2007-1403-Minutes for Meeting June 04,2007 Recorded 7/30/2007COUNTY
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKDS U 2007.1403
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL
of 07130/2007 02:55:25 PM
2007-1403
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
w4 2A Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
14
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ore
MINUTES OF MEETING
LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL
MONDAY, JUNE 49 2007
Commissioners' Conference Room - Administration Building, Second Floor - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
Present were Judge Michael Sullivan; County Administrator Dave Kanner;
District Attorney Mike Dugan; citizen members Bev Clarno and Jack Blum; Mike
Dugan, District Attorney; Bob Lacombe, Juvenile Community Justice; Sheriff
Larry Blanton; Scott Johnson, Mental Health; Bob Smit, KIDS Center; Carl
Rhodes, Oregon State Police; Robin Marshall, Commission on Children &
Families; Rick Treleaven, BestCare Treatment Center; Chief Ron Roberts of the
Redmond Police Department; Ernie Mazorol, Court Administrator; Jacques
DeKalb, Defense Attorney; and a media representative from Fox TV News.
1. Call to Order & Introductions.
Judge Sullivan called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m., at which time the
attendees introduced themselves.
2. Approval of Minutes of Monday, April 2 Meeting.
BLANTON: Move approval.
LACOMBE: Second.
The minutes were unanimously approved.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 1 of 9 Pages
3. Report on Deferred Sentencing Program for Domestic Violence.
Judge Sullivan explained that thus far the program has handled thirteen cases.
The established criteria is that the participants cannot be repeat offenders, that
there were no serious injuries involved during the offense, and the offenders
must complete the batterers' intervention program and pay all fees; it could
include participation in a substance abuse program. The program takes 18
months, and the case can be dismissed after that time.
Offenders have to meet the District Attorney's criteria, and do not automatically
go into the program. One good feature is that Parole and Probation
representatives are there to assure a quicker response to treatment by indicating
where to go and how to sign up. The response as been good. If it continues in
this manner, it could take out 150 cases a year, which would save a lot of
taxpayer dollars by cutting down on court time, the subpoena of witnesses and
police officers, and so on. Victims are not always cooperative, in part because
of economic hardships. Treatment is quicker as well. Because many of the
families want to get back together, this provides some measure of assurance that
treatment is being received.
Mike Dugan added that he feels the program is successful. There will be a $25
fee added for Fiscal Year 2007-08. His office handled 458 domestic violence
cases last year, and some of those were felonies. It is a good idea to have
Parole and Probation participate. It takes about two days a month of the
Judge's time to handle domestic violence court, but there should be good results
and subsequent protection of the victim and the family.
Judge Sullivan stated that if the offender does not complete the program, they
are arrested and brought in for sentencing. Consequently, there is a lot of
incentive to make it through the program successfully.
Bev Clarno asked about the recidivism rate. Mr. Dugan replied that it is not
known yet locally because the program is so new. On a national level, it has
been shown to be reduced by about 75%. This activity was tracked for three
years. In his opinion, it is successful if just one person doesn't commit another
crime.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 2 of 9 Pages
Bob Smit asked how bad they have to be to not qualify. Mr. Dugan stated that
they can't have committed domestic violence previously, and could not have
been in a domestic violence diversion program before. They can't be on parole
for a person crime, nor can they have a felony person crime conviction. Some
other things are considered as well. Generally, this targets the first offender,
trying to get them involved and out of the circle of violence.
Judge Sullivan added that it has been successful in other communities. It is not
a brand new concept but is a new program locally.
Becky Wanless explained that there are costs involved, but no additional
expense to the County. The savings are that the offender can go on probation
immediately, which saves the District Attorney's office time. They are under
the supervision of Parole and Probation. If they are ordered into a battering
program, they have to pay for it and it takes 48 weeks. It is a win-win situation,
doesn't cost any more and can result in substantial savings.
Mr. Dugan stated that if recontact into the system can be prevented, it saves a
lot of costs down the line. Ms. Clarno added that the program also provides
good coping skills. Ms. Wanless noted that it also helps the children who don't
have to witness their parents battling.
