2007-1110-Minutes for Meeting June 02,1981 Recorded 6/20/2007COUNTY OFFICIAL
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKDS ICJ ZU~1.1110
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL
06/20/2007 10;56:23 AM
111111111 loll 1111111111111 Ile I w
2007-lift
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
C -
r
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
DE.SCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
JUNE'.?. , 1981 - REGULAR MEETING
this was to clarify a
hat stated that the county
week. This motion is
provide for a 36-hour
the motion of last week
making a 36-hour work week for the next year.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Lawrence Erwin, representing the owner of Plateau Estates,
was present, but did not submit any additional testimony
at this time.
Chairman Paulson opened the public hearing. Pat Giesler
and Dan VanVactor representing Odin Crest Estates were
present. Mr. VanVactor saidr;that he felt that it would
be beneficial to the County road system if as many roads
as possible were brought up to consistent standards, and
that this was an opportunity to upgrade part of the road
system. He said that if the County were named in any en-
suing litigation, they would assume the responsibility for
protecting the County in any way necessary. Rick Isham,
County Counsel, said that with respect to the question of
benefit, Bond Counsel is confident that there is in fact
a benefit to the property owners in Plateau Estates and
that any assessment against that property would not be
overturned by a court. He said that if litigation were
filed, this would have to be a separate bond issue, be-
cause they are required to sign a non-litigation certi-
ficate, insuring that no litigation has been filed against
the bond. By putting these on separate issues, it will
create a greater expense to the property owners. He said
that the easiest approach would be to drop the LID or send
it back to the engineer for a new engineer's report.
There was some further discussion between the Board members
and County Counsel. Chairman Paulson then called for fur-
ther testimony. Mr. Erwin said that this subdivision had
been approved with roads at the present standards, and
if the Board does nothing on this, the LID will take place.
Mr. VanVactor noted that the roads in Plateau Estates
would have the benefit of being paved, rather than dirt.
r-
Chairman Paulson called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Commissioner
Shepard and Commissioner Young were also in attendance.
Amendments to Commissioner Shepard recommended that the amend the
the Agenda agenda to include the possible appointment of a mem-
ber to the Housing Authority.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to do so.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion of Chairman Paulson explained that
36-hour work- motion made the previous week t
week would operate on a 35-hour work
to amend the previous motion to
week.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to amend
Continuance
of Remon-
strance
hearing on
Odin Crest
Estates LID
Page 1 of 4
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
June 2, 1981 - Regular Meeting
Mr. VanVactor said that they are willing to work on
a cooperative effort with Plateau Estates(`-Owner in
readjusting the cost if necessary to come to an agree-
ment. After some further discussion, Mr. VanVactor
said that he wanted to make sure that Odin :Crest did
not lose the LID in order to save Plateau Estates from
having to participate. He siad that their major inter-
est was in at least seeing that Odin Crest be allowed
to proceed. He suggested that this go back to the en-
gineer and the surveyor to judge the equitability of
the assessments. There was some further discussion.
Mr. Isham said that if they amend the engineer's report
they must go back and re-adopt it, the only way to pro-
ceed under the current engineer's report is to reduce
it in scope. Chairman Paulson closed the public hearing.
There was some further discussion by the Board.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that the Odin Crest LID be allowed
to proceed excluding the portion in Plateau
Estates.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion Mr. Isham will prepare an order for Odin Crest to be
and Signat- signed at a later meeting.
ure for Odin
Crest LID
Discussion
Mr. Hudson explained that the County is bringing Sunnyside
regarding
Blvd. through Woodside Ranch and to Brightenwood. He
culdesacing
showed the proposed road on a map. They want to culdesac
of Woodside
Woodside Road to prevent problems with.dangerous snow
Ranch
and ice conditions at one intersection, yet leave it
open enough so that in case of an emergency, an emergency
'Vehicle could still get through. This was discussed, and
it was agreed to try this on a trial basis.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that the Road Department be instructed
to proceed with the culdesac on Woodside North
Drive.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Administrator
Neil Hudson handed the Board a memo on this, and explained
or Ordinance
that they had wanted to re-assign some people in his
203-6 and 203-
department. He had prepared an order directing this re-
7
assignment for the Board's signature. This involves re-
assigning one person, and directing the Director of Pub-
lic Works to administer Ordinance 203-6 and 203-7. Mr.
