Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1999-31-Order No. 99-015 Recorded 1/14/1999
VOL: CJ1999 PAGE: 31 RECORDED DOCUMENT STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF DESCHUTES I hereby certify that the attached instrument was received and duly recorded in Deschutes County records: DATE AND TIME: DOCUMENT TYPE: Jan. 14, 1999; 3:09 p.m. Order (CJ) MARY SUE PENHOLLOW DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK NT Y,k7= jPj ED 99, *CJ1999-31 * Vol -Page 02/04/1999 17:02:39 mICROFILMED 4 FEB 10 1997 BEFORE THE VIEWED T, J)c� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHU 1 , N An Order declaring the intention to create a Local Improvement District known as Piute L.I.D. for the improvement of a Certain Dedicated Public Road Known as all of Piute Circle within Deschutes River Woods Subdivision, * c Deschutes County, Oregon, Accepting the Engineer's Feasibility Report, Setting the Hearing for Remonstrance, and Authorizing the Road Department Director to Give;', Notice of Said Hearing. " ORDER NO. 99-015© .. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, by Resolution 98-130 initiated the improvement of a certain dedicated public road known as all of Piute Circle within Deschutes River Woods Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has investigated the feasibility of making the improvements, estimated the cost of the improvements, proposed a method of assessment and estimated the amount of the assessments against each of the specially benefited properties, in accordance with 12.48.150 of the Deschutes County Code; and WHEREAS, the Board has considered the Engineer's report and has determined to proceed with the proposed improvements, subject to the notice and hearing requirements of Chapter 12.48 of the Deschutes County Code; and WHEREAS, the Engineer conducted a mail poll of all the owners of all specially benefited lots within the LID in accordance with Section 12.48.166 of the Deschutes County Code. The poll approval rate is 74% of the owners of land representing over 60% of the total amount of the estimated assessment for the proposed local improvement; and WHEREAS, Section 12.48.170 of the Deschutes County Code requires that the Board provide notice to specially benefited property owners and set a hearing for the purpose of hearing remonstrances to said improvements; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDERS as follows: Section 1. That the Engineer's Report relating to the improvement of a certain dedicated public road known as all of Piute Circle within Deschutes River Woods Subdivision, Deschutes County, Oregon, marked Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, be accepted and hereby approved. PAGE 1 OF 2 - ORDER NO. 99-015 KEY"U�� EiED EF110 99�' Section 2. That a hearing be set on February 3, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. at the Deschutes County Board of Commissioner's Hearing Room, Administrative Building, 1130 NW Harriman, Bend, Oregon for the purpose of hearing remonstrances to said improvements. Section 3. That, subject to the hearing process set forth by Chapter 12.48 of the Deschutes County Code, the LID be formed and the improvements carried out as described in said Engineer's Report. Section 4. That the Road Department Director be authorized to notify benefited property owners of the said hearing and proposed improvement, in a form substantially as contained in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. DATED this 13 day of '1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFD SCHUTES, COUNTY, OREGON LIhDA L. SWEARINOEN, CHAIR R—ecording DEh•� • PAGE 2 OF 2 - ORDER NO. 99-015 �JTEs co Road Department 61150 S.E. 27th St., Bend, OR 97702 (541) 388-6581 • FAX (541) 388-2719 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Gary Judd, Engineer DATE: December 29, 1997 SUBJ: Piute Local Improvement District The Road Department recently completed the Engineer's Report (see attached) for Piute LID and conducted a Mail Poll of the property owners. Seventy-four percent (74%) of the property owners voted in favor by the postmark deadline of December 18, 1998. Deschutes County Code No. 12.48.166 requires that for a LID to be eligible for further consideration by the Board, at least 60% of the owners must vote yes. The mail poll results are: VOTES IN FAVOR 14 lots 74% VOTES AGAINST 1 lots 5% DID NOT VOTE 4 lots 21% 19 lots A break down of votes by owner's address is: ADDRESS YES NO Did not vote in LID 8(42%) 1(5%) 1 (5%) in Deschutes County 3(16%) 0 1 (5%) in Oregon 1 (11%) 0 0 out of state 4(5%) 0 2(11%) If the Board decides to proceed with the LID the next step in the process is to enact an order setting a public hearing and directing notice be given of the hearing. Owners shall have the right to object to further prosecution