1990-17624-Minutes for Meeting May 30,1990 Recorded 6/18/1990fit). r 0512
90-1'7624
DOG HEARING
P 2S 02 DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
May 30, 1990
E 34
fWU -
i-F
Chair Throop opened the hearing at 11:08 a.m. Board members in
attendance were Dick Maudlin, Tom Throop and Lois Bristow Prante.
Also present were Rick Isham, County Legal Counsel and Cynthia
Komurka, Animal Control Officer.
Officer Komurka testified that Bruce White, Assistant Legal
Counsel, would be unable to attend due to the length of another
hearing. She said that on the 21st of May she got a report of dogs
involved with livestock. She received a phone call from Nancy
Stevens, 126 NE King Way, Redmond, reporting some dogs in the
pasture at her residence, and she thought they had killed one of
her lambs. Later it was determined that the lamb was not hers but
belonged to a neighbor. At 2:30 pm that same day, Mr. Wagenblast,
who resided at 2036 N Canal and was a neighbor of Ms. Stevens,
phoned that he had shot a dog involved with his livestock. He was
the owner of the lamb that had been killed earlier that day. Mr.
Wagenblast asked Officer Komurka to investigate the incident. When
she arrived, she found a male blue heeler which had been shot by
Mr. Wagenblast. The dog was licensed to Mr. David Hart, 729 NE
King Way. She said she had dealt with Mr. Hart before concerning
problems with his dog. Mr. Wagenblast had told her that the other
dog involved in the incident was identical to the one that was
shot. Office Komurka then spoke with Nancy Stevens and her son
Jeffrey Hamilton. She did not speak with Ruth Grant, however she
was told that she was also a witness. Ms. Stevens directed Officer
Komurka to her neighbors. She then went down to the Lowery
residence which was directly east of Nancy Stevens and Ruth Grant's
residence. She spoke with Debi Lowery. Debi Lowery said she had
a blue heeler but the dog was not at the residence at that moment.
Mrs. Lowery mentioned that she had heard shots earlier in the day,
about 2-2:30 p.m. and had gone out to investigate. Officer Komurka
said about this time the Lowery dog came around the corner--it was
a female blue heeler with a red collar and looked very similar to
the one which Mr. Wagenblast had shot. When the dog came onto the
porch, she asked Mrs. Lowery if she could take a look at the dog.
She observed some blood on the dog's mussel. She did not check the
dogs teeth for wool because Mrs. Lowery indicated that the dog
might bite. It had been about three hours since the incident had
taken place. She advised Mrs. Lowery that she was required by law
to impound the dog, and that they had a right to a hearing. Kevin
Lowery then came home, and they agreed they wanted a hearing.
Officer Komurka impounded the dog and left a note at the Humane
Society asking that the shelter staff check the stool sample the
next morning.
Monna Lyon, Manager of the Humane Society, testified that the dog
PAGE 1 DOG HEARING MINUTES: 6/30/90
x.1011 0513
was brought into the shelter with a note to keep the dog separate
and to check the stool sample. They put the dog in a clean kennel
and the next morning there was a stool which was very black,
appeared to have blood in it, and was full of hair. The hair was
light colored and very short. She said it very possibly was from
a sheared sheep. She said the dog was still in the shelter. She
said the stool sample was completely full of hair which was
unlikely to come from the dog licking herself.
Ruth Grant, 126 NE King Way, testified that on the morning of the
21st she observed some dogs in the pasture while she was out
irrigating. She was irrigating in the pasture adjacent to the
pasture where the livestock were attacked. Ms. Grant identified
the picture of the dog Mr. Wagenblast shot as one of the dogs she
saw in the pasture that morning. She then identified the picture
of the Lowery's female blue heeler as the other dog that she saw
in the pasture that morning. She said both dogs were chasing the
livestock. She had heard the dogs barking. After finding the
injured lamb, she went to look for the yew when she hear the dogs
barking again. She was on the southeast corner of her property.
She saw a dog come out of a shed chasing the yews and lambs and
then the other dog came from around the rocks chasing more yews and
lambs and headed northeast. She yelled at them, they stopped and
then ran to the northeast. She went home and contacted Nancy
Stevens. Commissioner Throop asked if she could clearly,
positively identify both dogs in the pictures as the dogs she saw
chasing the yews and lambs in the pasture? She said she could.
