2007-1128-Minutes for Meeting July 14,1981 Recorded 6/20/2007FICIAL NANCYDESCHUBLANKENSHIPTES COUNTY CLERKDS Ind 2007'1128
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 0612012007 11;06;12 AM
11111111 IIIJ1111111 IIIIIIIII III
2007-1 Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
t-
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
JULY 14, 1981 - REGULAR MEETING
Chairman Paulson called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Commissioner
Young and Commissioner Shepard were also in attendance.
Amendments to One amendment was listed on the attached sheet, the second
-the Agenda was a request for a refund, and the third was approval
of Order #81-307, rehearing for Linda E. Johnson Way of
Necessity.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to adopt the amendments.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion re- Paul Arrasmith, BLM, and Betsy Shay, County Planning Re-
garding Agree- partment, came before the Board. Mr. Arrasmith introduced
ment with BLM Jim Hancock, their Assistant District Manager. He said
that he would be leaving Prineville, and that Mr. Hancock
would be taking his place until the new manager comes on
board. Roy Pearl, BLM's Planning Coordinator, was also
present. He briefly explained what their objective had
been in developing this agreement. He said that this sets
up a more formal process for cooperative planning activities
between BLM and the County.
Discussion re- Doug Maul came before the Board to discuss this. He
garding Public hAnded out to each of the Board members a photocopy of
relations a recently published letter to the Editor, in which a vis-
itor to Bend wrote and told of hostile treatment he and
his family had received from some local residents. Mr.
Maul said that he had been in contact with the State High-
way department in regard to posting "welcome" signs at
the entrance to Deschutes County on the major arterials.
He also suggested that the Board send a letter to these
people expressing their apologies. Chairman Paulson said
that the Board would send a letter to these people, as
well as a letter to the newspaper.
At this time Chairman Paulson moved the meeting to the large conference
room. The meeting reconvened at 10:17 in Room A.
Determination Richard Knoll, Planning Department, explained that this
of de novo
was to determine whether or not this appeal
hearing should
Hearing on
be de novo or on the record.
He said that
this request
SP-80-1, Black
was filed through Dave Jaqua,
representing
the Sunriver
Bear Condos
Homeowners Association, they
request a full
de novo
hearing.
Dave Jaqua then came before the Board. He said that when
this appeal had been before the Planning Commission, the
decision to hear it de novo was made at the hearing, and
prior notification of a de novo hearing was not published.
He asked that the notice be submitted to the record.
Gary MacMurry, representing Q and S Development Corporation
came forward. He did not feel that it would be appropriate
to hold a de novo hearing. He said that even though the
Planning Commission had opened the hearing de novo, no
new evidence was taken. He felt that the question was
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
July 14, 1981 Regular Meeting
whether there was a master plan and whether there was
acquiesence of development. He said that one question
had been raised in reference to notice to surrounding
property owners, but that was all in the Hearings
Officer;`s records, so this was not really a de novo hearing.
Next, Bob Lovlien, representing Sunriver Properties, Inc.
He said that they concurr with Mr. MacMurray's argument
that a de novo review would only delay the matter
He requested that this be heard on the record given to
them by the Planning Commission and the Hearings officer
and that the hearing be as soon as possible.
Dave Jaqua then commented that the Planning Commission
hearing had not been noticed as de novo, even though
the Commission moved to hear it de novo. He said that
he had spoken with Mr. Avedovech, the Hearings Officer,
who had said that there are several different'..maps of\;the
Sunriver Master Plan that he is aware of. He said that
there was some question as to whether the Design Committee
approval of the Black Bear project was still valid at
the time the Planning Commission heard it. He said that
there had been some mention of a time-sharing program
which had not been introduced into any previous record.
Mr. Isham, County Counsel, said in reference to the issue
of there being a possible procedural error, that if they
hold this hearing de novo, that would correct any pre-
vious error.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that they proceed with a de novo
hearing, a complete de novo hearing for Black
Bear Condominiums on July 29, 1981, SP-80-1.
YOUNG: Second.
MOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion re- Mr. Isham said that on July 18 he and John Andersen,
garding LaPine Planning Director, went to Marvin Russell's office in
Industrial LaPine to meet with members of the LaPine Industrial Com-
Park Planning mittee. It is plannod;that development will occur in
Committee several phases. One of the methods of financing discussed
for the development of the park was to sell stock, and
they would call this the LaPine Industrial Development
Corporation. They had discussed some kind of long range
lease arrangement, for the initial period it would be a
taxes only payment, and then after about five years, it
could come up for review. Mr. Russell said,l.that he would
like to see the Commissioners pass a resolution indicating
that if the City of LaPine was to incorporate, this 440
acres would be ceded to the City. There was some further
discussion on the development of the park. Commissioner
Paulson and Young expressed agreement with ceding this
property to the City of LaPine, after having been incor-
porated. Mr. Isham said that in memo form he would draft
something regarding these issues discussed today.
Page 2 of 5
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
July 14, 1981 - Regular Meeting
Discussion re- Ed Heath, representing a partnership that wants to
garding Soft- constrilct a softball park near Redmond, came before
ball field the Board to discuss this. He read aloud to the Board
near Redmond a letter to the Board dated July 13, 1981 from Mr. and
Mrs. Edward R. Heath and Phillip R. Powell. He is
interested in locating this park on County property.
