2005-1065-Ordinance No. 2005-024 Recorded 9/15/2005REVIEWED
aL
CODE REVIEW COMMITTEE
DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS r} ��0�,��65
NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK Q
COMMISSIONERS'
09/15/2005
03:29:19
For Kecorctmg stamp unry
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
An Ordinance Amending Title 18 of the Deschutes
County Code.
ORDINANCE NO. 2005-024
WHEREAS, the City of Redmond and Deschutes County have worked cooperatively since January of
2002 to jointly establish an urban reserve area around the City of Redmond; and
WHEREAS, the Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission and the Deschutes County Planning
Commission jointly held public meetings on June 3, and June 17, 2003 to review an analysis prepared by
OTAK, and on July 21, 2003 held a public hearing to take testimony on OTAK's recommendations. On
November 10, 2003 the two Commissions tentatively proposed 4,348 acres as a Redmond Urban Reserve Area
(RURA); and
WHEREAS, on December 21, 2004, the City of Redmond and Deschutes County provided DLCD 45 -
day notification announcing the first evidentiary hearing on establishing the RURA would be held on February
7, 2005. On March 14, 2005 the two Commissions held their final deliberations and made recommendations to
the Redmond City Council and the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners to designate 4,348 acres as the
RURA. The Commissions also made a recommendation to forward on to the City Council and Board of
Commissioners an additional 800 acres for their consideration, with no Commission recommendation on
including these additional acres in the RURA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redmond City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 2005 to take
testimony on establishing the RURA. On May 10, 2005 and June 14, 2005 the City Council recommended that
Deschutes County amend the County Comprehensive Plan Map to designate 5,661 acres as the Redmond Urban
Reserve Area; and
WHEREAS, the Deschutes County Development Code, Chapter 18.24, Redmond Urban Area
Combining Zone needs to be amended to regulate development in the RURA; and
WHEREAS, the Commissions directed staff to prepare a Findings Report which supports a designation
of certain areas around the City of Redmond as the RURA; and
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS
as follows:
Section 1. ADDING. DCC 18.24, Redmond Urban Reserve Area Combining Zone, is hereby added to
read as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
PAGE 1 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 2005-024 (08/23/05)
Section 2. AMENDMENT. Deschutes County Zoning Map is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit
"B," attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. FINDINGS. The Board of Commissioners adopts as its findings in support of this
amendment the Staff Report dated 8/23/05, EXHIBIT "D" to Ordinance 2005-023 and incorporated by reference
herein.
DATED this day of 2005.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, O GON
TOM DEWOLF, Chair
22
rd
Date of 1St Reading: 0�i day of , 2005.
Date of 2nd Reading: day of -, 2005.
Record of Adoption Vote
Commissioners No Abstained Excused
Tom DeWolf
Michael M. Daly
Dennis R. Luke
Effective date: l 2-;Iay of (Do- .—,2005.
ATTEST:
�I
Recording Secretary
PAGE 2 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 2005-024 (08/23/05)
EXHIBIT "A"
Chapter 18.24, Redmond Urban Reserve
Area Combinine Zone
18.24.010. Purpose
18.24.020. Uses permitted outright.
18.24.030. Conditional uses permitted.
18.24.040. Dimensional standards
18.24.050. Setbacks
18.24.060 Setback Exception Ap lication
18.24.070. Limitations for future urban
development
18.24.10. Purposes
The Redmond Urban Reserve Area (RURA)
Combining Zone implements the Deschutes
County Comprehensive Plan for those areas
designated as urban reserve. The RURA
Combining Zone maintains lands for rural uses
in accordance with state law, but in a manner
that ensures a range of opportunities for the
orderly, economic, and efficient provision of
urban serves when these lands are included in
the Redmond Urban Growth Boundarv.
18.24.020. Uses permitted outright.
Uses permitted outright in the RURA
Combining Zone shall be those identified in the
underlying zoning districts.
1.8.24.030. Conditional uses permitted.
Uses permitted conditionally in the RURA
Combining Zone shall be those identified as
conditional uses in the underlying zoning
districts. Conditional uses shall be subject to all
conditions of those zones as well as the
requirements of this chapter.
