2007-1100-Minutes for Meeting April 29,1981 Recorded 6/20/2007DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERKDS ~d ~V~~'~~VQ
NANCY
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL
46/24/2407 10;56;23 AM
.1..1.1. 11..1..i... 11.....I. .o.
2007-1100
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
• DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
APRIL 29, 1981 - REGULAR MEETING
Chairman Paulson called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Commissioner
Shepard and Commissioner Young were also present.
Amendments to There were four items on the amendment sheet attached to
the Agenda
the Agenda. They were: (1) Appointment of persons
designated by the governing body to carry on Labor
negotiations, (2) Discussion relating to representation
in the case of DiBernardi vs. Deschutes County, (3)
Explanation and signature of the Family Planning Grant,
and (4) Discussion regarding extension of Squaw Creek
Canyon Subdivision. There were no additional amendments
to the agenda.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to adopt the amendments to the
agenda.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Second read-
Accompanying the Ordinance were the proposed Findings
ing and pos-
of Fact. Chairman Paulson explained that the public
sible adopt-
hearing had been held previously and~_no-public=Comment----
ion of Sign
would be heard _ati.th s meeting. ;i
Ordinance
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that the.second reading of Ordin-
#81-009
ance #81-009 be read by title only.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Chairman Paulson gave the second reading of Ordinance #81-
009 by title only.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to adopt the Findings of Fact sub-
mitted for Ordinance #81-009.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: NO.
Bruce Knowlton, Planning Department, said that the Ordin-
ance contains one typographical error on page 8 of the text,
'Section 1.0301'should be changed to read "Section 1.130".
He had no other comments.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve Sign Ordinance #81-009.
PAULSON: Second.
Commissioner Young said that the Sign Ordinance is a dir-
ect result of the Comprehensive Plan. He did not approve
the Comprehensive Plan, so he said that he would be forced
to vote against this, but he expressed approval of a sign
ordinance.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: NO.
Commissioner Shepard noted that the editorial correction
is part of the motion, Chairman Paulson agreed.
Page 1 of 6
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
April 29, 1981 - Regular Meeting
Discussion re-
Chairman Paulson entered two documents into the record;
garding Tempo-
the first was a letter from Mr. Deteto, 4128 Hager St.,
rary Permit
Salem 97301, expressing objection to the issuance of the
for Crushing
permit, the second was a mailgram from R.L.T. House,
of Cement
Halsey, Oregon, also expressing his disapproval. Commis-
sioner Young said that he had received a telephone call
from Lee Kennell in Lapine who lives near the site, and
Mr. Kennell expressed his disapproval. Sylvia Shields
came before the Board as the party requesting the permit.
Brian Christensen, Planning Department, came before the
Board and briefly explained the background information.
He said that Mrs. Shields came into the Planning Depart-
ment last week to request this temporary permit. He
said that this was the former of site of LaPine Ready Mix
who has recently moved. There is some leftover material
at the former site and Mrs. Shields would like the oppor-
tunity to crush the material remaining at the site.
The Planning Department does not have the authority to
grant such a temporary use, so Mr. Christensen suggested
that Mrs. Shields approach the Board with this request.
Mrs. Shields said that its only a matter of cleaning up
the site. Her intention was to crush the cement and then
put the crushed material on the roads to keep the dust
down. Chairman Paulson asked if it was possible to move
the material to the new site and crush it there. Mrs.
Shields responded that it was possible but less practical
because of the trucking that would be involved.
Mr. Whitney then addressed the Board with comments on this
matter. He said that he represents some of the elderly
neighbors. He expressed their disapproval of this, saying
that it was not legal under the 1972 ordinance,because of
the noise it will create. Mr. Lunda then approached the
Board with his comments. He said that last winter the
Shields hauled rock onto the subject property and that is
what they intend to crush at this time. Mrs. Shields
explained that they often store aggregate materials on this
property and only intend to crush the residue of the pre-
vious operation.
