The URL can be used to link to this page

2002-1204-Resolution No. 2002-093 Recorded 9/25/2002REV WED LEGA COUNSEL COUNTY OFFICIRL MARYSUE HSPENNOLLOW, COUNTYRCLERKS Cu 2002-1201 COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 0911511001 44199'06 PM 1111111111111111111111111111111 20020012048 For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution Adopting an Annual Update of the Capital Improvement Plan and Annual Adjustment to the System Development Charges for Transportation and Parks within the Urban Growth Boundary and Outside the City Limits of the City of Redmond, as Authorized under Section 4 of Resolution No 2001-036 * RESOLUTION NO. 2002-093 WHEREAS, the intergovernmental agreement dated June 23, 1998 between Deschutes County and the City of Redmond provide for joint management within the City of Redmond Urban Growth Boundary, Redmond Growth Area and Redmond Area of Mutual Interest; WHEREAS, Deschutes County Code Chapter 15.12 and ORS 223.297 to 223.314 provide for the establishment of system development charges (SDCs) by resolution; WHEREAS, Deschutes County previously adopted Resolution No. 2001-036 which establishes new SDC methodology and fees as well as a Capital Improvement List for Transportation and Parks within the Urban Growth Boundary and outside the City limits and allows for the annual adjustment of SDCs based on the Engineering News Record Index; WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Redmond periodically reviews the existing SDC fee and Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP") as authorized by state law; WHEREAS, the City Council, after notice and public hearings and based on the recommendations from staff, adopted Resolution No. 2002-41 updating the CIP and adjusting the SDCs to reflect annual increases in costs; WHEREAS, pursuant to the intergovernmental agreement, approval of new City of Redmond Capital Improvement Plan and SDCs also requires approval of the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners for Transportation and Parks; WHEREAS, under ORS 223.304(6) notice and a hearing are required only for the establishment or modification of a SDC including the methodology supporting the system development charge; PAGE 1 of 3 — RESOLUTION NO. 2002-093 (9/25/02) WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 223.304(7) a change in the amount of a reimbursement or improvement fee is not a modification to an SDC if it is based on an adopted specific cost index; WHEREAS, the Board provided an opportunity for comment on the proposed fees consistent with ORS 294.160(1); Now, Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, as follows: Section 1. PURPOSE. This resolution adopts the annual adjustments and changes to the Capital Improvement Plan and SDCs for transportation and parks for the area within the urban growth boundary and outside of the City limits for the City of Redmond. Section 2. UPDATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. The Board hereby adopts the updated "Capital Improvement Plan," attached to this resolution as follows: Table 5-4 (2002), Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (included in Exhibit A) Table 8-4 (2002), Parks Capital Imprgvement Plan (Exhibit B) The attached Plans show updated cost estimates where applicable and the adjustment of the SDCs by the applicable cost index. These plans replace the Plan adopted by Section 3 of Resolution No. 2001- 036. Section 3. ANNUAL COST ADJUSTMENT. The County hereby modifies the SDCs for development for transportation and parks, as follows: Exhibit A: Transportation SDC (2002): $2,477.00 per PM peak hour trip Exhibit C: Parks SDC (2002): $719.00 per EDU PAGE 2 of 3 - RESOLUTION NO. 2002-093 (9/25/02) Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolutiop,and the charges shown in this Resolution shall become effective on them day of J14P2002. DATED thiV"5%day of 2002. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Record of Adoption Vote Commissioner Yes No Tom DeWolf Dennis R. Luke Michael M. Daly BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON TO/DEW F, Chair DUKE, Commissioner MI6HAEL M. DALY, C mmissioner Abstained Excused Effective datqoqqeday of P/��• ATTEST: Recording Secretary PAGE 3 OF 3 — RESOLUTION NO. 2002-093 (9/25/02) r/" CITY OF REDMOND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2002 TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE Lqha O Performed by: City of Redmond Public Works Department CITY OF REDMOND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 875 SE SISTERS AVENUE PO BOX 726 REDMOND, OR 97756-0100 541.504.2000 FAX: 541.548.0253 www.redmond.or.us 2002 TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. AMENDED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 3-4 III. NEW PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 5-7 IV. DELETED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 8 V. ENR INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 9 Vl. PROPOSED 2002 CIP SPREADSHEET 10 + Table 5-4 Revised VII. SDC CALCULATION 11-12 VIII. SDC COMPARISON: BEND VS REDMOND 13 IX. CONCLUSION 14 X. APPENDECIES Appendix A: Table 54A Recommended New Projects Table 5413 Recommended Amended Projects Table 54C Recommended Projects to Delete Appendix B: New and Amended Project Construction Cost Estimates Appendix C: Collector Roadway Inventory Appendix D: Construction Cost Data Spreadsheet Appendix E: Sample CIP Project Ranking Worksheet Appendix F: 2001 CIP (Table 5-4) Appendix G: ENR Construction Cost Index Data Appendix H: Pass -by Trip Percentage Estimation Appendix I: City of Bend Transportation SDC data (80%) XI. MAP — ATTACHED SEPERATELY TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 1 of 14 C ¢� .. Itrodu,ctio. n _ • : K ., -_ ._. _ , In July 2001, the City of Redmond adopted the Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as Section Five of the City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan (PFP). The purpose of the Transportation CIP is to identify transportation project funding priorities and to establish the Transportation System Development Charge required to help finance growth related infrastructure. The 2002 Transportation CIP Update is the yearly update to the previously approved 2001 Transportation CIP contained in the July 2001 PFP. The 2002 Transportation CIP Update consists of the following steps: 1. Amending several existing CIP Projects to adjust or reallocate project funding. 2. Adding new Projects established per review of the TSP, traffic analysis, collector inventory survey, or recommendation of ODOT. 3. Deleting outdated or redundant Projects. 4. Adjusting cost estimates of existing CIP Projects for inflation per the ENR inflation factor. 5. Update ranking of proposed CIP Projects per objective criteria. 6. Update System Development Charge calculation. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 2 of 14 U The following existing CIP projects have been amended to increase or reallocate project funding in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update: (See Appendix A for Project cost allocation.) Project: #7A, Maple Avenue connection between N Canal Blvd and Highway 97 City Cost Change: $500,000 (1999) to $692,900 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 97/Maple Avenue from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. Furthermore, the traffic signal may be constructed after construction of the Highway 97 Reroute Project, at which point existing Highway 97 will become a City arterial. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #14/15, SW 27th Street Extension from Highway 126 to Antler Avenue City Cost Change: $1,375,000 (1999) to $1,625,650 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 126/SW 27th Street from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #16/17, SW/SE Quartz Avenue extension — S Canal Blvd to Airport Way City Cost Change: $2,850,000 (1999) to $3,198,000 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 97/SW Quartz Avenue from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #29, Traffic Signal at Black Butte Blvd/NW 5th Street City Cost Change: $0 (1999) to $159,900 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Black Butte Blvd/NW a Street from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. Furthermore, the traffic signal may be constructed after construction of the Highway 97 Reroute Project, at which point existing Highway 97 (NW 5"' Street) will become a City arterial. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #26, Traffic Signal at Highway 97/Kingwood Avenue City Cost Change: $0 (1999) to $328,000 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 97/Kingwood Avenue from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. Furthermore, the traffic signal may be constructed after construction of the Highway 97 Reroute Project, at which point existing Highway 97 (NW 5th Street) will become a City arterial. Additional improvements on the Kingwood Avenue approaches will be required to accommodate the traffic signal, and have been included in the proposed project cost. The cost of the traffic signal and intersection improvements is 100% SDC eligible. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 3 of 14 Project: #28, Traffic Signal at Highway 126/SE Sisters Avenue City Cost Change: $0 (1999) to $159,900 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 126/SE Sisters Avenue from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #30, Traffic Signal at Highway 126/E 9°i Street City Cost Change: $0 (1999) to $159,900 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to move the cost of the traffic signal at Highway 126/E 9"' Street from State funding to City funding as the traffic signal will add capacity to the City street only. The cost of the traffic signal is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #31, Traffic Signal at Obsidian Avenue/S Canal Blvd City Cost Change: $150,000 (1999) to $256,000 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to add funding for minor improvements to the Obsidian Avenue approach in addition to "stand alone" project costs. The cost of the traffic signal and associated intersection improvements is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #38A, Traffic Signal at NW 19"' Street/NW Antler Avenue City Cost Change: $150,000 (1999) to $614,000 (2002) Project funding was adjusted to add funding for approach improvements on all four intersection approaches, in addition to "stand alone" project costs. The cost of the traffic signal and associated intersection improvements is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #76, NW 19"' Street/Rimrock Way sidewalk construction from Highland to Antler Avenue. City Cost Change: $145,000 (1999) to $274,570 (2002) Additional funding was added for sidewalk in -fill along developed properties from Antler Avenue to Maple Avenue. The cost of the additional sidewalk in -fill is 0% SDC eligible. Project: #48, 10"' Street bike lane construction from Maple Avenue to north UGB. City Cost Change: $55,000 (1999) to $83,630 (2002) Existing bike lane funding is inadequate for CIP Project from Maple Avenue to Spruce Avenue. The additional bike lane cost is 100% SDC eligible. All remaining projects in the existing CIP have been reviewed to ensure adequate funding, and therefore will be included in the 2002 Transportation C/P Update with an inflation adjustment. