Loading...
1995-05215-Ordinance No. 95-003 Recorded 2/2/19959505215 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY OREGON OF REVIEWED w,r�l LEGAL COUNSEL 0138-014 An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. * 80-216, the Bend Area General Plan, * as Amended, Changing a Certain Plan * Designation from Low Density Resi- *A dential (20,000 square feet) to Standard Density Residential (6,000 square feet) for a 4.52 acre parcel located in Section 15 of Township 17 South, Range 12 East, and Declaring an Emergency. * :" ORDINANCE 95-003 WHEREAS, Steven Foster requested a Plan Amendment to change the Plan Designation on a 4.52 acre parcel from Low Density Residential to Standard Density Residential; WHEREAS, a hearing was held, after notice given in accordance with law, before the County Hearings Officer; WHEREAS, the Hearings Officer approved of the proposed redesignation under the Bend Area General Plan; WHEREAS, the decision of the Hearings Officer has not been appealed; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMLKISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. Ordinance 80-216, The Bend Area General Plan, as amended, is further amended to redesignate a 4.52 acre parcel, described on the Attached Exhibit A, and as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, from Urban Low Density Residential to Standard Density Residential. Section 2. To adopt as its decision and findings the Findings and Decision of the County Hearings Officer dated January 9, 1995, relating to Plan Amendment Application PA -94-5, marked Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. This Ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance takes effect on its passage. ORDINANCE NO. 95-003 1 KED FE d 2 1995 IF ,=; 0 1 1995 DATED this _� day of ATTEST: Recording Secretaky ORDINANCE NO. 95-003 2 1995. 0138-0315 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON / " ��7* BARMY H. SLAUGHTER, C$air NANCY POPj SC"GEN,— commissjoner ��G�-tom —e. 1-7� - - RO ERT L. NIPPER, enTiffnfsginner s RATE OF OREGON ) SS. COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) i 1, MARY SUE ►INN NOW, COUNTY CIERR AND RKORDER OF CDMVITAW S. M AND FOR SAID aWITY, DO NERIRY CHEM THAT THE NITMNI NISTRDRMMF WAS RECORDED TM DAY: 94 MAR -3 AH 9: 37 MARY SUE PENHOLLOVt COUNTY CLERK L BY. NO. 94-U8SN+- FEE 15.. p� DtSCMM CORMTY OHIO" RECORDS r F j li iN. yt.. AI 011 A RATE OF OREGON ) SS. COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) 1. MARY SUE E'ENH%t0W, COUNTY CLERK AMO U ,.LZ ER Of CONVEYANCES. w AMO FOR SAID COMFY. 00 NERERY CERTIFY THAT THE wIT1101 M MMEHT WAS RECORDED THO OAT: 94 FES, BY. f_7 /__�l� plptlTY —07025 FEE" OESCNUTES COUNTY OFFKIAL RECORDS a I 330 - 0732 _ 331 - 0675 (080-61T6 r 1 A parcel of land containing 4.52 a=es, more or less, r located in the S 1/2 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 15, i` Township 17 South, Range 12 Fast of the Willamette � Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, and being more pa=tics?arly desc=ibed as follows: r Begi.-tni.-Lg at the Southwest one—sixteents corner of said Section 15: thence North 00' 26' 59" West, 661.75 feet i thence Nor—..h 89' 39' 39" East, 388.72 feet to a point on the centerline of Cant -al Oregon District Pilot Butte j Plain Canal: thence along said centerline, the following courses: South 19' 48' 56" West, 287.42 feet: thence " South 06' 31' 00" West, 163.00 feet: thence South 03. 36' 00" West, 231.00 y. feet: thence leaving said canal 4 centarliae South 89' 46' 03" West, 253.80 feet to the Point of beginning and terminus of this desc_-iption. s RATE OF OREGON ) SS. COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) i 1, MARY SUE ►INN NOW, COUNTY CIERR AND RKORDER OF CDMVITAW S. M AND FOR SAID aWITY, DO NERIRY CHEM THAT THE NITMNI NISTRDRMMF WAS RECORDED TM DAY: 94 MAR -3 AH 9: 37 MARY SUE PENHOLLOVt COUNTY CLERK L BY. NO. 94-U8SN+- FEE 15.. p� DtSCMM CORMTY OHIO" RECORDS r F j li iN. yt.. AI 011 A RATE OF OREGON ) SS. COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) 1. MARY SUE E'ENH%t0W, COUNTY CLERK AMO U ,.LZ ER Of CONVEYANCES. w AMO FOR SAID COMFY. 00 NERERY CERTIFY THAT THE wIT1101 M MMEHT WAS RECORDED THO OAT: 94 FES, BY. f_7 /__�l� plptlTY —07025 FEE" OESCNUTES COUNTY OFFKIAL RECORDS a I r 1 iso � VzX�e Q• O MOr= i = m i i m a i � � � � _ � � 0138-031"1 EXHIBIT"B" op o� �I SEE YAP 17 12 15CB pl I� c= O O O cn n r cr- m m m 0o 0 N O O Z _m .P. v m v) cn m n n w m cr Ln -� N n N O -- c Z N N m v N EXHIBIT "C" DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS AND DECISION OF HEARINGS OFFICER FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE: APPLICANT: ATTORNEY: OWNER: PA -94-5 and Z-94-6 December 6, 1994 Stephen Foster Sharon Smith Pat G. Bauer 0138-031.8 67891p77 JAN 1995 n CCU Rio REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change to amend the Bend Area General Plan designation and zoning on a total of 4.52 acres from RL, Urban Low Density Residential, to RS, Urban Standard Density Residential. PLANNER: Paul Blikstad, Associate Planner I. DECISION The Hearings Officer APPROVES the applicant's request to amend the Bend Area General Plan and the County zoning map to designate the subject property as Urban Standard Density Residential. H. APPLICABLE CRITERIA The following criteria apply to review of the above -referenced land use applications: 1. The Bend Area General Plan 2. Title 19 of the Deschutes County Code, particularly: Sections 19.24 and 19.28 of Title 19 of the Deschutes County Code establishes standards for the RL and RS zones, respectively. Chapter 19.116 of Title 19 establishes standards and criteria for amendments to Title 19 and the urban area zoning map. Page 1 - Findings & Decision (PA -94-5 & ZC-94-6, Foster) 0138-03 9 3. OAR 660-12-060, Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 4. Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals 5. Title 22 of the County Code, Procedures Ordinance. III. PROCEDURE This land use action is a quasi-judicial zone change and plan amendment. DCC 22.28.030 gives the Hearings Officer the authority to make decisions on quasi-judicial zone changes and plan amendments. To be effective, however, the changes approved by the Hearings Officer must be adopted by the Board of Commissioners. Any party disagreeing with the Hearings Officer's decision must appeal that decision to the Board of Commissioners in order to preserve their ability to contest the decision of the Hearings Officer. A review of this decision may also be initiated by the Board, according to the procedures set forth in DCC Title 22. IV. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Hearings Officer makes the following findings of fact regarding the above -referenced land use application: ADOPTION OF STAFF REPORT: The Hearings Officer has reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report prepared' by Associate Planner Paul Blikstad and has determined that the facts and findings in that report accurately reflect her view of the facts and law in this case, with the exceptions noted in this document. The Hearings Officer, therefore, adopts the FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW sections of said report as findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Hearings Officer, except to the extent that they are inconsistent with the findings and conclusions listed in this document. 2. ADOPTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL BURDEN OF PROOF: The applicant's attorney Sharon Smith submitted a document entitled "Supplemental Burden of Proof' to the Hearings Officer at the land use hearing on December 6, 1994. This document addresses compliance with the statewide land use planning goals. The Hearings Officer hereby adopts that document as findings and conclusions of the Hearings Officer in support of her approval of the above -referenced land use applications. 3. BEND AREA GENERAL PLAN: The following provisions of the General Plan, in addition to those cited in Associate Planner Paul Blikstad's staff report, apply to approval of plan amendments: Page 2 - Findings & Decision (PA -94-5 & ZC-94-6, Foster) 0138-0320 INTRODUCTION "The General Plan is not a zoning plan. However, zoning is one of the important legislative tools available to help implement the Plan. Any changes in zoning which occur are subject to a public hearing and a specific decision by the governing body. The greatest single problem between the Plan and zoning activity is timing. Some areas suggested in the Plan for different kinds of land uses can only be justified at some time in the future when sufficient population growth has occurred to warrant the development, or when public facilities are available to support that development. All zone changes shall be considered in relation to the comprehensive plan, and this serves as one of the continuing means of evaluating the Plan. If zone changes are contemplated which are contrary to the Plan, the community should first amend the policies and concepts in the Plan before a change of zone is made. This process insures that each petition for rezoning is considered in light of the best interests of the entire community." p. 2. Plan Amendments will be necessary as time passes and conditions. change. As stated at the outset, this plan is intended to be a guide for the future growth of the community. It should be subject to periodic review and should be flexible, but not so flexible as to be meaningless as a statement of community policy. Procedure - ... Individuals may petition for changes or amendments to the Plan by filing with the Planning Department on forms prescribed by the Commission, a request for plan change. FINDING: The applicant has filed a petition for the requested plan amendment and zone change on County approved forms. The development of 18th Street adjacent to the subject property and the installation of a public sewer line are major changes in conditions relevant to the subject property. Development of the subject property at standard, rather than low, density urban densities will allow the citing of many more residences on the subject property than presently allowed. This greater density is consistent with the purpose of the General Plan to encourage moderate increases in density as time passes. Greater density in this area will allow land developers to make more residential lots available within the Bend urban growth boundary, forestalling the day when an increase in the size of the UGB is needed to accommodate the rapid increase in population the Bend area is presently experiencing. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH OAR 660-12-060, Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) Amendments to functional plans, acknowledged comprehensive plans, and land use regulations which significantly affect a transportation facility shall Page 3 - Findings & Decision (PA -94-5 & ZC-94-6, Foster) 0138-031. assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and level of service of the facility. This shall be accomplished by either: (a) Limiting allowed land uses to be consistent with the planned function, capacity and level of service of the transportation facility; (b) Amending the TSP to provide transportation facilities adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division; or (c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs'through other modes. (2) A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it: (a) Changes