1989-11601-Minutes for Meeting May 10,1989 Recorded 5/18/19898s-11.vo.i
0095 1456
MINUTES
cr_
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
May 10, 1989=__?
Chair Prante called the meeting to order at 10:05 aifi- Boated:
members in attendance were Dick Maudlin, Lois Bristow Prante, and
Tom Throop. Also present were Rick Isham County Legal Counsel;
Craig Smith, Planning Director; Larry Rice, Public Works Director;
Dennis Maloney, Juvenile Department Director; Mike Maier,
Administrator; and Ernie Mazorol, Courts Administrator.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
Consent agenda items before the Board were: #1, signature of
89-91 Mental Health Division Intergovernmental Agreement/
Contract #09-001; #2, signature of Real Estate Option and
Warranty Deed for County property needed by Highway Division
for improvements on the O'Neil Junction-Redmond Couplet; #3,
signature of Resolution 89-031, approving third amendment to
Deferred Compensation Plan; #4, signature of Resolution 89-
030, approving agreement with Forest Service for construction
of Recreational Facilities and approving grant application to
the Marine Board; #5, signature of Student Retention
Initiative Application; #6, signature of MP-89-1 for Jess
Edgington in a Forest Zone South West of Sisters; #7,
signature of Correction Deed for City of Bend right-of-way;
#8, signature of Indemnity Agreement for LaPine Fourth of July
Parade; #9, chair signature of agreement between BLM and
Deschutes County Sheriff for supplementary law enforcement
services on BLM land.
THROOP: I'll move approval of the consent agenda items.
MAUDLIN: Second.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON REVISION TO CRITERIA FOR PLACEMENT OF MOBILE
HOMES
Before the Board was a public hearing on a revision to PL-15,
Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance regarding criteria to place
mobile homes. Craig Smith stated the change would allow
single-wide mobile homes which were less than 700 square feet
to be place in subdivisions where more than 50% (instead of
the previous 60%) of the existing dwellings were mobile homes.
Hap Davie stated that he appreciated the Board making this
change, but still opposed any limitation on the placement of
PAGE 1 BOARD MINUTES: 5/10/89
~
.i - 7-7777T-
0095 14 57
mobile homes. He questioned what would constitute a "site-
built" home, since many so called "site-built" homes in his
area were just shacks and should not be counted when the
percentages were figured.
John McGee, Whispering Pines, expressed concern that he
couldn't find a place to put the single-wide mobile home he
just purchased. He felt the problem was not with the size of
the mobile homes but with the people who occupied them. The
Board later announced that contrary to what he had been told,
the lot Mr. McGee had purchased would allow placement of a
single-wide mobile home.
Fred Janzen stated that unlike site-built homes, mobile homes
depreciated in value. He was concerned that when the double-
wide mobile moved from the lot next to him, a single-wide in
the neighborhood would move onto the vacant lot, and that he
would have to take them to court. Craig Smith explained that
existing single-wide mobile homes could stay where they were
but could not be moved onto another lot. Rick stated that if
the single-wide did move off its current lot, it could not
move back unless it qualified under the ordinance.
MAUDLIN: I would move first and second reading of ordinance
89-014 by title only.
THROOP: Second the motion.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
Chair Prante performed the first and second reading of
ordinance 89-014 by title only.
PRANTE: Entertain a motion to adopt.
MAUDLIN: So moved.
THROOP: Second.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
3. BUSINESS LOAN FOR OREGON PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Before the Board was preliminary approval of a Deschutes
County Business Loan to Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc. for
$60,000 to be used for working capital and the purchase of
equipment.
PAGE 2 BOARD MINUTES: 5/10/89
0095 1458
4.
5.
6.
THROOP: I'll move signature of the preliminary approval
letter.
MAUDLIN: Second the motion.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
ROCK PURCHASE FROM EUGENE MOORE FOR BACK TAXES
Before the Board was approval of the concept of an agreement
with Eugene Moore and Robert Riemenschneider to purchase
20,000 cubic yards of crushed rock for $55,000. The first
$22,500, which would be Mr. Moore's interest in the crushed
rock, would be deducted for back taxes owed to the County.
