44-228-Minutes for Meeting September 16,1982 Recorded 1/7/1983r'~
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS va `4-. :•.r~ JA
SEPTEMBER 16, 1982 - WORK SESSION ; t... t:
SUNRIVER MASTER PLAN M~~Y,
UWTV
Chairman Shepard called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. Commissioner
Paulson and Commissioner Young were also present. The purpose of the
meeting was to discuss.the Sunriver Proposed Community Zone amendments
to ,PL-15 and the Sunriver Master Plan. Before proceeding, Commissioner
Paulson stated that he had a possible conflict of interested, because
of a resort-tour business he has a partnership in.
George Read, Planning Department, was present to discuss the proposed
ordinances. He went through the material to be reviewed. Commissioner
Paulson noted for the record that a document containing all the changes
added as a result of input at the hearings had been prepared by Plan-
ning staff at the request of the Board. Mr. Read discussed how these
changes had been arrived at. He stated that this document had been
presented to the Board prior to the deadline for submitting testimony
given at the last hearing. The first five changes listed on the sheet
were clerical corrections. Mr. Read explained that item #6 was a result
of the Owner's Association's feeling that a bus station could have
some impact so they would prefer that a bus station be designated a
conditional use. There was some further discussion in this regard.
It was the Board's determination that the conditional use procedure
would not apply to bus stops, only central bus stations.
Mr. Read stated that North Shore Development has requested that multi-
family living units be allowed in the commercial area of the mall.
This proposal had not been formulated at the time the Planning Commission
reviewed it. He stated that staff doesn't see any problem with this
as a conditional use as long as it is consistent with the other standards
throughout the development.
Commissioner Paulson asked why they had made a distinction between day-
care centers and kitdergartens, and why one was an outright permitted
use and the other a conditional use. There was some further discussion
in regard to this. Commissioner Paulson suggested that these all be
made conditional uses which met with the approval of the other Commis-
sioners.
Mr. Read explained that there had been controversy over the Planning
Commission's recommendation on the Resort zone. Of particular concern
to both sides were the section regarding a property sales office and
the section addressing the retail sales commonly associated with outright
permitted uses in the Resort district. The homeowners and the developer
had wanted property sales confined to properties located within Sunriver.
The developer had requested that this use be only permitted for Sunriver
Properties, Inc. It was Mr. Read's recommendation that Sunriver Properties
be given an outright permitted use status, and all other property sales
offices would be a conditional use.
There was some discussion in regard to retail sales in the R District.
The homeowners are against any commercial uses in the R zone. It was
agreed that any commercial use would be a conditional use and would
have to be compatible with uses allowed by the Master Plan.
Page 1 of 4
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
` September 16, 1982 - Work Session 4
Sunriver Master Plan
Mr. Read noted that a school was proposed in the ice rink building
(in the R zone) and staff has suggested that that be a conditional
use. The staff also recommended that offices not related to property
sales by the developer be allowed only as a conditional use in the
R zone. Commissioner Paulson stated that he would be in agreement
with the school portion, but not with the offices. He did not think
that they should be allowed at all. There was some further discussion
and it was agreed to exclude offices as uses permitted under the condi-
tional use process.
With regard to height regulations, the local fire protection agency
suggested that heights be limited to 30 feet. It is suggested that
anything over 30 feet be a conditional use. The Board agreed to this.
Mr. Read stated that Paul Speck, attorney representing Stan Ochs has
sent him a letter requesting that a development plan amendment be a
zone change rather than a comprehensive plan change. Since this applied
only to the master plan within the zone, it was agreed to do this.
With regard to the RS-1 district, it was determined that they should
allow a density of 2.83 units per acre.
With regard to the RS-6 district, it was determined that this should
be maintained as an open area. Originally this area had been set aside
for a lake, but it was not feasible to put a lake there, so they will
maintain a portion as community property (CP). The other portion of
that property has already been developed.
They have agreed that the R-2 district located near the marina should
remain undeveloped bedause of flood hazard questions and sewer feasibility.
There is also the factor of a collective road maintenance which is funded
by all property owners. Because of the length of the road and the low
density of the development it would serve, it would increase the cost of
road maintenance to all property owners.
In regard to the RM-1 area located at the entrance to Sunriver, it was
the recommendation of the Sunriver Homeowners that this be CP with no
dwellings on it, but the staff supports the Planning Commission's recom-
mendation that this be developed for 36 units with special conditions,
which are contained in the proposed plan. The proposed overall density
is three units per acre. The Board agreed with the Planning Commission's
recommendation, but they changed the language to read, "Density will not
exceed 36 units."
It was agreed to adopt the Planning Commission's and staff's recommendation
in regard to the RM-11 district. This was located near the corporation
yard.
