2007-1590-Minutes for Meeting August 08,2007 Recorded 10/24/2007COUNTY OFFICIAL 1
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKS vd 2007'1590
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 10/24/2007 01;59;28 PM
111111111111111111111IIIII 11 III
2007-1500
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded to correct [give reason]
previously recorded in Book
or as Fee Number
and Page
w a
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ora
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2007
Present were Commissioners Michael M. Daly and Dennis R. Luke; Commissioner
Tammy Baney was out of the office. Also present were Susan Ross, Property and
Facilities; and, or a portion of the meeting; Catherine Morrow, Community
Development; Joe Studer, Forester; Anna Johnson, Communications; Timm
Schimke; Sue Brewster, Sheriff Larry Blanton and Rebecca Hallin of the Sheriff's
Office; and Teresa Rozic, Property Management. Also present were eight other
citizens. No representatives of the media were in attendance.
The meeting began at 1: 30 p. m.
1. Presentation - The Trust for Public Land.
Brad Chalfant (of the Deschutes Basin Land Trust) introduced Geoffrey Roach
and Joshua Alpert of the Trust for Public Lands, who gave an overview of the
services offered by the Trust. Central Oregon, and in particular conservation
needs outside the cities, has become the number one priority for Oregon.
Priorities would be identifying lands to be protected, and planning conserved
lands to meet public needs.
The voters are leaning towards funding lands that can be conserved.
Nationally, the passage rate is very high and there is a uniform non-partisan
approval rate.
The key variables are the funding source, the amount and duration, the purposes
and uses for the funds, and the timing. The bigger question is whether people
are willing to pay for lands to remain in the public trust.
Commissioner Daly asked if specific projects could be targeted, such as Skyline
Forest. Commissioner Luke stated he would like to see a list of the projects and
what the public might think it important, perhaps through a poll. He expressed
concern that land would be taken out of production and public access might be
limited.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 1 of 6 Pages
A representative of the Bend Park and Recreation District said they have
worked with the Trust before on river properties. He pointed out that the
District wants to plan for open space, parks and trails in future UAR areas. The
County could enter into an intergovernmental agreement with them to talk
about this type of planning; and discussions could begin about annexing
properties into the District. They need to get ahead of the curve before the cost
of land ends up being as high outside of Bend as it is in.
Mr. Chalfant explained that this would fund wildlife habitat or park space; but
the Board could perhaps consider acquisition of some Measure 37 development
rights. This has been done elsewhere for a variety of purposes. The County
could help steer through priorities for the community.
Catherine Morrow said that public involvement needs to come before asking
them for money. She asked what the timing would be. It was explained that
the original work would run between $75,000 and $100,000, and this would
help to determine what the public finds most important. The County would end
up with the detailed mapping software used for developing the plan. Also, the
cities and County can use this set of tools to develop a long-range plan for the
entire region in regard to trails between cities, parks, and other ways to
conserve land.
Commissioner Daly stated that he was glad to hear about this possibility. He
added that at this time the public is being asked to approve the 9-1-1 levy, the
construction of a new jail and other items, and did not feel the time is right this
year to approach the public for possible funding. However, in the future, once
the desires of the public can be defined, this should be considered. He said that
the most obvious project is Skyline.
Mr. Chalfant stated that they are currently negotiating with the landowner of
Skyline. He hopes he can bring a presentation of these efforts to the Board
within next thirty days.
2. Review of Towing Company Contracts.
Sheriff Blanton said on May 24 extensions were sent to towing companies
regarding their towing contracts, with a meeting set for June 19. Comments
were requested by July 3. On July 10 two towing representatives were asked to
participate in discussions about how to get a reasonable consensus on the
contract. A draft has been developed and some work still needs to be done.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 2 of 6 Pages
Rebecca Hallin stated that the contract just dealt with impound and abandoned
vehicles in the past. This new contract would cover any vehicle the Sheriff is
involved in towing.
Sheriff Blanton said that there are many tow companies in the area, but the
Sheriff's Office gets complaints if the towing bill is too high. The only remedy
is small claims court. This is an attempt to let the companies conduct business
as usual in their private business, but to be consistent when towing vehicles for
the Sheriff's Office.