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 4 of 14 V Since the adoption of the 2001 Transportation CIP, numerous transportation project needs have been identified that were not included in the CIP. The transportation needs have been identified either via additional traffic analysis, CIP review, or ODOT recommendation. The following are proposed New Projects for inclusion in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update: (See Appendix A for Project cost allocation.) Project: #2002-1, Sisters Avenue Widening: Highway 97 to S Canal Blvd Construction Cost Estimate: $244,000 Widen Sisters Avenue between Highway 97/S Canal Blvd to four lanes to accept dual left turns from northbound Highway 97. This project is recommended by ODOT as a result of the traffic analysis for the Highway 97 Reroute Project. The cost of this Project is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-2, S Canal Blvd/Sisters Avenue Traffic Signal Construction Cost Estimate: $280,000 Install traffic signal at the intersection of S Canal Blvd/Sisters Avenue. This project is recommended by MOT as a result of the traffic analysis for the Highway 97 Reroute Project. The cost of this Project is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-3, Highway 97/Sisters Avenue intersection improvements, East leg Construction Cost Estimate: $392,000 The intersection of Highway 97/Sisters Avenue will require improvements on the east leg to permit construction of an exclusive left tum lane and shared through -right lane on the east approach to match improvements on the west side. The project will require the existing railroad crossing to be widened to accommodate the street widening through this area. The cost of this Project is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-4, Yew Avenue/Hwy 97 NB ramp Traffic Signal Construction Cost Estimate: $310,000 Install traffic signal at the intersection of Yew Avenue/NB Highway 97 ramp. This project is required as a result of additional traffic analysis performed at the intersection within the past year. Public Works has established an exaction formula for recovery of cost associated with new growth at the intersection. No SDC funding is proposed to be collected for this improvement. If this improvement was made 100% SDC eligible, the Transportation SDC would increase by approximately $22 per PM peak hour trip. Project: #2002-5, Yew Avenue/Hwy 97 SB ramp Traffic Signal Construction Cost Estimate: $310,000 Install traffic signal at the intersection of Yew Avenue/SB Highway 97 ramp. This project is required as a result of additional traffic analysis performed at the intersection within the past year. Public Works has TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 5 of 14 established an exaction formula for recovery of cost associated with new growth at the intersection. No SDC funding is proposed to be collected for this improvement. If this improvement was made 100% SDC eligible, the Transportation SDC would increase by approximately $22 per PM peak hour trip. Project: #2002-6, Maple Avenue Modernization: NW 19"' Street to NW 27"' Street Construction Cost Estimate: $491,580 (NW 19"' Street to NW 23rd Street only) Modernize Maple Avenue from existing rural highway to urban roadway section (City of Redmond Minor Arterial Standard) from NW 19"' Street to NW 2r Street. The cost of this Project is 44% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-7, Sisters Avenue/Airport Way Traffic Signal Construction Cost Estimate: $428,000 Install traffic signal at the intersection of Sisters Avenue/Airport Way. This project is required as a result of additional traffic analysis performed at the intersection within the past year. The cost of this Project is 100% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-8, Hemlock Avenue Modernization: East of N Canal Blvd to east UGB and west of NW 19"' Street to west UGB Construction Cost Estimate: $1,400,000 This former County road requires modernization as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. SDC funding will be available to reimburse adjacent development for facility oversize. Project: #2002-9, Antler Avenue Modernization: NW 25"' Street to west UGB Construction Cost Estimate: $577,500 This former County road requires modernization as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. SDC funding will be available to reimburse adjacent development for facility oversize. Project: #2002-10, Obsidian Avenue Modernization Construction Cost Estimate: $87,500 Add funding for approximately 500 feet of unimproved street construction at various locations west of 23rd Street. The primary purpose of this project is to collect SDC funding for developer oversize reimbursement for street improvements adjacent to undeveloped parcels east of 23rd Street. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-11, Odem Medo Road Widening Construction Cost Estimate: $750,000 Odem Medo Road is an existing major collector roadway with commercial connectivity between S Canal Blvd and Highway 97. Odem Medo Road will require a three lane section to provide exclusive left turn lanes at S Canal Blvd and Highway 97. Furthermore, an additional fourth lane is required between Highway 97 and 17"' Place to provide an exclusive left turn lane for vehicles entering 17"' Place from Odem Medo Road. Project includes median to channelize existing access points located too close to the future traffic signals. The cost of this Project is 100% SDC eligible, as the entire improvement will provide capacity beyond that of a local street. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 6 of 14 Project: #2002-12, Helmholtz Way Modernization: Adjacent to existing UGB Construction Cost Estimate: $906,500 This former County road requires modernization as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. SDC funding will be available to reimburse adjacent development for facility oversize. Project: #2002-13, NW 35th Street Modernization: Obsidian Ave to Hemlock Ave Construction Cost Estimate: $1,295,000 This major collector requires funding for modernization as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard in some existing sections. Future sections of roadway will require oversize beyond that of a local street. SDC funding will be available to reimburse adjacent development for facility oversize. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. Project: #2002-14, NW 10'h Street Modernization: Spruce Avenue to north UGB Construction Cost Estimate: $227,500 This major collector requires funding for modernization as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard in the identified section. SDC funding will be available to reimburse adjacent development for facility oversize. The cost of this Project is 20% SDC eligible. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 7 of 14 As a result of the recommended Amended or New Projects contained in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update, several projects will no longer be required. Most of the recommended projects to delete are isolated sidewalk or pedestrian projects that will be constructed as a portion of a larger street modernization project. The following are proposed Projects to Delete with the 2002 Transportation CIP Update: (See Appendix A for Project cost allocation.) Project: #68, Hemlock Avenue bikeway construction from east of RxR to UGB. City Cost Change: $60,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Bike lanes to be constructed as a portion of the Hemlock Avenue Modernization Project (2002-8). Project: #69, Hemlock Avenue bikeway construction NW 19"' Street to NW 35"' Street. City Cost Change: $155,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Bike lanes to be constructed as a portion of the Hemlock Avenue Modernization Project (2002-8). Project: #52, Antler Avenue bikeway construction NW 23`d Street to NW 35"' Street. City Cost Change: $70,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Bike lanes to be constructed as a portion of the Antler Avenue Modernization Project (2002-9). Project: #33, Traffic signal at S Canal Blvd/Salmon Avenue. City Cost Change: $150,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Problematic signal spacing between Odem Medo Road and Salmon Avenue. Salmon Avenue connection to Odem Medo Road to be constructed with project PC -7. Project: #58, Odem Medo Road bike lane striping. City Cost Change: $5,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Bike lanes to be striped as a portion of the proposed Odem Medo Road Modernization Project (2002-11). Project: #64, 35"' Street shoulder bike lane construction: Antler Avenue to Hemlock Avenue. City Cost Change: $75,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Bike lanes to be constructed as a portion of the NW 35"' Street Modernization Project (2002-13). Project: #38, NW Antler Avenue/NW 19th Street intersection improvements. City Cost Change: $30,000 (1999) to $0 (2002) Approach improvements to be constructed as a portion of the Intersection Improvement Project 38A. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 8 of 14 w As directed in the 2001 CIP, the construction cost estimates (and associated SDCs) for projects contained in the CIP should be adjusted for inflation on a yearly basis. The method of adjustment approved in the 2001 CIP is by use of the Engineering News Record's (ENR) construction cost index'. See Appendix G for ENR construction cost index data and explanation. The ENR construction cost index reports a cost increase from April 2001 to April 2002 as follows: April 2001 Index April 2002 Index Inflation Factor 6286 6480 1.031 The construction cost estimates in the 2001 CIP reflect July 1999 construction cost estimates that were factored to April 2001 estimates by use of the ENR index. The ENR construction cost index reported a cost increase from July 1999 to April 2002 as follows: -July 1999 Index Aril 2002 Index Inflation Factor 6076 6480 1.066 The ENR inflation factor has been applied to existing CIP Projects that have not been amended in the CIP update process. All proposed New and Amended Project construction cost estimates in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update reflect current construction cost (April 2002). ' Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index History, 20 -City Average, April 2001 to April 2002, www.enr.com/cost/costcci.asp TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 9 of 14 IPropos`erd20027lransporfaton"CIPRanking The CIP Projects contained in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update have been ranked using objective criteria established by the Public Works Department. The criteria used to rank the Projects in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update factor level of service, facility type, safety and connectivity to establish an order in which projects should be constructed. See Appendix E for a sample CIP Project Ranking Worksheet. Approximately eight of the 65 street projects identified in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update are City projects associated with construction of the state funded Highway 97 Reroute and/or Highland -Glacier Couplet Projects. Due to the timing of the construction schedule established by ODOT, the aforementioned eight City projects have been hand placed in the CIP to ensure the adequacy of funding when these projects are required to be constructed. The timing of the Highway 97 Reroute Project will require design and partial construction of seven City projects in Phase I of the CIP (2000-2005) and completion in Phase II of the CIP (2006-2010). Consequently, the Reroute related projects have been consolidated into two separate projects with 25% of the funding allocated in Phase I of the CIP and 75% of the funding allocated in Phase II of the CIP. The project consolidation and associated funding breakdown is as follows: No. Project Roadway Classification Total Cost 2002 F2 Antler Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute Major Collector $1,066,0002 F3 Hemlock Avenue upgrade at US 97 Reroute Major Collector $1,785,550 F4 Maple Avenue/Negus Way upgrade at US 97 Reroute Minor Arterial $1,918,800 F5 US 97 north connection to US 97 Reroute Major Arterial $586,300 F6 N Canal Boulevard upgrade at US 97 Reroute Minor Arterial $346,450 PC2 S Canal Boulevard construction from Sisters Avenue to Kalama MinorArterial $959,4003 Avenue PC3 S Canal Boulevard construction from Kalama Avenue to 5th/6thMinor Arterial $852,800 Connection Total: $7,515,300 Project #97R-1 will contain 25% of the funding ($1,878,825) for the City related projects associated with the Highway 97 Reroute Project, and will be placed in Phase I of the CIP (2000-2005). Project #97R-2 will contain 75% of the funding ($5,636,475) for the City related projects associated with the Highway 97 Reroute Project, and will be placed in Phase II of the CIP (2006-2010). Table 5-44 (Revised) shows the proposed ranking and funding for the 2002 Transportation CIP Update: 2 SDC funding is 100% of Projects F2 -F6. 3 SDC funding is 44% of Projects PC2 and PC3. 4 The 2002 Transportation CIP Update is an update to Section Five of the July 2001 Public Facilities Plan and Table 5-4 contained therein. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 10 of 14 O CD �S N WF J N FO F- N S V LL d a a W r, OO N m O N 1n EO N � .� 1�mnp NNN W n A m 8 n y H 8 8h N8080 O�, N N N N uj H C5 C4 NN N(Oy N H pN § m t7 CND§ 8 8 8 § R O N W r N i c � c v r N H H TTS QJc i E S 1&9 2 K p 10 h app N 8 N O N O N arD�O � N N N N N y N LL n A m 8 n y O 8 8h N8080 O�, N N �tNpp C5 C4 NN N(Oy N N pN § m t7 CND§ 8 8 8 § R O O W r i c � c v r N H H TTS QJc i E S C LL c a O c PN 8 O 8pO ? p 8 p $g 8 a ci z Z9 pe y N CD r Y/ O O N N N H N H W E> Cp N' N 8 O 8 O uj z 8N p y E N C C m o 0 Qo a J J p N p W pp�� Q t7 O V O N N �c O 8 8 �8 8 Opptz M N N 16 N N N N N R m N O O �$ o N Cy' 2 K p 10 h app N 8 N O N O N arD�O � N N N N N y N 8 ppb 8N n A m 8 n y O 8 8h N8080 O�, N N �tNpp C5 C4 NN N(Oy N N pN § m t7 CND§ 8 8 8 § R O O N H C7 AI O � n N t0+1 A 2 mQD N m a C vri Vk N N N w N O O O O O N i q H r N H H C7 AI O � n N t0+1 A d7 2 f(pp (Oyy H {{ Vk i i TTS QJc i E S �a z =r� c a O c g 8 5 a ci z Z9 O � W E> Cp N' Z8 T uj z zz y E N C C m o 0 Qo a J J O m .. rn D+ a o O -21 Q ? mCi x O �c d7 2 f(pp (Oyy H {{ H § 9 N N N O S N N p ul0 a cc H 0I H 8 tq 8 a 88� 8 Y 8 N r N O Y N VV!! N H N N 5 8 8 8 {N+/ O N 8 O ,O H O O 0 N A N O N W w w N O w O O O W pOp 5W� Q H H W N N 8 tq 8 a 88� 8 Y 8 N r N O Y N VV!! N H N N 5 H g If a N N I N a N N N a I 2 M $ O 8 8 8 8 {N+/ O N 8 O ,O H O O W W r h f0 pl }� h N n� G V 'WC b w W o$ i i 5W� Q o g' gaa a a t`Wp p b N ¢ U o N NN U K C oQ g Z g A c g a o W o > Q O Wmli 0(1 E � N E a2C9 �= g a g ci Q(D nC i i 0 L o Z � ZWZ g 'n G m m�£W2'Sr�U E W W m w>s O $dmmo�000'� Ory} aN,Q �, a aW W Vo pp tmp to H g If a N N I N a N N N a I 2 M $ O 8 8 8 8 {N+/ O N 8 O ,O H O O W W r h f0 pl w a h N Ol O 1ff 1fl N V t� Of w w 5w� 5w�� 25 25 5N� 5N� 8 8 88 5W� SNN� 5w� 8 8 n gaa a a m �gp N W N M m H N NN N N W H a O1 8 8 8 M 8 Q� 8' 88 8 8 h W p a0 Oi N H N W H C t^O- O N A z � N m a W {N+/ O N 8 O O O H {Opp H W H O g oho 0 g K � c c m w o m maxc} G a � n o s � � g a W a O1 a o W o > Q O Wmli � a C QC 1 O Q C� � ZWZ Ory} aN,Q c a aW W Vo Q �a N m a W {N+/ O N 8 O O O H {Opp H W H O g oho 0 8 8 8 8 8 t � H O W a C g oho 0 g K � c c m w o m � p� C G a � n o s � � g � c g a : a s Q O Wmli � a O W a CL Co C 0 R! CD O CL �% C w F J N 0 F� N m Si S UM �R IA � f9 N H N 0 a N a 0 Co Q� id N N p' O � CpaO N m lm y N ��App H H N Q�W]? �Oy �Oy N N w N w N 8H ONS � W 8 8 8 8 Npp O N 0 Ori. O A O O N N N 0D N H W H 19 h N W N s _IIIAct 99393283 LL i i ' W O O Z y i t s8 t i pHA 's c > x o fii Z �FVT2�!m C4 C4 C4 C4 ' §�9g iO a aal � §a (-M�y v N Vl N OR a N a 0 Co N N p' O mi aC M N M N 8 8H ONS � W 8 8 8 8 Npp O O O O pm O pO �Npp N (b��O W O A f 8 N O N aOD H8 VSi N N N O O 8N pN O o 8N O 8 O a90 m m ci ci o W H H H h N W M Ori. O A O O N N N 0D N H W H 19 h N W N s _IIIAct 99393283 LL i i ' W O O Z y i t s8 t i pHA 's c > x o fii Z �FVT2�!m C4 C4 C4 C4 ' §�9g iO a aal � §a (-M�y v N Vl N OR 0 Co N N p' O mi aC M N M N O O O O O O O O NNN O 16 H h N s c6 N t7 1� W H N N N N N W M a n N H H C6 W a m � m s O pLU wmw 00 it f � O W O O W W F O O Z 6rKm nUop%(7 �f7<mFtl OiWm- W WF�W W o%— for h Q 6 W K 7 G m Z= 00, x W K o x x e 087 Q(7Qz� oU� m�JocZ� o F=m 33 77oUo Ci` cLLfFnNb moFW6'F mUg7GQ m v 0- -4 5 o GF�F Vl 1%0a in w IEW ZUZ IEI � W O W d g � � Co N N N UGB Expansion in 2001 The City of Redmond Urban Growth Boundary was expanded in 2001 to accommodate the planned relocation of the Juniper Golf Course. As a result of the UGB expansion, an additional 98 PM peak hour trips9 were added to the trip estimation contained in the 2001 PFP. The total number of new PM peak hour trips estimated to occur within the planning horizon (1998-2020) has been adjusted to 13,605 (13,507 + 98) in the 2002 Transportation CIP Update. Transportation SDC Calculation Per the methodology approved in the 2001 PFP, the recommended Transportation SDC for the 2002 Transportation CIP Update is as follows: SDC Eligible Funding: PM peak hour trips: Recommended 2002 SDC: $33,693,527.00 13,605 $2477 per PM peak hour trip 8 Transportation Impact Study — Zone Change for 180 Acres South of the City of Redmond, David Evans & Associates, July 2000. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 12 of 14 II proposed Transportation System FDevelopment�' har`,ge A portion of the funding required to construct the projects identified in the 2002 Transportation C/P Update can be attributed to the impact of new growth. The City of Redmond has previously elected to collect the portion of funding attributed to new growth via a Transportation System Development Charge (SDC). The City of Redmond Transportation SDC is calculated as a function of the number of new PM peak hour vehicle trips added to the transportation system by new development. The Transportation SDC is calculated by dividing the Transportation SDC eligible funding in the CIP by the anticipated number of PM peak hour vehicle trips added to the transportation system at build -out of the Urban Growth Boundary5. SDC ELIGIBLE FUNDING As previously shown in Table 5-4 (Revised), the SDC eligible funding for projects in the 2002 Transportation C/P Update is $33,693,527. PM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS As described in Section Five of the July 2001 PFP, the City of Redmond, per the transportation model provided in the Transportation System Plan, has estimated an increase of 15,172 PM peak hour trips from 1998 to 2020 (build -out of UGB). Of the estimated 15,172 PM peak hour trips, 4,163 trips are anticipated to be Retail/Commercial generated trips. The estimated 4,163 trips include both primary trips and pass -by trips generated by retail/commercial development. (Note: A primary trip is a new trip generated by a development and added to the transportation system, whereas a pass -by trip is a trip that is already on the transportation system that makes an intermediate stop at a development, then returns to the transportation system in its original direction of travel.) The 2001 PFP included both primary and pass -by trips generated by retail/commercial development in the SDC formula. Due to the lesser impact of the pass -by trip as opposed to the primary trips, the 2002 Transportation C/P Update, will calculate the Transportation SDC with the exclusion of pass -by trips in the PM peak hour trip estimation. A PM peak hour trip reduction was determined by averaging standard pass -by trip reduction rates reported by the Institute of Transportation Engineer's, Trip Generation Handbook. By use of the ITE resource, a trip reduction factor of 40% was applied to the 4,163 PM peak hour trips generated by retail/commercial developments. As a result of the exclusion of pass -by trips, the PM peak hour trip estimation has been adjusted to 13,507. Therefore, commercial/retail development will not be charged a Transportation SDC for PM peak hour pass -by trips, and thus will pay only for new (primary) trips added to the transportation system. e Per Section Five of the City of Redmond Public Facilities Plan, July 2001. Pass -by trips have a negligible impact on the transportation system as their impact is limited to the driveways of retail/commercial development as opposed to the arterial and collector network within the City of Redmond. TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice, ITE, October 1998. 8 See Appendix H for the pass -by trip reduction factor calculation. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 11 of 14 H H U 0 N N H H N 19 VlWNN W H H»1� O� H� N�AINRV A�- y�Ajj �I��pp O N •tiNN N N N N N N N AeN N 25 2l> in S 252 AH 9 9 1ogggrggTS H N N H » N N N N v AA t9IN OH M' I' 0 NO tD H H M M N N O N 8 g g s Wg€g W W v :01 'O .2 �F 15IUJ (,�m 2 QYI oy .2 ID ° y q" a Oas c m a Q �. p �jW c c y8 y a Z ci Q� ea LM tit a m >_� Q �t7 m grZ F C L L Q H Z Q Q j mul Z y W U) I.- ru u`i� obi°o r S1 �.