2005-990-Order No. 2005-064 Recorded 8/11/2005DESCHUTES
COUNTY CLERKOS CJ 2005-990
REVIE NANCY COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL
08/11/2005 02:06:58 PM
LEGAL COUNSEL 1111111111111111111111111111111
2 05-990
1
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
An Order Approving a Waiver of Land Use
Regulations to Authorize Frederick and Wanda
Stills to Use the Subject Property as Allowed
When they Acquired the Property
* ORDER NO. 2005-064
*
WHEREAS, On November 2, 2004, the voters of the State of Oregon approved Ballot Measure 37
which added provisions to Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 197 to require, under certain circumstances,
payment of just compensation to landowners if a government land use regulation reduces property value. In lieu
of just compensation, Ballot Measure 37 authorizes the governing body of a local government to modify,
remove or not apply the land use regulation, and
WHEREAS, Frederick and Wanda Stills have made a timely demand for compensation under Measure
37 for a reduction in value to their property at 20275 Newcomb Road, Bend, Oregon due to regulations which
took effect after they acquired this property, and
WHEREAS, Section 8 of Measure 37 authorizes the Board, as the governing body responsible for
adoption and enforcement of County regulations, to not apply the identified land use regulation that restricts the
owner's use and reduces the value of the property in lieu of payment of compensation; and
WHEREAS, the Board has received the report and recommendation of the County Administrator as
required by DCC 14.10.090; and
WHEREAS, the Board has considered the Administrator's report and the evidence presented by the
parties at a Board meeting as required by DCC 14.10.090; and
WHEREAS, the Board makes the following findings of facts and conclusions;
1. On March 4, 2005, Frederick and Wanda Stills filed a Measure 37 claim with the Community
Development Department.
2. Claimants' property at 20275 Newcomb Road, Bend, Oregon is within Deschutes County.
3. The County Administrator has recommended that the zoning regulations for the subject property
at 20275 Newcomb Road, Bend, Oregon that were not already in effect until after January 1,
1970, not be enforced in lieu of payment of just compensation to Claimants. The
Administrator's report is attached and incorporated by reference into this Order as Exhibit "A."
4. The Board concurs with the Administrator's report that Frederick and Wanda Stills are the
current owners of the subject property described in Exhibit "B," having acquired an interest in it
and continuously owned it since January 1, 1970.
5. The Board concurs with the Administrator's report that the current regulation, EFUTRB zoning,
if applied to the subject property, would not permit a partition on this subject property. The
current regulation is a land use regulation which is not exempt from Measure 37 claims.
PAGE 1 of 3 - ORDER No. 2005-064 (08/03/05)
6. The Board concurs with the Administrator's report that an application for a partition on the
subject property would be denied if the current zoning were applied. Therefore, such an
application to determine enforcement of the current zoning to the Claimants' property would be
futile.
7. The regulation, EFUTRB zoning, was not in effect at the time Claimants acquired the property
The Board concurs with the Administrator's report that Claimants have demonstrated that
domestic water, septic, and road access for the desired use on the subject property are feasible.
Therefore, there is substantial evidence that the basis for the alleged reduction in value is
feasible for water, septic and road access. Despite the lack of a precise amount of reduction in
value, the loss of the ability to add additional buildable lots from the subject property would be
a substantial amount of reduction in fair market value if the regulations at the time Claimants
acquired the property allowed that development; now, therefore,
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, HEREBY
ORDERS as follows:
Section 1. The Board hereby determines, based on these findings, conclusions, and the Administrator's
report in Exhibit "A," that the Stills claim is eligible under DCC 14.10.100.
Section 2. The Board hereby elects to not apply zoning and nonexempt land use regulations to the
subject property described in Exhibit "B" in lieu of payment of just compensation under Ballot Measure 37.
Claimants are hereby authorized to use the subject property as permitted at the time they acquired the property.
Claimants may apply for a use of the subject property consistent with the zoning and regulations in effect at the
time they acquired the property. That use shall be permitted if the subject property fully complies with all
regulations in effect on January 1, 1970. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to
determine the effects that any other non-exempt regulations in effect on this date would have on Claimants'
proposed development differently than current non-exempt regulations.
Section 3. To the extent that any law, order, deed, agreement or other legally enforceable public or
private requirement provides that the subject property may not be used without a permit, license, or other form
of authorization or consent, this order does not authorize the use of the subject property unless the Claimants
first obtain that permit, license, or other form of authorization or consent.
Section 4. This Order is a waiver of a non-exempt County land use regulation from a property
determined to be claim eligible as defined in DCC 14.10.020(0)
Section 5. A STATE OF OREGON WAIVER MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OR
USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THIS WAIVER APPLIES ONLY TO THE LOCAL REGULATIONS
SPECIFIED ABOVE. DESCHUTES COUNTY LACKS THE AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANY STATE
REGULATIONS OR LAWS. STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS MAY APPLY TO THE USE OF THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND A WAIVER OF SUCH LAWS AND REGULATIONS MUST BE
SEPARATELY OBTAINED BY THE OWNERS FROM THE STATE OF OREGON.