18.24.0340. Dimensional standards.
Notwithstanding the minimum lot size in an
underlying zone with which the RURA is
combined, new lots or parcels shall be a
minimum of 10 acres in size. Partitions for the
Mose of creating a nonfarm dwelling pursuant
to DCC 18.16.055 may be allowed that are less
than 10 acres in size.
18.24.050. Setbacks.
The following special setbacks are required in
the RURA Combining Zone:
A. Properties abutting existing public right of
way for arterial and collector streets identified in
the County Transportation System Plan shall
meet the setbacks prescribed in the underlying
zones.
B. New buildings or structures shall be setback
ninety (90) feet from the centerline of a planned
collector or arterial identified on the County
Transportation System Plan unless an
application for an exception to the this standard
is submitted and approved under section
18.24.060.
18.24.060. Setback Exception Application.
If it is not feasible to locate a proposed building
or structure outside of the prescribed setback
identified in Section 18.24.05013, the property
owner shall submit an Setback Exception
Application. The application shall be processed
as a land use permit regulated by DCC 22. The
application shall include:
1. A site plan drawn to scale showing:
a. the property boundaries,
b. the location of the proposed
structure,
c. the location of other structures on
thep=ML
d. the centerline of the future arterial
or collector street,
e. any other information needed to
show why it is infeasible to locate
the proposed structure outside of the
required setback.
2. A written statement demonstratine that:
a. It is infeasible to locate the proposed
building or structure outside of the
setback because of one or more of
the following reasons:
i. Physical constraints of the
property
ii. Conflict(s) with standards in the
underlying zone including, but
not limited to, setbacks or siting
requirements.
Page 1 of 2- EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 2005-024 (08/23/05)
EXHIBIT "A"
b. The proposed building or structure
is located to minimize the
encroachment into the setback.
18.24.070. Limitations for future urban
development
The following limitations shall apply to uses
allowed by DCC 18.24.020 and 18.24.030. Zone
changesplan amendments involving land
within the RURA Combining Zone and Multiple
Use Agricultural, Surface Mining, or Rural
Residential zoning_ districts that propose more
intensive uses, including higher residential
density, than currently allowed are prohibited.
(Ord. 2005-024 § 1, 2005)
Page 2 of 2- EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 2005-024 (08/23/05)
MAPLE
AVE - MAPLE AVE
.,
I I r
-4— L(1 KwGw GAVE
NEGUS WAY
t
�s
i
r
I
�71
HIGHLAND AVE
r
w r
F
p m
MAPLE
AVE - MAPLE AVE
.,
I I r
-4— L(1 KwGw GAVE
NEGUS WAY
Legend
Urban Reserve Area Combining Zone
Parcel
City Limit
Deschutes County
Community Development _�,
w,My.cr.s.
Deschutes County
Zoning Map
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2005-024
1 0.5 0
Miles
August 11, 2005
BOARD OF
OF DESCH
N
Dated this —7
day of 2005
Effective Dale: Nevemb r C i 2005
i
I-1
Legend
Urban Reserve Area Combining Zone
Parcel
City Limit
Deschutes County
Community Development _�,
w,My.cr.s.
Deschutes County
Zoning Map
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2005-024
1 0.5 0
Miles
August 11, 2005
BOARD OF
OF DESCH
N
Dated this —7
day of 2005
Effective Dale: Nevemb r C i 2005
HIGHLAND AVE
O SIDNN AVE.
OSSDIAN AVE 1-
1
HWY
SISTERSAVE
-
QUARTZ AVE
-
'.
-.. .. .. SALMONAV6'
•
Pp
L
WICKWPAVE
:-YEW !
-.
J
/
;
r
Legend
Urban Reserve Area Combining Zone
Parcel
City Limit
Deschutes County
Community Development _�,
w,My.cr.s.
