2003-142-Minutes for Meeting February 24,2003 Recorded 2/26/2003COUNTY
TES
FICIAL
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,FCOUNTY CLERKS
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 02/26/2003 04:30:50 PM
11ji][11
0
DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK
CERTIFICATE PAGE
This page must be included
if document is re-recorded.
Do Not remove from original document.
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1130 NW Harriman St., Bend, OR 97701-1947
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 388-4752 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 249 2003
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building
1130 NW Harriman St., Bend
Present were Commissioners Dennis R. Luke, Tom De Wolf and Michael M. Daly.
Also present were Mike Maier, County Administrator; George Read, Chris
Schmoyer and Dennis Perkins, Community Development Department; Jeff Kern,
Surveyor; Anna Johnson, David Givans and Ted Schassberger, Commissioners'
Office; Jenny Scanlon, Juvenile Community Justice, and Hillary Saraceno, Health
Department.
Also in attendance were Tom Blust, Roger Olsen and George Kolb, Road
Department; Mark Amberg and Rick Isham, Legal Counsel; media representatives
Barney Lerten of bend com and Chris Barker of the Bulletin; plus six other citizens.
Chair Luke opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. At that time, he introduced Chris
Adams of Bend's Scout Troop 18, who is working for his Eagle designation.
1. Before the Board was Citizen Input.
None was offered.
2. Before the Board was an Update and Discussion of the Activities and Plans
of the Humane Society of Central Oregon and the Humane Society of
Redmond - Jan Griffin (HSCO) and Jamie Kanski (HSR).
Jan Griffin of the Humane Society of Central Oregon and Jamie Kanski of the
Humane Society of Redmond distributed a handout to the Commissioners. (A
copy is attached as Exhibit A.)
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 1 of 11 Pages
Ms. Griffin gave an update of the activities of the two agencies. She said that
they have been working together on a neutering program titled "Nip their Love
in the Bud" in the tri -county area, which also includes the Humane Society of
Prineville. This program offers low-cost neutering for cats.
Jamie Kanski said that the agencies recently held their second annual doghouse
event; builders awarded custom-designed doghouses. The theme of the event
was educating the public and raising funds for the agencies.
Ms. Griffin explained that the directors of the two agencies have been meeting
every other month for the past year and one-half. They are working on a
software program that will benefit all local agencies, wherein stray dogs are
photographed and placed on a state-wide website. The Humane Society of
Oregon has the software in place, and will share with the others. It is hoped this
will be implemented within the year. This will also like microchipping and
licensing.
Ms. Kanski explained that they are all working on joint education programs
involving public service announcements stressing pet ownership
responsibilities. There will be videos provided to local networks in this regard.
Mike Maier pointed out that both contracts will expire the end of June, and the
contracts are different. He stressed that it is his hope that they can work
together to come up with the same contract for both agencies, including the way
the agencies work with the Redmond Police Department and the Bend Police
Department.
Ms. Kanski and Ms. Griffin agreed, and said they are working with County
Legal Counsel Laurie Craghead in this regard.
Commissioner Daly asked how the campaigns for the new facilities are
progressing. Ms. Griffin said the Bend facility is in its preliminary stages.
Ms. Kanski explained that there are updated photos on their website. They are
ready to finish the interior; the parking lots are paved, and they are putting
together the final pieces of their business plan. She added that they had to get a
mortgage to finish the interior, and they are still short of funds by about
$250,000 to $300,000. They hope some of this shortfall will be filled by grant
funds.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 2,4, Luus
Page 2 of 11 Pages
3. Before the Board was a Discussion and Considerate of Signature of an
Intergovernmental Agreement between Deschutes County and the State of
Oregon regarding the Disbursement of Funds to Six Other Counties for
Breast and Cervical Cancer Community Education and Outreach.
Hillary Saraceno explained that Deschutes County is the fiscal agent to
distribute these federal funds. Deschutes County's hare is $5,200, as the
amounts are based on population and need.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
4. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Amendment No. 2 between the State of Oregon Youth Authority, the Eastern
Oregon Juvenile Justice Consortium, and the Deschutes County Juvenile
Community Justice Department and Commission on Children & Families,
Decreasing State Funding for the Community Youth Investment Program.
Jenny Scanlon said this amendment significantly reduces her department's
funding. The bed allotment is being reduced from 26 to 15. There are nine
children in the CYIP and nine in the OYA. OYA will have to figure out which
five children will have to be released.
Commissioner DeWolf noted that closing this program doesn't save the State
any money unless kids are released onto the street. The funds would just be
shifted. The local legislators understand, but perhaps others don't.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
5. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Resolution No. 2003-013, Initiating the Vacation of a Portion of Arrowhead
Drive and Three Walkways in Tumalo Trails Subdivision.
George Kolb said this is a 100% vacation, all affected owners have signed. The
subdivision is being replatted and will be Deschutes River Ranch LLC. Some
homes were removed and donated to Habitat for Humanity. This replatting is
part of their subdivision requirements.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 3 of 11 Pages
6. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Order No. 2003-019, Vacating a Portion of Arrowhead Drive and Specific
Walkways.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
7. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Contracts between Deschutes County and Lake County, for Building
Inspection and Plan Review Services to be Provided by the Deschutes
County Building Safety Division.
Dennis Perkins said that this action extends the current contracts. This allows
for "A" level (commercial) inspections, and other types if needed. Lake County
doesn't have the proper inspectors on staff. Compensation covers travel
expenses.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
8. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Contracts between Deschutes County and Jefferson County, for Building
Inspection and Plan Review Services to be Provided by the Deschutes
County Building Safety Division.
Dennis Perkins explained that the contract for Jefferson County is similar to
that of Lake County. For the most part, Deschutes County provides for the
examination of plans.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
9. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Ratification of
Signature of Contracts between Deschutes County and the State of Oregon,
for Building Inspection and Plan Review Services to be Provided by the
Deschutes County Building Safety Division.
Dennis Perkins said that this contract was already approved, but the State of
Oregon was hesitant to sign it. They returned their own with a few changes,
and this document has been given to Legal for review.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 4 of 11 Pages
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
10. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of a
Letter Appointing Jack Nelson as the City of Redmond's Representative to
the Deschutes County Landmarks Commission, through February 2007.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
11. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of a
Letter Appointing Doug Knight to the Deschutes County Historical
Landmarks Commission, ending August 1, 2005 (completing the term of Ric
Nowak).
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
12. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Letters Appointing Barbara Smiley and Steve Stenkamp as Ex -Officio
Members of the Deschutes County Historical Landmarks Commission,
ending March 1, 2007.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
13. Before the Board was a Discussion of a Public Hearing (Continued from
February 12) and Consideration of First and Second Reading of Ordinance
No. 2003-008, Declaring an Emergency, regarding Land Use File #TA -02-11,
Requesting Changes in Zoning in the Wickiup Junction Commercial/
Residential District (Applicant: Wanek).
