HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolicy Review Batch 3 Revised June 2023
Page 1
Policy Review – Group 3 Updated
June 2023
TO: Deschutes 2040 Project Management Team
FROM: Andrew Parish, Emma-Quin Smith, and Matt Hastie, MIG
CC:
DATE: June 15, 2023
INTRODUCTION
This memorandum includes existing and recommended policy language related to the following
Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan topics:
1. Housing
2. Jobs and Economy
3. Public Facilities and Services
4. Recreation and Tourism
5. Destination Resorts
6. Area Specific Policies
POLICY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following tables list existing policy language in underline and strikeout, along with a column of
notes and discussion describing changes and their rationale. Items that have changed since initial
review by the Planning Commission are highlighted and policies that have been updated since the
most recent PC meeting are noted in bold text. Changes are based on a review by County staff and
the consultant team and public input to date. Additional changes may be identified through further
community engagement and/or coordination with technical advisors. This is intended to be a
starting point for discussion with members of the Planning Commission. Numbering has been
revised for consistency and navigation but likely will be updated again as the planning process
proceeds.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 2
Table 1. Housing Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Goal 3.1. Maintain the rural character and Support housing
opportunities and choices for rural County residents in
unincorporated Deschutes County, while meeting health and
safety concerns, minimizing environmental and resource land
impacts.
Revised to focus on addressing housing opportunities
and also noting the need to minimize impacts and meet
state requirements. Removed mention about
“Complying with state requirements,” as that is a
given, for brevity.
3.3.1 Except for parcels in the Westside Transect Zone, the
minimum parcel size for new rural residential parcels shall be 10
acres.
Assume this is addressed in the Development Code;
recommend deleting to avoid stating code requirements
in policy.
3.1.1 Incorporate annual farm and forest housing reports into a
wider system for tracking the cumulative impacts of rural housing
development.
Retain with no changes, assuming this annual tracking
still occurs and/or is desirable.
3.1.2 Continue to update the County zoning ordinance and work
with partnering organizations to address health and safety issues
associated with housing. address health and safety issues
associated with housing raised by the public, such as
a. The number of large animals that should be permitted on rural
residential parcels; or
b. The properties south of La Pine, in Township 22S, Range 10E,
Section 36, many of which are not in compliance with planning and
building codes."
Eliminated issues already addressed in the zoning
ordinance and/or overly specific. Broadened language to
include more general issues identified during Comp Plan
update process.
Simplified policy language to direct an updated
zoning ordinance that addresses health and safety
issues, rather than listing numerous topics.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 3
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.1.3 Encourage and/or require, where consistent with County
policies and requirements, new subdivisions to incorporate
alternative development patterns, such as cluster development,
that mitigate community and environmental impacts.
Incorporated “require” language with caveats re: when
something would be required (vs. encouraged).
3.1.4 Maintain the rural character of the County while ensuring a
diversity of housing opportunities, including initiating discussions to
amend State Statute and/or Oregon Administrative Rules to permit
accessory dwelling units in Exclusive Farm Use, Forest and Rural
Residential zones. Implement legislation allowing accessory
dwelling units in rural areas to expand housing choices.
Updated to reflect current ADU state rules and code
update process.
3.1.5 Create and encourage opportunities for flexibility in rural
housing including development of manufactured home parks, safe
parking sites, and RV parking areas.
New policy based on community input. No changes
since last PC.
3.1.6 Allow housing development and supporting services (such as
locally serving medical offices or similar uses) in unincorporated
communities.
3.1.6 (alternative) Reduce barriers to housing development and
supporting services (such as locally serving medical offices or
similar uses) in unincorporated communities.
New policy based on community input.
Added an alternative option for discussion based on
PC conversation.
3.1.7 Explore grants and funding opportunities for ongoing
maintenance and rehabilitation of existing housing stock.
New policy based on community input. No changes
since last PC.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 4
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.1.8 Evaluate the impacts of short-term rentals and consider
regulations to mitigate impacts, as appropriate.
New policy based on community input.
Updated language to call for evaluation and
regulations if appropriate.
Goal 3.2: Support agencies and non-profits that provide affordable
housing.
3.2.1 Support Central Oregon Regional Housing Authority and
other stakeholders to meet the housing needs of all Deschutes
County residents by assisting as needed in coordinating and
implementing housing assistance programs.
a. Assist as needed in coordinating and implementing housing
assistance programs.
b. Support efforts to provide affordable and workforce housing in
urban growth boundaries and unincorporated communities.
Removed (b) due to new policy 3.4.2 below.
Reworded to remove sub bullets.
3.2.2 Utilize block grants and other funding to assist in providing
and maintaining low- and moderate-income housing in partnership
with Housing Works and other housing agencies and providers in
Deschutes County.
Updated to reference Housing Works and other
community partners.
Goal 3.3 The transect concept provides a range of development
patterns from most to least developed. The Westside Transect
Zone implements the transect concept by providing a rural, low
density range at the western edge of the Bend UGB adjacent to the
urban transect typology inside the Bend UGB and extending
Converted to a Goal to precede the following policies and
made more general. Some of the existing descriptive
language should be pulled into Comp Plan narrative.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 5
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
outward westerly to the public and forested lands. The Westside
Transect Policies set forth below and the zoning ordinance
provisions implementing those policies are specific to Regulate the
location and density of housing in the area located between the
Bend UGB and Shevlin Park through Westside Transect policies
(3.3.1-3.3.x) and do not apply to other areas adjacent to the Bend
UGB.
3.3.1 Protect the sensitive eco-systems and interrelationships of the
urban/rural interface on the west side of Bend between the urban
area and Shevlin Park and the public and forestlands to the west.
No changes recommended.
3.3.2 Protect natural resources and environmentally sensitive
areas and provide special setbacks between development and
Shevlin Park, Tumalo Creek, and forestlands.
No changes recommended.
3.3.3 Development patterns shall reflect the protection of land
with environmental significance and fire-wise and other fire
prevention community design best practices.
Revised to add other fire prevention best practices.
3.3.4 Limit residential development to 200 single-family residential
lots.
No changes recommended.
3.3.5 Manage all areas outside of the structural building envelopes
on residential lots for wildfire mitigation and wildlife habitat in
No change recommended at this time. This language is
very specific but seems like a good policy.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 6
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
accordance with coordinated plans prepared by professionals,
reviewed annually with reports submitted to the County every three
years. The wildfire mitigation and wildlife habitat plans shall be
funded through homeowner assessments and administered and
enforced by a homeowners association established at the time of
creation of any residential lots.
