2005-1326-Minutes for Meeting September 26,2005 Recorded 11/22/2005�VCES�
p Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1130 NW Harriman St., Bend, OR 97701-1947
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 388-4752 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF DEPARTMENT UPDATE —
JUVENILE COMMUNITY JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2005
Commissioners' Conference Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St.., Bend
Present was Commissioners Dennis R. Luke, Tom De Wolf and Michael M. Daly.
Also present were Mike Maier, County Administrator; and Jenny Birnie and Bob
LaCombe, Juvenile Community Justice. No representatives of the media or other
citizens were present.
The meeting began at 3:45 p.m. A copy of the agenda is attached for reference.
Discussions took place regarding the items on the update agenda (a copy is
attached).
The Board approved contract changes for Ron Dowd and Brad Mulvihill, who
provide counseling services.
No further items were addressed, and the meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
DATED this 26th Day of September 2005 for the Deschutes County Board
of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
lAwu�,U&A--
Recording Secretary
Tom DeWolf, Chair
llennis K. Luke. Commissioner
DESCHUTES
FICIAL RECORDS COUNTY CLERKvu 200Y019w
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 41/22/2405 04'4202 PM
2005- 1326
QUARTERLY MEETING AGENDA
JUVENILE DEPARTMENT & BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
September 26, 2005 — 3:45 PM
Board of Commissioners' Conference Room
ITEMS:
x/ Issues from the Board
Update on Personnel
Department Work Service Projects
River Clean -Up; Munch & Movies/Music; Habitat for Humanity
Boys & Girls Club
t State Cap/Court
t Casey Foundation
7. Other
C/3) tvell,
)LP/^-. /e
)--f n 4 C A)Wvje,�
/6x_�
Research of Note
By Jennifer Moore
Old Myth: The Rise
in Girls' Violence
�An Assessment of Recent Trends In Girls' Violence Using Diverse
Longitudinal Sources: Is the Gender Gap Closing?
Pennsylvania State University, et al.
Abstract available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.
Six years ago, Meda Chesney -Lind, professor of women's studies at
the University of Hawaii at Manoa, described the pervasive "girls -are -
getting -worse" message touted by the media and some juvenile justice
stakeholders as "a bandwagon notion." (See "Are Girls Getting Worse, or
Are Adults Getting Scared?" Youth Today, February 1999.)
"No matter how much the data refute the idea, it's reborn every other
decade," said Chesney -Lind.
This new study, it is hoped, has bought an extra decade or two of
peace.
Darrell Steffensmeier, professor of sociology and crime at
Pennsylvania State University, and his colleagues compare three major
sets of longitudinal data on girls' violent behavior with the FBI's Uniform
Crime Report (UCR) to determine whether any corroborating statistical
evidence exists for the claim that female juvenile arrests for violent
crimes are rising, or that the gender gap in violent arrests for girls and
boys is narrowing.
They found none.
"When you heat this over and over, but yet it doesn't look like it's
really happening, you get to be a little skeptical of it," says Steffensmeier,
a member of the Girls' Study Group research consortium on delinquency
funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
The researchers compared federal UCR data with three sources that
collect data on violent incidents that include, but are not limited to, those
reported to police: National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) reports
from victims of violent offenders, and self -reports of violent behavior by
youth in Monitoring the Future (MTF) and the National Youth Risk
Behavior Survey (NYRBS).
Using an advanced time series technique, the researchers examined
the four datasets for statistically reliable patterns in the violent crime rate
trends of 12- to 18-year-olds from .1980 to 2003. The report says the test
allowed the researchers to "estimate the presence or absence of a signifi-
cant upward or downward trend in the gender gap in juvenile violence."
While the UCR showed a convergence in the arrest rates for boys and
girls, data from the other three studies indicated either stable conditions
(where male and female rates moved up and down in equilibrium), trend-
less conditions (random movements without a clear upward or downward
trend) or a widening in the gender gap.
The study's authors say girls' arrest rates have increased because of
"stretching definitions of violence" to include more minor incidents that
rarely led to arrests in the past, the emergence of "less tolerant family and
societal attitudes toward juvenile females" and more use of preventative
punishment and risk management by juvenile justice and other agencies.
Steffensmeier says that, while early identification may be the right
way to get services to troubled girls, "it may have collateral conse-
quences" that perpetuate the research, treatment and correctional indus-
tries' need for statistics on rising girl crime rates.
Deschutes County Juvenile Detention Analysis
Proposal to Annie E. Casey Foundation
Introduction
Deschutes County Juvenile Community Justice promotes public safety and strengthens
the community by repairing the harm and reducing the risk of juvenile crime. We do so
through Community Justice and Restorative Justice principles and practices.
Deschutes County has experienced explosive population growth, from approximately
75,000 people in 1990 to approximately 140,000 today. Until 1998, the agency operated
a 9 -bed detention facility, with no long-term or post -adjudicatory secure programs. The
facility regularly utilized a "matrix" system due to over -crowding. Our current, 56 -secure
/ 12 -non -secure bed facility was built in 1998, funded through a levy billed to the public
as a promise to hold youth accountable. The facility now has approximately 600-700
admissions annually, operates two longer-term residential programs and has on recent
occasion pre -released youth due to over -crowding.
Only three of four total secure housing units are currently used for detained /
incarcerated youth. The fourth, built for future secure use, currently houses an on-site
Boys and Girl's Targeted Reentry program. A fifth non -secure housing unit is currently
used by a community agency for long-term residential programming for non -delinquent
youth with behavioral issues requiring out of home placement.
