Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2010-2627-Minutes for Meeting May 05,2010 Recorded 6/8/2010
COUNTY NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKDS Q 7010-7671 COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 06/0812010 08;30:39 AM IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III 2010-2027 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244: Re-recorded at the request of [give reason] previously recorded in Book _ or as Fee Number to correct and Page Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2010 Present were Commissioners Dennis R. Luke, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; Tom Anderson, Nick Lelack, Peter Gutowsky, Paul Blikstad, Terri Payne, Community Development; Hillary Borrud of The Bulletin; and six other citizens. Chair Luke opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of Destination Resort Study, Concepts and Costs. Nick Lelack introduced Bob Gordon, who explained about a learning service program and workshop, which operates under OSU to assist local governments and teach graduate students how to apply research on a variety of projects. Mr. Gordon is a planner and the Director of Research at OSU. Their focus is economic development, destination resorts and tourism, and other community issues. Commissioner Unger said that Mr. Gordon worked with the City of Redmond on a variety of issues and this collaboration made the work go much more smoothly. Mr. Gordon stated that they run projects year-round, often using graduate students. Many of their projects have to do with rural communities. Commissioner Luke said that destination resorts are controversial, and graduate students have not been exposed to a lot about this issue. He asked about oversight. Mr. Gordon replied that they have adequate supervision Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, May 5, 2010 Page 1 of 5 Pages Commissioner Baney asked how this benefits the students. Mr. Gordon stated that it gives them real-life work experience. There often needs to be an objective study of various issues, and this type of program would give the County more flexibility to direct the study and decide what the concerns of the community are, and how to move forward. Discussion took place as to interaction with other agencies, various groups and the legislature, how to quantify the findings, the methodology, and whether more information is needed. Mr. Gordon indicated that these groups have won numerous awards for their work. Commissioner Luke said that if they take on the destination resort issue, they would have to consider direct and indirect financial impacts. Commissioner Unger added that the resort model could be fractional housing or timeshares; and people who have second homes and primary homes enter into it as well. One question is what is the future pattern of ownership going to be. Sunriver is an old resort, with only 15% of the people being residents. The resorts themselves may decide to change how they do business, and the economy and in-migration have an impact also. Commissioner Luke said that a consideration is how to handle mitigation of the impacts, both locally and from neighboring counties' resorts. The resorts also need how to figure out how to handle the needs of their employees. Mr. Gordon stated that there is no possible way to answer all concerns and the questions of every group. Mr. Lelack was asked for a recommendation from him and staff as to whether to start this process and what the study will cost. Mr. Lelack said that the group came up with the same approach, beginning with what information is already out there. The phased approach works well, and would come together at about the same time the legislative group makes some policy decisions on this issue. Commissioner Unger hopes that the legislature does not make it harder for existing resorts to succeed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, May 5, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Pages 2. Comprehensive Plan Update. Terri Payne provided a draft comprehensive plan review schedule. They appear to be on schedule at this point. She feels the Planning Commission is on track with this, and there is a fair amount of agreement on most issues, with differing perspectives on others. She is working on drafts of several sections. 3. Discussion of Destination Resort Remapping Amendments & Matrix. Peter Gutowsky reviewed a conceptual timeline on the progress of destination resort remapping. It is predicated on an assumption that a property tax bill insert might be used to notice the first hearing. Staff believes that a Measure 56 notice is required for un-mapping ineligible properties. Property owners would have to submit their applications by the first week in September to allow for a 45-day notice. Any amendment requires this, along with findings. All map amendment requests have to be submitted together, as required by the State. Commissioner Luke stated that there might just be a few people who want to add property. Mr. Gutowsky said that if action might change the comprehensive plan, notice is required. Commissioner Luke said that there are not a lot of people asking to put in destination resorts at this time. He does not feel everything has to be perfect, or it will never get done. Another look can be made later. Dave Kanner asked whether an application to map or un-map would have to be handled in the same fashion. Mr. Gutowsky said that the `grandfather' clause might become no longer eligible unless they submit a statement for that outcome. Mr. Gutowsky thought that the Board could apply the same deadline as the additions criteria. This would result in what properties would remain mapped and which might be added. DLCD would be notified of all of this at once. Commissioner Luke asked how the property owners would know whether to apply for remaining on the map. That takes a Measure 56 notice. Mr. Gutowsky stated that the property tax insert could not be used for that and a public hearing at the same time. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, May 5, 2010 Page 3 of 5 Pages Commissioner Luke would like to use the Measure 56 notice in the tax mailing. Laurie Craghead said there would be a difference based on notice requirements and whether changes are made to the map. The Measure 56 notice could be used for notifying people of the consideration of un-mapping property. They could be asked to testify at the meeting if they want to retain their eligibility. They could just submit some kind of application. Commissioner Luke suggested that the Board wants a proposal to get the map as close to final as possible, and those owners' properties that might be unmapped would have an opportunity to meet the criteria, knowing that they may never meet the criteria. In thirty months, it could be reexamined. Those already on the map will have the right to remain. Mr. Lelack said that this means they will have to give two notifications. One could be in early July to anyone who might be affected. The tax mailing could do the same thing. Mr. Gutowsky that using the tax mailing saves a lot of money. There are about 35,000 properties affected. Commissioner Luke wants people to be able to decide whether to stay on the map, prior to the hearing. He wants to save money by using the mailing, if it will work. If the law prohibits this scenario, he would like staff to advise what timeframe would work and the potential cost. 4. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules. Commissioner Luke would like to have a meeting in advance of the budget committee meetings to be prepared. Mr. Kanner stated that nothing much has changed since the last time they spoke about it. The budget books will be available on May 10. He will find a time to do this sometime next week. Commissioner Unger stated that the Hawthorne Station will host a COIC meeting next week. 5. Other Items. Before the Board was a Continuing Discussion of the Continuation of a Public Hearing (from April 19) on an Appeal of the Hearings Officer's Denial of a Wireless Telecommunications Facility in the Surface Mining Zone. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, May 5, 2010 Page 4 of 5 Pages The Board reviewed photos of the "balloon test" conducted in the area. Commissioner Unger agreed with the colors suggested for the tower and equipment, and he does not think camouflage (making the tower look like a pine tree) would work in this situation. Commissioner Luke would like them to take a look at this, but at the very least, there should be non-reflecting paint that blends into the area. The applicant also needs to provide proof that there are contracts for co-location in place. Staff was directed to draft a positive result in the findings and decision, considering the discussions that took place at the day's two meetings. The Board asked that the appropriate documents be made available for signature next week. At 3:05 p.m., the Board went into an executive session under ORS 192.660(2)(e), real estate negotiations. The session ended at 3:15 p.m. No formal action was taken. Being no further discussion or items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 3:15 p.m. DATED this 5th Day of May 2010 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. __I __,4z Dennis R. Luke, Chair 6L,,.X_ UU14A__ Alan Unger, Vice Chair ATTEST: Recording Secretary Tammy Baney, Comrffissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Page 5 of 5 Pages Wednesday, May 5, 2010 N L r T ca ( l.~ M J 0 V. N ~ © o C C t M I r b L N (v s V c v o i v O O L z 5 0 v ~ _ J I \ C ~ co Q. f~ Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2010 1. Discussion of Destination Resort Study, Concepts and Costs - Nick Lelack 2. Comprehensive Plan Update -Nick Lelack & Planning Division Staff 3. Discussion of Destination Resort Remapping Amendments & Matrix - Peter Gutowsky 4. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules 5. Other Items NOTE: There could be a quorum of Planning Commissioner members at this meeting. PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Community Planning Workshop 27 April 2010 To Nick Lelack, Deschutes County Planning Director From Bob Parker, Director SUBJECT IMPACTS OF DESTINATION RESORTS IN DESCHUTES COUNTY: PROJECT CONCEPT BACKGROUND Deschutes County is home to several of Oregon's "destination resorts." Goal 8 of the Oregon Statewide Planning system defines destination resorts as "a self-contained development providing visitor-oriented accommodations and developed recreational facilities in a setting with high natural amenities." Heightened by bills in the 2009 and 2010 State legislative sessions, considerable community dialog surrounds Deschutes County's current effort to establish a legislative process for amending the County's destination resort map and allow, potentially for the siting of new resorts. The public's dichotomous reaction to this project stems from, among other things, the impacts of "legacy" resorts (resorts that were developed prior to the state siting criteria), several approved and partially constructed resorts, resort litigation, and the economic downturn. Several studies examining the impacts of destination resorts exist-as well as a lot of anecdotal evidence., Our review of these studies is that each served a specific purpose and looked at a relatively narrow aspect of destination resorts. What is lacking is a study that provides a comprehensive overview of the fiscal, economic, societal, and environmental impacts (both positive and negative) and implications of destination resorts. In March 2010, County staff contacted the University of Oregon's Community Planning Workshop (CPW) to inquire about our capacity and interest in conducting research on the impacts of destination resorts in Deschutes County. This memorandum first discusses a project approach to such a study. Afterwards a phased approach is presented, with rough cost estimates associated with each task. 'These include an analysis of the fiscal and economic impacts by Fodor and Associates, a 2007 analysis of employment and payroll generated by destination resorts by the Oregon Employment Department, and considerable work on the issue by County staff as a part of the Destination Resort Remapping project, and several studies by private development interests and non-profit organizations such as the Urban Land Institute. 1209 University of Oregon I Eugene, Oregon 97403 1 P: 541.346.38891 F: 541.346.2040 hftp://cpw.uoregon.edu ABOUT COMMUNITY PLANNING WORKSHOP Community Planning Workshop is an applied planning, public policy, and economic development research program located in the University of Oregon Community Service Center. CPW provides graduate and undergraduate students with experience working with Oregon communities, organizations, agencies, and individuals assisting to improve economic, environmental, and social conditions in Oregon. CPW has a staff of six faculty and planning professionals and typically engages 30-40 graduate students in planning-related projects throughout the year. CPW has completed over 300 planning-related projects since 1977. CPW is also affiliated with the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management in the School or Architecture and Allied Arts at the University of Oregon. A recent project list was provided to County Staff and is available upon request. PROJECT APPROACH An ideal project approach entails a comprehensive study that evaluates every resort impact to all groups in every circumstance. Conceding that such a study is not technically nor financially possible, decisions are still necessary with respect to determining what resort elements are worthy of evaluation In short, what is needed is a list by the Deschutes County Board (Board) of Commissioners prioritizing resort topics worthy of analysis. Moreover, that list would be more useful if it were informed by preliminary discussions that describe the Board's expectations for the study CPW did not have the luxury of having such a list, but we proceeded despite that limitation. In fact, we propose an approach that recognizes that limitation and uses a phased approach to facilitate an informed research strategy. A phased approach recognizes that certain elements of the study can be better defined through strategic sequencing of the work program. It further recognizes that external efforts such as the State Destination Resort Work Group may change the policy environment in ways that seem logical today but possibly unnecessary in the foreseeable future. Such a study could evaluate many potential categories of impacts: • Costs of services: transportation systems, schools, public safety and emergency services, parks and recreational facilities, water, wastewater, storm drainage, libraries, etc • Water and wildlife impacts: both direct and indirect • Economic impacts: jobs and payroll-both direct and indirect • Revenue impacts: taxes and expenditures r-Q1=_ Impacts of Destination Resorts in Deschutes County April 2010 Page 12 • Social impacts: impacts to public services, school enrollment, community events, non- profit organizations, etc Travel and tourism impacts: Impacts to the travel industry • Secondary impacts: Impacts such as economic stimulus, business development, exposure, etc A phased approach would build from a literature review that would identify and describe the impacts of destination resorts. A tremendous amount of literature on this topic exists. The literature review would be broad and would include searches of academic and trade journals, books, studies completed for public and private entities, and other related sources. The literature review would mark a decision point in the project; CPW proposes to present the results of the literature review to the Board of Commissioners in a work session. The intent of the work session would be twofold: (1) present the results of the literature review; and (2) identify priorities for additional research (if any). The remainder of this memorandum provides a more detailed description of the conceptual work program. A key question that reviewers might have is "why a literature review?" Some reviewers may assert that we already know what the impacts are and that the project should skip the Phase and proceed directly to the analysis. A cursory review of studies available on destination resorts suggests that considerable work has already been completed. Our question is "why not build from that research?" This will prevent potential duplication of effort and may result in enough information that the Board of Commissioners chooses to either defer or skip Phase II. Moreover, CPW would conduct a literature review as a part of the Phase II work in the absence if Phase I. A final note on studies of this type: they are rarely definitive, are often controversial, and will not obviate the need for the County Board of Commissioners to make policy decisions. This is perhaps an obvious statement to make, but we want to keep this study in context. The value of the study is in identifying the range of impacts and making that information available for the public dialogue. PHASED APPROACH PHASE I : Literature Review & Local Assessment The initial phase is comprised of three tasks: a literature review; local assessment; and questions for the second phase of the study. The first phase would take 6-10 weeks to complete. 