2007-555-Minutes for Meeting May 09,2007 Recorded 5/24/2007COUNTY
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKDS yu NOME
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 05/2412007 02;38;04 PM
IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII
2007-555
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
L
C
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
.,>1 I-- ZZ3
G
:03 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.orc
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2007
Present were Commissioners Michael M. Daly, Dennis R. Luke and Tammy Baney.
Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Anna Johnson,
Commissioners' Office; Susan Ross, Property and Facilities; and, for part of the
meeting, Larry Blanton, Ruth Jenkin and Sue Brewster, Sheriff's Office; Marty
Wynne, Finance; Brian Nelson, Redmond Gun Club; Jeff Nielson, Bend Chamber
of Commerce; Pam and Bob Marble, NAM representatives; and media
representative Jeff Mullins of KBND Radio.
Chair Daly opened the meeting at 1: 30 p.m.
1. Discussion of Jail Decisions: Size and Funding Availability/Options.
Dave Kanner distributed a document regarding funding options. One would be
a general obligation bond; the rate would be 36 cents per thousand. The smaller
expansion would cost about 19 cents per thousand. The rate declines over time
as the assessed valuation of property increases. This option would require a
vote of the people.
The biggest issue is that if this waits until November 2008 and the voters do not
pass it, a lot of time would be lost. Commissioner Daly said this should be up
to the voters anyway. However, Commissioner Baney stated that it is the
Board's responsibility to make sure the public is safe.
Mr. Kanner said an option regarding full faith and credit bonding would
guarantee the funding, and no vote would be required. However, departments
could be negatively impacted. Commissioner Luke said that there needs to be
some way to pay it back.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 1 of 9 Pages
Mr. Kanner's recommended option is to do a land sale. The one piece of
property that might work the best is land located next to Redmond. The 215
acres are already within the City limit, and it is, therefore, worth much more
than the rest. All three Commissioners have stated nothing should be done until
the City has completed its master plan. The other concern is selling off all of
the County's property, leaving nothing for the future. Commissioner Daly has
stated that this is Redmond's future and that they need to have control over it.
Another concern is how it could be purchased.
The City wants to complete the framework plan, while working with the County
on this process. Ownership of the acreage could be transferred to the City; it is
not included in the master planning area at this time; and zone changes are
needed. The City is working with ODOT on a transportation plan that is to be
completed by August.
There are challenges, which is the main reason why this work should begin as
soon as possible. The County needs to establish a floor price, which must be
sufficient to cover the debt.
Commissioner Daly emphasized that nothing can be done until the
transportation plan is in place. He said that he doesn't think the value is as
great as Mr. Kanner thinks it is. Mr. Kanner stated that it should be appraised
under the scenario of the land being rezoned. The value could be about $36
million when properly zoned.
Commissioner Baney expressed concern about the value and whether it would
be adequate. She doesn't want to wait to proceed Mr. Kanner said that there is
another property owner who is also anxious to be able to sell property in the
area.
He suggested that about $2.5 million be borrowed from a County fund to get
started on the work. Because the smaller jail expansion will be done, the
reduced expansion needs to be reconfigured.
Commissioner Daly said that Sheriff Blanton stated that an RFP process was
done for the previous bid. Mr. Kanner said that once the revised plan is done,
they could then go out for competitive bid; at least they would then know what
is expected. A timeline would be set out for each step in the contract process.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 2 of 9 Pages
Sheriff Blanton explained his stance on option #1; he is not in favor of asking
the taxpayers for additional money. The OMNI study (he referred to an
oversized sketch) - shows that interim stage 1 will be at the 2010 stage. The
information is already owned, and the professionals need to be able to proceed.
He added that he is in favor of Dave's plan to let the City of Redmond work
with the County to sell this property. The work center remodel was to start in
2005, but the levy hadn't passed and a lot of time has been lost.
Sheriff Blanton emphasized that the Board should vote on this today, or being
ready by 2010 won't be a viable option. The number of inmates has greatly
increased and 78% of them are pre-trial. Others are getting matrixed out.
The cost increases the longer it waits. Selling the Redmond property could be a
win-win plan for the City of Redmond, the County and the taxpayers.
Commissioner Luke said that the request is for funding to get the design process
done; by the time this work is done, the County would know the status of the
Redmond property. Mr. Kanner confirmed that it would at least get it through
the design of the jail. He wants to start working with the City to get the land
sale process moving. By the time the master plan is complete, it will be ready.
The appraisal would come after the master plan is done. This could be very
complicated and time-consuming, and he needs the Board's blessing to proceed
with a potential sale.
Commissioner Luke stated that there is still another 1600 acres for future sale.
