2010-2658-Minutes for Meeting June 02,2010 Recorded 6/16/2010COUNTY OFFICIAL
NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKOS
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 06/1612010 11;27;47 AM
II 11111111111111111111111I IN
2 10-2656
Do not remove this page from original document.
County Clerk
Deschutes-
Certificate Page
If this instrument is being re-recorded, please complete the following
statement, in accordance with ORS 205.244:
Re-recorded at the request of to correct
[give reason]
previously recorded in Book and Page
or as Fee Number
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.oriz
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 29 2010
DeArmond Room
Present were Commissioners Dennis R. Luke and Alan Unger, and by conference
call later in the meeting, Commissioner Tammy Baney; Dave Kanner, County
Administrator; Joe Studer, County Forester; Erik Kropp, Deputy County
Administrator; Mark Pilliod, County Counsel, and approximately 25 other citizens.
No representatives of the media attended.
Chair Luke opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m.
1. Presentation by COCC Capstone Students.
Joe Studer gave an overview of the Forest Resource Technology Capstone
project, now in its fifth year. Instructor Mick Sears, and students from various
Oregon towns, Michael Mann, Jon Galvin, Becky Ryan, Ian Lasslett, Kevin
Johnston, Jamie Helms and Mitch Surplus gave a presentation on the work they
have been doing, and their recommendation on how to address the future of the
county-owned land known as the Hurtley Ranch Property. (A copy of the
presentation is attached for reference)
After the presentation, Erik Kropp asked whether the smaller diameter juniper
trees have any commercial value. He was advised that these trees can be
chipped and used for biomass fuel, but any profit would be minimal.
In regard to fencing the property, the Board was advised that this would present
various problems, such as driveways, public access and wildlife corridor
obstructions.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Page 1 of 5 Pages
Commissioner Luke asked if any thought was given to removing the juniper
because they tend to use a lot of water. He was told that some of the trees have
been there for over a hundred years, and are an important part of the established
ecosystem of the area.
Mr. Kropp asked who the major stakeholders are in this project. He was
advised that most of the adjacent property owners would like to see the land
stay as it is now. The College has an interest, as it is part of the annual student
proj ect.
Commissioner Unger asked about carbon credits and how that would work. He
was told that the U.S. Forest Service created a baseline and computes how
much carbon certain trees absorb. Carbon credits are not applied to
conservation efforts, but even if this were considered, the amount in the dry
parts of Oregon would be small.
Commissioner Unger asked how they determined how much water is in the
area. He was advised that studies have been done to figure out how much water
is in the different areas.
Commissioner Luke asked about removing noxious weeds and why they did so
by hand. The reply was that hand removal is more efficient than spraying or
using fire, as there are not that many noxious weeds on the site.
Reestablishment of native grasses such as fescue would help. It is almost
impossible to remove cheat grass. A better option would be to minimize its
spread by favoring native vegetation and staying out of the cheat grass areas.
Mr. Kropp asked about fire-resistant buffers. He was told that thinning out the
smaller Western juniper would be a first step. Pruning the lower limbs of the
smaller trees would reduce the ladder fuels. Limiting soil compaction by not
walking or driving on the ground helps with water retention. Commissioner
Unger feels that the normal process of snowfall, freezing, and so on helps to
keep the soil from becoming compacted. The students advised that in some
areas the soil is not that deep, but averages from 16 to 60 inches. There is also
about 200 million cubic feet of cinders.
Commissioner Luke asked what good it does to clean up this property when it is
surrounded by properties that have had little or no treatment. He was told that it
would at least create somewhat of a firebreak.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Page 2 of 5 Pages
Joe Stutler asked about the juniper to be removed, and why a specific size
would be subject to removal. The answer was that there are not a lot of very
small trees, so in order to make nutrients and water available, the larger sizes of
around 13-19 inches would be removed. Defensible space should be at least 30
feet.
Citizen George Chesley asked if they will use thirty feet for a buffer. The
students replied that most of the homes in the area have landscaped yards, and
therefore have eliminated much of the threat of wildfire.
Ed Carollo, who lives off Hurtley Ranch Road, asked who the 14 property
owners are who were contacted regarding the biomass project. He was advised
that his wife was contacted by phone. He wondered why a dump was being
built on the property. Mr. Studer explained that it was thought to be a good
idea to have a biomass location. It involves only vegetation, not household
trash, appliances, or other materials.
Citizen Dave Highbarger said that there are large junipers along the property
line. He wondered which trees would be removed. He was advised that the
next student group will develop a plan for the future of the site.
Joe Studer stated that the County's Fremont Canyon property was subject to a
multi-year plan for its future. The same is being done with this property.
Commissioner Baney joined the meeting at this time via conference call.
2. COCC Request regarding Reversionary Interest on County-Donated Land.
Central Oregon Community College representatives Matthew McCoy and
Charlie Miller, and COCC attorney Miles Conway, came before the Board. Mr.
McCoy said that this issue had been brought up previously. The County offered
ten acres on Awbrey Butte to COCC many years ago, but it was given with a
restriction that it be used only for specific college purposes. Enrollment has
nearly doubled recently, and more room is needed for additional buildings.
Commissioner Luke said that the County property belongs to all of the citizens.
He would be in favor of donating the property for public purposes.
Commissioner Baney stated that many conversations are taking place about a
four-year college rather than just a community college. She wondered if this
would restrict future opportunities. She would also like to see services offered
to students on the site.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Page 3 of 5 Pages
Mr. McCoy said they have contracted with both the County and St. Charles
Medical Center, and now have a dental clinic on site. They hope to break
ground for a health services building in the near future, which would provide
both student training and a location to receive health treatments.
Commissioner Baney stated that opportunities to students in the area and
bringing in more students should be a priority. She wants it to be profitable, but
wants to be sure that there is room for expansion and new ideas. She wondered
if something should be carved out specifically for this.
Dave Kanner reminded the Board that the college already owns the property
outright. There is no reversionary interest. The wording on the deed is a cloud
on the title. Mr. McCoy planned a long time ago for the arrival of a university
partner on the campus.
UNGER: Move approval of issuing a new deed.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
3. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules.
None were discussed.
4. Consent Agenda and Other Items.
BANEY: Move approval of the Consent Agenda.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
Approval of County Administrator's Signature of Document No. 2010-357,
a Right of Entry on County-owned Land for a U.S. Department of
Agriculture Data Collection Project
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Page 4 of 5 Pages
Signature of Document No. 2010-176, Amending a Space Lease Agreement
with the State Judicial Department
. Approval of Minutes: May 26 Work Session and Business Meeting
The Board went into executive session under ORS 192.660(2(h), Pending or
Threatened Litigation, at 3:10 p. m. The session ended at 3: 50 p. m.
Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 4: 00 p. m.
DATED this 2°d Day of June 2010 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
/-e'
C zz::K-~ 4~e~
Dennis R. Luke, Chair
d&.4_ U*
Alan Unger, Vice Chair
Tammy Baney, Com ' sioner
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session
Page 5 of 5 Pages
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.ora
WORK SESSION AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2, 2010
DeArmond Room
1. Presentation by COCC Capstone Students - Joe Stutler
2. COCC Request regarding Reversionary Interest on County-Donated Land -
Dave Kanner
3. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules
4. Other Items
Approval of County Administrator's Signature of Document No. 2010-357,
a Right of Entry on County-owned Land for a U.S. Department of
Agriculture Data Collection Project
Signature of Document No. 2010-176, Amending a Space Lease Agreement
with the State Judicial Department
. Approval of Minutes: May 26 Work Session and Business Meeting
Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(h), Pending or Threatened
Litigation - Laurie Craghead; Steve Grin
PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real
property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues
Meeting dates, times and discussion items are suhject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated.
If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
r-
e
p
N
d
-y
yr
e
N
M
v"
s
fij
4
p
f'
J~
9e3
C.L
hj
S
' n
V/
l
5
a
c
91
to
u
~
y
VI
N
~
~
~
Vim)
r✓
~
I
co
Hurtlev Ranch Propert
Central Oregon Community College
Forest Resource Technology Capstone
Spring 2010
Michael Mann, Jon Galvin, Becky Ryan, Ian Lasslett,
Kevin Johnston, Jamie Helms and Mitch Surplus
Instructor Mick Sears
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.
OBJECTIVE
3
II.
SITE DESCRIPTION
3
III.
SOIL CONSIDERATIONS & CONCERNS
5
PONDEROSA SITE CLASS
6
WESTERN JUNIPER SITE CLASS
. 6
STAND INVENTORY
. 7
IV.