A short description follows of the different secure detention and residential programs in
use, as well as recent (calendar year 2004) admission data.
Housing Unit 300/Detention provides up to 14 beds for males for short-term public
safety, accountability and competency development. Detainee girls are housed in a
separate unit from boys (see below); detainees are admitted and detained for the
following reasons: pre-adjudicatory/new law violations; warrants; technical probation
violations; conditional release violations; post -adjudicatory sanctioning / waiting for
other out of home placements.
Male detention admission reasons for the calendar year 2004 follow:
Admissions
389
Undup Youth
263
Av Days in Custody
11.6
Geographic
Admits
Deschutes
Crook
Jefferson
Region Total
Top Five 2004 Male Detention Admission Reasons
7% E3 New Law Violation
11% 33% ■Warrant
❑ PV Tech
24% ❑ PV Law Viol
16% ■ VCR
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005
272 78.6%
30 8.7%
44 12.7%
346 100.0%
1 of 6
Housing Unit 400/30 -Day Program provides up to 14 secure beds, divided between
female detention and 30 -day program beds and male 30 -day program beds. The 30 -
day program serves male and female youth with escalating criminal or delinquent
behavior. The unit also houses male population over -flow from Housing Unit 300. The 30 -
Day program is a gender -responsive, secure intervention setting. Youth are court-
ordered into the program as part of post -adjudicatory sanctioning and treatment /
waiting for placement orders.
Specific admission reasons follow. Please note that due to data system constraints, all
female data includes female detention admission reasons, not just 30 -day female
admission reasons. Male data comprises male 30 -day youth. Data refers to the
calendar year 2004:
Annual
All
Female
Percent
Male
Percent
Admissions
326
214
65.6%
112
34.4%
Undup Youth
216
123
56.9%
93
43.1%
Av Days in
Custody
12.2
10.6
15
Top Four Female 2004 Admission Reasons
400
8% 0 New Law Violation
11% 29% 0 P Technical
o Warrant
20% ❑ VCR
21% ■ 30 -Day Pgm
Geographic
Admits
Deschutes
Crook
Jefferson
Regional
Total
233 77.4%
29 9.6%
39 13.0%
301 100.0%
Top Fi%e 2004 Male Admission Reasons
400
6%
E3 New Law Violation
6% 0 30 -Day Pgm
13% 35%
❑ PV Tech
O PV Law Viol
23% ■ 8 -Day Pgm
WellSpring provides 14 beds for male offenders with serious and chronic criminal
behavior, with one-year (maximum) intensive, secure programming addressing
delinquent behavior through identification and treatment of cognitive, mental health,
family and interpersonal challenges. This program is funded partly by County general
funds and subsidized by federal Behavioral Rehabilitative Services Medicaid
reimbursement. The program serves the entire state. Youth are court ordered into the
program as part of post -adjudicatory treatment and sanctioning orders. Specific
admission reasons follow. Data refers to the calendar year 2004:
Annual
Admissions
29
Undup Youth
28
Av Length
Stay
186.0
Geographic
Admits
Deschutes
Crook
Jefferson
Multnomah
Total
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005
18 78.3%
1 4.3%
3 13.0%
1 4.3%
23 100.0%
2of6
P f
WeliSpring 9/03-2/05 Admission Reasons
By Type of Disposition
7% p PV - Technical
36% 0■ New Law Vio
57"/° O PV New Law Vio
Statement of Need
Department philosophy, policy and practice emphasize that the secure detention of
youth offenders is a serious response to serious and extreme delinquent behavior.
Detention decisions and practices are informed by a number of notable characteristics
and areas for improvement. These follow along the lines of the Casey Foundation's own
explanations for "uncontrolled detention practices" (Orlando, Frank. Pathways to
Juvenile Detention Reform: Controlling the Front Gates - effective admissions policies
and practices"):
"Can't distinguish between high- and low-risk youth": Available statistics (above)
indicate that a high proportion of admissions relate to technical probation violations
and warrants, particularly for girls. It is time to objectively evaluate our use and
philosophy of detention so as to prevent over -crowding and/or the inappropriate
use of detention in the first place. We have launched an effort to develop objective
rationale for admissions to detention. Through a two-year period of time, Juvenile
Community Justice staff, District Attorneys, Law Enforcement and the Judiciary have
held conversations. These conversations contributed to the development of a draft
Risk Assessment Instrument, based on the Multnomah County, Oregon model. We
are midway through testing a pilot version. This process has raised as many questions
as it has answered, however, and we are in need of further assistance to
understand, build ownership and develop a final tool that reflects a clear purpose
and practice around the use of secure detention.
2. "Too many people have keys to the facility": As we have expanded in general
county population, and the juvenile system size and staff since 1998, so too have
internal staff and community partner variations on the purpose and practice of
secure detention. As a result, there is not currently an optimum level of cohesion
regarding the purpose or practice of secure detention within the department's
continuum of services and goals. Continuing dynamic dialogue and ultimate
resolution is needed to build a cohesive community value -internally and with
community partners - around detention practices.