Chris Schmoyer explained that, per the Board's request, the Ordinance has been
revised to include an emergency clause. The document has already received
code review and review by legal counsel.
He added that because of serious surgeries, Mr. Wanek was not able to provide
a written request for this, but did request it verbally, as it would be serve the
needs of the community. No negative testimony has been received.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 5 of 11 Pages
14. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Order No. 2003-024, Accepting Petition and Setting a Public Hearing Date
regarding the Annexation of John Gill (d.b.a. Rock Springs Guest Ranch)
into Deschutes County Rural Fire Protection District No. 2.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
15. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Deschutes County General Policy No. P-2003-100, Public Records
Requests.
Mark Amberg said that after lengthy review and consideration by department
heads and legal, the final version has been completed. The biggest hurdles were
Community Development, the Assessor and the Clerk, who receive dozens of
requests daily. They can adopt a more informal policy for routine requests, but
the County as a whole needed a more formal policy in place. This will help
compliance with State public records law. If there are questions or concerns,
individuals can be referred to Legal Counsel except in the case of tax court
proceedings (BOPTA).
George Read stated that a few things still need clarification, and that his
department needs time to enact the policy.
After further discussion, the Board decided this could be approved now, with
the effective date in thirty days.
DEWOLF: Move approval, with the effective date to be in thirty days.
DALY: Second.
VOTE: DALY: Yes.
DEWOLF: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
16. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Resolution No. 2003-015, Transferring Appropriations within Various
Mental Health Funds as Budgeted in the Deschutes County Budget for
Fiscal Year 2002-03.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 6 of 11 Pages
17. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Resolution No. 2003-018, Establishing a Cash Change Fund for the
Deschutes County Mental Health Department in the Amount of $50 for
Community Support Services, the La Pine and Redmond offices, and the
Becky Johnson Center (to accommodate clients who now must make co-
payments for services).
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
18. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Order No. 2003-026, Transferring Cash from the Fairgrounds
Construction Fund to the Solid Waste Capital Projects Fund, as Budgeted
in the Deschutes County Budget for Fiscal Year 2002-03.
This item was placed on Wednesday's agenda.
19. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of a
Letter Appointing Richard T. Ford, Sr. of Sunriver, and Bruce Berryhill of
Sisters, to the Deschutes County Weed Advisory Board, through December
31, 2005.
Roger Olson explained that both individuals are already involved as volunteers
or have attended meetings as concerned citizens.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
20. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of a
Letter Reappointing Diane Adams to the Board of Howell's Hilltop Acres
Special Road District, through December 31, 2005.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
21. Before the Board were Additions to the Agenda.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 7 of 11 Pages
A. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of the Approval of
a Contract Retaining the Services of Ball Janik, LLP to Conduct Federal
Lobbying Efforts on Behalf of Deschutes County.
Commissioner DeWolf explained that he originally proposed this action a
long time ago, last summer; he has done a lot of studying and learning about
the potential. He then read an excerpt of an e-mail from Sheriff Les Stiles,
who is supportive of federal lobbying efforts. (A copy of this e-mail is
attached as Exhibit B.)
He also said that it is sad that Oregon is now the butt of a series of jokes in the
comic strip "Doonesbury". Legislators are worried that Oregon is becoming
the Appalachia of the west, and is systematically dismantling its
infrastructure.
Also, it was pointed out to him that it is still taxpayer money, even if it comes
from the federal level. He said, however, that more federal tax dollars leave
Oregon than comes back; so, therefore, Oregon is supporting another state in
this regard. He advocates that Deschutes County should do what it can to get
back some of these Oregon dollars that are rightfully Oregon's share. More
local influence in Washington, D.C. is critical.
A brief discussion followed. Commissioner Luke stressed that this needs to
be considered further. He would like to meet with other lobbying firms; and
this needs to go through the budget process. There should be set goals and
objectives.
Commissioner DeWolf reminded the other Commissioners that this was
proposed as far back as July, meetings with lobbyists have been held, and time
is running short. The appropriations process for the federal budget is
beginning now. There is still a lot of work to be done by the lobbyist to
prepare. This is an important move for Deschutes County.
Commissioner Daly acknowledged that this has been a lengthy process. He
said he was against it at first, but gradually learned more about the benefits.
Most department heads feel it would be beneficial to them, especially in
regard to roads, fire control, law enforcement and community health.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 8 of 11 Pages
He also said that the previous chief of staff for Senator Wyden is now will
Ball Janik, and Senator Wyden has said that lobbyists can be a great help to
legislators in researching and writing legislation.
He added that the biggest issue for him is getting a federally qualified clinic to
serve La Pine, which would help with the health and mental health needs of a
wide area. This could amount to $600,000 in funding. If even that one effort
were successful, it would be well worth the investment. He said this should
get going soon, since the budget process takes some time.
Commissioner DeWolf stated that the normal timing would be meeting in
November to establish priorities for the next federal fiscal year. By January
the firm would have its marching orders, as the deadlines for legislation are in
February, March and April, and the agency needs to be ahead of the game.
The T-21 legislation for roads is due in mid-March. The federally -funded
clinic is important. He added that he would be a lot happier if all three
Commissioners supported this. It's an important move for the County.
Commissioner Luke observed that he feels there could be political
ramifications when going for these projects. He wants to see a list of goals
and objectives, wants to know if there are political ramifications, and whether
there might be strings attached. He said he wants to see this go through the
budgeting process.
Further discussion took place regarding timing, budgeting and how the cost
would be covered. No final determinations were made today.
B. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of
Deeds of Dedication and Acceptance, Adding Public Right -of -Way off
Bacchus Lane.
Jeff Kern said that this is an existing physical gravel road, constructed to
County road standards. The individual property owners whose properties abut
the road are dedicating this land to the public.
This item was placed on Wednesday's consent agenda.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 9 of 11 Pages
C. Before the Board was a Discussion of a Public Hearing (Scheduled f
Tuesday February 25 at 3:00 p.m.), to Address a Zone Change and Plan
Amendment for File # PA-025/ZC-02-3, the Expansion and Improvement
of the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit II Sewer District.
Commissioner Luke asked if homeowners would be required to hook up to the
sewer system at any point. George Read explained that it would not be
required by the District. However, it is his understanding that there is a fee
waiver period of time for the $3,000 hookup fee. If they hook up during that
period of time, they save the fee. Also, this fee could go up over time. If at
some future date a septic system fails, the owner would then be required by
Environmental Health to hook up.
Commissioner DeWolf asked if the District can afford this. Mr. Read
explained that David Givans, Internal Auditor for the County, has reviewed
the funding situation and feels the District is in good shape. They did well in
getting grant funds for more than 50%. However, the balance of the funding
could be an issue.
He further stated that there is no County liability if they can't serve the entire
area. He added that he doesn't think the District made that kind of promises to
their constituents. In any case, it is an independent district with its own
representation. The only reason they are coming to the County is that this
involves a land use issue.
This action may help in that many lots that are marginal or unbuildable now
could be buildable. The way to afford expanding the system is to include
vacant lots. No doubt there is some speculative appreciation there.
At this time, Chris Schmoyer distributed some letters from citizens about this
issue to the Board. (A copy is attached as Exhibit C.)
Being no further items brought before the Board, Chair Luke adjourned the
meeting at 11:15 a.m.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 24, 2003
Page 10 of 11 Pages
DATED this 24th Day of February 2003 for the Deschutes County Board
of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
s R. Luke`, Chair
Tom DeWolf, C,qone;r
Attached
Exhibit A: Literature from the Humane Society of Central Oregon and the
Humane Society of Redmond.
Exhibit B: Copy of e-mail message from Sheriff Stiles supporting federal
lobbying efforts.
Exhibit C: Copies of recent letters from citizens regarding the expansion of the
Oregon Water Wonderland II Sewer District.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, February 1.4, luus
Page 11 of 11 Pages
FOR RELEASE ON:
February 14`h, 2003
HUMANE SOCIETY
OF CENTRAL OREGON
For more information:
Lynne Ouchida 541.382.4328
Cell: 541.350.4330
"Nip Their Love in the Bud"
Male Cat Neuter Campaign through March 14th
The Nip Their Love in the Bud male cat neuter campaign begins Valentines Day, February 14`h and
continues through March 14`h. Veterinarians in the tri -county area are making a difference in our
community by helping to reduce cat overpopulation with this low-cost male cat neuter program.
Caretakers can get their cat neutered for only $15 (additional costs and restrictions may apply at
individual clinics) at a participating veterinarian clinic.
Local veterinarians and Humane Societies sponsor this program to prevent the birth of unwanted cats,
improve the health and behavior of cats, reduce the spread of disease, and prevent the miserable and short
life that homeless cats suffer on their own. Call your local veterinarian to make an appointment or
contact your local Humane Society for more information. To reach the Humane Society of Central
Oregon call 382-3537, Humane Society of Redmond at 923-0882 and The Humane Society of the
Ochocos at 447-7178.
"Uniting our community in the compassionate care of animals.'
61170 S.E. 27th Street • Bend, Oregon 97702-9694 • (541) 382-3537 • Fax (541) 382-2021
Humane Society of Central Oregon
61170 SE 27`h Street -- Bend, OR --- 97702
541.382-3537
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information contact:
January 22, 2003
Lynne Ouchida: 382-4328
Dream Doghouses and Family Fun
Take a tour of the Dream Doghouses at the Mt. View Mall January 25"' through February 22nd
and enter to win one for your canine companion. The Dream Doghouse fundraiser will benefit the
animals being cared for by the Humane Societies of Central Oregon, Redmond and The Ochocos.
You are sure to find one to match your dog's personality or your home amongst the creative and
generously donated doghouses.
Fun events are planned throughout the month. Saturday January 250' will be our kick-off event
with an Obedience Trial Fun Match beginning at 11:00 am. Registration for the Fun Match is at
10:30 am. There will be adult and junior showmanship classes, obedience classes, canine good
citizen evaluations, fun events and prizes. There will be a few furry friends with their human
companions to help you understand how to care for them. The Humane Societies of Central
Oregon, Redmond and the Ochocos will be there to answer questions and to assist in raffle ticket
sales.
Saturday February 8h will be the day that you can see dogs run and agility course put on by
members of the Bend Area Agility Dogs (BARD) and learn how to make your own agility
course. The demonstration will begin at 11:00 am.
The grand finale will be Saturday, February 22nd when the doghouses are judged by radio
personalities from The TWINS for their unique qualities and when the individual doghouse
winners will be drawn. Family fun activities include face painting and adoptable animals from all
three Humane Societies and other animal rescue agencies. The doghouse prizes and drawings
will be held at 11:00 am in the Mt.View Malls Center Court.
For more information call 382-3537 or 923-0882.
HUMANE , `SOCIETT
OF
REDMOND
P.O. Box 1404
Redmond, OR 97756
Shelter 541923-0882
Thrift Store 541548-2270
Fax 541548-3453
61170 S.E. 27th Street
Bend, OR 97702-9694
Shelter 541382-3537
Thrift Store 541388-3448
Fax 541 382-2021
of Central Oregon
Page 1 of 6
Bonnie Baker
From: Tom DeWolf
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Bonnie Baker
Subject: FW: Letter regarding Lobbyist decision
Here's Les' letter regarding lobbying, along with a couple that led up to it.
tom
-----Original Message -----
From: Les Stiles
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Tom DeWolf
Cc: Cynthia Bell
Subject: RE: Letter regarding Lobbyist decision
Tom
What an excellent, cogent, to -the -point letter regarding this issue. I am taking the liberty of forwarding this Cindy Bell so she
can print a hard copy and keep it in our files for future reference and quoting. I am most concerned about what the Federal Gov.
will or WILL NOT do regarding the thinning of our forests. We are sitting on a time bomb in Deschutes County and Cache
Mountain was only a very small picture of what we are facing in the next few years if nothing is done to deal with the problem.
Thanks for your leadership and courage on this issue. I know we are in tight times. You more than many others know what
choices I am facing in the next 90 days. Even in light of the "hard decisions" that I need to make, I am still willing to invest a few
dollars toward the future. We cannot let the present "crisis" deter us from our need to continue to make decisions that will pave
the way to have the "critical" infrastructure in place to serve the community needs in coming years. Those years are coming
faster than most perceive.
