Loading...
2005-637-Minutes for Meeting March 21,2005 Recorded 4/18/2005COUNTY OFFICIAL NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKDS ICJ COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 1111111111111111111111111111111 04/18/2005 03;38;07 PM 2000-i3 DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE PAGE C This page must be included if document is re-recorded. Do Not remove from original document. ~%.>:T E S c~, u 4 A C Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESC1 UTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St.., Bend Present were Commissioners Tom De Wolf, Dennis R. Luke and Michael M. Daly. Also present were Mike Maier, County Administrator; Mark Amberg, Legal Counsel; Tammy Credicott, Property Manager; Jeanie Young, Health Department; Dan Sherwin, Road Department; Susan Ross, Anna Johnson, Andrea Blum and David Givans, Commissioners' Office; Les Stiles, Jim Ross and Neil Mackey, Sheriff's Office; media representatives Mollie Graham of Z-21 TV, and Chris Barker of the Bulletin; and six other citizens. Also in attendance were the following members of the Sheriff's Office Permanent Funding Advisory Committee: Leland Smith, Chair; Charles Humphreys; Gary Everett; Lindsay Stevens; Karen Rawnsley; Jacques DeKalb; Chris Earnest; Bill Pfeiffer; Randy Wight; and Allan Bruckner. Chair Tom De Wolf opened the meeting at 10:03 a.m. He explained that the meeting started late because the Board had been meeting with Paul Carlson of the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding homelessness issues. 1. Before the Board was Citizen Input. Paul Carlson of the Department of Housing and Urban Development said his agency is promoting a federal ten-year plan to address homelessness. This situation is viewed as a scandal that has been a problem for much too long. It is important that this issue not be handled just as a problem anymore, but instead addressed as a business plan with specific goals and strategies. The ten-year plan would emphasize the issues of chronic homelessness. One strategy is to get a good handle on the numbers, then build appropriate housing, and develop a plan to sustain people in the housing. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 1 of 5 Pages Commissioner Luke noted that the number of homeless individuals who are veterans is very high. Mr. Carlson stated that about 50% of the homeless are veterans, and that the group handling these efforts in the East is working through Veterans' Services. Veterans who are now returning from serving the country need to know they are returning to something. No other input was offered. 2. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2005-101, a Grant Agreement between Deschutes County and the State of Oregon regarding Teen Pregnancy Prevention Services. Jeanie Young explained that these grant funds will be used to defray the cost of an upcoming visit of a doctor who speaks to this problem. LUKE: Move approval. DALY: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. DALY: Yes. DEWOLF: Chair votes yes. 3. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2005-102, a Grant Agreement between Deschutes County and the Oregon Department of Agriculture regarding Noxious Weed Control Services. Dan Sherwin stated that this agreement is meant to address three noxious weeds that are considered to be a future problem; efforts will be made to eradicate them before they become a big problem in the area. LUKE: Move approval. DALY: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. DALY: Yes. DEWOLF: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 2 of 5 Pages 4. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2005-019, a Lease Agreement with Munchkin Manor Childcare and Preschool regarding the Operation of the Childcare Center at 1130 NW Harriman St., Bend. Susan Ross explained that at the Board's request, the wording regarding holidays has been changed (to allow for negotiations between the County and the vendor), and the contract dates were adjusted as necessary, with the beginning date to be June 1, 2005. DALY: Move approval. LUKE: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. DALY: Yes. DEWOLF: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2005-005, Authorizing the Sale of Certain Real Property (located off Archie Briggs Road). Tammy Credicott asked that this be postponed for a week, as Legal Counsel wants to add wording to clarify the order. Commissioner asked that perhaps this could be addressed this Wednesday instead if the paperwork can be handled by then. 6. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2005-033, Confirming the Authorization of the Inmate Trust Account and Authorizing Use of a Facsimile Signature for the Same Account. Sheriff Stiles explained that there are two inmate accounts: one for bail and one for commissary items. Double signatures are required for money received and disbursed. This resolution makes the accounting requirements a little tighter. It will require at least one original signature and a stamped signature. This allows the transaction to happen in a timely manner. LUKE: Move approval, subject to Finance Director review. DALY: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 3 of 5 Pages VOTE: LUKE: Yes. DALY: Yes. DEWOLF: Chair votes yes. 7. Before the Board was a Discussion and Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2005-034, Transferring Appropriations within the Deschutes County Health Department Fund. LUKE: Move approval. DALY: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. DALY: Yes. DEWOLF: Chair votes yes. 8. Before the Board was a Presentation and Discussion of SOPFAC's (Sheriffs Permanent Funding Advisory Committee) Recommendations for Sheriffs Office Funding Options. Lee Smith gave an overview of the process the Committee followed. He said there have been many long meetings and lots of lively discussion, following the mission statement and parameters the group was given. (He provided handouts, which are attached as Exhibits C, D and E.) The group looked at the Sheriff's Office's budget and cost projections, and used the plan as a basis for allocations. Assessor's records were used to determine future rates. They analyzed costs and needed revenues through Fiscal Year 2020-2021, per the strategic plan. The focus was to stabilize funding, which being fair to all citizens in structuring the proposal. Mr. Smith then explained the options that were developed by the Committee. The cost of constructing additional space at the jail was not considered since it is unknown what the potential cost would be. Out of thirteen Committee members, ten voted. (Members Darryl Nakahira and Judith Duncan were absent.) The Chair was not to unless there was a tie. A variety of votes were taken during the meeting process and compromises were made; ultimately most of the members favored the final recommendation. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 4 of 5 Pages A general discussion followed. No comments were offered from the audience. It was decided the Commissioners would read the documents thoroughly and meet with the Sheriff and others as appropriate during the next month. 9. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None were offered. Being no further items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:50 a. m. DATED this 21St Day of March 2005 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. Tom DeWolf, Chai ATTEST: Recording Secretary is R. Luke, Commissioner Attachments Exhibit A: Sign-in sheet, SOPFAC portion of meeting (1 page) Exhibit B: SOPFAC letter of recommendation and summary (6 pages) Exhibit C: SOPFAC spreadsheet detailing assessed valuations and revenues (1 page) Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 5 of 5 Pages VA/ve X80 - t~ o 5~ C50 3S3 4A Z3 if -rz~~ rv~ t~l 2 ~1 s f=~--~ 5'f 9 114 3 ,,,Jim 1~ ~~'~D ~~i r `3 3 -60Y 3 013 L.,-E LO ?iG~ Exhibit Page of March 21, 2005 Sheriff's Office Board of County Commissioners Permanent Deschutes County Funding 1130 NW Harriman Street Advisory Bend, OR 97701 Committee This letter presents the recommendations of the Sheriff's Office Permanent Funding Advisory Committee (SOPFAC) to the Deschutes County Board of Allan Bruckner Commissioners. Jacques DeKalb Judy Duncan The Mission Statement provided to the Committee at our first meeting Chris Earnest stated that our mission was three-fold: Gary Everett Charles Humphreys 1. Evaluate the present funding mechanisms for the Deschutes Dennis Krakow County Sheriffs Office. Darryl Nakahira 2. Based on the evaluation, determine a funding mechanism that Bill Pfeiffer would best serve the needs of the residents of Deschutes County Karen Rawnsley and assure continued public safety services. Leland Smith 3. Make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners on or Lindsay Stevens before March 31, 2005 as to what the maximum rate that could be Randy Wight assessed will be over what period of time AND how should those be apportioned. The Committee was also provided with a list of seven "parameters" which were used to guide our deliberations. These instructed the Committee to utilize budget and cost data provided by the Sheriff, the County Finance Director, and the County Assessor without changes. Consequently, the Committee accepted the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office Strategic Plan Update, September 2004, as our reference for the amounts and timing of costs to be covered by a new funding strategy. Our recommendations are contained in two motions that were approved by a majority of the Committee members. There was substantive discussion about the approved recommendations, as well as several alternatives, which the Committee felt should also be summarized and conveyed to the Commissioners. While not formalized by motions, please review that summary and consider it as integral to our recommendations. Exhibit Page / of RECOMMENDATION 1 - PERTAINING TO STRUCTURE The Committee recommends the creation of two Public Safety Service Districts: DISTRICT ONE A countywide district with a rate to be approved by a vote of all eligible voters in Deschutes County. The rate determined will be based upon the allocation of services as defined by the Sheriff in his document titled "Identification of Employees and Costs between County-wide and Rural Tax Districts" dated 12-7-2004. The rate will NOT include the costs of constructing new jail facilities but