Sheriff Blanton noted that a lot of the work can be started now. Not everything
can be known for a while, but some steps need to be taken right away. The
exact bed types and numbers for the jail are not known; the mix changes with
the need and population.
Commissioner Baney said that she is concerned a decision is being made based
on a crisis today. However, the numbers are good, based on KMD's previous
estimates. She added that perhaps it is not good stewardship without knowing
how the beds might be utilities in the future. Sheriff Blanton stated that he
would like to look at what is reasonable and responsible. By 2010, he hopes
that if the right things are done with programs and alternatives that the jail will
never be full. However, planning for the future needs to be done now. He
asked that the Board keep in mind that law enforcement's busy season has not
yet begun, and there also will be many new officers doing more arrests in the
near future.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 3 of 9 Pages
The group then briefly discussed leaving some of the inside area unfinished
until it is know how the beds should be configured. Sheriff Blanton added that
a courtroom is needed as well, and the kitchen and booking areas will have to
be expanded.
Commissioner Daly said he still wants to visit the Longview, Washington
facility. Sheriff Blanton stated that the facility has a dormitory type
arrangement that won't, for the most part, work for Deschutes County.
Sheriff Blanton stated that the Sheriff's Office plans to move the Redmond Rod
& Gun Club to wherever it can be moved. Perhaps local government entities
can enter into a joint venture with the Club and work in partnership for a more
permanent type of range.
Brian Nelson of the Club said they have about $35,000 invested in the current
site. Commissioner Luke stated that negotiations for the sale of this property
will take the needs of the Club into consideration.
Commissioner Daly expressed doubt of the estimated value of the 215 acres.
Sheriff Blanton said that there are many people in the community who are
interested in this type of investment property.
Mr. Kanner gave a brief overview of creating a new fund, capital improvement
fund for jail improvements. The money would come from other funds. KMD
is the architect for the $12,000 work on the footprint of the jail. A bid process
will follow, and there is no assumption that they will end up doing the final
work. The information will be owned by the County.
Larry stated they need to move forward now. He said that with all due respect,
the Board needs to make a decision immediately. Commissioner Luke
reiterated that the money wouldn't be moved now, but a commitment could be
made.
LUKE: Move support of the plan as outlined. Mr. Kanner will work with the
City regarding the 215 acres that are located within the City limits.
Commissioners Daly and Baney indicated support, but no formal vote was
taken.
BANEY: Move that funds be moved from the reserve fund for the footprint
and programming work.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 4 of 9 Pages
Commissioner Daly agreed. Marty Wynne added that this would have to be
approved by the Budget Committee and ultimately the Board.
Neither motions were formally seconded nor voted upon, but clear direction
was given for Mr. Kanner to proceed.
Mr. Kanner advised that Susan Ross and Teresa Rozic will present an overview
of all of the County-owned properties next week.
2. Discussion of Mental Health Residential Treatment Projects.
Robert Marble, a citizen and member of NAMI, said he is interested in reducing
the number of people going into the jail by keeping the mentally ill out. He is
working with Cyndy Cook of Housing Works, Gary Smith of the NAMI Board
and several other influential people to divert the homeless mentally ill off the
street.
Commissioner Luke stated that the County is working with the City of Bend on
a site for the Bethlehem Inn. There is additional acreage at the site that might
be used for other things. Mr. Marble stated they have identified five acres that
they hope they can use for housing purposes.
Commissioner Daly asked if they followed up on the FQHC (federally qualified
health clinic). Ruth Jenkin said that a presentation was given but they have not
gotten a response regarding medication costs. Commissioner Luke noted that
the NACo program allows agencies to purchase drugs at a reduced rate. Ms.
Jenkin replied that the federal agency would have to take control of this aspect
of the jail for this to work. Commissioner Daly said that any lawsuits would
then be defended by the U.S. Attorney. Ms. Jenkin stated that Sue Brewster
attended the meeting as well, and advised that the legal barriers are complicated
and extensive.
Scott Johnson explained that the new State hospitals are to open by 2011. (He
referred to a chart showing residential needs required to compliment the
hospitals.) He added that what is shown is what the County now has, although
they need twice as much.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 5 of 9 Pages
In the near future, the State will issue an RFP for the next biennium. The
facilities would be operated by private providers, primarily serving Central
Oregon residents, and the State would cover the operating costs. The State
would also provide additional funding for support services such as licensing and
screening.
For the first project, he hopes to see an eight-bed residential treatment facility
located in Bend near St. Charles and the clinic. The State would select a
residential provider, and will do the development and operation portion. The
County could provide an acre of land for both projects. This is a competitive
process throughout the State and providing land would give the County
additional leverage.