Representatives of the industry indicated there were a couple of minor language
issues regarding pricing structure. As a group they came up with something
agreeable. Just some language issues to make sure it is all covered. He added
that the County wanted a two-year contract, but there are costs to consider. The
cost of gasoline is the biggest unknown, and to get reliable people they have to
pay more.
Commissioner Luke stated that if a different rate could be justified after a year,
an addendum could be used without creating a new contract. Sue Brewster said
she would add some language concerning a cost of living adjustment. The
consensus of the Commissioners was that no public hearing is needed for this
situation since the towing companies have already been involved in the
development of the contract.
Timm Schimke stated that he developed a voucher to be presented at the landfill
gate; towing companies have had a big problem with abandoned motor homes.
The landfill can take camp trailers and cabovers, but not motor homes unless
they are dismantled. Those in the industry want to be proactive and get them
out of the woods before they become a safety issue.
3. Solid Waste Update.
Timm Schimke said that he authorized some extra paving of access roads that
was originally deleted. It appears that some of the contingency fund won't be
needed for other things.
Preliminary work is being considered on the demolition landfill RFP process.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 3 of 6 Pages
In regard to community-based education, the Eco Group changed from a non-
profit; their program is proprietary and he's trying to duplicate it. The County
is not the only entity involved; there is also the DEQ and the City of Bend, but
the County picks up most of the costs. The City has indicated it no longer
wants to participate. The Bend 2030 recommendation was to use the same
money allocated into waste reduction programs.
Commissioner Luke noted that a majority of the City of Redmond Council
seems to be in support of October 1 as the date to begin the increase in the
landfill tipping fee.
4. Forester Update.
Joe Studer said he drafted a memo to the Native Plants Society stating what is
being done regarding weeds and bitterbrush.
Mr. Stutler went over a list of what he has been involved in over the past few
months. (A copy of his report is attached.)
He said there has been a lot of support for fire control in the Brothers and
Alfalfa areas. The biggest concern is the land used for grazing; once it burns it
can't be used again for three years. It also causes a loss of habitat for the sage
grouse, which is close to being listed as endangered.
The interagency group is putting together an evacuation plan for the greater
Bend area, and about 20 tactical areas have been identified.
An important message was taken from meetings he attended in Nevada: 18,000
firefighters are committed in the west right now. Only four of the 18 teams are
now available. If there is a big fire, it will be a while until help can come in.
There are fewer and fewer people who are qualified and able to oversee fire
complexes.
There is a $200M grant on the horizon. With the help of Legal Counsel, he is
also putting together a plan to contract for a $2 million grant to coordinate work
on lands.
He is also working on a proposal for $770,000 funding that is left over and new
money for Title II and III projects. The County has to allocate where it should
go and how it should be managed.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 4 of 6 Pages
5. Discussion of Sales Agreement Language for La Pine Industrial Park
Property.
This will be addressed at a future date.
6. Update on Property Management Issues.
This was discussed under executive session.
7. Economic Development Grant Request(s).
None were offered.
8. Update of Commissioners' Schedules; Meeting Details.
None were offered.
9. Other Items.
The Board went into executive session under ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; and
ORS 192.660(2)(e), real estate negotiations.
Action was taken after conclusion of executive session
LUKE: Move that Property Management work with the Road Department to
explore making Chaney Road a public right of way, and come back to
the Board with a recommendation.
DALY: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
DALY: Chair votes yes.
LUKE: Move that the fee be returned to the applicant.
DALY: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
DALY: Chair votes yes.
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 5 of 6 Pages
Being no further items to come before the Board, Commissioner Daly
adjourned the meeting at 4:10 p. m.
