Loading...
2005-1129-Minutes for Meeting April 26,2005 Recorded 10/10/2005DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 11111111 i -ii RECORDS CJ 7005-1iZ9 CLERK 10/10/200510:28:00 AM DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE PAGE This page must be included if document is re-recorded. Do Not remove from original document. p A Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1130 NW Harriman St., Bend, OR 97701-1947 �^ (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 388-4752 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF DEPARTMENT UPDATE — JUVENILE COMMUNITY JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2005 Commissioners' Conference Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St.., Bend Present was Commissioner Dennis R. Luke; Commissioners Tom DeWolf and Michael M. Daly were out of the office. Also present were Mike Maier, County Administrator; and Jenny Birnie and Deevy Holcomb, Juvenile Community Justice. No representatives of the media or other citizens were present. The meeting began at 3:45 p. m., and a copy of the agenda is attached for reference. The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. DATED this 26th Day of April 2005 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Tom DeWolf, Chair AW —04-e, , C mmissioner is R. Luke, Commissioner Minutes of Department Update — Juvenile Community Justice Department Wednesday, April 26, 2005 Page 1 of 1 Pages io Monthly Meeting with the Board of Commissioners Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:45 p.m. Penhol low Conference Room Agenda Items X3:45 Wellspring annual report—Deevy Holcomb 4:10 Consultant Mark Carey—purpose of visit, staff survey and action plan Y 4:20 Updates Succession planning • M. McCulloch personnel/legal issues • Trillium '� HB 2833 Deschutes County BRS Level 4 Residential Program: WellSpring First Annual Report - Summary A. Demographic Information on Program Youth September 2003 - March 1, 2005 ■ 28 youth had participated or were participating in WellSpring between September 2003 and March 1, 2005. These youth comprised 29 admissions to the program (one youth had two admissions). 17 youth completed the residential portion in the same time period. ■ 100% of participants were male. ■ 86% of participants were White. 11 % of participants were Native American. ■ Average age at placement was 16.6 years. ■ Average length of stay: 190 days. B. Offense History Youth placed in WellSpring are serious and chronic property offenders. The most serious initiating offense of 68% of these youth was a felony. Seventy-five percent of initiating offenses were property crimes. C. Mental Health and Substance Abuse Profiles Youth mental health and substance abuse history profiles are acute. Nearly 90% of youth had a diagnosed substance abuse problem; of these 2/3 included methamphetamine abuse. More than 80% had other mental health and behavioral diagnoses; more than 70% had both mental health and substance abuse issues. D. Services and Programming Family Involvement: Nine of the 17 youths' families participated in significant family support interventions, from parent classes to individual therapy, in the first year, or approximately 53%. Community Work Service: Youth completed 1,671 hours of community work service; only four youth had court-ordered hours. Restitution: $2,625 was paid in restitution; 6 youth owed a total of $7,944. Youth who owed but did not pay are among the youth who were unsuccessfully terminated from the program. E. Post Program Placement, Detention, Probation Violations and Recidivism Completion Rates: The majority of youth completing the residential program have either transitioned into another residential program, or have been prematurely terminated and placed in an Oregon State Youth Correctional Facility. A smaller number have successfully completed residential and transitioned into Community Care. Recidivism: Fifty percent of youth had a new criminal referral within one year of program placement. Only 42% of these were felonies, representing a reduction in severity compared to their prior referrals. Returns to Detention: Sixty-one percent were detained within one year of placement. Probation Violations: Forty-seven percent received a probation violation within one year of placement; 55% for new law violations; 45% for technical reasons. Prepared by: Deevy Holcomb, Program Development Specialist. Please call (541) 617-3356 for questions or clarification. WellSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 1 04/26/05 Deschutes County BRS Level 4 Residential Program: WeIlSpring First Annual Report - Board of County Commissioners A. Demographic Information on Program Youth September 2003 — March 1, 2005 ■ 28 youth had participated or were participating in WeIlSpring between September 2003 and March 1, 2005. These youth comprised 29 admissions to the program (one youth had two admissions). 17 youth completed the residential portion in the same time period. ■ 100% of participants were male. ■ 86% of participants were White. 11 % of participants were Native American. ■ Average age at placement was 16.6 years. • Average length of stay: 190 days. B. Offense History Youth criminal history profiles prior to being placed in WeIlSpring remain similar to youth placed in the former CYIP: serious and chronic property offenders. The most serious initiating offense of 68% of these youth was a felony. Seventy-five percent of initiating offenses were property crimes. WeIlSpring 9/03-2/05 Admission Reasons By Severity of Initiating Adjudicated Offenses 32.1 0 ■ Felony ■ Misdemeanor •67.9% C. Mental Health and Substance Abuse Profiles Clinical Diagnosis WeIlSpring 9/03-2/05 Admission Reasons By Category of Initiating Adjudicated Offenses 10.7% ■ Property 14.3% ■ Behavioral ❑ Person 75.0% Piarron4 Substance Abuse 88%0..