WILDLIFE
8
V.
WILDLAND FIRE/WUI CONCERNS AND POTENTIAL TREATMENT OPTIONS.....
. 8
RATIINGS & CONDITIONS OF INTEREST
9
HURTLEY RANCH PROPERTY WILDFIRE/WUI RECOMMENDATIONS 9
VI.
BIOMASS ACCUMULATION SITE
10
VII.
WATERSHED PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT
10
VIII.
NOXIOUS WEEDS
11
IX.
MONITORING
12
X.
RECREATION MANAGEMENT
12
XI.
ADJACENT LANDOWNERS ........................................................................13
XII.
CARBON CREDIT POTENTIAL
13
XIII.
TREATMENT AREA MAP
14
XIV.
TREATMENT OPTIONS
15
OPTION A
.15
OPTION A COSTS
15
OPTION B ................................................................................................................16
OPTION B COSTS
.16
OPTION C
.16
OPTION D
.17
XV.
RECOMMENDATIONS
17
XVI.
REFERENCES
18
XVII.
CONTACTS
19
XVIII.
SAMPLING AND DATA COLLECTION PROTOCOL 20-22
XIX.
ENCLOSURES ....................................................................................23-
27
2
Obiective
The objective of the 2010 Central Oregon Community College Capstone project was to
develop a land management plan for the Hurtley Ranch Property, a 116 acre parcel owned by
Deschutes County. After extensive data collection and research, the following plan with
management alternatives and recommendation was prepared for consideration.
Site Description
The Hurtley Ranch Property is located approximately 4 miles northeast of the City of
' Sisters off Highway 126 on Hurtley Ranch Road. The property is divided into 2 tax lots, the
southern tax lot is 40.02 acres and the northern tax lot is 75.46 acres, for a total management area
of 116.48 acres. Both tax lots are zoned as RR 10 (rural residential), EFUSC (Exclusive Farm
Use Sisters/Cloverdale), and SM (Surface Mining).According to the Deschutes county code, the
following land uses are permitted outright:
• Single-family dwelling, including mobile home on an individual lot.
• Subdivisions, excluding mobile home subdivisions.
• Propagation or harvesting of a forest product.
• Extraction of all materials, sand, gravel, rock cinders, pumice, topsoil, fill
material, and any other mineral or aggregate material.
For the purposes of these management recommendations, the property will be broken up
into two sections called the South 20 (including the southernmost 20 acres) and the North 96
(including the remaining 96 acres). The management area is surrounded on all sides by private
property.
The main access into the property is Hurtley Ranch Road from Highway 126, which
continues as Emerald Valley Road into the Panoramic View Estates. A small rough road enters
the property and leads to the biomass accumulation site (BMA) from Emerald Valley Road. Past
the BMA site the road is not maintained and in poor condition. It continues until it ends near the
highest point on the property.
The plant association found on the property is mostly western juniper (Juniperus
' occidentalis) with a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) component. Ponderosa pine is the only
commercial tree species on the property. Big sage (Artemisia tridentata) is the dominant shrub
species with a small component of rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and decadent
1 bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) that is mostly dead. Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) is the
dominant grass specie. Juniper is a native to the area and historically found on this site; however,
it would not have historically been at densities as high as it is found today. When juniper reaches
' densities that are higher than the site has capacity to support, the ecological functions change and
begin to degrade. The declining shrub component and the lack of tree regeneration in the stand
indicate that the site is deteriorating.
Hurtley Ranch Location
Hurtley Ranch Property
o~
- S{SLeFS i
~
~
HWY 126
0
gen
j
County Parc
city LJmds
Streets
Streams
0 05 1 2 3 1
Miles
Map created by
Ian lasslett
Data provided by
Deschutes County IT
4
Soil Considerations & Concerns
The following information was attained from The Soil Survey of the Upper Deschutes
River Area, Oregon. The survey was conducted and authored by the USDA and Natural
Resources Conservation Service. According to the soil survey, the Hurtley Ranch property
consists of the following three soil types: Bluesters gravelly sandy loam, Wilt sandy loam,
Deschutes sandy loam.
Approximately 88% of the Hurtley Ranch properties, or 102 acres, consists of the
IJ
1
Bluesters gravelly sandy loam soil type on 15 to 50% slopes. This type of soil is found on the
north and south facing slopes of cinder cones. Native plants on these types of soils are western
juniper, ponderosa pine, mountain big sagebrush, antelope bitterbrush, Idaho fescue, bluebunch
wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata). Typical soil profiles on this type include a gravelly
sandy loam composing the top 16", a layer of black and reddish brown cinders from the depth of
16" to 60", and bedrock below. Rocky outcrops are common on these soils. This soil type has a
moderate to high susceptibility to soil erosion in the absence of vegetation and a moderate
susceptibility to compaction. Displacement of the surface layer of this soil type results in a
significant loss of fertility and reduced resistance to erosion.
Slope, rapid drainage and a cold, dry climate limits the agricultural and livestock
potential on these soils. Poor seedling survival and a susceptibility to invasive weeds limit
reforestation efforts. Trees are subject to windthrow due to a poor anchoring capacity.
Recommendations for the extraction of wood products include the use of designated skid trails,
water bars and/or crowned or sloped roads, seeding, and application and running over of slash to
reduce erosion and compaction.
In the southwest corner of the property lies approximately 11 acres of Wilt sandy loam on
0 to 15% slopes. These soils have slightly higher fertility and water retention capabilities.
Native vegetation is the same as the Bluesters gravelly sandy loam soil type. Lesser slopes
mitigate some of the erosion concerns, but displacement of the surface layer still results in a
significant loss of fertility. Seedlings have higher rates of survival on these soils, but the
management concerns mentioned in the previous paragraphs apply to this soil type as well.
Deschutes sandy loam is also present in the extreme northeast corner of the property.
These soils are among the more fertile in central Oregon, but occupy only about 3 acres and are
not currently accessible by road.
According to 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Addendum 469, there
are 2 million cubic yards of good quality cinders on 80 acres of the property. The addendum
notes a "potential savings of approximately $.20 to $.25 per ton mile in hauling costs if the
resource this site is extracted and processed."
5
1
1
Ponderosa pine site class:
To determine site potential the property should be divided into two sections based on soil
type. According to the soil survey, the north 102 acres of the property has a 100 year site index
of 53, with an annual growth of 40ft3 per acre/year. This portion of the property is a Site Class
VI for ponderosa pine, which is poor for productivity. The Capstone class cored six ponderosa
pines on this section; the 100 year site index was 46. This is a small sample size, but would be
categorized as a Site Class VII (very poor). The average of the last ten years of growth for the
cored trees was 0.78 inches.
Based on the soil survey, the southwest 11 acres of the property has a 100 year site index
of 60, with an annual growth of 46ft3 per acre/year. This portion of the property is Site Class low
V for ponderosa pine. Six ponderosa pines from this section of the property were cored; the 100
year site index was 70. Based on the cored trees, this section of the property would be
categorized a Site Class mid-V (below average). The average of the last ten years of growth for
the cored trees was 0.82 inches.
Although the soil types are different according to the soil survey, both are considered
' ponderosa pine Site Class VI. Combining all of the ponderosa pine core data, results in a 100-
year site index of 59. Based on the cored trees, the entire property would have a Site Class of
high-VI (poor). Overall the average last ten years of growth is 0.80 inches. The average age of
all cored trees is 99 years old, which indicates that the majority of the stand established between
1910 and 1920.
Both the soil survey and the core data collected identify the Hurtley Ranch property as a
poor ponderosa pine site. Based on these site indexes, this site should not be managed for
natural regeneration (Barrett 1979). Currently, little to no natural regeneration of ponderosa pine
is taking place on the Hurtley Ranch properties. Artificial regeneration is an option, but it is
expensive and requires a commitment to long-term management of the site to be successful. Site
preparation will be needed prior to planting, including "removing competing vegetation and
obstacles that impede planting (Barrett 1979)."
Western juniper site class:
Western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) is the dominant non-commercial tree species on
the property. Juniper pocket rot (Pyrofomes demidoffii) made it difficult to determine overall age
the older junipers on the site. Efforts were made to select middle age trees for coring so a more
accurate site index could be made. A total of 12 western junipers were cored throughout all 116
acres. Two of the cored trees had heart rot and were excluded from site index calculation. The
100 year site index for western juniper on this property is 25. Currently the COCC capstone
class has not been able to locate any literature that discusses site classes for western juniper.
