The URL can be used to link to this page

2001-502-Resolution No. 2001-036 Recorded 6/21/2001VOL: CJ2001 PAGE: 502 RECORDED DOCUMENT STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF DESCHUTES *CJ2001-502 * Vol -Page Printed: 06/29/2001 16:27:35 DO NOT REMOVE THIS CERTIFICATE (This certificate constitutes a part of the original instrument in accordance with ORS 205.180(2). Removal of this certificate may invalidate this certificate and affect the admissibility of the original instrument into evidence in any legal proceeding.) I hereby certify that the attached instrument was received and duly recorded in Deschutes County records. DATE AND TIME: DOCUMENT TYPE: Jun. 21, 2001; 9:23 a.m. Resolution (CJ) NUMBER OF PAGES: 27 Lv� 0,., 0,-� MARY SUE PENHOLLOW DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK KEYpuNCHED JUN 15 2001 OT A601005401M BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution Establishing a New System Development Charge (SDC) Methodology and SDC, Fee Amount, and Adopting Capital * 3 Improvement Lists for Transportation and Park Improvements * 4 Within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary, and Prescribing an Effective Date of July 1, 2001.- c', r RESOLUTION NO. 2001-036 WHEREAS, the intergovernmental agreement dated June 23, 1998 between Deschutes ouhty and the City of Redmond provides for joint management within the City of Redmond Urban Growth Boundary, Redmond Growth Area and Redmond Area of Mutual Interest; and WHEREAS, Deschutes County Code Chapter 15.12 and ORS 223.297 to 223.314 provide for the establishment of system development charges (SDCs) by resolution; and WHEREAS, Deschutes County had previously adopted Resolution 96-086 in 1996 which established a system development charge for transportation within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary outside the City of Redmond, pursuant to County Code and state law; and WHEREAS, the City of Redmond has been experiencing rapid growth, creating the need to update its public facility plan, methodology, and corresponding transportation system development charge; and WHEREAS, notice of the City of Redmond's consideration of an amended methodology for systems development charges was provided as required by state law, ORS 223.304(5); and WHEREAS, the City of Redmond City Council held public hearings on February 27, 2001; March 13, 2001; March 27, 2001; April 10, 2001; and May 8, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Redmond City Council, after considering all testimony and evidence presented at the hearings, authorized the establishment of a new public facilities plan and new SDC fees through the adoption of Redmond Resolution No. 2001-10 and Ordinance No. 2001-04; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the intergovernmental agreement, approval of the new City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan and SDCs also requires approval by the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners after a public hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Bend Bulletin on May 27, 2001; and WHEREAS, interested parties were notified of a change in systems development charges within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary; and WHEREAS, the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for good accounting practices to begin collection of updated SDCs at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2001-2002 which is July 1, 2001; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, as follows: Section 1. PURPOSE. This resolution shall establish new SDCs within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary, outside the City of Redmond. The purpose of the SDCs imposed by this resolution under PAGE 1 OF 2 — RESOLUTION NO. 2001-036 (6/13/01) authority of DCC Chapter 15.1.2, is to pay for a portion of the cost of capital improvements for transportation and park improvements in the Redmond Urban Area, outside the City of Redmond. Section 2. METHODOLOGY AND CHARGES. The Board hereby adopts, as the methodology to establish systems development charges and charge rates for transportation and park projects, within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary, outside the City of Redmond, the methodology and charges set forth in the City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan previously adopted by the City of Redmond Resolution No. 2001-10 and summarized in the "Executive Summary Outline, Capital Improvement Program and SDC Calculation", dated May 2001, marked as Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS. The Board hereby adopts Table 5-1, "Capital Improvement Program" (transportation), dated May, 2001, and Table 8-4 "Redmond's Parks' Capital Improvement List" (parks), dated 10-27-00, previously adopted by the City of Redmond Resolution No. 2001- 10, marked as Exhibits "A" and "D" to the Resolution No. 2001-10 and attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF CHARGES. Each year, the charges established herein shall be automatically adjusted based on the annual average of the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News -Record. The charges established above reflect the base year of 2001. