Loading...
2002-1260-Minutes for Meeting October 14,2002 Recorded 10/17/2002DCOUNTY OFFICIAL ESCHUTES PENHOLLOW, COUNTYRECORDS CLERKvel 2 0 O2 '+260 COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 10i1712001 04;25;59 PM ��'�E IIIlillllllllllllllllllllllllll ,���� 20020012600 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1130 NW Harriman St., Bend, OR 97701-1947 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 388-4752 - www.descliutes.ofg MINUTES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIAISON DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, OCTOBER 149 2002 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building 1130 NW Harriman St., Bend Present were Commissioners Tom De Wolf and Dennis R. Luke; Commissioner Michael M. Daly was unable to attend. Also present were Mike Maier, County Administrator; David Givans, Anna Johnson and Susan Ross, Commissioners' Office; Tammy Credicott, Property Manager; Steve Scott, Deschutes County's Real Estate Broker of Record, and Doreen Blome , Community Development. The meeting began at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of No -shooting District Issues. Doreen Blome' explained that that Commissioner Luke asked her to speak to the Board about this issue. She said a map showing the County's no -shooting districts was placed on the County's website. However, several hunters indicated they found it hard to understand, so the colors were changed to make it simpler to determine the boundaries. Walt Schloer of the U.S. Forest Service has indicated his approval of the new map. Ms. Blome' went on to say that Deschutes Land Basin owns one parcel, and the County owns a couple more. (At this time, she distributed a map showing the current no -shoot districts and the parcels that are not currently included. A copy is attached as Exhibit A) A citizen has decided that these parcels should be included in the no -shooting district, and has contacted various County officials and others in this regard. However, she is the only one who has pushed for this change. Mr. Schloer suggested the larger parcel not be closed off to hunters. Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 1 of 9 Pages Ms. Blome' found after conducting some research that although this citizen did sign the original no -shooting district formation petition, she is not actually a full-time resident of Deschutes County; and, in fact, lives in Portland. Apparently she owns property in the area near the no -shooting district. She has insisted the additional parcels should be included in the district for the public safety and welfare. She has also stressed that her husband is an attorney. The Commissioners advised Ms. Blome' that this citizen needs to go through the proper process, which would include submitting a petition that includes the signatures of others in the area. Ms. Blome' replied that this citizen has been fully informed of the process, but seems to direct her efforts to making this happen in another fashion. The Commissioners indicated that if this citizen continues her efforts in this direction, a letter describing the proper procedures should be sent to her. 2. Update on Current Market Conditions - Brosterhous Road Property. Steve Scott explained that a couple of things have recently occurred to make the Brosterhous Road property more marketable. There is a subdivision being developed south of the property, and the developer is installing a pressurized sewer system. There is also a new City water line being put in. However, on the books a proposed collector street is shown that would go through the County's property, but the City is reluctant to name a specific or designated location for the street. The developer will be required to install it, which would mean losing 1.37 acres with no compensation. Mr. Scott recommended that perhaps this amount of acreage could be sold to the City for $50,000, so the balance can be fully developed. A developer won't want to pay for that land just to have to dedicate it and pave it. There would be SDC credits going back to the developer as people tie in, but it will likely never equal that amount. The property is zoned RS, but shows as RM on the City's comprehensive plan. Medium density zoning allows for duplexes, triplexes or four-plexes. The remaining 3.6 acres is currently worth about $325,000. Commissioner Luke said the County could do a development plan with duplexes. Mr. Scott said there would be costs of $15,000 to $25,000 in any case. If the City had a road plan in place while the County owns the property, they wouldn't have to deal with a private party in the future. Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 2 of 9 Pages Commissioner DeWolf asked if the property could be sold to the City to fulfill their low cost housing requirements. Commissioner Luke asked if the Hellbusch's might be interested in trading for their property off Lafayette; Mr. Scott replied that they've been approached with this idea and are not interested. Commissioner DeWolf asked if a letter has been sent to the City about the road; it has not. Mr. Scott was asked if the City has any interest in purchasing the property for low-cost housing; he said that they indicated they don't have the funds to do so at this time. Mike Maier asked if there is any value in regard to project acquisition; Mr. Scott replied that the owner of the triplex on Lafayette might be interested in some kind of a trade. He will follow up on this. Commissioner DeWolf asked that this item be tabled for a couple of weeks while negotiations take place on the other properties. 3. Update of State/County Government Building Project Susan Ross explained the options for locating the new warehouse/archives/ building services/I.T. building. One option would be to place it in the corner of the main site. Other options are: #1, the "office" site, between Kearney and Greenwood, adjacent to the Parkway; and #2, the Lafayette site, between Lafayette and Kearney, adjacent to the Parkway. (Ms. Ross then distributed a document detailing preliminary project costs relating to the two sites; a copy is attached as Exhibit B) Steve Scott said that in regard to site #2, all parties are willing to negotiate, although the roofing company has a five-year lease in effect. Regarding site #1, Mr. Gisler, one of the owners, is presenting difficulties in negotiations, and this location also has complications regarding the existing large sign along the Parkway. Ms. Ross said that site #2 has better zoning for the County's use, a flat roof is okay with the City, and it would be closer to the main building. She then presented a written overview of the project options and costs; and a general discussion took place regarding expected growth in the County, lease payments, and total project development costs. (A copy of this document is attached as Exhibit C.) Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 3 of 9 Pages A brief discussion then took place regarding the original plan of placing the building in the corner of the main property. It could be done, but might present a potential problem in the future if any kind of expansion is desired. The developer has indicated that expansion may occur sooner rather than later. Commissioner DeWolf said he sees no problem in acquiring site #2 if it pencils. Ms. Ross explained that they have been very conservative on computing the debt service numbers, and rates are still low. Mike Maier said that the figures being shown detail the worst-case scenario, although no one can guess what the condition of the economy will be in four or five years. Also, Mr. Maier stated that timing -wise, decisions need to be made as soon as possible. This structure should be completed at least one or two months prior to the main building being completed, and the State wants occupancy in the main building within 18 months. Commissioner DeWolf said he's ready to proceed; however, Commissioner Luke asked for a little time to review the numbers. 4. Discussion regarding County -owned Properties. Steve Scott said these two properties could be sold at any time. Dale Road is a bit of a problem as it has two types of zoning: MUA 40, and EFU 40. The EFU ground could possibly be split into two parcels. To sell it now would take about six to nine months. The Rickard Road property is a bit more complicated. Mr. Scott said that the Fremont Canyon property has been on the market for a long time. The original value was computed from a total of the land value and a timber cruise. However, there's not enough timber to make the purchase interesting to a lumber company, and this makes the cost too high for the average land purchaser. He suggested the price be adjusted to make it more saleable. Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 4 of 9 Pages 5. Discussion of Property located near the Juvenile Justice Facility. Steve Scott said that eight acres has become available near the Juvenile facility, for $800,000. He further said that this is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in that area. Commissioner DeWolf stated that this should have been purchased before, and should be purchased now, for the future, before it is sold to another. He suggested that perhaps the County could borrow from the Solid Waste fund. He asked that a decision be made in this regard within three weeks. Mike Maier added that there might be a way to purchase it in the bond measure. He will develop a pros and cons plan in this regard. At this time, Ms. Credicott and Mr. Scott left the meeting. 