Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2006-387R-Minutes for Meeting December 20,2005 Recorded 4/7/2006
Tumalo Community School Boundary Changes for 2006-07 At their November 30th meeting, School Board members approved school boundary changes for the 2006-07 school year. Tumalo families will not be affected; however Tumalo Community School will grow by approximately 50 students as a result of the changes. Parents will receive written notification the week of December 19th informing them what school their child will be attending next year and additional information about the boundary changes. Middle School boundaries have not changed so middle school students will attend their neighborhood middle school. If you have not received notification by January 3,d, please contact your school. Exhibit R Page 1 of 16 Redmond School District 2J Code: JC-AR Administrative Regulation Adopted: 08124/2005 School Attendance Areas Criteria for New School Attendance Boundaries, September 2006 1. The target capacity for each elementary school in September 2006, shall be as follows: Current Target Boundary* Evergreen Elementary 602 550 427 John Tuck Elementary 504 450 425 Lynch Elementary 573 530 455 Terrebonne Community (K-8) 521 500 3481438 Tom McCall Elementary 0 500 434 Tumalo Community (K-8) 424 470 3701460 Vern Patrick Elementary 600 450 472 2. The target capacity for each middle school in September 2006 shall be 750 students. Using current boundaries with charter school, OMS 734 EGMS 686 3. A to ical walking boundary will be established for each school. 4. In the event that a school exceeds designated capacity: a. Priority for attending a specific school shall be given to those students who reside within the walking boundary. b. Students who reside outside of the designated attendance area for a specific school may attend that school only on a space available basis, with such transfers subject to annual review. c. Those students who normally ride buses may be transported to a school not at capacity. 5. All assignment/reassignment of students will take place for the 2006-07 school year, i.e., no students will be "grandfathered" at their present school, unless approved for transfer as per 4 - b above. *Boundary numbers are based on students currently enrolled in Redmond Schools who reside within the proposed attendance boundary for that school. The number does not reflect any growth for the 2006.07 school year. Students currently enrolled in the Deschutes Edge Charter School and Terrebonne and Tumalo Community Schools students in grade 6th through 8th would be exempt from 4b. The first boundary number for Terrebonne and Tumalo is their K-5 population, the second their K-8 population. Exhibit iz Page 2 of Z REDMO 001, DISTRICT TUMALO COMMUNITY SCHOOL 19835 SECOND STREET • BEND, OR 97701-9099 (541) 382-2853 • FAX 389-4197 December 12, 2005 Dear Parents and Students, In one of Oregon's fastest growing areas, the over 30,000 residents in the communities Redmond, Terrebonne and Tumalo. Redmond School District draws it students from of Alfalfa, Crooked River Ranch, Eagle Crest, School opened last September with over 6,700 students enrolled with a building capacity of 5,445. To help alleviate our increasing student population, voters approved a bond levy that provided the construction of a 600-seat elementary (Tom McCall) and an 800-seat middle school (Elton Gregory). Both schools are scheduled to open in September 2006. In anticipation of the opening of Tom McCall and with the need to balance student enrollment in each elementary school, board members approved boundary changes, per administration regulation JC-AR (included on back), for the 2006-07 school year at their November 30 meeting. Under these new attendance boundaries, the neighborhood elementary school your child will be attending next year is Tumalo Community School. Students enrolled in an ILS or BRC program will be contacted individually by special education staff to determine their neighborhood school for the 2006-07 school year. Please note: Middle school boundaries have not changed. Students currently in 5th grade will attend their neighborhood middle school in 2006-07 (Hugh Hartman's attendance area will become Elton Gregory's). For some, this may be a change. To make the transition as smooth as possible, we invite you on Wednesday, January 18`h from 6:00-7:00 to an open house to meet us and to tour your new school. Any questions or concerns you may have can be addressed at that time. For those interested, maps of the new boundary areas can be viewed at each elementary school, Transportation or the District Office. Your child's assignment to their neighborhood school for next year has been based on information in your current school's records. If you have moved or will be moving, your neighborhood school assignment will be based on your place of residence in September 2006. Our students are very important to us. If I can be of further assistance please call me at 382- 2853. Sincerely, Skip Offenhauser Principal, Tumalo Community School "A community is known by the schools it keeps. " Exhibit lZ Page ~ of r1C~ C~w O o. I E I ~ I ~ t ~ i ~wi. ,w. n ..wr -+..,4 w,w •.I. W . ~w~w.ro. w~w~ ~ d ~4p 4.hw r,Vr• W P Yir . ww ,rl M.., M1a9 M W W w 4 ~N f+w W '~•W .w~V.l I w w.~p.r • ~w..} is M . I..y r yl rr lvyr,c j C 4.n,n}rrwl •r,wM••Mn r}IMU.P~M.+.N .4 W..n~W P.4 aw wwn 4r PryPPO„wW MWP4rM P+S.1 •r }'rMtiPP+w1NYM `J 1~ r.Ir Mwrw PwA rN wt. P4•y N.4irw.4Pw Mr •]AAOr ~ ~R M,N••~IM r,•w/MPA.P.Y.,W PMP4 ',IPrrW "``p■iiiia w....r Pw,,.., r,.. wnr „.,!+r P.N,rw • p.. fiM, ~ w .,M i~[i YI.PrY+nw•er,l ,nr wy P,M,•.1• 1,MM,. P14~uw,PP,r+ ! C E , 10, 4 iI q as Igr 1 , rws 1•l0 N it ' :•'^1;~ E I 1! 5 " o #lilfllllil'!'►,I ri I l I I I I l l l ~ ~ f r--~ O oil ~~(IIIIIIiII flfl"Illill i 11i { In X cd,, 3RN3A V NOOO W a" 29A 6 t q Z • 74, Y 5 er rc ~ i ~ gg gg S 7 ~ a• t , e ~ l as 1 O I i OOR QUALITY I Print Map DOCUI`!'~.sT r' AT TIME OF RECORDING ~ 1 54PiQO X12 V ~O DTI N 5T Ma~~ E 2 i I I r 0 S rrx, s-d 016 F J►t, A/o. SP• OS•!rz. zq. &Ofte,& Page 1 of i 1 l 9 e S s q*t S 8 ~y"c~Ma~o /lvuw/Zw3l4j AWQ0 Exhibit IZ Page of http:(/Lava.deschutes.org/mox4/indexintra.ctm?action=dsp_nnox4 mapIE4 PrintableMap 10/4/2005 I i I 3 DOCUMENT POOR QUA AT TIME OF RECORDI t.w Community Di X Planning Division 117 NW NOTICE OF DECISION The Deschutes County Planning Division has approved; described below: FILE NUMBER: LOCATION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: STAFF CONTACT: APPLICABLE CRITERIA: SP-05-52 19855 4th Street, Bend (Tumald 16-12-31 A, tax lot 2700. Laidlaw Land Company, LLC The Deschutes County Plannin( site plan to allow a new commel Commercial District. Paul Blikstad, Associate Planner This application was reviewed criteria contained in sectiont 18.67.090, 18.84.030, 18.84.050 18.116.031, 18.124.060 and 18i- Deschutes County Code (DC0 Zoning Ordinance, as well at requirements of Title 22 of the Dt DECISION: Staff finds that the application satisfies all applicg is being granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the site plan application for the commercial submitted burden of proof statement, site plan and substantial change to the proposal will require a new slk 2. The applicant shalt complete the landscaping as specifi submitt ed with the application, prior to final inspect occupancy permit for the building. 3. The applicant shall be required to continuously mairtt attractive all landscaping on the subject property. All removed for construction shall be preserved. 4. Seven bicycle parking spaces shall be provided as sqs Bicycle racks shall be installed for all 7 spaces, and s occupancy of the building. Notice of Decision SP-05-52 Page 1 Quality Services Performers with Pride Opment Department Safety Division Environmental Health Division Avenue Bend Oregon 97701-1925 541)388-6575 FAX(541)385-1764 http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ e ° land use application d County Assessor's map Diiision has approved a sal building in the Tumalo 54 388-6554 fbr, compliance against 18.67.040, 18.67.080, 118.116.020, 18.116.030, 24.070 of Title 18 of the the Deschutes County against the procedural 3lis :criteria, and approval I building is based on the landscape plan. Any plan application. id in the landscape plan an or issuance of the i t tin { and keep alive and rees not required to be d in the application. be in place prior to Exhibit lZ Page ~C _ of '7 d DOCUMENT POOR QUALITY AT TIME OF RECORDING 5. 6. All exterior lighting shall be installed in County Code, Lighting Control. i 1 1 ' S ' s compliancd itf Chapter 15.10 of the All on-site access and parking areas shown on t slit plan shall be paved surfaces constructed for all-weather use. The on-sti parking spaces shall be installed and shall be striped for ease of use. The handicap spaces shall be marked according to building code standards. The pi irig and striping shall be completed prior to final inspection or issuance of thb occupancy permit for the building. 7. Curbs shall be installed for the 23 on-site parking spdc~es shown on the site plan that are adjacent to the landscaped areas. The cuft shall be in place prior to final inspection of issuance of the occupancy permit fdr'tthe building. 8. Clear vision areas shall be retained at the intersectigi of the driveways and 4'h Street and the intersections of Cook Avenue and 4 Street and Bruce Avenue and 4~' Street. 9. All requirements of the Bend Fire Department shall be • of for the building, which arc attached as Exhibit "A" to this decision. 10. 4'h Street shall ' eet s be constructed to the rural local commercial road standard for Tumalo, which includes a 20-foot wide paved surf 8: inches of aggregate base, 3-inch AC paving, and the sidewalk along this shelet. E The on-street parallel parking areas shall require either a paved or gravel surface, whichever is required by the County Road Deparment. All paving and other improvements for 4th street shall be completed and inspected and apptX~ved by the County Road Department prior to occuancy of the commercial buildi0 . It. All businesses within the proposed building shall togeth not exceed the parking requirement for the 33 off-street and on-street parking sp~ce$ provided. 12. The paved areas on-site shall be sloped down to tie ;surface storm water detention areas, and no surface water drainage W the street or adjacent properties shall be allowed. 13. The trash enclosure shown on the site plan shall be c6inpl®tely screened with a fence or structure so that no portion of the dumpster is visible from 4's Street or adjacent properties. The fence or structure shall be in eartih;tone colors. 14. The applicant shall submit written verification of the disposal system design from the Oregon Department prior to issuance of the building permit for the commerc 15. The applicant shall install a sight-obscuring wooden (parking space nos. 5-13) and southwest (parking spac 6 that is at least 3.5 feet in height. 16. The water rights shall be removed as required by the Tui District. Notice of Decision SP-05-52 Page 2 ved on-site sewage vironmental Quality, Iding. nce along the south )s. 1-4) property lines, 10 Town Improvement Exhibit 2 Page r7 of ?d DOCUMENT POOR QUALITY AT TIME OF RECORDING This land use permit shall be void two years from the date unless the permit is initiated or extended pursuant to Chapter; ;;decision becomes final .36 of the DCC. This decision becomes final twelve (12) days after the date M ilea, unless appealed by a party of interest. To appeal, it is necessary to submit a Notibe of: Appeal, the appeal fee of $250.00 and a statement raising any issue relied upohI flog appeal with sufficient specificity to afford the Hearings Body an adequate oppbrtudity to respond to and resolve each issue. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence subrhitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection ijt nb cost. Copies can be purchased for 25 cents per page. Pending land use applications information can bb accessed on-line at www. eschutas org(cdoc . Click on "Property Development l heading; then click on "Pending Land Use Applications" located on right side of pag0 fopens in new window). NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. Dated this 6' day of November, 2005 Mailed this § day of November, 2005 Notice of Decision SP-05-52 Page 3 LLER: ORS CHAPTER MUST BE PROMPTLY Exhibit 12 _ \ Page 3 of Appiication CU-05-20 Before Deschutes County, Oregon, Thornburgh Resort Company LLC Page 1 A application for conditional use permit and conceptual master plan December 20, 2005 Good Day Deschutes County Commissioners: My topic is transportation. Attached is Deschutes County's Chapter 23.32 Tumalo Rural Community Attached is Deschutes County Planning Commission's agenda from December 8, 2005. Item IV relates to Ordinance 2005-046, here attached in 17 pages which speaks to the need to collect transportation SDC`s. George Kolb was the presenter in Steve Jorgenson's absence. George identified that the County's budget for county road maintenance is $2Million Dollars per year for the next 5 years. George Kolb said he could use three times this budget. The maps he presented show deficiencies in our road systems which are q Af jh6re are a few images. to highlight the issue in Tumalo starting with Tumalo Transportation Plan. Local, Roads are shown, in, brown Rural Collectors are in blue: Cook ave crosses Hwy 20 to OB Riley Rd, 7th Street C Alpine Espresso crosses Hwy 20 to Bailey Rd C?Tumalo Feed Company, and Tumalo Road crosses the river headed East to Old Bend Redmond Highway and Deschutes Junction. The red Rural Arterial is Cline Falls Hwy. Next is a vicinity Map showing Redmond, Thornburgh's proposed resort, Cline Falls Highway. leading from Hwy 126 into Tumalo where it is called Cook Avenue and it's intersection with. Hwy 20 (an intersection with 12 directions of traffic). The next 2 maps are from George's presentation showing 1)Current County Road Status for Road ROW which identifies that in. Tumalo, Cline Falls, Hwy fails to meet the County arterial/collector standards for ROW width at the dangerous curves by Tumalo Cemetary, also 7th street and Bailey road are substandard, as are Johnson Market Road (west of OB Reiley); and on the West side of Redmond where 60% (I?I) of Thornbur-gh's traffic IS perported to head, there are many substandard. ROW widths, including two that intersect H.wy 126: 75th street and Helmholtz; identified as operating deficient by Ferguson & Associates in his previous testimony to this file. Also ROW sub-standard is SW Obsidian Ave. 2)This Map Current County Road Status Road Width shows that only 36% of Deschutes County's arterials and collectors meet the standard for paved width. West of Redmond there are even more roads that do not meet county pavement standards than ROW standards. Tumalo has it's fare share of substandard pavement widths, including: Cline Falls Highway, lnnes Market Road, Gerking Market Road, Tumalo Road, 7th Street and Bailey Road to name a few. Deschutes County recognizes the underfunding dilema. In the current 2005-2010 County CIP and Revised 20-Year Transportation. Project List (attached .Resolution. No 2005-088) it lists a huge laundry list of "to do" projects as Exhibit B yet the funding in Exhibit A budgets minimal funds to tackle the list. So the need and timing have now convened. The County is correct to look to new development to pay SDC's for transporation. This is a prudent financial step for the County. Transportation SDC's should be in place before reviewing one more County land use application or approving this one. Many roads listed above are identified in the Revised Project List Exhibit B. Exhibit jZ Page _ of 6 Pig a.13 Widen, & Overlay; Cline Falls Highway, Bailey Rd, Johnson Market, Widening & turn lanes: old Bend Redmond @ Tumalo Rd Pedestrian Sidewalks: 4th, 5th,7th and 8th Streets in Tumalo Grade separation/Alignment: the bridge @ Cook and Hwy 20 which is identified as a State Highway Improvement Project WITH COUNTY PARTICIPATION. Funny, I don't see Barr road here ...I guess Tumalo can handle it still being dirt north of Gerking.. it makes for great recreation. The dilema is that the County has believed Thornburgh's hired traffic consultants. Despite Ferguson & Associates clear and meticulous identification of deficiencies. Staff and the Hearing's officer simply have ignored the needs of our transportation system. 