Mr. Isham said that the Board could review the ordinance
for the purpose of allowing such a temporary use. The
current ordinance has limited authority with respect to
temporary uses. He said that the County receives frequent
requests for such temporary uses, so the Board may want
to reprise or amend the ordinance to provide for temporary
uses. He said that since they have no provision for this
in the ordinance, it is not allowed. The Board cannot grant
or deny something that is not covered in the ordinance.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that they deny the temporary
permit for crushing of cement.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Page 2 of 6
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
April 29, 1981 Regular Meeting
Discussion Paul Speck, Attorney representing neighbors of the
with Paul new KPRB radio tower, came before the Board to request
Speck regard- discussing with them the possible sale of some County
ing possible land. This proposed tower is currently under appeal.
sale of County before the Planning Commission,. however, the appeal has
land not yet reached the Board. He said that they were granted
a de novo hearing, with the condition that Dave Jaqua
(attorney representing KPRB) and the Radio Committee
have access to all evidence. Dave Jaqua was also present
at this meeting.
Mr. Speck explained that they are trying to find an alter-
nate site for the tower so that it won't be constructed
in the residential area of the persons he is representing.
They have located a site that may be suitable near Negus
landfill that is owned by the County. He would like to
find out if the County is willing to sell this land before
he takes his case before the. Planning Commission.! He
has contacted the Assessor's office to see how the land
was acquired by the County. It was granted to them by
the Federal Government. Rick Isham noted that any exchange
would fall under the patent lands laws. There was some
discussion on the proper way of acquiring lands under the
patent lands laws. Mr. Isham noted that the Awbrey Butte
Lease Committee has been meeting regularly and there have
been discussions in that committee of providing other
arrangements elsewhere in the County. There is a possib-
ility that that committee will be involved in the Redmond
area and if this was an appropriate site, they may want
to use it.
It was the Board's feeling that they should not make a
decision on whether or not they would be willing to sell
the land at this point. It was agreed that it should be
referred to staff for a recommendation, and possible the
Public Advisory Team as well.
Discussion
Lou Dvorak, Martin Hansen and Dick Brownrjag came before
regarding
the Board on this matter. Mr. Brownrich, Sun Country
Solid Waste
Disposal, said that he had only been informed of this
Franchises
hearing on the preceeding Tuesday, which was not enough
notice for him to have his attorney attend (his attorney
is from Salem). He requested that today's hearing be
postponed.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that it be continued for two weeks.
SHEPARD: Second.
Commissioner Shepard asked if the Board's intent was to
accept further testimony or make a final decision only.
Kim Ward asked that he be allowed to submit testimony,
as he was not aware of the first hearing and had not had
the opportunity at that time to submit testimony. There
was some further discussion on the question involved.
Commissioner Shepard said that there was some ambiguity
in the ordinance, and the Board should attempt to clear
it U.P.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
April 29, 1981 - Regular Meeting
It was decided that this would be heard on May 13.
Chairman Paulson said that testimony would be limited
to 15 minutes for each party. He said that all those
concerned with the mobile home aspect will be represented
at one time. Material related to the testimony can be
submitted to the Board in advance.
Acceptance
Rick Isham explained this briefly to the Board. In the
and signature
event that Diamond International owns a portion of China
of Quitclaim
Hat Road they are giving it to the County. He recommended
Deed
that if it was the Road Department's desire to acquire that
roadway they should go ahead and accept it. Mr. Hudson
recommended that the Board accept the quitclaim deed
Chairman Paulson read the Acceptance of Deed in part.
MOTION: YOUNG moved to accept the Quitclaim Deed.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Appointment
Rick Isham said that Mike Maier, Darrell Davidson and
of persons
himself had met with the Sheriff's union representatives
designated by
in an initial.meeting to.receive-_:their proposal-.:. It was
the governing
felt that the Board should officially appoint them if
body to carry
it was their desire for them to be negotiating team for
on labor neg-
the County.
otiations.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that Darrell Davidson, Mike Maier
and Rick Isham be appointed as the negotiating
team with the Sheriff's Association.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Mr. Isham said that in conjunction with this, he has
prepared a notice of Executive Session to be held the
next day at 1:30 p.m. This will be for the purpose of
deliberation with the team-members they have appointed.
MOTION: YOUNG moved to have an Executive Session
tomorrow at 1:30 between the Board and the
negotiating team.
SHEPARD: Second.
