Loading...
1993-22028-Ordinance No. 93-015 Recorded 7/1/1993BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON An Ordinance Amending the Joint Management Agreement between Deschutes County and the City of Bend with Respect to the Bend Urban Area and Declaring an Emergency * r' 012'7-0363 ORDINANCE NO. 93-015 WHEREAS, Deschutes County and the City of Bend are parties to a Joint Management Agreement regarding land use planning and development activities within the Bend Urban Area; and WHEREAS, both City and County desire to alter the management agreement to reflect changes in circumstances concerning land use planning and development in the Bend Urban Area; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has after public hearing considered the recommendations of the public; now therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of Revised Management Agreement. That certain document entitled "Agreement between the City of Bend, Oregon, and Deschutes County, Oregon, for the Joint Management of the Bend Urban Area" dated July 13, 1982, as amended, is replaced by the revised joint management agreement set forth hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, area, overlay or other separable part of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto. KEYP ..�1EG 11993 PAGE 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 93-015 (6/23/93) �MrD /U(1 go? 4 012'7-OaW Section 3. Emergency. This Ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance takes effect on its enactment. DATED this - day of June, 1993. ATTEST: �-�17. "- Recording Secretary` BOARD OF �OUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCJiU ES COUNTY, OREGON , MChair NANCY POPE S HLANGEN, Commissioner &4�/j BARRY If. SLAUGHTER, Commissioner PAGE 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 93-015 (6/23/93) REVILV ED LE p, COUNSEL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEND, OREGO DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, FOR THE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF THE BEND URBAN AREA WHEREAS, the City of Bend, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Deschutes County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as "County", are authorized under the provisions of ORS 190.003 to 190.030 to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the performance of any or all functions that a party to the agreement has authority to perform; and WHEREAS, ORS 197.175, 197.190, 197.275, and 197.285 and OAR 660-03-010 require counties and cities to prepare and adopt comprehensive plans consistent with statewide goals, and to enact ordinances or regulations to implement the com- prehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goal No. 14 requires that establishment and change of the urban growth boundary shall be a cooperative process between the City and the County that surrounds it; and WHEREAS, City and County recognize a common concern regarding the accommodation of population growth and utilization of lands adjacent to the City; and WHEREAS, City and County have adopted and coordinated consistent comprehensive plans which establish an Urban Growth Boundary for the urban area and policies related to urban development and the provision of urban services within the Urban Growth Boundary; and WHEREAS, City and County recognize that as their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances are amended from time to time, that they shall remain consistent and coordinated with each other; and WHEREAS, City and County recognize that it is necessary to cooperate with each other to implement the urbanization policies of their comprehensive plans; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. Definitions. Initial Urban Growth Boundary (IUGB). The urban growth boundary line imposed on the BAGP and acknowledged in 1981 which identifies and encompasses urban and urbanizable lands. 1 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 0127-0 bo Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The boundary line imposed on the BAGP which identifies and encompasses the City, IUGB, and adjacent lands designated urban reserve. Urban Facilities and Services. Basic facilities that are primarily planned for by local government but which also may be provided by private enterprise and are essential to the support of development in accordance with the comprehensive plan. Urban facilities and services include police protection, fire protection, sanitary facilities, storm drainage facilities, streets and roads, water facilities, planning, zoning and subdivision control, health services, recreation facilities and services, energy and communication services and community governmental services (including schools and transportation). 2. Intent of Agreement. A. City and County hereby agree to establish a procedure for the imple- mentation of the UGB and the Bend Area General Plan (BAGP), both of which form an integral part of the City Comprehensive Plan and the County Comprehensive Plan. B. The procedures for implementation of the UGB and the BAGP shall be as specified hereinafter in this agreement. C. The provisions of this agreement, the BAGP and the implementing ordinanc- es, as amended, shall establish the procedure for review and action on the comprehensive plan amendments, implementing ordinances, land use ac- tions, public improvement projects, and other related matters which pertain to the UGB. D. It is hereby recognized that actions relating to the land within the City may affect the joint management of the UGB and actions relating solely to lands within the UGB but outside the corporate limits of the City may impact lands within the City. E. All actions as specified by this agreement shall be taken to assure that the City and County Comprehensive Plans remain consistent and coordinated with each other. 3. Comprehensive Plan and Implementing Ordinance Amendments. A. All legislative amendments to the BAGP and implementing ordinances, and all legislative amendments to the UGB shall be enacted in accordance with the following procedures: 2 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 0127-0367 1. Whenever City or County proposes a textual change in the BAGP or implementing ordinances, it shall notify the other jurisdiction of the proposed change. The jurisdiction so notified shall have forty- five (45) days to review the change and forward its comments back to the initiating jurisdiction. Provided, however, that if immediate passage of the proposed amendment(s) is deemed necessary, and shorter time for review and comment may be allowed by the initiating jurisdiction so long as the time allowed is not less than ten (10) days. 2. At the completion of the review period, proposed changes shall be forwarded to the Bend Urban Area Planning Commission for review. Following their review, the Planning Commission shall recommend to the governing bodies approval, disapproval or modification of the proposed amendments(s). 3. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, the governing bodies shall set a date for either a joint public hearing or separate hearings. 4. Within fifteen (15) days after the close of the hearing, the governing bodies shall adopt the findings of fact, and adopt, adopt with changes, or deny the proposed amendment(s). 5. If there is a disagreement between the governing bodies, either jurisdiction may seek review of the other jurisdiction's decision. B. An amendment to the BAGP maps or the zoning maps, shall be enacted in accordance with the following procedures: The City shall have exclusive jurisdiction for all quasi-judicial plan map amendments and zoning map changes for lands within the City limits. Provided, however, the City shall notify the County of the proposed changes and afford the County the same opportunity for review as set forth in Section 2 (A) (1) of this agreement. 2. The County shall have exclusive jurisdiction for all plan map amendments and zoning map changes in the unincorporated UGB (lands outside the City, but within the UGB). Provided, however, the County shall notify the City of the proposed map changes and afford the City the same opportunity for review as set forth in Section 2 (A) (1) of this agreement. K Joint Management Agreement cont. 0127-0 a 68 3. The applicable jurisdiction shall set a date for a public hearing on the proposed change in accordance with the City's or County's adopted land use procedures. 4. The City and County shall have standing to appeal all map amendments of the BAGP and zoning ordinance enacted by the other jurisdiction. 4. Review Process for Other Land Use Actions. The City and County shall use the following process for review and action on proposed land use actions which are being considered within the UGB. A. County shall retain jurisdiction over land use decisions within the unin- corporated UGB, and such decisions shall conform to these adopted policies: 1. Recognizing that unincorporated areas within the UGB could ultimately become part of the City, the City's recommendation shall be considered. 2. The County shall send to the City a notice of pending applications for land use action within the unincorporated UGB. The City shall have not less than ten (10) days to respond from the date of notifi- cation. City recommendations shall be included in the county staff report.. No response by the City staff to the request shall be presumed to mean no staff comment regarding the proposal. 3. The City shall have standing to appeal all land use decisions in the unincorporated UGB. B. The City shall retain jurisdiction over land use decisions within the City, and such decisions shall conform to these adopted policies: 1. Recognizing that land use decisions within the City affect the area outside the City and within the UGB, the County's recommendation shall be considered. 2. The City shall send to the County notice of pending land use actions within the City. The County shall have not less than ten (10) days to respond from the date of notification. County recommendations shall be included in the city staff report. No response by the county staff to the request shall be presumed to mean no staff comment regarding the proposal. 4 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 012`-03 3. County shall have standing to appeal all land use decisions in the City. 5. Review Process for Other Land Use Activities. The City and County shall use the following process for review and action on public improvement projects, and similar programs, projects or proposals which are allowed by State land use laws and which will apply to the UGB and within the City. A. The County shall seek a recommendation from the City with regard to the following items which are within, adjacent to, or directly impact the UGB and for which the County has ultimate decision-making capacity: 1. Capital Improvement Programs. 2. Functional plan, or amendment thereto, for utilities, drainage, solid waste, transportation, recreation or other similar activity. 3. Plan, or amendment thereto, for economic or industrial development. 4. Proposal for formation of, or changes of boundary or functions of, special service districts, as these terms are defined in ORS 198.705 and 198.710, except as provided in ORS 199.410 and 199.512. 5. Recommendations for designation of an area as a health hazard. 6. Other plans or proposals similar to the above. B. The City shall seek a recommendation from the County with regard to the following items which will affect the UGB and the City, for which the City has ultimate decision-making capacity: 1. Proposal for annexation to the City. 2. Capital improvement programs. 3. Functional plans, or amendments thereto, for utilities, drainage, rec- reation, transportation or other similar activity. 4. Plans, or amendments thereto, for economic or industrial development. 5 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 0127--00: �,0 5. Proposals for the extension of any utility facility lines or service area. 6. Other plans or proposals similar to the above. C. The initiating jurisdiction shall allow the responding jurisdiction forty-five (45) days to review and submit recommendations with regard to the items listed in Sections 4 (A) and (B). Additional time may be provided at the request of the responding jurisdiction and with the concurrence of the initiating jurisdiction. D. The initiating jurisdiction shall consider, and shall respond to, as appropriate, the recommendations of the responding jurisdiction in making its decision. No response by the responding jurisdiction to the request shall be presumed to mean no comment on the proposal. 