DATED this 8th Day of August 2007 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
Michael
Dennis R. Luke, Vice Chair
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
Tammy Baney, Commissioner
Minutes of Administrative Work Session Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Page 6 of 6 Pages
Geoffrey W Roach
THE
Director
geoff.roach@tpl.org TRU S T
for
PUBLIC
Oregon Field Office LAND
806 SW Broadway
Suite 300
Portland, OR 97205
T (97I) 244-4I03
F. (971) 244-05I8 - -
wwwtpl.org
I
-
- -
- -MYa,>J
C/
Z~__ _
G
tt~ ~
❑ -c
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ore
WORK SESSION AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2007
Presentation - The Trust for Public Land - Josh Alpert, Director, NW
Conservation Services
2. Review of Towing Company Contracts - Sue Brewster
3. Solid Waste Update - Timm Schimke
4. Forester Update - Joe Stutler
5. Discussion of Sales Agreement Language for La Pine Industrial Park Property -
Susan Ross
6. Update on Property Management Issues - Teresa Rozic
7. Economic Development Grant Request(s) - Susan Ross
8. Update of Commissioners' Schedules; Meeting Details
9. Other Items
PLEASE NOTE:
At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to: ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations;
ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues
Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated.
If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
Growth
- Several years ago began discussions with District
Number one priority for TPL Oregon
Bend 2030 Vision Plan
TPL as partner for conservation vision
- TPL as partner for conservation finance
Deschutes County
- Conservation need outside of Bend
Skyline Forest
Metolius
Redmond
Sisters
Conversations
Commissioner Baney/County Planner
Redmond City Manager
Bend City Council
1
What does TP Do?
Conservation Helping communities to develop
Vision implementation strategies for their land
conservation goals.
Conservation Helping government partners and
Finance communities to create funding for
parks and land conservation
Conservation Helping government partners and
Transactions communities to evaluate and purchase
lands
TPL helps agencies and
communities define conservation
priorities, identify lands to be
protected, and plan networks of
conserved land that meet public
need.
2
Conservation Vision Process
e,
Constituency GIs mapping Conservation Action
Building Analysis Finance, Planning
Litchfield Hills, CT: Preserving natural beauty
St. Louis Metropolitan Parks District: Creating a vision for historic
preservation along the river
Gallatin County, MT: A ranching community votes to protect a way of life.
San Diego, CA: Sustaining biodiversity
1 4; I1 I[t
1! ttt
w i. I
3
King County Greenprint
Puget Sound
Shoreline Strategy
TPL helps states, counties, and
municipalities, create and pass
legislation and mount ballot
measures that generate new
funds for conservation. TPL's
national research team provides
analysis and recommends a
funding strategy that results in
measures aligned with public
priorities.
4
Wenatchee
Conservation Vision
Ballot Measures 2002 -tl- 2006
f
•192 •133 •219 •140 •180
measures measures measures measures measures
•143
measures
passed
(75%)
• $5.5
billion
created
•99
measures
passed
(74%)
• $1.2
billion
created
•164
measures
passed
(75%)
• $4.1
billion
created
•111
measures
passed
(79%)
• $1.7
billion
created
•133
measures
passed
(74%)
• $6.7
billion
created
9
C se atio Measures in 00
Voters approved 132 of 180 measures in 28 different
states: 73% passage rate
Over $6.7 billion in new conservation dollars were
generated
Most conservation dollars ever raised in one year
Oregon
City of Eugene- $27m acquisition bond measure,
passed with 59% support
Metro Portland- $227m natural areas bond measure,
passed with 59% support
,9
5
LandVote Ballot Measures 1998 - 2005
- $mea
'
"`t. g
Measures 1998-2005
. Measure pass
Measure fall
t Statew4e mee - pass
Staeewide measure tai
if
Who is Creating Funding?
Since 1994, Voters Have Approved 1,274 Land Conservation Ballot
Measures, Authorizing $31 Billion in Conservation Funding"
State 3d~e
i
County
~I.