6. Follow-up Discussion regarding the LPSCC Appointment. Commissioner DeWolf said that although Ernie Mazarol expressed urgency in making an appointment to replace Stan Owen, Mr. Mazarol has not responded to messages in this regard. The next meeting of the group is November 4, and will probably be discussed at that time. 7. Discussion of Appointments to the Cultural Trust Planning Committee. Commissioner DeWolf reviewed a memo regarding the Oregon Cultural Trust Planning Committee, and suggested that Eric Sande of Redmond, and Jody Ward of Bend would make good members. (A copy of the memo is attached as Exhibit D.) LUKE: I move that these two individuals be appointed to the Committee. DEWOLF: Second. VOTE: LUKE: DEWOLF: Minutes of Administrative Liaison Page 5 of 9 Pages Yes. Chair votes yes. Monday, October 14, 2002 8. Discussion of the Renaming of the Twin Lakes Conference Room (in the Human Services Building) the Stan Owen Memorial Conference Room. LUKE: I move that this room be renamed in Stan Owen's honor for all he has done for the County, and that up to $500 be set aside for the cost of a plaque. DEWOLF: Second. VOTE: LUKE: DEWOLF: Yes. Chair votes yes. Anna Johnson was asked to investigate options in this regard. She was also instructed to work with the Mental Health Advisory Board on a proper ceremony regarding the dedication of this room. 9. Discussion of the Upcoming County -wide Prioritization Meeting. Susan Ross asked the Board to select their top five choices in each category of agencies that have requested funding. After discussion, it was decided that the choices and ranking off Page 1 should be: 1) The La Pine Senior Center 2) The Crisis Resolution Center 3) The Redmond Airport 4) Redmond Hospice 5) The La Pine Soup Kitchen A brief discussion took place regarding both humane societies being left off the list. It was determined that it would be no use for them to be on the list as there is no potential funding for them to receive. Ms. Ross will attempt to explain this to them. The choices and ranking off Page 2 should be: 1) The La Pine Sewer -Interim 2) The La Pine Stormwater Project 3) Land for the La Pine Sewer Project 4) Roberts Field 5) The Airport Parkway and Roadway 6) Terrebonne Sewer Project Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 6 of 9 Pages The choices and ranking off Page 3 were: 1) Regional public safety computer system 2) Heart of Oregon marketing expenses 3) Heart of Oregon evaluation expenses 4) CDRP (Dispute Resolution) 5) Fall River Fire Safety Association - matching funds (A copy of the priorities list as provided to COIC is attached as Exhibit E.) It was decided that the cost of the Broadband project would be paid from additional lottery funds, off the top. Also, Commissioner Luke said he is providing $5,000 of his lottery dollars towards the Sunriver Music program for children, as he did last year. At this time, Timm Schimke of Solid Waste, Tom Blust of the Road Department Debbie Legg of Personnel and Mark Amberg, Legal Counsel, joined the meeting. 10. Discussion of Labor Relations Issues. Mike Maier explained that the 701 labor contract is up the end of this year, and he has been discussing this situation with various individuals and groups on an informal basis. He said that although this group is small in number, what happens would have a direct bearing on the negotiations regarding future contracts with the other unions. The issues are health benefits, salaries and PERS. An analysis has been done that compares costs versus CPI from 1997 to now, including rollups. (At this time, the group reviewed the documentation that was provided; a copy is attached as Exhibit F.) Tom Blust said that the job comparisons were very fair, and average what is paid by other agencies in Oregon. He added that there is no problem getting applications for vacant positions, especially since the private sector is cutting down employee benefit packages. Mike Maier suggested that the County absorb the additional PERS costs, with no increase in pay. There has been a huge PERS hit from 2001, and a worse one may be experienced from 2002 because the market has been bad for so long. The County must look at the total costs involved. Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 7 of 9 Pages Mr. Maier asked if it is felt a salary increase is necessary to keep good people. Commissioner DeWolf said that all entities are having a problem with PERS, and all employees need to be treated equally. There could be potential for a huge problem in a few years if costs keep increasing. Mr. Maier said that his advice would be to freeze salaries, pay the additional PERS hit, and part of the increase in health insurance. The slow state of the economy must be considered; however, this will still be expensive for the County to bear. Unfortunately, the union has indicated that a lay-off is okay with them. Commissioner DeWolf, after viewing the statistics, said that it appears that there really should be a salary reduction. Mark Amberg stated that in negotiations, you start with offering as little as possible. Timm Schimke suggested no reduction in pay, but a salary freeze and payment of PERS by the County, and payment of an additional 10% of insurance. He also explained that the employees in his department has only asked that they go back on a full schedule instead of the 176.67 hours per month, and that the pay for landfill attendant is the only one that appears to be lower than similar positions in other places. Mike Maier stated that perhaps they could go to an annual contract. He asked that the comparison be projected to 2006, and that a similar analysis be done for the Sheriffs union contract. Commissioner Luke said that he has no problem with these suggestions. Commissioner DeWolf encouraged the negotiations to start low and adjust as necessary. Timm Schimke and Tom Blust, although agreeable to the scenario, said there really isn't any choice in this situation. An updated analysis will be completed, and Mike Maier will keep the Commissioners informed of the progress of any negotiations. Being no further items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 3: 25 p. m. Minutes of Administrative Liaison Monday, October 14, 2002 Page 8 of 9 Pages DATED this 30th Day of September 2002 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Minutes of Administrative Liaison Page 9 of 9 Pages Tom DeWolf, _�k44 Mic ael M. Daly Commissioner Monday, October 14, 2002 ® N L ARCH ITECTU RE P.O. BOX 1845, BEND, OR 97709 PH.: (541) 3889897 FAX: (541) 3885167 PROJECTED PRELIMINARY PROJECT COSTS FOR DESCHUTES CO. BUILDING SERVICES / I.T / ARCHIVES SITE # 1 10/03/02 PROJECT COST: I.T 51000 S.F. a@ $95.00/S.F. _ $ 475,000.00 Bldg. Serv. /Archives 19,000 S.F. a@ $50.00/S.F. _ $ 950,000.00 Site: Bldg. Demo $1/S.F = $ 12,000.00 Improvements = $ 68,500.00 39,500 - 24,000 S.F. @ $4.5 / S.F.) Land Costs. _ SDC/ Permits 9% _ Real Estate 6% _ Hazardous Mat. _ Architect & Engineer'g 8% -7 &0 QQZ) $ , $ 128, 000.00 $ 34, 000.00 $ 10, 000.00 $ 114,000.00 Subtotal = $ .00 10% Cont. _ $ 236,150.00 TOTAL = $2,5979650.00 2.6 MILLION TOTAL PROJECT COST Ey kjaG ARCH ITECTU RE P.O. BOX 1845, BEND, OR 97709 PH.: (541) 388-9897 FAX: (541) 3885167 PROJECTED PRELIMINARY PROJECT COSTS FOR DESCHUTES CO. BUILDING SERVICES / I.T / ARCHIVES SITE # 2 10/03/02 PROJECT COST: I.T 59000 S.F. @ $95.00/S.F. _ $ 475,000.00 Bldg. Serv. /Archives 199000 S.F. @ $50.00/S.F. _ $ 950,000.00 Site: Bldg. Demo $1/S.F _ $ 10,000.00 Excavation@ / $14.00 = C $ 77,000.00 KA-- Improvm'tS 41,720 S.F@ $4.5 / S.F = $ 188,000.00 � oo� Land Costs = $ • SDC/ Permits 9% _ $ 128,000.00 Real Estate 6% of Land = $ 40,000.00 Hazardous Mat. _ $ 10,000.00 Architect & Engineer'g 8% _ $ 114,000.00 Subtotal = $2A4-2-)�. (a;5 GD o� 10% Cont. $ 26-:L;-2-Q-0;00— TOTAL _ , -TOTAL = $2,873)200.00 2.9 MILLION TOTAL PROJECT COST r Q W O O O N r O O O LO O LO j j O N N U) O LO O O 00 r T D � N O O N Lf) FaE) ]CD Fw(-NL) O � N tt _ Ln r 00 N O O O N r O O O LO O LO rl- Lr r- M O LO 00 O r r r O O O N Lf) O V N tt 00 0 N It LO 'IT O O O r -LO L.0 O N M t7' O ce) 00 LO N N O O O O O O ' O O O O M M O Ln L(') Ln On IT (O Vi 00 w aS oS r co (p N M r a (0 O 3 a a x U U N cn U to C � LB C Q � 0 � U L U = O U co a) U) ) E E O O (6 03 w w Lv MV O � N V tt w N It d I- O Nr O M O O N > Q d 00 r r r (7 V T _ N +� � C C � Np () d 'a o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0) O O O O O Y � N r N O C. N Od }1 L U O c O �x } C U ci o E a ' L C7 ami ca � a ~ g F� O _ O a N p L ` m O4 a) U ] Q r U cu c O ( o O cu N w O O o ix. U J U z d U N M er O a (0 O 3 a a x U U N cn U to C � LB C Q � 0 � U L U = O U co a) U) ) E E O O (6 03 w w Lv MV CN � � LLJ � C) E / f m / k . > § 2 o 2 2 W / CO � k CD $ E� ƒ/ / TZ(u ( Ct / � k / / C) E / f m k LO IT� 04 � % E \ \ \ LO C k , M � / k / 3 % $ A IT q / LO a / k / q R 2 ° Ct / � / � I 2 ? k LO IT� 04 � % E \ \ \ LO C k , M � / k / 3 % $ A IT q / LO a cu -0 ° Ct / k / � I / Q (D C) / ? 