Rick Treleaven said that this program results in a lot of personal responsibility.
Homes that have a domestic violence problem typically result in additional
future problems for the women and children. Mr. Dugan added that domestic
violence is usually, but not always, a crime against women. Judge Sullivan said
that the first case was actually a woman who assaulted her husband.
Judge Sullivan noted that it is very expensive to process a domestic violence
case. It usually results in a lot of officer overtime in court. This is a situation
where the District Attorney has developed a program that saves jail beds. It is
not for everyone, but can be effective.
4. Discussion of Nomination/Selection of LPSCC Member to Youth
Investment Work Group.
Bob Lacombe asked that a member of LPSCC sit on the Youth Investment
Work Group to spur the group to get up and running; preferably someone from
law enforcement. They need to meet to discuss an RFP for criminal justice
funds. The meetings are usually held quarterly for a few hours.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 3 of 9 Pages
Chief Ron Roberts said he would be interested in part because of the Juvenile
Justice portion. Sheriff Blanton said he would also consider it.
The LPSCC group unanimously endorsed this idea.
5. General Discussion of LPSCC Membership.
Judge Sullivan explained that Stephanie Alvstad of J Bar J had asked about
LPSCC membership. LPSCC has not appointed anyone for some time, but
there seems to be good representation from various components of the justice
system. He added that he feels when a committee gets too big, it is hard to get
things done. There are 19 members at this point. He asked if membership
should be opened up - or would it end up too big and would this marginalize
law enforcement participation. Law enforcement is essential for the function of
the committee.
He said he doesn't have any predetermined position, but is looking for
feedback.
Jack Blum stated that at this point, if everyone shows up, it works well. In the
past, there have been meetings where only a few members participated, but
attendance during the past year has been good.
Judge Sullivan said that everyone is welcome to attend and can be heard. The
important question is, who makes the decisions.
Mr. Dugan asked if the group is larger than statute allows. Judge Sullivan
replied that it is just a little bigger than what is required. Becky Wanless stated
that the statue says it shall include but isn't limited to a police chief, the Sheriff,
a Judge, a County Commissioner, the Director of Community Corrections, the
District Attorney, the Health Department Director, the Mental Health Director,
the Juvenile Community Justice Director, at least one lay citizen, a city
representative, and some non-voting members - the Oregon State Police and the
Oregon Youth Authority.
Judge Sullivan noted that the OSP and Youth Authority representatives have
been voting. Ms. Wanless added that a City representative is also supposed to
participate. Judge Sullivan said that Eileen Stein of the City of Bend has asked
about membership. Bev Clarno indicated that there is more than one city and
perhaps they all should be asked. Ms. Wanless said that it works well as it is set
up. The Health Director should participate, per statute. Others are welcome to
attend.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 4 of 9 Pages
Ernie Mazorol suggested that perhaps Ms. Stein could represent all of the cities.
Scott Johnson suggested that each City be sent information on what LPSCC
does and when they meet, and they could attend a couple of meetings to get an
idea of what takes place. Ms. Clarno agreed that bigger isn't necessarily better.
The focus is and should be on law enforcement coordination.
Judge Sullivan said an appointment letter will be sent to Dan Peddycord, the
Health Director. Others can be invited to attend. He suggested that Ms. Stein
contact the other cities to see if they are comfortable with her representing all of
the local cities.
6. Other Business and Items for the Next Meeting (Monday, July 2).
Mr. Mazorol suggested that "public input" be added to the agenda.
Ms. Clarno advised that on June 13 at 11 AM, the Youth Challenge graduation
ceremony is scheduled at the Fairgrounds. There are 110 youth from around
the State who graduate every six months. The program is run by the National
Guard and the school system, and is very effective. This year they will be
giving a scholarship to one of the cadets in memory of Dennis Maloney.
Judge Sullivan added that the parents and many others are very grateful for this
program, which has positively changed many lives.