Municipal
Special
District 3%
source: The rmst for PoOllc Land's LandVO e"Database
Cons. Funds Approved
100% _ $31 8
35%d
in Florida. New York. and
Men 12
6
Successful Measures
100% = 1,274
Passage R tes
Consistently 6
Conservation Ballot Measures Pass Nearly 80% of the
Time, With Voter Support Nearly 60% Across All
Jurisdictions
Success Rates by Jurisdiction
$ Approved
% Pass
Jurisdiction Type
# Fail
# Pass
Total
billion
by Juris
Avg. "Yes"
State
6
32
38
12.1
84%
61%
County
69
234
303
10.9
77%
59%
Municipal
292
972
1,264
7.5
77%
59%
Special District
24
36
60
0.5
60°/y^
56%
Total
391
1,274
1,665
31
77% '
59%
Source. The Trust for Publk L-d, L-V--Database
C."O'nsexvafi"O'n 849/6, of, I%Aez-,sures, Pa s- cl,
Year
1996
# • TPL/TCC Measures
27
Wins
26
Conservation Funds
Approved
$0.6 billion
1997
13
11
$0.2 billion
1998
34
30
$4.1 billion
1999
14
12
$0.9 billion
2000
71
55
$4.2 billion
2001
41
31
$0.7 billion
2002
61
47
$4.4 billion
2003
22
21
$0.8 billion
2004
52
45
$2.5 billion
2005
46
41
$0.8 billion
2006
•
49
'
41
$4.9 billion
$24.2 billion
13
7
41C
u r or N vona Trends
Bipartisan Red State/
Blue State popularity
Not subject to economic
fluctuations
Broad support base:
environmental and business
community
Leading States: NJ, CO, FL
15
17-LIs onseev t o Finance vacas
Feasibility Research
- Public Opinion Surveys
Program Recommendations
Ballot Measure Design
- Legislative Support
- Public opinion surveys and
focus groups
- Strategic campaign planning
Campaign management and
fundraising
- Selection of media professional
- Message development,
communications
- Compliance with campaign
finance laws
16
8
Raval[i County, Montana
- Pop. 40,000
- The Bitterroot
Valley between the
Bitterroot and
Sapphire Mountains
- Supplied timber for
the Butte copper
mines.
- $10 million bond
measure for working
farms, ranches and
forest easements
eta
1s , Oda
f
,7
is
9
Metro
Po a,'and, Oregon
• Pop. 1.6 million
• $227.4 million bond measure
- $168.4 million for land acquisition/easements
- $44 million pass through to local park
providers
- $15 million grant program
Aye for m'.Z.,isul Ballot Mleasures
Coalitions of Feasibility and
elected officials, Legal Research
land trusts,
local leaders,
and others
assembled
ELECTION
DAY!
Public Opinion Measure
Polling development
(ballot language
- written, filed, and
finalized)
Communication Fundraising
of Message
(direct mail,
advertising,
earned media,
PR)
Campaign
Coalition
building &
community
outreach
19
20
10
Bey ry an.,ablle in Measure Design
• Funding Source
• Amount (and duration)
• Purposes/Uses of Funds
• Timing (choice of election date)
• Management/Accountability
'e-pl: Feasibility Research
Explore fiscal capacity and finance options
* Evaluate legal issues and election history
Assess open space, working lands and
conservation priorities
If
11
Step 20 Public info vals
Determine potential level of public support for
financing land conservation
Test voter priorities, sample ballot language,
spending tolerance, fiscal safeguards
12
Public Opinion Surveys
Key Demographics
Who is our base?
Who is likely to oppose?
Who are swing voters/persuadables?
April 2004 alf oral GI Rev ?s W„
Support for an
a> Top national goals for land conservation
(ranked "very important")
t 84% feel it's very important to buy land to
protect drinking water quality; 75% to improve
water quality in our lakes, streams and rivers
- Quality of life: 70%
- Protect working farms and ranches: 63%
- Protect natural areas: 62%
25
TS
13
Voter Support for Conservation Purposes
Drinlang Water
89%
Water Quality/Hvers/Sbeans
81%
Natural Lands/Areas
849/6:
Mdife
84
Reserve WtDhc Lands
7080%,
d
Public Access (water)
751
N
a
Farm/Ranchland
75%
7
IL
Park lnprovement(General)
74%;
Scenic Views
72%
Open space
71%
Acquisitron
of SpecBkally Named Parcel/Area
B91/0
Bike, hike, w ark, ride trails
69°/4
Land for Parks/Brownfield Redeveloprrent
61%
50%
60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Percent Support
Based on 25 polls conducted by the Trust for Public Land, Dec. 2003 Dec. 2004
22
Step 3: IF1 `Baca c" ~ ~S'
Covering the choice of funding mechanism,
the amount and duration of financing,
expenditure priorities and public
accountability
a u.
