1988-01784-Resolution No. 88-002 Recorded 2/1/1988CAL Y t L. ' A;/ E
88 -01754 NSEL
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DES nu'ltb cuLTNTY,-J-OR'EGON
A Resolution Approving the Depart- *
ment of Public Works Program Bud- *
get, Adopting Policies for Major *
Road Capital Improvement Program *
and Prioritizing Candidate Roads *
by Categories. *
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -002
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department budget, as annually
adopted, provides for revenue expenditures on a line item basis;
and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has provided the Board
of County Commissioners with the 1987 - 1988 Budget Overview
setting forth the Department's budget as programs and policies
and prioritizing present and future resources to candidate roads
by categories; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
1987 - 1988 Budget Overview and program expenditures, policies
and priorities as set forth herein; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON as follows:
Section 1. The Board of County Commissioners of Deschutes
County, Oregon, hereby releases the document and adopts that
portion entitled "Major Road Capital Improvement Program, Polic-
ies and Criteria" of the Department of Public Works 1987 - 1988
Budget Overview as set forth in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and
by this reference incorporated herein.
DATED this DI/ iday of aXteati , 1988.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF I •CHUTE ) COUNTY, ,bEGON
ATT ST:
Recording Secretary
1 - RESOLUTION NO. 88 -002
LO PRANTE, Commissioner
/1(/ i/:4•'
TOM OOP ommissioner
DICK MAUDLIN, Chairman
i, CROFILMED
FEE; 4 i988
77
1987 - 1988 BUDGET OVERVIEW
0090-0497
CANDIDATE COUNTY ROADS THAT WILL BE
HARD SURFACED THROUGH THE ROAD MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
/, <OFILMED
FIE) 4 i988
0090-0498
CANDIDATE COUNTY ROADS FOR REVERSION TO PUBLIC ROAD STATUS
1. A -29 Livesay Road (Melvin Road)
2. A -32 Shattuck Road
3. B -02 Barr Road
4. B -09 Harper Road
5. B -17 Thorpe Road
6. B -25 Newcomb Road
7. B -54 A.J. Warrin Road
8. C -09 Hunt Road
9. C -10 Warrin- Jordan Road
10. C -11 W. Lambert Road
11. C -29 Jaeger Road
12. C -34 Simmons Road
13. C -36 Redmond - Powell Butte Road
14. C -68 Stockyard Road
15. C -70 504 Road
16. D -08 Cardwell Road
17. D -14 Horner Road
18. D -17 Morrill Road
19. D -18 McGilvray Road
20. D -20 McNaught Road
21. D -22 Ogles Road
22. D -27 walker Road
23. D -37 McIntosh Road
24. D -39 McCune Road
25. D -56 Ward Road
26. E -03 Pierce Road #1 (portion)
27. E -07 Pierce Road #2
28. E -43 Harper Townsite Road
29. F -01 Ford Road
30. F -04 Stookey Road
31. G -04 Montgomery Road
32. G -05 Schraeder Road
0090 -0499
CANDIDATE COUNTY ROADS THAT WILL BE HARD SURFACED
THROUGH THE ROAD MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
DIRT ROADS
NAME OF ROAD MILEAGE
1. Anderson Court 0.24
2. Livesay Road * 4.90
3. Frontage Road 0.20
4. Sisemore Road 7.00
5. Harper Road * 0.96
6. Hunnell Road 3.80
7. Newcomb * 1.49
8. West Lambert * 2.97
9. Redmond - Powell Butte Road 2.92
10. Horner Road * 4.70
11. Morrill Road * 7.54
12. McGilvray Road * 2.20
13. McGrath Road (c) 0.53
14. St. Clair (c) 3.75
15. Fred Meyers Road 0.42
16. Gribbling Road 1.65
17. Old Deschutes Road 0.23
18. Pierce Road #2 1.20
19. Crawford Road 5.00
20. Harper Townsite Road 1.53
21. Montgomery Road * 10.16
22. Schraeder Road * 12.16
* Indicates roads that can be reverted to public status
(c) Denotes collector status
P,;', ti;wFILMED
.1,666
0090 '-0500
CANDIDATE COUNTY ROADS THAT WILL BE HARD SURFACED
THROUGH THE ROAD MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
CINDER ROADS
NAME OF ROAD MILEAGE
1. Couch Market Road 0.99
2. Tyler Road 2.10
3. Glen Vista Road 0.32
4. Hardy Road 0.17
5. Tumalo Creek Road 1.05
6. Harrington Loop 2.04
7. 3069 0.72
8. Awbrey Butte Road 0.68