The average of the last ten years of growth on all 12 cores is 0.10 inch. The average age
of the cored trees is 136 years old, which indicates the presence of western juniper prior to the
establishment of the current cohort of ponderosa pine. Due to western juniper having little
commercial value, management should be limited to reducing the risk of wildfire and
maintaining wildlife habitat.
Stand inventory
Based on the cruise data collected at the site, there is an average of 80.7 trees per acre.
Of these trees, 97.3% are western juniper, with the remaining 2.7% consisting of ponderosa pine.
The volume of western juniper averaged 650 cubic feet/ acre. The volume of ponderosa pine
averaged 587 board feet/ acre. The total basal area for the property was 64.7 sq. ft. / acre, with
87.6% of that figure attributed to westernjuniper, and the remaining 12.4% attributed to
ponderosa pine.
' The cruise data indicates that the southern 20 acres and the northern 94.48 acres are
distinctly different in terms of composition. The southern 20 acres averages only 58.7 trees per
' acre, 13 of which, on average, are ponderosa pine. Ponderosa pine average volume on this
portion of the property is 2694 bd. ft/ acre, and western juniper volumes average 550 cubic feet /
acre. The average basal area on this southern end is 76 sq ft/ acre, 36.8% of which is pine. In
' summary, the southern 20 acres has significantly less trees per acre but considerably more pine
than the rest of the property. Volumes for ponderosa pine are significantly higher, and the overall
basal area is greater.
The northern 94.48 acres averages 87.1 trees per acre, and only 1.4 ponderosa pines per
acre. The average volume of juniper per acre is 669 cu ft/ acre, but the average volume of pine
was only 165 bd ft/ acre. The northern portion averages 62.4 square feet of basal area per acre,
93.6% of which can be attributed to western juniper. These numbers indicate that the northern
83% of the property is dominated by western juniper, and will remain dominated by western
juniper under natural conditions.
These figures are a product of sampling and statistics, and are only approximations, but
they paint a realistic picture of the stand dynamics of the property. The data clearly illustrates
' that forest management strategies for the property should differ for the southern 20 acres and the
northern 94.48 acres. The two acre biomass accumulation site is excluded from our data.
Variability across the property was considerable (see cruise data summary), and extraction
' volumes quoted in the treatment alternatives are estimates.
t Wildlife
The Hurtley Ranch property is a juniper dominated woodland that in its present state
provides valuable wildlife habitat, but can be managed for better habitat capabilities. Current
western juniper density has caused a loss of important understory plant species. The current
shrub component is reaching a point to where it may be lost for good, and any efforts to re-
establish this after it is gone would be difficult and costly. Currently there is an average of 6.8%
1
1
ii
1
~J
1
F1
shrub cover across the area, of which 63% is dead. 2.4% of the cover is live sage, and 0.0% is
live bitterbrush (Shrub Data Collection Summary). If the juniper can be set back in seral stage, it
would be a much more cost effective way to improve the shrub component. Thinning the
younger, invasive juniper will help to reestablish the shrub layer and allow reestablishment of
grasses and forbs.
In addition to improving the shrub component, the retention of snags and heritage trees is
vital to wildlife. A wide variety of birds and some bat species use juniper communities. Favoring
a stand with multiple plant layers provides habitat for many bird species and promotes
biodiversity. The greatest avian diversity in Oregon's semi-arid uplands occurs in the early and
middle stages of juniper encroachment into shrub/grassland communities, or open old-growth
woodlands where the trees do not dominate the site and shrubs and grasses are still abundant
(Woodland Fish and Wildlife, September 2001). Twenty-five different bird species have been
confirmed (Kristine Falco) to be nesting on the property, such as the Lewis' woodpecker
(Melanerpes lewis) and Red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). To maintain vital nesting habitat,
old-growth trees must be retained.
Based on visual sightings, shed antlers, and the deer utilization data, a resident herd of
mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) utilizes this property. Travel corridors and bedding
areas were observed throughout the property during data collection. A minimal amount of
Rocky Mountain Elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) sign was present on the property as well, in the
form of scat and tracks. Leaving larger densities of trees and shrubs along identified deer and elk
travel corridors, and around bedding areas will maintain necessary habitat cover requirements for
these species.
Wildland fire.IWUI concerns and potential treatment options
This property falls into the 2009 Greater Sisters Country Community Wildfire Protection Plan.
Due to the proximity of this property to Panoramic Estates, the Panoramic Estates ODF
Assessment of Risk was utilized to evaluate wildfire concerns. Hurtley Ranch Rd runs through
the county owned property, and serves as an emergency exit for the residents of Panoramic
Estates. Managing the land around Hurtley Ranch Rd and the west property boundary should be
a priority.
Ratings & conditions of interest:
• Received an overall ODF Rating & Score of 20 (Extreme)
• ODF Hazards rating of 67 (Extreme)
• ODF Likelihood of fire occurring rating of 15 (Moderate)
• This property is Fire Regime Group II with a fire frequency of 0 - 35 years.
8
1
• This property is a Condition Class 2 (missed more than one fire return interval).
• Western Juniper woodland fire return interval is approximately every 30 years
• Weather (ODF rating 40) and vegetation (ODF rating 15) contribute the most to the
overall Hazards rating of 67 (extreme).
Hurtley Ranch Property Wildfire-JWUI Recommendations:
• Homeowner Education - To provide information (Defensible Space Checklist) to
adjacent land owners and provide education on the importance of defensible space.
• Create and maintain a fire resistant buffer around Hurtley Ranch Rd (Emergency Exit).
• Proposed thinning of western juniper on the southern 20 acres to reduce fire hazards and
to protect the mature ponderosa pine.
• Treat fuels on the west boundary to reduce the risk of wildfire from Deschutes county
land carrying onto adjacent homeowner's property.
• Material should be piled at the Biomass accumulation site consistent with maintaining a
fire resistant buffer.
• Proposed treatment of removing ladder fuels near and around all mature ponderosa pine.
Biomass accumulation site
The biomass accumulation site (BMA) is an asset to the county and is something the
county would like to keep in place. Currently, the site is used for grinding biomass material for
the county, and is available to adjacent landowners to dispose of woody debris.
In addition to the current county operation of the BMA, installation of a gate at the
' beginning of the main access road is recommended to limit the amount of motor vehicle traffic,
9
thereby decreasing the amount of erosion. The gate will also keep people from bringing
unwanted material into the BMA. Due to the BMA being utilized by adjacent landowners and
residents of Panoramic Estates, the county should provide landowners the key or combination to
gain access to the site. Additionally, a kiosk should be posted at the gate to inform users of
regulations and restrictions, this will include information on how to prevent the spread of
noxious weeds, and what type of material is acceptable to deposit at the site. The total cost of
the gate and kiosk is $2475.
Watershed Protection and enhancement
Watershed management includes protection and restoration that sustains and enhances
watershed functions affecting the plant, animal, and human communities within a watershed
boundary. The Hurtley Ranch property is located approximately one mile southeast of Whychus
Creek, within the Whychus Watershed (State of Oregon Division of Lands). Whychus Creek is
currently undergoing management actions to provide restoration to a more ecologically sound
and natural environment by the USFS Sisters Ranger District. (Whychus Watershed Analysis),
(Whychus Creek Wild and Scenic River Plan)
To apply consideration of this watershed, management actions need to be executed in a way that
reflects this value. This can be achieved by:
• Reduction of current and future erosion
• Reduction of JUOC basal area
• Fire management
Weed monitoring
Accelerated erosion increases sediment into the waterways, which pollutes the water
causing unnatural and unhealthy environments for aquatic plant and animal species. To decrease
the erosion rates on the property the necessary actions include limiting access of motorized
vehicles on the road north of the BMA site and of user created trails, and installing erosion
controls on the roadsides along the newly created portion of Emerald Valley Road.
I.J
Western juniper is native to the area, however presently it is at densities that are unnatural
and beyond the sites carrying capacity. Reduction of juniper would increase recruitment of new
grass and shrubs, which are important for biodiversity and as soil stabilizers.
Fire has historically been an important element to Central Oregon forests. It acts as a tool
to thin tree densities and for rejuvenation of the plant life and cleans up the forest floor of dead
materials. With fire suppression over the last 100 years, our forested areas have grown into
10
1
11
1
ii
unnatural densities and specie compositions. Fire is essential in many natural environments for
maintaining productivity and diversity (Michael Dombeck et al). Reintroduction of fire or the
simulation of it would bring the stand back to an earlier seral stage for the grass and shrub
components, and create healthier tree densities.