Design measure to meet legal requirements,
reflect popular priorities and attract public and
political support
28
14
Anatomy of a Ballot Title
Shall Metro preserve natural areas;
i
areas'
68 % eservingnat
/
~
mporta
very ry
exfremey
mportant
vs
.
'Preserving open space'
'Protecting fish and wildlife
habitat'
protect fish, wildlife;
57%extremely7very important
67% exfremelylveryimportant
improve water quality;
'Improving water quality"
I6% exfremelyrLery important
issue $227.4 million
7e. 'Yes' vote
When told the average homeowner
will pay $2.92 per month.
in general obligation bonds;
-Ail of the bond funds would be
subject to an annual independent
audit published in the newspaper.'
audit spending?
73% more fikeryto support
the measure
Shall the Board of Ravalli County Commissioners be authorized to issue and
sell general obligation bonds of Ravalli County solely for the purpose of
preserving open lands in Ravalli County by purchasing land, conservation
easements, and other interests in land from willing land owners for the
following purposes: manage growth, preserve open lands, protect water
quality of streams and the Bitterroot River, maintain wildlife habitat.
protect drinking water sources, pay landowner costs and related transaction
costs associated with an approved project., and pay costs associated with the
sale and issuance of the bonds in the principle amount of Ten Million and
00/100 Dollars ($10,000,000), which bonds shall bear interest at a rate to be
determined at a competitive sale, payable semiannually during a term of not to
exceed twenty (20) years and redeemable on an interest payment date after
one-half of their term. with all expenditures based on recommendations of
an Open Lands Board, after public comment, approval by the Board of
Ravalli County Commissioners. and subject to Ravalli County's yearly
independent audit?
15
1997 Ballot Language - Lost 61% to 39%
Shall Adams county taxes be increased $5, 000, 000... by a countywide
sales tax of one-fifth of one percent ...for fifteen years ...for the purpose
of acquiring, constructing, equipping, operating and maintaining open
space and parks and recreational facilities (the "Open Space
Tax'): and shall all or a portion of the revenues from such tax be
deposited in a special fund to be known as the 'Adams County Open
Space Sales Tax Capital Improvement Fund" and utilized solely to
provide the capital improvements authorized in Adams County
Resolution No. 92-2 or for repayment of bonds: and shall all revenues
from such tax and any earnings on such revenues... constitute a voter-
approved revenue change: and shall such tax be imposed, collected,
administered and enforced as provided in Adams County Resolution
No. 93-1 as amended by Adams County Resolution No. 97-2?
1999 Ballot Language - Passed 90% to 460%
Shall Adams County taxes be increased $5.5 million, and whatever
amounts are raised annually thereafter, by a countywide sales tax of
one-fifth of one percent (20 cents on a $100 purchase), effective
January 1, 2000, and automatically expiring after 7 years, with the
proceeds to be used solely to preserve open space in order to limit
sprawl, to preserve farmland, to protect wildlife areas,
wetlands, rivers and streams, and for creating, improving
and maintaining parks and recreation facilities, in
accordance with Resolution 99-1, with all expenditures based on
recommendations of a citizen advisony commission and subject to an
annual independent audit and shall all revenues from any such tax and
any earnings thereon, constitute a voter appro ved. revenue change.
31
16
Step 5: NIna a Campaign
Structure the campaign
governance committees and
create plan for fundraising
Design communications and
media mix
® Get out the vote
Daschjutes County
Funding TPL
Conservation Finance
$20,000 grant from Brainerd Foundation for polling
Hewlett Foundation to cover research, time
Conservation Vision
TPL Oregon Field Office commitment
Jurisdictional commitment (County, Cities, Park and Rec District)
Blue Ribbon Committee
- Tom Atkins
Senator Ben Westlund
Jade Mayer, Brooks Resources
Greg Cushman
Brad Chalfant, Deschutes Basin Land Trust
Kathy Oxborrow
Bend Metro Parks and Rec District Board Member
JJ
Ja
17
PL " nservadon Finance Information
35
18
THE TRUST for PUBLIC LAND
C O N S E R V I N G L A N D F O R P E O P L E
Conservation Finance
Lobbying and
Campaign Management
TPL also has a campaign and
lobbying affiliate called The
Conservation Campaign that works
with business leaders, advocacy
groups, and elected officials to
support the adoption of legislative
and ballot measures.
