2007-1107-Minutes for Meeting May 21,1981 Recorded 6/20/2007COUNTY OFFICIAL Py
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKS vo 2007-1107
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 06/20/2007 10:56:23 AM
1111111111111111111111111111111
2 07-1107
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
-c
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
~ MAY 21, 1981 - SPECIAL MEETING
Chairman Paulson called to order the special meeting between the Board
of Commissioners and the Budget Board and members of the Public Advisory
Team at 10:08 a.m. Those present were: Commissioner Young, Commissioner
Shepard, Chairman Paulson, Wally Corwin, Jack Oliver, Jan Wick, Dick
Carlson, Greg Cushman and Betty Ahern, as well as numerous department
heads and employees in the audience.
The purpose of the meeting was to decide what the County would like to
place on the ballot to go before the voters June 30,or September 15, if
they should choose to go before the voters again.
They % went over the list that Mike Maier had prepared entitled "Budget
Options 1981-82". Each option was discussed. It was noted that a de-
cision must be made by the following Tuesday, because the ballot must be
submitted to the Elections office so that it may appear on the June 30
ballot. Mr. Maier then went over the second attached sheet entitled
"Estimated Total Revenue - General Fund (6%) $4,835,647.00". These:figures
were designed to provide the current level of staffing and services.
He also discussed the deficits being faced. He said that the County is
1.7 million dollars short of what they need. They must determine how to
meet the shorfall. On the third page, entitled "Possible Methods of Budget
Reduction", possible reduction measures were listed. The total of these
possibilities would amount to a 1.4 million dollar reduction. There was
some discussion of these possibilities.
Chairman Paulson called for comments from the audience. Duane Clark of
the Watermaster's office said that the County may lose a lot of employees
if they should go to a 4-day week on a permanent basis. He said that
many employees could not afford to live on that amount of money. Lou
Selken, District Attorney, agreed with Mr. Clark's comments. He added
that the County may lose their better employees who will not want to work
on a part-time basis for the entire year. Myer Avedovech, Hearings Offi-
cer, said that they need to be realistic with the people who have put in
the time for the last few months because this was a temporary situation.
He thinks they need to go back to running full-time jobs because the work
requirement is not part-time. Jane Kirkpatrick, Family Counseling, said
that the Mental Health Advisory Board met the previous day and discussed
the shopping list ballot idea and they felt very strongly that the Board
should not do that. She said that not everybody wants to acknowledge
that they need mental health services. She felt that just because a min-
ority of the people wants to use something, they still have a duty to pro-
vide that minority with the service. Marv Young, County Extension Agent,
said that this is a difficult situation and the elimination of those
departments that are identified as possible :exclusions are only the
suggestion of certain individuals. He said that he has talked to many
people who would prefer that the County offer a shopping list B ballot.
He suggested that the County go with alternative #6 listed on the first
sheet, or possibly option #4. Lynn Stonelake, Health Department, asked
about the advantage of having a September vote. Chairman Paulson explained
that they will need to live on the reduced budget until September if the
June budget doesn't pass. He said that by that time the County stands
to lose a number of its employees. He said that the advantage of going to
a September ballot would be that they might have a less crowded ballot.
Page 1 of 3
0
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
May 21, 1981 - Special Meeting
Bob Maine asked what the ramifications of Option #1 would be. Chairman
Paulson responded that if they have a five-day work week and live within
the 60 limitation they will lose as many people as they would otherwise
because they will have an increased workload. He added that there would
be some departments that would have to be discontinued.
Chairman Paulson said that he had been in contact with Senator AuCoin's
office, and was told that the County probably would not be receiving any
payment in lieu of taxes, and the interest from forest receipts will no
longer be transferred into the General Fund, but will go back to the Road
Department.
Ross Brown, Data Processing, asked how many people they will need to
remove from the General Fund payroll. Chairman Paulson responded that
they needed to make up a $536,000 deficit, so it depends on what salaries
the people that are let go are making. There are a total of 120 people
on the general fund payroll, so this may effect 16 to 20 people. They
must give notice to those individuals effected two weeks before July.
They hope to have the 6% budget out in draft form within two weeks.
Helen Rastovich made clear that under #7 if the County goes to a 36-hour
week they will include a loo cost of living raise in salary to the gener-
al fund employees and a 10% cut-back in hours, making salaries essentially
the same, but reducing the work week to 36 hours.
After some further minor discussion, Chairman Paulson called for comments
from those members of the Budget Board and the Public Advisory Team pre-
sent. Dick Carlson said that he doesn't think that a B ballot will pass
if it is presented as.an overall measure, but he thought that they should
discuss presenting a shopping list B ballot. It was the consesus of the
group to rule out option #2. There was some further discussion on the
feasibility of each option. Jan Wick said that he felt that the A and
B ballots should clearly identify where the funds were to be appropriated
for each ballot. Commissioner Shepard suggested grouping several of the
special interest programs together, such as Veterans, Senior Programs and
the Humane Society, in order to unify several minorities to build a major-
ity to give the ballot a better chance of passing. This was discussed
but met with some opposition from the other members of the panel. Betty
Ahern said that it was her feeling that the public was not well enough
educated as to the items being voted on and how they will effect their
taxes. This was also discussed. Mr. Cushman felt that the County, after
coming up with a viable budget, should go before the voters to promote it.
Mr. Oliver suggested lowering the A ballot to a low figure and putting the
bulk of the budget on individualized B ballots. Mr. Isham said that this
was not possible under State law. Chairman Paulson said that he felt that
option #4 was their best option, and that they should have no mandated
services on the B ballots, reserving them for the A ballot. This was
discussed. Oscar Bratton asked that part of his department be placed on
the B ballot, and put some of it on a B ballot, giving him a chance to
better staff his department. He would prefer that this be placed on a
single item B ballot. Marv Young said that he preferred to have the Exten-
sion Service appear on a single item B ballot, because he felt that in
the past people he works with did not want to support the entire County
budget, just the Extension Service. He added that they are looking at
going to a Special District status, as it may improve their chance of
obtaining voter approval. Mr. Isham said that he felt that the County
should continue to operate on a five-day 40-hour schedule, but not give
Page 2 of 3
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
May 21, 1981 - Special Meeting
any salary raises.
Helen Durrant said that her department has been working to try to educate
the public about budget matters. Wanda Lovejoy said that the problem
seems to be that the public is not well enough educated about the budget,
and that the County should work to try to provide information to them.
Darrell Davidson said that he felt that the reason the Sheriff's special
levy had passed was largely that they had put a lot of effort into going
out into the public to present their proposal. There was some further
discussion on-this. There was some further discussion on -the hour/wage
question. The budget options listed were further discussed, along with
the question of how to present the B ballot.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that they go with option #4.
PAULSON: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPAR.D : AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
They now have to decide what they want listed on the ballots. Chairman
Paulson said that he and Mike Maier would make a budget officer's deci-
sion by Tuesday.
Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
C
/ 5z
Robert C. Paulson,,Jr., Chairman v~
C/
Al er A. Young, Co ission
Clay C. Shepard, Commissioner
Page 3 of 3