the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; (b) Changes standards implementing a functional classification system; (c) Allows types or levels of land uses which would result in levels of travel or access which are inconsistent with the functional classification of a transportation facility; or (d) Would reduce the level of service of the facility below the minimum acceptable level identified in the TSP. (3) Determinations under section (1) and (2) of this rule shall be coordinated with affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. FINDING: The applicant's property will be one of the first residential developments to front on 18th Street. The street is designed to carry a large volume of traffic and will have no difficulty in handling traffic generated by the subdivision, without affecting the functional classification of the planned road. Review of this proposed amendment and zone change has been coordinated with the City of Bend Planning Department, which has recommended approval of this application. 5. REVISION OF STAFF FINDING: The Hearings Officer hereby deletes the following sentence, included in the staff findings (page 4, Staff Report) from those findings adopted by reference by this decision: "The increased density will create additional need for services which should be balanced out by the additional tax monies realized by a greater number of users." This sentence is deleted as increased density will not result in additional tax revenues for taxing districts that are not impacted by the tax limitations of Measure 5.' This is due to the fact that that Oregon governmental entities have fixed tax base amounts which may be increased a 'The Bend LaPine School District is impacted by Measure 5 and would receive additional tax revenues from the subdivision. This would not, however, directly increase the funds available to the District because the State of Oregon is required to replace funds lost due to the tax limitations imposed by Measure 5. Page 4 - Findings & Decision (PA -94-5 & ZC-94-6, Foster) 0138-0322 maximum of six percent a year, regardless of the rate of growth within the taxing district. The value of new construction increases the assessed value of the taxing district, not the amount of taxes that may be collected. If growth occurs too rapidly, a taxing district will find itself with expenses that far outstrip its tax base. The subject property will, however, increase the tax base of the City of Bend when it is annexed to the City. New tax revenues received by the City will help offset the cost of providing police, fire protection and other City services to the subdivision. Future homes in the subdivision will utilize City sewer services and generate fees to pay for City sewer related expenses. 6. DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES ORDINANCE: Chapter 22 of the County Code sets forth the procedures for processing applications. This application has been processed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the County Code with respect to notice, preparation of a staff report and record keeping. The Hearings Officer's decision will become final ten days after the decision is mailed unless the decision is appealed. Prior to becoming effective, the plan amendment and zone change will require adoption of implementing ordinances by the Board of County Commissioners. Such ordinances will be prepared by Planning Division and Legal Counsel staff. DATED this 1 day of January, 1995. C.� Liz Fanc , rings Officer Page 5 - Findings & Decision (PA -94-5 & ZC-94-6, Foster) 0138-03'3 DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION FILE NUMBERS: HEARING DATE: TIME: PLACE: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: STAFF REPORT PA -94-5 and ZC-94-6 Tuesday, December 6, 1994 7:00 p.m. Juvenile Justice Center, Room A 1128 Harriman Avenue Bend, Oregon 97701 Stephen Foster Pat G. Bauer 7404 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 4 CO JNrY s REQUEST: Applications for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change to amend the Bend Area General Plan designation and zoning on a total of 4.52 acres from RL, Urban Low Density Residential, to RS, Standard Density Residential. ATTORNEY: Sharon Smith Post Office Box 1151 Bend, Oregon 97709 STAFF CONTACT: Paul Blikstad, Associate Planner APPLICABLE CRITERIA: A. Sections 19.24 and 19.28 of Title 19 of the Deschutes County Code establishes standards for the RL and RS zones, respectively. B. Chapter 19.116 of Title 19 establishes standards and criteria for amendments to the comprehensive plan and zone changes for the Bend urban area. PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 1 0138-0324 C. The Bend Area General Plan establishes an overall planning and development framework for the Bend urban area. D. Title 22 of the Deschutes County Code establishes procedures for all land use applications in the County. FINDINGS OF FACT' 1. LOCATION: The subject property is located adjacent to the road currently referred to as 18th Street and the Pilot Butte irrigation canal in the northeast Bend area. It is described on the County Assessor's map 17-12-15CA, tax lot 501. 2. ZONING: The subject property is zoned RL, Urban Low Density Residential, and is designated Residential on the Bend Area General Plan. 3. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is 4.52 acres and has a varied topography of somewhat level areas and rock outcrops. The property has a cover of widely scattered juniper trees and scrub brush typical of the high desert. 