Learn more at:
wv,w.conservationcampaign.oi-g
The Trust for Public Land
conserves land for people to enjoy
as parks, gardens, and other natural places,
ensuring livable communities
forgenerations to come.
wwwtpi.org
Creating Public Funding for Conservation
In order to protect water quality, preserve family farms and ranches, manage growth,
and set aside parks for growing populations, many state and local governments want
to expand their park and open space systems. The Trust for Public Land's
Conservation Finance team advises governments on conservation funding and helps
to design, pass, and implement measures that dedicate new public Funds for parks
and land conservation. TPL identifies the right holding source and amount, and cre-
ates measures aligned with public priorities to mobilize broad-based support.
Feasibility Research
TPL explores funding and measure options and evaluates their legal,
fiscal, and political constraints.
Public Opinion Surveys
TPL manages surveys by expert polling firms to gauge voter support
for alternative funding methods and measure types.
Measure Design
TI'L recommends the optimal funding method, amount of funding,
election timing, and ballot language.
Program Design and Evaluation
TPL provides models and recommendations for operating conservation
programs.
Center for Conservation Finance
The Center for Conservation Finance conducts and publishes research on an array
of Funding topics and provides insights into emerging trends in land conservation.
LandVote Database
This online database brings together a comprehensive history of more
than woo conservation-related ballot measures since 1996.
Conservation Almanac
TPL compiles information on conservation programs, public spending,
and the progress of conservation in all So states.
Reports and Research
TPL publishes a wide range of reports and case studies including The
Conservation Finance Handbook, Economic Benefits of Parks and Open Space, and Local
G rempri nting for Growth.
Photo: Dominic Oldmhaw
THE TRUST for PUBLIC LAND
C O N S E R V I N G L A N D F O R P E O P L E
Greenprinting
aF
The Trust for Public Land's greenprinting services are practical and action-
c x
oriented, informed by more than 30 years of experience in real estate transac-
tions and conservation finding. Many communities continue to work with
> 'tF:
.
TPL on the conservation finance and land protection strategies that follow a
. ''lam
Aft
greenprinting effort.
The Trust for Public Land (TPL) uses state-of-the-art computer models cre-
11
ated with Geographic Information System (G I S) software to analyze commu-
.
nity-based data. Greenprinting helps communities make informed decisions
about land conservation. It can galvanize public support and encourage part-
ners to work toward common goals. Through a close working relationship
with ESRI, the world leader in G I S software, TPL has developed G I S models
The Trust for Public Land's green-
that combine layers of spatial information to guide growth-management
printing services are practical and
efforts:
action-oriented, informed by more
than ;o years of experience in real
Conservation Priorities
estate transactions and conservation
A community defines its own criteria for the lands it wants to protect. Its
funding. Many communities con-
highest-priority lands are then mapped on a greenprint.
tinuc to work with TPL on the
conservation finance and land pro-
Parks Gap Analysis
tection strategies that follow a
greenprinting effort.
Mapping reveals which neighborhoods are most in need of parks and where
land in those neighborhoods might be available to create parks.
Watershed Protection
Please contact:
Prcccc Robcrtson
National GIS Director
(505) 988-5977
brcecerobcrtson(,tpl.org
The Trustfor Public Land
conserves land for people to enjoy
as parks, gardens, and other natural places,
ensuring livable communities
forgenerations to come.
By mapping stream buffer areas, slope profiles, soil types, and other data,
greenprinting shoves where land conservation can protect water quality
Fragmentation Modeling
Those models identify lands whose conservation would create contiguous
natural resources such as forests, wetlands, and wildlife habitat.
Trail Linkages
Greenprinting finds opportunities to link or expand existing trail systems.
Development Forecasting
Models project which lands--including important conservation lands-are
most likely to be developed for commercial or residential uses.
www tpi.org
THE TRUSTfor PUBLIC LAND
C O N S E R V I N G LAND F O R P E O P L E
Conservation Transactions
Protecting Land for People
The Trust for Public Land works
with willing landowners to pur-
chase land for protection and
then conveys the land to a public
agency or land trust for long-term
stewardship. To complete transac-
tions TPL secures financing from
a wide variety of public and pri-
vatc sources.