Five beds would be extended care management; these people would otherwise
be in the State hospital. In exchange, the County would get an additional three
beds for respite care. Respite care was lost some years ago. This is a good
option to keep individuals out of Sageview. Services would be provided
through a private group, but the County would screen who would stay there.
The second project is a secure residential treatment program, with four beds for
extended care, with civil commitment or psychiatric review status. The County
would gain an additional two secure beds to be managed by the County. This
would prevent these people from having to go to the State hospital. Redmond
might be the best location for this.
The State will build the facilities, and is looking for local support. It is a
statewide competitive process. Mr. Kanner added that Jackson County did this
and the County came out ahead. The State pays for the beds and operations,
and used just part of them. The County retained ownership of the property.
Mr. Johnson noted that this does help find more appropriate ways to deal with
people who could instead end up in the jail. Commissioner Baney indicated
support of the idea, and said that when the Board reviews the County's
inventory of property, immediate needs can also be considered.
Commissioner Luke said that the County has been selling property, with the
funds being used to pay debt service on the bonds. Mr. Johnson noted that the
County has been paying increasingly large costs for patients, and balance is
needed.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 6 of 9 Pages
Commissioner Luke said that Mr. Johnson should work with Mr. Kanner and
Susan Ross on this issue, and they will rely on Mr. Kanner as to whether or
when it rises to the Board level. Mr. Johnson noted that he does not want to see
the County miss this opportunity.
3. Other Items.
Sue Brewster explained that representatives of the State, prior to the work
center remodel being done, require that no lien or claim can be filed against the
State and that there are performance and payment bonds in place; and the
County is to indemnify the State against any claims.
LUKE: Move that the State be informed that the County will indemnify
them for any construction or remodel work on the work center.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes
LUKE: Yes.
DALY: Chair votes yes.
Larry Blanton said bids close on May 24 and construction should start in July.
Commissioner Luke stated that the COACT forum on public transportation has
an estimated budget of $2,700. Commissioner Bellamy has offered to pay one-
third to cover the cost of speakers and the facility. All three Commissioners
agreed it would be appropriate for Deschutes County to cover the balance.
Susan Ross said she attended a public meeting regarding property owned by the
Division of State Lands. The property is located south on Bend near the Road
Department, adjacent to other County-owned land. She said she was surprised
to learn that the State has master planned both the State and County property.
The County's property would all be for public use, while the State sells theirs
for money.
Commissioner Luke noted that was the plan, as the Commissioners want to
protect the area around the landfill. Public use could be schools and parks. Ms.
Ross stated that the Board had previously talked about using some of the land
for low-incoming housing.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 7 of 9 Pages
Commissioner Luke pointed out that when the City brings the land into the
City, it doesn't have to follow the master plan anyway. Ms. Ross stressed that
the public now thinks it is all going to be parks and schools.
Commissioner Baney said that the professional advisory council, consisting of
members of the Commission on Children & Families, the school districts and
others, has made a specific request that a policy statement be made indicating a
percentage of the public safety budget be dedicated to prevention or alternatives
to incarceration. Commissioner Luke noted that if the County did this, other
groups would ask for the same thing, and where would it end. Mr. Kanner will
draft a letter in response, indicating that a percentage of funding cannot be
guaranteed, and that decisions regarding funding are made by the Budget
Committee.
The group then discussed Deputy Legal Counsel Mark Amberg's resignation.
Mr. Kanner said that in the short term, the County could contract for Mr.
Amberg's services at the municipal rate. It will be very difficult to recruit
someone with his background in employment law. A firm may have to be put
on retainer for this type of work. Commissioner Luke added that the office
needs a 4th lawyer on staff in any case.
Ms. Ross stated that the question of public safety related to the parking spaces
around the courthouse buildings has been in negotiations for some time. The
City has agreed to closing off fourteen spaces in front of the buildings for law
enforcement use. In return the County will make twelve spaces on Greenwood
open to the public, with a two-hour maximum rate. The City will contract for
enforcement, and the County will pay for signage. The general public will be
allowed to use the fourteen spaces after 6 p.m. and on weekends.
Being no further items to come before the Board, Chair Daly adjourned the
meeting at 4:15 p.m.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 8 of 9 Pages
DATED this 9th Day of May 2007 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
ATTEST:
(~Iw~ -
Recording Secretary
ee~110, 44
Michael M. balY;Y air
Dennis R. Luke, i_ca6,hair
Tammy Bailey, CoryI~issioner
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Page 9 of 9 Pages
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
WORK SESSION AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2007
1. Discussion of Jail Options:
• Size
• Funding Availability/Options
2. Discussion of Mental Health Residential Treatment Projects
3. Other Items
PLEASE NOTE:
At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to:
ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or
ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues
Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners
meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated.