2 > O ■ _ m ? R § k R R R R R 2 G ■ cr C C C C C C $ k R R R R R 2 § Q o r o o a / ^ — ~ � k / a- 2 /\ ^ k a ^ k / ) CL ? a / y $ >m ƒ e / I / 7 \ S 7 ƒ 22 0 /ƒ � / / a- j 75 \ 0 } k \ \ �? E E 2 a CL f o f# > \ o ƒ \ k a / — C4 M IV p cu -0 M Q W Lo N O O LO r M O M (fl N N r O O O (() O j 40 40 Q �p U) C > r h r O N co (0 O O r r o O O O (n O VL (LO 000 00 Lo N O O LO r M O M (fl N N r O O O (() O LO P- L' � Cl) O LJO 00 O O o r r o O O (n O VL N 00 O L } N 00 N LO C7 LO O ( 1- O N N N O O O O O O ' O O O O M M (() f— N fl- O M N M O O V' LO 00 LO V N LO r - M O M O m O 7 a. 06 x U m (D U O+. U (Q C 3 m C � U (D U a U = O i U) N Q U) E E O O (0 (Q N N w of O O o 0 o O } LJ I •- Il- O "' O M > 0 d 00 O C C CD O O O O O O O O N a O O O O O C O � 0 O O O O O O Q) C i O (f) (n (D (0 N d Ce) N N O N O N d_ s s ` N U C: a) U ci VO E a _ O >O N p J U)U a 4J CD Z a) °4,° a O C O 7 O � v O cr F- y O a. h � N Q o 0 3 a o z• :3d E p 3 0. 42- O 0 4) 0) ° m U -j v Z CL v r N M d' 1n m O 7 a. 06 x U m (D U O+. U (Q C 3 m C � U (D U a U = O i U) N Q U) E E O O (0 (Q N N w of a W v _M (O (fl O O O Ln CD 40 Q 1 j O to 1A (U � O r �— a) N co O OF O O O ](E') Fw(,NL) Oti U') O N _ Lr) T O v _M (O (fl O O O Ln O LO fl- LC) f1l. Cl) O Lo O O O O O U') O N N o, V co 0 LO Ln v LO O ch r- (.0 M �LO O N CY) OD LO N N O O O O O O ' O O O O (O Ln LO M L[> (O cri o r� f— O T T 'IT M cu � O O O O O O O N o, V LOC) LO N w T cn O to > d o0 r �— Cl) T � C : C O O °) a 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O a) 0 O O O O O O O o V O Ln Ln (o 0 N ce) 04 C4 `-' a o U co (D o U E � E Z Q o r a Q U m Ln N H U �, �. a� a_ O S2 O a- O �U a0 O d j (D Q CC �O CL E w O a) m 2 m U V Z m y T N Cl) IV O cu � LO � � uj � 2 � 2 Cli CSL / 2 § o . k R o 0 / / k k O± 00 V � / k k ( k / ƒ/ LO 00 $ 2 � 2 Cli CSL � W) $ / / k � / 7 2 q q �C k , S E n n k C / 2 LO \ � CN2 / / / 2 2 E � / k � / � $ ? � W) $ / / k � / 7 2 q q �C k , S E n n k C / 2 LO \ � CN2 0 � \ � a k � § 3 \ � 2 � ƒ � � c U / ƒ Q 3 \ ) / / k k M / / w 0 � / k � / 40 / ID \ / 2 CO > @ � 7 k k � E R E E E o ■ C C C C 0 q L) (D o R ( E R R R 2 ' o o m Lsi o S cm / © ~ o a « � c � ) m k /\a c / k / « k \ [ $ } f)G 'I a k2 lzi ° \ 2 / k , /_ c J ) ` k / CL ® \/ ®d & % C: e o ~ { / » CL = \ � 0 2 Q � � 0 � 2 0 r N n IV W) 0 � \ � a k � § 3 \ � 2 � ƒ � � c U / ƒ Q 3 \ ) / / k k M / / w 0 � � � LU � 2 U 0 CD CD 2 2 2 , > R o I 2 q E CD CW) k / � 00 k k k / / 2Of � k S % 't k / � M w Q (D C) / $ 2 U') 00 2 U 0 CD CD 2 � � rl- E CD CW) \ k / / � k 2 R 2 q E 2 k / / � k S % 't rZIMMIMM 0 � \ � k a § 2 C $ a) 2 2 � / ƒ d � & } $ ƒ < m / / # / w ƒ � � k k k � k S � w Q (D C) / $ 2 o ■ _ Cl) � 7 j k > aC) � Ci k � k a 0 Cl / a E R R 2 ' o o m L t o C4 7 / ~ - 04� « m % CL � O / 3 @ / Q \ , £ U & O (3 : CL j k >ca -4,j y 3 (DS / / m §' f J / 2 O m o a \ k < $ ) \ \ : § E E \ f / 0 cuCD/ e S- m U 2 Z a y )r � w CIA n � p 0 � \ � k a § 2 C $ a) 2 2 � / ƒ d � & } $ ƒ < m / / # / w ƒ � � LU Nt co LO N 5b; O O O LO O t17 O O O j j O I w U) C ti t~C O N � O r r O � N O � O N co 00 O C E O r� C LO co E Nt co LO N 5b; O O O LO O t17 O � Lr O M O L � 00 O o 0 O O ti UO O � llzh N co 00 O C LO � N N � CD U') O "t IT LO (f) O (O I-- O N N N O O O O O O ' O O M (07 O U) M I- [t 00 O N M 00 �f r (0 "T co Ld O (0 O O `t w M N M r (Q a) � C C O O O a) n - CD C U O C NN a° o S? O O O -. L � ,., o 0 — J m ti o d � (fl O co v C Q. E E O O E O O O w O O O +, nO Oi c O J O O O O O O () O L I a M N �- N N � CD U') O "t IT LO (f) O (O I-- O N N N O O O O O O ' O O M (07 O U) M I- [t 00 O N M 00 �f r (0 "T co Ld O (0 O O `t w M N M r (Q a) � C C O O O a) n - CD C U O C NN a° o S? -. Q) U 0 J m C: U U v C Q. E E E Q C L O N O Oi c O J p C7 V% ami a °p a) cn "= ami Q D a ~ N ° .� o CT Q U a > Q 0 c� o O a) CL E = O a) o 0 U a 0 z a r N M e} N) .O N O 7 a 06 a x U a) t U a) .N C � (u _C . Q U- in U a) U d U = O N Q (A O O w Of Cal co Q W 0 0 0 i CI CD j j O I W N (n C r 1- O Q) N 0~0 r (V � O O O l() O Il- O M (n 00 T 00 T N M N N r O O O Ln o Ln Il- t(i rll M O LO 00 O T T T CD C) LO o N 00 C LO It (D M M O O O O LO O LO r- O N M O M 00 LO N N O O O o O O ' O O O O M M LO Cl) N 00 � LO O ( P--� C) (D � cu � L cn F, V O Lr N N It LU U d Z T r,- o ti o CO) o O v 0 00 T T T Cl) � � N C C W O O a o 0 0 0 C) O O O O O O Q' U O O Cl O 0) O O O O N () O L' (D (D N C li r N T N C N O 0 W +% m U ami o J U E U g a o� o a J 0 U) a m Q U CL)0 pp a) N N . H O .2 O c d_ Q ) >' E _ o `m «� o U m m ani Z 2 a r N M le W) cu � � � � uj � / / 0 0 0 U') 2 % 0 00 C 0 0 2 0 0 / \ % q $ k 2 c o A / E q CN \ ® C k • � � k � � \ b / P- / � \ � � Cd � % \ � c 3 ƒ � c � U /12- 0 & 3 § � / / k k M � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI 2 % q I w 4 & E / ? 