Loading...
43-385-Minutes for Meeting August 11,1982 Recorded 9/7/198210 DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 43 : t`~ Sip AUGUST 11, 1982 - REGULAR MEETING VOL 7 19,92 RO Sr.MARY DESChUTES PATTEI Sp Chairman Shepard called the meeting to order at 10:00 A.M. CommiS94!t3f e_tLRK Paulson and Commissioner Young were also present. Amendments to Amendments to the agenda were (1) For Signature: MJP- the Agenda 81-11, Melvin Spiker and (2) For Signature: OLCC Lic- ense Renewal applications. Hearing no objections, Chairman Shepard amended the agenda-as noted. MJP-81-11 Craig Smith, Planning DePartment brought this before Melvin Spiker the Board for signature and approval. He explained that this had been changed from EFU zoning to MUA- 10 zoning and that it was located near Alfalfa. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve MJP-81-11. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Request for Commissioner Paulson explained that the request for Refund refund for Richard Shindler in the amount of $45 had been for a septic permit fee. Mr. Shindler had paid for his feasibility and septic permit fee at the same time but the feasibility was denied so no septic permit was necessary, so the fee was refunded. The Board approved this refund. OLCC License Before the Board were several OLCC Liquor License Renewal Renewals applications. The first was for LaPine Mini Mart & Fast Gas. MOTION: YOUNG moved to approve. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. The next was for the Owl's Fantasy in Sunriver. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. The next was for the China Ranch in Bend. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Ordinance MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve Ordinance #82-032. #82-032, Commissioner Paulson withdrew his motion. Amending PL-10 MOTION: PAULSON moved to have the first and second readings by title only. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Page 1 of 4 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners August 11, 1982 - Regular'Meeting V01 Chairman Shepard gave the first and second of Ordinance #82-032 by title only. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve Ordinance YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD- AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. 0c;~ readings #82-032. Lease Agree- The Board signed this document at this time. It contained ment for Self- the changes decided upon at the previous day's meeting. Propelled Striping Machine Order #82-253 Rick;Isham, County Counsel, explained that this land Exchange of exchange had originally been initiated by Adrian Wilcox Real Property but he sold the farm to the Hester's who wished to with Hester & complete the exchange. He stated that this was closing Duyck in escrow and requiring title insurance, so the County has charged a $500 fee. Chairman Shepard opened the public hearing. Mr. Isham added that this was a trade involving two 80-acre parcels of land located west of Redmorid.and Philip Gould, an appraiser, had appraised the two parcels as being equal in value. Being no further comments, Chairman Shepard closed the hearing. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve Order #82-153. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Order #82-252, Directing Transfer of Property to Bend Metro Parks and Recreation It was noted that this exchange order was for four parcels of property. The first was an 80-acre parcel near Tumalo Reservoir. Parcel 2 was 3.45 acres at the entrance to Shevlin Park. Parcel 3 was 130 acres on Century Drive. The fourth was 68.43 acres near the demo dump. Chairman Shepard opened the hearing. he closed the hearing. MOTION: YOUNG moved to approve Order the transfer of property. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Hearing no comments, #82-252 directing Page 2 of 4 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners August 12, 1982 - Regular Meeting VO Pyc~ ~ ` 17 Discussion re- Bob Shimek, Century West Engineering, was present to garding Terre- give this presentation. He noted that they had submitted bonne Water their facilities plan draft to DEQ on May 19, and received Study comments back from them about two weeks ago. He explained that the had done a waste-water planning study to deter- mine what would be needed to accomodate future growth and correct existing problems. He pointed out on a aerial photo of the Terrebonne area what area they had studied. He stated that there are approximately 800 residents of the area and approximately 300 dwelling units. At this time the water quality is good, it meets all standards. He stated that there aren't any major problems from a water pollution standpoint. During the course of the study, the identified a series of alternatives which could meet the needs of the growth in the area. He handed out a list of these alternatives (a copy of all material handed out during this presentation is attached to the minutes). He discussed each of the alternatives. He showed the board a diagram of a geological cross-section of the Terrebonne area, noting that there were two aquifers and showing what area drainfields were draining into. He noted that most wells are tapping the lower acquifer. He stated that it was felt that they could continue using the current disposal wells, but not add any new ones. He also explained that they had conducted a soils survey to see which soils were not adequate for septic tank use. He stated that their recommendation was to have the County Environmental Health Department and DEQ adhere closely to existing regulations and guidelines and that should prove effective. He suggested continued use of the existing disposal wells cautioning that they may be a problem in the future, but that he personally does not anticipate that happening. He stated that they are now in the process of preparing their final document and they will neo-d to have an official document, such as a resolution, from the Board indicating their acceptance or adoption of this plan. The plan will be-used as a planning guideline in that area. He stated that this this would be sent to DEQ for their final review. Consideration Chairman Shepard stated that about one month ago the of Opti6hs for Board learned that Deschutes County had received an Mental Health award from the National Association of Counties to Department be presented to the County at the NACo convention in Baltimore. As a representative of Deschutes County was not present to accept the award, it was sent to Deschutes County. At this time Chairman Shepard presented the award to Jane Kirkpatrick, Family Counselling. The award was for this department's "Drinking Decisions" program conducted over the holiday season. Ms. Kirkpatrick in turn presented it to Bob and Hyale Smith, who had headed the program. Page 3 of 4 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners August 12, 1982 - Regular Meeting vc1~ Ir , z In regard to the options for the Mental Health Department, Jane Kirkpatrick explained that she had received a position paper from Dr. Joseph Treleaven of the State Mental Health Services Division asking for comments on possible alternative ways of administering mental health programs statewide. The three alternatives given in the position paper were (1) Have the State take over local mental health services and administer them through local branch offices, (2) Give the Counties mental health block grants from the State with minimum or no strings attached, or (3) Divide the State into regions and administer mental health services on a regional level. These three options were discussed at length between the Board and Ms. Kirkpatrick. Ms. Kirkpatrick stated that it was her opinion that the program could best be delivered on a local level with a block grant from the state. She requested the Board's opinion so that she could represent their views when discussing this with the State administrators. It was the concensus of the Board that in Deschutes County the program has been run extremely well on a local level. It was the concensus of the Board to present that opinion to the State, however Commissioner Paulson noted that not all Counties may have as successful an efficient a program as does Deschutes County. OLCC License Before the Board were additional OLCC Liquor License Renewal Appli- Renewal applications. The first was for the Deli Shop cations in Sunriver. MOTION: YOUNG moved to approve. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. The next was for Callahan's Market in Bend. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve. SHEPARD: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. The next was for Treadwell's Handy Pantry on Highway 20 East and on Highway 97 South. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. DESCH S COUNT ARD OF COMMI IONERS Cla y-Z ep r Robert C. Pau. son 4_ A ert A. ung Chairma Commissioner Commissio r /ss Page 4 of 4 VOL 43 PnE,989 TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES Accepted/ Alternative Rejected Comments 1. No Action Rejected Did not allow planning pro- vision for dealing with future development. 2a. Continued Use of Accepted This is currently allowed Existing Waste and has not been shown to Disposal Wells be environmentally unaccept- able in Terrebonne. Will not accommodate growth needs of study area unless combined with another al- ternative. 2b On-Site Pretreatment Rejected and Discharge to Existing Waste Disposal Wells 2c. On-Site Waste Treat- Rejected ment, No Water System Expansion This level of treatment not required to protect water quality. Does not accommodate pro- jected growth. 2d. On-Site Waste Treat- Accepted ment, Water System Expansion Would accommodate project- growth. 3a. Community System Rejected Insufficient capacity at Redmond Treatment/ Redmond. Redmond not Disposal Facility designed or constructed as a regional facility. 3b. Community System Accepted Lagoon treatment, land dis- Local Treatment/ posal, pressure or gravity Disposal Facility collection. 5-23 va 43 FAcF3 99 COST SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVES Construction Alternative Cost Item Cost 2a/d On-Site Disposal $ 1,750(3) Systems $ 2,750 Water Distribution $234,109 System Annual Costs (1) Present Worth $40 $ 616,428 $3,959 238,168 $ 854,596 3b Gravity Collection System, Pump Station, Services and Pressure Main (From Table 6-1) $1,043,340 $8,389 Lagoon and Effluent Irrigation System $1,016,800 $33,120 (1) Operation, Maintenance and Replacement (2) Cost per system-Conventional System (3) Cost per system-Capping Fill System $1,414,576 1,367,673 $2,782,249 a U 10• 27;8 1 OL x o AH o° ry 2760_ O 778 4Q~;. i O a r TUDY B UNDARY a " ith ,g.. -ROAD 276 z. +284a \ SIT I j ; pO1 Cinder o % X800 Pit OO Q ,log it n ~j , 15 LAMB ' I 1 ~ ~Ang - t 28%81 1 Ilw _ _ _ A - 0 I ' I• g i n ROAD _ 275 J • ~ / III, ~ v I ~ ~ C Cinder Pit 0 1 _ CL ~ o 504 2011 ROAD 277 HALL D i O O C Cinder- A ItLATERAL 1 r i ! 'I / _ Pit H DA V/DSON .N JI 7 RDI lo,lll i 'Cinder 2sD P Y o IL' o inder - \ M ~ it inder I> \ it er _ ~¢3 inder A 0 00" 29 28 ee~ c x3//6 vO d ~~I\ I • I~ I ~ I SMITH ROCK 28181 00 b O ry 22 ill II O- II: i q u `o II .2910.- •t- Ali LEGEND 13 DESCHUTES SERIES ® MADRAS SERIES SCABLAND OR ROUGH STONY LAND TERREBONNE CEN7E'ST FACILITIES PLAN ENCiiNEERINC~ DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON FIGURE 3•-11 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL TYPE DESIGNATIONS _j 8 U 10 • ~I - 9 rr/e 1 , io ry. 2 0 43 PACE 39 N• N 0 UI 2760- °O J A\ 778 o 1 ~ 2 0 F \1 _ . it NEW ° tT B u'NDARv AREA DWELL NGS LOT SIZE ~~ROAD 276 - A 1 2 5 ACRE xCinder ° -Pit r- ~ I 7 ~1 1 f AVE o Terrebonne ~ B 189 15,000 r ~ I((eM((Z o I SOFT. 0 g~ -AVE . r ~ T ry A •A E• ••BM " e o L~ 2869 ROAD 0 1 n w ~ . Cinder II 1 - pit x BM C 14 5 ACRE 2876 I 21 ROAD_____ 0 277 HALL • D ' o/~ 1• I~/n D 16 EXISTING Cindei> \ 2e0 o LATERAL] ; a ; ( - Flt LOTS A N DA V/D$ON IN JI -II RD 1071 TOTAL 231 I 'Cinder ,oy P O nder V ~ V it p: /65~ inder er inder II y ti W CL a 28 \ I it / x 31 /6 8~ i a~~- 0 II 2910 ~ I + W o , ~ / x296/x y iI I ~ 0 11 TERREBONNE FIGURE 5-1 CENT~U~R~ FACILITIES PLAN POTENTIAL NEW DWELLING EST ENC~INEERINCI DESCHUTES COUNTY, UNITS BASED ON oapar,~ OREGON CURRENT ZONING TERREBONNE C EN T~U~R/~ V1~EST ENC~INI~E~ERINCA FIGURE 5-2 FACILITIES PLAN NEW DWELLING UNITS WITH DESCHUTES COUNTY, COMMUNITY WATER OREGON SERVICE IN ALL SECTIONS