3.3.6 Reduce the impact of construction by using best
management practices to minimize site disturbance during
construction and construction impacts (i.e., erosion) on Shevlin
Park, Tumalo Creek, and forestlands.
No changes recommended.
3.3.7 Coordinate with the City of Bend for mitigation of impacts to
City infrastructure from development within the Transect.
No changes recommended.
Goal 3.4 Participate in regional efforts to plan for housing. New goal based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
3.4.1 Collaborate with cities and private sector partners on
innovative housing developments to meet the region’s housing
needs.
New policy based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
3.4.2 Partner with cities to incentivize development within urban
growth boundaries and reduce infrastructure costs for workforce
and affordable housing.
New policy based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 7
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.3 Partner with local, state, and federal agencies to address
and limit nuisance and public health issues related to
homelessness.
New policy based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
3.4.4 Utilize County owned land in city limits for affordable and
workforce housing, where appropriate.
New policy based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
3.4.5 Promote regional housing planning, including urban
reserve planning for cities, to allow for longer term and multi-
jurisdictional housing strategies.
New policy based on community feedback. No changes
since last PC.
3.4.6 Limit parcelization and development adjacent to cities or in
conflict with planned and/or known road/utility corridors to
preserve land for future urban development.
New policy based on community feedback. Removed the
word “cluster” development based on recent
feedback from the PC.
Table 2. Jobs and Economy Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Section 3.4 Rural Economy Policies
Goal 1 Maintain a stable, and sustainable, and thriving rural
economy, compatible with rural lifestyles and a healthy
environment.
Added “Thriving” language per PC discussion.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 8
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.1 Promote rural economic initiatives, including home-based
businesses, that maintain the integrity of the rural character and
natural environment.
A. Review land use regulations to identify legal and appropriate
rural economic development opportunities.
Struck language is an action item. Could be part of an
action plan.
3.4.2 Work with stakeholders to promote new recreational and
tourist initiatives that maintain the integrity of the natural
environment
Move to recreation section
3.4.3 Support a regional approach to economic development in
concert with Economic Development for Central Oregon or and
similar organizations.
Minor change for broader applicability
3.4.4 Support growth and expansion of colleges and universities,
regional educational facilities, and workforce training programs.
Minor changed based on community input, oxford
comma. Additional wording to capture COCC and
OSU.
3.4.5 Support renewable energy generation as an important
economic development initiative, while taking other community
goals and concerns into consideration.
Compare with Energy policies to ensure consistency.
Added additional language to note community
concern about visual/wildlife impacts.
3.4.6 Support and participate in master planning for airports in
Deschutes County, including expansion of noise impact boundaries
and upgrades to facilities as airports continue to grow.
Updated based on local government/agency comments.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 9
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.7 Within the parameters of State land use regulations, permit
limited local-serving commercial uses in higher-density rural
communities. Support limited and locally-serving commercial uses
in appropriate locations.
“Within the parameters….” is not necessary. Consider
further defining “Appropriate locations”. No change
since last PC.
3.4.8 Support expansion of high-speed internet in rural areas and
integrate infrastructure such as fiber-optic cables into new
development and road projects.
New policy based on community input. No change since
last PC.
3.4.9 Support funding and development of childcare locations
across the County to support families in the workforce.
New policy based on community input. No change since
last PC.
3.4.10 Explore need for master planning for rural economic
development lands, including Deschutes Junction.
New policy – simplified, based on current area specific
policy. No change since last PC.
3.4.11 Recognize the importance of maintaining a large-lot
industrial land supply that is readily developable in Central Oregon,
and support a multi-jurisdictional cooperative effort to designate
these sites.
Moved and combined from 4.2.13 and 4.2.12, same
language. No change since last PC.
Lands Designated and Zoned Rural Commercial
Goal 2: Support creation and continuation of rural commercial
areas that support rural communities while not adversely
affecting nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Change “sub header” into new goal language.
3.4.8 Update the policies for lands designated Rural Commercial
as needed.
Unnecessary
3.4.9 Rural Commercial designated lands located outside of urban
growth boundaries shall allow uses less intense than those allowed
in unincorporated communities as defined by Oregon
Administrative Rule 660-22 or its successor. Rural Commercial
Simplified language. Minor rewording.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 10
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
zoning shall be applied to any new properties that are approved for
Rural Commercial designation as allowed by State Statute, Oregon
Administrative Rules and this Comprehensive Plan.
Allow for new Rural Commercial zoning designations if otherwise
allowed by Oregon Revised Statute, Administrative Rule, and this
Comprehensive Plan.
3.4.10 Rural Commercial zoning shall be applied to Deschutes
Junction, Deschutes River Woods Store, Pine Forest, Rosland and
Spring River
Remove, assuming this has occurred.
3.4.11 In Spring River there shall be a Limited Use Combining Zone. Keep this language for now; flag for potential elimination
at a future date once it is conformed that this is fully
embedded in the Development Code or that “backstop”
policy language is not needed.
3.4.12 County Comprehensive Plan policies and land use
regulations shall ensure that new uses authorized on Rural
Commercial designated lands do not adversely affect agricultural
and forest uses in the surrounding areas.
Ensure new uses permitted on Rural Commercial lands do not
adversely affect nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Simplified language.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 11
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.13 Zoning in the area shall ensure that the uses allowed are
rural as required by Goal 14, Urbanization, and less intensive than
those allowed for unincorporated communities as defined in OAR
660-22. New commercial uses shall be limited to those that are
intended to serve the surrounding rural area or the travel needs of
people passing through the area.
Ensure new commercial uses on Rural Commercial lands are limited
to those intended to serve the surrounding rural area and/or the
needs of the traveling public.
Simplified language removing references to State
planning goals and rules.
3.4.14 New commercial uses shall be limited in size to 2,500 square
feet or if for an agricultural or forest-related use, 3,500 square
feet.
No change currently.
3.4.15 A lawful use existing on or before November 5, 2002 that is
not otherwise allowed in a Rural Commercial zone, may continue to
exist subject to the county’s nonconforming use regulations.
No change currently.
3.4.16 An existing lawful use may expand up to 25 percent of the
total floor area existing on November 5, 2002
No change currently.
3.4.17 The Rural Commercial zoning regulations shall allow a mixed
use of residential or rural commercial uses.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.14.
3.4.18 Residential and commercial uses shall be served by DEQ
approved on-site sewage disposal systems.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.14.