WILL include the estimated costs of current and projected expanded jail operations and the re-opening of the Work Release Center. The rate established will be the maximum rate required to fund Sheriff services as defined through FY 2020-21 but will be assessed annually as necessary by the Board of County Commissioners and will assume the continued availability of "Other Revenue" as shown in the Sheriff's Strategic Plan dated September 2004. DISTRICT TWO This District would include all areas in Deschutes County outside of the cities of Bend, Redmond and Sisters, and the Sunriver and Black Butte Ranch Service Districts. This district would be established to fund rural patrols, investigations and related support services as defined by the Sheriff in his document titled "Identification of Employees and Costs between County-wide and Rural Tax Districts" dated 12-7-2004. Funding for this district would be voted upon only by eligible voters residing in this district. The rate established will be the maximum rate required to fund services as defined above through FY 2020-21 and will be assessed annually by the Board of County Commissioners and will assume the continued availability of "Other Revenue" as shown in the Sheriff's Strategic Plan dated September 2004. The Committee further approved a motion to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the formation and tax rate of either district not be dependent upon the passage of the other district. SOPFAC Recommendations 2 March 21, 2005 To BOCC Exhib!~Zof Page (D RECOMMENDATION 2 - PERTAINING TO RATES The Committee recommends the following maximum and initial tax rates to be set for the two districts: District One: Maximum tax rate of $1.25 per $1,000 of assessed value. Initial tax rate of $0.90 per $1,000 of assessed value in FY 2006-07. District Two: Maximum tax rate of $1.55 per $1,000 of assessed value. Initial tax rate of $1.45 per $1,000 of assessed value in FY 2006-07. Projections from the Sheriff's Office show that the maximum rates will be required in FY 2013- 14 to cover the increased costs of the expanded jail operations. Rates should be reduced beyond that point because property tax revenues are projected to increase faster than costs. Respectfully submitted, Leland F. Smith, Chairman SOPFAC Recommendations 3 March 21, 2005 To BOCC Exhibit Page `3 of CD DISCUSSION SUMMARY AND ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations of the Sheriff's Office Permanent Funding Advisory Committee to the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners were approved by a majority of the members operating under Robert's Rules of Order. However, there was not unanimous agreement on some of these recommendations. Many different ideas and opinions were expressed during the series of meetings, with time made available for expressing and discussing the views of all members. The following discussion summary addresses the primary issues considered by the Committee and includes the positions supported by the minority members. For more detailed information on the Committee's deliberations, please review the minutes of the individual meetings. 1. The Committee considered the alternatives of forming one, two, or three districts as described below: One District: A single district was evaluated that would have covered all of the operating costs of the Sheriff's Office that require property tax revenues, with a single tax rate dividing the costs equally among all County taxpayers according to their assessed valuations. At least one Committee member felt that this would be the most fair and equitable method, and many agreed it would be the simplest to design. Other members felt that this option would place an unfair tax burden on residents of the three incorporated cities and two service districts who are paying for their own police services. There were also questions about whether this option would be approved by the respective city councils as required, and whether urban voters would pass such a measure on the ballot. Two Districts: The two-district option was ultimately approved by a 14-to-1 vote with one abstention, primarily for the reasons above. In addition, many members felt this option most closely follows the existing precedent of a split-levy that has been approved by the voters. The Sheriff's Office provided a breakdown of employee assignments which showed whether they were primarily for the benefit of county-wide or rural residents as contained in the December 7 document. The Sheriffs Office also provided detailed cost projections of the services of each district. These were matched against projected property tax revenues from the Assessor's Office to show the rates that would be required in each of the two districts to fully cover the costs. Three Districts: There was some discussion about forming a third district that would function only to build and operate the jail facilities. The three-district option was unduly complicated and did not offer significant benefits over the two-district option. Exhibit Page of (p 2. There was also substantive discussion about whether some of the costs of patrol and investigative services should be divided between both districts rather than fully assigned to just one. At least one member felt that Sheriff's patrols benefit all residents in Deschutes County to some extent, even if they are primarily conducted in rural areas. That member favored assigning some part of the costs of patrols to the county-wide district, thereby reducing the tax rate in the rural district while increasing it in the county-wide district. Other members felt that residents of the incorporated cities and two service districts are already paying for patrol services, without tax support from the rural areas, and they should not have to pay additional taxes for rural patrols. The Committee voted 8 - 2 to fund all patrol and investigative services by residents of District 2. 