Loading...
1995-04449-Minutes for Meeting November 23,1994 Recorded 1/12/199595-0.44=19 0138-00 k MINUTES DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Wednesday, November 23, 1994 Chair Nancy Pope Schlangen called the meeting to order at 10:07 a.m. Board of County Commissioners in attendance were Nancy Pope Schlangen and Barry Slaughter. Also in attendance were Dennis Maloney, Community Corrections Director, Catherine Morrow, Planner; Ralph Delamarter, Librarian; Scott Johnson, Commissioner on Children & Families Director; Brad Chalfant, Property Manager; Sue Stoneman, Public Relations Specialist; Brad Mulvihill, Juvenile Department Division Manager; Rick Isham, County Counsel; George Read, Community Development Director; Bruce White, Assistant County Counsel; Darrell Davidson, Sheriff; Susan Mayea, Support Services Manager; Andy Crosby, Assistant County Counsel; Damian Syrnyk, Planner; James Lewis, Planner; Kevin Harrison, Planner; and Dave Leslie, Planner. 1. SIGNATURE OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-114, DIRECTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL TO DEVELOP A JUVENILE JUSTICE WORK PLAN FOR DESCHUTES COUNTY Before the Board was signature of Resolution No. 94-114, directing the Criminal Justice Advisory Council to develop a Juvenile Justice Work Plan for Deschutes County. Denny Maloney introduced the Advisory Council. Judge Tiktin reported this was a statutory mandated council. He felt that juvenile justice was one of the most important issues facing the community. Jim Carlton, supported the fact that the County needed to take some action. Cal Krausch, board member for Commission on Children and Families, supported this resolution. Brad Mulvihill, Division Manager Juvenile Department, stated strongly supported this resolution as it was what was best for the community. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval and signature of Resolution No. 94-114. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED INJ 2. PUBLIC HEARING: ON ORDER NO. 94-136, TRANSFERRING 'OF}� REAL PROPERTY TO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Before the Board was a public hearing on Order No. 94-136, transferring of real property to Oregon Departme t of Transportation. KEYP �E 1995 0 0138-4018 Brad Chalfant reported this was to further the Parkway project. Chair Schlangen opened the public hearing. There being no testimony, the public hearing was closed. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature of Order No. 94-136, subject to review. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED PUBLIC HEARING: ON PERIODIC REVIEW WORK TASK 4 AND RIPARIAN AREA CUMULATIVE EFFECTS STUDY (RESOLUTION NO. 94-113) Before the Board was a public hearing on Period Review Work Task 4 and riparian area cumulative effects study. Catherine Morrow stated she had provided a packet last week which included a staff report, a draft of Resolution No. 94- 113, and copies of testimony that was submitted in front of the Planning Commission public hearing, and a copy of the draft cumulative effects analysis. She stated we were here to take testimony on the draft report and the resolution. She reported the resolution was to amend the periodic review order for factor one. She stated we were required to do this because we had a remand order which said we did not adequately address the cumulative effects of land use actions on riparian areas. A study was conducted to meet the requirements of the remand order. This study was to determine whether there had been any significant cumulative effects resulting from plan and land use regulation amendments and implementation actions on the acknowledged plans, factual base, map designations and policies which relate to statewide planning goal requirements. She stated in this case it was related to Goal 5. She stated they were trying to see if the land use actions, such as conditional uses, setback exceptions, flood planes, fill and removal, and landscape management review, on river front properties caused any cumulative effects to the riparian habitat that we are protecting under Goal 5. She stated the period that was reviewed in this study was from June 30, 1986 through December of 1992. The rivers and streams were shown on the map provided by Catherine. Catherine reviewed the summary of the findings. She reported there were 107 land use actions on these streams. Site visits were conducted to 70 of these properties. A form was used to record the data from the land use action file and the site visits to determine what the condition of the riparian habitat was before development action was allowed, what the conditions were in the land use MINUTES PAGE 2 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 0138~-0019 action that addressed protection of the riparian habitat, and whether, as a result of those conditions, the riparian habitat had deteriorate, stayed the same or improved. Of the 107 applications, 78 were on the main stem of the Deschutes, 16 were on the Little Deschutes, 3 on Tumalo Creek, and 3 on Squaw Creek. Most of the applications were in south county and most of the habitat deterioration was happening between Sunriver and La Pine. Parcels with extensive wetland areas have not experienced deterioration. Catherine reviewed photographs of riparian areas with the Board. Bruce White stated that he knew there was an issue with respect to septic systems in the south county. The 