3.4.19 Residential and commercial uses shall be served by on-site
wells or public water systems.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.14.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 12
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.20 Community sewer systems, motels, hotels and industrial
uses shall not be allowed.
No change
3.4.21 Recreational vehicle or trailer parks and other uses catering
to travelers shall be permitted.
No change
Lands Designated and Zoned Rural Industrial
Goal 3: Support the creation and continuation of rural
industrial areas that support rural communities while not
adversely affecting nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Update subsection into new goals.
3.4.21 Update the policies for lands designated Rural Industrial as
needed to limit and control industrial uses through the use of the
Rural Industrial designation and development standards.
Added additional general language which can help
replace more detailed language in the future.
3.4.22 To assure that urban uses are not permitted on rural
industrial lands, land use regulations in the Rural Industrial zones
shall ensure that the uses allowed are less intensive than those
allowed for unincorporated communities in OAR 660-22 or any
successor.
Keep this language for now; flag for potential elimination
at a future date once it is conformed that this is fully
embedded in the Development Code or that “backstop”
policy language is not needed. Ultimately, suggest
consolidation and simplification of these policies and
referring to a map for Limited Use Combining Zones.
3.4.23 Limited Use Combining zones shall be applied to the
Redmond Military (Tax lot 1513000000116), Deschutes Junction (Tax
lot 161226C000301, Tax lot 161226C000300, Tax lot 161226C000111
and Tax lot 161226A000203) to ensure permitted uses are
compatible with surrounding farm and forest lands.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.22.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 13
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.24 To ensure that the uses in Rural Industrial zone on tax lot 16-
12-26C-301, as described in Exhibit “C” and depicted on Exhibit “D”
attached to Ordinance 2009-007 and incorporated by reference
herein, are limited in nature and scope, the Rural Industrial zoning
on that site shall be subject to a Limited Use Combining Zone which
will limit the uses to storage, crushing, processing, sale and
distribution of minerals.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.22.
3.4.25 To ensure that the uses in Rural Industrial zone on tax lot 16-
12-26C-301, as described in Exhibit “C” and depicted on Exhibit “D”
attached to Ordinance 2009-007 and incorporated by reference
herein, are limited in nature and scope, the Rural Industrial zoning
on that site shall be subject to a Limited Use Combining Zone which
will limit the uses to storage, crushing, processing, sale and
distribution of minerals.
Same comment as for policy 3.4.22.
3.4.26 26 To ensure that the uses in the Rural Industrial Zone on
Tax Lot 300 on Assessor’s Map 16-12-26C-300 and Tax Lot 203 on
Assessor’s Map 16-12-26A-300 and portions of Tax Lot 111 on
Assessor’s Map 16-12-26C-111 as described in Exhibit ‘D’ and
depicted in Exhibit ‘E’ attached to Ordinance 2010-030 and
incorporated by reference herein, are limited in nature and scope,
the Rural Industrial zoning on the subject parcel shall be subject to
a Limited Use Combining Zone, which will limit the uses to storage,
No change currently because this is not yet reflected
elsewhere in the code.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 14
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
crushing, processing, sale and distribution of minerals, subject to
conditional use and site plan approval.
3.4.27 Land use regulations shall ensure that new uses authorized
within the Rural Industrial sites do not adversely affect agricultural
and forest uses in the surrounding area.
Ensure new uses on Rural Industrial lands do not adversely affect
nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Simplified language
3.4.28 New industrial uses shall be limited in size to a maximum
floor area of 7,500 square feet per use within a building, except for
the primary processing of raw materials produced in rural areas, for
which there is no floor area per use limitation.
Staff recommends retaining language.
3.4.29 A lawfully established use that existed on or before February
2, 2003 not otherwise allowed in a Rural Industrial zone may
continue to exist subject to the county’s non-conforming use
regulations
Staff recommends retaining language.
3.4.30 A lawfully established use that existed on or before February
2, 2003 may be expanded to occupy a maximum of 10,000 square
feet of floor area or an additional 25 percent of the floor area
currently occupied by the existing use, whichever is greater.
Staff recommends retaining language.
3.4.31 Residential and industrial uses shall be served by DEQ
approved on-site sewage disposal systems.
Ensure new uses on Rural Industrial lands are served by on-site
sewage disposal systems approved by the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ).
If this policy applies to lands beyond industrial land,
consider duplicating or moving.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 15
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.4.32 Residential and industrial uses shall be served by on-site
wells or public water systems.
Staff recommends retaining as-is.
3.4.33 Community sewer systems shall not be allowed in Rural
Industrial zones.
No change
3.4.34 A 2009 exception (Ordinance 2009-007) included an
irrevocably committed exception to Goal 3 and a reasons exception
to Goal 14 to allow rural industrial use with a Limited Use
Combining Zone for storage, crushing, processing, sale and
distribution of minerals.
No change
3.4.35 A 2010 exception (Ordinance 2010-030) took a reasons
exception to Goal 14 with a Limited Use Combing Zone for storage,
crushing, processing, sale and distribution of minerals.
No change
3.4.36 Properties for which a property owner has demonstrated
that Goals 3 and 4 do not apply may be considered for Rural
Industrial designation as allowed by State Statute, Oregon
Administrative rules and this Comprehensive Plan. Rural Industrial
zoning shall be applied to a new property that is approved for the
Rural Industrial Plan designation.
No change
Section 4.9 Rural Service Center Policies
Goals and Policies
Goal 1: Support the creation and continuation of rural service
centers that support rural communities while not adversely
affecting nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Added goal for this section.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 16
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
4.9.1 Land use regulations shall conform to the requirements of
OAR 660, Division 22 or any successor.
Unnecessary, remove.
4.9.2 Rural Service Centers zoning shall be applied to Alfalfa and
Brothers and shall consist of three districts: Commercial/Mixed Use;
Residential; and Open Space. in Alfalfa, Brothers, Hampton,
Wilstlestop, and Wildhunt are identified on the Comprehensive Plan
Map and shall have zoning consistent with Comprehensive Plan
designations.
Consolidation of policy with the following policy.
4.9.3 Rural Service Center zoning shall be applied to Hampton,
Whistlestop and Wildhunt and shall consist of a single
Commercial/Mixed Use District.
See above.
4.9.4 The area in the Brothers Rural Service Center Boundary that
is north of Highway 20 and east of Camp Creek Road shall be zoned
as Rural Service Center - Open Space District (RSC-OS).
Recommend removing. Should already be captured in
Zoning map and also can be cited in narrative.