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. The system development charges established pursuant to this Resolution shall become effective on July 1, 2001. Until that time, the charges previously established shall remain in effect. Section 6. REPEAL. Upon the effective date for the systems development charges established in this Resolution, Deschutes County Resolution 96-086 shall be repealed. DATED this! 3 day of 4^ 12001. ATTEST: Tllm_� Recording Secretary BOARD OF COUNTY COMMJSSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY GON Tom De Debnis R. Luke, Commissioner ch el M. Daly, Co missioner REVIEWED ,..,,..LEGAL COUNS11 PAGE 2 OF 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 2001-036 (6/13/01) EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OUTLINE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND SDC CALCULATION Prepared by Mary Meloy Redmond Public Works Director Updated May 2001 TRANSPORTATION FACTORS: • Used official growth rate of 4.25% • Transportation Capital Improvement Plan is based on implementation of the projects over a 20 year period (Source: Redmond Transportation System Plan (TSP)] • TSP transportation forecasts were updated in 1999 to reflect future residential, commercial and industrial traffic at 4.25% growth rate • Cost estimates were prepared for each project (1999 dollars) and include design, construction, right-of-way and contingencies • Total cost of 20 year CIP projects is $96,642,900 SDC METHODOLOGY: 1) Of the $96,642,900, only the cost of arterial and collector "oversizing" is eligible for SDC funding Extra width and extra depth is eligible Bike Lanes are eligible Sidewalks are not eligible Separated Bike Paths are not eligible if for recreation 2) SDC eligible costs were separately calculated for each project 3) Of the total cost ($96,642,900), $27,972,710 million was eligible for SDC funding 4) This new methodology recommends using trip generation from the ITE (International Traffic Engineer's) 6th Edition, Manual PM Peak Hour Trip Rate, as a basis for calculating SDC charges, or applicant may have a licensed traffic engineer prepare an estimate of trip generation for a particular use. (City Engineer may accept or reject the traffic study.) 5) 6) 7) Table 5-2 forecasts the increased trips over the 20 year period at 15,172 To get a cost per trip, divide the cost basis by the number of new PM peak hour trips: Cost basis of $27,927,710 # of New PM peak hour trips is 15,172 with ENR* Inflation z * Engineering News Record Cost of new trip $1841 $1905 Examples of Transportation System Development Charges for Various Land Uses (Table 5-3) TABLE 5-3 Examples of Transportation System Development Charges for Various Land Uses Key: DU = dwelling unit TGSF = total gross square feet TGLA = total gross leasable area Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers F PM Peak Hour Trip Total No. Estimated No. Description Size Unit Rate of Trips SDC Fee 210 Single -Family Residence 1 DU 1.01 1 $1,905 220 Apartments 40 DU 0.62 25 $47,625 240 Mobile Home Park 75 DU 0.56 42 $80,010 252 Congregate Care Facility (Senior Care) 50 DU 0.17 9 $17,145 565 Day Care Facility 10 students 0.86 9 $17,145 710 General Office Building 8,000 TGSF 0.00149 12 $22,860 720 Medical/ Dental Office 2,500 TGSF 0.00366 9 $17,145 814 Specialty Retail Center 4,500 TGSF 0.00259 12 $22,860 832 High-Tumover Sit-down Restaurant 3,500 TGSF 0.01086 38 $72,390 834 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through 2,500 TGSF 0.03348 84 $160,020 Window 912 Bank (with Drive -Up Window) 4,000 TGSF 0.05477 219 $417,195 820 Regional Shopping Center 100,000 TGLA 0.00374 374 $712,470 320 Motel 80 rooms 0.47 38 $72,390 130 Industrial Park 30,000 TGSF 0.00092 28 $53,340 140 Manufacturing 30,000 TGSF 0.00074 22 $41,910 150 Warehousing 30,000 TGSF 0.00051 15 $28,575 Key: DU = dwelling unit TGSF = total gross square feet TGLA = total gross leasable area Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers F WATER FACTORS: • Used official growth rate of 4.25% and used final population figures as distributed to each City by Oregon Office of Economic Analysis • Water Capital Improvement Plan is based on implementation of adopted Water and Sewer Master Plan • A computer model was used to represent build -out conditions to determine the size of pipelines, wells and reservoirs • Cost estimates were prepared for each project (1999 dollars) and include design, construction and contingencies • Total cost of 20 year CIP projects is $27,026,910 SOC METHODOLOGY: 1) Water SDC consists of two parts; an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee. The improvement fee is designed to recover the cost of future capital projects. The reimbursement fee is based on the costs of capital improvements already constructed or under construction. 2) Of the $27,026,910, only the cost of pipelines, wells and reservoirs attributable to growth are eligible to be funded by SDCs Pipelines over 8 -inch diameter have the cost increment exceeding 8 - inch line attributed to SDCs Pipelines to replace existing older pipelines are not eligible New wells are considered 100% new capacity Storage reservoirs over and above those needed to correct deficiencies in the current system are considered new capacity. 3) SDC eligible costs were separately calculated for each project 3 4) Of the total cost ($27,026,910), $17,995,900 was eligible for SDC funding PART ONE: Determine Future EDU's 1) First determine how many equivalent dwelling units (EDU's) of future capacity in the planned improvements for the 20 year period 2) Based on actual water use characteristics in Redmond, residential units use 61% of the water. 