Loading...
2007-385-Minutes for Meeting February 05,2007 Recorded 3/29/2007FICIAL NANCYDESCHUBLANKENSHIPTES COUNTY CLERKDS Cj Z001'3YJ COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 03/29/2007 04:23:36 PM 111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III 20Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded to correct [give reason] previously recorded in Book or as Fee Number and Page OTES 4 to Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.orc MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING - LAND USE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2007 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend Present were Commissioners Michael M. Daly, Dennis R. Luke and Tammy Baney. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administration; Will Groves, Tom Anderson, George Read and Catherine Morrow, Community Development Department; Mark Pilliod and Laurie Craghead, Legal Counsel; and ten other citizens. No representatives of the media were present. Chair Daly opened the meeting at 10: 00 a. m. 1. Before the Board was Citizen Input. None was offered. Dennis Luke noted that Loismae Benson has passed away, and the community lost a great advocate for many worthwhile issues. One of the bills she helped pass was "55 Alive She was 94. 2. Before the Board was Discussion and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 2007-006, Text Amendments regarding the Rural Commercial Zone. Will Groves came before the Board. This was examined before as a non- conforming use with long-established established businesses, and a permanent change to commercial zoning is requested. The Hearings Officer has approved the application, and indicted that the road alignment needs to be addressed as part of the site plan application process. Laurie Craghead added that the Board is required to adopt the Hearings Officer's decision, per County Code, and there have been no appeals submitted. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 1 of 13 Pages LUKE: Move first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 2007-006. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: LUKE: DALY: Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. Chair Daly then conducted the first reading of the Ordinance. The second reading will be conducted no sooner than in two weeks. 3. Before the Board was Discussion and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 2007-007, Map and Text Amendments regarding the Rural Commercial Zone. LUKE: Move first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 2007-006. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY LUKE: DALY: Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. Chair Daly then conducted the first reading of the Ordinance. The second reading will be conducted in two weeks. Tom Anderson distributed copies of the Measure 37 statement regarding procedure. 4. Before the Board was a Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-039, a Measure 37 Claim (Andres). Tom Anderson stated that the claim was filed on property located just within the new Redmond urban reserve area. Under the joint management agreement with Redmond, the County still has jurisdiction on the land use process within that area. The primary focus is preserving rights of way interest. It is 18 acres zoned EFU, and the claimants wish to establish a farm or non- farm dwelling, basically a residence on the property. The amount of damage claimed is $200M. In terms of ownership, they received a land sale contract on May 15, 1989, with a warranty deed issued a few days later. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 2 of 13 Pages In 2004 via warranty deed it was conveyed to one of the parties. Farm rules changed after 1989, and it is likely that the rules at that time would probably allow the residence. Commissioner Luke asked if the $80,000 threshold was in place in 1989. Mr. Anderson said he is unsure of the exact date, but he thinks the standard was not that high at that time. Chair Daly opened the public hearing at this time. Attorney Lisa Klemp said she has an affidavit from her clients regarding the diminished value of the property, as well as septic and soil tests and water availability. She said they concur with the staff report and have no other issues with the recommendations of staff. Mark Pilliod said he received a fax copy of the affidavit and it doesn't change anything; it supplements information previously submitted. Chair Luke noted that he has known the family for years. No other testimony was offered, so the hearing was closed. LUKE: Move approval. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was a Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-004, a Measure 37 Claim (Young). Tom Anderson said the claim was filed by William Young and others. There is no formal address; the property is referenced by tax lot number. It is not located in the new City of La Pine, as the staff report notes. LUKE: Move approval of corrections to the staff report. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 3 of 13 Pages Mr. Anderson explained that the property is located north of Burgess Road and west of Day Road. It is 4.5 acres zoned RR, with a wildlife overlay. The claimants wish to build a house or subdivide the property into two or three lots. The amount of damages claimed is $250,000. In terms of ownership, all three claimants are listed on the original warranty deed dated April 3, 1966. All of the parties are still listed as owners, although William Young transferred the property into a revocable trust in 2004. As the staff report states, this is not considered a break in ownership. Therefore, the acquisition date for each claimant would be April 3, 1966. One residence is permitted outright today. The original property was ten acres, but was subdivided before the mid-1970's. Chair Daly opened the public hearing. Lisa Klemp, attorney for the applicant, said they concur with staff's recommendations. An affidavit from Mr. Young has been submitted regarding reduced value, the soil, and water availability. LUKE: Move approval. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 6. Before the Board was a Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-038, a Measure 37 Claim (Burk). Mr. Anderson stated that this claim concerns two parcels located northeast of the City of Redmond. Both are just outside of the new urban reserve area. They are near O'Neill Junction; one straddles the City of Prineville railway. One is 61 acres on Yucca Avenue, zoned EFU; the other is 40 acres on 17th Street, also zoned EFU with the Terrebonne subzone. The claimants wish to subdivide the property into residential lots; the acreage amount is unclear. The amount of damages claimed for Yucca is $1 million, and for 17th Street it is $200,000. In terms of ownership, there were different acquisition dates. Yucca was acquired via land sale contract by the Burks on July 20, 1973. The second property was acquired via a separate land sale contract on December 1, 1981. The Burks have owned both continuously since then. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 4 of 13 Pages The first property had A-1 zoning in place in 1973. It could be that five-acre parcels were allowed at that time. The second property had EFU-20 zoning in place in 1981, so it possibly could be partitioned into 20-acre parcels. There was one letter of opposition filed by Central Oregon Land Watch. Mark Pilliod said that the County received a draft staff report from the DLCD; however, they have no control over the decision. A waiver has been obtained from the State. Chair Daly opened the public hearing. Lisa Klemp, attorney for the claimants, said they concur with the staff report Pamela Hardy of Central Oregon Land Watch then asked to speak. Mr. Pilliod stated that the rules require that only those persons entitled to notice of the hearing within the notice area are permitted to testify orally. They can, however, submit testimony in writing. Ms. Hardy said that the information sheet distributed to the public says that those who submit information in writing can also testify in person. Mr. Pilliod stated that the notice says they are invited to testify, but can't expand on permission as stated in the notice. Commissioner Luke noted that Deschutes County actually sends out a notice; most counties do not. The Ordinance is clear that only those who received written notice can testify orally. Mr. Pilliod said that the statement looks like it is broader than the Code allows. Chair Daly asked Ms. Hardy if what she wants to say is different from what was submitted in writing. Ms. Hardy said that it is not, but she wishes to emphasize a point. She said that there was a lot line adjustment making one parcel substantially larger. Because of the lot line adjustment, part of the property does not qualify for a waiver back to the date noted in the report. Mr. Pilliod stated that they haven't had an issue in the past in regard to lot line adjustments. This suggests that there needs to be some consideration of a mixture of acquisition dates. He suggested the matter be continued. Chair Daly noted that Mr. Burk is a neighbor of his. BANEY: Move continuance to the February 13, 2007 Board meeting. LUKE: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 5 of 13 Pages Ms. Klemp said that she objects to the testimony given today, and recommended it be disregarded due to notice requirements. Commissioner Luke asked that she respond in writing prior to February 13. Mr. Pilliod explained that the material submitted by Central Oregon Land Watch dated January 31, 2007 does indicate the point Ms. Hardy emphasized. Therefore, the Board already had this testimony. It seems more appropriate to continue the matter to avoid a possible error. The material was received after the point when staff would have drafted the staff report, so it was not considered at that time. The areas taken in by lot line adjustments should be identified. Bill Burk, property owner, said that the original property was 80 acres. (He pointed out the location on an oversized map.) The lot line adjustment was done for his son to be able to build a home. Mr. Pilliod recommended that Mr. Burk and his attorney work to identify the land that was affected by the lot line adjustment. Tom Anderson added that the lot line adjustment was done through Community Development in 2002, so there should be detailed information available. Commissioner Baney expressed concern that there appears to be no way to address this type of situation. Mr. Pilliod said that it is probably not uncommon for a property owner to have sold off portions of property. There may be cases concerning lot line adjustments, but this particular situation has not come up before. This appears to be a unique instance. Mr. Anderson added that even if two parcels are owned by the same person, they still have to meet minimum lot sizes. There could be limitations on reducing the parcel to benefit the other lot. This one probably met the standard and the change was probably not large. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 7. Before the Board was a Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-008, a Measure 37 Claim (Kaesche). Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 6 of 13 Pages Tom Anderson said that this involves three different parcels. The tax lots and legal descriptions are correct. The order and staff report show 3 addresses on Walker Road. The property is located east of Bend near Alfalfa Market Road and Stenkamp. Lot 1500 is approximately 59 acres, zoned EFU. Lot 1400 is about 18 acres, also zoned EFU. The third parcel is Lot 3400, about 40 acres zoned EFU. Combined this is approximately 117 acres. The claimant wishes to subdivide for residential purposes; there could be up to 120 one-acre lots. The claim amount is $22 million. Ownership is through the Wayne Curtis Kaesche revocable trust. Lot 3400 was acquired via warranty deed on June 5, 1967. Lots 1400 and 1500 were acquired on March 17, 1971. All three were transferred to the revocable trust on November 2, 1994. A revocable trust does not affect the ownership history. Therefore, the acquisition date for Lot 3400 is June 5, 1967 and the other two is March 17, 1971. Those dates would govern future land use. There