Commissioner Shepard said that he had a conflicting
schedule and would not be able to attend.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion Mr. Isham said that several days ago he had been served
relating to with a new complaint on the DiBernardi case. He said
representa- that Lou Dvorak is currently representing the County on
tion on Di- this case. He said that there is some question as to the
Berndardi Board's intent with respect to this particular litigation
case as to whether he or Mr. Dvorak should carry on with
this case. After some discussion, it was the Board's
concensus that Rick Isham should represent the County
in this matter from this point forward.
Page 4 of 6
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
April 29, 1981 - Regular Meeting
Explanation Lynn Stonelake came before the Board to explained this.
and Signat- She said that the Board had signed a Family Planning grant
ure of the application at the beginning of the year, but there has
Family Plan- since been a change in the administration of the funding.
ning Grant The County will be receiving more money directly, instead
of being held at the State level. She requested that the
Board sign the document.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that they sign the re-done grant
because of the fact that some extra monies will
be received by the State and have alterations
to the Budget Committee for the Family Planning
grant.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion John Rankin came before the Board and explained that they
regarding have all the signatures on the final plat except the
extension of Planning Director's, the Board's and the Road Department's.
Squaw Creek He explained that they have several areas of the road that
Canyon sub- need to be brought further up to specifications. He said
division that they have bonded for the roads. He had a letter from
BLM indicating that they had no objection to the use of
these roads and a letter from the original owner stating
that the road was built in the 1920's and 1930's and the
road has been used by the public since that time.
Neil Hudson said that the question the Road department had
was whether or not this was a legal access road. He said
they must verify and determine that they have the right to
use that road. There is a technicality involved with BLM,
based on their letter they recognize the road, however
the don't officially recognize it. Mr. Rankin was not
aware of this until the day before. They had assumed that
since this road had been used as access for a subdivision
created in 1967 that the road was a legal access road.
Mr. Rankin requested an indefinite extension. Lou Dvorak,
representing the applicant, suggested that they be granted
an extension based on getting legal right of way from BLM.
Mr. Rankin said that the road traverses some private prop-
erty and they need to obtain a dedication for that portion
of the road. It was suggested that they be granted a 10-
month extension for the access requirement, but all other
requirements must be complete by the original expiration
date.
MOTION: YOUNG moved to grant a 10-month extension for
Squaw Creek Canyon subdivision, Addition 1,
until March 1, 1982 for the road requirement.
Chairman Paulson noted that March 1, 1982 is the new
deadline for the road requirement, and it is an arbitrary
date. It is anticipated that this will be enough time,
however if there is a problem with BLM, additional time
may be granted.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Page 5 of 6
.'Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
r April 29, 1981 - Regular Meeting
For Signature:
MJP-79-65,
Whitaker
Craig Smith brought this before the Board for signature
and approval.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that
Elmer Whitaker.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
There was some discussion
partition.
they approve MJP-79-65 for
on the flag lot on this major
River Forest Neil Hudson explained to the Board that they had approved
Acres Special this agreement once before, but the road district did not
Road District have funds available to have the work completed under the
Agreement terms of the agreement. The district has since found a
private party who agreed to finance the work, so they would
like to enter the agreement now. They are now prepared to
reimburse the County as soon as the work is done. The
work they are requesting is to have cinders hauled and
put on the roads.
Rick Isham said that it is legal for the road department
to do work of this nature for other governmental agencies,
including special road districts. He has become aware
recently that the private contractors object to this because
they feel that the County is competing with them.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that they approve the River Forest
Acres Special Road District agreement.
PAULSON: Second.
It was pointed out that the County will recover all of
their total cost.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Other Staff/ Commissioner Shepard said that he had had a telephone con-
Public Con- versation with Bill Penhollow, Association of Oregon
cerns Counties, during which he had been informed that there
will be a meeting on the following Monday at 10:00 a.m.
at the AOC office regarding interest. There is"currently_
a lawsuit filed against Grant County by a citizen because
Grant County transferred interest into the General Fund.
Chairman Paulson suggested that they authorize Rick Isham
to attend that meeting and that they pay his expenses as
he suggested. He will go for half the usual cost because
he plans to be in that area on the preceeding weekend.
They will pay half of the round-trip mileage.
Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS O RS
obert C. Paulson, Jr Clay C Shepard A ert A. g
7-
/ss
Page 6 of 6