4.9.5 In April 2002, Alfalfa area residents expressed a desire to
keep the community “the way it is” and to limit commercial activity
to 2-acres south of Willard Road that is the site of the Alfalfa
Community Store and the community water system. These two
acres are designated as a mixed used commercial district in the
Comprehensive Plan and shall be zoned mixed use commercial. The
remaining 20 acres of the Rural Service Center will continue to be
zoned Rural Service Center – Residential District, with a 5-acre
minimum lot size. Since the Board of County Commissioners finds it
Staff recommends retaining language or potentially
removing some of the narrative but retaining the
final sentence.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 17
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
may be necessary to accommodate the need for future commercial
expansion 2 acres north of Willard Road are being designated on
the Comprehensive Plan for future commercial uses. A zone change
to mixed use commercial can be considered only for a specific use
and upon findings that the existing commercial area is fully
developed.
4.9.6 County Comprehensive Plan policies and land use
regulations shall ensure that new uses authorized within the Alfalfa,
Brothers, Hampton, Millican, Whistlestop and Wildhunt Ensure that
land uses at Rural Service Centers do not adversely affect
agricultural and forest uses in the surrounding areas.
Simplify and generalize language.
4.9.7 Zoning in the rural service areas shall promote the
maintenance of the area’s rural character. New commercial uses
shall be limited to small-scale, low impact uses that are intended to
serve the community and surrounding rural area or the travel
needs of people passing through the area. The commercial/mixed
use zoning regulations shall allow a mixed use of residential or
small-scale commercial uses such as health and retail services.
Minor changes recommended for clarity at this time;
consider incorporating this language in a future
“purpose statement for this zoning designation in the
Development Code. More general policy language could
say: “Maintain the rural character of Rural Service
Centers though appropriate land use regulations.”
Addition of “such as health and retail services.”
Consider RC, RI, and RSC language together.
4.9.8 Residential and commercial uses shall be served by DEQ
approved on-site sewage disposal systems.
Staff recommends retaining language as-is.
4.9.9 Residential and commercial uses shall be served by onsite
wells or public water systems.
Staff recommends retaining language as-is.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 18
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
4.9.10 Community water systems, motels, hotels and industrial
uses shall not be allowed.
Staff recommends retaining language as-is.
4.9.11 Recreational vehicle or trailer parks and other uses catering
to travelers shall be permitted.
Staff recommends retaining language as-is.
4.9.12 The County shall consider ways to improve services in the
area consistent with the level of population to be served.
Revised policy based on community feedback. Removed
due to combination with 4.9.7
Table 3. Public Facilities and Services Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Goal 1 Support the orderly, efficient, and cost-effective siting of
rural public facilities and services.
Oxford comma
3.6.1 Encourage the formation of special service districts to serve
rural needs rather than have the County serve those needs.
Encourage and support the formation of special service districts to
serve the need for public facilities in rural areas.
Minor changes
3.6.2 Encourage early planning and acquisition of sites needed for
public facilities, such as roads, water and wastewater facilities.
Encourage and support planning for and acquisition of sites needed
for public facilities, such as transportation, water, and wastewater
facilities.
Minor changes for clarity
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 19
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.6.3 Support the siting of community health clinics, hospitals, and
private medical practices to serve rural residents throughout the
County.
Updated language for clarity to reflect PC discussion
3.6.4 Where possible, maintain County offices in locations
convenient to all areas of the county.
Consider removing.
3.6.5 Continue to sSupport the County Fairgrounds as a
community gathering place, event facility and home to the annual
County Fair.
Minor change
3.6.6 Maintain the County Fairgrounds as an emergency readiness
location and staging area in the event of a Cascadia Subduction
Zone earthquake or other large disaster.
Elaboration of policy
3.6.7 Before Prior to disposing of County-owned property,
consider review whether the land is appropriate for needed public
projects such as schools, health clinics, fire stations, or senior
centers, or affordable housing.
Added housing as a potential project.
3.6.8 Coordinate with rural service districts and providers to
ensure new development is reviewed with consideration of service
districts and providers needs and capabilities. review development
proposals.
Simplified language.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 20
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.6.9 New development shall address impacts on existing facilities
and plans through the land use entitlement process. Use the land
use entitlement process to ensure new development addresses and
mitigates impacts on existing and planned public facilities.
Rewording.
3.6.10 Support education districts, library districts and recreation
districts in meeting community needs, such as meeting spaces.
No changes.
3.6.11 Where practicable possible, locate utility lines and facilities
on within or adjacent to existing public or private right-of-ways
rights-of-way and to avoid dividing farm or forest lands.
Minor changes.
3.6.12 Review public facilities and services to minimize impacts of
the facilities on the larger community. a. Review and revise as
needed County Code to require screening of public facilities
including power generating facilities and sewage treatment plants,
and to address impacts from cell towers. Use the development code
to mitigate visual and other impacts of public facilities and cell
towers.
Rephrase from one-time action. Added “cell towers”
3.6.13 Support the creation of a landfill overlay zone.
Remove. Moved as an option under Goal 2
3.6.14 Guide the location and design of rural development so as to
minimize the public costs of facilities and services. Use the
Comprehensive Plan and Development Code to guide rural
Suggested rewording.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 21
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
development in a manner that supports the orderly and cost-
efficient provision of public facilities and services.
3.6.15 Support siting and development of city owned water and
wastewater facilities on rural lands, including innovative facilities
that include additional community amenities.
New policy based on local government feedback. Note:
This policy is similar to policy 6.5.7 and may be deleted
or combined with that policy in a subsequent draft.
Goal 2. Pursue sustainable, innovative, and cost-effective waste
management practices
New goal based on community feedback
Added “innovative” per PC comments.
3.6.16 Allow for siting of waste management facilities on rural
lands, including but not limited to landfill facilities, transfer stations,
organics management facilities, material recovery facilities, and
recycling modernization facilities, in a manner that is sensitive to
environmental and community concerns.
New policy based on community feedback
3.6.17 Provide incentives, education, and resources to promote
reuse and recycling of construction waste
New policy based on community feedback
Reworded based on PC discussion to mention “reuse
and recycling” and “education”
3.6.18 Encourage waste reduction through community education
and partnerships with community groups such as the
Environmental Center
New policy based on community feedback
3.6.19 Support the creation of a landfill overlay zone.
Option for PC – moved from prior goal.
Goal 3. Serve as conduit for countywide resources New goal based on community feedback. Recommend
moving to a more appropriate section in subsequent
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 22
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
draft but included as a placeholder in this section for
now.
