The URL can be used to link to this page

2010-214-Minutes for Meeting April 05,2010 Recorded 4/19/2010COUNTY NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKS COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 04/19/2010 08:21:11 AM III IIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIII l -234 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes- County Clerk Certificate Page If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded at the request of [give reason] previously recorded in Book _ or as Fee Number to correct and Page < Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2010 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend Present were Commissioners Alan Unger and Tammy Baney; Commissioner Dennis R. Luke was out of the office. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; Tom Anderson, Nick Lelack, George Read, Will Groves and Peter Gutowsky, Community Development; and approximately twenty other citizens. Vice Chair Unger opened the meeting at 10:00 a. m. 1. Before the Board was Citizen Input. None was offered. 2. Before the Board was a Public Hearing on Ordinances No. 2010-015 and 2010-016, regarding Goal Exceptions to Add Wireless Telecommunications Facilities to the List of Uses Permitted in the Oregon Water Wonderland Sewer District Zone. Will Groves explained that this is a de novo hearing, and Vice Chair Unger then read the opening statement. In regard to possible conflicts of interest or personal interest, the Commissioners stated that all that has occurred is a public work session on this issue. Mr. Groves gave a brief overview of the purpose of the hearing and the proposed Ordinances. There has been no public input against this Ordinance. This use would only be put on the list of possible uses. Under the proposal, three types of cellular towers would be allowed: tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3. A tier 3 facility could have a tower as high as 150 and allow for lighting. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 1 of 14 Pages General conditional use standards would have to be met; in this case, those related to adjacent residential uses. The previous forest zone and RR-10 zone and limited use combining zone have the same approval process as the current zoning. Miles Conway, for AT&T Mobility, said that members of the Sewer District are in attendance. They are asking for an amendment to the comprehensive plan and zoning. The current zoning was created specifically for this property and for the sewage treatment system. Approval of this change would allow them to go forward with an application and further proceedings. These facilities would have been allowed in the previous zone but the language was not included when the change was made to add the current zoning. He said that the site is 480 acres, screened from residences, and this use would not impact the sewage treatment facility or other uses. It will provide an additional source of revenue to the District. An amendment to the conservation easement would also be needed. The tower would be near the existing facility and should not diminish the natural values of the property. Commissioner Baney noted that that approving this Ordinance would allow the applicant to go forward with an application. Mr. Conway said the conservation easement change is needed before other issues can be pursued. Citizen Nunzie Gould voiced concerns about piecemeal applications, which does not look at the overall cellular tower plan. There are a lot of opportunities for co-location throughout the County. She is not seeing this concept used and wants the Board to think about what the conservation easements and additional cellular towers mean to the community. Eagle Crest offered a golf membership to two residents who appealed a Central Electric Cooperative power line. Therefore, the applicant acknowledged a loss of value when these things occur. Regarding Cline Butte, not all property owners who might be impacted were notified. When the golf poles were erected in north Bend, they negatively impacted local property values. She would like to see the County make a comprehensive review of what is important to the community. She asked for a straw poll as to why people moved to this area. People move here for natural amenities, and cellular towers are impacting this in an adverse manner, and she feels there is no need for additional poles. The landscape has to be protected, not just for the local people but also for those living miles away. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 2 of 14 Pages Commissioner Baney stated that it is her understanding that they cannot proceed unless they can show that other means, such as co-location, will not work. Mr. Groves said that even 9-1-1 acknowledges a "dark spot" in this particular area that lacks signal strength. In terms of identification of alternate sites, that will be part of the application process. Commissioner Baney asked if the County can deny cellular towers. Dave Kanner said the law states that there cannot be a barrier to a provider, and if zoning rules allow for "dark" areas, this is against the law. The law prohibits requiring co-location. The County asks for an explanation of why they can't do co-location, but cannot require it. Commissioner Baney said that she is sensitive to the comments made, but knew there was more to it. Commissioner Unger closed the hearing. He observed that the ability to apply for a tower was previously allowed, but is not at this time. He supports moving forward. Commissioner Baney stated that she feels this is a logical location for the facilities. Laurie Craghead said that there are a few modifications needed, as not all the documents were available for Board review in their final version. Mr. Groves said that findings and decisions need to be drafted; and the conservation easement will be drafted with acceptable language. The applicant asked that the Ordinances be adopted by emergency, but the findings and decision need to be completed first. The Board asked staff to move forward with draft findings. 3. Before the Board was Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 2010-008, regarding the Adoption of an Urban Growth Boundary and Urbanization Policies for the City of La Pine. Commissioner Baney read the opening statement at this time. The Commissioners had no bias, prejudgment or personal interest to disclose. Peter Gutowsky gave an overview of the item, which is the first comprehensive plan for the City, an important document guiding its development in the future. The La Pine City Council and La Pine Planning Commission recommend adoption, and the County Planning Commission also recommends that the Board adopt this Ordinance. Staff feels this proposal is defensible at the State level. The process has been very transparent and the community appears to be behind it as a sound document. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 3 of 14 Pages Commissioner Unger asked about noting and accepting Redmond's comprehensive plan in the language, but no others. Mr. Gutowsky said the County gives deference to other planning documents; however, there is litigation surrounding the Bend document so it has not yet been codified. Commissioner Unger asked about a transportation system plan map. Mr. Gutowsky said this does not change the County's plan, as this system would be within the City. Debra McMahon and James Lewis, consultants for the City of La Pine, said that they are using the County's transportation plan until the City can adopt its own. The first step is studying the corridors and other plans, which will be the base for a future TSP. Mr. Lewis added that the TSP is not an element of the comprehensive plan, but it is part of a continual transformation for the City. This is an ongoing process. Commissioner Unger stated that there is a committee involved in this. Ms. McMahon said that the citizens were to be involved in the entire process. The local Planning Commission has been doing a good job, considering it is a new process, and has engaged the community at a high level. She added that the County Planning Commission and County staff have done a great job of seeing this process through. Mr. Gutowsky explained that the emergency clause is requested because this was an exhaustive process and they would like to see it finalized. Ms. McMahon added that the water and sewer districts are anxious to have this adopted so they can apply for grants, and there are timelines for grants from DLCD. Commissioner Unger is impressed with what has been done, and encouraged this to move forward. BANEY: Move first and second readings by title only of the Ordinance. UNGER: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Vice Chair votes yes. Commissioner Unger conducted the first and second readings at this time. BANEY: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2010-008. UNGER: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 4 of 14 Pages VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was a Public Hearing, and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2010- 002, regarding Destination Resort Remapping Amendment Procedures. This hearing was continued from March 1, 2010. Mr. Gutowsky entered the entire file into the record. There has been considerable citizen input, which has been made available to the Board. Also produced is a matrix showing mapping criteria. Both oral and written testimony are allowed at this time. Commissioner Unger said he would like to hear oral testimony, and then close further oral testimony. Commissioner Baney would like to wait on this decision until hearing from citizens today. Commissioner Unger stated the Planning Commission had asked that this process be reconsidered. The Planning Commission was requested by the Board to meet again on this issue and make recommendations. The hearing was continued to allow the Planning Commission time to revisit the recommendation, since not all Planning Commission members were present at the meetings at which this was addressed. Since then they have met twice on this issue. They made changes to the first recommendations, which are in the record. Before changes can be made to the existing map, the eligibility criteria has to be determined, and the procedures for submitting an application must be included. Dave Kanner said that Neil Bryant's letter asks about special districts. He asked if special districts were to be allowed but public lands not to be include. Mr. Gutowsky said the issue of irrigation districts never came up. Commissioner Unger opened the meeting for public testimony at this time. Barbara McAusland of Bend asked if testimony should be on the new Planning Commission recommendations or an overview of the issue. She has previously submitted testimony, both oral and written. Her major objections relate to water use. The Planning Commission has added in all lands that are subject to water mitigation in the future. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 5 of 14 Pages The other objection is that these destinations are de facto towns because developers abused the purpose of the permit process. They give assurances they will follow the rules, but fail to do so. It is a privilege to make a resort, and it is not the role of Deschutes County to carry the burden for this kind of development. There are 23 now and I 1 more to come. Paul Dewey for Central Oregon Landwatch asked if the County has reviewed his March letter. Commissioner Baney said she did receive it. Mr. Dewey said that they oppose the changes in Code allowing for contiguous ownerships to combine. There is some controversy as to whether State law would allow this. Regardless, Deschutes County has the ability and authority to be more restrictive than State law. This change could cause gerrymandered resorts. There is not an adequate record of the impact this change might have to the Code. From the beginning, it was thought the County was going to cut back on the amount of acreage allowed, but expansion has occurred instead. If Measure 49 claims are making the County overly cautious, the map will be massive. This is coming when the public and DLCD realize there are a lot of costs involved in these kinds of resorts. Whether they working, and if should they change in light of the current economy, and other factors should be analyzed. Mr. Dewey said his group is also against any cluster subdivisions being allowed in this mapping. Kathryn Lindbloom, a resident for three years, lives near the Bend city line. In other places all of the farmland went into subdivisions. She would like to have a say on how things change here. Subdivisions are necessary, as people have to live somewhere. She lived in Chicago, then in the Bay Area. The economy changed and so do a lot of things. She feels that you can't stop progress, but you can have a say in how it happens. She owns property in Aspen Lakes, and is impressed with the local destination resorts. People cannot even see the developments from the road. She works in Sisters and knows that people come from all over the world to visit. The City of Sisters relies on these visitors to live. She is not for all destination resorts, but is not against them altogether. Recreational pursuits change. Life changes. She has visited Brasada Ranch and it seems very busy in the summer. She hopes the Board will consider keeping all of the options open. The resorts are a source of income and help to keep businesses, especially small businesses, going. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 6 of 14 Pages Charlie Ringo said he is stunned by the comments that change has to happen. The quality of life needs to be considered. Subdivisions are not the answer. He urged the Board to oppose the Planning Commission's proposal. Places like Sunriver and Black Butte Ranch are true destination resorts. On the flip side, developments that are masked as destination resorts but are just subdivisions are the kind of thing that should not be allowed. Those do threaten the quality of life. He is grateful for the land use system the State has in place, preserving farmland and open spaces. All you have to do it go to other places to see how the lack of land use planning has affected those areas. Decisions need to be made in the spirit of land use laws. A major justification for the resorts seems to be jobs. The thing the County needs is a stable economy, and this cannot be found with destination resorts. If there are no jobs, no one will be buying property. Industry that lasts year in and year out is what is needed; something sustainable. He asked that the resort mapping not be expanded. Duncan Brown of Bend said he previously submitted written testimony. He would like to discuss the findings now before the Board. These findings are meant to provide the legal basis for the Board's actions. There is no good definition of a destination resort and no way to know what is being mapped. There is no clear picture for the public as to what is occurring. He suggested they develop a definition, at least the State's definition, and put it into Code. The State's definition does refer to recreation, but there is no support in the findings for recreation. Goal 8 lists beneficial impacts but does not explain what those benefits are and how they are supported by the proposed mapping. Regarding grandfathering in properties, if a document is updated, it needs to show it is in conformance with State and other regulations. A main requirement of the document is to conform to State regulations. There are still about as many unbuilt or undeveloped lots now within 20 miles, of Bend as they have built in the past thirty years of destination resorts, so there is no need for additional buildable land at this time. A clear vision of what Deschutes County wants to see in the future is important. Merry Ann Moore testified for the 900 local members of the Sierra Club. (She distributed a document at this time.) She pointed out the money that has been spent over the past few years. She said that `paper' subdivisions should not be included, nor should cluster developments even if they dedicate 50% open space. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 7 of 14 Pages Grandfathering should not be allowed, nor any new lands that might be under multiple ownerships. She feels that resorts have damaged natural resources, and the new mapping process has not incorporated new research on current habitat and wildlife needs. More protection is needed, not less. She would like to see the resort map repealed entirely, and the wildlife maps should be revised to include current information. Regarding item #3 of the matrix, it should be noted that this is not already a part of statute. Jim Guild stated that attending meetings seem to be an "us versus them" type of environment, and does not feel that the citizens of the County are as well represented as the developers are. It is a slippery slope. The Bulletin published a reference to the public trust. The government is responsible for the health, safety and welfare of constituents. He asked about the financial liability of the failed resorts. Capital reserves are drying up for some of them, like Brasada Ranch. Thornburg, Pronghorn and Tetherow are struggling. He asked if the people of the County may end up being responsible for these failures. Regarding remapping, Mr. Guild feels it is inappropriate that the Cyrus family has a representative on the Planning Commission, since they have a definite personal interest. Mr. Cyrus is not the only Planning Commissioner with an agenda. Mr. Guild feels that the Cyrus development expansion has been planned for a long time. Planning Commissioner Brown was referred to in the article only by his last name. He has tried to change requirements for roadside farm stands so he can establish one at his own property. This is not an individual case. The Planning Commission needs to consider why they are a part of this group in the first place. It does matter if they are unpaid volunteers. It is nothing but trouble to allow someone like this to go forward, as others will want to do the same. He asked Commissioner Unger about destination resort reform, as he heard that Commissioner Unger is now supporting destination resorts in Salem, and thinks this is remiss and a conflict of interest. The people who come to the meetings and oppose resorts are not anti-growth NIMBY's or have a hidden agenda. They are committed community activists and care about the County. They'd like to have the respect of the Board and be represented. Commissioner Unger said that he did give testimony in Salem, which had been approved by the Board. The gist was that the criteria needs to be reevaluated to keep what is good and get rid of what is bad. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 8 of 14 Pages Mr. Guild stated that this will not happen by expanding the amount of property that is mapped. These are not viable enterprises and should be excluded. Nunzie Gould said that the statistics created by the County do not really add up. There are some parcels as small as three acres included on the map right now. She asked if the Board knows the impact of this type of thing on the overall plan. Lands that cannot meet criteria should not be included, so this is flawed. They are trying to get somewhere without objections and appeals. Grandfathering is inappropriate. What prompted the change is a change in State law. A few additional things were suggested by the Planning Commission. She suggested that the matrix be changed to include State requirements only. There is no need to add in subdivisions, public lands, and some other properties. She sees Deschutes River Ranch as a viable resort. It was platted for 52 homesites. Parts of this area includes leased lands, which should not be allowed in the subdivision. A developer of the subdivision has not filed homeowner's association dues, resulting in a lien. She has been getting notices from the homeowners' association saying that the water going to be turned off in that development. In the maps that the County creates, remaining eligible lands should not include Deschutes River Ranch. This is just one example of what has not been considered. A construction lien to Hickman Williams for Thornburgh is on file. They are not paying their bills. This is not unusual for these resorts. There are notices of federal tax liens listed as well. The bigger picture is the economies of real estate and second homes, which has been altered. This process is not moving forward. Adding any more land to resort mapping further threatens the existing resorts. Look carefully at the services, what is happening within resorts and how things are being run. Commissioner Baney said that the Board has not stated its particular position. They are aware of foreclosures and the economy. The Commissioners have not taken a particular position, and continue to take public testimony and review the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Ms. Gould said she is concerned about who is footing the bills for the problems created by destination resorts. She is not seeing any recommendations that the public has made being considered. The document she sees appears to be in support of the changes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 9 of 14 Pages Commissioner Baney stated that they have to start somewhere, and will make a decision at some point based on testimony and other factors. Ms. Gould asked for the time for testimony be left open, even though the discussion has been very drawn out. Liz Fancher, an attorney representing Belveron, said that the 160 acres is not a State law requirement at all. The suggestion is that the County make expectations realistic. The change matches State law. The only question is whether lots can be combined; but there is no law addressing this issue. If this is added, it will not violate a State law. There is no legal ramification for doing this. Additionally, this process is just taking things off the map and reducing the eligibility. Most of the changes are more restrictive than current Code. The Planning Commission has asked that some others be added back in, but previously there was more taken off. For the most part, most that is taken off won't be an issue. Justification to the State will be required to add anything. This County is more restrictive than the State, who has already said what is ineligible. If the previous recommendation was adopted with a few changes, it would be a reasonable approach and would limit the added lands. Ms. Fancher noted that there was a comment by Duncan Brown regarding changes being justified. Others are worried about grandfathering. She agrees that if they are not eligible now under current Sate law, they should not be grandfathered. These lands are not eligible and not entitled. State law controls, and the County has to follow. The UAR's and areas of critical concern need to be considered. In regard to adding in subdivisions, this is the prior recommendation of the Planning Commission. Subdivisions are allowed by State law. Kimry Jelen testified that Kathryn Lindbloom mentioned that Sunriver and Black Butte bring in business and are not that noticeable from the road. They are successful because of the views and natural areas. Ms. Jelen is concerned about the quality of life, wildlife and water. Perhaps a larger overview is needed by the County, and a public forum to decide how the County should be developed, and overlay the destination resorts over that. To start adding more lands does not make sense. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 10 of 14 Pages There are many impacts of destination resorts and residents have to carry the burden of those impacts. Eagle Crest is its own town, but its residents use the local roads. She does not see the larger priorities being addressed. The big picture needs to be looked at, so that nothing is lost. They can't afford to lose what makes Oregon unique. Frank Deggendorfer said he is impressed by the testimony given. In looking at the Planning Commission's recommendations, he has a number of concerns. He owns 316 acres, with subdivisions on each side, and because of that his land is a forced green belt for all the neighbors to enjoy. As the destination resort remapping process evolves, this might change. The reason for his comments is to ask for clarification on the Planning Commission's recommendations. When Bend gets its new urban growth boundary established and the population reaches 100,000, most of this issue will be moot because no new destination resorts will be allowed within 24 air miles of Bend. Also, regarding what might be considered "prime" farmland in Deschutes County, he is confused. He mostly grows rocks. In regard to wildlife, the studies are 30 years old or older. The applicants or staff need more current studies to rely upon. Irrigated lands of 40 acres or more contiguous is one criteria, but he has this plus a lot of dry land. All EFU lands are eligible, but on the other hand they are not. He asked how he can make his voice heard. Clarification needs to take place before a rational decision can be made. Pamela Burm of Sisters said she feels too many things are unknown. Water is a big concern. She asked which way the County is going to go with conservation and the environment. Alan Holzman, Vice President of the Sisters Planning Commission, spoke individually. He said last year County staff came before the Sisters Planning Commission; he is a supporter of the Planning staff and they have a lot of good information. Sisters also has a good staff for this, and is puzzled why the County Planning Commission has not relied on them more. There is a lot of responsibility, whether appointed or elected, to listen to folks with vested interests and well as the everyday citizen. He is somewhat concerned that the County Planning Commission has not always listened or has chosen to ignore public testimony. The professional Planners bring a lot of knowledge to the table. The original plan was much simpler, but now there is a totally different recommendation from the Planning Commission. He hopes the Board can bring this back under control. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 11 of 14 Pages Commissioner Baney acknowledged that the original request was to reduce the amount of lands. Lyn Mattei asked that the record be left open for at least seven days. She wants to submit testimony in writing as well. The Board has to consider the Planning Commission's recommendations, and at least four of the motions rely on whether farming is economically viable. There are hard luck stories with farming, but are also success stories. One farmer wanted to do a bed & breakfast, another wanted to do a community center; they wanted more flexibility in the use of farm land Farmers should have some flexibility in using their farmland for more economic viability. The Board should not necessarily adopt the extreme position that farming is not viable. There are many less intrusive measures, some of which are listed in the matrix that the Planning Commission effectively rejected. (She read some of the wording from the document.) She suggested that the Board suspend the mapping process and finish those applications that are already underway, and spend the next couple of years working with the State to make the use of agricultural lands more flexible. The findings are inadequate to support compliance with State law, Goal 8 and the comprehensive plan. The grandfather clause includes properties that are not eligible, and violations cannot be grandfathered in. This does not meet State law, and should not be a new right. Tom Filcich said he wants to learn about government. He read the recent Bulletin article and has begun to lose confidence in the Planning Commission and upholding the public trust. He thought they would be taken to task for what they are doing. The testimony given today is impressive and he wants to honor what these citizens have said. He realizes there is a controversy with the Planning Commission, and they need to regain the public trust. Personally, he objects to staff having to spend so much time following up on this work. No further testimony was offered. Mr. Gutowsky said a directive of the Board was to summarize the testimony received at the Planning Commission meetings, and this is in the record. The Board has suggested extending the hearing, so a date certain is needed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 12 of 14 Pages Commissioner Baney said that some matrix in the past will show staff recommendations, especially if something is not legally defensible. She'd like to see that column added. She has not found a matrix that includes public testimony on different types of ideas. Commissioner Unger would like to know staff's input on the legalities. Commissioner Unger said that public testimony is not necessarily representative of the whole. Mr. Gutowsky said that all of the recommendations listed are legally defensible. It is important to know that they received direction from the Board to find out more about remapping. They held thirty meetings, and draft criteria was given to reduce the map based on public input. This input guided the draft text amendments. On December 2, the Planning Commission added some clarifications regarding contiguous ownership and other things. This all became the staff recommendation. Since then, the Planning Commission made a lot of changes. He feels that it should go back to the original recommendation. If things have changed since then, he needs to know based on policy direction so they can draft the documentation accordingly. Commissioners Baney and Unger would like a review of what the policy was before; which was how to make the map smaller. The Planning Commission is allowed to make these changes, but they are an advisory group and cannot change policy. Nick Lelack said that one issue is the sites that are less than 160 acres. A key issue is that State law has two sets of criteria. One set is for mapping, another for siting. Siting requires 160 acres, but mapping has no acreage requirement, per State law. Staff wanted to use the siting criteria as a basis for mapping. Most subdivisions of any kind in the County are not likely to be eligible due to size, ownership, and funding. Staff believes that all are legally defensible but this may not make sense. Commissioner Baney said that discussions took place as to allow someone to stay on the map, but they would have to request to be left on, rather than just leaving them on. Mr. Lelack said that the next destination resort work group meeting at the State level is scheduled on Monday, April 12 in Salem. Mr. Gutowsky asked for clarification on what is wanted from staff at this time. Commissioner Baney said she would like to see staff recommendations listed in the matrix as to whether something is defensible or makes sense. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 13 of 14 Pages The hearing was continued to Monday, April 19, 2010 at 10:00 a. m. for both oral and written testimony. 5. Before the Board were Additions to the Agenda. None were offered. Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 12:50 p.m. DATED this 5t" Day of April 2010 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. Dennis R. Luke, Chair ATTEST: 6nz~~ Recording Secretary Alan Unger, Vice Chair C-4 Tammy Baney, Co missioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Page 14 of 14 Pages Monday, April 5, 2010 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2010 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Citizens who wish to speak should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign-up cards provided. Please use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject of a public hearing will NOT be included in the record of that hearing. 2. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinances No. 2010-015 and 2010-016, regarding Goal Exceptions to Add Wireless Telecommunications Facilities to the List of Uses Permitted in the Oregon Water Wonderland Sewer District Zone - Will Groves, Community Development 3. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance No. 2010-008, regarding the Adoption of an Urban Growth Boundary and Urbanization Policies for the City of La Pine -Peter Gutowsky, Community Development 4. A PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from March 1), and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2010- 002, regarding Destination Resort Remapping Amendment Procedures - Peter Gutowsky, Community Development 5. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Pages FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572) Monday, April 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Tuesday, April 6 11:30 a.m. Family Access Network Luncheon - St. Charles, Bend Wednesday, April 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 14 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, April 15 9:00 a.m. Community Justice Department Update Monday, April 19 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 21 11:30 a.m. Redmond Economic Development Luncheon - Eagle Crest, Redmond 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, April 22 11:00 a.m. Quarterly Meeting with the Commission on Children & Families Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Pages Monday, Apri126 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Tuesday, April 27 11:30 a.m. League of Women Voters' Forum Wednesday, April 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Monday, May 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, May 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Wednesday, May 12 10:00 a.m. Meeting with Secretary of State, others re: Vote by Mail Process Update 11:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, May 13 7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, Redmond City Hall Monday, May, 17 9:00 a.m. Budget Committee Meeting and Department Budget Presentations (all day) Tuesday, May 18 9:00 a.m. Budget Committee Meeting and Department Budget Presentations (all day) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 3 of 4 Pages Wednesday, May 19 9:00 a.m. Budget Committee Meeting and Department Budget Presentations (all day) Thursday, May 20 9:00 a.m. Budget Committee Meeting and Department Budget Presentations (all day) Monday, May 24 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 12:00 noon Regular Meeting with Department Directors 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Wednesday, May 26 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Monday, May 31 Memorial Day - Most County offices will be closed Wednesday, June 2 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session - could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 3 10:00 a.m. Quarterly Meeting with the District Attorney 11:00 a.m. Quarterly Meeting with Community Development 1:30 p.m. Quarterly Meeting with the Road Department 2:30 p.m. Quarterly Meeting with Solid Waste Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Pages U~J-jES ~ r a \Z{ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: I T Tod Date: Name Co y/5- Address Phone #s ~ 9 ~ <4 % 19 E-mail address yl~n Cc~rv vjG t-0 Sc 1.,v ,Cam In Favor M Neutral/Undecided F-1 Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes F] No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. G~ ES co o Z~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: -1) V m ~ Date: Name N' wx Address 1~ cg y `-sw k_14~9. 9~ Phone #s 94 L f 2 0--- E-mail address In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes F] No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. U~0-V ES CO` L -A o < BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: G ' z3A d Date: )G Name 3 1 V C Al Address Phone #s ' --q72011 -7 /a Z--- E-mail address ❑ In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided „ Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the reco, /d" v-~es n jBOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: 1095 Date: Ll/G/,e Name k A, v L 7 E W F-Y Address l ej3 N w y< <lc s~., Phone #s 4, { l _S t 4~3 E-mail address ,~~j E 6 y b 0.~ 6 Q ❑ In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided ❑ Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes [a-No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. G~JTES CO 0 ' Z< Agenda Name Address V) 2, 54_5' ~fl-PS Phone #s Qyl ?7 7-- 76 ~ O E-mail address ❑ In Favor , Neutral[Undecided F-1 Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? 1:1 Yes KNo If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. JTES C G~ Oo < BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: fieAl/~fi'~~ lJcr Date: Name f?G~- /~n a Address 6- 5g"7c Z Phone #s ( 5-111 3 ?U" 3 GG E-mail address e A, • C4^ ❑ In Favor F-] Neutral/Undecided BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK of Interest: °Date: ~S ® Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes W] No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. G1'v-rFS co o BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: %vm"T! r-, Date: `r1 1 z0V 0 Name 1 LA In C-2-4 0 Address 4 Phone #s S7411-31,71 1, 00 E-mail address cto-A ea h r br-0 "r-w-, cf ea t'~tu_ . )I(R In Favor Neutral/Undecided ❑ Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? F]Yes XNo If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. U~JTES 7r o{ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING _ REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: Date: Name W 1~ V) of Address Phone #s E-mail address In Favor Neutral/Undecided D'',Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes F-] No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING L.Y REQUEST TO SPEAK f Agenda Item of Interest:i Date:l i ~ Name Address Phone #s 11 :r' Vi , 1~k C) )PV E-mail address ❑ In Favor F~ Neutral Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? r_1 Yes No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. v-r~s c ~G4 ✓2 o { BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: S~-SO✓-t- Date: Name Address a 02 T7701 -t- I - Phone #s ~!'(a S' C) E-mail address ' 12-Q I I'7_~; vA G~4 'e/ , In Favor F-] Neutral/Undecided F-1 pposed ubmitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. OG w2 o { BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: Date: CName Address R o eD x ?3(,,:, S/ sue, s Off, j 7 751 Phone #s 25 1 - 211 - & 5-6, -7 E-mail address ❑ In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided FA Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? M Yes If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. 0 JT~S 47i No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING Agenda Item of Interest: REQUEST TO SPEAK 0 41 C_ 10--, Date: Name k- Address t~ lK Phone #s 4--, Lj I 5 N 9. - L4 E-mail address R~-~z(~ U~Q-~K ' Suc t ms's , C A In Favor ~ Neutral/Undecided F] Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record' el n 2{ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: Y/►' t ~J . Date: Mbo Name ilar 1 el a &((\A Address "s), s Phone #s 70L 360 E-mail address )b~ 0(-CM64 ❑ In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided IN Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes X No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. .I'JTrs ~ o { BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REOUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest X? Name Address t, Phone #s S~~ / r E-mail address 3J ❑ In Favor Submitting written documents as-part of testimony? ❑ Yes No (❑0, Neutral/Undecided ❑ Opposed G~JTES n~ r Z~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of I terest:'a &w f--f te: y A . ~_7// Name 7 4 jl~ 4 Address Ll ~ '5~;JZIK o_.f X" J. Phone #s E-mail address L. 17 ❑ In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? 0 Yes ❑ No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. Je ~h oBOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest: Date: , Name M 2C C, Address Z 2~ % # 3aA) Phone #s E-mail address 0 In Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided ❑ Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes ❑ No If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT FOR A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS La Pine Urban Growth Boundary Public Hearing April 5. 2010 This is a public hearing on Ordinance 2010-008, File Number PA-10-1. Initiated by staff, the proposal modifies the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan and designates an Urban Growth Boundary for the City of La Pine: The Board will hear oral testimony, receive written testimony, and consider the testimony submitted at this hearing. The hearing is also being taped. The Board may make a decision on this matter today, continue the public hearing to a date certain, or leave the written record open for a specified period of time. The hearing will be conducted in the following order. The staff will give a report on this issue. We will then open the hearing to all present and ask people to present testimony at one of the tables or at the podium. You can also provide the Board with a copy of written testimony. Questions to and from the chair may be entertained at any time at the chair's discretion. Cross-examination of people testifying will not be allowed. However, if any person wishes ask a question of another person during that person's testimony, please direct your question to the chair after being recognized. The Chair is free to decide whether or not to ask such questions of the person testifying. Prior to the commencement of the hearing any party may challenge the qualifications of any Commissioner for bias, prejudgment or personal interest. This challenge must be documented with specific reasons supported by facts. Should any Commissioner be challenged, the member may disqualify himself or herself, withdraw from the hearing or make a statement on the record of their capacity to hear and decide this issue. At this time, do any members of the Board need to set forth any information that may be perceived as bias, prejudgment, or personal interest? I will accept any challenges from the public now. (Hearing none, I will open the public hearing). STAFF REPORT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT FOR A DE NOVO PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1. INTRODUCTION A. This is a de novo hearing on a proposed goal exception to the Statewide Planning Goals 4 and 11. The County File Number is PA-09-4. B. In those applications, the applicant requested approval of a plan amendment and a "reasons" goal exception to add wireless telecommunications facilities to the list of uses permitted in the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 2 Sewer District Limited Use Combining Zone. C. These applications were previously considered by the Hearings Officer after a public hearing was held on January 5, 2010. Evidence and testimony were received at that hearing. The Hearings Officer recommended the Board approve the exception to Goals 4 and 11, to add wireless telecommunications facilities to the list of uses permitted in the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 2 Sewer District Limited Use Combining Zone. D. The Board takes notice of the record below and includes that record as part of the record before us. II. BURDEN OF PROOF AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA A. The applicants have the burden of proving that they are entitled to the proposal sought. B. The standards applicable to the application before us are listed in the Hearing Officer's Decision. Copies of this decision are available near the door. C. Testimony and evidence at this hearing must be directed toward the criteria, as well as toward any other criteria in the comprehensive land use plan of the County or land use regulations which any person believes apply to this decision. D. Failure on the part of any person to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Board of County Commissioners and parties to this proceeding are opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on that issue. Additionally, failure of the applicant to raise constitutional ot• other issues relating to the approval with sufficient specificity to allow the Board to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. III. HEARINGS PROCEDURE A. Evidence to be reviewed by the Board. The Board's decision on this application will be based upon the record before the Hearings Officer, the Hearings Officer's decision, the Staff Report and the testimony and evidence presented at this hearing. IV. ORDER OF PRESENTATION A. The hearing will be conducted in the following order. 1. The staff will give a report. The applicant will then have an opportunity to offer testimony and evidence. 2. Proponents of the proposal then the opponents will then be given a chance to testify and present evidence. 3. The applicants will then be allowed to present rebuttal testimony but may not present new evidence. 4. At the Board's discretion, if the applicants presented new evidence on rebuttal, opponents may be recognized for a rebuttal presentation. 5. At the conclusion of this hearing, the staff will be afforded an opportunity to make any closing comments. 6. The Board may limit the time period for presentations. B. If anyone wishes to ask a question of a witness, the person may direct the question to the Chair during that person's testimony, or, if the person has already testified, after all other witnesses have testified but before the Applicant's rebuttal. The Chair is free to decide whether or not to ask such questions of the witness. C. Continuances The grant of a continuance or record extension shall be at the discretion of the Board. 1. If the Board grants a continuance, it shall continue the public hearing to a date certain. D. If, at the conclusion of the hearing, the Board leaves the record open for additional written evidence or testimony, the record shall be left to a date certain for submittal 2 of new written evidence or testimony and at least seven additional days for response to the evidence received while the record was held open. Written evidence or testimony submitted during the period the record is held open shall be limited to evidence or testimony that rebuts previously submitted evidence or testimony. E. If the hearing is continued or the record left open, the applicant shall also be allowed a period to a date certain after the record is closed to all other parties to submit final written arguments but no new evidence in support of the application. V. PRE-HEARING CONTACTS, BIASES, CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS A. Do any of the Commissioners have any ex-parte contacts, prior hearing observations; biases; or conflicts of interest to declare? If so, please state their nature and extent. B. Does any party wish to challenge any Commissioner based on ex-parte contacts, biases or conflicts of interest? (Hearing no challenges, I shall proceed.) (Staff Report) 3 H L V O a a c d .O IL 0 w wC W C d E C. 0. m E 0 N d C w c N d ci o N Va a x x xxxxxxxxx'~I l X X IX X X X XXXXX X . U c~ X x x x x x x x x x x x x X xxx x X Xxx }1; x x x a E c x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x c t ~ O U U) d X X x x X x x x x x x o c o E C _0 O N y D C O O O N C t V E E U co C N m O C m L i3 T O N m O N N O U O 74 = m w E O O CD U N U N p O a t0 E L C N 0 o O O N c6 L N N o a c © tU tU £ L E = a) w. C 7 ~ O L a> N cn 0 0 O.. a> e 3 CL 0 C m a m m .0) 3 CO M C C O - C .C E U L N U w 3 to T O c 75 10 c> > u, E Q> U & 2 ` y N N cn a E U E a U r o a (D D ie ca C m a N N a i C CD a`m a ~ 30 aD ~ V C 0 C i CL N 0 0)'o 7 ` (D L c N C 0 a y . E O y o C O ,w - ) 0 5 'a n w 6 a cn .9 x 0 U O O L L ` O C f° a o N 0 C N N Q O 0 p C f0 N C C f6 N 70 O O C p C O co O N O U L a U M - M <0 0 co C t0 w l6 c N 0) O C c • > O :3 N 7` ~p o Q r+ O N U) L a) a L E cc d ~ O L rn a N N w m e 'p ' a w m in _ 7 a j C 0 3 w N O N L O- N t L O O N C 7 O 3 a> N N f3 E o o w> 7 X O O E w L- O w C x (D V O N o C O ~ C aN U c0 N LL D W a) w- c 0 N tU I1' co O N N N z X S3 O` L C »L c4 mO u d N 30 `o L N M O o O N C C m m 0) w N . , T 'E a N O N N fl C L N C .r N D O N 'y 2 C ca w `0 N Oo w tll w C s~? 