 '165 0 0.98 1.00 t 185 185 0 1.00 1.00 ++ n1 771 0 I 313 313 0 1.00 1.00 1736 0 0.94 I 1.00 No 1736 820 0.94 1 891 0.27 3299 439 439 0 +T'444 60440 6000 0.991.00 1.00 No 1709 1750468 640,94 0.9430752 1020,26 0.26 2868 390 +T" 596 596 0 1.00 No 1723 634 0.94 2 851 0,11 2589 1709 196 0.94 3 ng 0.14 1628 1736 170 0.94 1 219 0.03 1654 1,00 No 1723 467 0,94 2 584 0.08 2317 1723 176 0.94 2 218 0.08 B66 1750 197 0,94 0 271 0.10 1667 0.00 1471 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vehft/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g3), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/lr V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lnu Delay {d2}, s/veh lnitial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackofQ(500/o),veh/tn Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),stueh LnGrp LOS 307 1654 20.3 20.3 1.00 337 0.91 361 0.33 0.66 50.3 18.4 0,0 $.7 400 1637 26.1 26.1 538 0.33 0.66 44.5 6.1 0.0 12.4 393 1600 26.2 26.2 0.41 526 0.75 526 0,33 0.66 44.6 6.3 0.0 12.2 50.9 D 196 1628 13.0 13.0 1,00 n3 O.BB 281 '1.00 1"00 46.5 20.0 0.0 6,5 264 1624 15.8 15.8 426 0.62 426 1.00 1.00 35.7 6.6 0.0 7.0 268 1635 15.9 15.9 0.24 429 0.63 429 1,00 1.00 35.8 6,7 0.0 7.1 170 1654 8.3 8.3 1.00 219 0.78 219 0.33 0.95 32.3 14.9 0.0 4,4 329 1637 21.7 21.7 412 0.80 431 0.33 0.95 47.7 8.9 0.0 10.5 314 1547 22.0 22.0 0.56 390 0.81 408 0.33 0.95 47.B 10.1 0.0 rc.2 197 1667 9.6 9.6 1.00 271 0.73 271 1.00 r.00 29.1 9.0 0.0 4.4 820 1650 26.6 26.6 891 0.92 930 1.00 1,00 39.0 13.5 0.0 12,3 0 1471 0.0 0,0 1.00 538 0.74 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 50.6 DE 67.1 42.4 42.5 47.2 56.5 57.9 38.'t 52.5 0.0EDDDEEDD Approach Vol, veh/tr Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1 100 55.8 E 728 49.1 0 813 55.1 E 1017 49.7 D A Phs Duration {G+Y+fr6), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Sefring (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4',1.2 5.0 31.0 28.2 1.9 14.0 5.0 9.0 10.3 0.0 34.7 5.0 31.0 28.6 1.2 16.0 5.0 11.0 1'1.6 0.0 24,1 5.0 19,0 15.0 0.1 27.4 5.0 24.0 22.3 0.1 33.9 5.0 26.0 17.9 1,7 32.7 5.0 29.0 24.0 1.6 :iliri .i l,I i. j,t i:lr::,. i:l,r' HCM 6th Ctrt Delay HCM 6th LOS 52,6 D Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Ward Rd & Hwv 20 Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 11.1 l$ ':"1 Lane Configurations t Tr t Tr + + Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 13 534 71 75 443 21 13 41 30 6 45 61 Future Vol, veh/h 113 534 71 75 443 21 13 41 30 6 45 61 ConflictingPeds,#ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT0hannelized - Yield - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 Mvmt Flow 119 ; 0 95 3 562 ; 0 95 7 32 ; 0 95 0 43 0 0 9; 0 22 9; 1 75 95 954579 466 95 0 14 95 95170647 95 2 64 Conflicting Flow All Stage't Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 4BB 0 0 562 4.11 4.14 2.209 1080 1080 - 2.236- 999 0 1529- 838- 691- 7.1- 6.1- 6,1 _ ?5-97- 364- 438 1484 B3B 646 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 126 384 470 6.2; 3.36; 492 635 B38 7.27 6.27 6.27 3.653 97 442 340 :600 1473 1435 477 635 800 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 135 476 400 6.22 3.318 5BB 999 50 103 49250 103 324 342 320 433 53 111 5BB53 111 393 438 247 356 HCM ControlDelay, s 1.4 HCM LOS 1.2 96.9 56,6 F F Capacity (vel/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ConholDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 117 0.756 96.9 F 4.2 1080 0.11 8.7 A 0.4 999 0.079 8.9 A 0.3 . 180- 0.655- 56.6.F - 3.8 Synchro 10 Report Page 7 Queues 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j +{ts \ t Lt Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio ControlDelay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) lntemalLink Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 116 0.42 37.0 0,0 37.0 67 104 125 0.36 26.0 0.0 26.0 48 95 579 43 0.21 33.0 0.0 33.0 24 48 75 204 0 0 0 4.21 128 0.63 42.7 0.0 42,7 54 111 1087 537 0 0 0 0.24 54 0.17 8.7 0.0 8.7 11 32 694 0.33 13.6 0.0 13,6 126 210 737 6B 0.14 13.5 0.0 13.5 23 m32 1 039 0,49 21.5 0.0 21.5 n3 m2B2 '1209 741 0 0 0 0.17 75 356 0 0 0 0.33 75 487 75 329 2096 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0 0.16 2100 0 0 0 0,49 i.llli,1ir lr lr ;ili. i,!i m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j \{+-a t t L I J Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) \ 116 116 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,9s 1 805 0.39 744 Tt 65 65 1900 4.7 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 1727 1.00 1727 t 43 43 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1719 0.68 1225 T. 62 62 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.92 1,00 1726 1.00 1726 t 54 54 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.21 394 +T' 664 664 1900 5.7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1,00 3534 1.00 3534 t 6B 6B 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1752 0.35 639 +T. 880 BBO 1900 5,7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 351 6 1.00 351 6 60 60 1900 66 bb 1900 30 30 1900 159 't59 1900 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#lhr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1.00 116 0 116 1.00 66 0 0 1.00 159 0 U 1,00 664 2 692 1.00 54 0 54 2o/o 1.00 62 44 B4 0o/o .00 43 0 43 5o/o 1.00 60 0 0 1 3o/o 1.00 65 42 B3 0o/o 1.00 30 0 0 1 1.00 6B 0 6B 1 3% 1,00 BBO B 1 031 Heaw Vehicles (o/o\00 3o/o 1o/o 100/o 0o/o 2o/o Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension {s) pm+pt 7 4 27,5 27.5 0.25 4.5 2.0 19.7 19.7 0.18 4.7 2.5 pm+pt 3 8 15.2 15.2 0.14 4.5 2.0 11,9 11.9 0.11 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 5 2 67.3 67.3 0.61 4.5 2.0 62.5 62.5 0.57 5.7 4.0 pm+pt I 6 67,9 67.9 0.62 4.5 2.0 62.8 62.8 0.57 5.7 4.0 NA 6 NA 2 NA I NA 4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 290 c0.04 c0.06 0.40 33.3 1.00 0.3 JJ,O c 309 0.05 0.27 38.9 1.00 0.3 39.3 D 36.6 D 184 0.01 0.03 0.23 41.9 1.00 0.2 42.1 D 186 0,05 0.45 46.0 1.00 1.3 47.3 D 46.0 D 301 c0.01 0.10 0.18 9.6 1,00 0.1 9.7 A 2007 0.20 0.34 12.8 1.00 0.5 13.2 B 13.0 B 446 0.01 0.09 0.15 8.6 1.77 0.0 15.3 B 2007 c0.29 0.51 14.3 1.45 0,5 21.3 C 20.9 c HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) lntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c Critical Lane Group 21.9 0.48 110.0 63.70/o 15 19.7 B HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service c Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour j +\{+-a t f L t t iili,i4rlrr:t jii.I j, , j;'j , j:].. rl,11i 11 1r,rl,' !lri;li- ,r,li.jr' irli;ill lil,tl' Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/tr) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach AdjSat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive 0n Green Sat Flow. veh/h 116 116 0 1.00 1.00 t 43 43 0 1.00 1.00 1826 43 1.00 5 249 0.03 1739 t 68 6B 0 1.00 1.00 159 159 0 1.00 1.001.00 No 1900 65 1,00 0 123 0.14 903 1.00 No 1900 62 1.00 0 80 0.09 842 1.00 No 1 885 664 1,00 1 2134 0.61 3490 1.00 No 1900 BBO 1.00 0 1877 0.61 3054 +T. 880 BBO 0 +t' 664 664 0 t 54 54 0 .00 .00 T- 62 62 0 T. 65 65 0 60 60 0 0.99 1.00 66 66 0 1.00 1.00 30 30 0 1.00 1.00 1900 '116 1.00 0 230 0.07 1810 1856 60 1.00 3 114 0.14 833 1856 66 1.00 3 85 0.09 896 1870 54 1.00 2 380 0.04 1781 1752 30 1.00 10 96 0.61 158 1856 6B 1.00 3 523 0.04 1767 1870 159 1.00 2 339 0.61 552 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/l/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/ir V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/?r HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay {d2), s/veh lnitial Q Delay(d3),siveh o/oile Back0fQ(50%),vet/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 116 1810 6.1 6,1 1.00 230 0.50 399 1.00 1.00 39.3 0.6 0.0 2,8 39,9 0 0 0.0 0,0 125 1736 7.4 7.4 0.48 237 0.53 715 1.00 1.00 44.2 1.4 0.0 3.3 43 1739 2.4 2.4 1.00 209 0.21 238 1.00 1.00 42.9 4.2 0.0 1,1 128 1739 7.9 7.9 0.52 165 0.78 506 1.00 1.00 48,6 5.7 0,0 3.7 54 1781 1.2 1.2 '1.00 380 0.14 403 1.00 1.00 8.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 341 1791 10.0 10.0 1095 0,31 1095 1.00 1.00 10.2 0.7 0.0 4.0 353 1857 10,0 10,0 0.08 1 135 0.31 1135 1.00 1.00 10.3 0,7 0.0 4.2 11.0 B 6B 1767 1.5 1.5 1.00 523 0.13 557 1.00 0.34 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0 0 0.0 0.0 520 519 1805 180017,2 17.2 17.2 17.2 0.31 1109 11060.47 0.47 1109 11061.00 1.00 0,34 0.3411.5 11.50.5 0.50.0 0.06.6 6.6 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 A 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 D 43,1 0.0 54.3 8,5DA 11.0 B 12.07.5 12.0 BDDAAB Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 241 42.8 D 171 51.5 D 748 10.8 B 1107 11.7 B I ir'iti.: ,'l'), Phs Duration {G+Y+fts1, s 8.