Noxious weeds alter a site by out-competing the native vegetation and eventually taking
over. Once they take root in a site, they are very difficult to get rid of, leading to increased
erosion and alteration of the vegetative structure. Monitoring for, and treatment of, noxious
weeds will prevent weeds from becoming established.
Noxious Weeds
"Noxious weeds overrun native vegetation, destroy natural animal habitat, shelter
undesirable insects, steal scarce water, infest crops and cost local communities in terms of visual
blight, a reduction of property values and lost agricultural dollars. Some noxious weeds are
poisonous to humans, livestock and wildlife. Foot and vehicular traffic along our roadways and
through our public lands spread seeds from noxious weeds. Many property owners unknowingly
have these non-native, noxious weeds growing in their yards and fields, which aggravates the
situation." (Deschutes County Government, Oregon-Noxious Weeds)
Currently the Hurtley Ranch property does not have any major infestations of noxious
weeds. There was one small population of knapweed (Centaurea spp.) noted near the west
property boundary just south of Emerald Valley Road. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) was
present on 8 out of 60 nested plots (ground cover data). Treatment of these small sites would
prevent the spread of the weeds.
On the Southwest property boundary, hand pulling the knapweed and properly disposing
of it is recommended. The best time to take action would be in the spring when the knapweed is
still green and not dropping seeds. For the cheatgrass, the best action would be to favor native
vegetation (grasses in particular), which could outcompete the weed and prevent spread. A
monitoring plan needs to be implemented to maintain the relatively weed free condition
particularly around the BMA site, along roads and trails, and property boundaries. In the event of
the discovery of a new weed population, treatment will be required to eliminate and/or contain
the plants to prevent their spread. To achieve these treatments and monitoring actions, we
recommend visual inspection in previously mentioned important areas by the county forester or
volunteer groups at the minimum of annually in mid to late spring, and the use of volunteer
groups to hand pull any noxious weed populations that are known or found. To favor native
vegetation around the cheatgrass sites it is recommended that disturbance is minimized. It is also
recommended that actions be taken to prevent the spread of noxious weed seeds during
silvicultural treatments such as requiring the washing of equipment before coming on site. If the
11
' recommended use of volunteer groups to achieve these actions is used, the cost would be
nothing. "Unless the site is properly prepared and maintained, undesirable plants may compete
with reforestation." (Soil survey 2002)
Monitoring
On April 28t", 2010 three landscape photo points were established on the Hurtley Ranch
' property. Locations, camera settings, and lens directions have been recorded in the protocol for
future reference. One photo point was established on the south end of the property, one in the
middle, and one in the northwest section. The goal is to use these photo points as a way to track
the progress of any treatment, along with tracking any changes due to natural disturbances.
The photo points can be used as a tool for educating both students and professionals.
This monitoring could be conducted by Central Oregon Community College (COCC) forestry
students and is recommended to be done for at least 10 years. The photo points will be vital in
determining if the management plan was implemented effectively and if objectives are being
met. Furthermore, the photo points could indicate the need for additional treatment due to
increased fire hazards.
1 Recreation Management
Currently the local landowners use the Hurtley Ranch property for horseback riding,
paintball, photography, ATV use and walking/hiking.
Slight soil damage could occur on the south end of the property, by having campgrounds,
' picnic areas, and path/trail development. (Soil Survey 2002) Severe damage can be caused if this
area was to be used for a playground or golf course. On the North end of the property, severe
damage could occur if the area were to be used for camping/picnic areas, playgrounds, and
path/trails because of the "susceptibility to compaction." "Because of the low fertility of the
subsoil, displacement of the surface layer should be minimized." (Soil survey 2002) Because of
' these considerations, no additional roads or trails should be established on the property due to the
risk of compaction and erosion.
Recommendations for recreational use include the installation of a locking gate to help
prevent off-road travel and employing methods to prevent ATV's and OHV's from traveling off
' designated roads. These methods could include creating natural boundaries (rocks, shrubs, etc.)
and posting signs that restrict the use for ATV's and OHV's. The public would still be allowed to
ride bicycles, walk, and ride horses on established trails. It is recommended that no shooting
signs be posted on the property because of the narrow width of the Hurtley Property and the
close proximity of occupied homes.
12
' Adjacent Landowners
The 2010 COCC capstone class spoke with eleven of the thirteen adjacent landowners.
Seven of the landowners were contacted in person and four others were contacted by phone. The
remaining two landowners were not responsive. From the interactions it appears that, the
adjacent landowners were interested in the property as a place to recreate and enjoy the wildlife.
Each landowner received an information booklet about living in the Wildland Urban Interface
(WUI) and defensible space. With the exception of the Pine Ridge Ranch Company, which owns
the land to the north and east of the property, the adjacent properties are in residential use. The
neighboring owners do not have any land use changes planned in the future. The Pine Ridge
Ranch Company currently raises cattle and has a large area that is irrigated. Future land use plans
' were not identified for this landowner.
The majority of the responsive adjacent landowners were interested in the project and
' supportive of the ideals and plans which were identified. The common consensus was to manage
the land for fire safety, wildlife, recreation, and ecological values.
I Carbon Credit Potential
Carbon credits are essentially a measure of 1 ton of carbon dioxide removed from the
' atmosphere. These credits are then sold on the open market, and eventually purchased by either
companies seeking to offset their emissions, or by investors seeking a profit in much the same
way as investors have made profits on such things as oil futures. As of April 20th, 2010, one
carbon credit is worth $.25 on the Chicago Climate Exchange, down from a high of $7 in 2008.
Carbon credits are available to companies who reduce their emissions through innovation, but
' also to landowners who actively seek to increase the carbon sequestration capabilities of their
land.
0
l
For landowners, carbon credits are quantified based on established baselines of carbon
sequestration applicable to specific vegetation types. Currently, carbon credit eligibility is only
available to landowners who are either reforesting former agricultural lands and rangelands or
owners of productive timberlands who are willing to extend their normal harvest rotations.
However, carbon credits are a relatively new concept and are still evolving. In the future, they
may be applied to the conservation of existing woodlands, in which case they may apply to the
Hurtley Ranch property. The baseline established from the USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis
data (USDA Forest Service 2002) for juniper woodlands is 10.6 tons of carbon/ acre, which at
current prices would amount to $300 annually for the entire property. Earnings could rise
significantly if the price of carbon credits were to rebound. This is all highly speculative,
especially because the juniper on this property is old-growth. Many scientists and policy makers
feel that only rapidly growing forests are suitable for carbon credit accreditation, since mature
forests are not increasing their carbon storage at a significant rate due to a slowing of the
photosynthetic process, as well as tree mortality and decomposition.
13
Treatment Areas
fvliles
Pine Restoration
map created
Juniper Reduction bvIsi~Las5lett
N
-
data from
R
E
Wildlife Habitat Deschutes Co. IT
S
soil types
14
ii
F1
11
Treatment Options:
Option A: Encourage ponderosa pine establishment and address hazardous fuels on the
property.
Thin encroachment juniper and eliminate ladder fuels on the southern 20 acres to
maintain the area as a ponderosa pine site and to reduce the fire hazard along Hurtley Ranch
Road. All junipers with diameters of less than 19" at breast height, will be cut. All material
greater than 3" in diameter will be yarded out and brought to the biomass accumulation site to be
chipped and sold. In order to minimize erosion, material less than 3" in diameter will be lopped
and scattered and utilized to rehabilitate areas disturbed by the extraction. Mechanized
equipment can be utilized, but only on designated skid trails and existing roads. Juniper that are
not cut, and are within 25' of a ponderosa pine, as well as the ponderosa pine themselves, will be
pruned to a height of 8' or no more than one third of the total tree height. Ladder fuels will be
eliminated around all ponderosa pines on the entire property, as well as within a 30` wildfire
buffer along the western property boundary which directly interfaces with homes and
outbuildings. This distance was identified in the Oregon Forestland-Urban Interface Fire
Protection Act Property Evaluation Guide. Junipers less than 13" within the wildfire buffer and
around ponderosa pine will be cut. Material from this cutting will be extracted, lop and scattered
or piled and burned as conditions dictate. The residual barbwire located at the southwest corner
of the property poses a threat to public and wildlife safety, and should be removed. Measures to
manage the biomass accumulation site, recreation, and to install a monitoring plan for the
property will be instituted as mentioned in those sections of this plan.