Sorry for the "editorial" comments here, but I support the decision to have someone advocating for us for all the reasons you
stated and a few more. I applaud the courage to move forward on this "controversial" decision during such tough times.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
Les
-----Original Message -----
From: Tom DeWolf
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:25 AM
To: _Department Heads
Cc: Ben Westlund (Westlund, Ben); 'Blair, David (Wyden)'; Susan Fitch (susan_fitch@gsmith.senate.gov); Brian Hard
(brian.hard@mail.house.gov); Anna Johnson; Mike Maier
Subject: Letter regarding Lobbyist decision
Deschutes County Department Directors,
I thought you might be interested in a letter that was received by the Board of County Commissioners and many others
last night, along with my response to it. Since this viewpoint is being represented in our community, perhaps some of our
Department Directors share some of these concerns and I wanted to be clear about my reasons for making a proposal for
Deschutes County to hire a firm to represent us in Washington DC. First is the e-mail we received last night, followed by
my response. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you,
Tom
Tom DeWolf
2/25/2003
Page 2 of 6
Deschutes County Commissioner
1130 NW Harriman
Bend, OR 97701
(541) 388-6567 (phone)
(541) 388-4752 (fax)
----- Original Message -----
From: Carol Peters
To: Dave-E.......a--t-o-n ; Art..Roethe. ; Dennis Luke... ; Mike Daly ; Tom DeWolf
Cc: Vikki_Breese Tom Dehm ; Steve. McCarty Spencer._Schock ;Rod_.-....Desc..hutes._Republi.cans ;REP Knopp , Randy
H.ilderbra1nd , Mi.ke.Shirtcliff : Marilyn -Jewell ; Linda_..Hanna...; Kevin.CParke,r@aol.com ; Jon Wood ; Gene &_Josie
Whisnan..t , Donna McDonnell. ; Dave.. Dewey
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: Total Waste of $
To the Deschutes County Commissioners - It is a total waste of money to spend $80,000 for a lobbyist to go to Wash.
D.C. to get more money for more programs! That is why we have Cong. Greg Walden, Sen. Gordon Smith and Sen. Ron
Wyden!! Much of the money will be for more programs. You should be looking to scale back many of your programs as
they are redundant! This expense is redundant! What about travel to and from? What about the expenses for living in
D.C.? This is absurd. When is your next meeting? I will fight you on this expense. This is a very liberal, Democratic
idea. If this is a done deal, I want to know. We have people representing us already! Tom, Cong. Walden already
delivered money for your Tower Theatre! I will tell you my theory on art. Good art is supported by the communtiy, bad art
is subsidized! Bad art would be: a cross in urine and the Madonna with dung. These were subsidized with National Arts
money. All of you that have received copies of this please let our Commissioners know that this is an expenditure that is
unneeded! Fellow Elephant, Carol
-----Original Message -----
From: Tom DeWolf [mailto:dewolf@bendcable.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:28 AM
To: Carol Peters; Dave Eaton; Art Roethe; Dennis Luke; Mike Daly
Cc: Vikki Breese; Tom Dehm; Steve McCarty; Spencer Schock; Rod - Deschutes Republicans; REP Knopp; Randy
Hilderbrand; Mike Shirtcliff; Marilyn Jewell; Linda Hanna; KevinCParker@aol.com; Jon Wood; Gene & Josie Whisnant;
Donna McDonnell; Dave Dewey; Tom (work); Bonnie Baker
Subject: Re: Total Waste of $
Carol,
Though I appreciate your right to claim that a proposal to hire a firm to represent Deschutes County in
Washington DC is "a total waste of money," I believe if you asked Tim Knopp, Bev Clarno, Ben
Westlund, former State Representative Dennis Luke and former State Senator Neil Bryant, all Fellow
Elephants, you might learn that the role of lobbyists is not as black and white as you seem to believe.
From what I have learned over the past year that I have researched this possibility, your claim that
this "is a very liberal, Democratic idea" is incorrect. Lobbyists work for both Republicans and
Democrats and they lobby both Republicans and Democrats. I would encourage you to ask Senator
Gordon Smith and Congressman Greg Walden about their positions regarding lobbyists. Dennis,
Mike and I met with Senator Wyden's Chief of Staff, Josh Kardon recently, and we have spoken with
various staff members of Senator Smith and Congressman Walden. They have all been quite clear
about the value that Congressman Walden, Senator Smith and Senator Wyden and their staff receive
from lobbyists.
Deschutes County has employed a lobbyist to work on our behalf in Oregon for years. Dennis will tell
2/25/2003
Page 3 of 6
you his experiences with lobbyists in his six years as our State Representative. The story he told us
last week was how he could identify a good lobbyist because they could tell their side of the story, but
could tell the other side of the story equally well. He indicated that they were a big help in educating
him and the other Representatives and Senators on the many, many complicated issues they faced.
The role of a lobbyist is far more than trying to get money for "more programs" as you
suggested. Having a firm with experts in forestry to help teach people back East about forests in
Oregon and our need to effectively thin them to prevent the catastrophic fires we experienced at
Black Butte Ranch last year, with experts in transportation to influence the writing of important
legislation such as the TEA -21 bill that is up for reauthorization this year (and only once each 6 years)
that may be able to help with the extension of 19th Street in Redmond by the fairgrounds in order to
relieve traffic on Highway 97 and improve safety for our residents and visitors, and yes, with experts
in appropriations to help influence the budget writers so that Oregon (and Deschutes County) can
reverse the current imbalance in tax fairness, are worth considering for Deschutes County. Oregon
pays more in federal taxes than we receive in support from the federal government. Oregon is 35th
out of the 50 states in this regard.
My purpose in proposing that Deschutes County consider hiring a lobbyist is threefold. First, to have a
firm located in Washington DC to gather information that is important to Deschutes County. We need
to know what kind of legislation is being written that will impact our county in a positive or in a
negative way. Second, to improve our ability to influence the writing of legislation to help Deschutes
County. Again, feel free to contact Gordon Smith, Greg Walden or their staffs here in Central Oregon,
in Portland or in Washington DC and ask what they believe the value of lobbyists are. Third, to seek
funding for specific needs we face in Deschutes County that we are unable to meet. As an example,
Mike Daly has been working with a County Commissioner in Klamath County (as Dennis and I and
other Commissioners before us have) to try and find a solution to the lack of health care in South
Deschutes County and North Klamath County. The private sector has not been able to succeed. Talk
with Eric Alexander, as I did at our Rotary dinner last week, and you'll learn that St. Charles or Bend
Memorial Clinic simply can't make it pencil. However, if we can locate a Federally Qualified Health
Clinic in La Pine, the reimbursement rate is higher for such a clinic than it is for private providers and
it would serve a needy population that presently isn't being served. There are many more examples
such as this, but I don't want to write "War and Peace" here, I want to point out that this is not as
simple as you have indicated it is.
What we are considering is contracting with a firm to represent us, to work with us, to help us in
Washington, DC.
Ball, Janik has offices in Portland, Bend and Washington DC. They have a "legal arm" which you may
be aware does a lot of work for Bill Smith, Pronghorn and others in our region. They are quite
reputable and capable. I encourage you to contact Bill if you'd like a reference for them. They also
have an arm that has proven an effective lobbying organization for many clients, public and private, in
Washington, DC. Clackamas County, which currently has a Board made up of a conservative
Republican, a liberal Democrat and a moderate (I'm not sure of his party affiliation), has hired this firm
to represent them for the past eleven years. I would be happy to share with you the letter I received,
signed by all three, about their satisfaction with their decade-long association with Ball-Janik.