3. "Lack effective quality controls": Until 2002, the department operated detention
without the benefit of a unified, standardized or accessible database. In 2002, it
made the transition to a statewide "Juvenile Justice Information System", an Oracle
software product with department and statewide networking and information
sharing capacities. The learning curve of understanding and uniformly utilizing the
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005 3 of 6
system remains relatively steep. As a result, there has only been recent and limited
(but growing) capability of historic or instant data production and analysis to
understand and/or drive detention practices. The department needs a clear blue-
print for both individual and aggregate data inputs and outputs, based on a clear
understanding of detention -related goals and objectives.
4. Finally, all of the above factors contribute to and derive from a department in
transition since 1998 from a small, informal structure, to a larger, more complex
agency attempting to respond to new and greater pressures. One especially
relevant pressure is the growing need to create and use data to derive, guide and
justify practices and procedures. Staff opinion on this dynamic ranges from
enthusiasm to skepticism to resistance regarding the utility of data in individual
caseload and/or detention admission practices. We are in need of training,
technical assistance and change management techniques to learn, adjust and
incorporate objective data into our practices, particularly risk and need
assessments, as effective an tool in repairing the harm and reducing the risk of
further juvenile crime.
Request:
We are requesting funds and technical assistance from the Annie E. Casey
Foundation's Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative to:
1. Refine and implement a collaborative change management process with internal
staff and community partners (Law Enforcement, District Attorney and Judicial) to
work collectively towards a unified understanding of the purpose of secure juvenile
detention within the continuum of services and sanctions offered.
2. Develop and implement data -driven detention admission policies and practices,
through the refinement and use of a location -specific Risk Assessment Instrument.
3. Improve existing and develop new data practices (input and output) that improve
our ability to understand and continually monitor our use of secure detention.
4. Identify detention alternative resources and avenues to access them, based on
results from the RAI and other data analysis.
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005 4 of 6
Ji- -4
Work Plan:
We propose a 12 month timeframe for Casey Foundation assistance, beginning
September 1, 2005, at the end of which the following action items would be complete:
Acronyms: DC (Deschutes County); CF (Casey Foundation)
Item
By Who By When
1.
Unified, working philosophy and practices for the
secure detention of youth offenders in Deschutes
County
a. Draft and finalize change management
a.
DC, w/ CF
September
process, to include partners, introduction,
assistance
30
dialogue, training and implementation of
revised / renewed detention philosophy and
purpose
b. Introduction / Dialogue around purpose of
b.
Identified
November 1
detention w/ relevant partners / staff
contractors /
- February 15
CF
c. Training regarding new / revised detention
c.
DC,
January 1 -
admission procedures and practices w/
Identified
March 30
relevant partners / staff
contractors /
CF
d. Implementation of philosophy and any new /
d.
Deschutes
April 2005
revised procedures and practices
County
2.
Cohesive and efficient data collection and
analysis system in place to understand, monitor
and share with stakeholders the use of Deschutes
County secure detention
a.
Analysis of current data system/s strengths,
a.
DC, with CF
October 1
weaknesses, needs and gaps
b.
Develop and begin data collection plan
b.
DC, with CF
November 1
c.
Review data collection
c.
DC, with CF
May 1
d.
Preliminary analysis of new system results
d.
DC, with CF
July 1
e.
Plan for continual monitoring and maintenance
e.
DC, with CF
July 1
3.
Improved understanding and use of objective risk
assessment instrument that drives majority of
detention admissions.
a.
Analyze May -June 2005 pilot RAI results
a.
DC, with CF
July -Aug 05
b.
Re -apply data analysis to historical data, if
b.
DC
October 1
necessary
c.
Introduce and revise RAI as part of Item #I
c.
DC,
November 1
process
Identified
- February 15
contractors,
CF
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005 5 of 6
d. Implement Pilot phase 2 RAI d. DC January -
e. Analyze and share results with partners and staff e. DC, March 2005
Identified
contractor,
f. Revise and Finalize RAI CF June 1
g. Implement new RAI f. DC July 1
g. DC
Budget
ITEM
Deschutes
Requested
Total Cost
Contribution
from Casey
Foundation
1. Research / Data Collection
Hiring a temporary Research Assistant to
DC Research Contact / Specialist:
$35 per hour for approx 500 hours (over 6
$1,500
$16,000
$17,500
months
2. Technical Assistance
Trainers, consultants from Casey
Foundation, other JDAI locations, to train
and consult w/ DC staff and system at DC
location for three, two-day consultation /
training events:
$2000 trainer / consultant fee per event
$6,000
$6,000
$500 miscellaneous supplies/equip for
$ 500
$ 500
training / consulting
3. Travel / Accommodations
On-site Training/Consultation:
$400 hotel / food per consultant per event
$1,200
$1,200
$500 airfare per consultant per event
$1,500
$1,500
One regional/out of state Casey
Foundation training for local Team of 4:
$500 airfare per person
$2,000
$2,000
$450 accomodation per person
$1,800
$1,800
$240 food/expenses per person
$ 960
$ 960
TOTAL
$1,500 1
$29,960 1$31,460
Casey Foundation Detention Reform Proposal 9/26/2005 6 of 6
0)
c6
CL
o
w
r
U
0
o
ro o
O
3
F
U
bA 0 0
0M -d
o2°aro
ro L7
"q
Cd
3roro°o?
3
s v
o°
3
g «��� d
ro
n C
�ro
° Cd p,
��bb
V
y
O
Q o
•~
ai
SO
a
P
,,
rrl
�
C
x a¢
bn U
A
p
U a
�
U
y
p
d
a
Q
H �
�'
as
:n'G
No
i
U
o
0'a
r
>
O�
ti
v
0)
c6
CL
o
w
o
ro o
O
U)
bA 0 0
0M -d
o2°aro
ro L7
"q
ou
3roro°o?