1 more car adversely impacts the Tumalo transportation system. You have heard that Destination Resorts do not impact our roads or facilities, Well, just how do you get from Thornburgh's property to Redmond, Bend, Tumalo or Sisters? You have heard that destination resorts pay for all of their roads. Well, they certainly don't pay for a I I the rest of roads they use. My property tax base doesn't go towards roads and neither will Thornburgh's unless changes are made in Deschutes County (See County Road Revenue Sources Fiscal Year 2004 attached.) The hearings officer apparently is not familiar with these needs. She ignored our traffic engineer (Ferguson & Ass.). Hopefully this Commission will recognize the liability it will incur if it approves Thornburgh prior to upgrading our streets. Tumalo, safety is on the line. You know it; we drive it. ~ ph.~Vs a ~ Visit us in Tumalo, we have over 39 businesses here. Swing by the School to see it's lack of pedestrian, access or ADA, connectivity in. town. See how a string of cars gets backed up behind the garbage collection service because the sub-standard pavement width inhibit's pullout off of Cline Falls Highway. Watch as Hap Taylor or Cascade Pumice's long trucks navigate the street intersections. Drive slow on curvy Cline Falls road, take in the scenery of Cline Buttes. And when you try crossing Hwy 20 to get to Bend, look twice, look twice. Through this Thornburgh application, Deschutes County has flicked it's responsibility of Tumalo area roads into ODOT's lap where Deschutes County roads connect to Hwy 20 and into BLM's lap where our dusty trails crisscross dusty Barr or Cline Falls or Hwy 126. This has been going on since Eagle Crest was approved. Deschutes County must step up for it's own laundry list of County road works needs and the County must step up to maintain it's livability vision for Tumalo. Deschutes. County cannot turn a blind eye to theses issues that Thornburgh's, traffic will exaccerbate. There is a very big difference between collecting for a bridge and getting the bridge built. Previous projections based on Eagle Crest development were to have the interchange in Tumalo this year: 2005. Yet regional growth has more pressing priorities, close to home are Hwy 97 at Sunriver, Hwy 97/Hwy 20 for Juniper Ridge, Cooley Road interchange, Parkway improvements, Deschutes Junction alignment and more. There are regional issues that even ODOT's $1 Billion budget shortfall cannot deliver (Bulletin 1 1 /26/05 C2, The Oregonian 1 1 /27/05 A1,8). What is sensible now is to deny Thornburgh's application until County road and pedestrian areas Exhibit Z Page -/0 of 1_ Pte. 3~ 3 are improved and the Cook Ave/Hwy 20 grade-separated interchange infrastructure is built and functioning safely. These sensible and reasonable priorities will keep traffic on the highest designated streets (not local streets like 5th street by the Vet clinic) and will assure safety for our residents, merchants, children and visitors. This Commission nor any other can afford the huge liability which lies ahead if it approves development knowing of it's road deficiencies and that Cook Ave/OB Reiley and 7th Street/Bailey Road intersections crossing Highway 20 are now failing. Locals will tell you that the easiest way to get to Sisters from downtown Tumalo is past the vet clinic on 5th Street and turn right onto Hwy 20. 5th Street is also the safe-ist travel path to get to. Bend because there is a refuge lane on Hwy 20 and no oncoming traffic. We are ruining Tumalo by using 5th Street, our local road (brown color on this map) as a defacto collector. Thornburgh's Traffic Impact Analysis grotesquely understates the resort's impacts. It goes so far to not even identify counts at Cline Falls Road for one of it's two proposed access roads! Thornburgh's first computations for it's share of Cook ave/Hwy 20 interchange dues was $7500.00. Wow what a contribution! this really would help out ODOT in their one Billion dollar shortfall. So where does this leave Deschutes County. What safety can this Commission guarrantee our county citizens? Where will the County get it's funding to catch-up on maintenance, or purchase ROW, or install sidewalks, or stripe for bike lanes or facilitate a disabled child to get to school? These are your decisions. I trust you will have vision for our Community. Thank you, Annunziata Gould, 19845 JW Brown Rd, Bend, OR 97701 541-317-5829 Enclosures: as stated above. 11, C.`,411, S q\,o k-A`.. Exhibit R Page _L1 _ of 8 C,IA U~~ZJ Chapter 23.32 TUMALO RURAL COMMUNITY 23.32.010. Tumalo Rural Community. 23.32.020. Maps. 23.32.010. Tumalo Rural Community. A. General. 1. Background - Historical. Tumalo is located in the north central portion of Deschutes County, less than 3 miles northwest of the city limits of Bend. Situated at an altitude of approximately 3,200 feet, the community of Tumalo lies in the middle portion of the Upper Deschutes River Basin (river mile 157). The commercial core of Tumalo lies on the alluvial bowl bounded by the Laidlaw Butte on the west and the bluff of he Deschutes River canyon on the east. The Deschutes River bisects the community. Originally named Laidlaw, Tumalo was platted by the Laidlaw Townsite Company in 1904. The development of Tumalo began in 1899 with incorporation of the Three Sisters Irrigation Company. Under the Carey Act, they made plans to divert water from Tumalo Creek and the Deschutes River in order to irrigate 60,000 plus acres of desert land. Town founder, A.W. Laidlaw of Portland, and his investors believed that Tumalo would become the heart of Central Oregon. There was reason to be optimistic due to the fact the railroad was coming north up the Deschutes River Canyon, which would undoubtedly follow the river into their newly platted town, and the proposed railroad to be built up the North Santiam River and across the mountains would surely guarantee the town's success. Neither of these projects came to fruition. Out of nearly 900 lots platted, a third were sold by 1907. In those early days, Tumalo had a weekly newspaper, a barbershop, a two story hotel, two lawyer offices, a wallpaper company, a bakery, two feed stores and a bank, for example. As the town grew, it became its own voting precinct with 65 registered voters to Bend's 66 voters in 1906. By 1909, Laidlaw, being called Tumalo on occasion, still had hopes of being the junction of the two railroads, the new "metropolis" of Central Oregon. However, at the time the Columbia Southern Railroad still ended in Shaniko, and the Corvallis and Eastern rails were still stalled at the foothills on the western side of the Cascades, where they had been for approximately 15 years. With the announcement that the railroad was coming to Bend not Laidlaw, Bend had moved ahead in population by 1910. As a result, the population in Laidlaw decreased to 250 people and many businesses moved to Bend. The small town was known as Laidlaw for only six years when the Laidlaw post office was closed in 1913. The post office eventually reopened in 1923 as the Tumalo post office and thus the name of the town was forever changed. 2. Background - Population and growth. The population for Tumalo has been extrapolated from four sources: the 1990 Census, the Deschutes County Unincorporated Land Use Inventory (October 1995), and the Residential/Vacant Lands map generated by the Deschutes County GIS data. The fourth source is a refinement of the 1995 Land Use Inventory projection for Tumalo contained in the Deschutes County Non-Urban Population Capacity Projection (November 8, 1996). In review of the 1990 US Census for Tumalo area totaled approximately 325 persons. Historical population data for Tumalo have not been collected. However, the Tumalo Elementary School has experienced an influx of younger couples with children replacing retirees who have moved out of the area. The Tumalo elementary school has approximately 301 students at the present time with a capacity of approximately 400 serving grades K through 5th. According to the Deschutes County Chapter 23.32 (01/2002) Exhibit R Page _/2 of Land Use Inventory (October 1995) Tumalo had 155 developed lots. Using 1990 Census data of 2.54 persons per household, the population figure would be 393. Again, this does not take into account percentages of retirement population and second homes in the Tumalo area. According to the GIS Parcel basemap (Assessors data) the developed lots in Tumalo equal 172. Using the 1990 Census figure of 2.54 persons per household, this population figure is approximately 436. The rate of future population growth in Tumalo is difficult to estimate because growth is limited due to the substandard platted lots of the Laidlaw Platt as well as the difficulty in extrapolating data for the specific boundary of Tumalo. Deschutes County projects a county-wide growth rate of 4.5 percent until the year 2000. Recent estimates for all unincorporated areas of Deschutes County (excluding unincorporated urban growth boundary lands of Sisters, Redmond and Bend) indicate a growth rate of 4.8% annual growth between 1990-1995. 3. Background - Periodic review. In the fall of 1994, the Land Conservation and Development Commission adopted a new administrative rule, OAR 660.22, Unincorporated Communities. As part of 1996-97 periodic review, the County updated the Comprehensive Plan and implementing regulations for Tumalo to comply with the rule. 4. Rural Community. Tumalo meets the definition of a Rural Community because it is primarily a residential community, which also has a school, church, and a handful of local businesses that serve the community, the surrounding rural area or persons traveling through the area. The comprehensive plan designates Tumalo as a Rural Community and provides for its growth and development accordingly. 5. Tumalo Rural Community boundary. The 1979 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan designated Tumalo a Rural Service Center, a Goal 3 and 4 exception area, consisting of 491 acres and 288 tax lots. The 1979 Tumalo Rural Service Center boundary included the Laidlaw Plat, the southeast flank of Laidlaw Butte north of Bailey Road, the area east of the Deschutes River on the north and south sides of Tumalo Road, six lots of the Winston Ranch subdivision on the east bluff of the Deschutes River canyon and seven parcels located north of Putnam Lane. During the 1997 update, the Tumalo Rural Community boundary was amended in the following ways to include 504.11 acres and 321 tax lots (See Map A). a. A parcel comprising ten acres was the subject of a zone change, plan amendment and minor partition in 1980, File #ZC-PA/80-1. This parcel is located approximately 1/4 mile north of the existing boundary on the between Cline Falls Highway and the west bank of the Deschutes River. The plan designation for this area was changed from Rural Service Center to Rural Residential Exception Area. b. An area consisting of 33 lots of the Deschutes River Homesites subdivision was changed from a plan designation of Rural Residential Exception Area to Rural Community- Residential 5 acre. In addition, the strip of land that is located between Cline Falls Highway and the Deschutes River that links the previous Tumalo Rural Community boundary to the lots adjacent to Beaver Lane was included within the boundary and designated Residential 5 acre. c. One tax lot north of Putnam Lane on the west side of Hopper Road which comprises the northern lot of the Rockwood Subdivision not included with the other seven lots that are located within the boundary. The plan designation for this area was changed from Rural Residential Exception Area to Residential 5 acre. d. The community boundary was refined to coincide with parcel lines along the east rim of the Deschutes River canyon and along the east channel of the Deschutes River. The plan designations for these adjustments were changed from "Residential-5 acre" to Rural Residential Exception Area and Agriculture. The south boundary of the community was refined to coincide Chapter 23.32 2 (01/2002) Exhibit IZ Page 13 of t7 d with the southern extension of the TuR5 and TuR zoning designations in the area of designated Floodplain. In 1999, the boundary of the community was revised to exclude tax lots 2301, 2300 and 2600 that were inadvertently excluded from the mining processing operations conducted by Bend Aggregate and Paving for many years. These parcels were mistakenly included in the community boundary in 1997. The community boundary now without these tax lots includes a total of 318 tax lots. Each of the community maps in the comprehensive plan was revised in 1999 to reflect this boundary change. B. Land use planning. I . Existing land uses. The predominant land use in Tumalo is single-family residences. Commercial land uses include a market, restaurants, real estate offices, a small commercial/retail complex, and various other small- scale retail businesses located in the core of the community along Cook Avenue. There is a fire station, an irrigation district office, a church and an elementary school. Land bordering Tumalo is zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFUTRB) Tumalo/RedmondBend Subzone, Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA10 - 10 acre minimum lot size), Floodplain (FP) and Surface Mine (SM). The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan designates EFU land for Agriculture uses and WA10 and RRIO land for Rural Residential uses. The EFU land surrounding Tumalo is employed in large-lot, irrigated agricultural uses, whereas the MUA 10 land is parcelized and developed with rural residences and small-scale agricultural uses. A land use inventory using the County Assessor's data (GIS parcel basemap) is shown in Table B. Table B: Land Use Inventory - Tumalo Rural Community mss ; ~>ldE - 'fax itxots : ' IiLoft h 15 2 13 63 26 37 0 'Tr ► 181 138 43 28 5 23 04= . ;;A)fki 288 172 116 )E istri ;Tic >C ax 1Jts~ tax to - 48 32 16 190 113 77 t.;; : 48 26 22 288 172 116 : : Source: Deschutes County Assessors Database. March 19 1997 & Deschutes County PW 1-11S Parcel Basemap, March 19, 1996 2. Comprehensive Plan designations. Chapter 23.32 3 (01/2002) Exhibit Page _ (9 of t7 0 The 1997 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan for the Tumalo Rural Community has the following five comprehensive plan designations (See Map B). a. Residential District. At the time of adoption, the boundary of the Residential district coincided with the boundary of the old Laidlaw Plat including the Deschutes River Homesites plats between Riverview Avenue and the Deschutes River. It also includes the area surrounding the Bend Aggregate site south of Highway 20. It is intended to accommodate higher density residential uses b. Residential 5 Acre District. The lands designated Residential-5 acre minimum included the larger parcels of land to the east across the Deschutes River and to the west on the slope of Laidlaw Butte. This plan designation is intended to remain in large parcels to maintain the rural character of the community. c. Commercial District. In general, the Commercial plan designation extends north from the intersection of Cook Avenue and Highway 20 to 3rd Street between Wood and Wharton Avenues. The Commercial lands also comprises a portion of land west of Highway 20 between 5th and 8th Streets. The commercial plan designation was intended to accommodate a mixture of small scale commercial and limited industrial uses that serve the rural community of Tumalo. The core commercial area was intended to focus on the area adjacent to Cook Avenue north of Highway 20. The Commercial Land designation was expanded to accommodate a section of land between Cook Avenue and Wharton Avenue that extends south to Highway 20. This area includes the "Tumalo Mall", an existing commercial/retail complex. The use of this building has been authorized as a nonconforming use (1986), and subsequent site plan alteration in 1987/88. The purpose of the commercial lands expanding to include this parcel is to bring the uses specified in the previous land use decisions into compliance with the uses allowed in the commercial zone. This complex contains one existing business which occupies 2/3 of the building. d. Research Development District (RD). This plan designation contains two parcels in one ownership located on the southeast slope of Laidlaw Butte to the west of Tumalo. This plan designation was originally created to accommodate a research and development site and its associated uses that predated the county 1979 zoning ordinance that would be compatible with the rural character of the area. e. Floodplain District (FP). This plan designation contains the previous Floodplain designation that follows the channel of the Deschutes River that bisects the Tumalo Rural Community. The Floodplain Zone is identified by the Federal Insurance Administration as areas of special flood hazard in the report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study for Deschutes County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas," dated August 16, 1988. 