9. Shattuck Road * 1.00
10. Barr Road * 6.72
11. Gift Road 0.62
12. S.W. 61st Street 0.55
13. Sturgeon Road 0.97
14. Fryrear Road (c) 3.96
15. Olson Road 0.20
16. Twin Bridges Bridge 1.08
17. 1151 Road 0.45
18. S.W. 35th 0.08
19. Wilt Road (c) 4.87
20. Doney Road 0.71
21. Lower Bridge Road 1.25
22. Weston Road 0.34
23. N.E. 13th Street 0.62
24. N.E. Eby Avenue 0.25
25. N.W. 19th St. 0.23
26. Perit Huntington Road 0.32
27. Buckhorn (c) 4.30
28. Crossroad #2 0.16
29. N.E. Sedgewich Avenue 0.87
30. Tetherow Road 1.28
31. Waugh Road 0.50
32. Willard Road 0.25
33. Schmidt Road 0.74
34. County Line Road 1.00
35. Ross Road 0.35
36. Pierce Road #1 6.17
37. Masten Road (c) 1.47
38. Chief Paulina Drive 0.37
39. Huntington Road 2.36
40. Covina Road 0.75
41. Grinstead Road 2.50
42. Fort Rock Road 2.70
43. Pine Mountain Road 3.38
44. Newt Morris Road 1.46
45. Finley Butte Road 0.97
46. Merrill Road 21.50
47. Van Lake Road 4.13
L cROFILMCt
F b 4 iJod
* Indicates roads that can be reverted to public status
(c) Denotes collector status
•
0090 -0502
m: aoFriMED
FEB 4. 1988
DESCHUTES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1987 -1988
BUDGET OVERVIEW
For a copy, please contact Public Works at 388 -6581.
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
0090 =0503
t, %! C? OFILMED
Fcb4 1988
Contents Page #
Purpose Statement, Department Organization,
Road Fund Revenue 1
Departmental Fund Expenditures 2 - 3
1987 -1988 Revenue History Graphics 4
Executive Summary - Program Budget 5 - 6
Program of Services - Ofc. of Support Services 7
Programs of Service - Engineering Services 8
Programs of Service - Fleet Services 9
Programs of Service - Surveying Services 10
Programs of Service - Solid Waste 11
Programs of Service - Transportation Services12 - 13
Major Road Capital Improvement Program 14 - 15
Draft Policies for a MRCIP 16 - 19
Criteria Definations 20
MRCIP Candidate Roads 21 - 30
Program Budget Summary, Department of Public Works
Organizational Chart
0090-0504
PURPOSE STATEMENT: Our purpose is to present a readable
summary of the Department of Public Works budget and
operating programs of service.
M :Cr.0 NED
F� b 4 i88
THE DEPARTMENT PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC SERVICES:
— Preservation, maintenance, modernization of 1,467 miles of
roads, development, review; and construction of new roads..
— The operation of six landfills throughout the County.
— The maintenance and replacement of over 200 pieces of
motorized equipment.
— Surveying services ,records management and support of
public projects.
— Engineering Design services for County projects, project
construction inspection and land use conditioning.
— The administration of The Inn of the 7th Mtn. Special Sewer
District, The Solid Waste Recycling Program, and The
Special Bike Fund.
DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION
The Department consists of 57 full time employees within an
office of Support Services, the Division of Transportation
and Solid Waste Services, the Division of Fleet and Equipment
Services and the Division of Engineering and Surveying
Services.
The Department administers monies from several fund accounts.
Included are: Road fund, Solid Waste Fund, Bicycle Fund,
Solid Waste Recycling fund, Equipment Reserve Fund, LID
accounts, and the Inn of the 7th Mtn. Sewer District.
The estimates of forest receipts upon which the County bases
its budget are sometimes very inaccurate. Therefore, the
County must be prepared for the possibility of not receiving
the budgeted amount of revenue. If the Road Fund were to
find out midway through the fiscal year that twenty to thirty
percent of its revenues would not be received, there would be
a financial disaster. A substantial unappropriated cash
balance and contingency protect against this possibility.
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 1
069'a-0Z05
DEPARTMENTAL FUND EXPENDITURES .