This treatment will encourage ponderosa pine regeneration by reducing competition from
' encroachment juniper, as well as protect the few old-growth pine on the site from being lost to
fire. Basal area on the treated area will be reduced by 41 Juniper density will be reduced
' from 50 trees per acre to 6.5 trees per acre, with only the largest heritage junipers to be retained.
The treatment also reduces the fire hazard along the western boundary, which is where the
largest wildfire concerns are due to its proximity to so many homes. This option also effectively
mitigates the fire hazard encompassing Hurtley Ranch Road, which is an important wildfire
escape route for Panoramic Estates.
' Option A costs: This treatment will extract approximately 7140 cubic feet or 93.5 tons of hog
fuel. These figures are consistent with volumes extracted from the southern 20 acres. Volumes
extracted from the wildfire buffer and ponderosa pine outside this area are difficult to predict due
' to the fact that material will be widely scattered and mechanical extraction will be limited to
existing roads. Treatment costs for the southern 20 acres, the western wildfire boundary, and
' around the existing ponderosa pine would cost, at $450/ acre (Stutler), approximately $12,330.
Grinding of the material would cost $400 per 60 tons of biomass (Stutler), which would bring
treatment costs to $12,930. Initial cost of artificial regeneration with 1-2 ponderosa plugs for the
' southern 20 acres would be $3850 at 150 trees per acre (USFS Priest). The total estimated cost
of this treatment including the associated costs for managing the BMA and planting would be
$19,255.
15
Option B: In addition to encouraging the establishment of ponderosa pine and treating
hazardous fuels, 64 additional acres will be thinned to restore the site to a more ecologically
healthy condition.
In addition to the treatments in Option A, an additional 64 acres north of Option A's
project area will be thinned. All juniper less than 13" in diameter at breast height, will be cut and
extracted and sold as firewood or biomass to offset some of the treatment costs. Material greater
' than 3" in diameter will be yarded out by tractor or ATV using designated skid trails and existing
roads. To minimize soil erosion, slash less than 3" in diameter will be lopped and scattered and
utilized to rehabilitate areas disturbed by the extraction. Volunteer groups will be recruited to
spread bitterbrush and big mountain sagebrush seeds directly before the thinning is to occur,
preferably in the fall, with the exception of the wildfire buffer zone. The northernmost 30 acres
of the property will be left untreated asides from the reduction of ladder fuels around ponderosa
pine as described in Option A. This area is heavily utilized by deer and elk as bedding grounds,
and the area serves as hiding cover and a wildlife corridor for deer and elk to access Whychus
Creek and adjacent farmer's fields. By excluding this area from treatment, excessive transport of
extracted materials will be limited, preventing the most sloped ground from being subject to
■ erosion.
This option will be employed to restore the site to an ecologically stable and healthy
state. The exclusion of fire on this site, as a result of fire suppression, has created unnaturally
high populations of western juniper, which have choked out the shrub component necessary to
prevent soil erosion and support native populations of wildlife. Since conducting a prescribed
burn on the property is impractical due to the property's proximity to homes, this treatment will
attempt to mimic the disturbance that would result following a wildfire. Basal area on the treated
64 acres would be reduced 31.6%. Western juniper densities would be reduced from 84.1 trees
per acre to 26.7 trees per acre.
Option B costs: This treatment would extract approximately 283 tons of hog fuel material.
The cost of this treatment, at $450 an acre, is $37,800 plus an additional $3,850 to plant southern
20 acres, and an additional $1887 dollars to grind and remove the hog fuel. Factoring in the
costs associated with managing the BMA, the total estimated costs of this option would be
$46,012.
Option C: Sell or trade the property when the real estate market rebounds.
Seek to sell the property when the market rebounds or explore possible land exchange
options in an attempt to acquire more ecologically sensitive areas (ie - wetlands and riparian
areas), or lands which could better serve the county's needs. An exchange for lands more
suitable for timber production may also be a good investment for the county. In order to sell the
property as two distinct tax lots, it may need to be resurveyed. An easement to the northern 40
acres would need to be established.
16
1
This option is the most economically viable for the county. According to the data in terms
of timber production, the site is poor. The only ground which shows any potential for timber
production is the southern 20 acres. The Upper Deshutes River Soil Survey indicates that the
soil found on this southern 20 acres is capable of yielding 24,500 board feet of ponderosa pine an
acre per rotation, but after at least 90 years with no significant disturbance to the site, if every
pine was removed from the site, it would only yield 10% of that figure. This indicates that any
type of management for timber production on the site would have to be intensive and rotations
would be long, leading to high costs and low and infrequent yields. On the other hand, in 2008
the county had estimated the market value of the two properties at $650,000 (Theresa Rosiz).
Based on our research, this figure is consistent with other comparable properties currently for
sale in the area. In addition to the revenue generated by the sale, annual revenue will be
generated from property taxes and from building, well, and septic permits. The only costs
associated with this option, involve having the property resurveyed and associated real estate
costs.
Option D: Take measures to manage the biomass accumulation site and establish a monitoring
protocol for the property.
Manage the biomass accumulation site, recreational usage, and the invasive weed/ fire
hazard monitoring program as described in those specific sections of the plan. Based on the
zoning of this site and its many potential uses, it may be advantageous to maintain possession of
the property. Oregon Department of Transportation has deemed this property as a valuable
cinder resource as is described in 2008 Addendum No. 469. The total estimated cost of this
option would be $2475 in order to implement management of the biomass accumulation site and
regulate recreation.
Recommendation
The 2010 COCC Capstone class recommends that the county implements treatment option
B. This treatment would increase the aesthetic value of the property, reduce hazardous fuels,
manage the biomass accumulation site, and establish a monitoring program from which future
management decisions can be made. It would also mimic the natural role of fire on the property
and return the site to an ecologically stable and healthy condition, while also reducing runoff and
erosion. This treatment will provide a model of treatment that may encourage other residents to
similarly maintain juniper habitat and reduce hazardous fuels on their own properties.
17
1
References:
Carbon Credit Values: Chicage Climate Exchange, 4/20/10
Carbon Credit Potential: USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis. USDA Forest Service, 2002.
Westen Juniper Cubic Feet to Tonnage Conversion: Developing Volume-to-Biomass Factors
For Small Diameter Tree Species in Central Oregon: Progress Report 3. Matt Delaney. June 19,
2007.
Soil & Site Index Information: Soil Survey of Upper Deshutes River Area, Oregon including
parts of Deshutes, Jefferson, and Klamath Counties. USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of the Interior BLM, and
Oregon Agricultural Experimental Station. 2002.
Cinder Resource Information: Addendum 469. Oregon Department of Transportation, 2008.
Real Estate Comparison Information: www.centraloregonrealtors.com
Cruise Calculations: Forest Measurements, 5th Edition. Avery & Berkhart 2002
Site Index and Site Class: Silviculture of Ponderosa Pine in the Pacific Northwest: The State of
Our Knowledge. James W. Barrett, December 1979.
Watershed: State of OR Division of Lands, USFS, Sisters/Whychus Watershed Analysis, USFS,
Whychus Creek Wild And Scenic River Plan.
Michael P. Dombeck, Jack E. Williams, Christopher A. Wood; Wildfire Policy and Public
Lands: Integrating Scientific Understanding With Social Concerns Across Landscapes
Zoning Information: www.lava5deschutes.org
Zoning Information: Deschutes County Code, http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/dccode/index.htm,
Chapter 18.60, Chapter 18.6, and Chapter 18.52.
Wildlife: Old Growth Western Juniper Woodlands; Rick Miller, Wendy Waichler, and Paul
Doescher, 1998.
Wildlife: Woodland Fish and Wildlife: Managing Western Juniper for Wildlife; September
2001.
