Loading...
1995-06219-Ordinance No. 95-017 Recorded 3/2/1995REVIEWED 9506219 LEGAL COUNSEL BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES� UUUNTY, DREGON Adopting Amendments to Agricultural Policies 1-" - ? ' of the Deschutes Year 200.0 Comprehensive Plan and Declaring an Emergency. ORDINANCE NO. 95-017 01 38-06111 y�— til 1 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO PLAN POLICIES. The discussion and policies in the Agriculture section of the Deschutes County Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan are amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, with additions in bold-faced type and deletions enclosed in brackets. Section 2. REPEAL OF ORDINANCES AS AFFECTING EXISTING LIABILITIES. The repeal, express or implied, of any ordinance, ordinance provision, code section, or any map or any line on a map incorporated therein by reference, by this amending ordinance shall not release or extinguish any duty, condition, penalty, forfeiture, or liability previously incurred or that may hereafter be incurred under such ordinance, unless a provision of this amending ordinance shall so expressly provide, and such ordinance repealed shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such duty, condition, penalty, forfeiture, or liability, and for the purpose of authorizing the prosecution, conviction and punishment of the person or persons who previously violated the repealed ordinance. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, area, overlay or other separable part of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto. Section 4. CODIFICATION. County Legal Counsel shall have the authority to format the provisions contained herein in a manner that will integrate them into the County Code consistent with the County Legal Counsel form and style for ordinance codification. Such codification shall include the authority to make such changes, to make changes in numbering systems and to make such numbering changes consistent with interrelated code sections. In addition, as part of codification of these ordinances, County Legal Counsel may insert appropriate legislative history reference. Any legislative history references included herein are not adopted as part of the substance of this ordinance, but are included for administrative convenience and as a reference. They may be changed to correct errors and to conform to proper style without action of the Board of County Commissioners. 1 - Ordinance 95-017 (3/l/95) KE CHEC rf'"'MED � ` Chia � U M 0 21995 71 a�ax; 0138-°0042 Section 5. EMERGENCY. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance takes effect on its passage. DATED this 1st day of March, 1995. ATT Recording Secre ary BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON 7BAR H. S GHTE , C airman / Air% � NANCY_I?OP4 43CHtANGEN, Commiss oner 2 - Ordinance 95-017 (3/1/95) L. NIPPER, C6ifimissioner 0138-0643 AGRICULTURAL LANDS The protection of farmland is a public policy goal of the federal government (USDA, Secretary's Memo #1828, Revised, Oct. 30, 1978), most states in the United States and many other countries. In Oregon, the 1975 Planning Goals, as amended, set statewide standards which must be met by local governments. For farmlands, ORS 215 and 197 and OAR 660, Division 33 [5] set forth the criteria for compliance. The principal concept is that standards in the EFU zones must provide protection for the continuation of commercial -scale agriculture in the county, including farm operations, marketing outlets and the agricultural support system. In Deschutes County, where some lands have severe limitations for the commercial production of agricultural products, this has resulted in considerable debate and occasional hostility. The County has found itself between angry landowners who do not wish to protect what they see as marginal agricultural land, other County residents who are adamant that agricultural land is a non-renewable resource that must be preserved and a State law mandating specific actions that must be taken to protect the land defined as agricultural land. Commercial agriculture in Deschutes County consists primarily of field crops (alfalfa, other hay, some peppermint, potatoes and seed crops) and livestock operations. The high elevation (2700-3500 feet) and low rainfall make difficult conditions for crop farming. A short growing season and the risk of crop damage from frost or mid -summer hail storms must be factored into agriculture investment planning. Irrigation is essential for crops and is used extensively for irrigated pastures. Without irrigation, little soil is classified better than SCS Soil Capability Class IV. These factors, along with limited marketing alternatives, often produce a frustrating and discouraging experience for local farmers, although some do manage to be successful. However, agriculture still is an important economic element of the County, contributing significantly to the local economy. Agriculture also provides secondary benefits such as open space and scenic appearance; benefits which may also pay economic returns in the form of tourist dollars. Since detailed soils mapping existed for only a portion of the County in 1979, it was necessary to develop a more elaborate definition than that found in the State Goal. The definition finally agreed to by the County used the available information on agricultural lands and laid a foundation for future additions or deletions as better soils information became available. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 1 0138-0644 Agricultural lands were defined as those lands identified as possessing Soil Conservation Service Agricultural Capability Class I -VI soils (S.C.S. Land Capabilities Classification Map) or, where detailed soils information was not available, land identified by having been listed as on Farm Tax Deferral within the five years preceding the adoption of the 1979 plan (as indicated on the the Existing Land Use Map complied from County Assessor's records) and/or by the fact that the land was indicated on the County Planning Department's Irrigated Lands Map. Having a definition was only the first step, as it was then necessary to differentiate between the various types of agriculture to be found locally and to identify the various areas they characterized. Members of the Planning Staff, the Agricultural CAC and the Overall CAC identified seven types of agriculture and areas characterized by such agriculture. These types included High Desert Sagebrush and Juniper Land, located east of Horse Ridge and characterized by extensive livestock grazing; Riparian Meadows, located along the Upper Deschutes River, the Little Deschutes River and in the Sisters area and characterized by sub -irrigated pasture and meadow hay; Irrigated Commercial Crop Land, located in Lower Bridge and characterized by field crops; Irrigated Marginally Commercial Land, located in the Alfalfa, Cloverdale and Terrebonne areas and characterized by pasture and forage; Dry Rangeland, located near Odin Falls and characterized by dryland grazing; Marginal Farm Land - Undeveloped, located east of Bend and near Redmond, Tumalo and Sisters and characterized by pasture and forage; and Marginal Farm Land - Developed, located in the Bend, Plainview and Tumalo areas and characterized by pasture and forage. As part of periodic review in 1992, the county conducted a study of commercial agriculture in Deschutes County. The purpose of the study was to ensure that EFU zone boundaries and standards for farm divisions and dwellings were consistent with Goal 3 and relevant administrative rules. The results of the study are detailed in the completion report dated June 1992, and are incorporated into the Resource Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The study identified 7 agricultural subzones: Lower Bridge, Sisters/Cloverdale, Tumalo/Redmond/Bend, Terrebonne, Alfalfa, LaPine and Horse Ridge East. For each subzone, standards were determined for minimum parcel sizes for [both] farm divisions [and farm -related dwellings]. The standards are designed to protect the commercial agriculture land base [while providing for flexibility. A tiered administrative process administers the standards]. One of the primary findings of the study is that irrigated acres is the controlling variable for defining commercial agriculture. Therefore, the standard for defining what constitutes a farm parcel is keyed to the number of irrigated acres typically found on commercial farms in each subzone. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 2 0138--065 The study also found that farms in Deschutes County usually contain a mix of irrigated and nonirrigated land, as well as a mix of soils of different classes. Since the assessed farm use value is linked to the productive capability of property, it provides a surrogate for irrigated acres by acknowledging the presence and role of unirrigated soils in farm operations. The assessed farm use value can be used in place of the irrigated acreage figure where the land value is set to equal that of the irrigated land (i.e., median irrigated acres in subzone x farm use value of best irrigated land in subzone = threshold assessed land value). Notwithstanding the preceding, the LaPine Subzone is somewhat different from the other subzones in that farm sales are less than farm use values. In general, this is due to agricultural practices that depend to a much greater degree than in the other subzones on livestock grazing on non -irrigated pasture. To address this situation, median irrigated acreage and median assessed farm use value are used to set the basic commercial standards[, with the income test for dwellings derived by the county farmland appraiser from the sum of the sales potentials that the median commercial farm could realize considering typical irrigated acreage, wet meadowland and dry grazing land in the subzone]. Following the completion of the 1992 farm study and submission of the County's periodic review package to LCDC, the Oregon legislative session and LCDC amended the statutes and rules governing uses in the farm zones. The County's ordinances and the policies that follow have been amended as necessary to conform to those changes. Recognizing the importance of protecting agricultural land the following policies were [was] chosen to meet State requirements and local needs: To preserve and maintain agricultural land. POLICIES• ZONING 1. All lands meeting the definition of agricultural lands shall be zoned Exclusive Farm use, unless an exception to State goal 3 is obtained so that the zoning may be Multiple Use Agriculture or Rural Residential. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 3 0138- 06 *16 2. Lands not meeting the agricultural lands definition but having potential for irrigation according to the Bureau of Reclamation Special Report - Deschutes Project, Central Division, Oregon, although not presently without water, shall receive exclusive farm use zoning. 3. Public lands meeting the criteria for EFU zoning shall be so zoned unless some other resource (i.e., forest) or public use exists on the land. 4. No more than 25 percent of a given agricultural subzone shall be composed of lands not of the same agricultural type. Any agricultural lands not zoned EFU agriculture shall be identified in the County Exception Statement. zoning districts shall be at least 40 acres in size. 5. zones and minimum parcel sizes shall be established to assure the preservation of the existing commercial agricultural enterprise of the area. 6. For purposes of profiling the existing commercial agricultural enterprises of the County, the County shall consider as one land unit all tracts in contiguous ownership (including those parcels separated only by a road) zoned EFU. 7. The County will consider as its pool for profiling the nature of the existing agricultural enterprises of the area those farms that make the highest 90% contribution to the local agricultural economy. 