Jeffrey Hamilton, 126 NE King Way, testified that he had seen the
lamb that was chewed. He heard shots around 2:30 pm and went to
Mr. Wagenblast's property where he witnessed the sheep that had
been chewed and the dog that had been shot. He identified the
picture as the dog that Mr. Wagenblast had shot. He identified the
picture of the Lowery's female blue heeler as a dog that lived
right across the tracks from him. He said this dog was usually
loose when he went by it, however he didn't witness this dog in the
field.
Mike Wagenblast, 2036 N Canal in Redmond, testified that he was the
owner of the sheep that were killed and injured. He identified the
picture of the dead dog as the one that he shot. He identified the
picture of the Lowery's dog as the dog that ran off when he shot
the first dog. He said the dogs were identical, with short bobbed
tails. He shot at the second dog but missed. He said he got home
about 10:30 a.m. that morning. His son said they had received a
call from a neighbor lady about dogs being with his sheep. They
went through the sheep herd and found one dead yew and
approximately 14 yews and 2-3 lambs that had been injured. They
then went to the neighbors to see about the injured lamb they had
reported. They brought the injured lamb (which later died) home
from Nancy Stevens. He brought home all his sheep to sort our the
injured ones and then went in for lunch. He looked out the kitchen
PAGE 2 DOG HEARING MINUTES: 6/30/90
101 -0514
window and his sheep were scattering everywhere. He went out and
saw these dogs chasing the sheep. He went back in and got his gun
and as he came out, one dog was killing a lamb so he shot it. He
shot at the other dog but missed as the dog was running towards
home. He said he was surprised that they were both dingles with
bobbed tails. He had not seen the dogs before. He said he had
shorn the yews about one week before the incident. He said they
had approximately 500 yews and 600 lambs.
Officer Komurka review some pictures she had taken with the Board
regarding the Lowery residence and the Wagenblast residence in
relation to the pasture area.
Kevin Lowery, 492 NE king Way, Redmond, and owner of the impounded
blue heeler dog, testified that his dogs were always in at night.
On the morning of the incident, he let the dogs out about 7:30 a.m.
when he left for work. When he got home that evening, Officer
Komurka was at his home and explained that his dog had blood on her
and that she had been seen chasing sheep. He said his wife had
heard the shots earlier in the day. She went out to see what it
was and called her dog "Blue." The dog came down off the little
hill with her two puppies which she always had with her. He said
a day or two before the incident, he had shot a rockchuck in the
field where the dog had been, and it was gone the day after the
incident. He thought his dog might have eaten it which could have
been the cause of the blood and hair in the stool. He said they
had had sheep in the past, and they had two baby calves. Their
dog played with them and never harmed them. He said there were
other dogs in the area that looked like his dog, and if his dog was
involved they would have seen three dogs because her two puppies
were always with her. Commissioner Maudlin asked Mr. Lowery if his
dogs were loose during the day, and he said yes.
Debi Lowery, 492 NE King Way, Redmond, said that if anyone had seen
"Blue" there would have seen her puppies, too.
Commissioner Prante clarified that the law was very clear and gave
no flexibility on the part of Board of Commissioners. Commissioner
Throop pointed out that if the Board conclusively decided that the
dog had been chasing livestock, injuring livestock, or killing
livestock, they would have to order the dog put to death by State
law. Therefore the Board's only role was to determine if the
evidence concludes that the dog in question was chasing, harming
or killing livestock.
There was discussion about whether or not the hair in the dog's
stool could be analyzed to get proof it was sheep's hair.
Commissioner Maudlin felt very strongly that there had been eye-
witness testimony identifying the Lowery dog as the dog seen
chasing Mr. Wagenblast's sheep, and therefore the Board did not
have any alternative but to have the dog put to sleep. Whether or
not the owners wanted to have a hair analysis done would be up to
PAGE 3 DOG HEARING MINUTES: 6/30/90
:7
101 - obis
them but it would not alter the Board's action.
MAUDLIN: I move that we proceed to have the dog put down.
Commissioner Prante pointed out that if the dog had been identified
as chasing the sheep without doing any damage, they would still
have to be put down.
Monna Lyon testified that most dogs that chase livestock do not do
so to eat them. They do it to play, and it could end up with the
livestock being killed.
Commissioner Throop said the evidence was very clear, the dog was
identified, and he didn't feel there was any choice under state law
but to order the dog put to sleep in a humane fashion.
PRANTE: I would second Dick's motion.
VOTE: PRANTE: YES
THROOP: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ois is tow rante, Commissioner
To Throo , Chair
/ickaudlin, Commissioner
BOCC:alb
PAGE 4 DOG HEARING MINUTES: 6/30/90