Gate quote: ABC FENCE CO., Prineville, OR (541)447-6780
Wildfire/WUI: 2009 Greater Sisters Country Community Wildfire Protection Plan
18
t
1 Contacts:
' Adjacent landowners: Deschutes County DIAL
Treatment and Kiosk Costs: Joe Stutler, Deshutes County Forester
Planting Costs: Dave Priest, Reforestation Specialist, U.S. Forest Service - Sisters Ranger
District
r
Real Estate Values: Theresa Rosiz, Deshutes County Land Specialist
Ponderosa pine management: Ron Boldenow, Central Oregon Community College, Forestry
Recreation: NRCS Soil Survey of Upper Deschutes River Area, Oregon
Noxious Weeds: Deschutes County Government, Oregon-Noxious Weeds
Wildlife: Glen Ardt, ODFW Wildlife Habitat Biologist (541)416-6765
Wildlife: Steve Castillo, Prineville BLM Forester (541) 416-6765
Potential Volunteers:
National Guard Youth Challenge Program
Kim Coleman (541)317-9623 extension 224
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Oregon
(541)548-2840
Camp Fire USA Central Oregon Council
Carol M. Flinn (541)382-4682
Central Oregon Youth Challenge Foundation
Richard Demars (541)389-5877
Central Oregon Partnerships for Youth
Bob Moore (541)388-6551
Deschutes County 4-H Programs
David White (541)548-6088
J Bar J Youth Services-Cascade Youth and Family Center
Joy Hayes (541)382-0934
19
Objectives
1
Central Oregon Community College
Forest Resource Capstone (Spring 2010)
Protocol
Hurtley Ranch Properties, Deschutes County
To collect the necessary data to complete a land management plan for the Hurtley Ranch
Properties. The data collection will include: basal area, tree density, cubic foot volume, and site
class of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). Data
will also be collected on to determine grass cover, deer utilization and the health and percentages
of the shrubs present. Three photo points will be established to track the long-term progress of
management and to monitor site conditions.
Sampling design
Sixty temporary plots will be systematically nested with the 116 acres on the Hurtley Ranch
properties. Twelve rows with five plots each will be established starting at the SW corner of the
property. The first row will start 2.5 chains of the SW corner, heading due north. Five chain
spacing will be used to establish each addition row, heading due north. Plots will be numbered 1
- 60 and have the centered mark with a orange pin flag. The first plot in each row with be nested
4 chains due east of the beginning of the row, still heading due east a spacing of 4 chains will
continue to be used to nest the remaining four plots on that row. Both fixed plot and variable
plot cruising will be utilized from established plot centers.
Tree density
Tree density will be determined based on calculations derived from our variable plot cruise
data. Tree expansion factors were determined by dividing the basal area factor (20), by the basal
area of each individual tree. These tree expansion factors are then applied to trees tallied in each
plot to determine the number of trees per acre.
' Basal Area
Basal area will be determined by using variable plot cruising. A 20 BAF prism will be used to
' select measure to count and select measure trees. Trees will be identified as ponderosa pine or
westem jumper, than a diameter at breast height (DBH) will be recorded as well as total tree
height (using either a relaskop or a laser range finder).
1
20
Tree coring
' One dominant or co-dominant ponderosa pine that is in the 1/8 acre fixed plot will be cored at
breast height to determine total age and last ten years of growth. Total age will be counted in the
field and recorded. The last ten years of growth will be measured to the nearest 1/10th inch and
' recorded. Due to a low number of ponderosa pine throughout the management area exceptions
will be made to core a dominant or co-dominant ponderosa pine just out of the plot radius.
One western juniper will be randomly selected for 12 of the established plots to be cored.
Every fifth plot starting at plot #1 will have a western juniper cored. Using a compass and facing
due north the first co-dominant western juniper to the right will be selected for coring.
Exceptions will be made so that older trees with heart rot are not cored. The next tree to the right
will be selected to avoid a tree with heart rot. The total age and last 10 years of growth (to
nearest 50th inch) will be recorded in the field and noted with plot number.
Shrub and grass cover
To determine shrub and grass cover a 1/100th (11.8' radius) fixed plot will be nested on all 60
plots from the previously marked plot center. All shrubs in the plot will be identified and the
percentage of each species, both live and dead will be recorded. Shrub height will be noted as
well, this can be either live or dead from the highest point.
The percentage of total grass cover within the plot will be recorded. Grass species will not be
separated by percentage, but species present in plot will be recorded.
To determine the average percentages of live shrub, dead shrub, and grass cover, an MS Excel
' spreadsheet will be used to calculate the data. Data will be calculated on the all 60 plots, the
south portion (plots 1-10), and north portion (plots 11-60) of the management area.
Deer utilization
Deer utilization will be determined using a 1 / 100th acre (11.8' radius) fixed plot from the
center of all 60 plot centers. Only a notation of "yes" or "no" will be noted to indicate the
presence of deer scat. Any deer scat present in the plot will be noted as a "yes." A percentage of
the total plots that had deer scat present will be calculated using an MS Excel spreadsheet.
21
J
Photo points
' Three photo points were established in the planning area. The following are the locations
(Garmin etrex GPS used) and camera settings used:
' Photo point #1 - location: 10 T UTM 0622251, 4907015 3.5 chains due east of SW corner
maker, 2'/2' from fence, camera lens facing 342°. Camera settings: Nikon D40, 18 mm, 1/250
sec, 3.6 app, F 9. Pin flag put in ground, shoot directly over pin flag.
Photo point #2 - location: (10 T UTM 0622202, 4907517), 2 chains due east of power pole
' (UTM 0622169, 4907518), camera lens facing 352°. Camera settings: Nikon D40, 18 mm,
1/160 sec, 3.6 app, F 6.3. Stake and pin flag put into ground, shoot directly over stake.
' Photo point #3 - location: (10 T UTM 0622549, 4907549), directly over the NW corner property
marker for the south 76 acres, camera lens facing 330°. Camera settings: Nikon D40, 18 mm,
1/125 sec, 3.6 app, F 8. Shoot directly over property marker.
Cruise Data Calculations
The stock and stand tables were created to show the size distribution of each tree species,
as well as to calculate volumes extracted from thinning at specific diameter cut limits. The tree
' expansion factors were determined by dividing the basal area factor by the average basal area of
each tree. Tree densities were determined as described in the tree density portion of this
protocol. The volumes per 2" size class were determined by multiplying the mean volume-to-
basal area ratio by the basal area of the size class by the number of trees in each size class. The
ponderosa pine stock and stand table is more functional as a representative of tree size
1 distribution, than it is for tree densities and volumes due to the relatively low sample size (21
trees).
The data in the cruise data summary was determined independently from the stock and stand
tables, and confidence intervals are given to indicate variability of the stand. Volumes were
calculated by applying Region 6, Forest 1, regression equations for each species from The
National Volume Estimator Library. Tree densities were determined as described in the tree
' density portion of this protocol. Volumes per acre figures were determined by calculating the
basal area for each tree and volume for each tree to determine the mean volume-to-basal-area
ratio (VBAR). The mean VBAR was then multiplied by the mean basal area per acre, The
standard errors were pooled to determine confidence intervals. Basal area per acre was
determined by multiplying the basal area factor (20) by the number of measure trees. Tonnage
was calculated using data collected by Oregon State University indicating the average density of
' western juniper to be 42 g/cubic cm. This translates to 26.2 pounds/ cubic foot. Cubic feet were
then multiplied by 26.2, and that quantity was then divided by 2000 pounds to calculate tonnage.