1986 River Study builds upon our existing plan which has recognized the area of the south county as an exception area which allows for dwellings to be sited on all of those plated lots. These lots were plated prior to any kind of land use planning and are recognized as exception areas. The plan has been that those parcels, for planning purposes, are buildable lots. He stated there has always been an assumption that those lots could be buildable. He stated that if there were assertions that somehow change the circumstance that come up because of increased septic approvals, those were always contemplated as potentially buildable lots. That was also part of the 1986 River Study. Bruce also stated that if you look at the Comprehensive Plan, it recognizes a drought as a natural hazard. This was recognized during the planning process that droughts do occur. He stated that does not constitute a change of circumstances in the intervening time for which this study occurred. Chair Schlangen opened the public hearing. Howard Payne read and submitted written testimony from Maret Pajutee which was in opposition. Howard Payne also testified on his own behalf in opposition. He stated he disagreed with the county's conclusion that the land use regulations for riparian habitat protection have prevented significant loss during the 1986 to 1992 study period. He submitted written testimony and some photographs for the Boards review. Howard Payne stated that another major cause for riparian damage occurred from cattle grazing. Aerial photos were submitted at the Planning Commission public hearing on this matter showing 100% loss in some areas. The county fails to impose grazing restrictions when they have the authority to do so in all zones except EFU. He submitted aerial photos of cattle damage done in the riparian and stream channels of Indian Ford Creek during the last 30 days in RR -10 zone lands. MINUTES PAGE 3 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 0138-0020 Howard felt it was the county's responsibility to fund and conduct a flood plane mapping of Indian Ford Creek. He stated the county had an obligation to protect its citizens from natural hazards. There are currently applications before the county for housing developments along the creek which could be within the 100 year flood plane and build -out could occur before FEMA gets around to mapping it. The county needs to implement an enforcement program that would protect riparian areas to the fullest extent. He felt that since the Community Development Department was supported primarily by permit fees, the fee structure should be adjust in order that full enforcement could occur. He felt that if land development was causing the damage, then land development permit fees should pay for the cost. Howard Payne stated that if Resolution No. 94-113 was approved as written, he assured that it would be contested at the LCDC level on the basis that it violates Goal 5, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3. He requested the Board to make a finding of significant cumulative effects and move this process to Phase II. Bruce White asked Howard Payne if he felt it was the development actions in the study period that actually caused that grazing to occur. For example, on Indian Ford Creek has that grazing always occurred. Howard Payne stated that apparently had. Bruce White asked if it would be fair to say that grazing had not then been increase or caused to happen by any development action the county has approved. Howard Payne felt it had not been caused by development actions the county had approved. It stated it was just another force and one needed to look at all aspects. If you are going to protect the resource, you have to protect it countywide. He understood that it could not be protected in the EFU Zone. Commission Slaughter asked if Howard Payne felt there was an overall net loss. Howard Payne felt we had a tremendous loss historically. Howard explained that there was a 1965 and a 1991 photograph of Black Butte Ranch prior to development. He stated the destruction had removed the riparian area, the golf course goes right to the stream side, it was mowed regularly and there was no chance for that riparian area to recover. Bruce White asked Mr. Payne if he felt there had been much loss of riparian area since 1986. Howard Payne thought that most of the loss had occurred prior to that time. Bruce White explained that Black Butte Ranch was permitted prior to the County's zoning. Howard Payne stated he realized that but he wanted to point out how much riparian loss had taken place even prior to 1986. Bruce White stated the cumulative effects were to analyze what the cumulative effect MINUTES PAGE 4 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 0138--0021 had been under the current effective land use regulations. Howard Payne stated that was right, but he felt one needed to look at the broad picture. Howard stated that if you have lost 50-75% of the riparian prior to 1986, and there was no enforcement action to prevent constant removal, there would be no chance for return. Commissioner Slaughter stated this county was almost totally undeveloped in the early 1900's. He felt there had been an incredible amount of riparian areas added to the county because of the irrigation districts being added throughout the county. He felt the County had maintained or increased the amount of riparian areas. Howard