Since 1912 TPL has protected
2.2 million acres in 48 states.
The Trust for Public Land
conserves land for people to enjoy
as parks, gardens, and other natural places,
ensuring livable communities
forgenerations to come.
How TPL Completes Transactions
The Trust for Public Land (TPL) acts as a principal in land transactions and, as
such, assumes the risks and costs associated with buying, owning, leasing, and sell-
ing land. TPL is not a broker, agent, or guarantor for transactions between other
parties.
Sometimes TPL acquires conservation easements and transfers them to public
ownership. Easements restrict development of land while keeping it in private
ownership and preserving productive uses, such as farming and sustainable forestry.
TPL conveys land or easements to public agencies at or below fair market value as
established by an appraisal that strictly meets the agency's requirements. In most
transactions, TPL does not charge the agency a fee for staff time or costs. As a
qualified 501(c) (3) public charity TPL is supported by charitable donations.
Significant support comes from donations of land value or cash from landowners
who sell property to TPL.
Working with :Landowners
Landowners appreciate working with TPL because as a private party, T P L can
move quickly, confidentially, and predictably. TPL structures transactions to meet
the financial and timing needs of landowners. TPL also provides expertise in tax
benefits, appraisals, title issues, property surveys, and public agency procedures.
Working with Public Agencies
Public agencies appreciate that TPL can often secure transaction funding and
provide the extra staff, financial expertise, and legal support needed to move
quickly. TPL coordinates due diligence to ensure that price and condition are
acceptable. Whether acting as a principal in the transaction or not, TPL may pro-
vide technical assistance in acquiring land in cases involving contaminated sites or
-brownfields".
www.tpi.org
Photo: M."Jin I-L--
THE TRUST for PUBLIC LAND
C O N S E R V I N G L A N D F O R P E O P L E
Benefits to Public Agencies
Everyone who acquires land for public use understands how complicated it can be to
align the needs of private property owners seeking to sell or protect land with the
needs of public agencies seeking to acquire it. The Trust for Public Land (TPL)
structures transactions that align those needs, facilitating a successful acquisition.
TPL can:
The Trust for Public Land
conserves land for people to enjoy
as parks, gardens, and other natural places,
ensuring livable communities
forgenerations to come,
www.tpl.org
Act fast, assume risk
TPL acquires and sells land in its own name, assuming the risks of ownership as
well as the costs associated with buying, holding, and selling. Because it functions
as a private purchaser, TPL can move quickly in the marketplace in ways that public
agencies often cannot. TPL may assume ownership of a property until an agency has
the resources to acquire it, or until environmental cleanup has been completed.
Meet agency purchase requirements, secure funds
TPL sells land to public agencies at or below Fair market value, as established by an
independent appraisal that meets strict agency standards. TPL solves complex issues,
such as title irregularities and disputes over water rights, property contamination,
and pending litigation. TPL can raise funds from multiple public and private sources,
secure private interim financing, or use such financing tools as installment and lease-
purchase sales.
Resolve complexities, defuse conflicts
TPL excels at assembling a single parcel of land from smaller, individually owned
properties, and at removing buildings or reconfiguring property boundaries to meet
agency requirements. TPL helps businesses, community and environmental groups,
and other stakeholders to resolve conflicts over landuse or property valuation and
can bring together agencies that might not see eye-to-cyc on conservation priorities.
Handle innovative financing and distressed properties
TPL meets landowners' financial needs with such tools as life estates, annuities,
and payment schedules, thus advancing a transaction. TPL resolves issues around
properties in poor condition and then prepares those parcels for use as parks.
Offer a full suite of services
TPL seeks long-term relationships with public agencies by providing services
that include setting priorities for conservation, raising conservation funds, and
acquiring land.