1=- impacts of Destination Resorts in Deschutes County April 2010 Page 13 Task 1: Literature Review. The literature review would be a comprehensive assessment of academic and professional work related to the impacts and implications of destination resorts. The product of this task would be a memorandum that summarizes the literature, provides a bibliography of materials reviewed, and describes the impacts of destination resorts based on the literature. Task 2: Local Assessment / Focus Groups The intent of the local assessment is to develop a refined understanding of what individuals that are knowledgeable about destination resorts see as key impacts. The local assessment would consist of four focus groups conducted during the same visit with representatives from (1) the tourism industry; (2) environmental community; (3) resort industry; and (4) affected agencies - e.g., cities, irrigation districts, Oregon Department of Transportation, Housing Works, Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council. The product of this task would be a memorandum that summarizes the focus group discussions. Task 3. Phase I summary This task identifies a range of impacts for the Board of Commissioners and stakeholder groups to consider analyzing in Phase 2. The impacts will be identified in Tasks 1 and 2, as well as potential legislative concepts drafted by the State Destination Resort Work Group. Time Frame: 6-10 weeks beginning in July 2010 Products: Memorandum summarizing literature review and focus groups; identifying issues for next study phase(s); and presentation to Board of Commissioners in September 2010 Estimated Cost: $8,000 (assuming two visits to Deschutes County, County staff assistance in assembling information, coordinating and providing space to conduct focus groups, and final scope of review). PHASE 2: Impact Analysis Phase 2 would build from Phase 1, Tasks 1-3, and would be a detailed analysis of all or some of the identified impacts of destination resorts in Deschutes County. The specific methods used in the analysis would depend on which impacts are included in the study, but would be commonly applied and accepted for analyzing the impacts. A technical committee and stakeholder group would be created to provide input into the impact Analysis and would be staffed by the CPW project manager with assistance from Deschutes County planning staff. This phase would last three to nine months depending on the extent of the study, including the number of technical/stakeholder meetings. Time Frame: 3-9 months, October 2010-June 2011 Product: Draft and Final report (including Phase 1, Tasks 1-3) and presentation to Board of Commissioners Estimated Cost: $15,000-$30,000+ (depending on the scope of the study) Impacts of Destination Resorts in Deschutes County April 2010 Page 14 Community Planning Workshop Community Planning Workshop 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403 Phone: 541.346.3889 Fax: 541.346.2040 Community Planning Workshop Summary of Projects Completed, 1997-2009 Community Planning Workshop is an applied planning, public policy, and economic development research program located in the University of Oregon Community Service Center. CPW provides graduate and undergraduate students with experience working with Oregon communities, organizations, agencies, and individuals assisting to improve economic, environmental, and social conditions in Oregon. CPW has a staff of six faculty and planning professionals and typically engages 30- 40 graduate students in planning-related projects throughout the year. CPW has completed over 300 planning-related projects since 1977. CPW is also affiliated with the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management in the School or Architecture and Allied Arts at the University of Oregon. Robert Parker, AICP Director Community Planning Workshop 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403 Phone: 541.346.3889 FAX: 541.346.2040 E-mail: rgp@uoregon.edu http://cpw.uoregon.edu/ Amanda Stocker West Project Coordinator Community Planning Workshop 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403 Phone: 541.346.3615 FAX: 541.346.2040 E-mail: astocker@uoregon.edu Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Year 2009 Projects Formative Evaluation for an Adult and Oregon Department of 3 $25,000 Disabled Resource Center in Lane Human Services County-Working with the Oregon Department of Human Services, CPW conducted research on how an Adult and Disabled Resource Center should be structured to best benefit target populations in Lane County. University of Oregon Emergency UO Emergency 5 $32,000 Management Strategies-Working in Management partnership with UO emergency management, CPW evaluated strategies to inform emergency planning on campus. The project included a review of how other campuses are approaching continuity of operations planning, analysis around communication strategies, and preliminary research on development of a regional emergency operations center. UO Communications/Development UO Foundation 4 $10,000 Website Evaluation-CPW facilitated a process that included key person interviews, focus groups, and other research to evaluate the UO Communications/Development website. Based on our research, CPW made recommendations on how to improve the site. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 2 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members St. Paul School Strategic Plan-CPW St. Paul Catholic School 2 $8,000 worked with staff and parents of the St. Paul Catholic school to prepare a five- year strategic plan. Community Survey of Residents in the City of Eugene 2 $7,000 Rasor Park Mixed-Use Node-CPW work with City of Eugene staff on this projected funded through the Transportation and Growth Management Program. The project was a survey of 1400 households on preferences for future development in the Rasor Park mixed-use node. Mt. Angel Parks Master Plan-CPW City of Mt. Angel 3 $9,000 worked with the Mt. Angel Parks Board and City Council to prepare a parks master plan and conceptual plans for two City parks. Land Use Impacts on Water Quality in Eugene Water and 5 $55,000 the McKenzie River Basin-Working Electric Board with the Eugene Water and Electric Board and a group of stakeholders, CPW developed an analysis of the water quality implications of residential development in the McKenzie River Basin. The analysis included mapping development patterns, review of the County development code, analysis of case study developments to understand how the code was implemented, and best practices research. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 3 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members EWEB Employee Focus Groups. CPW Eugene Water and 2 $5,000 organized and conducted a series of Electric Board focus groups with Eugene Water and Electric Board staff to identify organizational issues and employee satisfaction. Cascadia Regional Earthquake Cascadia Earthquake 1 $5,000 Workgroup Strategic Plan-CPW Workgroup (CREW) facilitated a two-day retreat to prepare a strategic plan for the Cascadia Regional Earthquake Workgroup (CREW). The strategic plan included a process for evaluating projects submitted for funding through CREW. Corvallis Fire Department Strategic City of Corvallis Fire 5 $23,000 Plan-CPW facilitated a strategic Department planning process with City staff and the community to prepare a five-year strategic plan for the Corvallis Fire Department. Lane Transit District Bus Rapid Transit Lane Transit District 5 $55,000 Evaluation-CPW assisted LTD staff in process evaluations around the EmX bus rapid transit system, conducted interviews and surveys with key stakeholders to identify perceptions of EmX, and developed a framework for evaluation of the system. Year 2008 Projects City of Eugene Diversity and Equity City of Eugene 7 $48,000 Strategic Plan - CPW conducted community outreach for the needs assessment portion of this strategic plan and developed action items to address community needs CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 4 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members UO Emergency Management, University of Oregon 5 $40,000 Emergency Operations Program - CPW assisted the university in develop emergency support function annexes for the UO Emergency Operations Plan City of Monmouth Parks Master Plan- City of Monmouth 5 $28,000 working the local parks commission, CPW developed a parks master plan to guide development and acquisition for the next 15 years. Columbia Gorge Hazard Mitigation Partners for Disaster 4 $40,000 Collaboration - CPW helped this region Resilience evaluate how it could best implement individual natural hazard mitigation plans and helped them for a collaborative for implementation. ODOT ACT Assessment - working ODOT 5 $70,000 jointly with researchers from Portland State University, CPW conducted an assessment of the state's Area Commissions on Transportation (ACT). School Travel and Household Location Oregon Transportation 5 $33,000 - using a grant from the Oregon Research and Education Transportation Education and Research Consortium Consortium, CPW administered a survey to 5000 households in the Eugene 4J School District to assess how housing location and school travel are related. City of Bandon Parks Plan - CPW City of Bandon 3 $5,000 assisted this small city develop their parks plan and capital improvement list. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 5 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members UO Development Communications University of Oregon 3 $3,000 Website Evaluation - working with the Development department, CPW conducted a series of focus groups and interviews to evaluate the department's current website. Lane County Fair Survey - CPW Lane County Fair 6 $3,000 conducted a yearly intercept survey at the Fair in both Spanish and English to assess the experience of fairgoers. Year 2007 Projects Shaping 4Js Future - working with Eugene School District 5 $40,000 Eugene School District 4J, CPW helped 4J facilitate a "think tank" process to identify key policy issues and options for the District. The District used the information to address a number of equity and financial issues. Evaluation of the Residential Energy Oregon Department of 3 $18,000 Tax Credit Program. This project Energy surveyed 500 participants of the Residential Energy Tax Credit Program to gather information about their experience with the program. The study will be used to enhance the program. Silverton Community Services Survey - City of Silverton 3 $16,000 Working with the City Administrator, CPW designed and administered a survey to 2500 city residents. The City Council used the results to make decisions about spending on public services. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 6 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members City of Troutdale Employee Survey - City of Troutdale 2 $3,000 working with the City of Troutdale, CPW administered a survey of all City employees. The City Council used the survey to gauge employee satisfaction. Revised Feasibility Assessment for a UO Architecture & 3 $18,000 Learning Center at the Shire, working Allied Arts with the AAA Shire Advisory Committee, CPW evaluated the feasibility of developing a learning center with overnight facilities on the Shire site in the Columbia River Gorge. Eugene Water and Electric Board Eugene Water and 3 $5,000 Website Evaluation - working with Electric Board EWEB's website developer, CPW facilitated a public involvement process to evaluate the utility's website Canby Parks and Recreation City of Canby 4 $6,000 Assessment - working with the City of Canby, CPW facilitated a series of meetings with the City, the School District, the YMCA, and the local recreation program to identify strategies to address recreation funding. City of Eugene Website Evaluation - City of Eugene 5 $36,000 working with the City of Eugene Information Technology Department, CPW facilitated a public involvement process to evaluate the City's Web Portal. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 7 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Sweet Home School District Enrollment Sweet Home School 3 $7,000 Forecasts - working with the Sweet District Home School District, CPW evaluated demographic, socioeconomic, and migration trends to develop a 10-year enrollment forecast. Sweet Home Buildable Lands Inventory City of Sweet Home 2 $5,000 - working with the City of Sweet Home, CPW conducted a buildable lands inventory consistent with statewide planning goals 9, 10, and 14. University of Oregon Emergency University of Oregon 6 $40,000 Operations Plan - working with UO administration, CPW conducted research and related work to update the UO emergency operations plan. Willow Lake Resort Master Plan - Jackson County Parks 5 $10,000 working with Jackson County Parks, CPW developed a master plan for the Willow Lake Resort and Campground at the base of Mt. McLoughlin. Year 2006 Projects City of Eugene Pedestrian and Bicycle City of Eugene 7 $50,000 Strategic Plan - working with the City of Eugene, CPW developed the City's first bicycle and pedestrian strategic plan. Troutdale Parks Master Plan Update - City of Troutdale 5 $25,000 Working with the City of Troutdale, CPW updated the City's Parks Master Plan and developed conceptual designs for two city parks. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 8 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members City of Cannon Beach Post-Disaster Cascade Regional 5 $28,000 Recovery Plan - working with the USGS Earthquake Workgroup; and the City of Cannon Beach, CPW and US Geological Survey ONHW conducted a post-disaster recovery forum to identify issues and strategies related to recovery from a serious earthquake/tsunami. Multnomah County Youth Prevention Multnomah County 5 $50,000 Environmental Scan and Gaps Analysis -Working with Multnomah County Treatment and Prevention staff, CPW conducted a scan of youth prevention programs and identified gaps in the service delivery system. Lane Sheriff Strategic Plan - Working Lane County Sheriff's 6 $38,000 with the Lane County Sheriff's Office, Office CPW facilitated a process to gather information, identify strategic issues, and develop goals and strategies to provide a roadmap for Office activities over the next five years. Talent Parks Master Plan Update - City of Talent 6 $26,500 Working with the City of Talent, CPW updated the City's Parks Master Plan and developed conceptual designs for two city parks. Positive Youth Development Program Lane County 2 $8,000 Evaluation - Working with Lane County, CPW conducted a program evaluation of the Positive Youth Development Program. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 9 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Tillamook Futures Council Benchmarks Tillamook Futures 2 $10,000 Update - Working with the Tillamook Council Futures Council, CPW updated the benchmarks the Council uses to measure progress toward the vision. Year 2005 Projects Feasibility Assessment for a Learning UO School of 5 $18,000 Center at the Shire, working with the Architecture and Allied AAA Shire Advisory Committee, CPW Arts evaluated the feasibility of developing a learning center with overnight facilities on the Shire site in the Columbia River Gorge. The Impact of Subdivision Regulations US Dept of Housing and 8 $56,000 on Housing Cost. CPW gathered and Urban Development; analyzed development standards for a National Association of random sample of 469 jurisdictions in Homebuilders; the U.S. ECONorthwest and NAHB used ECONorthwest the results to develop a national estimate of the costs of excessive regulation on single-family housing. Sustainability plan for the Bethel Weed City of Eugene 3 $5,000 and Seed Initiative - Working with the Bethel Weed and Seed Site Coordinator, CPW developed a set of strategies to sustain the five-year Bethel Weed and Seed Initiative after its grant funding ran out. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 10 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members City of Eugene Downtown Bicycle City of Eugene 4 $7,500 Parking Analysis - Working with the City of Eugene's Planning and Development Department, CPW conducted an inventory of bicycle infrastructure in the downtown area, reviewed the City's policies on bicycle infrastructure, and made recommendations for modifying the City's code. City of Lebanon Parks Master Plan City of Lebanon 4 $25,000 Update. Working with the City of Lebanon, CPW updated the Lebanon Parks Master Plan and Capital Improvement Program. Lane County Community Wildfire Lane County 5 $62,000 Protection Plan - Working with staff from Lane County, ODF, and other agencies, the CPW team developed a CWPP for Lane County that includes a set of goals and actions to reduce risk to properties in the wildland/urban interface. City of Eagle Point Parks Master Plan City of Eagle Point 5 $25,000 Update - Working with the City of Eagle Point, CPW updated the city's park master plan. TGM Smart Growth Case Studies - Transportation and 5 $20,000 Working with the state Transportation Growth Management and Growth Management (TGM), CPW Program conducted case studies of five smart growth developments in Oregon cities. The case studies focus on the financial performance of the projects. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 11 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Klickitat Shoreline Management Plan Yakima Nation 5 $20,000 Analysis. Working with the Yakima Nation, CPW completed an analysis of development that occurred within the shoreline management zone along the Klickitat River between 1972 and 2004. Mobile/Manufactured Home Recycling Heartwood Resources 4 $10,000 Feasibility Assessment - Working with Heartwood Resources, CPW is evaluating organizations that have implemented mobile/manufactured home recycling programs. Climate Change Communications - Resource Innovation 3 $5,700 working with the UO Resource Group Innovation Group, CPW conducted a series of focus group meetings that explored issues related to communicating information about climate change. Disaster Resistant University/Region 3 UO/FEMA 4 $70,000 Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Working with the UO and the state Office of Emergency Management, CPW and the Oregon Natural Hazards Workgroup developed a disaster mitigation plan for the UO. Region 3 Natural Hazards Mitigation Mid-Willamette Council 3 $10,000 Plan - Working with the UO and the of Governments, FEMA state Office of Emergency Management, CPW and the Oregon Natural Hazards Workgroup developed a disaster mitigation strategy for the UO and six counties in the southern Willamette Valley. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 12 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Clatsop County Economic Development Clatsop County 3 $25,000 Survey. Working with the Clatsop County Administrator, CPW conducted surveys of county residents and businesses concern economic development policy in Clatsop County. The County used the results to prepare an economic development plan. Canby Community Services Survey, City of Canby 3 $15,000 2004 - Working with the City of Canby, CPW designed and administered a community services survey to city residents. The Canby City Council used the results in its annual goal setting session. City of Turner Parks Master Plan - City of Turner 3 $10,000 Working with the City of Turner, CPW prepared a park master plan. The plan included a conceptual design for the City's community park. Lane County Fair Visitor Survey - Lane Events Center 6 $2,500 Working with Lane Events Center Staff, CPW conducted an intercept survey of 300 visitors to the 2005 Lane County Fair. The Fair Board used the results in its annual review of the Fair. Silverton Community Services Survey, City of Silverton 3 $15,000 2004 - Working with the City Administrator, CPW designed and administered a survey to 2500 city residents. The City Council used the results to make decisions about spending on public services. Year 2004 Projects CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 13 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members TGM School Siting Evaluation. CPW Transportation and 6 $59,000 completed 10 case studies on the Growth Management process school districts use to site Program schools. The project resulted in a handbook on school siting. Canby Wayside Properties Master City of Canby 7 $35,000 Plan. CPW developed an open space master plan for the 100-acre Wayside properties adjacent to the Willamette River. Illinois Valley Housing Needs Options of Southern 5 $22,000 Assessment. CPW developed a housing Oregon, Inc. needs assessment of the Illinois Valley in southern Oregon as a part of a larger HUD grant. Jackson County Parks Master Plan. Jackson County Parks 6 $52,000 CPW updated the Jackson County parks Department master plan and explored approaches to decrease the Parks Department's reliance on County general fund revenues. Seaside Parks Master Plan. CPW City of Seaside 5 $20,000 developed a park master plan for the City of Seaside. The plan included a household survey and landscape designs for Broadway Park. PERI Data Exchange Market Study. Public Entity Research 3 $42,000 CPW evaluated the market for on-line Institute risk data and reports. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 14 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members DLCD Fish/Flood Analysis. CPW Oregon Department of 3 $10,000 conducted a survey of Oregon cities to Land Conservation and identify conflicts between the Federal Development Emergency Management Agency's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the Environmental Protection Agency's rules on water quality if anadromous fish bearing waterways. West University Neighborhood City of Eugene 3 $15,000 Housing Condition Analysis. CPW conducted a neighborhood walking survey of housing conditions in Eugene's West University Neighborhood using palm computers and GIS. Lane County Fair Visitor Survey. CPW Lane County Fair Board 6 $1,600 conducted an intercept survey of 350 visitors to the 2004 Lane County Fair. OregonHEAT Program Evaluation. CPW Oregon HEAT 1 $10,000 evaluated a pilot refrigerator replacement program sponsored by OregonHEAT. Heartwood ReSources Program Umpqua Community 2 $2,000 Evaluation. CPW conducted a program Development evaluation for Heartwood ReSources, a Corporation deconstruction and recycled building supply retailer. 2004 Silverton Community Services City of Silverton 1 $15,000 Survey. CPW developed and administered a survey to 2,400 households in the City of Silverton. The Silverton City Council used the survey results in their 2005 goal setting process. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 15 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members City of Canby Community Perceptions City of Canby 2 $15,000 Survey. CPW developed and administered a survey to 1,200 households in the City of Canby. The Canby City Council used the survey results in their 2005 goal setting process. Clatsop Economic Development Clatsop County 2 $24,000 Survey. CPW administered a survey of 1200 households and 1200 businesses in Clatsop County. The County used the results to identify key economic opportunities, community and business attitudes toward economic development and economic development policies. The County planning department used the results to develop a county-wide economic development strategy. Year 2003 Projects Brownsville Park Master Plan. CPW City of Brownsville 4 $3,800 developed a park master plan for the City of Brownsville. The plan included conceptual landscape designs for Pioneer Park. Marion & Polk County Natural Hazards Mid-Willamette Council 4 $10,000 Mitigation Plans. CPW assisted the of Governments Mid-Willamette Council of Governments with data collection and analysis for this project. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 16 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Estacada Parks Master Plan Update. City of Estacada 4 $17,000 Working with the City of Estacada, CPW updated the City's Park Master Plan, including a capital improvement program for Timber Park and an evaluation of the feasibility of establishing a parks and recreation district. Willamette Wayside Open Space City of Canby 5 $15,000 Scoping Analysis. Working with the City of Canby, CPW completed an evaluation of open space properties the City owns along the Willamette River. The purpose of the study was to identify issues, concerns, and opportunities in preparation for the development of a master plan for the sites. Bethel Weed and Seed Evaluation - City of Eugene 3 $25,000 Year 3. Working with the City of Eugene and the Bethel Steering Committee, CPW conducted an interim evaluation of the Bethel Weed and Seed Initiative, a community development and law enforcement partnership funded by the Department of Justice. Planning Commissioner Outreach. Transportation and 5 $40,000 Working with the Transportation and Growth Management Growth Management Program, CPW Program; Oregon and Portland State University Department of Land conducted 26 planning commissioner Conservation & train ings throughout Oregon focusing Development; Oregon on smart growth concepts. CPW also Department of developed a series of educational Transportation materials as part of this project. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 17 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Evaluation of the Metro Telework Metro Regional 5 $20,000 Outreach Program. Telework has been Government; Oregon implemented as a transportation Office of Energy demand management strategy in Portland for the past 10 years. CPW conducted an evaluation of efforts by Metro and the Oregon Office of Energy to develop telework programs at employers in the region. City of Redmond Annexation City of Redmond 5 $17,000 Evaluation. Located in Central Oregon, the City of Redmond expects to add 23,000 new residents by 2020. This study evaluated the impacts of annexing unincorporated areas within the Redmond Urban Growth Boundary. The City Council will use this study to prioritize future annexations. Foods, Farms & Community. Working Food for Lane County, 5 $12,000 with Food For Lane County, CPW U.S. Dept. of Agriculture assisted in the implementation of this community organizing project intended to establish food action groups in seven Lane County communities. Beaverton Natural Hazards Mitigation City of Beaverton 5 $43,000 Plan. Working with the City of Beaverton, CPW prepared a natural hazard mitigation plan consistent with federal guidelines developed in response to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 18 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Stayton Aquatic Facility Survey. City of Stayton 1 $400 Working with the City of Stayton, CPW gathered financial and operations data on comparable aquatic facilities. The City used the data to develop an operations plan for a facility that was previously managed by the YMCA. Eugene Business Climate Study. CPW City of Eugene 2 $22,000 surveyed 400 Eugene businesses to gather data on perceptions of business climate. The study, sponsored by Mayor Jim Torrey, and City Councilor David Kelly will be used as the City considers economic development strategies. Year 2002 Projects Tillamook Benchmarks Update. CPW Tillamook County 3 $6,000 updated the countywide benchmarks Futures Council we developed for the Tillamook County Futures Council in 2000. Evaluation of the Residential Energy Oregon Office of Energy 3 $10,000 Tax Credit Program. This project, surveyed 400 participants of the Residential Energy Tax Credit Program to gather information about their experience with the program. The study will be used to enhance the program. DLCD Technical Assistance and Mid-Willamette Council 6 $21,000 Outreach Needs Assessment. Working of Governments, with the State Department of Land Oregon Department of Conservation and Development, CPW Land Conservation and surveyed 1400 planning commissioners Development and planning directors to identify technical assistance and outreach needs. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 19 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Farmworker Service Gaps Analysis. Oregon Department of 6 $25,000 CPW worked with a broad cross-section Housing and of social service providers to assess the Community Services status of social services available to farmworkers and identify service gaps. Brookings Park Master Plan. Working City of Brookings 6 $20,000 with the City of Brookings, CPW developed a comprehensive Park Master Plan that included a needs assessment, a standards analysis, a capital improvement program, and identified funding options. City of Sweet Home Parks Master Plan. City of Sweet Home 5 $12,000 CPW worked with the City of Sweet Home to conduct a parks inventory and needs assessment. Bethel Weed and Seed Evaluation. City of Eugene 2 $5,000 Working with the City of Eugene and the Bethel Steering Committee, CPW developed an evaluation methodology and conducted an interim evaluation of the Bethel Weed and Seed Initiative, a community development and law enforcement partnership funded by the Department of Justice. Year 2001 Projects CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 20 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Upper Deschutes Resource Bureau of Land 3 $20,000 Management Plan Social Attitudes Management Survey. Working with the BLM, CPW conducted a survey of 2,400 households in Deschutes, Jefferson and Crook Counties. The survey gathered detailed information regarding social attitudes around BLM land management activities. The BLM will use the results to develop the social impacts section of the RMP. Redmond Area Community Deschutes County, City 2 $6,600 Development Survey. Working with of Redmond Deschutes County and the City of Redmond, CPW developed and administered a survey to 1,200 Redmond households. The survey results will be used to develop an Urban Reserve strategy and identify transportation priorities. City of Silverton Community Survey. City of Silverton 2 $13,600 Working with the City of Silverton, CPW developed and administered a survey to 2,400 Silverton households. The survey focused on land use, growth management, transportation, and community development issues. CPW received a 41% response rate. City of Canby Parks Acquisition Plan. City of Canby 3 $25,000 Following up on recommendations CPW made to the City regarding a parks dedication ordinance, Canby hired CPW to develop a parks acquisition plan and funding strategy. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 21 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Lane County Fair Recycling Survey. OLUM Group (City of 5 $3,600 Working with the City of Eugene Eugene/Lane County Recycling Program and the Lane County Fair) Fair, CPW implemented an intercept survey during the 2001 Lane County Fair. The intent was to assess Fairgoer attitudes about recycling and the use of recyclable foodware at the Fair. The survey also gathered marketing data. Eagle Point Periodic Review. CPW City of Eagle Point 5 $30,000 worked with the City of Eagle Point to assist in the Periodic Review of its Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The project included review of the land use, natural resources, economic development, housing, public facilities, and natural hazards elements of the plan. City of Gold Beach Buildable Lands City of Gold Beach 2 $12,000 Inventory. CPW inventoried buildable lands in Gold Beach as part of the City's Periodic Review of its Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The project was funded with a Technical Assistance Grant from the State Department of Land Conservation and Development. Lane County Financial Education Needs OUR Credit Union 5 $18,000 Assessment. Working with the OUR Credit Union, CPW conducted an evaluation of the financial education needs of low-income rural Lane County residents. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 22 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Jackson County Natural Hazards Jackson County 6 $85,000 Mitigation Plan. Working with the Jackson County Emergency Management Office, CPW conducted a hazards vulnerability assessment and developed a detailed natural hazards mitigation action plan. This project also included a business preparedness survey and a flood mitigation plan for the City of Phoenix, Oregon. Washington County Natural Hazards Washington County 6 $45,000 Mitigation Plan. Working with the Consolidated Washington County Consolidated Emergency Emergency Management Office, CPW Management conducted a hazards vulnerability assessment and developed a detailed natural hazards mitigation action plan. Eugene-Springfield Community U.S. Department of 8 $150,000 Outreach Partnership Center. CPW is Housing and Urban annually for working to implement a 3-year Development (HUD) three years Community Outreach Partnership Center targeting 10 low-income housing sites in the Eugene-Springfield area. Canby Parks Master Plan Update. City of Canby 3 $15,000 Working with the City of Canby, CPW updated elements of the City's Parks Master Plan including the parks inventory, the parks and open space needs assessment, and the parks capital improvement program. CPW also drafted a parks dedication ordinance for the City. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 23 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Skamania County Housing Needs Skamania County, 2 $16,000 Assessment. CPW conducted a survey Washington of all households in Skamania County, Washington to determine housing needs. Economic Impacts of Non-Profit Douglas County Non- 2 $7,500 Organizations in Douglas County. Profit Consortium Working with a consortium of non- profit organizations, CPW conducted an economic impacts analysis of non-profit organizations in Douglas County, Oregon. Year 2000 Projects Eagle Point Flood Mitigation Plan. CPW City of Eagle Point 3 $10,000 evaluated flood hazards in the City of Eagle Point and prepared an action plan for reducing flood risk. Siletz Basin Flood Mitigation Plan. CPW Lincoln County 3 $7,500 evaluated flood hazards in the Siletz River Basin in Lincoln County and prepared an action plan for reducing flood risk. Natural Hazards Technical Resource Oregon Department of 5 $50,000 Guides. CPW developed a series of Land Conservation and technical resource guides to assist local Development (DLCD) governments in developing sound natural hazard mitigation plans and policies. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 24 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Eugene-Springfield Community U.S. Department of 8 $150,000 Outreach Partnership Center. CPW is Housing and Urban annually for working to implement a 3-year Development (HUD) three years Community Outreach Partnership Center targeting 10 low-income housing sites in the Eugene-Springfield area. Linking Vision to Action: Tillamook Tillamook County 6 $37,000 County Strategic Visioning Action Plan. Working with the Tillamook County Futures Council, CPW is developing a process for a series of community forums, and completed a five-year action plan to implement the County's Strategic Vision. City of Eugene Downtown Vision and City of Eugene Planning 6 $15,000 Innovative Housing Analysis. CPW is and Development providing technical assistance to city Department staff administering the downtown visioning process, and researched innovating housing opportunities in Eugene. Assessment of Hunger and Food Oregon Department of 5 $20,000 Security Among Low-Income Housing and Community Households. CPW is conducting an Services assessment of food security and hunger among households participating in the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program. Lane County Head Start Evaluation. Lane County Head Start 2 $10,000 CPW completed an evaluation of the Lane County Head Start Program, including a survey of participants, staff, and agencies involved in the program. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 25 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Coos Bay/North Bend Housing Needs Shoji Associates 1 $5,000 Survey. CPW completed a survey of Coos Bay/North Bend households to determine housing needs. The results were used in development of a local affordable housing strategy. 1999 CPW Projects Oakland Historic Inventory and City of Oakland 5 $14,000 Community Development Analysis. CPW worked with the City of Oakland to update their historic resources inventory and to develop a marketing plan to enhance retail activity and attract more visitors. Klamath-Lake Social Service Oregon Housing and 6 $50,000 Needs/Asset Analysis and Community Services Organizational Evaluation. CPW Department worked with the state Department of Housing and Community Services to conduct an social service needs/assets analysis and develop a strategy to establish a Community Action Program in the bi-county area. McKenzie Basin Rural Comprehensive Lane County Land 5 $15,000 Plan Periodic Review. CPW worked Management Division with Lane County on the update of its Rural Comprehensive Plan for the McKenzie Basin. CPW's primary role is to develop and implement a comprehensive public involvement program. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/--cpw Page 26 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members City of Corvallis Community Policing City of Corvallis Police 4 $16,000 Implementation Plan Update. CPW Department worked with the City of Corvallis Police Department to update its Community Policing Implementation Plan. Tillamook County Partnerships. Tillamook County 5 $32,000 Working with Tillamook County and the County's Futures Council, CPW developed implementation strategies for the County's Future's Plan. 1998 CPW Projects Evaluation of Statewide Planning Goal Oregon Department of 5 $25,000 7. CPW evaluated Oregon's Statewide Land Conservation and Planning Goal 7 that requires local Development government's inventory natural hazards and regulate development in areas subject to natural hazards. Tillamook County Strategic Vision. Tillamook County 5 $18,000 CPW worked with the Tillamook County Futures Council to develop a countywide strategic vision. Cottage Grove Rails-To-Trails City of Cottage 6 $17,000 Feasibility Assessment. Working with Grove/Cameron-Gilbert- CMG Landscape Architects, CPW McCarthy Landscape conducted a market feasibility analysis Architects and corridor plan for an extension of the Row River rail-trail into downtown Cottage Grove. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 27 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Siting Affordable Housing in Oregon Oregon Housing and 6 $25,000 Communities. Working with the Oregon Community Services Department of Housing and Community Department Services, CPW conducted an analysis of low-income housing siting issues in five Oregon communities. The project resulted in recommendations regarding public involvement in siting decisions. Murphy Florence Mill Site Murphy Lumber 4 $15,000 Redevelopment Evaluation. Working Company with the Murphy Lumber Company, CPW evaluated the land use, transportation, and financial implications of redevelopment of a 14-acre mill site near Florence, Oregon. 1997 CPW Projects Alsea Community Development Alsea Community 5 $43,000 Analysis. CPW evaluated the feasibility Economic group of reuse of the former Alsea Ranger Station, initiation of a food cooperative, and potential tourism marketing strategies. Canby Parks Master Plan. CPW City of Canby 7 $15,000 developed a community parks master plan for the City of Canby. Monmouth/Independence Community Cities of Independence 3 $14,000 Center Market and Feasibility Analysis - and Monmouth CPW worked with the Independence/Monmouth community group IMPACT to analyze the feasibility of a public or privately operated community center. CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 28 Project Description Client Student Budget Team Members Josephine County Housing Needs Community 3 $26,000 Assessment. CPW analyzed housing Development conditions, characteristics and needs in Corporation of Josephine Josephine County, Oregon. County Grants Pass Affordable Housing Policy City of Grants Pass 2 $12,000 Analysis - CPW analyzed of affordable housing policies in the City of Grants Pass, Oregon. The analysis included a comprehensive analysis of housing needs, and potential policies to facilitate the development of affordable housing. Blue River Community Development. Blue River Community 6 $20,000 CPW