3) Based on the adopted Water and Sewer Master Plan there will be 15,047 residential EDU's in the year 2020 (Land Use, water capacity, and population analysis) 4) Knowing that 15,047 EDUs equates to 61% of the water used, allows us to project the total number of EDUs in the year 2020 as follows: 15,047 Residential EDUs ---------------------------- _ .61 Total EDUs Residential EDUs Commercial/Industrial EDUs 24,667 Total EDUs 24,667 - 15,047 ------------ 9,620 PART TWO: SDC's for Future Capacity (Improvement SDC): 1) Determine the growth EDU's as follows: Total Future EDUs Current EDUs Growth EDUs Il 24,667 - 8,823 ------------- 15,844 2) To calculate the Improvement 50C, divide growth costs by growth EDUs: Growth costs of $17,995,900 -------------------------------- _ $1136 per EDU 15,844 growth EDUs PART THREE: Reimbursement 5DC for Existing Capacity 1) The Committee recommended not adding this fee to the improvement fee 2) To Calculate the Reimbursement SDC, divide the present unused capacity by new EDU's Present unused capacity of $2,766,958* -------------------------------------------- _ $112 per EDU 24,667 new EDU's *PFP Committee recommends using Book Value of assets rather than factoring in inflation 3) Calculate the combined 5DC: Improvement SDC $ 1,136 Reimbursement SOC 112 Combined SDC $ 1,248 with ENR Inflation $ 1,287 METER SIZE RECOMMENDED: 1) Charging the customer by the meter size is recommended for ease of calculation 2) Charges are scaled upward with the size of meter (Table 6-8) 5 TABLE 6$ City of Redmond Water System Combined Schedule Improvement Hydraulic Fee with Capacity SDC Book Reimbursemen Improvement Inflation Meter Size Ratio (gpm)(1) Value(2) t Fee (1999) Fee (1999) Increase(3) 2001 SDC(4) Disc or Compound Meters 5/8 inch 1.0 $1,248 $112 $1,136 $1,175 $1,287 20 3/4 inch 1.5 $1,872 $168 $1,704 $1,763 $1,931 30 1 inch 2.5 $3,120 $280 $2,840 $2,938 $3,218 50 1 1/2 inches 5.0 $6,240 $561 $5,679 $5,875 $6,436 100 2 inches 8.0 $9,984 $897 $9,087 $9,401 $10,298 160 3 inches 16.0 $19,968 $1,795 $18,173 $18,802 $20,597 320 4 inches 25.0 $31,200 $2,804 $28,395 $29,377 $32,181 500 6 inches 50.0 $62,400 $5,609 $56,791 $58,756 $64,365 1,000 gpm = gallons per minute (1) Based on Industry Reference Data (2) At time information was developed, July 1999. Book Value=Reimbursement Fee+Improvement Fee (3) Based on ENR Index of 6076 in July 1999 and 6286 in April 2001. 6286/6076=1.0346 Inflation increase applies only to Improvement fee, not to Reimbursement Fee (4) 2001 SDC = Reimbursement Fee (1999) + Improvement Fee with Inflation Increase WASTEWATER FACTORS: • Used official growth rate of 4.25% and used final population figures as distributed to each City by Oregon Office of Economic Analysis • Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan is based on implementation adopted Water and Sewer Master Plan • A spreadsheet model was used to represent build -out conditions to determine the size of pipelines and treatment facilities • Cost estimates were prepared for each project (1999 dollars) and include design, construction and contingencies • Total cost of 20 year CIP projects is $12,567,600 SDC METHODOLOGY: 1) Wastewater 50C consists of two parts; an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee. The improvement fee is designed to recover the cost of future capital projects. The reimbursement fee is based on the costs of capital improvements already constructed or under construction. 2) Of the $12,567,600, only cost of pipelines, and treatment facilities attributable to growth are eligible to be funded by SDC's Pipelines over 8 -inch diameter have the cost increment exceeding 8 - inch line attributed to SDC's Pipelines to replace existing older pipelines are not eligible New expansion at the existing treatment facility 60%eligible 3) SDC eligible costs were separately calculated for each project 7 4) Of the total cost ($12,567,600), $5,382,325 was eligible for SDC funding PART ONE: Determine future EDU's 1) First determine how many EDU's of future capacity in the planned improvements for the 20 year period 2) Based on actual wastewater flow characteristics in Redmond, residential units use 61% of the wastewater flow. 3) Based on the adopted Water and Sewer Master Plan there will be 15,047 residential EDU's in the year 2020 (Land Use, wastewater flow, and population analysis) 4) Knowing that 15,047 EDUs equates to 61% of the wastewater flow allows us to project the total number of EDUs in the year 2020 as follows: 15,047 Residential EDUs ---------------------------- = .61 Total EDUs Residential EDUs Commercial/Industrial EDUs 24,667 Total EDUs 24,667 - 15,047 ------------ 9,620 PART TWO: SDC's for future capacity (Improvement SDC): 1) Determine the growth EDU's as follows: Total Future EDUs 24,667 Current EDUs -8,573 ------------ Growth EDUs 16,094 L 2) Calculate the Improvement SDC by dividing the growth costs by growth EDU's Growth costs of $5,382,324 -------------------------------- _ $334 per EDU 16,094 growth EDUs PART THREE: Reimbursement 5DC for existing capacity 1) To calculate the Reimbursement 51)C, divide the present unused capacity by new EDU's Present unused capacity of $12,207,708* -------------------------------------------- _ $759 per EDU 16,094 new EDU's *Committee recommends using Book Value of assets rather than factoring in inf lotion 2) Calculate the combined SDC: Improvement SDC $ 334 Reimbursement 50C 759 Combined SDC $ 1,093 with ENR Inflation $ 1,105 METER SIZE RECOMMENDED: 1) Charging the customer by the meter size is recommended for ease of calculation 2) Charges are scaled upward with the size of meter (Table 7-8) E TABLE 7-8 City of Redmond Wastewater System SDC Combined Schedule Improvement Hydraulic Fee with Capacity SDC Book Reimbursemen Improvement Inflation 2001 Meter Size Ratio (gpm)(1) Value(2) t Fee (1999) Fee (1999) Increase(3) SDC(4) Disc or Compound Meters 5/8 inch 1.0 $1,093 $759 $334 $346 $1,105 20 3/4 inch 1.5 $1,639 $1,138 $502 $519 $1,657 30 1 inch 2.5 $2,732 $1,896 $836 $865 $2,761 50 1 1/2 inches 5.0 $5,465 $3,793 $1,672 $1,730 $5,523 100 2 inches 8.0 $8,744 $6,068 $2,675 $2,768 $8,836 160 3 inches 16.0 $17,487 $12,136 $5,351 $5,536 $17,672 320 4 inches 25.0 $27,324 $18,963 $8,361 $8,650 $27,613 500 6 inches 50.0 $54,648 $37,926 $16,722 $17,301 $55,227 1,000 gpm = gallons per minute (1) Based on Industry Reference Data (2) At time information was developed, July 1999. Book Value=Reimbursement Fee+Improvement Fee (3) Based on ENR Index of 6076 in July 1999 and 6286 in April 2001. 6286/6076=1.0346 Inflation increase applies only to Improvement fee, not to Reimbursement Fee (4) 2001 SDC = Reimbursement Fee (1999) + Improvement Fee with Inflation Increase 10 PARKS FACTORS: • Used Official growth rate of 4.25% • Used Comprehensive Plan direction of park within I mile walking distance. • Used Comprehensive Plan direction of acquiring Dry Canyon property and other park properties before they are gone and become more expensive. • For allocation of future costs to new development, consultants used the total acres of parks to be built by four agencies - City, COPRD, Redmond School District, and BLM. This spreads the responsibility of meeting NPRA standards to all park providers in Redmond area. It does not load it all on Redmond SDC's and Park taxes. • Parks Capital Improvement Plan is based on implementation of projects over a 20 year period. • Cost estimates were prepared for acquisition and development (1999 dollars). • If the project is to meet a deficiency, 0% is attributed to growth or SDC's. • If the project would be built to meet only the demands of growth it is attributed 100% to growth or SDC's. PARK UPGRADES (Improvements to existing park parcels) If the upgrade would benefit both existing and future residents a percentage was used based on a population growth in the UGB of 58.54% (4.25%/year increase over the next 20 years.) 11 ADDITION OF NEW PARKS For five new parks, the percentage of land area within the service area (yellow circle) that is vacant land was estimated. Only that land area was used to determine the percentage attributed to growth. SDC METHODOLOGY: 1) Parks SDC's consist of an improvement fee only. Of the total cost of $6,215,914 only Redmond projects were used and the percentage attributable to growth was calculated totaling $4,201,913. (See Table 8-4 in the Public Facilities Plan for a list of Redmond's Parks' Capital Improvement List. ) 2) An 5DC fee was calculated per new household (using residential units only.) The PFPC recommended dropping the 51)C charge for Commercial and Industrial uses. 3) To get a cost per household: Cost basis of $4,201,913 -------------------------------------------- _ $ 203 per Capita Population growth of 20,645 people ($203 per capita) X (2.24 persons per household) = $456 per Household* *Cost per dwelling unit whether single family or multifamily. 12 REDMOND RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. 2001-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDMOND, OREGON ADOPTING A METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT PLAN, ESTABLISHING NEW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2001, AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS 91-56,91-56,93-08,9M6 and 99-16. WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorized establishment of systems development charges for the City through the adoption of Ordinance No. 2001-04; and WHEREAS, the City has, pursuant -.to its Code and state law, had systems development charges in place since 1982; and WHEREAS, the City updated its systems development charges and related regulations periodically over the past eighteen years; and WHEREAS, the City has been experiencing rapid growth, creating the need to update its capital improvement plans, methodology, and corresponding systems development charges; and WHEREAS, notice of the consideration of an amended methodology for systems development charges was provided as required by state law, ORS 223.304(5); NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDMOND CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Capital Improvement Plan. The Council hereby adopts the "City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan", dated July, 2001, as recommended by the Planning Commission, as the Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Redmond for transportation, water, wastewater, and parks improvements, as required by ORS 223.309. Section 2. Methodology. The Council hereby adopts as the methodology to establish systems development charges for the City, the methodology contained in the "City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan", dated July, 2001, as recommended by the Planning Commission. A copy of the report is on file at City Hall and is available for public inspection, having been made available more