Loading...
1985-15617-Minutes for Meeting May 22,1985 Recorded 8/1/1985Y` 4 851561'7 DESCHUTES COUNTY BUDGET COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING, MAY 22, 1985. VOL 65 FAGE 274 i-75 -I PH It: 27 Chairman MacKenzie called the Deschutes CbYLir ! �F'mittee Meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Commissioners tt:ld Prante were in attendance, Commissioner Maudlin was absent; Mike Maier, Jack Tate and Eileen Donaldson were also in attendance. Commissioner Prante read aloud the Budget Message (see attached) which recommends a change from the present 36 hour - four day work week to a 37 1/2 hour - five day work week which will provide the public with improved service and easier accessibility to the County offices. After discussion on the proposed five day work week, Chairman MacKenzie requested input from. the.CommittP.e either in favor or opposed to the recommendation. The Committee was unanimous in favor of the proposed five day work week. Mike Maier reported the following : HEARINGS OFFICER No reported change in revenue with a proposed and recommended budget of $3,500.00. The proposed and recommended budget requirement is $32,771.00. TREASURER TAX Helen Rastovich, County Treasurer, reported an increase in the County tax base and the revenues collected in 84-85. The proposed and recommended budget is $230,000.00. An addition of office equipment has been proposed and recommended in the amount of $17,900.00. The proposed and recommended budget is $264,175.00. COUNTY CLERK A reduction of $2,500.00 in revenue has been proposed and recommended. An increased need for postage has been proposed in the amount of $3,500.00; however, the recommended amount is $1,500.00. The proposed budget is $127,053.00 and the recommended budget is $123,053.00. ELECTIONS An increase in revenue is proposed and recommended in the amount of $82,800.00. • VOL 65 FACE 2 f 5 Overtime in the amount of $3,000.00 has been added to the budget this year. Materials and Services have been proposed at $85,800.00 to cover the election boards; however, the recommended figure is $80,000.00. The proposed budget is $134,633.00 and the recommended budgtet is $128,833.00. LAW LIBRARY The projected revenue is proposed and recommended in the amount of $119,000.00 The proposed and recommended budget requirement is $119,000.00. WATERMASTER The Watermaster.'s Department is funded.by :Crook, Jefferson, and Deschutes County with a small portion funded by Klamath County. Electricity and water is being included in the budget since a move of offices has been made. The projected revenue is proposed -and recommended in the amounE of $41,322.00. SCHOOL FUND An increase of $355,660.00 in revenues generated from forest receipts is proposed and recommended. The proposed and recommend- ed budget figure is $1,911,023.00. The proposed and recommended budget requirement is $1,911,023.00. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING LOAN FUND Postponed until Commissioner Maudlin is available for discussion. BUSINESS LOAN FUND Commissioner Tuttle requested this item be postponed pending the pre-closing of title for $500,000 business loan fund grant to Deschutes County. DATA PROCESSING Revenues in the amount of $6,500 are projected from fees acquired from access to the main frame computer by three Title Companies. The proposed budget requirement is $304,768.00 and the recommend- ed budget requirement is $305,768.00. Chairman MacKenzie adjourned the meeting at 3:15 p.m. VOL 65 FACF276 DE TES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LAURENCE A. T TTLE, CHA AN S STOW PRANTE, COMMIS IONER I/ 0/��f DICK MAUDLIN, COMMISSIONER BOCC:kbw VOL 65 FAcF 277 1985/86 BUDGET MESSAGE These last two years of limited services and cost-effective operations have provided the County with a reasonable carry over. A decision facing the Budget Committee is whether to maintain present limited service and a four-day week, reserving the carry over for a future rainy day, or to increase the services to the voters of Deschutes County. As Budget Officer, I recommend increased services. I believe that the carry over would not have a significant impact on the 86/87 year budget without a new tax base. In evaluating the recommended Deschutes County Budget for 1985/86, 1 ask -you .to take into account -the substantial changes which have occurred over the last six years. 1. Six years ago, Deschutes County had a population of 49,000 people. Today the population is 64,000. This represents a 29% increase. 2. Six years ago, the True Cash Value of Deschutes County was just over one billion dollars ($1,146,305,889.00). Today the True Cash Value is almost two and a half billion dollars ($2,485,582,434.00). This represents a 116% increase. 3. In six years, the inflation rate has increased nearly 400. 4. The recommended 1985/86 General Fund Budget calls for 33% fewer employees than did the budget of six years ago. This transition has been demanding. Maintaining reasonably adequate services to an increased popula- tion with minimum staff and reduced hours does not happen automatically. Deschutes County is fortunate to have dedicated and competent employees. We have reorganized departments, implemented money -saving procedures and committed ourselves to a County -wide automation program. The results of these efforts are significant when one compares total expenditures per capita to our neighboring counties. According to the Bureau of Governmental Research, Deschutes County spends 17.50 less per capita than Jefferson County; 19.5% less than Klamath County; 37.5% less than Crook County; and 7% less than the State average for all Oregon Counties. With respect to the general administration expenditures, Deschutes County spent 39% less than the State average. 1 VOL 65 PACE 2 18 The cutbacks made in Deschutes County in June of 1983 were made after the defeat of our levy. The subsequent savings enable us now to provide much needed additional services this coming year. (See attached.) We can increase services either of two ways: Add significantly to our present staff and remain on a four day week, or add a few people and increase the hours of the existing staff. The increased hours will enable us to use the training and the experience of the people we have. Should cut-backs come in the future it is less disruptive and less costly to reduce hours than lay off employees. I also believe that we will experience some increased production on a five day 37.5 hour week. Recommended in this budget are several changes. - Because of substantial workload increases additional staff is recom mended in the following departments: * Assessor's Office * Board of Commissioners' Office * Building Maintenance * District Attorney * Juvenile Department * County Counsel * Administration and Personnel * Solid Waste * Mental Health * Community Development - Because of the likely elimination of General Revenue Sharing, several major ongoing expenses have been shifted to the General Fund. These include maintenance on data processing equip- ment, a portion of the mental health and juvenile budgets, capital outlay expenses, memberships, and dues. - Because we have realized significant savings in operational expense, this recommended budget proposes a return to a 37.5 hour, five day per week operation for all General Fund employees effective October 1, 1985. Office hours would be 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. As Budget Officer, I stongly support returning County operations to a five day, 37.5 hour work week, believing this provides a maximum return on service -delivery dollars. However, we must be aware that the County cannot continue indefinitely to provide 2 VOL 65 FADE 279 this level of service on our present tax base. It will be my recommendation that in May of 1986, when we are required to present a tax base to the voters, that the tax base cover the General Fund, Sheriff and Library operations. I am convinced that the days of pouring money on problems in order to resolve them are over, and never again will dollars flow copiously into public coffers. Stringent budgetary controls and effective management are and will be necessary if local govern- ment is to continue to provide the services for which it is charged. It is also important for the citizens of Deschutes County to realize that the tax base paid for by property owners accounts for 20% of General Fund opc-rations an3,approximately 4% of the total County operation. Deschutes County infuses into this community over $25,000,000.00 in salaries, purchases and capital operations. This budget for 1985/86 provides the citizens of Deschutes County with solid value for tax dollars spent on services we render. 3