I would be interested to know the basis upon which you say that we "should be looking to scale back
many of your programs as they are redundant!" How many of Deschutes County's programs have
you studied or worked with to come to this conclusion? If you can help provide us with examples, I
know we'd be interested in reducing any redundancies. We currently provide Information Technology
support and do all the Permit Inspections for the city of Redmond, to reduce duplication and save
2/25/2003
Page 4 of 6
both organizations money. We are working to join all local law enforcement and fire departments
together on a single computer system to improve safety, efficiency, save money and reduce
redundancy. Our Commission on Children and Families provides funding for a variety of non-profit
organizations to perform services that the County does not provide. The vast majority of work
performed on County Roads is contracted to the private sector. Our Road Department has fewer
employees today than it did seven years ago.
Dennis Luke has been Budget Officer for three of the past four years. I believe he has done an
excellent job of proposing budgets that reduce the possibility of redundancy of service and
encourages lean, efficient operations. I was Budget Officer for the other year and Mike Daly is Budget
Officer this year. During the first two .years Dennis and I were in office, we levied less than the full
amount approved by our voters, thus leaving $1.5 million dollars in the pockets of our taxpayers.
Studying and concluding what future needs would be for service delivery in our County, we have
charged exactly what our taxpayers have authorized for the past two years, but did not put
those additional dollars into programs or operations, we set aside the money into a Construction Fund
so that when new building projects are necessary, we will not need to ask the voters for more taxes,
and into a reserve account to help pay the huge, unfunded PERS balance we face. Combined with
the sale of what we have determined are "excess properties," we believe that Deschutes County will
be able to meet its needs far into the future without asking for new taxes. I spent four years on the
Bend City Council. I am now in my fifth year on the Deschutes County Commission. During those 8+
years, not one tax measure has been proposed to support additional government services by either
organization. I believe in living within our means and have practiced it since 1992.
1 never would have thought of seeking a federal appropriation for the Tower Theatre. In January,
2002, Congressman Walden took me aside at the Gala at the Riverhouse and asked me to request
an appropriation for the Tower Theatre. It is a project he strongly supports, not only as a community
gathering place, but as an economic development tool for our region. He is well aware that this
project got its start due to the support of the Bend Chamber of Commerce. It's smart for
business. The Tower Foundation Board is obviously quite pleased that Congressman Walden and
Senators Smith and Wyden were successful in securing this grant for the Tower, along with funding to
support a sewer project in La Pine, canal piping in the Tumalo Irrigation District and others. By the
way, this is not my Tower Theatre. It is our Tower Theatre. I would be happy to provide you with a list
of our Board of Directors and Advisors. I guarantee you will be impressed by the long list of
community business leaders who have worked to make this dream into a reality. (Due to the length of
this correspondence already, I won't respond here on your theory of art in general and the National
Endowment for the Arts, other than to point out Gordon Smith's strong support and consistent "yes"
vote for the National Endowment for the Arts. I'm happy to discuss it with anyone in the future.)
You are absolutely correct that all this is Walden's, Smith's and Wyden's jobs. It isn't that we are
claiming that they aren't doing their jobs. But they will be the first to tell you that they can't do their
jobs alone. They need staff support, they need constituent support. They need my help and your help.
And they rely on lobbyists. I would ask that we all avoid falling into the trap of villifying lobbyists
without fully understanding the important role they can and do play in affecting policy in our state and
in our nation. It is an unfair characterization. Are there unscrupulous people out there lobbying?
Undoubtedly there are, just as there are unsrupulous lawyers and politicians. It is unfair to lump them
all into a single, negative category.
Greg is one of 435 Congressman. Gordon and Ron are two out of 100 Senators. What we are
considering is another piece of a very complicated puzzle in trying to do our jobs to the best of our
ability to work with all of those who serve in the U.S. Congress. We are considering hiring a firm that
has worked closely with Greg, Gordon and Ron as well as having relationships with 434 other
2/25/2003
Page 5 of 6
Congresspeople and their staffs and 98 other Senators and their staffs. We are considering improving
the possibilities for Deschutes County, which remains in the top 3% fastest growing counties in the
U.S. to impact the very legislation that will impact us. We are considering adding one more arrow in
our "quiver" to improve our ability to do our jobs better. Whether we like it or not, whether we agree
with it or not, this is how politics work in Washington, DC. Lobbyists are part of the function of our
government. That is a fact.
We can choose to hire representation and improve our chances for success in Washington by adding
additional influence and knowledge to our team, or we can choose not to. Either way, Dennis, Mike
and I will continue to do our best to work with our delegation in DC and they will do their best on our
behalf. I suspect we will continue to do just as well as we have in the past. My goal, on the other
hand, is to improve, to do better, to be the best we can be.
We created a new position a few years ago of Communications Coordinator to support our Board and
all our departments in communicating with our constituents, our partners and the media in more
effective ways. This past year, we created another new position, that of Internal Auditor, to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of our departments and to help prevent the potential for fraud. I am
quite certain there are people out there who would argue that one or both of these positions is a
waste of money. We made these decisions to create these positions because it was necessary in our
growing county. This is exactly the same reason I am proposing that we add a lobbying firm to our
team. It is necessary in our growing county.
This is not a done deal. As with the rest of the decisions we make, we have researched this issue
thoroughly. We've discussed it with other County Commissioners in Oregon and in other states.
We've met with two lobbying firms. We've discussed this with our Department Directors and met just
last week as a Board with our Department Directors and a representative from Ball, Janik. I met with
the Bulletin Editorial staff this past Tuesday morning and was asked very pointed questions by
Gordon Black, John Costa, Erik Lukens and Janet Stevens. You've read their conclusion in today's
Bulletin. I am happy to provide you with a copy of the materials I've gathered together to date. I first
made this proposal last July.
You clearly know where I stand. Dennis and Mike have been deliberating thoughtfully. Both have
spent a great deal of time learning about this proposal and asking very important questions. None of
us takes this decision (or any of our decisions) lightly. If we move forward it will be because we
believe this decision will help Deschutes County, will help us to be more effective in our jobs of
representing our constituents, the residents of Deschutes County.
I would ask all who have taken the time to read my words that rather than simply "fight us" on this
expense, that you consider these words thoughtfully, talk with the people you know who work for us in
Oregon (Tim, Ben and Bev and their staffs) and in Washington, DC (Gordon, Greg and Ron and their
staffs) and then give us your thoughtful input. I'm sorry for going on for so long, but felt that it was
necessary to answer the issues raised in your e-mail, Carol. If anyone reading this has any questions
or would like further examples of how a lobbying firm will help us in Washington, DC (there are
many), please let me know.