Hudson noted that this had been considered for some time,
and any actions taken by people may have been taken to
try to preclude this action. Mr. Isham suggested that
the order make it clear that this order is repealing the
former order. He will redraft the document including this
for the Board's signature at a later date.
Page 2 of 4
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
June 2, 1981 - Regular Meeting
17
Cost Account- Mr. Hudson gave the Board a memo regarding this. He
ing of 1981- explained that they have to have these forms on file
82 Projects one month before they adopt the Road Department Budget.
He said that they do not have any projects amounting to
over $50,000. He saidclthat if they go over $50,000
they have to go to the least cost method. There was
some further discussion.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve the Director of Public
Works' recommendation regarding cost accounting
for 1981-82 time period.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion Chairman Paulson explained this. Mr. Brewer was present
regarding ex- and explained that he was not aware of the deadlines.
tension for His project was PP#387, Canyon Ranch Estates. His ex-
Brewer piration date was November 11, 1980. It was approved in
May of 1978 and had been granted a previous 18 month
extension which has lapsed. Craig Smith explained that
all the signatures had been obtained except for the san-
itarian's. Mr. Brewer had applied for the feasibility
study prior to the expiration date. Hugh Helms from
Sanitation said that he had reviewed the test holes and
found them to be '9very borderline". He said that those
that could be approved would have to be an alternate
system. He suggested getting more test holes dug so
that they would not.have to go to an alternate system.
Commissioner Shepard said that it would be appropriate
to wait until the new extension policies are approved
before taking any action on the matter. Commissioner
Shepard said that these were problems beyond Mr. Brewer's
control and the sanitarian is prepared to sign off now.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that he be allowed 30 days to
complete this thing and that Craig Smith get
all the necessary signatures.
SHEPARD: Second.
Commissioner Shepard said that he is not opposed to this
motion but they are putting in the new procedure on this
and should consider that. There was some further dis-
cussion, after which it was the Board's consensus to
delay action on this until the extension policies were
complete. Commisssioner Young withdrew his motion,
Commissioner Shepard withdrew his second.
Chairman Paulson left the meeting at 11:30 and turned the
Chair over to Commissioner Young.
For Signature: Craig Smith came before the Board and explained this item.
Mortgage He said that the parcel being mortgaged is smaller than
Agreement allowed by zoning. Chairman Young read the agreement in
part aloud. There was some discussion on the meaning of
"contract purchaser". Mr. Smith said he will check on this
and bring the document for signature back before the Board
at a later date.
Page 3 of 4
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
June 2, 1981 Regular Meeting
For Signature: Mr. Smith explained this to the Board, saying that the
MP-81-21, Owen subject property is located within the Redmond Urban
Larkin Growth Boundary.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve MP-81-21.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: YOUNG: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
MP-81-23, MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve MP-81-23.
John Howell YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: YOUNG: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
One request This was in regard to Receipt #24540, in the amount of
for refund $120 to be paid to J. Price because a feasibility study
was not necessary. The Board approved the request.
Possible Commissioner Shepard said that currently there are four
appointment persons from Jefferson County and three persons from
to the Deschutes County serving on the Housing Authority. The
Housing Board needs to appoint another member from Deschutes
Authority County to the Housing Authority. It was decided to
put out a news release indicating that the County is seeking
someone for this appointment.
Being no furhter business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Robert C. Paulson, Jr., Chairman
t
/ss
Page 4 of 4