1992-19900-Minutes for Meeting May 27,1992 Recorded 6/3/19920118-0723
92-19900 S
MINUTEST N,
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS`,/",- /.
May 27, 1992
Chairman Maudlin called the meeting to order at 10 a.m. B6ard
members in attendance were: Dick Maudlin, Tom Throop and Nancy
Pope Schlangen. Also present were: Brad Chalfant, Property
Manager; Sukey Waller, CYSC; Jerie Schutte, Building Services
Manager; Mike Maier, County Administrator; and Rick Isham, County
Counsel.
1. PURCHASE OF LOT IN LAPINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
Before the Board was an application from Rick, Sharon, and
Pearl Riffle to purchase Lot 1, Block 2, in the LaPine
Industrial Park. Brad Chalfant said the Riffles proposed to
purchase the lot with cash. They would build a 601x 60' shop
facility to allow consolidation of their LaPine and Port
Orford truck repair shops. Their LaPine shop was currently
operating in a residential area, and this move would resolve
an ongoing zoning violation. This application was submitted
to COIC for review and their analysis was that the project was
feasible and the applicants' appeared to have the resources
necessary for the project. The LaPine Chamber of Commerce was
asked for their comments, however none were received.
Commissioner Throop said when he gave a speech at the LaPine
Chamber of Commerce, they were very vocal about this
application and the LaPine Industrial Park in general. He
said the community was divided over what they wanted the
industrial park to be. He suggested that the Board ask the
LaPine Chamber of Commerce to identify an Industrial Park
Committee to be used as an advisory body for the Board.
Sharon Riffle, 52787 Day Road, said going through this
application process was very confusing and frustrating, and
there was nothing in writing for them to know whether the
County wanted a small business like theirs in the industrial
park. She suggested the County streamline the process to
encourage businesses to come to LaPine.
Brad Chalfant recommended that the Board authorize this sale.
If approved, the money would be placed in escrow until the
conditional use permit and all land use applications were
granted.
THROOP: I'll move approval of the application by Riffle
Repair to purchase Lot 1, Block 2 in the LaPine
Industrial Park with the caveats that Brad Chalfant
outlined conditioned upon getting land use
approval, et al.
PAGE 1 MINUTES: 5/27/92'�..',t,'
�� f
2.
3.
4.
0118-0724
SCHLANGEN: I'll second the motion.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
PURCHASE OF WOOD ELEVATOR
Before the Board was a request to purchase a new wood elevator
for the Community Corrections wood yard. The current elevator
(a conveyor belt used to move the wood) was a safety hazard
and should no longer be used. They estimated it would cost
more to fix than to buy a new one which would cost $6,900.
Rick Isham pointed out that the public purchasing ordinance
required that there be written quotes for any purchase over
$5,000. The purchase would be made by the Public Works
Department and paid back by Community Corrections over the
next two years. Mike Maier said he felt it was critical that
this equipment be purchase as soon as possible.
MAUDLIN: I'll move purchase of the wood elevator subject to
the bidding process.
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
CYSC PLAN AMENDMENT
Before the Board was signature of a CYSC Plan Amendment for
the 1991-93 biennium. Sukey Waller said this amendment
corrected two errors which were made by the State.
MAUDLIN: I would entertain a motion for Chair signature.
SCHLANGEN: So moved.
THROOP: I'll second the motion.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PARENTS ACTIVELY CARING FOR
TEENS
Before the Board was signature of a Personal Services Contract
with Parents Actively Caring for Teens. Sukey Waller said
this was the first contract for the Community Action Program
Coordinator in the amount of $15,000.
PAGE 2 MINUTES: 5/27/92
5.
M
7.
SCHLANGEN: I move signature
Contract.
