Loading...
2010-78-Minutes for Meeting January 27,2010 Recorded 2/16/2010DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS ~J 2010-78 NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK ~I COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 02/16/2010 1145;58 AM I I I II III II IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 -78 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded at the request of [give reason] previously recorded in Book _ or as Fee Number to correct and Page Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010 Present were Commissioners Dennis R. Luke, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Joe Studer, County Forester; Tom Anderson and Peter Russell, Community Development Roger Olson, Road Department; Capt. Tim Edwards of the Sheriffs Office; Hillary Borrud of The Bulletin; and seven other citizens, including Tiffany Telfer of Senator Telfer's office. Chair Luke opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of Weed Control Enforcement. Dave Kanner said the members of the Weed Board requested that the Weed Inspector be given some additional enforcement authority when a property owner does not comply with the County's request to clear noxious weeds. He stated that the Board does not have to be given more authority. Under State statute it is a Class A violation to not control noxious weeds on property. The issue is that when the Board created the Weed District and authorized the District to do what it is doing, there was an understanding that voluntary compliance would be sought and no penalties would be assessed. However, this is not in writing but has been the general practice. The question is whether the Board wants the District to use all of the authority given by statute. The other question is, because it is a violation of a State statute and not a County ordinance, a citation has to be issued by a Deputy or by someone who has been designated to do so and has been deputized specifically for this purpose. Commissioner Luke stated that some of the biggest violators at the time were the Forest Service, the Park & Recreation District, the BLM and the City of Bend. Therefore, at that time, the idea was to educate and not necessarily to enforce. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 1 of 8 Pages Mr. Kanner added that the work of the Weed District and Weed Inspector does apply within the City since it is a State statute. Paul Stell of the Weed Board said that the City is revising Code in this regard, and they would be doing enforcement within the City. Capt. Tim Edwards stated that they do not want to be the weed police, but could deputize someone on the Weed Board. Commissioner Unger feels that there is a mid-ground before citing someone. Brenda Pace of the Weed Board passed out a summary sheet showing information on fifteen counties. Fourteen have a specific ordinance that allows them to enforce the law. Most of the cities have had to agree to allow the counties to do the enforcement for them. There is a process followed to get to compliance. When the notice is sent out, and the owners know it can be enforced, compliance was more common. Ten counties have never had to collect a fine. Deschutes County may have more problems because it is less agricultural than some others. The point is, there would be no additional labor. There would be some cost if it went to the Sheriff or the Courts, but that is outside of the Weed Board's work. The difference in the wording of the letter makes all the difference. Roger Olson stated that problems are typically reported to the Road Department over the phone. Dan Sherwin makes the first call, and often people will comply at that time once they know what to do. Spring Olson of the Weed Control District said she deals with about 200 landowners a year. She spends time educating each one on the process. If the owner does not comply, there is nothing she can do about it. Cheryl Howard of the Weed Board started the Weed Pull event, which started out very small but has gone statewide a few years later. Over 1,000 people helped last year. At first the people who showed up did not know what to do. Since 2006, many volunteers are now very educated. Many of them are dealing with weeds on their own property or the neighbors', but want to reach out to others who do not comply. Education is important but there needs to be enforcement potential to handle those that will not do anything about the problem. Many properties that became vacant were then overrun with noxious weeds. Realtors and developers were contacted to address this problem, and probably about 95% of the properties were appropriately handled. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 2 of 8 Pages A representative of Sunriver said they have had their own program in place since 2002. It started on a voluntary basis and went up from there. Knapweed was a big problem at the time. Joe Stutter added that there are issues with eradication through chemicals and herbicides. Other options are the use of fire and mechanical removal. There needs to be a plan in place. The consensus was that this problem that needs to be addressed. Mr. Blust said the recommendation is to endorse the procedures plan, giving them another tool to use. Commissioner Baney stated that if this is going to be considered a serious issue, they need to be enabled to address it. Mr. Pilliod said that perhaps the City of Bend wants to enact its own and have this go through Municipal Court. Redmond might want to do the same. It may be that in cases inside the cities, but perhaps there should be alternative officers who would like to have the authority in those municipalities may be able to get familiar with this thorough the Sheriff's Office. Mr. Anderson will bring back a modified agreement and, in the meantime, Mr. Kanner will talk with City representatives. 2. Conference Call - Public Affairs Counsel regarding February Session. Mark Nelson and Erica Hagedorn of the Public Affairs Counsel, along with Representative Gene Whisnant, spoke with the Board via a conference call. The two tax measures did pass (66 and 67), overwhelmingly in Multnomah County and some of the other big counties, which carried the measures for the State. The revenue forecast is coming out in February. People feel it might be flat or down a bit from December. The Senate has introduced two bills, the House has introduced one bill, and committees are introducing bills as well. Probably there will be about 200 bills introduced in the 30-day special session. The will have a hard time getting it done within 30 days. Bills can be printed and introduced on the first day. There is a tight time frame for all of this. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 3 of 8 Pages Representative Whisnant said that there are several bills he will be signing on, but will not introduce any himself unless they have to do with job creation or the economy. Things will have to move fast and some things could fall through the cracks. There will not be time for much discussion of each. In regard to the ODOT Bridges Transportation Waiver - Tom Blust said that he supports the recommendation in the memo from the AOC. County has a good relationship with local entities on getting the dollars to where they do the best. Peter Russell said that local jurisdictions use different ways to measure trips. Primary trips can be computed in different ways, and the definitions in regard to land use and land use approvals are different. In regard to destination resorts, Representative Whisnant said the task force adjourned, with minor changes. He added that Nick Lelack is doing a good job representing Deschutes County. Erica said that the only change of concern is the housing impact analysis. Representative Whisnant stated that the wording was changed and the task force accepted it. For resorts, it was changed to a proportionate share for impacts. Regarding the surveyor being a non-partisan position, Commissioner Luke said that the County already did this several years ago. This is an adjustment. Recreation landowner liability is being discussed because of a lawsuit against the State. It is not known how this affects the County; for instance, the Fair & Expo Center. Mr. Kanner said he thinks there is already protection for public entities; this is for private landowners. Commissioner Luke stated that he thought it was due to an injury on public land where they were charged a fee. In regard to the Constitutional Amendment, it was felt that this probably will not go anywhere. SB 1024, highway access standards, relates to approach road permitting. Peter Russell and Tom Blust have reviewed this, and some major concerns are being raised. This will need to be discussed at AOC. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 4 of 8 Pages Commissioner Baney asked about three other bills: 3601, 1057 and 1039, which were introduced by local representatives. She wanted to know how these could be tracked. Mr. Kanner said that he has asked about the greenhouse gas bill. It needs to go to a regular session and not done in a quick process. Representative Whisnant said he would work on this one, which needs more discussion. The Governor has already agreed that the base year should be 2005. Representative Whisnant stated that he is working with Scott Johnson on the bill that addressed the distribution of funds. The new Director at the State, Mr. Harris, feels the distribution is for new funds only, but that is not right. He will meet with Mr. Harris and Dr. Goldberg to try to get this changed. They are already issuing new directives about distribution. He does not want to wait for a new census to do this. Commissioner Baney said that she is going to be on a conference call with Dr. Goldberg this week, so will try to learn more. Commissioner Unger noted that there are a lot of legislative concepts being discussed. Some are interesting, especially in regard to the use of domestic wells. This may need more discussion in the future. Tom Anderson said that the DSL indicated that they acquire land from BLM through the school fund trust. Some lot of record issues came up because of these conveyances, since parcels did not go through a local partition process. Therefore, they may not be legal lots. DSL has a placeholder bill to circumvent this lot of record issue, but it is supposed to be limited to parcels acquired by DSL under this fund. Tom Anderson said that this would come up as part of the County's receipt of DSL land, or any federal land that is conveyed. Commissioner Baney stated that she would like to be informed of anything relating to the Saturday market provisions for licensing temporary facilities. Erica said that the Department of Agriculture is looking at this, and a work group has been meeting to discuss it. Mr. Anderson added that he had some information on this issue. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 5 of 8 Pages 3. Presentation of Decennial Census. Gary Ollerenshaw of the U.S. Census Bureau provided some history on the Census, which started in 1790. The Constitution requires this, and has nothing to do with who is in political office at the time. The personal and confidential information gathered is released to the public every 72 years. Over $400 billion is passed to the States based on the Census, so it is important that everyone be counted. The average return the last time was about 60%. There is a local office located in Redmond, with thirteen employees to cover eighteen counties. Others will be trained to do the upcoming fieldwork. Hiring is done through test scores; veterans and U. S. citizens receive preference. On March 31, there will be interviews of the homeless population. In the past, $754 million came to Deschutes County, and federal grants equaled $92 million. He then went over the questions that will be asked. There are only ten. Forms will be sent out either by mail or personal delivery if there is a rural route situation. 4. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules. The one-night homeless count takes place on January 27, and Commissioner Baney will participate. Discussion occurred about conveyances related to the La Pine Rodeo and the La Pine Sewer District; and eight acres located next to the south transfer station. Mr. Kanner noted that the easiest way to resolve the issue is to acquire the land in a trade. Mr. Kanner said that the library in La Pine sits on a small triangle of land owned by the BLM, and it makes sense to include this in any trade. Teresa Rozic said it has taken over two years to get resolution on the southwest transfer station because the BLM says it does not have the staff to handle the process. Consensus was that the La Pine area transfers are a priority. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 6 of 8 Pages Commissioner Baney said that the Redmond Rod & Gun Club location evidently does not have the support of the surrounding property owners. Commissioner Unger observed that they do not create the problem that some people think they might. Crest Ridge Estates would like the County and BLM to consolidate land adjacent to the Estates to put it under one ownership. The BLM agrees with the Estates' rules regarding the use of dirt bikes, and this would make it easier for those rules to be enforced. Ms. Rozic stated that the BLM is very difficult to work with, as their priorities are not the same as the County's and their process is very slow. 5. Other Items. At 3:55, the Board went into Executive Session, called under ORS 192.660(2)(e), Real Estate Negotiations. Present were the three Commissioners, Dave Kanner, Erik Kropp, Susan Ross and Teresa Rozic of Property and Facilities; and Hillary Borrud of The Bulletin. The executive session ended at 4:05 p.m. Erik Kropp suggested that a public hearing be held on February 8 at 6:00 p.m. on the Skyliners Road event issue. This relates mostly to the use of the road by cyclists and in particular those who participate in cycling events. Cascade Cycling Classic changed its staging area last year, which helped. There were still complaints about the scheduling and blocking the road to vehicles. The first year of the U.S. Nationals started last year, and it is a two- year event. Commissioner Unger would like to see the County be consistent on any decision it makes. The group discussed a draft resolution regarding the use of the road and a fee to be imposed for events. Commissioner Luke suggested that the cost for service would need to cover having a Deputy present for however long the event might take. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, January 27, 2010 Page 7 of 8 Pages Mr. Kanner suggested that there could be a set fee and anything that is not used can be refunded. Commissioner Tammy said there should be a minimum set based on the hours, with an amount to be charged for any additional time. Mr. Kropp stated that some events might not need a Deputy present. Commissioner Baney said that she feels every event on this road, until it is reconstructed, should have a Deputy present for the duration of the event while it is taking place on the road. Mr. Kropp said that the average length of an event is about five hours. Commissioner Luke said that there are problems with other users of the road, including recreational bicyclists and those who travel the road for winter activities. Some of them do not drive or bicycle appropriately, either. Discussion occurred regarding limiting the number of events. It was felt this kind of restriction might be difficult to manage. A fee of $100 per event was felt to be a good starting point, in addition to the basic $35 processing fee. Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m. DATED this 27th Day of January 2010 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Dennis R. Luke, Chair 01 11.- V I Alan nger, Vice Chair C A~I VV,,-/ Recording Secretary Tammy Baney, Coi nissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Page 8 of 8 Pages Wednesday, January 27, 2010 n <Z* 4-4 x N N ~ c O o c rs" b O V~ ` v J l r~ G \S V V ~I n ~ 41 \ v C O %A •Cl) C Q) ! CL V1 L v S _ 0 I a Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010 1. Discussion of Weed Control Enforcement - Weed Board 2. Conference Call - Public Affairs Counsel regarding February Session 3. Presentation of Decennial Census - Gary 011erenshaw, U. S. Census Bureau 4. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules 5. Other Items Executive Session, called under ORS 192.660(2)(e), Real Estate Negotiations PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. `r TES WJ Department of Administrative Services p ~ Dave Kanner, County Administrator rA-~ 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 3BB-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 www. co. deschutes. on us January 20, 2010 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Dave Kanner RE: Noxious weed enforcement Last fall, you were each contacted individually by a member or members of the County Weed Board, requesting that Deschutes County create an ordinance to give the County Weed Inspector additional enforcement authority; specifically the authority to require private property owners to remove noxious weeds from their land and to take action, cite and fine, and lien the property if the owner refuses to do so. The Commissioners requested that the Weed Board draft an enforcement ordinance that could be brought forward for the Comm'issioners' review. As I met with Dan Sherwin and further researched this, it became clear that the authority the Weed Board is seeking already exists and that an additional order or ordinance is not necessary. Board Order 2002-037 (attached), which established Deschutes County as a weed control district, states, "The Board hereby appoints the Deschutes County Road Department Director as the County Weed Inspector to carry out the actions authorized and required pursuant to ORS 570.515 to 580.600." These statutes (which are attached) already give the weed inspector the right of entry on private land (570.530), the ability to require the owner or occupant to eradicate weeds (570.535), and the authority to eradicate weeds when the owner or occupant refuses to do so and to issue an itemized statement of expenses (570.545). The statutes also authorize the County Clerk to enter the itemized statement of expenses as a lien against the property. It is my understanding that although the Board of Commissioners granted this authority to the weed inspector in 2002, there was a policy decision made at that time that the County would rely on education and would not use this enforcement authority. As such, there is no formal action required by the Board in order to grant this authority, however, given that this would be a major change in direction for the County, there should at least be some consensus recorded in the minutes of your meeting that this is in fact the direction the County wishes to go. Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner There are a few other issues to which the Board must devote some attention. First, Legislature in 2009 renumbered the statutes and moved most of the language into chapter 569. At a minimum the Board should adopt an order acknowledging that the provisions of Board Order No. 2002-037 apply to the renumbered statutes. Second, the statute, as we read it, would seem to indicate that when enforcement action is to be taken, the Board must, on a case-by-case basis, establish a "reasonable" time within which a property owner must destroy noxious weeds after they have been notified that they must do so. Alternatively, the Board could adopt an order that establishes what a reasonable time frame is and apply it in all cases. Similarly, although the weed inspector is authorized by statute to enter private property to eradicate weeds, the statute also seems to indicate that the authority to enter any specific piece of property must be granted by the Board of Commissioners on a case-by-case basis. Again, the Board could adopt a blanket order authorizing entrance onto private property in all cases, without prior approval. Finally, 570.545(l) states that, "If the owner or occupant of the land fails or refuses to immediately destroy or cut the noxious weeds the weed inspector shall at once notify the district attorney of the county who shall at once take necessary steps for enforcement..." It is not clear from the statute exactly what this means and it would therefore be prudent to involve Mr. Dugan in any discussion of enforcement to clarify roles and expectations. Finally, the Weed Board believes there should be authority to cite and fine property owners who fail to comply with requests to eradicate noxious weeds. The authority to cite and fine is already contained in statute (renumbered as ORS 569.990(2)), however, since a violation of the statutes is a state violation, citations would have to be issued by an "enforcement officer" as defined in ORS 153.005. That would mean a sheriff's deputy, OSP officer, city police officer, etc. Per Mark Pilliod, "The County code has not specifically delegated enforcement authority beyond that contained in the statutes, so enforcement of violations has necessarily required the issuance of citations by a deputy sheriff. The BoCC could adopt an ordinance in the case of violations of weed abatement laws (or any county-declared violation), delegating enforcement authority to particular persons other than the Sheriff, but it has not done so. This is largely a political question." In other words, if the Board wants the weed inspector to have the authority to issue citations for violations of the noxious weed removal laws, it must delegate that authority by ordinance. Attached to this memo is a proposed enforcement procedure protocol that has been drafted by the Road Department. As you can see it continues to rely on voluntary compliance, but with the possibility of fines and enforcement thrown into the mix. We look forward to further discussion of this matter and the above policy choices at your work session of January 27. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES DESCHUTES COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL When a noxious weed infestation is brought to the attention of the County Weed Inspector an inspection of the site is warranted. 2. Each contact, attempt to contact, and the results of that contact shall be documented. The inspector shall visit the property and try to make an assessment of the infestation. If unable to make a determination from the public right of way the inspector shall make reasonable effort to contact the property owner or agent prior to entry as permitted in ORS 569.380. A reasonable effort may be a personal contact while at the site, a phone call, a notice left at the dwelling, or a letter. 4. If the inspector believes the property contains noxious weeds, the inspector shall either personally serve notice on the property owner or occupant, or post notice in three conspicuous places on the land. The notice shall contain: the date of service, the name of the weed or weeds growing on the land, and a statement setting forth that the weeds must be destroyed or must be prevented from producing seed within a specified time of not less than two days or more than 20 days (as determined by the inspector) from the date of service. The notice may contain an invitation to the property owner or occupant to visit with the inspector for clarification of any requirements relative to noxious weed abatement, alternative methods of achieving compliance and an agreement by which the property owner will control the noxious weeds by a date certain, together with follow up inspection. 5. If follow up inspection reveals that the noxious weeds have not been adequately or effectually controlled or not controlled as agreed upon then a citation will be issued, by a person duly authorized to cite for a violation, and served on the owner or occupant in accordance with applicable law. Each day that the noxious weeds are permitted to set seed could be considered a separate violation. 6. If the follow up inspections reveal compliance with the agreed upon treatment the inspector should continue to inspect the property for 1 and 1/2 growing seasons to verify that the noxious weeds are no longer growing or producing seed. DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS 202-157 MARY SUE PENHOLLOW, COUNTY CLERK CO MISSIONERS' JOURNAL 03/13/2002 02:24:33 PM For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON An Order Establishing Deschutes County as a Weed Control District * ORDER NO. 2002-037 * WHEREAS, ORS 570.515 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of Deschutes County, Oregon to declare Deschutes County a Weed Control District; and WHEREAS, the Board is authorized to declare certain weeds and plants noxious for the purposes of ORS 570.515 to 570.600; and WHEREAS the Board is authorized to appoint one or more weed inspectors to carry out the purposes of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 and to take such actions as authorized and appropriate to eradicate noxious weeds on private and public property; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, HEREBY ORDERS as follows: Section 1. That Deschutes County, as described in ORS 201.090, is declared to be a Weed Control District for the purpose of destroying noxious weeds and of preventing the seeding and spread of such other weeds and plants as a governing body may, for the purposes of ORS 570.515 to 570.600, declare noxious. The name of the District shall be the "Deschutes County Weed Control District." Section 2. The Board hereby appoints the Deschutes County Road Department Director as the County Weed Inspector to carry out the actions authorized and required pursuant to ORS 570.515 to 570.600. Section 3. The Weed Inspector shall publish the Notice, marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, describing the District and naming the weeds to be destroyed and to be prevented from producing seed within the District. This Notice shall be published in the Bulletin once each week for two consecutive weeks. The Weed Inspector is authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 immediately after the last publication and this Notice. Section 4. Pursuant to ORS 570.545, the County Weed Inspector and such assistance as the Weed Inspector may employ, may enter upon land or premises and do any act authorized by their order, and is further authorized to file with the County Clerk an itemized statement of expenses necessarily incurred, including the wages of the Weed Inspector, in accordance with ORS 570.545. PAGE 1 OF 2- ORDER No. 2002-037 (01/2002) S:\LEGAL\ROAD DEPT\WEED DISTRICT\ORDER ESTABLISHING WEED DISfRICT.DOC Section 5. Deschutes County Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to have printed a sufficient number of copies of ORS 570.570 and 570.575 and deliver such copies upon request to owners or operators of machinery described in ORS 570.570 and 570.575. Section 6. This order becomes effective on March 28, 2002. DATED this 25th day of January, 2002. Recording Secretary BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGQN PAGE 2 of 2- ORDER No. 2002-037 (01/2002) S:\LEGAL\ROAD DEPT\WEED DISTRIMORDER ESTABLISHING WEED DISTRICT.DOc EXHIBIT A NOTICE FORMATION OF DESCHUTES COUNTY WEED CONTROL DISTRICT The Board of County Commissioners' of Deschutes County, Oregon ("Board") has declared that Deschutes County, described in ORS 201.090, to be a Weed Control District. The district shall be known as the "Deschutes County Weed Control District." The following described weeds are declared to be noxious weeds and plants, and such weeds are to be destroyed, prevented and prevented from producing seeds within the District: FORMAL NAME COMMON NAME Cardaria spp. whitetop; hoary cress Carduus nutans musk thistle Centaurea pratensis meadow knapweed Centaurea repens Russian knapweed Centaurea solstitialis yellow starthistle Centaurea virgata squarrose knapweed Chondrilla juncea rush skeletonweed Cynoglossum officinale common houndstongue Daucus carota wild carrot Euphorbia esula leafy spurge Hydrilla verticillata hydrilla Isatis tinctoria dyer's woad Lepidium latifolium perennial pepperweed Lythrum salicaria purple loosestrife Onopordum acanthium Scotch thistle Peganum harmala African rue Potentilla recta sulfur cinquefoil Salvia aethiopis Mediterranean sage Senecio jacobaea tansy ragwort Solanum rostratum buffaloburr Taeniatherum caput-medusae medusahead rye Tamarix ramosissima tamarix Tribulus terrestris puncturevine Centaurea diffusa diffuse knapweed Centaurea maculosa spotted knapweed Cirsium arvense Canada thistle Conium maculatum poison hemlock Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Kochia scoparia kochia Linaria dalmatica dalmation toadflax Linaria vulgaris yellow toadflax or "butter and eggs" Ranunculus testiculatus bur buttercup Salsola iberica Russian thistle(= S. kali) Agropyron repens quackgrass Cicuta maculata water hemlock Cirsium vulgare bull thistle Convolvulus arvensis field bindweed Page 1 of 2 - EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDER NO. 2002-037 (0112002) S:LLepKRoad DepMeed District\Exhibit A (2-08-02) A.doe Conyza canadensis horseweed Cuscuta spp. dodder Elodea densa South American waterweed Hypericum perforatum St. Johnswort Iva axillaris poverty stumpweed Melilotus alba sweetclover Melilotus indica Indian sweetclover Verbascum thapsis common mullein Xanthium spinosum spiny cocklebur The Board has appointed a County Weed Inspector who has the power to enforce ORS 570.515 to 570.600 including the right to enter upon land or premises and destroy noxious weed or control them in such manner as will destroy all seeds of such noxious weeds. The County Weed Inspector is authorized to place liens upon real property to recoup the expenses (including the wages of the Weed Inspector) necessarily incurred in the destruction of noxious weeds. Every person, firm or corporation owning or occupying land within Deschutes County shall destroy or prevent the seeding on such land any noxious weeds within the meaning of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 or declared to be noxious by the Board no weed declared noxious shall be permitted (to produce seed) by the owner or occupier of land. Publication : Bulletin March 20 and 27, 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON TOM DEWOLF, Chair Page 2 of 2 - EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDER NO. 2002-037 (01/2002) SM-gahRoad DeptMeed District\Exhibit A (2-08-02) A.doc Chapter 570 - Plants; Inspection, Quarantine, Pest and Weed Control Page 1 of 5 WEED CONTROL (Generally) 570.500 Legislative findings; need for evaluation. The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that: (1) Noxious weeds are currently invading agricultural land and natural environments and causing severe production losses, increased control costs, negative impacts on native flora and fauna, decreased utilization of recreational areas and decreased value of farm, range and forest lands. Some of those noxious weeds are poisonous or harmful to humans or animals. (2) Noxious weed control programs are carried out by private and public landowners, counties and state agencies. (3) The economic and environmental impacts of noxious weeds in Oregon have not been quantified. Although 92 weeds have been listed by the State Department of Agriculture as restricted noxious weeds or prohibited noxious weeds, only tansy ragwort has been studied for economic and environmental impact. A comprehensive evaluation of other noxious weeds is necessary to determine in which areas, if any, the invasion of noxious weeds is sufficiently severe to justify a declaration by the Director of Agriculture of a weed control emergency. (4) The overall effectiveness and efficiency of the various noxious weed control programs of this state have never been evaluated. Evaluating and coordinating those programs could reduce the need for the director to declare weed control emergencies. [ 1999 c.472 § 1 ] Note: 570.500 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 570 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation. 