3. The maximum rate recommended for District One is intended to cover the full operating costs of expanded jail facilities to be constructed at various times between FY 2007-08 and FY 2020-21. The Committee agreed unanimously that the maximum rate SHOULD NOT be levied unless and until the voters approve the bonds or other financing mechanisms for the jail expansions. If the construction bonds for the jail are not approved by the voters, or for any other reason those jail expansions should not occur, then the annual levies should be at rates lower than the maximum. In that event, any amount of the maximum rate allocated to jail operations should be considered as a reserve for future jail operations and should not be levied and/or used for other purposes. The Committee did not consider alternatives to the jail because the Sheriffs calculations were based solely on the expansion of the jail. 4. The Committee was provided by the Sheriff's office with a spreadsheet showing the annual tax rates that would be required in order to fully fund Sheriff's services through FY 2020-21 under the assumption that the jail expansions would occur. That spreadsheet incorporated projections provided by the Assessor's office showing increases in assessed valuations in Deschutes County during that time period. The Assessor's projections included a breakout for the rural areas of the county, which enabled the Sheriff's office and the Committee to assign costs to the two districts respectively. The Committee strongly recommends that the projections of annual tax rates be included in the ballot language to show that the initial rates are not the maximum rates, the time periods when higher rates are anticipated, and that the rates are expected to decline after the jail expansions are completed and fully operational. The Committee also recommends that the Budget Committee consider the Sheriff's projections in setting annual tax rates for both districts. 2 Exhibit Page 5 of ~O 5. The ballot to form District One should clearly show what the maximum rate assessed will be if the expanded jail facilities are not constructed. While the Committee was aware that the County cannot set a "contingency" rate, the members felt that the voters have a right to know what portion of the maximum rate is assigned to the expanded jail operations. 6. There was considerable discussion about whether the Committee should recommend increases in the allocation of the Transient Room Tax to fund Sheriff's services in District 2. There was also discussion about whether the General Fund allocation to the Sheriff s office should be increased and/or maintained at a higher level even as Transient Room Taxes increase over time. The Committee agreed that the BOCC and the Budget Committee should consider these and other revenue options in order to reduce the property tax rates for the two districts. 7. There was considerable discussion about whether the passage of the two permanent tax districts should be linked, i.e., whether the failure of one district should automatically cause the failure of the other, even if it received majority approval. In particular, some Committee members felt that the Rural District, primarily dedicated to financing patrols and investigations, should not be formed if the County-wide District, largely dedicated to financing the jail operations and general administration, should fail. It was unanimously decided and recommended that each district should stand on its own and that urban residents should not be able to deny rural residents the opportunity to form their own district independently of the County-wide District. Respectfully submitted: Leland F. Smith 3 Exhibit Page of Lo m 0 CC' ) 40 T h O O r m CD v - 69 . N c T N 0i r Nc w i ti - r r r OD CD O 0 C to co e co LL 0~ OD to 69 co r tt) 0 to to r U) CCD O D C h N r 0 14 r cj~ M r 60 v CD CN v N 03, C> N M = ~ M m O r r r h r } CCDD C W O r M LL V E9 M r - - - tp - - - - - - - - - - - - co O (o h M O r C tD co V cO r" - - - - - CO - - Cl - - - CO N 2 N n C O r r 00 69 0) 64 n _ E (D G N r 60% h IT M Of d' ar h 0) C9 N to N 01 O O r o OO N o h t'7 st t0 co p r } LL v N r M O r N 6N M~ } CD t N r M N 64 O N r Q LL r O 6H N r oo C LO N w h O IT 4m p tD co OD m c o r 4 D o p M O r Or to c ( C A M c CA to 0) Imo r 66, tp C m 6 %j C 13, ti E CN' M O C4 T- i V) v co O r . r r OD W co IV 0) O r LL t7 M tO N N 6t! } r C*4 t N v h LO N IT t N C r r to LL 0 N 01 fA ~ O O O tO S !n 1% C OD O a (D M CD C 0 r O 0 O r 0 O O 4 CD O C 0 r O n 6H to U.) 6 ~N 