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.5 Green Ext Time {p_c), s 0.0 73.0 5.7 33.3 12.0 6.1 8.5 4.5 5.5 3.2 0.0 73.3 5.7 34.3 19.2 8.0 12.7 4.5 18.5 8.1 0.1 15.4 5.0 32,0 oo 0.5 8,2 4.5 5.5 4.4 0.0 20.0*5 *45 9.4 0.6 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS 17.7 B - HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th TWSC 7: Quail Run Pl & Bear Creek Rd Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 2.7 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 Future Vol, veh/h 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Conhol Free RT Channelized - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 50 -f 147 107 0 Free None 0 0 100 4 107 Y I 1 0 Stop 0 0 0 100 0 1 T.113 I113 900 Free Free- None 0- 0 100 100311113 I 58 5B 0 Stop**: 100 0 58 i i'i': i,'r Conflicting Flow All 122 Stage 1 Stage 2CriticalHdwy 412 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1465 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % MovCap-1 Maneuver 1465 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 325 118 207 6.4 5.4 5.4 3.5 673 912 832 ,,t- 6.2 3; 93: 649 939 649 879 832 HCM ControlDelay, s 2.4 HCM LOS 0 9.1 A Capacig (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ControlDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Totile Q(veh) 1465 0.034 7.5 A 0.1 932 0.063 9.1 A 0.2 0 A Synchro 10 Report Page 1'1 HCM 6th TWSC 10: Ward Rd & Bear Creek Rd Existing Conditions Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 4.4 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow ++22 46 4222 46 42001 -0-0 100 100 10002022 46 42 7 7 1 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop- - None 100 0 7 +++ 69 69 0 ree ++l 34 34 0 00 0 2 23123100 Stop Free F None 0 3'l 13 13 0 Free None 0 0 100 100 100'1 0069 13 14 14 14 0 Free + 161 161 0 Free 47 47 0 Free None 0 0 00 0 34 10011 0 0 100 I 161 100 0 47 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-l Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-l Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 369 357 213 213 156 144 7.1 6.52 6.1 5.52 6.1 5.52 3.5 4.018 591 569 794 726 851 778 ,u: 6.2 3.3 861 396 138 258 7.1 6.'1 6.1 3.5 568 870 751 374 138 236 6,5 5.5 5.5 4 560 786 713 6.2 3.;*1 1 208008200 4.1 2.2 4.1 - 2.2- 1528 - 1528 537 547 550 860 547 550 775 719 792 759 492 541 991 1375 492 541 849 767 661 706 HCM Conkol Delay, s 11.8 HCM LOS B 12.2 B 2.1 0,5 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Conhol Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 375 0.023 7.7 A 0.1 ; i 0 A 637 544 1528 0.173 0.079 0.009 11.8 12.2 7 .4BBA0.6 0.3 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 12 Appendix F Yea r 2030 Forecast Traffic Conditions Operationa I Worksheets Queues 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hw 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour I -+{{-A t LI J iiiri .:.t, r,.;rl"i ,::,ll r,ii ritt,Il .i.;i :,;,1 :Itr't.:; l,ir\ r: I Lane Group Flow (vph) vlc Ratio ControlDelay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th tt) Queue Length 95th (ft) lnternal Link Dist (fr) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 310 0.91 60.3 0.0 60.3 161 #324 150 359 0 0 0 0.86 1281 4.77 26.0 0.0 26.0 385 483 599 1654 0 0 0 4.77 114 0.55 28.1 0.0 28.1 27 m3B 100 210 0 0 0 0.54 1 155 0.87 30.8 0,0 30.8 434 n#541 1225 1334 0 0 0 0.87 112 0.57 43.7 0,0 43.7 59 105 100 {95 0 0 0 0,57 280 0.85 63.7 0.0 63.7 180 #295 569 122 4.71 55.6 0.0 55.6 65 #1 33 241 4,72 54.3 0.0 54.3 158 242 590 281 0.51 20.6 0,0 20.6 99 170 275 572 0 0 0 0.49 378 0 0 0 0.64 275 172 0 0 0 4.71 374 0 0 0 0.75 # 95th percsntile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum afier two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwv 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour I \{\a t r L I J{- Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) t 301 301 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 662 0.09 153 +T' 1146 1146 1 750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 3210 1.00 3210 97 97 1750 t 111 111 1750 5.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1662 0.14 245 +T- 1059 1 059 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 e{oo 1.00 31 99 61 61 1750 109 109 1 750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1627 0.36 614 Tt 203 203 175A 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 0,96 1.00 1 665 1.00 1 665 69 69 1750 |I 118 118 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1 662 0.27 468 + 234 234 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1733 1.00 1733 f 273 273 1750 5.0 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1,00 1440 1.00 1440 Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heaw Vehicles (%)0o/o 2o/o 1o/o 0o 3o/o 2o/o 1o/o 0olo AYo 1o/o 0.97 310 0 310I 0.97 't181 5 1276 0.97 100 0 0 13 0,97 114 0 114 13 0.97 1092 4 1151 0.97 112 0 112 6 0.97 209 11 269 0,97 122 0 122 1 0.97 241 0 241 0.97 281 45 236 6 3 2o/o 00,97 63 0 0I 2 a% .97 71 0 0 1 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension {s) pm+pt 5 2 68.6 68.6 0.62 5.0 2.5 56.6 s6.6 0.51 5.0 5.2 pm+pt 1 6 52.8 52.8 0.48 5.0 2.5 45,8 45.8 0.42 5.0 5.2 pm+pt 3 B 26.3 26.3 0.24 5.0 2.5 21.0 21.0 0.19 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 7 4 26,5 26.5 0.24 5.0 2.5 21.1 21.1 0.19 5.0 2.5 5 4 38.9 38.9 0.35 5.0 2.5 pm+0vNA 4 NAINA 6 NA 2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 339 c0.15 c0.42 0.91 31.9 1.00 28.1 60.0 E 1 651 0.40 0.77 21.5 1.00 3.6 25.1 U 31.9 c 207 0.03 0.23 0.55 17.7 1.48 2.0 28.2 c 1 331 0.36 0.87 29.3 0.7B 6.1 29.1 c 29.0 c '195 0.03 0.11 0.57 35.7 't.00 3.3 39.0 D 317 c0.16 171 c0.03 0.14 0.71 36.8 1.00 12.3 49.1 D 332 0.14 0.73 41.7 1.00 7.2 49.0 D 39.5 D 574 0.07 0.'10 0.41 26.9 1.00 0.4 27.2 c 0,85 43.0 1.00 18.3 61.2 E 54.9 D HCM 2000 Conhol Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 34.5 0.91 110.0 92.10/o 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 20.0 c F Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwy 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j -{r \1lf +-a t t L I Jts Lane Configurations TrafficVolume (veM) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone On Approach AdjSat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flsw veh/h t 301 301 0 1.00 1.00 +T. 1146 1146 0 t 111 111 0 1.00 1.00 +T- 1059 '1059 0 1.00 No 1709 1092 0.97 3 1430 0.46 31 13 t 109 109 0 1.00 1.00 1723 112 0.97 2 192 0.05 1641 T.+ 203 203 0 1.00 No 1736 209 0,97 1 241 0.19 1236 t 118 118 0 1.00 1.00 1750 122 0.97 0 173 0.05 1667 97 97 0 0,99 1,00 61 61 0 0.96 1,00 69 69 0 0.99 1.00 il 273 273 0 0.98 1.00 + 234 234 0 1750 310 0.97 0 339 0.12 1667 1.00 No 1723 1 181 0.97 2 1604 0.53 3051 1736 100 0.97 1 136 0.53 258 1750 63 0.97 0 82 0.46 180 1750 71 0.97 0 82 0.19 420 1.00 No 1736 241 0.97 1 338 0.19 1736 1723 281 0.97 2 450 0.19 '424 1750 114 0.97 0 244 0.05 1667 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vet/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vel/h ViC Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay {d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(S0%),veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),stueh LnGro LOS 25J 18.9 29.1 310 1667 10,7 10.7 1.00 339 0,91 429 1.00 100 22.4 19.8 0.0 5.7 633 1637 32.9 32.9 860 0.74 860 1.00 't.00 20.2 5.6 0.0 13.3 648 1672 33.0 33.0 0.'15 879 0.74 879 1.00 1,00 20.2 5.5 0.0 13.6 114 1667 3.9 3.9 1.00 u4 0.47 263 1.00 0.58 18.3 0.6 0,0 1.5 569 1624 32.1 32.1 586 1669 32.1 32.1 0.11 767 0.76 767 1.00 0.58 24.8 4.2 0.0 13.2 29,0 c 112 1641 5.0 5.0 1.00 192 0.58 192 1.00 1.00 37.6 3.8 0.0 0.9 0 0 0.0 0.0 280 1656 18.0 18.0 0.25 322 0.87 361 1.00 't,00 42.9 17.7 0.0 8.9 122 1667 5.0 5.0 1.00 173 0.71 173 1.00 1.00 39.7 11.7 0.0 1.6 241 1736 14.3 14.3 338 0.71 379 1.00 1,00 41.4 5,0 0.0 6.5 281 1424 18.6 18.6 '1.00 450 0.62 484 1.00 1.00 32.3 1.9 0.0 6.6 746 0.76 746 1,00 0.58 24.7 4.3 0.0 12.9 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.2 25.7DC 41.4 D 0.0 60.7 51.4 D 34.2 c 46.4 DcBcAE Approach Vol, vel/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1591 28.9 c 1269 28.1 C 392 55.2 E 644 42.1 D Phs Duratisn {G+Y+Rc}, s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10,8 5.0 7.0 5.9 0.0 0,0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 18.1 5.0 19.0 12.7 0.4 55.5 5.0 42.0 34.1 0.2 10.