3.6.20 Provide resources to connect community members with a
variety of housing and health related issues in Deschutes County
New policy based on community feedback
Table 4. Recreation & Tourism Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Section 3.8 Rural Recreation Policies
Goal 1 Increase affordable, sustainable, and diverse recreation
opportunities through partnerships with government and
private entities. Promote a variety of passive and active park
and recreation opportunities through a regional system that
includes federal and state parks and local park districts.
Amended language based on community feedback
3.8.1 Reduce barriers to regional parks and recreation projects,
including acknowledgement or adoption of federal, state and local
parks district trail and facility plans. Cooperate with public agencies
and local park districts to provide park and recreation lands,
facilities and opportunities.
Simplify language.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 23
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
a. The Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan and
State Park Master Plans shall serve as a basis for
coordination on County-wide park and recreation issues.
b. Support exceptions to Statewide Planning Goals for urban
fringe areas owned or acquired and operated by park and
recreation districts.
3.8.2 Work cooperatively with public agencies to promote
standards for consolidation of public land access and to ensure
recreational entry to those lands, especially along rivers and
streams
3.8.2 Collaborate with partners to develop a regional system of
trails and open spaces, prioritizing recommendations from County,
state, and federal recreational plans and studies.
Simplify language.
3.8.3 Encourage coordination between the U.S. Forest Service, the
Bureau of Land Management and recreational use interest groups
off-road vehicle organizations to regulate use of motorized vehicles,
including motorbikes, ATVs and snowmobiles in order to minimize
environmental degradation, agricultural fragmentation and user
conflicts on public and private land property.
Simplified language.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 24
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.8.4 Participate in federal recreation planning on federal lands
and state park planning on State lands.
Consolidated with policy above.
3.8.5 Support the creation and improvement of accessible park
and recreation opportunities in compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
Added additional language per PC comments
3.8.6 Support efforts to coordinate recreation planning between
the County, park and recreation districts, school districts, irrigation
districts, unincorporated communities, and cities.
Minor addition
Added “County”
3.8.7 Work with Unincorporated Communities that express an
interest in parks, open spaces and community centers. Coordinate
with unincorporated communities to identify opportunities for
parks, trails, open spaces, and community centers.
Rewording
3.8.8 Coordinate trail design and funding with transportation
system plans and support efforts to provide and manage rural trail
segments and bicycle routes.
Alternative language:
3.8.8 Establish trail design standards and identify specific funding
sources for them as part of future transportation system planning
Added potential stronger language for discussion.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 25
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
efforts to ensure development of identified priority rural trail segments
and bicycle routes.
3.8.9 Support the Committee on Recreational Assets in identifying
priority recreational projects, including incorporating as
appropriate, elements of the Committee on Recreational Assets into
this Plan.
Remove policy – committee is no longer active.
3.8.10 Update County Code as needed to define rural recreational
uses such as private parks.
Remove
3.8.9 Explore creation of a County Parks and Recreation
Department to increase the County’s role in recreation and natural
resource management and implement if deemed appropriate.
New policy based on community input.
3.8.10 Support community efforts for acquisition and
management of Skyline Forest as a community amenity.
New policy based on community input. Same policy is in
Forest section – better suited here.
3.4.2 Work with stakeholders to promote new recreational and
tourist initiatives that maintain the integrity of the natural
environment
Moved policy from Economic Development section
Table 5. Destination Resort Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Section 3.9 Destination Resorts
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 26
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Goal 1 To provide Provide for development of destination resorts in the
County consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 8 in a manner that will
be compatible with farm and forest uses, existing rural development,
and in a manner that will maintain important natural features, such as
including habitat of threatened or endangered species, streams, rivers,
and significant wetlands.
Goal structure is different from other Plan sections.
Multiple goals up front with policies following.
Edits for clarity, consider cutting further.
3.9.x Goal 2 To provide Provide a process for the siting of
destination resorts facilities that enhance and diversify the
recreational opportunities and economy of Deschutes County, on
rural lands that have been mapped by Deschutes County as eligible
for this purpose.
Change from a goal to a policy under the above goal.
Combine with language from Goal 3.
Goal 3 To provide for the siting of destination resort facilities that
enhances and diversifies the recreational opportunities and
economy of Deschutes County.
Goal 4 To provide for development of destination resorts
consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12 in a manner that
will ensure the resorts are supported by adequate
transportation facilities.
Staff recommends keeping as-is
Change from goal to policy.
3.9.1 Destination resorts shall only be allowed within areas shown
on the “Deschutes County Destination Resort Map” and when the
resort complies with the requirements of Goal 8, ORS 197.435 to
197.467, and Deschutes County Code 18.113.
Staff recommends keeping as-is
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 27
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3.9.2 Applications to amend the map will be collected and will be
processed concurrently no sooner than 30 months from the date
the map was previously adopted or amended.
Provision better suited for development code.
3.9.3 Create and implement additional limitations on the siting
and development of destination resorts that go beyond current
state regulations to ensure protection of water quality, recreational
resources, and other County resources and values.
New policy based on Phase 2 outreach results.
3.9.4 Ensure that destination resort developments support and
implement strategies to provide workers with affordable housing
options within or in close proximity to the resorts.
New policy based on Phase 2 outreach results.
3.9.5 Mapping for destination resort siting.
a. To assure that resort development does not conflict with the
objectives of other Statewide Planning Goals, destination resorts
shall pursuant to Goal 8 not be sited in Deschutes County in the
following areas:
1. Within 24 air miles of an urban growth boundary with an existing
population of 100,000 or more unless residential uses are limited to
those necessary for the staff and management of the resort;
2. On a site with 50 or more contiguous acres of unique or prime
farm land identified and mapped by the Soil Conservation Service
or within three miles of farm land within a High-Value Crop Area;
General recommendation is to remove statute/code
language items from comprehensive plan policies.