3
s v
o°
3
g «��� d
ro
n C
�ro
° Cd p,
��bb
O
o
= 0
Q o
� O 9 0a r
SO
,,
C
x a¢
bn U
Aq U
U -d PL to
U a
:n'G
No
i
o
0'a
r
N
O
41 d
�r .Q
P. C)
0 09
ti
d
1�
w
o
N CO)
p
C `�
m
O
bA
p
N
G co
3
U
a
U
a
t
a�roi
C
y O
co
_Y
O cd:
N (u C
s '
Gnq
U E
O i.
O
O
w. O
O
Cl.
to CL
C
c3a
.b Q)
v~i
p,
U
cCd
•'"
>
O
ro:
o.
8 ti
a
C Ca
`� o d
Y
'� •o
o
a
CO 0
.Q
'�w~
'A cd
o
^U0oow
ddfA
ca
a�Cs
v�'i
0 o
C*
O u Co0
cd
••3+
oam'.bsi.AI
�O .�o
o
0wd
•�CCO
vC
."dcCN° °C�
Oa •
>
co
Cro
�
0
Ca 0
3
b w o _Cao
a
2 U)
Cl)
Q a '>
CQ a G o
o
U Ca
Q v
GO o.
¢
E
R o o
0
0
~C. N G
L.•• Ci
V
4 bn •�
•ti N O
OA CO
N
•°+ U h
�. • C". bA
w
h
a o 0
to 0
N
0 ro o
O
m
v
•=+
c
°
UIcu
a�
O
G
oo
_W
CO
L >
C
' y
b
o
a`pi '�
p
>a�
d
>
U a a
ooa
'
O
o
4P
ia.ro
.°O
o°
0)
c6
CL
1-1
N
o a3i b^�
ti
p
C'4
�•
O
O
N 0 O
N�
����
to)E3
1A
C o°�'
cl
o
w
F~ �u O
d V
4.)a;
C) v cw�
9z 0
oll
r
N
N cqj �
2 c O
Hc
�n
vC
00Cd
�a
0
o 0
O co
O+ OGa. N 'O
x�v�
a�aS�Qw
O'S�
w3Uc�
b
p d�
ON
o
o� °�'
ON
o
c
.C^ .0
4A'
O
Ot. >
ON
N
M
Cl(14
N
� id
�i
G1 -i
�••-� V] a'-7 N
�--�
ti td
Q
Q,
Y
w
N • �
��" �
Q
y
O
pp
q
� • El cd
O
O
O
a
3 c-pv
o m
cn
a`"i .14
0
ani
�
U
> .lu
oo
°
00 co
V
41
N
N
«t cd
^a
C'i
b +
~
O
0
c..
y
v
O
N
x
0
°
q
O
a�
Cd
� °
.
O
o
W
>
0
4, O
� o
Wav
0
q
00v:i
N
.14
0C`
>
ai o
:
'b
a
'd ci
N
co
c75
v�od2
co
o`
c
v
U
�
a
0
'Oy o
R2
Qm co
O
v
w�°
.0
cd
s
b
o o
0 . 0 o
O " .9A. -
•�
° N
.5v
yC
O
�
0 O
a. co-
w to >
0aO a °
O ya
b•
o>
U N
a�
' otc
O O
G>
O
N U -o
O + to N b
ca 0p
> 4,
Y
'� Y
N a N
L
C ' '
U
U
>
Q O
"
cq
O • . 3
F, a cd 0 V
acz [�
N .--. cC
b
p
x N
GCj vAi 3
U
�1 o
Q 3 o
ami
a1 v
aoi
U to 8
Q v U
C1U i; ro a o
U
Q
°
3
a cli 3
a
m cd 0
U
^d
p o Cq
O
V)
•Z,
O d
0 o a
LU
> b'o
3 O
a�
N
M
cd
+,
.o.crib
3
o o
c
> ro
k¢ a
a
�'
aj
�0
E
o
6'4�5 °
�b0oar
Y O`
�
cd d
O ky
b oap
-
3
V
~°o
0
•g "o o o
b
o
H
p
cw
c� 0 U
b o
U a
b ti U
o
U
3c�•
ooo�'�cn�
'ajb
o
3 c
O o
° •
vii
2'aw
H.�a°aH b
Q 'o
�
o
_
M
4)
d C
O
N
N
O
o
N
`n
p
•--�
O
(D
M
N
a+ .p
cw
a)
0
U tn
Acq
z
-��
- r
y
O cd N
cd
on
c0
on
N. a; ed
on
cd
as
N
ao
o
In.-�'
b
00
v
o
a
a a o
¢
tea.
ti
R
'c J43-
++R.'
U
° 0
- E-�U o
w 00 0°
E-�UUE-
00
U
o b i° °o
U
c
00 0
u
a�
c
c
o
5
(
V) L6
�'
o
on
0
oo
� ti O
0 �
.� •>
o cw
ao '
'ca
ao
� aUi
C_ =
0 o
,a (=o.�
ao
n ani
id b b
o
w
o>
cl cn
0
13�°'o
O
acl
Q
y E ^�
y O ci
co
0
N
d 0
o
— �j C
�.. O c f N
O �,
c0 '
a� p
tom, -0 H
O O cd
aGi b 'b
a�
ani o
rr Vl
0 c0
b' 3
CO '.
id
o O
G w
>
.•
b °
ani
'o �°
.0 0 ro v O
m
3
�°,
ba
°nwro�
J9
xoo
>
4.Qoa0
C4C
.a
co bo
G�QCl
"bS�
U.