7 a 0 O Q N m m L E E 7 to o L N N .C N c 0 2 2 2 Q) Q Y E°' C. U U . C N 0 m m~ U O O 0 O . ~ NN N U N N C N - ca d O c CD U 2 LL m D' E p 0 a b m> in 0 EE 0) 0) cD 0 cts ip C. D U C 0~ y N` E C N O C C C L C > j.0 N P lz Z a) 0 N 0 N N N N . (D U) 7 U " (6 U LO (D C M 7 , N o N C N L L L 7 to f6 C 'O cQ LU m N 4. O O C CU O C' c 3 f6 :C N o . d t 0 a o m ` (D p C O 0 N O N V L> U N L c as C co U) D a s LL O N. C o C O a~ N .0. C N M a V 0 ` f6 7 LL p m U ~ y W C M .L -1 ~ ~ a) W a) p> 3 tp U L N Y U~ X -t ~N N G r Q~ tV Y C a V M " + y> o N j (D LLB. v ' 0) 0) , " ` a • c a) m o a c U` QI U -0 0) 0 C LT ' o C N N W N .m f0 = (n O ~ C c a W c` o C Q U ` j O p co E O L O (6 C C 0 :3 N E O 0 cn co r c N N f6 :3 •N (D N O CL - a N z r- d m E E U L U L U N Z .L N 0 y O ? O 0 ty N -0 a) Q W 'O O y 0 0 C O 's c a 0 4) ca r 0 CD a0 m -0 c o N o i.U n - a 0 coca •rn o 0) = a) m m 0>wv > - N (D - o 4) cso U 3 o E- b, w E E 'n a m o a) ° (0 _ a D i e c E a '0 ~L m g? CO CL CA o M _ L O 0 -0 O 0 N u3 = C 0 O E c N M (D ate. :t to LL U O o m 16 E - (D r- 0 a 0-.v) N_= 4 N <tl -0 L 0 O N LO d 2 N N- Q W Q a •03 i O Z i L - w L Zr, •C 0 C_ y .d U O E Q C= O c6 0 0 -o J > 0 L D a L L Q Z U L L N N -0 CL 3 LL (9 Q Cd C Q 0d U 0 LLI Li C7 2 _ Y J Z O W Q C6 U 6 Lu Li U 2_ . R 2 Q Co r CV f"1 1 14 Peter Gutowsky From: Mad [yurtwoman@mac.com] Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 9:42 PM To: Dennis Luke; Tammy Baney; Alan Unger; Peter Gutowsky; Nick Lelack Subject: NO destination resort for Aspen Lakes! I read the latest article in the Bulletin and am opposed to destination resort status, as it surely seems like good old boys doing questionable business for private gain at the expense of wildlife, traffic congestion, and many other quality of life issues around Sisters. I just went through 3 years of fighting the two proposed destination resorts in and around Camp Sherman. Thank goodness the people of Oregon were sensible enough to declare the area an ACSC. Don't you think the majority of local people feel the same about this Aspen Lakes expansion? The people of Sisters may not have that option but the issues are just as big and complex. Rarely do the developers pay for all the hidden costs and impacts we the public have to put up from such growth. And it is not right to have such a change go through after the area was first built in their neighborhood as a golf course with homes around it. Please vote NO on destination resort status for Aspen Lakes. The Cyrus family doesn't deserve any special treatment just for being around a long time. They must follow the rules like everyone else. Thank you Madeleine Landis 1 Page 1 of 1 Peter Gutowsky From: KELLY and KAREN SMITH [kls1998@msn.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:17 AM To: Tammy Baney; Dennis Luke; Alan Unger Cc: Peter Gutowsky; Nick Lelack Subject: Destination Resort Remapping Hearing, April 5, 2010 Dear Commissioners: I will not be able to attend this morning's hearing on destination resort remapping. Please consider the following as my testimony. First, it is important, and some would say imperative, that Deschutes County regulations be consistent with state and local laws and rules. Thus, make sure that the new map does not include lands that don't meet state and local laws and rules. Second, you and the county planning commission have heard much testimony about destination resorts over the last few years. It has been overwhelmingly against liberalizing the statutes and rules to allow resorts more easily. Listen to the public. When I was on the county planning commission, I know that we were the primary body for public input, and we took public testimony with gravity. The current planning commission does not seem to do so, and they do a serious injustice to county residents in their disregard for public opinion. I would urge you to keep that in mind when considering their ill-advised recommendations. As you know, destination resorts were initially allowed by state law to benefit rural areas by encouraging tourism. They have since morphed into rural subdivisions that benefit developers by encouraging second homes, not tourism. Their costs to the local communities were initially not appreciated, but have since been recognized by most land-use experts to exceed their benefits. There is simply no excuse for making it easier for them to do further damage to our county. Do not include subdivisions in the resort map. Do not include cluster developments in the resort map. Do not grandfather lands currently on the map that do not meet current criteria. Do not include EFU lands on the map. Your job is to manage our county responsibly, not to cater to developers who wish to profit at our expense. Please keep that in mind. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Kelly L. Smith 18700 Bull Springs Road Bend, OR 97701 4/5/2010 Page 1 of I Peter Gutowsky From: Doug Hancock [doughhllp@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 3:25 PM To: Tammy Baney; Dennis Luke; Alan Unger; Peter Gutowsky; Nick Lelack Subject: Do Not Allow Destination Resort on Cluster Development Land Dear Commissioners, I urge you to maintain the county's position regarding not allowing destination resort developments on land zoned for cluster developments. The Commission has every reason to not allow such development it has been advised at nearly every level that such developments are inappropriate and illegal (from the planning commission to DLCD to hundreds of citizens). However. the planning commission saw fit under very questionable circumstances to reverse itself and now the County Commission will again face the issue. Please stop this charade. Mr. Cyrus' misuse of public process and abuse of his position as a public official undermines the credibility of our entire local government. Even if a public official recuses himself on votes, that does not mean that the official did not exert undue influence on the proceedings. Those who have been active in governmental process know how important the public meeting rules are to an effective and credible system. The actions of Mr. Cyrus and the planning commission demonstrate an abject disregard for those processes and are an example of the old-boy network run amok. When a pro-development publication such as The Bulletin decides to run an article that is as close to critical of a developer as yesterday's piece on Mr. Cyrus, you know that the situation is smelly. Please follow the advice you have received from top to bottom and vote tomorrow to not allow Destination Resort on land zoned for cluster development. Not only is it the right vote, but it will be a good step toward telling the voters that the Commission at least is representing all of its constituents. Doug Hancock Sisters/Camp Sherinan 4/5/2010 Neil R. Bryant April 2, 2010 Robert S. Lovlien John A. Berge Sharon R. Smith Via: Hand Delivery John D. Sortie Mark G. Reinecke Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Melissa P. Lande 1300 NW Wall Street Kitri C. Ford Bend, Oregon 97701 Paul J. Taylor Christopher A. Bagley Kyle D. Wuepper Jeremy M. Green Re: Destination Resort Map Amendment Procedures Helen L. Eastwood Draft Ordinance No.: 2010-002 Leanne Ryan-Nokell Dear Commissioners: BEND Our office represents several Special Districts who own property in Deschutes 591 S.W. Mill View Way County. We have been following the draft code language change for the above Mail: P.O. Box 880 referenced ordinance. Bend, Oregon 97709 Phone: (541) 382-4331 We have reviewed the draft changes to Code Section 23.84.030(3)(c)(1 0) which Fax: (541) 389-3386 refers to "Federal, State, and City land It is our understanding that Special Districts are neither state, federal nor city entities and therefore are not included in WWW.BULAWYERS.COM this Code section. The purpose of this letter is for clarification only and not to take a position with regard to the adoption of the draft ordinance. Please include me as a party to the Record. c: Peter Gutowsky (via e-mail only) Peter Gutowsky@co.deschutes.or.us Very truly yours, Page 1 of 1 Peter Gutowsky From: Derek & Rachel Cornforth [dhcgrc@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:07 PM To: Peter Gutowsky Subject: Fw: Motions approved by Planning Commission Peter - FYI as citizen input Original Message From: Derek & Rachel Cornforth To: tammy baney-@ckeschutes.org ; Dennis Luke ; alan_unger@co.deschutes.orus Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:50 PM Subject: Motions approved by Planning Commission Dear Commissioner, April 1, 2010 It is my understanding that the County Planning Commission at their February 25 meeting submitted several recommendations to the Board, including: Motion (2): Remove staffs recommendation that platted subdivisions become ineligible for destination resorts Motion (4): Add as an eligibility criterion cluster developments that have at least 50% of their sites dedicated to permanent open space, excluding streets and parking areas Motion (5): Properties presently designated as eligible on the destination resort map shall retain that designation unless a property specifically requests, in writing, a desire to be unmapped Any reasonable interpretation of Motions (2) and (4) is that they have been written specfically to support the efforts by the Planning Commission Chairman, Keith Cyrus, to convert the completed rural clustered subdivision of Aspen Lakes into a destination resort. He and his family would have a substantial financial benefit from such an outcome. It completely disregards the property rights of the many hundreds of property owners on platted subdivisions and cluster developments (at Aspen Lakes and elsewhere) who bought their properties because they are protected from future developments by the Land Use laws governing such developments. With respect to Motion (5), what possible use is there for a Destination Resort Map that includes property that is ineligible for destination resorts? As president of The Rim at Aspen Lakes Association (adjoining Golf Course Estates at Aspen Lakes), our association strongly opposes all three motions listed above. The County Planning Department has been doing an excellent job in moving forward to update the destination resort rules for the county (in compliance with statewide rules) and we hope it won't be diverted by the type of Motions being put forward by the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Derek H. Cornforth President, The Rim at Aspen Lakes Association, Inc. 4/1/2010 710 WALL STREET P.O. BOX 431 BEND, OR 97709 [5411388-5505 TEL February 26, 2010 [5411388-5519 FAX www dbend.or.us Deschutes County Commissioners 1300 NW Wall Bend, OR 97701 KATHIE ECKMAN Mayor Dear Commissioners: MARK CAPELL Mayor pro Tern The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge the long history of cooperation between Deschutes County and the City of Bend with respect to land use JIM CLINTON issues, and to encourage continued cooperation in the future. City Councilor Specifically, the County's current process of reviewing the mapping of JODIEBARRAM properties eligible for destination resorts may result in designation of city Councilor properties within close proximity to Bend as eligible for such development. Depending on the location and size of any future destination resorts, there tycounGERcilor are likely to be both positive and potentially negative impacts on the City of city Coun Bend. At this time the City is not requesting that the County prohibit future TOMGREENE destination resorts within the Bend vicinity. We note that recent passage of city councilor Senate Bill 103,1 will help to alleviate many potentially negative impacts. ORAN TEATER City Councilor ERIC KING City Manager SOMA ANDREWS Finance Director SANDRA L BAXTER Police Chief LARRY HUHN Fire Chief PATRICIA STELL City Recorder If and when the County receives a proposal for a future destination resort in Bend's vicinity, in conformance with the County's modified eligibility map, we will look forward to working with County staff to ensure a thorough review to minimize negative impacts to both the City of Bend and Deschutes County. While the current joint management agreement between the City and the County formalizes this coordination process for proposed land use actions within Bend's expanded urban growth boundary, we would also request an opportunity for informal review and coordination when any destination resort is proposed beyond the UGB. Thank you for your consideration. i MAR 1 2010 L BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ADMINISTRATION LIZ FANCHER, ArrOIRNEY RECEIVED MAR 3 1 2010 March 31, 2010 1 "SkE BY: DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS C/O PETER GUTOWSKY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 117 NW LAFAYETTE AVENUE BEND, OREGON 97701 Liz Fancher Sue Stinson, Paralegal Re: Destination Resort Mapping and Comprehensive Plan Amendments Ordinances 2009-021 and 2009-024 I am writing to provide comments on behalf of Belveron Real Estate Partners, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Belveron") for inclusion in the record of Ordinances 2009-021 and 2009-024. Belveron owns property in Deschutes County that may be considered by Deschutes County for destination resort mapping. I am sending this letter to elaborate on testimony I offered at the Board's March 1, 2010 hearing. Position 1: Any land located inside the Wildlife Priority Area identified on the 1999 ODFW map submitted to the South County Regional Problem Solving Group that is currently mapped Destination Resort should be removed from the destination resort map. DCC 18.88.040(D) prohibits destination resorts from being built on these lands. Reason: The current County law prohibits the development of destination resorts in the Wildlife Priority Area identified on the 1999 ODFW map submitted to the South County Regional Problem Solving Group. DCC 18.88.040(D). Removing the lots from the map will not change the property rights of the lot owner as destination resort development is already prohibited on those lots. Position 2: The 160-acre minimum site size requirement is not a State of Oregon destination resort mapping criterion. Reason: ORS 197.455 is the law that establishes the State's mapping requirements for destination resort maps. It does not list the 160-acre site requirement as a mapping criterion. It says: 644 NW BROADWAY STREET BEND, OREGON • 97701 PHONE: 541-385-3067 FAX: 541-385-3076 -2- March 31, 2010 "(1) A destination resort must be sited on lands mapped as eligible for destination resort siting by the affected county. The county may not allow destination resorts approved pursuant to ORS 197.435 to 197.467 to be sited in any of the following areas: (a) Within 24 air miles of an urban growth boundary with an existing population of 100, 000 or more unless residential uses are limited to those necessary for the staff and management of the resort. (b)(A) On a site with 50 or more contiguous acres of unique or prime farmland identified and mapped by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service, or its predecessor agency. (B) On a site within three miles of a high value crop area unless the resort complies with the requirements of ORS 197.445 (6) in which case the resort may not be closer to a high value crop area than one-half mile for each 25 units of overnight lodging or fraction thereof. (c) On predominantly Cubic Foot Site Class 1 or 2 forestlands as determined by the State Forestry Department, which are not subject to an approved goal exception. (d) In the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area as defined by the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Act, P.L. 99-663. (e) In an especially sensitive big game habitat area as determined by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife in July 1984 or as designated in an acknowledged comprehensive plan. (2) In carrying out subsection (1) of this section, a county shall adopt, as part of its comprehensive plan, a map consisting of eligible lands within the county. The map must be based on reasonably available information and may be amended pursuant to ORS 197.610 to 197.625, but not more frequently than once every 30 months. The county shall develop a process for collecting and processing concurrently all map amendments made within a 30-month planning period. A map adopted pursuant to this section shall be the sole basis for determining whether tracts of land are eligible for destination resort siting pursuant to ORS 197.435 to 197.467. " Position 3: The 160-acre minimum site size requirement applies when a destination resort application is filed. Reason: The 160-acre site size requirement is found in ORS 197.445, the law that specifies what standards must be met by a destination resort application. The 50% open space, $7 million dollar recreational facilities rule and the visitor-oriented accommodations requirements are some of the other requirements imposed by ORS 197.445. All these other requirements are written to apply when a destination resort application is filed; not when it is mapped. Position 4: The 160-acre site size requirement is not a minimum lot size requirement that applies to a single unit of land. -3- March 31, 2010 Reason: ORS 197.445 says that the "site" of a destination resort must be 160-acres. A "site" can contain multiple legally-created lots or parcels as long as they add up to a site that is 160 acres or larger. Position 5: Measure 49 Position: The County should, in most cases, make its destination resort mapping decisions based on issues other than Measure 49. Measure 49 does not make it unwise for Deschutes County to remove properties from the destination resort map, especially where there is no practical chance that the lot will be developed as a resort or part of a resort. Reasons: It is unlikely that a property owner of the type of propeM to be removed from the destination resort map would qualify for Measure 49 relief. Section 12 of Measure 49 is the section that applies if the County changes the destination map. To obtain relief under Measure 49, a property owner must: 1. show that the desired use of their property is residential or a farming or forest practice; and 2. show that the new map reduced the fair market value of the property; and 3. submit an appraisal that assesses the value of the property based on the highest and best use of the property. All of these requirements pose a barrier for any potential Measure 49 claimant, especially for those whose lots cannot be combined into a contiguous tract of land that is 160 acres or larger. First, a destination resort is not a residential use. It is a Goal 8 recreational use. It must include overnight lodging accommodations, recreational uses and open space use that are clearly not residential. While residences can be built in destination resorts, a property owner cannot obtain the right to build a residence unless all of the other amenities are provided. Second, it would be difficult to show that the map change would reduce the fair market value of many of the properties that might be removed from the map. In exceptions areas, residential uses are allowed as a matter of right. In those areas, the ability to ask to build a resort may not add any value to the land because the single-family residential use may well be the highest and best use of the land for appraisal purposes. This would be the case due to the fact that huge financial investments must be made to pursue approval of a destination resort application that can be denied. In addition, prior to development, water rights must be purchased and major financial -4- March 31, 2010 investments must be made to provide overnight lodging, recreational and resort facilities and open space areas. Also, expensive traffic system improvements may be required as a condition of approval. Unless property is a large undeveloped tract or can readily be combined with other land whose existing development can be made a part of the resort, it would be unlikely that a resort would be a potentially profitable use of the land. Most rural residential exceptions areas, where most subdivisions are located, are already developed with homes. That is why the areas were designated exceptions areas. The existing development pattern of these areas would make it very difficult and costly for a resort developer to assemble land and develop it as a resort that complies with destination resort requirements or is attractive to investors. The relief granted under Measure 49, if allowed, would not be costly for the County. The relief allowed if a Section 12 Measure 49 claim is granted is for the County to authorize the claimant to use their property without application of the land use regulation that limits the use of their property. Section 12(4)(b). This means that the County could resolve any claim by allowing a property to be used as a part of a destination resort development, if one is proposed. Thank you for your consideration of our positions on these issues. We ask that you move forward at this time to establish the destination resort map. Z cerel Liz Fancher Cc: L. Craghead N. Lelack Board of Commissioners client s 1000 534 SW Third Avenue, Suite 300 • Portland, OR 97204 • (503) 497-1000 • fax (503) 223-0073 • www.friends.org friends Southern Oregon Office • PO Box 2442 • Grants Pass, OR 97528 • (541) 474-1 155 • fax (541) 474-9389 of Oregon Willamette Valley Office • 220 East 1 l to Avenue, Suite 5 • Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 520-3763 • fax (503) 575-2416 i Central Oregon Office • 115 NW Oregon Ave #21 • Bend, OR 97701 • (541) 719-8221 • fax (866) 394-3089 March 31, 2010 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall Street Bend, OR 97701 Re: Destination Resort Remapping Criteria Dear Commissioners, I am writing today regarding your difficult decision regarding the criteria by which Destination Resorts shall be mapped. As you are well aware, the majority of the public is not in favor of increasing the number of acres eligible for the location of destination resorts in Deschutes County. The Planning Commission's proposed language expanding the lands eligible for destination resort siting should be rejected. Specifically, EFU land, especially irrigated EFU land, should not be included. The Board's original vision of narrowing the criteria for eligible destination resort lands was appropriate, and should be followed. It is likely that the Planning Commission is acting out of sympathy for farmers who see profits dwindling in the face of stagnant commodity prices, and increased costs. However, as you are well aware, they are not elected officials. While 1000 Friends and its members appreciate the need for healthy rural economies, we reject the notion that the way to accomplish that includes the wholesale transformation of otherwise productive farm into a destination resort. Other uses on EFU lands should be accessory to farm uses, not in replacement of those uses. We look forward to working with the Board and the Planning Commission during the Comprehensive Plan Update process to find productive ways to address this issue. However, mapping those lands for Destination Resort use is not the way. Please feel free to contact us at the Central Oregon office if you have any questions, or we can be of any help in locating relevant information for your decision. Sincer Pam ardy Y Staff Attorney & Central Oregon Advocate 1000 Friends of Oregon Celebrating Thirty-five Years of Innovation Destination resort may be a reality; Aspen Lakes owner, Keith Cyrus, could get approval to proceed wit plans I The Bulletin 4/4/10 11:20 PM n ull in. m TheBtdkfin Critics decry path to possible resort By Hillary Borrud / The Bulletin Published: April 04. 