8. In recognition that irrigated acres per farm unit is the key variable identifying commercial agricultural enterprises in the County, the County shall use the median number of irrigated acres per farm unit in the area or subzone as its principal standard for defining what size of tract constitutes a farm parcel. As an alternative to median irrigated acres as a standard, an assessed farm value equal to that of the median irrigated acres shall be used as a standard for establishing farm parcel size. The formula for the assessed farm value determination shall be as follows: the median number of irrigated acres per farm unit for the area or subzone x per acre farm use value of best irrigated land in subzone = dollar threshold for assessed land value alternative. 9. Following from the June 1992 OSU Extension Service completion report detailed in the resource element, the County has identified 7 subzones representing distinct groupings of agricultural types. The County's EFU zoning shall reflect those identified subzones, Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 4 0138-0647' generally described as follows and as more particularly detailed in the resource element of the comprehensive plan: Subzone Profile Lower Bridge Irrigated field crops, hay and pasture Sisters/Cloverdale Irrigated alfalfa, hay and pasture, wooded grazing and some field crops Terrebonne Irrigated hay and pasture Tumalo/Redmond/Bend Irrigated pasture and some hay Alfalfa Irrigated hay and pasture LaPine Riparian meadows, grazing and meadow hay Horse Ridge East Rangeland grazing 10. For the purposes of determining relevant characteristics (i.e., farm use values, multipliers, irrigated acres and assessed farm use values) of commercial farms, the County will rely on those farms and those statistics identified in the completion report prepared by the OSU Extension Service dated June 1992 and set forth in the resource element of the comprehensive plan. [11. To allow for flexibility, local variations and innovative farming proposals, a tiered administrative approach, as described in the resource element of the plan, shall be used to determine, based upon the data profile of each subzone, appropriate parcel sizes for purposes of decision-making on individual farm land division and farm dwelling applications. In Tier 1, decisions on parcel size shall be based upon the median irrigated acres or farm assessed values in the identified subzones. In Tier 2, decisions shall be based upon the median irrigated acres or farm assessed values in a more localized radius. In Tier 3, decisions shall be based upon whether under a proposed farm Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 5 U138-Q6�B management plan the subject parcel can generate the median annual gross sales for the subzone, as determined by a local technical advisory committee. Tiers 1, 2 and 3 shall apply to farm dwelling decisions; only Tiers 1 and 2 shall apply to farm divisions.] [12. Farm divisions reviewed under Tier 2 shall contain, at a minimum, the amount of irrigated land found in the lower quartile of commercial farms in the subzone.] 11 [13]. In order to provide some flexibility in the zoning and to assist farmers who may need to sell an isolated unproductive piece of land in order to assure continued operation of the farm, individual isolated partitions (creation of one [or two] new parcel [lots]) establishing [lots] parcels less than the EFU minimum lot size in EFU areas shall be permitted to the maximum extent allowed by state law. The remaining farm parcel must be at least the minimum established by the EFU zone. In order to provide some flexibility in the zoning, while still maintaining the rural character of the area and limiting the costs of providing services to rural residents, the county shall allow non-farm residential divisions with a minimum lot size of 20 acres and limit to three the number of new non-farm parcels that can be created from any one parent parcel. This prohibition shall apply to all parcels created after the effective date of Ordinance 92-065. 12 [14]. So that a farmer who has lived on his land for 10 years or more may retire and sell his property while retaining the use of his existing home, a homestead exception may be permitted which allows the homesteader to retain a life estate lease on the home and some of the surrounding land. The lease will end with the death(s) of the homesteader and spouse. This exception shall not permit the creation of another residence on the property in question. 13 [15]. A division of land for non-farm uses, except dwellings, may be approved as long as the parcel for the non-farm use is no larger than the minimum size necessary for the use. The parcel shall be at least one acre in size. 14 [16]. Parcel size exceptions may be granted because of survey errors when original section lines were established, so that standard section divisions may be achieved (i.e., 160, 80, 40, 10, etc., acres). Man-made barriers such as roads or canals, over which the applicant has no control, may serve as adequate justification for granting a parcel (lot) size variance. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 6 0138-06119 15 [17]. Normal agricultural practices (i.e., aerial pesticide applications, machinery dust and noise, etc.) [should] shall not be restricted by non-agricultural interests in [agricultural districts] exclusive farm use zones. The County shall consider requiring noise, dust, fly, etc., easements to be granted to adjoining farmers where non-agricultural uses are permitted. 16 [18]. Coordination between public and private landowners to encourage farm use shall be encouraged. And projects to increase productivity and to bring new land into agricultural production shall be fostered. 17 [19]. Control of noxious weeds through educational programs should be continued. 18 [20]. Farm and non-farm uses in rural areas shall be consistent with the conservation of soil and water. 19 [21]. Prior to the next periodic review of its comprehensive plan and to the extent allowed by state law, the County Planning Department shall initiate a study of EFU-zoned lands to develop a recommendation as to whether marginal lands or secondary lands would be appropriate. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (Draft 03/95) Page 7