Loading...
2007-1320-Minutes for Meeting June 06,2007 Recorded 6/28/2007D NANCY BLANKENS ESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS r COMMISSIONERS' JOURNALNTY CLERK ~J 2007-1320 11111 I ~~~~~~1111111111111 1111 0612812007 04:11:41 P11 2007-i320 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page t If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded to correct [give reason] previously recorded in Book or as Fee Number and Page w Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.orc MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 69 2007 Present were Commissioners Michael M. Daly, Dennis R. Luke and Tammy Baney. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Susan Ross and Teresa Rozic, Property and Facilities; Joe Studer, Forester; Timm Schimke, Solid Waste Department; Anna Johnson, Communications; media representative Jeff Mullins of KBND Radio and Chris Stollar of The Bulletin; and approximately thirty other citizens, including about a dozen COCC students. Chair Mike Daly opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of Green Building Design. Scott Steele of Steele Associates Architects explained his accreditations and then gave an overview of Energy and Sustainable Design. The G.B.C. - United States Green Building Council - indicates there is interest in this process all over the world. LEED - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - is a system of certifying the design, construction and operation of green buildings. Plans are reviewed in Washington, D.C. by a panel of experts, and then can get the appropriate credentials. The cost of LEED design and construction is about 2% to 11% of the regular cost. Extra time is required to process the design and to build to LEED standards. A savings of 30-70% of operational costs is realized during the life of the building, so this is recouped very quickly. Deschutes County's utility costs for its buildings in 2006 were $1,182,101. If all of the facilities had been built by LEED standards, it could save approximately $355,000 in last year alone. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 1 of 8 Pages Many federal agencies and virtually all states have LEED initiatives in place. Oregon is known as a leader both nationally and internationally in sustainability. Commissioner Daly asked what the additional up-front costs would be. Mr. Steele said the additional cost of 2-11 % is recovered within about three years. Commissioner Luke asked if it is a standard practice, why the cost is more. Mr. Steele said that submitting LEED documentation to Washington, DC is time- consuming and demanding. There is a lot more work involved, and the materials can be more costly. It is becoming a best-practices situation but does require additional work. Dave Kanner asked if Mr. Steele has any examples of ordinances or resolutions used by other entities in Oregon. Mr. Steele said he could help locate these and provide them to the County. Mr. Kanner said the County will not be doing that much more new construction in the near future; and asked if LEED works with remodeling and additions. Mr. Steele replied that there are standards for buildings that are being remodeled as well. Mr. Kanner stated that a few years ago LEED design was thought to add about 20% to the cost; he asked if it would get to the point where it doesn't cost any more to use LEED. Mr. Steele said the cost would drop as use becomes more widespread. Commissioner Baney stated she would like to hear more about the process and get specific information on what might work for the County. Commissioner Luke said that it is important to have the cities follow suit, since much of local construction occurs within city limits. 2. Solid Waste Update. North Area Update - Landscaping. Mr. Schimke stated that this was pulled out of the initial contract for the north area project. This part of the work will go out to bid again. Negus Transfer Operations. The site has been open seven days a week for the last couple of weeks, and the response from the public has been very positive. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 2 of 8 Pages • Free Event Statistics. There has been a tire recycling event and a FireFree event so far this year; and a hazardous waste event is planned soon. He provided a sheet detailing activity at the various locations. • Other. Mr. Schimke stated that PP&L (Pacific Power & Light) wants to look at the landfill site as a potential energy producing site. They would likely want to build construction generators and pay the County for the use. Commissioner Luke asked if any thought was given to using this energy to heat the County buildings. In regard to raising tipping fees, this may be discussed again soon as it has been added to the proposed fee schedule. A representative of a disposal service company asked if it has been finalized. Commissioner Luke said the Budget Committee asked that it not be included but it has been left on for the Board to consider. The person said that $5 per ton adds about 12.5% to their operations, resulting in customers paying between 3% and 7% more. Commissioner Luke asked how to keep construction debris out of the landfill. Eric Brownrigg of Cascade Disposal said that green builders sort out the debris at their site, but a better solution would be to tip it at the landfill and sort it there. Brad Bailey said the cost of disposal is fairly low, so there is less of an incentive to sort it out and divert it. Commissioner Luke asked if a private contractor could do the sorting, and what it would cost. Mr. Bailey said that many builders would not have room at their locations. Commissioner Baney stated that it would be good to get various entities together to discuss this further. Mr. Kanner added that the cities really need to be involved as well. Mr. Schimke stated that this was discussed at the Bend 2030 forum, and two ideas were brought up: adding a cost to permitting, with a rebate if they recycle at a certain level; or do something municipally. Mr. Schimke stated that the material is coming to the landfill anyway; perhaps a different rate could be used to encourage this type of change. Commissioner Luke asked if Mr. Schimke could work up some kind of numbers in this regard. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 3 of 8 Pages 3. COCC Capstone Presentation. Joe Studer said this is the third presentation by this group, which consists of different COCC students from the first and second years. The students worked on the Community Fire Plan and the County's Fremont Canyon/Wilt Road property fire fuel reduction project. The students took what they have learned and worked on the various projects. At this time, they did a presentation of the work they accomplished, starting with statistics on wildfire fuel issues. Some property owners were willing to participate; others said they were already SB-360 certified. Residents of Panoramic View Estates and a few other locations were not interested. However, this particular area, near Tollgate, is especially prone to wildfires. Commissioner Luke asked if recent fire scares has created further interest. The students stated that a lot of people still don't want to be involved even though awareness is increasing. Commissioner Luke asked if the management plan for the fuels reduction project should be reviewed by Legal Counsel. Mr. Studer said they are using the regular County contract documents for this work. Discussion then occurred about the type of work to be done and the timeframe for getting it accomplished. 4. Discussion regarding Land Exchange. Chair Daly explained that the DSL has acquired some property that could possibly be subject of an exchange. The focus would be preserving land south of the Fairgrounds for future uses. John Lilly of the Division of State Lands came before the Board. The Board referred to an oversized map of the area. Some is owned by State Parks, some is owned by the BLM, and some is owned by the DSL or the County. Mr. Lilly said that some land was transferred to the DSL from the BLM; 800,000 acres in the State are managed for the school trust, with most of it located in the western part of the State. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 4 of 8 Pages He said he met with the City of Redmond earlier in the day, and has also talked with the Military Department regarding an alternative site for a new armory. They'd require about 80 acres. The logical thing would be land for the County south and adjacent to the Fairgrounds. There are from 170 to 320 acres that could be exchanged. It depends on what property the County has that would meet the needs of DSL. He then explained the criteria. The asset management plan addresses lands located within a UGB or city limits, including urban reserve. Those have potential to be developed under current zoning. They look at producing revenue in the short term, or capital appreciation. The property also has to be feasible to manage in regard to size and access, and should be reasonably free of environmental hazards or have clearance in terms of knowing what environmental risks might be. The south Redmond tract was cleared by the BLM before it was transferred. Other locations have been reviewed for archeological resources and other concerns. He will provide this information to the County. A main criterion is having an exchange of equal value or better for the State. This is probably predictable with