4. SURROUNDING LAND USE: Land use in the vicinity of the subject parcels is all residential development at a low density. There is no sewer system currently serving this area and consequently all dwellings are on individual septic disposal systems. Some of the adjacent land is vacant, including parcels directly west and north. Further west is the Morningstar subdivision platted in 1979 and 1980. To the east and northeast is the Country View Estates subdivision platted in 1974. Also to the east is somewhat larger acreage homesites. Zoning in the vicinity of the property is RL to the north, west and south. To the east across the irrigation canal is land zoned SR -2.5. RS zoned land exists to the west near Morningstar subdivision and to the south in Sections 21 and 22 of Township 17 S, Range 12 E. 5. The applicant is requesting approval to amend the Bend Area General Plan map and zoning on the subject property from an RL designation and zoning to RS. The applicant has submitted a burden of proof statement addressing the zone change standards of Section 19.116.030 of Title 19. 6. The Planning Division sent notice of the proposed plan amendment/zone change applications to several public agencies and received the following comments: A. The City of Bend recommends the County approve the zone change and plan amendment for the above PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 2 0138-0325 mentioned property. The property is served by adequate road, water and sewer to allow increased density within the Urban Area as contemplated by the Bend Area General Plan goals and policies. B. The Bend Fire Department states that at the time of development, the developer will need to provide fire hydrants spaced at 500 feet apart along future roadways that provide at least 1000 GPM at not less than 20 PSI residual. C. The County Transportation Planner states that if approved and developed/subdivided, the applicant will be responsible for improving east side of 18th Street to County standards for entire frontage length. D. US West Communications states that the developer is responsible for trenches and all costs to extend phone service from Country View Lane or Eastview Drive. E. Central Oregon Irrigation District states that they are currently not assessing the subject parcel with a water right. The District does have the Pilot Butte Canal facility that traverses on the west side of the subject parcel. The District has a deeded right of way 200' that being 100' from the centerline of the canal on both sides. There is to be no encroachment of any kind within this right of way without the prior written consent from this office. F. The County Public Works Department, Bend-LaPine School District, the Watermaster and Avion Water Company had no comments. 7. The public notice for the plan amendment/zone change applications has not been sent out at the time of writing of the staff report. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Page 69 of the Bend Area General Plan establishes the following standards for amending the plan: "Plan changes shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and statements of intent of the plan, or these guidelines shall be first changed or amended to reflect new policies. An individual requesting a change shall demonstrate that the change is warranted due to changed conditions, a mistake or other specific facts that demonstrate a public need and benefit for the change . " PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 3 0138-0326 The following sections and policies of the Bend Area General Plan are applicable to the proposed zone change: Under the general policies and recommendations section, (page 4 of the Plan) the following apply: I. Urban development shall be encouraged in areas where urban services can be provided and in a manner which will minimize tax costs related to necessary urban services such as schools, parks, highways, police, garbage disposal, fire protection, libraries, and other facilities and services. Staff findings: The County Public Works Department is in the process of constructing the new 18th Street connection between Cooley Road on the north to Yeoman Road on the south. This road construction is being completed to provide a road to the new elementary school, as well as provide a needed north -south transportation route as specified on the 'Bend Area Transportation Plan. This road was scheduled for completion in Fall of 1994. However, due to construction delays, it appears the road will not be completed until Spring of 1995. This road will be an urban minor arterial serving the northeast Bend urban area. The new elementary school adjacent to 18th Street is completed and is now in use. This school was designed to serve the district's needs in the northeast area of Bend and beyond the urban growth boundary. The school district had no comments on the proposed zone change. The fire department's comments indicate the development of this land will need to meet their standards. Police protection will initially be handled by the County Sheriff's Department until such time as this area is annexed to the City of Bend. Parks development in this area has not been forthcoming as of 1994. The Bend Metro Parks and Recreation District has a park plan in place and the new parks systems development charges for development are designed to provide the necessary funding for urban parks. Libraries are somewhat limited in Bend. The County will not be expanding the library system until such time as additional funding for increased facilities is approved. It is Staff's belief that the proposed increase in density proposed by the applicant will minimize tax costs for all of these services and facilities. The increased density will create additional need for services which should be balanced out by the additional tax monies realized by a greater number of users. 