2010 4:OOAM PST A recent vote by the Deschutes County Planning Commission could help Commissioner Keith Cyrus finally turn his subdivision into a resort, an action that is raising questions about whether Cyrus is using his position to advocate for his family's development interests. Eight months ago, it looked as if Cyrus' long-sought goal of converting his family's Aspen Lakes golf course and subdivision east of Sisters into a destination resort was headed for another setback. Deschutes County staff had proposed removing subdivisions - including Aspen Lakes - from the county's destination resort zone, which identifies lands eligible for resort development. Now, county planning officials have reversed course, and Aspen Lakes could stay on the map. Current and former planning commissioners say Cyrus has used his position on the commission to bring up the issue in ways not available to the general public, including at commission retreats and by talking to other commissioners about his situation outside of meetings. Minutes of planning commission meetings also show that Cyrus continues to raise his issue at meetings. For his part, Cyrus says that being on the planning commission has limited his ability to advocate his family's development plans. "It would better serve our interests to be sitting in the audience, where I could participate in the discussion and certainly (son Matt Cyrus) can, but he can't always be there," Keith Cyrus said. The Cyrus family has been a fixture in Central Oregon for generations. Keith Cyrus and his wife and children have grown crops, including potatoes, mint and alfalfa, on their land near Sisters. spn La Cascade Meadows Ranch Planning Commissioner Keith Cyrus' family owns the golf course and subdivision. http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100404/NEWSO1/4040405/-1&template=print Page 1 of 4 Destination resort may be a reality; Aspen Lakes owner, Keith Cyrus, could get approval to proceed with plans I I The Bulletin Cyrus has been careful to recuse himself from decisions on the destination resort zone, but he's raised the issue more than once at planning commission and Deschutes County Commission meetings, according to meeting minutes. Cyrus also acknowledges he has occasionally spoken to other planning commissioners about Aspen Lakes outside of public meetings. Meeting Monday The Deschutes County Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing Monday at 10 a.m. on the planning commission's recommendations for which types of land and developments to add or take away from the resort map. Property must be on the county's destination resort map in order for owners to apply for a resort, but much of the land currently mapped in Deschutes County's destination resort zone is ineligible for resort development because it does not meet state requirements. For example, state law requires resort properties to be at least 160 acres, more than three miles from any high-value crop areas and outside of especially sensitive big-game habitat. County commissioners said last year they hoped the destination resort remapping process would remove land ineligible for resorts and make it clearer which properties can be developed for resorts. But instead of removing properties from the map that do not meet state resort law, the planning commission has suggested adding land, including about 58,000 acres zoned for farm use. 4/4/10 11:20 PM t7l% 4i a Planning Commissioner Keith Cyrus' family owns the golf course and subdivision. In February, the planning commission voted to put subdivisions on the map of resort-eligible land in Deschutes County. Commissioners also voted to specifically add "cluster development" subdivisions to the map. The Cyruses' Aspen Lakes subdivision is one of only four cluster developments in Deschutes County. The Aspen Lakes issue Planning commissioners have discussed the Cyruses' desire to convert Aspen Lakes into a destination resort since at least early 2008, when the commission heard the family's application to create new county rules to allow certain cluster developments to convert to resorts. Keith Cyrus recused himself from the vote on the issue, but his son, Matt Cyrus, spoke in favor of the proposal. The planning commission ultimately voted 4-2 against the idea, and the county commission also later rejected the application. Oregon's land use agency also opposed the Cyrus proposal in two separate letters, one of them from Department of Land Conservation and Development Director Richard Whitman. Developed subdivisions cannot convert to destination resorts because state law requires resorts to build at least 50 units of tourist lodging, such as a hotel, before developers can sell lots. http://www.bendbuIletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100404/NEWS01/4040405/-1&template=print Page 2 of 4 Destination resort may be a reality; Aspen Lakes owner, Keith Cyrus, could get approval to proceed with plans I I The Bulletin 4/4/10 11:20 PM The prominent farming family has not given up on the idea, however, and Keith Cyrus talked about his frustration with the county's denial of the resort conversion and other applications during a March 2009 planning commission retreat. Commissioners at the retreat had an opportunity to raise issues related to the county's planning work, and Cyrus was one who critiqued how the county's planning staff handled his personal land use case. Cyrus "described in detail how difficult the land use processes have been as they specifically applied to his family's past and present land use applications," according to minutes from the retreat. "These included his attempts to convert his cluster development to a destination resort and the use of his land for `events.' He stressed that his family had settled this land long ago, and he feels he has received inconsistent, untimely, and biased information from the Planning Division." Cyrus said last week he did not recall talking about his family's cluster development and attempt to convert to a destination resort at the retreat. Meeting minutes show Cyrus also raised the issue of turning existing subdivisions into resorts at a joint meeting of the planning and county commissions on Jan. 6, when he said an existing subdivision could decide to stay on the resort map and its owners should then be able to add amenities and become a resort. Criticism Cyrus' close involvement with the destination resort issue bothers some who have been part of the county's planning process. They have questioned Cyrus' comments about his personal land use issues, and say the destination resort provision for cluster developments seems targeted at Aspen Lakes. Former Planning Commissioner Susan Quatre, who resigned recently because of health issues and "disenchantment with the process," says she believes Cyrus "works the system" and questions his "collaborative relationship with the planning commission." A year ago at the retreat, Quatre said it was an inappropriate use of taxpayers', planning staff's and some planning commissioners' time for commissioners to air personal grievances with the county's planning process, according to meeting minutes. Quatre said it was a violation of the public trust because the public does not have direct access to the commissioners to bring up their own issues. Former Planning Commissioner Brenda Pace was also concerned and said at the retreat the commissioners' personal and financial goals should not influence decisions, according to minutes. When planning commissioners suggested adding cluster developments to the resort map in late January, Commissioner Ed Criss said the idea seemed to be targeted to help the Cyruses' resort plans. "I have a bit of a problem with that because we have an existing situation," Criss said, referring to the mostly built-out subdivision and golf course at Aspen Lakes. But Brown, the planning commissioner who suggested adding Aspen Lakes and three other cluster developments to the resort zone, said Cyrus' interests did not factor into his decision. http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100404/NEWS01/4040405/-1&template=print Page 3 of 4 Destination resort may be a reality; Aspen Lakes owner, Keith Cyrus, could get approval to proceed with plans I I The Bulletin 4/4/10 11:20 PM 9 '"I was not trying to target something to Keith's property," Brown said. "As the planning commission chairman, any time the conversation becomes personal, I stop it. Or if it's private, I just won't hear it." Quatre also was concerned that other commissioners occasionally continued talking about issues before them after public meetings adjourned. "Sometimes after the meetings, four or so of those guys will sit around and talk about the meetings," Quatre said. "I stayed there one time to see what they talked about. They kept right on talking about business." Cyrus acknowledged it might be a problem for the commissioners to continue discussing issues after meetings ended. "Technically, we potentially have an issue when we adjourn a meeting, and we're all still there and we visit afterwards," Cyrus said. Cyrus' term expires June 30, but he can apply to extend it six months to work on a major project such as the current update of the county's development blueprint, known as the comprehensive plan, Planning Director Nick Lelack said. "I think he's expressed interest in that, but hasn't formally applied," Lelack said. Meanwhile, Lelack said the Deschutes County Commission is interviewing candidates to replace Quatre and will likely make a decision in mid-April. Hillary Borrud can be reached at 541 -617 -7829 or at hborrud@bendbulletin.com. Published Daily in Bend Oregon by Western Communications, Inc. © 2010 www.bendbuiletin.com http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100404/NEWSO1/4040405/-1&template=print Page 4 of 4 Testimony on Deschutes County Destination Resort Rem apping f Submitted by Merry Ann Moore for Sierra Club Juniper Group April 5, 2010 SIERRA I am in my third year of testifying on the need to reform destination CLU B resort rules in Deschutes County. I request that the Board of County FOUNDED 1892 Commissioners consider the following factors in your upcoming decisions on how to update the resort map and Comprehensive Plan. 1. Please consider the resources and money Deschutes County has spent over the years trying to settle disputes over zoning rules, text amendments and variances related to destination resorts. The County has been trying to get remapping done since 2005. It's time to move on. If the new map resulting from this long process doesn't reflect the reality of state and local statutes and development rules, the County can expected a continued drain on its resources from more disputes, not to mention potential lawsuits. The new map should include only areas where state and local resort statutes and development rules can be met. 2. The resort map shouldn't include developed housing subdivisions or paper (platted but not yet developed) subdivisions. The state Department of Land Conservation & Development has already weighed in on this matter in 2008, stating that such developments are not eligible for destination resort conversion. In May 2009, the county planning department recommended removing existing housing subdivisions and lands platted for subdivisions from the map. 3. The resort map shouldn't include cluster developments with at least 50% of their site dedicated to permanent open space. This is an applicant-driven provision that would set a precedent for owners of other types of land to also ask for exceptions to rules that are supposed to apply to everybody. A housing subdivision is not a resort. The process and rules for applying for a cluster development are different from those for a destination resort. The property rights of those living in and near cluster developments should be respected. 4. The resort map should not grandfather in all lands currently on the map as recommended by the Planning Commission. If this is allowed, the County will continue to have a document that doesn't reflect where resorts can actually be built. Good government demands that the Board fulfill the objectives you set at the beginning of this long process: to have a map that truly reflects where resorts may be built according to existing statutes, and to have clear and objective mapping criteria. If not, taxpayers have a very good reason to ask, "what was the point?" Sierra Club Juniper Group Resort Map Comments 4/5/2010 - p. 1 5. The resort map should not add in new lands to the resort map by bringing in all exclusive farm use lands, and allowing in parcels under multiple ownership. Citizens of this county have made it abundantly clear in community meetings, listening sessions and written and oral testimony that they do not want more resorts in Deschutes County. I hope you will not ignore the public record and the information gathered by your own county planners by adopting these proposals. 6. Also, I request clarification on item 3F on the matrix produced by the County on resort remapping recommendations. The provision allowing a minimum site of 160 contiguous acres or greater under multiple ownerships is not already a part of county statute. 7. Resorts that have been approved and built under Goal 8 guidelines have damaged natural resources, have resulted in net loss of wildlife or habitat, and will strain water sources (groundwater, rivers, streams) beyond their carrying capacity. They are resulting in sprawl development, with consequently higher carbon emissions from commuting employees, homeowners and visitors. They furthermore overstretch public facilities, and burden taxpayers with an unfair and hefty share of transportation improvements, emergency services and other infrastructure costs. 8. Moreover, this resort map process has not incorporated new research on current habitat and wildlife needs. For example, the Whychus Creek watershed should be excluded from the resort map, because water rights on this crucial waterway for reintroduced threatened steelhead are already far oversubscribed. Sierra Club's position is that Deschutes County has enough resorts and we urge the County to repeal the destination resort overlay map as was done in Crook County. Thank you for considering our views. Sincerely, Merry Ann Moore Secretary, Sierra Club Juniper Group P.O. Box 6376 Bend, Oregon 97708 541.549.2468 merryann@bendcable.com Explore. Enjoy. Protect. Sierra Club Juniper Group Resort Map Comments 4/5/2010 - p. 2 m Y c4 m C O m O O ; U N bA U ~ -0 d m cn a~ 03 CI -off ~~3 a~ '3 o bA ° cp o ° a ' C,3 U~ m~ m OC4 C,3 C13 oA V cl i 0Q U~t~ 00 (u C14 in V) 0) r_i 'Fu LO C;3 0 r CL cn ;::s 3 C 3 =cow 00 0 o - C6 on a~ E U O' C~ v ~ U U 03 C) as Li N F°- N U a m . ~--i u Cl. ~bA U N a~ 0 a Cd 3 N ~a0 73 ~ N ti ~ ~ Document Reproduces Poorly (Archived) r, z a a J 4 a; w z w U i r 1 -to I 1 C) D nS u: CS l O Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 1' 1 4/5/10 9:43 AM ~v ~nh3ncina the lives of citizens by delivering ` ry uaiitf sit-vices in a cost-effective manner Deschutes County (Go hot news! be informed first! help site map location contact us En espanol V"s tla Inren^ao r--ir.;J „ _ Cornprehenswa cn 'a . esida nts of Deschutes Couniy. I You are here: Government » Departments » Assessor's Office » DIAL Search Results Standard DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Information on the Deschutes County Computer is not guaranteed to be accurate and may contain errors and omissions. Deschutes County provides NO WARRANTY AS TO THE MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE FOR ANY INFORMATION. Original records may differ from computer entries. If reliance upon computer record is intended, verification of information on source documents is required. User expressly acknowledges and agrees that the use of any information appearing on the Deschutes County Computer is at User's sole risk. Deschutes County shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages caused by mistakes, omissions, deletions, errors, defects, in any information, or any failure or delays in receiving information. The following property tax assessment data is updated nightly. Account: 248139 Map/TL: R 2-007 161220 00 00104 * * * CURRENT Ownership Information ONLY DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC JOHNSON TRUST DATED APRIL 6 1993 JOHNSON,HAROLD VICTOR TRUSTEE JOHNSON,JANET JOSEPHINE TRUSTEE JOHNSON TRUST DATED 4-6-93 (LESSEE) 20220 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 NOTATION Type: EXCLUSIVE FARM USE POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TAX LIABILITY Site Address: 20220 SWALLEY RD BEND 97701 Prop C1s:551 MA:3 VA:63 NH 000 Asmt Zone:EFU CDD Zone:EFUTRB (EXCLUSIVE FARM USE - TUMALO/REDMOND/BEND) :CHC (CONVENTIONAL HOUSING COMBINING) " :AS (AIRPORT SAFETY COMBINING ZONE) " :SMIA (SURFACE MINING IMPACT AREA COMBINING) :LM (LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT COMBINING ZONE) Land Values Asmt type W3 EXCLUSIVE HOME SITE HOME SITE SD SD *Total Acres 2.96 1.00 1.00 DEFERRED FARM USE ZONED Improvement Values FB 4.96 BLT %GD http://co.deschutes.or.us/index.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-91D726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 1 of 16 Deschutes Cobnty Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 151 2005 154 2008 *Total 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Room Grid for 151 Total SgFt: 6624 - - - - - - R 0 0 M S - - - - - - - LR K DR FAM BD BATH 0TH FP UTL Sq Ft: 2356 1st F1 1 2 2\1 1 1 2924 Basemt 1344 Attic 5009 Garage 620 Carport Room Grid for 154 Total SgFt: 5267 - - - - - - - R 0 0 M S - - - - - - - LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL Sq Ft: 2937 1st Fl 1 1 1 1 1\1 976 2nd F1 2 1 1354 Basemt 1 1 959 Garage Values shown below are as of the Assessment Date, January 1 of each year --------2009-------- --------2008-------- ---------2007 Total Taxable Total Taxable Total Taxable RMV A.V. RMV A.V. RMV A.V. LND: 229,740 323,830 323,830 IMP: 877,640 488,950 514,680 TOT: - - - 1,107,380 - - - - - - - - 487,607 - - - - - - 812,780 - - - - - 257,719 - - - - - - 838,510 - - - - - - - - 250,214 - - - R 2007 161220-00-00104 248139 Prop Class 551 Value Area 63 Maint Area 3 Neighborhood 000 Asmt Zone EFU JOHNSON TRUST DATED 4-6-93 (LESSEE) 20220 SWALLEY RD 20220 SWALLEY RD BEND, OR 97701 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * I N S P E C T I O N S * * * Insp By: SEXTON, E 05/20/09 Intr Insp No, Owner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Card 1 of 2 Sq Ft: 2356 2924 1344 5009 620 Factor Book: 151 Year Bui - - - - - - R 0 0 M S - - - - - - - LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL 1st F1 1 2 2\1 1 1 Basemt Attic Garage Carport Lt: 2005 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 2 of 16 1 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard I N T E R I O R C O M P O N E N T S Qty/ Qty/ Description-----------------------Area Description-----------------------Area AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER 2 COMP HVY - ROOF COVER 2085 AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER 2 LAUNDRY TUB 1 DRYWALL 1 SIDING - LAP 1 WINDOWS - DOUBLE/THERMAL PANE 1 WINDOWS - VINYL 1 ROOF - GABLE 1 ROOF CVR - COMP HEAVY 2356 ELEVATOR 1 TILE FLOOR 1 HEAT PUMP 2356 DISHWASHER 1 GARBAGE DISPOSAL 1 HOOD-FAN 1 FULL BATH 1 FULL BATH W/2 LAVATORIES 1 RAISED HEARTH 1 GAS FIREPLACE 1 CARPET - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - FOUNDATION - CONCRETE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2356 - - - - - - * * * O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S * * * Factor Book: 151 Year Built: 2005 Qty/ Description-----------------------Area 2356 ROOF EXT. AVERAGE 62 GARDEN GREENHOUSE 160 Qty/ Description-----------------------Area DECKS-GOOD 200 BATH IN ACCESSORY BLDG I Card 2 of 2 - - - - R 0 0 M S - - - - - - - LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL Sq Ft: 2937 1st Fl 1 1 1 1 1\1 976 2nd F1 2 1 1354 Basemt 1 1 959 Garage Factor Book: 154 Year Built: 2008 I N T E R I O R C O M P O N E N T S Qty/ Qty/ Description-----------------------Area Description-----------------------Area HEAT PUMP 488 RAISED HEARTH 2 COMP HVY - ROOF COVER 679 2 STORY OUTSIDE BRICK 1 LAUNDRY TUB 1 DRYWALL 1 ELEVATOR 1 HARDWOOD FLOOR 1 HEAT PUMP 2937 RECESSED LIGHTING 1 TILE FLOOR 1 VAULTED CEILING 1 BAR SINK 1 CT EXH GRILL/S. OVEN/DW/GD/MW 1 KITCHEN SINK 1 TOILET 2 LAVATORY 3 SHOWER WDOOR, TILE 2 SOAKING TUB 1 HALF BATH 1 FOUNDATION - CONCRETE 2937 ROOF - GABLE 1 ROOF CVR - COMP HEAVY 2937 SIDING - LAP 1 WINDOWS - DOUBLE/THERMAL PANE 1 WINDOWS - WOOD 1 HEAT PUMP 677 AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER 2 GAS FIREPLACE 2 AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER 1 COMP HVY - ROOF COVER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=6SF1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 3 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard AT/Class Desc Adj Factor#1 Adj Factor#2 Adj Factor#3 W3 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 2.96 HOME SITE A 1.00 HOME SITE A 1.00 SD SD * * * T A X P A Y M E N T S * * * For current balance due information on this account select the following button (Please note that this link will provide current balance information, including interest & fees, EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNTS IN FORECLOSURE, please call the tax office @ 388-6540 for payoff information on foreclosure accounts) Get real-time tax summary for this property'' This web site uses the FREE Adobe® Acrobat® Reader- plug-in. Arnow[ If you do not have this plug-in, click the icon to get it. p R er For balance due information on this account for a future date, specify a future date and select the following button (Please note that this link will provide current balance information, including interest & fees, EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNTS IN FORECLOSURE, please call the tax office @ 388-6540 for payoff information on foreclosure accounts) Enter a value future Date (mm/dd/yyyy): 04/05/2010 Get real-time tax summary for a future date for this property This web site uses the FREE Adobe® Acrobat® Reader- plug-in. FAT,, AaoW If you do not have this plug-in, click the icon to get it. /Idle R 2009 Balance Due Adval Tax 2,406.66 7,219.99 Trn Date Btch Received Int/Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description 11-06-09 6097. -2,406.66 0.00 886184 02-11-10 2010 -2,406.67 0.00 966682 2008 Balance Due Adval Tax 0.00 3,431.48 Trn Date Btch Received Int/Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description 11-04-08 0408 -3,328.54 -102.94 718234 2007 Balance Due Adval Tax 0.00 3,266.85 Trn Date Btch Received Int/Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description 11-02-07 0207 -3,168.84 -98.01 581488 2006 Balance Due Adval Tax 0.00 3,083.05 Trn Date Btch Received Int/Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description 11-03-06 3068 -2,990.56 -92.49 404585 2005 Balance Due Adval Tax 0.00 16.92 Trn Date Btch Received Int/Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description 11-03-05 2059 -16.41 -0.51 281431 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 4 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 4/5/10 9:43 AM Building Permit: 49156 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 ACCOUNT 248139 STATUS EXPIRED ***NOTE: This permit has not received final inspection. Therefore, final verification that this structure complies with applicable safety codes has not been determined. BUILDING CLASS..........: RESIDENTIAL PERMIT CLASS NEW STRUCTURE TYPE..........: BUILDING PERMIT ZONING...........: EFUTRByCHCyASyLMySMIA BUILDING USE REPLACEMENT DWELLING STRUCTURE TYPE..........: WOOD FRAME ON SEWER? YES SEPTIC PERMIT NUMBER....: N/A FRONT SETBACK IN FEET...: 0 RIGHT SETBACK IN FEET...: 0 LEFT SETBACK IN FEET....: 0 REAR SETBACK IN FEET....: 0 SOLAR APPROVED? YES PERMIT NAME BLAKE,GARY B CONTRACTOR NAME.........: UNKNOWN ARCHITECT OTAK INC SITE ADDRESS 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 STORIES 1 SQ FEET 1042 BEDROOMS 2 PERMIT VALUATION........: 81,000 APPLICATION DATE........: 05/03/02 PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: 02/01/05 EXPIRED DATE 02/01/05 Inspection Initial Comments 02/20/08 LEF GC OLD SITUS=20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND OLD SERIAL # 132532 02/01/05 JMM REPLACED BY B57679 08/05/04 JMM 180 DAY EXTENSION GRANTED PER DAP "WORK DESCRIBED IS ACCEPTABLE PROGRESS" 08/02/04 JMM GC:G BLAKE IN WITH REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - ROUTED TO D.PERKINS FOR DECISION. 