The expenditures appropriation for the 1987 -88 fiscal year
total $8,951,822, summarized as follows:
ROAD FUND
Personnel services $1,653,994 (18 %)
Materials and services $1,449,530 (16 %)
Capital projects $2,810,740 (30 %)
Transfers (General Fund, Equip., Reserves, Insurance,
bike Fund etc. $1,406,287 (18 %)
Contingency $ 631,271 ( 7 %)
Unappropriated balance $1,000,000 (11 %)
Sub total $8,951,822 (100 %)
OTHER FUNDS
Solid Waste
Recycle Fees
Bicycle Fund
Inn of the 7th Mtn.
Sub total
$1,160,993
$ 10,197
$ 64,320
$ 64,958
$1,300,468
TOTAL $10,252,290
Assuming that there are no unexpected emergencies, the Road
Fund will have a cash carry over in the 1988 -89 fiscal year
of between 1.3 million and 1.5 million. The goal of the
Department is to reach 2 million.
CASH RESERVE REQUIREMENTS
Over the last 10 years, the beginning cash balance in the
Road Fund has averaged nearly two million dollars. The
beginning cash balance for the 1987 -88 fiscal year is
estimated at three million dollars. The main reason the cash
balance is a million dollars higher than the average is
twofold:
1.
Forest receipts received during the 86 -87 fiscal year
exceeded original projections by $600,000.00.
2. Two major capital projects scheduled for completion
during the 86 -87 fiscal year were delayed. This
resulted in nearly a $750,000 reduction in spending but
programmed for next fiscal year.
The uniqueness of the Road Fund .7peration, i.e.,
funding /expenditures, require that this fund in particular
establish and maintain a non- obli;ated beginning cash balance
of 2 million dollars. The rationale for this requirement is
as follows:
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 2
•
•
1. The months of July, August, and September are the
highest spending months for the Department. On the
average up to 40% of budget is expected in the first
three months.
2. Forest receipts revenues are not received by the county
until the middle of October. And then only 75% of the
revised estimate is distributed. The balance of the
forest receipt revenues is distributed in January.
3. The estimates of forest receipts upon which the county
bases its budget are sometimes very inaccurate.
Therefore, the County must be prepared for the
possibility of not receiving the budgeted amount of
revenue. If the Road Fund were to find out midway
through the fiscal year that twenty to thirty percent of
its revenues would not be received, there would be a
financial disaster. A substantial unappropriated cash
balance and contingency protect against this
possibility.
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 3
t i1C7‘0111. D
F.L6, "9
•
0094= -0507
W
aa
. Q f CROFfl. ED
b 4 1988
W
00
00
00
CO
N
00
. .
. 3
3
. .
. .
3 .
. .
3 3
3 .
3 .
3 3 .
'
3
3 —
to 1
s:z :\ .
{.+Y+� ; jl
L.� . j
3
U ,
.
J 04
co 0 co ;
1-- co
•
•
•
F—1 r •
E_ 1
w� C`A'• ,
G Z. :
U U,1 CI)
r .
U1 C4
1-
.
0
co
W
ci
.
t9
•
F L
;
1 4.
3 s
i 1 'I
I/
W
A co
00 0
CU H
t LA-
CO
00
N
t9
00
00
oo
C`-
L`-
to
tU
PAGE 4
•
Q
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROGRAM BUDGET
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 5
0090 -0508
t :CROFILMED
ci 1938
FORWARD:
0090 -0509
rr is c iOFILMED
'888
Department of Public Works has initiated a Program Budget to
supplement the traditional line item budget. The program
Budget is a management tool devised to enable the
Commissioners, the Budget Committee and Department Managers
to better allocate and track expenditures. The Department's
cost accounting system will account for all expenditures in
terms of "Programs of Service ". A summary of those programs
of service follows.
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 6
OO9O -O51O
•
1987 -1988
PROGRAM OF SERVICES
OFFICE OF SUPPORT SERVICES
2% of Total
OBJECTIVES:
To provide administrative, purchasing, accounting, personnel,
business management, data management, and human resource
support services to the operating divisions. The nature of
this office is overhead and includes monies for rent, power,
general office supplies, insurance, building and grounds
maintenance. The office also manages the Inn of the 7th
Mountain Sewer District.
SUB SERVICE PROGRAM
SUB PROGRAM OF SERVICE
MAN MONTHS COSTS
Management Analyst 10 ( 32,090]
Accounting & Personnel 21 (253,952]
Building & Grounds 0 (251,300]
Secretarial 21 ( 64,7381
Data Management 4 (110,577]
Director 10 ( 58,326]
Inn of the 7th Mountain Sewer District 0 84,475
New Equipment 0 104,472
TOTAL IN OVERHEAD 66 [770,983]
TOTAL NOT IN OVERHEAD 188,947
NOTES: 1. Actual working man months
2. [ -$ -] means included as an overhead to other
services
3. Not included as an overhead item
1
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 7
1987 —1988
PROGRAMS OF SERVICE
ENGINEERING SERVICES
3% of Total
OBJECTIVES:
0090 -9511
1..1:CROFILMFD
To provide Engineering Design, Traffic and Development
services to the public, contractors, and staff.