Deschutes County
Zoning Map
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2005-024
1 0.5 0
Miles
August 11, 2005
BOARD OF
OF DESCH
N
Dated this —7
day of 2005
Effective Dale: Nevemb r C i 2005
REVIEWED
LEGAL COUNSEL
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDMOND, OREGON AND D
FOR THE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF THE REDMOND UNI
AND THE REDMOND URBANRES`
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1982, CITY OF REQMOND
(COUNTY), entered a Joint Management Agreement (JMq) for
development within the Redmond Urban Growth Area; and
WHEREAS, City and County entered amended JMAs on
latter as Deschutes County Contract No. 2002289 that was a
No. 2004-176, effective May 25, 2004; and
WHEREAS, City and County desire to rescind all
1Ti..i=
Areas;
DRAFT
8/23/2005
For Recording Stamp Only
1998 and August 27. 2002, the
by Deschutes County Contract
amendments and incorporate
197.175 etseq. City and County are authorized
d to prepare and adopt comprehensive plans
County are authorized to establish Urban Reserve
WHEREAS, City and�County recognize the importance of providing an orderly transition of urban
services Rfrom, County to City turisdictidm and administration as the Redmond Urban Reserve Area
transitions from a rural to urban character; and
WHEREAS;ORS 190.003 et seq. requires that an intergovernmental agreement relating to the
performance of functions or _ activities by one unit of local government for another specify the
responsibilities between�the parties;
CITY AND COUNTY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Rescission. The following prior agreements are rescinded. Rescission of these agreements does
not nullify any actions taken by City under authority delegated to it by any prior agreement.
A. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDMOND, OREGON AND DESCHUTES
COUNTY, OREGON, FOR THE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF THE URBAN GROWTH
BOUNDARY, THE PLAN FOR THE REDMOND GROWTH AREA AND THE REDMOND
AREA OF MUTUAL INTEREST, dated August 27, 2002, Deschutes County Contract No.
2002-289.
Page 1 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
2.
B. AMENDMENT TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
REDMOND and DESCHUTES COUNTY dated May 25, 2004, Deschutes County Contract
No. 2004-176.
Definitions.
AMI. Area of Mutual Interest regarding County owned land in the RURA.
BOCC. Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners.
Building Services. Plan review, inspection, and enforcement of State of Oregon building codes for
new construction and remodeling. ..>'
City Community Development Director. City Communty`Developm n#,Director or designee.
Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive plan
requirements.
Council. City of Redmond City Council.
DCC. Deschutes County Code.
JMA. Joint Management Agreement,
Limited Transportation Services. Transl
standards, transportation -related condi
Planning Services,40 bislatiVe activities such as adoption„and amendment of comprehensive plan
text and maps, adoption and amendment of land use regulations and quasi-judicial processing of
land use actions .
Redmond Unincorporated Urban Growth Areat(RUUGA). Territory within the Redmond Urban
Growth Boundary but outside the boundarres'of City.
RUAPC. Redmo d Urban Area Planning Commission.
Redmond Urban Growth Boundary (RUGB). The boundary line shown in the Redmond Urban
Area .tan that separates ;urban and urbanizable lands in and adjacent to City from rural territory
within County.
Redmond Urban Reserve Area (RURA). Territories outside of RUGB identified bythe Council and
the BOCC as the,highest priority for inclusion in the RUGB when it is expanded under state law.
The RURA, as ofdthe date of this agreement, is shown in Exhibit A.
Urban Facilities and Services. Basic facilities that are primarily planned for by cities, but that also
may be provided by counties or districts and are essential to the support of development in
accordance with a Comprehensive plan. Urban facilities and services include police protection,
fire protection, sanitary facilities, storm drainage facilities, streets and roads, planning, zoning and
subdivision control, health services, recreation facilities and services, energy and communication
services, schools, transportation and community governmental services.
Page 2 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
3. Intent and Purpose of Agreement.
The intent and purpose of this agreement is for City and County to:
A. Establish a procedure for the implementation of a land use plan for the Redmond Urban
Reserve Area and continue the procedure for the implementation of a land use plan for the
Redmond Unincorporated Urban Growth Area.
B. Improve planning, building, and limited transportation servicesto customers located within
the RUUGA and RURA.
C. Continue and improve coordination and communicati6wbetween City and County.
xom
D. Develop consistent policies and procedures for managing urbangrowth and development
within the RUUGA and RURA.