22
Western Juniper Stand and
Stock Table For Hurtley Ranch
DBH Class
Tally
Tree Expansion Factor
Trees/ac in size class Average
Volume/ ac in size class (cu ft/ac)
4
3
229.343
11.46715
10.40661
6
9
101.9302
15.28953
31.98736
8
12
57.33574
11.46715
43.39114
10
16
36.69488
9.7853
58.63334
12
22
25.48255
9.343603
81.50614
14
12
18.72188
3.744375
44.8703
16
23
14.33394
5.494676
86.69206
18
17
11.32558
3.208914
64.53041
20
19
9.173719
2.905011
72.57883
22
7
7.581586
0.884518
26.89266
24
13
6.370638
1.380305
50.2045
26
5
5.428236
0.452353
19.40223
28
5
4.680469
0.390039
19.48855
30
5
4.077208
0.339767
19.56925
32
0
3.583484
0
0
34
1
3.174297
0.052905
3.943304
36
0
2.831395
0
0
38
0
2.541196
0
0
40
0
2.29343
0
0
42
1
2.080208
0.03467
3.993533
170
1000/ ac:
76.24027 JUOC Vol./ ac:
638.0902
Ponderosa Pine Stand & Stock Table
Ponderosa Pine Stand & Stock Table
DBH class
Class BA
Tally
Tree Expansion Factor
TPA/ size class
12
0.785376
1
28.57143
0.47619
14
1.068984
2
20
0.666667
16
1.396224
1
18.18182
0.30303
18
1.767096
3
13.33333
0.666667
20
2.1816
3
12.5
0.625
22
2.639736
4
11.76471
0.784314
24
3.141504
3
11.76471
0.588235
26
3.686904
2
9.090909
0.30303
28
4.275936
1
9.090909
0.151515
30
4.9086
0
8.695652
0
32
5.584896
0
8.333333
0
34
6.304824
0
8
0
36
7.068384
1
7.407407
0.123457
21
TPA: 4.688105
23
Vol/ size class (Bdit/
31.3466
59.73269
35.46282
98.74179
114.2845
173.5331
154.8891
93.64401
54.30244
0
0
0
73.14207
Bd Ft/ac: 889.0791
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hurtley Ranch
JUOC SITE CLASS
Plot#
Tree# DBH
Height
Age
10yrgrowth (to 1/10th of an inch)
1
1
11.7
34
95
0.1
7
2
14.7
48
104
0.1 (HEART ROT AT 5.3")
13
3
13.1
36
144
0.08
19
4
17.1
41
75
0.1 (HEART RI OT AT 3.0")
25
5
11.6
32
151
0.08
30
6
11.4
34
102
0.12
34
7
16.5
46
153
0.06
38
8
14.1
31
154
0.1
42
9
10.6
32
113
0.14
46
10
12.8
34
150
0.08
52
11
8.9
27
163
0.08
58
12
9
31
132
0.1
Avg
12.63
35.50
128.00
0.10
100 yr site index
27.73
Hurtley Ranch Juniper Site Index
No heart rot included
Plot# Tree#
DBH Height
Age
1
1
11.7
34
13
3
13.1
36
25
5
11.6
32
30
6
11.4
34
34
7
16.5
46
38
8
14.1
31
42
9
10.6
32
46
10
12.8
34
52
11
8.9
27
58
12
9
31
Avg
11.97 33.70
100 yr site index
10yr growth (to 1/10th of an inch)
95 0.1
144 0.08
151 0.08
102 0.12
153 0.06
154 0.1
113 0.14
150 0.08
163 0.08
132 0.1
135.70 0.09
24.83
24
Hurtley Ranch
PIPO SITE CLASS
A l l 116 acres
Plot #
Tree# DBH Height
Age
10yr growth (to 1/10th of an inch)
4
1
67
89
1.4 out of plot
5
2 22.1
56
95
0.9
6
3 24.3
71
80
0.9
7
4
84
91
0.6 out of plot
8
5 23.7
68
97
0.7
10
6 26.5
91
177
0.4
13
7 19.9
55
90
0.5
16
8 21.1
51
90
0.7
20
9 20.6
46
150
0.5
26
10 11.3
28.7
49
1.2
37
11 21.5
40.6
95
0.9
45
12 14.6
39.2
88
0.9 out of plot
Avg 20.56
58.13
99.25
0.80
100 yr site index =
58.56
Site class high VI
Southwest 10.5 acres
Plot #
Tree# DBH
Height
Age
10yrgrowth (to 1/10th of an inch)
4
1
67
89
1.4 out of plot
5
2
22.1
56
95
0.9
6
3
24.3
71
80
0.9
7
4
84
91
0.6 out of plot
8
5
23.7
68
97
0.7
10
6
26.5
91
177
0.4
Avg
72.83
104.83
0.82
100 yr site inde
x =
69.48
Site class mid V
North
102
acres
Plot #
Tree# DBH
Height
Age
10yr growth (to 1/10th of an inch)
13
7
19.9
55
90
0.5
16
8
21.1
51
90
0.7
20
9
20.6
46
150
0.5
26
10
11.3
28.7
49
1.2
37
11
21.5
40.6
95
0.9
45
12
14.6
39.2
88
0.9 out of plot
Avg
43.42
93.67
0.78
100yrsite index =
46.35
Site class VII
25
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hurtlev Ranch Cruise Data Summa
Trees/ acr 80.7
Trees/acre:
58.7
95% Cl: 55.7 to 195.8
90% ch
14.3 to 103.1
Juniper/ acre: 78.5
Juniper/ acre:
50.42
95% Cl: 53.25 to 103.8
90.14 ck
5.9 to 95.0
Pine/ acre: 3.4
Pine/acre:
13
95% ck .93 to 5.81
l
V
901 Cl:
2.3 to 23.7
o
ume per acre:
Juniper (cubic feet/ acre): 650.1
Volume per acre:
Juniper (cubicfeet/ acre:
95% Cl: 526.4 to 773.8
95% Cl:
118.2 to 979.8
Pine (board foot/ acre): 586.7
Pine (bf/ ac):
2694.3
95% Cl: 224 to 948.6
sal
e
B
90% CI:
615.7 to 4773
a
ar
a per acre:
Total: 64.7 sq ft/acre
Basal area per
Total:
acre:
76 sq ft/acre
95% Cl: 53.0 to 76.5
95% Cl:
23.8 to 128.2
Pine: 7 sq ft/acre
Juniper:
48 sq ft/acre
90% Cl: 3.0 to 11.0
95% Cl:
10.4 to 51.6
Juniper: 56.7 sq ft/acre
Pine:
28 sq ft/acre
95% Cl: 46.0 to 67.3
9011. CI:
6.7 to 49.3
Northern 94.48
Trees/ acre:
acres:
87.1
95% Cl:
58.4 to 115.8
Juniper/ acre:
84.1
95% Cl:
55.4 to 112.8
Pine/ acre:
1.4
95% ck
l
1 to 2.8
Vo
ume per acre:
549.9 Juniper (cubic feet/ acre): 669
95% Cl:
542.0 to 796.6
Pine (bf/ac):
165.2
90% CI:
l
B
40.9 to 289.5
asa
area per
Total:
acre:
62.4 sq ft/ acre
95% CC
51.5 to 73.3
Juniper:
58.4 sq ft/acre
95% CI:
47.4 to 69.4
Pine:
2.8 sg ft/acre
90% Cl:
1.1 to 4.5
Ground Cover Data
Avg total ground cover=
Avg shrub cover=
ARTR live =
ARTR dead =
PUTR live =
PUTR dead =
CHVI live =
Avg grass cover
=
Avg shrbu height (inches) _
All plots
1 thru 10 11 thru 60
27.8%
36.1%
26.1%
6.89to
9.3%
6.3%
2.4%
6.0%
1.7%
1.69to
1.8%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.00/0
2.7%
1.3%
2.9%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
21.0%
26.8%
19.8%
23.3
22.4
23.48
26
0-r Es
XA2~ Department of Administrative Services
0
A~ Dave Kanner, County Administrator
AY-~
1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202
www.co. deschutes. or. us
May 26, 2010
TO: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
FROM: DAVE KANNER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RE: COCC USE RESTRICTION
For discussion at your June 2, 2010, work session is a request from Central Oregon
Community College for the County to modify a use restriction on college-owned property
that was donated to the college by the County in 1962. I must emphasize that this is not a
reversionary interest per se, although the deed language creates limitations for the college
that have the same effect as a reversionary clause. That is, the college would be unable to
sell the property or, in all likelihood, obtain financing for the improvements planned for
the site as long as the language is present. As such, COCC would like to mitigate or,
better yet, remove the language.
This is an issue we have been working on for nearly four years; just about the entire time
I have been employed by the County. At issue are the words in the deed, "for college
purposes." This phrase is not defined in state law or County ordinance, and the meeting
minutes from 1962 offer no clues as to what the commissioners at that time were thinking
by including the language in the deed. The 1962 land donation was one of several that
created what is now the 200-acre college campus. Another conveyance we have located,
from Robert L. and Joyce Coats (dated September 27, 1962) contains very specific
reversionary language. That deed states, "...that Grantee shall use [the land] solely for
the purpose of constructing college buildings, facilities and campus within on or before
January, 1967. In the event such use is not made of this property ...then this grant shall
terminate [and] property shall revert to Grantors..."
One might infer and speculate that because COCC was a start-up venture in 1962, there
was legitimate concern that the venture might not get off the ground, and that the County
and other grantors wanted to ensure that their property would revert if such a venture did
not succeed, or at least get started within four years. I think we can fairly assume that,
nearly 50 years later, the venture has in fact been successful and that the concerns these
deed restrictions were attempting to address are moot.
Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner
When we were first approached by COCC in 2006, it was with a proposal to place a
reversionary interest (to the County's benefit) on a different piece of property on the
COCC campus. This has proven to be a very difficult and cumbersome process for the
college. What's more, COCC now has plans for the County property that may or may not
fit the definition of "college purposes," depending on the interpretation of the Board of
Commissioners. I believe a reasonable person can determine that "college purposes"
includes residential, retail, commercial and academic development that generates income
to support the education mission of the college as well as amenities for students and
faculty. COCC, as you are probably aware, has received zoning approval from the City
of Bend to proceed with a mixed-use development on the property and has entered into a
development agreement with William Smith Properties, Inc., under which the college will
retain ownership of the land.