3. Future development and local development standards shall recognize and respect the character of existing areas. Maximum flexibility in development should be encouraged in undeveloped areas. PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 4 0138-0327 Staff findings: The area adjacent to the subject property is relatively undeveloped at this time. Morningstar subdivision to the west was platted in 1979 and 1980, with infill of the subdivision occurring over the next 14-15 years. This area is developed with individual septic systems. The maximum flexibility listed above should apply to the proposed density increase, as this area is relatively undeveloped. 4. Residential developments should be located so that they are convenient to places of employment and shopping facilities, and they should be developed in ways which are consistent with the character of the topography and soils on the site. Staff findings: The development of the subject property will be convenient with respect to employment and shopping facilities, as 18th Street will provide access to points north and south, including the Highway 97 corridor for commercial uses and also for 'potential employers. The development of the subject property at a higher density can be consistent with the character of the topography and soils on the site. The site does have some topographic differences, however, these can be accommodated into the design of a development for the site. The soils are not as -important given that the project could be connected to the City sewer system now that the sewer runs to the new school down 18th Street. 5. Residential areas should offer a wide variety of housing types in locations best suited to each, and shall be developed in a way which will not create health or erosion hazards. Densities recommended on the plan shall be recognized in order to maintain proper relationships between proposed public facilities and services and population distribution. Staff findings: The development of the subject property will or can offer a housing type in a more affordable housing range, given the larger number of units per acre allowed in the RS zone as opposed to the RL zone. With approved road and utility plans, the development of this property would not create health or erosion hazards. The existing density shown on the plan is for a lower density that the one proposed. The original density was established based on the fact that the sewer plan for Bend did not include this area, as well as several other areas. The revised sewer and water master plan for Bend indicates that all of the urban area will be sewered, including the subject property. The sewer system to the new school has been installed and runs along the new 18th Street. The subject property can connect directly to that system. In fact, the development of the subject PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 5 0138-03 400 8 property would require that it be connected to the sewer system. The construction of 18th Street was hastened by the locating of the new elementary school. This school will serve the northeast area of Bend until such time as a new school is needed. It is Staff's belief that proper relationships between the new school, as well as other public facilities and services and the population distribution will be maintained by the proposed zone change. The road system, and sewer and water system will be in place by spring of 1995, and electric and phone service are available for development of this property. The following policies of the urbanization section (page 13 of the Plan) are applicable to the proposed zone change: Assumptions: 1. New development should bear the burden of paying for costs of the development. Staff findings: If development of this property proceeds, widening with a curb and sidewalk will be required on the east side of 18th Street along the subject property. Any connections to public or private utilities would be borne by the developer of the property. 2. New development should locate in areas where facilities are available or can be provided at least cost. Staff findings: As indicated in a foregoing finding, sewer, water and other utility services are available to the subject property. In addition, by spring of 1995 18th Street will be paved in front of the subject property. The cost to the public has already been absorbed for 18th Street. The development of the subject property will require the completion of the necessary improvements to 18th Street along the boundary of the subject property. 3. New development can occur anywhere in the IUGB, provided that it pays for necessary facilities. Staff findings: Any development of the subject property will require all necessary improvements established by the County and City of Bend. 4. Developments must services if they to the city's improvements. PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 6 pay the full cost of urban occur on developable lands prior or county's planned capital 0138-0329 Staff findings: As indicated in a foregoing finding, the cost of constructing 18th Street was borne by the County. This road will be completed from Cooley Road on the north to Yeoman Road on the south by spring of 1995. The cost to a developer of the subject property would be for widening and curbing with a sidewalk along the property frontage. Additionally, all costs associated with connection to the City's and other utility facilities will be borne by the developer. Timing: 1. Within the IUGB, vacant lands passed over by development shall be encouraged to develop prior to other lands within the boundary. Staff findings: What is obvious as the reason to now develop the subject property is the construction of 18th Street and the sewer and water construction to the new school. Without these improvements, this land may have been postponed for development indefinitely. The northeast quadrant of Bend will proceed with development at a faster pace now that sewer is available, and this development will be somewhat systematic based upon who goes first. 