If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
i
CA", 61
lbau~d
L~'~2~ut f3~~rc~
i
Bonnie Baker
From:
Dave Kanner
Sent:
Friday, April 20, 2007 11:00 AM
To:
Bonnie Baker
Subject:
Wednesday, May 9 work session
Please add discussion of Mental Health residential treatment projects. This should be on
the agenda after the jail stuff.
Thanks,
Dave
~J-cES c
~ O`
Department of Administrative Services
Air Dave Kanner, County Administrator
0
DISCUSSION PAPER: FUNDING OPTIONS
WORK SESSION DATE: May 9, 2007
1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202
www. co. deschutes. or. us
The county has three basic funding options, which are discussed below. They are: 1. A
general obligation bond; 2. Sell land and use the proceeds for jail construction; and 3.
Issue a full faith and credit bond.
1. General obligation bond
A G.O. bond could fully fund a jail expansion of whatever size the county chooses. A
portion of the debt service could be covered by regional partners, thus reducing the
required tax rate. A 25-year $75 million G.O. bond, using '06-'07 county-wide
valuation, would require a mill rate of 36¢ and declining steadily over time as assessed
valuation increases. A 25-year $40 million G.O. bond, again using '06-'07 county-wide
valuation, would require a mill rate of 19¢. It would be prudent for the county to wait
until May '08 or November '08 to seek voter approval, thus eliminating any worry about
the double majority.
PROS
• Taxpayer buy-in
• Tax rate can be extremely low
• Debt can be paid off by land sales
• Once approved, it's a sure thing
CONS
• If voters say no, we're back in our
current situation
• Sheriff will oppose
2. Land Sale - RECOMMENDED OPTION
The County owns a good deal of land it is not currently using and for which it has no
plans. Much attention has been focused on an 1,800-acre parcel on the northeastern
boundary of the City of Redmond. Most of this parcel is not in the city's urban growth
boundary and is unlikely to come into the UGB for 15 years or more. The city is
currently engaged in a master planning process for the land that will not be completed
until January or February 2008. The city will then need about three more months to
complete a framework plan for the property.
Quality Services Performed with Pride
PROS
• Does not require a referral vote
• Trades capital for capital
• Demonstrates that we're exhausting
all options before asking the voters
for a G.O. bond
CONS
• Not known how much money a land
sale could actually raise
• No assurance that a land sale could
be executed within a timeframe that
meets the county's need to secure
funding for a jail
There are a number of complicating issues surrounding the sale of this land. The first is
that we don't know how much it's actually worth. That's something we can't determine
until the city finishes its master plan. An appraisal should be conducted to determine
what the value would be if the land was zoned as master planned and included in the
UGB. Next, there has been some sentiment expressed that the city should be given an
opportunity to purchase the land before it is offered to a private buyer. Finally, we don't
know how competitive an offering for the land might be if it was available for sale.
With the Board's concurrence, I propose the following:
A. Initiate discussions with the City of Redmond on selling all or a portion of the
land to them. No competitive bidding process is required for the county to
transfer land to another government agency. Because the city does not have
enough money to purchase the property, the city would have to establish a
competitive process to select a "master developer" for the property who would be
willing to buy it on contract and pay an amount sufficient to cover the county's
debt service on jail construction bonds over a fixed period of time. (Alternatively,
a developer could pay a lump sum if they are so inclined.)
B. Solicit letters of interest from potential buyers. I would have staff put together a
"prospectus" for the land and place an ad in the Daily Journal of Commerce. This
prospectus would make it clear that the land is not currently in the UGB and that a
minimum price has not been established. (For purposes of the prospectus, we'd
have to state some minimum price with the proviso that it is subject to change.)
Potential buyers would only need to indicate a willingness to purchase if the land
became available. This would both demonstrate that there is in fact interest in
purchasing the property and help the City of Redmond in its process.
C. Conduct an appraisal of the property as soon as the master plan is completed in
order to determine its true value and establish a floor price. The floor price would
be the minimum bid the city would accept for the land. Any difference between
the floor price and the accepted offer would presumably accrue to the county.
D. The city at this point (presumably with the county's assistance) would issue a
request for proposals for a master developer to sell the land to. By doing an RFP
rather than a straight bid process, the city and county can be assured of getting a
developer with the financial solvency to carry through on this purchase and the
experience/expertise to develop the property in a manner that is consistent with
the city's vision.
Note that it may not be necessary for the county to sell the entire parcel in order to raise
enough money for jail construction. Slightly over 215 acres of the property are already
inside the city limits of Redmond. It can reasonably be assumed that this land alone
could generate sufficient revenue to pay for all or a significant portion of jail expansion.