Section 6. This order does not affect any land use regulations of the State of Oregon. If the use allowed
by Section 2, above, remains prohibited by a State of Oregon land use regulation, the Planning Director shall
send notice of the Board's decision to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development.
The notice shall include a statement that the County will not accept an application for a building permit related
to the newly allowed use on the property until the earlier of the following events: (i) notice by the Department of
Land Conservation and Development that it concurs with the Board's decision, or (ii) a date 180 days from
issuance of the Board's decision where no response is made to the notice by the Department of Land
Conservation and Development.
PAGE 2 of 3 - ORDER No. 2005-064 (08/03/05)
Section 7. This Order shall be recorded in the Deschutes County Deed Records together with portions
from the deed or other instrument in Exhibits A and B sufficient to identify the subject property for recording
purposes.
DATED this /6 day of August, 2005.
BOARD OF COUNTY CON
OF DESCHUTES COUNTY
D
ATTEST: MIC M. DALY, Co missioner
Recording Secretary
R. L
PAGE 3 of 3 - ORDER No. 2005-064 (08/03/05)
Deschutes County Department of Administrative Services
1300 NW Wall St., Ste. 200, Bend, OR 97701-1947
(541) 388-6570 Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
TO: Board of County Commissioners
From: Michael A. Maier, County Administrator
RE: Measure 37 Claim - Frederick and Wanda Stills
20275 Newcomb Road. Bend
Introduction
DATE: August 3, 2005
The County processed the initial Measure 37 claims using its brief claim form, evaluating the initial
submission, asking that the Claimants furnish more evidence to complete or clarify the claim, and
preparing this report and recommendation under DCC 14.10, the Measure 37 ordinance. The County's
claims process recognizes that less precise evidence of value may be sufficient to evaluate claims, since
there are currently no County funds available for payment of compensation. Also, the ordinance provides
further opportunities for affected neighbors to present evidence and testimony at the Board meeting when
these claims are considered.
This report and recommendation is intended to be a summary and evaluation of evidence in the record.
The report may be attached to the Board's Order which decides Measure 37 claims, as a factual basis for
the Order. Any factual changes or additions to this report from testimony or other evidence can be made
part of the Board's Order. Claimants and affected parties have the opportunity to rebut this Report and
provide additional relevant evidence to the Board. Also, under the County's process, Claimants must
provide evidence that the desired use of the property, which may be allowed by a waiver of County
regulations is feasible, i.e., not prevented by physical, utility or other development limitations of the site.
Report and Recommendation - DCC 14.10.090
This is my report and recommendation on this Measure 37 claim received on March 4, 2005 when
Measure 37 was in lawful effect. Claimants have paid the filing fee and the County's official demand form
has been submitted. The property, shown on the attached map, is about 47 acres (see attached). The
Page 1 of 5 - Exhibit A - Order No. 2005-064
current zoning is Exclusive Farm Use, Tumalo/Redmond/Bend (EFUTRB) with a farm use minimum lot
size. The Claimants' desired use is to partition the property into three lots with lots of 20, 13, and 13
acres and Claimaints alleges a reduction in value of $353,274 due to the inability to partition the property
as desired. The following is an analysis of the evidence in the record on the elements of this Measure 37
claim. Claimants are represented in this proceeding by Bruce White, attorney.
Current Owner- Frederick and Wanda Stills
Claimants presented a copy of Contract of Sale, showing they purchased the property on January 1,
1970, which was recorded at Vol. 17, p. 952 of the Deschutes County deed records. Claimants received a
warranty deed to the property dated January 12, 1973, recorded at Vol. 191, p. 892 of Deschutes County
records.
Owner Date of Acquisition - January 1, 1970
The date of acquisition by the current owner is the relevant date for Board consideration of waivers under
section (8) of Measure 37. The compensation section of Measure 37, section (6), uses the acquisition
date of a family member to determine the extent of reduction in value for compensation. Since the County
has no funds budgeted for payment of compensation, waivers that are issued by the County are limited
by section (8) of Measure 37 to County land use regulations that were adopted after the later acquisition
date of the current owner. If a waiver is granted as to County land use regulations which were adopted
after the current owner's acquisition date, no compensation is due, even if the prior family member held
the property for many years. While this may seem inconsistent, the measure was, evidently, written to
encourage waivers of local and state land use regulations.
The first date of the current owners' acquiring an interest is the date of the recorded Contract of Sale.
Frederick and Wanda Stills acquired an interest in the property in 1970 and they have been owners
continuously since that time.