However, this is expected to be item of further discussion
with PC/BOCC.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 28
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3. On predominantly Cubic Foot Site Class 1 or 2 forest lands which
are not subject to an approved Goal exception;
4. On areas protected as Goal 5 resources in an acknowledged
comprehensive plan where all conflicting uses have been prohibited
to protect the Goal 5 resource;
5. Especially sensitive big game habitat, and as listed below, as
generally mapped by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in
July 1984 an as further refined through development of
comprehensive plan provisions implementing this requirement.
i. Tumalo deer winter range;
ii. Portion of the Metolius deer winter range;
iii. Antelope winter range east of Bend near Horse Ridge and
Millican;
6. Sites less than 160 acres.
b. To assure that resort development does not conflict with Oregon
Revised Statute, destination resorts shall not be sited in Deschutes
County in Areas of Critical State Concern.
c. To assure that resort development does not conflict with the
objectives of Deschutes County, destination resorts shall also not be
located in the following areas:
1. Sites listed below that are inventoried Goal 5 resources, shown
on the Wildlife Combining Zone, that the County has chosen to
protect:
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 29
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
i. Antelope Range near Horse Ridge and Millican;
ii. Elk Habitat Area; and
iii. Deer Winter Range;
2. Wildlife Priority Area, identified on the 1999 ODFW map
submitted to the South County Regional Problem Solving Group;
3. Lands zoned Open Space and Conservation (OS&C);
4. Lands zoned Forest Use 1 (F-1);
5. Irrigated lands zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) having 40 or
greater contiguous acres in irrigation;
6. Non-contiguous EFU acres in the same ownership having 60 or
greater irrigated acres;
7. Farm or forest land within one mile outside of urban growth
boundaries;
8. Lands designated Urban Reserve Area under ORS 195.145;
9. Platted subdivisions;
d. For those lands not located in any of the areas designated in
Policy 3.9.5(a) though (c), destination resorts may, pursuant to Goal
8, Oregon Revised Statute and Deschutes County zoning code, be
sited in the following areas:
1. Forest Use 2 (F-2), Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10), and Rural
Residential (RR-10) zones;
2. Unirrigated Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) land;
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 30
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
3. Irrigated lands zoned EFU having less than 40 contiguous acres in
irrigation;
4. Non-contiguous irrigated EFU acres in the same ownership
having less than 60 irrigated acres;
5. All property within a subdivision for which cluster development
approval was obtained prior to 1990, for which the original cluster
development approval designated at least 50 percent of the
development as open space and which was within the destination
resort zone prior to the effective date of Ordinance 2010-024 shall
remain on the eligibility map;
6. Minimum site of 160 contiguous acres or greater under one or
multiple ownerships;
e. The County shall adopt a map showing where destination resorts
can be located in the County. Such map shall become part of the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance and shall be an overlay
zone designated Destination Resort (DR).
3.9.6 Ordinance provisions.
a. The County shall ensure that destination resorts are compatible
with the site and adjacent land uses through enactment of land use
regulations that, at a minimum, provide for the following:
1. Maintenance of important natural features, including habitat of
threatened or endangered species, streams, rivers, and significant
Keep for now, explore opportunities to integrate into
development code and remove from comprehensive plan
through a separate project.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 31
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
wetlands; maintenance of riparian vegetation within 100 feet of
streams, rivers and significant wetlands; and
2. Location and design of improvements and activities in a manner
that will avoid or minimize adverse effects of the resort on uses on
surrounding lands, particularly effects on intensive farming
operations in the area and on the rural transportation system. In
order to adequately assess the effect on the transportation system,
notice and the opportunity for comment shall be provided to the
relevant road authority.
3. Such regulations may allow for alterations to important natural
features, including placement of structures, provided that the
overall values of the feature are maintained.
b. Minimum measures to assure that design and placement of
improvements and activities will avoid or minimize the adverse
effects noted in Policy 3.9.4(a) shall include:
1. The establishment and maintenance of buffers between the
resort and adjacent land uses, including natural vegetation and
where appropriate, fenced, berms, landscaped areas, and other
similar types of buffers.
2. Setbacks of structures and other improvements from adjacent
land uses.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 32
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
c. The County may adopt additional land use restrictions to ensure
that proposed destination resorts are compatible with the
environmental capabilities of the site and surrounding land uses.
d. Uses in destination resorts shall be limited to visitor- oriented
accommodations, overnight lodgings, developed recreational
facilities, commercial uses limited to types and levels necessary to
meet the needs of visitors to the resort, and uses consistent with
preservation and maintenance of open space.
e. The zoning ordinance shall include measures that assure that
developed recreational facilities, visitor-oriented accommodations
and key facilities intended to serve the entire development are
physically provided or are guaranteed through surety bonding or
substantially equivalent financial assurances prior to closure of sale
of individual lots or units. In phased developments, developed
recreational facilities and other key facilitated intended to serve a
particular phase shall be constructed prior to sales in that phase or
guaranteed through surety bonding.
Table 6. Sunriver Policies
Note – no changes are proposed to these policies at this time, though a larger cleanup as part of a future process is
recommended. Existing policies are shown below.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 33
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Section 4.5 Sunriver Policies
4.5.1 Land use regulations shall conform to the requirements of OAR 660 Division
22 or any successor.
4.5.2 County comprehensive plan policies and land use regulations shall ensure
that new uses authorized within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community do
not adversely affect forest uses in the surrounding Forest Use Zones.
4.5.3 To protect scenic views and riparian habitat within the community,
appropriate setbacks shall be required for all structures built on properties with
frontage along the Deschutes River.
4.5.4 Open space and common area, unless otherwise zoned for development,
shall remain undeveloped except for community amenities such as bike and
pedestrian paths, and parks and picnic areas.
4.5.5 Public access to the Deschutes River shall be preserved.
4.5.6 The County supports the design review standards administered by the
Sunriver Owners Association.
Residential District Policies
4.5.7 Areas designated residential on the comprehensive plan map shall be
developed with single family or multiple family residential housing.
Commercial District Policies
Policy 4.5.8 Small-scale, low-impact commercial uses shall be developed in
conformance with the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. Larger, more
intense commercial uses shall be permitted if they are intended to serve the
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 34
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
community, the surrounding rural area and the travel needs of people passing
through the area.
Policy 4.5.9 No additional land shall be designated Commercial until the next
periodic review.
Policy 4.5.10 Multiple-family residences and residential units in commercial
buildings shall be permitted in the commercial area for the purpose of providing
housing which is adjacent to places of employment. Single-family residences shall
not be permitted in commercial areas.
Policy 4.5.11 Approval standards for conditional uses in the commercial district
shall take into consideration the impact of the proposed use on the nearby
residential and commercial uses and the capacity of the transportation system and
public facilities and services to serve the proposed use.
Town Center District Policies
Policy 4.5.12 Small-scale, low-impact commercial uses shall be developed in
conformance with the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. Larger, more
intense commercial uses shall be permitted if they are intended to serve the
community, the surrounding rural area or the travel needs of people passing
through the area.
Policy 4.5.13 Development standards in the town center district should encourage
new development that is compatible with a town center style of development that
serves as the commercial core of the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community.