SUB — PROGRAM
MAN MONTHS COSTS
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
* Land Use 1 4,200 4%
* Plans & Specifications 9 53,000 51%
* Public Information 5 25,000 24%
* Special Projects 4 21,339 21%
IP- TOTAL 19 $103,539 39%
TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES
* Accident Surveillance 2 12,000 14%
* Traffic Studies 2 17,453 21%
* Traffic Control Meeting 2 17,800 21%
* Hazard Inventory 2 17,000 20%
* Road Inventory 4 19,500 24%
TOTAL 12 $83,753 31%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
* Project Inspection 6 31,680 40%
* Utility Inspection 2 12,500 16%
* Subdivisions & Partitions 3 14,500 18%
* Contract ADM 2 10,000 13%
* Permit ADM 2 10,000 13%
TOTAL 15 $78,680 . 30%
PROGRAM TOTAL
•
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 8
46 $265,972 100%
1987 -1988
PROGRAM OF SERVICE
FLEET AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FLEET SERVICES
4% of Total
OBJECTIVE:
0090-0512
To purchase, service and repair, the Department fleet of
passenger vehicles, and other County vehicles.
SUBPROGRAM OF SERVICES MAN MONTHS COSTS
FLEET SERVICES
* Fleet Servicing 5 ( 50,000] 22%
* Fleet Repair 8 ( 71,897] 32%
* Fleet Inventory and Supplies 12 (101,200] 46%
* County Fleet 20,000
TOTAL 25 (223,097] 21%
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
OBJECTIVES:
To purchase service and repair the Department's heavy
equipment.
SUBPROGRAM OF SERVICE MAN MONTHS COSTS %
* Equipment Service 54 (453,362] 40%
* Purchasing 2 [ 15,000] 3
* Field Service 11 ( 95,362] 21%
* Inventory & Supplies 25 (208,000] 46%
* Servicing 16 (135,000] . 30%
* New Equipment 252,118
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 9
126 ($906,724] 100%
151 ($1,129,821)
•
•
•
•
PROGRAM OF SERVICES
SURVEYING SERVICES
5% of Total
OBJECTIVES:
0090 -0513
To provide data management, map preparation, right -of -way and
field surveys to the public, contractors, and staff.
SUB - PROGRAM OF SERVICE
MAN MONTHS COSTS
SURVEYING SERVICES
* Topographic Surveys 2 14,000 7%
* Property Surveys 7 44,500 24%
* Route Surveys 7 46,000 25%
* Construction Surveys 4 22,000 12%
* Control Surveying 10 60,635 32%
TOTAL 30 $187,135 53%
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES
* Education and Training of
staff 4 18,000 24%
* Application development 4 19,645 26%
* GIS Development 9 38,000 50%
TOTAL 17 $75,645 21%
RIGHT -OF -WAY SERVICES
* Acquisition 6 20,000
* Acquisition 6 32,000 46%
* Vacation 3 18,000 26%
* Information 3 20,180 28%
TOTAL 12 $ 90,180 26%
PROGRAM TOTAL 59 $352.960 100%
Budget Overview 1987-88
PAGE 10
1987 - 1988
0090-0514
•
SOLID WASTE SERVICES
10% of Total
OBJECTIVES:
To provide convenient, economical and sanitary landfills for
recycling or burial of Deschutes County domestic and building
materials wastes.
SUB - PROGRAMS OF SERVICE
SUB-SERVICE PROGRAM MAN MONTHS $ COSTS
* Knott landfill Site 55 343,373 47%
* Demo - building Material
Wastes 29 149,151 20%
* Negus 22 115,253 16%
* Fryrear 12 61,016 8%
* Southwest 11 54,237 7% S
* Alfalfa 3 13,568 2%
TOTAL 132 $736.578 100%
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 11
1987 -1988
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
76% of Total
OBJECTIVE:
0090 -0515
a 5 4 i339
To preserve and maintain the existing road system; to
modernize the existing system by improving all arterials and
collectors to County safety, structure, and capacity
standards; to complete the County planned roadway and bikeway
systems.