570.505 Necessity of eradication of weeds; cooperation in control and eradication. Noxious weeds have become so thoroughly established and are spreading so rapidly on state, county and federally owned lands, as well as on property in individual ownership and in transition to county ownership through tax delinquency, that they hereby are declared a menace to the public welfare. While it is recognized that complete eradication may not be practicable, it hereby is established that steps leading to eradication and control are necessary and that responsibility rests not only on the individual landowner and operator but also on the county, state and federal government, and that the county, state and federal government should cooperate with individual owners in the control and eradication of noxious weed pests. [Amended by 1985 c.621 § I] 570.510 State and counties to control noxious weeds. The state and the respective counties shall control any weeds designated as noxious by the state or the respective counties in any such county on land under their respective ownerships. [Amended by 1985 c.621 §2] 570.515 County governing body may create weed control district; petition for special weed control district. (1) The county governing body of each county may declare the county, or any portion of the lands in a county, a weed control district for the purpose of destroying such weeds and of preventing the seeding and spread of such other weeds and plants as the governing body may for the purposes of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 declare noxious. (2) If the county is not made a weed control district or if the county weed control district does not include all such weeds or plants desired as included as noxious, interested parties may present a petition for a special weed control district. The petition shall describe the area to be included in the special weed control district and name the noxious weeds to be destroyed or prevented from blooming and producing seed within the district, and must be signed by more than half of the landowners in the area described in the petition who also own more than half of the acreage in the area. Upon presentation of such a petition, the county governing body shall declare such area a special weed control district and such weeds noxious within the district, in accordance with the petition. [Amended by 1985 c.621 §3] http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/570.html 12/14/2009 Chapter 570 - Plants; Inspection, Quarantine, Pest and Weed Control Page 2 of 5 570.520 Weed inspectors; appointment; duties; compensation. (1) The court shall, upon declaring a weed control district, appoint a weed inspector or inspectors, whose duties it shall be: (a) To find out if any noxious weeds or plants are being permitted to grow and produce bloom or seed within the district or districts contrary to the provisions of ORS 570.515 to 570.600; (b) To serve notices; (c) When necessary to destroy or cut or to supervise the destruction or cutting of the noxious weeds growing or seeding within the weed control district; and (d) To conduct investigations, approve plans and certify expenditures pertaining to weed control projects pursuant to ORS 570.590. (2) The person or persons appointed by the county court shall receive for their services reasonable wages, as determined by the county court, for the time actually employed in the performance of duty under ORS 570.515 to 570.600. [Amended by 1975 c.555 §12] 570.525 Notice of district creation and weeds to be controlled. The county court shall, upon declaring a weed control district or districts, cause to be published an official notice describing each district and naming weeds to be destroyed and to be prevented from producing seed within the districts. The notice shall be published in a newspaper or newspapers, not exceeding three in number, serving the districts, in two consecutive issues if weekly, or two times at intervals of one week if daily or semiweekly. Immediately after the last publication of the official notice, the provisions of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 shall be enforced. 570.530 Weed inspector right of entry; service of notice to eradicate weeds; department or district control measures. (1) The weed inspector shall have access to the land within the district. (2) When the provisions of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 are not being complied with, the weed inspector shall serve a written notice to the owner or occupant of the land. When the weed inspector is unable to serve the notice personally, the weed inspector shall post the notice and two copies thereof in three conspicuous places on the land. The notice shall contain: (a) The date of service or posting of notice. (b) The name of the weed or weeds growing on the land, and a statement setting forth that the weeds must be destroyed or must be prevented from producing seed within a specified time of not less than two days or more than 20 days, to be established by the inspector, from the date of service of the notice. (3) The service of notice as provided in subsection (2) of this section imposes a requirement on the owner or occupant of the land to destroy or prevent the weeds from seeding or spreading during the continuation of ownership or occupancy of the land or until the district is dissolved. A copy of the notice, together with proof of service indorsed thereon, shall be filed with the county court. (4) Notwithstanding subsections (2) and (3) of this section, ORS 570.520 or 570.535, with permission of the owner or occupant of land, employees of the State Department of Agriculture, or of designated weed control districts, may enter the land to identify noxious weeds and to implement or provide for the implementation of integrated noxious weed control measures, including but not limited to the application of pesticides to the land. The control or eradication of noxious weeds may be conducted with or without charge to the owner or occupant of the land. A notice as described in subsection (2) of this section is not required for the conduct of activities described in this subsection. [Amended by 2001 c.219 § 1 ] 570.535 Owner or occupant to eradicate weeds; disposition of fines. (1) Each person, firm or corporation owning or occupying land within the district shall destroy or prevent the seeding on such land of any noxious weed within the meaning of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 in accordance with the declaration of the county court and by the use of the best means at hand and within a time declared reasonable and set by the court, except that no weed declared noxious shall be permitted to produce seed. (2) All moneys collected as fines for violation of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 in any county shall be paid into the county treasury and shall become a part of the weed control fund. http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/570.html 12/14/2009 Chapter 570 - Plants; Inspection, Quarantine, Pest and Weed Control Page 3 of 5 570.540 Eradication of weeds on public lands and rights of way. The State Highway Commission, the respective county courts, reclamation districts and municipalities shall destroy or prevent the spread or seeding of any noxious weed within the meaning of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 on any land owned by them or constituting the right of way for any highway, county road, drainage or irrigation ditch, power or transmission line, or other purposes under their respective jurisdictions. 570.545 Eradication of weeds when owner or occupant refuses to do so; request for quarantine; statement of expenses to be filed. (1) If the owner or occupant of the land fails or refuses to immediately destroy or cut the noxious weeds in accordance with ORS 570.515 to 570.600, the weed inspector shall at once notify the district attorney of the county who shall at once take necessary steps for enforcement of ORS 570.515 to 570.600. The county court shall authorize the weed inspector or such assistants as the weed inspector may employ to go upon the land or premises and destroy the noxious weeds or control them in such manner as will destroy all seeds of such noxious weeds; provided, however, that if destruction or control of the weeds on any farm is in the judgment of the county weed inspector impracticable because the weeds may be too far advanced, or if for any other reason the means of control available are unsatisfactory, the weed inspector shall so notify the county court, which shall request the State Department of Agriculture to immediately quarantine any such uncontrolled noxious weed infested farm within the county to prevent the movement of infested crops or of livestock from such farm except under conditions prescribed in the quarantine that will prevent spread of the weeds by such crops or livestock. In all cases where the inspector undertakes to destroy or control noxious weeds, the most effective and practical method, in the judgment of the inspector, and with least injury to the land or crops, shall be used. (2) Upon the completion of such work the person so appointed and authorized by the county court shall file with the county clerk an itemized statement of the expenses necessarily incurred in the destruction of such weeds, including the wages of the person as provided in ORS 570.520, verified by the oath of the person. 570.550 Statement to be entered on lien docket; recovery of unpaid amount. When the statement of expenses is filed, the county clerk shall cause it to be entered upon a lien docket prepared for that purpose. The amount of the charges and expenses when so docketed shall constitute a first lien upon such lands or premises, except as to taxes. If the charges and expenses are not paid and the lien discharged by the owner or occupant of such lands within 90 days from the date the lien is docketed, the county may recover the expenses in an action at law. [Amended by 1957 c.99 §1; 1985 c.621 §4; 1991 c.459 §437] 570.555 Payment for work. If within 10 days from the date of filing and docketing the lien as provided in ORS 570.545 and 570.550, no objections have been filed thereto, the county court shall pay to the person or persons appointed by the court, as provided in ORS 570.520 (1), out of the general funds of the county, the amount of such lien. 570.560 County tax for weed control fund; expenditure. (1) The county courts of the several counties of this state hereby are required to levy a tax and create a fund to be known as the weed control fund for the control of weeds on county highways and public lands and for cooperation with individuals, state and federal agencies in controlling noxious weeds within weed control districts. The amount estimated by the county court as being sufficient for such purposes may be placed in the county budget and after consideration at the meeting held for the purpose of passing upon the tax levy by the electors of the county, may become one of the items for which expenditure may be made during the ensuing year. (2) When such a fund is created, it shall be expended under the supervision of the county court in such manner as to effectuate the purposes of ORS 570.515 to 570.600. 570.562 Special assessment. Notwithstanding ORS 570.560, in addition to or in lieu of the tax authorized by ORS 570.560, a county governing body may levy a special assessment based upon benefit to finance weed control activities. All such assessments shall be treated in the same manner as the tax referred to in ORS 570.560. [1985 c.621 §5a; 1989 c.570 §1] http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/570.html 12/14/2009 Chapter 570 - Plants; Inspection, Quarantine, Pest and Weed Control Page 4 of 5 570.565 Dissolution of weed control district; disposition of funds. If in the judgment of the court the enforcement of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 in any county which has been declared a weed control district seems impracticable or likely to work injury to the people of the district, it may after a hearing declare that such weed control district no longer exists. Any special weed control district shall be declared terminated by the county court when a majority of landowners in the district, by petition or by public hearing state that they desire such district terminated for any weeds declared noxious in the district. Any moneys remaining in any fund for weed control shall, after the termination of the district, be credited to the general fund of the county. 570.570 Duty to clean machinery before moving; weed infested residue not to be moved. No person operating or having control of any threshing machinery, clover huller, hay baler, seed cleaning or treating machinery or other machinery shall move said machinery over any public road or from one farm to another without first thoroughly cleaning it. Before moving it, all hay or bundle racks and all other equipment shall be thoroughly swept and cleaned. All hay, straw or other crop residue infested with noxious weeds under the meaning of ORS 570.515 to 570.600 having partially or fully formed seeds shall not be moved from the land on which grown to other lands not infested with any of the weeds in the field from which such crop material came. 570.575 Copy of statute to be posted on machinery; copies furnished by county clerk. (1) No person shall operate any threshing machine, clover huller or hay baler, seed cleaning or treating machinery or any other similar machinery within any duly created weed control district in this state without first having posted in a conspicuous place on such machinery a copy of ORS 570.570 and this section. (2) The county clerks of the various counties of this state hereby are authorized and directed to have printed a sufficient number of copies of ORS 570.570 and 570.575 and shall deliver such copies upon request to owners or operators of such machinery. (Cost-Share Assistance Grants) 570.580 Cost-share assistance grants for weed control; application. Any person owning or occupying land within a weed control district or special weed control district who conducts a weed control project in accordance with the provisions of ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600 may apply to the county court or commission for a cost-share assistance grant. [1975 c.555 §10] 570.585 Cost-share assistance grants for weed control; source of expenditures; limit on grants. (1) The county courts of the several counties of this state hereby are required to provide cost-share assistance grants to persons owning or occupying land within such counties who conduct a weed control project in accordance with the provisions of ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600. Expenditures by any county court or commission for cost-share assistance grants shall be made from the county's weed control fund pursuant to ORS 570.560. (2) In any fiscal year, the amount of cost-share assistance to any person eligible for such assistance under ORS 570.580 and 570.590 shall be an amount equal to, but not exceeding, 50 percent of the actual cost of the eligible person's weed control project. [1975 c.555 §9] 570.590 Eligibility for grants. No person shall be eligible for a cost-share assistance grant under ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600 unless: (1) A weed control inspector has: (a) Conducted a field inspection of the weed control site; (b) Approved the eligible person's plan for implementing a weed control project; and (c) Certified that specific expenditures are appropriate for implementation of the project. (2) The eligible person has made certified expenditures for the purpose of implementing an approved weed control project. Adequate proof of such expenditures shall consist of: (a) Receipts, invoices or other evidence indicating the amount and cost of the project; and (b) Such other weed control information as the county court or commission may require. [1975 c.555 §11] http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/570.html 12/14/2009 Chapter 570 - Plants; Inspection, Quarantine, Pest and Weed Control Page 5 of 5 570.595 Department funds for grants; reports by county. (1) Subject to ORS 291.232 to 291.260, the State Department of Agriculture may distribute in the manner prescribed in subsection (3) of this section to each county court an amount equal to 50 percent of the amount of cost-share assistance grants actually provided by the county court to eligible persons pursuant to ORS 570.580 to 570.590. (2) Any funds available and received by any county court under this section shall be placed in the county's weed control fund and shall be expended by the county court to carry out the purposes of ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600. (3) Each county court receiving funds under this section shall report to the department, at such times as the department shall require: (a) The total number of eligible owners who have received cost-share assistance grants under ORS 570.580; and (b) Any other weed control information the department shall require to carry out the purposes of ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600. The department shall make any necessary adjustments in the amounts due each county court at such times as the department determines appropriate in order to avoid overpayment. [1975 c.555 §13] 570.600 Financial assistance by department for weed control; limit on county responsibility. (1) The State Department of Agriculture may provide financial assistance to counties to promote the implementation of noxious weed control projects. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600, a county court is not required to perform any duty, function or power provided in ORS 570.520 and 570.580 to 570.600 unless the department provides financial assistance to the county pursuant to subsection (1) of this section. [1975 c.555 §§14,15] http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/570.html 12/14/2009 Tax Base of Unincorporated Deschutes County Compared to Weed Budget 2009-2010 County Areas Deschutes County City of Bend City of Redmond City of Sisters City of La Pine Remainder- Unincorporated County Weed Budget Total Budget Management and Control Activities Tax Base Alternatives Taxable Accounts Assessed Value 99,496 17,612, 789, 038 39,081 8,097,077,212 12,304 1,784,947,367 1,945 305,341,871 1,698 133,746, 393 44,468 7,291,676,195 330,000 330,000 155,100 155,100 Cost Share 80,000 80,000 Unincorporated County Weed Budget Comparison Costs Amt. per $1000 of Amt. Taxable Account Assessed Value Total Budget $7.42 $0.045 Management and Control Activities $3.49 Cost Share $1.80 Sources: Deschutes County Summary of Assessment Role 2009-10 OISC Statewide Management Assessment of Invasive Species July 9, 2009 $0.021 $0.011 Private Acreage 380,699 330,000 155,100 80,000 Amt. Per Private Acre $0.87 $0.41 $0.21 Deschutes County GIS t 1 PCB r I 4F FAIRS C UI N S E L Deschutes County Agenda Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2 a.m. 1. INTRODUCTIONS II. TAX MEASURE OUTCOME DISCUSSION III. FEBRUARY SESSION OUTLINE a. February 8: Revenue Forecast b. February 11: Bills Must Move From Chamber of Origin c. February 19: Bills Must move From Second Chamber (with presiding officer signature, Feb.22) d. February 22: Last Day for Ways and Means IV. FEBRUARY SESSION ISSUES a. Budget Issues i. ODOT Bridges Transportation Waiver b. Specific Bills i. Destination Resorts ii. County Surveyor Non-Partisan Office iii. Recreation Landowner Liability iv. Constitutional Amendment Referral to Limit Non-Economic Damages to $1 Million for Public Bodies, Non-Profits and Health Care Providers v. Highway Access Standards vi. Guest Ranches in Eastern Oregon in EFU Zones vii. Public Subsidy Prohibition for Construction With Foreign-Made Materials viii. Rural Airport Exemption from Multimodal Study Payments ix. Permission for County Fees for Premium Permit Processing c. Bill Priorities i. Sending Bills Weekly ii. About 200 Bills This Session V. OTHER BUSINESS PO BOX 12945, SALEM, OR 97309 • 867 LIBERTYSTREET NE • PH 503.363.7084 • FAX 503.371.2471 EMAIL: pacounsel@aol.com 1 0 it M~ w A W O x d F cy) N 0 M cu ca U O (6- A C N J o c L -0 J O C t~ I I N U W d ~ t; a a) E o o c E O L- +r co = Lo d L 0- U N N 0) N A > A ~ a N x E J otS r- N co N O C O O ~ ~ O O p cn (D C • A L ~cn cn m W ot~ J A CO) cn E= .2 ` I N T- J N 04 cn L O °a ° 'a -a V ~MM L (D W AA`` W E AA,, W > 4) a) A' W V1 G E W I E o K H O E-~ B Cu U N 'gin N J 0 'cn -0 d o O O Co N N -0 4- E O ' a _ ' N 0 O I n m o v o 0 7 N O - N 00 Q Y co -j LO 04 F 0 0 N e N N N L LL H LL 0 L/W V/ D O 2 0 0 0 ea 0 IZ 0 0 o Q o y y a_ Q-2 y cc to r av y H N afj y N aVi c O C .3 N O is V Q it:: ca U i a. N N N c i31 N L p a l S ` Bow E.9E C L ~ L Eu~Ec°,yav ~aX 0 m0 LL 117 N X o) U ED U W IL Q L l I - co N -0 1 od ca L) 0 r- p C ~ ~ = O ui > 0 0 a > . tit N Q 0: C o m 0 E - c y .0 Ix L6 w0 N y CO O N 0 ~+0LH N N N~- N 'C E 0 W C I] E U-0 W C S 0 0 a)= O O X N 0 aU-0 LIIOf L X N m 0 ~JU5ULLIOf w N N 0 m m a ca C N Q C U) om y E O m _ 4 N O` t O V -5 E L d d m m y E'-' U> M x a) ~ wU a U~ a0 N H LC V > m O LL d~ H d c O F- N GN X CD 0'W r N 0 y ai y 0 1 ' s 3 U R v cn tr E° •y O O E CO O N c o c 0 y !n 0 ~ Q a>ts O N N N D > C N 000 V m(n . 02 N N LU LTp 0'a(D - 0 o f ti a . C E 5 E~ ow CO iOEo,a?- "a M (D LL CL a~O N E a) LO E . E E 0 aU (D NJ C ~LLQZ N co UU LL a Um UaQ W O O O O O O ~p m It m - d ~C O O Q Q O H y y N. H H N r 0 Q) co r aln N a Co ah O O N b N M Public Affairs Counsel From: Dennis Luke [Dennis _Luke@co.deschutes.or.us] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 3:09 PM To: pacounsel@pacounsel.org Subject: FW: Transportation Steering Committee Meeting February 1st Attachments: Impacts of Waiver 2010.pdf; AOC Steering HBRRWaiver 2002.doc FYI Dennis Luke From: Art Schlack [mailto:aschlack@aocweb.org] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 1:39 PM To: 2010 AOC Transportation Committee Subject: Transportation Steering Committee Meeting February 1st Please add these attachments to the materials I sent you earlier this afternoon. Sorry I did not include them in the first e-mail. Hope all is well. Art 4 ALLOCATION OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE PROGRAM FUNDS 2014-2015 BIENIUM Based on 2009 NBIS Data Deficient Briges Allocation with Allocation with (Relative 15% OFF-System OFF-System Units) Requiremene Waivers TOTAL OREGON BRIDGE INVENTORY City/County Bridges 344,262,405 25.3% $39,906,766 25.3% $39,906,766 25.3% ODOT Bridges 969,226,408 71.1% $118,077,170 74.7% $118,077,170 74.7% "Other Agency" Bridges 49,386,091 3.6% $0 0.0% $0 0.0% TOTAL OREGON BRIDGES = 1,362,874,904 100.0% $157,983,936 100.0% $157,983,936 100.0% CITY/COUNTY 2014-2015 BIENIUM ALLOCATION Two-Year Allocation $39,906,766 $39,906,766 Projected Carryover from FY 2014 $5,643,888 $5,643,888 Less Local Program Expenses ($4,625,000) ($4,625,000) Less Reserve /Contengency ($1,000,000) ($1,000,000) TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR CITY/COUNTY DISTRIBUTION $39,925,654 $39,925,654 Share Share Share Share Share Share CITY/COUNTY BRIDGES Total Local Total Local Total Local Big Bridges (All ON-System) 94,760,494 7.0% 27.5% $10,989,799 7.0% 27.5% $10,989,799 7.0% 27.5% Small ON-System Bridges 171,404,872 12.6% 49.8% $5,238,264 3.3% 13.1% $15,823,188 10.0% 39.6% OFF-System Bridges (All Small) 78,097,039 5.7% 22.7% $23,697,590 15.0% 59.4% $13,112,667 8.3% 32.8% Subtotal = 344,262,405 25.3% 100.0% $39,925,654 25.3% 100.0% $39,925,654 25.3% 100.0% CITY/COUNTY BRIDGES ONLY City/County ON-System Bridges 266,165,366 77.3% $16,228,063 40.6% $26,812,987 67.2% City/County OFF-System Bridges 78,097,039 22.7% $23,697,590 59.4% $13,112,667 32.8% 344,262,405 $39,925,654 $39,925,654 Relative Units are bridge area multiplied by cost per square foot factor Assumes $78,991,968 million annual Highway Bridge Program January 11, 2010 TO: AOC Transportation Committee FROM: Jon Oshel, County Road Program Manager SUBJECT: HBP Bridge Fund Waiver Federal law requires a minimum of 15 percent, of Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds made available to Oregon, be used to fund bridges on roads classified as local or rural minor collectors (Off-System). As a result of the 15% Off-System funding requirement, County On-System bridges with higher priority needs than County Off-System have not been funded. Historically FHWA has granted Oregon waivers, beginning with federal fiscal year 2000, from this requirement. In keeping with that waiver, the use of HBP Funds is applied to bridges as they contributed to the federal HBP fund allocation. The FHWA waiver requires ODOT to perform an analysis to determine that Off-System needs are not adversely affected by the lower limit. ODOT's current analysis shows Oregon's bridge deficiency needs for Off-System Roads is 8.3% of the total needs: ODOT is prepared to request FHWA to continue waiving the 15% Off-System Bridge Fund requirement, with the Off-System fund level being set at 8.3% for HBP projects selected through 2015. This topic will be reviewed at the OACES January 28`h meeting and their recommendation will be presented to you at your February 1, 2010 meeting. RECOMMENDATION Support ODOT's request to FHWA that the waiver of the 15% Off-System Bridge Fund requirement be continued and that the Off-System fund level remain at 8.3% for Highway Bridge Program projects selected through 2015. 6 Public Affairs Counsel From: Erica Hagedorn [ericah@pacounsel.org] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:01 PM To: 'Dennis Luke'; 'Dave Kanner' Cc: pacounsel@pacounsel.org; Nick_Lelack@co.deschutes.or.us Subject: Destination Resort LC Dennis and Dave, I had a great talk with Nick today about the destination resort planning work group. I told him I'd touch base with you after our conversation. Let us know when the Commission has a chance to sit down with Nick and hash out the bill. We'll need marching orders for February regarding the sections that Nick says may be sticky (i.e. housing analyses and possibly wildfire plans). We'll need to know early what you guys think and what you need changed if anything. Thanks, Erica Erica C. Hagedorn Public Affairs Counsel, Inc. Salem, Ore. Office: 503-363-7084 Cell: 503-544-8973 7 r LC 113 1/12/10 (B-HC/ps/ss) DRAFT SUMMARY Modifies requirements for siting destination resorts. Declares emergency, effective on passage. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to destination resorts; creating never provisions; amending ORS 3 197.455 and 197.460; and declaring an emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. ORS 197.455 is amended to read: 6 197.455. (1) A destination resort [must be kited] may be sited only on 7 lands mapped as eligible for destination resort siting by the affected county. 8 The county may not allow destination resorts approved pursuant to ORS 9 197.435 to 197.467 to be sited in any of the following areas: to (a) Within 24 air miles of an urban growth boundary with an existing it population of 100,000 or more unless residential uses are limited to those 12 necessary for the staff and management of the resort. 13 (b)(A) On a site with 50 or more contiguous acres of unique or prime 14 fannl.and identified and mapped by the United States Natural Resources 15 Conservation Service, or its predecessor agency. 16 (B) On a site within three miles of a high value crop area unless the re- 17 sort complies with the requirements of ORS 197.445 (6) in which case the 18 resort may not be closer to a high value crop area than one-half mile. for 19 each 25 units of overnight lodging or fraction thereof. 20 (c) On predominantly Cubic Foot Site Class 1 or 2 forestlands as deter- 21 mined by the State Forestry Department, which are not subject to an ap- 22 proved goal exception. NOTE. Matter in boldfaced type in an eunended section is now; matter [italic and bracketefl is existing law to be emitted. New sections are in boWaeed type. 8 LC 113 1/12/10 1 (d) In the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area as defined by the 2 Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Act, P.L. 99-663. 3 (e) In an especially sensitive big game habitat area as determined by the 4 State Department of Fish and Wildlife in July 1984 or [as designated], if a 5 county and the department agree, as designated by the county, with 6 the written concurrence of the department, in an acknowledged compre- 7 hensive plan. s (f) On a site in which the lands are predominantly classified as be- 9 ing in Fire Regime Condition Class 3, unless the county approves a 1o community wildfire protection plan that demonstrates the site can be 11 developed without being at a high overall risk of fire. 12 (2) In carrying out subsection (1) of this section, a county shall adopt, as 13 part of its comprehensive plan, a map consisting of eligible lands within the 14 county. The map must be based on reasonably available information and may 15 be amended pursuant to ORS 197.610 to 197.625, but not more frequently than 16 once every 30 months. The county shall develop a process for collecting and 17 processing concurrently all map amendments made within a 30-month plan- 18 ning period. A map adopted pursuant to this section shall be the sole basis 19 for determining whether tracts of land are eligible for destination resort 20 siting pursuant to ORS 197.435 to 197.467. 21 SECTION 2. ORS 197.460 is amended to read: 22 197.460. A county shall [insure] ensure that a destination resort is com- 23 patible with the site and adjacent land uses through the following measures: 24 (1) Important natural features, including habitat of threatened or endan- 25 gered species, streams, rivers and significant wetlands shall be retained. 26 Riparian vegetation within 100 feet of streams, rivers and significant 27 wetlands shall be retained. Alteration of important natural features, in- 28 cluding placement of structures [which] that maintain the overall values of 29 the feature may be allowed. 30 (2) Improvements and activities shall be located and designed to avoid or 31 minimize adverse effects of the resort on uses on surrounding lands, partic- [21 9 LC 113 1/12110 1 ularly effects on intensive farming operations in the area. At a minimum, 2 measures to accomplish this shall. include: 3 (a) Establishment and maintenance of buffers between the resort and ad- o jacent land uses, including natural vegetation and where appropriate, fences, 5 berms, landscaped areas and other similar types of buffers. 6 (b) Setbacks of structures and other improvements from adjacent land 7 uses. 8 (3) If the site is west of the summit of the Coast Range and within 9 10 miles of an urban growth boundary, or if the site is east of the 10 summit of the Coast Range and within 25 miles of an urban growth 11 boundary, the county shall require the applicant to submit an eco- 12 nomic impact analysis of the proposed development that is prepared 13 by a qualified, professional economist or financial analyst and that 14 includes analysis of the projected fiscal, economic, infrastructure and 15 ;hoou:g impacts within the county and within cities whos4=, urban 16 oun aries are within the distance specified in this subsection. 17 (4) If the site is west of the summit of the Coast Range and within 18 10 miles of an urban growth boundary, or if the site is east of the 19 summit of the Coast Range and within 25 miles of an urban growth 20 boundary, the county shall require the applicant to submit a traffic 21 impact analysis of the proposed development that is prepared by a U.- 22 tensed professional engineer experienced in traffic analysis and that 23 includes measures to avoid or mitigate adverse effects of transporta- 24 tion on state highways and other transportation facilities affected by 25 the proposed development, including transportation facilities in the 26 county and in cities whose urban growth boundaries are within the 27 distance specified in this subsection. 28 SECTION 3. The amendments to ORS 197.455 and 197.460 by sections 29 1 and 2 of this 2010 Act apply to destination resort applications ap- 30 proved by a county on or after the effective date of this 2010 Act. 31 SECTION 4. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate pres- [3) 10 LC 113 1/12/10 X ervation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is de- clared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect on its passage. 3 [4] 11 LC 179 12/11/09 (GHH/ps/ss) DRAFT SUMMARY Designates elected county surveyor office as nonpartisan. Declares emergency, effective on passage. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to county surveyors; amending ORS 249.002 and 254.005; and de- 3 claring an emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. ORS 249.002 is amended to read:- 6 249.002. As used in this chapter: 7 (1) "Candidate" means an individual whose name is or is expected to be 8 printed on the official ballot. 9 (2) "County clerk" means the county clerk or the county official in charge to of elections. 11 (3) "Elector" means an individual qualified to vote under section 2, Arti- 12 cle II, Oregon Constitution. 13 (4) "Judge" means judge of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, circuit 14 court or the Oregon Tag Court, or any county judge who exercises judicial 15 functions. 16 (5) "Member" means an individual who is registered as being affiliated 17 with the political party. 18 (6) "Minor political party" means a political party that has qualified as 18 a minor political party under ORS 248.008. 20 (7) "Nonpartisan office" means the office of judge, Superintendent of 21 Public Instruction, Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries, any 22 elected office of a metropolitan service district under ORS chapter 268, jus- NOTE: Matta in boldtaced type in an amended section is new, matter [italic and bracketed} is existing law to be otoitterl New sections are in boldfaced We. 12 LC 179 12/11!09 1 tice of the peace, county clerk, county assessor, county surveyor, county 2 treasurer, sheriff, district attorney or any office designated nonpartisan by 3 a home rule charter. 4 (8) "Prospective petition" means the information, except signatures and other identification of petition signers, required to be contained in a corn- 6 pleted petition. 7 (9) "Public office" means any national, state,, county, city or district office 8 or position, except a political party office, filled by the electors. 9 (10) "State office" means Governor, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, 1o Attorney General, Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries, Su- 11 perintendent of Public Instruction, judge, state Senator, state Representative 12 or district attorney. 13 SECTION 2. ORS 254.005 is amended to read: 14 254.005. As used in this chapter: 15 .(1) "Ballot" means any material on which votes may be cast-for candi- 16 dates or measures. In the case of a recall election, "ballot" includes material 17 posted in a voting compartment or delivered to an elector by mail. 18 (2) "Chief elections officer" means the: 19 (a) Secretary of State, regarding a candidate for a state office or an office 20 to be voted on in the state at large or in a congressional district, or a 21 measure to be voted on in the state at large. 22 (b) County clerk, regarding a candidate for a county office, or a measure 23 to be voted on in a county only. 24 (c) City clerk,. auditor or recorder, regarding a candidate for a city office, 25 or a measure to be voted on in a city only. 26 (3) "County clerk" means the county clerk or the county official in charge 27 of elections. ,28 (4) "Elector" means an individual qualified to vote under section 2, Arti- 29 cle II, Oregon Constitution. 30 (5) "Major political party means a political party that has qualified as 31 a major political party under ORS 248.006. [2) 13 LC 179 12111/09 1 (6) "Measure" includes any of the following submitted to the people for 2 their approval or rejection at an election: 3 (a) A proposed law. 4 (b) An Act or part of an Act of the Legislative Assembly. 