2. Growth in the Bend Area shall be managed through the cooperative efforts of the City of Bend and Deschutes County, and shall be in accordance with the plans, timing, phasing, and financing of public facilities and services. Staff findings: If development of the subject property proceeds, the County and City will have joint responsibility for overseeing that development. All standards and requirements of the County and City must be met by a developer. 3. Future urban development shall be contained within the geographic limits of the IUGB. Staff findings: The subject property is within the IUGB. The boundary of the IUGB runs along the irrigation canal. 4. All parties shall work toward the most efficient and economical method for providing specific urban services to the area within the IUGB. In the long run, the city is the logical provider of such services. Staff findings: As indicated in a foregoing finding, the County financed the construction of 18th Street, with the exception of some of the improvements to it along the School District's property, which were funded PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 7 by the School District. 0138-0330 5. The plan shall encourage the development of vacant lands that have urban services before the extension of services beyond presently served areas. Staff findings: The subject property now has urban services available, including sewer, water, roads, as well as police and fire protection. 6. No new service districts shall be created within the IUGB to provide sewer or water service without the concurrence of the city and county. Staff findings: No new service districts are proposed as part of the plan amendment/zone change. No service district would be allowed as part of the development of the property. The Residential Areas - Statements of Intent of the Plan section of the Bend Area General Plan has the'following applicable standards: 1. The basic and most important single development criteria for residential areas is housing density. 2. Residential densities indicated on the general plan shall be respected and reflected in city and county codes, ordinances, and development policies. The intent of the plan is to indicate housing density rather than type of building construction permitted within various density areas. 3. All new housing developments shall conform with the designated housing density; regardless of building type, site size, or timing as related to other developments. Staff findings: As indicated in foregoing findings, the subject property was designated for a lower density in 1979 based on the fact that sewer service to this area was not envisioned. Without sewer service available, larger lot sizes were needed to accommodate individual septic systems and reserve areas. With the rocky soils in the area, even 20,000 square foot lots may not qualify for individual septic systems. The Sunbird subdivision approved for 34 lots on 21 acres (TP -90-733), which was in the RL zone, had three lots within the first phase of that development which required sandfilter systems. These systems require annual inspections to check for necessary corrective maintenance. This project was not developed based in part on the requirements for septic systems. Staff believes that the RL zoning will become obsolete PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 8 0138-0331 as the need for this much land for individual septic systems is gone. New development, specifically subdivision development, requires connection to the City's sewer system. The costs of extending the sewer and other utilities is too prohibitive to develop at the lower density, and Staff believes that the costs to the public in general for necessary services, such as police, fire, schools, libraries and other services, is higher for a lower density. Conversely, the cost to the general public for these services with a higher density are lower, by having more people pay for the services in a smaller area and by reducing the area needed for the ever increasing population. Also, with the increase in density, alternative modes of transportation such as transit and bicycle use, are much more viable than with a lower density. The lower density requires greater distances to drive or ride and the cost per dwelling unit for public transit is much higher with a lower density. 4. All residential developments shall respect the physical characteristics of the site relating to soils, slope, geology, erosion, flooding, and natural vegetation. Staff findings: No specific development proposal for this property has been submitted at this time. If the zone change is approved, the development of this property would require review through the land use process, which would including looking at the physical characteristics of the site relating to soils, slope, geology, erosion, flooding and natural vegetation. 8. Residential development standards within the urban growth boundary shall be the same for areas of similar densities or topographic conditions, both inside and outside the city. 9. New developments in existing residential areas shall respect the character and quality of the areas in which they locate. Staff findings: If the zone change is approved and a development proposal is submitted for the subject property, the review of that development will require meeting the County and City standards for subdivisions. The subdivision will require paved roads and all utilities installed, which would be similar in character and quality of other developments in the area. Staff finds that proposed plan designation and zone change is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and statements of intent of the plan, as indicated in the foregoing findings. Staff also finds that there is a substantial change in conditions, PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 9 2. 