any potential exchange partner. They are in the middle of a land use review, and land exchanges is one of the issues. They want to move quickly but will work through the process with the County, and can negotiate a parcel size to meet the needs of the County. Commissioner Luke stead that it won't cost the DSL much except for management. And under current conditions, when could you get a fair return off the property. Mr. Lilly said that it would likely be 20 to 25 years before it is annexed, and is outside the urban reserve, the urban growth boundary and city limits. The short-term plan is to hold it and receive revenue from rights of way. Commissioner Luke asked if the National Guard could go in on a shorter time frame; this was done in Lane County. Mr. Lilly said they pay from 9% to 12% of fair market value on a lease. The property is zoned EFU, so the applicant would have to comply with land use requirements. He added that he isn't sure it is a proper land use for the property, as makes a difference what is next to it. They want to be aware of any potential for conflict. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 5 of 8 Pages Commissioner Baney asked if Mr. Lilly was familiar with the County's property assets, and whether there is anything of interest to the State. Mr. Lilly replied that he is not as well versed on County holdings, except for the Stevens Road property off 27th Street, some lands in northeast Redmond and a few in the city limits and some within the urban reserve. He has not done an in-depth analysis, nor is he aware of any that might be suitable for State use. Commissioner Daly stated the County recently had a land inventory done, which is quite comprehensive detailing what the County owns and the potential uses. He would like to get a consensus as to how to proceed. He suggested Mr. Lilly meet with the County's property manager to discuss this issue. Commissioner Baney stated that there are three options to consider. However, she'd like to add a 4th, which would be carving out a portion of the land located south of the Fairgrounds. It's difficult to know what the State might want since there is no idea of where everyone is heading. Commissioner Luke said there is a reversionary clause on the Redmond armory site. The National Guard is reluctant to give it up entirely. He could envision the DSL taking this one on to get them out of downtown. He added that the Redmond Gun Club area is located of Highway 126. He stated that a buffer between the Fairgrounds and development would be desirable. The City of Redmond wants to consider other recreational uses. Mr. Lilly observed that conversations with the City of Redmond have not yet identified anything specific. He is concerned about the concept that includes residential development near the airport. Commissioner Luke observed that 19th Street needs to be completed as soon as possible. Mr. Lilly said that road corridor questions are short-term issues and paramount. He said it would be prudent to consider the exchange of land, but it is up to the State Land Board. Commissioner Baney said that it is important to get more specific. There should be an agreement to go ahead and have the property manager talk about and review County assets. Dave Kanner observed that the State manages the lands but are also allowed to donate property for public purposes. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 6 of 8 Pages Mr. Lilly replied that the lands are managed under trust and Constitutional direction for the maximum benefit. Trust lands cannot be donated. They also retain the mineral rights on all their lands. The DSL has 50,000 acres in the tri- County area, with the greatest amount located in Deschutes County. The Hampton area has about 30,000 of those acres. There is potential for wind or solar energy production; it could also be a possible future landfill site. A consensus was reached that staff would meet with Mr. Lilly and discuss various ideas. Mr. Kanner stated that he would like to get some sense from the Board on how much land the County is seeking. The Fairgrounds wants a little land for expansion and more for a buffer. Susan Ross will coordinate further discussions. 5. Other Items. Susan Ross presented the intergovernmental agreement between the County and the City of Bend regarding their respective roles involving the acquisition of the Bethlehem Inn property. The document dose include a reversionary clause. BANEY: Move approval of the intergovernmental agreement with the City of Bend regarding the Bethlehem Inn property. LUKE: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. LUKE: Yes. DALY: Chair votes yes. Ms. Ross stated that the Oregon Housing and Community Solutions group reviewed the La Pine study regarding the need for low-income housing, and doesn't feel there is a need for affordable housing in the area. They don't want to subsidize those at a 30% or below the poverty income level. There is a meeting in La Pine on June 7 to announce this. It is hard to believe the market study doesn't show a need. The County had discussed dedicating County property located behind the Senior Center for this purpose. Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 7 of 8 Pages Commissioner Luke said that perhaps Habitat for Humanity could use some help. Commissioner Daly said that the County should consider a FQHC (Federally Qualified Health Clinic) since a grant from the federal government for this. Perhaps a clinic can be built instead. The grant is for $600,000 a year and is perpetual. A study is being done to review whether the County will need to provide staffing. Ochoco Community Clinic and two more locations in Bend and Madras opened, and they are overwhelmed with the need. They are stretched tin with the existing staff. This opportunity should not be ignored. The Commissioners indicated they would not go to Salem on June 25, due to pressing end of the fiscal year County business to be addressed. Being no further items to come before the Board, Commissioner Luke adjourned the meeting at 4:30 p.m. DATED this 6th Day of June 2007 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Michael M. Daly, air Dennis R. Luke, Vice Chair Tammy limey, Comossioner Minutes of Administrative Work Session Page 8 of 8 Pages Wednesday, June 6, 2007 ~v-% C--'-5C gG , w ~ Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ore WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, JUNE 69 2007 1. Discussion of Green Building Design - Susan Ross 2. Solid Waste Update - Timm Schimke 3. COCC Capstone Presentation - Joe Studer, others 4. Discussion regarding Land Exchange - John Lilly, Division of State Lands 5. Other Items PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to: ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Solid Waste Update 5/6/07 Agenda 1. North Area Update - Landscaping 2. Negus Transfer Operations 3. Free Event Statistics 4. Other N M M ' N O l!) N CA O O M M d' -0 ~ O U ) "t (0 ,-t O O T M N 0 M O O ti M O O O L T 1` r M 'd- IO ct T T T T t- N '--t M N T U N U) M CM Cl) O 00 00 N LO I- T N I- N f~ ti O M O0 T T 1- 00 N (D LO f~6 U 0) In 0 0 to I- ti N M 1- O w 0 yy T T T~ ti (O M O CM M Cl) -0 T T CY) M I U') T o O N -1L ~ TF T U 3 M M r (0 I` (n 0 ti N M Cf U L N T L M Cl) ~ co T 0} T U 3 N T T M N Z V M CO N ~ O - u Lc) E C) CC L1 O M 00 'IT f• In _0 N O T 1- 1` (0 CO T N 0 O T O N N In U I- cp ~ ~ rn O Z ~ T CD M 00 (O N M 4-- N 0.2 coo M E CJ Lo co n CV C 4 L C OD O `-r O 0 N 0) (0 M LO C CU OD 't O 't (0 ti 0} O tl- O (0 (fl O (f) O CO C "L L yy d' T T T T T N F V M M (.C) 6 0 M' L 1_ Y (A T O m 00 00 N 00 d co O Y ~ O 1- ti O M 00 r M M r M r 4- V O O 0 0 0 1-- co N M •y,L L 1 I l l r T f~ 7) ' d } Q } } L L L L L L L L L (n U U U U U U r` C C, 1 C, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 O o ~ w ~ M Q Q . T N N N m N 4 N Lo N M N r- N w N m N to (0 O ~ > U > U > U ' ' CV 2 o 0 2 76 0" E 0 0 0 F- h--' F F- O UJ L(7 r CD ~ O cc G O N N co N co G 0) o O C O N O F- c0 cu J) * O O ) Lo C O U) L , ~ r CP N C Y ~ ~ o m ~ 0 U U_ U U U U L L' L' L .Q > U > U > U m td (II (5 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D O O N Deschutes County Dept. of Solid Waste Tire Event Statistics Tire Events: 8-25-01; 9-7-02; 3-15-03; 9-27-03; 9-25- 04: 3-26-05: 9-17-05 Year•~t !,I Ton"s -;Cost r k Vff#jQars~ft *Avg:.CostLton Cost/car,,' 20011 8 25- 1 01 " 466.38 $ 59,919.20 $ 128.48 2002.1"T ' 9 398.12 $ 46,849.80 $ 117.68 2003~Sp'r. 5-03'", 298.54 $ 35,726.60 925 $ 119.67 $38.62 2003,Fall W 9 -2 7=0 3',~- 325.39 $ 38,468.10 933 118.22 $41.23 2004'Fall .9-25-04 , 189.62 $ 19,833.30 875 $ 104.59 $22.67 s2005,Spr" -.3-26-05 174.22 $ 18,564.30 841 $ 106.56 $22.07 2005 Fall, 9 17 05 180.16 $ 18,670.70 664 $ 10163 $28.12 2006'Spr, .3.18=06:. 