SUBPROGRAM OF SERVICE
SUB - PROGRAM Man Months Costs %
PRESERVATION & MAINTENANCE
* So. Century overlay 0 100,000 3%
* Hamby Road overlay & safety 0 189,000 5%
* Romaine Village overlay 0 140,000 4%
* S.E. 27th overlay 0 100,000 3%
* Bend Revenue Sharing 0 356,436 10%
* Sisters Revenue Sharing 0 42,945 1%
* Traffic Regulation 21 183,506 5%
* Snow and Ice Control 22 273,600 8%
* General Roadway 163 2,156,683 60%
New Equipment -- 38,000 1%
TOTAL
206 $3,580,164 61%
SUB - PROGRAM
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY
* Alfalfa Intersection 0 61,000 43%
* Tumalo Intersection /Bailey Rd. 0 22,000 16%
* Misc. Spot Improvements 8 58,000 41%
TOTAL 8 $141,000 2%
SUB - PROGRAM
MODERNIZATION SERVICES
* Paulina Reconstruct 0 300,000 16%
* Hamhaltz R/W 0 60,000 3%
* Reed Market Reconstruct 0 620,000 32%
* Parrell Reconstruct 0 250,000 13%
* Burgess Rd. FHS Reconstruct 0 52,000 3%
* Redmond Revenue Sharing
(S. Canal) 0 359,365 19%
* Bridge Dr. Bridge (HBR) 0 27,000 1%
* Miscellaneous Intersections 0 111,000 6%
* Miscellaneous 1 18,000 1%
* Masten Rd. 4 42,000 2%
* Pengra - Hunnington 8 85,150 4%
TOTAL
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 12
13 $1,924,515 34%
0090-0516
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CONT.
SUB — PROGRAM
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
* Deep Woods 28 198,700 100%
TOTAL
PROGRAM TOTAL
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 13
28 198,700 3%
255 $5,844,379 100%
•
•i
•
• 0990 °0517
1
DESCHUTES COUNTY
MAJOR ROAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 14
(MRCIP)
t ,I Cs.;FILMED
•
•
0090-0518
M:; ;�OFlLMED
F i 388
MAJOR ROAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MRCIP)
The Department of Public Works is developing two new
management programs during 1987 -88. The first one is a Road
and Pavement Management Program. This program requires all
County right of way and pavements to be maintained ,field
inspected and rated as to safety, width, condition of
pavement, ditches, and traffic signs etc. A series of •
appropriate actions and their costs are then matched with the
inventory and ratings. The result is a priority pavement
maintenance management program.
The second program is a Major Road Capital Improvement
Program (MRCIP). This program lists candidate roads needing
safety improvements, modernization or an entirely.new road.
The candidate roads are weighted against Policies and
Criteria adopted by the Board of Commissioners.
Following is a draft of Policies and Criteria to be
considered by the Board of Commissioners and a list of
candidate roads in the categories of (1) Traffic safety (2)
Modernization (3) Transportation System (new roads).
Prior to the 1988 -89 budget years, the candidate roads will
be prioritized using adopted policies and criteria and a five
year listing of projects will be developed and adopted by the
Board of Commissioners.
A candidate road can be recommended by a citizen, an
organization, a public agency, or the Board and staff. All
recommendations should be forwarded to the Public Works
Director.
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 15
•
DRAFT POLICIES
FOR A
M R C I P
Budget Overview 1987 -88
PAGE 16
•
CANDIDATE ROADS BY CATEGORIES
0090-0520
tCFtLMED
•
•
•
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF
DESCHUTES COUNTY
MAJOR ROAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, POLICIES AND CRITERIA
FORWARD: The following Policies and Criteria were adopted by
the Board of County Commissioners by order # 88 -002. It is the
intent of the Board that they be applied to the preparation
and update of the Department of Public Works Major Road
Capital Improvement Program ( MRCIP).
The policies address the question of who is responsible for
funding major Class I or III road improvements to existing
public or County roads. The criteria speak to the allocation
of County monies for road improvements through the
establishment of project priorities or in the categories of
Traffic Safety, Modernization, and systems Development.
The policies and criteria do not address the allocation of
monies to Class II Projects, ROAD PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES. The Department of Public Works comprehensive ROAD
AND PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT program will be the
vehicle to establish the annual Program of Preservation.
The following definitions will apply to these policies and
criteria:
1. ARTERIAL ROAD; A restricted access street of substantial
continuity which is primarily a traffic arterial and so
designated by the County;
2. AVAILABLE RESOURCES; Those monies remaining in an annual
department budget after deducting expenses for overhead,
administration, County services, reserves, unappropriated
funds, dedicated accounts, and road preservation services.