�.�a m a°Wm.Sfj � a yZ a' C� Q a L H a F F -y V H a H F- 4 40 V) 0 U U V g }NAV{ lQn .Qj 5y� n F J O w a a ' Tranispd"6tidW DIC.Comparison: Clty:of'Redmond ver'susCity�of Bend Comparisons are frequently drawn between the cost of the Transportation SDC in Bend versus Redmond. The City of Bend's Transportation SDC methodology is significantly different than the City of Redmond's methodology. For comparative purposes, the following table outlines the difference between the Transportation SDC in Bend versus Redmond and the difference between the existing SDC and proposed SDC in Redmond for identical land uses: Table VIII -1: Coml2arative Trans ortation SDCs by Land Use Land Use Size of Bend SDC :i City of RedmondCity -. Proposed SDC Single Family Dwelling Each $2,600 $1,905 $2,477 Light Industrial Building 20,000 s.f. $42,700 $37,338 $48,549 Motel 100 rooms $265,500 $110,490 $143,666 High School 1,500 stu. $504,000 $428,625 $557,325 Office Building 20,000 s.f. $93,660 $56,769 $73,814 Shopping Center 50,000 s.f. $569,300 $356,235 $300,753 High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant 5,000 s.f. $93,660 $103,442 $76,666 Fast Food Restaurant (with Drive-Thru Window 2,500 s.f. $63,700 $159,449 $105,736 Church 25,000 s.f. $42,750 $31,343 $40,871 Gas Station 8 pumps $133,224 $221,894 $144,261 Bold = SDC reduction due to the exclusion of pass -by trips. Note: The City of Bend Transportation SDCs shown in Table VIII -1 reflect a recently approved 20% reduction as a result of a negotiated lawsuit between the City of Bend and the Central Oregon Builders Association. The City of Bend will be revising their Transportation SDC methodology to a methodology similar to that of the City of Redmond's. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 13 of 14 kl ;Concision } rpt ,; r� The 2002 Transportation C/P Update is the yearly update of the Section Five of the July 2001 Public Facilities Plan. The 2002 CIP Projects have been ranked based on objective criteria established by the City of Redmond Public Works Department. The ranking establishes a numerical basis on which basic transportation needs are scored, however it is anticipated that the Mayor, City Council, and Planning Commission may review and adjust the project ranking to meet other community needs. As a result of the recommendations of the 2002 Transportation C/P Update, the Transportation SDC will increase from $1,905 per PM peak hour trip to $2,477 per PM peak hour trip. The $572 Transportation SDC increase is attributed to a number of factors as follows: Item $ Increase Inflation ENR construction cost index +$59 Amended Projects +$84 Added Projects +$210 Removal of retail/commercialpass-by tris +$219 Total +$572 The 2002 Transportation C/P Update documents the transportation system improvements required to provide an acceptable transportation system at build -out of the UGB in 2020. The construction cost estimates associated with the identified projects are based on construction cost data from recent City projects. The 2002 Transportation C/P Update was performed using the methodologies established and approved in the July 2001 PFP; no methodology changes are proposed. TRANSPORTATION CIP UPDATE 2002 Page 14 of 14 -0.1)M0A>. APPENDIX A TABLE 5-4A: RECOMMENDED NEW PROJECTS TABLE 5-4B: RECOMMENDED AMENDED PROJECTS TABLE 5-4C: RECOMMENDED PROJECTS TO DELETE g o ul C: k IL m4, 3 NEW Ei�'.. a, Lu c -8, e Z q Q ri m L)i O a C W C> J G O}5 H 2; ♦O Op O I O Op N N pO pb O N a N ♦ Am�yy {p�� ♦�♦ ♦N+ N � ^ N N N A i f� i i i i� i? i 2 i i i a N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O b 1t IL coco 6 N 2 � m - 3m W m E a tq n W i� N g c n Z w E o N 0 ° - is E s m E E E ETO 20 o Q Q tmio. %o tQ $ E g e o o m 3 3 0c 0 a m m > Q T m 0 Q Q Q m Q L L L N ro m ; <' < m m �' o E E o o N fn N = > > i U)) 2 6 O O I Z Z Z Z ry 4 cp O O N r � N N � N O 2 O 2 O O O O O O O O O O O Go p F H 8 8 ^� q M m NN N N 1Hf) N f n N A N � �pj' N N H H H N N N tl Nop oN opp 0 oN o$ 00 O N N N N 0p 0O O 8 Yf Cl N y 1A O W tl O N cj N N N h I H N N I w w w w w w w w w h I (D N h C-4 N h w W H N N N N N N N N A N c c a a c a m c a m m W U pQ >0 AW� OOO C > O EJz m i� o deo E Jy °i00� �� 03zo Waa �a `mo�ocFi Eaao aOOZo 3�� ocFii Wa ioF a= z� -= vOZ E yzj K cay meyy pa W F y Y fUm Z my. �y =dl� OcF > WZ f o :WE Z, cy- SZ'�'�iiSy ZOw EE Ey 3a002 ¢ 0J 17� mmQa op0y07 QOOZy OO �O7 Qqa my W 'CQH 0.5 0° u100 �aN y m2 Ayn�m aU<-Ot-O Q V �U� �Q a= OO- mpl W w W U m c a J m> G y y Q W O m m W U W W m Q 0 ^ y m m U K -B~ Z < a UcOZO =m O S{LLJ v QyU W�KOy+1O �U-'X mO7 UK cLL ?11 z a2 0- Cp m c o pp J O y S N o W ~ i J c O W m 0 p i= W Ny O0 (/J� mZya H yZ� W K c Cyr a C 4j= a 6 $z 2 Z Z W O N WW T 5 LL J F8 m U r E = z X m z w K a p m Q N = Z y O a z LL my y mNr z •k WOW a>0Oo m2o i -f mOJ vU' m0 c F cyw0� aUO �I, CzF; c wyWN 72Q Sao 00 aO SUP �z OI W O)J � �t�Fl� Cy01g Q J Q z yO 7H Q a W QYH �_W az< y Q Y1 c B V O a 2 t7 2 aO W m V 2 mE QF N J Q O Q z J z Q N Q y , Z W W W J F 4 €�z ow E "iW 0�mpc�� SJ az z o=t� e'�} y?� mo r ids £�w v b G F p V Q F b y U Q 0 O F- y E O Q m z p y iS r N ZU-' UU izy m y� mZ ZU' UO °�� J Z Z yi z U cO O c�C9 V c>O 'YSG Oy oiOS-l-dl U)0z IS �� O = US g c LL 20 y O C._ /- m5 cLL G W O qLL K E W m C2LL N c ClN mul y i �Or my zZ Y 0N19= W O1- m y fH 94 f m O $'p�ZKo m e U QU�C yO00 �ZKZO yQ JQ W W r OO W ffllQ'O oOZ �p� {c0Q gOY-OF mUFN_'iZp W Y� WUZ Waa W W= �� nOy mm x-�(Oy m f m W a ci K cO C tL' cyy cOO cQK cOU y oz Wo n > wZ-� Q Q Ol ,• LLa. WI-=LLy _W- fn _OIFr _OI a �jQ >OQ CJ O m;6 W 2a N �ZQm 3CQNm uZOf~/1 ua��u fZQy y W y Q W y2 Z uZ� rn_QJ_J �Zp W02rL 2 s>2<m iD cam �f0 0 e2ruj2> 200 mt7� 12i° 1?0 3m`�a ofd a � i=yQ Ky tnvQQU W cn W 1-0000 /-yQKQQ 1-iF F-f/ly f QQ F1.. y¢Zi QLL m a E r N N N M O O (O � O T N N H N N N H N N N Go p F H 8 8 ^� q M m NN N N 1Hf) N f n N A N � �pj' N N H H H N N N tl Nop oN opp 0 oN o$ 00 O N N N N 0p 0O O 8 Yf Cl N y 1A O W tl O N cj N N N h I H N N I w w w w w w w w w h I (D N h C-4 N h w W H N N N N N N N N A N c c a a c a m c a m m W U pQ >0 AW� OOO C > O EJz m i� o deo E Jy °i00� �� 03zo Waa �a `mo�ocFi Eaao aOOZo 3�� ocFii Wa ioF a= z� -= vOZ E yzj K cay meyy pa W F y Y fUm Z my. �y =dl� OcF > WZ f o :WE Z, cy- SZ'�'�iiSy ZOw EE Ey 3a002 ¢ 0J 17� mmQa op0y07 QOOZy OO �O7 Qqa my W 'CQH 0.5 0° u100 �aN y m2 Ayn�m aU<-Ot-O Q V �U� �Q a= OO- mpl W w W U m c a J m> G y y Q W O m m W U W W m Q 0 ^ y m m U K -B~ Z < a UcOZO =m O S{LLJ v QyU W�KOy+1O �U-'X mO7 UK cLL ?11 z a2 0- Cp m c o pp J O y S N o W ~ i J c O W m 0 p i= W Ny O0 (/J� mZya H yZ� W K c Cyr a C 4j= a 6 $z 2 Z Z W O N WW T 5 LL J F8 m U r E = z X m z w K a p m Q N = Z y O a z LL my y mNr z •k WOW a>0Oo m2o i -f mOJ vU' m0 c F cyw0� aUO �I, CzF; c wyWN 72Q Sao 00 aO SUP �z OI W O)J � �t�Fl� Cy01g Q J Q z yO 7H Q a W QYH �_W az< y Q Y1 c B V O a 2 t7 2 aO W m V 2 mE QF N J Q O Q z J z Q N Q y , Z W W W J F 4 €�z ow E "iW 0�mpc�� SJ az z o=t� e'�} y?� mo r ids £�w v b G F p V Q F b y U Q 0 O F- y E O Q m z p y iS r N ZU-' UU izy m y� mZ ZU' UO °�� J Z Z yi z U cO O c�C9 V c>O 'YSG Oy oiOS-l-dl U)0z IS �� O = US g c LL 20 y O C._ /- m5 cLL G W O qLL K E W m C2LL N c ClN mul y i �Or my zZ Y 0N19= W O1- m y fH 94 f m O $'p�ZKo m e U QU�C yO00 �ZKZO yQ JQ W W r OO W ffllQ'O oOZ �p� {c0Q gOY-OF mUFN_'iZp W Y� WUZ Waa W W= �� nOy mm x-�(Oy m f m W a ci K cO C tL' cyy cOO cQK cOU y oz Wo n > wZ-� Q Q Ol ,• LLa. WI-=LLy _W- fn _OIFr _OI a �jQ >OQ CJ O m;6 W 2a N �ZQm 3CQNm uZOf~/1 ua��u fZQy y W y Q W y2 Z uZ� rn_QJ_J �Zp W02rL 2 s>2<m iD cam �f0 0 e2ruj2> 200 mt7� 12i° 1?0 3m`�a ofd a � i=yQ Ky tnvQQU W cn W 1-0000 /-yQKQQ 1-iF F-f/ly f QQ F1.. y¢Zi QLL m a E r N N N M O O (O � O W O f W O N: a e w d c Z LU E. O o V V E aN R J V m CD Q O H cm wz: a a a a a a O w Q a u W a W W _Mz O o F~- mFa EW Fr o V DO WW m=JMW O U a' W tnzzQ P 10 mW� 0 o U VU W i O H c~ J= o E i~ ��+z J c.ow z mei ya a '~zo m= ay ca^iU caUZ �. c�a aWi aWU2 Z. -0 $,-Na o �Hu d`v % a F 8 a w z 8 w N c >a 7 0$ x a= 6 ei W N O cm m o a'O W NZ oU'1' �O cRNZ mZ W a 0 x a H K g� Z -, Z d p= 8� F K g a�ow �awo `aVvi $aWv �yua _`atercWo m p wa'm aaZF OZ_ xpa� W �Z01 V. a vF�„ oa Zr Wry O E0fxz W 7 IS n W Z cKoa ca Z_ >Z. aw iwOg aE�w m as $wZi �aNW ma�"z aamW aa�2 00 �U HW6m m02z IL E4W s((�OO �( wW Y OK >W UK a W fnW (7 O iW b mKq b Lu DOC 'r z 2 $ S.yZ f0 m oj= W mbOY W W �W a�0 u W JQ �W W W E m of � i0Y mai �m x0a� xnfm �ca� Roza o� vSi Mafm Uaa �a 'a m _ m O w Q a IIDM 0A, APPENDIX B NEW PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES U 'w 10 Project: Sisters Avenue Widening, H97 to S Canal Blvd g Project Number: 2002-1 u � Description: Add additional WB lane to Sisters Avenue to accommodate future dual left tum lanes in NB H97 (per MOT recommendation). Comments: Project recommended by MOT per Alternate Route analysis - dual left recommendation. Project does not include funding of dual left tum lane construction in H97. (ODOT) SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $145,000.00 51 Right -of -Way 3000 IS.F. 1 $ 4.001$ 12,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 14,500.00 7 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal Engineer's Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit 4,350.00 Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal - Utility Relocation 1 Lump Sum $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 2 Add WB lane (widening -sidewalk relocation 1 Lump Sum $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 3 Widen 3 -sided bride 1 Lum Sum $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 41Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 1 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $145,000.00 51 Right -of -Way 3000 IS.F. 1 $ 4.001$ 12,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 14,500.00 7 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 14,500.00 8 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 4,350.00 9 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 7,250.00 10 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 2,900.00 11 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 7,250.00 12 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 7,250.00 13 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 29,000.00 VI) Mo4, 146 � L h � Ir Project: S. Canal Blvd/Sisters Avenue Traffic Signal " x Project Number: 2002-2 Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of S. Canal Blvd/Sisters Avenue. Signal will require coordination with signal at Highway 97. Comments: Required due to connection of 5th/6th Streets to S Canal Blvd - ODOT Alternate Route analysis. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $175, 000.00 4 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ Engineers Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Signing and Striping 1 Lum Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 3 Utilities and Coordination 1 LumpSum $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Subtotal $175, 000.00 4 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 17,500.00 5 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 17,500.00 6 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 5,250.00 7 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 8,750.00 8 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 3,500.00 9 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 8,750.00 10 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 8,750.00 11 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 35,000.00 Project: Highway 97/Sisters Avenue intersection improvements (East) a Project Number. 2002-3 km Description: Construct standard 3 -lane section on Sisters Avenue east of Highway 97 (thru RxR tracks) to permit exclusive left tum phasing at intersection of Highway 97/Sisters Ave. Comments: Current shared phasing on Sisters Avenue approaches is inadequate for existing and future projected traffic volumes. This project is an extension of the original Sisters Avenue Project. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $ 237,500.00 51 Right -of -Way 2000 IS.F. 1 $ 6.00 1 $ 12,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 23,750.00 7 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal Engineers - Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit 7,125.00 Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal - Relocation and rephasing 1 Lump Sum $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 2 Street widening and modernization 500 LF $ 215.00 $107,500.00 3 Widen and modernize RxR crossing. 1 Lump Sum $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 4,Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 1 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 237,500.00 51 Right -of -Way 2000 IS.F. 1 $ 6.00 1 $ 12,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 23,750.00 7 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 23,750.00 8 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 7,125.00 9 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 11,875.00 10 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 4,750.00 11 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 11,875.00 12 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 11,875.00 13 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 47,500.00 Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Yew Avenue/Highway 97 NB ramps. Signal will require coordination adjacent Yew Avenue/Highway 97 SB ramp intersection and minor approach improvements. Comments: Required as per recent traffic analysis and projections for proposed development. SDC Impact: City has established Traffic Signal Exaction Formula for impact of new growth. SDC funding not used. Subtotal $ 20-0—,0-0-0.0-0-1 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 Engineer's Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Intersection Shoulder and Lane Widening 1 Lump Sum $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 3 Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 4 Utilities and Coordination 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 20-0—,0-0-0.0-0-1 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 6 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 7 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 6,000.00 8 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 9 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 4,000.00 10 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 11 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 12 Contingency 15% of Subtotal $ 30,000.00 PCS �1� j5tz. ._ ��N, o Project: Yew Avenue/Highway 97 SB ramps Traffic Signal Project Number. 2002-5 Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Yew Avenue/Highway 97 SB ramps. Signal will require coordination adjacent Yew Avenue/Highway 97 NB ramp intersection and minor approach improvements. Comments: Required as per recent traffic analysis and projections for proposed development. SDC Impact: City has established Traffic Signal Exaction Formula for impact of new growth. SDC funding not used. Subtotal $ 200, 000.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 Engineer's -Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Intersection Shoulder and Lane Widening 1 Lump $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 3 Signing and Striping 1 Lum$ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 4 Utilities and Coordination 1 Lum$ 5,000.001$ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 200, 000.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 6 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 20,000.00 7 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 6,000.00 8 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 9 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 4,000.00 10 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 11 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 10,000.00 12 Contingency 15% of Subtotal $ 30,000.00 Project Number: 2002-6 Description: Modernize NW Maple Avenue to minor arterial standard from Ws existing rural standard. Comments: Prior CIP does not have modernization funds for this section of minor arterial roadway SDC Impact: Project eligible for use of SDC funds (44%) beyond local street funding. Engineer's Estimate # IDescription of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost I Item Cost 1 I Street Modernization (minor arterial standard) 1 2640 ILF 1 $ 215.00 1 $ 567,600.00 Subtotal $ 567,600.00 21 Right -of -Way 20000 S.F. 1 $ 3.751$ 75,000.00 3 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 56,760.00 4 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 56,760.00 5 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 17,028.00 6 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 28,380.00 7 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 11,352.00 8 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 28,380.00 9 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 28,380.00 10 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $113,520.00 Comments: Required as per recommendation of TSP re-evaluation at intersection. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $ 267, 500.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 26,750.00 Engineer's - Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Stop controlled approach realignment 500 LF $ 215.00 $107,500.00 3 Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 4 Utilities and Coordination 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 267, 500.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 26,750.00 6 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 26,750.00 7 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 8,025.00 8 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 13,375.00 9 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 5,350.00 10 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 13,375.00 11 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 13,375.00 12 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 53,500.00 Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Black Butte Blvd/5th Street. Comments: Revised from CIP as project will require minor approach improvements as well as stand alone project status. Funding to be moved to City from State as project will be installed in City Street after 5th Street returns to City upon completion of the US 97 Reroute. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Engineer's Estimate Item I 215igning and Striping I 1 ILuma Sum 1 $ 5.000.00 1 $ 5.000.00 1 Subtotal $155,000.00 3 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 15,500.00 4 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 15,500.00 5 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 4,650.00 6 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 7,750.00 7 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 3,100.00 8 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 7,750.00 9 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 7,750.00 10 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 31,000.00 Project: Kingwood Avenue/Highway 97 Traffic Signal Project Number: 26 -Revised Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Kingwood Avenue/Highway 97. +V'D M 04,d C Ra r v x Comments: Revised from CIP as project will require minor approach improvements as well as stand alone project status. Funding to be moved to City from State as project will be installed in City Street after Highway 97 returns to City upon completion of the US 97 Reroute. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. -Engineer's Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Signing and Striping 1 LumpSum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 3 Minor street approach modernization 1 Lump Sum $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Subtotal $ 205, 000.00 4 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 20,500.00 5 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 20,500.00 6 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 6,150.00 7 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 10,250.00 8 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 4,100.00 9 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 10,250.00 10 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 10,250.00 11 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 41,000.00 Project: Obsidian Avenue/S Canal Blvd Traffic Signal Project Number. 31 -Revised Description: Construct traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Obsidian Avenue/S. Canal Blvd. Comments: Revised from CIP as project will require minor approach improvements as well as stand alone project status. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $160,000.