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 62.8 5.0 54.0 35.0 u.a 26.4 5.0 u.a 20.6 0.7 1 26.4 5.0 24.4 20.0 0.5 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS 33.5 c Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j +{F \ t LI J ,;11r1 : ir I lr'i r1,,,,ii 'r L,'lr' I i :l i Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th {fi) Queue Length 95th (ft) lnternalLink Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn $pillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 339 0.95 61.4 0,0 61.4 193 m#378 150 359 0 0 0 0.94 864 0.90 39.2 0.0 39.2 320 M47 1225 212 0.84 71.9 0.0 71.9 144 #257 580 0.76 45.4 0.0 45.4 197 263 1261 185 0.94 89.5 0.0 89.5 105 #228 175 197 0 0 0 0,94 697 0.82 41.6 0.0 41.6 129 267 1209 216 0.87 57.9 0.0 57.9 102 #228 893 0,96 61.4 0.0 61.4 327 #460 571 368 0.63 '16.5 0.0 16,5 67 174 150 580 0 0 0 0.63 375 278 0 0 0 0.76 957 0 0 0 0.90 0 855 0 0 0 0.82 767 0 0 .87 0 0 0 0.76 927 0 0 0 0,96 200 247 0 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro '10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour -f+\{\a t t L t Jts Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldealFlow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, pedibikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (nerm) t 319 319 1750 5.0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 646 0.95 1 646 +T. 649 649 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,97 1,00 31 55 1,00 3155 164 164 1750 199 199 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1614 0.95 1614 478 478 1750 5.0 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 3172 1,00 3172 t 174 174 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1 645 0.14 239 +T. 477 477 1750 5.0 0,95 0,99 1.00 0.96 1.00 3111 1.00 3111 179 179 1750 203 203 1750 5,0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 662 0.17 289 839 839 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3292 1.00 3292 346 346 1750 5.0 1,00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 1421 1.00 1421 67 67 1750 Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#ftr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heaw Vehicles l%) 0.94 339 0 339 B 0.94 174 0 0 6 0.94 212 0 212 6 0.94 509 10 570 0.94 71 0 0I 0.94 185 0 185 16 0.94 507 35 662 0,94 216 0 216 5 0.94 368 180 1BB 16 1 1o/o1o/o 0.94 893 0 893 0.94 190 0 0 5 2o/o 0.94 690 20 844 2o/o lolo 3o/o 3o/o 0o/o 1o/o 2o/o 0o/o 1o/o Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) 4 NA 8 NA 2 Prot 5 NA 6 26.3 26.3 0.24 5.0 2.5 Prot 1 pm+pt 3 8 38.0 38.0 0.35 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 7 4 42.4 42.0 0,38 5.0 2.5 NA Perm Vehicle Extension {s) 23.7 23.7 0.22 5.0 2.5 32.7 32.7 0.30 5.0 5.2 17.3 17.3 0.16 5.0 2.5 29.0 29.0 0.26 5.0 2.5 31.0 31.0 0.28 5.0 2.5 4 31.0 31.0 0.28 5.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 354 c0.21 937 c0.27 253 0.13 0.84 45.0 1.00 20.5 65.5 E 758 0.18 0.75 38.8 r.00 6.8 45.6 D 50.9 D 197 0.08 0.25 0.94 29.3 1.70 44.8 94.6 F 820 0.21 927 c0.27 400 0.13 a.47 32.7 1.00 0.6 33.4 c 0.96 42.7 0.74 27.0 58,5 E 0.90 37.1 0.80 9.0 38.7 D 44.3 D 247 c0.09 0.25 0.87 26.3 1.00 27.0 53.3 D 0.81 37.9 0.94 5.4 40.9 D 52.2 D 0.96 38.9 1.00 21.0 59,9 E 52.3 D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c CriticalLane Group 49.8 0.98 1 10.0 92.30/o 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service D 20.0 F Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour i+\t +-a t r L I JF Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vehft) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach Adj Sat Flow, vehfuln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent HeavyVeh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow. veh/h 319 319 0 1.00 1.00 164 164 0 0.99 1.00 1736 339 0.94 1 361 0.07 1654 1736 174 0,94 I 200 0.1 0 651 1709 212 0.94 J 239 0,15 1628 1736 185 0.94 1 210 0.03 1654 1736 0 0,94 1 I 346 346 0 1.00 1.00 839 839 0 1.00 No 1736 893 0.94 1 930 0.28 3299 t179 203179 203000.98 1.001.00 1,00 1723 1750190 216 0.94 0,9420228 2650.09 0.10 865 1667 +T. 477 477 0 +T-478 67478 6700 0.99 1.00 1.00 No 1709 1750509 710,94 0.9430670 940.24 0.242859 397 649 649 0 t 199 199 0 1,00 1.00 t 174 174 0 1.00 1.001.00 No 1723 690 0,94 2 795 0.10 2585 1.00 No 1723 507 0.94 2 612 0.09 2320 0.00 1471 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhiln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c*a), vehfi HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay (d2), stueh lnitial Q Delay(d3),siveh %ile BackOfQ(5090),veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),stueh LnGrp LOS 339 1654 22.4 22.4 1.00 361 0.94 361 0.33 0.55 50.3 21.4 0.0 12.1 71.8 212 1628 14.1 14.1 1.00 239 0.89 281 1.00 1.00 46,0 23.6 0.0 7.2 69,7 28B 1624 18.1 18.1 292 1633 18.3 18.3 0.24 386 0.76 386 1.00 1.00 39.1 12.9 0.0 8,7 185 1654 8.9 8.9 1.00 210 O.BB 214 0.33 0.92 32.1 30.3 0.0 5.6 357 1637 23.6 23.6 431 0.83 431 0.33 0,92 47.7 '1 1,3 0.0 11.7 340 1548 23.8 23.8 0.56 408 0.83 408 0.33 0.92 47.B 12.5 0.0 11.3 216 1667 10.4 10.4 1.00 265 0,81 265 1.00 1.00 29.0 17.0 0.0 5.4 893 1650 29.3 29.3 930 0.96 930 1.00 1.00 38.9 20.4 0.0 14.3 0 1471 0.0 0,0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 437 427 1637 159928.9 29.028,9 29.A 0.41504 4920.87 0.87504 4920.33 0,33 0.55 0.5547.2 47.210,9 11.20.0 0.0 14,2 13.9 58.1 58.4 384 0.75 384 1.00 1.00 39.0 12.7 0.0 8.5 51.7 D 59.1 60,4 46.1 59.3 0.0EEEE62.4 E 52.0 D EEDE Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1203 62.0 E 792 56.6 E 60.3 882 E 1 109 56.7 E A Phs Duration {G+Y+fts), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s 14.0 5.0 9.0 '10.9 0.0 34.0 5.0 29.0 25.8 1.2 21,2 5.0 19.0 16.1 0.1 38.8 5.0 3'1.0 31.0 0.0 36.0 5.0 31.0 31.3 0.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 20.3 1.5 16.0 5.0 11.0 12.4 0.0 29.0 5.0 24.A 24.4 0.0 liri:il l rr.l,ii:l r''r,:r I irl.f HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 59.1 E Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Ward Rd & Hwv 20 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 48.7 Lane Configurations Traffc Vol, veh/h 133 Future Vol, veh/h 133 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 Sign Conhol Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1MvmtFlow MA T. 520 520 0 Free 0 0 95 5 547 25 25 0 Free None 15 15 0 Stop A*++i +'48357537148357537100000 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop-None - -None 0 0 95 0 56 95 2 75 o6 7 37 9; 0 26 0 0 95 0 51 95 0 16 95 17 7 Conflicting Flow All 573 Stage 1 Stage 2CriticalHdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 PotCap-l Manewer 1005 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % MovCap.t Maneuver 1005 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 000 920 920 658 4,14 2.236 0 1794- 982- 812- 7,1- 6.1- 6.1- 3.5-63- 302- 376 1741 982 759 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 8B 330 418 702 1728- 746- 982 8.27 7.27- 6.27- 8.27 3.363 3.653430 64- 383- 281 6.22 3.318 528 1 684 746 938 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 95 424 346 560 18 68 430 2A 74 52818 68 20 74 260 284 - 330 381 248 376 182 298 HCM ControlDelay, s 1.4 HCM LOS 't.3 $ 496.3 F 247.2 F Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ControlDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th o/otile Q{veh) 60 1005 1.719 0.139 $ 496.3 9.2FA9.5 0.5 924 0.101 9.4 A 0.3 - 109- 1.265- 247.2-F- 9.2 -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: AII major volume in platoon Synchro '10 Report Page 7 Queues 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour tsj-+{a tLl .J t ' ,r 'I r,,', i, Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) lntemal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 135 0.47 36.6 0,0 36.6n 115 143 0.41 27.6 0.0 27.6 58 106 579 49 0.23 31.8 145 0.66 44.9 0.0 44,9 66 125 1087 536 0 0 0 0.27 65 4,24 10.6 0,0 10.6 15 39 792 0.39 15.7 0.0 15.7 158 262 737 77 0,18 15.0 0.0 15.0 29 m34 1182 0,58 25.3 0.0 25.3 275 m303 1209 75 360 0 0 0 0.38 20n 0 0 0 0.39 75 274 0 0 0 0.24 0.0 31.8n 51 75 2',14 0 0 0 0.23 742 75 427 0 0 0 0.18 0 0 0 0.19 2426 0 0 0 0.58 i ti i: Ii' i l'ri I ,irtl ,t ir ii ; r: ,i m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour I \{+-a t t L I JF Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) t 135 135 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 805 0,35 659 T.+ 74 74 1900 4.7 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 1726 1.00 1726 t 49 49 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1719 0.67 1205 T.+ 70 70 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1726 1.00 1726 75 75 1900 t 65 65 1900 4.5 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.16 302 758 758 1900 5.7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 3534 1.00 3534 34 34 1900 t 77 77 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.95 1752 0,30 551 +T. 1001 100'l 1900 5,7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1,00 351 6 1.00 351 6 181 181 1900 69 69 1900 Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj, Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr)1 0o/o 0o 3o/o 1,00 1.00 1.0065 758 3442065 790 0 1 2o/o 1o/o 100/o 1.00 135 0 135 .00 49 0 49 5o/o 1.00 75 0 0 .00 77 0 77 1 3o/o 1.00 1 001I 1173 1.00 74 43 100 1.00 69 0 0 1.00 70 44 101 1,00 181 0 0 1 Heaw Vehicles (o/o\}Yo 30 0o/o ZYo Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension {s) pm+pt 7 4 28.6 28.6 0.26 4.5 2.0 NA 62 NA 8 NA 4 19.7 19.7 0.18 4.7 2.5 pm+pt 3 B 16,5 16.5 0.15 4.5 2.0 12.1 12.1 0.'11 5.0 2.5 61.1 61.1 0,56 5.7 4.0 61.4 61,4 0.56 5.7 4.0 pm+pt 5 2 66.2 66.2 0.60 4.5 2.4 NA pm+pt 1 6 66.8 66.8 0.6'l 4.5 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor lncrementalDelay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 293 c0.05 c0.07 0.46 32.9 1.00 0.4 33.3 C 201 0.01 0.03 0.24 40.9 1.00 0.2 41.1 D 189 0.06 0,54 46.3 1.00 2.3 48.6 D 46.7 D 249 c0.01 0.14 0.26 11.1 1.00 0.2 11.3 B 1962 0.22 0.40 14.0 1.00 0.6 14.6 B 14.4 B 