3. BICYCLE LANE; A portion of a roadway which has been
designated by striping, signing and pavement markings for the
preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists.
4. BICYCLE ROUTE (BIKE ROUTE) - A segment of a system of
bikeways designated by the jurisdiction having authority with
appropriate directional and informational markers.
5. CLASS I AND III PROJECTS; Those projects that require a
land use action by the County or an Environmental Assessment
(EA) or a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
6. CLASS II PROJECTS;, Those Preservation and traffic Safety
Projects that do not require a land use action by the County.
7. COLLECTOR ROAD; A restricted access street sup
fit; C:O Di
1 MRCIP
PAGE 17
mentary
0090- 0522
to the arterial street system used or intended to be used
principally for the movement of traffic between arterials and
local streets.
8. LOCAL ROAD; A street intended primarily for access to
abutting properties.
9. MAJOR ROAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; A priority
listing of road improvements to County bridges, arterials, and
collectors spanning a five year period. The MRCIP is updated
each year during the budgeting cycle.
10. ROADWAY; That portion of a street developed for vehicular
traffic.
11. SIDEWALK; A pedestrian walkway with permanent surfacing
generally located within a public right of way.
POLICIES FOR FUNDING RESPONSIBILITY
LOCAL ROADS: The entire cost of improving a local road is the
responsibility of the abutting or benefiting land owner.
COLLECTOR ROADS: (urban Area) Where frontage access exists or
is permitted, the benefited owner shall pay the estimated cost
of a local access road including parking if any, and curbs and
drainage. The County shall be responsible for costs
attributable to added structure and capacity, and a bike lane
if required, as well as signing and striping. Where access is
denied to a majority of owners of frontage property or the
majority of the traffic volume, existing or projected exceed
that of the access users, the County shall pay the entire cost
of the improvement except as otherwise provided for as a
function of a land use action and conditioning through the
development review process. Rural Area collectors are the
responsibility of the County.
ARTERIAL ROADS: The County is responsible for the entire cost
of the improvement except as otherwise provided for as a
function of a land use action and conditioning through the
development review process.
The above improvements include bridges, but do not include
sidewalks which are a function of ti,, benefited owner or as
provided for through a sidewalk ord:%ance or a land use
action.
CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING
PROJECT PRIORITIES
The following priorities, percentages allocations and criteria
apply to the development of the Department of Public Works
Major Road Capital Improvement Program (MRCIP). The MRCIP
•
•
•
•
4..
•
009.0 =0523
criteria apply to the development of the Department of Public
Works Major Road Capital Improvement Program (MRCIP). The
MRCIP consists of class I and III Projects on County
Collector and Arterial roads and bridges.
PRIORITY 1. Traffic Safety Projects which require the
vertical or horizontal realignment of the road.
Funding Range: Between 10% and 40% of available resources.
PRIORITY 2. Cooperative projects where funding is provided in
part by a Federal or State agency, another local public
agency or through a LID or other cooperative program.
Funding Range: Between 10% and 40% of available resources.
PRIORITY 3. Economic development projects that are required
to support the creation of new employment centers or the
retention of existing employment centers.
Funding Range: Between 10% and 40 %.
PRIORITY 4. Modernization Projects and Transportation System
projects. Modernization Projects are right of way
acquisition, structure, width, and drainage improvements
designed to a line and grade, and constructed as required to
meet County adopted road standards. Transportation System
Projects are new roads and right of way identified in the
adopted County Transportation Plan as necessary to meet
transportation system needs.
Funding Range: Between 20% and 40% of available resources.
NOTE 1: The minimum percentage of funding for each priority
shall be allocated to each annually, however one priority can
borrow from another for special projects except no borrowing
can occur from Priority 1, Traffic Safety. Borrowed monies
must be repaid within two fiscal years.
CRITERIA WITHIN PRIORITIES
Within the above criteria the following additional criteria
shall be applied to distinguish between competing projects:
Each criteria shall be given rating points.
3 MRCIP
PAGE 19
J;',:ysOFl! LAMED
CRITERIA DEFINITIONS
0090 -0524
ACCIDENT TYPE AND FREQUENCY. MAXIMUM 25 POINTS
10 = fatality; 15 = >4 injuries; or 10 = >4 property
damage; or 6 = >2 accidents; 3 = >0 accidents. 0 - no
accidents.