The remainder would go to Mr. Riemenschneider. The Board
agreed that Public Works should pursue the agreement.
ROCK PURCHASE FROM FOREST SERVICE FOR BURGESS ROAD PROJECT
Before the Board was approval for Public Works Director to
sign a mineral permit from the U.S. Forest Service to quarry
rock from the Deschutes Bridge site to use on the Burgess Road
project. All reclamation costs would be passed on to the
contractor.
PRANTE: I'll entertain a motion to approve the Public Works
Director to sign the contract with the Forest
Service.
MAUDLIN: So moved.
THROOP: Second the motion.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
WEEKLY WARRANT VOUCHERS AND REFUNDS FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Before the Board was approval of weekly warrant vouchers in
the amount of $174,594.27, and refunds from Community
Development.
PRANTE: Entertain a motion to approve upon review.
MAUDLIN:
THROOP:
So moved.
Second.
PAGE 3 BOARD MINUTES: 5/10/89
0095 1459
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
7. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Dennis Maloney submitted a written plan from the Community
Corrections Advisory Board regarding how they would perceive
the Community Corrections program should the County decide to
go to Option #1 and take over the program from the State. He
said the Advisory Board gave him a set of values to
incorporate in a draft plan, which were to spend Community
Correction dollars: (1) on situations where there was
imminent risk to vulnerable victims, particularly women and
children, (2) on the drug issue, (3) to secure services to
lock up parole /probation violators, and (4) to reduce the flow
of misdemeanants. He said they wanted a balanced approach of
first, Community Protection which would include
probation/parole enforcement, electronic monitoring and
evening surveillance; second would be Accountability, which
would include fast track accountability and work crews; and
third, Productivity, which would include work release,
substance abuse groups, and assaultive offender groups.
He stated that since the late 701s, the Community Corrections
case load had gone up dramatically while the resources have
remained the same. After meeting with the Judges, he felt
their main concerns were: (1) they wanted to see a good
working program before they would sentence anybody to it and
(2) they felt there was a conflict of interest in having the
same individual do the assessment that would end up treating
the individual.
He said the budget figures that were used in the plan were
the latest ones available, but that correspondence from the
very beginning would make it clear that the Deschutes County's
participation would be contingent upon a continued strong
commitment by the State. He also pointed out that the amount
of money spend on Community Corrections in counties of similar
size was very different, and he felt the amount spent in
Deschutes County was low in comparison.
Ernie Mazorol said that the County should attempt to negotiate
with the State before taking the program, regarding what core
services should be funded by the State. He felt strongly that
enhancement money should not be spent on pre-sentence
investigations.
Dennis asked that if the Commissioners were supportive of the
plan as presented, he would like to be instructed to work hard
on replenishing the losses of basic core services, and that
if the Community Corrections Advisory Board, meeting later
PAGE 4 BOARD MINUTES: 5/10/89
that day, made any adjustments
to represent the Commissioners
had to be submitted on may 15.
0095 1460
within budget, that he be able
interests, since the proposal
Commissioner Throop indicated that if there were major changes
in the policy of the program, the Board could look at them on
Monday, but if there were only minor changes, Dennis could
just let the Board know what they were.
Rick Isham stated that the County would be incurring the
liability that was previously held by the State if the County
took over the Community Corrections program, but that it would
be a reduced liability because of the way the County would be
handling the program.
THROOP: I'll move submission. I'd add as a amendment to
the motion, clearly that we asked Dennis to analyze
other comparable counties and see where we seem to
be deficient on core services and then authorize
Dennis to aggressively advocate on our behalf to get
core services comparable.
MAUDLIN: Second.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
J ~7 Lam, 2 ~U
Lois B 'stow Prante, Chair
t~
To Throop, Commissioner
Maudlin, Commissioner
BOCC:alb
PAGE 5 BOARD MINUTES: 5/10/89