Becky Wanless asked that the Community Corrections Biennial Plan be placed
on the LPSCC July 2 agenda. The Department of Corrections requires that a
biennial plan that specifies programs and what is to be accomplished be
provided to them. It is necessary for LPSCC to approve it. It will then be
approved by the Board of Commissioners before going to the Department of
Corrections. There have been no changes except the addition of cognitive
programs. There are no new positions as they are trying to keep their heads
above the water. They are converting temporary, part-time positions to
benefited positions.
Mr. Dugan said that LPSCC's obligation is to make a recommendation to the
Board of Commissioners; this has to do primarily with 1145 dollars. There are
also funds from the County. He asked if these are broken out. Ms. Wanless
replied that they can break out the State funding from the County funding in a
summary, but plan to bring the entire plan to the meeting.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 5 of 9 Pages
Judge Sullivan asked what the current status of mental health and substance
abuse treatment funding is at the State. Mr. Treleaven said that he was told by
the co-chairs that they are adding back SB 184, but he will believe it when it
happens.
Scott Johnson added that they are weighing in on the amount through a note to
Ways & Means from him and the Commissioners. They will still get a lot less
than is needed.
Mr. Treleaven stated that there is still discussion occurring regarding a beer tax.
Probably 90% would go to the State, with 5% to the cities and counties for law
enforcement, and 5% for treatment programs.
Judge Sullivan noted that Deschutes County has the lowest per capita number in
Central Oregon for mental health programs and treatment. The amount is not
fair, and it is a huge issue to address.
Sheriff Blanton said that he feels 1145 dollars will go away some day, just like
the federal timber money. Every year something gets cut. Ways to address this
possibility need to be reviewed so they can be ready when it happens.
Mr. Mazorol stated that a letter has been sent out to the police chiefs and the
Sheriff regarding the fourteen parking spots located in front of the Courthouse,
which have now been designated for law enforcement use during regular
working hours. The spots should be marked by the curbs being painted red by
the end of next week. The City will have violators cited or towed.
Judge Sullivan asked that law enforcement please take advantage of the spaces.
It was a battle to get them designated, but it is far safer for the Courthouse to
have them. Three poles have also been added in front of the Courthouse to
protect the lobby. The officers handling security work are very pleased.
Mr. Mazorol noted that this will be analyzed in a year. Diamond Parking will
enforce the parking situation and report back to the City.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 6 of 9 Pages
Sheriff Blanton provided a matrix report, which was then reviewed by the
group. Matrixing is cyclical in nature, and the numbers are higher in the
summer months. The OMNI study is based on the peaking factor.
Mr. DeKalb noted that July could be limited regarding the number of persons a
Parole Officer can sanction. Sheriff Blanton said that they are trying to work
out the best use of the jail beds. Friday and Saturday nights are always a
problem. This is a continual management issue, and a lot of work.
Mr. DeKalb said that it is best to use sanctions during the week. There is
probably an average of two nights in jail. Mr. Treleaven stated that some are
frequent flyers. If there was no Drug Court, they would use up more jail beds.
Mr. Johnson said that there is talk that when the Drug Court is full, there should
be a stronger child welfare approach taken. Mr. DeKalb stated that usually jail
occurs when they fail to follow the rules, criminal or otherwise. As more enter
the program, there could be more sanctions.
Sheriff Blanton explained that there are only 28 beds for females, which is a
problem. They cannot discriminate based on gender when they matrix out. Mr.
Johnson noted that most participants in Drug Court are female.
Sheriff Blanton said that concerning the jail project, there was a meeting today
to discuss an RFQ for an architect to design the interim phase of the OMNI
plan. The Board of Commissioners committed funded for that design. Dave
Kanner and the Board are aggressively checking out all plans for possible
funding. Matrixing and the jail bed situation will get worse before the jail is
ready. The timeline for completion is now about mid-2010.
Mr. Mazorol asked if the contracting will be through low bid or CMGC. Mr.
Kanner replied that this hasn't been decided, but the Board did rule out design-
build. An architect is needed for the others. Sheriff Blanton added that there
are many programming issues - a bed is not a bed. The jail has to stay fully
operational while the work is occurring. Judge Sullivan said that they are also
talking about a courtroom at the jail to minimize the transport of prisoners.