Restrictive Regulation - EFUTRB zoning.
Under the terms of the ordinance, the Claimant must identify County land use regulations that prevent the
Claimant from using the property in a way that he or she otherwise could have used the property at the
Page 2 of 5 - Exhibit A - Order No. 2005-064
time the property was acquired. The Claimant must also show that these identified regulations cause a
loss of property value.
The Claimants have identified the EFU zoning as the land use regulation restricting the desired use of a
3-lot partition. This regulation is a County land use regulation, which is subject to Measure 37 claims. The
applicability of additional standards listed in the application letter and the requested access change will be
determined consistent with the Board's Order when a specific land use application has been received.
Non-exempt regulations will not be applied. Public safety regulations or other exempt under subsection
(3) E of the Measure cannot be waived.
Enforcement of County Regulation - futile DCC 14.10.040(G).
Measure 37 requires that an ordinance which restricts the current owner's use be "enforced" against
them.
Claimants have applied for a land division of the property resulting in the current zoning being enforced
on the subject property. The Claimants partitioned the propety into two parcels in 2003. (See: Partition
Plat no. 2003-55) Claimants have not demonstrated that submitting an application for an additional land
division would be futile. However, this Report confirms that such an application for the desired use would
violate the current zoning and be denied. Therefore, the intent of DCC 14.10.040(G) has been met for this
claim.
Reduction in Value - $353,274 alleged on Claim Form
The ordinance requires that the Claimants provide evidence of the amount of the claim in alleged
reduction in the fair market value of the property resulting from the enforcement of the County's land use
regulation.
• Claimants have submitted a letter summarizing well logs for property as evidence that domestic
water is available.
• Claimants have submitted a letter stating that telephone and electricity are available and serving
the existing dwelling.
Page 3 of 5 - Exhibit A - Order No. 2005-064
• Claimants have submitted a letter stating that the existing dwelling is served by an approved
septic system, as confirmed by County records, as evidence that septic approval is feasible in the
area.
• Claimants have submitted a letter and map that demonstrates access from Newcomb Road for
three proposed lots.
• Claimants have not submitted an appraisal of the reduction in value or evidence of the reduction
in value that complies with DCC 14. 10.040(1).
Assuming Claimants could obtain approval of a partition of the property, absent current EFU zoning
restrictions, the value of Claimants' property for Measure 37 purposes would be substantially reduced.
Effect of County Waiver - Measure 37 clearly allows the County to waive its non exempt land use
regulations only back to the date the current owners, not family members, acquired the property:
"(8) Notwithstanding any other state statute or the availability of funds under
subsection (10) of this act, in lieu of payment of just compensation under this act,
the governing body responsible for enacting the land use regulation may modify,
remove, or not to apply the land use regulation or land use regulations to allow
the property owner to use the property for a use permitted at the time the owner
acquired the property, ,(emphasis added)
11(c) "Owner" is the present owner of the property, or any interest therein. "
In this case, the present owners have continuously owned an interest in the property since January 1,
1970. This predates the November 15, 1972 effective date of 5-acre minimum lot size of PL-5, the County
zoning ordinance. The terms of PL-2, the October 1, 1970 subdivision ordinance would not be applicable,
as it was adopted after the date of Claimants' recorded land sale contract.
A Claimant who receives a waiver must use the current process to seek the needed development permits
based on the zoning in place at the time the current owners acquired the property. Except in a rare case,
the current procedural requirements for handling permits are not regulations that reduce value. Therefore,
the County's procedural regulations are not waived.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Page 4 of 5 - Exhibit A - Order No. 2005-064
The present owners of the property have submitted a claim pursuant to Measure 37 which demonstrates
eligibility for their use of the subject property based on nonexempt land use regulations in effect on
January 1, 1970, the date they acquired an interest in the property. There seems to have been no zoning
of the subject property at the time. There is evidence in the record that some additional development on
the subject property would be feasible for available domestic water, sanitary waste disposal and public
road access. Therefore, the desired use of a 3-lot partition seems to be feasible for water, septic and
access. The non-exempt regulations that were in effect at the time the current owners acquired the
property would be applied to a subdivision application for that use.
My recommendation is that the Board approve a waiver in the form of Order attached. This Order would
have the effect of waiving the non-exempt County land use regulations which were not in effect until after
January 1, 1970, to allow the owners to use the subject property in a manner permitted at the time the
owner acquired the property. In essence, the County would not apply any land use regulations to the
Claimants' property which were not in effect when the Claimants acquired the property unless they are
exempt from a Measure 37 waiver under subsection (3)E of the Measure. This waiver is not a
development permit. Claimants must apply for development of any use that the regulations in effect on
January 1, 1970 would allow.
Page 5 of 5 - Exhibit A - Order No. 2005-064
EXHIBIT B
Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2003-52.
Order No. 2005-064; Stills