of the LID either by filing a written objection or by oral testimony at the hearing. Quality Services Performed with Pride ES 2 Road Department 0 'AA .A � -C MEMORANDUM 61150 S.E. 27th St., Bend, OR 97702 (541) 388-6581 • FAX (541) 388-2719 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Gary Judd, Engineer DATE: Novemeber 30, 1998 SUBJ: Feasibility study for the Piute Circle L.I.D. This report is made pursuant to Section 12.48.150 of the Deschutes County Code concerning the engineering investigation, by the Deschutes County Road Department, of proposed local road improvements. Deschutes County received a petition from certain property owners to improve a certain dedicated public road known as Piute Circle in Deschutes River Woods, near Bend, Oregon. Due to this petition, the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners initiated a Local Improvement District by Resolution No. 98-130 signed on November 25, 1998. The Resolution was referred to the Deschutes County Road Department for the completion of a feasibility study of the proposed local improvements in accordance with Deschutes County Code 12.48.150. This report constitutes the engineer's findings. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ROAD AND SURROUNDING AREA The area in which the road improvements are sought constitutes a portion of a subdivision south of Bend known generally as Deschutes River Woods. The subdivision is accessed either from Brookswood Boulevard or Baker Road. The primary access to Piute Circle is Navajo Road, designated as a rural local on the County's Transportation Plan. Navajo Road intersects with Cinder Butte Road, designated a rural collector. All of the lots within the boundaries of the LID abut on Piute Circle. Quality Services Performed With Pride FEASIBILITY STUDY PIUTE CIRCLE LID 2of6 Piute Circle within the proposed LID is currently an unpaved road consisting of decomposed cinder aggregate and dirt. The road was built to serve lots in Deschutes River Woods Subdivision in the late 1960's. Piute Circle was not constructed to current County standards and is not included in the County maintained road system. The County bears no responsibility for maintaining this road. Maintenance of the road must be provided by owners of the property served by the road. Since the road is unpaved, it is prone to extensive washboarding and rutting, which requires frequent grading to smooth the ruts and washboards out. Repeated grading, snowplowing, and the effects of traffic have caused the cinder base material to nearly disappear from the roadway. In many places the road is now down to dirt, with rocks showing through. A map of the area is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. OPTIMAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE IMPROVEMENT The road to be improved is classified as a local street by the Deschutes County Transportation Plan. Meaning that the purpose of this road is to carry local traffic and primarily serve lots abutting the subject street. See DCC 17.08.620(F). Since the entire length of road from it's intersection with Navajo Road (a County maintained road) to the end is proposed to be included in the local improvements this is an optimal location and extent of the project. The proposed improved road will facilitate orderly development and efficient use of infrastructure throughout the neighborhood as well as effective maintenance of the improvements. BOUNDARIES OF THE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DCC 12.48.130 requires that properties to be assessed be included within the boundaries of a designated local improvement district (LID). Properties to be included in a LID are properties that are benefited by the proposed local improvements. Attached as part of Exhibit 2 of this report is a map showing the boundary of the proposed local improvement district and the benefited properties, along with the location of the improvement and the road to be improved. Properties abutting a street improvement are presumed to benefit from such construction. Accordingly, except as noted herein, the boundaries of the LID have been drawn to include those properties that abut the improvements. Because the road is designated as a rural local road and will be constructed to standards appropriate for rural local roads. A map of the Local Improvement District is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION DESIGN The construction standards for local streets are found in the County subdivision ordinance. See DCC 17.48.010. The relevant standards are set forth in Section 17.48.050 and Table A. Those standards require a pavement width of 22 feet, a base depth of 6 inches of crushed aggregate and a surface of 0-9 mat or 2" of AC. Roads must be designed to the safety and design standards of FEASIBILITY STUDY PIUTE