There was some discussion in regard to permitting an art gallery in the
administration building. This is an administrative area. It has been
their concern that commercial uses be allowed only in the commercial
areas. Sunriver Properties had submitted a letter indicating that they
do not object to having an art gallery in the administrative building,
but they do object to medical/dental offices there. After some discussion,
it was the concensus of the Board to request that staff seek clarification
from the Homeowner's Association as to what they feel would be an approp-
Page 2 of 4
I
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners ~ac,~`~
September 16, 1982 - Work Session
Sunriver Master Plan
priate in this building, and which of the three options listed they
would recommend.
With regard to the C2 area by the north entrance, it was suggested that
items C and D be deleted, thus allowing only a gas station and conven-
ience store in that area. The Board agreed to do this.
The next area discussed was the C-Commercial district in the mall area.
North Shore Development had submitted evidence which indicated that there
was excess commercial area, because the development had turned out to be
smaller than originally proposed; the commercial area was planned for more
people than will actually live there. This created an excess of about
ten acres of commercial property in the mall area. Based on this, it had
been recommended that residential uses be allowed in this area as well.
The staff is recommending that there be an addition of a C-4 district
that states, "This area contains 30.66 acres of which approximately six
acres is currently developed for retail uses. Uses allowed in this area
shall be any use permitted in the C-Commercial section of the zoning ordin-
ance subject to site plan review. Uses allowed as conditional uses in
this area shall only be approved upon additional findings by the Hearings
Body that the use will not conflict with commercial uses permitted out-
right in the existing area. The characteristics of the use will relate
harmoniously to the surrounding environment and existing buildings. That
the density of the residential units does not exceed eight units per gross
acre or the density of other multi-family developments. The use will have
adequate parking and access and will not conflict with other uses in
area. In the case of residential dwellings, the development will provide
a share of aesthetic and recreational amenities comparable with other
milti-family development in Sunriver. The use shall not cause the overall
density of Sunriver to exceed 1.5 dwelling units per acre." He stated that
this was all new information; because the evidence submitted by North
Shore Development had been submitted after the Planning Commission hearings.
Both the Sunriver Homeowners Association and the Sunriver Development
Corp. stated that this would abe agreeable to them as long as it remained
a conditional use.
Mr. Read wentothrough the proposed ordinance's language in regard to the
R-Resort district, which included the skating rink area. The Board did
not wish to make any changes in regard to that portion of the ordinance.
The next item was in regard to the industrial area. Mr. Read pointed out
that there have been provisions made for apartment buildings for employee
housing in this area. He stated that this four acre area should be estab-
lished as an RM-12 district, and a specific density should be established.
The staff made a recommendation that not more than 48 units be developed,
and that the developer submit a recommendation. In a letter from Mr.
Lovlien, they suggested up to 30 units per acre, which would allow 120
dwelling units. There was some discussion in regard to access for these
units,,a tunnel and an overpass as a means of crossing the road were dis-
cussed. The Board agreed to allow 30 units per acre as Mr. Lovlien had
suggested, but it was noted that site plan review will probably limit
that development to less than 30 units per acre.
Page 3 of 4
r
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Vol '
September 16, 1982 - Work Session 44 Sunriver Master Plan
In regard to the airport, Mr. Read stated that it is the intent of the
staff and the Planning Commission to ensure that the airport remain a
private airport and not become a commercial airport. To do this, the
Planning Commission adopted the suggestions of the homeowners association,
which was to impose a 12,500 lb. weight limit. This is the limit estab-
liihed-by FAA to designate a small aircraft. He stated that it was
also important to restrict commercial uses, like flying schools and
glider tows. In discussing this with the State aeronomics division,
Mr. Read found that they may have some problems limiting the airport
to certain users because of certain discrimanatory regulations and various
court cases that have occurred in the past. There was much further
discussion in regard to this. Commissioner Paulson and Commissioner
Young stated that they did not feel that a weight limit would be necessary
because the size and type of aircraft would be controlled by the length
of the runway. It was decided that aircraft maintenance would be
done inside the hangars. The runway will be extended for safety reasons.
This will be used only for take-offs. It was agreed that there would
be no commercial gliding operation and no flight school, and ballooning
would be allowed only by special permit. There was some further discus-
sion in regard to the airport. It was agreed that the purpose of the air-
port is for the convenience of the Sunriver residents, and not to be
used for commercial purposes.
Mr. Read then outlined what the CC&R's would cover and would not need
to be covered in the master plan. There was some further discussion
in regard to the time frame of the master plan's adoption. The Board
thanked Mr. Read for the work he had done on this project.
Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES ICOUNTY MMISSIONERS
C ALBER A. YOUNG, ISSI
e4l)~_ ROBERT C. PAULSON, JR., COMMkS NER
f
/ss
Page 4 of 4