A o 3
q
0 0
ui x
cri
to o
0
'v
.n
� 0 0
4°
C
.9
b
�d U
O
Ca
a.�
o 0
>
4.
t >
U U �.
cli
W
C
4 a) 91,
Ocz
M
ZI
4)
rn
co
a
M
v
U
r, O
O
° o
Cd
Cd
.�
��,
'4
o a
o o
..
V
a�
ZA
8
b
�? C)
3
O
O N
O
Vim.
C4
ago
�•�
w
ar
Q,
w
Q
cri
to
421
PC
0 Cd
O
O
Q y
O
v
Q
Ln
7b
U
U O •�
� � O
rA
N
N cn ,�
N
W
cn Er
Q .�
is
0
ZI
4)
rn
co
a
M
W)
O
O
N
N
Ln
v
o
d
y
o
3�
n
o
U�
Cd
o
Y
_Cd
0
0
2oa
d
d
v
�
C
:6
�
ami
O
N
O
d
owcn
z
z�
b
cd
- 'a
2
o >
to
uz
F -u04
a cd
Hu
rN�o
�.
w CZ
W
co
NO
d>
b
N
0
> �m
• r- a
C1..
i co OCNy
'C O
•G
00
to
En
-
> 'bQA
4)
.0 O
co
El
b
Q >
04 p
O «34�
C
..
s.
o v, .b ro
lu
o b O y
b q
o 0
cd o co co
40
bU
3
N O
w o
a.
c
aki
2�
Q actio
W'>'>U
b
0
¢U-ov
ami
i o
b
�
w
0
1.
a
CD
M
O
caw
b
ov
o
0O
O q
t
w V
=
y
.�
> a
O
ti
U o
O .-.
; 5
W)
O
O
N
N
Ln
M
0
o
a�q
m °o
a
o
o
O N .a
14,
>
11 O
co 0
N
b.
ti
3�
as
U
m
m
a
�0N
N Cd
c
�
(1. "o
N
•o.: O
ca
U0
y
.O &
o
(D 0
30
n
° o
�,
°
o •
.
o
c
a�
q4.
a o a
c,
p"
a
o
o
'��"'�
o
3c."a�i
O O
o
�''•°'
0
b
°
o
a
Cd
P.
>
++ h
O
GO) c
kn
kn
:^ O
0-0
.-."
N
N
N
O
O
�+
p°paU+
V)
a o
y
U
U
co
D r
ti
c
O
-
300
x>3'�
.,
a'
U°�
a
�U°
O
`� U
> `°
p
cn
p3�
3 `�
a��i °
C',
o
o v
0
t m
v a
3
�A
•�
3rd
Qaxtiux
^cn .4
xLnu
� ti
o
�
�
`°
o o
a 0
o
0
O
0
0
c
°��' to
3
to
0
o
o
a� o
0
Y
o
o°
0C's
a
C'.
>
>,
w°
3°
,.
n° U
b
ac°i
o Q
to a
w a
O �
o
R;
U a�
a
°'
a
0 0
o �
`"
on °
.c
b
D ow
o
a
W
o
w"
conn ro
b
v,
is T,
0.
�
o
o
oQ
�0c
�.�p
°
° av,_
a
�a°ima
a+
a`tl
U�o
'w
U
:bo
a
p
A
¢ 3
3
fY1
b
°c •>
G
o
.�
w
Y
Ica od
o
3
�
to co
y�
U
O CW
q
cn
G1
O b
c
w
rn
d
o ani 0
O
0 °' 3
C
d
...
o alCO
o
CO
ya
Q v
�-
v
co
.14
Cj
O
r4
M
�7
u
0)
co
CL
O
N
O
o4)
U0
y
��
o ° o
a
Cd
a o „
al
3o
r b c
Q
Uk U
3c�CoV
3cb�
pN
C
r
a�.5
a
2'Op
O a °
U
W°°
U
>
Wn
�o
0
d C-
�'' O
"0
o
aHi
ap
O
:• �
ti o°n
c
to
o°p
oate
r
o
z���
R O
o
a�
.0
0
4)
U
04U�
z
�°�
Cd
.0
O
200,
(u
(,
-
Or V
13
13 Q
"
4, ccs
a°
o
ami C b0
O
o
o
ani
°
a
H
q
bas
a:
oar 3>
a
H a cn
a
Gacgi
2 N
Co) 0
C
N
�
al
0
3
�
d
o
c
a
-Op
x
Z d
} N
N
0)
co
CL
CL
C
0
Q
m
M
N
cu
CL
O
5
O
7 N
w
0'
O «
}. r„
o
N
O N
a
lN0
d
O
t�
o
N (D
bA
`n
p
•���
y
•�.�
,,
o
G.
�-o
as
c
�,
n
a o a�i�
`" °
3Q
a
�
oo
a,a�'a
��
"on
O
O ani
o 9 q ami
a' d
a
cd p cd
CIO
y
U N
E ti
p v
a
w ;3
PG
�+ �•
�n
cn
y =
0
'O
o
N
o
N
')
C)
0
r--0
N
N
4).