E. Continue City responsibility for quasi -Judicial and legislative planrnng.for the RUUGA.
F. Minimize financial impacts of transition of lands from RURA to within the RUGB.
4. Process for Exercising Responsibilities in the RUUGA
A. Except as otherwise providedtriin Section 4.R, County delegates to City responsibility for
initiating and processing legislative andquasi-judicial actions'o adopt or amend County's
comprehensive plans, plan maps, zoning maps and DCC for the RUUGA in accordance
s.
with this agreement. a
B. City is responsiblefor enforcement offthe land us regulations.
C. The parties .agree that ;the BOCC retains authority to initiate and have City process
comprehensive. plan„`plan map, zoning map and zoning regulations in accordance with
Section 4.R without charge..
y p p g' quasi-judicial Pp g
Cif �staffwill accept
and rocess all legislative and uasi-'udicial a lications, including
County i fitted one, for comprehensive plan, plan map, zoning map and zoning
regulation text amendments
E. City will give Cq, nty at least 20 days notice before the first hearing of any non -County
'proposed amendment to County's comprehensive plan, plan map, zoning map or zoning
regulations beforethe RUAPC.
F. City staff will incorporate County comments in the staff report and present them to the
hearings;bo'dy.
G. All proposed comprehensive plan, plan map, zoning map or zoning regulations will be
submitted to the RUAPC for public hearing and recommendations to the Council and
BOCC.
H. Proposed amendments of countywide impact will be submitted to the County Planning
Commission simultaneously with the submission to the RUAPC.
I. The Council will review and comment on the RUAPC's recommendations to the BOCC for
Page 3 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
proposed comprehensive plan and zoning regulations prior to transmittal to County.
J. City will transmit all records of the proceedings before the Council to the BOCC within five
working days of Council's final decision.
K. Except for proposed amendments of countywide impact, the County agrees to set a BOCC
hearing date within 90 days of receipt of a recommendation from the Council for all
ordinances prepared in County format.
T. Any conflictebetweenCtyandCounty will be resolved by the BOCC and Council.
U Cityis'responsible'for�complying with any changes in state law that may require changes in
City or County's comprehensive plan and DCC.
City is responsible for complying with any periodic review order or periodic review work
xv
tasks required byjh, a Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) or
tie Department,, Land Conservation and Development (DLCD).
W. Citywill apply the County's zoning and land division ordinances applicable to lands within
the RUUGA ... 1
1) City Community Development Director has authority to make interpretations of
County land use regulations within the RUUGA, but must consult with County
Community Development Director concerning any requests in writing for
interpretation of land use regulations.
2). If County Community Development Director disagrees with the City interpretation,
the City may use the Declaratory Ruling procedure in Title 22, Chapter 22.40.
X. County delegated authority to City under Paragraph Y.1) below includes authority of City
Community Development Director to take any action that County staff is empowered to
Page 4 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
V
take under the applicable County land use ordinances to process, decide and implement
land use decisions.
1) Where applicable ordinances contemplate signature of a document by the County
Planning Director (such as signing conditions of approval agreements,
improvement agreements or plats) the City Community Development Director is
authorized to execute such documents.
2) Where applicable ordinances require approval of the County Counsel, Public
Works Director, or County Engineer, such authority is granted to the City official or
agent of similar capacity. A'1 ,
3) The BOCC or a designated member retai
divisions within the RUUGA.
City will continue to recognize the RUAPC as the
RUUGA.
Funding of services delegated under
by City.
1) City has authority oto, collect fees
applications and inspections neces
approval.
sign plats affecting land
mittee for the
1) will,b"e ;provided throug) fees collected
n applicants for processing land use
to assure, compliance with conditions of
County is responsible for theme enforcement of all land use ordinances within the RURA.
C. "Resource lands'tlat are included in the RURA shall continue to be planned and zoned
k,
N"', the requirements of applicable Statewide Planning Goals.
D. For exception fiands and nonresource land in the RURA, land use regulations shall prohibit
IRW
zone amendments allowing more intensive uses than permitted by acknowledged zoning in
effect as of the date of establishment of the RURA. Zoning regulations in effect at the time
of designation of the RURA shall remain in effect until such time as the land is included in
the urban growth boundary.
