44-201-Minutes for Meeting September 23,1982 Recorded 10/15/1982I-t
4
,IF _E
44 C
OCT 1982
SEPTEMBER 23, 1982 - SPECIAL MEETING ROSEMARY
40CHUTES ~p NTY SON
Chairman Shepard called the meeting to order at 1:55 P.M. CorX-
sioner Young was also present, Commissioner Paulson was absent.
Also present were John Huffman, Oregon State Department of Human
Resources; Jay Langley, County Sanitarian; and Roger Everett, San-
itation department. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the
possiblity of the County performing water system surveys for the
State.
-01
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Huffman explained that the Legislature had recently passed
legislation that would permit the counties to accept authority for
monitoring water quality with reimbursement by the State. He
stated that a total of $60,000 had been appropriated for this
purpose. They will give $2,000 to each county that accepts, plus
$14 for each water system they have in the county. There are
approximately 141 water systems in the county. He stated that at
this time the sanitarians are inspecting residential water sup-
plies and water supplies for trailer parks, so they can combine
the work. He stated that the need is greatest for information on
non-community water systems. He then explained that about five
years ago the state legislature was approached by EPA to enforce
water quality laws with federal funds. Oregon was one of four
states to turn this down, so this has left the state with a lack
of drinking water monitoring for the last four years. Senate Bill
288 required every county to send in a report on all the drinking
water in their county, but the law has not been enforced because
the state did not fund the program. He stated that now that funds
have been provided they are going to all the counties to request
their cooperation in this program. He stated that at this point
three out of 16 counties have not accepted, and three counties are
also looking at contracting to do neighboring counties.
Mr. Langley asked if the State was try
Federal Primacy Act) at this time.
Governor Atiyeh is not interested in
program adopted by the State is very
gram. Mr. Huffman then handed out a
the survey report they would ask the
water systems.
ring to get primacy (from the
Mr. Huffman responded that
doing so, however, the new
similar to the federal pro-
copy to everyone present of
counties to complete on the
Mr. Everett asked about enforcement actions. Mr. Huffman res-
ponded that it was part of the law that any time a county comes
across an enforcement problem the State is a partner in the enfor-
cement action which means that the State will carry some of the
enforcement load.
Mr. Langley stated that he felt that this would be a good program
and would like to participate, but that he would have to study the
possibility further because of funding constraints. Mr. Huffman
suggested that they consider the possibility of contracting with
another county. Commissioner Young stated that he would have the
PAGE 1
v 'VOL ~ ?A~, E
opportunity to discuss this with representatives of other counties
at an upcoming AOC meeting. Mr. Huffman stated that the contracts
for this program will be sent to Deschutes County by mail and the
County would have the opportunity to review them at this time. He
stated that they would also be conducting workshops for county
sanitarians in regard to this, and that they would try to set them
up in the community, rather than having them travel to Salem.
Being no further business, Chairman Shepard adjourned the meeting.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
z 166~
CL=A.Y , C A N
AL , MISSION
ROBERT C. PAULSON, JR., COMMISSIONER
/ss
PAGE 2
STATE OF OREGON SMALL PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
nREGON STATE HEALTH DIVISION
L'epartment of Human Resources SANITARY SURVEY REPORT
VOL 44 PACE203
1. Basic Information
Supply Name Phone
Address City Zip
County Township N/S Range E/W Section No.
Establishment Pop. Served No. Of Service Connections____ _
Contact Person
Owner
Title
Phone
Phone_ Certification_
7 Public Private
Type Ownership: 17
Period of Operation: L-7 12 Month Seasonal If Seasonal: From to Annual Disinfection / % Yes No
11. Wells (Source of Information: /-7 Owner Measured /e Well log (attached) )
Total No. Wells Drilling Method Depth____ ft. Casing Depth___ ft.