3. Land use policies. a. General land use policies. I. Land use regulations shall conform to the requirements of OAR 660 Division 22 or any successor. 2. County plans and land use regulations shall ensure that new uses authorized within the Tumalo Rural Community do not adversely affect agricultural uses in the surrounding exclusive farm use zones. Zoning regulations shall require any new structure on land contiguous to );,FU-zoned land which is receiving special assessment for farm use to be set back 100 feet from the common property line. 3. To protect scenic views visible from the community, adequate setbacks shall be required for homes built along the rim forming the Deschutes River Canyon and Laidlaw Butte. 4. Uses such as parks and open space shall be encouraged, and where feasible, the County should acquire those lands as open space. 5. Public access to the river shall be preserved. 6. Publicly owned lands along the river should remain as open space. Chapter 23.32 4 (01/2002) Exhibit lR Page is of T7 7. The County shall encourage the preservation of historical structures such as the Laidlaw Bank and Trust (1910), and the Tumalo Community Church (1907). b. Residential District policies. I . Areas designated residential on the comprehensive plan map shall be designated a corresponding residential district on the zoning map. 2. Lands designated Residential shall be in proximity to the commercial area, while the lands designated Residential 5 acre will be on the perimeter of the community. The higher density lands designated Residential shall remain in the bowl formed by the Deschutes River canyon. 3. Livestock shall be permitted in the residential districts subject to use limitations. 4. The County shall plan and zone for a diversity of housing types and densities suited to the capacity of the land to accommodate water and sewage requirements. c. Commercial District policies. 1. Allow small-scale commercial uses in conformance with the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22, and larger more intense commercial uses if they are intended to serve the community, the surrounding rural area and the travel needs of people passing through the area. 2. Allow small-scale industrial uses in conformance with the requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. 3. Where there is a choice to use a road other than Highway 20 for access, access shall not be taken from Highway 20. 4. Design standards in the commercial district should encourage new development that is compatible with the rural character of the community and to reduce negative impacts on adjacent residential districts. 5. Livestock shall not be permitted in the commercial districts. 6. No additional lands shall be designated Commercial shall until the next periodic review. 7. Residential uses or residences in conjunction with uses listed in the commercial districts shall be allowed, but they are not intended to predominate or set development standards for others uses in the commercial district. 8. Approval standards for conditional uses in the commercial district shall take into account the impact of the proposed use on the nearby residential and commercial uses and on the capacity of the transportation and other public facilities and services to serve the proposed use. 9. Replatting for residential purposes shall not be allowed in the commercial district. C. Public facility planning. I. Special Districts: Tumalo Rural Community is served by the following special districts. (l) Laidlaw Water District; (2) Deschutes County Rural Fire Protection District #2; (3) Redmond School District #2J; (4) Tumalo Irrigation District; and (5) Tumalo Town Ditch. a. Water. The area previously identified as the Tumalo Rural Service Center (RSC) has two water sources. The Laidlaw Water District serving the area identified as the old Laidlaw Plat, and the area described as T16S R12E section 29 (WI/2 SW1/4), section 30 (E1/2 SW 1/4), (SW 1/4 SE 1/4), section 31(NE1/4, NI/2 SE1/4). The Tumalo Town Ditch is the original source of water which has water rights dating back to 1924 and 1938. The system consists of 3 miles of ditch that begins near the bridge at Tumalo State Park, and runs along the river as a ditch crossing Bailey Road at the Tumalo Feed Company Restaurant, continues under Highway 20 to the commercial district of the Tumalo Chapter 23.32 5 (01/2002) Exhibit Page _l (o of r? community. The Tumalo Town ditch is used for irrigation purposes only, serving approximately 35 customers. During the 1997 plan update, the Oregon Department of Water Resources commented that there is an abundant supply of potable water in multiple water bearing zones based upon a report prepared by a geologist for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, "Geology and Mineral Resources Map of the Tumalo Dam Quadrangle". Limitations are imposed by the lack of capacity of domestic pumps and not the capacity of the aquifer. The department has not identified Tumalo Rural Community as a groundwater limited or groundwater critical area. The Laidlaw Domestic Water District currently depends on two groundwater wells. The District's groundwater source does not exceed current EPA maximum contaminant limits. No treatment is performed; none has been required by the state Health Division. A proposed EPA groundwater disinfection rule would require continuous disinfection of the water supply. The area in the Tumalo Rural Community that is outside the District's boundary relies on individual wells for drinking water. The Water Resources Department routinely approves new groundwater wells in this area of the Tumalo Rural Community. b. Sewer. Tumalo does not have a community sewer system or a sewer facility plan. Land uses in the Tumalo Rural Community rely on on-site sewage disposal systems of all ages and descriptions, ranging from newer sand-filter systems to old drainfields. In some cases on-site systems are insufficient for current needs. According to the Environmental Health Division, past experience has indicated most of the soils in the area would fall under the category of rapidly draining soils. Based upon the most restrictive parameter onsite administrative rules would require a minimum lot size of one-half acre per single-family dwelling. This standard is based upon a projected sewage rate not to exceed 450 gallons per day. This is termed the loading rate pursuant to OAR 340-71-290(3)(e) and 340-71-275(3). Because of the alluvial soil profile (rapidly draining soils) a standard septic system is not feasible on smaller lots. It is often necessary to install a relatively expensive sand-filter system in order to obtain development permits for new development or for alterations to existing development. There are a few tax lots that cannot be developed or redeveloped, because they are too small to accommodate any approved on-site sewage disposal system. The County plan and zoning regulations restrict the type and intensity of allowed uses to those which can be served by a DEQ approved on-site sewage disposal systems. The County does not allow uses or densities that cannot obtain approval for an DEQ approved on-site system. In addition, County zoning regulations set minimum lot sizes to ensure the on-site systems do not exceed the capacity of the land. Accordingly, the Environmental Health Division has stated that the minimum loading rates are addressed in the DEQ on-site rules and the minimum lot size requirements in the zoning ordinance. Due to these provisions, a public facility plan is not necessary. c. Other. During the 1997 update, the community expressed strong support for retaining the existing fire station in the rural community of Tumalo. The Planning Commission recommended a policy encouraging the continued presence of a fire station in Tumalo. However, the Board of County Commissioners understands that such a specific policy would be beyond its jurisdiction and control. The Board has addressed the community's concerns about fire protection in Tumalo by adopting a more general policy statement. inclusion of this policy statement in the county's comprehensive plan should not be misconstrued as an endorsement for or against a fire station in the community but a mere finding that at this point in time, a large number of Tumalo 4,. residents believe that a fire station presence is necessary. Chapter 23.32 6 (01/2002) Exhibit Page __L'I_ of _!7 6 - 2. General public facility planning policies. a. Residential minimum lot sizes shall be determined by the capacity of the land to accommodate available water and sewer facilities, in order to protect and promote public health and safety and to provide the efficient public facilities and services. b. The County shall encourage quality fire protection in the rural community of Tumalo. c. The County shall encourage early planning and acquisition of sites needed for public facilities (e.g. school, roads, water supply facility). d. The County shall encourage all development within the Laidlaw Water District to connect to the system. e. The County shall support replatting of lots in the area comprising the Laidlaw Plat and outside the lands designated commercial to create lots large enough to accommodate a DEQ approved on-site sewage disposal system. f The County shall support the protection of the Tumalo Town Ditch easement and its distribution system. g. The County shall support the development and management of the domestic water system for the Tumalo community so that cumulative development will not result in public health hazards of adverse environmental impacts that violate state or federal water quality regulations. D. Transportation planning. t. Background - Transportation in Tumalo. The Transportation plan addresses the transportation concerns of the Tumalo community. The plan meets the requirements of the state Transportation Planning Rule - OAR Chapter 660, Division 12, by designating a network of local roads, sidewalks and bikeways with associated road development standards. a. Community transportation goals. The livability of the Tumalo community depends on the ability of the transportation network to provide safe and convenient access in the residential and commercial areas and to the Tumalo elementary school. The community reached consensus on the following transportation goals: I . Improve the access from Cook Avenue to and across Highway 20 2. Reduce truck traffic through the community 3. Provide safe pedestrian walkways in the commercial core and to the school 4. Provide road standards that are practical and cost effective to construct and maintain 5. Provide shoulders on county roads b. Community profile. Tumalo is a rural community near Bend with a mix of residential, commercial, and nearby employment, including gravel quarries and a high-tech research company. It functions as a bedroom community for Bend. Historical population data have not been compiled. The 1990 US Census for the Tumalo area totals approximately 325 persons. County Assessor's data show 172 dwellings within the Tumalo community boundary. According to the Deschutes County Land Use Inventory (October 1995) Tumalo had 155 lots. Using the 1990 Census data of 2.54 persons per household, the population figure ranges from approximately 393 to 436. According to the Redmond School District, the Tumalo Elementary School has experienced an influx of younger children in recent years. Although figures indicating the demographic mix for the Tumalo area are not available, the population appears to be a mix of families and retirees, with an average or above number of children (nondrivers). c. Collision data. There were 38 reported collisions on Highway 20 near Tumalo during the 10-year period from 1986 to 1995. There were 42 injuries and 1 fatality. Of the 38 crashes, 17 occurred at intersections, with seven at Cook Avenue and eight at 7th Street. The majority of crashes (27) were during daylight. Eight incidents involved a wet surface and 10 involved trucks; no Chapter 23.32 (01/2002) Exhibit R Page 19 of pedestrians or bicyclists were involved. 't'hese numbers place this segment of Highway 20 below the state average for accident rate. d. Constraints on the transportation system. 1 Topographic Features: Tumalo is located on the valley floor of the Deschutes River canyon, bounded by rimrock on the west and east. Laidlaw Butte forms the other significant topographic feature to the west of Tumalo. The rimrock and river limit the opportunities for a network of continuous streets. 2. Transportation Features: Highway 20 runs north-northwest through Tumalo and limits east-west street connections. There are 3 accesses to the highway: 5th Street, 7th Street/Bailey Road, and Cook Avenue/O.B. Riley Road. Pavement runoff is handled by direct absorption into the soil since there is no community stormdrain or sewer system. This affects street design especially the use of curbs, paved surfaces, and landscaping. Special attention must be given to drainage needs and runoff into the Deschutes River. 2. Inventory of existing transportation facilities. This section contains an inventory of the existing public roads and pedestrian and bicycle facilities in Tumalo. These data were gathered primarily from the County Department of Public Works database supplemented by site visits and aerial photographs. a. Roads. The essential component of the region's transportation system is U.S. Highway 20 which runs diagonally through the community. Highway 20 has three lanes, a travel lane in each direction and a continuous two-way center left-turn lane. The traffic count at the intersection of Highway 20 and Cook Avenue in 1996 was 7600 average daily traffic (ADT). The posted speed on Highway 20 through Tumalo is 55 mph. Intrastate truck traffic and local truck traffic serving nearby mining operations comprise a significant percentage of the traffic mix. O.B. Riley Road, which is outside the community boundary, is a rural arterial which intersects Highway 20 from the south directly across from Cook Avenue. This road bisects the gravel mining operation that abuts Highway 20. County collector roads include Bailey, Cline Falls, Cook, and Tumalo which all intersect Highway 20 in the central portion of Tumalo. Cline Falls feeds into Tumalo from the north, Tumalo Road from the east, and Bailey Road feeds into the community from the south. There are approximately 4.7 miles of roads in Tumalo. Table D I (Inventory of Existing Roads), is organized by functional classification, road name and alphabetical order. The available (ADT) counts provided by the county and state are listed. The public roads in Tumalo (see Map DI) range in pavement width from 20 feet to 24 feet. Some streets (e.g., Riverview Ave.) are in poor condition (i.e. cracking and pot holes). Most unpaved roads need grading and a fresh layer of gravel. b. Pedestrian facilities. There are no sidewalks or trails in Tumalo. The bridge on Tumalo Road has a walkway on its north side. There are two designated crosswalks, one on Cline Falls Road on the north side of the Tumalo Road intersection and the other on Cook Avenue on the north side of the 4th Street intersection. Cline Falls Road is signed for 20 mph if children are present because of the nearby elementary school (the normal speed limit is 35 mph). All other pedestrian travel is on roadways with narrow or no shoulders. Chapter 23.32 (01/2002) Exhibit rZ Page of _EL o Except for the school grounds, Tumalo lacks public space such as a park, square or commons to which pedestrians could be attracted. There is undeveloped public access to the river from Tumalo Road. The primary trip attractors are the school, a church and the small commercial area (gas station, market, and restaurant). There is also a restaurant on the west side of Highway 20. c. Bicycle facilities. Highway 20 has a four-foot paved shoulder bikeway. All other bicycle travel is on shared roadways. Cline Falls Road and Cook Avenue are popular recreational routes. There are bicycle racks at the school. 