02/04/04 JMM 180 DAY EXTENSION GRANTED 02/04/04 SYS GC Permit expired by system 07/29/03 JMM 180 DAY EXTENSION GRANTED 01/28/03 STS THIS REPLACEMENT DWELLING PERMIT WILL APPLY TO NEW (FUTURE) RESIDENCE TO BE BUILT AT 1612200000100, MOST WESTERLY LOT, NEAR INTERSECTION OF TWIN BRIDGES & SWALLEY RD 10/07/02 JMM 180 DAY EXTENSION GRANTED 05/03/02 STS APPLIED FOR AS "PLACE HOLDER" HOME/PLANS FOR ACTUAL HOME TO BE BUILT WILL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF THIS PERMIT 05/03/02 STS PROOF OF WPCF PERMIT REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT 05/03/02 STS OK TO TAKE IN PER PEB/ROUTE TO HIM FOR SIGN OFF REPLACEMENT DWELLING IN EFU ZONE, SETBACKS, SOLAR, LM0288 Building Permit: 57679 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 ACCOUNT 248139 STATUS FINAL BUILDING CLASS..........: RESIDENTIAL http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 5 of 16 Deschutes Cdunty Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard PERMIT CLASS NEW STRUCTURE TYPE..........: PERMIT ZONING...........: BUILDING USE STRUCTURE TYPE..........: ON SEWER? SEPTIC PERMIT NUMBER....: FRONT SETBACK IN FEET...: RIGHT SETBACK IN FEET...: LEFT SETBACK IN FEET....: REAR SETBACK IN FEET....: SOLAR APPROVED? PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: ARCHITECT SITE ADDRESS STORIES SQ FEET BEDROOMS PERMIT VALUATION........: APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE BUILDING EFUTRByCHCySMIAyLMyAS RESIDENCE WOOD FRAME YES N 145 436 295 1036 YES JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY GARY NORMAN HOMES INC LINDA ROYER 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 2 2730 2 385,110 05/03/02 02/17/05 11/23/05 Inspection Initial Comments 11/23/05 DBS *FINAL APPROVED* 09/27/05 DBS CORRECTIONS: NOT READY 09/22/05 SFJ INSPECTION NOTICE: 1. POST PERMANENT ADDRESS. 2. GUARD RAILS SHALL BE MINIMUM 36" ABOVE GRADE. 09/16/05 SFJ CORRECTIONS 1) POST PERMANENT ADDRESS 2) GUARD RAILS SHALL BE A MINIMU OF 36" ABOVE GRADE 3) DOOR CANNOT SWING OVER STEP 4) COMPLETE MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING 06/17/05 DKP INSULATION APPROVED 06/13/05 SFJ INSPECTION NOTICE: 1. COMPLETE TRUSS BRACING, SEE TRUSS ENGINEERING. 2. FIRE BLOCKING ABOVE FIREPLACE. FRAMING APPROVED WITH CORRECTION 06/07/05 DBS NOTICE 1.PROVIDE "ELECTRICAL APPROVAL". 2.COMPLETE EXHAUST VENTING. 3.PROVIDE TEST ON GAS LINE. 4.PROVIDE TEST ON WATER AND DWV PIPING. 5.INSTALL NAILS OR SCEWS AT ALL TJI HANGER TABS/EARS. 6.PROVIDE "FIRE-BLOCKING" AT LID-LINE ON GABLE-END WALLS. 7.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED TRUSS DETAILS ON SITE (WITH STAMP) 8.INSTALL "POSITIVE - CONNECTION AT ALL POST/ BEAM JOINTS (METAL). 9.PROVIDE MISSING METAL PLATES AT PLUMBING PENETRATIONS IN WALLS. 10.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED SPEC S" ON SITE FOR INSPECTION. ll.CORRECT/RECALL. REINSP REQ. 06/03/05 RRN INSP NOTICE: NOT READY FOR INSPECTION, FINISH FIRESTOPS. 05/13/05 STS LTR FROM EQUINE FACILITY DESIGN RECD/THIS FIRM NO LONGER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT/WILL BE BE INVOLVED IN MODIFICATIONS OR ISSUES REGARDING SET OF DRAWING 05/05/05 RRN SHEAR NAILING APPROVED 04/20/05 MAS ALTERNATE SITUS FOR 20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND 03/04/05 RGK STEMWALL APPROVED 03/01/05 RRN FOOTING/UFFER APPROVED 02/02/05 DAN GC-- R-3,2730 SQ.FT. X $111.00 = $303,030.00/ U-1, 2645 SQ.FT. X$24.50 = $64,800.00/ R-3N, 220 SQ.FT. X $9.50 = $2,090.00/ R-3N, 620 SQ.FT. X $24.50 = $15,190.00/ TOTAL $385,110.00 . 01/31/05 JMM THIS IS FOR REPLACING B49156 01/31/05 JMM ROUTE TO DEVIN OR MATT FOR SIGN OFF. Building Permit: 58561 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.us/index.cfm?objectid=65F111OA-BDBD-57C1-91D726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 6 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS STRUCTURE TYPE........... PERMIT ZONING...........: BUILDING USE............ STRUCTURE TYPE..........: ON SEWER? FRONT SETBACK IN FEET...: RIGHT SETBACK IN FEET...: LEFT SETBACK IN FEET....: REAR SETBACK IN FEET....: SOLAR APPROVED? PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: ARCHITECT SITE ADDRESS............ STORIES SQ FEET PERMIT VALUATION........: APPLICATION DATE.......:: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW ACCESSORY EFUTRByCHCySMIAyLMyAS DETACHED SHOP WOOD FRAME YES 149 510 305 ER YES JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY GARY NORMAN HOMES INC EQUINE FACILITY DESIGN 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 1 3407 98, 927 04/19/05 05/16/05 12/13/05 Inspection Initial Comments 12/13/05 LAM *FINAL APPROVED* 12/09/05 RRN CORRECTIONS 1) NEED HANDRAIL AT LOFT STAIRS 2) NEED APPROVED GUARD RAIL AT STAIRWELL 3) NEED GATE THAT MEETS GUARD RAIL REQUIREMENTS OR FIXED GUARDRAIL AT HOISTWELL. 09/27/05 DBS CORRECTIONS: NOT READY 09/16/05 SFJ CORRECTIONS 1) SHEAR WALLS COVERED WITHOUT INSPECTION OR APPROVAL 2) COMPLETE PLUMBING WITH TEC 06/03/05 RRN INSP NOTICE: VERTICAL REBAR CORRECTION NOT MADE. REBAR HAS BEEN CUT OFF AT TOP OF FOOTING. RE-INSPECTION REQUIRED 06/01/05 RRN STEMWALL CORRECTIONS:VERTICAL REBAR IN SHEARPANEL OF PORTAL FRAME AT EAST SIDE GARAGE (N.E.CORNER) NOT IN WALL.OK TO POUR AFTER CORRECTION ADDRESSED. 05/25/05 DKP APPROVED FOOTING, UFFER OK. 05/13/05 STS LTR RECD FROM EQUINE FACILITY DESIGN/FIRM IS NO LONGER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT AND WILL NOT BE INVOLVED IN MODIFICATIONS OR ISSUES REGARDING PLANS 05/12/05 TTT GC U-1*1952 SF X $24.50=$47824.00/R-3N*1344 SF X $36.00=$48384.00/R-3*111 SF X $24.50=$2719.50/ TOTAL=$98927.50. 05/09/05 JMM STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE BROUGHT IN AND ROUTED TO HARD FILE 05/09/05 JMM UPPER FLOOR PLAN AND ENG BROUGHT IN AND ROUTED TO TTT 05/03/05 TTT GC P.O.H. FOR UPPER STORY FLOOR PLAN AND ENG. AND CONSTRUCTION DESIGNS OF THE GREEN HOUSE, SPOKE TO THE CONTACT--AL. 04/20/05 MAS ALTERNATE SITUS FOR 20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND 04/19/05 MAS MATT TO SIGN OFF. NEEDS TO SUBMIT STMT OF INTENDED USE Building Permit: 66503 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS STRUCTURE TYPE..........: PERMIT ZONING...........: 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW BUILDING EFUTRByCHCyASyLMySMIA 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9ES&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 7 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard BUILDING USE............ STRUCTURE TYPE..........: ON SEWER? SEPTIC PERMIT NUMBER....: FRONT SETBACK IN FEET...: RIGHT SETBACK IN FEET...: LEFT SETBACK IN FEET....: REAR SETBACK IN FEET....: SOLAR APPROVED? PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: ARCHITECT SITE ADDRESS............ STORIES SQ FEET BEDROOMS PERMIT VALUATION........: APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE RESIDENCE/GARAGE WOOD FRAME NO N 162 200 94 232. YES JOHNSON,HAROLD & JANET BLACKROCK CONSTRUCTION RICK WRIGHT 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 3 5511 3 797,178 12/05/07 02/11/08 04/24/09 Inspection Initial Comments 02/05/08 TTT GC R-3*5511 SF X $133.00=$732963.00/COVERED PORCH*1669 SF X $24.50=$40890.50/U*952 SF X $24.50=$23324.00/ TOTAL=$797177.50. 01/31/08 LAF ADDENDUM SUBMITTED BY KAELEN, PER TTT REQUEST, FOR STRAPS. ROUTED TO TTT. 01/23/08 STS ENGINEERING FOR COVERED PORCH SUBMITTED BY KAELEN/TO TTT 01/14/08 TTT GC P.O.H. FOR LATERAL DESIGN OF COVERED PORCH, ENGINERS CALCS & REVISED CONST. PLANS. SPOKE TO THE ENGINEER. 01/09/08 TTT GC STAMPED REVISED QUICK START FDN. AND DETAIL PAGES, MINIMUM FEE OF $33.00 IS REQUIRED. 01/07/08 LAM ENGINEERING LETTER SUBMITTED BY KAELEN BOYCE (948-4196). 12/18/07 TTT GC P.O.H. FOR REVISED LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER FOR CHANGES. 12/17/07 LAF KAELEN, WITH BLACKROCK CONST., SUBMITTED REVISIONS (3- SETS) TO PLANS, WILL BE SENDING LETTER FROM ENGINEER WITH APPROVAL ON FOOTING CHANGES FOR QUICKSTART. ROUTED TO TTT. 12/17/07 LAF QUICKSTART PICKED UP BY KAELEN, BLACKROCK CONSTRUCTION. 12/10/07 JJR THIS IS PART OF AN ESTATE LOT & APPROVED TO DO A REPLACEMENT DWELLING. NOT A LEGAL LOT OF RECORD OF ITSELF PER PEB. 12/07/07 LAF KAELEN, GC, SUBMITTED SINGLE DWELLING AGRMT. ROUTED TO PERMIT. 12/06/07 DAN Q/S STAMP 12/05/07 JJR 5421X133=720993 958X24.50=23471 TOTAL=744464 12/05/07 JJR NO PLANNING ISSUES - SMIA HAS BEEN RECLAIMED 12/05/07 JJR QUICKSTART - CONTRACT & ENGR LTR SUBMITTED 12/24/07 DJW 100**FOOTING CORRECTIONS 1)**1007 - INSPECTION CANCELLED BY OWNER OR CONTRACTOR CANCELLED BY KAELEN, BLACKROCK CONST. 12/26/07 DBS 100**FOOTING APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: CORRECTIONS: 1.BASEMENT FOOTING, OK, 2.UFER TO BE IN GARAGE FOOTINGS, 3.SETBACKS PER CONTRACTOR 01/10/08 SEF 103**FOUNDATION WALL APPROVED 02/14/08 SEF 115**SLAB APPROVED 02/25/08 RWW 100**FOOTING APPROVED 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: UFFER INSTALLED/SOIL DENSITY REPORT ON SITE. 03/07/08 DBS 101**STEMWALL APPROVED 03/26/08 DBS 121**UNDER FLOOR FRAMING APPROVED 07/17/08 SEF 181**REINSPECTION CORRECTIONS 1)**1036 - WRONG INSPECTION TYPE REQUESTED WATER LINE 4/5110 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 8 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard APPROVED 07/22/08 SEF 123**SHEAR WALL APPROVED 08/06/08 SEF 122**FRAMING CORRECTIONS 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN FRAMING DENIED 1. COMPLETE FIREBLOCKING 2. SEPERATE WALL FRAMING FROM CONCRETE *OK TO INSULATE* 08/15/08 SEF 122**FRAMING CORRECTIONS 1)**1103 - WORK NOT READY FOR INSPECTION AS PER ORSC SECTION R109.3 OR OSSC SECTION 109.5 08/21/08 RRN 131**INSULATION WALL (L) CORRECTIONS 1)**1007 - INSPECTION CANCELLED BY OWNER OR CONTRACTOR KAELEN W/ BLACKROCK CONST. (GC) CANCELLED INSPECTION, CONTRACTOR NOT READY. 08/22/08 DKP 131**INSULATION WALL APPROVED 08/22/08 DKP 122**FRAMING APPROVED 08/25/08 RRN 131**INSULATION WALL CORRECTIONS 1)**1036 - WRONG INSPECTION TYPE REQUESTED 10/13/08 SEF 113**FIREPLACE FINAL APPROVED 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: OUTDOOR FIREPLACE APPROVED 04/24/09 RRN 161**FINAL BUILDING (L) FINALED Electrical Permit: 79406 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS BUILDING USE............ SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE RESIDENCE/GARAGE RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE OR MULTI-FAMILY PER DWELLING UNIT. SERVICE INCLUDED. 1,000 SQ FT OR LESS. 57679 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY THT ELECTRIC LLC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 05/03/02 02/17/05 11/23/05 Inspection Initial Comments 11/23/05 JCM *FINAL APPROVED* 09/22/05 JCM INSPECTION NOTICE OF 9/16/05 NOT COMPLETE 09/16/05 RED CN 1. BOND METAL STALLS TO EQUIPOTENTIAL PLANE. 2. PROVIDE GASKETED BOXES AND TRIM IN AG PORTION OF BLDG. 3. UPSTAIRS APPROVED 06/07/05 JCM CN 1.WIRING TO FURNACE - HEAT PUMP CHECK MFG LISTING ON DOOR - SERVICE DISC ONLY 2.LIMITED ENERGY PERMIT (HOMEOWNER OR GENERAL TO BUY). REINSP REQ. 06/03/05 GTJ GC CANCELED BY CONTRACTOR 04/20/05 MAS GC OLD SITUS=20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND OLD SERIAL # 132532 03/22/05 JCM EQUINEPOTENTIAL PLANE APPROVED Electrical Permit: 79407 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS BUILDING USE SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE TEMP TEMPORARY SERVICE - RELOCATIONS INSTALLATION, ALTERATIONS OR 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9ES&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 9 of 16 Deschutes C6unty Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS............ APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 57679 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY THT ELECTRIC LLC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 02/09/05 02/09/05 02/10/05 Inspection Initial Comments 04/20/05 MAS GC OLD SITUS=20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND OLD SERIAL # 132532 02/10/05 JCM *FINAL APPROVED* Electrical Permit: 81676 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS............ BUILDING USE SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE DETACHED GARAGE 200 AMPS OR LESS/SERVICES/FEEDERS: INSTALLATION, ALTERATION OR RELOCATION FEEDER FEEDER 58561 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY THT ELECTRIC LLC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 04/19/05 05/16/05 11/23/05 Inspection Initial Comments 11/23/05 JCM *FINAL APPROVED* 09/22/05 JCM GC NOT REQUESTED 09/16/05 RED ROUGH & SERVICE APPROVED 07/22/05 RJR CCN:INSPECT NOTICE: UNDERSLAB. 1. CONDUIT NEEDS TO BE COVERED BY A MIN OF 4" OF CONCRETE. OK TO COVER SIGN & RETURN. APPROVAL TO CONTINUE AFTER CORR ARE MADE. 07/21/05 JCM CN NO POSTED PERMIT FOUND ON SITE OR IN MAIN ELECTRICAL ANEL WHERE FEEDER TO BUILDING STATS. POST SIGNED PERMIT, PAY RE-INSPECTION FEE (#22), CALL FOR INSPECTION. FURNISH SET OF APPROVED PLANS. RE- INSPECTION REQUIRED Electrical Permit: 81677 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS BUILDING USE............ SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE LIMITED ENERGY LIMITED ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONDITIONING SYSTEMS 58561 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY OWNER 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 04/19/05 05/16/05 11/23/05 - 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 10 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 4/5/10 9:43 AM Inspection Initial Comments 11/23/05 JCM *FINAL APPROVED* 09/22/05 JCM GC NOT REQUESTED 09/16/05 RED GC NOT INSTALLED Electrical Permit: 82356 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS BUILDING USE SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE LIMITED ENERGY RES LIMITED ELECTRICAL ENERGY - 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING : CONDITIONING SYSTEMS LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 57679 PERMIT NAME JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY CONTRACTOR NAME.........: OWNER SITE ADDRESS 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 APPLICATION DATE........: 06/07/05 PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: 06/07/05 FINAL DATE 09/16/05 Inspection Initial Comments 09/16/05 RED *FINAL APPROVED* 06/13/05 JCM APPROVED ROUGH Electrical Permit: 99455 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS BUILDING USE............ SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS............ APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE RESIDENCE/GARAGE RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE OR MULTI-FAMILY PER DWELLING UNIT. SERVICE INCLUDED. 1,000 SQ FT OR LESS. 66503 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC MCS ELECTRIC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 12/05/07 02/11/08 03/13/09 Inspection Initial Comments 12/17/07 LAF QUICKSTART PICKED UP BY KAELEN, BLACK ROCK CONST. 08/06/08 SFJ 520**FINAL ELECTRICAL (L) CORRECTIONS 1)**1036 - WRONG INSPECTION TYPE REQUESTED 08/06/08 SFJ 510**ROUGH ELECTRICAL CORRECTIONS 1)**1048 - SEE CORRECTION NOTICE AT JOB SITE POST SIGNED PERMIT. 08/22/08 DBS 510**ROUGH ELECTRICAL (L) APPROVED 03/13/09 DBS 520**FINAL ELECTRICAL FINALED Electrical Permit: 99456 on Account number: 248139 http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 11 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS............ BUILDING USE............ SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW SERVICE LTD ENERGY LIMITED ELECTRICAL ENERGY - 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING CONDITIONING SYSTEMS 66503 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC OWNER 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 12/05/07 02/11/08 03/13/09 Inspection Initial Comments 12/17/07 LAF QUICKSTART PICKED UP BY KAELEN, BLACKROCK CONST. 08/06/08 SFJ 513**SERVICE CORRECTIONS 1)**1036 - WRONG INSPECTION TYPE REQUESTED 08/06/08 SFJ 510**ROUGH ELECTRICAL CORRECTIONS 1)**1048 - SEE CORRECTION NOTICE AT JOB SITE POST SIGNED LIMITED ENERGY PERMIT 08/22/08 DBS 510**ROUGH ELECTRICAL (L) APPROVED 03/13/09 DBS 520**FINAL ELECTRICAL (L) FINALED Mechanical Permit: 31519 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS............ SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW ISSUANCE FEE PERMIT HEATING OR AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM AUTHORIZED BY A PERMIT EXHAUST, INCLUDING DUCT FOR HOOD BUT NOT CLASSIFIED IN OTHER APPLIANCE CATEGORIES TYPE FURNACE OR BURNER, INCLUDING DUCTS AND VENTS ATTACHED TO SUCH APPLIANCE OVER 100,000 BTU/H 57679 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY CENTRAL OREGON HEATING & COOLING IN 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 05/03/02 02/17/05 09/22/05 Inspection Initial Comments 09/22/05 SFJ *FINAL APPROVED* 06/13/05 SFJ ROUGH/GAS TEST AP PROVED 06/07/05 DBS NOTICE 1.PROVIDE "ELECTRICAL APPROVAL". 2.COMPLETE EXHAUST VENTING. 3.PROVIDE TEST ON GAS LINE. 4.PROVIDE TEST ON WATER AND DWV PIPING. 5.INSTALL NAILS OR SCEWS AT ALL TJI HA NGER TABS/EARS. 6.PROVIDE "FIRE-BLOCKING" A T LID-LINE ON GABLE-END WALLS. 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 12 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 7.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED TRUSS DETAILS ON SITE (WITH STAMP) 8.INSTALL "POSITIVE - CONNECTION AT ALL POST/ BEAM JOINTS (METAL). 9.PROVIDE MISSING METAL PLATES AT PLUMBING PENETRATIONS IN WALLS. 10.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED SPEC S" ON SITE FOR INSPECTION. ll.CORRECT/RECALL. REINSP REQ. 06/03/05 RRN INSP NOTICE:.NEED GAS LINE PERMIT, NOT READY FOR ROUGH IN 04/20/05 MAS GC OLD SITUS=20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND OLD SERIAL # 132532 Mechanical Permit: 32470 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS............ APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW ISSUANCE FEE 58561 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY CENTRAL OREGON HEATING & COOLING IN 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 04/19/05 05/16/05 12/09/05 Inspection Initial Comments 12/09/05 RRN *FINAL APPROVED* 11/02/05 DKP GASLINE APPROVED 09/27/05 DBS CORRECTIONS: NOT READY 09/16/05 SFJ NOT READY FOR INSPECTION Mechanical Permit: 40220 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 ACCOUNT 248139 STATUS FINAL BUILDING CLASS..........: RESIDENTIAL PERMIT CLASS NEW SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: ISSUANCE FEE TYPE FURNACE OR BURNER, INCLUDING DUCTS AND VENTS TYPE FURNACE OR BURNER, INCLUDING DUCTS AND VENTS ATTACHED TO SUCH APPLIANCE OVER 100,000 BTU/H PERMIT. VENT INSTALLED AND NOT INCLUDED IN AN APPLIANCE PERMIT. LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: HEATING OR AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM AUTHORIZED BY A PERMIT EXHAUST, INCLUDING DUCT FOR HOOD INCINERATOR OR WOOD STOVE BUT NOT CLASSIFIED IN OTHER APPLIANCE CATEGORIES 66503 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC SHEPHERD HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 12/05/07 02/11/08 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 13 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard FINAL DATE 04/24/09 Inspection Initial Comments 12/17/07 LAF QUICKSTART PICKED UP BY KAELEN, BLACKROC K CONST. 02/19/08 SEF 210**UNDER SLAB APPROVED 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN-SLAB RADIANT LINES APPROVED. 03/26/08 DBS 217**U/FLOOR APPROVED 08/06/08 SEF 209**ROUGH MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ROUGH DENIED 1. PROVIDE PAN FOR FURNACE AS PER M/411.3.1 2. PROVIDE T&P RELIEF VALVES ON RADIANT HEAT BOILER * GAS LINE, IN- FLOOR HEAT APPROVED* 08/15/08 SEF 209**ROUGH MECHANICAL CORRECTIONS 1)*-1103 - WORK NOT READY FOR INSPECTION AS PER ORSC SECTION R10 9.3 OR OSSC SECTION 109.5 08/22/08 DKP 209**ROUGH MECHANICAL APPROVED 04/24/09 RRN 215**FINAL MECHANICAL FINALED Plumbing Permit: 26676 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 ACCOUNT 248139 STATUS FINAL BUILDING CLASS..........: RESIDENTIAL PERMIT CLASS NEW SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: ONE & TWO FAMILY/3 BATH LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS............ APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE 57679 JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY SUNSET PLUMBING OF BEND INC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 05/03/02 02/17/05 11/23/05 Inspection Initial Comments 11/23/05 DBS *FINAL APPROVED* 11/02/05 DKP GC: NO ONE HOME - HOUSE OCCUPIED CANNOT ENTER. 09/27/05 DBS GC: NOT READY 09/22/05 SFJ INSPECTION NOTICE: 1. REMOVE COMBUSTABLE MATERIALS FROM BEHIND WATER HEATER. 2. TIGHTEN SET SCREW AT AVB. 3. NO HOT WATER (NO POWER). 4. SEAL BACK SPLASH AT 1ST FLOOR LAV. 07/28/05 SFJ INSPECTION NOTICE: 1. SPLICE ALL TRACER WIRES. 2. PROVIDE FOR SHUT OFF VALVE TO BACKFLOW DEVICE/YARD HYDRANT. 3. PROVIDE FOR CLEAN-OUT AT BLDG DRAIN 2" WYE. 4. ADD CLEAN-OUT AT 3" STACK AT SHOP (AT TOP OUT) (SHUT OFF VALVE AT METER?? & BACKFLOW DEVICE??) OK TO COVER DITCHES. 06/13/05 SFJ ROUGH APPROVED: SECURE TUB PANELS 06/07/05 DBS NOTICE 1.PROVIDE "ELECTRICAL APPROVAL". 2.COMPLETE EXHAUST VENTING. 3.PROVIDE TEST ON GAS LINE. 4.PROVIDE TEST ON WATER AND DWV PIPING. 5.INSTALL NAILS OR SCEES AT ALL TJI HANGER TABS/EARS. 6.PROVIDE "FIRE-BLOCKING" AT LID-LINE ON GABLE-END WALLS. 7.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED TRUSS DETAILS ON SITE (WITH STAMP) 8.INSTALL "POSITIVE - CONNECTION AT ALL POST/ BEAM JOINTS (METAL). 9.PROVIDE MISSING METAL PLATES AT PLUMBING PENETRATIONS IN WALLS. 10.PROVIDE "ENGINEERED SPEC S" ON SITE FOR INSPECTION. ll.CORRECT/RECALL. REINSP REQ. 06/03/05 RRN INSP NOTICE: NOT READY FOR INSP 04/20/05 MAS GC OLD SITUS=20210 SWALLEY RD,BEND OLD SERIAL # 132532 03/17/05 RGK U/SLAB APPROVED 4/5/10 9:43 AM http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 14 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 4/5/10 9:43 AM Plumbing Permit: 27536 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL ACCOUNT STATUS BUILDING CLASS..........: PERMIT CLASS SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: 161220 00 00104 248139 FINAL RESIDENTIAL NEW REMODEL/U1 ISSUANCE FEE LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 58561 PERMIT NAME JOHNSON,JODY & HARRY CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SUNSET PLUMBING OF BEND INC SITE ADDRESS 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 APPLICATION DATE........: 04/19/05 PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: 05/16/05 FINAL DATE 12/09/05 Inspection Initial 12/09/05 RRN 09/22/05 SFJ 09/16/05 SFJ 06/24/05 SFJ Comments *FINAL APPROVED* ROUGH APPROVED WITH CORRECTION: 1. PROTECT ALL PLUMBING FROM FREEZING. 2. INSTALL WATER CLOSET FLANGE AND SECURE. COMPLETE PLUMBING UNDERSLAB PLUMBING APPROVED Plumbing Permit: 33733 on Account number: 248139 Map/TL 161220 00 00104 ACCOUNT 248139 STATUS FINAL BUILDING CLASS..........: RESIDENTIAL PERMIT CLASS NEW SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....: WATER SERVICE (EACH ADD'L 100FT OR FRACTION THEREOF) LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: PERMIT NAME CONTRACTOR NAME.........: SITE ADDRESS............ APPLICATION DATE........: PERMIT ISSUE DATE.......: FINAL DATE PUMPS, EXTRACTOR, WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT, ETC.) 66503 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC NOE PLUMBING INC 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 12/05/07 02/11/08 04/24/09 Inspection Initial Comments 12/17/07 LAF QUICKSTART PICKED UP BY KAELEN, BLACKROCK CONST. 