5 (c) A revision of or amendment to the Oregon Constitution. 6 (d) Local, special or municipal legislation. 7 (e) A proposition or question. s (7) "Minor political party" means a political party that has qualified as 9 a minor political party under ORS 248.008. 10 (8) "Nonpartisan office" means the office of judge of the Supreme Court, 11 Court of Appeals, circuit court or the Oregon Tax Court, Superintendent of 12 Public Instruction, Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries, any 13 elected office of a metropolitan service district under ORS chapter 268, jus- 14 tice of the peace, county clerk, county assessor, county surveyor, county 15 treasurer, county 'judge who exercises judicial functions, sheriff, district at- 16 torney or any office designated nonpartisan by a home rule charter. 17 (9) "Prospective petition" means the information, except signatures and 18 other identification of petition signers, required to be contained in a com- 19 pleted petition. 20 (10) "Regular district election" means the election held each year for the 21 purpose of electing members of a district board as defined in ORS 265.005 (2). 22 (11) "Vote tally system" means one or more pieces of equipment necessary 23 to examine and tally automatically the marked ballots. 24 (12) "Voting machine" means any device that will record every vote cast 25 on candidates and measures and that will either internally or externally 26 total all votes cast on that device. 27 SECTION 3. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate pres- 28 ervation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is de. 29 Blared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect on its passage. 30 [31 14 LC 207 1/11/10 (DWps/ss) DRAFT SUMMARY Modifies. laws governing immunities provided to landowner that allows use of land for recreational purposes, gardening, woodcutting or harvest of special forest products. Provides that if owner imposes charge in excess of specified amounts for permission to use land, immunities continue to apply to uses of land other than activities for which charge is imposed. Provides that if owner imposes charge in excess of specified amounts for permission to use specific part of owner's land, immunities apply to remain- der of owner's land. Allows landowner to charge daily parking fee of $ or less without loss of immunities. . Declares emergency, effective on passage. A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to landowner liability; creating new provisions; amending ORS 3 105.672 and 105.688; and declaring an emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. ORS 105.672 is amended to read: 6 105.672. As used in ORS 105.672 to 105.696: 7 (1) "Charge": 8 (a) Means the admission price or fee requested or expected by an owner 9 in return for granting permission for a person to enter or go upon the 1o owner's land 11 (b) Does not mean any amount received from a public body in return for 12 granting permission for the public to enter or go upon the owner's land. 13 (c) Does not include a daily parking fee of $ or less. 14 (2) "Harvest" has that meaning given in ORS 164.813. 1,5 (3) "Land" includes all real property, whether publicly or privately owned. NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter jildlic and bracketed] is existing law to be omitted New sections are in boldfaced type- 15 LC 207 1/11/10 1 (4) "Owner" means the possessor of any interest in any land, such as the 2 holder of a fee title, a tenant, a lessee, an occupant, the holder of an ease- 3. ment, the holder of a right of way or a person in possession of the land. 4 (5) "Recreational purposes" includes, but is not limited to, outdoor actin- 5 ities such as hunting, fishing, swimming, boating, camping, picnicking, hik- 6 ing, nature study, outdoor educational activities, waterskiing, winter sports, 7 viewing or enjoying historical, archaeological, scenic or scientific sites or 8 volunteering for any public purpose project. 9 (6) "Special forest products" has that meaning given in ORS 164.813. 10 (7) "Woodcutting" means the cutting or removal of wood from land by an 11 individual who has obtained permission from' the owner of the land to cut 12 or remove wood 13 SECTION 2. ORS 105.688 is amended to read: 14 105.688. (1) Except as specifically provided in ORS 105.672 to 105.696, the 15 immunities provided by ORS 105.682 apply to: 16 (a) All land, including but not limited to land adjacent or contiguous to 17 any bodies of water, watercourses or the ocean shore as defined by ORS 18 390.605; 19 (b) All roads, bodies of water, watercourses, rights of way, buildings, fix- 20 tures and structures on the land described in paragraph (a) of this sub- 21 section; 22 (c) All paths, trails, roads, watercourses and other rights of way while 23 being used by a person to reach land for recreational purposes, gardening, 24 woodcutting or the harvest of special forest products, that are on land ad 25 jacent to the land that the person intends to use for recreational purposes, 26 gardening, woodcutting or the harvest of special forest products, and that 27 have not been improved, designed or maintained for the specific purpose of 28 providing access for recreational purposes, gardening, woodcutting or the 29 harvest of special forest products; and 30 (d) All machinery or equipment on the land described in paragraph (a) 31 of this subsection. [2I 16 LC 207 1/11/10 1 (2) The immunities provided by ORS 105.682 [for recreational purposes and 2 for the harvest of special forest products] apply to land [only] ' if[: ] 3 [(a)] the owner transfers an easement to a public body to use the land[; 4 or]. 6 [(b) The owner makes no charge for permission to use the land.] 6 (3) Except as provided in subsections (4) to (7) of this section, the 7 immunities provided by ORS 105.682. do not apply if the owner makes 8 any charge for permission to use the land for recreational purposes, 9 gardening, woodcutting or the harvest of special forest products. 10 (4) If the owner charges for permission to use the owner's land for 11 a specific recreational purpose, the immunities provided by ORS 12 105.682 apply to any use of the land other than the activity fox which 13 the charge is imposed. If the owner charges for permission to use a. 14 specific part of the owner's laird for recreational purposes, the immu- 15 nities provided by ORS 105.682 apply to the remainder of the owner's 16 land. 17 [(3)] (5) The immunities provided by ORS 105.682 for gardening do not 18 apply [only] if the owner charges [no] more than $25 per year for the use of 19 the land for gardening. If the owner charges more than $25 per year for 20 the use of the land for gardening, the immunities provided by ORS 21 105.682 apply to any use of the land other than gardening. If the owner 22 charges more than $25 per year for permission to use a specific part 23 of the owner's land for gardening, the immunities provided by QRS. 24 105.682 apply to the remainder of the owner's land. 25 [(4)] (6) The immunities provided by ORS 105.682 for woodcutting do not 26 apply [only] if the owner charges [no] more than $75 per cord for permission 27 to use the land for woodcutting. If the owner charges more than $75 per 28 cord for the use of the land for woodcutting, the immunities provided 29 by ORS 105.882 apply to any use of the laird other than woodcutting. 3o If the owner charges more than $75 per cord for permission to use a 31 specific part of the owner's land for woodcutting, the immunities [3] 17 LC 207 1/11/10 1 provided by ORS 105.682 apply to the remainder of the owner's bond. 2 (7) The immunities provided by ORS 105.682 for the harvest of spe- 3 cial forest products do not apply if the owner makes any charge for 4 permission to use the land for the harvest of special forest products. 5 If the owner charges for permission to use the owner's land for the s harvest of special forest products, the immunities provided by ORS 7. 105.682 apply to any use of the land other than the harvest of special S forest products. If the owner charges for permission to use a specific 9 part of the owner's land for harvesting special forest products, the 1o immunities provided by ORS 105.652 apply to the remainder of the 11 owner's land. 12 SECTION 3. The amendments to ORS 105.672 and 105.688 by sections 13 1 and 2 of this 2010 Act apply only to causes of action that arise on 14 or after the effective date of this .2010 Act. 15 SECTION 4. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate pres- 16 ervation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is de- 17 clared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect on its. passage. 18 [41 18 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2010 Special Session Senate Joint Resolution 46 Sponsored by Senator GIROD; Senators ATKINSON, BOQUIST, FERRIOLI, KRUSE, MORSE, TELFER, WHITSETT, WINTERS (Precession filed,) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Proposes amendment to Oregon Constitution to limit awards of noneconomic damages against health care providers, nonprofit corporations and public bodies to $1 million. Refers proposed amendment to people for their approval or rejection at next regular general election. 1 JOINT RESOLUTION 2 Be It Resolved by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon: 3 PARAGRAPH 1. The Constitution of the State of Oregon is amended by creating a new section 4 12 to be added to and made a part of Article XV, such section to read; 5 SECTION 12. (1) Noneconomic damages may not be recovered against a health care pro- 6 vider, a nonprofit corporation or a public body in an amount that exceeds $1 million. 7 (2) Noneconomic damages may not be recovered against any officer, employee or agent 8 of a health care provider, a nonprofit corporation or a public body, for acts or omissions 9 within the scope of the person's employment or duties, in an amount that exceeds $1 million. 10 (3) The limitations of this section apply to all subjective, nonmonetary losses, including 11 but not limited to pain, mental suffering, emotional distress, humiliation, injury to reputa- 12 tion, loss of care, comfort, companionship and society, loss of consortium, inconvenience and 13 interference with normal and usual activities apart from compensated employment. 14 (4) For the purposes of this section, a health care provider is a person who is licensed, 15 registered or certified under law as: 16 (a) A psychologist; 17 (b) An occupational therapist; 18 (c) A physician; 19 (d) An emergency medical technician; 20 (e) A podiatric physician and surgeon; 21 (f) A nurse; 22 (g) A nurse practitioner; 23 (h) A dentist; 24 (i) A dental hygienist; 25 (j) A denturist; 26 (k) An audiologist or speech-language pathologist; 27 (L) An optometrist; 28 (m) A chiropractor; 29 (n) A naturopath; 30 (o) A massage therapist; NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter (italic and bracketed) is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 16 19 SJR 46 1 (p) A physical therapist; 2 (q) A medical imaging licensee; 3 (r) A pharmacist; or 4 (s) A physician assistant. 5 (5) For the purposes of this section, a public body is the state, a county, a city, a district 6 or any other entity created by law. 7 g PARAGRAPH 2. The amendment proposed by this resolution shall be submitted to the 9 people for their approval or rejection at the nest regular general election held throughout to this state. 11 121 20 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2010 Special Session Senate Bill 1024 Sponsored by Senator JOHNSON (Presession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Establishes when new approach road permit is required. Directs Department of Transportation to develop highway access management system. Declares emergency, effective on passage. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to highway access; creating new provisions; amending ORS 374.310; and declaring an 3 emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. ORS 374.310 is amended to read: 6 374.310. (1) The Department of Transportation with respect to state highways and the county 7 court or board of county commissioners with respect to county roads shall adopt reasonable rules 8 and regulations and may issue permits, not inconsistent with law, for the use of the rights of way 9 of such highways and roads for the purposes described in ORS 374.305. However, the department 10 may not issue a permit for the construction of any approach road at a location where no rights of 11 access exist between the highway and abutting real property. 12 (2) Such rules and regulations and such permits shall include such provisions, terms and condi- 13 tions as in the judgment of the granting authority may be in the best interest of the public for the 14 protection of the highway or road and the traveling public and may include, but need not be limited 15 to: 16 (a) Provisions for construction of culverts under approaches, requirements as to depth of fills 17 over culverts and requirements for drainage facilities, curbs, islands and other facilities for traffic 18 channelization as may be deemed necessary. 19 (b) With respect to private road crossings, additional provisions for the angle of intersection, 20 crossing at grade or other than grade, sight distances, safety measures including flaggers, crossing 21 signs and signals, reinforcement for protection of the highway, maintenance of the crossing and for 22 payment by the applicant of the costs of any of the foregoing. 23 (c) With respect to private road crossings, the granting authority may also require the applicant 24 to furnish public liability and property damage insurance in a sum fixed by the granting authority, L5 which insurance shall also indemnify the members, officers, employees and agents of such authority 26 from any claim that might arise on account of the granting of the permit and the crossing of the 27 highway or road by vehicles operating under the permit; and the granting authority may also require 28 the applicant to furnish indemnity insurance, an indemnity bond or an irrevocable letter of credit 29 issued by an insured institution as defined in ORS 706.008 in a sum fixed by the granting authority, 30 indemnifying such authority for any damage to the highways or roads that may be caused by the 31 use of the crossing. NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter [italic and brachetedl is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 60 21 SB 1024 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 2.3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 (3) The powers granted by this section and ORS 374.315 may not be exercised so as to deny any property adjoining the road or highway reasonable access to the adjoining road or highway. In determining what is reasonable access to the adjoining road or highway, the department or county court or board of county commissioners shall apply -the following criteria: (a) The access must be sufficient to allow the authorized uses for the property identified in the acknowledged local comprehensive plan. (b) The type, number, size and location of approaches must be adequate to serve the volume and type of traffic reasonably anticipated to enter and exit the property, based on the planned uses for the property. (4)(a) As used in this subsection: (A) "Average weekday primary trips" means the total number of primary trips made during a consecutive 24-hour period falling between the start of Tuesday through the end of Thursday. (B) "Peak hour" means the hour with the highest amount of traffic volume entering and exiting a property from Tuesday through Thursday, excluding weeks containing a legal holi- day. (C) "Primary peak hour trips" means the total number of primary trips during the peak hour. (D) "Primary trip" means a trip made for the purpose of visiting a property. A primary trip travels from a point of origin to a property and then returns to the point of origin. Primary trips do not include intermediate stops made on the way to a property from a point of origin or internal trips made within a property that do not involve using any highway ad- joining the property. (E) "Private approach" means a privately owned connection providing vehicular access to and from a highway and adjoining property. (F) "public approach" means an existing or planned city street or county road connection providing vehicular access to and from a highway, that serves or is planned to, serve more than one property. (G) "Trip" means vehicular movement in one direction, either entering or exiting the property. (b) A new approach permit for a change of use of an approach is not required for a public approach. (c) A new approach permit for a change of use of an approach is required for a private approach if: (A)(i) The number of primary peak hour trips increases by 25 trips or more from that of the property's prior use; or (ii) The number of average weekday primary trips increases by 250 trips or more from that of the property's prior use; and (B) The increase in subparagraph (A)(i) or (ii) of this paragraph represents a 10 percent or greater increase in the number of average weekday primary trips and primary peak hour trips from that of the property's prior use. (d) A new approach permit for a change of use of an approach is required for a private approach if the daily use of a private approach increases by 10 or more vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,000 pounds or more. (5) The department shall establish access management rules, mitigation measures and [2l 22 SB 1024 1 spacing and mobility standards that are less stringent for highway segments where the an- t nual average amount of daily traffic is 5,000 motor vehicles or fewer, than for highway seg- 3 ments where the annual average amount of daily traffic is more than 5,000 motor vehicles. 