03, h to to N E co N co O ^ a co st C6 t GOT C OC D V 06 co (6 _ E t0 M *0 a cr) t0 CD V- N C6 C (6 to r ^ CO M r M V) O M N h O r t} L m O M N } M Cl N n N m r Cl tp LL r r O) OD tq tD C CD CCDD W d r co : N 11 O O - r O a N N M N CO w C lp CO C C C O r CD O M O G% C r N t O~ OD v C' O _ E CN N r 0 r E9 gt N o r O ' - E CA p h 40 0) CD h O C%i - (0 r p 'l N co C W r C r LL CC D Q C N~ 69 } LL M r N IT tG ( ~ N t0 0) - - - - - - - - - co r CD ttp O M f 0c r O O a- - - - - - v~ - C - O - - - - MO - M - - - - v - c - - r h 4 N • M C h C M CV M m r tO N t~ CD tO N 0) ~ h Ci E Ch ( O CD N co n r 0) r g O N h O t Cl ty O LL C r } LL O O N M r N M E9 n r v M Ch O tOD ~ M OC to N ~ r- 1- co O v N O hC O r- 60 r V LO N E tO N O N N O r N " . CO CS _ h C~ -E t d CD ~ ~ h r O r v N N 6 J tC0 ' O O h 0 LL Ll~ 113i - r C9 64 fR r U- r CA r tD co r N r r ~ CD to r ~ (h0 M O co O lO p W m (h 00) r c ~ ~ r O M N 0D ~ O N co r M O c ^ O r O er- tNr) tf? 4n C M O v r t o r EA Lt) O N E9 CU r M 4 C't O o co CO h m N O r co M ar- r N CD 0 0) p V- > - LL W C IL tV r N w co r O N O N CD Cp m - - - IT - 64 - - LL v r C N r-: 6 A N D1 - - - - - - - C N W 15 X (U > C (D N X SY h _ H atS ~ ~ . a a iS ' U) C _ C N . C G p v+ a N c O + U) > d 3 M O M O yN c r to N 4) 0 tll C) O a Q tO - 0 to 7 > O m 3 O O 7 ~ a O d N y O N 6 4) O N ' C1 O . T ) 1 U) N ~ ~ ~ to QO' ~ ~ N S a Q to ~ Q' to (o 2 ' .2 C co > I p O O X aXX O N O S, C F - IX F - F- U fn a' r n <1 C to E F- F O - 7 td w H I- O ; U to N Exhibit Page I_ of I ❑ Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ory WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building 1300 NW Wall St.., Bend CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Visitors who wish to speak should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign-up sheet provided. Please use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you to speak. 2. DISCUSSION and Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2005-101, a Grant Agreement between Deschutes County and the State of Oregon regarding Teen Pregnancy Prevention Services - Jeanie Young, Health Department 3. DISCUSSION and Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2005-102, a Grant Agreement between Deschutes County and the Oregon Department of Agriculture regarding Noxious Weed Control Services - Dan Sherwin, Road Department 4. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2005-019, a Lease Agreement with Munchkin Manor Childcare and Preschool regarding the Operation of the Childcare Center at 1128 NW Harriman St., Bend - Susan Ross, Commissioners' Office 5. DISCUSSION and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2005-016, Authorizing the Sale of Certain Real Property (located off Archie Briggs Road) - Tammy Credicott, Property Management Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 1 of 8 Pages 6. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Resolution No. 2005-033, Confirming the Authorization of the Inmate Trust Account and Authorizing Use of a Facsimile Signature for the Same Account - Marty Wynne, Finance Department 7. DISCUSSION and Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2005-034, Transferring Appropriations within the Deschutes County Health Department Fund - Marty Wynne, Finance Department 8. PRESENTATION and Discussion of SOPFAC's Recommendations for Sheriff's Office Funding Options - Lee Smith, Chair, Sheriff's Office Permanent Funding Advisory Committee 9. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County conducts meetings in locations that are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County also provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For persons who are deaf or who have hearing or speech impairments, dial 7-1-1 to access the State transfer relay services for TTY. At meetings of the Board of County Commissioners, the County will provide an interpreter for hearing impaired persons who make their request at least 48 hours' notice. Written information can be made available in large print or in audio format; to request these services, please call (541) 388-6571. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572) Monday, March 21, 2005 9:00 a.m. Meet with Representative of HUD regarding Housing Issues 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 11:30 a.m. Working Luncheon - Prepare for Organizational Consultant Meetings 1:30 p.m. Interview Organizational Consultants Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 2 of 8 Pages Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:30 p.m. Property Management Update Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Director of Tax & Finance 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:30 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with Parole & Probation 2:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Sheriff 4:15 p.m. Meet with Information Technology regarding Archiving Issues Monday, March 28, 2005 8:00 a.m. Meet with City of Bend Planner regarding the Development of Juniper Ridge 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 2:00 p.m. Meeting with Sheriff's Office Corrections Needs Assessment Committee, at the Sheriffs Office (MAC Center) Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Commission on Children & Families 3:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with Juvenile Community Justice Wednesday, March 30, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:00 a.