UU
tw
b4
O w
'=
Q
Q
ti
Y
V
??
b
-� C•
O
O
0
aC�
d)C
,� N
G
q
=
o�o0�U
Cd
GG
cc
h
�
y
N❑
N
Q
N
O
y Q
o ro
o o
w
o
a3
i
a
a�
a�
m
v
a
a�
,o
0
o
oco
�v0ao
00
0
ap-��°'�o��
cts
mw
a
� o0
0
0
2 p
o M
°
; CO
0
„ 0
>
CO
�v�
� a�w
co
°'
o
a� �
.. ofCd
_ d1
(L)q oA
b
;m cv
p
cd
y
b a�
ea O •�
�O
ti 0
d
'> „0
o t:
O
�.�.
cd
cad .0
= N
Q°
E
N
U
_
>
� �
O
Ca
("•
w 0
O
CA
U
420
0
tb
U
Y
0 0
o o
o m
o
t>
t ro
y 2
U)
b v
OfyiC
O�
.0
Y
M
N
cu
CL
N
O)
cu
a
U
•�
N
Q
(�•�
U
cw.
>
U
°
�
ti
¢, 'nU
cis
a
U
y
.�.
cid
t�N .
3'I
..
O
a�
U
O
.B
U
U
«3
O
En
cd
4-i
tN.
�cd+
O
4
G�
V
cn
fl O
+`�-
Cn
O
O
N
41ani
Cd
°
3
0
b
th
r
cd
a�
b
o
a
Cc
N
cl0
C4
o�bo
Ln
cts
G�
Q
.0
t03�
f/1
W
U O
b
C. of
U
°'
rn
as
a�
o
•.
a�
a�
U
Cc °�
°03
r
ti
°�
°'
cn
od
74
lc�
�.
w
awn � � �
� -�
0
3
a�
o
3
cli
cj
>°
Q>
a.
O
°
�.
cn
cm
`4:
>
CIA
0
°
0
N
O)
cu
a
JKE`S C
o { Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1130 NW Harriman St., Bend, OR 97701-1947
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 388-4752 - www.deschutes.ora
AGENDA REQUEST AND STAFF REPORT
DEADLINE: The following items must be submitted to the Board's secretary no
later than noon of the Thursday prior to the Board meeting.
• This agenda request form • Maps of the subject property and
• Your staff report general area, if appropriate
• Any relevant backup information • The original documents to be approved
The Board's secretary will route your original documents to Legal Counsel for
approval if necessary..Please do not give your documents directly to Legal Counsel.
All boxes must be completed.
Department/Division: Person Submitting Re uest: Contact Phone #:
Juvenile Comm Justice Deevy Holcomb 617-3356
Date Submitted: Person to Attend Meeting: Date of Meeting:
9/15/05 Bob LaCombe/D Holcomb 9/26/05
llescription of Item (as it should appear on the agenda), and Action Requested:
Seek approval of Amendment to Personal Services Contract between Deschutes County and
Ron Dowd, and between Deschutes County and Brad Mulvihill.
Background Information (please attach additional pages as appropriate):
We would like to increase the contract amount between the County and Ron Dowd an
additional $7,000 for our federally funded Sex Offender Grant currently being conducted in
the tri -counties. Ron performs research, data collection and analysis as well as report writing
for this federal grant. Additional funds are required due to an increase in research/data
components of the grant. We would like to decrease Brad Mulvihill's contract by the same
amount: $7,000, to use it instead for the research scope of duties carried out by Ron Dowd.
Budget Implications:
None. We will be moving amounts between categories within the grant. No additional funds
will be required.
Policy Implications:
None.
Distribution of Documents after Approval:
One copy to Juvenile, One copy to Contractor.
2�,157- 3 5'8 1
ZoDs 3 sy
Rev. 7-03
REVIEWED REVIEWED
LEGAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT HEAD
AMENDMENT: DESCHUTES COUNTY PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT, made and entered into on January 14, 2004, by and between DESCHUTES COUNTY
(County) and Ronald P Dowd (Contractor), DC#2004-016, is amended as follows:
EXHIBIT 1 MAXIMUM COMPENSATION. The maximum compensation under this contract, included expenses, is
amended from $64,000 to $71,000 over the two year duration of the contract.
CONTRACTOR DATA AND SIGNATURE
Contractor Address: 19322 SW Laurelhurst Way, Bend, Oregon 97702
Federal Tax ID# or Social Security #: 20-1264158
Is Contractor a nonresident alien? ❑Yes X No
Business Designation (check one): X Sole Proprietorship ❑ Partnership
❑ Corporation -for profit ❑ Corporation -non-profit ❑ Other, describe
A Federal tax ID number or Social Security number is required to be provided by the Contractor and shall be used for the
administration of state, federal a9djdcal tax laws. Payment information shall be reported to the Internal Revenue Service
under theme an/dFeedderraall x numb if none, the Social
/Security number provided bove.
Sifnatur �% Title
Name (please print) Date
DESCHUTES COUNTY SIGNATURE
(This Contract is not binding on the County until signed by the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners)
APPROVED this day of
County Board of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
2005 for the Deschutes
Tom DeWolf, Chair
Michael M. Daly, Commissioner
Dennis R. Luke,Commissioner
Page I of I DE
E--_ 9__ 2
DC 4 2005-358
REVIEWED REVIEWED
LEGAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT HEAD
AMENDMENT: DESCHUTES COUNTY PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT, made and entered into on December 29th, 2003, by and between DESCHUTES COUNTY
(County) and Brad Mulvihill (Contractor), DC#2003-548, is amended as follows:
EXHIBIT 1 MAXIMUM COMPENSATION. The maximum compensation under this contract, including expenses, is
amended from $132,320 to $125,320 over the two year duration of the contract.