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 16,000.00 Engineer's Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Stop controlled approach realignment 0 LF $ 215.00 $ - 3 Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 4 Utilities and Coordination 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.001$ 5,000.00 Subtotal $160,000.00 5 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 16,000.00 6 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 16,000.00 7 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 4,800.00 8 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 8,000.00 9 Construction Staking 2% of Subtotal $ 3,200.00 10 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 8,000.00 11 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 8,000.00 12 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 32,000.00 Comments: Revised from CIP as project will require significant approach improvements in addition to traffic signal costs. It is estimated that a roundabout could be constructed within the funding established for this traffic signal improvement at this intersection. SDC Impact: Project adds capacity beyond local street equivalent and is 100% SDC eligible. Subtotal $ 335,000.00 51 Right -of -Way 13000 S.F. 1 $ 6.00 1 $ 78,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 33,500.00 Engineer's - Estimate # Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 Traffic Signal Installed 1 Each $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Approach modernization major collector std 1000 LF $ 175.00 $175,000.00 3 Signing and Striping 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 41 Utilities and Coordination 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 335,000.00 51 Right -of -Way 13000 S.F. 1 $ 6.00 1 $ 78,000.00 6 Engineering and Design 10% of Subtotal $ 33,500.00 7 Construction Management 10% of Subtotal $ 33,500.00 8 Legal and Administrative 3% of Subtotal $ 10,050.00 9 Clearing and Grubbing 5% of Subtotal $ 16,750.00 10 Construction Staking (2% of Subtotal $ 6,700.00 11 Mobilization 5% of Subtotal $ 16,750.00 12 Traffic Control 5% of Subtotal $ 16,750.00 13 Contingency 20% of Subtotal $ 67,000.00 Ism .A1)MOa> APPENDIX C COLLECTOR ROADWAY INVENTORY m$1) M O 4�d �4 M, CITY OF REDMOND .. p PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Z 875 SE SISTERS AVENUE PO BOX 726 REDMOND, OR 97756-0100 541.504.2000 FAX: 541.548.0253 www.redmond.or.us COLLECTOR ROADWAY INVENTORY 2002 Public Works has undertaken a review of the CIP to ensure adequate planning and -funding of Collector Roadway projects in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as a portion of the 2002 CIP Update. The following is a summary of the review of the existing CIP with regard to Collector Roadway Projects and their respective project funding sources: Inventory: Collector: Spruce Avenue CIP Funding: $1,000K -Street CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Reroute Project may affect status of Spruce Avenue as a collector. East-West collector may shift to Quince Avenue between 10"' Street and N Canal Blvd. Funding to remain the same. Collector: CIP Funding: CIP Funding Adequate: CIP Funding Add: CIP funding Delete: Comments: Kingwood Avenue $60K -Bike; $50K -Ped Yes $0 $0 Collector: Hemlock Avenue (NEW PROJECT 2002-8) CIP Funding: $215K -Bike CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $1,400K -Street CIP funding Delete: $215K -Bike Comments: Add modernization improvement funding for improvements east of N Canal Blvd and west of NW 19'h Street. These former County roads require urban modernization, as their alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. Delete the Chris Doty, PE Assistant City Engineer 541.504.2015 chrisd@redmond.or.us Page 1 of 5 proposed Bike funding as the necessary facilities will be constructed in the modernized sections. Collector: Dogwood Avenue CIP Funding: $10K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: Antler Avenue -Black Butte Boulevard (NEW PROJECT 2002-9) CIP Funding: $90K -Bike; $25K Ped CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $577.5K -Street CIP funding Delete: $70K -Bike Comments: Add modernization improvement funding for improvements east of 25"' Street. This former County road requires urban modernization, as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. Delete the proposed Bike funding as the necessary facilities will be constructed in the modernized sections. Collector: Obsidian Avenue (NEW PROJECT 2002-10) CIP Funding: $115K -Bike; $70K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $87.5K -Street CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Add improvement costs for approximately 500 feet of unimproved street construction at various locations west of 23`d Street. Collector: Quartz Avenue CIP Funding: $4,925K -Street CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Delete proposed signal at S Canal Blvd/Salmon Avenue Collector: Salmon Avenue CIP Funding: $952.3K -Street CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $150K Comments: Delete proposed signal at S Canal Blvd/Salmon Avenue as the spacing is too close to Odem Medo signal. Collector: Odem Medo Road (NEW PROJECT 2002-11) CIP Funding: $5K -Street CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $750,000 -Street (100% SDC) CIP funding Delete: $0 Chris Doty, PE Assistant City Engineer 541.504.2015 chrisd@redmond.or.us Page 2 of 5 Comments: Add improvements to construct 34ane section with medians to channelize access and allow traffic signals at Highway 97/Odem Medo and S Canal Blvd/Odem Medo to function properly. Collector: CIP Funding: CIP Funding Adequate: CIP Funding Add: CIP funding Delete: Comments: Collector: CIP Funding: CIP Funding Adequate: CIP Funding Add: CIP funding Delete: Comments: Wickiup Avenue -Reservoir Drive $305K -Bike; $205K -Ped Yes $0 $0 Badger Road $1,625K -Street (includes 43`d Street) Yes $0 $0 Collector: Helmholtz Way (NEW PROJECT 2002-12) CIP Funding: $0 CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $906.5K -Street CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Helmholtz Way is classified as a minor collector bordering the UGB from Wickiup Avenue to Quartz Avenue. This rural section of roadway will require urban modernization to a minor collector standard. Collector: 43`d Street CIP Funding: See Badger Road CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: 3e Street (NEW PROJECT 2002-13) CIP Funding: $75K -Bike CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $1,295K -Street CIP funding Delete: $75K -Bike Comments: This facility is mostly unconstructed and/or constructed to a rural standard. CIP placement allows SDC funds to be collected for developer oversize improvements. Delete Bike improvement funding as the Bike facilities will be accommodated in the modernization improvement for the entire facility from Obsidian Avenue to Hemlock Avenue. Collector: 23rd Street CIP Funding: $475K -Street CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 Chris Doty, PE Assistant City Engineer 541.504.2015 chrisd@redmond.or.us Page 3 of 5 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: 19th Street-Rimrock Way (UPDATE PROJECT 76) CIP Funding: $145K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $120K -Ped CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Add sidewalk infill along developed properties from Antler Avenue to Jackpine Avenue Collector: S Canyon Drive CIP Funding: $225K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: 15th Street -N Canyon Drive CIP Funding: $325K -Street; 480K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: Ninth Street CIP Funding: $125K -Ped CIP Funding Adequate: Yes CIP Funding Add: $0 CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Collector: 10th Street (NEW PROJECT 2002-14, UPDATE PROJECT 48) CIP Funding: $55K -Bike CIP Funding Adequate: No CIP Funding Add: $227.5K -Street; $25K -Bike; $99K -Ped CIP funding Delete: $0 Comments: Add modernization improvement funding for improvement north of Spruce Avenue. This former County road requires modernization, as the alignment, condition, and grade do not translate to an urban standard. Add additional $25K for bicycle lane widening on the west side (3300 feet), south of Spruce. Add $99K for sidewalk infill south of Spruce Avenue (3300 feet). Total Fiscal Breakdown: Collector CIP Funding Additions: Collector CIP Funding Deletions: Total CIP Funding Impact: SDC Eligible Funding Additions: SDC Eligible Funding Deletions: Total Trans SDC Funding Impact: $5,487,500.00 $ 510,000.00 $4,977,500.00 $1,719,125.00 (see spreadsheet) $ 510,000.00 $1,209,125.00 Chris Doty, PE Assistant City Engineer 541.504.2015 chrisd@redmond.or.us Page 4 of 5 Note: SDC funding is 20% of a Major Collector project, 25% of a Minor Collector Project, 100% of a Bicycle Project (bicycle lanes on major collectors only) and 0% of a Pedestrian Project (sidewalks considered part of a local street and not considered an oversize). Recommendation: As per the attached spreadsheet, it is recommended that the CIP Update include the aforementioned Collector Roadway projects and their associated cost estimates. The proposed changes to the CIP will result in an increase of $4,977,500.00 to the CIP of which $1,209,125.00 will be funded with SDCs. As a result of the amended funding for the aforementioned Collector Roadway projects, the Transportation SDC will increase by $89.52 ($1,209,125.00/13,507 trips) per pm peak hour trip. Chris Doty, PE Assistant City Engineer 541.504.2015 chdsd@redmond.or.us Page 5 of 5 4b DLL � o C O O a 7� i J J J 0 F - y c 7 LL a U i i i L C 4 A A D m f6 io 75 LL c OD O C m N 669 � Q "7' m W LL O O A 1 75 Vi Z IF C m E C LL 7 In W m W C7 mLL O 'D J Z t6 M in pc p N U Y @ co C m C C W m 0 h N m � to E 5 N >. m E C > fy/1 of y d U c v m E co m > d CL U c a U E c a o Q a y > 02 O C1m 0 fl C � a > U j( O m O O W W c 0 0 c CD na W c c Q H Q W N m ami � m O C N f/) L LL C ELL e d N o Z N co I o c c c b in o N 75 J J J J = CD N In N CM - Ta - G O p O p m O O1 O O A a M COD p N N N N A N N fV N N O O O O O O O 1 O O O O N O p j O h O O f0 O N N N N N N N N N N 1 O O O O O O O O 1 0 0 o n o C o i O 101.� 1� CAD W) CD an 14 N I f v_ in A of W. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 6A N► N 61► "I N O O 00 O O 00 O N O O n y o v to ; 28 Y co a 0 0 C', 0 0 0 O 0 0 to 0 O 0 O 0 M 0 In 0 O w 0 �t M 6Av9 N M N N Z 0 m CO) O N W O. N O O Co M O O O O O aE. m o N o v N w CL E c w O M O Cl M M M D N W O o S o O 0 N 0 0 0 CD cn M N m co 1- COD w O f0 p• p cn 0 0 V COD 1. �" 'O U Q Q bib0 O O O 0 O �Op O p M 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 M 0 O O O s o O co coO M O �j M t0 O — O r N Of et f0 M O W A O CO N I O p C f0 O Z y 4)Z O y ID O y } y } y } O Z y } y } O Z y } O Z y } O Z y } y } y } O Z m m > > Z c>D p > m m m Y c Q m m N m O > V c U aci c c c m° c >. m E> c v Q Q� Q> m m > 0 3 p z > S Q Q 06 j, N W in IC S v V Om E O Y m c rn L in (n r in in c E y m E m 'Dv E E L U L L Y Y 0 2 o Q O 0 75 to O > CO = v M N N M It LO (o 1- w m O N M IA (O h CD m O N i i i L C 4 A A D m f6 io 75 LL c OD O C m N 669 � Q "7' m W LL O O A 1 75 Vi Z IF C m E C LL 7 In W m W C7 mLL O 'D J Z t6 M in pc p N U Y @ co C m C C W m 0 h N m � to E 5 N >. m E C > fy/1 of y d U c v m E co m > d CL U c a U E c a o Q a y > 02 O C1m 0 fl C � a > U j( O m O O W W c 0 0 c CD na W c c Q H Q W N m ami � m O C N f/) L LL C ELL e d N o Z N co I o c c c b in o N 75 J J J J APPENDIX D CONSTRUCTION COST DATA SPREADSHEET 4" CITY OF REDMOND CIP PROJECT COST ANALYSIS u Minor Arterial Construction Costs 3 Structure 4 Railroad Crossing 5 Traffic Signal 6 Median with Landscaping SF $ 75.00 EA $ 575,000.00 EA $ 150,000.00 LF $ 60.00 7 Lane Widening SF $ 4.00 8 Sidewalk Addition (Includes curb and drainage appurtenances) LF $ 45.00 Collector (Major and Minor) Construction Costs (Modemization and New Construction) Unit Unit $ 1 Street Improvement Cost Includes: PV SECT, CURB, SW, DRAIN, SGNS, STRIP. MINOR EXIFILL, LF $ 175.00 2 Lane Widening SF $ 4.00 3 Sidewalk Addition (Includes curb and drainage appurtenances) LF $ 40.00 % of Project Cost SDC Eligible Funding (per CIP, July 2001) from SDC Minor Arterial 44% Major Collector 20% Minor Collector 25% Unit Unit $ 1 Street Improvement Cost (New Construction and Modernization Projects) Indudes: PV SECT, CURB, SW, DRAIN, SGNS, STRP, MINOR EX/FILL, LF $ 215.00 2 Right -of -Way (includes 50% contingency) EFU SF $ 0.50 R1 -R4 SF $ 3.75 R5 SF $ 5.00 C1-C2 SF $ 6.00 C4 SF $ 5.00 M1 SF $ 4.50 3 Structure 4 Railroad Crossing 5 Traffic Signal 6 Median with Landscaping SF $ 75.00 EA $ 575,000.00 EA $ 150,000.00 LF $ 60.00 7 Lane Widening SF $ 4.00 8 Sidewalk Addition (Includes curb and drainage appurtenances) LF $ 45.00 Collector (Major and Minor) Construction Costs (Modemization and New Construction) Unit Unit $ 1 Street Improvement Cost Includes: PV SECT, CURB, SW, DRAIN, SGNS, STRIP. MINOR EXIFILL, LF $ 175.00 2 Lane Widening SF $ 4.00 3 Sidewalk Addition (Includes curb and drainage appurtenances) LF $ 40.00 % of Project Cost SDC Eligible Funding (per CIP, July 2001) from SDC Minor Arterial 44% Major Collector 20% Minor Collector 25% ,IDM 0A, F.11 J J =1 z 111 K SAMPLE CIP PROJECT RANKING WORKSHEET Lu w m 0 0 c� CL f - V to i 0 Ix a w W 2 Y 2� 00 ZZ OY Z D W 9 � U LL O0 IL CL U U 2 C 0 a r 3tLA M N U r5 N w C c xO t W w Z c t � o r OL $ N N r Q lfl X > C f0 ' CL $ c c n m - m M CO N F°- n 4 > 2 ¢ r E O C r > C $ C> t c a s (a n �' 'R (D c § $ o i ( N : E > 4) U D N Y II N c+> at .aUMOA> APPENDIX F 2001 CIP y p W S N a a gas a aaaaaaa N m tm 0 N a.a a s al 00& Y§N a N N V N N M N NN N O O O O O Op1O� O O O § OW O O 0 0 8O �pp 8 O m �O�pp N h f n N N A w C D N NNN N q p N N 0 $ 00 S z o 8 g g C6 8 m C6 N R N « 8 S 0p 0 0000p0 0 0 0 8 h N N O O OO N N pp pO N M o1 mN O Om61 WPl N N a Q �H N HN40 N N (may N M 00 O O 8 w8 O 00 0 cli w $ 8 r N H 88 w y OrY) ON w pO0 00 0 sN ppp pppp11 O O oOp Y) a7 m N m w 00 Mq k IS N N R r w w aaNww CO L'°C C L00 L L• (AL L L L I I s�II o` o00 0 0 `000`o$So o $ b c^q W cfc c c c Ne O c rn m m m o 0 y a CL ; m ° o ; m E a a' g 3E� o ' g•o'L" E ° 'm m C a W @ S c �nE !8EE o s a E E 8 m o��v�� g m E' o e� m N E W h H C > m = a?mWoo$ $ 0i m $ a b' H m c O° = �� p$ H m = CmEm OUm> KOb.0°m Jm °'m YO mCn_AP Pm= m> m> mm a 2> 0 oc m co ca 0 c 3 S m c c m m Q' i 6 w m m m 5 44m 3£micmavUU>Uo3m oa'< Q Y)wm 2 mH Qwam 7Z ma U) 0U) ; a 2 O O N O o 0 o S N N w M w b H 8g00 M 0 0 0 0 00i N � N A w w w w w 0 $ 00 S z o m m � Ep 'c Yui = o = c m w 0 v m 0 0 H C, c N r0 T = o t E c m2 L H 3 C o N A O M 0 0 0 3 CR 8 H w N ci 40 N E 3 0 $ S z o m m � Ep 'c Yui = o = c m m m v m r H C, = N r0 T = o t E c m2 L H 3 m U c o = o E EE $ $i o c U L $ toq N m L oc z 3 v° o mW = o Yi ��88 m x$00 c $ Y mom m C a ! w m b p p m U 6 c [O Z A i myoN tn�eo as W W 4m�rn� m�Q, 3: vm c Z Q Z m N ; Q In m U S O C o N A O M 0 0 0 H w N 40 N 0 0 8 zz m 0 S E 3 0 $ v � m v m r c > W a ° rn L H 3 m n 0I = m o = Z U L $ N m L oc z ^ CH = C c m T E V a E w 5 p C 0 m > C A C Q m a m c Q Q rn ate_ co a =N zz m 0 S _■ p$p1p o 0 0 w H o 0 0 $ o lri o o � o Ip N m N N W W N g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 10 F L L 00 m `o o Q� V m c v J m A rn rn � c m m c U m N m °c � Q a Z O . A rn 2 p T m O } z E E T N€ t $ n Q ao V m m C7 C G xE m o c m W m 3Qa u¢ m 0 Um�f 00> J O U m m n 'c Q W 5 o o o m E n o o.ivzttcclnm m ; H o 0 0 $ o lri o o � o Ip N m N N W W N g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N < w N Q Cl �q 1y R R k N N w w f 10 Q T 'aC `o o Q� V Q� V V � C °c °c ° W °c S � m . w Q U U m U V W A T c W t $ n aC s G o m C7 C G xE m c C % m C U p b ti 15 Q U g dC w O > O C W m N 0 o m m c C c = be m > O m R S m E N 1p E O Ip Ip w r D yCC y 0O � C l7 W l7 N q A l0 10 A 17 N 1D O t- O q 0 ..2.0 N O q q M q W C c q{�{;; m u m m ¢ m Y v o m Y n m c > o c > m m a m e c to m 3> �o c u mlj N vmvo W min A 00 Om 8O N < w N Q Cl �q 1y R R k N N w w f 8 0 8 0 0 0 N w N C 0 0 8 25 C 00 N N O n n 1D N i0 O O 10 lA M 1+1 w w w N N N W 10 Q 0o 'aC `o o Q� V Q� V V � C °c °c ° w$ °c S � m . w U V O v ° E _m O f w i W A T c W t $ n aC s G m y x C G xE n5 N m a c >= E g g c m a m 9 c = m v ¢ w m LL 2 U Y Z S 8 S m C o S c N 1p O Ip Ip w r 3 vi N m C; m O l7 W l7 N q A l0 10 A 17 N 1D O t- O q 0 ..2.0 N O q q M q W C c q{�{;; m u m m N H N N N N m m a 44 m p N > J J 8O N W m= 8 z m bm W$ min 3 c rn� Ol0 cim J �m C t Sm p O 0 U) m Q i wN J � Urn _ p m p O w :a w 8 0 8 0 0 0 N w N C 0 0 8 25 C 00 N N O n n 1D N i0 O O 10 lA M 1+1 w w w N N N W 10 Q 0o 'aC `o o Q� V Q� V V � C °c °c ° c °c S � m . W m U V O v ° E _m O f m b i W A T c W t $ n aC s G m y x C G xE n5 a m o m a c >= E g g c m a m 9 c = m v ¢ w m LL 2 U Y Z i 3 i m C o S c m 3 N N Q NEE O N O a L C 0 ..2.0 O O E O W W C c q{�{;; m u m m m m a m p W W > J J N W m= 03 z m bm W$ min 3 c rn� W a cim J �m plc Sm < 2 t`tn'a U) m Q i wN J � Urn _ r m o 8 0 o /A"1 w q w w w N 2 Q U T U U `o o `0 0 � C c V ym K m � � m o W W m U V O v ° E _m O m b 49 m v $ n aC s tl m y x C G xE n5 a m o c a � n Jc Jo m Q I U) > W > m Q 0¢ S e m£ cf mwm�N a » r j T N m ¢ w m LL 2 U Y Z i 3 i 2 i 31 w 18 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 o S S S w w m n w w N l7 w w ~ � z 8 8 w g 0 0 f y A 25 N E o 0 'W m 25 asp /40 01 LL 0 c `m E w w p � m m n m Q E w v r m ¢> m i O C K a m E y g H U N w S ' w w N q V O m w O r w A w S w w 'o m t m �m m Z t � O y �m a a' Q m rn = m Q£ U) m E d 0 u v o 0 �nQm =inz <3 A 31 w 18 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 o S S S w w m n w w N l7 w w bp No z r z 0 g 0 0 f y 0 m m E o 0 'W m 0 c 0 c 0 c `m E C j c m c p � m m n m Q E w v r m ¢> m i O C O m E y g H U N w S ' w w N q N N O m w O r w A w S w w 31 w 18 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 o S S S w w m n w w N l7 w w W m U U) m .Q a W a w a a A IN V O w N N N 0 a $ 8 W h N M N w w S C S C o S o o � w N w w F dC bp d m z r z 0 0 0 0 f y 0 m m E o 0 'W m 0 c 0 c 0 c `m E C j c m c p � m m n m Q E m v r m ¢> m i O C O m E y c 1° 3 a m m m W s T m d N 'o m t m �m m Z t � O y �m a a' Q m rn = m Q£ U) m E d 0 u v o 0 �nQm =inz <3 A O E ` m E m Eo= e a 8 0 c mm E m ry E m m 0 m m N m ry p u 0 U t N b n m £ rn ¢ m m `w n m O m m W m U U) m .Q a W a w a a A IN V O w N N N 0 a $ 8 W h N M N w w S C S C o S o o � w N w w F dC bp d m U U U 0 0 0 0 0 f y 0 m m E o n _ o £ 0 r L `m E _ m o c E m O C n T u N O c � m c 1° 8 x m W s T m d � m t v 'o m t m i m , o m m p O '0 2 c m y �m a y m ��s 0 Q£ U) m E d 0 u v o 0 �nQm =inz <3 A 3 §a§N N 8 8 8 < N N N w w S Ct e N 8 888 N t�0 O w w N w 88888888 x 8 8 8 2 2- 8 w w w N N N �p p8p pop pgp gpp � 8 � t0 10 10 �0 N N S S w w w w w N w w S S O B S 00 0 p0o p0 0 1A N N IA N w w N w w 8888888888888 Z9 N 1N N N N N N N N N w w 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C C 01 3 v E L > E A m J rn m m E c p m N m°0 o m m ¢ C. b m To' 705 (((i300000 �o 0 m' V Q C C m m E m= W= c v o W A b b m p m c m `12 m c £ m 26 m Cp E 3 o m c c m ScUWw O O A> 8� m m m m m m m m m m m o e - n n C C c c c c c c c c c c E E CII Ol Cfl W CA T m CP tom m0 m Sl N in in N fA Vl fn fn N m D .D E E IE IE EIF A n n § §§o'c8 keR9 Vl S N N N N N N g U. Mpp pp pp N M N N T g i d W SEE O k E C a V 7 § §§o'c8 keR9 S N N N N N N N U. pL_ 6 g O k E C a V E lg Oo o %300 N o g 9 C s o C o s a 7�g LL N N N p g� $ 6 F o y C p O M N N N p RX r O x t p T �pk¢ iyxES� T W C N N F E N N C N Ot 4R $C� c O Yf Y/ O ■y X tl N .E r M $ g O O��` OONO�f � e gi g V O O O N N O W YI YINO 11 10b SS k g L7 n N N N N N N N S X g S ye 000000 0Yeo�n .bisg� 8 �'� � .Q�00000002 ^ A r r r 1�� y�y C •� g oQQ000 gmoogo O 00 O O W OO O V ^ p^ W H A N M N W m' A N 10 yE E aS G a N N N N N s $q is 4 ; & «SS Q 8 • �� Y L6+ c� Ig a-�'�.a'-0 .a O �rBFBg6 "ga E pGu=r�D vii gWg �'�eE�E m Via: m �'. ouuo u o C u O F❑ a E E E roa m m m o � n tccc o.aaa Q :.rg a` U U 0- � co m m a `i- F.l)MOA, APPENDIX G ENR CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX DATA Construction Cost Index History (1908-2001) (b J I! ca rn a=ftmmW �d%d�c•here far•a: Home This week's magazine Cover Story Covers and Features E -Construction Equipment Tracks & Trends : Industry Calendar : Opinion People and Awards Cost Indexes Construction Economics Headline News : Buildings : Business & Labor : Environment : Finance Technology Transportation Industrial Power Weather Career Opportunities Project Bids and Legal Notices Special Sections Powerplant Construction Nation's Construction Schools ENR'S Top Ranked Firms Top Design Firms Top Contractors Top Specialty Contractors Top International Contractors Top International Design Firms Page Transportation CIP Update 1► Construction Cost_ Index History (1908-2002) HOW ENR BUILDS THE INDEX: 200 hours of common labor at the 20 -city average of common labor rates, plus 25 cwt of standard structural steel shapes at the mill price prior to 1996 and the fabricated 20 -city price from 1996, plus 1.128 tons of portland cement at the 20 -city price, plus 1,088 board -ft of 2 x 4 lumber at the 20 -city price. ANNUAL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG 1980 3132 3134 3159 3143 3139 3198 3260 3304 3319 3327 3355 3376 3237 19813372 3373 3384 3450 3471 3496 3548 3616 3657 3660 3697 3695 3535 1982 3704 3728 3721 3731 3734 3815 3899 3899 3902 3901 3917 3950 3825 1983 3960 4001 4006 40014003 4073 4108 4132 4142 4127 4133 4110 4066 1984 4109 4113 4118 4132 4142 41614166 4169 4176 41614158 4144 4146 1985 4145 4153 41514150 41714201 4220 4230 4229 4228 4231 4228 4195 1986 4218 4230 42314242 4275 4303 4332 4334 4335 4344 4342 4351 4295 1987 4354 4352 4359 4363 4369 4387 4404 4443 4456 4459 4453 4478 4406 1988 4470 4473 4484 4489 4493 4525 4532 4542 4535 4555 4567 4568 4519 1989 4580 4573 4574 4577 4578 4599 4608 4618 4658 4658 4668 4685 4615 ANNUAL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG 1990 4680 4685 46914693 4707 4732 4734 4752 4774 47714787 4777 4732 19914777 4773 4772 4766 48014818 4854 4892 48914892 4896 4889 4835 1992 4888 4884 4927 4946 4965 4973 4992 5032 5042 5052 5058 5059 4985 1993 5071 5070 5106 5167 5262 5260 5252 5230 5255 5264 5278 5310 5210 1994 5336 5371 5381 5405 5405 5408 5409 5424 5437 5437 5439 5439 5408 1995 5443 5444 5435 5432 5433 5432 5484 5506 5491 5511 5519 5524 5471 1996 5523 5532 5537 5550 5572 5597 5617 5652 5683 5719 5740 5744 5620 1997 5765 5769 5759 5799 5837 5860 5863 5854 5851 5848 5838 5858 5825 1998 5852 5874 5875 5883 5881 5895 5921 5929 5963 5986 5995 5991 5920 1999 6000 5992 5986 6008 6006 6039 6076 6091 6128 6134 6127 6127 6060 ANNUAL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG 2000 6130 6160 6202 6201 6233 6238 6225 6233 6224 6259 6266 6283 6221 2001 6281 6273 6280 6286 6288 6319 6404 6389 6391 6397 6410 6390 6342 2002 6462 6462 6502 6480 6512 Base: 1913=100 M O4 APPENDIX H PASS -BY TRIP REDUCTION M.a' CITY OF REDMOND 6 CIP PROJECT COMMERCIAL/RETAIL TRIP REDUCTION ESTIMATE # Land Use Variable Pass -by Trip % Total PM Peak Hour Trips Pass -by Trips Total PM Peak Hour Trips (less pass -by) 1 Sho in Center 100,000 s.f. 34% 374 127 247 2 Super Market 50,000 s.f. 36% 460 166 294 3 Bank w/ drive thru 4,000 s.f. 47% 219 103 116 4 Fast Food Rest. 3,000 s.f. 50% 100 50 50 5 Quality Restaurant 4,000 s.f. 44% 30 13 17 6 Gas Station with Convenience Mkt. 8 fueling positions 56% 107 60 47 Totals 1290 519 771 st. Pass -by Reduction: o Trip Generation Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE, 1997 Pass -by Trip Source: TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice, ITE, October 1998 -O.D M DA, _ APPENDIX 1 CITY OF BEND TRANSPORTATION SDC WORKSHEET 4' STREET SDCS SDC Trip Ends X Trip Length 1217200 X e cat) $711,328 (law Odle `9l a " ,r, Daily Chargeable Gaversion: Aver. RT .10056 - Category Trip ends Unita 9/t. Dtti(y trip trip length SDC per unit reduction edi per will '(miles) per unit !ndusriia/ Industrial - general 6.97 T.G.S.F. 0.00% 6.97 62 $2,135 Industrial - batch plant 100.00 tmit 0.00% 100.00 62 $30,627 Maaufadming - bulky items 1.02 employees 0.00% 1.02 62 5312 Manufacturing - high tech-tesear ch & t 2.09 employees 0.000A 2.09 5.0 $516 Service and repair 5.60 T.GS.F. 0.009/. 