149.91 $ 16,051.90 603 $ 107.08 $26.62 2006f.all 9/16/06 178.12 $ 18;91230 722 $ 106.18 $26.19 200V'Sp 180.5 $ 19,179.00 768 $ 106.25 $24.97 2007, 1`~~~fi.. Total 2,540.96 $292,175.20 6331 Wilt Road Timber Sale/Fuels Reduction Project Abstract In March of 2005, the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOLL) with Central Oregon Community College. This agreement provides the availability of Deschutes County lands for educational use by forestry and natural resource department students. For our program capstone assignment, Forest Resources Technology students were asked to compile a request for proposal (RFP) providing for a timber sale and fuels treatment on two adjacent properties owned by Deschutes County. To accomplish this task we used management plans that were comprised by previous COCC Forest Resources Technology Capstone students. Site Information The two properties are located approximately 8 miles northeast of Sisters and measure 160 and 240 acres. Since they are close in proximity to one another and have similar vegetative structure, they were treated as one 400 acre project. Both parcels are located in Township 14S, Range I IE, with the 160 acres being in Section 7 and the 240 acres in Section 6. The primary vegetation consists of an uneven-aged overstory of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) with a significant amount of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) in the midstory. The understory is composed primarily of tall, thick bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) along with some manzanita (Arctostaphylos patula). These are both highly volatile fuel components that could greatly increase the threat and potential intensity of wildfire. Proiect Obiectives: ■ Remove invading juniper throughout the stands. ■ Commercially thin ponderosa pine, creating revenue to fund fuels reduction practices. ■ Mow/chip vegetation and timber slash to reduce hazardous fuels. The goal is to create a fire resistant uneven-aged forest that will benefit dominant and co-dominant trees. The sites should be under-burned periodically into the future to control re-growth of the underbrush and maintain fire resistance. This will leave a park like setting consisting of thinned, healthy ponderosa pine trees that will be an amenity to the area well into the future. Overall Steps Taken: 1. Review management plans from previous capstone classes. 2. Develop a contract and send to Joe Stutler, county forester, for review. 3. Flag boundaries and corners. 4. Send contracts out for bidding. 5. Collaborate with contractors regarding any questions. 6. Make a final recommendation to the county concerning who will be awarded the bid. After close review, we recommend that the bid be awarded to: David A. Elpi Sisters Forest Products Sisters, OR Panoramic Estates and Tollgate Fuel Reduction Projects Standards Guidelines and Recommendations Forest Resource Technology Graduates 2007 Project completed by: Reed Youngbar John Sheggeby Justin Stubbs Sean Powell Travis Lowe Trista Williams Tyler Wright Abstract For the past few years student's in the Forest Resource Technology Program at Central Oregon Community College (COCC) have advocated the importance of first hand experience and its value in an ever-changing forestry environment. It is only fitting that for our Capstone course we are assigned a true hands on project that exposes us to a side of Forestry which we had limited exposure. In spring quarter 2007 Deschutes County Forester Joe Stutler and Professor Michael Fisher approached us with the opportunity to allocate money granted by the county into certain high risk neighborhoods located within the greater Sisters area that have been deemed as high risk areas for wildland fire. The main focus of the project will be to reduce hazardous fuels in high risk neighborhoods of the Sisters community. We suggest the treatment standards and guidelines for each area and distribute contracts to local contractors for bidding. Completion of this project will exemplify the invaluable skills the Forest Resource students attained in the program at COCC. In turn we learn about how to deal with the difficult situations we may face in our future careers as land managers and stewards of the environment. Objectives Greater Sisters Community Fire Plan (CWPP) was complete in 2005 and updated in 2006. The community with the highest structural vulnerability from a wildland fire perspective is Panoramic Estates. Several other neighborhoods have similar risks but none as extreme as Panoramic Estates. The objectives of this project are as follows: 1. Utilizing the Greater Sisters CWPP as the guiding document, identify the standards to be achieved in Panoramic Estates to reduce wildland fire hazards. 2. Identify specifically the private lands within the neighborhood that do not currently meet those standards, this will include homes and vacant lots. 3. Contact the appropriate neighborhood association and/or individual property owner and seek permission to treat the fuels on private lands. 4. Obtain written permission from each landowner using example from either Deschutes County or Oregon Department of Forestry. 5. Develop a contract which will include standards for treatment to meet specific objectives in the Greater Sister CWPP for an amount not to exceed $50,000. 