0138-0332 specifically the construction of 18th Street in this area and the extension of sewer and water service to the area. The sewer system was not intended to serve the RL zone during the completion of the Bend Area General Plan in 1978-79. The update of the City of Bend's sewer and water master plan now shows that all of the urban area will eventually be connected to the sewer system. Staff also believes that there will be a public need for increased density in the Bend urban area and there is a benefit to the public in general in the form of reduced costs for services by increasing the density. Fewer roads are required for the population, as one example of cost savings, including construction and maintenance of these roads. Section 19.116.030 of Title 19 establishes criteria for zone changes as follows: 19.116.030 Standards for Zone Change. The burden of proof is upon the one seeking change. The degree of that burden increases proportionately with the degree of impact of the change which is sought. The applicant shall in all cases establish: A. That the change conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the change is consistent wit the plan's intent to promote an orderly pattern and sequence of growth. Staff findings: Conformance with the Bend Area General Plan has been addressed in foregoing findings. Staff finds that the proposed plan amendment/zone change is consistent with the plan's intent to promote an orderly pattern and sequence of growth. With the construction of 18th Street and the extension of the City of Bend sewer system to the area, the surrounding parcels will develop at a faster pace than previously thought. A subdivision is approved in the Morningstar area (Wishing Well) for a total of 107 lots on 27 acres. A new subdivision (Majestic) is proposed across from Wishing Well for 115 lots on 32.2 acres. Additionally, a 20 -lot subdivision (Canal View) on 9.8 acres is proposed directly adjacent to the subject property. Staff believes that the zone change for this property and the subsequent development of the property for residential use will provide orderly development. 18th Street will be completed in spring of 1995, so the subject property will have direct access to an improved urban minor arterial. B. That the change will not interfere with existing development, development potential or value of other land in the vicinity of the proposed action. PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 10 0138-0333 Staff findings: The proposed zone change will not interfere with the other residential development in the area. To the west, north and south of the subject property is currently undeveloped land. The property directly north has a 20 -lot subdivision approved, but not yet developed or platted. To the east is land outside of the inner urban growth boundary on the east side of the Pilot Butte Canal. The lack of existing development in the area makes the impacts from the zone change to existing and subsequent development negligible. Staff finds that the proposed zone change will also not impact the value of other land in the vicinity, as it will all eventually be developed to urban densities, including the land currently in the urban reserve areas. The higher density is needed to accommodate increased growth and not foster urban sprawl to areas outside the boundary. The value of the land will continue to increase as development occurs and infrastructure is put in place. The community service costs must be spread out to residents. C. That the change in classification for the subject property is consistent with the purpose and intent of the proposed zone classification. Staff findings: The purpose of the RS zone is as follows: "The RS zone is intended to provide for the most common urban residential densities in places where community sewer services are or will be available and to encourage, accommodate, maintain and protect a suitable environment for family living." The proposed zone change will provide for an increase in density for this area of Bend, which now has sewer available, as well as water service, and in the spring the area will have the new 18th Street arterial road. The zone change will allow for additional families to live in the urban area near an existing elementary school, and relatively close to employment and shopping areas. When 18th Street is connected to Empire Avenue, it will be convenient to even more areas of commercial and employment use. The zone change will serve to encourage, accommodate, maintain and protect a suitable environment for family living. D. That the change will result in the orderly and efficient extension or provision of public services. Also, that the change is consistent with the County's policy for provision of public facilities. Staff findings: Public services in the area are being installed. The sewer and water systems are already in place. The new road serving the area, 18th Street, is under construction and will be completed in the spring PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 11 0138.0jA of 1995. Connections to this new road from adjacent parcels will be limited. The development of the subject property into residential use will require the construction of a new road, as no individual accesses will be allowed to 18th Street. It appears that electric and phone service is also available to the subject