We are scheduled to vote on this issue this coming Monday. Our regularly scheduled meetings take
place each Monday and Wednesday at 10:00am in the County Board Room at 1130 NW Harriman
Street, with the exception of the third week of each month. You can always check our meeting
calendar and agendas for upcoming or past meetings at ww.w deschutes.org. Upcoming meeting
agendas are usually posted by the Friday prior to the meeting.
2/25/2003
Page 6 of 6
Thank you all for your continued support and interest as Dennis, Mike and I continue to do our best to
represent you well.
Sincerely,
Tom
Tom DeWolf
Deschutes County Commissioner
1130 NW Harriman
Bend, OR 97701
Direct Phone Line: (541) 388-6567
E-mail: tomd@desc_hu_tes_.org
2/25/2003
Re: Oregon Water Wonderland Unit II sewer district
12/09/02
This position paper is submitted by Austin Smith. As an owner of properties in
both Sunriver and Oregon Water Wonderland Unit II (OWW2), I feel the interests
of both communities would be ill served should the expanded sewer district be
forced to process their sewage through Sunriver LLC. I am emphatically in favor
of the OWW2 expanded sewer district being allowed to disperse their effluent onto
the area designated as Section 25.
Citations to "STAFF" refer to Planning Division Staff Report PA-02-5/ZC-02-3.
The inadequacy of the present sewage district and the contamination of
groundwater from independent septic and sandfilter systems within OWW2 is
clearly identified by the Department of Environmental Quality [STAFF pA(G) and
p.9(B3 comment)]. That the contamination has not yet been linked to any specific
illness or health risk does not invalidate the health hazard presented by the
contamination. The necessity of a solution is admitted by all; it is only the means
that is in dispute.
Over two years ago the property owners of OWW2 voted approval of a bond issue
to expand the limited sewage district of OWW2 to include the entire development.
After numerous delays, the various financial, administrative and procedural issues
have been largely dealt with. The OWW2 sewer district board of directors has done
an outstanding job in coping with and organizing a project of this size and
complexity.
Realizing that widespread community participation was necessary to insure success,
the bond issue was presented in terms to minimize the financial impact on the
community residents. A relatively low rate structure with no connection fee for
existing homes with sewer connection or independent sanitation systems was
proposed in order to encourage widespread and early connection to the new system.
Fees for connections made after expansion is complete are analogious to SDC
(System Development Charges) payments which are not imposed on existing
homeowners. All planning and discussion was based upon an independent sewer
district serving OWW2. The question of contracting out processing of sewage was
never considered or presented to those voting on the bond issue.
OWW2 is a community of limited economic means, many of whose residents live
primarly on Social Security. Those depending upon septic/sandfilter sanitation
systems absorb those costs as part of the mortgage financing upon their homes. Any
monthly service fee will be an extra expense, uncompensated by any reduction in
their mortgage payments. Nevertheless, the majority voted to approve the bond
issue, with a proposed rate structure IN EXCESS of the sewage processing fees of
communities such as Sunriver and Crosswater. The need was apparent, but it must
have been a difficult decision. -
After exhaustive study, the U.S. Forestry Service has determined that area
designated as Section 25 is undesirable as National Forest, will suffer no detrimental
environmental impact by use as a sewage effluent dispersal field, and is available for
sale to the OWW2 sewer district to be used for that purpose. This area lies near to
OWW2 and promises a minimum of negative impacts on the surrounding
neighborhood. (STAFF p.20(comment to Goal 11)
Mr. George Read (Director, Deschutes County Commission Development
Department), expresses the opinion that whatever other factors favor the use of
Section 25, interpretation of the Statewide Planning Goals block such use of Section
25, leaving the only alternative for OWW2 sewage district expansion to be a
connection to Sunriver Environmental LLC processing facilities in the community
of Sunriver. Mr. Reed's position is weakened by the failure of the Oregon
Department of Land Conservation and Development to respond or comment upon
the OWW2 Sewer Districts proposal. Lack of such response constitutes approval
and overrides the concerns of county officials. More importantly, the groundwater
contamination presently found constitutes a public health issue and as such
specifically superceeds the land use concerns of the Statewide Planning Goals.
For the expansion of the OWW2 sewer district to succeed, participation by the
homeowners is critical. As noted above, the rate structure approved in the bond
issue election is greater than that of Sunriver and Crosswater. Imposing additional
costs on the homeowners will minimize their participation. This will in turn reduce
the cash flow to the project and make its financial success even more difficult. Also,
the validity of the bond issue itself was based upon having an independent and non-
profit sewer district and mandating a Sunriver LLC connection may bring a legal
challenge to void the bond issue. The sewer district expansion must be "practical"
(STAFF p.11(Cl, final paragraph) in an economic sense as well as a physical sense.
While Sunriver LLC has indicated that they are willing to contract with the OWW2
sewer district for processing, they have made no effort to work directly with the
OWW2 sewer district on how that might be accomplished. No engineering study of
the technical issues of transporting raw sewage to the Sunriver LLC processing
plant has been made. It should be noted that Sunriver LLC can only process raw
sewage, not the treated effluent to be piped to Section 25. No envirnmental study
has been made of the problems of transporting raw sewage across the Little
Deschutes River, nor of what provisions should be made if a break in the raw
sewage pipeline should occur. Most importantly, no formal proposal or binding,
contractual financial agreement has been presented by Sunriver LLC to the OWW2
sewer district.
Financial projections based on an independent sewer district show a gradually
increasing positive net return. As a nonprofit entity, this might be used in future
years to mitigate rate increases and/or connection fees. Initial cost estimates using a
Sunriver connection for processing were so high as to be beyond consideration. Mr.
Givens (Deschutes County Internal Auditor), testified in the public meeting of
November 14th that he had conducted two rounds of negotiations with Sunriver
LLC and this had resulted in cost estimates only slightly in excess of a break-even
point with expenses. A Sunriver LLC connection shows a steadly greater
NEGATIVE return using the proposed rate structure. Since a for-profit
corporation clearly won't run at a loss, rate increases or subsidies are the only
solution available.
Why a public employee is conducting business negotiations with a private
corporation, in behalf of an entity to which he has no connection, is an issue that
offends me as a taxpayer. Leaving that aside, no binding, legally contractual
proposal has been offered in behalf of Sunriver LLC. Additional expenses of
transmitting to and processing raw sewage by Sunriver LLC continue to come to
light. These are NOT being identified by Sunriver LLC representatives, but by the
engineering firm engaged by the sewer district. To mandate sewage processing by
Sunriver LLC without a long term (20 to 30 year) contractual agreement
guaranteeing the homeowners of OWW2 a rate structure at or below that for which
they voted the bond issue to expand the sewage district would be a travesty.