CIRCLE LID 3 of 6 the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). These standards as adapted to rural local streets reflect the designation and function of the improvement as a local street. This engineer's report has been drafted anticipating that the work to be done will meet the rural local construction standards. The following is a description of the proposed work under those standards: Mobilization - normal mobilization costs incurred in preparation of the work. Construction Surve idng - setting slope stakes, subgrade stakes, and base hubs for the contractor to construct the road. Traffic Control - signs and flaggers will be provided to warn, safeguard, protect, guide, and inform the public and workers. Subgrade - earthwork will be required to construct subgrade. There will be some construction required to provide proper drainage. Base - placing, shaping, compacting, and fine grading of base will be required. A six inch depth of aggregate base will be utilized for the roadway and a four inch depth of aggregate will be used for driveways. Paving - the paving will be a two inches in depth of asphaltic concrete surface. The pavement width will be twenty-two feet. Miscellaneous Work - resetting mailboxes, moving utilities, and obtaining right-of-way. Engineering and Administration - the expenses incurred by the County in the preparation of plans and specifications, inspection, surveying, accounting, payment collection, and interim financing costs. From the staff's review of the proposal and the site, it does not appear that there is anything that would make the proposal unfeasible from a technical standpoint. All right-of-ways are dedicated to the public with a width of fifty feet. Except for areas where the current road base does not align with the right-of-way, the road to be improved is already laid out and in use. The terrain is generally flat in nature, with some areas where excavation and embankment will be required. If slopes extend outside of the right-of-way, easements will be obtained from the property owners affected. CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS There are two considerations to be looked at in assessing whether the proposed improvements are consistent with zoning requirements. First, whether the class of the road improvement is one that would require land use approval and second, whether the requirements of the applicable zones would require land use approval. FEASIBILITY STUDY PLATE CIRCLE LID 4of6 In this case, the proposed improvements would be considered to be a Class III road or street project. Class III road and street projects are those involving modernization, traffic safety improvements, maintenance, repair, or preservation of a road or street. See DCC 17.08.625(C). Improvements falling within this classification do not as a general rule require a land use permit. As a general rule, it is only when modernization involves widening by more than one lane that a land use permit is required. See, e.g., DCC 17.08.625(B) regarding Class II road and street projects. That scenario is not presented by the proposed road improvements. As to the requirements of the zones themselves, the proposed improvements are located within RR -10 zoning. Class III road improvements in the RR -10 zone are outright permitted uses. See DCC 18.60.020(F) and DCC 18.032.020(E). The proposed project is consistent with the RR -10 zoning and may proceed without obtaining permits. Given that zoning allows for the proposed improvement, the project is feasible from a land use perspective. DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM ACTUAL COST Under DCC Chapter 12.48; assessments for local improvements may include, in the costs to be assessed to benefiting properties, the "actual cost of the local improvement project. "Actual costs" includes all direct and indirect costs incurred by the County to undertake a capital construction such as that proposed by Resolution No 98-130 "Actual costs" includes but is not limited to; the cost of labor, materials, supplies, equipment rental, property acquisition, permits, engineering, financing, legal, administration, depreciation, amortization, reserve for delinquencies, or defaults, and debt service. Administrative expenses may include those incurred in preparation for formation of a local improvement district, such as meeting with property owners, preparing and processing the feasibility report, and providing notice and conducting hearings. The engineer has determined the maximum actual cost of the proposed local improvement, including interim financing, to be assessed to the benefited properties is $83,490. Attached as Exhibit 113" is a detailed schedule of the cost estimate. The estimate construction costs are based on 1998 project costs for similar types of construction. A contingency