THROOP: Second the motion.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH GENE COTA
0118-0'725
of Personal Services
Before the Board was signature of an Amendment to Personal
Services Contract with Gene Cota. He had requested his hourly
rate be increased from $35 to $40 an hour, however Mike Maier
recommended that his current rate only be increased by 7%
($37.50) which was equal to the CPI which was granted to
County employees over the last two years. Mr. Cota handled
the County's phone installations and communication equipment
and did any excellent job. Mr. Cota agreed with this change.
MAUDLIN: I would entertain a motion we accept Mr. Maier's
suggestion.
THROOP: I'll move it.
SCHLANGEN: I'll second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MICROGRAPHICS, INC.
Before the Board was signature of a Maintenance Agreement with
Oregon Micrographics Inc. for the microfilm reader in the
Clerk's office.
SCHLANGEN: Move chair signature of maintenance agreement.
THROOP: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO RATIO REVIEW BOARD
Before the Board was appointment of Nancy Pope Schlangen, Pat
McVicker, Ken Johnson, Thomas Harris, and Donald Yeager to the
Board of Ratio Review. John Goodwin was selected as an
alternate.
PAGE 3 MINUTES: 5/27/92
0118-0'726
THROOP: I'll move appointments.
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
VEHICLE FORFEITURE ORDINANCE
Before the Board was discussion of a proposed vehicle
forfeiture ordinance and selection of a public hearing date.
Greg Brown said he, Sheriff Darrell Davidson, and County
Counsel Rick Isham met with the police chiefs from Bend,
Redmond, Sisters, and representatives from Madras who
represented Jefferson County. This group had unanimously
agreed upon the language in the draft ordinance before the
Board. The targets of the ordinance were persons who operated
motor vehicles in the County who were suspended drivers. The
suspended drivers who would come under this ordinance were
those who had been suspended for drunk driving, manslaughter,
criminal negligent homicide, attempt to allude, or any of the
major traffic violations. They also would go after people who
had more than one drunk driving arrest or diversion on their
record. He said the Cities of Bend, Redmond and Sisters would
also adopt this ordinance so there would be one unified
ordinance throughout Deschutes County. They were recommending
that the ordinance be effective August 1, 1992.
Rick Isham suggested that the Board set a public hearing on
this issue before adoption of the Ordinance.
Chairman Maudlin wanted to make sure that the cities were
willing to adopt this ordinance before proceeding. He asked
what would happen if the County adopted it and the Cities did
not. Rick Isham said it would be enforced in unincorporated
Deschutes County but not in the Cities. Greg Brown said the
working group was unanimous in recommending this language, and
Crook County had contacted him and indicated that they would
be adopting this ordinance. He said the Police Chiefs had
been in contact with the City Councils. He felt the County
should adopt the ordinance even if the Cities did not, however
he was confident that the cities would.
July 1, 1992, at 10 a.m. was selected as the date for a public
hearing.
MAUDLIN: I would entertain a motion for public hearing
regarding Ordinance 92-022.
THROOP: I'll make that motion.
PAGE 4 MINUTES: 5/27/92
0118-0727
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
9. ORDER 92-048 AND 92-049
Before the Board was signature of Order 92-048 authorizing the
refund of taxes pursuant to Board of Equalization orders; and
Order 92-049 authorizing the refund of taxes.
THROOP: I'll move consideration of the two orders.
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
10. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE VOUCHERS AND TAX OVERPAYMENT REFUNDS
Before the Board was approval of Accounts Payable Vouchers in
the amount of $190,756.57 and Tax Overpayment Refunds from the
Unsegregated Account in the amount of $5,338.69.
THROOP: I'll move signature.
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
11. DECLARATION OF DEDICATION
Before the Board was signature of road dedication for the new
Airport Way road just outside the City of Redmond, and
signature of acceptance of dedication.
THROOP: I'll move signature.