02/14/08 SEF 307**UNDER SLAB PLUMBING APPROVED 02/19/08 SEF 307**UNDER SLAB PLUMBING CORRECTIONS 1)**1036 - WRONG INSPECTION TYPE REQUESTED 03/26/08 DBS 308**UNDER FLOOR PLUMBING APPROVED 07/17/08 SEF 303**WATER LINE APPROVED 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: INSPECTION WAS SCHEDULED I N ERROR UNDER BUILDING PERMIT. 07/29/08 SEF 305**SEWAGE EJECTOR APPROVED 07/29/08 SEF 301**SEWER LINE APPROVED 08/06/08 SEF 309**ROUGH PLUMBING CORRECTIONS 1)**1000 - INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ROUGH DENIED 1. http://co.deschutes.or.us/index.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 15 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 4/5/10 9:43 AM TEST DWV THRU ROOF 2. REMOVE HOSE BIB FROM GARAGE. 3. COMPLETE M/TUB AND RAT PROOFING. 08/15/08 SEF 309**ROUGH PLUMBING CORRECTIONS 1)**1103 - WORK NOT READY FOR INSPECTION AS PER ORSC SECTION R109.3 OR OSSC SECTION 109.5 08/22/08 DKP 309**ROUGH PLUMBING APPROVED 10/13/08 SEF 315**SHOWER PAN CORRECTIONS 1)**1786 - SHOWER PAN DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS AS PER ORSC SECTION P2710.5 OR OPSC SECTION 412.6 10/14/08 CEG 315**SHOWER PAN APPROVED 04/24/09 RRN 313**FINAL PLUMBING FINALED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * No Historical Real Property Tax Lot Record * * * Get Latest Tax Lot Record for this property This web site uses the FREE Adobe® AcrobatO Reader'" plug-in. /~~cot If you do not have this plug-in, dick the icon to get it. lldk e7 Tax Lot Record prior to July 2003 For Tax Lot Records prior to 1995 please call our office at (541)388-6508 http://co.deschutes.or.uslindex.cfm?objectid=65F1110A-BDBD-57C1-9lD726DBA942A9E5&CMD=SERIAL&DATA=248139&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 16 of 16 Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard 4/5/10 9:40 AM wt Enhancing the lives of citizens by delivering quality services in a cost-effective manner Deschutes County ° hot news! be informed first! I help I site map ~ location I contact us l En es panol , , _ _ _ ee InTormcc.' First! _.yli. C. COmpreheils;ve Ir crmation for residents Gi' Deschutes County. You are here: Government u Departments » Assessor's Office p DIAL Search Results Standard I Account(s) on Record for DESCHUTES RIV ER RANCH GROUP LLC SELECT Account Property ID Address St atus (000011 130679 R20081612160001000 A (000021 132396 820071612160000900 A 1`000031 132397 R20071612160000800 65850 WHITE ROCK LOOP, BEND 01 A 1`000041 132400 R20071612160000700 65900 WHITE ROCK LOOP, BEND 01 A 1`000051 132452 R20071612170002600 65695 WILD HORSE TRL, BEND 01 A 1`000061 132453 R20071612170002500 65750 WILD HORSE TRL, BEND 01 A 1`000071 132532 R20071612200000100 20210 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 A 1`000081 132582 R2007161220AA02500 20355 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 A [000091 133830 R20081612170002700 65620 TWIN BRIDGES RD, BEND 01 A 1`000101 160648 R20071612200000203 C r000111 160651 R20071612200000204 C j000121 208525 P200712221 20210 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 A 1-000131 209509 820071612170002700 A r000141 242774 R20071612200000101 A 1-000151 248137 R20071612200000103 20240 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 A 1`000161 248139 820071612200000104 20220 SWALLEY RD, BEND 01 A 1000171 248189 R20081612170002701 20400 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 A 1000181 249602 R20081612160001001 A 1000191 249603 R20081612160001002 A 1`000201 251309 R20081612160001003 20425 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 A 1`000211 251311 820081612160001004 20435 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 A 1`000221 254298 R20081612160001005 20450 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 A 1`000231 254299 R20071612170002502 65701 WILD HORSE TRL, BEND 01 A 1`000241 259855 R20071612170002503 65770 WILD HORSE TRL, BEND 01 A 1`000251 261835 R20071612160000703 A (000261 263807 R20071612170002603 65700 WILD HORSE TRL, BEND 01 A http://co.deschutes.or.us/index.cfm?objectid=65Fl11OA-BDBD-57...RANCH+GROUP+LLC*DESCHUTES+RIVER+RANCH+GROUP+LLC&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 1 of 1 1 C) C O u L180 1 - - DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK 2009.54199 H11111ll it III) VIII III1II Atiter Recording Return To: 0657'02000 4 900 030 Chris Hatfield 12/30/2009 09:43:03 AM Hurley Re, PC D-LE Cntai Stnal BN 747 SW Mill View Way $15.00 611.00 616.00 $10.00 66.00 Bend, OR 97702 3 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE DATED: December 15 2009. BETWEEN: Gary Blake and Lynette Blake. ("Landlord") 20240 Rock Canyon Road, Bend OR 97701 AND: Robert A. Lotter and Maria Lotter ("Tenant") 6 Upper Newport Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Landlord and Tenant have entered into a Residential Lease dated this same date regarding the real property in Deschutes County, Oregon, more particularly described on Exhibit A. If not terminated earlier, the Residential Lease shall terminate on December 30, 2010. A. Pursuant to that certain unrecorded lease dated January 4, 2010, (the "Lease"), landlord has leased the Property to Tenant and Tenant has leased the Property from Landlord. B. The parties to the Lease are desirous of placing their interests therein as a matter of record. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and contained in the Lease, the parties agree: 1. The term of the Lease (the "Term") commences on January 5, 2010 and expires on December 30, 2010. This Memorandum is for informational purposes only and noting herein shall be deemed in any way to modify or otherwise affect any of the terms and conditions of the Lease, the terms of which are contained herein by reference. This instrument is merely a Memorandum of the Lease and is subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions of the Lease. In the event of any inconsistency between the terns of the Lease and this instrument, the terms of the Lease shall prevail After recording, return to Amedtitle 15 OREGON AVENUE, BEND Recorded by Amerfntle as an accommodation only. No liability is accepted for the condition of title or for the validity, sufficiency, or effect of this document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this memorandum to be executed as of the day and year first above written. STATE OF OREGON County of Deschutes )ss S OFFICIAL SEAL this Z~ day f December 2009, by Gary Blake. .435225 My NO UBLIC OREGON STATE OF OREGON County of Deschutes )ss STATE ROX.ANaYE't~i SUPPLEE NOTARY PtJi3LIC-OREGON COP~tnk;:?,SiON NO ~ Cos;~;~rss _'N l=xplREs NOTARY COMMISSION NO. 435225 VO N~~ FMY CO:JiI~lISSldN EXPIRES JAN. 11 2013 N LIC FOR OREGON SUBSCRIBED AND SWO this Z U day of December 2009, by Lynette Blake. OFFICIAL SEAL t?tOXANNE M SUPPLEE OF OREGON County of Deschutes )ss s SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME this Iti'dlay of December 2009, by Robert A. FMN00TARY PUBLIC-0REGON Lotter. OFFICIAL SEAL ANNE All SUPP ROX LEE COAAfiAISSlON N0.435225 STATE OF OREGON County of Deschutes )ss NO ARY LIC FOR OREGON SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME this zU day of December 2009, by Maria Lotter. COMMISSION N0.435225 ~ MYCOMIWiuS10NECPIR;_S JAN. 11 2013 OFFICIAL SEAL ROXANNE AA SUPPLEE ! NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC FO OREGON T . ESTATE LOT 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A tract of land located in the Northwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 20, Township 16 South, Range 12 East, of the Willamette Meridian, in Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center North one-sixteenth corner of said Section 20; thence along the south line of the Northwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 20, North 89°35'47" East 378.65 feet; thence leaving said south line North 00°24' 13" West 81.21 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Swalley Road and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said Northerly right of way North 01°01'48" West 523.83 feet; thence North 84°31'27" East 599.37 feet; thence South 44°58'42" West 145.16 feet; thence 110.15 feet along the arc of a 410.75 foot radius curve left, the chord of which bears South 37° 17'44" West 109.82 feet; thence South 29°36'47" West 48.35 feet; thence 121.51 feet along the arc of a 135.00 foot radius curve left, the chord of which bears South 03°49'38" West 117.45 feet; thence South 06°32'59" East 190.31 feet; thence 53.33 feet along the arc of a 32.00 foot radius curve right, the chord of which bears South 41 ° 11'49" West 47.37 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Swalley Road; thence along said northerly right of way South 88156'37" West 377.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 5.34 acres, more or less. D9_.. -5 DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS 20 NANCY B`LANIM MIP, COUNTY CLERK $a-00 IIIIIIII II II IIII ( I~IIII~~I~IIIIIIIIII$a-00 0069:1 10/16/2 9 09;46;27 M WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: L{ Cnt td Sltwl BN Vial Fotheringham LLP ~>i.Ia .00 911.00 914.00 7000 SW Vams Street Portland, OR 97223 (503)6844111 HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION CLAIM OF LIEN Homeowner Association Lien Against Lot Pursuant to ORS 94.709 KNOW ALL PERSONS: The undersigned, on behalf of Deschutes River Ranch hereby claims a lien for unpaid assessments and charges (as noted below) against the individual lot noted below and the undivided interest in those common elements appertaining to lot. A tract of land located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW 1/4 NE 1/4) of Section 20, Township 16 South, Range 12 East, of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows:Commencing at the Center North one-sixteenth comer of said Section 20; thencealong the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW 1/4 NE 1/4) of said Section 20, North 89°36'09" East 380.06 feet; thence leaving said South line North 00°23'51" West 82.08 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Swalley Road and the point of beginning; thence leaving said Northerly right of way North 01*01'57" West 523.21 feet; thence North 84°31'27"East 599.85 feet; thence South 44°58'42" West 146.37 feet; thence 110.15 feet along the arc of a 410.75 foot radius curve left, the chord of which bears South 37°17'44" West 109.82 feet; thence South 29°36'47"West 48.35 feet; thence 120.90 feet along the arc of a 135.00 foot radius curve left, the chord of which bears South 03°5772" West 116.90 feet; thence South 06°44'28"East 189.69 feet; thence 53.46 feet along the are of a 32.00 foot radius curve right, the chord of which bears South 41°07120 West 47.46 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Swalley Road; thence along said Northerly right of way South 88°59'08"West 376.83 feet to the point of beginning.. Also known as: 20240 Rock Canyon Rd., Bend, Oregon 97701 Common Expenses, Assessments, Charges and Late Fees Due as of October 8, 2009: Assessments: Attorney Fees: Recording Fees: TOTAL: $6,123.92 $423.78 $16.00 $6,563.70 Property owners or reputed owners are: Deschutes River Ranch Group, LLC, Gary B. Blake, Lynette H. Blake THIS IS A CONTINUING LIEN THE AMOUNT WILL INCREASE AS ADDITIONAL UNPAID ASSESSMENTS ACCRUE. DATED: October n 2009. Deschutes River Ranch Christina Robertson, Paralegal Vial Fotheringham, LLP Attorneys for Lien Claimant STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss County of Deschutes ) Christina Robertson, personally appeared and acknowledged that he!she has knowledge of the facts set forth in the claim of lien and that he/she believes that all statements made in the claim of lien are true and correct. Subscribed and sworn to before melon October 20 OFFICIAL SFJtL SCARLETT ROSE WNRE NOTARY PUBLIC-0REOON otary Public for Oregon 7 COMMISSION NO. M14717 My commission expires: e~~~ /ad MY CLAIM OF LIEN COAgIIISSION OFM KBRUARY 27, 2011 Deschutes River Ranch Attn: Jim Prehoda 805 SW Industrial Way, Suite 9 Bend, Oregon 97702 Lien Claimanl Deschutes River Rauch Group, LLC clo Laura Craska-Cooper, 15 SW Colorado Ste. 3 Bend, Oregon 97701 Lien Debtor Gery Blake and Lynette H. Blake 20240 Rock Canyon Road Bend, OR 97701 Lessee I WO-01 ~ Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard O Go) 4/5/10 9:37 AM Enhancing the lives of citizens by delivering ' quality services in a cost-effective manner Deschutes County hot news! be informed first! I help site map location I contact us En espanol OT NIEVVS~ Comprehensiv in to rr2 cn for ins denis of Descnutes Count;. You are here: Government » Departments » Assessor's Office » DIAL Search Results Standard I Account(s) on Record for BLAKE,GARY B SELECT Account Property ID Address Status 1`000011 129721 R2001151308DBO3500 2349 W ANTLER AVE, REDMOND 56 C 1000021 132545 R2007161220AA00200 20320 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C 1000031 132546 R2007161220AA00100 20332 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C 1`000041 132556 R2007161220AA01100 20305 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C [000051 132557 R2007161220AA01000 20315 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C r000061 132558 R2007161220AA00900 20325 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C r000071 132559 R2007161220AA00800 20331 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C x000081 132560 R2007161220AA00700 20335 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C (000091 132561 R2007161220AA00600 20345 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C ['000101 132562 R2007161220AA00500 20351 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C 1`000111 132563 R2007161220AA00400 20310 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C r000121 132564 R2007161220AA00300 20316 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C r000131 132565 R2007161220AA02200 20370 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 02 C r000141 132566 R2007161220AA02100 20363 ARROWHEAD DR, BEND 01 C [000151 132567 R2007161220AA02000 20366 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 C x000161 132569 R2007161220AA01800 20352 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 02 C r000171 132570 R2007161220AA01700 20346 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 C (000181 132571 R2007161220AA01600 20336 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 02 C r000191 132572 R2007161220AA01500 20330 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 C r000201 132573 R2007161220AA01400 20324 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 C r000211 132574 R2007161220AA01300 20316 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 02 C 1`000221 132583 R2007161220AA02400 20365 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 02 C [000231 241977 R2001151308DBO3400 C f000241 248137 R20071612200000103 20240 ROCK CANYON RD, BEND 01 A http://co.deschutes.or.us/index.cfm?objectid=65F111OA-BDBD-57...PICKNAME&DATA=BLAKE%252CGARY+B*BLAKE%252CGARY+B&OPTS=TADNSIEC Page 1 of 1 1 q-! -ho GDuL.-> .9- Bocc 'D g- &Ma-f From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart(LDdeschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Notice of Ranch Water System Down Time Date: October 15, 2009 1:07:20 PM PDT To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Cc: Craig Morton"' <csmorton 9 earthlink. net>, "'Gary Blake<gblake@deschutesriverranch.com> To Deschutes River Ranch Water System Users: This is to let you know that time has been scheduled for Thompson Pump Company to review the pump and control system on the community well to improve efficiency. They have scheduled two dates for the work to be done which are: • Tuesday, October 27th from 11:00am to 1:00pm and • Thursday, October 29th from 11:00am to 1:00pm It is likely that the system will be shut down during those times however only one of the two days may be needed. If more extensive work needs to be done, it will be scheduled at a later time and I will notify you in advance. f)e, ra, De,Ear't Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Oregon Real Estate Licensee - Windermere Central Oregon Real Estate Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Fax: 541.382.1939 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4504 (20091013) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Scheduled Time For Water System Maintenance Date: November 4, 2009 3:15:40 PM PST To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.corn> To the Deschutes River Improvement District Members, It is necessary to schedule a 4 hour block of time for our pump company to work on the water system pumps and controllers. Thompson Pump and Preferred Pump will be here on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 from 10:00am to 2:00pm. Water will be shut off during this time. The two recent reviews indicated that the pumps may run more efficiently with changes to the control system settings. The work on Nov. 17th will be directed at making those improvements. Debra. Do}E"T Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Oregon Real Estate Licensee - Windermere Central Oregon Real Estate Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Fax: 541.382.1939 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4574 (20091104) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: WATER SYSTEM ALERT TO CONSERVE WATER Date: December 8, 2009 2:44:44 PM PST To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Cc: Craig Morton"' <csmorton @ earthlink. net>, "'Gary Blake<gbiake@deschutesriverranch.com> There was a CEC transformer failure early this morning leaving customers from Champ Sherman to north Bend without power. Deschutes River Ranch was among those customers. Power came back around noon. Meanwhile the water system went on the backup generator system as it is designed to do and supplied water to homes at the ranch. The pump that pumps water from the cistern to your home is working however there has been damage to the pump or controller that pumps water out of the well. Thompson Pump Company will be out today to access the problem. It is necessary to conserve the water remaining in the cistern. There is approximately 9000 gallons left. I have notified Bend Water Hauling of this emergency however they won't be running until Thursday or Friday due to the extreme cold and have a list of people ahead of us on the delivery schedule. Their truck can deliver 4000 gallons at a time. You must reduce your water use to as low as possible. Please no laundry or long showers. I'll let you know when the well pump is working again. Uebra. DeW a rt Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4671 (20091208) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. httl2://www.eset.com From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Water System Update Date: December 8, 2009 3:40:48 PM PST To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Cc: Craig Morton"' <csmorton@earthlink.neb, "'Gary Blake<gblake@deschutesriverranch.com> Thompson Pump was out this afternoon to evaluate the problem with the well pump. Unfortunately it is bad news. The pump motor was damaged by the power surge. They will return tomorrow to pull the pump and begin system repairs however this is a big job so it is necessary to continue measures to conserve the water remaining in the cistern. I'll send updates as work progresses. Debra, Deff arr Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4671 (20091208) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. hftp:/Avww.eset.com From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Water System Update Wednesday Afternoon Date: December 9, 2009 2:00:45 PM PST To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Cc: Craig Morton<csmorton @earthlink. net>, "'Gary Blake<gblake@deschutesriverranch.com> Wednesday, December 09, 2009 As you probably know the cistern is empty. We are trying to get water hauled in to replenish the cistern supply. Bend Water Hauling has a backlog of requests. They are experiencing problems with jelling diesel in trucks and frozen hydrants. We are third on their list and have been in touch with them throughout the day. We may be able to get water from them this afternoon. Thompson Pump Company has been responsive to the need to replace the pump. They have a pump on order that should arrive and be installed tomorrow. The damaged pump should be removed today. I'll keep you posted as things progress. Debra. Deffart Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4674 (20091209) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Water System Update 12-9-09 3:50pm Date: December 9, 2009 3:53:44 PM PST To: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Cc: Craig Morton"' <csmorton @earthlink. net>, "'Gary Blake<gbiake@deschutesriverranch.com> Thompson Pump Company is here now with the boom truck to remove the pump from the depths of the 500+ foot deep well. Bend Water Hauling is coming through the gate with a load of 4000 gallons to replenish the cistern supply and will return in the morning with another load. You will have water shortly. Please be very conservative with the available supply to get through the night. V ebra. DW a4T Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4674 (20091209) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From: Craig Morton <csmorton @earthlink. net> Subject: Water Update Date: December 10, 2009 9:38:42 AM PST To: Adam Angeles <adamangeles@yahoo.com>, Angie Mombert <ang@bendbroadband.com>, Becky Rozewski <bck@rcodesigners.com>, Dennis Pahlisch <dennisp@pahlisch.com>, Gary & Lynette Blake <gbiake@deschutesriverranch.com>, Harry Johnson <harryj@bendbroadband.com>, Jim Rosewski <jim@rcodesigners.com>, Jody Johnson <jodyj@bendbroadband.com>, Kevin Rea <krea@bendbroadband.com>, Lynette Blake <Iblake@ livingwaterranch. net>, Nunzie Guild <Nunzie@pacitier.com>, Sue Bastian <runsuebike @ hotmail.com> Cc: Debra DeHart <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Good Morning. John Farlow reports that the 4000 gallons of water delivered yesterday late afternoon got us through the night, but it is now used up. I just got off the phone with Bend Water Hauling and they are warming up their trucks right now, and DRR is first on the delivery list. Thompson Pump is scheduled to be out this morning to finish pulling and replacing the failed pump, and they told John that they should have us back up today. You all should have sufficient water for the day shortly, and by sunset latest, we should have the system back up and running normally. We apologize for the inconvenience, and thank you for your patience. ---Craig Morton From: "Debra DeHart" <ddehart@deschutesriverranch.com> Subject: Notice of Water Shut Off for Service Date: March 8, 2010 2:57:21 PM PST To: Craig"' <csmorton@earthlink.net> Dear Deschutes River Ranch Water System Users This is a notice that the water system will be shut down for service on Thursday, March 11, 2010 from 9:OOAM to 4:00PM. The pump company will be out that day to make adjustments to the system. The water may be on intermittently but please plan that water will be shut off most of those hours. We are sorry for the inconvenience but it is important to get the system operating more efficiently. Thank you, Debra. E)W a rt Office Manager - Deschutes River Ranch Ranch Office: 541.382.7240 Cell: 541.419.7807 Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4926 (20100308) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. httr)://www.eset.com ~ 1J~✓lo lnw\\~Wv 1 From: 'Tim Berg" <Tim_Berg@co.deschutes.or.us> Subject: RE: DR remapping Date: February 16, 2010 1:58:17 PM PST To: "Nunzie" <nunzie@pacifier.com> Nunzie, Within this particular set of analyses, it was requested that I create a map to display lands that could potentially be developed within the existing Destination Resort Combining Zone code. This analysis consisted of determining where properties that were either 160 acres or greater and within the Destination Resort Combining Zone or properties that were any size, but contiguous to other lands that could be potentially blocked up to larger tracts of land that are 160 acres or greater. For instance, if 3 contiguous parcels are mapped for Destination Resort Combining Zone, and each parcel was 150 acres in size and also contiguous, the size of the tract would be considered 450 acres, regardless of ownership. I'm not sure exactly who wanted to know how many tracts of land within the Destination Resort Combining Zone were over 400 acres. It could have been a member of the Planning Commission or CDD staff. The analysis was completed in February of 2009. Tim Berg Deschutes County Community Development Department 117 NW Lafayette Ave Bend, OR 97701 phone: (541) 330-4648 From: Nunzie [mailto:nunzie@pacifier.