2 cn / o ■ o cn r 2 \� CD � k k � C L) 0 0 / E .R 0 R R 2 ' Q o m r ( c q D / ~ e % CL C4 o m Q ) U 7 § % « \ \ § / ^^ $ % ƒ o $ § '/ / o cr O ¢\ 2 / j k k / z _m e d £ \ o q / § § E E / f \ / ƒ / 2 a $ — q n V In / � \ � � Cd � % \ � c 3 ƒ � c � U /12- 0 & 3 § � / / k k M � � O TOM Q W a 00 M O O O O to O Li CD r - > o LO N C m U > r ti O Fes- m Go O O Cal C14 C)NGo LO O V' N 00 (fl .rr v (n v C O C N r (rj 00 N a 00 M O O O O to O tf) ti LQ r - M O LO 00 C) r � r O O O lf) O V' N 00 0 .rr v (n v CD M It Lr W) LO M r— TZ C)o cr :,C) L U')00 N00 N ~ O O O O O O O O O O M M O (f) (n LO O (f') O O O 00 00 (3)rn ti r - r - m O W 7 a 06 CL x U cu O U U � C � N C_ Q L.L � Y U U a U = O N N N !n L Q fn E E O O (0 (Q C C Of w c� � O I .rr v lO N N I W .Q a)r- � o ti v W) > d 00 r r r ('7 N f0 � C C O O O a O O O O O O �_ O O O O C U C 0 O O O O O O N •0 U O L (f) (O (O N N `— N N N CL r N O a o 1 L cU U v m CL L C i gx > N O J TU m En U O� � V O Q O U) U LO a' Q U) C)co O C C O O N y O d O O a) N 2 co U a C') z a r N M V LO m O W 7 a 06 CL x U cu O U U � C � N C_ Q L.L � Y U U a U = O N N N !n L Q fn E E O O (0 (Q C C Of w c� � 9 v c G> V A.V. Times X 0.0383/1000 192.0% 2001-02 County -wide A.V. 9,476,924,265 362,966 333,929 X 1.08 2002-03 10,235,078,206 392,003 360,643 X 1.08 2003-04 11,053,884,463 423,364 389,495 Year 1 X 1.08 2004-05 11,938,195,220 457,233 420,654 Year X 1.08 2005-06 12,893,250,837 493,812 454,307 Year 3 X 1.08 2006-07 13,924,710,904 533,316 490,651 Year 4 X 1.08 2007-08 15,038,687,777 575,982 529,903 Year 5 X 1.08 2008-09 16,241,782,799 622,060 572,295 Year 6 X 1.08 2009-10 17,541,125,423 671,825 618,079 Year 7 X 1.08 2010-11 18,944,415,456 725,571 667,525 Year 8 X 1.08 2011-12 20,459,968,693 783,617 720,927 Year 9 X 1.08 2012-13 22,096,766,188 846,306 778,602 Year 10 9 v c G> V = N O LO d' M 0 M � N M O O 1` M M 1;t � V- '�t V -- Cc:) Cc:'E0 E 0 OM M— N0000NOM M 00 N O M M 0 L6 (6 C4 06 vi VM o rn Lli O L O (6 0I- DO O M M CT U } M- 0 1- O 'r- M q (6 N O UO O M 1- M O W (ii o 0, NCD N 0 1` U') U') Ln 1`m 1` M 1-- a O M 1` U) O M DO N C Ln N Ln U7 L() ( CD ( 00 0 = O O LO W LO t0 r- N M O O 1` M M� T- T-� T- N O O M— N M 00 N O M O L O (6 N DO L() M rn a) O- M- 0 1- O 'r- M q (6 CO 0 0 w 0 CO w 1` 1` 1` (a a 0 C a r- N CO d- U) M 1` CO O O T- n Subject: Oregon Cultural Trust Planning Committee c(Lc, To: Dennis Luke, Mike Daly From: Tom DeWolf cc: Mike Maier October 10, 2002 As you are aware, The Oregon State Legislature established the Oregon Cultural Trust in 2001 for the purposes of providing financial support for the protection and promotion of Oregon's cultural resources. Deschutes County needs to identify a fiscal agent to receive Cultural Trust dollars to support our local Cultural Planning. We need to form a Cultural Planning Committee to draft a Cultural Plan. The Deschutes County Cultural Plan will identify Cultural Priorities in our county as well as the structure for a Deschutes County Cultural Coalition which will implement the Cultural Plan and receive and distribute monies from the Oregon Cultural Trust. This Committee's first task will be to develop strategies for, and submit a grant application that addresses the creation of our Cultural Plan and will ultimately administer the grant. With the assistance of Cate O'Hagan from Arts Central, along with a variety of people from throughout the county, I've received a host of recommendations for individuals to serve on our planning committee. Ultimately, our committee should represent Deschutes County's broad cultural interests. Areas of discipline which should be represented include all forms of the arts (including dance, theatre, film, video, visual arts, music, sculpture, arts education and folk art), history and heritage (including archaeology, storytelling, artifacts, publications, photographs, prehistoric and historic sites, heritage celebrations, and songs), and humanities (including history, literature, linguistics, philosophy, ethics, American studies, political science and religion). Committee members should also represent Deschutes County in terms of geography, race, gender and generation. My/our recommendation is that we appoint an initial Executive Board of 7-9 people so as to keep the planning process moving with a "manageable" group. This is consistent with Deschutes County's past practices. A much larger Board would then be made up of any appropriately interested people representing the various disciplines listed above (and those I may have inadvertently left out). The Executive Committee should be folks who would not be looking out for a particular project or discipline, but would have wide