SCHLANGEN: Second.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
12. POSSIBLE FORMATION OF TRANSIT DISTRICT
Rick Isham suggested some possible courses of action if the
Board wanted to proceed with a November election on the
PAGE 5 MINUTES: 5/27/92
0118-0'728
formation of a transportation district in Deschutes County:
(1) assign someone on staff to be a resource to the citizen's
committee and monitor the development of the process to form
the district; (2) develop an economic feasibility statement
that would cover the issues raised by the Cities of Sisters
and Bend and that it should be a clear business plan which
would set forth the proposed operation and a line item budget
for three years; (3) go back to the cities and propose a
county service district, or take the next six months to
develop a economic plan and continue as a transportation
district.
Chairman Maudlin said he felt the proposed transportation
district was being pursued "before its time," and he would not
approve of the formation of another county service district.
He felt this issue had gone beyond the point where it could be
rejuvenated and made to work.
Commissioner Throop agreed with Chairman Maudlin and agreed
with Rick Isham's memo. He felt this proposal had suffered
from a lack of consistent advocacy in resent months, and the
formation committee hadn't understood the legal obligations
and time lines. He didn't feel there was enough of a "public
push" behind this proposal for it to have any chance of
passage. The calamity of events in recent weeks indicated
"there was just nobody minding the store." When a County
staff person was working closely with the formation committee,
everything went smoothing, however the County did not have the
ability to continue to make this staff time available, and the
issue should be carried by the public if there was going to be
any chance of it passing. He thought it was premature to
place this issue on the ballot, and that they should come back
and try again in 1994.
Commissioner Schlangen agreed.
MAUDLIN: I would entertain a motion that we do not initiate
the formation of the transportation district.
SCHLANGEN: So moved.
THROOP: Second the motion.
VOTE: THROOP: YES
SCHLANGEN: YES
MAUDLIN: YES
13. COOK PROPERTY ACQUISITION NEAR JAIL SITE
The Board had made an offer to Kenneth Cook, the owner of
property at 20309 Hardy Road, for $175,000, the appraised
value of the property. This offer was rejected. Rick Isham
PAGE 6 MINUTES: 5/27/92
0118-0'729
recommended that the County make no further effort to purchase
the property since (1) it was not critical to the development
of the jail and (2) it would not be available except for
substantially more than the appraised value.
The Board agreed.
DATED this !-�' day of
Commissioners of Deschutes (
t
N
V-'4' apL—Y4�
Recording Secretary D
PAGE 7 MINUTES: 5/27/92
1992, by the Board of
Z on .
I,Throo* 7issio er
::y Pope Wdhllangen, CommissilDner
Maudlin, Chai3!mg'n
w
„�"'I'� iaa��l
0118-0'730
Legal Department
OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ■ 1130 N. W. HARRIMAN ■ BEND, OREGON 97701
FAX (503) 388-4752
Richard L. Isham ■ 388-6625
Bruce W. White ■ 388-6593
Susan A Brewster ■ 385-1714
May 27, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: RICHARD L. ISHAM, Legal Counsel
SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
FILE NO.: 1-753
On May 12, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners sent letters to
the cities of Sisters, Redmond and Bend regarding the formation of
a transportation district in Deschutes County, Oregon. Attached to
that letter was a timeline setting forth the dates upon which the
formation process would have to proceed in accordance with ORS
Chapter 198 and ORS Chapter 267. The timeline was determined by
the July 16, 1992 date upon which the County Clerk was to issue
notice to candidates wishing to file for the district board
election. While there was sufficient time in the schedule to
proceed working back from the July 16, 1992 date, there was
virtually no time available for delay in the schedule. Since
publication date related to the formation order to be adopted by
the Board of County Commissioners under the process selected, the
schedule was arranged so that there would be no conflict under the
dates and timelines specified by statute.
In order for the Board of County Commissioners to initiate the
formation of a special transportation district under ORS Chapter
198, each of the cities within the proposed district must adopt
resolutions approving the formation order to be adopted by the
Board. The cities of Redmond and Bend both adopted resolutions in
due course approving the proposed order. The City of Sisters first
considered the order at its May 14, 1992 meeting. Representatives
from Citizens for Transit attended the meeting and made a
presentation. For whatever reason, the Board's order was not
approved at that meeting, ostensibly because the Council needed
more time to consider the proposal. It was learned that the
urgency in the timeline had been misunderstood by the member of
Citizens for Transit who made the presentation. The City of
Sisters was contacted to see if they might be able to hold a
special meeting to approve the order.