Attached is a letter and background material that I received from Matt McCoy, vice
president of administration at COCC. Staff concurs with Mr. McCoy's request and
recommends that we remove the use restriction from the deed.
CENTRAL OREGON
community college
VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADMINISTRATION
Telephone 541.383.7210
Fox 541.317.3065
May 21, 2010
Dave Kanner
Deschutes County Administrator
1300 NW Wall St., Ste 200
Bend, OR 97701
Re: Release of County Use Restriction on College Land
Dear Dave:
I am writing on behalf of the Central Oregon Community College ("COCC") as a
follow up to our recent conversations related to a use restriction that impacts certain land owned
by COCC. This letter is our formal request that Deschutes County release a use restriction that it
created in the conveyance of a ten acre parcel to COCC as part of the original Awbrey Butte
Campus site in 1962. The release of this restriction is needed to facilitate the development of
College owned land as a part of COCC's mixed use "Campus Village" area. The City of Bend
recently created a "Special Planned District/Overlay Zone" with a wide range of land uses that
are authorized on lands owned by the College. Our request would allow the land donated by
Deschutes County in 1962 to be utilized consistent with the terms of this special zoning district.
1. Background
This request concerns an approximately ten acre parcel that lies immediately
adjacent to Shevlin Park Road. The specific location of the parcel is shown in the attached
Exhibit A. Deschutes County conveyed the land to the Central Oregon Area Education District
(the predecessor in interest to COCC) in 1962. A recorded deed conveyed the land to the Central
Oregon Area Education District for "college purposes". A copy of the deed issued by the
County is attached as Exhibit 13. The County land donation was linked to the original land
donations that established COCC's Awbrey Butte Campus in Bend. The campus began with the
donation of a 140-acre tract of land in the spring of 1962. The construction of College facilities
began shortly thereafter in 1963, with the first three campus buildings (Ochoco, Modoc and
Deschutes) completed by the spring of 1964. Additional buildings were constructed on the
campus in 1965. The College experienced rapid growth in subsequent years with the
construction of various educational buildings, residence halls, libraries, supporting facilities and
infrastructure. The Awbrey Butte campus is now approximately 200 acres in size with 21
educational structures and over 400,000 square feet of interior space devoted to college related
uses.
In recent years, the College has faced an unprecedented demand for educational
services and corresponding increases in student enrollment. The College has considerably
expanded its curriculum, staff, enrollment and facilities in an effort to meet this growing
demand. Enrollment has grown 85 percent in the past three years, with the total number of
Central Oregon Community College 2600 NW College Way Bend, Oregon 97701-5998 www.cocc.edu 541 383 7700
Dave Kanner
Page Two
May 21, 2010
students exceeding 18,000 in the 2009-10 academic year. Despite the growing need for
educational services, the state support for COCC has declined significantly in recent years, with
the College receiving a diminishing share of available state revenues. As a result of these
factors, COCC is exploring alternative sources of funding and indentifying revenue models that
will serve the long term growth and viability of the institution. Through this process, the College
has developed a long term plan that will utilize its significant land resources to support College
programs and the continuing educational needs of our community.
2. COCC's Special Planned District
In 2009, COCC completed a zone change for its Awbrey Butte Campus. The
zone change was initiated, in part, because the entire campus was zoned for residential uses- a
zoning designation that is inconsistent with the both existing and planned development on the
campus site. In close coordination with the City of Bend, the College created what is now
codified as the "Central Oregon Community College- Special Planned District/Overlay Zone"
(Bend Development Code Section 2.7.1000). The Special Planned District established two
primary zoning designations for the campus. A map depicting the boundaries and zoning within
the special planned district is attached as Exhibit C. The primary zone in the district is the
approximately 170-acre "Core Campus Area". The Core Campus Area includes the educational
buildings and supporting facilities that serve the College's primary education programs. This
includes classroom space, administrative buildings, residence halls, the bookstore, libraries,
Cascades Hall (which houses the Oregon State University- Cascades Campus) and our recently
constructed Campus Center. The remaining land within the Special Planned District is zoned as
the "Campus Village Area". The boundaries of this zone are also depicted in Exhibit C. The
Special Planned District will be developed as a mixed use area that will serve the educational,
vocational and service sector needs of the College, its students, faculty, staff and the community.
The Campus Village Area allows a broad range of permissible land uses that range from
traditional classroom space to the service sector and commercial uses that are needed to support
the College and its various programs. A copy of the zoning text for the Special Planned District
(listing permitted and conditional uses in the various zones) is attached as Exhibit D. The
Special Planned District is intended to foster an innovative mixed-use area of academic, social,
residential, retail and commercial uses/activities that are accessible to students, faculty, and staff
located on lands owned by the College. The broad range of uses now permitted on College
owned lands will facilitate the long term development of the educational and vocational
programs that are needed to serve our community.
COCC's first building within the Campus Village Area will be the "Cascade
Culinary Institute". This flagship program is designed as a regional culinary arts program that
will attract students, faculty, staff and visitors from throughout the nation. Development of this
project is well underway with construction scheduled to begin Summer 2010. The parcel that
COCC obtained from Deschutes County in 1962 has been zoned primarily as part of the
Dave Kanner
Page Three
May 21, 2010
"Campus Village Area". While COCC has no immediate plans for the development of this
parcel, the County use restriction is inconsistent with its current zoning designation.
3. Impact of the Use Restriction
COCC's Special Planned District has been designed to further the educational and
vocational needs of the College and the Central Oregon community. While all campus land will
remain under College ownership, the district zoning rules allow the development of certain
commercial and service sector uses within the Campus Village area. This will foster the growth
of'businesses and commercial enterprises as part of a fully integrated campus environment where
the needs of students, faculty and staff can be met on site. COCC anticipates entering leases
with compatible business interests that will provide Cor the construction of buildings for service
and commercial uses in the Campus Village. At the conclusion of an applicable use term, the
district zoning rules allow the conversion of facilities to classroom space, vocational programs
and other more traditional educational programs. This program provides the College with a
mechanism to construct additional buildings and public infrastructure without any initial capital
outlay or expense.
The County deed restricts use of the donated parcel for "college purposes". This
term is undefined and its precise scope is difficult to interpret under the law. COCC strongly
believes that all of the activities and development planned for the Campus Village Area will be
directly or indirectly tied to the public educational mission of the College. However, in
individual cases, a specific lease or development proposal could arguably run counter to this
restriction. For example, the development of a credit union, medical office or other facility
intended to serve students, faculty and staff would have only an indirect connection to College
purposes. The recorded use restriction could make it impossible for the College to attract much
needed service providers or to obtain the financing that is needed to build supporting facilities
and infrastructure. The governing use restriction would preclude the College from implementing
many of the mixed use zoning designations that are now authorized in the Special Planned
District and that are critical to developing a fully integrated campus environment.
4. Request
As noted above, we respectfully request that the County remove the "college
purposes" use restriction that it placed on the donated parcel in 1962. Oregon law (ORS
271.335) provides the County with a legal mechanism to relinquish a use restriction that was
created by deed over 20-years ago. At the time of the original land donation, this restriction was
intended to facilitate the development of higher educational programs in the area that is now
COCC's Awbrey Butte Campus. We believe the County's objectives have been well served in
this instance. The campus has grown and developed with our community and currently serves
the educational needs of our entire region. The release of this restriction will facilitate the long
term growth and development of the campus consistent with the Special Planned District that has
been developed for the College.
Dave Kanner
Page Pour
May 21, 2010
A draft document that releases the existing use restriction is attached as Exhibit E. Please review
this document with your legal counsel and provide us with any comments or concerns.
Representatives of the College are always available to answer any questions you may have
regarding this request or the Special Planned District generally. We sincerely appreciate your
consideration of our request. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Matthew Y. Mc(;6
Vice President or Administration
V ijgngx2[ All
AFROW By, an Ar CENTRAL OREGON COMIWUfirff COLLEGE (COCC)
O ~wsr mr. s~o nor o,.m mrmnc EXHIBIT MAP aao men ara ona
w.+. o..so. sns►aai
~ arraawo oaAAMPUMILAMsXMIMM:curea
SCAlL` i1M.GG' .YO. ORAMr = M.6MG' . a~rr . a.Nr . rrrr. ra~wr
I X200' 3:794 79aurv-COCC-bcx