4 [(4)] (6) The department may not charge any fee for issuance of a permit under this section for 5 construction of an approach road. 6 SECTION 2. The Department of Transportation, in cooperation with stakeholders, shall 7 develop a highway access management system based on objective standards. s SECTION 3. The Department of Transportation shall provide a report to the Legislative 9 Assembly prior to January 2011. The report must include a description of the highway access 10 management system developed under section 2 of this 2010 Act and any legislation necessary 11 to implement the highway access management system. 12 SECTION 4. The amendments to ORS 374.310 by section 1 of this 2010 Act apply to per- 13 mits issued before, on or after the effective date of this 2010 Act. 14 SECTION 5. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public 15 peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect 16 on its passage. 17 [31 23 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2010 Special Session Senate Bill 1.036 Sponsored by Senator FERRIOLI; Senators ATKINSON, B04)UIST, GIROD, KRUSE, MORSE, TELFER, WIIITSETI', WINTERS (Presession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Reauthorizes establishment of guest ranches on land zoned for exclusive farm use in eastern Oregon. Deems guest ranches established under sunsetted law to be conforming use under new au- thority for guest ranches. Declares emergency, effective on passage. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACTT 2 Relating to guest ranches; and declaring an emergency. 3 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 4 SECTION 1. Sections 2 and 3 of this 2010 Act are added to and made a part of ORS 5 chapter 215. 6 SECTION 2. (1) As used in this section and section 3 of this 2010 Act: 7 (a) "Guest lodging unit" means a guest room in a lodge, bunkhouse, cottage or cabin used 8 only for transient overnight lodging and not for a permanent residence. 9 (b) "Guest ranch" means a facility for guest lodging units, passive recreational activities 10 described in subsection (6) of this section and food services described in subsection (7) of this 11 section that are incidental and accessory to an existing and continuing livestock operation 12 that qualifies as a farm use. 13 (c) "Livestock" means cattle, sheep, horses and bison. 14 (2) Subject to the provisions of ORS 215.296 (1) and (2) and other approval or siting 15 standards of a county, a guest ranch may be established in an area of eastern Oregon, as 16 defined in ORS 321.805, that is zoned for exclusive farm use. 17 (3) The guest ranch must be located on a lawfully established unit of land that- 18 (a) Is at least 160 acres; 19 (b) Contains the dwelling of the individual conducting the livestock operation; and 'Il (c) Is not high-value farmland, as defined in ORS 215.710. 21 (4) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, the guest lodging units of the 22 guest ranch cumulatively must: 23 (a) Include not fewer than four nor more than 10 overnight guest lodging units; and 24 (b) Not exceed a total of 12,000 square feet in floor area, not counting the floor area of 25 a lodge that is dedicated to kitchen area, rest rooms, storage or other shared or common 2& indoor space. 27 (5) For every increment of 160 acres that the lawfully established unit of land on which 28 the guest ranch is located exceeds the minimum 160-acre requirement described in sub- 29 section (3) of this section, up to five additional overnight guest lodging units not exceeding ,30 a total of 6,000 square feet of floor area may be included in the guest ranch for a total of NOTE; Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter [italic and brachetedl is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 21 24 SB 1036 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 not more than 25 guest lodging units and 30,000 square feet of floor area. (6) A guest ranch may provide passive recreational activities that can be provided in conjunction with the livestock operation's natural setting including, but not limited to, hunting, fishing, hiking, biking, horseback riding, camping and swimming. A guest ranch may not provide intensively developed recreational facilities, including golf courses as identified in ORS 215.283. (7) A guest ranch may provide food services only for guests of the guest ranch, individ- uals accompanying the guests and individuals attending a special event at the guest ranch. The cost of meals, if any, may he included in the fee to visit or stay at the guest ranch. A guest ranch may not sell individual meals to an individual who is not a guest of the guest ranch, an individual accompanying a guest or an individual attending a special event at the guest ranch. SECTION 3. (1) Notwithstanding ORS 215.283, the governing body of a county or its designee may not allow a guest ranch in conjunction with: (a) A campground as described in ORS 215.283 (2). (b) A golf course as described in ORS 215.283 (2). (2) Notwithstanding ORS 215.263, the governing body of a county or its designee may not approve a proposed division of land in an exclusive farm use zone for a guest ranch. (3) The governing body of a county or its designee may not approve a proposed division of land that separates the guest ranch from the dwelling of the individual conducting the livestock operation. SECTION 4. A guest ranch approved and established under section 1, chapter 728, Oregon Laws 1997, as amended by section 1, chapter 216, Oregon Laws 1999, section 2, chapter 467, Oregon Laws 2001, section 5, chapter 544, Oregon Laws 2001, section 1, chapter 147, Oregon Laws 2003, section 107, chapter 621, Oregon Laws 2003, and section 1, chapter 258, Oregon Laws 2005, and made nonconforming by repeal of chapter 728, Oregon Laws 1997, by section 5, chapter 728, Oregon Laws 1997, as amended by section 3, chapter 467, Oregon Laws 2001, and section 3, chapter 258, Oregon Laws 2005, is deemed a conforming use under section 2 29 of this 2010 Act on and after January 2, 2010. 30 SECTION 5. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public 31 peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect 32 on its passage. 33 (21 25 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-2010 Special Session Senate Bill 1050 Sponsored by Senator VERGER; Senators KRUSE, METSGER, ROSENBAUM, SCHR.ADER, WHITSETT, Repre- sentatives BARKER, BARTON, HOLVEY, KAHL, SCHAUFLER, VANORMAN, WITT (at the request of Oregon State Building and Constriction Trades Council, Oregon AFL-CIO, Oregon AFSCME) (Presession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Prohibits public body from providing public subsidy for purpose of constructing, reconstructing, renovating, altering, maintaining or repairing, or entering into contract to construct, reconstruct renovate, alter, maintain or repair, structure on real property unless iron, steel and manufactured goods used in structure are made within United States. Provides that prohibition does not apply if public body or contracting agency finds that amount or quality of iron, steel or manufactured goods made within United States are insufficient or if ap- plying prohibition would increase cost or contract price by more than 25 percent. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to public subsidies for structures on real property,. 3 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 4 SECTION 1. Section 2 of this 2010 Act is added to and made a part of the Public Con- 5 tracting Code. 6 SECTION 2. (1) As used in this section, "public subsidy" means moneys or the equivalent 7 of moneys that this state, a subdivision of this state or the federal government, or an agency 8 of this state, of a subdivision of this state or of the federal government, provides in the form 9 of: 10 (a) A direct appropriation; 11 (b) A tax credit or abatement; 12 (c) A loan or loan guarantee; L3 (d) A combination of the forms described in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of this subsection; 14 or 15 (e) Any other form by means of which moneys from taxpayers are used or by reason of 16 which this state, a subdivision of this state or the federal government, or an agency of this 17 state, of a subdivision of this state or of the federal government, does not charge or collect 1S moneys for a public purpose that would otherwise be due. 19 (2) A public body may not provide a public subsidy to construct, reconstruct, renovate, 20 alter, maintain or repair, or for the purpose of entering into a contract to construct, re- 21 construct, renovate, alter, maintain or repair, a structure or appurtenances for a structure 22 on real property unless the iron, steel and manufactured goods used in the structure or the 23 appurtenances are produced within the United States. 24 (3)(a) Subsection (2) of this section does not apply if the public body or a contracting 25 agency finds that: 26 (A) Iron, steel or manufactured goods intended for use in the structure or the 27 appurtenances are not produced within the United States in sufficient and reasonably avail- NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter [italic and bracketed] is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. M 105 26 SB 1050 1 able quantities or with satisfactory quality; or 2 (B) Applying the provisions of subsection (2) of this section would increase the cost or 3 contract price for constructing, reconstructing, renovating, altering, maintaining or repair- 4 ing the structure or the appurtenances by more than 25 percent. 5 (b) If a public body or a contracting agency makes a finding described in paragraph (a) 6 of this subsection, the public body or contracting agency shall publish and make the finding 7 publicly available, together with detailed reasons for the finding. 8 SECTION S. Section 2 of this 2010 Act applies to public subsidies that are provided for- 9 (1) Constructing, reconstructing, renovating, altering, maintaining or repairing a struc- 10 ture or appurtenances for a structure on real property on or after the effective date of this 11 2010 Act; or 12, (2) A contract that is advertised or solicited or, if not advertised or solicited, that is en- 13 tered into on or after the effective date of this 2010 Act for the purpose of constructing, 14 reconstructing, renovating, altering, maintaining or repairing a structure or appurtenances 15 for a structure on real property. 16 [2] 27 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-•2010 Special Session Senate Bill 1054 Sponsored by Senator VVMTSETT; Senators KRUSE, MORSE (Precession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Exempts rural airports from requirement to pay portion of grant or loan received from Multi- modal Transportation Fund for statewide multimodal study. Permits Oregon Transportation Commission to provide grants or loans from Multimodal Trans- portation Fund to rural airports for certain transportation projects already completed or under construction. Declares emergency, effective on passage. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to rural airports; creating new provisions; amending section 2, chapter 859, Oregon Laws 3 2007; and declaring an emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. Section 2, chapter 859, Oregon Laws 2007, is amended to read: 6 Sec. 2. (1) To the extent that proposed transportation projects meet the qualifications estab- 7 lished by the Oregon Transportation Commission by rule, the commission shall allocate at least 10 S percent of the net proceeds of the lottery bonds authorized by section 1, chapter 859, Oregon Laws 9 2007, (of this 2007 Act] to each region described in this section. For purposes of this section, the 10 regions are as follows: 11 (a) Region one consists of Clackamas, Columbia, Hood River, Multnomah and. Washington 12 Counties. 13 (b) Region two consists of Benton, Clatsop, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook and 14 Yamhill Counties. 15 (c) Region three consists of Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson and Josephine Counties. 16 (d) Region four consists of Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman, Wasco 17 and Wheeler Counties. is (e) Region five consists of Baker, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union and 19 Wallowa Counties. 20 (2) In addition to any other fees or payments required for grants or loans from the Multimodal 21 Transportation Fund, between July 1, 2007, and July 1, 2013, each recipient of moneys from the fund 22 shall pay two percent of the recipient's total project costs to the Department of Transportation. The 23 department shall use the funds received under this subsection to conduct a statewide multimodal 24 study of the transportation system. The study shall include an assessment of the infrastructure, ca- 25 pacity demand and constraints, development of criteria for strategic investments and return on in- 26 vestment and identification of potential funding sources and strategies. The department may not use 27 the funds received under this subsection for any components of the study if the department has other 28 available and eligible funds. 29 (3) Subsection (2) of this section does not apply to recipients of moneys from the fund NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter [italic aril bracketed[ is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 92 20 a SB 1064 1 that are rural airports and that received moneys on or after July 1, 2009. 2 SECTION 2. For the biennium beginning July 1, 2009, notwithstanding ORS 367.084, if a 3 rural airport received federal grants on or after July 1, 2009, for a transportation project, 4 as defined in ORS 367.010, that has already been completed or is under construction, the G Oregon Transportation Commission may provide to the rural airport grants or loans from 6 the Multimodal Transportation Fund to be used as matching funds. 7 SECTION 3. This 2010 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public 8 peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2010 Act takes effect 9 on its passage. 10 [21 29 75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2010 Special Session House Bill 3600 Sponsored by Representative ESQUIVEL (Presession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential :Features of the measure as introduced. Authorizes counties to adopt premium service program for development review permits. Sunsets January 2, 2015. 1 A BELL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to development review processing. 3 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 4 SECTION 1. (1) Notwithstanding ORS 215.416, a county may charge an additional fee for 5 premium services in excess of the actual costs of processing a permit. 6 (2) Before charging an additional fee for premium :services, a county shall: 7 (a) Adopt a premium fee schedule; and 8 (b) Adopt standards for premium processing justifying the premium fee. 9 (3) A county may not require applicants to use premium services and may not reduce 10 existing standards and timelines adopted for nonpremium permit processing. 11 (4) As used in this section, "permit" has the meaning given that term in ORS 215.402. 12 SECTION 2. This 2010 Act is repealed on January 2, 2015. 13 NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new; matter [italic and bracketed] is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 128 30 00")UESTIONS 1 C1 TO DEFINE WHO WE ARE AS A NATION The Census: What: The census is a count of everyone residing in the United States. Who: All U.S. residents must be counted-both citizens and non citizens. When: You will receive your questionnaire in March 2010 either by U.S. mail or hand delivery. Some people in remote areas will be counted in person. Why: The U.S. Constitution requires a national census once every 10 years to count the population and determine the number of seats each state will have in the U.S. House of Representatives. How: Households should complete and mail back their questionnaires upon receipt. Households that do not respond may receive a replacement questionnaire in early April. Census takers will visit households that do not return questionnaires to take a count in person. A Complete Count: The Importance of Census Data Every year, the federal government allocates more than $400 billion to states and communities based, in part, on census data. Census data are used to determine locations for retail stores, schools, hospitals, new housing developments and other community facilities. Census data determine boundaries for state and local legislative and congressional districts. With only 10 questions, the 2010 Census questionnaire takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Households are asked to provide key demographic information, including: whether a housing unit is rented or owned; the address of the residence, - and the names, genders, ages and races of others living in the household. By law, the Census Bureau cannot share an individual's responses with anyone, including other federal agencies and - - law enforcement entities. Frequently Asked Questions 1. 