Sunriver LLC is a for profit entity being required to process its sewage effluent to a
level 4 purity. Use of Section 25 for effluent dispersal only requires processing to a
level 2 purity, a much less costly process. Additionally, it is commonly known that
Sunriver LLC intends a new edition on the opposite side of South Century Drive
from Crosswater. The additional sewage processing costs of this addition are being
calculated into the overall cost estimates presented to OWW2. I have before me my
Sunriver LLC utilities bill (water and sewage). The sewage component has a base
charge of $26.00 with three separate surcharges for various expansions. These
surcharges total $7.53, for a total of $33.53. Part of this expansion was done to
accomodate the Crosswater addition. Crosswater residents pay the same water and
sewage rates as Sunriver residents. In short, Sunriver residents are subsidizing
Crosswater costs. Should the OWW2/Sunriver processing be put in place, I would
expect that cost overruns/increases will be passed on to both OWW2 residents AND
Sunriver/Crosswater residents. Moreover, a bulk billing arrangement with the
OWW2 service district billing its residents and compensating Sunriver LLC would
make it very difficult for OWW2 residents to see where increases in their services
fees were being applied. Inquiry of the staff at Sunriver LLC revealed that unlike
water rates, sewage rates/charges are NOT regulated by the Oregon Public Service
Commission. Absent a contractual obligation, Sunriver LLC can raise sewage
processing rates at any time without regulatory approval.
In short, Sunriver LLC, a private, for-profit corporation has provided no long term
guaranteed rate structure, has made no binding commitments, and not undertaken
the necessary engineering and environmental studies necessary to properly
estimates costs, and seems to be saying "trust us, sign on and we will deal fairly with
you in the future, but we can give no specifics now". Having a county auditor
espouse such a position is frightening.
Would you consider buying a house where neither the final purchase price or the
mortgage rate was known in advance of a legally binding commitment? To
mandate a Sunriver LLC processing connection without long term rate guarantees
to the OWW2 residents is not an ethical process. Moreover, should the rate
structure not be at or below that initially proposed, such a number of OWW2
households will adopt a "wait and see" stance that cash flow will suffer, debt
charges increase, and the final result will be even more bitter.
Whatever choice the Commission makes, it will have to support a rate structure that
is acceptable to the OWW2 community, or the project will fail. Should Deschutes
County provide a solution that will support a substantial increase in affordable
housing and an increasing tax base; or one which may result in lawsuits,
condemnation proceedings, a moratorium on future construction and a body of
disgruntled voters. (STAFF p.29, goals 9. & 10.)
Finally, to address a few issues brought before the Commission at the meeting of
November 14th.
Mosquito control on Section 25: Mosquitos lay eggs in stagnant water. The effluent
ponds of Section 25 are used for spraying during mosquito breeding season, will not
stagnate, and are subject to standard mosquite control measures if required.
Offensive Odor: While the offensive odor of a level 1 effluent purity site was
mentioned by a resident of the Section 25 area, OWW2 effluent will be processed to
level 2 and will be virtually odor free. Odor problems are much more likely in the
Sunriver area should OWW2 raw sewage be processed there. Expensive chemical
pre-treatment and post-treatment is necessary to prevent the formation of hydrogen
sulfide gas when raw sewage is confined in the absense of air as would be necessary
during the transportation (pumping) process.
Wildlife habitat: Effluent ponds will be fenced for safety and a large meadow will
be created for the dispersal field. The small area lost to pond surface will be
compenstated for by a greatly increased browsing/grazing area. The fenced areas
are so small as to not impede Elk migration. No high noise levels will result. Until
this planet adopts a policy of negative population growth, we and the wildlife will
have to co -exist together. Certainly the deer seem to be adapting to this very well.
Use of Section 25 will not prove harmful to wildlife.
February 10, 2003
Community Development Department
Planning Division
117 NW Lafayette Ave.
Bend, Oregon 97701
File Number PA -02-5 and ZC-02-3
Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 2 Sewer District.
On receiving Notice of Public Hearing I would like object to the proposal as
Stated.
1. I do not agree with the proposal for the expansion of the sewage treatment
facility onto property with would include two (2) effluent ponds and
effluent onto approximately 100 acres.
a. Additional ponds increase the chance of additional odors in the area.
(I live in River Meadows across the river from OWL and the smell
from our ponds is very strong.
b. Ponds do not add to the beauty of an area.
c. Ponds attract migratory birds that can carry West Nile Virus.
d. The addition of a spray area of 100 acres, also does not add to the
beauty of the area and odor.
Why change the area from a wilderness area to a sewage area. The
comprehensive plan was put in place for a purpose.
2.. I believe that the best solution to keep the beauty to the area and not have a
odor is to pump the sewage to Sunriver wastewater treatment facility
Sincerely, _
�1
- f -
David L. Grenbemer
55824 Lost Rider Loop
Bend, Oregon 97707
01 1
a
e. F
I •�`t
February 10,2003
Walt Scholer,District Ranger
ReTile Numbers PA02-5 and ZC-02-3
We received notice of another public hearing regarding PA -02-5 and
ZC-02-3.
Again we would like to voice our disapproval of this project.
Enclosed with this letter you will find previous objections that was
conveyed to you and the Board of Commissioners. I hope that all
these objections have been made known to all those who are making
the decisions,We have no way of knowing whether these objections
are being conveyed to the respective people since we are out of state
and are not able to attend the meetings. We do not receive any
communication about any of the previous meeting.
My notice of the public hearing specify the rezoning of Section 25.
It mentioned the management of the excess land as habitat for deer, elk,
raptors and associated species, fire control and timber and for the
control of invasive exotic species and dumping. I would like to know
what procedures are set in place to enforce this. No where did I see any
mention of procedure to control the bad odor that is so prevalent in the current site.
at Oregon Wonderland. Has the County Planning Commision and the
Board Of Commissioners gone on a walk through in that area? Odor is rel bad and I can
say that if any of you live in the area,the project would not pass. I hope tot all my
concerns would be expressed in the coming meeting.
{ Thank You
tue 1. �
FE'S 1.4 2
Ulm
OIE
r
secondbend.document.txt
October 22,2002
Walt Scholer, District Ranger
Re: File Numbers PA -02-5 and ZC-02-3
We received notice of the public hearing regarding file numbers PA -02-5
and ZC-02-3.
My wife and I (Winifred and Eugene Wong) have a residence at 55485
Homestead Way. Since we reside in California and will not be able to
attend the hearing, we are writing to reiterate our original objections
to constructing a sewer plant on the property at 16480 So Century Drive.
It doesn't make sense to consider this the primary proposal since
there is a means to make improvements to the existing sewer system.
Attached you will find our first letter stating our objections to this
proposal. We hope that the commission will take the concerns of all the
property owners surrounding this area seriously.
We know it wi 11 - severe 1y impact our 1 i fes since we are planning to move
into our home permanently. When we bought this retirement house, it was
not our intention to move into an area surrounded by a sewer system.