has been added to the construction costs estimate to cover unexpected cost overruns due to unforeseen construction complications and to reflect the possibility of higher construction costs due to increase in the costs of materials and labor. PROPOSED METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The recommended method of assessment, to arrive at a fair apportionment of the actual cost of the local improvement to the properties specially benefited, is to divide the total cost of the project or maximum actual cost, which ever is less, by the number of specially benefited lots. This per lot apportionment method is recommended due to differing lot sizes, shapes, and frontages, the presence of corner lots, and takes into account densities prescribed by zoning in the area. The differences amongst the lots make for difficulties in apportionment if an alternative apportionment method based on frontage or acreage were to be used. Since all of the lots, except combined or partitioned lots, have more or less an equal size, it is reasonable to assume that each abutting lot will have only one residence; therefore, the ability to use the improvements would be the same per lot regardless of the frontage a particular lot has. FEASIBILITY STUDY PIU TE CIRCLE LID 5 of 6 The boundaries of the LID have been drawn to include only properties that abut or directly access onto the proposed improvements. All included properties are zoned RR -10. Given the existing zoning, the size of the subject parcels, and the nature of existing development in the area, it is reasonable to assume that future development on the vacant lots in the proposed LID will be for residential uses. SPECIAL BENEFITS TO ASSESSED PROPERTIES All of the properties to be assessed abut the proposed improvements. As rural local roads, abutting properties may take access directly from any of the road segments to be improved. After the improvements are finished, all properties proposed to be assessed will have the entirety of their access be by way of a paved improved road designed and constructed to County standards. County standards reflect the safety and design criteria of the Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The road to be improved currently does not meet AASHTO safety standards. Direct access from a paved, improved road will reduce wear and tear on vehicles and generally make access to the abutting properties for the entire length of the access more convenient. Direct access from a paved, improved road will improve response time from emergency service vehicles, such as fire trucks and ambulances. Emergency service vehicles will not be required to slow down to negotiate bad stretches of road. Direct access from a paved, improved road will reduce dust raised by vehicles traveling past residences on cindered roads. The status of the road, as improved to County standards, will allow the County to accept the road into the County maintained road system for maintenance. The County currently has a policy of not accepting roads or streets into the County maintained road system that have not been constructed to County standards. Such roads are not maintained by the County and if property owners who use them wish them to be maintained they must take responsibility for such maintenance. Unimproved roads require frequent maintenance to keep them from getting rutted and washboarded. This can be an expensive undertaking, especially when additional cinder base material is added. Often, the washboards and ruts will reappear on the surface of the road after only a week and the road will need to be regraded. In a heavy snow winter, these roads often need to be snow plowed. As County maintained roads, the improved road would be plowed by the County according to the County's schedule for plowing. Properties not abutting the improvements will not gain the benefits of County road maintenance. Direct access from a paved road will improve the property values of the abutting properties. For all these reasons, the properties to be assessed are specially benefited from the proposed improvements. FEASIBILITY STUDY PIUTE CIRCLE LID 6 of 6 Exhibit 112" is a drawing showing specially benefited properties. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSED VALUE A description and assessed value of each lot or parcel to be specially benefited by the local improvements and included within the LID boundaries, with the names of the owners of record, is attached as Exhibit "4" of this report. MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT AGAINST EACH LOT The maximum assessment against each lot or parcel to be included in the LID is: $83,490 / 19 lots = $4,394.21 per lot. This is the assessment against each lot that the County agrees not to exceed, if the actual costs are less than the engineer's estimate then the assessment against each lot will be reduced. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS DCC 12.48.150(B) address minimum requirements for the minimum financial feasibility of the proposed project. Attached in exhibit "5" is the analysis by the County Finance Director regarding financial feasibility of the project. Of the 19 lots, 12 of the lots have residences on them which is 63% of the total number of lots. Therefore, the requirements of 12.48.330 do not need to be specifically met. Regardless, much of the criteria of this section should be addressed as a means of addressing the financial risks that the County may incur if this LID is approved. The ratio of assessed property value to the estimated LID assessment is one means of determining the financial risk. The ratios and lot percentages in this LID are as follows: RATIO # of LOTS % of LOTS 2:1 or less 0 0% 2:1 to 5:1 7 37% 5:1 to 10:1 0 0% 10:1 or greater 12 63% Most of the lots within the LID are approximately one acre in size and are zoned RR -10. There is a reasonable expectation that residences would be approved on the undeveloped lots. Utilities such as: electricity, water, and telephone have been installed within the right-of-way of the road to be improved and are adjacent to all of the lots within the LID. No one property owner owns more than three lots within the boundaries of the LID. This LID appears to meet the criteria in DCC 12.48.330(A) for feasibility from a financial standpoint. .,a pa T��- a �� MLI 'i tete L_ I _ L '��® =BOMB me m w -I .,a pa T��- a �� MLI 'i tete L_ I _ L Section 36 Sec. 36, T1 8S, R11 E,wm 0 Affected Lots 0 Other Lots c:Watalarcviewkoaddept%dWitAe Exhibit 2 Mute L.I.D. Deschutes County Local Improvement District Printed: November 10, 1998 n.lnkxm0wonYtsmywasd.dndnemd&Iar ea.aam Dmhjwt CoAWs GJA Cara weahken in M enatim oflhk map, but k kprWW dtis W. Desdetas Coanq cannot WCC ary naP•wbilty ter arar., orN Wem, a powaend aaew.ey 1, V. dpbal Oak or the un Wna words. Than am w wwmtiw wpnn or knpli.d kidudrp the ~afft of nwehantadky er Ila»n kr a patkdar purpow awarmawft We prodad. Ho .rlomatm d arty mars vAt be aWedakd. ►T.TJ 0 300 600 Feet DESCHUTES COUNTY 4 ROAD DEPARTM£NI' GIS DIVISION Anna naakrmn, cls Speaiakat Ph— 64113MOSBI,—d ydwaMaJneNubn.erg 6115n 1:.1, vm sa, eeet tat xlnla Exhibit 3 PIUTE CIRCLE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE ITEM UANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ATION All LumpSum $10,000 ING All LumpSum 2,000 AFFIC CONTROL rFLAGGERS All LumpSum 1,000 NS 100 S.F. $8.00 800 50 HRS $28.00 1,400 G & GRUBBING All Lump Sum 3,000 EARTHWORK 1,000 C.Y. $12.00 12,000 FINISH ROADBED 1,200 L.F. $ 1.50 1,800 WATERING 500 M.G $10.00 5,000 6" OF BASE 3,500 S.Y. $ 3.50 12,250 2" OF A.C. 3,000 S.Y. $ 3.75 DRAINAGE All LumpSum DRIVEWAYS 15 EA. $300.00 SUBTOTAL' CONST. CONTINGENCY 15% d$72,600 SUBTOTAL ENGINEER & TION 15% TOTAL LID COST Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT #4 PIUTE L.I.D. PROPERTY OWNERS PROPERTY ASSESSED NOT TO _ NAME DESCRIPTION VALUE EXCEED COST 1. SHINO, GEORGE Y. 181136 DO 09700 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 SHINO, MICHIKO H. Lot 15 Block E 3140 EASY AVENUE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS LONG BEACH, CA 90810 2. ASPLUND, RONALD C. 181136 DO 09800 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 ASPLUND, DOROTHY C. Lot 16 Block E 42607 BRIDGE RD. DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS OAKHURST, CA 93644-8659 3. ROMINE, DAINA 181136 DO 09900 $95,155.00 $4,394.21 ROMINE, RON Lot 17 Block E 19427 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 4. GREAT WESTERN HOMES, INC. 181136 DO 10000 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 62393 N. HWY. 97 Lot 18 Block E BEND, OR 97701 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 5. HUDSON, DARREL W. 181136 DO 10100 $95,325.00 $4,394.21 HUDSON, KRISTIN A. Lot 19 Block E 19413 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 6. GUSTAFSON, CRAIG 181136 DO 10200 $48,120.00 $4,394.21 19410 MOHAWK RD. Lot 20 Block E BEND, OR 97702 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 7'. WALTERS, VERNA L. 181136 DO 10300 $66,085.00 $4,394.21 TRUSTEE WALTERS TRUST Lot 21 Block E 60159 CINDER BUTTE ROAD DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 8. JONES, HARLAN C. 181136 DO 10400 $119,280.00 $4,394.21 ROOT, MARIE A. Lot 4 Block F 603 W IOWA ST. DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BOISE, ID 83706 9. HUDSON, DAVID A. 181136 DO 10500. $21,935.00 $4,394.21 HUDSON, SANDRA L. Lot 5 Block F 19383 SEMINOLE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 10. KNOWLES, MARILYN P. 181136 DO 10600 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 19377 PIUTE CIRCLE Lot 6 Block F BEND, OR 97702 