3. Future transportation needs. A rural community such as Tumalo, located on a major highway, requires a transportation network that can accommodate local, commuter, regional, and interstate traffic without detracting from the community's livability and rural character. Accomplishing this goal requires integrated street, bicycle and pedestrian networks, appropriate street standards, and safe access to the Highway 20 corridor. The Tumalo transportation plan is based on conventional road functional classifications; or: arterial, collector and local roads. It establishes the roles and development standards appropriate to each type or road. The design of arterial and collector roads gives priority to through traffic over access to adjacent land uses. On local roads the emphasis is on access to adjacent land uses. a. Transportation network plan. The transportation network plan for Tumalo identifies where the roads need to be improved and where pedestrian and bicycle facilities are warranted. The network plan has three components: roads, sidewalks and bikeways. 1. Roads. Central Tumalo is a relatively compact area without need for additional public streets; infill will access existing streets. For the roads depicted on Map D2, planned improvements take advantage of existing public right-of-way, where it exists. Lands in the low density areas are served by existing public right-of-way which are unpaved, non- maintained public roads (Beaver Lane, Putnam Lane and Hopper Road) and private drives (Research Road, Winston Loop Road).. Map D2 also depicts the roads that need improvement to serve the local road network and through traffic corridors. 2. Sidewalks. Map D2 shows where sidewalks are needed for safety and identifies a potential opportunity for a trail extending south along the west side of Deschutes River. In Tumalo, a sidewalk network is needed along Cook Avenue, 4th, 5th, 7th and 8th streets to access the school and provide safe places for people to walk in the commercial area as it develops. Sidewalks are usually separated from the road by a curb and gutter, which function as part of the storm drain system. Tumalo does not have a storm drain system. As an alternative, sidewalks in Tumalo shall be constructed without curbs and gutters and set back from the road surface behind a drainage swale. This type of sidewalk design is adequate, less costly and is consistent with the rural character of Tumalo. A drainage swale is a broad, manmade depression running parallel to the right of way between the roadway and the sidewalk, where water can drain into the ground. The swale also provides room for signs, mailboxes, and snow storage, leaving the sidewalk free of obstructions. Street trees should not be planted in drainage swales where they will conflict with existing or planned utility lines, whereby the tree roots may damage pipes and conduits complicating repair work. 3. Bikeways. Chapter 23.32 (01/2002) Exhibit R, I Page 20 of Two types of bikeways are appropriate in rural areas. A shared roadway for local roads with low traffic volumes and speeds, and a paved shoulder bikeway for collectors and arterials with higher volumes and speeds or significant truck traffic. In Tumalo, paved shoulder bikeways are needed on Cline Fails Highway/Cook Avenue, Tumalo Road and Bailey Road which are County collector roads, including a bicycle connection from O.B. Riley south to Tumalo State Park (see Map 132). 4 Highway 20. The intersection of the Highway 20 and Cook Avenue has been identified by the community as a traffic safety hazard. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) will have the lead authority to develop a solution to the realignment of this intersection. Preliminary designs have been presented to the Tumalo community. The County will work with ODOT to provide a solution to this intersection and to the connecting network of County roads which includes the realignment of O.B. Riley Road through the existing mining operation on the south side of Highway 20. Projects to complete the transportation network plan are listed in Table D2. The tables list the type of improvement and the associated cost. The priorities are based upon perceived -need while being flexible to grant funding or development opportunities. b. Road development standards. In recent years, urban street development standards were required in unincorporated communities within the county. The urban standards required 36 feet of pavement, with curb-tight sidewalks, curbs and gutters. It became evident that this standard was not practical or necessary in Tumalo. None of the existing roads in Tumalo meet this standard. The cost to build to this standard prohibited local residents from forming Local Improvement Districts (LIDs). In addition, people resisted the urban street profile because it did not fit with the community's preference for a rural appearance. The road standards are intended to decrease the cost of road improvements and to remove barriers to the formation of LIM for improving local roads. There are sound traffic engineering principles that support reduced street standards. The State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660.12.045(7)) directs local governments to establish standards for local streets that minimize pavement width and total right-of-way consistent with the operational needs of the facility. Excessive standards increase the costs of construction, use up valuable land, encourage inappropriate traffic volumes and speeds and create a problem channeling stormwater runoff. In Tumalo, full urban road standards are not needed because the traffic volumes and speeds on roads in the community are low compared to city streets. Many roads serve only a few residences. However, existing County rural road standards are not adequate to serve the densities and variety of uses found in Tumalo. Local businesses and the elementary school generate more local trips than normally found in the rural county. The Tumalo Rural Community road development standards were developed in coordination with the community planning process, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, the state Bicycle and Pedestrian Program and with the County Planning Division and Public Works Department. These road standards are consistent with ODOT and the American Association of State Highway Traffic Officials (AASHTO) standards for rural communities. They apply to public rights-of-way other than the state highway which is under state jurisdiction. 4. Transportation policies. a. Road Network Policies Chapter 23.32 10 (01/2002) Exhibit V Page 21 of 1_ 1. The County shall adopt a Transportation System Plan for Deschutes County that incorporates adopted policies and standards for the Tumalo Rural Community. 2. The County shall explore the potential for alternate truck routes to reduce the impacts of traffic through the Tumalo Rural Community. b. Road and sidewalk development policies. I. The County shall implement road development standards for the Tumalo Community that minimize pavement width and are consistent with the rural character of the community. 2. Specific street segments in the Tumalo Rural Community have been identified as priorities for improvement projects listed in Table D2. These priorities shall be flexible in order to take advantage of land development and grant funding opportunities. 3. Provide functional, cost effective sidewalks that are consistent with the rural character of the community. 4. Provide sidewalks where they are needed for safety, as set forth in Map D2. 5. Where sidewalks are specified on community roads, they shall be constructed without curbs and gutters, set back from the road surface behind a drainage swale at a distance from property lines to allow room for utilities. c. Highway 20 policies. 1. The County shall support the Oregon Department of Transportation efforts to implement both short and long-term improvements to solve the Cook Avenue/Highway 20 intersection safety and access problems. 2. The County shall consider the realignment of O.B. Riley Road through the Bend Aggregate site and coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation at its intersection with Highway 20. (Ord. 2000-017 § 1, 2000, Ord. 97-031, 1997) Chapter 23.32 11 (01/2002) Exhibit R Page ' L. of 11 d Table D1: Existing Roads by Functional Classification (source: Deschutes County Public Works, Traffic County Summary 1980 - 1996, June 1996) Road From To Ungt Classification Width ADT Names s h feet US Hwy 20 North URC south 1.04 Highway 48 7600 55 mph URC Bailey Rd. west URC Hwy 20 .352 Collector 22 1239 35 mph Cook Ave. Cline Falls Hwy 20 .373 Collector 24 4774 H Cline Falls north URC Cook .160 Collector 24 3478 H 35 m h Ave. Ttumalo Cline Falls URC 1.13 Collector 24 2250 Road Hwy 2nd St. Wood Ave. Cline Falls .151 Local 20 25 mph H 4th St. Wood Ave. Cline Falls .100 Local 25 mph H 4th St. Cline Falls Wharton .066 Local 24 Hwy Rd. 25 mph 5th St. Hwy 20 Wood ,023 Local 20 25 mph Ave. 5th St. Wood Ave. Wharton .180 Local 24 25 mph Rd. 7th St Hwy 20 Wharton .140 Local 21 25 mph Rd. 7th St. Wharton Riverview .023 Local Rd. Ave. 25 mph 8th St. Cook Ave. Riverview .088 Local 24 25 mph Ave. Bruce Ave. 4th St. 7th St. .210 Local 22 25 mph Cook Ave north end 2nd St. .070 Local 35 mph Cook Ave. 2nd St. Cline Falls .095 Local 20 35 mph H Riverview north end 8th St. .110 Local Ave. 25 mph Riverview 8th St south end .150 Local 18 Ave 25 mph Wharton 4th St. 8th St. .272 Local 24 Rd. 25 m h URC - denotes unincorporated rural community boundary (Ord. 2002-005 § 1, 2002; Ord. 2000-017 § 1, 2000; Ord. 97-031, 1997; PL-20, 1979) Chapter 23.32 12 (01/2002) Exhibit R Page 2-3 of _d 23.32.020. Maps. Exhibit 2 Page 2.-1 of Chapter 23.32 Comprehensive (01/2002) Exhibit 2 Page 2a of __76 Chapter 23.32 3 (01/2002) Exhibit IZ Page _2--(P of Main Dl- tntiAntnru A* PvIal lnd 12^2.4g% ' ' h . y d rr• ~ N All Z, 1 7 S SS~~ *4t > r ~ • ~ '"r ~ ' fwiuta. ~ . ter. r t Chapter 23.32 LEGEND T"w»alo Rem RueW Commanity s Rkr " tfmm* w no to Co"nmmftyrear~ry •~•.,,-•;,~tiw;>,,~ S ` mrom U 4 (0(/2002) Exhibit IR Page 2.11 of Map D2: Planned Road way, Sidewalk and Trail Improvements LEMW Piwe/Resd 1lo~d ritatrka~i - - - _ Rim" L3 ` %vo-Olow SwM% wwwwww~w Ire wwwwwa 9Av~ldet ~ ~ a Oilla a`' y ~,F Qh1I!rt 1 .ix a i 1 e~'V Tumalo Dural Community elf a!i M7 r J~~ !~i• 1: is J ell lk ~ *moo . r ~ ~ fix ;(at' ~Y~ * ' • f y.M f i~nsn' t' rill y Chapter 23.32 5 (01/2002) Exhibit Page '2_8 of O Y'` OTPS ~j I Z 70-0 ~ C,LL o s= 2.v Community Development Department { Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Health Division 117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon 97701-1925 (541)388-6575 FAX(541)385-1764 http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ AMENDED AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DESCHUTES SERVICES CENTER BARNES-SAWYER ROOMS 1300 NW WALL STREET, BEND, OR 97701 DECEMBER 8, 2005 - 4:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. I. DISCUSSION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CONDUCTING MEETINGS 5:30 P.M. II. CALL TO ORDER (Approval of 10/27/05 minutes and 11/10/05 minutes) III. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Non-agenda Items) IV. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2005-046 A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DESCHUTES COUNTY CODE, CHAPTERS 18.124 AND 17.16, TO ADOPT LANGUAGE THAT REQUIRES VARIOUS LEVELS OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CERTAIN LAND USE APPLICATIONS - GEORGE KOLB, DESCHUTES COUNTY ENGINEER V. WORK SESSION - INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PROPOSED DESTINATION RESORT REMAPPING WORK PROGRAM A. League of Women Voters Panel Discussion Handouts from November 17 B. Information Requested by the Planning Commission • Destination Resort Map • Housing Profile • Market Demand • Transportation Impacts • Water Resources (See Subsection E. Below) C. Planning Commission Questions and Discussion Quality Services Performed with Pride Catherine Morrow Tim Berg Terri Payne Terri Payne George Kolb Exhibit R Page 29 of D. Public Comments and Questions E. Next Steps • Water Policy Panel Discussion (January 12, 2006) • Work Program Discussion and Recommendation (January 26, 2006) VI. OTHER ITEMS OF CONCERN / DISCUSSION VII. ADJOURN NOTE: Items included in the packet for Planning Commission meetings can be located in the Community Development website by going to www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd on the internet and clicking on the Calendar for the date of the meeting you are interested in. The meeting location is wheelchair accessible. For the deaf or hearing impaired, an interpreter or assistant listening system will be provided with 48 hours notice. Materials in alternate formats may be made available with 48 hours notice by dialing 541-388- 6621. For other assistance, please dial 7-1-1, State Relay Service. NEXT MEETING - JANUARY 12, 2006 Exhibit Paged of ■ i DEC-16-2005 FRI 11;40 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 02 Community Development Department Planning Division auiiding Si fety Division Environmental Heslth Division 117 NW Lafayette A ienue Bend Oregon 97701-1925 (511)388-6575 FAX (541)385-1764 1 ittp://www,co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING December 8, 2005 STAFF; Steve Jorgensen, Senior Transportation Planner Subject; Ordinance 2005-046, Amending the Deschutes County Code Chapters 18.124 and 17.16 to Adopt Language that Requires U arious Levels of Traffic Impact Analysis for Certain Land Use Applications. INTRODUCTION: The County Community Development and County Road Departments have operated for many years without clear and objective requirements for traffic impact stud es. Such traffic studies allow the Planning and Road Department staffs to equitably assess the impacts to traffic and the County transportation facilities when certain land use actions are props -sed. Applicants for land use permits have also lacked clear guidelines to follow. The draft guide lines below are intended to fill this void and create a requirement based in DCC Title 17, and referenced in DCC Title 18. ACTION: The Planning Commission held a work session regarding this topic on November 5, 2005. Staff requests that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing on the proposed Traffic Impact Study guidelines, including text changes in DCC Title 18.124 (Attachment A), and the added text in DCC Title 17.16, (Attachment B). Following the close of the t hearing, staff seeks a recommendation from the Planning Commission, to forward this item o i to the County Board of Commissioners for their approval. DRAFT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) GUIDELINES: A. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish standards and procedures for preparing a traffic study for land use applications that significantly impact the transportatio 1 system in Deschutes County. The transportation system, for the purpose of this policy, is cor sidered to include public and private roads, intersections, sidewalks, bike facilities, trails, and trai sit systems. It shall be the responsibility of an applicant to meet with County staff in a pre-application conference to discuss study requirements, then generate the traffic study and submit it concurrently with the land use application. The traffic study will be used by the County staff to: • Evaluate site access and circulation; • Evaluate the ability of the roadway system to support the pro Dosed development and otherwise meet relevant planning criteria; • Determine specific on-site and off-site transportation system mitigation requirements: and, Page 1 Quality Services Performed with Aide Exhibit 1Z Page 51 of '70 ;DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:41 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 03 • Determine the development's share of future roadway improvements. B. Guidelines for Traffic Studies 1. All traffic impact studies performed under this policy shall lie conducted under the direction of a professional engineer or traffic engineer who is licens ;d in the State of Oregon and Is otherwise qualified to prepare traffic studies. The final rep,)rt shall be stamped and signed by the Registered Professional Engineer responsible for this document. The County Engineer shall determine when the report has satisfied all tie requirements of the development's impact analysis. Incomplete reports shall be retume d for completion. 