geographic representation as well as a familiarity with cross -disciplines. We would recommend that Co -Chairs be named rather than a single Chair so as to send the message that we want to focus broadly, not narrowly. A process would be created for communicating effectively with the larger cultural community as the planning moves forward. j -D In keeping with the above thoughts, I would like to recommend seven individuals for our initial planning committee (see below). You will note that I have included myself in this recommendation. I do so because of my familiarity with the Trust and its goals, my background with the Oregon Arts Commission and many local arts, culture and historical organizations, but most importantly to provide a direct connection between Deschutes County and the Cultural Trust process here. Since this is the beginning of the Trust and Deschutes County will be one of the leaders in this process, I feel that this direct connection is important. If you have other thoughts or suggestions for different members of the Executive Committee, or a couple additional members, or different thoughts about this process altogether, please bring them to the Administrative Liaison meeting this coming Monday, October 14. It is my hope, if you agree, that we could appoint this Executive Committee on the 10, and submit these names to the state's Cultural Trust Board for approval immediately thereafter. They meet on, or around the 23ra I've had this recommendation reviewed by staff at the Cultural Trust and have been told that this is a reasonable approach to take in setting up our process here in Deschutes County. Please let me know if you have any questions. Recommended members of Deschutes County's Cultural Trust Planning Committee: Lori Noack (Sunriver) Jo Ann Anderson (La Pine) Jody Ward (Bend) Cate O'Hagan (Sisters) Tom DeWolf (Bend) Eric Sande (Redmond) ** Ward Tonsfeld (Bend) ** **We're still waiting to hear from Eric and Ward as to their willingness to serve. If not, it would be my intention to find another Redmond representative and another representative with extensive knowledge of the Historical field. I should know by Monday about both Eric and Ward. Bonnie Baker From: Susan Ross Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:07 AM To: Bonnie Baker Subject: FW: Needs & Issues Inventory -----Original Message ----- From: Susan Ross Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 AM To: 'Scott Edelman' Subject: RE: Needs & Issues Inventory Here's our prioritizations: Community Facilities 1. LaPine Senior Center 2. Crisis Resolution Center 3. Redmond Airport Terminal Expansion 4. Hospice Renovation/Addition 5. LaPine Community Kitchen Infrastructure 1. LaPine Sewer Interim Improvements 2. LaPine Stormwater Management Plan 3. Land Acquisition for LaPine Sewer System 4. Roberts Field Office Park Water & Sewer 5. Redmond Airport Parking & Roadway Expansion 6. Terrebonne Sewer Project Community Readiness 1. Regional Public Safety Computer System 2. Fall River Estates 3. Heart of Oregon Marketing and Public Awareness 4. Heart of Oregon Outcome and Evaluation 5. Conflict Resolution Services and Skills Education Let me know if you have any questions, Scot. Thanks for your help. -----Original Message ----- From: Scott Edelman [mailto:SEdelman@coic.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:10 AM To: susan_mayea_ross@co.deschutes.or.us Subject: Re: Needs & Issues Inventory Susan, I am going to send a packet out to each city and the county before the county -wide prioritization. I would appreciate it if you would send me your local prioritization as soon as you are able to. Thank you. Scott David "Scott" Edelman Program Coordinator Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Phone: (541) 504-3307 Fax: (541) 548-9548 >>> Susan Ross <susanmayea_ross@co.deschutes.or.us> 10/14/02 06:22PM Scott, do you want our prioritized lists now or wait until we have the countywide meeting? Susan Ross Senior Management Analyst 541-383-6713 PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT OPERATOR / Top Step / 5 yr Longevity/ NO TSP Certification pay 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Wages 31,395 32,328 33,280 34,264 35,278 36,322 36322 FICA 2,402 2,473 2,546 2,621 2,699 2,779 2779 PERS 4,323 4,451 4,978 5,532 5,794 6,068 7608 Health Ins. 4,779 4,995 5,258 5,527 6,045 6,707 7627 Life/LTD Ins. 282 289 267 243 250 257 257 Unemployment 314 323 333 343 353 363 363 Workers' Comp 314 323 333 343 353 363 363 Total: 43,809 45,182 46,995 48,873 50,772 52,859 55,319 County Percent Increase 3.13% 4.01% 4.00% 3.89% 4.11% 4.65% Cumulative Increase 3.13% 7.15% 11.14% 