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Redmond City Council, Redmond Fire Hall 2:00 p.m. Meet with Community Development regarding Adding an Industrial District to the Tumalo Rural Community Zoning District 3:30 p.m. Open House - Horizon House Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Pages Monday, April 4, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:30 p.m. Meeting of Local Public Safety Coordinating Council (LPSCC) Tuesday, April 5, 2005 1:30 p.m. Public Hearing regarding Adding an Industrial District to the Tumalo Rural Community Zoning District Wednesday, April 6, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting Thursday, April 7, 2005 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Sisters Council, in Sisters Monday, April 11, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Community Development Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Update with Information Technology Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:30 a.m. Legislative Update - Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Forestry Specialist 1:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Road Department 2:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Solid Waste 3:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Health Department 4:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Mental Health Department Thursday, April 14, 2005 12 noon Regular Meeting of the Audit Committee Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 4 of 8 Pages Monday 2, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:30 p.m. Meeting of Local Public Safety Coordinating Council (LPSCC) Wednesday 4, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday 9, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Community Development Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:30 a.m. Legislative Update - Conference Call 1:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Forestry Specialist, at Road 1:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Road Department, at Road 2:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Solid Waste, at Solid Waste 3:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Health Department, at Health 4:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Mental Health Department, at Mental Health Thursday, May 12, 2005 7:00 a.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Redmond City Council, Redmond Fire Hall Monday, May 16, 2005 9:00 a.m. Administrative Liaison 1:00 P.M. Budget Committee Meeting Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Pages Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:00 a.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Manager of the Fair & Expo Center 11:00 a.m. Regular Meeting of Employee Benefits Advisory Committee 1:00 P.M. Departmental Budget Presentations Wednesday, May 18, 2005 1:00 P.M. Departmental Budget Presentations Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:00 P.M. Departmental Budget Presentations Friday, May 20, 2005 1:00 P.M. Budget Approval Meeting MondM, May 23, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Commission on Children & Families Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:30 a.m. (Tentative) Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the City of Bend Council, at the City Wednesday, May 25, 2005 9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Director of Tax & Finance 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:30 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with Parole & Probation 2:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Sheriff 4:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with Juvenile Community Justice Monday, May 30, 2005 Most County offices will be closed to observe Memorial Day. Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 7 of 8 Pages Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison Wednesday, June 1, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, June 6, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Work Session 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison Wednesday, June 8, 2005 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:30 a.m. Legislative Update - Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Forestry Specialist 1:45 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Road Department 2:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Solid Waste 3:30 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Health Department 4:15 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of the Mental Health Department Thursday, June 9, 2005 12 noon Regular Meeting of the Audit Committee Monday, June 13, 2005 12 noon Regular Meeting of Board of Commissioners and Department Heads 1:30 p.m. Administrative Liaison 3:00 p.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Director of Community Development Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Work Session Agenda Monday, March 21, 2005 Page 8 of 8 Pages