2. The following vehicle trip generation thresholds shall determine the level and scope of transportation analysis required for a new or expanded developmer t. a. No Report is typically required if there are fewer than 50 trips per day generated during a weekday. b. Site Traffic Report (STR): If the development or change it use will cause the site to generate 50-200 daily trip ends, and less than 20 PM peal; hour trips, a Site Traffic Report will normally be required. c. Traffic Impact Analysis (T1A): If the development or dv inge in use will generate more than 200 trip ends and 20 or more PM peak hour tr ps, then a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be required. The County Engineer may waive or expand study requirements for unique circumstances. C_ Traffic Study Area 1. After consulting with other affected jurisdictions, the County Enl liner shall determine the impact analysis area. The impact analysis study area shall incl ide, at a minimum: a_ All site access points to the public roadway system via eft ier a driveway or private roadway; b. Nearest intersecting collector or arterial roads to the levelopment that would experience an increase of 25 additional peak hour trips; c. Any other collector or arterial intersection requested by staff, D. Study Time Frames 1. The analysis shall include the following time frames: a. Existing conditions (including approved, but not yet built d )velopments as identified by the County Engineer); b. Completion year of each significant phase of the developm( ant; c_ Five year forecast after buildout for each phase of develop neat or the final phase of development. d. Generators of large volumes of traffic (}5,000 daily and >E00 peak hour trips), zone changes, and any destination resort development will also require an analysis of traffic conditions in a twenty-year horizon. F. Minimum Study Requirements for an STR 1. The minimum study requirements for a Site Traffic Report are: a. A vicinity map showing the location of the project in relE tion to the transportation system of the area; b. Trip generation forecast using data from the most recent edition of the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual unless more appropriate data is available and approved by the County Engineer; c_ Trip distribution and assignment. Page 2 Exhibit 1Z Page _32 of 'DEC-16-2005 FRI 1141 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 04 d. Safety analysis of the site accesses, including sight distance and operation characteristics; e. Description of the proposed development and surrounding Lind uses; F. Minimum Study Requirements for a TIA 1. The minimum study requirements for a Traffic Impact Report ant: a. A vicinity map showing the location of the project in relai ion to the transportation system of the area; b. All of the elements of a STR; c. Traffic signal progression analysis and interconnection ma J be required if a new signal is proposed; d. Supplemental study issues may be identified by other affected jurisdictions; These supplemental issues will need to be addressed in the final rE port; e. Projects that distribute trips to a residential local road and ; ire projected to increase the volumes on that road to a volume greater than 1,000 i kDT, may be required to propose traffic calming techniques as mitigation, if otherwise appropriate; f. Trip generation forecast using data from the most recent .dltloni of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual t inless more appropriate data is available and approved by the County Engineer, g. Trip distribution assumptions should be based on historical data, existing and future travel characteristics, and capacity constraints; h. A complete description and drawing of the proposed develof,ment. i. Existing traffic volumes; j. Existing and future levels of service, average vehicle del: ty and volume /capacity ratios (V/C) for all intersections and road sections within the study area for conditions with and without the proposed project; k. Forecast traffic volumes with and without the development; 1. Safety analysis of the site accesses, include sight distance and operation characteristics; m. Analysis of right and left turn lane warrants (ODOT standards); n. Analysis of parking needs of the proposed development; o. When needed, warrant analysis for traffic control devices; p. Findings and conclusions including a recommendation of suggested potential mitigation for off site impacts and an evaluation of the effectiveness of those solutions. G. Operation And Safety Standards 1. The minimum operational and safety standards for use on DE schutes County's roads are: a. The minimum level of service for intersections and roads, du •ing the P.M. Peak Hour, is LOS "D" on existing facilities and LOS "C" on new facilities, b. The minimum sight distance for driveways and intersections is defined in ASSHTO's "GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS" (Green Book) and the AASHTO Design Guideline for Very-Low Volume Local Roac s (:E 400 ADT). H. Mitigation The applicant shall be responsible to mitigate any safety or capacity problems that are caused by their proposed development. At the County Engineer s discretion, if there are pre-existing safety deficiencies and/or capacity failures at releva it intersections or road frontages within the impact analysis area, then no additional devel apment may be allowed until a solution is funded or built that accounts for the proposed prof( ct's additional impacts. Page 3 Exhibit Page 33 of DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:41 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 05 Please contact Steve Jorgensen at 383-6718 if you have quest Ions or need additional information. Attachments: A) Draft Zoning Code Amendment (Chapter 18.124 B) Draft Subdivision Code Amendment (Chapter 17.16) SLJ:slj TA 05,-6headng.doc 11/29/05 Page 4 Exhibit R Page 3'9 of 7 y DEC-16-2005 FRI 11.42 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 06 Chapter 18.124. SITE PLAN REVIEW 18.124.010. Purpm, 48.124.020. Elements orsite plan. 18.124.030. Approval required. 18.124.040. Contents and procedure. 18.124.050. Decislon nn site plan. 18.124,060. Approval criteria. 113.124.070. Required minimum standards. 18-124.090. Other conditions. 18.124.090. Right of way improvement standards, 18.124.010. Purpose. WC 18.124.010 provides For administrative review of tite design of certain dovelopme its and improvements in order to promote functional, safe, innovative and attrucuvc site dcvcl apment compatible with the,wturul and man-made envirotunent (Ord. 91-020 § 1, 1991) 18.124.020. Elements of site plan. The elements of a site plan are, The layout and design of all existing and proposed improv .ments, including, but not limited to, buildings, structures, parking, circulation areas, outdoor 810raft: areas, bicycle parking, landscape areas, service and delivery areas, outdoor recreation areas, retaining walls, signs and graphics, cut and fill actions, accessways, pedestrian walkways, buffering and screening measures and street furniture. (Ord. 93-043 § 791),1993; Ord. 93-005 § 6, 1993) 18.124.030. Approval required. A. No building, grading, parking, land uoe, sign or other required permit shall be issued fi r a use subject to DCC 18.124.030, nor shall such a use be oommrnccd, enlarged, altered or c fanged until a final site plan is approved according to DC'C Title 22, the Uniform Deval >pment Procedures Ordinance. B. The provisions of DCC 18.124.030 shall apply to the following; 1. All conditional use permits where a site plan is a condition ofapproval; 2. Multiple family dwellings with more than three units; 3. All commercial uses that require parking facilities; 4. All industrial uses; 5. All other uses that serve the general public or that otherwi4e require parking fa:ilitics. including, but not limited to, landfills, schools. utility facilities, churches, corn nunity buildings, cemeteries, mausoleums, crematories, airports, parks and recreation facilit es and livestock sales yards. and 6. As specified for Flood Plain Zones (FP) and Surface Mining Impact Area Con bining Zones (5M IA), C. The provisions of DCC 18.124.030 shall not apply to uses involving the stabling and trai ting of equine in the EFU zone, noncommercial stables and horse events not requiring a con( itionaI use permit. D. Noncompliance with a final approved site plan shall be a zoning ordinanee violation. Attachment A Ordinance 200: i-046 Exhibit Page 35 of DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:42 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 07 E: As a condition of approval of any action not included in 13CC 18.124.030(8), the Planning Director or Hearings Body may require site plan approval prior to the issuance of any per nits. IOrd. 2003-034 § 2, 2003; Ord. 94-008 § 14, 1994; Ord. 91-038 4 1, 1991; Ord. 91-020 § 1 1991; Ord. 86-032 § 1, 1986) . 18.124.040. Contents and procedure. A. Any sita plan shall be filed on a form provided by the Planning Dcpartment and s call be Acwmpanied by such drawings, sketches and descriptions necessary to doscxihe the pr )posed development. A plan shall not be dccmcd complete unless all information reque itcd is provided. 8. Prior to filing a site plan, the applicant shall confer with the Planning Director or his representative concerning the requirements Ibr formal application. C. After the pre-application conference, the applicant shall Submit a site development p an, an inventory of existing plant materials including all trees six inches in diamcicr or gran ar and other Agniliic4rit Rpeeies, a landseape plan and architectural drawings including floor Pic ns and elevations. D. The site plan shall indicate the following, I. Access to sitc from adjacent rights of way, streets and arterial. Parking and circulation areas. 3. Locution, dimensiora (height and bulls) and design of buildings and signs. 4. Orientation of windows and doors. 5. Entrances and exits. 6. Private and shared outdoor recreation spaces. 7. Pedestrian circulation. 8. Public play areas. 9. Service areas for uses such as mail delivery, trash disposal, above ground utilities, landing and delivery. 10, Areas to be landscaped. 11. Exterior lighting 12. Special provisions for handicapped pemons. 13. Existing topography of the site at intervals appropriate to the site, but in no case N ving a contour interval greater than 10 feet 14. Signs. 15. Public improvements. 16. Dtninfield locations. 17. Bicycle panting facilities, with location of racks, sibmnge, lighting and showing the design of the shelter for long term parking tcilities. 18. Any rcquircd bicycle commuter facilities. 19. Other sits nlarncras and infomtation which will asslst in the evaluation of sito dcvclol •manr. E. no landscmpe plan shall indicate: 1. The sires, spocies and approximate locations of existing natural plant materials prop, s:ed to be retained and now plant materials proposed to be placid on sita, 2. Proposed site contouring. 3. An explanation of how drainage and soil erosion is to be dealt with during an i alter construction. (Ord. 2003-034 § 2, 2003; Ord. 93-005 § 7, 1993; Ord. 91-020 § 1, 1991) Attachment A Ordinance 200 ii-046 Exhibit Page 3(,o of _2C) DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:42 AN Desch. Co. Road Dept, FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 08 18.124.050. Decision on site pint. A. The Planning Director or Hearings Body may daily the site plan or approve it Witt such modifications and conditions as may be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or the c tito is and standards listed in DCC Title 18. B. The Planning Director or Hearings Body as a condition of approval may require th it the applicant file with the County a pcrfom-.lnce bond or other security approved by the gov. iming body to assure fiill and faithful performance of any required improvements. The bolod sl all be for the dollar amount plus 10 percent of the estimated cost of thr improvements. C. Planning Director or Hearings Wxiy rovicw shall be subject to DCC Title 22, the Ui iti rm Development Procedure Ordinance. (Ord. 91.020 § 1, 1991; Ord. 86-032 § 1, 1986) t8.124.060.Approval criteria. Approval ofa site plan Shull be based on the following criteria: A. The proposed ckvelopment shall relute hurmoniousiy to the natural environment and w isting development, minimizing visual impacts and pruscrving natural features including vient s and topographical features. 0. Tile landscape and existing topography shall be preserved to the greatest extent pa Bible, ermsidering development constraints and suitability of the landscape and topogjaphy. Preserved trees and shrubs shall be protected. C. The site plan shall be designed to provide a safe environment, while offering appropriate opportunities for privacy and transition from public to private spaces. D. When appropriate, the sits plan shall provide for the special needs of handicapped persons such as ramps for wheelchairs and Braille signs. B. The location and number of points of access to the site, interior circulation patterns, separ lions between pedestrians and moving and parked vehicles, and the arntngemrnt of parking ar- !as in relation to buildings and stntcnnes shall be harmonious with proposed and height oring buildings and structures. T. Surface drainage systems shall be designed to prevent adverse impacts on night axing properties. sft ts, or surface and subsurfar a water quality. G. Areas, structures and kellities for storage, machinery and equipment, services (mail, ri ifuse, utility wires, and the like), loading and parking and similar ac casory areas and structures shall be designed, located and buffered or screened to minimize adverse impacts on tine sia and neighboring properties. H. All above-ground Utility inglallatiotts shall be located to minimize adverse visual impacts r n the site and neighboring properties. 1. Specific criteria are outlined for each zone and shall be a required part of the site plan (e. jr lot setbacks, etc.). J. All exterior lighting shall be shielded so that dima light does not project off-site. (Ord. 93-143 21, 22 and 22A, 1993; Ord-91-039 § 1,1991; Ord. 91-M-0§ I, 1991) 1A.1Z4.070 Required minimum standards. A. Private or shared outdoor recreation arras in rcsidcntial developments. Attachment A Ordinance'2005, 046 Exhibit--R Page 177 of r7 0 DEC-16-2005 FRI 1142 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept.. FAX NO. 5413882719 Private Areas. Each ground-level living unit in a residcntiul developmit subjec; to site plan approval shall have an accessible outdoor private apace of not less than 48 sqt are feet in area. The area shall be enclosed, screened or otherwise designed to provide pri, -acy for unit residents and their guests. Shared Arms. Usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided for thts shares use of residents and their gucstq in any apartment residential development, as follows: a. Units with one or two bedrooms: 200 square fort per unit. b. Units with three or more bedrooms: 300 square feet per unit. Storage. In residential devclapmcnts, convenient areas shall be provided Ibr the su rntge of articles such us bicyelas, barbecues, luggage, outdoor furniture, ctc. Tltc+e areas .hall be entirely enclosed. B. Required Landscaped Areas. 