0. Who should fill out the census questionnaire? A. The individual in whose name the housing unit is owned or rented should complete the questionnaire on behalf of every person living in the residence, including relatives and non-relatives. 2. 0. How will the 2010 Census differ from previous censuses? A. In 2010, every residence will receive a short questionnaire of just 10 questions. More detailed socioeconomic information March - April 2010 previously collected through the decennial census will be asked A Be • program of a small percentage of the population through the annual 1... 2...3... implemented. Census American Community Survey. To learn more about the American L P, questionnaires available Community Survey, visit www.census.gov. 3. 0. How are census data used? A. Census data determine the number of seats each state will have in the U.S. House of Representatives. Census data also can April 1, • . help determine the allocation of federal funds for community 17) services, such as school lunch programs and senior citizen CENSUS DAY centers, and new construction, such as highways and hospitals. 4. 0. What kind of assistance is available to help people complete the questionnaire? A. 2010 Census questionnaire language assistance guides are available in a variety of languages. Questionnaire Assistance Centers (QAC) will also assist those unable to read or understand the questionnaire. Large-print questionnaires are available to the visually impaired upon request, and a Teletext Device for the Deaf (TDD) program will help the hearing impaired. Contact your Regional Census Center for more details about the types of assistance available and for QAC locations. law, the Census Bureau S. 0. How does the Census Bureau count people without a delivers population permanent residence? to the President. A. Census Bureau workers undertake extensive operations to take in-person counts of people living in group quarters, such as college dormitories, military barracks, nursing homes and shelters, as well as those who have been displaced by natural disasters. March 2011 By law, the Census Bureau completes delivery ~ redistricting data to states. For more information about the 10 Census, ® to 2010cel sus.a;yo@9. 2010 CENSUS ITS IN OUR HANDS . 1. i' L 1. i I. f r~" 5 key steps to counting every person in the nation I How will the 2010 Census actually happen? Many operations, people and activities must come together to produce a successful census. Here are five key steps every U.S. resident should know: and maps from the previous census. This process is importar because buildings that existed in the last ce hs~ s m I ay no lona t~ be standing, or a • may have new construction tha needs to be recorded, I I I tt'd i'~ t 3'- n <t F sfi yp,. 1 'fit 4 1E'' j . A h 7 R 911 Zfi Ynt ~I1- 7 x;•^Ec a jj w< 1- ar t a v t i. ~1k'~?.5~;,"`1r ~trt1 ryr "kn ~l -i f 7 ♦ ur ~..Y Y~+~T ,A1 u~r~R~~- Y ~,,,,7,..~~+y . I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Step 3, Census Day is April: 1, 2010. Responses to the intormation witn anyone, inciuamg otner reaerar agencies ana taw enforcement entities. Step 4: Follow-up because every person matters. Addresses A < I i i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Where should you Most people should be counted in the residence in wl be counted? unique living situations. The Census Bureau residencE Typical living situations Living situation Where they are counted Live at their home and Their home nowhere else On vacation or a business trip Their home where they live and sleep most of the time Live no one place regularly OR The residence in which they Experiencing homelessness are staying on Census Day People in places where groups of people live Living situation Where they are counted Places where groups of people Group location live such as jails or prisons, group homes, domestic violence shelters, and emergency or transitional shelters for people experiencing homelessness U.S. military personnel In barracks in the United States Vhere they are counted The barracks On base or off base in the United States, but not in the barracks In the military and living overseas The residence where they live and sleep most of the time Counted using the military's records for home address rich they live or sleep most of the time. However, some individuals or groups have rule helps make it clear where people should be counted. Common situations inc~de: College students Luring- * Live with their parents while Parental home attending college in the United States Live away from the parental home while attending college in the United States Attend college outside the United States On-campus or off-campus housing Not counted in the census a Foreign citizens in the United States Citizens of foreign countries The residence where they live living in the United States and sleep most of the time Foreign citizens visiting the Not counted in the census United States on a vacation or business trip People on the move Staying at more than one place (like a vacation home) or at a transitory location, such as recreational vehicle (RV) parks, campgrounds, marinas, racetracks, circuses or carnivals In the residence in which they live and sleep most of the time In the residence in which they are staying on Census Day, if time is divided equally Would life in your community be better if: You had access to new hospitals and senior centers or enhanced health care services for ill or aging family members? Your children could learn in new or improved schools or child-care centers? • Your commute to work were safer and less congested thanks to better roads or expanded public transportation options? Your local emergency services providers had up-to-date maps to ensure faster response in a crisis? Your local markets could better deliver goods and services to your community? The federal government distributes more than $400 billion annually to state, local and tribal governments based on census data. One of the shortest census forms in history, the 2010 Census form asks 10 questions and takes about 10 minutes to complete. Completing your census form is easy, important and safe. Your participation is vital. I By participating in the census, you can help create a better future for you and those important to you. T, f~ ' k ^ ( t K y ; ~Tl lh ti K• t ra 4 ,,,ts'~ 3'~ ~ fy ~ r~~ lr~i }t ~',T '~4'•"~S.iV ~ ~ ~ ~1}' y ~ ~ . c ~ 4 ~lK, i e t ~ s t F 4 • a i e ~+t Y 3 {4 i S. f t 1C09 • For - r, CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT U.S. Census Bureau CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT: Fiscal Year 2008 Detailed Federal Expenditure Data - Oregon DESCHUTES COUNTY View. Spreadsheet FY 2008 SUMMARY TOTALS AMOUNT DIRECT EXPENDITURES OR OBLIGATIONS RETIREMENT / DISABILITY PAYMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS 453,773,728 (DR) OTHER DIRECT PAYMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS (DO) 126,222,509 DIRECT PAYMENTS OTHER THAN FOR INDIVIDUALS (DX) 1,590,576 GRANTS (BLOCK, FORMULA, PROJECT, AND 92,393,026 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS) (GG) PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS (PC) 24,261,716 SALARIES AND WAGES (SW) 56,295,947 TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES OR OBLIGATIONS 754,537,502 EXHIBIT TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES OR OBLIGATIONS - 20,053,296 DEFENSE TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES OR OBLIGATIONS - NON 734,484,206 DEFENSE OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE DIRECT LOANS (DL) 6,824,368 GUARANTEED/INSURED LOANS (GL) 137,431,913 INSURANCE (II) 77,850,634 Retirement & Disability Payments for Individuals (DR) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME 17.307 COAL MINE WORKERS' COMPENSATION 17.310 ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION 17.FEC FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION 57.001 SOCIAL INSURANCE FOR RAILROAD WORKERS 57.AAA SOCIAL INSURANCE FOR RR WORKERS - UNEMPLOYMENT & SICKNESS BENEFITS 64.104 PENSION FOR NON-SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY FOR VETERANS 64.105 PENSION TO VETERANS SURVIVING SPOUSES AND CHILDREN 64.109 VETERANS COMPENSATION FOR SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY 64.110 VETERANS DEPENDENCY & INDEMNITY COMPENSATION FOR SVC-CONNECTED DEATH 86.001 PENSION PLAN TERMINATION INSURANCE 96.001 SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY INSURANCE 96.002 SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INSURANCE 96.004 SOCIAL SECURITY SURVIVORS INSURANCE Page I of 5 FY 2008 AMOUNT 24,944 221,136 1,840,341 4,927,934 45,079 1,377,623 301,042 21,186,265 2,070,726 2,463,805 46,127,464 245,604,623 56,657,738 http://harvester.census.gov/cffr/asp/GeographyB.asp 1/25/2010 CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT Page 2 of 5 96.006 SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME 8,693,774 DR.100 FEDERAL RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-MILITARY 18,468,000 DR.200 FEDERAL RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-CIVILIAN 40,725,216 DR.300 RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-COAST GUARD/UNIFORMED EMPLOYEES 1,442,899 DR.500 RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICERS 978,210 DR.600 RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-NOAA COMMISSIONED OFFICER CORPS 172,512 DR.700 FEDERAL RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS-PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 444,397 Retirement & Disability Payments for Individuals Total: 453,773,728 Other Direct Payments for Individuals (DO) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME 10.427 RURAL RENTAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 10.551 FOOD STAMPS 10.912 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM 64.100 AUTOMOBILES AND ADAPTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR CERTAIN DISABLED VETERANS 64.101 BURIAL EXPENSES ALLOWANCE FOR VETERANS 64.116 VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION FOR DISABLED VETERANS 64.117 SURVIVORS AND DEPENDENTS EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 64.124 ALL VOLUNTEER FORCE EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 84.007 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS 84.033 FEDERAL WORK STUDY PROGRAM 84.063 FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM 93.773 MEDICARE-HOSPITAL INSURANCE 93.774 MEDICARE-SUPPLEMENTARY MEDICAL INSURANCE FY 2008 AMOUNT 332,514 13,450,331 384,909 768 6,294 135,804 144,125 848,288 116,885 127,376 3,607,736 55,860,636 51,206,843 Other Direct Payments for Individuals Total: 126,222,509 Direct Payments Other than for Individuals (DX) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT 10.051 COMMODITY LOANS AND LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS 39 10.055 PRODUCTION FLEXIBILITY PAYMENTS FOR CONTRACT COMMODITIES 31,208 10.069 CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM 5,493 10.450 CROP INSURANCE 1,297 10.914 WILDLIFE HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM 36,750 10.918 GROUND & SURFACE WATER CONSERVATION ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES 84,455 PROGR 14.195 SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM-SPECIAL ALLOCATIONS 98,970 14.850 PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING 127,409 17.310 ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION 19,506 64.103 LIFE INSURANCE FOR VETERANS 1,039,331 84.037 LOAN CANCELLATIONS 151 97.022 FLOOD INSURANCE 2,107 97.090 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PROGRAM 140,451 DX.100 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE-OTHER EXPENDITURES (NON-SALARY/NON-PROCUREMENT) 3,409 Direct Payments Other than for Individuals Total: 1,590,576 http://harvester.census.gov/cffr/asp/GeographyB.asp 1/25/2010 CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT Page 3 of 5 Grants (Block, Formula, Project, and Cooperative Agreements) (GG) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT 10.417 VERY LOW-INCOME HOUSING REPAIR LOANS AND GRANTS 7,195 10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM 1,708,927 10.557 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN 1,896,764 10.674 FOREST PRODUCTS LAB: TECHNOLOGY MARKETING UNIT (TMU) 500,000 10.769 RURAL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GRANTS 23,000 10.901 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 12,500 10.904 WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PREVENTION 741,400 11.302 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-SUPPORT FOR PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS 55,000 11.303 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 43,000 14.218 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTS 430,383 14.231 EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM 296,759 14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS 7,111,642 14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUNDS 85,227 15.228 URBAN INTERFACE COMMUNITY AND RURAL FIRE ASSISTANCE 794,949 15.507 WATER 2025 1,171,434 15.530 WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM (WCFSP) 63,095 15.632 CONSERVATION GRANTS PRIVATE STEWARDSHIP FOR IMPERILED SPECIES 204,000 15.808 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-RESEARCH AND DATA ACQUISITION 10,000 15.FFB FISH AND WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT 200,000 16.606 STATE CRIMINAL ALIEN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 61,346 16.745 CRIMINAL & JUVENILE JUSTICE & MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATION PROGRAM 199,638 20.106 AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 6,544,642 20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION 16,110,615 20.500 FEDERAL TRANSIT-CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS 418,000 20.507 FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS 664,148 47.041 ENGINEERING GRANTS 1,023,771 84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCIES 2,270,817 84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION-GRANTS TO STATES 3,380,075 84.132 CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING 104,790 93.121 ORAL DISEASES AND DISORDERS RESEARCH 192,192 93.276 DRUG-FREE COMMUNITIES SUPPORT PROGRAM GRANTS 100,000 93.550 TRANSITIONAL LIVING FOR HOMELESS YOUTH 200,000 93.557 EDUC & PREV TO REDUCE SEXUAL ABUSE OF RUNAWAY HOMELESS AND STREET 100,000 YOUTH 93.558 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 5,639,978 93.563 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 1,038,689 93.568 LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE 1,022,764 93.600 HEAD START 1,311,251 93.623 RUNAWAY AND HOMELESS YOUTH 110,424 93.767 STATE CHILDREN'S INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP) 964,570 93.768 MEDICAID INFRASTR GRANTS TO SUPPORT THE COMPETIT EMPLOY OF PEOPLE W/ 10,406 DISA 93.777 STATE SURVEY AND CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND SUPPLIERS 40,374 93.778 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 34,357,498 93.781 SEED GRANTS TO STATES FOR QUALIFIED HIGH-RISK POOLS 90,390 93.959 BLOCK GRANTS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE 464,329 94.002 RETIRED AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM (RSVP) 41,612 97.044 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTERS GRANT 571,162 98.003 OCEAN FREIGHT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM(OFR) 4,270 http://harvester.census.gov/cffr/asp/GeographyB.asp 1/25/2010 CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT Page 4 of 5 Grants (Block, Formula, Project, and Cooperative Agreements) Total: 92,393,026 Procurement Contracts (PC) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT PC. 100 PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS-DEPT OF DEFENSE 821,296 PC.200 PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS-ALL FED GOVT AGENCIES OTHER THAN DEFENSE & 18,041,208 USPS PC.300 PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS-U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 5,399,212 Procurement Contracts Total: 24,261,716 Salaries and Wages (SW) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT SW.100 SALARIES AND WAGES-DEPT OF DEFENSE (ACTIVE MILITARY EMPLOYEES) 88,000 SW.400 SALARIES AND WAGES-DEPT OF DEFENSE (CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES) 676,000 SW.500 SALARIES AND WAGES-ALL FED GOVT CIVILIAN EMP EXCEPT DEFENSE & USPS 33,618,000 SW.600 SALARIES AND WAGES-U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 21,913,947 Salaries and Wages Total: 56,295,947 Direct Loans (DL) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT 10.410 VERY LOW TO MODERATE INCOME HOUSING LOANS 2,624,506 10.760 WATER AND WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES 2,022,000 11.415 FISHERIES FINANCE PROGRAM 640,000 84.268 FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOANS 1,537,862 Direct Loans Total: 6,824,368 Guaranteed/Insured Loans (GL) PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT 10.410 VERY LOW TO MODERATE INCOME HOUSING LOANS 11,968,090 10.768 BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY LOANS 300,000 14.117 MORTGAGE INSURANCE HOMES 99,468,996 59.012 SMALL BUSINESS LOANS 7,985,415 59.041 CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOANS (504 LOANS) 3,152,000 64.114 VETERANS HOUSING GUARANTEED AND INSURED LOANS 14,557,412 Guaranteed/Insured Loans Total: 137,431,913 Insurance (ll) http://harvester.census.gov/cffr/asp/GeographyB.asp 1/25/2010 CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT Page 5 of 5 PROGRAM PROGRAM NAME FY 2008 AMOUNT 10.450 CROP INSURANCE 50,763 97.022 FLOOD INSURANCE 77,799,871 Insurance Total: 77,850,634 http://harvester.census.gov/cffr/asp/GeographyB.asp 1/25/2010 Use a blue or black pers. ~ Start hey The Census must count every person living in the United States on April 1, 2010. Before you answer Question 1, count the people living in this house, apartment, or mobile home using our guidelines. • Count all people, including babies, who live and sleep here most of the time. The Census Bureau also conducts counts in institutions and other places, so: • Do not count anyone living away either at college or in the Armed Forces. • Do not count anyone in a nursing home, jail, prison, detention facility, etc., on April 1, 2010. • Leave these people off your form, even if they will return to live here after they leave college, the nursing home, the military, jail, etc. Otherwise, they may be counted twice. The Census must also include people without a permanent place to stay, so: • If someone who has no permanent place to stay is staying here on April 1, 2010, count that person. Otherwise, he or she may be missed in the census. 