was no effective zoning in 1967. In 1971 the PL-2 zone was in effect, which could affect future development. A letter was received from Central Oregon Land Watch on this claim. Chair Daly asked for testimony; none was offered. BANEY: Move approval. LUKE: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 8. Before the Board was a Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-009, a Measure 37 Claim (Walker). Tom Anderson said the claim involves six separate parcels. The property is located between Bend and Sisters, west of Highway 20 at approximately Tweed Road. The staff report and Order describe the property as being one address. He will refer to the parcels by lot number. The first one is Lot 400, which is 80 acres. Lot 330 is approximately ten acres. Lot 1400 is 19 acres, and Lot 1500 is 18 acres. Lot 1600 is approximately 239 acres, and Lot 1700 is approximately 20 acres. All are zoned EFU. Combined they total about 386 acres. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 7 of 13 Pages The claimant has indicated a desire to subdivide the property for residential use; the lot size is unclear. The claim is for $1 million. The current owner is the Donald P. Walker and Maryann M. Walker trust. In 1973 they each acquired one-half interest in the combined properties, and both put their interest into a revocable trust. This does not affect Measure 37 ownership history. The date of ownership for all six parcels would be October 19, 1973. In 1973 PL-5 was in effect, which may have a bearing on the lot sizes. Two letters of opposition have been received. One was from Karnoff Peterson and the other from Central Oregon Land Watch. Commissioner Luke noted that it appears there was a lot line adjustment at one point. Mr. Pilliod said that all properties were acquired at the same time, so it is not an issue. Commissioner Baney asked why only one trust applied and not the other. Mr. Anderson replied that the claimant decides who would apply. There have been claims in the past when only one owner submits the claim. Chair Daly opened the hearing. Ms. Klemp said her clients concur with the staff report. She added that the lot line adjustment was related to the development of domestic water and septic systems. Also, Mr. Walker has passed away and Mrs. Walker is now the sole owner. His death certificate is a part of the record. Mrs. Walker then testified. She said she has lived on the property since its purchase, with the hope that it would be passed on to children or grandchildren. When it was rezoned from 20 acre to 80 acre parcels, this destroyed hope of passing it on to the children. There are only seven other parcels in that area that are more than 80 acres irrigated. A person needs to have an outside income to support farming efforts. Her daughter and son-in-law have offered to help maintain the property, but zoning prevented them from establishing a house. All of the irrigation equipment has been replaced and a new hay storage building put in place. They have no interest in tearing up the land to subdivide it. Two of the neighbors don't like the idea but they live in Portland. They want the land to stay the same but don't want to help. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 8 of 13 Pages Neighbors who live there have decided they do not want to become part of the Tweed Road coalition that is fighting the change. They understand what is wanted is not a bunch of houses, but for the family to be able to live on the property and help out if they want to. A person can't run a ranch of this size without family help. The land will still be beautiful. Ellen Grover, representing the Tweed Road coalition, said that her clients were unable to attend today. One owner lives on Tweed Road, and there are two others. She said she appreciates the desire to provide a home for family members; that was the intent of the Measure. However, the property is beautiful and does back up to public land, and there is wildlife on the property. Subdividing it will take away the value of other peoples' properties. She urged the Board to reject the claim. She feels that the wildlife and open space are a great attribute to the area, and a five-acre subdivision is incompatible. The Walkers advocated for the wildlife overlay on part of their property. At that time the Bend Trap Club wanted to amend the forest zone in that area. Ms. Walker felt this was not compatible. She added that the value is questionable if you can't put a use on it. Previous comments noted that a subdivision is not a use. Multnomah County has found that it is not a use. It only permits this Board to waive regulations that restrict use and devalue the land. A subdivision is not a use, and the Board can't waive subdivision use. Commissioner Luke pointed out that Measure 37 is not a land use action; it is an administrative, legislative action. The Board is not approving a subdivision. Ms. Grover stated that it is unlikely that State law would have permitted a farm dwelling in 1973. On October 19, 1973, amendments were adopted and the legislature adopted an agricultural policy to keep land in large blocks. She added that the chain of title shows a 1964 contract of sale to the Mallids, with a recorded contract of sale to the Walkers in 1976. There is no proof of Morley, who sold it to the Walkers, received interest from the Mallids. There is nothing in the record that Marley had any interest to convey. Commissioner Luke stated that it is very possible to have an interest through an unrecorded contract. Further, that all the Board is doing today is establishing the date of acquisition - not approving a land use action at all. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 9 of 13 Pages Lisa Klemp, for the claimants, said she felt compelled to respond. She agreed that the testimony offered was appropriate for a land use application, not for a Measure 37 claim, and those arguments have no place here today. The record establishes that the application had an interest in the property through a land use contract in November 1972. This entitles the owner to possession of the property and meets the requirements of ownership. This does not say that the deed or evidence of recorded documents is necessary. The ownership interest has been established. There is evidence in the record that the property has a devaluation of $1 million if they are not able to subdivide. They have met that burden. Although neighbors may be concerned about value, Measure 37 does not allow that as part of the consideration regarding waivers. Commissioner Luke asked if there is a copy of the land sale agreement to support the record. Ms. Walker said that in those days selling land on contract was very common. She and her husband made payments on the contracts with Morley and then to the estate. Everything was under contract the entire time. She added that her husband and she were not advocates for the land use change. Her husband served on several committees to help develop the comprehensive plan, and there was a lot he and other farmers didn't like. It was not all good but it happened. Wildlife does a lot of damage to the property, eating about forty acres of crops a year. Commissioner Luke asked if it would be best to postpone the decision so that the record can be clarified. There is a possibility it could be appealed, and it is always better to have more in the record. Commissioner Daly noted that they spent a lot of money improving the property. Ms. Walker stated they never financed anything, just paid as they went. Commissioner Luke suggested that perhaps the irrigation district would have some information as well. Mark Pilliod stated that there does not have to be anything in the record except evidence that is deemed to be reliable; it does not have to be recorded evidence. The claimant feels comfortable with the decision. If there is an appeal, it appears all parties will be represented. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 10 of 13 Pages Ms. Walker said that they bought the property in September 1973 and recorded the deed in October 1973. They moved onto the property in the spring of 1974 to start the irrigation pumps. They have taken care of the land from then on. Stan Standiford of the brokerage on Wall Street handled the transaction. Lisa Klemp asked that the Board make a decision at this time. Chair Daly closed the hearing at this time. Commissioner Luke said that Legal Counsel makes a good point; both sides have counsel. The claimant feels the information is sufficient. Real estate transactions were handled very differently at that time. BANEY: Move approval. LUKE: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 9. Before the Board was Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2007-008 regarding Private Property Compensation Claims (Measure 37). Mark Pilliod stated that he made some adjustments in the Ordinance in response to testimony given by Attorney Bruce White. In regard to a request to amend or continue a claim and waiving the time frame, Mr. White had pointed out that perhaps this was too broad. This was not the intent. Language has been inserted that rather than a waiver of the time frame, a request for an extension is to be deemed the equivalent of restarting the time frame. As a practical matter it would be addressed well within the 180 days. Mr. White said that it should be the amount of time requested by the claimant; this should be possible but doesn't have to be indicated within the Ordinance. He added that all cases were filed before December 4, 2006. If any are submitted later, they can be handled well within the 180 days. Commissioner Luke asked that if a person has owned a property since 1963 and never applied, would they have to be turned down for a land use action before filing a claim. Mr. Pilliod said yes, but it has nothing to do with this issue. This situation could be challenged later as well. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 11 of 13 Pages Commissioner Daly asked if the claimant amends the claim before it goes before the Board, does this change the timing. Mr. Pilliod stated it doesn't go into any detailed description of what an amendment means. Sometimes the record is supplemented and this does not change the application. If a person files on day 1 and comes in on day 10 and wants to include other property, what harm would there be in starting the 180 days again. This helps staff understand what the rules are going in. If you change it in some material way, add a claimant, change the property or whatever, you will have agreed that the 180 day time clock restarts. Commissioner Daly asked what happens if it could be finished up long before the 180 days. Mr. Pilliod replied that this gives some leeway; it can be done sooner if possible. But this gives staff some flexibility in timing, especially if there is a major change. Mr. Pilliod said the only other change is regarding whether to deny a building permit request if it doesn't come from the owner. Based on comments, it is suggested that the language should stated that Community Development must apply the underlying zone to a parcel if someone other than the owner or the owner's authorized representative applies. There are probably still some gaps, but this is the best that can be done to address the transferability issue under land use laws. Commissioner Luke said that part of the Ordinance talks about testifying. The last sentence says a public hearing is not required. He asked if a hearing is different than a public hearing. Mr. Pilliod stated that it is really not a public hearing for this. Simply calling it a hearing limits who can give oral testimony. The statement will be changed to reflect this. Commissioner Baney stated she has a concern regarding deadlines for submittal of information from outside counsel. Mr. Pilliod replied that one problem is that people testify and present material up to the point of the hearing that might not have been submitted previously. This is like a trial, and plays out before the Board. The process does allow for the Board not to make a decision when the hearing is concluded; it can be continued. The Board will be advised if there is a deadline issue. People are not perfect, and the process allows more than what Measure 37 requires. Someone's failure to follow the process can't be a defense in the decision. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 12 of 13 Pages LUKE: Move first and second readings by title only of Ordinance No. 2007- 008, declaring an emergency. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: LUKE: DALY: Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. Chair Daly did both readings at this time. LUKE: Move approval. BANEY: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. 10. Before the Board were Other Items. None were offered. Chair Daly adjourned the meeting at 12:15 p.m. DATED this 5th Day of January 2007 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Land Use Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 13 of 13 Pages IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY Please complete this card & turn it in to a County staff person. Name: E?I, gtvv.e,,~ Mailing Address: tgYj; Off- q-7701 Phone (54 i~ 3g Z - w I 1 E-mail Address: &,roozo , curd Date: a 5 07 Subject: p~AWe 7 (wojl~y~ &6x N0. 1 -v oq ModA ltvq -f,~5 16-- x`01-E S L~ fr C3 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA - LAND USE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2007 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building 1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Visitors who wish to speak should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign-up sheet provided. Please use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you to speak. 2. DISCUSSION and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 2007- 006, Text Amendments regarding the Rural Commercial Zone - Will Groves, Community Development Department 3. DISCUSSION and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 2007- 007, Map and Text Amendments regarding the Rural Commercial Zone - Will Groves, Community Development Department 4. A HEARING and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-039, a Measure 37 Claim (Andres) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel; Tom Anderson, Community Development Department 5. A HEARING and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-004, a Measure 37 Claim (Young) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel; Tom Anderson, Community Development Department 6. A HEARING and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-038, a Measure 37 Claim (Burk) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel; Tom Anderson, Community Development Department Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 1 of 5 Pages 7. A HEARING and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-008, a Measure 37 Claim (Kaesche) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel; Tom Anderson, Community Development Department 8. A HEARING and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2007-009, a Measure 37 Claim (Walker) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel; Tom Anderson, Community Development Department 9. CONSIDERATION of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2007-008 regarding Private Property Compensation Claims (Measure 37) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel 10. OTHER ITEMS Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572) Friday, February 2, 2007 6:00 a.m. Sunriver Chamber of Commerce Annual Installation Dinner, at Sunriver Monday, February 5, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board Land Use Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 2 of 5 Pages Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:30 a.m. Fair Board Interviews (Tentative) Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Measure 37 Claims Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:15 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, February 15, 2007 7:00 a.m. Bend Chamber of Commerce Legislative Policy Council Meeting, at County Monday, February 19, 2007 Most County offices will be closed to observe Presidents' Day Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:30 a.m. Community Fire Plan Signing, at Sunriver Library 12 noon Regularly scheduled Department Heads Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Monday, February 26, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board Land Use Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Wednesday. February 28, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:15 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 3 of 5 Pages Monday, March 5, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board Land Use Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, March 7, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting - Measure 37 Claims Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:15 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:00 a.m. Regularly Scheduled Meeting with the Redmond City Council, Council Chambers Monday, March 19, 2007 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:00 a.m. Regular Meeting of the Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Wednesday, March 21, 2007 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Monday, March 26, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board Land Use Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 4 of 5 Pages Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:15 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Monday, Apri12, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board Land Use Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, April 4, 2007 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 11:15 a.m. Legislative Update Conference Call 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, April 5, 2007 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Sisters Council, Sisters City Hall Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 5, 2007 Page 5 of 5 Pages J'C ES C G 0~( Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.oriz ADDITION TO THE AGENDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2007 A HEARING (continued from January 31) and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2007-008 regarding Private Property Compensation Claims (Measure 37) - Mark Pilliod, Legal Counsel