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:42 PM To: Tim Berg Subject: Fwd: DR remapping Hi Tim: I see many parcels in your database that are smaller than 160 acres. (such as Three Sisters Irrigation District, Willett, Tumalo River LLC, Westlund, Loomis, Charlotte Nash, Kenneth & Tracy Johnson, Baney Corp. etc) Yet, some of these parcels appear in yellow on the map "remaining eligible lands". Why are these mapped in yellow if they aren`t eligible due to size? On what basis (by whom) was the 400 acres established as a criteria in your database? (the "remaining eligible lands" map clearly identifies ineligible lands as individual parcels < 160 acres) Could you kindly email me a database and map that would show only those parcels > 160 acres? Thanks in advance, Nunzie Begin forwarded message: From: "Tim Berg" <Tim Berg@co.deschutes.or.us> Date: February 16, 2010 9:33:59 AM PST To: "Nunzie" <nunzie@pacifier.com> Subject: RE: DR remapping Hi Nunzie, If you open the database with Microsoft Excel, the database will act much like an Excel spreadsheet, and should be more friendly to read/view. Once you have opened the database with Excel, you can also save it to an Excel spreadsheet if you would like. Depending on your personal settings, you may need to first save the attachment to your local PC hard drive, then open Excel, then choose "File" "Open" to navigate to the location that you have saved the database to on your PC. The fields within the database are as follows: TAXLOT - 13 digit taxlot number NAME - First name on Assessor ownership table for current taxlot number NAME2 - Second name on Assessor ownership table for current taxlot number MAILING-AD - Mailing address (house number, street name) for current taxlot number CITY/ST/ZI - Mailing address (City, State, Zip Code) for current taxlot number ACRES - Number of acres of each individual taxlot (many taxlots may be contiguous to make a larger block of land) 400ACRES - Do the number of contiguous taxlots amount to 400 acres or more? (YES or NO) SITUS_ADDR - Situs address of each taxlot number (physical property address) If you have any more issues, let me know and I will try to help you out. Tim Berg Deschutes County Community Development Department 117 NW Lafayette Ave Bend, OR 97701 phone: (541) 330-4648 From: Nunzie [mailto:nunzieCla oacifier.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:20 AM To: Tim Berg Subject: DR remapping Hi Tim: Your attachment is hard to read because it is not in a columnar format. When I open your attachment, I see 9 letter sized pages. It appears that at the end of each entry there is a yes or no after the acreage.., what does yes/no relate to? Perhaps if you could identify the titles for each heading (data title) this would help me navigate your database and decipher this list. nn!,TAXLOTCNAMEC3NAME2C"MAILING _ADC(CITY/ST/ZICACRESN 400ACRESC What I understand is taxiot, owner name(s), mailing address (city/St/Zip) and I think acres but I don't understand yes/ no... Thanks much for your assistance. Nunzie Gould Begin forwarded message: From: "Tim Berg" <Tim Berg@co.deschutes.or.us> Date: January 28, 2010 11:35:48 AM PST To: "Nunzie" <nunzie@pacifier.com> Subject: RE: DR remapping Nunzie, Attached is a database that contains all of the property records displayed on the maps that display the "contiguous ownership parcesl", relating to the unmapping scenario for the Destination Resort Remapping project. Tim Berg Deschutes County Community Development Department 117 NW Lafayette Ave Bend, OR 97701 phone: (541) 330-4648 nn!,TAXLOTCNAMEC3NAME2C"MAIL ING_ADC(CITY/ST/ZICACRESN 400ACRESC SITUS ADDRC! 1412000002604 SKVORAK,DAVID A BOWERS,LISA M PO BOX 1237 REDMOND OR 97756 150.17YES 10325 NW COYNER AVE 1412000002603 SKVORAK,DAVID A BOWERS,LISA M PO BOX 1237 REDMOND OR 97756 20.03YES 20600 NW COYNER AVE 1412000002601 SKVORAK,DAVID A BOWERS,LISA M PO BOX 1237 REDMOND OR 97756 283.39YES 1410240000100 DIERK D & CECILE E PETERS TRUST PETERS,DIERK D PO BOX 1119 SISTERS OR 97759 14.27NO 16869 WILT RD 1410240000100 DIERK D & CECILE E PETERS TRUST PETERS,DIERK D PO BOX 1119 SISTERS OR 97759 73.88NO 16869 WILT RD 141024DO05600 DIERK D PETERS & CECILE E PETERS TRUST PETERS,DIERK D PO BOX 1119 SISTERS OR 97759 30.31 NO 17087 BUFFALO DR 141024DO05600 DIERK D PETERS & CECILE E PETERS TRUST PETERS,DIERK D PO BOX 1119 SISTERS OR 97759 9.76NO 17087 BUFFALO DR 141024DO05601 DIERK D & CECILE E PETERS TRUST PETERS,DIERK D PO BOX 1119 SISTERS OR 97759 41.52NO 17095 BUFFALO DR 1511000002600 THORNBURGH,AMBERS J THORNBURGH,BONNIE J 19419 W HWY 126 REDMOND OR 97756 90.56NO 19419 W HWY 126 1511000002600 THORNBURGH,AMBERS J THORNBURGH, BONNIE J 19419 W HWY 126 REDMOND OR 97756 67.52NO 19419 W HWY 126 1511000002900 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 12.97YES 1511000002900 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 25.04YES 1511000002800 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 399.66YES 17830 FORKED HORN DR 1511000003303 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 40.44YES 1511000002800 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 1.33YES 17830 FORKED HORN DR 1511000003302 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 40.42YES 1511000002800 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 0.25YES 17830 FORKED HORN DR 1511000004002 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 80.98YES 1511000004001 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 158.91 YES 1511000006000 WINFREE,DENNIS M WINFREE,LEONOR A 5601 PENNY CIR ANCHORAGE AK 99516 163.32NO 1511000005901 DORSEY,SAGE DORSEY,LYNNE 67200 SAGE RANCH RD BEND OR 97701 80.86NO 67300 SAGE RANCH RD 1511000005900 DORSEY,SAGE DORSEY,LYNNE L 67200 SAGE RANCH RD BEND OR 97701 14.57NO 67200. SAGE RANCH RD 1511000005900 DORSEY,SAGE DORSEY,LYNNE L 67200 SAGE RANCH RD BEND OR 97701 101.79NO 67200 SAGE RANCH RD 1511000005902 DORSEY,SAGE DORSEY,LYNNE 67200 SAGE RANCH RD BEND OR 97701 2.88NO 67190 SAGE RANCH RD 1512000001400 WILLETT,ART PO BOX 1529 REDMOND OR 97756 79.24YES 11900 EAGLE CREST BLVD 1512000005000 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 264 BEND OR 97708 676.49YES 1512000004701 BCC LLC PO BOX 70006 EUGENE OR 97401 1.OONO 1512000005001 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC EVENSON,JOHN E 2447 NW CANYON DR REDMOND OR 97756 3.OOYES 1512000007700 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 264 BEND OR 97708 644.94YES 67205 CLINE FALLS RD 1512000007701 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC EVENSON,JOHN E 2447 NW CANYON DR REDMOND OR 97756 1.OOYES 1512000005002 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC EVENSON,JOHN E 2447 NW CANYON DR REDMOND OR 97756 1.OOYES 1512000007800 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 264 BEND OR 97709 445.14YES 67555 CLINE FALLS RD 1512000007900 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 264 BEND OR 97709 40.63YES 67545 CLINE FALLS RD 1512000007700 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 264 BEND OR 97708 4.62YES 67205 CLINE FALLS RD 1512000007801 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS LLC 79-145 MONTEGO BAY DR BERMUDA CA 92203 40.79YES 67525 CLINE FALLS RD 1512000008000 DE LASHMUTT,AGNES M 4048 NW XAVIER REDMOND OR 97756 46.81 YES 1512000008000 DE LASHMUTT,AGNES M 4048 NW XAVIER REDMOND OR 97756 110.04YES 1512000004700 TRAIL CROSSING REVOCABLE TRUST THORNBURG,EVERETT 16450 SW TRAIL CROSSING RD TERREBONNE OR 97760 167.54NO 67585 CLINE FALLS RD 1510120000500 CYRUS,OMER K CYRUS,CONIDA E 17204 HWY 126 SISTERS OR 97759 81.31 YES 16809 HWY 126 1510140000700 THREE SISTERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT PO BOX 2230 SISTERS OR 97759 190.96YES 68000 HWY 20 1510130000100 CYRUS,O KEITH CYRUS,CONIDA E 17204 HWY 126 SISTERS OR 97759 271.27YES 16850 JORDAN RD 1510130000100 CYRUS,O KEITH CYRUS,CONIDA E 17204 HWY 126 SISTERS OR 97759 39.25YES 16850 JORDAN RD 1510130000702 CYRUS,OMER KEITH CYRUS,CONIDA E 17204 HWY 126 SISTERS OR 97759 67.70YES 68195 CLOVERDALE RD 1510130000501 CYRUS,O KEITH CYRUS,CONIDA E 16900 ASPEN LAKES DR SISTERS OR 97759 2.15YES 1510130000600 THREE SISTERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT PO BOX 2230 SISTERS OR 97759 16.61 YES 1511170001100 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 27.21 YES 1511170001000 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 34.52YES 1511170001100 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 3.79YES 1511170001200 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 37.99YES 1511170001200 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 1.57YES 1510240000200 PATTERSON,KAY ELLEN PO BOX 1839 SISTERS OR 97759 108.43YES 67750 HWY 20 1510240000100 PATTERSON,KAY ELLEN PO BOX 1839 SISTERS OR 97759 13.30YES 1510240000300 PATTERSON,KAY ELLEN PO BOX 1839 SISTERS OR 97759 107.56YES 67640 HWY 20 151119AO01305 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 5.06YES 151119AO01304 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 5.06YES 151119AO01303 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 10.12YES 1511300000100 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 87.86YES 1511300000300 DESERT SPRINGS RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11301 SW MILITARY RD PORTLAND OR 97219 80.60YES 1 51 1 340000400 MEEK,MARVIN 66900 FRYREAR RD BEND OR 97701 40.02NO 1 51 1 340000300 TOMJACK,TOM TOMJACK,MARY 18290 PLAINVIEW RD BEND OR 97701 0.02NO 1511000005600 MEEK,MARVIN 66900 FRYREAR RD BEND OR 97701 161.02NO 66900 FRYREAR RD 1611140000402 NASH-BRAUER,ELIZABETH NASH,CHARLOTTE 65870 WALDRON TRL BEND OR 97701 39.11 YES 65870 WALDRON TRL 1611130001300 HOWARD DAY LIVING TRUST DAY,HOWARD M 65525 GERKING MARKET RD BEND OR 97701 27.04YES 65635 GERKING MARKET RD 1612170002503 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 3.26NO 65770 WILD HORSE TRL 1612170002500 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 27.37NO 65750 WILD HORSE TRL 1612170002501 SUSAN C LOOMIS REVOCABLE TRUST LOOMIS,SUSAN C 65798 WHITE ROCK LOOP RD BEND OR 97701 4.98NO 65740 WILD HORSE TRL 1612170002603 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC FINEBERG,HARVEY V 1812 NW KALORANA SQUARE WASHINGTON DC 20008 3.25NO 65700 WILD HORSE TRL 1612170002700 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 1.78NO 65620 TWIN BRIDGES RD 1612170002701 TUMALO RIVER LLC DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 21210 SWALLEY RD 420 BEND OR 97701 4.15NO 20400 ARROWHEAD DR 1612170002600 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 26.88NO 65695 WILD HORSE TRL 1612160000500 WESTLUND,BERNARD J II WESTLUND, ELIZABETH J 20590 ARROWHEAD DR BEND OR 97701 0.24NO 20590 ARROWHEAD DR 1612160000500 WESTLUND, BERNARD J 11 WESTLUND, ELIZABETH J 20590 ARROWHEAD DR BEND OR 97701 19.58NO 20590 ARROWHEAD DR 1612160001400 HEDLUND, BEATRICE B 240 SW BIRDSHILL RD PORTLAND OR 97219 0.69NO 1612160001600 KOLISCH,J PIERRE ETUX 11343 SW BREYMAN AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 0.69NO 1612160001002 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 1.67NO 1612160001004 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC VONHEIDEKEN,SVEN G 20435 ARROWHEAD DR BEND OR 97701 2.50NO 20435 ARROWHEAD DR 1612160001002 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 0.41 NO 1612160001001 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 35.28NO 1612160001000 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 2.90NO 1612160001005 JAEGER,JAY D ESTATE OF DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC PO BOX 819 SANTA BARBARA CA 93102 2.50NO 20450 ARROWHEAD DR 1612160001003 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC MOHR,SHAWN M 4831 ROSA RD WOODLAND HILLS CA 91364-3924 2.50NO 20425 ARROWHEAD DR 1612160001300 GATES,SYLVIA B KOLISCH,J PIERRE 2024 SW 58TH ST REDMOND OR 97756 38.09NO 1612160001500 GATES,SYLVIA B 01659 SW GREENWOOD RD PORTLAND OR 97219 0.42NO 1612160000400 SWINDELLS,THEODORE H 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 47.54NO 1612160000900 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 24.48NO 1612160001100 MORTON,DEAN O 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 1.10NO 1612160001200 GATES,SYLVIA B KOLISCH,J PIERRE 2024 SW 58TH ST REDMOND OR 97756 38.93NO 1612160000700 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 26.33NO 65900 WHITE ROCK LOOP 1612160000800 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 9.96NO 65850 WHITE ROCK LOOP 1612160000703 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 2.95NO 1612140000802 BUNGE,JOHN L BUNGE,CAROL Y 21225 YOUNG AVE BEND OR 97701 99.85NO 21225 YOUNG AVE 1612140000502 BUNGE,JOHN L BUNGE,CAROL Y 21225 YOUNG AVENUE BEND OR 97701 20.61 NO 65825 61 ST ST 1612140000500 BUNGE,JOHN L BUNGE,CAROL Y 21225 YOUNG AVENUE BEND OR 97701 79.57NO 65745 61 ST ST 1611000010500 TUMALO CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC 95 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND OR 97702 403.99YES 1611230000402 JOHNSON,KENNETH C JOHNSON,TRACY A 19228 DAYTON RD BEND OR 97701 0.11 YES 1611230000514 TUMALO CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC 95 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND OR 97702 14.83YES 19170 DAYTON RD 1611230000400 TUMALO CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC 95 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND OR 97702 15.11 YES 19200 DAYTON RD 1611240000700 DAY,HOWARD M JR 19330 DAYTON RD BEND OR 97701 5.15YES 19330 DAYTON RD 1611240000800 HOWARD M DAY JR TRUST CARLTON,JERRY W 19330 DAYTON RD BEND OR 97701 5.11 YES 19350 DAYTON RD 1612200000104 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC JOHNSON TRUST DATED APRIL 6 1993 20220 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 4.96NO 20220 SWALLEY RD 1612200000100 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 0.20NO 20210 SWALLEY RD 1612200000100 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 0.62NO 20210 SWALLEY RD 161220AA02500 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 5.14NO 20355 ROCK CANYON RD 161220AA02501 BALLENGER,TIM BALLENGER,KIM 2498 NW 1 ST ST BEND OR 97701 5.18NO 1612200000102 PAHLISCH,DENNIS L PAHLISCH, BEVERLY A 20290 ROCK CANYON RD BEND OR 97701 3.23NO 20290 ROCK CANYON RD 161220AA02500 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 11.05NO 20355 ROCK CANYON RD 1612200000103 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC BLAKE,GARY B 20240 ROCK CANYON RD BEND OR 97701 5.43NO 20240 ROCK CANYON RD 1612200000101 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC PAHLISCH,DENNIS L 20290 ROCK CANYON RD BEND OR 97701 2.13NO 1612200000100 DESCHUTES RIVER RANCH GROUP LLC 20210 SWALLEY RD BEND OR 97701 0.14NO 20210 SWALLEY RD 1711000006000 TUMALO CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC 95 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND OR 97702 335.58YES 62600 MCCLAIN DR 1711000006205 MILLER TREE FARM LLC 110 NE GREENWOOD AVE BEND OR 97701 526.33YES 18900 SKYLINERS RD 1711000006002 MILLER TREE FARM LLC 110 NE GREENWOOD AVE BEND OR 97701 160.58YES 1713210000100 GASSNER,PETER GASSNER,PIYAJIT 4512 LIN GATE ST PLEASANTON CA 94566 233.52NO 1711260000400 TUMALO CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC 95 SW SCALEHOUSE LOOP BEND OR 97702 40.25YES 3225 NW SHEVLIN PARK RD 1813060001700 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 79.87YES 1813060001100 DAN AND HELEN RASTOVICH TRUST RASTOVICH,DAN TRUSTEE (CB) 21925 RASTOVICH RD BEND OR 97702 80.26YES 1813050000201 BANEY CORPORATION 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 116.23YES 1813040000105 WARD,KIM D LLC 61535S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 17.97NO 23040 HWY 20 1813040000107 WARD,KIM D LLC 61535 S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 20.09NO 23050 HWY 20 1813040000108 WARD,KIM D LLC 61535 S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 19.89NO 23160 HWY 20 1813040000803 BANEY CORPORATION 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 90.48YES 1813040000300 KIM D WARD LLC 61535S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 31.43NO 23125 HWY 20 1813040000300 KIM D WARD LLC 61535 S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 13.89NO 23125 HWY 20 1813040000300 KIM D WARD LLC 61535 S HWY 97 9-517 BEND OR 97702 57.09NO 23125 HWY 20 1813030000600 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1055 SW LAKE CT REDMOND OR 97756 39.93YES 1813030000602 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1055 SW LAKE CT REDMOND OR 97756 39.80YES 1813000000100 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1055 SW LAKE CT REDMOND OR 97756 871.69YES 1813000000300 WOHLERS,RUSSEL F WOHLERS,LINDA B 23636 TEN BARR TRAIL BEND OR 97701 159.82YES 23636 TEN BARR TRL 1814000000400 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1055 SW LAKE CT REDMOND OR 97756 160.66NO 1814000001203 CLARNO CATTLE COMPANY 6811 THUNDERBIRD CT REDMOND OR 97756 280.28NO 61100 OBERNOLTE RD 1813080000101 CURTIS O BANEY TRUST BANEY,CURTIS O COTRUSTEE (CB) 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 4.44YES 61530 GOSNEY RD 1813080000900 CURTIS O BANEY TRUST BANEY,CURTIS O COTRUSTEE (CB) 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 59.13YES 61388 GOSNEY RD 1813080001001 BANEY CORPORATION 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 44.56YES 61330 GOSNEY RD 1813080001000 CURT BANEY INC 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 71.63YES 61270 GOSNEY RD 1813080000200 ELSEY,ANITA S ELSEY,DANIEL T 61590 GOSNEY RD BEND OR 97702 3.05YES 61590 GOSNEY RD 1813080000201 RONALD J ROBINSON JR REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST ROBINSON,RONALD J JR 61560 GOSNEY RD BEND OR 97702 11.40YES 61560 GOSNEY RD 1813080000100 CURTIS O BANEY TRUST BANEY,CURTIS O COTRUSTEE (CB) 475 NE BELLEVUE AVE 210 BEND OR 97701 127.52YES 61508 GOSNEY RD 1813080000700 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 80.49YES 1813080000800 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 78.80YES 1812120000101 RASTOVICH, ROBERT D RASTOVICH,COLLEEN 21915 RASTOVICH RD BEND OR 97702 2.17YES 21915 RASTOVICH RD 1812120000100 DAN AND HELEN RASTOVICH TRUST RASTOVICH,DAN TRUSTEE (CB) 21925 RASTOVICH RD BEND OR 97702 37.79YES 21925 RASTOVICH RD 1813070000301 DAN AND HELEN RASTOVICH TRUST RASTOVICH,DAN TRUSTEE (CB) 21925 RASTOVICH RD BEND OR 97702 41.13YES 1813070000200 DAN AND HELEN RASTOVICH TRUST RASTOVICH,DAN TRUSTEE (CB) 21925 RASTOVICH RD BEND OR 97702 40.OOYES 1813070000100 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 121.51 YES 1813070000500 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 39.93YES 1813070000600 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 39.24YES 61130 WARD RD 1813070000600 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 0.03YES 61130 WARD RD 1813090000900 MONDRY,JEFFREY L 22820 TIMLAND LN BEND OR 97702 19.84YES 22820 TIMLAND LN 1813090002200 BANEY,CURTIS A BANEY,ROBIN J 1550 NE WILLIAMSON BLVD BEND OR 97701 19.06YES 1813090002100 BANEY,CURTIS A BANEY,ROBIN J 1550 NE WILLIAMSON BLVD BEND OR 97701 20.58YES 22895 TIMLAND LN 1813180000100 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 38.73YES 61135 WARD RD 1813180000100 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 O.OOYES 61135 WARD RD 1813180000100 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 155.38YES 61135 WARD RD 1813170002300 BEND METROPOLITAN PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 3.90YES 61105 WARD RD 1813170002301 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 3.77YES 1813170002301 BEND METRO PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 74.25YES 1813170002300 BEND METROPOLITAN PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 200 PACIFIC PARK LN BEND OR 97701 34.62YES 61105 WARD RD 1813000006005 SUNDANCE MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 60335 ARNOLD LOOP BEND OR 97702 23.67YES 60305 ARNOLD MARKET RD 1813000006005 SUNDANCE MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 60335 ARNOLD LOOP BEND OR 97702 389.18YES 60305 ARNOLD MARKET RD 1813000006008 SUNDANCE MEADOWS INC 60335 ARNOLD MARKET ROAD BEND OR 97702 3.95YES 1813000006004 SUNDANCE LAND & LIVESTOCK INC PO BOX 644 MURRIETTA CA 92564 5.18YES 60220 STIRLING DR 1812000004400 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 282.98YES 1812000004411 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 145.03YES 60000 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004419 WINDLINX, FREDERICK R 59895 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 41.83YES 59895 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004418 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 248.52YES 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004420 WINDLINX,ROBERT H WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M 59885 SCALEHOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 35.60YES 59885 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004412 KERR,DONALD M KERR,CAMERON M 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 207.43YES 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000000099 KERR,DONALD M KERR,JOSEPHINE T 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 7.21 YES 1812000004404 J L WARD CO 20505 MURPHY RD BEND OR 97702 33.40YES 20000 KNOTT RD 1812000004404 J L WARD CO 20505 MURPHY RD BEND OR 97702 317.59YES 20000 KNOTT RD 1812220001800 PAPE' PROPERTIES INC 355 GOODPASTURE ISLAND RD EUGENE OR 97401 12.14NO 1812220001900 PAPE' PROPERTIES INC 355 GOODPASTURE ISLAND RD EUGENE OR 97401 7.88NO 60375 CORRAL RD 1812000004400 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 282.98YES 1812000004411 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 145.03YES 60000 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004419 WINDLINX, FREDERICK R 59895 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 41.83YES 59895 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004418 WINDLINX,ROBERT H TRUSTEE WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M TRUSTEE 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 248.52YES 59850 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004420 WINDLINX,ROBERT H WINDLINX,SHIRLEY M 59885 SCALEHOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 35.60YES 59885 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000004412 KERR,DONALD M KERR,CAMERON M 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 207.43YES 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD 1812000000099 KERR,DONALD M KERR,JOSEPHINE T 59700 SCALE HOUSE RD BEND OR 97702 7.21 YES 1812000004404 J L WARD CO 20505 MURPHY RD BEND OR 97702 33.40YES 20000 KNOTT RD 1812000004404 J L WARD CO 20505 MURPHY RD BEND OR 97702 317.59YES 20000 KNOTT RD 1813200001401 SUNDANCE MEADOWS PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION 60335 ARNOLD LOOP BEND OR 97702 157.42YES 60300 ARNOLD MARKET RD 1 81 22700001 00 PAPE PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 407 EUGENE OR 97440 80.08NO 1812270000200 PAPE PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 407 EUGENE OR 97440 138.85NO 60340 CORRAL RD 1812260000600 MOORE,PATRICIA A POWERS,CHERYL D 21295 BACK ALLEY RD BEND OR 97702 80.01 NO 21295 BACK ALLEY From: Nunzie <nunzie@pacifier.com> Subject: DR remapping Date: January 26, 2010 8:56:03 AM PST To: Tim Berg <Tim_Berggco.deschutes.or.us> 2 Attachments, 920 KB Save v ) Hi Tim: Attached are 2 maps I received from Peter Gutowsky on the DR remapping topic. Could you kindly email me a table with Taxmap and Taxlot, Tax Serial owner, acreage and physical address of the property (if there is one) for the "contiguous ownership parcels" shown in yellow on the map called Unmapping Scenario for Destination Resorts. Thanks in advance. Nunzie Gould r Ineligible lands: ' v * Platted subdivisions ter: ' * Individual parcels < 160 acres Mir * Certain public lands * Deer Migration Priority Area / * Resource lands w/in 1 mile of Urban Growth Boundaries * Lands in Urban Reserve Areas * Area of Critical State Concern * Large irrigated farm lands * Wildlife Area Combining Zone c. Unmapping Scenario for Destination Resort Re BW - F A l.r. 7:N, Legend " . Urban Area Contiguous Ownership eligible lands = mately 15,058 acres Cl i/ ' a l 5. Unmapping Scenario for Destination Resort Legend Urban Area ri_= Contiguous Ownership send Ir`- iii C a ~o U~ U c w MR&I 1v - E %y i r r V w r 1 c ~ ai 1 1 r/ C: Q ' c 1+ 1 1, ~ r O 0 N d 4) 0 0 ~ y G L o Q t a> c m d = Q c _ co c -e o d U M ;r Uu 00 t Vf r\ 1 5~~9 e ' _ . . c j y IFy IM FA U) V O d7 O O Q f1 ~ m i. N L V Nl N a Ecv Ma Q Vf V •L = C d c O .a • of £ C o'c M In U) O N C _ Nf M V Q V= m V O V C a~ _ ~ .3 .u m a 'o 'a CL C L O L ch L cn M CL &M fA cri to cm L O ~ +r a .O O $i c = C i L, eta 0 I ooej3 o M 1 PRMS q_S`'(o q"u(d I CUTES C, D ~ = BLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERK 101~10164 after recording, return to: 1111IILI $5Z - 00 HENDRM,, BRMICH ZO 1 0 A- BERTALAN, LLP 03/ 1 O/2010 WAX PM 716 NWHarriman St L-L Cntst Stnu3 PG Bend, OR 97701 $26.00 $11.00 $16.00 541.382.4980 LIEN CLAIMANT: HICKMAN WILLIAMS & ASSOCL4 TES, INC. CONSTRUCTION LIEN KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: The undersigned, hereinafter called the claimant, has performed labor upon, transported or furnished materials and/or rented equipment (as hereinafter described), actually used in the construction of that certain improvement known as THORNBURGH RESORT all at the request of the owner of said improvement or owner's construction agent; said improvement is situated upon certain land in the County of Deschutes, State of Oregon, more fully described EXHIBIT A attached. TAXLOTS: 15-12-00-00-07801, -07900, -05000, -07700, -05001, 05002 s QyN~ ~ O1 Z ~ < M ~ y O A Of G F ~ a o d x m z a a ~ 1. The address of said land is: CLINE FALLS ROAD, Redmond, OR 97756. 