BOCC
On Thursday,
Sisters City
meeting to
information
endorse the
approve the
-2-
0118-0'731
May 27, 1992
May 21, I received a phone call from Barbara Warren,
Manager, who informed me that they held a special
consider the proposed order, but felt that the
supplied was conflicting and inadequate for them to
proposed formation order and voted unanimously not to
order.
This project has had a number of normal procedures cut short. The
reason why each of the cities must endorse the Board's order is
that this district is not being proposed by initiative petition.
Although petitions were gathered, they were not official petitions
because the required number of petitions that the Board requested
was less than half of the required number to put the measure on the
ballot. Additionally, although this project was initiated over two
years ago, no economic feasibility statement was prepared until the
week of the Council meetings for the cities of Sisters and Redmond.
One could read that an economic feasibility statement is not
required for a Board -initiated district, however, clearly, the
Board of County Commissioners must base its decision with respect
to the proposed tax base on some rational basis such as that
contained in an economic feasibility statement. An economic
feasibility statement essentially becomes a business plan which is
intended to answer those financial and special district formation
questions along with a description of its main purpose, its
proposed operations and as a justification for any necessary tax
base.
Although an economic feasibility statement as such was put together
at the last minute, it consisted predominantly of photocopies of
previous information and the final report from Weston Consulting
Services for Deschutes County funded by the Transit Division of the
State of Oregon.
There may still be time to change the project from a special
district with an independently elected Board of Directors to a
county service district and still have a vote on the proposal in
November, 1992. In my opinion, none of the other formation process
available, such as the special transportation district initiated by
Board order pursuant to Chapter 198 or by petition of the largest
city in the proposed district, is available.
Although the City of Sisters had questions regarding the proposal,
it should be noted that the City of Bend in discussions raised
similar concerns as to the scope of service, how the proposed
district would operate and whether or not sufficient service was
designated for the Bend area.
Due to the failure of the County's tax base and the extra burden
that a county service district could place on County resources,
BOCC
-3-
May 27, 1992
0118-0732
unless the Board of County Commissioners wants to revisit the issue
of the type of district to be formed it would be my recommendation
that: (1) the Citizens for Transit regroup and meet with each of
the cities; (2) develop a comprehensive business plan for the
proposed district meeting any concerns which are raised by the
cities to be served by the district; and (3) develop a new economic
feasibility statement and present it to the Board of County
Commissioners for initiation of special district vote in May 1994.
This would need to be accomplished within the next six months.
If the Board desires not to propose formation at that late date, in
my opinion, the proposal would have to be modified to a County
Service District. This gives additional time for formation since
no elected Board of Directors would be voted on in conjunction with
the proposal. This would not obviate the need to do a better job
of meeting the concerns of the cities and those cities that have
previously approved the project may not necessarily approve the
project in changed form.
Previously when Susan Mayea was involved, the project information
and communication moved smoothly. Susan was on top of timelines
that needed to be met and was well versed in issues that arose
regarding formation. In the absence of Susan Mayea, or some other
designated County representative, it has become difficult to keep
the project focused. The Board of County Commissioners needs to
decide whether or not it wants to take over this project, assign
staff to it and assure that it is done correctly or take a less
involved role in the process. When Susan Mayea and I met with
Citizens for Transit last fall, they were informed that in order to
assure adequate time for formation, all formation should be
initiated not later than February. It wasn't until sometime in
March that the showing of support was filed with the Board of
County Commissioners. Although in a nonlegal sense, six to ten
weeks of slippage may not seem important, except that losing those
amounts of time during the formation process create the kind of
crises that developed.