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT #4 PIUTE L.I.D. PROPERTY OWNERS PROPERTY ASSESSED NOT TO . NAME DESCRIPTION VALUE EXCEED COST 11. KNOWLES MARILYN P. 181136 DO 10700 $143,235.00 $4,394.21 MERRILL, JOSEPH (CB) Lot 7 Block F MERRILL, REBECCA (CB) DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 19418 PIUTE CIRCLE BEND, OR 97702 12. HARRIS, MICHAEL E. 181136 DO 10800 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 HARRIS, BARBARA Lot 8 Block F P.O. BOX 2 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS CANBY, OR 97013 13. ROGERS, RAY L. 181136 DO 10900 $104,485.00 $4,394.21 19434 PIUTE CIRCLE Lot 9 Block F BEND, OR 97702 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 14. ROGERS, CAROLYN L. 181136 DO 11000 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 7295 SW 167TH PLACE Lot 10 Block F BEAVERTON, OR 97007 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 15. HAM, WILLIAM BAYLESS 181136 CO 00100 $98,175.00 $4,394.21 HAM, JUANITA GODOY Lot 3 Block F 19388 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 16. KORNISH, DAVID N. 181136 CO 00200 $227,980.00 $4,394.21 KORNISH, DEBORAH E. Lot 1, 2 Block F 19372 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 17. KNOWLES, STEVEN M. 181136 CO 00400 $218,725.00 $4,394.21 KNOWLES, LINDA J. Lot 24 Block E 19377 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 18. KNOWLES, MARILYN P. 181136 CO 00500 $179,215.00 $4,394.21 19377 PIUTE CIRCLE Lot 23 Block E BEND, OR 97702 DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 19. MINAHAN, DENNIS R. 181136C000600 $51,480.00 $4,394.21 MINAHAN, MARIAN E. Lot 22 Block E 19389 PIUTE CIRCLE DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS BEND, OR 97702 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT #5 PIUTE CIRCLE Local Improvement District Financial Analysis I. Assessment to Value Ratios The ratio of assessed property value to the estimated LID assessment is one means of determining the financial risk. The ratios and lot percentages in the LID are as follows: Number of Lots % of Project Ratio Analysis 12 63.2% 10:1 to greater 0 0.0% 5:1 to 10:1 7 36.8% 2:1 to 5:1 0 0.0% 2:1 or less The following information was compiled by the Deschutes County Road Department: Most of the lots within the LID are approximately one acre in size and are zoned RRA 0. There is a reasonable expectation that residences would be approved on the undeveloped lots. Utilities such as: electricity, water, and telephone have been installed within the right-of-way of the road to be improved and are adjacent to all of the lots within the LID. No one property owner owns more than three lots within the boundaries of the LID. This LID appears to meet the criteria in DCC 12.48.330(A) for feasibility from a financial standpoint. I1. Risk Related to Undeveloped Land Approximately 37% of the property within this area is undeveloped. Of the 37% undeveloped properties, all have assessments to value ratios greater than a 2:1 ratio. III. Interim Financing Outside interim financing for this project has not been required. We do plan, however, to issue bonds for assessments requested to be financed on behalf of property owners. IV. Long-term Financing Ballot Measure 50 has not affected our ability to issue limited tax improvement bonds for a project such as this one, according to representatives of Seattle -Northwest Securities Corporation, our financial advisor for recent bond issues. 0a --- Marty Wynne Finance Director, Deschutes County EXHIBIT "B" NOTICE OF PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENT DATE: January 13, 1999 TO: «NAME1» «NAME2» «NAMES» «ADDRESS» «CITY», «ST» «ZIP» DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: PIUTE LID DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITED PROPERTY: «ACCOUNT» Estimated Cost of Improvement: $83,490.00 Estimated Amount of Assessment: $4,394.21 The Board of County Commissioners has initiated the above improvement. The County Engineer has made a favorable report to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the proposed improvement. The engineer's report relating to the proposed LID is on file and available for public examination. The area affected by the proposed local improvement is a portion of Deschutes River Woods Subdivision, located near Bend, Oregon. The road to be improved is all Of Piute Circle. The benefiting lots that would be assessed for the proposed improvement include those lots abutting the aforementioned road improvements shown on the attached list. Upon completion of the proposed improvement, the roads will be accepted into the County Road System, and will be maintained by Deschutes County. IF YOU OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENTS, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO FILE WRITTEN OBJECTION, IF