The following policies should guide development in the Town Center District in
Sunriver:
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 35
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
a. Combine a mixture of land uses that may include retail, offices, commercial
services, residential housing and civic uses to create economic and social vitality
and encourage pedestrian use through mixed use and stand alone residential
buildings.
b. Develop a commercial mixed-use area that is safe, comfortable and attractive to
pedestrians.
c. Encourage efficient land use by facilitating compact, high-density development
that minimizes the amount of land that is needed for development.
d. Provide both formal and informal community gathering places.
e. Provide visitor accommodations and tourism amenities appropriate to Sunriver.
f. Provide design flexibility to anticipate changes in the marketplace.
g. Provide access and public places that encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.
h. Provide road and pedestrian connections to residential areas.
i. Facilitate development (land use mix, density and design) that supports public
transit where applicable.
j. Develop a distinct character and quality design appropriate to Sunriver that will
identify the Town Center as the centerpiece/focal point of the community.
Policy 4.5.14 Development within the Town Center (TC) District will be substantially
more dense than development elsewhere in Sunriver. This increased density will
require changes to existing topography and vegetation in the TC District to allow for
screened, underground parking. The requirements of the County’s site plan
ordinance shall be interpreted to reflect this fact.
Resort District Policies
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 36
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.5.15 Areas designated resort on the comprehensive plan map shall be
designated resort, resort marina, resort golf course, resort equestrian or resort
nature center district on the zoning map to reflect a development pattern which is
consistent with resort uses and activities.
Business Park District Policies
Policy 4.5.16 A variety of commercial uses which support the needs of the
community and surrounding rural area, and not uses solely intended to attract
resort visitors, should be encouraged.
Policy 4.5.17 Allow small-scale, low-impact commercial uses in conformance with
the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. Larger more intense commercial
uses shall be permitted if they are intended to serve the community, the
surrounding rural area and the travel needs of people passing through the area.
Policy 4.5.18 Small-scale, low-impact industrial uses should be allowed in
conformance with the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22.
Community District Policies
Policy 4.5.19 Areas designated community on the comprehensive plan map shall
be designated community general, community recreation, community limited or
community neighborhood district on the zoning map to reflect a development
pattern which is consistent community uses and activities.
Policy 4.5.20 Lands designated community shall be developed with uses which
support all facets of community needs, be they those of year-round residents or
part-time residents and tourists.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 37
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.5.21 Development shall take into consideration the unique physical
features of the community and be sensitive to the residential development within
which the community areas are interspersed.
Airport District Policies
Policy 4.5.22 Future development shall not result in structures or uses which, due
to extreme height or attraction of birds, would pose a hazard to the operation of
aircraft.
Policy 4.5.23 Future development should not allow uses which would result in
large concentrations or gatherings of people in a single location.
Utility District Policies
Policy 4.5.24 Lands designated utility shall allow for development of administrative
offices, substations, storage/repair yards, distribution lines and similar amenities
for services such as water, sewer, telephone, cable television and wireless
telecommunications.
Forest District Policies
Policy 4.5.25 Uses and development on property designated forest that are within
the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community boundary shall be consistent with
uses and development of other lands outside of the community boundary which
are also designated forest on the Deschutes County comprehensive plan map.
Policy 4.5.26 Forest district property shall be used primarily for effluent storage
ponds, spray irrigation of effluent, biosolids application and ancillary facilities
necessary to meet Oregon Department of Environmental Quality sewage disposal
regulations.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 38
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.5.27 The development of resort, residential or non-forest commercial
activities on Forest district lands shall be prohibited unless an exception to Goal 14
is taken.
General Public Facility Policies
Policy 4.5.28 Residential minimum lot sizes and densities shall be determined by
the capacity of the water and sewer facilities to accommodate existing and future
development and growth.
Policy 4.5.29 New uses or expansion of existing uses within the Sunriver Urban
Unincorporated Community which require land use approval shall be approved
only upon confirmation from the Sunriver Utility Company that water and sewer
service for such uses can be provided.
Policy 4.5.30 Expansion of the Sunriver Water LLC/Environmental/LLC Water and
Sewer District outside of the historic Sunriver boundaries shall adequately address
the impacts to services provided to existing property owners.
Water Facility Policies
Policy 4.5.31 Water service shall continue to be provided by the Sunriver Utilities
Company.
Sewer Facility Policies
Policy 4.5.32 Sewer service shall continue to be provided by the Sunriver Utilities
Company.
Transportation System Maintenance Policies
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 39
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.5.33 Privately-maintained roads within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated
Community boundary shall continue to be maintained by the Sunriver Owners
Association.
Policy 4.5.34 The bicycle/pedestrian path system in Sunriver shall continue to be
maintained by the Sunriver Owners Association or as otherwise provided by a
maintenance agreement.
Policy 4.5.35 The County will encourage the future expansion of bicycle/pedestrian
paths within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community boundary in an effort
to provide an alternative to vehicular travel.
Policy 4.5.36 All public roads maintained by the County shall continue to be
maintained by the County. Improvements to County maintained public roads shall
occur as described the County Transportation System Plan.
Table 7. Resort Community Policies
Note – no changes are proposed to these policies at this time, though a larger cleanup as part of a future process is
recommended. Existing policies are shown below.
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
General Resort Community Policies
Policy 4.8.1 Land use regulations shall conform to the requirements of OAR 660
Division 22 or any successor.
Policy 4.8.2 Designated open space and common area, unless otherwise zoned
for development, shall remain undeveloped except for community amenities such
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 40
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
as bike and pedestrian paths, park and picnic areas. Areas developed as golf
courses shall remain available for that purpose or for open space/recreation uses.
Policy 4.8.3 The provisions of the Landscape Management Overlay Zone shall
apply in Resort Communities where the zone exists along Century Drive, Highway
26 and the Deschutes River.
Policy 4.8.4 Residential minimum lot sizes and densities shall be determined by
the capacity of the water and sewer facilities to accommodate existing and future
development and growth.
Policy 4.8.5 The resort facility and resort recreation uses permitted in the zoning
for Black Butte Ranch and the Inn of the Seventh Mountain/Widgi Creek shall serve
the resort community.
Black Butte Ranch General Policies
Policy 4.8.6 County comprehensive plan policies and land use regulations shall
ensure that new uses authorized within the Black Butte Ranch Resort Community
do not adversely affect forest uses in the surrounding Forest Use Zones.
Policy 4.8.7 The County supports the design review standards administered by
the Architectural Review Committee.