CONTRACTOR DATA AND SIGNATURE
Contractor Address: 2909 NE Laurel Oak Drive, Bend, Oregon 97701
Federal Tax ID# or Social Security #: 543-62-3504
Is Contractor a nonresident alien? ❑Yes X No
Business Designation (check one): X Sole Proprietorship ❑ Partnership
❑ Corporation -for profit ❑ Corporation -non-profit ❑ Other, describe
A Federal tax ID number or Social Security number is required to be provided by the Contractor and shall be used for the
administration of state, federal and local tax laws. Payment information shall be reported to the Internal Revenue Service
under the name and Federal tax ID number or, if none, the Social Security number provided above.
ig ure Title
21— d
Name (please print) Date
DESCHUTES COUNTY SIGNATURE
(This Contract is not binding on the County until signed by the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners)
APPROVED this day of
County Board of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
2005 for the Deschutes
Tom DeWolf, Chair
Michael M. Daly, Commissioner
Dennis R. Luke,Commissioner
Page 1 of 1 ate.:)Q=
DC -2005-359"-
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS
OF CENTRAL OREGON
Options for Continued Operations of the Re -Entry Program
Historical Overview:
• The Re -Entry Program, spear -headed by former BGCCO President, Butch Holden
and former Director at the DCJCJ, Dennis Maloney; opened its doors for the first
time October 11, 2001 inside the Juvenile Community Justice Department.
• Asa 2 year pilot ro am, Re -Entry received 150,000 each year from BGCA t
q7imL_pl_ee_tm_�_e_nta r esigned to reintegrate a Ju lcate youth back into t e1r
ommunity t ough participation with local Boys & Girls Clubs.
• Re -Entry had 2 full time and 2 part time staff to run the 2 component program.
• First program component was participation in the club inside the DCJCJ.
• Second program component was reintegration back into local B&Gs.
• The first year 57 kids walked through the doors, 51 boys and 6 girls serving 2
housings units.
Current Program Overview:
• 4 years later, Re -Entry served 143 kids this past year, 78 males and 65 females.
• Operating on a budget of $100 000. 25% from Deschutes County, 25% from
OJDDP, 25% om Grants, and 25% from the community, Re -Entry runs a larger -
scale program with 1 full time staff and 2 part time staff.
• Re -Entry has now expanded to incorporate kids from all housing units.
• The program has expanded to include community service projects, positive
recreational activities, life skills, and job skills into the reintegration process.
• Re -Entry currently runs a girls -only program for the increasing number of
adjudicated females.
• Re -Entry staff assist in the tracking and aftercare of youth to aid Community
Justice Staff in their increasing caseloads.
• After 4 years of operations, we can now see the results of our work through
continued documentation: 78% of tracked Re -Entry youth have committed no
new crimes in a span of 12 months.
Options for Continued Operations:
1. Re -Entry Program is absorbed by County Juvenile Programs = $100,000 -
$150,000 per year
2. Re -Entry Program is funded by County 100%, but contracted to BGCCO
at $100,000 (no pers)
3. Program is closed effective December 30, 2005
1q
months after being released. Non -participating youth have a 58% Commission
chance of staying out of trouble.
Percentage of Re-EMry Members Without
New Offenses within 12 Months of Release
00
60
ao
0
Trad.d Nm4larlklpmd
Re -Entry Club Funding
■ Deschutes County
■ US Dept. of Justice
FUNDING
As part of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central
Oregon, the Re -Entry facility is funded
through the system's general operating
funds. Specific funding comes from state
and county judicial sources, such as Office
of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of
Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP), Deschutes County - Juvenile
Justice Center, and Boys & Girls Clubs of
America as well as grants. We are, however,
continually seeking funding for this particular
Club so that it may operate on its own.
Please help save Oregon taxpayers
millions of dollars by sending yourtax
deductible contribution today.
10
W
J_ i
V �
QU
LL
W '-
D
Z E
OE
0
WU
O A, _W
s_
C.
`W
Z
W
V
O
Ov
V
V
SEESs
}
O
BACKGROUND
In 2001, the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Oregon opened a Club within the walls of the Deschutes
County Juvenile Community Justice Center. This was a pilot project for the national organization, ours
being one of only two to test the formula. Thanks, in part, to hard work by the Deschutes County and
Club staff, the project took off and is now emulated across the country.
MISSION
The Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Oregon seeks to inspire and enable all young people, especially
those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible,
caring citizens.
The mission of the Re -Entry Club Is to help teens who have found themselves in trouble with the law
to re-enter society and become productive members of the community.