393 0.01 0.11 0.20 9.3 1.75 0.0 16.3 B 1962 c0.33 309 0.06 0.32 39.4 1.00 0.4 39.8 D 36.6 D 0.60 16.'1 1.44 0.5 23.8 c 23.3 c HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c CriticalLane Group 23.5 0.56 '110.0 69.80/o 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service c 19.7 c Synchro '10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour I \ t ts t-\ t t \ I I \-lir l,r ii.:jrii j; ll : -. ;l.i r !il,i r: ,'i:!i:l Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h{n Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow. veh/h t 135 135 0 1.00 1.00 1900 135 1.00 0 246 0.08 1810 t. 74 74 0 69 69 0 0.99 1.00 \ 49 49 0 1.00 1.00 1B'l 181 0 1.00 1.001,00 No 1900 74 1,00 0 137 0.1 5 898 1.00 No 1900 70 1.00 0 8B 0.11 839 1.00 No 1885 758 1,00 1 2065 0.59 3491 1.00 No 1900 1 001 1,00 0 1812 0.59 3054 +T. 758 758 0 t 65 65 0 .00 .00 Tt 7A 70 0 75 75 0 1.00 1.00 34 34 0 1.00 1.00 t +T"77 100177 100100 1,00 1,00 1856 69 1.00 3 128 0.15 B38 1856 75 1.00 3 95 0.11 899 1870 65 1.00 2 322 0.04 1781 1752 34 1.00 10 93 0.59 157 1856 77 1,00 3 463 0.04 1767 1870 181 1.00 2 327 0.59 551 1826 49 1.00 5 220 0,04 1739 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vel/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/lr V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay {d2), sfueh lnitial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile Back0fQ(50%),veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 135 1810 7.0 7.4 1.00 246 0.55 400 1.00 1.00 38.0 0.7 0.0 3.2 0 0 0.0 0.0 143 1736 8.4 8.4 0.48 266 0.54 715 1.00 1.00 43.0 1.3 0.0 3.7 49 1739 2.7 2,7 1.00 220 0.22 246 1.00 1.00 41.9 0.2 0.0 '1,2 145 1738 9.0 9.0 0.52 183 0.79 506 1.00 1.00 48.0 5.7 0.0 4.2 53.7 D 65 1781 1.5 1.5 1.00 322 0.20 342 1.00 1.00 10.3 0,1 0.0 0.6 389 1791 12.5 12.5 1059 0.37 1059 1.00 1,00 11.7 1.0 0.0 5.1 403 1857 12.5 12.5 0.08 1098 0.37 1098 1.00 1.00 11.7 0.9 0.0 5.2 77 1767 1.8 1.8 1,00 463 0.17 495 1.00 0.23 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 591 1805 21.8 21.8 1071 0.55 1071 1.00 0.23 13.5 0.5 0.0 8.5 591 1800 21.9 21.9 0.31 1 068 0.55 1068 1.00 0.23 13.5 0.5 0.0 8.5 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.7 D 10.4 B 0.0 A 42,0 D 44.3 D 0.0 A 12.7 12.7 8.6 14.0 14.0BBABB Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 278 41.6 D 194 D 50.8 857 12.5 B 1259 13.7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+qg), s 9,0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.8 Green Ext'[ime (p_c], s 0,0 70.8 5.7 33.3 14.5 6.7 13.6 4.5 18.5 9.0 0.1 16.6 5.0 32.0 11.0 0.6 8A 4.5 5.5 4.7 0.0 21.8*5 *45 10.4 0,7 8.8 4.5 5,5 3.5 0.0 71.0 5.7 34.3 23.9 6.9 HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 19.1 B - HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th TWSC 7: Quail Run Pl & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 2.7 {.r1,1 rj r rII r.,i: : , 1,: rirr.;, i, ii;Jl ',"' l;,1 l: i:r' Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 62 Future Vol, veh/h 62 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2MvmtFlow 62 t.t 133 '133 0 Free Tt 141 141 0 11 11 0 72 72 0 Y I I 0 None 72 None - None-000-0000 100 100 100 1004311 0 133 141 11 1 Free Free Stop Stop 100 0 Conflicting Flow All 152 Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-l Manewer 1429 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % MovCap-1 Maneuver 1429 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 404 147 147 2576.4 8,2 5.4 5.43.5 3.3 606 905 BB5 791 578 905 578 843 791 HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 HCM LOS 0 93 A Capacity {vehlh} HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ControlDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Yotile Q(veh) 1429 0.043 7.6 A 0.1 0 A 898 081 9.4 A 0.3 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM 6th TWSC 10: Ward Rd & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 No Build Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 4.9 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 Mvmt Flow 27 -0-0 100 100 10001017 201 59 2 2 0 I o 1 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free- -None - -None +27 57 5227 57 52001 0 0 100 2 57 + 42 42 0 100 0 2 0 0 100 0 42 00 0I 39 39 0 + 86 B6 0 16 16 0 Free None 17 17 0 Free + 201 201 0 Free 59 EO 0 Free None 100 1 3952 100 o- 0 100 1001086 16 0 0 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 459 445 265 265 194 180 7.1 6.52 6.1 5.52 6.1 5.52 3.5 4.018 516 508 745 689 812 750 464 486 464 486 722 680 740 727 4.1 3,3 2.2 968 't 316 968 1316 3.3 812 492 172 320 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 490 835 696 466 172 294 6.5 5.5 5.5 4 497 760 673 n1 6.2 232- 6.2 811 403 475- 403 475- 809 736- 5BB 664 2600010200 4.1 - 2.2. 1503 - 1503 HCM ConholDelay, s 13.3 HCM LOS B 13.6 B 2.2 0.5 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Totile Q(veh) 1316 0.03 7.8 A 0.1 0 A 0 A 568 470 1503 0.239 0.1 13 0.01 1 13.3 13.6 7.4BBA0.9 0.4 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 12 4: US 20/Hamby - Ward Road (Roundabout)Year 2030 No Build Conditions, Weekday PM Peak HourRT bypass configuration(Note: This is in addition to the entry lane(s))Number of conflicting circ lanesNumber of conflicting exit lanes for bypa$ lane (if used)Pedestrian Volumes {crossing leg)n_pRT bypass, 1 @nfl lane (assumed same as Case 1 above)Calibration paramete6A (intercept)B (coefficient)RT bypa$,2 confl lanes (assumed right lane, Case 2 above)Calibration parametersA (interept)B (coefficient)SUMMARYEntry lane volume (veh/h)Entry lane €pacity (veh/h)x (v/c ratio)Lane control delay (s/veh)Lane LOSApproach @ntrol delay (s/veh)Approach LOSlnteFection @ntrol delay (*eh)lnteFection LOSq5fh npr.Fntile d!raua fvah\Vehicular VolumesFlow (veh/h)%HVPHFINPUTSLane ContigurationEntry Lane(s) Configuration(Note: This assumes 4 legs.)Case 2: 2 confl lanesCalibration parametersA (inter@pt)B (coefficient)Capacity modelsCase 1: 1 confl laneCalibration parameteEA (intercept)B (coefficient)Constantsfime period, T (h)PCE for HVDefault ValuesLane volume assignmentCase 4: LT, TR (bias to right lane)70 Volume in left lane, right laneCase 5: L, LTR (bias to left lane)70 volume in left lane, right laneCase 6: LTR, R (bias to right lane)76 volume in left lane, right lanePerameterL (vl) T (v2\ R (v3)'133 625 831310.95 0.95 0.950.252N/AN/AN/A17.OcBN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ACase:N0rr[TRCase:0,470.530.47U (v1U)0.9501419.560.00084781379.U0,00102381349.83 1419.560,0009213 0.00084781379.U 1379.840.00t0238 0.00102388U11400.7817.Oc0.53o.470.53L (v4) T (v5) R (v6)88 520 254500.95 0.95 0.95N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A12.0BN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ACase:LTRCase:o.470.530.47U (vau)0.9501 419.560.00084781379.840.00102381349.83 1419.560.0009213 0.00084781379.84 1379.840.0010238 0.00102386651063u.bJ12.0B0.530.470.53U (v7U)v1NurE00.9511Case:1N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A8.3N/A1075920,188.3o7N/AN/AN/ANiAN/A[1RCase:0.470.53o.471379.840.001023a1349.83 1419.560,0009213 0,00084781379.84 1379,840.0010238 0.001023814'19.560.0008478L (v7)1500.950.53o.470.53T (v8) R (v9)48 35a70.95 0.95Nts {South Leq): Ward RdSBN/AN/AN/AN/A,:T (vl 1)5300.95N/AN/AI'l/AR0.95(v12],7'lCase:Ns$ELTRCase:0.470.53o.471349.83 1419.560.0009213 0.0008478't379.84 1379.U0.0010238 0.0010238't419.560.00084781379.Uo.0010238138671o.217.80.53o.470.53U (vlou) L (v10)7170.95 0.95 Appendix G Year 2030 Forecast Traffic Conditions Operationa I Worksheets Queues 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwv 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour T +{A t L+ J I, ,,,,i: ,,r'it i i1,,1: ,ri,r ll:,1,:t ,.,1,,; Iti,ll r.rli.l Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio ControlDelay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th (fr) Queue Length 95th (ft) lntemalLink Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 310 0.9? 