Settlement conferences could also take place there.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 7 of 9 Pages
Chief Roberts thanked the various agencies regarding a critical incident that
occurred in Redmond; everyone was very cooperative and he is impressed with
their willingness to help.
Sheriff Blanton stated that public safety in Deschutes County works well
together. They had a fire drill in Deschutes River Woods with many agencies
involved, and it went well.
Judge Sullivan noted that he has talked with judges from the timber counties.
Those counties are facing devastation due to the federal timber funds fiasco.
They have been releasing about 90% of their prisoners, and are losing many
trained officers and staff. It costs a lot to train law enforcement personnel, so it
will take them years to recover. Josephine County is letting 90% of their
deputy District Attorneys go, and it can get worse.
Sheriff Blanton said that Josephine County has no deputies working right now.
He said that many of them are applying for Deschutes County positions; he put
on ten people last week. There will be more to come for the work center. He
could have 212 people on board in July.
Officer Rhodes noted that they are adding 60 more officers to the I-5 corridor
for 24/7 coverage. Some are taking lateral moves. There will probably be eight
more in the Bend area, six to eight in Madras, plus a criminal detective in
Madras to handle prison crimes. Two forensic scientists will be added at Bend.
Negotiations are taking place for a new facility in Bend.
Chief Roberts said that they will have 96 in his department this year. Sheriff
Blanton noted that he believes Bend is holding or is adding a few. Judge
Sullivan stated that Mr. Dugan is getting another prosecutor and trial assistant.
There are huge demands on the system everywhere.
BLUM: Move adjournment.
BLANTON: Second.
Approval was unanimous.
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 8 of 9 Pages
Being no further items discussed, the meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
'IV
q~~JUUAwk~
Recording Secretary
Attachments
Exhibit A: Sign-in sheet
Exhibit B: Agenda
Exhibit C: LPSCC statute
Exhibit D: Deschutes County Forced Release Report, 2005 & 2006
Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, June 4, 2007
Page 9 of 9 Pages
z
z
V
w
4
w
J
CL
O
N
C
Q
o
p
l
to
C
~
v
N
M
z
J
A
~
~
~
2
~
A
o
v
-ly
'
VI
v
C
O
m
0
v
v
v
a
o~G
w ~
0
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
AGENDA
LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL
3:30 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 49 2007
Commissioners' Conference Room - Administration Building, Second Floor
1300 NW Wall St., Bend
1. Call to Order & Introductions
2. Approval of Minutes of Monday, May 7 Meeting
3. Report on Deferred Sentencing Program for Domestic Violence - Judge
Sullivan; Mike Dugan
4. Discussion of Nomination/Selection of LPSCC Member to Youth Investment
Work Group - Bob Lacombe
5. General Discussion of LPSCC Membership
6. Other Business and Items for the Next Meeting (Monday, July 2)
Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated.
Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
423.560 Local public safety coordinating council; duties. (1) The board or boards of
county commissioners of a county shall convene a local public safety coordinating
council. The council shall include, but need not be limited to:
(a) A police chief selected by the police chiefs in the county;
(b) The sheriff of the county or, if two or more counties have joined together to
provide community corrections services, a sheriff selected by the sheriffs in the counties;
(c) The district attorney of the county or, if two or more counties have joined together
to provide community corrections services, a district attorney selected by the district
attorneys of the counties;
(d) A state court judge, and a public defender or defense attorney, both appointed by
the presiding judge of the judicial district in which the county is located;
(e) A director of community corrections, a county commissioner, a juvenile
department director, a health director, a mental health director and at least one lay citizen,
all appointed by the county commissioners;
(f) A city councilor or mayor and a city manager or other city representative, both
selected by the cities in the county;
(g) A representative of the Oregon State Police, who is a nonvoting member of the
council, selected by the Superintendent of State Police; and
(h) A representative of the Oregon Youth Authority, who is a nonvoting member of
the council, selected by the Director of the Oregon Youth Authority.