1. The rolluwing landscape requirements are established for multi-family, cummer•;ial and industrial developments, subject to sito plan approval: a. A minimum of 15 percent of the lot area shall he landscaped. b. All areas subject to the final site plan and not otherwise improved shall be lands stped- 2. In addition to the requirement of DCC 18.124.070(B)(1)(a), the following to ►dscupe requirements shall apply to parking and loading areas: it. A parking or loading area shall be required to be improved with defined Ian Iscaped areas totaling no less than 25 square. W per parking space, b. In addition to the landscaping required by DCC 18.124.070(B)(2)(a), a par king or loading area shall be scpuratud from any lot line adjacent to a roadway by a Ian bw4ped strip at least 10 feet in width, and from any other lot linc by a land=ped strip at least five feet in width. c. A landscaped strip separating a parking or loading area from a street shall carim n: i. Taos spaced as appropriate to the species, not to ex=d 35 Not apart on the average. fl. Low shrubs not to reach a height grrater than three feet zero inches, sp iced no more than eight feet apart on the average. iii, Vcgctativc grround rover. ladndscaping in a parking or loading area shall be located in defined landscaped area; which are uniformly distributed throughout the parking or loading area. The landscaping in a parking atca span have a width of not less than five feet. Provision shall be made for watering planting areas where such care is rrgnired. Required landscaping shall be continuously maintained and kept alien and attractive Maximum height of tree spccics shall tits considered when planting under ovcnccu 1 utility lines. C. Nonmutorirrd Access. Bicycle Parking_ The development shall provide the number and type of bicycle 3arking facilities as required in DCC 18.116.031 and 18.116.035. The location and ds sibRt of bicycle parking facilities shall be indicated on the sit; plan. Pedestrian Access and Circulation: a. Internal pedestrian circulation shall be provided in new commercial, off cc and multi-family residential developments through the clustering of buildings, cons ruction of hard surface pedestrian walkways, and similar techniques. b, Pedestrian walkways shall connect building ertiranees to one another and from i ntilding cntmnces to public streets and existing or planned transit facilities, tan-site w.lkways shall connect with walkways, sidewalks, bikeways, and other pede:;man or bicycle connections on adjacent properties planned or used for commercial, multi family, public or park use. Attachment A Ordinance 20(5-046 P. 09 Exhibit (Z Page _ a of DEC-16-2005 FRI 1143 AM Desch. Co, Road Dept, FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 10 Walkways shall be at least five feet in puvW unobstructed width. Walkways which border parking spaces shall be at Icust seven feet wido unless concn;tc bump" or curbing and landscaping or other similar improvements are provided which p event parked vehicles from obstructing the walkway, Walkways shall be as direct as po: sible_ Drivoway crossings by walkways shall be minimized. Where the walkway s istcm crosses driveways, parking areas and loading areas, the walkway must be clearly identifiable through the use of elevation changes, speed bumps, a different laving material or other similar mothod. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the prino y building entrant a and any walkway that connects a transit stop to building entrances shall have a max mum slopc of five pcroent. Walkways up to eight percent slope are permitted, but are t cared as Campy with spccial standards for railings and landings. D. Commercial Development Standards: I. Now commercial buildings shall be sited at the front yard setback line for- lots wit r one Frontage, and at both front yard setback lines for comer lots, and oriental to at lr4st (0e of these streets, except in the 5unriver UUC Business Park (BP) District and tlx: La Pine UUC 1usiness Park (i+PBP) District. The building(s) end any caves, overhangs or owning., shall not interfere with the required clear vision area at comm or driveways, 2. To meet the standard in paragraph (1) of this subsection, buildings developM as patt of a shopping complex, as defined by this title, and planned for the interior, rear or nom street side of the complex may be located and oriented toward private ink;rior strocts with n the development if consistent with all other standards of paragraph (1) above ant this paragraph. interior streets used to satisfy this standard may have on-street parking anc shall have sidewalks along the strvxt in front of the building. Such sidewalks sliall Conn ;ct to existing or future sidewalks on public streets accessing the site, The master plan f it the shopping complex shall demonstrate that at least one half of the extedor perimeter - if the site thut abuts Cuch public street, will be developed with buildings mating the standa ds of paragraphs (D)(1) or (D)(3) of this subsection. 3. An increase in tho front yard setback may be allowed where the applicant can demor. amte that one or more of the following factors makos it desirable to site the now building bi yond the minimum street setback: a, Existing development on the site; b. Lot configuration; c. Topography of the lot; d, Significant trees or other vegetative features that could be retained by allowing a g cater setback; e. I,acation of driveway access. Such an increase in the front yard shall be the min mum necessary to accommodatc the reason for the increase. f. Architectural feAtwes, driveways, landscaping areas equal to or greater than the der th of the structure, and outdoor commercial areas, when at least one half of the structure rtcrts the minimum sued setback. 4. Utl=street motor vehicle parking for new mmmereial developments in excess of 1 ),000 square feet shall be located at the side or behind die building(s), except in the Sui.river UUC Bwiaoss Paris (BP) District. Off-strect parking proposed with a shopping con plea, as defined by this tide, and intended to serve buildings located in the interior or rear if the complex may have parking in front of the building provided the overall master plan fi ir the site satisfies paragraph (2) of this subsection. (Ord_ 2002-033 § 1, 2002; Ord. 20014144 § 5, 3001; ord. 97-07R § 7, 1997; Ord. 93-M3 § 3, 993; Ord. 93.043 § 22K 1993; Ord. 93-005 § 6, 1993) Attachment A Ordinance 2005 046 Exhibit Page 39 of 76 .DEC-16-2005 FRI 1143 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 11 1&124.080. Other conditions. The Planning Director or Hearings 13ody may rcquire the following in addition to the mi0mum standards of DCC Tide 18 as a condition for site plan approval. A. An increase in the required yards. B. Additional off-street parking. C. Screening of the proposed use bya fcrtce or landscaping or combination thereof. D. Limitations on the size, type, location, orientation and number of lights. E. Limitations on the number and location of curb cuts. F. Dedication of land for the creation or enlargement of streets where the existing street .ystcm will be impac Wd by or is inadequate to handle the additional burden caused by the pp rposed use. G. Improvement, including but not limited to paving, curbing, installation of traffic sibmr Is and constructing sidewalks or the street system that scrvoi the proposed use whore the a Listing street system will be burdened by the proposed use. H, lmprovemeat or enh rrment of utilities serving the proposed use where the existing t tilities system will be burdened by the proposed use. Improvements may include, but shall not be limited to, extension of utility facilities to serve the proposed use and installation of fire hydrants. L I..4ndscapin6 of the site, 1-_ - "Pro is Imnact Studv at, identified in Title 17.14,1 1 S. An other limitafions or conditions that are considered neccssary _ to achieve the _pulp _ r ~scs_gf DOC Title I S. (Ord. 3005-046 4 ,2005: Ord. 45-075 § I, 1995, Ord. 93-043 § 22C, 1993) 18.124.090. Right of way improvement standards. Any dedications or improvements to the road right of way required under OCC IS. 124 she I meet the standards for road right of way improvements set forth in DCC Title 17 and any stanch Lis for tight-of-way improvements set forth in DCC rifle 18 for the particular zone in question. (Ord, 97-003 § 4, 1971) Attachment A Ordinance 200 i-046 Exhibit 12 Page 40 of _7 d DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:43 AM Desch. Co, Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 12 Chapter 17.16. APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION TENTATIVE PLANS AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS 17.16.010. Applicatioa-Submission. 17.16.020, Scale of tentative plan. 17.16.030. Inrurmational requirements. 17.16.040. Protective covenants and homeowner assoeiatlohl agreements. 17.16.050. Master development plan, 17.16.060. Master development plan-Approval. 17.16.070. Development following approval. 17.16.080. Tentative plan as u muster plan. 17,16.090. Tentative plan approval. 17.16.100. Required findings fur approval. 17.16.105. Access to suhdNisions. 17.16,1 10. Resubmission of denied tentative plan. 17.16.115. Traffic Impact Study. 17.16.010, Application-Submission. Any person proposing a .subdivision, or his authorized agent or representative, 4h4il include vith an application and filing f4i7 for a subdivision, a tentative plan, together with imprnvcmcni plans nt d other suppicmentary material as may be required. A master dwclopment plan may also be required in ace hrdance with DCC 17.16.050. The applicant most submit 20 copies of any plan required, together with all equired accompanying material to the Planning Department. (Ord. 90.003 g 1. Exhibit A, 1990; Ord. 81-4;3 § I, Exhibit A, § 3.015, 1981) 17,16.020. Scale of tentative plan. The tenattivo plan of a proposed subdivision shall be drawn'on a sheet at a scale not greater than t ne inch per 400 tieet, or as approved by the Planning Department. (Ord. 90-003 § 1, Exhibit A, 1990; Ord. 81-043 ii 1, Exhibit A, § 3.020,198 1) 17.16.030. Informational requirements. The following information shall be shown on the tentative plan or provided in accompanying materi ils. No tentative; plan shall be considered complete unless all such information is provided. A. General information Required I . Proposed name of the subdivision; 2. Names, addresses and phone numbers of the owners of record, uuthoriaed agents or mpresci mtivcs, engineer or surveyor, and any nssumcd business names tiled oe to be riled with the Cori unction Commission by the applicant; 3. Date of preparation, true north, scale and 1goss area of the proposed subdivision; 4. Appropriate identification of the drawing as a tentative plan for a subdivision. 5. Loaction and taut designation sufficient to define its location and boundaries', and r legal description of the tract boundaries in relation to cxisting plats and streets; 6. Certified gimpy of the recorded instrttnmrit under which the applicant claims an ownership : Merest, such as a copy of a land sales agreement or similar binding ngrccmcnt, which binds the appl cant in the event of ten",ve approval; 7. Title report or subdivision guarantee. S. Information Concerning Existing Conditions, 1. Location, names and widths of cxisting improved and unimproved 6lrcets and roads, hikcw. y4 and access corridors in the proposed subdivision and within 300 feet of the proposal subdivision: Attachment B Ordinance 2005046 Exhibit 2 Page A- ( of r d 'DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:44 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 2, t.ocution or any existing *,tures, such as sGaion lines, section comers, special district be undary lines and survcy monuments; 3. Location of existing structures, irrigation canals and ditches, pipelines, waterways, railroads i nd any natural teatures, such as rock outcroppingo, marshes, wooded areas and natural hamrds; 4. Location and direction of watercourses, and the location of areas subject to flooding and hig i water tables; 5. Location, width and use or purpose of any existing easement or right of way for utilities, bi :eways and access corridors within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; 6. Existing sewer tines, water mains, culverts and other underground and overhead utilities wit tin and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, together with pipe sizes, grades and locations; 7. Contour lines related to sonic otablished benchmark or other engineering acceptable dap un and having minimum intervals of two fact for slope-Q of less than rive percent, 10 feet for slopes or five to 20 percent, and 20 feet for slopes greater than 20 percent; 8. Zoning da si fication of lands within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; 9. A map showing, the locution of any site zoned SM, Surface Mining, under DCC Title 18, within one-half mile of the proposed subdivision or partition boundary, 10. The structures, trees, rock outcroppings or other shade producing objects, if the object a. ill cast shade from or onto the subdivision. C. Information Concerning Proposed Subdivision. 1. Location, names, width, typical improvements, antis-sections, bridges, culverts, appr( ximute grades, curve radii and centerline lengths of all proposed strcas, and the relationship to all 1-silting and proposed strects, 2. Location, width and purpow of all proposed eascmcnts or rights of way for roads, i dliticu, bikeways and access corridors, and relationship to all existing casements and rights of way, 3. location of at least one temporary benchmark within the subdivision boundary; 4. Location, approximate area and dimensions of each lot, and proposed lot numbers; 5. Location, approximate area and dInionsions of any lot or area proposed for public use, .he use proposed, and plans for improvements or development thereof; 6. Proposed use, location, approximate area and dimensions of any lot intended for nonresident at use, 7. Phase boundaries outlined in bold lines, if phasing is contemplated far the subdivision; 8. Source, method and preliminary plans for domestic and other water supplies, scwuW dispos.I, solid waste diVospl and all utilities; 9. Description and location of any proposed community facility: 10. Storm water and other drainage facility plans; 11. Statement from each utility company proposed to serve the subdivision, stating that ear h such company is able and willing to serve the subdivision as set forth in the tentative plan; 12. Propw=4 fire protection system for the subdivision; 13, Solaraccam: a. Provide a statement relutivc to the solar access to be provided by the subdivision plan. b. Determine the location and type of street trees, if proposed, 14. Location and design of all proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities; 15, location and design of all proposed facilities providing for public transit. -16, MiM. pgit a Traffic Imnget Study as %Reci flea in 71 6.1 15. D. Infmmation for lots located in Surface Mining bnpact Area (SMIA) zones. For each hat located wholly or partially within u SMIA zone, an applicant shall submit a site plan, accompanied by appropr ate site plan fees, indicating the location of proposed noise or dust scngitive ups (as defined in DCC T tie 18), the locution and dimensions of any mitigating berms or vegetation and data addressing the giant lards of DCC 18.56, us amended, with respect to proposed noise or dust sensitive uses. (Ord. 2005x346 , 2110,1 93.012 § 15, 1993; turd. 90-003 § 1, Exhibit A. 1990: Ord. 83-039 g§ 3-:, 1983: Ord, 8 t -043 r 1, Exhibit A. § 3.035, 1981) Attachment 13 Ordinance 2005-0411 P. 13 Exhibit 12 Page 42 of 7D DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:44 AM Desch. Co, Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 14 17.16.040. Protective covenants and humeowner association agreements. Landowner covenants, conditions, and restrictions and homeowner association agreements are not relevant to approval of +ubdivisions and partitions under DCC Title 17, tmlem otherwise detcrminM by the County to carry ma certain conditions of approval, midi as mad maintenance or open space pieservatic z. Any provisions in such agreements not in conformance with the pruviiians of DCC Title 17 or uppiicabt - zoning ordinances are void, (Ord. 93-013 § 16, 1993; Ord. 90-003 § 1, Exhibit A, 1990) 17.16.050. Muster development plan. An overall master development plan shall be submitted for 411 developments affecting land under t u same cnvnership for which phased development is contemplated, The master plan shall include, but not bi limited to, the following elements: A. Oventll development plan, including phase or unit sequence; B. Show compliance with the comprehensive plan and implementing land use ordinances and polic cs; C. Schedule of improvements, initiation and completion; D. Overall transportation and traffic; pattern plan, including bicycle, pedestrian and public transit transportation f4cilitics and access corridor: I-. Program timetable projection; F. Development plans for nny common elements or fucilitiem; 0. If the proposed subdivision has an unknown impact upon adjacent lands or lands within the general vicinity, the Planning Director or tfearinga Bady may rcquira a potential development pat em for streets, bikeways and access corridors fir adjoining lands to be submitted together with the r:ntative plan as part of the master development plan for the subject subdivision. (Ord. 93-012 § 17, 1993; Ord. 81-043 § 1, Exhibit A, § 3.030, 1981) 17.16.060, Master development plan- Approval. The Planning Director or Hearings Body shall review a master development plan at the saine t me the tentative plan for the first pha.w is rovicwed. The Planting Director or hearing Andy may approve, modify or disapprove the mu:ater plan and shall set forth findingm for such decision. 