63.0 0,0 63.0 167 #333 1322 0,80 27.2 0.0 27.2 406 508 599 114 0.58 31.7 0.0 31.7 26 m43 100 200 0 0 0 0.57 1181 0.89 32.7 0,0 32.7 446 m#550 1225 1322 0 0 0 0,89 112 0,57 43.4 0.0 43.4 59 105 100 197 0 0 0 0.57 280 0.85 63.7 0.0 63.7 180 #295 569 374 0 0 0 0.75 127 4.74 58.4 0.0 58.4 68 #144 241 4,72 54.2 0.0 54.2 158 242 590 378 0 0 0 0,64 281 0.50 20,4 0,0 20.4 99 170 275 573 0 0 0 0.49 150 352 0 0 0 0.88 1 275 172 0 0 0 0.74 652 0 0 0 0.80 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacig, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hvw 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j \{+-a t f L I J Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) t 301 301 1750 5,0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 662 0.08 139 +T. 1 185 1 185 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1,00 3211 1.00 3211 97 97 1750 111 111 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1662 0.13 221 1084 1 084 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 3200 1.00 3200 61 61 1750 t 109 109 1 750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1627 0,36 620 t- 203 203 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1 665 1.00 1665 t 123 123 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1662 0.27 466 + 234 234 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1733 1.00 1733 if 273 273 1750 5.0 1.00 0,99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1441 1.00 1441 69 69 1750 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/h$ Confl. Bikes (#ihr) Heaw Vehicles {70)0o/o 2o/o 1% 0o/o 3Yo 2o/o 1Yo 0o 0To 1o/o 0.97 310 0 310I 0.97 1222 5 1317 0,97 114 0 114 13 0.97 1118 4 1177 0.97 63 0 0I 2 0o/o 0.97 112 0 112 6 0.97 241 0 241 0.97 281 44 237 b 3 2o/o 0.97 100 0 0 13 0.97 209 11 269 0.97 127 0 127 I 0.97 71 0 0 1 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated glC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) pm+pt 5 2 68,5 68.5 0.62 5.0 2.5 56.4 56.4 0.51 5.0 5.2 pm+pt 1 6 52.5 52.5 0.48 5.0 2.5 45.4 45.4 0.41 5.0 5.2 pm+pt 3 B 26.3 26.3 0.24 5.0 2.5 21.0 21.0 0.19 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 7 4 26.7 26.7 0.24 5.0 2.5 21.2 21.2 0.19 5.0 2.5 5 4 39.3 39.3 0.36 5.0 2.5 pm+0V 4 NA 8 NA 6 NA 2 NA Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 337 c0.15 c0.42 0.92 33.2 1.00 29.1 62.3 E 1 646 0,41 198 0.04 0.24 0.58 18.2 1.53 2.5 30.3 c 1320 0.37 0.89 30.0 0.78 7.4 30.9 c 30.8 c 196 0.03 0.11 0.57 35.6 1.00 3.3 38.9 D 317 c0.16 0.85 43.0 1.00 18.3 61.2 E 54.8 D 172 c0.04 0.14 0.74 36.9 1.00 14.4 51.4 D 333 0.14 580 0.07 0.10 0.41 26.6 't.00 0.3 26.9 c 0.80 22.1 1.00 4.2 26.3 c 33.1 c 0.72 41.7 1.00 7,1 48.8 D 39.8 D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c CriticalLane Group 35.6 0.92 110.0 93.2Y0 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service D 20,0 F Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 1: NE Purcell Blvd & Hwy 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour I \{+-a t f L + J--+ Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach Adj Sat Flow, vet/ldln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive 0n Green Sat Flow, vet/h 61 61 0 0.96 1.00 69 69 0 0.99 1.00 t 301 301 0 1.00 1.00 1750 310 0.97 0 339 0.12 1667 +T. 1 185 1 185 0 1.00 No 1723 1222 0,97 2 1610 0.53 3061 97 97 0 0.99 1.00 1736 '100 0,97 1 132 0.53 250 t 111 111 0 1.00 1.00 +t. 1084 1 084 0 1.00 No 1709 1118 0,97 3 1417 0.45 31 1B t 109 109 0 1.00 1.00 1723 112 0.97 2 192 0.05 1641 Tt 203 203 0 1.00 No 1736 209 0,97 I 239 0.19 1236 t 123 123 0 1.00 1.00 1750 127 0,97 0 172 0.05 1667 f 273 273 0 0.98 1.00 + 234 234 0 1750 63 0.97 0 80 0.45 176 1750 114 0.97 0 235 0.05 1667 1750 71 0,97 0 81 0.19 420 1.00 No 1736 241 0.97 1 336 0.19 1736 1723 281 0,97 2 457 0.19 1424 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/tr V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/tr HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay (d2), sfueh lnitial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile Back0fQ(50%),veMn Unsig. Movement Delay, siveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh LnGrp LOS 310 1667 11.3 11,3 1.00 339 0.91 420 1,00 1.00 24.1 20.7 0.0 6,1 670 1674 34.8 34.8 0.15 881 0,76 881 1.00 1.00 20.6 6.1 0.0 14.4 114 1667 4.0 4.0 1.00 235 0.48 253 1.00 0.53 0.6 0.0 1,5 582 1624 33.5 33.5 738 0.79 738 1.00 0.53 25.5 4.6 0,0 13.4 599 1670 33,6 33.6 0.'11 759 0.79 759 1.00 0.53 25.5 4,5 0.0 13.8 112 1641 5.0 5.0 1.00 192 0.58 192 1.00 1.00 37.7 3.9 0.0 0,9 0 0 0.0 0.0 127 1667 5.0 5.0 1.00 172 0.74 172 1.00 1.00 40.4 14.9 0.0 1.9 241 1736 14.3 14.3 336 0.72 379 1.00 1.00 41.5 5,1 0.0 6.6 46.6 D 281 1424 18.4 18.4 1.00 457 0.61 492 1.00 1.00 31.9 1.7 0.0 6,5 280 1656 18.0 18,0 0.25 321 0.87 361 1.00 1.00 43.0 18.2 0.0 8.9 19.0 652 1637 34.5 34.5 861 0.76 861 1.00 1.00 20.5 6,2 0.0 14.1 0 0.00 0 1.00 0,00 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 44.8 26.7 26.7 19,6 30.1 30.0 41.6 0.0 61.2 55.3 33.6 cDCCBCCDAEE Approach Vol, veh/lr Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1632 30,'t c 1295 29.1 c 392 55.6 E 649 42.7 D Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting {Gmax), s Max Q ClearTime (g_c+ll), s Green ExtTime {p_c), s 10.8 5.0 7.0 6.0 0,0 0.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 18,7 5.0 19.0 13.3 0.4 10,0 5.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 26.3 5.0 24.A 20.0 0.5 62.9 5.0 54.0 36.8 13.3 26.3 5.0 24.0 20.4 0.7 55.0 5.0 42.0 35.6 5.2 HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 34.4 c Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour ,r {A t LI J rlil 'I il lr, 'ti,t; '1.i,1 ]l i !,1,.l ..1.'i,r. Lane Group Flow (vph) vlc Ratio ControlDelay Queue Delay TotalDelay Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) lntemal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity {vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 339 0.95 61.2 0,0 61.2 196 m#362 911 0.95 44.1 0.0 44.1 -340 #486 1225 212 0.84 71.9 0.0 71.9 144 #257 602 0.79 46.7 0.0 46.7 206 274 1261 201 1.02 108.9 0.0 108.9 -123 #255 714 0.84 45,8 0,0 45.8 137 #312 1209 854 0 0 0 0.84 256 1.06 10'l .0 0.0 '101 .0 -140 #306 893 0.96 61.4 0,0 61.4 327 #60 571 368 0.63 16.5 0.0 '16.5 67 174 150 580 0 0 0 0.63 150 359 0 0 0 0.94 375 278 0 0 0 0.76 956 0 0 0 0.95 927 0 0 0 0.96 200 242 0 0 0 1.06 766 0 0 0 0.79 175 197 0 0 0 1,02 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 2O Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j \{+-a t t L + t Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow ( t 319 319 '1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1 646 0.95 1646 +T" 693 693 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 3160 1.00 31 60 164 164 1750 t 199 199 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1614 0.95 1614 +T. 488 4BB 1750 5.0 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 3164 1,00 3164 7B 7B 1750 189 189 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1645 0.14 239 +T- 493 493 1 750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,96 1.00 3114 1.00 3114 179 179 1750 241 241 1750 5.0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1662 0,15 271 ++ 839 839 1750 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3292 1.00 3292 f 346 346 1750 5.0 1,00 0.96 1,00 0.85 1.00 1421 1,00 1421 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. {#ihr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 0.94 ,110 0 339 8 0.94 174 0 0 6 0.94 212 0 212 6 0,94 519 11 591 0.94 B3 0 0 8 Ao/o 0.94 190 0 0 5 2o/o 0.94 256 0 256 5 4.94 368 180 lBB 16 1 1o/o 0.94 737 1B 893 524 33 681 0.94 893 0 893 0.940.94 201 0 201 16 Heaw Vehicles (%)10 2Yo 1Yo 3o/o 3o/o 1o/o 2To }Yo 1o/o Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) pmNAI NA 6 Prot 1 NA 2 Prot 5 pm+pt 3 8 38.0 38.0 0.35 5.0 2.5 + 4 pt 7 4 .0 .U NA Perm 23,7 23.7 0.22 5.0 2,5 32.7 32.7 0.30 5.0 5.2 17.3 17.3 0.16 5.0 2.5 26.3 26.3 0.24 5.0 2.5 29.0 29.0 0.26 5.0 2.s 31.0 31,0 0.28 5.0 2.5 4 31.0 31.0 0.28 5.0 2.5 42 42 0.3B 5.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 354 c0.21 939 c0.28 253 0.13 756 0.19 0.78 39.2 1,00 7.9 47.0 D 51.8 D 197 0.08 0.27 1.02 30.8 1.71 67.1 119.7 F 242 c0.11 c0.30 1.06 27.9 1.00 73.9 101.9 F 927 0.27 0.96 38.9 1.00 21.0 59.9 E 60.6 E 400 0.13 0.47 32.7 1.00 0.6 33.4 c 820 0.22 0.96 42.7 0.76 26.1 58,3 E 0.95 37.9 0.78 13.5 43.0 D 47.2 D 0.84 45.0 1.00 20.5 65.5 E 0.83 38.2 1.02 6.6 45.4 D 61.8 E HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) lntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c Critical Lane Group 55.5 1.05 110.0 93.20/o 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service E 20.0 F Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 2: NE 27th St & Hwv 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j +\{F +*a t t L I I Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone 0n Approach AdjSat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive 0n Green Sat Flow. vel/h t 319 319 0 1.00 1.00 164 164 0 0.99 1,00 t 199 199 0 1.00 1.00 78 7B 0 0.99 1$0 189 189 0 1,00 1.00 179 179 0 0.98 1.00 t 241 241 0 1.00 1.00 346 346 0 1,00 1.00 0.00 839 839 0 +T- 493 493 0 +T' 488 4BB 0 1.00 No 1709 519 0,94 3 662 0.24 2801 693 693 0 1736 339 0.94 1 361 0.07 1654 1.00 No 1723 737 0,94 2 807 0.10 2623 1736 174 0.94 1 190 0.10 619 1709 212 0,94 J 239 0.15 1628 't750 B3 0.94 0 105 0.24 446 1736 201 0.94 1 210 0.03 1654 1.00 No 1723 524 0,94 2 618 0.09 2343 1723 190 0.94 2 223 0.09 845 1750 256 0,94 0 261 0.10 1667 1.00 No 1736 893 0.94 1 930 0.28 3299 1736 0 0.94 1 1471 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veffi V/C Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/lr HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay (d2), s/veh lnitial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile Back0fQ(507d,veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 62.1 62.3 69.7 53.9 339 1654 22,4 22.4 1,00 361 0.94 361 0.33 0.51 50.3 20.3 0.0 n.a 460 1637 30.6 30,6 504 0.91 504 0.33 0.51 48.0 14.1 0,0 15.4 451 1606 30.6 30.6 0.39 494 0.91 494 0.33 0,51 48.0 14.3 0.0 15.1 212 1628 14.1 14.1 1.00 239 0.89 281 1.00 1.00 46.0 23,0 0.0 7.2 300 1624 19.0 19.0 384 0.78 384 1,00 1.00 39.3 14.6 0.0 9.1 302 1623 19.2 19.2 0.27 384 0.79 384 1.00 1.00 39.4 15,0 0.0 9.2 201 1654 9.0 9.0 1.00 214 0.96 21A 0.33 0.90 33.7 47.3 0.0 4.1 431 0.85 431 0.33 0,90 48.0 12.9 0.0 12.2 349 1552 24.4 24.4 0.54 409 0.85 409 0.33 0.90 48.1 14.2 0.0 11.8 62.3 E 256 1667 11.0 11.0 1.00 261 0.98 261 1.00 1.00 32.3 50.1 0.0 8,6 893 1650 29.3 29.3 930 0.96 930 1.00 1.00 38.9 20,4 0.0 14,3 0 1471 0,0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 365 1637 24.2 24.2 70.7 E 54.4 D 81.0 61.0 82.3 F 59.3 EEEEDFE Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1250 64.5 E 814 58.2 E 915 65.9 E 1149 64.5 E A Phs Duration {G+Y+P61, g Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l'l), s Green Ext T'ime (p_c), s 21.2 5.0 19.0 16.1 0,1 38.8 5.0 31.0 32.6 0.0 14.0 5.0 9.0 11.0 0.0 36,0 5,0 31.0 31.3 0.0 29,0 5.0 24.4 24.4 0.