EXISTING ADT AND FUTURE ADDITIONAL ADT (EACH). MAXIMUM 20
POINTS
10 = 5,000; 6 = 3,000 to 5,000; 3 = 1,000 to 3,000; 0 = <
1,000
MAINTENANCE. MAXIMUM 10 POINTS
10 = Reconstruction; 6 = More Than Average; 3 = Average; 0
_ < Average.
CITIZEN CONCERNS. MAXIMUM 10 POINTS
10 = petition in support; 0 = petition against; 6 = public
hearing in support; 3 = public hearing against.
PROJECT READINESS. MAXIMUM 10 POINTS
10 = can be bid in fiscal year; 6 = bid in second year; 3
= bid in third year; 0 = schedule out four years.
NOTE! Plans will be authorized for all 5 year projects.
OF JOBS CREATED OR SAVED BY IMPROVEMENT. MAXIMUM 10 POINTS
10 = >50; 6 = 30 to 50; 3 = 10 to 30; 0 = <10
PART OR MAJOR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR. MAXIMUM 10 POINTS
10 = essential for arterial; 6 = essential for collector;
3 = staged construction; 0 = not a corridor.
BIKE LANE OR ROUTE. MAXIMUM 5 POINTS
5 = part of priority bike route or lane; 3 = part of a
planned bike route or lane; or 3 = necessary connection
with a bike path; 0 = none.
* MAXIMUM POINTS ARE 100.
FOOTNOTE:
Projects which have -been committed by the Board through
inter — governmental agreements or contract shall be
scheduled as required by the agreement.
PAGE 20
•
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
URBAN ARTERIALS (BEND URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY)
1. Cooley Road
2. Deschutes Market Road
3. Butler Market Road
4. Yeoman Road
5. Boyd Acres Road
6. Empire Avenue
7. Shevlin Park Road
8. Neff Road
9. Bear Creek Road
10. S.E. 15th Street
11. S.E. 27th Street
12. Reed Market Road
13. Arthur Avenue
14. Skyliners Avenue
15. Knott Road
16. Blakely Road
17. Brookswood Boulevard
18. S.W. 9th Street
Page 21
0090 -0525
;CFILAFD
iy�a
0090 -0526
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
URBAN COLLECTORS (BEND URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY)
1. Cooley Road
2. Yeoman Road
3. O.B. Riley Road
4. Briggs Road
5. Pettigrew Road
6. Chase Road
7. Brosterhous Road
8. Ferguson Road
9. Murphy Road
10. Parrell Road
11. Ponderosa Drive
12. Lodgepole Drive
13. China Hat Road
Page 22
•
•
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
0090 -0, i
URBAN ARTERIALS (REDMOND URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY)
1. N.E. 9th Street
2. N.E. Maple Avenue
3. S.W. 27th Street
4. S.W. Yew Avenue
5. S. Canal Avenue
6. S.W. Helmholtz Way
7. N.E. Maple Avenue
8. N.W. Maple Avenue
•
Page 23
0090 -028
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
URBAN COLLECTORS (REDMOND URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY)
1. N. Canal Boulevard
2. King Way
3. N.W. 10th Street
4. N.E. Hemlock Avenue
5. N.W. Hemlock Avenue
6. N.W. 19th Street
7. W. Antler Avenue
8. E. Antler Avenue
9. Lions Lake Road
10. S.W. Obsidian Avenue
11. S.W. 23rd Street
12. S.W. Reservoir Road
13. S. Canal Avenue
14. S.W. Quartz Avenue
15. S.W. Salmon Avenue
16. N.W. 35th Street
17. S.W. 35th Street
Page 24
•
•
•
0090 -0529
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
URBAN COLLECTORS (SISTERS URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY)
1. Camp Polk Road
2. Cascade Street
Page 25
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
RURAL ARTERIALS
1. Lower Bridge Way
2. Smith Rock Way
3. Holmes Road
4. N.W. 31st Street
5. N.W. Sedgwick Avenue
6. N.W. Almeter Way
7. N.W. Maple Avenue
8. N.W. Helmholtz Way
9. S.W. Helmholtz Way
10. N. Canal Bouelvard
11. S. Canal Bouelvard
12. Redmond -Bend Highway
13. O.B. Riley Road
14. Johnson Road
15. Deschutes Market Road
16. Butler Market Road
17. Neff Road
18. Alfalfa Market Road
19. Willard Road
Page 26
0090 -0530
•
•
•
•
•
•
CANDIDATES FOR M.R.C.I.P.