Again, please take our concerns seriously.
Thank you.
Page 1
June 28, 2004
Walt Scholer,District Ranger
Re: Proprosed sale of 520 acres of USFS land in Deschutes County.
My husband and I (Eugene & Winied Wong) have a residence at 55485 Homestead
Way. We reside in California and did not received any notification of the impending
changes that are being considered for the OWW2 Waste Disposal System. We heard from
our neighbor about the changes that are being considered and am very disturbed about
it. We heard that the original site was to be at Vandevert and now USFS is considering a
site at Foster Road. It was also my understanding that Foster road was not a viable site
because of the water table. Why the sudden shift in position now? We hope that it's not
due to any politics between Sunriver and Forest Service. One of the primary reason we
bought our property was because of the USFS land behind our property and now a
OWW2 Waste Disposal behind our property is very disturbing. We are definitely opposed
to the Foster Road Site. Our other concerns are:
1. Water quality and impact on our wells. Contamination.
2. Property values will be significantly impacted.
3. Negative impact on the wildlife and wildlife habitat.
4. Odor that will be emitted.
5. Loss of recreational area.
6. Negative impact on deer and elk migration trails.
We feel that since it's a OWW2 problem, they should find a site on their development.
If you were in our place, would you like to have that in back of your property?
Hope you will take this into consideration when choosing a site.
Thank you.
February 12, 2003
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
c/o Community Development Department
117 NW Lafayette Avenue
Bend, Or 97701-1925
Dear Sirs;
RECEjvFn
FEB 14 2003
JE81uhu I UNTY tell
At their August 11, 2003 annual meeting, the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 1 Property
Owners Association supported the application for OWW Unit 2's purchase of the
property along South Century Drive for the purpose of expanding the district's sewage
treatment facility. OWW Unit 1's only caveat is in the near future, they are allowed to
hook up to this facility.
Owners of OWW Unit 1 are concerned about water quality in the Deschutes River and its
drainage system. We know that removing the different septic systems currently in use in
our area and adding them to this sewage treatment facility is the preferred method to
dispose of sewage.
Therefore it is most appropriate, knowing the close proximity to this proposed treatment
facility, that OWW Unit 1 be included in this project or be added in the near future. We
believe this to be imperative in maintaining or improving the water quality of the
Deschutes River and to preserve the safe drinking water provided by wells in our area.
At one time, I have been told that developing a sewage treatment facility was a joint
investigative process by both OWW Units 1 and 2, but somehow Unit 1 has not been
included.
It is the hope of OWW 1 Property Owners Association that for the sake of the River and
general water quality in the area, greater numbers of homeowners be included in this
project.
Thanks for allowing us this forum to present our views. I am sorry I cannot attend this
hearing. Allowing OWW 2 the opportunity to pursue this development should be
approved. OWW 1 supports the application of OWW 2.
Sincerely,
Al Z upo, President . .
Oregon Water. Wonderland;Unit 1 Property Owners Association
3226 East Ave Q-10
Palmdale, CA 93550
February 13, 2003
RE: Notice of Public Hearing, Tuesday, February 5, 2003, 3:00 PM
Deschutes County Hearing Room
1130 NW Harriman Street
Bend, OR 97701
File Numbers PA -02-5 and ZC-02-3
TO: Chris Schmoyer, Associate Planner
After receiving your notice of public hearing and contacting you personally, I feel
compelled to offer written commentary to the plan. As I mentioned to you over the phone,
I am a long term property owner of Tax Lot 15400, township 2C, Range 10, Section 13,
C quarter A.K.A. 56030 Browning Drive, Bend. As you also know, the entire area there
has been restricted from development, due to concerns about the effects of septic systems
on the ground water supply. You stated that the subject property for this hearing is
located a couple of miles from the parcel I own.
Imagine my shock at the concept of placing tons of semi -treated sewage in
evaporation ponds. Nowhere in the letter does it speak to the planning to keep this fluid
output out of the ground water. Nor does it speak in writing about how the county plans
to control seepage. I was told that the basins would be concrete lined (after I asked if they
would). The processing of the sewage prior to placing the material in the ponds is also not
defined in the mailing. As a result, I don't feel that you have presented a case that is in
anyone's interest but the county. Therefore, I write to object to the initial plan.
I could support the second alternative, that is, pumping sewage to the Sunriver
wastewater treatment facility. This is the only fair alternative to the problem presented,
since it (should) preclude pumping water into the water supply that will contaminate it
forever. It may even set a longer term precedent that will allow later development to be
"water supply safe".
Further, are there environmental impact statements available electronically? Please
return a telephone message if there is a web or other site available to view the documents
that have been filed.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Malcolm L (Mel) Shuman
FEB 18 2003
Gtta OUN i Y GDS
4 February 2003
Jeffrey T. Scott
55471 Richard Way
Bend, OR 97707
541.598.7477
Subject: Notice of Public Hearing, reference File Numbers PA -02-5 and ZC-02-3
Dear Deschutes County Board of Commissioners,
This correspondence is a formal written response to your Notice of Public
Hearing regarding the applicant request for a comprehensive plan amendment and zoning
change to expand the District's sewage treatment facility onto the subject property
(16480 South Century Drive, Bend, Tax lot 1900 on County Assessors map 20-10-0000).
My name is Jeffrey T. Scott and my wife and I reside at 55471 Richard Way,
Bend, OR 97707. I have included a copy of the map, you provided with the Notice of
Public Hearing, where I have highlighted my property location in green. As can be seen,
our property lies virtually adjacent to the proposed activities.
It appears from the notice that no sewage treatment plant is planned for the site but
rather it will be an area to hold effluent, from an existing plant, in retention ponds and
apply such effluent to the subject property. Our concerns with this plan are as follows:
We have been told, and it is logical, that ground water generally flows from the
Big Deschutes, on the West, toward the Little Deschutes to the East. If this
effluent found it's way into the aquifer it would likely migrate toward our lot and
that of our neighbors. What studies have been done on the possible effects to the
underground aquifer and what guarantees can be made that our drinking water
will not be contaminated?
2. What studies have been done to make sure there is no possible odor to the
surrounding property owners?
My wife and I recently moved to Bend to fulfill our life's dream of living a quiet
lifestyle in an area of unspoiled natural beauty. Preserving the excess land, which is part
of Section 25, for management of the various wildlife species is a worthwhile cause as
long as you can guarantee us that we won't be tasting and smelling the effects of this plan
for years to come. We strive to be good neighbors and are not opposed to controlled
growth based on sound engineering principles, however any deleterious effects to our
property would force us to seek the appropriate legal remedies.
Sincerely,
4ant�Penny,Scott
2003
-die