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 21.2 1.4 16.0 5.0 11.0 13.0 0.0 34.0 5.0 29,0 26.4 1.0 HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 63.5 E Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay, Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th TWSC 3: RIRO Collector & US 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour ,., .i,r / lnt Delay, s/veh 0.3 li:)r:li:j::"i i ,:, ; ., : . , ,;il,l ; .ir..ill.,. ,.,1,t .:, I, I Lane Configurations T. Traffic Vol, veh/h 859 Future Vol, veh/h 859 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % 0 PeakHourFactor 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 Mvmt Flow 904 87 87 0 Freet*: 95 0 92 F 30 30 0 Stop None : 95 0 32 0637 00637 0000 Free Free Stop- None -00-00 95 95 950300671 0 Conflicting Flow All Stage t Stage 2 CriticalHdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Manewer Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-t Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage I Stage 2 00 950 8.2 ; 0 0 ; 0 0 3.3 318 318 HCM ControlDelay, s HCM LOS 17.6 c 1'r i.r(:l r 1:;:11.r ;1,1, i.,!r: ,1i, ;:.i ! . l.: :1. ';,'1 :. Capacity (vel/h) HCM Lane ViC Ratio HCM ContmlDelay {s} HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 318 0.099 17.6 c 0.3 Synchro 10 Report PageT HCM 6th TWSC 4: Ward Rd & Hwy 20 Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 43.2 ++50367617150367617100000 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 9; 2 75 : 0 0 95 0 64 15 15 0 Stop 95 T"tT.628 83 95 520 25628 83 95 520 2500000 Free Free Free Free Free-Yield - -None 750-00095 95 95 95 9531450661 87 100 547 26 Lane Configurations t Traffic Vol, veh/h 160 Future Vol, veh/h 160 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, To Peak llour Factor 95 Heavy Vehicles, % I Mvmt Flow 168 NoneNone : 0 0 95 0 53 959; 7 3816 17 7 i'iri rr il i l rii,it,rl. r, '!r Conflicting Flow All 573 Stage I Stage 2CriticalHdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 CriticalHdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap-1 Manewer 1005 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-l Maneuver 1005 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Slage 1 Stage 2 0 661 0 - 4,14 1814 705 18031041 - 760773 - 1043 6.5 6.27 7.275.5 6.275.5 - 6.27 4 3.363 3.65379 428 56310 376412 260 1757 560 760 997 6.5 6.22 5.5 5,5 4 3.31886 528 417 325 0 0 1871- 1041- 830- 7.1- 6.1- 0.1- 3.5-56- 280- 367 2.236 918 918 -59-59 233 258 232 367 428 10 -64 528- 10 -64- 313 372- 157 271 HCM ControlDelay, s 1.7 HCM LOS 1.4 $527.1 F Capacity {vehfir) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ConfolDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Yotile Q(veh) - 1005- 0.168- 9.3.A - 0.6 918 0.1 09 9.4 A 0.4 -78 - 1.876 $527.1-F- 12,8 -: Volume exceeds capacig $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Nol Delined ': All major volume in platoon Synchro 10 Report Page B Queues 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j +{a t Ll Lane Group Flow (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (ff) Queue Length 95th (ft) lntemalLink Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 135 0.48 35,1 0.0 35.1 75 109 167 0.44 31.8 0.0 31.8 81 130 579 66 0,28 30.8 0.0 30.8 35 60 191 4.72 46.8 0.0 46.8 91 158 1087 65 0,25 12.0 0.0 12.0 16 42 B't9 0.43 17.6 0.0 17.6 174 290 737 77 0.20 16.5 0.0 16.5 30 m34 1182 0.61 26.9 0.0 26.9 274 m301 1209 pn 0 0 0 0.43 75 260 0 0 0 4,25 539 0 0 0 0.35 75 238 0 0 0 0,28 744 0 0 0 4,22 75 0 0 0 0.19 1 0 0 0 75 39636 0.37 949 0 0 0 0.61 ;ll,iri:.ltli,t,),ili, ll., i,, i I i I m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour j \{\a t t L t J+ Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) ldeal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 61 6'l 1 900 181 181 1900 t 135 135 1900 4.5 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 805 0.28 540 Tt 98 9B 1900 4.7 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 1751 1.00 1751 66 66 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1719 0.65 1179 Tt 85 B5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1713 1.00 17 13 106 106 1900 \ 65 65 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.15 286 +T' 758 758 1900 5.7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 3505 1.00 3505 77 77 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1752 0.28 515 1001 1001 1900 5.7 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 351 6 1.00 351 6 69 69 1900 Peak-hourfactor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds, (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/h0 Heaw Vehicles {%)0o/o 0%IYo 3o/o 1o/o 100/o }Yo 2o/o 1.00 135 0 135 .00 69 0 0 1 3o/a ,00 65 0 65 2o/o 1.00 758 4 815 1.00 1001I 1173 1,00 9B 31 136 1.00 B5 50 141 1.00 106 0 U 1.00 61 0 0 I 1.00 181 0 0 ,00 66 0 66 5o/o 1 1 ,00 77 0 77 1 3Yo Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension {s) pm+pt 7 4 31.0 31.0 0.28 4.5 2.0 22.1 22.1 0.20 4.7 2.5 pm+pt 3 8 19.1 19.1 0.17 4.5 2.0 14.7 14.7 0.13 5.0 2.5 pm+pt 5 2 63.7 63.7 0.58 4.5 2.0 58.5 58.5 0.53 5.7 4.0 pm+pt 1 6 64.5 64.5 0.59 4.5 2.0 58.9 58.9 0.54 5.7 4.0 NA 8 NA 4 NA 2 NA 6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor lncremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 284 c0,05 0.0B 0.48 31.3 1.00 0.5 31.7 c 351 0.08 226 0.01 0.04 0.29 39.1 1.00 0.3 39,3 D 235 c0.01 0.15 0.28 12.4 1.00 0.2 12.7 B 1 864 0.23 0.44 15.7 1.00 0.7 16.5 B 16.2 B 364 0.01 0.11 0.21 10.5 1.69 0.0 17.7 B 1882 c0.33 0.62 17.8 1.38 0.6 25.2 c 24.7 c c0.08 0.62 45.0 1.00 4.2 49.2 D 46.7 D 228 0.39 38.1 1.00 0.5 38.6 D 35.5 D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ntersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)c Critical Lane Group 25.2 0,59 110.0 72.|o/a 15 HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service c 19,7 c Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 6: NE 27th St & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour T +\ t ts +*a t t L I J ir,ttr.:], r t li,i,,:rl ]t:l.t rl,l.:: ttLl'j li.lr:i;rii r:l.t' ,fi ' iili,ti a t:j rjl :.rjrrl i Lane Configurations Traflic Volume {vehlh) Future Volume (veh/h) lnitialQ (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone On Approach AdjSat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green t 135 135 0 1.00 1.00 1900 135 1.00 0 244 0.08 1810 1.00 No 1900 9B 1.00 0 176 0.17 69 69 0 0.99 1.00 1856 69 1,00 3 124 0.17 726 1826 66 1.00 5 241 0.04 1739 106 106 0 1.00 1,00 1856 106 1.00 3 128 0.1 3 959 |l 65 65 0 1.00 1.00 1870 65 1.00 2 304 0.04 1.00 No 1BB5 758 1.00 1 1897 0,57 3357 61 61 0 1.00 1.00 1752 61 1.00 10 153 0.57 270 1856 77 1.00 3 428 0.04 1767 +T- 1001 1 001 0 1.00 No 1900 1001 1.00 0 1732 0.57 3054 1870 181 1.00 2 313 0.57 t 77 77 0 .00 .00 +T' 758 758 0 T. 85 B5 0 1.00 No 1900 B5 1.00 0 103 0.13 769 T. 9B 9B 0 66 bb 0 1.00 1.00 181 181 0 1.00 1.00 veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vef/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s Prop ln Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h ViC Ratio(X) AvailCap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filte(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh lncr Delay (d2), s/veh lnitial Q Delay(d3),siveh %ile Baek0fQ(50%),veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS I 55 '135 1810 6.8 6.8 '1.00 244 0.55 401 1.00 1.00 36.2 0.7 0.0 3.1 37,0 0 0 0.0 0.0 167 1758 9.6 9.6 0.41 300 0.56 724 1.00 1.00 41.8 1.2 0.0 4.2 66 1739 3.6 3,6 1.00 241 0.27 252 1.00 1.00 3B.B 4,2 0.0 1.5 39,1 191 1727 11,9 11.9 0.55 230 0.83 503 1.00 1.00 46.4 5.7 0.0 5.4 65 1781 1.6 r.6 1.00 304 0.21 323 1.00 1.00 11.7 0.1 0.0 0.6 404 1791 13.9 13.9 1012 0.40 1412 1.00 1.00 13.4 1.2 0.0 5.8 415 1836 14.0 14,0 0.15 1038 0.40 1038 1.00 1.00 13,4 1.2 0.0 5.9 77 1767 2.0 2.4 1.00 428 0.18 460 1.00 0.23 0.0 0.0 0.7 591 1805 23.2 23.2 1023 0.58 1023 1.00 0.23 15.3 0,6 0.0 9.3 591 1800 23.3 23.3 0.31 1021 0.58 1021 1.00 0.23 15.4 0.6 0.0 9.3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0,00 0 1.00 0.00 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 D 0.0 A 43.0 D