5.60 6.0 $1,660 Residential Single Family 937 Dwemug Unit 0.00% 937 5.5 $2,600 Apartments 6.63 Dwelling Unit 0.001A 6.63 53 $1,801 Condominium 5.86 Dwelling Unit 0.000A 5.86 53 $1,592 Manufactured Home 4.81 Dwelling Unit 0.009/0 4.81 53, 51,307 Senior Care 2.15 Dwelling Unit 0.001A 2.15 53 5584 PUD - residential 7.44 Dwelling Unit 0.00% 7.44 53 $2,021 Lodging -motel 9.11 Room 0.00% 9.11 5.9 52,655 Hotel 6.95 Room 0.000% 695 5.9 52,026 Recreational Golf Course 5.04 Am O.00Y. 5.04. 73 $1,867 Bowling Alley 3393 T.GS.F. 0.00OA 33.33 73 512,348 Theaterw/Matnee 029 Seat 0.00% 029 73 $107 Arima 33.33 Acre 0.00% 33.33 73 $12,348 Community Center 22.88 T.G.S.F. 0.00% 22.88 73 58,477 Athletic Facility 2.30 T.G.S.F. 50.00% 1.15 5.0 $284 Spa 18.00 per station 36.00% 1132 3.0 51,707 Institutional Elementary School 1.02 Student 0.00% 1.02 3.8 $191 High School 1.79 Student 0.00% 1.79 3.8 $336 Community College 2.38 Student 0.00% 2.38 3.8 $447 Community College Library 45.50 T.G.S.F. 80.009/0 9.10 3.8 $1,708 Community Library 4530 T.G.S.F. 60.00% 1820 3.8 $3,416 Church 9.11 T.G.S.F. 0.009/0 9.11 3.8 $1,710 Daycare 432 Student 60.00% 1.81 3.8 $339 Medical Hospital 16.78 T.G.S.F. O.WO/O 16.78 5.0 $4,144 Medical/Dental Clinic 36.13 T.G.S.F. 0.00% 36.13 5.0 $8,924 Specialty Medical, 23.79 T.G.S.F. 20.000/a 19.03 5.0 54,701 General O,dke Bldg. size <50,000 1529 T.G.S.F. 0.009/• 1529 62 $4,683 50,000<- Size < 175,000 10.08 T.G.S.F. 0.00% 10.08 62 $3,087 175,000<- Size 7.78 T.GS.F. 0.00% 7.78 6.2 $2,383 Government Gov't Office Bldg. 68.93 T.G.S.F. 0.00% 68.93 62 $21,111 Retail General Retail 35.15 T.G.S.F. 47.00% 18.63 4.0 $3,681 Gasoline/Service Station 168.56 ramp rodt•. 50.00% 84.28 4.0 $16,653 Convenience Market 737.99 T.G.S.F. 61.009/a 287.82 4.0 $56,870 Shopping Center: Size <50,000 8731 T.G.I..S.F. 34.00% . 57.62 4.0 $11,386 50,000<= Size < 175,000 43.23 T.G.L.S.F. 34.00% 2833 4.0 $5,638 175,000< -Size 28.98 T.GLS.F. 34.001/o 19.13 4.0 $3,779 Restaurant - High tumover/Drive throu 238.80 T.G.S.F. 46.00% 128.95 4.0 $25,480 Restaurant - Specialty Food Item Servi. 36.81 T.G.S.F. 50.00% 18.41 4.0 $3,637 Restaurant - Dinner only 10.00 T.G.S.F. 5.00% 9.50 4.0 $1,877 Restaurant- Lunch/Dinner 25.00 T.G.S.F. 15.00% 21.25 4.0 $4,199 Restaurant- BreakfastILunch/Dinner 158.00 T.G.S.F. 40.00% 94.80 4.0 518,732 Supermarket w/Stripmail 111.51 T.G.S.F. 36.009/0 71.37 4.0 $14,101 Specialty /Neighborhood Grocery 24.36 T.G.S.F. 20.00% 19.49 3.0 $2,888 Drinking Establishment 12.00 T.G.S.F. 20.00% 9.60 3.0 $1,423 . .._ ,. 11 c r. Al nn./., i 4n Si 4 () 527,77 4' a,=_v trd O 7 Z LL y N N d 000 M o O N O N co N O O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0- e O O `•� r w � V) N Vi Vi n O N9 6 V) V! 63 V! O V) t� 61> !y =� O U V j 0 O 69 O O O O O O O O O O W LL �C LO'l. 3 0 0 O N O N m N 0 O 0 0,- O O O Ct O O O O C' t,• a c C O Vi O Vi O M O 69 O 69 O V). O V) O Vi O Vi O 69 O 69 O V! o Vy ] G ar tfi y N N d L o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 o e e w O C m O V)� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U V j 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �C LO'l. 3 0 0 O N O N m N 0 O 0 0,- O O O Ct O O O O C' t,• a c •O 609 N o aw ON 6.3,V) � � Ot%i ^t9 4 fY LZ Q Vi U b' o a o 0 00 ro 0 0 m tecli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. t7 N N N O O O O O O O O CJ O O M C ~ V).Vy Vf !! V> L O � y � W w E O O V)� O 69 O 6), O 69 O Vi O Vi O Vs O 61f O Vs O V3 O 69 O 69 O 0 a> 4+s O J Q O c O o O 0 0 O N O N m N 0 O 0 0,- O O O Ct O O O O C' t,• a c •O 609 N Vy 669 ON 6.3,V) � � Ot%i ^t9 4 fY LZ Q Vi b' C O � y � W C O U J Q O Y m a o a o y `-In Ci m O O O N O V O O 0 Q a C O N O N CO y CO y C C y C N C N C N C N C N C y C C 4i C d N Q .N Q Mn U U •� Q .y Q A U y U y U •y U �y U .y U •y U Q �N Q U Q n U `'.. U n O U Q N O' (p Q Q) Q N 7 Q � 3 Q O' N •7 Q C V 7 cr •7 Q^ •7 f Q CV :_i tom' t"f' t7 U. D ai Qto v Qco QS U cq Qo U Q� U Q� U Qo U Qo U Qo U Qo U Q- U Q� U a:,: . 1 . O O C m Q O— C N m Q O M C Q m 'O C Q v m C O O C Q v (O C Q O r, C Q v ro C Q 'o O) C Q v O C v 7 C Q V c n T a: "6 Y` m m Q m m m m m m Q m m m m q O Y V Y` Y` Y a) Y2 -?5 2 Y` 2 2 U a lia as as Iia as as as as as as a a as a m 1 ro si` a CL. c R a W m A A A A (J m NO J v o c Z '..' O v U U U r U c a) U c 0 U c a) U c a) U A c d U c a) U A c a) U m a) U C1 !J !G L � C J �� I 1 I •� I^i I c I I I I I 1 I -�j i LL : O= ~ O O O O G'c U ' o V k7i " ° 's r r r r z r r r r r r r r r �• c ECD a o 0 E r � v a Z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q Q n c W U O J Q,+>,+ U) ° 0 a N (1)R )f) !:) T., a? rn `T — f•) M V' f_i I— 0 d C O C N et} G N p ' 1 f'•. b} N M.7. M +y N 07 O 0 7 W LL Z O C.)fi ti} 4i bi O fi y tFf Q 0 = r Cl O U Cl C_) O "3 i) Ch O C CJ c7' � U' N QV U) N •7 C4 to O N V% C f1 in CrY vY Cl) to J?, WLL L O O Y m C C M :'9 a: t/Y HY O i) C) bg ciY .: t to tiY CS Yf N (D je q o 0 L O C M �j J G O O 0 C) 0 m v a a o V N N 00 0 LOQ O p ' 1 f'•. b} N M.7. M +y N 07 i L O C.)fi ti} 1 O fi y tFf Q 0 = r Cl O U Cl C_) O G CS f_ N W Y to O V' � U) N LOO gN in — r) O N a f1 in CrY vY Cl) O O Y m C O 0 O O hl O N 69 N •� O MCe)lV Cl) N O G (tV< tV A VjY 031 C14 V> a b`T V N N 00 C J tjC V � O O M M r O N O O a 0 — N O O Y m A a o a M w� .10 (f; N O 0 Q W O O M - to 0 u M N ui 4+: C U r) G O d h7 N N fr a7 V � N a' ry �� .� 'r,•• uh • '. U M A U) a (;1 .N CJ �� Ti UA> lC R �) lTq7 .: W1 L} �. i f) 'U U a U fly u 9 'cT TJ LL O a -a (•t '^ ,u t v M >.o OU M? J Z y O Z ¢ W `7 C J ¢ a r Z 0 7' 0 7.. 0o- 's ry .2Ln 'N 'Vl •M i rn L d a N d [Y 7 ..i .c.. .M.. C ca a. 0 i y u) GJ ZJj CO ft:7 fA to c U, a+ _ J c� L m Z c5 s Y Y N .!. r w v Y u v O J f; I I . ro LL `m LL a(� LL m 0 -NeIL E T t v a .0 tl tl a `ta. E 0Cl) 0)U W LZ Ll V ,aL}. .M;n). p LR p C a ! .C) .. .0 C J C L C O a .O •(T a7 Qt .O 07 p 0) Z O N r` N CL a rt ti •C) ti .d a d ... (G ~ I W W W E z z 2: _47 "l..' Z Z f OC N O R �. E NQ m O C14 M cli ao U a Z¢ �t Q a a a a a Q a ¢ i(14 - co J 'vJ O m A o c to N C•.. Hr U a a` Z �a N N a N V N L R O M Q IA m CL d =- 0) v li m <i 0 o t° CM t\ mV,' SV '7' '� ;�� Sl tri C.) Clc�i Y.. ,y LL Z c 9 i?. •4 {COY "T t9 f; N to i �i 4fl C14 m r �? Ln N N 0 Vi � 17) m OMl) co O +•Y __ 6 0l) VTI N t v C." W to t 1p W4 613,m LL jp C O V! G V'l O Vi O VT O VT O t� Vi V' a) VY O O N O a) VT M V) y L o c a� N d V �t tr) l: "d' l.t7 V V V NG N N O co 7 to N LO N N M Ln to fto J N gym.. t co A G) M CL !Jt R U a O O O O C O O O m O �' 47 O Y V O R, O O O H W N, iO O n O Ln Vf yT 69 b`T c N (m0 M G9 Cl) '.fY VT W, 69 � a O cJ o o `0 ii7 0 0 0 wv 0 0 0._l 0 �! o f o o O W> E ro to o =7 N t» °� aT tri r: u) fri 0 M 0 o M p VT CtT 64 C4 ii vT � y^9 C O O - CJ u7 M 3 Q V to a C d C O Lf) t`O M n n N O O CO Lr) a 3 Q CO N M O 0 h tri n O 'n CN Y O M m a o N N N 20 yU Q Nig «y. a o� o� Q =D as o C 0 w w_ Or- o a) a)o m a w d ai EE E E E a >n y LL> W> O Y N E y uO U C LL 0 Ud > O a O a U a20 m t- ECn a R E 0-00 EO a- Eri Oaayyal O a) n E EE o m v CU CCc •sUdO Laf Ya A Q NOZ 1 Q n m aOa aE Q CL o o 2- 4) d d Nm U f0 a N y U) N r ❑ m C C N >. = .>. Y T >. >. T >. >. >. m to T N >. >. N m u _m a m m LL m m m m m y R = y w = a 1-- � d •L) d 'U o 2 O C LL m LL C Y LL m Y LL Y LL m LL m 1L 0 m LL y m LL y m o o LL T LL V lL N lL WN Y d `md Y y `mc Y a Y a Y a Y a Y a Y W Y W Y Y E Y U Y U �c c LL U LL t mE a aY ac °' 0. ac a� aY ave: atn 'L a� �U= c mY mm = E m m m Co a m c a ❑ c c (L C7 ti E _ _ _ a) _ 0) _c r _ c n •m O U .y a) X .N m X U1 •X y X y •X y= X y LL X •y m •y m X y N Cu •X •- y U •X y N d •X a' _ y C •X IA a CO w U w w w w w w X J w J w w d w U w = W W U C: m Z z z z z z z z cj w O m U U U U a r. R O M Q IA m CL CL d �+ N J LL. a� 0 7 O` a a CD c N E w co W U J O H in Fa- U a. r m (1 - t W O r� r ti O 7 w Z W v a) LL co cr> R7 C07 �Ci N O M r' N O) N) C? O O m U z cc C) �p ::] U N 4 to to O N W cl� C4760 cli Clt V> CQ LL C V! If>ol tl9 b9 CVC p O w !P (o N v3 L N O d C m O O O O O O t N O O U 3 0 n 0 m 0 o 0 m 0 Lf) 0 o w a m U Q Cl) c.) Ci 0) r,. O N L Ce) {Q N tO Lr) 04 N ('. ue � c) a O c o) r) cc, 0 c� 0 Cl r) h o o O o O C) r` i ` a) rCN CO o» 00 m w ❑ v: � +rr N u9 � c o CD r. y N 0 Q _ A Q(V ffJ (i9 O y p N O ^ 0 N :ti m J U 3 Q O C7 U) r` N N Cl)W l)) Y N N m IL `o p 0 m '4m a) ` N co Q Q y Cpp C p C C O N O E m C > m m CC O U O ` O y U O) C m C n. O y` lC` 0 c N` l0 CJ W O E a LL 1 U O_ U) a N a N O N W n C > N min (U d Cp Ill - N 0 in in a m U O d a N Y N - — m E Z m 4) d m Y a {� a + ov aY Anaa m i Y 2 i J y �c U Y Y iy a m :3 a m a wo am a> am f' 0 rn 0 r O m s m a? m a F V� O C'2 d N O ON Z ILL r z ('55U la y 7 m> a (A C F- L o x m a c 3 m a` ❑ w c- z n a e C o Z n� a a a Cl) a to a all a O z z z z z z c a Z <r (n in cn �; n LL N U iv O C/.) �l Q N Off; 00 Q N O n 00 '-s3 (6�4 0 ' 0 0 0 69 O O O � LO fn 64 fn N u a, w U U i c Q Q .� In 7 m V a Z v ui CL (Dj Y O >, i vnja U C c L E a) u m E J O D Z U N w O z 0 (n LJ c!y u E c CD = Z a U r,) Ci CE ai co C U J C tm m < C L c v CD cL > a• >' > C Q E E 0 tJ V .N E c ,4 o _ r; a) .y T N v; L6ii co Q Q F -- N ('h v V R N O m a Parks SDC (2002) City Of Redmond Park SDC Calculation As of June 30, 2002 EXHIBIT C Per the methodology approved in the 2001 Public Facilities Plan: Parks Cost Basis $6,623,197 Divided by the Population Growth 20,645 Equals per Capita $320.81 Per Capita $320.81 Mulitplied by number of persons/household 2.24 Parks SDC 2002 (per household) $718.61