E. Consistent with Sections 3 and 4, County staff will accept and process comprehensive
plan, comprehensive plan map, zoning map or zoning regulation amendments.
F. County will provide City with 45 days notice before the first hearing of any proposed
comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, zoning map or zoning regulation.
Page 5 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
G. County staff will incorporate any City comments in the staff report and present them to the
initial and final hearings body.
H. All proposed County comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, zoning map or zoning
regulation amendments will first be submitted to the RUAPC for public hearing and to
County Planning Commission for recommendation to the respective governing bodies.
I. The Council will hold a hearing and make a recommendation to the BOCC on any
proposed change to County's comprehensive plan, plan map zoning map and zoning
regulations.
J The BOCC will set a hearing date within 90 days of receipt of a recommendation from the
Council for all ordinances prepared in County formate k
K. City will transmit all records of the proceedings„before the RUAPC and Council to the
BOCC within five working days of Council's ficial decision.
L. No County comprehensive plan, plan i zoning map or zoning reg ation is effective
within the RURA unless it is adopted by the BOCC
M. The provisions of Title 22, DeschutesCounty Development Procedures Ordinance will be
followed for notice and heardng requirements.'
N. If there is a conflict, DCC Title ,22 controls the provisions ofthis agreement.
gg
O. City will enter urban reserve area agreements with special districts that currently provide
urban services, to territory within the4RURA, and -have plans in place to continue such
services untilthe territory is included,—within the RUUGA.
P. CountyTIW i notify City�of all proposed countywide amendments that will have an impact
within the Rt)RA.
6. RUGB Amendments
County retains the authority to accept applications and fees for, process and decide any
amendment of:the RUGB aand RURA designation in accordance with the procedures of
DCC Title 221.M&
this agreement.
B. ';Legislative amendments of the RUGB and RURA designation will be heard by both the
RUAPC and theCounty Planning Commission and by both the Council and BOCC.
1) Ariy corresponding plan designation and zoning map amendments may be heard
as part of the same process.
2) City and County planning commissions and Council and BOCC may meet either
separately or jointly.
3) Any conflicts will be worked out between the Council and BOCC.
C. Quasi-judicial UGB amendments shall be heard in accordance with Title 22, with any
appeal heard before the BOCC.
Page 6 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
1) Any corresponding plan designation and zoning map amendment may be heard as
part of the same process.
2) City shall be given a forty-five day notice of the proposal prior to the hearing before
the Hearing Officer, and any City comments shall be included in the staff report.
3) The amendment shall become effective upon adoption of the amendment by the
BOCC.
4) No adoption by the City Council will be required.
5) County shall send a copy of the ordinance
City.
D. Recognizing that the City and County have
under OAR 660-021-020, the County will r
7. Public Facility Planning.
A. City is responsible for the preparation, adopti
for any RUGB amendments.
the map amendment to the
ity to cooperatively designate RURA
quasi-judicial RURA applications.
B. City will coordinate the preparation of any RURA pub
districts, state and federal agencies and private provid
OAR 660-021-0040(5).
C. Nothing in thi
reserve areae
nt authorizesU'fban leve
�� W
air inclusion: in the urban
ment of the public facility plans
cility plan with County, special
fpublic facilities as required by
development or services in urban
th boundary.
1) The Sewarage Facilities Plan, ai ointly adopted by City and County, is controlling
for future sewer coh;tructi
of facilities and services for approval for any subdivision, land partition or
other land use application within the RUUGA, unless urban facilities and
services are required to be provided as part of the development.
E. SDCs. Coordination of SDC adoption, revision, and collections will be covered by a
separate City and County agreement.
F. Reimbursement Policy for Public Improvements.
1) City has adopted an ordinance providing that ,an 'applicant who installs
infrastructure improvements that benefit other properties may be reimbursed by
City for an appropriate portion of the cost of these improvements. Installation of
such improvements in a timely and orderly hion
,,faswill further the coordination of
development in the RUUGA consistent with this agreement.