This 215 acre parcel is not part of the master planning area, but Redmond city staff has
indicated its willingness to expand the master planning area to include this property. (In
addition, the land is currently zoned open space reserve. A rezoning consistent with the
master plan would likely improve its value.) The Sheriff's Office shooting range and
another shooting range licensed to a private entity are located on the property. Both will
have to be moved.
It may also be possible (and even fiscally prudent) for the county to subdivide the 1600
acres outside the city limits (and the UGB) into smaller parcels and sell off only as much
as is necessary to pay for phase I, while still providing sufficient acreage for urban
growth boundary expansion in 15 years (or whenever it might occur).
Assuming the appraisal could be started in February '08, I would not expect to be able to
conclude this land sale process until May '08 at the earliest. If this doesn't work out, we
would still have the option of seeking a G.O. bond in November '08.
3. Full Faith and Credit Bonds
I know the Board is familiar with the concept of full faith and credit bonds. These are for
all intents and purposes bonds secured by, in the absence of a dedicated revenue source,
the general fund of the county. Assuming debt service of $5 million a year (for a $75
million bond issue) cuts elsewhere in the general fund would be substantial. For instance,
$5 million could be raised by eliminating general fund support to Health, Mental Health,
Commission on Children and Families, the Fair and the Sheriff (who could presumably
have at least some of his lost general fund restored by raising the District 2 tax rate to its
voter approved maximum, something that was not projected to happen for many years).
What's more, further cuts in operating departments could be necessary in future years if
growth slows down and property tax collections start shrinking relative to the growth in
operating costs. I do not view FFC bonds as a viable option.
PROS
• Can be done immediately without
referral to voters
CONS
• Takes away from other county
departments and locks those budget
cuts into place until the bonds are
repaid
May 9, 2007
DESCHUTES
COUNTY To:
SHERIFF' S
OFFICE
From:
LARRY BLANTON
Sheriff
63333 W. Hwy. 20
Bend, OR 97701
Bend Station
541.388.6655
Fax 541.389.6835
Regarding
Commissioners Mike Daly, Dennis Luke and
Tammy Baney
County Administrator Dave Kanner
Sheriff Larry Blanton
Funding for an Expanded Correctional Facility
I appreciate all of the work and consideration that has gone into this jail
expansion project. I find that it is necessary to put in writing where I stand
regarding the funding of this much needed project.
Administration
541.388.6659
Fax 541.389.4454
La Pine Station
51340 Highway 97
La Pine, OR 97739
541.536.1758
Fax 541.536.5766
Sisters Station
703 N Larch St., Suite C
541.549.2302
Fax 541.549.1762
Terrebonne Station
8154 11th Street, Suite 3
Terrebonne, OR 97760
541.923.8270
Fax 541.548.7589
Special Services/SA)?
541.388.6502
Fax 541.388.0793
Emergency Services
541.617.3303
Fax 541.388.0793
Adult Jail
541.388.6661
Fax 541.330.9162
In my opinion the only time that we should ask the tax payers of
Deschutes County for additional tax revenue support, is when all other
means or possibilities for funding for issues such as the jail expansion
have been exhausted.
I believe that the tax payers of Deschutes County have been asked enough
for additional taxes. They have supported us time and time again for
operating levies for the Sheriff's Office and in November of 2006 they
gave us stable funding for all Sheriff's Office operations, which includes
operations money for a newly expanded jail. At the time that this letter is
being written the tax payers are also being asked to support 911 and the La
Pine Fire and Rescue operations levy.
As I understand it there is also the possibility of an additional gas tax
and/or system development charge ( SDC ) being considered for the loss
in revenue for the cut in Federal timber money.
I will not run, nor will I endorse a campaign to ask the tax payers of
Deschutes County for additional money for the construction of a new jail
as long as other options such as the sale of tax payer owned property is a
possibility.
Respectfully Submitte
rry lanto e iff Deschutes County
■
ADP Distribution by Adjudication Status
Basis for the Evaluation of Master Plan Alternatives
At present, the male population is proportioned approximately 53% pre-trial and 47% sentenced
status; with the female population at 55% pre-trial and 45% sentenced. Given trends of
increasing lengths of stay, a shift in the future proportioning of adjudication status to one of
50% pretrial and 50% sentenced is assumed for both the male and female populations.
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Male Pre-trial ADP
121
165
202
241
286
(53%)
(52%)
(50%)
(50%)
(50%)
Male Sentenced ADP
107
155
203
241
287
(47%)
(48%)
(50%)
(501/6)
(50%)
Female Pre-trial ADP
31
56
87
103
122
(55%)
(53%)
(50%)
(50%)
(50%)
Female Sentenced ADP
25
51
86
104
123
(45%)
(47%)
(50%)
(50%)
(50%)
ADP Distribution by Primary Housing Classification
in concert with jail administrative and classification staff, an analysis was made of current and
anticipated future patterns of the allocation of ADP capacities among primary housing
classifications (i.e., maximum, medium, minimum security and work center assignments).