Casing Diameter in. Year Installed Approval Oate_ _ _ Own County
Well Driller
Pump Installer)
Well House: L:7 Yes No Slab:/ % Yes / No Other Enclosure: Heated, Lighted, insulated
100 ft. Isolation Area Owned L/ Easement L/ Other
Casing Termination: L/ Pitless Adaptor Well House L/ Basement Offset -1-7 Pit(Drained) Ye
12 in.Ahove Grade or Floor: Yes No Approved Well Seal: / / Yes ! / No / / Water Level Device _
Approved Casing Material: /-7 Yes /-7 No well or Well Site Subject to Flooding: /-1 Yes / / No Casing Vent
Provided: L:7Yes L/ No Grounting Material
Distance to Potential Contamination ft. Source
ti a field, sewer, surface water
Distance to Potential Contamination _ ft. Source
tie field, sewer, surface water _
If Sewer is within 100 Feet, is Material and Installation Approved: /-7 Yes No
Distance to Major Source of Contamination ft. Source
andfip , chemica waste, sewage legoonj
111. Other Source /-j Infiltration Gallery /-7 Spring /-7 Surface Source
Security (Signs. Fences, Etc.)
Minimum Available Flow gpm L_1 Measured Estimate Approval Date
Distance to Potential Contamination ft. Source
Source Area Ownership
OSHD County.
Springs! (-7 Surface Runoff Ditch /-j Fencing Proper Springbox Construction Screened Overflow
Bottom Drain L= Hatch and Curbing
Surface Source: Source Name Intake Location
/=7 Impounding Reservoir /-7 Diversion Dam /-7 Multiple Intake /=j Screens /-7 Spillway Provision for
Draining Impoundment
Infiltration Gallery: Depth of Piping ft. Installed in /-7 Riverbank / / Under Piverbed
Sanitary Hazard Upstream from intake/-/ Yes No Describe _
Wet Well Diameter_in. Depth* ft. Lateral Dian. in. Depth, ft.
Openings: Slots Well Screen Distance to the River
IV. Pump
Type: / % Shallow Well Jet / Deep Well Jet / Submersible Hand Pump Other__
Location: /-7 Well / / Well House Basement / / Pit (Properly Drained: Yes /77 No)
Other
Installation Approved: /-7 Yes No Pump Capacity- gpm Pump Capacity Adequate: Yes No
Water Lube j~ Oil Lube
Pump Setting/Drop Pipe Length_ ft. Protected Suction Line: / 1 Yes 1-7 No Not Applicable
Sample Tap: Raw L % Treated
/ % Pump to Waste Piping Pump Removal Provision / / Yes No Subject to Flooding Yes No
33-5 (R/Y.2)
PAGE 2 SMALL PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SANITARY SURVEY REPORT V. Stara e VOL 44 PAGE 20-11t
' Type Capacity gal. Operating Range _ psi
(buried, by ropneumatic, reservoir, etc.
` Material Covered Yes L/ No Hatch Yes No Drain to daylight L/ Yes No
Overflow L :-I- Yes L/ No Flap Valve Yes No Screened Vent / % Yes No
Separate Inlet/Outlet / I Yes / % No Approved Coating t:77 Yes L/ No water Level Gage L/ Yes / /No
VI. Distribution System
Material: Approved / % Unapproved Type Proper Separation: L/ Yes L/ No
Adequate Pressure: L/ Yes / / No Properly Maintained: / / Yes No List Cross Connection:
VII. Treatment
Type: L/ Softener / / Chlorine / / Filtration / / Phosphate Iron Removal Coagulation
L/ Settling L/ Other
Type of Chlorinator --Proportional to Flow Yes No Chlorine Form: L/ Gas
Liquid HTH Contact Chamber
Contact Time Adequate (30 min) L ::I- Yes No Explain _
VIII. Monitoring and Recordkeeping
Sampling Frequency: Bacteriologic per Nitrate per Turbidity_per_
DPO Chlorine Test Kit Yes / J No Turbidimeter L/ Yes L :::I- No Type _
Are Records Maintained by Owner on:
Yes No Yes No
Bacti Results Maintenance _
Inorganic Chemical Results Variances and Permits _
Secondary Contaminant Results Plans
Turbidity Chlorine Residuals
IX. Comments/Recommendations /Plans for future development
XI. Drawing
`surveyed By
Date Date Last Surveyed Agency