identified and evaluated various Development community development strategies for Corporation the community of Blue River, Oregon. Prospect Community Master Plan. Prospect Community 5 $15,000 Working with a local community group, Response Team CPW developed a community master plan for the Prospect, Oregon. Community Planning Workshop CPW Project Summary, 1997-2008 http://www.uoregon.edu/-cpw Page 29 d 3 W u 0 L a M c m N .2 d 0 a c d E c d E Q 01 .a CL m E d 0 d U U ° a v, xx xxxxxxxxx xx x xxxxxxxx x x x G N N 7 O U c o ~ ~ F ~ N ~ d E y E O w x x X X X X X X X X X x x X X X X x X X X X X x x w ~ F C 0 * U w w c 7 ~ v£ M xx xxxxx x x x x x x x xxxx x ~P %d w~ N C d E 2 0 v xx xxxxxx x x x a, a, (n . E O U !D a) C C N 76 00 21 N a7 L U 7) ° f` C F N E c6 T N C) N C = V O a7 F O a Y c c E a C 7 7 O .C a7 ` `n N _ 0 2? E G7 ° > N c o O L O O (D w ac N = 0 m 3 o C 2 03 c C a) ° p p m c C O C = d 7 m- 0 o N v w 3 O C N v o N - U ° 7 0 .2 o m. o a _ n co o>Na E E ° > t0 tun _ "a E m Q 34) V) C o Q L C i N a O II) O N c m= a) n C C 7 a C N G N f S O t` m -a 3 ° u o w o OL F O y o ao m U _ co Em c - a o o c , O c L a) 03 -0 Q) C 7 L C U) ° CL U m a) l6 .tlJ a. m " c C F y N (n -0 0 =3 ° F C - O C~ O 0 O 2)0 m a3 a m L C 01 O o o c c m 3 y 01 - O Y 3 c 7 E f ~v - N O O 3 w y 0 N a) -E 2 p 0 7 N 76 m. d T c .s N of Q E Y m i l X C 7 O E 7 d {gy~pp y C O a N a7 7 C O in C y a) L X 0) O C Ol ~.n (p - O Ci . a E U U O a) a C fn N O O C N y 2 m 0 (0 O N 0 C c p $ m c `O d Q. E N 0 En L 7 m E j w u N N m V) CC) ~ a y F o'S C O U U N " E f0 O 5 O 7 2 07 i c 0 3 N m LO N y . C- a) N ' a °o t.E ° ° L rn~ _ v o= ` cmoamo ~.R 5)cn N C U F V1 y N ` O C N rn N ' u E O m co O L ~O c0 c ¢ g 0 m~ a y Nc o ~ ) m U a cA U y 7~ o C w L LL 7 N c6 N w O) "O L C .O c3 : w 0 O E.2) a). m d C ' y O y -0 O c L a7 C F °7 U m x U r ccp r a1 tU 0 in w a3 F w N C> 3 O 0 Lo N 7 tm -M -0 a C~ E ` m O 7 U Ur co N C > U U w -O a) -O O 0 n C a) 0) 1. ~ L_ C U) U C LL-0 Q) G N 7 c _ (n A ¢ . a7 i T 'O N V ( 0 E N U N N D N . _ 'j d O 0 N Q r L.. F a a 41 U 0 N n r U ) 1- c N a ' V E O U ( N V1 O co ' N C4 y W -NO O N p° O ° . c O cam i 7 - m~ m C a) pJ a) 7 a) Q) O CL o c o >U tea` LM) J.°~o d:3 UO C 7 . a) YG y m m m aQ>cnaa) 4-- a) A 3 F a) d C E ~CoE'O m cvE am a c U) - m U Eas Cl. n c 1 Y ° N ° o m m c" c - y o o m a ? a w O E° r W. a m'ai a 'v w~ o m w : a c 0 mac~aa) w O =z ~ o c rnoca~0) X - w¢ D=z cU W Q oomrnao4) C, a NCL LL FLL Q LL CL ¢ a0 Q m U O w LL C7 2 Y .J 2 z o - w Q m U U W U_ C9 2_ F Q C6 U N <f G7 E H w V am a CL m E ce t ce ■0 /r m Yl n c O m c T :P 'L E 'C O = O U LL V LT a.+ c c m a a~ 0 O 0 L a~V O O O Z o Z 01 LA M i C O O to CL CL N M E c c w x F- d a 0 a Q L ~ U U D w o L C Z LT a) E L. 10 Lh C E. u c 0 CM ~ c O c Q o ac aE° c 0 p a a O 1-1 O N O rl E N 0 z If C a~ c C~ O C O N 4Zf C N n. o ~ c 0 O 1-1 O N ri N L Q) N O ri O N M L .0 2 cn O r--l O N L Q~ 0 u 0 E .a a~ co p1 C .L ro Q) 2 a-J C N .5; Q) L 0 L 0 L p1 C L rv L -v fa ca. a~ a~ 0. 0 U ra L- 10- 0 0 N V Ln L a) E 0 z a) (Q I ru u N rn C L U .0 > ra Ln N C .0 a~ fo U a) 0_ Ul) Draft Comprehensive Plan Review 2010 Deschutes County Planning Commission Review Schedule DATE NEW SECTIONS REVISED SECTIONS Feb 11 1.2 Community Involvement 1.3 Land Use Planning Feb 25 4.2 Urbanization 4.3-4.9 Unincorporated Communities March 11 New items for the record March 25 2.2 Agriculture Review revisions made on 2.3 Forest Feb 11 and 25 to Sections 2.4 Goal 5 Introduction 1.2; 1.3; 4.2-4.9 April 8 New items for the record April 22 2.5 Water Quality and Quantity Review revisions made on 2.6 Rivers, Streams and Fish March 25 to Sections 2.2; 2.3; 2.7 Regional Problem Solving for south 2.4 Deschutes Count Ma 13 New items for the record May 27 2.8 Wildlife Review revisions made on 2.9 Open Space and Scenic Views April 22 to Sections 2.5; 2.6; 2.10 Energy 2.7 2.11 Environmental Quality June 10 New items for the record June 24 2.12 Surface Mining Review revisions made on 2.13 Cultural and Historic Resources May 27 to Sections 2.8; 2.9; 3.3 Rural Housing 2.10; 2.11 3.4 Rural Economy Jul 8 New items for the record July 26 3.5 Natural Hazards Review revisions made on 3.6 Public Facilities and Services June 24 to Sections 2.12; 3.8 Rural Recreation 2.13; 3.3; 3.4 3.9 Destination Resorts August 12 New items for the record August 26 Wrap up Review revisions made on July 26 to Sections 3.5; 3.67- 3.8; 3.9 Sept 1 Issue 45 day DLCD notice Oct 28 Initiate public hearings This schedule is subject to change Revised 2-16-10 nri§~O'.,o ~e.Y \ /n Theodore R. Kulongoski, Govemor January20, 2010 Department of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100 Salem, OR 97301-1279 (503) 986-5200 FAX (503) 378-4844 www.oregonstatelands.us. State Land Baard Deschutes County Board Of Commissioners Theodore R. Kulongoski Governor Kate Brown RE: Proposed Amendments to Deschutes County Code Chapter 23.84, Secretary of State Clarification of Common School-Fund Trust Lands Ben Westlund Presented by Douglas Parker, Asset Planner State Treasurer Commissioners, Staff and public school advocates: In the most basic of terms, the intent of this testimony is to make sure that the Board is aware of the significant difference between Common School Fund (CSF) Trust Lands and "state lands" as the term is used in the proposed ordinance. The purpose of Common School Fund Trust Lands is to generate revenue to support K-12 public education statewide through real estate-oriented activities including ground leases and land sales, most often to the private sector. CSF Trust Lands are not "public lands" or "state lands" in the conventional usage of these terms. CSF Trust Lands are managed according to the Admission Act, the Oregon Constitution, state law and various legal directives including an Attorney General Opinion (Crookham Opinion, July 24, 1992, No. 8223) [attached] that requires the State Land Board ...to use lands dedicated to the Common School fund in such a way as to derive the. greatest net profit for the people of this state." In order to codify the distinction between CSF Trust Lands and state lands, the Board is requested to adopt a minor modification to proposed Deschutes County Code (DCC) Chapter 23.84. This modification will help avoid future constraints to the constitutional and judicial mandates regarding the highest priority use and management of the real estate assets of the Common School Fund. A clear legal distinction between "state lands" and "Common School Fund Trust Lands" is the goal. This requested clarification has direct bearing on 400 acres of CSF Trust Lands currently leased to the proposed Destination Resort on Cline Buttes. This lease represents significant income to the Common School Fund while a possible future lease to develop this site has the potential to produce even greater revenue for the CSF. 1* Deschutes County Ordinance 2010-001, as currently proposed in DCC Chapter 23.84.030 (3)(d)(6), allows Federal, State, or City land not otherwise excluded that'becomes privately owned through land exchanges or other disposition can be considered for destination resort siting consistent with these policies and mapped as available for destination resort development. Given the above-cited Cline Buttes example where CSF Trust Lands are leased rather than sold or exchanged, it is essential that the adopted implementing Ordinance and resulting Code language distinguish between state lands and CSF Trust Lands so as not to inhibit or impede CSF Trust Lands highest priority use and management goals. To avoid this possible future development conflict, it is requested that the following be added to proposed DCC Ordinance 2010-001, Chapter 23.84 as part of this Plan and Text Amendment procedure: DCC 23.84.030 (3) (f). For the purposes of this Ordinance, State land, does not include Indemnity lands or School lands as defined in ORS 273.251 (3) and (4), respectively or any other Common School Fund Trust Lands managed by the Oregon Department of State Lands. In closing, this amendment request provides adequate clarification to avoid a direct conflict between CSF Trust Land management obligations and the proposed Deschutes County Code pertaining to Destination Resorts. On behalf of the DSL, I thank you for considering this important Deschutes County Ordinance 2010-001 clarification issue. 41