D 0,0 A 52.1 11.9 14.6 14,6 9.9 15.9DBBBAB 15.9 B Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 302 40.3 D 257 48.8 D 884 14.4 B 1259 15.5 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+|1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9,0 4.5 6.5 4.0 0,0 67.9 5.7 33.3 16.0 6.7 23,8*5 '45 11.6 0.8 68.1 5.7 34.3 25.3 6,1 13.4 4.5 18.5 8.8 0.1 19.7 5.0 32.0 13.9 0.8 8.8 4.5 5,5 3.6 0.0 9.3 4.5 5.5 5.6 0.0 HCM 6th CtrlDelay HCM 6th LOS 21.1 c - HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM 6th TWSC 7: Quail Run Pl & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 2.3 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Conhol RT Channellzed Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % PeakHourFactor 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 62 -t62 18462 18400 Free Free- None T.204 11204 1100 Free Free- None 0- 0 100 100311204 11 0 0 100 4 184 Y 1 I 0 Stop 0 0 0 100 0 1 72 72 0 Stop**: 100 0 72 Itrr,..li,,l. :ll:i li j'l r, t i, I . ' Conflicting Flow All 215 Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy 432 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Capl Manewer 1355 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % MovCap-t Maneuver 1355 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 518 210 210 3086.4 6,2 5.4 5.43.5 3.3 521 835 830 750 494 835 494 788 750 0 HCM ControlDelay, s HCM LOS 2 0 9.8 A Capaci$ {vet/h} HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ContolDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Yotile Q{veh) 1355 0.046 7.8 A 0.1 0 A 827 O.OBB 9.8 A 0.3 Synchro 10 Report Page 12 HCM 6th TWSC 8: SE Bear Creek Rd & Collector Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour rrl.,.:r tl:i.,: r lnt Delay, s/veh 2 ttir \,j ll:,:i l I r,i lil; r"r,l't :"',.1:,1, i.,il, :',ti..r Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #ihr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 39 14939 14900 Free Free- None T.153 18153 1800 Free Free- None 50 50 0 Stop Y 5 5 0 Stop- None 00- 0 100 10000550 100-00-00 100 100 10000039 149 153 100 0 18 ilili i: rtt i,:l'i, i r, Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 'l Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy PotCapl Manewer Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % MovCap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 389 162 227 63 ,u: 6.2 5.4 3.5 619 872 815 3.3*: 602 888 602 848 815 4.1 2.; 1418_ 1418_ 0 5.4 HCM ControlDelay, s 1,6 HCM LOS 9.5 A Capacity {veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM ControlDelay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Totile Q(veh) 1418 0.028 7.6 A 0.1 851 065 9.5 A 0.2 0 Synchro 10 Report Page 13 HCM 6th TWSC 9: SE Bear Creek Rd & East Access Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations \ Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 Future Vol, vehih 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 Mvmt Flow 12 142 142 0 Free None 0 0 100 0 142 T-Y1583213158 3 2 130000 Free Free Stop Stop- None - None 000-0-0- 100 100 100 10000001583213 1 ,,1','1 i,1: r;r;::;i,r, ;, ',lt i; 't' ,,,t; :,.t Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 CritlcalHdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Manewer Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ,u1 4.1 2.; M\A_ 1430 0 326- 160- 166- 6.4- 5.4- 5.4- 3.5- 672- 874- 868 0 ,u: 6.2 3.; *: 667 890 667 867 B6B HCM ControlDelay, s HCM LOS 0 9.3 A i,, i t,,r , t. ;lr;,, ll r ,.i:,'r r, , , l: ,:r'l r t r,,' I '; I , Capacity (velvh) HCM Lane ViC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th Totile Q(veh) 1430 0.008 7.5 A 0 852 0.018 9.3 A 0.1 Synchro 10 Report Page 14 HCM 6th TWSC 10: Ward Rd & Bear Creek Rd Year 2030 With Project Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour lnt Delay, s/veh 16 16 0 Free None 74 74 0 Free None 100 0 74 ++ 201 201 0 Free +++305954945242863059549452428600110000 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free- -None - -None 100 10000242 0 0 00 0 45 00 1001086 16 17 17 0 Free -0-0 100 1000117 201 ; 0 -0-0 100 1000230 59 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Conhol RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1100 0I 100 0 54 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 CriticalHdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-l Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 474 272 202 7.1 6.1 6.1 3.5 504 738 805 458 272 186 6.52 5.52 5.s2 4.018 499 685 746 449 476 449 476 713 676 728 721 508 487 178 178 330 3097.1 6.56.1 5.56.1 5.53.5 4 479 484 828 756 687 663 4.1 3.3 2.2 968 1300 968 1300 239_ 6.2 3.;-: 6.2 2750010200 4.1 - 2.2- 1503 - 1503804 390 461- 390 461- 800 730- 577 654 HCM ControlDelay, s 13.7 HCM LOS B 14 B 2.3 0.4 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 554 456 1503- 0.258 0.123 0.0117 14 7.4BBA10.40 1300 0.032 7.9 A 0.1 ; i 13 ; i Synchro 10 Report Page 15 4: US 2OMard - Hamby Road (Roundabout)Year 2030 With Project Conditions, Weekday PM Peak HourRT bypass configuration(Note: This is in addition to the entry lane(s))Number of @nflicting circ lanesNumber of conflicting exit lanes for bypass lane (if used)Pedestrian Volumes (cro$ing leg)n_pRT bypass, 1 confl lane (assumed same as Case I above)Salibration paramete6A (intercept)3 (coefficient)RT bypass, 2 confl lanes (assumed right lane, Case 2 above)3aiibration parametersC (interept)I (@efficient)Default Valu6sLane volume asignmentCase 4r LT, TR (bias to right lane)% Volume in left lane, right laneCase 5: L, LTR (bias to left lane)% volume in left lane, right laneCase 6: LTR, R (bias to right lane)7o volume in left lane, right laneConstantsTime period, T (h)PCE for HVCas 2: 2 confl lanesCalibration parametersA (inter@pt)B (coefflcient)Capacity modelsCase 1: 1 confl laneCalibration paramete6A (intercept)B (coefficient)SUMMARY=ntry lane volume (veh/h):nW lane €pacity (veh/h)( (v/c ratio)-ane control delay (s/veh)-ane LOS\pproach control delay (s/veh)qpproach LOSntereection @ntrol delay (s/veh)ntersection LOSlsth oermnfib duprc aveh)Vehicular VolumesFlow (veh/h)%HVPHFINPUTSLane ConfiguratignEntry Lane(s) Configuration(Note: This assumes 4 legs.)ParameterN/AN/A19,6c15.6N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AR (v3)8310.950.25c19.60.829151123NurrCa*:0.95U (vlU)I-TRCase:0.470.530.471419-580.00084781379.840.00'10238'1379.84 1379.840.0010238 0.0010238L (v1)160I0.950.530,470.53T (v2)628J0.951349.83 1419.560.0009213 0.0008478L (v4) T (v5) R (v6)95 520 254500.95 0.95 0.95U (v4U)N/AN/AN/AN/A13.0BN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A00.95Case:I-TRCase:o.470.530.471419,560.00084781379.840.00102341349.83 1419.560.0009213 0.00084781379,84 1379.840.0010238 0.001023867110300.6513.0B?')'l0.530.470.53N/AI{/AwANI/A8.7N/AN/AN/AN/AN/ACase:R0.95(w)367LTRCase:0.470.530.471419.560.00084781379.840.00102381349.83 1419.560.0009213 0,00084781379.84 1379.U0,0010238 0.0010238U (v7U)0.9501105730.194.70.53o.470.53L (v7) T (v8)15 50000.95 0.95N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A8.0(v1717't476670.228.0(v1610N/AN/AN/AN/AR (v12)7120.950.950.951)0)TCase:LTRCase:0.470.530.47U (v10U)0.9501419.580.00084781379.Uo.00102381349.83 1419.560.0009213 0.00084781379.84 1379.U0.0010238 0.00102380.530.470.53 Appendix I Proposed Site Layout and Phasing Plan '€&--$izo!! :i= ->H 6S dl =9 >a *= o- X(t rCO 06 -r*dH E3 q:dd r*N -=a:oUF:iilril!*,1 1 1 iRrttl l .L,lIilL,,,t,,,r-!Phase 244 l\,,larket-Rate For-SalelJnitsIlI30Phase 3N,4arketRate For-SaleUnitsIv,aarcnElKFoAD iMNoRARTERTL)III,ItE{l;tI-iIIlJIIll. -eo:t-1III Fif t:;Pli.1l LIn ii'IIIltxs19:€ rl'ri I inili :.ffi-_r-11{:j;ai)'lIL{Illl ,I:1.,l.l-l-Pi?-ae.4Nlarket-Rate For-SaleUnitst-t-l.gl\4arkeFRatc For-Sa e UnltsPhase 1-l0B Affordable Rental un tsBzPhase 615 Alfordable Forsale Units25 [IarkelRate For-Sale UnitsPhase 515 Affordable FotrSale Units25 MarkelRate For-Sale Units!Ii&ttt-IhE._lIPhase 731 Market-Rate For-Sale Units21455 HWY 20PRELII\,1INARY LAYOUTTAX LOTS: 1s00 & 1501, MAP: 171235BEND, OREGONNOVEMBER.2O2'I!!!q4ru9!!!!iry3d slaNoAFosPACaS 1r3scccoilPAfrsPAcEs 35r2rJ,0FTolALjlar^LPARKNC 16fslPERUlri1:muN rs)SCALE: 1' = 60*;;r;,.l(I,/OFAWN AY:DFAW]NG:JOB NO.OPTg Ei t BEND Sch LAPINE ls t88g fi MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT 14,10 S.E. Wilson , Bend, Oregon g7\o2 Offce, (g4t) gS5-47oo Fax,(i4D g1s_471o oo January 19,2A22 Greg Blackmore Blackmore Planning and Development Services LLC 19454 Sunshine Way Bend, OR 97702 RE: Hayden Home - HB 4079 UGB Expansion and Master plan Mr. Blackmore, This letter serves to document our coordination regarding Hayden Homes, plan toexpand the Bend UGB by approximately 35 acres on the easi side of Bend and developa Master Plan of approximately 350 new residential units, consistent with the City ofBend Application to DLCD under HB 4079. Bend-La Pine Schools (BLpS) has, or willhave adequate capacity through future Bond projects to serve the new housing unitsthat will be built on the site, as detailed in the conceptual plan, Please