Policy 4.8.8 Residential, resort and utility uses shall continue to be developed in
accordance with the Master Design for Black Butte Ranch and the respective
Section Declarations.
Policy 4.8.9 Industrial activities, including surface mining, shall only occur in the
area zoned Black Butte Ranch Surface Mining, Limited Use Combining District (Black
Butte Ranch SM/LU) located in the northwest corner of Black Butte Ranch.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 41
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.8.10 Employee housing shall be located in the area zoned Black Butte
Ranch-Utility/Limited Use Combining District (Black Butte Ranch-U/LU).
Policy 4.8.11 Any amendment to the allowable use(s) in either the Resort
Community District or the Limited Use Combining District shall require an exception
in accordance with applicable statewide planning goal(s), OAR 660-04-018/022 and
DCC 18.112 or any successor.
Policy 4.8.12 The westerly 38-acres zoned Black Butte Ranch Surface Mining,
Limited Use Combining District (Black Butte Ranch SM/LU) shall be used for the
mining and storage of aggregate resources. Uses that do not prevent the future
mining of these resources, such as disposal of reclaimed effluent and woody debris
disposal from thinning and other forest practices may be allowed concurrently.
Other resort maintenance, operational and utility uses, such as a solid waste
transfer station, maintenance facility or equipment storage may be allowed only
after mining and reclamation have occurred.
Policy 4.8.13 The 18.5 acres zoned Black Butte Ranch-Utility/Limited Use
Combining District (Black Butte Ranch-U/LU) may be used for the disposal of
reclaimed sludge.
Policy 4.8.14 The area west of McCallister Road and east of the area zoned Black
Butte Ranch may be used for large equipment storage, general storage,
maintenance uses, RV storage, telephone communications, administration offices,
housekeeping facilities and employee housing.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 42
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.8.15 Employee housing shall be set back at least 250 feet from the eastern
boundary of the area zoned Black Butte Ranch Surface Mining, Limited Use
Combining District (Black Butte Ranch SM/LU).
Policy 4.8.16 Surface mining within the Black Butte Ranch community boundary
shall adhere to the following Goal 5 ESEE “Program to Meet Goal” requirements:
a. Only the western most 38 acres of the site shall continue to be mined.
b. Setbacks shall be required for potential conflicting residential and other
development. A minimum 50-foot setback shall be maintained from the perimeter
of tax lot 202 for all surface mining activity.
c. Noise impact shall be mitigated by buffering and screening.
d. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. weekdays.
No operations shall be allowed on weekends and holidays.
e. Processing shall be limited to 45 days in any one year, to be negotiated with
Deschutes County in the site plan process in consultation with the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW).
f. The conditions set forth in the August 10, 1989, letter of ODFW shall be adhered
to.
g. Extraction at the site shall be limited to five acres at a time with on-going
incremental reclamation (subject to DOGAMI review and approval).
h. Mining operations, siting of equipment, and trucking of product shall be
conducted in such a manner that applicable DEQ standards are met and minimizes
noise and dust.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 43
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
i. DOGAMI requirements for a permit once mining affects more than five acres
outside the 8.6-acre exemption area shall be met.
j. A conditional use permit shall be obtained from Deschutes County, under the
provisions of section 18.128.280. Surface mining of resources exclusively for on-site
personal, farm or forest use or maintenance of irrigation canals, before mining
activity affects more than five acres outside the 8.6-acre exempt area.
Black Butte Ranch Public Facility Policies
Policy 4.8.17 Police protection services shall be provided by the Black Butte Ranch
Police Services District.
Policy 4.8.18 The Black Butte Ranch Water Distribution Company and the Black
Butte Ranch Corporation shall confirm the water and sewer service, respectively,
can be provided for new uses or expansion of existing uses that require land use
approval.
Policy 4.8.19 The Black Butte Ranch Water Distribution Company shall provide
water service for the Black Butte Ranch Resort Community.
Policy 4.8.20 The Black Butte Ranch Corporation shall provide sewer service for
Black Butte Ranch.
Policy 4.8.21 The Black Butte Ranch Fire Protection District shall provide fire
protection services for Black Butte Ranch.
Policy 4.8.22 The roads and the bicycle/pedestrian path system within the Black
Butte Ranch Resort Community boundary shall be maintained by the Black Butte
Ranch Owners Association.
Inn of the 7th Mountain Widgi Creek General Policies
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 44
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.8.23 Any amendment to the allowable uses in either the Resort
Community District or the Widgi Creek Residential District shall require an
exception in accordance with applicable statewide planning goal(s), OAR 660-04-
018/022 or any successor, and DCC 18.112 or any successor
Policy 4.8.24 The County shall encourage and support land exchanges efforts by
and between private property owners, public agencies and public trusts for the
purpose of fostering public access to and protection of natural resources, such as
rivers, streams, caves, areas/features of historical importance and other natural
features.
Inn of the 7th Mountain/Widgi Creek Public Facility Policies
Policy 4.8.25 Police protection services shall be provided under contract with the
Deschutes County Sheriff.
Policy 4.8.26 Water service shall be supplied by on-site wells for the Inn/Widgi
Resort Community.
Policy 4.8.27 New uses or expansion of existing uses that require land use
approval shall be approved only upon confirmation from the City of Bend that
sewer service can be provided.
Policy 4.8.28 Fire protection services for the Inn/Widgi shall be provided through a
contract with the City of Bend until such time as Inn/Widgi develops another plan to
provide adequate fire protection.
Policy 4.8.29 The Resort Community, not Deschutes County, shall maintain roads
in the community.
DRAFT Policy Review – June 2023 Page 45
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Policy 4.8.30 The bicycle/pedestrian path system shall be maintained by the
Inn/Widgi Owners Association.
Policy 4.8.31 Emergency access between Widgi Creek and the Inn of the Seventh
Mountain shall be provided in accordance with the approved development plan for
the Elkai Woods town homes. The respective resort property owners shall maintain
emergency access between the Inn and Widgi Creek.
Table 8. Terrebonne and Tumalo Policies
Policy Language Notes and Discussion
Section 4.6 - Background
The Terrebonne Community Plan was adopted in Ordinance 2010-012 is hereby
incorporated into this Plan as Appendix A.
The Terrebonne and Tumalo
Community Plans are incorporated as
appendices. These sections are not
needed. Section 4.7 - Background
The Tumalo Community Plan was adopted in Ordinance 2010-027 and is hereby
incorporated into this Plan as Appendix B.