(2) The boards of county commissioners of two or more counties may jointly convene
a single, regional local public safety coordinating council by means of an
intergovernmental agreement. Local officials may combine the council with existing
local criminal justice advisory councils established under ORS 1.851.
(3) The local public safety coordinating council shall, at a minimum:
(a) Develop and recommend to the county board of commissioners a plan for use of.
(A) State resources to serve the local offender population; and
(B) State and local resources to serve the needs of that part of the local offender
population who are at least 15 years of age and less than 18 years of age, which plan must
provide for coordination of community-wide services involving prevention, treatment,
education, employment resources and intervention strategies; and
(b) Coordinate local criminal justice policy among affected criminal justice entities.
(4) Nonvoting members of a local public safety coordinating council may not be
counted in determining whether a quorum exists. [ 1977 c.412 § 12; 1995 c.423 § 11; 1997
c.249 § 136; 1997 c.698 § 1; 2003 c.162 § 1 ]
423.565 Additional duties of public safety coordinating council. In addition to the
duties assigned to it under ORS 423.560, the local public safety coordinating council
convened by the board of commissioners shall, at a minimum:
(1) Develop and recommend to the county board of commissioners the plan for use of
state resources to serve the local youth offender population;
(2) Coordinate local juvenile justice policy among affected juvenile justice entities;
and
(3) In consultation with the local commission on children and families, develop and
recommend to the county board of commissioners a plan designed to prevent criminal
involvement by youth. The plan must provide for coordination of community-wide
services involving treatment, education, employment and intervention strategies aimed at
crime prevention. [ 1995 c.422 §75; 1995 c.423 § 11 a]
c
Deschutes County Sheriff`s Office
FORCED RELEASE REPORT
2005 & 2006
2006
2005
Matrixed Sentenced = 442 Inmates
Matrixed Unsentenced = 480 Inmates
Highest Rankin Charges Released
(A-Felonies - Number of Inmates)
Burglary 1 = 24
Manufacture/Delivery of
Controlled Substance Schedule 1 = 9
Manufacture/Delivery of
Controlled Substance - School =1
Kidnap 1 =1
B-Felonies - Number of Inmates
Manufacture/Delivery of
Schedule 2 Controlled Substance
= 27
Possession of Schedule I
Controlled Substance
= 2
Child Neglect I = 3
Unlaw. Poss of Short Barrel Gun
=1
Attempted Burglary 1
=1
Assault 2
=1
Kidnap 2
=1
Longest Sentence Not Completed
Over 6 Mos. = 1 Inmate(9 Months)
3 Mos.- 6 Mos. = 47 Inmates
Less 3 Mos. = 394 Inmates
Forced Release Score
80 - 100: 0
50 - 79: 24
0 - 49: 38
Matrixed Unsentenced PV's: 56 Inmates
Matrixed Sentenced PV's: 163 Inmates
Matrixed Sanctioned Parole: 45 Inmates
Matrixed Sentenced = 549 Inmates
Matrixed Unsentenced = 411 Inmates
Highest Rankinp- Charge Released
(A-Felonies - Number of Inmates)
Burglary 1 = 23
Manufacture/Delivery of
Controlled Substance Schedule 1 = 4
B-Felonies - Number of Inmates
Manufacture/Delivery of
Schedule 2 Controlled Substance
=35
Possession of Schedule I
Controlled Substance
= 3
Custodial Interference I
= 2
Unlaw. Poss of Short Barrel Gun
= 1
Robbery 2
= 1
Aggravated Theft I
= 4
Assault 2
= 1
Longest Sentence Not Completed
Over 6 Mos. = 2 Inmates (8 Months)
3 Mos.- 6 Mos. = 41 Inmates
Less 3 Mos. = 379 Inmates
Forced Release Score
80 - 100: 0
50 - 79: 6
0 - 49: 22
Matrixed Unsentenced PV's: 46 Inmates
Matrixed Sentenced PV's: 162 Inmates
Matrixed Sanctioned Parole: 20 Inmates
(Probation Violation releases may include multiple counts and other charges)