contact me with any questions at Mi,kp.Tiller@bend.kt2.or.us Mike Tiller Executive Director of Facilities Bend-La Pine Schools Bend Park faRecreation January 27,2022 Hayden Homes Megan Norris, Forward Planning Manager 2464 SW Glacier Place, Ste. 1L0 Redmond, OR 97756 SUBJECT: Bend Park & Recreation District Coordination Letter, Parkside Place, UGB Expansion with Comprehensive Plan Designation Dear Ms. Norris Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your project to construct approximately 350 residential units on approximately 35 acres in an Urban Growth Boundary expansion area on the eastern side of Bend, lt's the district's understanding that this project is consistent with the City of Bend application to the Department of Land Conservation and Development pursuant to House Bill 4079. The district has reviewed the information that you provided regarding the proposed Parkside Place development. We understand that this project will be reviewed in phases and that this current phase includes review of the requested UGB expansion and Comprehensive Plan designation. The following comments are most relevant to future phases of project review, but we felt it was prudent to share these comments early in the planning process to help inform future planning submittals. a a Parks and Open Space - The proposed Parkside Place development is located within Park Search Area #t4 per the 20L8 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan). Thank you for coordinating with BPRD on the potential for a park within the development. As we have discussed, the in-progress wetland delineation will help inform the viability of the area as a park site, and potential development constraints. The district looks forward to continued conversations about this potential park, and recommends that we schedule coordination meetings in the coming months to discuss parkland dedication and property transfer requirements should the park property be conveyed to the district. Trails - The district's Comprehensive Plan identifies a planned trail, the Big Sky Park Trail, which runs through the western side of the project site. The trail is also identified in the city's Transportation System Plan, The district expects this trail to be developed as a "primary trail' and built to city and district standards. Please coordinate with the district and city to review the design, material and construction requirements. Additionally, the district requests that the applicant:o Grant a minimum 20' wide easement to the district for operation and maintenance of the trail prior to, or concurrent with, the recording of the final plat. The easement location must be approved by district staff. District Office I Don Horton, Executive Director 799 S\A Columbia St., Bend" Otegon 97702 | vw:bendparksandrec.o€ | (541) 389- r'275 a road crossings,and shift ProP osed lots and b rb extensions on both side uilding site Placements as s of the ProPosed trail far awaY from theo Restrict on-street Parking with signage or cu trail crossing locations as possl ble to Protect site distance triangles and clear vision areas' o Where the Proposed irrigation pipeline runs along HighwaY 20, locate the proPosed PiPeline as far south within the open space/tra ilarea as feasible to imp rove the viability of a future I undercrossing of HighwaY 20. The distri ct is concerned that tocating the pipeline in the center of the oPen/space trail area willlimit the abilitY to excavate for a futuretrai undercrossing district s review of the December 8'2021 o Future TransPortation Facilities Undercrossing, of HighwaY HighwaY 20 is li 20 - Based uPon the it's our kelY feasible understanding BPRD bel that a ieves that future Ped this Potential future undercrossi ng isestrianand bicYcle RePort, connectivitY, and requests that the aPPlica nt continue to facilitate the un dercrossing opPortunitY feasibilitY in for a future future aPPli undercrosst cation submittals ng of HighwaY 20 for the Big SkY Park trail, and illustrate this critical for pedestrian and bicYcle Sidewalks, Livingston the Litchfield Park site Drive on Livingsto - The TIA identifies n. The district a project mitigation measure to comp lete sidewalks at does not currentlY have anY Projects identified at this site in the five-Ye ar CaPital lmProve ment Plan, but looks forward to coordinating with the aPPlicant on any necessarY Project mitigation measu res. Given that this is a requt red Project mitigation, the district System DeveloPment Charges' Please be aware that any new resi dential construction is subject to the does not support SDC credits for these imProvements applica ble Park SYstem s DeveloPment Charge (SDC) Per SincerelY, pj.-/"/'W &b* Rachet Colton Park Planner t"nJ tttft and Recreation District charges' :'|r"-+'^ti'a cite nlan dated *::"'TJT;Tili:.?1*#i'iif :#-:xii'::t'#:fl i[#:#.l'::lii;i"x''::l';:nil*.n' il:::1*lt;:'"il1[^':ilil:ffi'',"":fili"''ooul''?" ll":";;;;ents mav P"'H:*:'ii"nn 'n" subsequent'pprit"iJll't;;';;";;'"a"no'l'u"t'il;.'*"lookforwardtocontinuedcoo ;;ft;;- and reviewing agencies' -:a^&^ +^ .dnract me at 541-70 6'6Lg2, lfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthesecomments,pleasedon,thesitatetocontactm oi r-a.ftetcfo U" na pa rttsa na rec'ore District Office I Don Horton' Executive Director 799 Sw coiumbia sr, r.,ra, orJ* "tt, I *-*.*ndparksandrec'org I (541) 389' t'275 Planning Application I City of Bend - CityView Portal ?-t15122,4:25PM Online Permit Center Portal Planning APPlication - Submitted Project Number: PLCPMAzo220111 Thank you for your application. please note that your application wi* not be processed and the city's 3o-day completeness check process Jffii;;t" untit aitlees havebeen paid' There are fees totaling $lz'89o'36 owing on this application' :::ff:ffi.::::":";- processor ree is incurred. credit/debit card transactions incur an additionar service ree or ".gi% "f alt" atal, $r'95 minimum' --: ^ 4.-ro +roncfer. nlease mail your payment to City of Bend fJ,H,iffi$iT.TiilT;Tlr#,f3iJ":::i'Ji"1*::1'$fi::":lffii'[l,.":'lxHi?fiT"TllJ';::llH;;;"1:l:'"'yourpa'menttother",-i,iii"",*.rocated#jy.ftH::il"HLTi*1TiTL""1ffi'Notethat payment processor service fees apply to credtt Planning Information Proiect Descriptive Name: HB 4O79- City of Bend Affordable Housing Pilot Program ProiectType: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application Types: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment .o " " ni,, :"mru; ** *;l:l*ffitif: H., "' :ilT#*i;lJ I o u si n e p i t ot Program' Locations: ii[?;* 20' BEND' oRs77o1' ProPertY 1712350001500 Contacts: ProPertYOwner PORTERTTILVSUNNISLANDHOLDINGSLLC'AddTCSS:5691MIRAMARDR, FRlscoTX,75034 Applicant Greg Blackmore, Address:19454 Sunshine Way' Bend OR' g77O2'Phone:(541) 419- i+i? E*ri r,greg@blackmoreplanning'com Additional Contacts Developer/Applicant Contact (Contact Type' "i,:t#;;iti Phon"' M ai li n g Addres:, !i"-; Hayden Homes / Megan Norris / mnorris@hayden-homes'com / 24645W Glacier Pl ace, Su ite 1 10 Red mo nd''- OA gl I S O (6 16\ 529 - 5 69 7 other contacts for this Application (.1:t"-t] ;:*":,ffi:J"'::"::Iil:::::referenceNumber=plcpMA202ro",or""n='*e&isAddNewAppricationrvpe=Farse&isAddAppricatio 7t 2.115122,4:25 PM City, State, ZiP): ApplicationDetails(pleaseentersiteAreainAcres) SiteArea:35.52 Non-ResidentialAPPlication: No Comprehensive Plan MaP Amendment Building Height (in feet): # of Floors: Number of Units: # of Nonresidential Floors: # of Residential Floors: Residential Density (in # of units per acre' per BDC 2.1.500): Documents & Images Date UploadedFile TYpe oz/r5/zozz Plans ozlr5lzozz Plans ozlr5lzozz Plans ozlt5lzozz Plans ozlt5lzozz Plans ozlt5lzozz Plans ozlt5lzozz Plans ozlr5lzozz SubmittalDocument ozlt5lzozz SubmittalDocument ozlt5lzozz SubmittalDocument ozltglzozz Form ozltglzozz SubmittalDocument ozlrglzozz SubmittalDocument ozltglzozz SubmittalDocument ozlr5lzozz SubmittalDocument ozlr5lzozz SubmittalDocument ozlt5lzozz SubmittalDocument Planning Application I City of Bend - CityView Portal DocumentName B and C Deschutes CounW Form E Title RePPr! G ConceptPlan H Citv of Bend Resolution 347: L HE-+oZ-slpplicaties--Eend $nal Upproval-of-eend-Affordable g-Pilot-Project O Library Letter N BLPS Letter M TIA F Public Meeting Documentation F Public Meeting Documelrtalisn :QIry-reRM P BPRD Coordination Letter Parkside Place Propglly K Avion Will Serve letter L Sewer AnalySis:liIY-sf Egld r Burden of Proof Narrative - Final D Ownership Deed A Authorization Form - CitY of Bend please print this page or record the application number for future reference. You will need it in order to view the status of your application online. please select a link below to access the city of Bend's online Permit center Portal' Start a new aBplEaIiQD View the status of mv-ap-p-ligaX!98 Portal Home Powered bv CitvView & https://cityview'ci'bend.or.us/Portal/Planning/Application?referenceNumbeI=PLCPMA20220 1 i 1 &isstep=True&isAddNewApplicationType=False&isAddApplicatio' at1