RURAL COLLECTORS
1. Sundown Road
2. Wilt Road
3. Camp Polk Road
4. Buckhorn Road
5. Three Creeks Road
6. N.W. 43rd Street
7. Chinook Drive
8. N.W. Ice Avenue
9. N.E. Wilcox Avenue
10. N.E. 33rd Street
11. N.E. Eby Avenue
12. N.W. Eby Avenue
13. N.E. 5th Street
14. N.E. Cayuse Avenue
15. N.E. 9th Street
16. Crooked River Drive
17. N.E. 1st Street
18. Cornelius Way
19. N.E. Knickerbocker Avenue
20. N.W. 19th Street
21. N.W. Odem Avenue
22. Pershall Way
23. N.W. Coyner Avenue
24. N.W. Helmholtz Way
25. N.W. 35th Street
Page 27
0090-0531
O€ O-O 32
26. N.W. Maple Avenue
27. N.W. Antler Avenue
28. N.W. 27th Street
29. N.W. 59th Street
30. N.W. Kingwood Avenue
31. N.W. 67th Street
32. N.E. King Way
33. N.E. Maple Avenue
34. Negus Way
35. N.E. 17th Street
36. Catlow Way
37. S.W. 63rd Street
38. S.W. 59th Street
39. S.W. Wickiup Avenue
40. S.W. Helmholtz Way
41. Cline Falls Highway
42. Fryrear Road
43. Cloverdale Road
44. Gist Road
45. Plainview Road
46. Couch Market Road
47. Collins Road
48. Tumalo Reservoir Road
49. Bailey Road
50. Johnson Road
51. Innes Market Road
Page 28
•
0090-0533
52. Gerking Market Road
53. Nichols Market Road
54. Pleasant Ridge Road
55. S.W. 61st Street
56. McGrath Road
57. Hamby Road
58. Stenkamp Road
59. Johnson Market Road
60. Bennett Road
61. McNaught Road *
62. Erickson Road
63. Dickey Road
64. Dodds Road
65. Torkelson Road
66. Ward Road
67. Arnold Loop
68. Bear Creek Road
69. Rickard Road
70. St. Clair Road
71. Baker Road
72. Shoshone Road
73. Zuni Road
74. Pima Road
75. Choctaw Road
76. River Woods Drive
77. Kiowa Road
* indicates roads that can be reverted to public status
Page 29
78. Cinder Butte Road
79. Cottonwood Drive
80. S. Century Drive
81. Spring River Road
82. Vandevert Road
83. Foster Road
84. LaPine Rec Road
85. Huntington Road
86. Day Road
87. 5th Street
88. Amber Lane
89. Deep Woods Road
90. Burgess Road
91. Dorrance Meadow Road
92. Sixth Street
93. Masten Road
94. Finley Butte Road
95. Reed Road
96. Paulina Lake Road
Page 30
0090 -0534
•
•
•
19 8 7-19 8 8 PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
•
•
0090-0535
1,V.;),Of11.140
-'6aB
P
a
1
a
8
8
3
'I
0 3
:110•00, its O 100 Pg ill
4
z"3.1
C") fil
IC
—
r M
.1' •037 —
0400 I H
11:14 § § §§ ( g
i21::::
eles
11 2
11.03, -fir-
a
Id
—
1 i Zm0i7
a ••ass
wsibi
ill Hai
7 PIM8s9 1
110F. �
I
Q M8519
•, ••••
v-Q
M
<
s MIR ig g
• ••
4 a W
i
1 Z7
• •0
•. UP
P$ 4
14007 • �1 m0s,
•••• 111 ;8 =• ••••
ii
• a
a
P4g
—
a
•••• It h
lig
:'I 1 14037 +
�•i••••� jib
:
1. .1 14007
;$ + •O beg a ..
dddil
11140:, !
I
golQ_
i
10
M :li
a
•
x8482
• ••••
e
g
QppQ pq ..
141 is
sa —
1
8J I
a�ss9 i
s
- -•
•
8
M
M
rP
r0 VO
IdNo
•
II 0
3 "Ili 7
! - h
0
0 V�
O +•
M M1
.: a Ms9 a
• • ••• • ~ Aro Is R 1 ss9
°41 as
aras9
.17:. IP 5°
ii-
1 As
3
IN =1 Sz a M29
.. •* • •••
. S g 18
Q16129
•i - -- g
FM :a
;;
gag 6
a
1
s • v a.
O • — • IY M
x x x x
1987/88 PROGRAM BUDGET
x