ANY, WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CIO DESCHUTES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT, 61150 S.E. 27TH STREET, BEND, OREGON 97702, WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE MAILING OF THIS NOTICE, OR BY ORAL TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WHICH WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 3, 1999 AT 10:00 A.M. AT THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER'S HEARING ROOM, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 1130 NW HARRIMAN, BEND, OREGON. If more than 50% of the owners of land representing more than 50% of the total amount of the assessment for the proposed improvement file objections, the proposed improvement will be declared abandoned and no new resolution shall be adopted within a period of one year. If the required number of objections are not received, the improvement will proceed and you will be notified of the actual assessment when it is determined by the Engineer. This assessment, as finally approved by the Board of County Commissioners, will be entered into the lien docket of Deschutes County and will be released when the assessment is paid in full. Owners may apply to make payments in installments which can be paid over a ten-year period. A single owner of more than three lots or parcels to be assessed will be required to furnish security in the amount of 110 percent of the estimated assessment for each lot or parcel held by the owner in excess of three lots or parcels. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON TOM BLUST, Director, Deschutes County Road Department On Behalf of the Board of County Commissioners MUTE L.I.D. PROPERTY OWNERS DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS Page 1 of 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED NOT TO _ NAME DESCRIPTION VALUE EXCEED COST 'I. SHINO, GEORGE Y. 181136 DO 09700 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 SHINO, MICHIKO H. Lot 15 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 2. ASPLUND, RONALD C. 181136 DO 09800 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 ASPLUND, DOROTHY C. Lot 16 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 3. ROMINE, DAINA 181136 DO 09900 $95,155.00 $4,394.21 ROMINE, RON Lot 17 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 4. GREAT WESTERN HOMES, INC. 181136 DO 10000 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 Lot 18 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 5. HUDSON, DARREL W. 181136 DO 10100 $95,325.00 $4,394.21 HUDSON, KRISTIN A. Lot 19 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 6. GUSTAFSON, CRAIG 181136 DO 10200 $48,120.00 $4,394.21 Lot 20 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 7. WALTERS, VERNA L. 181136 DO 10300 $66,085.00 $4,394.21 TRUSTEE WALTERS TRUST Lot 21 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 8. JONES, HARLAN C. 181136 DO 10400 $119,280.00 $4,394.21 ROOT, MARIE A. Lot 4 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 9. HUDSON, DAVID A. 181136 DO 10500 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 HUDSON, SANDRA L. Lot 5 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 10. KNOWLES, MARILYN P. 181136 DO 10600 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 Lot 6 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 11. KNOWLES MARILYN P. 181136 DO 10700 $143,235.00 $4,394.21 MERRILL, JOSEPH (CB) Lot 7 Block F MERRILL, REBECCA (CB) DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 12. HARRIS, MICHAEL E. 181136 DO 10800 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 HARRIS, BARBARA Lot 8 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS Page 1 of 2 PIUTE L.I.D. PROPERTY OWNERS DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS Page 2 of 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED NOT TO NAME DESCRIPTION VALUE EXCEED COST 13. ROGERS, RAY L. 181136 DO 10900 $104,485.00 $4,394.21 Lot 9 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 14. ROGERS, CAROLYN L. 181136 DO 11000 $21,935.00 $4,394.21 Lot 10 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 15. HAM, WILLIAM BAYLESS 181136 CO 00100 $98,175.00 $4,394.21 HAM, JUANITA GODOY Lot 3 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 16. KORNISH, DAVID N. 181136 CO 00200 $227,980.00 $4,394.21 KORNISH, DEBORAH E. Lot 1, 2 Block F DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 17. KNOWLES, STEVEN M. 181136 CO 00400 $218,725.00 $4,394.21 KNOWLES, LINDA J. Lot 24 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 18. KNOWLES, MARILYN P. 181136 CO 00500 $179,215.00 $4,394.21 Lot 23 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS 19. MINAHAN, DENNIS R. 181136C000600 $51,480.00 $4,394.21 MINAHAN, MARIAN E. Lot 22 Block E DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS Page 2 of 2