Payne stated that a tremendous amount of riparian area had also been lost because of logging practices. He stated he was contesting the inventory because the County had no base line information or picture of the lots. He felt the County did not know if the riparian was 10 feet or 30 feet. Jim Knapp, owner of most of the property in the Indian Ford Creek area, testified. He felt the vegetation was heavier now than it was previously on Indian Ford Creek. Ed Benton resides in the Indian Ford area. He addressed the rezoning of the flood plain in the Indian Ford Creek. Catherine Morrow stated some of the upland vegetation had deteriorated on 50% of the properties but she had not measured how much on each property. She read a written report from James Lewis, Planner. Bruce White asked if we protected the wetlands. Catherine stated yes. Bruce White asked if it was fair to say the 100 foot setback was under -inclusive of the "wet areas". Catherine stated that was correct and it would also apply in the flood plane circumstance. Bruce White asked if the 100 foot setback in other areas was over -inclusive of what was typically viewed as riparian wetland type areas. Catherine stated there were a lot of distinctions that were made about riparian habitat. She stated they made the distinction in the study as to upland and riparian habitat. In the ESEE it stated the 100 foot setback was significant to the habitat. She stated the Department of Forestry used the 100 foot setback in their hierarchy of riparian protection and they have different classifications for the area immediately adjacent. Bruce White clarified that there are exception of the 100 foot setback from the streams but that it was under very restrictive rules. Catherine stated the setback exceptions were granted under certain circumstances. MINUTES PAGE 5 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 0138-0022 Commissioner Schlangen asked if we had a lot of exceptions. James Lewis reported that out of 70 properties there were 11. In these 11 exceptions, most of them were granted because of the odd or irregular shaped lots. The amount of the deterioration varied on the properties with the exceptions, but the number of those were small. Catherine stated the setback exception did not cause the deterioration, it was caused the lack of compliance. Bruce White stated most of the lots with the exceptions were platted in the south county prior to the land use regulations. He stated we allowed an escape valve through our exceptions processes to site closer than our 100 foot setback in certain situations where otherwise the lot would not be buildable. The county did not say that once the 100 foot setback has been breached someone could locate 10 feet from the stream. The county said the 100 foot setback could be violated to the extent to site the dwelling. Chair Schlangen closed the public hearing. A work session will be scheduled for a future date. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: ON ORDER NO. 94-152, THE FORMATION OF THE REDMOND LIBRARY SERVICE DISTRICT Before the Board was a public hearing on Order No. 94-152, the formation of the Redmond Library Service District, Order No. 94-153, the formation of the Bend Library Service District, Order No. 94-154, the formation of the Sisters Library Service District, Order No. 94-155, the formation of the La Pine Library Service District and Order No. 94-156, the formation of the Sunriver Library Service District. Rick Isham stated the public hearings could be held as a group with individual action on each order separately. This was the date that was noticed for the hearings. If the Board adopted the order, they will then be set for a final hearing at which time the districts will be formed or set to an election. These districts do not propose a tax base because they are capital improvement districts only. The final board order would not authorize any ad valorem tax if that final order was signed. Chair Schlangen opened the public hearing which covered all five of the Orders regarding the formation of the Library Service Districts. Ralph Delamarter stated that one of the things that the task force determined was that the entire county be covered by these library districts and that the school district boundaries be followed as much as possible. He stated these districts were for capital improvements only. MINUTES PAGE 6 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 0138-00/,3 There being no further testimony, the consolidated public hearing was closed by Chair Schlangen. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Order No. 94-152, the formation of the Redmond Library Service District. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Order No. 94-153, the formation of the Bend Library Service District. SCHLANGEN: I'll second that. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Order No. 94-154, the formation of the Sisters Library Service District. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Order No. 94-155, the formation of the La Pine Library Service District. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Order No. 94-156, the formation of the Sunriver Library Service District. SCHLANGEN: Second. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED MINUTES PAGE 7 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 5. 6. 