� Percent above for 6700 Methamphetamine Abuse Mental / Behavioral 82% Includes: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Conduct Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Depression Dual Dia nosis 71 % WeIlSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 1 04/26/05 D. Services and Programming The WeIlSpring program holds youth accountable for their crimes in a secure residential custody setting and uses a behavioral restructuring model of treatment, supplemented with a strong mental health enhancement component. Youth remain in secure custody while earning privileges such as community work service and home visits with family and other guardians through positive behavioral and cognitive changes. All youth must successfully complete program milestones, based on a point "level system", in order to transition into the community. Once determined BRS eligible, youth may participate for up to one year before BRS eligibility is reviewed for renewal. The program does not release youth from residential placement into community care, until the youth successfully completes the program as identified by an individual treatment plan, or a significant event occurs that causes unsuccessful and early termination. The minimum number of days a youth has been in the residential portion of the program is seven. The maximum is 364. Family Involvement The program has a goal of improving family functioning of youth who participate. Family interventions occur in a number of ways: contact and support with residential staff, parent education classes, individual family counseling with community based therapists, and in-house family work with the program's MSW. Nine of the 17 youths' families participated in significant family support interventions, from parent classes to individual therapy, in the first year, or approximately 53%. See Addendum A for a snapshot look at the challenges and characteristics of families of youth to date. 2. Community Work Service Community Work Service is an important component of the WeIlSpring program, particularly for youth court-ordered to complete CWS, but for all program youth, regardless of whether any CWS was court- ordered. The following table details CWS completion data for youth who have completed the program thus far: COMMUNITY WORK SERVICE 9/03-3/05 * You Youth w/ court-ordered hours at admission 4 Total hours ordered 276 Percent youth w/ ordered hours who completed hours 25%(l)- 5%(1)*Number Numberof hours completed (regardless of ordered) 1,671.5 Percent of youth participating in CWS --76%(13)- 6%(13)- Youth failing to complete or make significant progress would not and did not successfully complete. WeIlSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 1 2 04/26/05 3. Victim Restoration: VOMP, Restitution and Fresh Start Victim Restoration is an important component of WeIlSpring youth participation. The following table details information related to these issues for youth who have completed the program thus far. VICTIM RESTORATION 9/03-3/05 Youth w/ court-ordered restitution at admission 6 Total restitution ordered $7,943.5 Restitution paid $2,625 Percent of youth who paid all restitution 17%(1) Percent of youth who paid any restitution 50%(3)_ Youth with department ordered Fresh Start hours at admission 2 Total Fresh Start hours ordered 253 Fresh Start hours completed 127 Percent of youth who completed hours 50%(l)- 0%(1)*Percent Percentof youth screened for VOMP 5 Percent of youth screened, who completed VOMP 40%(2) 4. Program / Goal Completion Rates When completion levels and their corresponding points for all goal areas are combined and averaged for all youth, the following overall figures emerge for the first 17 youth to compete the WeIlSpring program: COMPLETION SCORE NO. YOUTH PERCENT GOAL ACHIEVED 0 0% SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS 5 31.3% SOME PROGRESS 6 37.5% NO PROGRESS 5 31.3 DETERIORATION 0 0% E. Post Program Placement, Detention, Probation Violations and Recidivism 1. Transitional Placements The majority of youth completing the residential program have either transitioned into another residential program, or have been prematurely terminated and placed in an Oregon State Youth Correctional Facility. A smaller number have successfully completed residential and transitioned into Community Care. Youth failing to complete or make significant progress would not and did not successfully complete. WeIlSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 3 04/26/05 TRANSITIONAL PLACEMENTS 9/03-3/05 PERCENT COMMITTED TO AN OYA CLOSE CUSTODY FACILITY 47.1% (8 youth) PERCENT TRANSITIONED TO COMMUNITY CARE 23.5% (4 youth) PERCENT TRANSITIONED TO OTHER RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT 17.6% (3 youth) PERCENT TURNING AGE 18 AT THE TIME OF TRANSITION (And whose probation was therefore terminated) 11.8% (2 youth) TOTAL 100% 17youth) 2. Recidivism The program uses the standard definition of recidivism (percent of youth with a new criminal referral) within 6 and 12 months of placement date to track re -offending behavior of program participants. Percent youth with a new criminal referral within six months of program placement: 22% Percent youth with a new criminal referral within one year of program placement: 50% Percent of new criminal referrals that were a Felony: 42% The data demonstrates a reduction of both frequency and severity of crimes after involvement in the program, but an increase in the proportion of offenses that were person and behavior related. Please note that not all youth in this sample had a full year's eligibility or "days of opportunity" to commit a new offense. Post -Placement WeIlSpring Re -Offenses 9/03-3/05 21.1% By Category of Re -Offenses m Property ■ Person o Behavior 31 .6 0 47.4% WeIlSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 4 04/26/05 The following table compares two figures directly: the most serious prior and post crime, by felony and misdemeanor. Prior and Post Offense History Wellspring Participants 9103-3105 By Category of Pre and Post Offense 80% 70% — 60% 40% ■Prior 30% ■ Post 20% 10% 0% Ili"' Property Person BehaHor 4. Returns to Detention Prior and Post Offense History Wellspring Participants 9103-3105 By Severity of Category of Pre and Post Offense 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% ■ Prior ■Post 20.0% 0.0% Felony Misdemeanor Slightly more than 33% of youth in the program were detained or committed to an OYA close custody placement within 6 months of program placement. Sixty-one percent were detained within one year of placement. 5. Probation Violations PROBATION VIOLATIONS IN SIX AND 12 MONTHS OF PLACEMENT 9/03-3/05 TOTAL YOUTH 17 NO. W/ PV'S IN 6 MOS OF PLACEMENT 3 PERCENT 18% NO. W/ PV"S IN 12 MOS OF PLACEMENT g PERCENT 47% PV'S BY TYPE TECHNICAL45% NEW LAW VIOLATION 55% Notes: Data relates to 17 youth who transitioned from the residential program between September 1, 2003 and March 1, 2005. Data sources: Juvenile Justice Information System; Internal Deschutes County WeIlSpring Database and program files Prepared by: Deevy Holcomb, Program Development Specialist. Please call (541) 617-3356 for questions or clarification. Thanks to: Jeanette Ramage, Community Justice Specialist II -database development; WeIlSpring program staff — review and cooperation in data collection and preparation; Jim LaPorte, Mental Health Specialist II - youth diagnostic data WeIlSpring Program BOCC First Annual Report March 2005 5 04/26/05