6. If the entire amount can not be spent in Panoramic Estates, identify the next viable neighborhood for treatment and obtain written permission to treat fuels. 7. Under take a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit bidders and award the contract before spring quarter is complete. Project Areas Panoramic Estates Located off of highway 126 approximately 5 miles east of Sisters, Panoramic Estates was rated as a high risk neighborhood for wildfire in the Greater Sisters CWPP. After extensive community out reach we obtained interest from two land owners for treatment. Treatment for the area is described in the standards. Tollgate Located of highway 20 approximately 5 miles west of Sisters, Tollgate was also rated as a high risk neighborhood for wildfire in the Greater Sisters CWPP. It was determined that 47.2 acres of common lands in Tollgate were in the greatest need of treatment to reduce structural vulnerability. Treatment for the area is described in the standards. Standards Our main objective was to develop standards for fuel treatment options in each project area. We developed individual standards for each area in order to meet the objectives of our project. Listed below are the standards for thinning, liming, and mowing in each project area. Spacing Guidelines: Panoramic Estates Leave Trees selection: The leave trees will be selected with Ponderosa Pine being the most desired species to be left following the spacing guidelines. 1) Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa) 2) Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) Spacing_ Using the leave tree selection hierarchy cut from below leaving dominant and co- dominant trees with spacing 12' to 18' between the stems of leave trees. Tollgate Leave Trees selection: Leave trees will be marked S acin All Ponderosa Pine under 8" DBH to be thinned to a spacing of 16'-18' All Ponderosa Pine less than 2' in height will be spaced at 4'-5' Ladder Fuel Reduction: Liming Standard: All leave trees should have a minimum of 80% of live crown remaining. Mowing Guidelines: 1) All mowing will be done leaving a maximum of 4 inches in brush height 2) All Wax Current may be left (gibes cereum) Recommendations Tollgate Bids ranged from $276/acre to $803/acre. Based on the wide range of bids we believe some contractors are less suited to meet the objectives in the Tollgate area. Tollgate has had prior positive experiences with one of the contractors who bid on the project. As a result our recommendation for this project is to award the contract to Keith Ross for $20,792. Panoramic Bids ranged from $275/acre to $1,400/acre. The contractors proposed several different methods to meet the objectives. They ranged from 10 man hand crews to one man using mechanized equipment. The choice was tough to make. In this case we would like to recommend the contract be awarded to Nordic Environmental for $2,750. Due to the small project area there is an opportunity to save money and still meet the project objectives by using Nordic Environmental. Project totals $23,542 Additional Recommendations Since the project budget was $50,000 the above proposals allow for additional work. The remaining $26,458 could be used as follows: Use $9,000 to complete project B, use $17,458 to continue the effort to reduce hazardous fuels in one of the following neighborhoods such as; Panoramic Estates, Crossroads, or Camp Sherman. Future Maintenance of Treated Area's Forests and Woodlands in Central Oregon are in need periodic maintenance. We recommend to the Land owners at Panoramic Estates and Tollgate to maintain their properties to attain a fire resistant landscape. We hope by setting a good example that their neighbors will take notice and approach the county about future projects. t~ O i■!~'i9 + e y'~t ~ D x p . - { L piy . t f s t AI A AI y a , 1s'. 2_ I I t b I I _ lrs4Ci1 f t ~ ,rC~ x? ' ~ s~- ~•n a. , ~ , 3 k~', ~ t 4 q ~ a~. s < Yf .~~V `fie z r4:. +yr T ~ ~ at• ~ G■I ((1 1C.. ~ 4~ ~y y~.; ~ • Fa.;r~ Y2 $ ~ J .fi ltik fn•#+"ls' y,{v~ -~1w~ "'~FS•.y t~})H ~i1f ',£L ~k'~ .~W:' f '7!'~~ 1 'n ~k~ ~ q.. f q fY•~ Fr ~~d ~~,gr . -n. , ~ '.~y '11u~'~i~x A~ 4.~ j . y, ~ h• { "}r t<~~kt ~ t•i 7t Y.f.~:l.~ ` , .y ~ F.. ~ ,1 - 1 . ~ y d* 4 F"':. t d'n~} 'y R /K+ j 4ai FI 1.Y~~ _ + ~,'L ~ +f ` ~ti`' ~ o f 7 - ~ ~'i ' Y'.'r -~I~YE"P1 4 1 f 3• t m .Y ..:t`if+k~,,i f : ~ 1 a,p, r ~ ~A' t T t ` rtS i' • • ~Pf~yi~~,~ J i ' ~a lt~• 45 ~`"Rji ~Si~+,f l d tt ~ ~4L fitF ~ 4 } } ' ' ' m [ ~ A ~ 4 i~'L'}7~1!l~Ti r f.. N E_ Y .4 k . ~ 00 +y. Project Areas Pjnorar is Esta s Legend Tawkft AssessCode N Q Pdva03 L nd "ea sees. A; 49515 Leb Dc YIIYR_ YELr ~ ~ 5 DVAtIE ` i i John Sheageor _ _ _ - COCC 2007 1 L . • Wt Am T©itgate onons ft4ae pOBuw ti CammWor !a~td L / 4 ' oa a~ at as ~ app \ N ~ ~ 4 e 1 C John Sheggehy cecc 2 -7