Although a finer grain of classification will be assessed as part of the detailed jail space
programming process, these categories reflect the level of ADP and bed distribution consistent
with facility master planning.
Presented in Table D.1 is a distribution of 2005 ADP capacities by housing classification which
reflects current jail operations (inclusive of the ongoing matrix program but excluding the
availability of a dedicated Work Center). A total ADP capacity of 243 (excluding early releases
through the matrix program) is distributed in accordance with present operating experience,
consistent with classification snapshot data. Presented in Table D.2 is a distribution of 2005
ADP capacities, adjusted to reflect a discontinuation of the matrix program and the renewed
availability of the Work Center. A total ADP capacity of 284 (increased by the need to house
inmates previously released under the matrix program) is redistributed among housing
classifications, now inclusive of a work center. Due to these factors, a significant reduction in
the medium security classification, and a lesser one in minimum security, is anticipated to occur
when the work center is again available for use.
Presented in Table D.3 through D.6 are projected ADP distributions for 2010 through 2025. The
pattern of ADP assignment by housing classification at these future points in time are predicated
upon the above referenced 2005 ADP distribution, (Table D.2), representing a master planning
benchmark. While these estimated distribution patterns may serve as a framework for
Corrections Needs Assessment - Deschutes County 13.3.2
Omni-Group, Inc. • KMD Justice
■ Basis for the Evaluation of Master Plan Alternatives
Section Three
Projected ADP and Bed Distribution by Category
Introduction
Presented in Tables DA through D.6 are the results of the analysis of projected adult
corrections capacities with respect to their distribution by gender, adjudication status and
primary housing classification. Patterns of distribution are provided, for purposes of master
planning, for projected average daily population (ADP) and bed requirements at the years 2005,
2010, 2015, 2020 and 2025.
Twenty Year ADP Projections
A range of adult corrections capacity forecasting models were developed and reviewed with the
Corrections Needs Assessment Committee on July 25th. While a variety of potential outcomes
over the upcoming twenty year planning period were identified, the following ADP projection
was recommended and accepted to serve as a basis of initial capital planning purposes.
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Projected ADP 284 427 578 689 818
ADP Distribution by Gender
Analysis of inmate population profile and forecasting data indicated that the current jail
population is comprised of approximately 80% males and 20% females; with the female subset
historically, and in the future, growing at a faster rate than that of the male population. This
trend, subject to review over time, is reflected in future ADP levels projected between 2010 and
2025.
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Projected Male ADP
228
320
405
482
573
(80%)
(70%)
(70%)
(70%)
(70%)
Projected Female
56
107
173
207
245
ADP
(20%)
(30%)
(30%)
(30%)
(30%)
Corrections Needs Assessment - Deschutes County D.3.1
Omni-Group, Inc. • KMD Justice
MI
CO
M
n,
C~m
0
Cf~~O
C
o
O
C)
Cn~M
U)
0
OEM
MOM
co
OO ti
M
OOO
do h
0
O
1~~0
1
- a
o
C
N
-
-
r
O t
Q
L
Jc 4)
0
N
U)
Co vC'J r"
o Vh
Maco
NM
O
MCM
V
~M~
OC°\p~
Ned'
~o~
N M
~•7
y
CD '.R co
Cl)
v~
.,t~
(fl
n
No M
N VN
CMo N
v0
'ct~ r-
N T
O
0
M
e
N
co)
v
v
(0
W
O
~•0
NMf 7 0
~\N
IVMM
d'~ (10
cc)
V'
OD
COD (D
CO
,°N(00
3
V
M
3
t
d
C
~
d r-+ N
d to
d w H
d to
a CO
d Z, U)
d w
w
y N
N
N N
N
N N
G y N
G y d
C
0
QOtn
Q6m
QGm
Q5m
QDm
QOm
Qam
N
N
d
Q
Y
m
U)
•
V
C
m
°D
Z
c
t0
Ta
E
B
C
3
M d
a
p
.LL
CD
o
p
O
~a
d
o
w
° o
d
'
O
_C-A
O
r
i
Z
°i
M
t
°
i
C
cn~
nnC
L
a-
u
-
nM
f
-
V
O
i
I
il.