6. Sewer Boundary. A. The City and County agree to establish a Sewer Boundary as the UGB. B. City shall provide sewage services to users within the IUGB on the same basis as such services are provided to users in the City. 1. The provision of sewage services by City shall be at all times consistent with and in the furtherance of all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and policy. C. County shall do the following: 1. Cooperate with City and the Department of Environmental Quality in the administration of all applicable laws, rules and regulations in the provision of sewage services and effluent disposal within the UGB. 2. Not approve the formation of sanitary districts or the like within the UGB, except as consistent with the BAGP. 3. Adopt appropriate legislation requiring the installation of sewage collector systems within all new subdivisions as a condition of plat approval. C.1 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 0127-05'd 4. Refer persons proposing new development within the UGB to the City of Bend for information relating to the extension of sewage facilities to the property being developed. 5. Adopt legislation requiring persons receiving land use permits for new construction in the IUGB to hook up to sewer facilities as they are extended to serve their properties. 7. Special Provisions. A. Annexations: 1. City annexation shall occur only within the IUGB. 2. Specific annexation decisions shall be in compliance with applicable land use law and be consistent with governing annexation policies of the City of Bend. The City will provide an opportunity for the County to comment on annexation proposals in the manner provided in Section 2 (B) (1) of this Agreement. 3. All the land within the IUGB may be annexed to the City. B. Urban Services: 1. The Sewer and Water Master Plan (1991) ("Master Plan"), as join- tly adopted, shall be the controlling guideline for future sewer and water system construction within the UGB until more detailed engi- neering consistent with the Plan's intent is available. City will extend water and sewer outside the IUGB only as allowed by state land use law. a. Annexation to the City will be encouraged over the formation or expansion of special districts. b. The County will not approve subdivisions or partitions required by the zoning ordinance to have sewer or water that are not connected to a sewer system and a water system consistent with the master plan. 2. The City, County and affected agencies shall coordinate the expansion and development of all urban facilities and services 7 Joint Management Agreement 0.27-05 N Cont. within the IUGB in a manner to promote early annexation of said areas to the City. a. Provisions for urban facilities and services shall be planned in a manner limiting duplication in an effort to provide greater efficiency and economy of operation. b. The City and County shall require urban facilities and services to be available concurrent with or prior to any development within the IUGB. C. Consider legislation establishing systems development type charges to be imposed upon all new development in the IUGB. County and City systems development charges shall be coordinated, and in compliance with applicable law. 8. Public Works Construction Standards. A. The County and City shall cooperatively develop development standards for sewer, water, fireflows, roads and drainage systems, in order to assure that an adequate transition may be made from a semi -rural to an urban environ- ment and from County to City jurisdiction. B. City shall be responsible for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan required by ORS 197.712(2) (e) with the aid and assistance of County. City shall coordinate the preparation of the public facility plan with the County, special districts, state and federal agencies and private providers of public facilities as required of OAR 660-11-015 (2). [Amended May 7, 1986] 9. Special District Coordination. A. When a special district situated fully or partly within the UGB has entered into an intergovernmental coordination agreement with the County and the City, it shall be given the opportunity to review and comment on the land use actions and activities as specified in Sections 2 through 4 of this agreement. B. If such an agreement is entered into, the special district shall give the City and County the opportunity to review and comment on the following activities which will apply to the UGB. 1. Public works projects to be provided by the district. 0 0.27-03 13 Joint Management Agreement Cont. 2. Plans for establishment, improvement or extension of facilities provided by the district. 3. Capital improvement programs developed by the district. 10. Enforcement. City shall be responsible for the enforcement of all land use ordinances within the City Limits. County shall be responsible for the enforce- ment of all land use ordinances outside the City Limits and within the UGB. 11. Review Amendment and Termination. A. This Agreement may be reviewed and amended at any time by mutual consent of both parties, after public hearing by the City Commission and Board of County Commissioners. B. This Agreement shall be reviewed, and may be amended, at the time established for review of the BAGP. C. Any modifications in this Agreement shall be consistent with the BAGP and County Comprehensive Plan. D. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following procedure: 1. A public hearing shall be called by the party considering termination. The party shall give the other party notice of hearing at least forty-five (45) days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The forty-five (45) day period shall be used by both parties to seek resolution of differences. 2. Public notice of the hearing shall be in accordance with applicable state-wide and local goals and statutes. 3. An established date for termination of the Agreement shall be at least ninety (90) days after the public hearing in order to provide ample time for resolution of differences. 12. This Agreement replaces the management agreement between the City and County dated July 13, 1982 as amended. That agreement is hereby declared to be null and void. N Joint Management Agreement Cont. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Urban Gowth Area Joint Management Agreement is signed and executed this 30., day of , 1993. CITY OF BEND, OREGON BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON Mayor ATTEST: Finance Officer Recorder Q:\PLN\UGB\JNTMNG.fnl 6/29/93 10 Throop, Chairman �rxzf�Q Nancy Pope Schlangen, Commissioner Barry Slabghter, ComrrAssioner ATTEST: Rec rding Secretary