2) County delegates to City all authority'hecessary or appropriate to implement the
reimbursement ordinance within4the RUUGA. NW
8. Area of Mutual Interest.
To promote uniform street standards, policies and development requirements
within the RURA, including promoting a grid system pattern of streets, the County
agrees to implement the adopted Road Department standards and specifications
and the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan.
3) Any amendments to City street standards, policies or exaction requirements will be
processed accordance with Section 4.G and Section 5.1-1 respectively.
C. Future Transportation Corridors. City and County agree to cooperate in the early
identification of possible transportation corridors that might be located within or near
County owned AMI land east of City. City and County hope that this can occur during the
master planning phase for the AMI.
Page 8 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
10. Special Provisions.
A. Annexations to City Limits.
1) City and County may rely on this agreement as a prerequisite to annexation under
ORS 195.205(2)(a)(B) and statutes referenced therein.
2) City annexations will occur only within its Urban Growth Boundary.
3) Specific annexation decisions will comply with a plicable land use law and be
consistent with City annexation policies.
4) City will provide County at least 15 days to review and comment on annexation
decisions.
5) When annexing territory, City will annex roads adjacent 6such territory.
6) Transfer of authority upon annexation:
a) Upon annexation, jurisdiction of,all:land use approvals within the territory
annexed will automaticallytransferfrom County to City. Permits will remain
effective and will be recognized by"City as if they were made by City.
b) Upon annexation, City will administer all laNd use approvals in the annexed
territory, implement and, enforce sucapprovals together with all
implementing agreements, This includes improvement agreements,
conditions of approval agreements; bonds and other similar arrangements.
c) For land''use approvals.within the RUUGA after the date of this agreement,
all improvement agreements, conditions of approval agreements,
annexation agreements, 'utilty agreements and similar agreements will be
appro- ddland signed by,.'City and County jointly. All bonds must designate
y
both lCityand-County as the assured agencies.
Building Permits.
1) City has!authoritybfor building permitting and inspections within the RUGS, except
that County continues to be responsible for building services in the RURA under
Deschutes"`County Contract No. 2002-288, effective August 27, 2002.
2) City agrees to review and obtain County approval for any changes of service
Yroyiders of contractual building permitting and inspections services.
9 P g p
11. Admin istrative"Coordination.
City and County agree that their community development directors will meet on an on-going basis
to monitor all activities relating to this agreement.
12. Indemnification. To the extent legally possible City and County will jointly indemnify, hold
harmless, and defend each other, including officials, agents, and employees from and against
any and all claims, damages, losses, and expenses (including but not limited to attorney fees)
relating to performance or failure to perform under this agreement. This indemnity provision
Page 9 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
survives the termination of this agreement.
13. Review, Amendment and Termination.
A. This agreement may be reviewed and amended at any time by mutual consent of both
parties, after a joint public hearing by the Council and the BOCC.
B. This agreement will be reviewed, and may be amended at the time of a RURA designation
or any RUGB amendment. AN
C. Any modifications in this agreement will be consistent withF the City and County
comprehensive plans and state law. F
D. This agreement may be terminated by either party by the following procedure:
1) A public hearing will be called by the party considering termrridt"ion. The party must
141111,
give the other party notice of hearing at least 45 days pnorto the, scheduled
hearing date. The 45 day period mus#be used by both parties to se;resolution of
differences. ,,,:.,. , Win.JI
2) Public notice of the heanng must comply,Qth state law and I goals.
-.
3) Termination of the agreement must be at leas #f90 days after the public hearing to
provide time for resolution ofdifferences.
., \
E. City and County planning and building staffs will attempt to informally resolve any disputes
regarding this agreement or relating to its terms, conditions, or meaning. For any disputes
not resolved, -,through this informal process, the Council and BOCC will meet jointly in an
attempttoesolve those disputes. Either party may request the services of a mediator to
resolve,4anv;`dispute
Thomas Sponsler, City Attorney
Page 10 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
Dated this of , 2005 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
TOM DEWOLF, CHAIR
MICHAEL M. DALY, COMMISSIONER
DENNIS R. L
Page 11 of 11 — CITY OF REDMOND/DESCHUTES COUNTY
Unincorporated Growth Area & Urban Reserve Area Agreement
County Contract No. 2005-
SIONER
Redmond uRA
From: Alan Aulie [aaulie@coinet.com]
sent: wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:29 PM
To: Peter Gutowsky
subject: Redmond URA
Dear Mr. Gutowsky,
I see by the new "preliminary URA map" from Redmond planners that the
north boundary from Northwest way is a straight line to Helmholtz. This
line devides the two parcels at 3615 (outside)) and 3563 (inside), owned
by myself and my father, vere Aulie. we would like our 20 acres at 3615
to be included within the URA.