than thirty days before Council's consideration of this Resolution. Section 3. Charges Established. The Council hereby adopts as the Systems Development Charges for development within the City or connecting to the City's water or wastewater systems, those charges shown in the schedules attached as exhibits to this Resolution, incorporated herein by this reference, and denoted as follows: Exhibit A: Table 5-1 and 5-113, Transportation Capital Improvement Program Transportation SDC: $1905.00 per PM peak hour trip Exhibit B: Table 6-813, Water System Combined Schedule Water SDC: $1,287.00 per EDU Exhibit C: Table 7-813, Wastewater System Combined Schedule Wastewater SDC: $1,105 per EDU Exhibit D: Table 8-4 and 8-413, Park Capital Improvement List Park SDC: $458.00 per EDU In calculating the Transportation SDC, the City may rely either upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, current edition, or upon the estimate of trip generation from a development as prepared and certified by a licensed traffic engineer, in the City's discretion. Section 4. Annual Adjustment of Charges. Each year, the charges established herein shall be automatically adjusted based on the annual average of the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News -Record. The charges established above reflect the base year of 2001. Section 5. Effective Date. The charges established pursuant to this Resolution shall become effective on July 1, 2001. Until that time, the charges previously established shall remain in effect. Section 6. Repeal. Upon the effective date for the systems development charges established in this Resolution, Resolutions 91-55, 91-56, 93-08, 95-06 and 99-16 shall be repealed with no further action from the City Council. PASSED by the Redmond City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this � day of 2001. Ed Fitch, Mayor, City of Redmond . ATTEST: Nancy 131ankensh ity Recorder 1`XHIBIT A TABLE 5-1 Capital Improvement Program F Altematerrruck Route construction $32,000,000 $20,000,000 $12,000,000 SDC F1 Evergreen Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute Total State/ Total Eligible No. Project Cost Federal City Funding (2) Phase 1: 2000 to 2005 Hemlock Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute $1,675,000 $1,675,000 Transportation Demand Management Program $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $1,800,000 Street Projects US 97 north connection to US 97 Reroute $550,000 $550,000 A Airport Way reconstruction south of the airport $1,356,100 $325,000 $1,356,100 $377,000 21A Alternate Route Planning and Environmental Studies - Part 1 South Canal Boulevard construction from Sisters Avenue to Kalama PCI SE 19th Street construction from Airport Way to UGB $1,325,000 $900,000 $1,325,000 $583,000 2 Evergreen Avenue and 5th Street Improvements $0 $0 1 Highland Avenue and 5th Street Improvements $25,000 $25,000 $800,000 6 Highland Avenue/Highway 126 Modifications at Highway 97 $4,300,000 $4,300,000 25A Quartz Avenue improvements from South Canal Boulevard to 25th Interchange to Highland Avenue $3,450,000 $3,450,000 $1,518,000 Street $850,000 $26,375,000 $850,000 $170,000 F Altematerrruck Route construction $32,000,000 $20,000,000 $12,000,000 F1 Evergreen Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute $2,050,000 $2,050,000 F2 Antler Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 F3 Hemlock Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute $1,675,000 $1,675,000 $1,675,000 F4 Maple Avenue/Negus Way upgrade at US 97 Reroute $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 F5 US 97 north connection to US 97 Reroute $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 F6 North Canal Boulevard upgrade at US 97 Reroute $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 PC2 South Canal Boulevard construction from Sisters Avenue to Kalama Avenue $900,000 $900,000 $396,000 PC3 South Canal Boulevard construction from Kalama Avenue to 5th/6th Connection $800,000 $800,000 $352,000 9 27th Street reconstruction and extension from Yew Avenue Interchange to Highland Avenue $3,450,000 $3,450,000 $1,518,000 Subtotal $5Z406,100 $26,375,000 $26,031,100 $8,746,000 Bikeway Projects 45 Dry Canyon bike path from Highland to Elm Avenue $336,500 $266,500 $70,000 52 Antler Avenue bike lane construction from 35th to 23rd Street $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 58 Odem Medo Road bike lane striping $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 60 South Canal Boulevard bike lane construction from Yew to Heights Avenue $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 Subtotal $541,500 $266,500 $275,000 $205,000 Pedestrian Projects 78 9th Street sidewalk construction of missing links from Highland Avenue to Canyon Drive $98,000 $98,000 86 9th Street sidewalk construction from Canyon Drive to Maple Avenue $125,000 $125,000 76 19th Street/Rimrock Way sidewalk construction from Highland to Antler Avenue $145,000 $145,000 80 Black Butte Boulevard sidewalk construction of missing links from $25,000 $25,000 Dry Canyon to North Canal Boulevard 87 Highway 97 sidewalk construction from Jack Pine to Maple Avenue $130,000 $130,000 89 Obsidian Avenue sidewalk construction from Canyon Drive to 15th $70,000 $70,000 Street and 12th Street to South Canal Boulevard Subtotal $593,000 $130,000 $463,000 $0 Total Phase 1 $53,560,600 $26,781,600 $26,779,100 $8,951,000 Phase 2: 2006 to 2010 Street