2. The name of the owner or reputed owner of said land is: THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, and as set forth in EXHIBIT B attached. 3. The name of the owner or reputed owner of said improvement is: THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, and as set forth in EXHIBIT B attached. The person or persons above-named at all times herein mentioned had knowledge of the construction of said improvement. 4. The name of the person who employed claimant to perform Engineering Services is: KAMERON DeLASHMUTT, member, THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY, LLC. 5. The kind of labor so performed by claimant was: Engineering services. 6. Claimant commenced to perform said labor, to furnish said material and/or equipment on August 6, 2004, and completed same on November 21, 2008; after which claimant ceased to perform labor and/or furnish materials or equipment. The construction of said improvement was completed on UNCOMPLETED. The following is a true statement of claimant's demand after deducting all just credits and offsets, to-wit: Engineering .............................$127,763.87 Recording fees $ 52.00 Total $127,815.87 Plus interest of 18% from November 21, 2008 until paid. Attorney fees are provided under the contract. Page 1. CONSTRUCTION LIEN Claimant claims a lien for the amount last stated upon the said improvement and upon the site, to-wit: the land upon which said improvement is constructed, together with such space about the same as may be required for the convenient use and occupation of the improvement constructed on said site, to be determined by the court at the time of the foreclosure of this lien. LIEN CLAIMANT 07,e~ byADAMES O WELL, , Sec. s h z pd Q a .s qz F a x U z a a~ X a O Ql a m M 0 a a m d 4 b C d m w a e 4 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Deschutes ) I, JAMES DOWELL, being first duly sworn, do hereby say as follows: That I am the Secretary of Hickman Williams & Assoc., Inc., claimant named in and who signed the foregoing instrument; that I have knowledge of the facts therein set forth; that all statements made in said instrument are true and correct, as I truly believe. 4: 57 6 XEMIS:~OWELL STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Deschutes ) TP~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this q day of March, 2010. C, Ar • OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon SARAH H~ERRON r' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: COMMISSION NO. 440602 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 26.2013 Page 2. CONSTRUCTION LIEN EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SEl/4SE1/4) of Section Twenty-nine (29), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12), East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon. PARCEL 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NW1/4SE1/4) of Section Twenty-nine (29), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12), East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon. PARCEL 3: In Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12) East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, Section Twenty-nine (29): Northeast Quarter, East Half of the Southeast Quarter, Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE1/4, E1/2 SE/1/4, SE1/4 NW1/4, SW1/4 NW1/4, NE1/4 SW1/4, NW1/4 SW1/4). EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4SE1/4). TOGETHER WITH; In Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12) East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, Section Thirty (30): The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE1/4NE1/4) and the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE1/4SE1/4). PARCEL 4: The East Half of the Northwest Quarter (E1/2NW1/4), the South Half of the Southwest Quarter (S1/2SW1/4) and the West Half of the East Half (W1/2E1/2) of Section Seventeen (17): The Northwest Quarter (NW1/4), the West Half of the Northeast Quarter (W1/2NE1/4), the North Half of the Southwest Quarter (N1/2SW1/4), the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4SW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12) East of the Willamette Meridian. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: TRACT A: Beginning at the center one-quarter (1/4) corner of Section Twenty (20), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12) East of the Willamette Meridian, the true point of beginning; thence North 88044'26" West along the center line 653.40 feet, thence North 00006154" East 200.00 feet. Thence South 88044'26" East 653.40 feet to the North-South center line: thence South 00006'54" West 200.00 feet to the true point of beginning. TRACT B: Beginning at the South center one-sixteenth (1/16) corner of Section Twenty (20), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12) East of the Willamette Meridian, thence North 00006'54" East along the North-South center line 179.75 feet to the true point of beginning: Thence North 89053106" West 208.71 feet. Thence North 00°06.54° East 208.71 feet; thence South 89053106" East 208.71 feet to the said center line; thence South 00006154" West along said center lin4f-208.71 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL 5: The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE1/4SE1/4) and the South Half of the Southeast Quarter (S1/2SE1/4) of Section Twenty (20); the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4SW1/4) of Section Twenty-one (21); the North Half (Ni/2) and the North Half of the South Half (N1/2Si/2) of Section Twenty-eight (28), all in Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12), East, of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon. EXCEPTING: TRACT C: Beginning at the East 1/4 corner of Section Twenty (20), Township Fifteen (15) South, Range Twelve (12), East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, the true point of beginning; thence South 00006137" West along the East line of said Section 20, 208.71 feet; thence North 88044,261, West, 208.71 feet; thence North 00006,371, East, 208.71 feet to the East-West centerline of said Section 20; thence South 88044,26" East along said centerline, 208.71 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL 6: TRACT A: Beginning at the center 1/4 corner of Section 20, Township 15 South, Range 12, East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, the true point of beginning; thence North 88044'26" West along the centerline, 653.40 feet; thence North 000061541, East, 200.00 feet; thence South 88044'26" East, 653.40 feet to the North-South centerline; thence South 00006154" West, 200.00 feet to the true point of beginning. TRACT B: Beginning at the South center 1/16 corner of Section 20, Township 15 South, Range 12, East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon; thence North 00006154" East along the North-South centerline, 179.75 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 89053'06" West, 208.71 feet; thence North 00006154" East, 208.71 feet; thence South 89053'06" East, 208.71 feet to the said centerline; thence South 00006'541, West along said centerline, 208.71 feet to the true point of beginning. TRACT C: Beginning at the East 1/4 corner of Section 20, Township 15 South, Range 12, East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon, the true point of beginning; thence South 00006'37" West along the East line of said Section 20, 208.71 feet; thence North 88044126" West, 208.71 feet; thence North 00006'37" East, 208.71 feet to the East-West centerline of said Section 20; thence South 8804412611 East along said centerline, 208.71 feet to the true point of beginning. EXHIBIT "B" VESTING PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 THORNBURGE RESORT COMPANY, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 958 interest, and PARKER GROUP ZNVSSTMENTS, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 58 interest; PARCELS 4 and 5 7710RNBURGH RESORT COMPANY, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 50% interest as to Parcel 4 and an undivided 958 interest as to Parcel 5 and PARKER GROUP 2N1ES7AUw7S, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to an undivided 50% interest as to Parcel 4 and an undivided 58 interest as to Parcel 5 PARCEL 6 TRACT A, B & C: TBORNBURGS RESORT COMPANY, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to an undivided 468 interest and PARKER GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to an undivided 58 interest and JOHN S. SVENSON and BARBARA L. EVENSON, each as to an undivided 50% interest, as to an undivided 498 interest J.v.LOD Form 668 (Y)(c) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service (Rev. February 2004) Notice of Federal Tax Lien Area: Serial Number For SMALL BUSINESS/SELF EMPLOYED AREA #6 Lien Unit Phone: (800) 829-3903 621520910 As provided by section 6321, 6322, and 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code, we are giving a notice that taxes (including Interest and penalties) have been assessed against the following-named taxpayer. We have made a demand for payment of this liability, but It remains unpaid. Therefore, there is a lien in favor of the United States on all property and rights to property belonging to this taxpayer for the amount of these taxes, and additional penalties, interest, and costs that may accrue. Name of Taxnaver TunRwnrmr_u DL-r%nm nn*er,r~n, a Partnership Residence PO BOX 264 BEND, OR 97709-0264 IMPORTANT RELEASE INFORMATION: For each assessment listed below, unless notice of the lien is refiled by the date given in column (e), this notice shall, on the day following such date, operate as a certificate of release as defined in I R C 6325(a). Tax Period Date of Last D for Kind of Tax Ending Identifying Number Assessment Refing 941 (09/30/20081 20-1409735 01/05/2009 02/04/2019 941 12/31/2008 20-1409735 103/30/20091 04/29/2019 OFFICE OF CLERK DESCHUTES COUNTY BEND, OR 97701 DESCHUTES NANCY BLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CCLERKDS S1N6011 111111111JU111 I1I~ ~IIII31 08 13 US-L Cnt■1 Strwi BN 02/09/201010;58;53 AN a. oo Place of Filing Office Unpaid Balance of Assessment 12674.24 1494.50 Total 1416 8.74 This notice was prepared and signed at SEATTLE, WA the 28th day of January 2010 , on this, Signature ACS for MICHAEL W. COX 26-00-0008 (800) 829-3903 (NOTE: Certificate of officer authorized by law to take acknowledgment is not essential to the validity of Notice of Federal Tax lien Rev. Rul. 71-466,1971 - 2 C.B. 409) Form 668M(c) t • Kept By Recording Office (Rev. 2-2004) CAT. NO 60025X PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX WARRANT (This is a lien demand and not an arrest warrant) State of Oregon, County of DESCHUTES Date Issued: Jan 13, 2010 Interest to: Feb 15, 2010 ss. Warrant Number: 2009 - 883 THORNBURGH RESORT COMPANY LLC THORNBURGH PROPERTIES PO BOX 264 BEND, OR 97709 DESCHUTES COUNTY RECORDS NANCY BANKENSNIP,F000NTY CLERK NIM 0111111 i 111(1111111111111 $32.00 mrmnmo m:u:u m $5.00 $11.00 $16.00 The above named appears as owning or having possession or control of certain personal property on the accounts listed below. Taxes lawfully assessed, levied, and charged on said personal property have not been paid and are delinquent for the years and in the respective amounts specified. This warrant is issued to enforce payment of these taxes pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 311.610. The description of the personal property as it appears in the latest tax roll, the year(s) for which taxes are delinquent, the principal amount for delinquent taxes for each year plus interest to the date of issuance of this warrant, and service charges, are as follows: Description of Personal Property Tax Amount of Amount Due Code Area Account Number Kind of Property Taxes Interest Total 1 260121 PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 1 2009 2008 $584.85 1 $668.651 $7.80 $96.10 1 $592.65 $764.751 Total Amount of Taxes to be Recorded Totat Taxes and Interest $1,357.40 Service Charges $84.00 TOTAL Due 1,441.401 The amount due on this warrant is the sum of total taxes due, interest on all past due installments at the rate of 1.3333 percent per month until paid (ORS 311.505), and the service charges. SERVICE OF WARRANT A duplicate of this warrant was served on the person named by: Certified Mail (ORS 311.620) Jan 13, 2010 Date Mailed The cost of such service is $ 84 RELEASE OF LIEN This warrant has been satisfied in full, and the lien is fully released. MARTY WYNNE Tax collector by Deputy (MUST be signed to release lien) AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR- 1300 NW WALL ST., SUITE 200 BEND OR 97701 (541) 388-6540 Zo cc r-~fZ.- la NANCY~BLA E SHIP, C=OUNTY LERK RECORDS 201W17 H11'd11171L'11Y~1ei~mio 10:48:56 AM C4-CL Cntel Stnm3 PO $45.00 $21-00 After Recording, return to: Michael T. Wise Michael Wise & Associates, P.C. 806 SW Broadway, Ste. 800 Portland, Oregon 97205 Ph. (503) 224-8422 General Judgment and Money Award Clackamas County Circuit Court of Oregon Case No. CV04040547 Titled Venture Properties, Inc. v. Jeff Parker Money Award Creditor: Venture Properties, Inc. 4230 Galewood St., Ste. 100 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Attorney: Michael T. Wise Michael Wise & Associates, P.C. 806 SW Broadway, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97205 Debtor: Jeff Parker 1500 Northshore Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Attorney: David B. Markowitz Markowitz Herbold Glade & MehIhaf, P.C. Suite 3000 Pacwest Center 1211 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-3730 Costs & Disbursements/ Attorney Fees: Amount to be determined by supplemental judgment in accordance with ORCP 68 Total Amount: $1,200,000.00 Interest: Postjudgment interest at the rate of 9% simple interest per annum Effective Date: January 14, 2010, the date of entry of judgment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4 r r h IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON ~ FOR THE COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS VENTURE PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, I No. CV 0404-0547 vs. JEFF PARKER, Plaintiff, Defendant. GENERAL JUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD o' c...y" 51 "11LA GENERAL JUDGMENT This case came on regularly for trial on November 3, 2009, before the undersigned judge and a jury. Plaintiff's first claim for relief for breach of contract was tried to a jury, and its second claim for relief for rescission was tried to the Court. Plaintiff, Venture Properties, Inc., appeared by and through Michael T. Wise, of its attorneys. Defendant, Jeff Parker, appeared by and through David B. Markowitz, of his attorneys. The attorneys made opening statements on behalf of their respective clients, introduced testimony and other evidence in support of their respective cases, and rested. Arguments were made to the jury on behalf of the respective parties, and the jury, having been instructed on all matters of law, and having retired to deliberate on its verdict, returned into court a verdict in favor of plaintiff on November 13, 2009 (copy attached). Following the jury's verdict, plaintiff dismissed with prejudice its claim for rescission. This matter now coming on for judgment, it is hereby Page 1 - GENERAL TUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD MARKOWITZ, HERBOLD, GLADE & MEHLHAF, P.C. SUITE 3000 PACWEST CENTER 1211 SW FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 97204-3730 (503) 295-3085 Fax: (503) 323-9105 I ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims pending before the Court are disposed of 2 as follows: Plaintiff, Venture Properties, Inc., shall have judgment based upon the jury's verdict 3 against defendant, Jeff Parker, in the sum of $1,200,000.00, plus post judgment interest; 4 plaintiff's claim for rescission is dismissed with prejudice; and, entitlement to attorney fees and 5 costs will be determined by supplemental judgment pursuant to ORCP 68. 6 DATED: ,2 fadlaa* , IMT-WID 7 8 9 The Honorable Kathie F. Steele Circuit Court Judge 10 MONEY AWARD 11 I . The name and address of the judgment creditor are: 12 Venture Properties, Inc. 4230 Galewood St., Ste. 100 13 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 14 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the judgment creditor's attorney are: Michael T. Wise 15 Michael Wise & Associates, P.C. 806 SW Broadway, Ste. 800 16 Portland, Oregon 97205 17 3. The name of the judgment debtor and [his / her) address, date of birth, Social Security number, and driver license number, as well as the state that issued the driver license, 18 are: 19 Jeffrey I. Parker 1500 Northshore Road 20 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Date of birth: 8/26/1955 21 Social Security number: Driver license number: ~2 State of issue: OR 23 4. The name of the judgment debtor's attorney is David B. Markowitz 24 5. The amount of the money award is $1,200,000.00. 25 6. Post udgment interest is at the rate of 9% simple interest per annum on item 5, 26 said interest running from the date of entry of the judgment. Page 2 - GENERAL JUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD MARKOWIIZ, HERHOLD, GLADE & MEHL L4F, P.C. SUITE 3000 PACWEST CENTER 1211 SW FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97204.3?30 (503) 295-3085 Fax: (503) 323-9105 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7. Cost and disbursements are to be determined by supplemental judgment in accordance with ORCP 68. 8. Attorney fees are to be determined by supplemental judgment in accordance with ORCP 68. Zoto , DATED: 2A69 " Matthew A. Levin, OSB 4003054 Joseph L. Franco, OSB #073913 MARKOWITZ, HERBOLD, GLADE & MEHLHAF, P.C. 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000 Portland, OR 97204 Ph: 503-295-3085 Fax: 503-323-9105 Attorney for Defendant VENT\197486 The Honorable Kathie F. Steele Circuit Court Judge Page 3- GENERAL JUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD MARKOWnz,HERBOLD. GLADE & MEHLHAF, P.C. SURE 3000 P4CWEST CENTER 1211 SW FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-5?30 (503) 295.3085 Fax: (503) 323-9105 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [Odg fyGti 19 ~,~T c; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREMNr FOR THE COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS to 411 VENTURE PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, I No. CV 0404-0547 Plaintiff, vs. JEFF PARKER, Defendant. VERDICT FORM (Nine or more Jurors must agree on all answers.) We the jury find: QUESTION 1: Did Parker breach the Agreement? ANSWER: (Yes or No) If your answer to question I is "no", your verdict is for Defendant and you should not proceed any further. If your answer is "yes" to question 1, then you should proceed to question 2. QUESTION 2: Was the breach material? ANSWER: (Yes or No) If your answer to question 2 is "no", your verdict is for Defendant and you should not proceed any further. If your answer is "yes" to question 2, then you should proceed to question 3. I 1 QUESTION 3: Did Venture substantially perform or else have a valid excuse for its 2 failure to perform the Agreement? 3 ANSWER: ~ ES _ (Yes or No) 4 If your answer to question 3 is "no", your verdict is for the Defendant and you should 5 not proceed any further. If your answer is "yes" to question 3, then you should 6 proceed to question 4. 7 8 QUESTION 4: If Parker materially breached the Agreement, did that breach cause 9 Venture any foreseeable damages? 10 ANSWER: L1E S (Yes or No) 11 If your answer to question 4 is "no", your verdict is for the Defendant and you should 12 not proceed any further. If your answer is "yes" to question 4, then you should 13 proceed to question 5. 14 15 QUESTION 5: What are the Plaintiff's damages? 16 ANSWER: $ . 2 m V it lorx 17 Proceed to question 6. 18 19 QUESTION 6: If you found that Venture was damaged by a material breach on the 20 part of Parker, did Venture take reasonable steps to minimize its damages? 21 ANSWER: (Yes or No) 22 If your answer to question 6 is "no", proceed to question 7. If your answer is "yes" to 23 question 6, then you should proceed to question 8. 24 25 26 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 QUESTION 7: How much of Venture's damages would have been avoided if it had taken reasonable steps to minimize its damages? ANSWER:. $ Proceed to question 8. QUESTION 8: Did Parker detrimentally change his position at the time of the rescission in reliance on Venture's statement that it was rescinding the Agreement? ANSWER: ;'1© (Yes or No) [Sign this verdict form and notify the bailiff.] DATE: _ 1 / (3 0 C/ L Presiding Juror ATTORNEY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 25, 2009, I served a draft version of the foregoing GENERAL JUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD on the party/ies listed below in the manner indicated Michael T. Wise ❑ U.S. Mail Marcus H. Reed ❑ Facsimile Wise & Associates, P.C. ❑ Hand Delivery 800 Jackson Tower ❑ Overnight Courier 806 SW Broadway ® Email mreed@wiseattorneys.com Portland, OR 97205 AND I hereby certify that on December 14, 2009, I served the foregoing GENERAL JUDGMENT AND MONEY AWARD on the party/ies listed below in the manner indicated Michael T. Wise Marcus H. Reed Wise & Associates, P.C. 800 Jackson Tower 806 SW Broadway Portland, OR 97205 ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Facsimile ® Hand Delivery ❑ Overnight Courier ❑ Email mreed@wiseattorneys.com DATED this 14th day of December, 2009. Mattlfew I. Levin, OSB #003054 Attorney or Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE oiwry Certified Tme Copy Of The OrigkW 3 ? fi Dated Tid Day Of Trial COUrI A mi~istra By; ~TF y C~