Also, the other maps show the boundary following the powerline to the
corner of our property. This line will split serveral parcels between
3615 Northwest way and upas. The most logical northern UGB boundary
would be at the next street, coyner.
Please record my request for inclusion in the uRA, or refer me to the
correct office.
Regards,
Alan Aulie
3615 Northwest way
Redmond Oregon 97756
Tel: 923 2035
Fax :548 7355
E-mail: aaulie@coinet.com
Page 1
August 9, 2005
Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners
117 NW Lafayette Ave
Bend, Oregon 97701
RE: .Proposed Redmond Urban Reserve Area
Clayton & Heidi Hail
Account #130259 (R 2-004 151330 00 01300)
Fredric L. Hall ETUX
1513310000 200
1513310000 202 through 205
Dear Board of County Commissioners:
AUG 1 12009
DL C.HUT CDUN L
This letter is in response to a "Notice of Public Hearing" we just received informing us
that the Redmond City Council has decided to add our property into the Redmond Urban
Reserve Area. We will be unable to attend the August 23'd Public Hearing meeting but
wanted to make sure that you knew we did not want any of the above mentioned
properties included into the Redmond Urban Reserve Area. This is one of several
letters that we. have done over..the ;past few. months. sent to The Redmond City Council,
Redmond City- Planners and Deschutes Couirty.Piammng Cgmmrssion."
We never have nor do we went to be included into the proposed Redmond trban Reserve
Area (RURA). Our property is very important to us and we have no intention of
selling now or in the future which is why we DO NOT WANT included in the RURA.
We are surrounded by small farms and enjoy our rural lifestyle. We and our neighbors
raise a variety of different crops, animals, etc. Our roads are traveled by farm
machinery; cattle, horses, families riding bikes, walking, running, etc. We love our area
the way it is now. .
Being placed into the RURA would drastically change our lifestyles and would affect our
farming. This was just recently put to the test with the Great North American Motor
coaches. There were. three areas out in our area where the Motor coaches were
stationed. Elkhorn Ave was used as the main road to get back and forth to the
Deschutes County Fairgrounds for the Motor coaches. Elkhorn was used by normal
traffic as well as Motor coaches and their vehicles and School Buses. The road was
unsafe to walk on (we;tned three different tinges and each tune we were almost hit by
either a sahaol.bus ot: velucle);,we had, tq chat}ge our i rigation watering times, as well as
: some.of.our other.farming. -
The reason for pulling the properties all the way down to where S Canal & SW
Helmholtz Way meet, we were told, was so that when the School Property (60 acres
located on corner of S Canal & SW Elkhorn) is either developed into a High School or
sold to a Developer; then neighborhoods could be created around it with the additional
properties. None of us intend to sell so that is roughly 120 acres (39.2 acres Clayton
Hail and 80 Acres Fredric Hall) that unless forced to sell would not be developed land for
neighborhoods. It does not make any sense to us properties owners. The City has
known from the beginning that we do not want to be included and yet they are trying to
push us through, as well as, an additional 1300 acres that are not needed. The
Deschutes County and Redmond Comprehensive Plan designated 4,348 acres and so now
the Redmond City Council wants to push it up to 5,661 acres. It just does not make
sense.
We want to protect our farmland, our quality of life and our rural area. Please read and
consider our letter of EXCLUSION from the Redmond Urban Reserve Area.
Respectfully yours,
Clayton C. Hall
Heidi L. Hall
Fredric L. Hall
Sharlene Hall
Clinton J. Hall
Patricia Hall
Jdith L. Pies