property. Fire and police services are already in place. With the development of the subject property into residential use, the water system will have to include the necessary fire hydrants and minimum fire flows. The proposed zone change is consistent with the County's policy of the provision of public facilities. E. That there is proof of a change of circumstance or a mistake in the original zoning. Staff findings: As stated in foregoing findings, there has been a change of circumstance since the original zoning was established. The City of Bend, through the Bend-LaPine School District, has extended a sewer line down 18th Street adjacent to the subject property, and has also decided by policy that all of the IUGB will be served by the sewer system. Extension of that system will be largely the responsibility of developers in cooperation with the city. Staff finds that it is also responsible from a environmental standpoint to have dwellings in the urban area connected to the city sewer system, rather than using individual septic systems. If the city and county are looking to keep urban development in the IUGB, the increase in density for the residential areas is imperative. There was not a mistake in the original zoning, but as stated above, there has been a significant change of circumstances since the zoning was established. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMIENDATION: Based upon the above findings, Staff finds that the proposed plan amendment/zone change application meets the standards and criteria of the Bend Area General Plan and Title 19 of the Deschutes County Code. The Planning Staff finds the proposed change to be entirely consistent with the Plan. Sewer service to all parcels is much preferred to the continuation of individual septic systems within the Bend urban area. Staff recommends approval of the proposed plan amendment/zone change for the subject property. If this plan amendment/zone change is approved by the Hearings Officer, the applicant will need to provide a legal description for the subject property. PEB/mjz PA-94-5/ZC-94-6 Page 12 0138-0335 BEFORE THE DESCHUTES COUNTY HEARINGS OFFICER APPLICANT: STEVE FOSTER PA -94-5, ZC-94-6 SUPPLEMENTAL BURDEN OF PROOF COMPLIANCE WITH STATE-WIDE PLANNING GOALS: When a Comprehensive Plan map is amended to change the permissible use of a single tract of land, without any change in the Plan's underlying policies, the proponent of the change has the burden of proving that the changes in the Plan map is consistent with the goals and policies expressed in the plan as a whole and that the change does not violate the specific provisions of any applicable state-wide planning goal. South of Sunnyside, etc. v. Board of Commissioners, etc., 569 P2d 1063, 1075, 280 Or 3 (1977). The following addresses the compliance with State -Wide Planning Goals: 1. Citizen Involvement. This goal has not been violated because there has been substantial public input on the application process. 2. Land Use Planning. This goal has not been violated because the land use planning process and policy framework has been applied in this application. 3. Agricultural Lands. The proposed zone change does not effect any agricultural lands. 4. Forest Lands. The proposal does not effect any forest lands. 5. Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, Natural Resources. The proposal does not impact any of these Goal 5 resources. 6. Air. Water and Land Resources Quality. The proposal does not violate Goal 6 because there is no specific proposal which would impact air, water and land resources currently. 1 - SUPPLEMENTAL BURDEN OF PROOF srs\foste 1.00\5825 Holmes Hurley Bryant Lovlien ® Lynch 117 WN] YSNI JAI% �n NI 1A, h ............... 4 i1n R..., 11C;l R__j n......... Q7700_11Fl !�,l1Z1 4R7_A'2'21 Fav lFl1414RQ-24RF, 0138-0336 36 . 7. Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards. No identified natural disaster or hazard area are identified in the proposed property to be affected. 8. Recreational Needs. The proposed zone change involves only an increase in residential density. This will favorably impact recreational needs because it will increase the number of park fees paid when the property is developed. 9. Economic Development. The proposal does not violate Goal 9 because it involves only an increase in residential density, not impacting any commercial or industrial lands. 10. Housing. The proposal furthers Goal 10 because it will provide additional density within the IUGB. 11. Public Facilities and Services. Goal 11 is not violated because the parcel has been identified as urban land and is served with adequate urban facilities and services, including: water, sewer, electricity, etc. 12. Transportation. Goal 12 is not violated. There is adequate access to the site via the new 18th Street extension. 13. Energy Conservation. The proposal is in compliance with Goal 13 in that it will increase density and accordingly, will reduce energy consumption through automobile traffic. 14. Urbanization. Goal 14 is not violated because the proposal does not impact the transition from rural to urban use. 2 - SUPPLEMENTAL BURDEN OF PROOF srs\foste 1.00\5825 Holmes Hurley BTan) L(when ® Lynch I -fl ptNIA'> Al IA%\ ,10 nl W P() ROY I]';] Rend_ Orev rn 977(19-1151 (';03)392-4331 Fax (503) 389-3386 r Goals 15 through 19 are inapplicable because they are tied to specific locations not within the proposed area. DATED this 6th day of December, 1994. HOLMES, HURLEY, BRYANT LOVLIEN , YNCH SHARON R. SMITH OSB 86292 Of Attorneys for Applicant 3 - SUPPLEMENTAL BURDEN OF PROOF srs\foste 1.00\5825 Holmes Hurley Bryant L(when ® Lynch ATP WNVNS,VI 1 AIV 40 N.W. Groenwood P.O. Box 1151 fiend, Oregon 97709-1151 (503) 382-4331 Fax(503)389-3386