'I'1rc Planning Din ctor or Hearings Body may also attach conditions necessary to bring the plan into compliance with all ap rlicable land use ordinances and policies. Any tentative plan submitted for the plait area shall conform to the master plan unless approved otherwise by the County. Master plan upprova) :4hal) be granted for a specifi A time period by the Planning Director nr Hearings Body, and shall be included in the conditions of approva (Ord. 93-012 § 18, 1993; Ord. 90-003 § 1. Exhibit A, 1990; Ord. 81-043 § t. Exhibit A, § 3,030, 1913 ) 17.L6.070. 0eve4rtpment rollowlrtg approval. Once a master plan is approved by the County, the plan shall be binding upon both the County ind the developer; provided, however, aft five years from die date of approval of the plan, the County may initiate n review of the plan for conformance with applicable County regulations. If necessary, the Cour..y may require changes in the plan to bring it into c arformancc. (Ord. 81.043 § 1, Grhibit A, § 3.040, 1981) 17.16.060. Tentative plan as a masiter plan. A. As an altemutivc to the filing of a master plan for phased development, the applicant may file a it nmtive plan for the entire development. The plan mu:x comply with the provisions of DCC Title 17 for tentative plans. Attachment B Ordinance 2005-046 Exhibit Page 4 of ? d ° DEC-16-2005 FRI 1144 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 15 R, lr the applicant proposed to phase development, he shall provide sufficient information Toga ding the ovemil development plan and phasing sequence when submitting the tentative plan, C. If the tenwtive plan is approved with phasing, the final plat for each phase Ahull be tiled in w cordance with DCC 17 24.020 through 17 24.110. (Ord. 81-043 § 1, Exhibit A, § 3.045.198 1) 17.16.090. Tiontative pina approval. A. The Hcuringu Body shall review the application and any comments submitted by other of prnpriate county, state, or federal agencies and shall render a decision in accordance with DCC 17.16.10, setting forth findings supporting its decision. B. Approval of the tentative plan shall not constitute final acceptance of the plat of the proposed subdivision for purposes of recording; however, upproval of such tentative plan shall be bins ing upon the County for the purposes of preparation and review of the final plat. Upon reviuw of the final plat, the County may require compliance with the terms of its tentative plan npprovul of the proposed subdivision and the terms of DCC Title 17. (Ord. 90.003 § 1, Exhibit A, 1990; Ord. S 1-043 § 1, Exhibit A, § 3.055t1), 1961) 17.16.100. Required findings for uppruval. A tentative plan for a proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the planning Director or Hearings Body rinds that the subdivision as propmed or modified will meet the requirements of DCC Tit a 17 and DCC Title 18 through 21, and is in compliance with the comprehensive plan, Such findings shal, include, but not be limited to, the following: A. The aubdivision contributes to orderly development and land use patterns in the area, and pn vides for the preservation of natural features and resources such as streams. lakes, natural vegctutio i, special terrain features, agricultural and forest lands and other natural resources. B. The subdivision will not create excessive demand on public facilities and services, and utilities required to serve the development C. The tentative plan for tho proposed aubdivision meets the requirements of ORS 92.091). D. for subdivision or portions thereof proposed within it Surface Mining Impact Area (SM1A) a -ne under DCC Titic 18, the aubdivision creates lots on which noise or dust sensitivc uses can be sited onsistcnt with the requirements of i]CC 18.56, i s amended, as demonstrated by the site plan ltumd uccoa ipanying information required under DCC 17.16.030. E. The subdivision name has been approved by the County' Surveyor. (Ord. 93-012 § 19, 1993; Ord. 90.003 § 1, Exhibit A. 1990; Ord 81443 § I, F,xhibitA, § 3.060, 1! 81) 17.16.105. Aevem to subdivisions. No proposed subdivision shall be approved unless it would be accessed by roads constructed 13 County standards and by roads accepted for maintenance responsibility by a unit of local or awta governor att. This standard is met if the subdivision would have direct access to an improved collector or tuterial, a, in cases where die subdivision has no direct actxAS to suclm a collector or wteriul, by demonsmdng thrq die toad acccsa(ng the subdivision from a collector or artcr ial mtxts relevant County standards and has beer accepted for maintenance purposes. (Ord. 93-012 § 19(A), 1993) Attachment B Ordinance 200",16 Exhibit Page ~ of -'DEC-16-2005 FRI 1145 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 16 17.16.110. Resubmission of denied tentative plan. A. if the tentedve pion for a subdivision is denied, n'submitial thereof shall not be accepted for a p viod of six months after the date ol'the final action denying such plan. Upon resubmission, the applies nl shall consider all items upon which the prior denial was bayed, and the resubmission shall he tucompt hied by a new tiling fee. B. A tentative plan resubmitted in accordance with DCC 17.16.110 shall be reviewed in the same manner as any other tentative plan. (Qrti, 90-003 § 1, E.thibit & 1990; Ord. 51-013 § 1, Exhibit A 3.035, 1981) 37.16.114. Traffic lmand Studies. !M-eL"- undedne ,k. [ urnoSe ft M(ltWd. Font: (tDfa►tIC}Tlfng 1 The purpose of this policy is to cstabilih standards nth nrooedures for Vrgnrina n traffic Auily fir lti ! ~ use apalicutinns that situniftcantly impttet the transt)nrhjL np ,cv%Lem in Nschutes Coilnt~ The hnnsnortation system. ft the mttnme of this nulicv_ is consid2md In iq_clrlde public and nrivnp; mad-. hatl bathe responsibility ni'an applicant tn_ heat with County staff in a nrc-AUDIicution contet En to uss study requirements, then twncrate the tan tc study and submit it concurrently with the I M! LM licntiort '1'hc traffic study will be used by the County gtnff n: • Evnluatc Rite., cce!ta and circulutinn: FOrmdme* Want: Left 025", • Evaluate. rho nhility of the rnndw,tiv riwwm to ounport the_nEnnnccd development and m hcrw[ye Bulktee t imal. 1 + Aipned at: 0.7 t Tab aftr. 0.75" + Indent at:: meet relevant planning criteria: 0,75", Tat= Not 41: 0.75" 0 g_ 12etermine %MCifiC on-site and off site transoms. iop sytitem initi nation mouirgmenw. and a . Determine the development's sine of rurum, rt> dwav improvemenm nn Of o 1e-DMIM qualified to pragam tn. Me ghidle%, ng rinall DWLtl shall be stamped and -idgDed by (lie Re ti4tct'ed hen the reporl has satisfied jilt tl c Mglilmments of the development', in3ma annlyris. [neomnlete MDargi -hall be returned Ibr eomoleti n, of we uti n h. Sire Tiuffie Report (STR): If flte dove nnment nr chnnae in use w[ll causeShe -ate to p anaCtre 50-200 daily trip ends. and less an 3n PM reek hour trips. n.5it't•-T'ra ffic Reyyrt will nnrmaliv he required. c. Troffig Impael Aanlvtris MA),-- i the develcrpmeat or chnnpae in use will venerate ing thin 200 trip ends and 20 nr mnre PM ruak hour teiln, then a Traffic hneg"~t Analysis 1TI. 9 -,h11 _L Lie nuauired. The. Count)! Eneinetr mnv waive or m nd ,,tud,v requirements ibr tinlatie cin_htrtstances. C. Traffic Study Aroa Attachment 13 Ordinance 2005-0411 Exhibit 91 Page a of _2 °DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:45 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 I Afwr cnnsulting with orlter atf'etted iutieclicttnrla• the t:uunty Engineer ermine IN imput dwq C Crime nn D. Stodv Timc From I The nnnlysis shall include the Pnllnwinu time frames: Fxiating amditiunfi f includina arrntnved but not vet built develo mcnta us ulenht7e l h t r. c. Five vqjr n st after huildout iitr each 1 ya of development ur the finul use 0 development. t o ui'lor a vnlum2s of trtttlic >5 il(Itl i v und:•~00 eak 0 s . n,ne i hanee.s. and any destinntio 1 rcsort-deveinninent will also re ulr roil . is of traffic c0 d l ins in u tymmv-yanr horizon. the actin: seem of tU c n duty is P. 17 _ - ~FOrlnatb~: Font~lQ ` Ferrnatted: Fant {Default) rimes New parnan formateedr Font: (Derau~ Tlmes t New Rmnzn F Minimum Study Rcctniremcnts fnr a Trnflie Impact AnaLYgis ITI Al Fornataed'• Font Not tm113 1. The minimum st~ rrents nr a Traffic Impact Re rnm e - - - - - - - - - - - - { tmd. Fam (p yit) limes n' ma showing the ) the rn'ret in reluliat to tile s r.•rtntion a stem of l New Roman to r• "fl n_f the elemenu t of u STR: Forrnwtmd: Fart: (I>areutq C. Traf9ie Signal rrogreslion_Rna.lv,~i and inlr~Wnnr C[fOn may b? rcnuired, if,a , new i 6 - `s Nw Rammwn These mg the volurnes an thnt n d to a vnlumn greater than Intl h reQuired t r n aftiu ltuute of dnttt h e trave characteristim. rind Opacity ctmstraints; h. A col 1 lets esc i tinn and awin of the ro.aaa even enG Ec•sti ua ffie volumes' j. ExisUne andful] eve v service uvera ~C e ' e volume !ea ; 6t "•a (WO for all intersections and-mad sectiw4 within the stud rn fn-r conditions with and wit nu r the rn used rii e,:t• Attachtttant 13 ordinance 2005445 Exhibit 2 _ Page /4 (p of '17- c Airy other aallcctnr nr ,vterial intersection reauc3tcd,hv stufT -DEC-16-2005 FRI 11;45 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 k. Forecast traffic valunieh with and without die development: L_ _G; fctv.nn:ilvsiR rr'rhe 4i . ;iccc~sea, includr sight distance and arleraiinn charaereris•[ic G m. Analysis ofritdit and left turn lane warrants (ODOT stnn6rd4): n. An:tl)Mi¢ of narking needs of the plnnnaed development; -r, Whgv nc ded, wnrrnni anvlwk for mi ir amtml devices: n. Findinug and canclu,,ions ineludino a recarnmendation al• suuirested potentiml niltigi 'o fir oft=site, imn,'rcts nnd.nn.cvalitatii?aL,l'the effectiveness of thoAe sah;iione. G. Oryrntinn And Safety S1nnd rds 1. The minimum olierational and sufg& standards i`or use on Deschures C'nitnti%, roads are: '1'lie.lnlnilntt levc f scrv'cr for intmcctionn ;and rnritls, during the P.M. Peak Hour is OS "D" on exisrine facilities and LOS "CC" on new facilities, h. The minimum 4ie ht disrunw far drivgways and intersections is detino!d.in _*ITU."i "GEOMETRIC D@SICiN.ON IiICsHWAYS_r1yE?,S3,'I,t6Q'ti" and the AASIITO 'Desi+ _ Guidcline,4 for Verb Lwv Volume Lot~al iZwds f< 400 A DTI------------------- 1110 .l.uii•~tiim al4licant shall lie utispansibie to mitie;ue tiny saterv nr_ctnncity nrnblems thttt are cuuyed by their mmni'Acd deveinnment. At the Cminty Enuinrer's discretion, if there are Dn;-exlsrlltt sefcty deflciencl" andlor ciip;ldly_tiiihir- at_rcleynnt int-m-tinn or rand Frontiggs within th impact analysts area, then no :additional dovelonntent inav be allowcd..linril a Rnlut_inn is funded nr E Alt that nowuntti fnr the nrnnnaed nrniacr's additinnal imrracts P. 18 Fctvutw& Fort: (Wmt) TAries New poman Fwaama& font: (DefauR) Ttn+ New Raman ftn"Nbdt Font (tiefauq Times New ROMM IOrtI.3(N}5-t146 - Attachment B Ordinance 2005.041i Exhibit R Page ~ofr7 a DEC-16-2005 FRI 1145 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept, FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 19 REVJEWED LEGAL COUNSEL i L-ZO- C'j For ke(ording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUT _HS COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution Adopting the 2005-2010 Deschutes County Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and Revised 20-Year Transportation Project List. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-088 WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a vehicle -or scheduling improvements for modernization, preservation, traffic safety, transportation system, bidge, right-of-way and local improvement district projects; and WHEREAS, the CIP is intended to give consistency to the dec slop making process at the policy level and specific direction to the Road Department whereby re sources available for capital improvements can be appropriately applied to the major road and brid )e networks under County's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, in 1998, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a Deschutes County Transportation System Plan (TSP), which included a countrywide list of arojects for the next 20-year period that forms the basis for the development and implementation o the CIP; and WHEREAS, Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0045, "Implementation of the Transportation System Plan", considers that the "..operation, maintem nce, and repair of existing transportation facilities identified in the TSP, such as road, bicycle, pediastrian, port, airport and rail facilities.." are not subject to land use regulations except as necessary to implement the TSP and, under ordinary circumstances do not have a significant impact on land use ; and WHEREAS, Policy No. 6b of the Transportation Resource Element of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan identifies that the Transportation Project List (Table 5.11.T1) may be updated by resolution periodically by the Board of County of Commissioners; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS ONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, as follows: Section 1. That the Capital Improvements Program, Exhibit "A" ; ittached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby adopted as the policy of the Board of County Commissioners relating to the planning, design and construction scheduling of Capital Improvements including modernization, preservation, traffic safety, transportation system, bridcles, right-of-way and local improvement district projects for the four years following the current fiscal i,ear. Section 2. That the Transportation Project List, Exhibit "B" at:ached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby amended and updated to reflect the deletion of completed projects, reprioritization of existing projects and inclusion of new projects fcir the next 20-year period. PACE T of 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-088 Exhibit Page A 9 of ,DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:46 AM Desch. Co, Road Dept, FAX NO. 5413882719 e~ DATED thi--'day of , 2005. DOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON TOM DEWOLF MICHAEL, Chair ATTEST: 7 Recording Secretary P, 20 inner { PAGE 2 OF 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 2005,088 Exhibit Page ~ of 6 iDEC-16-2005 FRI 11:46 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P, 21 DESCHUTES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (Does not include farce account work) PRESERVAT SERVICES asp a t ovorldy projects 20135-06 2006-07 2007-OE 2000.09 2009.10 A .it t7vorlay Projects _ $ 21000,000 $ 212D0,000 $ 2,000 000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2.000.000 (Includes widening for hike lanes and bringln9 toads - u to Count Standards - _ + - _ - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 'Nate: ma r Involve adding, turn lanes, flashing llgl1ts or intersec tion coal! nmenl Huntington ROadllst Street Intersection •576,000 Installation of fia in intomactlon, lights $ 40,0130 $ 40.)00 $ ' 00.000 $ 40 000 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Miplcan Road $50,0001FY for 2003.04 thru 2012-13 ; 50~000a $ 50,ODO $ 50 t00 $ 50,000 50 000 peschutes Junction,- Hwy, 97 Phase 2 $ __F,350,760 (Budgeted FY 05-0 6 will be carrlt d av er Io FY 00-D7 for possible construction] FS Road 40/45 -_Sunriver to Mount 9achelor ' $ 6,400,000 $1 000,000 nty $5,400,000 -FHWA HI hwa 971Sauth Cenlu Drive interchange (Sunriverf $ 6,000,000 _ " $1,000,000 - Deschutes County _ - - $2 500,000 - ODOT _ 1 - $2,100,000 - FHWA South Century pri vy - General Patch addga to Sur ess Road 4,006 000 Federal Contract, no County funding 27th Street Extanslon $ 250,000 WIC" 'i Junction Davelo ment reject (01]OT) $ 76,B00 Wllscoilaneous Right-of-Wa a ulfiltion $ 200,000 $ 30,000 _ „3010 t0 30,000 $ _ _ 30,000 Future LID's $ 750,000 $ " 750,00 IF 750,13 10 $ 750,000 $ 750,400 31 cle/Pedestrian im"rovements (195 of allocated'Kjjy fun $ 75,000 ":F 75,000 $ 76.0-10 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 ^~'4 ^T~ S YEAR CAPITAL I MPROVEMENT SU MMARY 'RESERVATION SERVICES $ 101200000 NTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 730,000 _ 'RANSPORTATION SYSTEM UEVEI-OPMENT $ 23 767,2613 EXHIBIT "A" -ft,D-1 Exhibit_ R Page 50 of 70 . DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:46 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 22 o a x cd w A-1 co co G xK ~ UJ p, m a. E 'o tl} U ) yy G z O La 0. G N 0 1 C w G ° Ul~~ u G 4 C ~ ;DEC-16-2005 FRI 11:47 AM Desch. Co. Road Dept. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 23 L xx ~ ' 'C ,C K' 'C 'L 'G CC •C~ 'p S 9 1 0. C L LL 0 '_C yam n •~o , o 0. 4 ••CEC 6 opp a A 4 LL 4 > 6 d a a 0. a a a a a a a a a a R a 6 ♦1 11. 11. 0. l 0. 0. P. P. a a a e C n n n G O D a n 289 4 C 99 n 9 n D O G 0 O o 4 IP Q a 0 2 4 n a C o n 0 9 O o e e 4 4 m e e e ra1 p n p 4 e o 6 p a 0 t c u 0 6 YE Q 0 °a e o N P] S O e 4 n d q 'b p N O 8 m m W I`• m P P 0 rr p pp pp t0 tr7 4 8 tr n m , r ri 8 m ~ e o i Q G N ~ 0 Cmt pp w1 Q N n A ~~rr ,~rr,, •f W C Sr N Q C, d P s" N + e n t m 4 C n _ P ry , m N I 4 N N Y C Q W .'i hl N N N N ~ 4 m Y W ~ u N r w r N r N M• N M H W b N N g r N r w N r r r N r r r N N w r r r w N b N r p ry O 5' ~ R A hn A N N g n M M1 h M Qh nh q n hm 4 ti h ti n h o M h m h o M W W R w ° W ^ Y W b q !0° m V ~ ° 9 c C h re 8: V h N N a T. 4 • n nn h 111.'. N N 2r N~ T. ~ h I H h is N N G N b N N d N N N 21 tv .v N N qz M Sy M W k Y w h a N pl N N N N 1`I ~ n c L~ 'd 1 ~ 1~i• F $ n G 3 s y~ ~ J %a ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ° u Zi 737 4 ~[S[;S ~ x A 1 li ,E ~ H J _ C E~ o rp V V ' +f +pZ2p ~ lp pu ppJ pp pp p U V u u 4{ 5 1 U U U L] u u lu L 1 p p_ U 5 U Y s 5 4 ~ U U L7 55 5 ~ U S3 9 Q .-1 ° ..1 ~.1 4 o-•1 4 4 ~ -i . . L h 0 n gq O w p r O n m 5L O m n " n N u_ 'O N:4 S a N u m ~1 A F ° 9 r~ s ° W m pf ' G • n 'M ' W ~Op ~ n n a 4 n mS ~ w ~ iA w ~ E n Y a b w~ ~ r ~ C y ~ ~ Y J z z i~'2 Lo •L2 ~ z .1 e S S L S° y L 5'~ i°• y ° 2,v,c ° S S S S S 4 0 4 ~ S S S S e ° C q G j0 F a p : x r ~°e C p x y tl e d d C 0 0 p q 0 p 0 0 O 3 3 3 W b N -0 -0 -0 tl b -0 b y ' .a .a ' sg r C + e C 'T cc e e O O O O O O S O ° .a a ti b -0 d M -0 c e tl e d C D 0 0 4 0 -0 -0 t C N t a i ~n 3 T m m l a~ i ~~f T a m n i in L 5 ` g 9 ` EE , fl 'tdr'i e a d'F fo've' L a ° ° ~ 9 A3 s .r S S K S tr x m S S S $ f f' C fr to 4 f n fn to in & n In i n ~ In rg (r w S P O pp L% O - m m m 4 w O a I W 1~ W ~ O u1 qp W C Y L r 1. a L 0G p Lz" X t 7 Q ' 7 s tt r . m N 4 w 4~ p q 4 m a Y Y x Y Y rl- d w p ti IK d d i.. 4 d N 4 W N U at m a m a (Ij Y m a Ia 1 i !C 1 Y. x l yy {n S 6 Y} m a a x d s( In } I~ a T w i q p~p G N o m n u N w • sF CI hP ? n 'b i ~6 [ ,d ° ti ~i m ~e ~ii ~ ry 6 }5 °m t 17 r5 rn v A w O P. r 2 p a S m 3 7 D c.R 7 m Co~ co W m` 1 W ~O s a d r z to O 4 F ^p ui .,cG ° p p b In o S b M v r w x O r r U r g P T rt T S r F 1 x w Z O C T T x i , w w m u m V ED K U 7 i U U r a b c WY i O a u tt tz S t} m ° 3 C D > Y O 1 ~1 p q 1~ d O a f C h H pp ! K ! O n U V I~ y~ry~~ is r m t j r m 4a o . (C } W r 2 W m /j C q C3 lil 1=. J. I I- m u a+ m is d O m .9 m rlZ~ xo:xw i 0 W N O Y tG Ai Sdd ~d~p i'i $ n Uw x m C 7 s qn x K LL c~~ xm ~i. C 4 m N 7 C m r~$ p nsSFA m m d ti m 7 S r ~ d m c m m } 9 rvm am N~ C?s'O 8'~- p. x m n m t7 s ct of O t9 CO LM1°8x 15 ~Tt 1: ` O Y x W a n: • a a ~ 0 0 4 8 d t x O O w c= o W r O a m D i n s 17 m m x x u r 1C N 1 x x x a~ ~a x 4 v s w m m .41 Ur m a u{ . Ip x L n m a v7 U S L1 a U a y 0. p c W W Y L O 9 4 4 z a Iqi' a m 6 P ¢ [ s t7 w d: W J m L~ .c V ~ an d ~ rn G d y Y C o y K m o- W rj a m iE IeG r K c W s v R i • d r m m T x (ry x a m l2 w rr~~ u m ti 15 -Ur w N yM7 N @ •o c a n ` ` & e 1 U ti II _ r Y F K `1 W q Y S p 9 c? V u 4 u Q 7 x 7 7 y. m O in s w u m rc~ ~ m 0 w x 111 iii C1 C1 W L> t D ``2 _ J x a -1 W S S}? ~ U a_ = x a a Ls Pi 4 O S m r 9G o LL V y A: 2' O N M LL m O fi 'C 7 m m ° n S m n1 w} m S d 5 d i W M U 1 1 i fA V 8 a In ~G m 4 M . T m 0. 'w M1 O Q r+ inI N X Cd wa N K wa e P4 e7 N ,11.. in w a E 7 N cS N m L. d 4 0. V! C .DEC-16-2005 FRI 1147 AM Desch. Co, Road Dept. a~,~' T ~r o n I 'C eF d S TT'{ 6 LL ~ 1 g.~gO a a a 0.a m ji- a a a p. 6 C~ u°1 u°i n E P q 0 ~y q 1~ M s , m W r M Q 4 ~ N N N N ~ 's m N m m a Y_ pl yy W N M I w w N y w w N w N M ~ J v ~ ° a m m q s 4 4 W w U e 09 1 P i 1 9 6 0 ~ r R C a W m f s w n°~ 8 y~ 5 .,L 115 ~Cg $5 'P t t' 5 ~ ~a R g ~ $ a •L~`~ aS8 v q b 3 u m m m ' m C m y gq~ 0.^° R TT~~JJ S o IY ~4 y K C ~ l x4 g Y Y 9 W m l C ~ fL m~ G ~ ~ ~tiT a a ' u ~ 1 m m aa i V A Q G b~ ~ M p 7 P, r c q F P P rr f p E K 4 _ y+s C T m * il" o + cp 3 7 x C N F' O C m ~irc W 5 ai ry y~ j U a 1 ~ O tp -a N v n m 01 uiS O rSLL x m A G r r m m lp 9 p r c m m 3 P 4 s° r 0 [0 4 ro m " r1 p W 9 5 F 0 G W 7 U IflflCfl_ l^ V r ~ ug 2 i a E V W . A C ✓m f _ • Ffl N E a ~ P = a IZ . to O a 8 ~ Y 5 Z C y SYrmj - C , ~ 1C K p ~0 z ~a r UI m All } c[ U ~ w C d sit) K P W m d W V U U= 0 n ~ d H 0. FAX NO. 5413882719 P. 24 m L a LMM ~ F1.1 O 1 w x M W 0. o-. 0 ml W ~ 1t COUNTY ROAD REVENUE SOURCES Fiscal Year 2004 Miles o County Road Property Taxes Other Local Revenue State Highway Fun Other State Revenue Federal Forest Revenue e Federal Revenue TOTAL REVENUE Baker 837 $0 $64,258 $1,178,952 $364,398 $788,712 $64,823 $2,461,143 enton 458 $0 $689,150 $3,258,799 $967,126 $306,467 $324,791 $5,546,333 ackamas 1,424 $0 $15,171,300 $18,610,819 $387,239 $4,887,200 $1,700,464 $40,757,022 [ atso 242 $1,351,618 $198,659 $1,793,499 $1,935,566 $0 $0 $5,279,342 lumbia 542 $0 $307,755 $2,112,708 $1,279,133 $0 $524,982 $4,224,578 Coos 543 $0 $1,049,009 $3,145,422 $22,578 $490,924 $690,492 $5,398,425 Crook 518 $0 $419,211 $1,295,678 $147,113 $2,240,087 $13,201 $4,115,290 C 230 $0 $427,075 $1,211,352 $0 $3,410,437 $0 $5,048,864 Deschutes 958 $0 $1,567,646 $7,085,179 $445,515 $2,928,117 $20,173 $12,046,630 Dou las 1,127 $0 $3,570,512 $5,695,305 $13,030 $13,802,713 $101,290 $23,182,850 Gilliam 399 $302,733 $184,958 $141,467 $0 $0 $24,762 $653,920 Grant 495 $0 $466,405 $490,249 $245,470 $6,292,100 $18,662 $7,512,886 Hame 804 $0 $117,539 $446,624 $0 $2,582,660 $22,294 $3,169,117 Hood River 210 $0 $649,133 $1,167,927 $149,623 $1,703,632 $1,523 $3,671,838 Jackson 942 $0 $2,219,952 $9,007,600 $0 $3,900,600 $6,120 $15,134,272 Jefferson 478 $0 $109,568 $957,573 $844,656 $527,389 $38,072 $2,477,258 Josephine 576 $0 $202,633 $4,370,080 $433,560 $1,866,588 $0 $6,872,861 Klamath 847 $0 $2,254,233 $3,653,119 $0 $9,862,955 $2,677 $15,772,984 Lake 712 $0 $238,332 $525,842 $418,464 $3,464,274 $4,324 $4,651,236 Lane 1,433 $0 $1,562,052 $14,263,384 $2,037,001 $19,590,967 $332,674 $37,786,078 Lincoln 339 $0 $425,124 $2,039,178 $30,281 $3,226,008 $760 $5,721,351 inn 1,116 $0 $1,781,743 $5,437,076 $27,494 $6,736,659 $81,598 $14,064,570 Malheur 1,471 $815,944 $1,132,391 $2,240,273 $392,263 $6,899 $204 $4,587,974 Marion 1,121 $0 $3,137,417 $13,066,621 $694,037 $2,455,071 $29,583 $19,382,729 Morrow 868 $1,660,545 $1,009,181 $638,473 $299,362 $231,737 $112 $3,839,410 Multnomah 335 $0 $8,313,536 $30,789,539 $110,436 $615,737 $1,586,536 $41,415,784 Polk 501 $0 $477,783 $2,866,530 $112,140 $7,054 $0 $3,463,507 Sherman 440 $576,516 $94,009 $158,142 $92,440 $0 $110 $921,217 Tillamook 338 $0 $146,448 $1,396,239 $967,888 $1,724,584 $20,216 $4,255,375 matilla 1,577 $0 $33,873 $3,654,960 $314,780 $632,295 $0 $4,635,908 Union 564 $0 $261,352 $1,256,928 $148,920 $645,727 $72,560 $2,385,487 Wallowa 558 $0 $559,762 $490,562 $205,689 $862,114 $0 $2,118,127 Wasco 661 $0 $231,098 $1,316,752 $118,784 $1,819,506 $78 $3,486,218 Washin on 1,365 $2,776,827 $31,107,107 $18,041,299 $7,274,209 $0 $0 $59,199,442 eeler r 232 $0 $59,149 $0 $171,027 $721,370 $12,872 $964,418 arnhill. 672 $0 $264,304 $4,136,103 $93,802 $478,527 $62,140 $5,034,876 TOTALS 25,932 $7,484,183 $80,503,656 $167,940,253 $20,744,026 $98,809,109 $5,758,092 $381,239,320 Exhibit Page _5A of 96 Lajo W~V~ CDD d,cc"5 l , )I 7z) ~v C~ ~~s l~ ~ ~s z_ E J [0 w x F LO O O N N a~ a N O z ro v io Cf) N LP O C 0 x c~ W f1, n 3 o rom°aci O woCZ ~ca3 •c7~°~"d0 ~o❑NCV C~~ ~,n? ~°-m ce oa y•'..d~•`pVpn awl-`°-vp oA 3 mpq°~ O c ❑ co m. x o N twg•!/~ p.p ds ~C7 ~U cep, y i; d G .L..'o RS 1 P.15 ° N N o . tLr' c6 p_ p y p N p b y O O W N 3 N dr.+ N C bD[+ O ~ j+ m . fA fn O.L.. (7 O •p ' bA c ro N L N« ii 'O N t0 N y N N N P, ice..C I w O y e) J m N u c« O m ~'G N m A'o F: C ti F ° O U V bA G N mc.c m E m roL. 0 5 o s°. N cNd N o an d W c N« p~.7 p O O vi N W caL mmvo ca cdUwo 11 o . ° a. o2S o co "ao~ ~o'o I m:?xoX a A apo° -o~abi°oy°o° C°a °a o o Eazm 3v.=_ o °.~owo n> bp~ V O . N a> 'b'8 V O .0+'O .SJ N .O~t NrA.Q rT a F'r'I i 0 0 0~o iJ L a C^ N Nv g a d ° na o 0 y 0 '..7 w O m tl c~ O o o> ° CO d ay g a~ °N =1 Qt+ Au O -~'°c E a~O Y 03 ° °~xcdoo .-gym c3 4) M) bb N, a~>v d o.o L I ° 3.6u Nam-om10Smo~ v1 C ~~o ~°~~~uo O W.2. °bnoopap°.5~~ V V I ti°. 3bng ¢'m R =-C A~ w°° cx' e° d V Vl = A mo z'o Zo o '6 3 LR,.~' ami ~v: Y'a ° o aa' o g - L E y h- 6q V' F. 'm d 'b fC U 4, N w o o e o N V U' q o pa ° m k. oo p m N 0 w o a~ • d N =1 Ei IA ° .o o y o of M 3 T cxi ;n_y ~ca aCi oA ro fC 7c Y h~ ~n~o v I N a3~ y~>v°a>a°v a e d cy m a G7 G1 c~3 o O o p. ~ " `d cd Q7 O " o. 1~ 1A . F U u c r M c -j H 0 3 a. v o m C7 bnp Q O V) O (Qoq r■ V ■ ■V 0 t/'1 E Q a--J m 0- V 4--J 4--J W cu a--,j V brc~edy °o~a oo~ dAA U cNe C 0~.c V 'Z bDq O bp~ c C mp 00, O y~ mo.. W3~~rO .4;t_ 44 b " y o d d=0 0.:3 co n:3 is a 0 0 0 0 c0 in.4~ > ~ 0 e. o 3 u 0. cl Q. r CO :O7 .y t ic2~d v{ N o-. G'':" O,~i N m g B CNN N a~ y ~ d .N y. Lll M m 'CO c~/l o a~ y G' cf . n~ ~~pa~uo io~bn a F ~n mz u H buy o 'v°~ ~ F_~ ~v g [bob ~a o ° ~oooao ~A o y A N' O •p ~ a+ c3 ai l9~ 0 u.~A O aNN a ni't bA~ ~ a) a) 919 . a g o,o bey c°v°a w'N rd cd co ai w a5. i Oa a~yo>+~aSdi~ u~o~ado~N~ ~ Y o ce o a y o v° c~ h G o u 3 ti u °x u oc Nco ~~.~'pa c"i cad a0i .0 y~~ 7 Oy00'~ ONOid. a) cc w 44, 12 g o o$ woa k o o- d N O N.~ c m w° Co 'd C ti By a w.8' w aNi CL° tV 'a'i ~q Ngcd Ccy~ce ° i.',.,. bqN G d O O q d 00 y.O~. ~O-,v y.dro o .,o . O O ~~a°.5 aau°: 'O u ebb c~. a~.° = w O- 1 W. `Ca m 7 C oo vp~~j,' ,haN ns ad-m ti L y cd cd N O Ov ti'`k'" V y y N c~ C O' m•O y2yp' E•b o a^ v o c u o d d e O C N" I a die g a a o1'd p N~ CA q.S m U 3 e~ v N r 'o N i d n an aayv bno b u a n: a o°o•-~ > ay ro G O °d~ E o. 0. G,u aaoy3 do°4ao3mu ayd d,C3 OoN0 ceao~ ~7 a i Ova": a 3avu 'n+v~~~° my3d..4 m o'°~. Q da a av u mo d;;. o a ~0mx apnsFOv eb m~ o 0 -co 0 r. cad o F •o v .ux '6b 1'' 3 O m E`• C7 a o a, a,:H .c a •~3 a>i U c i C a tio m 0 O N w m uj w O Z '-o -zoQrv o _ in• ~~-OCR o L W N o kima' lip - ~ o a, o - Y 75 _LOE r o, ' e r O N~ 3 N L Lll A x c7 3 c m. c a JLL E c cV FA o. m o 0 0 - o o x~ ; w lo- s m. U •C y _ N 3 O p w d L' m m 7 ~y .Nd a c o d~° °v ~ o r y o` =m v~ a 3 c °..U 'o o o 5° dr~~ ° a~rob to. Q v h ~ J F~ c~..,, 7 ,C .Oda a) o .4- t a a'oQ orb cx c~ y ~a'm v.m ova a.too o cmao~ c c,;= ~•3 n yz o ° E•C 0° 3d = u ?0b Abp 3 - m N O d d. w a~i O vi to b o- sJ ~ O 0q o'C"y 3-w'.wr5 R,"8 'b9 O N m a.+ -"15 U a U cd d U A y - 0-'~ a~•'-„yam„ L.L dC ° c c C p'Qa .rJ in DC d Y O N O O N r C N 7` 7 m umi a.n' " 7 r r E o a a S y> L N O W d r Y Z N to m m N y" C A 09 C Q ~ bU4., ~ o o. ~ ~ bow c 3 oxa N .o p q o ' M .G cC C w O N HU 'af S :D bu O iy ,T aO.. C G C C w O sr F G y' ° ~d 45 *-j O c c op o •C O Cp o O~ R. L v v oa~u~~3mo 3 v a ~ o'w aCryy ~ b ~ R ~3 ° op c o 0O;~°°'"ce cvyd N mmN°$ aEa 2.~ o a 5 c`a ~ b i O O w r% V~ p Q are' ~ ~ ~ .N Qi a 0 G vJ ~rQ 0~, G> J o y N O yu.. O c5d O 3 w0 N T d O ~ wtow I o o r 0I 0 O I N C, m O ~ N C) U TA c[d z O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O. T ~ ~ ~ to ~ W 0.O ~ ~ o ~ acv ~ o'^ ~•c~m o ~ _ a° ~n9E oc-~ t > oci,~°~ to o d oA n~aoib o v u c ° 0b ° v ° Z o O v0. ° m a° a z ay a 0.3 o E o _ aUn o o°na'5 a Yb o c_ n n Fn ° O 5 q v~ E° 3 a c n n a Wm 3° z a o o o E 3 u7 ~ Q N ~ 'S7 O S> O 'O ~ T T~ C Aon'N" y u J O O o~- o 0.5=m 7O Oo o~ F ryy ° In c -4 J~ r ~I 0 XN d y 7 " T ° 'D ban O ~ O O O ~~d! C O vii O V ' In N I (N~~ l N co { 0 .-0' 'U I N ~ ~ c~ N U U O [ vi ~ U? U ~ J T/1 O- ~ ~ N ^ WJ 75 o ml" ...r7 3 d a~~ a~ y o y U ° vT !n u1 +n vi ins' X Cd 6 ow "0 =0 o dCO .Cm cv•^1J"ONa~yL7 •yQ~°O o Tp C Ev _ • p a' F b U °,Z bn p 00 70.97 p C y 0.7 v ° y ° d o3 v° m'aw 'y vl N cq c m a yr O '~7 T• bF." N pp O C E b U T•d A vOi 3 Ctd [o: •p d N (Oj n o d v I ~I ° o O.b N aoA v •Gl d t~.~ SN L cy ¢ 4 '~c k y I ra=o a> _ v O= L O F E1 a~°'c Eoa9. SILO lo~lo.v t = aFA0Qw N vE'a~o y a~ ~orOV~npd 3.. go°~~°q°l~ oa°i vv Y ~yILyJ a'-L © a~ ce a~ 'd 491 'erbw.'~ 0~ ° 044 cc = n ~ i°ca . 3p~~ou moa CoNw 0.a" ° o . E W g o m 3.c S~ 2 L a' c 0 0 , 0. c N .0.E Eo .n 3~v•a,.va 0 qb vi C bo O c) r0. us r`o o ~aO m._Oa H C to o Q s `~'m Eau m m ~ EA. L cn uo o.~ iJ O. c _ o ~ O 0.v "a to C31% C, v L~ = aNOm~o~a" $ a ~opD O~f Q L o" o o °~o o o v ~mE 6 O V O w O' O L L O N d > rs U cu L . o: _ vw.-- vAo u N * O E ❑ a ` c o-q N C G N r~ Vi ovvso ` vv E .a E o o g L d (/1 Q~ N ~ o ` ~ v O L Q ❑o -O m p k O ['p S V N 16 N L o v° o ° • m ~O m tV O O m n O ~ N G .mi A F,F~ ~ O ~ f: ~y ~ ° ~ o "o , Cc ~ GJ CmC o~vra m , w ..O w U C y ie ~'Cce y Dn rr o i3 y d' ° ~ I id n, O c,C Ow C N ~ w Rt OC: O C N N y y bo Er E 0°0 p• O . o C 5p n ti° v c m °A ~ o° x 5 ti 5 98 r9 F. 04 o 7 g o 0.o C ~a o o~0] 43 ° a a 0 00cIN O•~ © O <tl o n z d U E y E 3 0.U E 3'~ o[ 5 Ewa, o c G E° ° g ~.n b odow p oEl E N ar7 A° 00 0.0+ N q, 0a 3 o a y '«r7 Boa❑¢tABI w v b T a ° O o NA ,O. 6J O Oq N'ar7 N ON 3 OA ° E c 4 o ~o^ C b 0.g o 0.Q ~ OE oxo ~r G. O°n C" ❑V❑ 0 'of Ted [ 0Q4 vpOi 0 t❑d U OiD fd O` o . V ~ •C7 y OJ (Oj O Kt O O O. O p w Mu yq N w n' O 0 -u y b N 0.0 0 ° ~ 0 •r0. a ~ SO oomsa,,......b.. m 0 r: 0 !u V~ ~°C7~c cEo ~0 MEMO 3,, 0 C7 Q a00i T y 'J m v.-,don P: E b O 0.799 C O O Y 3 0 =0 -E V' .}.t C a°a~O 0.o many O c 5 c w~ E A5 E acv fE r0. ~x o `a o ~.0 A-0 m~~ °.50El 0'. tq p mv~mdQ,E V1 o•b .o~= ° 0 0."i d~ m~ y`b Cq ° moa~nh q° L~ •V O~ > [ O q TO O T L o m act v a W- b TA 0.o E b ° ° a -o m my a° g =a 74 > EGm'oa_~Z O 0 v: a 0 t > o a E ° H o rA V1 x 'mw 0 -:l , l 0= .a co 'C 5 r~ i4 1 - 6 z:!"0. _ 0 00 ; ~ N ^ LO a C C14 C, Ln - 1 10 cy o O I, - . a s LI y m I - m o In C r u -0 o ~f, . p o k- ~i•~ c o o ~ rn ° O CU) 0 v / 00 j y: U ~ G' ti +Ni '1" y N q ~ cC •Gj y •°~C 0~~ '.7 F m O m h ~ N .vi a~., p d O O N N N o a 3a qbA ~ b.5 ❑ o o~e» root C, u o ro a Q N O a N -1-~ N a• cC -0 0 0.0.5. Ld❑p o o'er?' E o cl, ° m 3 pYOq~ id C°° o o ° N 1515, cd owgn-o.~aaodo>tp 5O-NaaNy~ r yo U.:a~'c~'cbc2O'.+O004 _QAG o~ ~°~~oxaoo00: a Ma bow c a 3 3 °'ov° 3v o~ ° o C_ o F, P. R ui rx v ° ' m a d `i m>° 3 -o o n o ~ m C I _ " i c u v o X m o o Eta 3` s > G f0 c-oyo°:~~° ~ co K o co v.., c E U O N m y h .N, y N 'b O off: m ° y ,p (U o > c "~.'ooA ^(Ji boo; GGC NU o o Q' .'b J3 'E ti w `id Y .00 -a o a= 00 y 7• ~L7', ai O N O :C O ate.. O 0- ccab'7 o y C ww O 'O o - ~ ~ a .a'a~ ,4 a b _ _ ~ _ d .5 A ~n d C ° I y c0 O 'pv,, ' pp J U O• 5[ S v 0 N. aa) .O C • U N 9) E" f{dy, U M a I C °w.9 aSj o R;.L~O' 3 I O bOiO 0 co d o° o o 0 p y °i o a q v v, N .pro°~3 m.o~'oas>~~.n>~a o'rh~> n [ 0 aa° o:8 .5 0 L N C V Q /C • V Q. C V W Gr o v Sao dpcy; 2yy0oy- ~ cN2~ ~~p ~e'3 d m~ ~ ° °ooa~o [=N t c ob b 5 0-0 m o 0 0 o v o O~ d Q ~qc~ t- C'.ro•~ 0 o o a ne3 a° n aa~5br~ to ca N ° ° a A p ° ~ CO pp o .ty 5 w C d00W Qb ~-S C V.' ° N BYO N y 0- U ry a' U '4= A o b ° Q) r F a c ~ -b w ti ~ 'L7 TCdJ t`~~U O 'd a b N k"y y li35 5 a .a ti u,duo. 00 ~r -0 .O O m qpp G' N d LL pN F'. a 5 ~•6oy quo bb53 o aC ° ray v~ a o IS o 0 U O q" O a^ d O O O ~bo a°i '6b~ °AApp'o d m m bN0 O 00,00 cd C w .ar7 m~' w cd ec-0! ~ I O ~ ❑O U ~w b'~~, Cry d~7 0 13v O OFv ~'CS ~~w~ m api d R. cd CL) °50 oo°'o a0oo°00°o D° o~ oy obu O.U~F co IV ftr" WX Awl . fh7 At T to ♦ ) _ t ) 1 yr 'r t t 40 000~ l r,~ ♦ rf~ y'~yf~ Exbiblt Page & a al ~ X 777 . t+ s~ r tt 60zo f 1V* K Exhibit '9 Page t'f of..._`_fo j i i i r w r;y oiw~ Ah MVPW Pale of_..r0.__ r ~ ~ ty ~1 ~ i~~f ~ , ~r~~ A' 1 a ~r ~ ~~w t ~ 4 ~s ~«S s r e ~ ~*.i~:;1~7 I~MI,! I t! 4 ~'h'',.~ Eh,ihi w ~ ~ rrAl,'h~; ~M~~Iy. _ 7Yp;g511EU ~y I L~ ~ ~ I Yw 1 tt l~ f 1 ~ „~y ; ~ . G? s.~.r'.d~ YrY Y-~ ~ r 't W ~ a.