1. How many people were living or staying in this house, apartment, or mobile home on April 1, 2010? Number of people = z. were tnere any aaaitionai people staying nere April 1, 2010 that you did not include in Question 19 Mark 'X I all that apply. Children, such as newborn babies or foster children Relatives, such as adult children, cousins., or in-laws Nonrelatives, such as roommates or live-in baby sifters People staying here tempore(My No additional people 3. Is this house, apartment, or noblle home - Mark 'X' ONE box. Owned by you or someone in this household with a mortgage or loan? Include home equity loans. Owned by you or someone in this household free and clear (without a mortgage or loan)? Rented? Occupied without payment of rent? 4. What is your telephone number? We may call if we don't understand an answer. Area Code + Number OMB No. 0607-0919-C: Approval Expires 12/31/2011. Form D-61 (1-15-2009) USCENSUSBUREAU 5. Please provide information for each person living here. Start with a person living here who owns or rents this house, apartment, or mot home. If the owner or renter lives somewhere else, start with any ad living here. This will be Person 1. What is Person 1's name? Print name below. Last Name First Name - - _ . - - - - MI 6. What is Person 1's sex? Mark JX ONE box. Male - Female 7. What is Person 1's age and what is Person 1's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print r►umbers,in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month.'"Day Year of birth 4 NOTE: Please answeft"86TH-fluestion 8 about Hispanic origin and Question 9 about raae.. For%this census, Hispanic origins are not rac( 8. Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mekican,V Mexican Am., Chicano Yes Puerto Rican ' .;~.Yes;_Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for exan ;Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on. 9. What is Person 1's race? Mark X] one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native - Print name of enrolled or principal tribe. Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. A7 Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - race, for example, Fijian, Tonc and so on. 17 Some other race - Print race. 10. Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes - Mark IJ all that apply. In college housing For child custody In the military In jail or prison :_J At a seasonal In a nursing home or second residence For another reason If more people were counted in Question 1, continue with Person 2. Print name of Person 2 Last Name First Name MI How is this person related to Person 1 ? Mark X ONE box. Husband or wife Biological son or daughter Adopted son or daughter Stepson or stepdaughter Brother or sister Father or mother Grandchild Parent-in-law Son-in-law or daughter-in-law Other relative Roomer or boarder Housemate or roommate Unmarried partner Other nonrelative What is this person's sex? Mark X ONE box. Male Female What is this person's age and what is this person's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print numbers in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month Day Year of birth NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin and Question 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races. 5. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano Yes, Puerto Rican Yes, Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on. 17 What is this person's race? Mark x one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native - Print name of enrolled or principal tribe. Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. A7 Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - Print race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on. 17 Some other race - Print race. A7 . Does this person sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes - Mark X all that apply. In college housing For child custody In the military In jail or prison At a seasonal In a nursing home or second residence For another reason If more people were counted in Question 1 on the front page, continue with Person 3. 1. Print name of Person 3 Last Name First Name Mi 2. How is this person related to Person 1 ? Mark X-1 ONE box. Husband or wife Biological son or daughter Adopted son or daughter Stepson or stepdaughter Brother or sister Father or mother Grandchild Parent-in-law Son-in-law or daughter-in-law Other relative Roomer or boarder Housemate or roommate Unmarried partner Other nonrelative 3. What is this person's sex? Mark X ONE box. Male Female 4. What is this person's age and what is this person's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print numbers in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month Day Year of birth 4 NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin and Question 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not race; 5. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano Yes, Puerto Rican Yes, Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on. j7 6. What is this person's race? Mark X one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native - Print name of enrolled or principal tribe. Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. 47 Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - Prin race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on. 17 Some other race - Print race. AW 7. Does this person sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes - Mark X all that apply. In college housing In the military At a seasonal or second residence If more people were counted in Questic continue with Person 4. For child custody In jail or prison In a nursing home For another reason )n 1 on the front page, Print name of Person 4 Last Name First Name MI How is this person related to Person 1 ? Mark X! ONE box. Husband or wife Biological son or daughter Adopted son or daughter Stepson or stepdaughter Brother or sister Father or mother Grandchild Parent-in-law Son-in-law or daughter-in-law Other relative Roomer or boarder Housemate or roommate Unmarried partner Other nonrelative . What is this person's sex? Mark; X ONE box. Male Female What is this person's age and what is this person's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print numbers in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month Day Year of birth NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin and Question 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races. . Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano Yes, Puerto Rican Yes, Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on. ; What is this person's race? Mark ;X one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native - Print name of enrolled or principal tribe. j7 Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. 17 Some other race - Print race. AW Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - Print race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on. W Does this person sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes - Mark Xi all that apply. In college housing For child custody In the military In jail or prison At a seasonal In a nursing home or second residence For another reason If more people were counted In Question 1 on the front page, continue with Person 5. 1. Print name of Person 5 Last Name First Name MI 2. How is this person related to Person 1? Mark XI ONE box. Husband or wife u Biological son or daughter Adopted son or daughter Stepson or stepdaughter Brother or sister Father or mother Grandchild Parent-in-law Son-in-law or daughter-in-law Other relative Roomer or boarder Housemate or roommate Unmarried partner Other nonrelative 3. What is this person's sex? Mark i X; ONE box. Male Female 4. What is this person's age and what is this person's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print numbers in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month Day Year of birth NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin and Question 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races 5. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No; not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano Yes, Puerto Rican Yes, Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on. j7 6. What is this person's race? Mark X~ one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native - Print name of enrolled or principal tribe. Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. A7 Some other race - Print race. AW Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - Prin race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on. A7 7. Does this person sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes -Mark: X! all that apply. In college housing For child custody In the military In jail or prison At a seasonal In a nursing home or second residence For another reason If more people were counted in Question 1 on the front page, continue with Person 6. o tA~'i~ ° If your enclosed postage-paid envelope-is missing, please mail your completed form to: U.S\'Census Bureau ,National Processing Center fM` East 10th Street ' Jeffersonville, IN 47132 If you need help completirig~ this form, call 1-866-872-6868 between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., 7 days a week. TheJelephone call is free. TDD - Telephone, display device for the hearing impaired. Call 1-866-783-2010 between 8:00 a.m. and-9:606,p, 7 days a week. The telephone call is free. ;,NECESITA',:Q►yl1DA? Si usted necesita ayuda para completar este cuestionario, flame al 1-866-928-2010 entre las 8:00 a.m. y 9:00 p.m., 7 dias a la semana. La llamada telefonica es gratis. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that, for the average household, this form will take about 10 minutes to complete, including the time for reviewing the instructions and answers. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this burden to: Paperwork Reduction Project 0607-0919-C, U.S. Census Bureau, AMSD-3K138, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233. You may e-mail comments to <Paperwork@census.gov>; use "Paperwork Project 0607-0919-C" as the subject. Respondents are not required to respond to any information collection unless it displays a valid approval number from the Office of Management and Budget. GL' U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 2009-545-238/10219 . Print name of Person 6 Last Name First Name MI . How is this person related to Person 1 ? Mark X ONE box. Husband or wife Parent-in-law Biological son or daughter Son-in-law or daughter-in-law Adopted son or daughter Other relative Stepson or stepdaughter Roomer or boarder Brother or sister Housemate or roommate Father or mother Unmarried partner Grandchild Other nonrelative . What is this person's sex? Mark; Xi ONE box. Male Female What is this person's age and what is this person's date of birth? Please report babies as age 0 when the child is less than 1 year old. Print numbers in boxes. Age on April 1, 2010 Month Day Year of birth 00 NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin and Question 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano Yes, Puerto Rican Yes, Cuban Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin - Print origin, for example, Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on, J7 . What is this person's race? Mark X! one or more boxes. White Black, African Am., or Negro American Indian or Alaska Native Print name of enrolled orprincipal tribe. Asian Indian Japanese Chinese Korean Filipino Vietnamese Other Asian - Print race, for example, Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on. w Some other race - Print race. W Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander - Print race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on. w . Does this person sometimes live or stay somewhere else? No Yes - Mark' X all that apply. In college housing For child custody in the military In jail or prison At a seasonal In a nursing home or second residence For another reason If more than six people were counted in Question 1 on the front page, turn the page and continue. Form D-61 (1-15-2009) 4 If more people live here, turn the page and continue. Use thi s section to complete information for the rest of the people you counted in y Question 1 on th front page. We may call for additional information about th e em. Person 7 Last Name First Name MI Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No Person 8 Last Name First Name MI Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No Person 9 Last Name First Name MI Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No Person 10 Last Name First Name MI Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No Person 11 Last Name First Name MI :1 Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No - Person 12 Last Name First Name MI Sex Age on April 1, 2010 Date of Birth Related to Person 1? Male Month Day Year Female Yes No Thank you for completing your official F oFFICiAL use ONLY 2010 Census form. J I C1 JIC2 REVIEWED LEGAL COUNSEL For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution @ DRAFT * RESOLUTION NO. 20_-@ * WHEREAS, Skyliners Road is a popular road to hold events, and WHEREAS, the road condition of Skyliners Road continues to deteriorate, and WHEREAS, neighbors living off of Skyliners Road have expressed concerns over the safety of holding events on Skyliners Road, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, as follows: Section 1. Directs staff to create a new Skyliners Road event actual cost of service fee until the road is constructed. The actual cost of service fee will include the $35 event permit fee along with costs associated with Sherriff's Office reserve deputies assigned to the event. The County Administrator, or designee, shall determine which Skyliners Road events to request Sherriff's Office reserve deputies and the number of hours. Section 2. Limits the events that will be permitted on Skyliners Road to the Time Trial/Duathlon Series, Duel in the Desert, US Elite Nationals, High Desert Omnium, and Cascade Cycling Classic until Skyliners Road is reconstructed. Events that only cross over Skyliners Road such as the Cascade Lakes Relay, Haulin Aspen, and High Cascade 100 shall continue to be permitted. Section 3. Limits the events listed in Section 2 to no more than two "event days" per event until Skyliners Road is reconstructed. DATED this day of , 20_ ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON DENNIS R. LUKE, Chair ALAN UNGER, Vice Chair Recording Secretary TAMMY BANEY, Commissioner PAGE 1 OF 2 - RESOLUTION NO.20_-@ (M/D/Y)