Loading...
41-570-Ordinance No. 82-007 Recorded 2/24/1982=E r N "1 VOL 41_ prFE 3 In BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON An Ordinance Amending Ordi- nance No. PL-15, Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance of 1979; Rezoning Certain Property from Exclusive Farm Use - 20 (EFU-4) Zone to Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10) Zone; and Declaring an Emergency. * * * ~ D * * FEB 24 1982 * ROS * L)ESCH ~ SRCOA T T ERS0N Ordinance No. 82-007 NTY CLERK WHEREAS, George Cleveland proposed the rezoning of certain property from Exclusive Farm Use - 20 (EFU-4) Zone to Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10) Zone; and law; and WHEREAS, notice of hearing was given in accordance with WHEREAS, the Hearings Officer held a hearing on the proposed zone change on September 22, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Hearings Officer recommended that the property be rezoned from Exclusive Farm Use - 20 (EFU-4) Zone to Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10) Zone, by decision dated September 29, 1981; and WHEREAS, the decision of the Hearings Officer has not been appealed to the Deschutes County Planning Commission; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. To amend Ordinance No. PL-15, Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance of 1979, to change zoning from Exclusive Farm Use-20 (EFU-4) Zone to Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10) Zone, for the parcel of real property described as: Tax Lot 100, Section 24D, Township 17 South, Range 12 East, Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, and depicted on the map marked Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 2. To adopt as the Board of County Commissioners' findings and conclusions, the findings and decisions of the Hearings Officer dated September 29, 1981, relating to Zone Change Application Number Z-81-14, marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Ordinance No. 82-008, Page 1 vOL 41-Pau 511 Section 3. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance takes effect on its passage. i DATED this the )I day of 1982. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO ERS OF DE C ES 7TY, ON CLAY PAR D, Cha r an AL A. Y UNG, ~Iommiss' er ROBERT C. PAULSON, JR.,Commissioner ATTEST: SUSAN STONEMAN Recording Secretary Ordinance No. 82-008, Page 2 - 'SEI/4• SEC. 24 T17S. R.12E.W. M. Exhibit "A" DESCHUTES COUNTY Zane. C,nNO nc3e, Z-81-14 i7 I_ 24C 111200' Georgc,, Cleveland T I'7 R 12 SeJion 9 See Mop 17 12 24 Tax LO( 100 ZZD 33 P46EL Road QDA9 -----i Exhibit "B" von 4t wE. Yi i HEARINGS OFFICER DESCHUTES COUNTY COURTHOUSE ANNEX BEND, OREGON 97701 P ~C t -j 0 TELEPHONE (503) 388-6626 h/l T I9~j v DESCHAILED UTg~ COUNTY fly,/ FINDINGS AND DECISION FILE NO: Z-81-14 APPLICANT: George Cleveland PLANNING STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Richard Knoll PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial PUBLIC HEARING: The public hearing was held in room 106, Deschutes County Courthouse Annex, Bend, Oregon on Tuesday, September 22, 1981 at 7:00 P.M. An oral decision was rendered at that time. BURDEN OF PROOF: In order to approve this request the applicant must meet the criteria set forth in Sections 10.040 and Section 4.040 of Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance PL-15. FTNDTNGS: 1. LOCATION: The subject property is located on the west side of Dickey Road, 1 mile south of the intersection of Butler Market Road, and is further described as Tax Lot 100, Township 17 south, Range 12 east, Section 24D. 2. ZONE: The property is located within an EFU-20, Exclusive Farm Use zone. 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Agriculture. 4. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is 120 acres in size and is currently vacant of all permanent structures. The 80 acre to the northwest has a varied topography with a ridge extending northeast through the center of the acreage. The north and south portions of the land are more level. The 40 acre parcel has a generally flat topography with an elevated area to the west. The majority of the acreage is irrigated pasture. Two irrigation laterals are existing on the parcel. A few scatttered juniper trees are existing in the elevated lands. Z-81-14 - GEORGE CLEVELAND - PAGE 1 CONCLUSIONS: 574 VOL 41 PAGE The applicant has addressed the criteria set forth in Sections 4.040 and 10.040 of Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance PL-15 as follows: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: This particular property has been indicated in the Comprehensive Plan as marginal farmland-developed. This land is similar to Type "F", but is existing residential development and hobby-farm activities have re- duced the predominant ownership and tax lot size to less than 20 acres. The land is suitable for raising and grazing livestock on a small scale. Because the farm activities are subsidized, the farm productivity is higher than what it might be other-wise. Lands typical of these usually lie close to the urban areas, such as Bend, Redmond, and to some extent Tumalo. 2. That the rezoning to MUA will not interfere with any existing neighborin agricultural use, regardless of the existing zoning on such neighboring and. The subject property lies within 1 mile of the Bend Urban Growth Boundary and could be developed to a 5 acre density, instead of using the cluster development concept. However, this general area is potentially available for devlopment'. The farming use is reducing as time proceeds, and the Hearings Officer finds that this property will not adversely affect the neighboring agricultural uses. 3. That the land that is the subject of the application predominantly con- sists o soils in Soil Conservation Service Capability Classification VI or VII, or is not classified; or 4. If Subsection D is not satisfied, and the County Assessor finds that the land subject to the application redominantl consists of soils in Grade VII or VIII, as determined by the Oregon Department o Revenue Methods Manual, Section on Mass Appraisal of Farm and Ranch Properties, or is not graded; or The Deschutes County Tax Assessor - Farm Appraisor has classified the entire 80 acres as a Class VII soil type. The applicant has submitted a,,detailed soil analysis of the subject property, completed by Ted Hoss and Ralph Pine, both are certified soil scientists. This documentation establishes that the subject property is either totally Class VI or Class VII soils according to the Soil Conservation Service Capability Classification. The applicant has established through the detailed soil '.study that 80 acre is more than 75% Class VI or Class VII soils. 5. The land is not classified under any of C, D, or E, a testing method approved by the Planning Director and executed by a certified soil scientist discloses that the soil consists predominantly of Class VII under the Soil Conservation Service Capability Classification System. Not applicable. 6. That the land does not have sufficient water ri hts or existing water supply to allow farm use, as defined in ORS 2 5. 03( The total farm unit has 23 acres of water all of which is adjudicated to the40 acre parcel to the south. The Hearings Officer finds under Z-81-14 - GEORGE CLEVELAND - PAGE 2 VOL 4-1 PArF ~ J } the definition of case law in Meyer vs Lord would not make a contigious parcel for the purpose of determining total farm unit. DECISION: APPROVAL DATED this day The applicant has established through his attorney and letter addressed to the Hearings Officer dated September 22, 1981 that in fact there is a great distinction between this situation and the one created in the case of Meyer vs Lord. The 80 acre parcel in question has never been tilled. There is no relation between the 80 acre parcel and the 40 acre parcel and are not to be considered as part of a farming unit. A letter from the United States Department of Agriculture from Mr. George Hamlin, Soil Conversation Service clearly indicates that farming should not be attempted on the 80 acre parcel. There is only sufficient ground cover to graze four to eight head of cattle for a one month period. This property does not meet the test of an economical farm unit as defined within ORS 213.230. The Hearings Officer finds that the lands although in a sense contigious, are not part of an economical profitable farming unit, therefore should not be considered adjacent or contigious under the terms of Section 10.040 of PL-15. of September, 1981. This decision becomes final 15 days after the date mailed, unless appealed to the Manning Commission by a party of interest. MA:ch cc : File Planning Commission Planning Department George Cleveland 'L-81-14 - GEORGE CLEVELAND - PAGE 3