Loading...
2007-1120-Minutes for Meeting June 23,1981 Recorded 6/20/2007COUNTY NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKS C 200NIN COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 0612012001 11;04;32 AM III 20 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded to correct [give reason] previously recorded in Book or as Fee Number and Page P DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JUNE 23, 1981 - REGULAR MEETING Chairman Paulson called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Commissioner Shepard and Commissioner Young were also present. Amendments to Amendments to the agenda were: (1) Consideration of the Agenda Consortium Agreement for COIC and CETA, and (2) Public Hearing regarding Pacific Power and Light Transmission Line along Tekampe Road. MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve the amendments. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: PAULSON: AYE. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Public Hearing Chairman Paulson explained that this was an informational regarding PP&L hearing and opened the hearing for comments. Harold Transmission Baughman, District Manager for Pacific Power and Light, Line came forward. He explained that they are in the process of trying to locate a right-of-way to place a much needed transmission line that will serve the area south of Bend. He discussed alternate routes that they had tried to obtain, but had been unsuccessful: Mr. Hinman of Central Electric Co-op was also present. The two companies have worked out an agreement in which Pacific Power's new line will utilize the Co-op's existing poles. There was some general discussion on the matter. Bob Munn, a property owner on Tekampe Road asked about the location of the line in rela- tion to the irrigation canal. Chuck Evert presented the Board with a notice and map that was signed by-.some.,of the surrounding property owners that was in favor of-the Tekampe Road route. Chairman Paulson read the document aloud. Bob Lovlien asked if a conditional use permit would be in order in this case. There was some discussion on this. John Andersen „ Planning Director, said that this would not be required. MOTION: YOUNG moved that the Board of Commissioners approve the line to run along Ferguson to Tekampe and then down Tekampe Road to Knott Road. They will use the existing Right of Way of Central Electric Co-op, changing those poles and making them higher and following Ferguson Road due east and then leaving Ferguson to Tekampe and then down to Knott Road. The motion is for the poles to be placed on the east side. SHEPARD: Second. VOTE: PAULSON: AYE. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Discussion re- Brian Christensen, Planning Department, said that on garding DOGAMI June 16, 1981 they had received an advisory letter from Reclamation the Department of Geological and Mineral Industries Permit for advising the Planning Department that they were considering Surface Mines a permit application for R.L. Coats. He said that there had been a temporary permit issued for this location about 6 or 7 years ago. It is the Planning Department's feeling Page 1 of 4 r Deschutes County Board of Commissioners June 25, ,1981 - Regular Meeting that DOGAMI should be notified that Mr. Coats does need to comply.with County Site Plan requirements within PL-15 under the Surface Mining Section. He said that there will bean asphault plant, rock-crusher and dynamite in use at the site. This is an old site contiguous to an old one. Mr. Coats has indicated that he does not intend to file a site plan with the County. The County has the right to appeal the proposed decision of DOGAMI to the Board for review. There was some further discussion. MOTION: PAULSON moved that the Board direct staff to to see that the County's ordinances are considered and incorporated within the State's requirement to the applicant when they approve a A Surface Mining application and that the staff be directed to take whatever steps are necessary to see that those steps are complied with. SHEPARD: Second. Brian Christensen said that he had left a message with Mr. Coats!: office that this would be discussed at the meeting today.. 'VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: NO. Request for Bill and Mick. Tye came before the Board. They showed the Easement proposed easement on a map. There is a community sewer system in the development and they are currently drilling a well nearby, The State Health Division requires that there be a 100. foot radius around wells where no subsurface disposal be located, There is a conflict with that re- quirement, so they are seeking an easement from the County saying that the County will not allow drainfields on the affected portion of the adjoining county land. Commissioner Young suggested that County Counsel draw up an easement pursuant to the request. MOTION: YOUNG-moved that once it is drafted to Counsel's satisfaction the Board will sign the easement. SHEPARD: Second. VOTE: PAULSONe AYE. SHEPARD• AYE. YOUNG: AYE, Decision on Chairman Paulson explained that they had reviewed a number Water Hemlock, of documents relating to this issue, including a letter Program dated June 18, 1981 from Marvin Young indicating that Klamath.County has withdrawn from this program. The total cost of the program will be $1422-.-. MOTION: YOUNG moved that until such time as there is a better-method developed they continue the Water Hemlock, spraying program for this year at a cost of $1422,50, SHEPARD: Second. VOTE: PAULSON: AYE. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Page 2 of 4 y Deschutes County Board of Commissioners ' June 23, 1981 - Regular Meeting Marv Young said that if the amount is approved, the program will begin on Monday, July 6. Mr. Young said that if any of the other counties do not agree to contribute to the funding of the project, it will not be initiated. Discussion of Mr. Isham explained that this had been before the Board at grazing lease a previous date, prior to the meeting with the Douglas County policy lands manager. The draft that he had to present to the Board had been drafted previously. He explained that he had worked with Helen Rastovich on this, and they had endeavored to eliminate some of the administrative effort which is not productive. There was some further discussion. MOTION: SHEPARD moved that they ask County Counsel to work to define the figures still and that upon that we send a copy of this proposal out to a few land leasors with a cover letter explaining the purpose of what they are trying to accomplish. YOUNG: Second. After some discussion, it was decided to send it to a random sample of ten leasors. VOTE: PAULSON: AYE. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Decision and Chairman Paulson discussed some additions to the contract possible Sig- that he felt were necessary. He felt that there should nature - Lib- be a guarantee contract for Workman's Compensation Insurance. rary Janitor- They also need to add something stating that this person ial Services is an independent contractor. Contract MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve the contract subject to the changes being worked out by County Counsel and have the contract signed by Willard C. Bruce. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: PAULSON: AYE. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. This will be brought back after that is done for the Board's signature. Consideration Rick Isham briefly explained that he had made some clar- of Consortium ifications in regard to proof of liability and entitlement Agreement for for the liability. COIC and CETA MOTION: SHEPARD moved to accept the contract as written by Rick Isham, County Counsel. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: PAULSON: NO. SHEPARD: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. For Signature: This was a request in the amount of $200 to CMI Construction Request for receipt number 23879. The Board approved the request. Refund Page 3 of 4 • Deschutes County Board of Commissioners June 23, 1981 - Regular Meeting Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. /ss Page 4 of 4 DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS