Loading...
2007-1187-Minutes for Meeting January 27,1982 Recorded 6/20/2007COUNTY OFFICIAL NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKDS ICJ 2007.1187 COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 11111111110111111211101111111111 06/20/2007 11:39:43 AM 2007-1187 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page - { If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded to correct [give reason] previously recorded in Book or as Fee Number and Page • "DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JANUARY 27, 1982 - REGULAR MEETING Chairman Shepard called the meeting to order at 10:00 A.M. Commissioner Young and Commissioner Paulson were also present. Amendments to There were two amendments listed on a sheet attached to the Agenda the agenda. Being no objections, the amendments were included with the day's agenda. Discussion I~Bob Shimek, Century West Engineering, was present to discuss with Bob the activities of the 208 Water Study. He gave a brief back- Shimek, Cen- ground of the study, noting that it started in the summer of tury West 1980. He said that this was brought about by the Water Engineering Resources Department and the County Sanitation Department. Regarding 208 He noted that they had taken numerous samples of water from Water Study domestic wells in the LaPine area and found high nitrate levels, causing some concern about the ability of septic tanks in the area to be functioning correctly. He then briefly outlined how the water study had been funded. He said that they have formed two committees in conjuction with this study, the first is a technical advisory committee composed of experts in the field of geology and hydro-geology. The other is a citizens advisory committee, comprised of citizens in the LaPine study area. Their function is to provide local input. He said that they have installed num- erous monitoring wells and exploratory bores in the area. They have done geographic investigations to try to deter- mine what things are encouraging and not encouraging ground water movement. He also noted that the Planning Department had done a study to see what the growth trends may be in the future. He said that they also did a house-to-house study to see what kind of wells and septic systems are in use. They also had water samples taken from all residents who would give permission. He said that no unoccupied property was approached. He said that they tested for chemicals and bacteria on a spot check basis. He briefly outlined their findings to this point. He said that the geologic conditions are sufficiently complex that they cannot say that a particular factor is common to the whole basin. They found that the shallow ground water was good except near densely developed areas, and in some cases near septic tank systems. He said that they had found some chlorides and sulphates, which tend to be higher where there are some septic tank problems. They did not find any bacterial growth which indicates that the drainfield systems are working right. He noted one other factor was that they did not have much precipitation, so they did not see the effects of high ground water contamination. He said that the work they will be doing is continued monitoring of the water table levels and spot checking for bacterial contamination. He said that they are also in the process of revising some of their original work after seeing the effects of precipitation. He said that they are now doing more borings as well. He also noted that the water is not moving in the direction that they thought it was, which was north, but it seems to be moving to the east. He said that they will also develop a plan to protect the aquifer. He said that when the devel- op a management plan that has been reviewed by the committees it will come before the Board for their review. He said Page 1 of 6 'Deschutes County Board of Commissioners January 27, 1982 - Regular Meeting they intend to maintain a close working relationship with the Board. He said that the study is aimed at area specifics and their guidelines will also be on an area specific basis, not just a general recommendation. There was some further general discussion. Discussion re- Jane Kirkpatrick, Family Counselling Director, was present garding Emer- to discuss this. She had presented with a report on this gency Holding which they have reviewed. She noted that this was an Costs informal discussion for the purpose of keeping the Board informed. She introduced Julie Tikton, a member of her staff who has been working on this. Ms. Kirkpatrick said that they are pleased that the local hospital is providing quality treatment for patients with mental illness, when before these people were housed in the jail. She noted, however, that this is at an increased cost. She said that in the long run, they have been able to keep people out of the state hospital. She said that so far they have spent between $25,000 and $30,000 for this, with only $15,000 remaining in the budget for this purpose. She is requesting that the Board take this under advisement and consider the possibility of having to spend contigency funds for this for the remainder of the fiscal year. Appointment Ms. Kirkpatrick explained that new members are recommended to the Des- by a membership committee of the Board. She said that the chutes County board members requested that each year they be sent a letter Mental Health stating their membership and the remainder of their term. Advisory Board There was some further minor discussion. MOTION: YOUNG moved that the following persons be appointed: Dave Hulse; Mrs. Sherrie Pierce; Rev. Randyl Taber; Juanita Serano; Barbara Preble; Lloyd Bishop; Hyale Smith; Joan Hibbs; Larry Tuttle; Alan Hilles, MD; and Steve O'Brien. Commissioner Young moved that the above people be appointed as listed. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Program Var- Ms. Kirkpatrick explained that the Mental Health Division iance for does site visits on various programs, and they had done the Alcohol one on the drug & alcohol treatment program. She gave the & Drug Treat- Board a copy of their review. She said that the state ment Program requires certain conditions be met, and they are not at this time equiped to meet the state's condition on record-keeping. She is requesting that the Board request a variance to this condition. She gave the Board a draft letter requesting this variance. She noted that they have over 200 persons in the alcohol program, which far exceeds the caseload of other counties. This is why they are unable to maintain the records on the level that the state requires. There was some further minor discussion. Page 2 of 6 'Deschutes County Board of Commissioners January 27, 1982 - Regular Meeting MOTION: YOUNG moved that the letter to Dr. Joseph Treleaven asking for a variance for certain requirements being asked for by the director be approved. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Consideration MOTION: PAULSON :roved to appoint Bill Mayfield to the of appointment Deschutes County Fair Association Board of to the Des- Directors. chutes County YOUNG: Second. Fair Assoc. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. Board of Dire- PAULSON: AYE. ectors YOUNG: AYE. The Board will send Mr. Mayfield a letter advising him of this appointment. Adoption of Jordan Maley, County Coordinator, introduced Perry Hereford, Historic a member of the Deschutes County Historical Society, to Landmarks the Board. Mr. Hereford explained that it had taken them Criteria a long time to formulate this criteria. He gave some back- ground on how the group had arrived at this criteria, and explained that they are now seeking the Board's approval of this criteria. Commissioner Young asked how they might stop someone from tearing down a building if it was des- ignated a historical site. Mr. Hereford said that they could put a stop work order on the building for 30 days, which would give them some time to do some research on the building, and perhaps hold public hearings on the matter. Mr. Maley said that they had met with the new owners of the Pine Tavern to inform them of the tax credits avail- able if they were to maintain the building. After talking to the new owners, they found out that plans are to restore the building to more of its original state. He discussed the improvements they are making. There was some further general discussion. Chairman Shepard read aloud Resolution #82-001, providing for the acceptance of the Deschutes County Land Mark Com- mission Rating Criteria. MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve Resolution #82-001. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Commercial Before the Board was Resolution #82-002, a resolution Feasibility establishing Sanitation Fees for Commerical Facility Fee for Sani- Feasibilities and Permits. tation MOTION: PAULSON moved to approve Resolution #82-002. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Rick Isham, County Counsel, noted that this becomes effective upon signing and recording. *Deschutes County Board of Commissioners January 27, 1982 - Regular Meeting Consideration Chairman Shepard read aloud the ordinance by title. of Adoption MOTION: PAULSON moved that the first reading be by of Ordinance title only. #82-0020 YOUNG: SEcond. naming Hurtley VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. Road PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Chairman Shepard gave the first reading by title only of Ordinance #82-002. MOTION: PAULSON moved to have the second reading by title only. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Chairman Shepard gave the second reading by title only of Ordinance #82-002. MOTION: PAULSON moved to adopt Ordinance #82-002. YOUNG: Second. VOTE : SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Ratification MOTION: YOUNG moved to ratify the signing of the bargain of Bargain & and sale deed of January 22, 1982. Sale Deed PAULSON: Second. signed 1/22/82 VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Other Staff/ Mr. Isham noted that yesterday the Board considered the Public Con- addition of duties to the County Surveyor, which would cerns include the administrative duties of the County Engineer. He noted that there had been a concern expressed by the Board that this would set a precedent that the surveyor would always be the county engineer. There was also some concern about dual office holdings. The Board had asked Mr. Isham to look at setting up this position separately, making this a part-time appointment of a county engineer. He had made copies of AG opinion #74-61 which deals with dual office holding. He said that the main prohibition is when dealing with incompatibility of functions. A public official is not allowed to supervise himself as an employee. Another prohibition is that an elected official not be in a position as an elected official that directly or indirectly affect the appointed position. Mr. Isham said that he felt that the proposal would be feasible as long as these positions were maintained as separate and distinct positions, the supervisor not being the surveyor, and where the surveyor is not in a position to make decisions that affect the appointed position in any way. He also noted that they should maintain separate budgeting for the two positions. There was some further discussion on how this could be budgeted for. Page 4 of 6 'Deschutes County Board of Commissioners January 27, 1982 - Regular Meeting MOTION: PAULSON moved that the Board authorize the appropriate paperwork and job descriptions if any need to be drawn up. YOUNG: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Six month Tom Crabtree, Indigent Defense Attorney, was present to report on discuss this. He had sent the Board a letter dated January Public Defend- 25, 1982 with a six month report attached. He noted that ers Office in this six month period they had opened a total of 395 cases and closed 254. He said that they have switched to the "AMICAS" system for keeping statistics in public defenders offices. He noted that 16% of the cases that were closed were dismissed by the District Attorney's office. He then briefly discussed some of the figures contained in his report. He said that they anticipate the summer months being busier for them. He said that because of this, and due to the fact that the are opening more cases than they are closing, they may need to consider hiring a fourth attorney at some point. He said that starting January 1, 1983 the State will being paying for all indigent defense. At that point their responsibility to the Board will cease and they will look to the state for any further contract. There was some further discussion on the terms of their current contract with the county and on the state take-over of the courts. He expressed concern about their contract with the county terminating in the event of take-over by the state, and if the state does not choose to contract with them, they will be in the middle of on-going cases with no financial support. The Board agreed to send a letter to the State indicating their satisfaction with Crabtree & Rahmsdorff's services as indigent defense attorneys and recommend that they re- tain them as indigent defense contractors. There was some further discussion. Mike Maier, Director of Adminis- trative Services, asked for direction from the Board to have himself and Mr. Isham work up a six-month agreement for the program including budget material. The Board agreed. Discussion After review in the previous day's work session, Commissioner regarding in- Paulson suggested that based on the discussion, they don't formation col- take any forward type movement, but keep the door open lected by Bar- in case they would like to take such steps in the future. ney Cosgrove Chairman Shepard said that they would like to have a pro- concerning the posal in to the state by February 2 if the county wishes Jail situation to proceed. He said that if they wish to submit a proposal, in Deschutes they should notify the State of that intent immediately. County and Commissioner Paulson and Commissioner Young indicated that Nearby Coun- they were not supportive of submitting a proposal. ties page 5 of 6 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners January 27, 1982 - Regular Meeting Request for Before the Board was a request for refund in the amount Refund of $151.84 to Mrs. Veeck, permit number 81-408. The Board approved the request. Financial MOTION: YOUNG moved to approve the agreement between Agreement Deschutes County and Ross H. Brown and Jackson R. and Johnnie Frank for the purpose of fin- ancial arrangements. PAULSON: Second. VOTE: SHEPARD: AYE. PAULSON: AYE. YOUNG: AYE. Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS /ss Page 6 of 6 Ro ert C. aulson, Jr., Commi oner