MX A1Nnoo Mooao
f~ _M X
10 LLJ
0° $
---i - ° o Z
a I I co
2-I
g~"' - Im9
° ~a o o Lo LLJ
a
C\I
a'SN x N e N
o r o
W
I~RNq INd o ,N W
I:-Ln. qo -i 7VNY~. ' rr (n
=m e n 7 I
q r r
oN8N~ I _ i .
- o o $
a 1 $ \
a N , t l ,I a 'C} u g4Si I-
go ri a - 1 N~ --'y L a.p /
C\j t s ° iN!
C\j
a'°no~{ ! i .ofd a. C \ /n M
O<-~= T
Eo 01
0.- 0
w CJ.
F w w y ~i II ~CW M
N.' tl Is axle p..
V{ A N N
W Q Q. AtlMHJIH Q W Fpl rr m
0 Q O N .11411 1= Q
-o a) W Hi l ui m
M
(w w w °ww w N M
N
z w M f
w N
C
Q
U y~yII d
i °
W~ \
O< O
yN2Yf
CL Q z Q is ►Ee n
C\j
t
W2 U)
_ ~ I dV 33S
W 2
y - n.a ....w
W F
W Il
Z w 20 2
W 1 vn M
W w is w aa£a
T N N
y N
A
zi a am =s
o-ads
_ -M
inn ♦i,n wrr,«
1~~UUNTY
0
14. 13
SEE AP
N
300 thru 1406,1500A1,1500A5,1~501A1,1600thr'u 2400,m103A11500B ;209Ahr1501A4,
1504A1,150003,105,117, 117A1,118,124 thru 127, 1500A2 thru 1500A4,150OA6 thru 15.
1500.49,150081 thru 150083 1500B5thru 150002 1500041150OC5,1501 1501A2
1501A3,15 ~12 )2A1,1504'1505 1505A1,1506,1607,1508,1508A1,120,121,119,1~ 2,122A1 & I
128,129, 29A I
g000 GLO
I 1 100 100
a 40Ics _ 3 I 2 I
Q -1 w•~ +e.u
40-09 7AA
Ol-
j
i~ o. 2- 1 2-/ /8/.330 R~~• ~~-y~G299.88.4C
2
2
SEE MAP;
HEMLOCK AVi,-,,,,.,o
00
v 00
r-
-T 00
GLO
80.3 ~
ANTLER AVE.
S MAP
1313.5/ 123
39~Bv a
ac ~
103
I
Lary
O PARCEL I
II
•
n
'o 3
f~ o~ ~ St'rtc..~%
11 39.41 ,y
LOT 2, 611-, 1a.
II
150C
SE
SE 6TH ST.
JI -
SALMON A E2 j~ 23
/ \ POR. PARCEL I
PP. NO.1991-81
PP NO. 1992- 25
PP. NO. 1993-"
100
}
z
O
U
O
O
X
U
100
12
100
13
115 $
115
116
-143)
LL"
100
-roo
i
i
i
1
100
100
r
0
w
w.~
To: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners; Dave Kanner, Administrator, Susan Ross
From: Scott Johnson, Deschutes County Mental Health Department
Date: May 4, 2007
Subj: Critical Housing Priorities in 2007-2009 - SUPPORT REQUESTED
Cc Leo Mottau, Chair; Dolores Ellis, Vice Chair (Advisory Board); Lori Hill (DCMH Program Mgr)
We are dedicating time at the May 9 County Commissioner work session to discuss 2 priority housing
projects for Deschutes County and the region's mental health system. The following information was
reviewed and discussed in detail at the May 2 Addictions and Mental Health Advisory Board meeting.
The information and recommendations have their full support.
Residential programming is a priority in our Central Oregon Plan titled "A Regional System to Support the
Oregon State Hospital Plan", adopted by both our Advisory Board and the County Commissioners. Over
the past two months, we've become better educated about housing development opportunities and
residential programs that could benefit our community. On March 23, we participated in a housing
development workshop sponsored by the State. On April 16, regional representatives met with a
representative of the DHS Addictions & Mental Health Division (AMHD) and others to prioritize projects
for the next two years. We have also had preliminary discussions with Susan Ross and Dave Kanner.
Our immediate priorities include:
An 8-bed Residential Treatment Facility located in Bend. In general proximity to the main
Deschutes County Mental Health clinic and the services of St. Charles Medical Center, the facility
would provide 5-beds to serve adults under the "Extended Care Management" designation as
well as 3 respite care beds managed through DCMH in cooperation with Jefferson and Crook
counties. Development, operation and ownership would be through a private residential
provider. State AMHD would pay for the cost of operations (all) and County support services
(10% of operations). Deschutes County would be asked to invest the needed land, thereby
helping to make the project a reality and gaining 3 respite beds. State funding to DCMH would
pay for our help with licensing, placement and support services. Land need: up to one acre.
A 10-bed Secure Residential Treatment Facility. Located in Redmond (best regional location) or
Bend, the facility would provide 4-beds to serve adults under the Extended Care designation and
4-beds to serve adults under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
The remaining 2-beds would be managed by DCMH in cooperation with Jefferson and Crook
counties for people needing a secure placement (often more beneficial than out of community
care). Deschutes County would be asked to invest the needed land, thereby helping to make the
project a reality and gaining access to two County managed beds, 8 other beds and an additional
state funded resource. State AMHD would again pay for the cost of operations (all) and County
support services (10% of operations). State funding to DCMH would pay for our help with
licensing, placement and support services. Land need: up to one acre.
More information on next page.
Housing / Priorities memo 4.07
Benefits:
■ Placement priority will always be given to people who have been residents of Deschutes County /
Central Oregon and / or who have family and support ties to our region. All people placed in the
facility must meet eligibility criteria; screening will occur through DCMH. People from
elsewhere in Oregon will benefit if additional beds are available (excluding designated DCMH /
Central Oregon beds).
■ Respite beds are urgently needed for people not requiring the secure level of care offered through
Sage View. This is a more appropriate level of care and more cost effective in some cases.
■ The projects will have great potential to bring experienced and capable residential providers into
our area to provide local help to Central Oregon adults with a mental illness.
• The associated funding will relieve some of the pressure on the limited indigent acute care (State)
resources in our region.
■ The projects will greatly increase our general residential program capacity which the State has
determined to be the lowest in Oregon.
Requests:
■ That the State DHS Addictions / Mental Health Division include both projects in their May 2007
statewide Request for Proposals, seeking a one or more residential program providers to develop
and operate each project in close coordination with the Central Oregon's 3 County designated
Community Mental Health Programs. We would ask to participate in the selection of the
provider(s).
■ That the development of both projects be completed by June 2009, earlier if possible.
■ That Deschutes County supports the development of both projects including donation of suitable
parcels of land. The donation will be with the necessary assurances that each project will benefit
our region for at least 30 years and that we receive county-managed beds.
Ongoing Housing Development: While these projects will be extraordinarily beneficial to our region,
more work is needed on an ongoing basis. Examples include:
■ Affordable apartments and scattered site housing for people with a mental illness
■ Additional supportive housing services allowing people to live semi-independently in all
communities in Central Oregon
■ Section 8 vouchers and other financing methods to subsidize unaffordable housing in the region
• The assistance of local government throughout the region in designating suitable foreclosed
properties for possible use by special populations.
• Use of county land assets to support affordable housing projects and additional residential
program development.
Thank you for your consideration.
Cc Cissie Bollinger, Dept. of Human Services Addictions & Mental Health Division
Nancy Tyler, Crook County and Lutheran Community Services NW
Rick Treleaven, Jefferson County and BestCare Treatment Services
Robin Henderson, Cascade Healthcare Community, Behavioral Health
Housing / Priorities memo 4.07
C"Au f ~flM r9ionGl plan
Aa yed by Pesch s f e5 V(/
Supporting Material #6
Residential Needs Greatest in Central Oregon
Note: The data in these tables comes directly from the Oregon State Hospital Framework Master Plan
Phase II Report as prepared by KMD Architects, February 28, 2006 and data provided to the Central &
Eastern Oregon Community Services Work Group. Central Oregon has made no attempt to test this data
or offer alternative estimates. We are concerned that KMD may have underestimated the population
growth in our region and, as a result, the geriatric and forensic needs. If that is in fact the case, the actual
need, without a significant State investment in community services, could be higher.
In addition, we are particularly concerned with the acute need for affordable housing options in several
communities in Central Oregon. Those costs may compromise our ability to move at the accelerated pace
suggested by the data below. At the same time, we are in complete agreement that affordable housing
options, residential facilities and supported housing are urgently needed in our region.
2005-07
2009-11
2011-13
2030
% Change
2005-2030
Central Oregon
36
104
112
153
325%
Rest of Oregon
1,693
1,952
1,995
2,480
46%
State reported estimated OPERATING COSTS of community beds by region
2005
2007-2009
2009-2011
2(
Beds
Bed
Need
Cost
Bed.
Need
Cost
Bed
Need
Central Oregon
36
95
$5,900,263
104
$6,753,083
112
Total Beds
1,729
1,959
$130,480.035
2,056
$136,922,004
2,147
State reported DEVELOPMENT COSTS for new beds by region
)11-13
Cost
$7,167,681
$142,537,842
2007-2009
2009-2011
2011-2013
Central Oregon
$903,450
$190,100
$172,500
Rest of Oregon
$9,520,400
$1,901,550
$1,673,850
Page 19