Photo: Jerry & Marcy Monkman
Solid Waste Update
August 8, 2007
Agenda
1. North Area Update - extra paving
2. Demo investigation RFP
3. Recycling promotion and education grant
4. Other
Deschutes County Solid Waste Education and Promotion Program
ri arrant
Focus Area 1: Youth Education
$50,000
Focus Area 2: Community Events and Presentations
$6,500
Focus Area 3: Business Technical Assistance and Education
$5,000
Grant
Focus Area 4: Materials Exchange
$12,500
Agreement
Focus Area 5: Annual Report
$1,250
Contingency
$1,400
Total
$76,650
CBSM Project Lawn and Garden Waste Prevention and Conservation $65,000
TOTAL
Revised
$141,650
Focus Area 1: Youth Education
$50,000
Focus Area 2: Community Events and Presentations
$6,500
Focus Area 3: Business Technical Assistance and Education
$5,000
Grant
Focus Area 4: Materials Exchange
$12,500
Agreement
Focus Area 5: Annual Report
$1,250
Contingency
$1,400
Bend 2030 Waste Prevention Education and Promotion
$65,000
Total $141,650
Since our last update (June 13th) the following are the significant updates for the BOCC: Page 1 of 3
Bonnie Baker
From: Joe Stutler
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:13 PM
To: Mike Daly; Tammy Baney; Dennis Luke; Bonnie Baker; Dave Kanner; Anna Johnson
Subject: Forester Update
Since our last update (June 13th) the following are the significant updates for
the BOCC :
• Presented ICS for Law Enforcement to Bend PD.
• Organized the Central Oregon Preparedness and pre-fire season meeting
@ Deschutes County Fairground with all state, federal and local
agencies. This included a two hour presentation from Gordon Graham on
risk management.
• Attended the WUI Blue Ribbon Panel in DC along with Gary Marshall
from City of Bend. Our presentation was Project Wildfire and the
FireFree Programs.
• Conducted wildland fire refresher training for public works employees to
enable the use of Deschutes County owned equipment and operators for
emergency wildland fire work.
• Began the development of the last CWPP for Deschutes County by
conducting a work session with "ALL" the residences of Brothers Oregon.
We will have subsequent meeting and expect to have the last piece of the
Deschutes County CWPP completed by end of September. From there,
updates to the existing CWPP's and tracking fuels accomplishments will be
the priority.
• Completed the issuance of a contract for Tollgate to treat hazardous
fuels in the common areas. This project is funded by a National Fire
Plan Grant that previously was awarded to Sisters which was unable to
implement.
• Project Wildfire recognition ceremony which provided formal recognition
to businesses, neighborhood and individuals who best exemplifies the
8/7/2007
Since our last update (June 13th) the following are the significant updates for the BOCC: Page 2 of 3
mission of Project Wildfire.
• Conducted a fire season update and safety meeting for Deschutes County
Search and Rescue.
• Participated in an interagency effort to plan the orderly evacuation of
the "Greater Bend" area in the event of a significant natural disaster
i.e. wildland fire, hazardous material spill or flood. This will be several
months in the completion but will serve all agencies in the event of such
an incident.
• Continued the inspection for hazardous fuels cleanup on previously owned
county lots to satisfy the deed restrictions. Out of the original 78 lots
we have less than 10 that need additional work, only 3 have made no
effort.
• From July 19-August 1St I served as Deputy Incident Commander on two
large wildland fire complexes in Northern Nevada. One complex (Red
House) burned in excess of 80,000 acres and the second (Wild Horse
Zone of the Murphy Complex) burned in excess of 660,000. In addition
to the long hours and two weeks of "sleeping in a tent" the two most
important lessons learned was that relationships before the smoke go a
long way when the fires hit; the second lesson that will apply to the
eastern portion of Deschutes County was succinctly stated by a Nevada
ranch owner, "I don't care if my house burns down, I can rebuild it in 6
months or less, but when you burn my feed on public lands I can't use
the land for three years. How would you survive three years without
that livelihood?"
• On August 1, 2007 a great interagency effort successfully stopped the
Woodside Ranch Fire @ 600 acres. There was some great firefighting,
outstanding interagency cooperation and if in fact the fire had not
burned into the 18-Fire we would have had a significantly different
outcome. Lesson learned there was keep up the interagency efforts with
all partners and treat the fuels on both public and private lands.
8/7/2007