Projects 7A Maple Avenue connection between North Canal Boulevard and $650,000 $150,000 $500,000 $205,000 Highway 97 (including traffic signal at Highway 97) D Spruce Avenue construction from 10th Street to Highway 97 $550,000 $550,000 $110,000 21B Alternate Route Planning and Environmental Studies -Part 2 Table 5-1 050101.xis:Funding;jed; 5/2/01 Page I of 4 1W 'EXHIBIT A TABLE 5-1 Capital Improvement Program 23C Maple Avenue extension from 9th to 19th Street (excluding bridge) $950,000 $950,000 $418,000 8 North Canal Boulevard reconstruction from Antler Avenue to US 97 $1,825,000 $1,825,000 SDC Reroute $5,650,000 Total State/ Total Eligible No. Project Cost Federal City Funding (2) 11 Highland Avenue widening to three lanes between 15th and 27th $1,775,000 $1,775,000 $90,000 Boulevard Street 19 Forked Hom Butte Connection 23A Maple Avenue reconstruction from Highway 97 to 9th Street $150,000 $150,000 $66,000 23B Maple Avenue bridge across Dry Canyon (4) $5,200,000 $5,200,000 $5,200,000 23C Maple Avenue extension from 9th to 19th Street (excluding bridge) $950,000 $950,000 $418,000 8 North Canal Boulevard reconstruction from Antler Avenue to US 97 $1,825,000 $1,825,000 $803,000 Reroute $5,650,000 $2,486,000 126 to NE 9th 10 Rimrock Way connection to 23rd Street $475,000 14/15 27th Street extension from Highway 126 (Highland Avenue) to Antler $475,000 $95,000 H Spruce Avenue construction from Highway 97 to North Canal $450,000 $450,000 $90,000 Boulevard 19 Forked Hom Butte Connection Subtotal $12,025,000 $1,925,000 $10,100,000 $6,987,000 Bikeway Projects $1,254,000 (including traffic signal at Quartz Avenue and Highway 97) 43 Evergreen Avenue widening for bike lanes from east of RR crossing $45,000 $45,000 $1,075,000 $215,000 to Jackson Street $3,575,000 $3,575,000 $1,573,000 Avenue 48 10th Street bike lane construction from Maple Avenue to north UGB $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 53 Black Butte Boulevard bike lanes striped from Canyon Drive to 5th $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Dtre ry Vanyon bike path construction from Quartz to Highland Avenue 55 $160,000 $160,000 Rsidian Avenue bike path construction from 23rd Street to Canyon 56 Drive (4) $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 57 Obsidian Avenue bike lane striping from Canyon Drive to South $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Canal Boulevard Subtotal $405,000 $45,000 $360,000 $200,000 Pedestrian Projects 85 Canyon Drive sidewalk construction of missing links from Highland $335,000 $335,000 Avenue to 9th Street 81 Evergreen Avenue/Ochoco Highway sidewalk construction from east $60,000 $60,000 of RR crossing to Lake Road I North Canal Boulevard sidewalk construction from Highland to $85,000 $85,000 Evergreen Avenue Subtotal $480,000 $145,000 $335,000 $0 Total Phase 2 Phase 3: 2011 to Street Projects PCs Connect SW 13th Street from Airport Way to Lake Road to Highway $5,650,000 $5,650,000 $2,486,000 126 to NE 9th 14/15 27th Street extension from Highway 126 (Highland Avenue) to Antler $1,525,000 $150,000 $1,375,000 $605,000 Avenue (including traffic signal at 27th Street and Highland Avenue) 21C Alternate Route Engineering and Right -of -Way Acquisition 19 Forked Hom Butte Connection $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $406,250 16/17 Quartz Avenue extension from South Canal Boulevard to Airport Way $3,000,000 $150,000 $2,850,000 $1,254,000 (including traffic signal at Quartz Avenue and Highway 97) 25B Quartz Avenue improvements from 35th Street to Helmholtz Way $1,075,000 $1,075,000 $215,000 20 South Canal Boulevard widened to three lanes from Yew to Obsidian $3,575,000 $3,575,000 $1,573,000 Avenue Subtotal $16,450,000 $300,000 $16,150,000 $6,539,250 Bikeway Projects 44 5th/6th Street improvements to add bike lanes and facilitate crossing 65 Antler Avenue shoulder bikeway construction from east of RR crossing to East 9th Street $370,000 $370,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 Table 5-1 050101.xis:Funding;jed; 5/2/01 Page 2 of 4 OL "EXHIBII A TABLE 5-1 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Projects 96 _, Highway 97 sidewalk construction from Yew Avenue to Odem Medo $260,000 $260,000 and South Canal Boulevard SDC Road Subtotal Total State/ Total Eligible No. Project Cost Federal City Funding (2) 66 Evergreen Avenue bike lane striping from 6th Street to Canal $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Highway 97 to 4th Street Boulevard $205,000 $205,000 Canal Boulevard 67 Fir Street bike path construction across Dry Canyon (3) $60,000 $60,000 $165,000 $575,000 $0 68 Hemlock Avenue shoulder bikeway construction from east of RR $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Total Phase 3 crossing to East 9th Street $1,110,000 $16,525,000 $6,719,250 70 Kingwood Avenue bike lane construction between Highway 97 and $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Straet Projects North Canal Boulevard Subtotal $610,000 $370,000 $240,000 $180,000 Pedestrian Projects 96 _, Highway 97 sidewalk construction from Yew Avenue to Odem Medo $260,000 $260,000 and South Canal Boulevard Road Subtotal $775,000 $0 $775,000 $775,000 Pedestrian Projects 97 Highway 97 sidewalk construction from Maple Avenue to north UGB $180,000 $180,000 $145,000 $145,000 98 Kingwood Avenue sidewalk construction from 9th to 8th Street and $50,000 $225,000 $50,000 $165,000 Highway 97 to 4th Street 99 