0138--00A24 Dave Gordon, Library Board Chairman, thanked the commissioners for their help and for supporting the library. SIGNATURE OF BOARD'S FINAL DECISION ON A-94-13, AN APPEAL OF NUV-94-2 (FRALEYj Before the Board was signature of the final decision on A-94- 13, an appeal of NUV-94-2. Damian Syrnyk stated he had worked with the applicant and his attorney to draft a decision. He stated what was before the Board was the latest version which included some conditions that the Board, Legal Counsel, Planning Department and Mr. Fraley had agreed upon at a meeting on October 18, 1994. Damian reported the Board should have received a letter dated November 21, 1994, from seven neighbors of the Fraley property. The letter states that they intend to appeal this if the Board should complete this process and make a final decision of the non -conforming use. SLAUGHTER: I move signature on Board's final decision on A-94-13 and appeal of NUV-94-2. SCHLANGEN: I will second that motion. Commissioner Slaughter stated he would be watching this issue very carefully and he hoped that others would help and report this to code violation. He felt the Fraleys might not abide by these conditions. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED APPROVAL OF 1995-97 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR COMMISSION ON CHILDREN & FAMILIES Before the Board was approval of the 1995-97 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Commission on Children & Families. Scott Johnson reviewed the proposed amendments to the 1995-97 Comprehensive Plan. The Commission on Children & Families was require to have an approved plan. SLAUGHTER: SCHLANGEN: I would move approval of the 1995-97 Comprehensive Plan amendment for Commission on Children & Families. I second that motion. MINUTES PAGE 8 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 nn r- VOTE : SCHLANGEN: YES 0138-01J�0 SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 7. APPROVAL OF FUNDING REQUEST FOR TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Before the Board was approval of a funding request for a trail feasibility study. Brad Chalfant reported this was a proposal from State Parks and Bend Metro Park & Recreation for a trail project. This was for a feasibility study only. The County would contribute $8,000. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of the funding request for trail feasibility study. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 8. APPROVAL OF LOTTERY GRANT AWARD FOR HERITAGE WALK PROGRAM Before the Board was approval of a lottery grant award for the Heritage Walk Program. Susan Mayea reported that this was a Lottery Grant Award from the Economic Development Fund for Heritage Walk Program in the amount of $1,500. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of grant for $1,500 for the Heritage Walk Program. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 9. SIGNATURE OF ORDINANCE NO. 94-058, REPEALING 10.08 COUNTY COURT HOUSE PARKING RULE Before the Board was signature of Ordinance No. 94-058, repealing 10.08 County Court House parking rules. SLAUGHTER: I move first and second reading of Ordinance No. 94-058, by title only. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. MINUTES PAGE 9 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES 0138 V'l��V SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED Chair Schlangen performed the first and second reading of Ordinance No. 94-058, by title only. SLAUGHTER: I move approval of Ordinance No. 94-058. SCHLANGEN: I second the adoption. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 10. SIGNATURE OF AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR RESIDENTIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Before the Board was signature of an amendment to Personal Services Contract for Residential Assistance program. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of amendment to Personal Services Contract with Residential Assistance Program. SCHLANGEN: I second that. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 11. SIGNATURE OF FINAL PLAT AND DECLARATION OF DEDICATION FOR MP - 92 -53, PARTITION TO DIVIDE A 40 -ACRE PARCEL INTO THREE PARCELS IN A MUA-10 ZONE Before the Board was signature of a final plat and Declaration of Dedication for MP -92-53, a partition to divide a 40 -acre parcel into three parcels in a MUA-10 Zone. Paul Blikstad reported that this was not ready for signature today but would request approval subject to review. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature on final plat and Declaration of Dedication for MP -92-53 subject to review. SCHLANGEN: I'll second that motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED MINUTES PAGE 10 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 12 . 13. 14. 15. 01.38-000'2;'17 REAPPOINTMENT OF RONALD DELZER TO THE RIVER BEND ESTATES SPECIAL ROAD DISTRICT Before the Board was reappointment of Ronald Delzer to the River Bend Estates Special Road District. SLAUGHTER: I would move reappointment of Ronald Delzer. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED APPROVAL OF WEEKLY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE VOUCHERS Before the Board was approval of the weekly accounts payable vouchers in the amount of $445,271.42. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval upon review. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SIGNATURE OF AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL SERV_ICES CONTRACT FOR CENTRAL OREGON RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING (CORIL) Before the Board was signature of an amendment to a Personal Services Contract for Central Oregon Resources for Independent Living (CORIL). SLAUGHTER: I would move signature of amendment to Personal Services Contract for Central Oregon Resources for Independent Living. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SIGNATURE OF AWBREY BUTTE TRANSMISSION SITE SUBLEASE AGREEMENT WITH COOK TELECOM, INC. Before the Board was signature of Awbrey Butte Transmission Site Sublease Agreement with Cook Telecom, Inc. Brad reported this was a sublease agreement with Cook Telecom. The use was for a paging system. They are technically a high MINUTES PAGE 11 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 16. 17. powered system at 1000 watts. county in June. This proposed use came to the Chair Schlangen stated she was concerned about the 1000 watt user being on this location. She felt that intermodulation studies should be required. Brad Chalfant will discuss this with Cook Telecom, Inc. and bring this item back to the Board at a later date. SIGNATURE OF AWBREY BUTTE TRANSMISSION SITE SUBLEASE AGREEMENT WITH AVION WATER Before the Board was signature of Awbrey Butte Transmission Site Sublease Agreement with Avion Water. Brad Chalfant reported this was for an existing operator on this site. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature on Awbrey Butte Transmission Site Sublease Agreement with Avion Water. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED SIGNATURE OF LEASE ASSIGNMENT FROM LOUIS AND MARY REED TO BRADLEY AND LISA GARDNER FOR GRAZING RIGHTS Before the Board was signature of a lease assignment from Louis and Mary Reed to Bradley and Lisa Gardner for grazing rights. Brad Chalfant reported that this was an assignment of a present lease. Brad reported that all of our grazing leases terminate this coming spring. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature on lease assignment. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED MINUTES PAGE 12 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 4138-44ti4 18. SIGNATURE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR WALLY AND LYNNE KNECHT FOR PROPERTY ALONG SPRING RIVER Before the Board was signature of Conservation Easement for Wally and Lynne Knecht for property along Spring River. SLAUGHTER: I would signature on conservation easement. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 19. APPROVAL OF CHAIRS SIGNATURE ON LETTER FROM FIRST INTERSTATE BANK DECREASING INTEREST RATE ON LEASE DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 1993 AND LEASE DATED DECEMBER 16, 1992 Before the Board was approval of Chairs signature on letter from First Interstate Bank decreasing interest rate on lease dated September 2, 1993, and on the lease dated December 16, 1992. Rick Isham reported First Interstate had been audited and required to reduce their interest rates. SLAUGHTER: I would move Chair signature on two letters from First Interstate decreasing interest rates. SCHLANGEN: I will second that motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 20. SIGNATURE OF INDEMNITY AGREEMENT FOR LA PINE CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 2, 1994 Before the Board was signature of an Indemnity Agreement for La Pine Christmas tree lighting ceremony to be held on December 2, 1994. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature on indemnity agreement. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED MINUTES PAGE 13 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 21. SIGNATURE OF LIQUOR LICENSE FOR TOP HAT ENTERPRISES Before the Board was signature of a liquor license for Top Hat Enterprises. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature of liquor license. SCHLANGEN: Second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 22. SIGNATURE OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-115 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-109 Before the Board was signature of Resolution No. 94-0115, amending Resolution No. 94-109. Brad reported this hearing was scheduled for Wednesday, November 29, 1994, but the notices were not published in the Bulletin. This resolution sets a new hearing date of December 7, 1994. SLAUGHTER: I would move approval of Resolution No. 94- 115. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED 23. SIGNATURE OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-116 CREATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS Before the Board was signature of Resolution No. 94-116, creating a Community Development Block Grant Fund and making appropriations. Susan reported we received a grant from the Community Development Block Grant program in the amount of $19,800 for Terrebonne and $600,000 for La Pine Community Campus. SLAUGHTER: I would move signature of Resolution No. 94- 116. SCHLANGEN: I second the motion. VOTE: SCHLANGEN: YES SLAUGHTER: YES THROOP: EXCUSED MINUTES PAGE 14 NOVEMBER 23, 1994 11 1 ?138-OC31 Chair Schlangen adjourned the Board of County Commissioners. Chair Schlangen opened the Executive Session and continued it to November 29, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. DATED this 11?0 day of _, 1994, by the Board of Commissioners of Deschut s County, Oregon. Nancy Pope S hl ngen, Chair Tom Throop, Co 'ssioner AT ST: ecording Secretary Barry H. Slaughter, Commissioner MINUTES PAGE 15 NOVEMBER 23, 1994