Percentage of Re -Entry Members'
too- Participation in Specialized Programs
so
so
40-
20-
PROGRAMS
0-
20-
Health Conflict Resistance Life Sports, Education
Skills Resolution Skills Skills Fitness & & Career
Recreation
PROGRAMS
All the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Oregon center around 5 core program areas. Those are:
Career & Education, Character & Leadership, The Arts, Health & Life Skills and Sports, Fitness &
Recreation. The Re -Entry Club, however, offers its members specialized programs to meet their
needs and the Club's mission. Examples of those are: Conflict Resolution, Resistance Skills, and Life
Skills. Another central focus of the Re -Entry Club is recreation, showing troubled youth alternative
and productive means of using their adrenalin. For example, the
youth help restore biking trails, then learn to ride mountain bikes "The Re -Entry program works
in order to enjoy those same trails. well within Deschutes County's
Positive results from our tracking show phenomenal success. Afull -. Tom DeWolf, Chair
78% of our tracked youth committed no new crimes for at least 12 Deschutes County
months after being released. Non -participating youth have a 58% Commission
chance of staying out of trouble.
Percentage of Re -Entry Members Without
New Offenses within 12 Months of Release
d.
30
•
LIR-M-
Trac.! N•n4berlicip•M
Re -Entry Club Funding
■ Deschutes County
■ US Dept. of justice
■ Grants
■Indhdduol/Corporate
Donations
FUNDING
As part of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central
Oregon, the Re -Entry facility is funded
through the system's general operating
funds. Specific funding comes from state
and county judicial sources, such as Office
of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of
Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP), Deschutes County - Juvenile
Justice Center, and Boys & Girls Clubs of
America as well as grants. We are, however,
continually seeking funding for this particular
Club so that it may operate on its own.
Please help save Oregon taxpayers
millions of dollars by sending your tax
deductible contribution today.
E10Y8 �(iliiLt3 GWBS
OF CENTRAL OREGON
For additional information
on supporting these kids,
call (541) 548-2840 or visit becco.org
THE (POSITIVE PLACE FOR WIDE
philosophy of balanced and
SUCCESS RATE
Each year, the Club staff tracks close to 50 youth who have participated
restorative justice. Our
Partnership offers kids tools
in the Re -Entry Club and are then released from the facility. In tracking
to overcome unacceptable
the youth, we help them with resumes, completing job applications, family
behavior, reduce recidivism
tannin r isterin to vote and general mentoring. We want to be a
planning, �J 9 9 9•
and keeps our community
constant in their lives, helping them reintegrate with their community.
safer in the long run."
Positive results from our tracking show phenomenal success. Afull -. Tom DeWolf, Chair
78% of our tracked youth committed no new crimes for at least 12 Deschutes County
months after being released. Non -participating youth have a 58% Commission
chance of staying out of trouble.
Percentage of Re -Entry Members Without
New Offenses within 12 Months of Release
d.
30
•
LIR-M-
Trac.! N•n4berlicip•M
Re -Entry Club Funding
■ Deschutes County
■ US Dept. of justice
■ Grants
■Indhdduol/Corporate
Donations
FUNDING
As part of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central
Oregon, the Re -Entry facility is funded
through the system's general operating
funds. Specific funding comes from state
and county judicial sources, such as Office
of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of
Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP), Deschutes County - Juvenile
Justice Center, and Boys & Girls Clubs of
America as well as grants. We are, however,
continually seeking funding for this particular
Club so that it may operate on its own.
Please help save Oregon taxpayers
millions of dollars by sending your tax
deductible contribution today.
E10Y8 �(iliiLt3 GWBS
OF CENTRAL OREGON
For additional information
on supporting these kids,
call (541) 548-2840 or visit becco.org
THE (POSITIVE PLACE FOR WIDE
Deschutes Co. Boys and Girls Club Targeted Reintegration Recidivism Comparisons
Data Source: Juvenile Justice Information System
Definitions:
1. Includes all TR youth participants from 10/1/01 to 10/1/03 (131 youth)
2. "Tracked TR Youth" is defined as youth w/ a month or more of both TR in-house and community tracking services (116 youth).
3. "All County Recidivism" describes the annual percent of youth referred to the juvenile department within one year from an initial
referral. Majority of these youth were never detained.
4. "All Detained Youth" describes Deschutes County youth admitted to Deschutes Co. Juvenile Detention 10/01-10/03 (420 youth)
the data says...
Youth with any level of
participation in Targeted
Reintegration since the
program began were between
20-40 percent less likely to
recidivate within one year
when compared to recidivism
among all youth admitted to
detention from October 2001
to October 2003.
Targeted Reintegration
participants who were tracked
in the community for at least a
month were almost twice as
likely to avoid re -offending
behavior than those who were
only seen by the program in-
house.
Tracked Targeted
Reintegration participants, all
of whom have serious enough
criminal histories to have been
detained, have a lower
recidivism rate than the overall'
county average, which
includes a large number of
youth with less serious offense
histories.
12 mo. Recidivism - Tracked v. Untracked TR Youth
60%-
50%-
E
0%
50%
c 40%-
0 ® Untracked
g 30%-
z ■ Tracked
20%
10%
� o%
12 mo. Recidivism - Detained Youth Comparison
E 70%
12 mo. Recidivism - County v. TR Tracked Youth
M All Youth
v 60%
Detained
_ 50%
60%
z C 40%
■ TR Youth (All)
50%
10/00 -10/03
E
4096
®AII County 2002
0 TR Youth
0%
Recidivism
1
30%-
z
0 T Tracked
20%
Recidivism
=rs
10%
o%
�
12 mo. Recidivism - Detained Youth Comparison
E 70%
M All Youth
v 60%
Detained
_ 50%
10/01-10/03
z C 40%
■ TR Youth (All)
3 30%
10/00 -10/03
20%
a. 10%
0 TR Youth
0%
(Tracked)
10/00-10/03
Page 1 BGC 1104 Request Charts