wckiup Avenue sidewalk construction from 34th Street to South $205,000 $205,000 Canal Boulevard 91 Salmon Avenue sidewalk construction from 1 st Street to Airport Way $85,000 Subtotal $85,000 $165,000 $575,000 $0 Subtotal $575,000 $440,000 $135,000 $0 Total Phase 3 $17,635,000 $1,110,000 $16,525,000 $6,719,250 Phase 4: 2016 to 2020 Straet Projects 22 15th Street improvements from Quartz to Obsidian Avenue $325,000 $325,000 $65,000 24 27th Street extension from Antler to Maple Avenue $2,800,000 $2,800,000 $1,232,000 21D Alternate Route Construction 18 East 9th Street improvements from Highway 126 to Maple Avenue $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $1,628,000 713 Maple Avenue reconstruction from east of RR crossing to UGB $675,000 $675,000 $0 PC6 Connection of NW 19th Street to NW Spruce (portion within the UGB) $800,000 $800,000 $160,000 PC7 SW Salmon Ave & Odem Medo Connector Project - S. Canal Blvd to $952,300 $952,300 $190,460 19th St. Subtotal $9,252,300 $0 $9,252,300 $3,275,460 Bikeway Projects 64 35th Street shoulder bikeway construction from Antler to Hemlock $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Avenue 69 Hemlock Avenue shoulder bikeway construction from 35th to 19th $155,000 $155,000 $155,000 Street 72 North Canal Boulevard bike lane construction from US 97 Reroute to $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 north UGB 75 Wickiup/Reservoir Road shoulder bikeway between Helmholtz Way $305,000 $305,000 $305,000 and South Canal Boulevard Subtotal $775,000 $0 $775,000 $775,000 Pedestrian Projects $150,000 $150,000 84 15th Street sidewalk construction from Obsidian to Highland Avenue $145,000 $145,000 95 Canyon Drive sidewalk construction from Quartz to Highland Avenue $225,000 $225,000 82 Highway 126 from East 9th Street to Sisters Avenue $165,000 $165,000 99 wckiup Avenue sidewalk construction from 34th Street to South $205,000 $205,000 Canal Boulevard Subtotal $740,000 $165,000 $575,000 $0 Phase 4 When Warranted Street Projects 29 Traffic Signal at Black Butte Boulevard and 5th Street (Highway 97) $150,000 $150,000 26 Traffic Signal at Kingwood Avenue and Highway 97 $150,000 $150,000 27 Traffic Signal at Canyon Drive and Highway 126 $160,000 $150,000 28 Traffic Signal at Sisters Avenue and Highway 126 $150,000 $150,000 Table 5-1050 10 I.x1s:Fundingjed; 5/2/01 Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT 'A TABLE 5-1 Capital Improvement Program Notes, (1) Roadway classification corresponds to Redmond's map of existing and future transportation facilities that was adopted in 1998. (2) Eligibility for SDCs was estimated as the proportion of the improvement which provides capacity over a local roadway. For minor arterial, major collector, and industrial collector projects, this includes both added roadway capacity and bike lanes. For minor collector projects, this only includes added roadway capacity. Sidewalks were not considered SDC eligible since they are part of the local roadway standard. To calculate SDC eligible costs, local roadway construction costs were estimated to be 56% of a minor arterial, 80% of a major collector, 75% of a minor collector, and 71% of an industrial collector. (3) Bike path projects have been identified in the transportation element of the Public Facilities Plan. Most are not SDC eligible since they are principally for recreational uses and not capacity enhancements. However, they may be eligible for parks SDCs. (4) This project is 100% SDC eligible since the entire improvement will add capacity to the transportation system. The extension will provide an east -west connection with ne local access. (4) The bike path connecting Obsidian Avenue through Dry Canyon has been included as a transportation SDC eligible project since it is a capacity enhancement allowing bicyclists to continue along a roadway and is not primarily a recreational path. Table 5-1 050101.xls:Funding;jed; 512/01 Page 4 of 4 SDC Total State/ Total Eligible No. Project Cost Federal City Funding (2) 30 Traffic Signal at East 9th Street and Highway 126 $150,000 $150,000 31 Traffic Signal at Obsidian Avenue and South Canal Boulevard $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 32 Traffic Signal at Quartz Avenue and South Canal Boulevard $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 33 Traffic Signal at Salmon Avenue and South Canal Boulevard $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 34 Traffic Signal at Yew Avenue and South Canal Boulevard $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 35 Traffic Signal at Odem Medo Road and South Canal Boulevard $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 38A Traffic Signal at 19th Street and Antler Avenue $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 37 Capacity improvements at 19th Street and Hemlock Avenue $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 38 Capacity improvements at 19th Street and Antler Avenue $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 40 Capacity improvements at 9th/10th Street and Maple Avenue $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 41 Capacity improvements at 19th Street and Maple Avenue $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Subtotal $1,770,000 $750,000 $1,020,000 $1,020,000 Subtotal Phase 1 $53,560,600 $26,781,500 $26,779,100 $8,951,000 Subtotal Phase 2 $12,910,000 $2,115,000 $10,795,000 $7,187,000 Subtotal Phase 3 $17,635,000 $1,110,000 $16,525,000 $6,719,250 Subtotal Phase 4 $10,767,300 $165,000 $10,602,300 $4,050,460 Subtotal When Warranted $1,770,000 $760,000 $1,020,000 $1,020,000 TOTAL - All Projects $96,642,900 $30,921,500 $65,721,400 $27,927,710 Notes, (1) Roadway classification corresponds to Redmond's map of existing and future transportation facilities that was adopted in 1998. (2) Eligibility for SDCs was estimated as the proportion of the improvement which provides capacity over a local roadway. For minor arterial, major collector, and industrial collector projects, this includes both added roadway capacity and bike lanes. For minor collector projects, this only includes added roadway capacity. Sidewalks were not considered SDC eligible since they are part of the local roadway standard. To calculate SDC eligible costs, local roadway construction costs were estimated to be 56% of a minor arterial, 80% of a major collector, 75% of a minor collector, and 71% of an industrial collector. (3) Bike path projects have been identified in the transportation element of the Public Facilities Plan. Most are not SDC eligible since they are principally for recreational uses and not capacity enhancements. However, they may be eligible for parks SDCs. (4) This project is 100% SDC eligible since the entire improvement will add capacity to the transportation system. The extension will provide an east -west connection with ne local access. (4) The bike path connecting Obsidian Avenue through Dry Canyon has been included as a transportation SDC eligible project since it is a capacity enhancement allowing bicyclists to continue along a roadway and is not primarily a recreational path. Table 5-1 050101.xls:Funding;jed; 512/01 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A TABLE 5-113 City of Redmond Transportation System SDC Schedule SDC per PM peak hour trip $27,927,710 (cost basis) / 15,172 (projected number of PM peak hour trips generated by new development, 1998-2020) = $1,841 (cost per trip) 1999 SDC 2001 SDC $1,841 $1,905 The 2001 SDC is based on ENR Index of 6076 in July 1999 and 6286 in April 2001. 6286/6076=1.0346 2001 SDC of $1,905 = $1,841 X 1.0346 The 1999 SDC of $1,841 has been revised from previous information due to updates in the Transportation System CIP o:\chmx0025\SDC update tables.xls 512101 r. w m N °E O N O 00 N O 01 w C ° fOA N 44 44 y m O M G g O O O O O O O O 9 o Cl 0 0 U a to � r !9 a a A U �4 $ N g Co O ° H coMM In NN N Vs N 40% 40 40 m C n O N O C O O O O 1D w M v, MO to► 0 d c O o O N O h V M `ffs r- O Q � w {Cp co t --:N W •Y� i Q O O a � �i ago 0 0 40 0) r of &6 6 o g to ri m Ti m t t3 m 2"i in m W !u �' w o A� o Q u K d Yl O w �i N D �i a E a a a a a c¢ cQ a! a 'S Q' CC 0 u •- �a a 0 0 c 0 0 m 0 0'�' hcb o'° o m E ea Q a!) m e4D a Q c �'t3 =) E z z z z z z CL a Q Q a > m Ua SW? N-Ef N 0 co r- a 0 V) ° z m m m cc m 00 m C a E eo �� a c c ° c ° a a a a E a a o� a E a >v o �1 CL .. N f f f f f E w f fm a �° s aL c g,� t � . .� a uS m a z z z z z °'° z z z Lb lb d _ OL. Z r r r N N N N co N M r. w m N N J C N E a� 2 Ia. E 3§ o V 4 a N E 1= N C V � ^ N N (OA 00 O O V N N Go co C fA 4 � 4A N t- O C14 Go to N O C d c6 c6 c6 ad c6 c6 p6 p6 � a a O 0 0 O 0 0 0 (� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t co0 H to M O M M b9 E E O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 N An M O i! m OD Nf fA .�-- Vi cm M �gn N i 0 O M M c Q u a a' f- 0 0 (`� n (00 0 aY (O N M O M C3 A d O1 Cl_ yca ym L Q H U 0= 420 Q= Q Q '0 C V T cc a O Oi C O W H C 0 y C O) C V "E (�00 E ac 2 do m E o u m c> n o > E o o 6, E _m n t- n n co CL CL °= n U� >> Eacc c t Ern_ Ems, Ern_ z ID E (x of- c �.. �`� �., Q � a o� Q UE U CO u ' m m a��i I cc ca 4� _ csi C � w a CL L OU- j5 CL L L N '� N O >. U a U- Lcc C L U. U. c lL U- LLL y 11 y lL 2 lL 15U E N Ca CL m c a.r (Caam CLE Md ad m m a°g' a= (a a (haw aM mw aM m a (a CL my n.o �a _�� o m�' V Em � a u'S N I Lb Lbu'S u'S u'S � u'S � uS � � a � 2 2 Z Z Z 2 Z �pZ �. Q U 0 m U U z M M MM M M M OUp M M V NV 2 4 N d R J N J C N 0 a 3§ U co a- 0 O �L Z c4 O �V p C 4) 'D E w Q ea o E d W 0 E S 8 o C w 4 w w c G N K N 1 M O A w M 0 0 0 o c 0 0 coo 0 co o � a a A U io o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a 0+ ~ ^ Ne� M N 4n in to N N N w c O C o O O O o O 0 O o O Cl O n M N NN0 N °ifA i w c o � :. N to v 7 cr V � N Q � 0 in O N O Cl1- O QN ('i 1l7 1� Y7 M N a o vm :2 ca c 30 §0 coo Q Qa 0= O ot`, _ co c o m m m � � � c m� o o c 0 C drn dt�`a c 0.. 0 � � W 2 C iii o E0 Ea „ � � ri c �- AI I �v `—°� �Eu�= zip "'U a ,o o = m E'0 -C wo CL v_ c a , �v cn CO C t X = a r d 5 — a v m o m o �a ~ o LLU v c0a LL� coa y > c A ,� � ca O mU F a LL8 a c o. ma �� mo b m o z U.15m 1•0 0- H p d a` CO 3 Z Z d 0 aZp Q z z z z z z U MMUp Z V �p�p a st p 1n b Z c4 O �V p C 4) 'D E w Q ea o E d W 0 L O Z C w C 8c N N d C N � p C E9 d co C Cl. N v N to Co r.3 N > d' O ocv Ema� $EE cc8v o mw U y C >. U r C QQU N M N N aQ� O Q O O � O O O vjOO f -0C �rfb O O O O O O O 6 O O M 6n U') ,r- to U) 619 69 69 EXHIBIT D TABLE 8 4B City of Redmond Parks SDC Schedule SDC per residential household $4,201,913 (cost basis) / 20,645 (population growth in people) _ $203.53 (cost per capita) $203.53 (cost per capita) X 2.24 (persons pe household) _ $456 (cost per household) 1999 SDC 2001 SDC $456 $458 The 2001 SDC is based on ENR Index of 6259 in October 2000 and 6286 in April 2001. 6286/62596=1.0043 2001 SDC of $458 = $456 X 1.0043 o:\chmx0025\SDC update tables.xls 5/2/01