He showed the location on a map. He also had a letter
from Bob McWilliams, City Manager of Redmond, expressing
their approval of such a project. Commissioner Shepard
read this aloud. Mr. Isham said that the Assessor
said that this property was worth about $1500 per acre,
for a total value of $60,000.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that they enter into negotiations
to lease this 40 acres to Tournament City.
SHEPARD: Second.
There was some discussion about time frame for the lease.
Mr. Heath requested that this be a 20-year lease, because
of the investment they will have to make. He will make
a written recommendation to the Board.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Discussion re- Mr. Andersen said that he recommends that the Board
garding Surfaceappoint Charles Clark, James Curl, Thomas Richardson,
Mining Commit- and Brenda Bean as the regular members, and Clifford
tee Rose and Leanna Rice as alternates to the Surface Mining
Committee.
MOTION: YOUNG moved that the appointments be made as
outlined by the Planning Director and the
alternates also be appointed.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Mr. Andersen said that he would contact these people and
notify them of their appointment.
Other Staff/ Chairman Paulson said that they would hear the amendments
Public Con- to the Agenda under Other Staff/Public Concerns.
cerns
Discussion re- Commissioner Shepard said that he had been in contact
garding pos- with Mr. Adrian Wilcox who is interested in exchanging
sible land 80 acres of his land for 80 acres of nearby county land.
exchange The County land he is interested in isi:n_between parcels
of his land, by making this trade it would consolidate
his property holdings into contiguous ownership, as:well__. _
as the County's land in that vicinity. The Board indicated
that an appraisal of the two parcels would have to be
done. Mr. Isham said that he would write Mr. Wilcox a
letter indicating the necessary procedure to begin nego-
tiations for a land trade. Chairman Paulson expressed an
interest,n proceeding.
Page 3 of 5
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
July 14, 1981 - Regular Meeting
For Signature: Rick Isham explained that this memorializes the
Order #81-307 hearing on the Linda E. Johnson Way of Necessity.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved to approve ORder #81-307.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
The order called for a re-hearing.
Ordinance #81-
This Ordinance determined Deschutes County's Library
030, Determin-
Board's responsibilities and decalred an emergency.
ing Deschutes
Chairman Paulson read this aloud by title only.
County Library
MOTION: YOUNG moved to adopt the ordinance.
Board's res-
Commissioner Young withdrew his motion.
ponsibilities
MOTION: YOUNG moved to read ordinance #81-030 by title
only.
SHEPARD: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Chairman Paulson gave the first reading by title only.
MOTION: YOUNG moved to have the second reading by
title only.
SHEPARD:) Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Chairman Paulson gave the second reading by.htitle only.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that they approve Ordinance #81-
030.
YOUNG: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
Personal
Mike Maier, Director of Administrative Services, came
Service Con-
before the Board to discuss this. Mr. Isham explained
tract for
that the Board approved the document, but some legis-
Indigent De-
lation that concerned them seems to be proceeding and
fense
it is being amended so the final outcome is not certain.
They have a written a new provision in the agreement
which takes care of the legislative uncertainty, and
he suggested that the Board again review it. The
addition was Section 19, which Mr. Isham read aloud.
MOTION: YOUNG moved to sign the document as revised.
Mr. Isham added that there had been revisions in the
recording requirements and section under renegotiations.
SHEPARD: Second.
Comi:ssioner Shepard expressed thanks to Mr. Isham and
Mr. Maier for their work on this.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
YOUNG: AYE.
There was some further discussion on this.
Page 4 of 5
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
July 14, 1981 - Regular Meeting
Three Requests Before the Board were three requests for refund,
for Refund receipt #24940 in the amount of $25, Receipt #24779
in the amount of $144, and Receipt #24857 in the
amount of $110. The Board approved all three.
At this time, Chairman Paulson recessed the meeting until 2:00 p.m.
At 2:05 p.m., Chairman Paulson reconvened the meeting. Present were
Chairman Paulson and Commissioner Shepard, Commissioner Young was absent.
Discussion re- Jane Kirkpatrick came before the Board to discuss the
garding Mental status of the Mental Health funds. She discussed the
Health Funds feasibility of continuing to administer the funds for
mental health programs that are being contracted to
private contractors. Currently, doing so is a cost
liability to the County. She suggested that the County
should no longer subcontract, forcing the State to
deal directly with the contractor. The problem with
this, though, would be interim funding. This action
could cause a temporary cease in funding for these
programs. This was discussed. Mr. Isham suggested
that they work for the year to drop the subcontracts
so that they will be free of this by next year.
There was some further discussion.
MOTION: SHEPARD moved that the Board advise Jane Kirk-
patrick to continue with the status quo to
continue with the contract and that the Board
begin to make preparations that next year they
charge the subcontractors for administrative
costs or the County will not accept the res-
ponsibility of contracting.
PAULSON: Second.
VOTE: PAULSON: AYE.
SHEPARD: AYE.
Mr. Isham suggested that the put the State on notice
that they are spending money improperly. They will do
this with a letter from County Counsel saying that
we can no longer administer the programs at a cost to
the County. A copy of this letter shall be sent to
each of the subcontractors.
Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
/ss
5