15.03% 19.14% 23.79% CPI Percent Increase 1.30% 1.60% 2.80% 3.70% 0.90% 2.00% Cumulative Increase 1.30% 2.90% 5.70% 9.40% 10.30% 12.30% E U 0 C 0 N C d Q E 0 U C C Q V Q 0 C 0 0 �L C. E 0 U N N L p O O O O O p M O O N N O O N 0 0 N O Co O N O O O r w rn rn f - M rn v� ca ca a) i U O — O O Q UE CO U E U aE a DU U N N L p O O O O O p M O O N N O O N 0 0 N O Co O N O O O r w rn rn f - M rn ri N N L p O O O O O p M O O N N O O N 0 0 N O Co O N O O O r w rn rn f - M rn i Y v tO CL c 0 :0 0 c a) 0- E E 0 U m t 0 d M R! i d V L 4) IL 0 0 c� 4) c 4) m O LO LO m -f M O O N N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 N sL 10 OR o OR SO- C=! O O b O U') d v M M 60,000-.,, 1998 1999 58,000 2001 2002 56,000-- 6,00054,000 Actual Compensation Package 43,809 $ 45,182 54,000 $ 48,873 $ 50,772 52,000 55,319 r 50,000 45,089 46,351 48,000f, 48,499 49468.61 46,000--, 803 1,906 44,000 2,706 4,360 42,000 ". 1.8% 40,000 5.4% 5.6% 14% + 12% 10% Actual Compensation 8% Package ® Compensation Package Based on CPI 6% Percentage increase 1--4% 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2% 0% Compensation Package: Percent Increase: Percentage increase between CPI compensation package and actual compensation package DATA TABLE 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Actual Compensation Package 43,809 $ 45,182 $ 46,995 $ 48,873 $ 50,772 $ 52,859 55,319 Compensation Package Based on CPI 43,809 44,379 45,089 46,351 48,066 48,499 49468.61 Difference 0 803 1,906 2,522 2,706 4,360 5,850 Percentage increase 0 1.8% 4.2% 5.4% 5.6% 9.0% 11.8% a L a 4 C a Cc c i F c c c c S E } c U C c �L �a O U to La a O 0 0 U C C J O U C 0 N Y V x x x x x x x x x x x x LUXX O J O O 0 6R o M co Q x J d 0 U 0 .O C O to N 'V w w t U) U) co to LO N j ti M 1` ct LO (O 1- N O O (D `' 7 L @ Q 0) U CO C E O d Q Q N V N cO N N tD O N C0 O 0) r O N Oj { Oro r N m (p 00 O CN O N N N N N N - O t v > N O a .� � pp x 0.i �= Q .;; t t t t o F- O -4 �t LQ 00 (D M o c LO a d LO CV h; W 't 00 LO CA 00 LO 00 "t LO O d c0 W 0) QO O O Ln O N M M 'l: V 'T@ N O N M q 0 O M ,N, O d' In t.C) CO O m O M (A L T r r t r r,. r r r T N N r r r T T r +0 O Cn LO tM 'T00 (D M M O ;5t,O (D CA N r r 00 r 1,- LO Cl) v'. N h M cl' (D; O LO r a) M N N 00 (D 0) LO �T ti M f` M CA I� V oq O O O f� CV M 1- 00 O M r r r T r !r,•! r N r N N-. r T r N r F .•v. 1 1 I I 1 .j/ (N- I U) 1 m I T 1 LC) I V � `- N 1` O LO CoLO O N d M 0 0' M M �' '" r d 00 1- ti O co �t M d; 6 U ') O M N N O M M4 CA Cil O O N N O t9 N O) O CA CA M d m LO c0 O zt, t r t T t N t r r r T N M d LO (O LO M N O t h O t LO O t t t f- r Ln M O N T r LO T O r r r LO N V ti r T CO CA (D N r 0)r Cn O co N 1` N M N N N r r N r c0 N (D (D r M r V rt (D Cn O LO (D O N LO p N rn LO O d N N co O m N M d LO O O N Cl? (O O M r T N N N N CO T ti LO O (h, LO d; ,I: N 0) T ti 0 d O T LO LO (O ti N N N d O LO 1,- O (D M co M O M N It M c0 M CO N CO h CO O O r ',T T CA (D N J M f,� LO , 1- p) O co It 0 LO t- co, T r o) r (V N r T r r T r r r r CO f� (.,) t O t M (� N ' O M O M O c0 LO O N LO M N M O LO � N ' O co LO r C� LO LO p r r N co ct r NJ 0 00 r r r r r- r r r ti ti M w P -C) O O O (D O LO a7 LO N O LO LO LO 1` OO M Q 00 Q LO N N N r t t r CA M co M ,` 1` LO LO 1- tO N LO N c0 o N N c0 c0 LO CD N d L(1 lO LO (D (0 00 O M r r r t r r r r r T �--• LO a0 d r ao ti OO N' (D LO O N N 1� O : N N co r OR T M (D OO O N N LO LO Itti L) N M tD ti O , CV -t -, M LO co CO 1- t t t t N c0 N M O M N c0 r d' (D M CD`- LO 1l- (6 N M N co r (\J CO N O �t W M m LO NM - O r N N M 0) C71 LN O O `- �- t!) LO r O o LO 00 00 com N C7) LO 1� O r r ti r 1• O r o (rj O r O N O( m N LO p (h M 6 r O CD Cn r N N r N r r r N N N r r N r r r N t t t t t CA CO t t t O LO co N 0 0 co O 0« CO r O N to r O 0 1- LOO r r M'IT .., N LO O O LO r co N O M t r O CO CO CO N •. "T LO M p M N Cfl d' (O co N N cl p r V r LO M r M LO i t.:• .Y O Q Q) U = UU) ) O cn C fj o _ U C@ U) y V) U) Q w C U Y N Y U _ r -LL N N a) (OA ;� N in in p) 0) G O U O 0 Q N O B C N E Q- O = N Q N Cl Q) N .0 ~ Q) Q) E •� Q) U Q) C C w (n U @ L i1 •.�. Q Cn in tll C_ N C m C C lT ,0) .03 O CL M E Q @ C LII U N O i O Cn Cn 0T tT w N C to O U E C O 0) H��� @ L- L �wacn00wwcn Q ,`LO L c C L O@ o2 UQUU 0 0 0 CT w x x x x x x x x x x x x LUXX O J O O 0 6R o M XI x xl x x x x co Q x J d 0 U 0 .O C O x O Z3 a U ._ a) j C (O 'O O U a o a7 r U-)tn 0- w o T 0 O @ Q w (.0 >> U CO C E O d O N D 03 a, E 0 a. 0- z t J o a) o U W (n x E 0) m N y CL A m O N v > N O a .� � pp x 0.i �= Q L C C x r > L- 0 J 0 -0 C: C JO Lu o U n 'v U 4, D- Lo -oa c XI x xl x x x x X x 0 .O C O • O Z3 a U ._ a) j C T L O U a � U 0- w o T 0 O @ Q w (.0 >> U CO C E O Cn O N D 2 0 > z w a. 0-