Loading...
2011-2971-Minutes for Meeting April 04,2011 Recorded 8/5/2011L~/ ocG ~ iy ~ MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2011 Allen Room, County Administration Building, 1300 NW Wall, Bend, OR MINUTES OF MEETING Present were Judge Michael Sullivan; Commissioner Alan Unger; Sheriff Larry Blanton; Patrick Flaherty and J. Pat Horton, District Attorney's Office; Jack Blum, citizen member; Shelly Smith, KIDS Center; Jacques DeKalb, defense attorney; Interim Chief Dave Tarbet and Al LaChance, Redmond Police Department; Ken Hales, Community Justice; Scott Johnson, Health Services; Rob Poirier, 9-1-1; Cap t. Tim Edwards, Sheriff s Offi ce; Chief Sandi Baxter and Cory Darling, Bend Police Department; Donna McClung, Oregon Youth Authority; and Charity Hobold, Parole & Probation. Also in attendance were Trish Meyer, Saving Grace; Shelly Smith, KIDS Center; Scott Ramsay, Bend City Council, Eileen Stein, City of Sisters; Sarah Johnson, Children & Families' Commission; Deevy Holcomb, Juvenile Community Justice; Chief Denney Kelley, Black Butte Ranch Police Department; and media representatives Dave Adams of KBND Radio and Hillary Borrud, The Bulletin. No other citizens were present. 1. Call to Order & Introductions Judge Sullivan called the meeting to order, at which time the attendees introduced themselves. 2. March Minutes HALES: Move approval of the March minutes as written. BLANTON: Second. Approval was unanimous. 3. Public Comment None was offered. DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 1111111 X111111111111111 2012-20 1 RECORDS CJ +~o~~~~~~1 CLERK 1n1 ` + 081051201108:27:58 AM Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 1 of 8 Pages 4. Gang Assessment Follow-Up Deevy Holcomb referred to the assessment document. She said they received a grant two years ago to enable them to conduct an assessment of youth gangs (with the criteria being up to age 24, with the focus on age 18 and younger). They talked with law enforcement, students, teachers, school administrators and others. The report is now available. Reassessment was to take place in one to two years. In December and January they did an abbreviated reassessment, but did not include students or citizens at large. Gang activity was identified at level 1, emerging and intermittent. For the most part, it has been broken up early by low tolerance and police action. Individuals from two years ago are mostly no longer around. Some gang-type graffiti has been noted, but not much criminal behavior on behalf of gangs. They found that there has been some improvement. The `catch 22' is that few resources are available unless there is an existing problem. But everyone needs to know what to watch for. Schools have had improvement in that regard, by noting whether bullying or assaults are gang-related. This would now show up on a police report as well. She noted that the school resource officers are valuable in keeping this activity down. Lt. LaChance added that it is an important part of their work. These officers know more than the average street officer does about kids in the community. Chief Sandi Baxter agreed that the relationship of these officers with students and school personnel is critical. There would be a lack of consistency without them. Sheriff Blanton said that his philosophy is that this type of thing is not free. It costs money to keep officers in the schools although the schools pay for part of it. Commissioner Unger observed that his brother was a resource officer for a year. Building relationships with youth is a valuable thing, and can send them in the right direction. Judge Sullivan added that his wife works at Summit High School, and has mentioned what good work this is. Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 2 of 8 Pages 5. OYA Update Donna McClung provided an update on Oregon Youth Authority changes. In the Governor's original budget, closed-custody capacity in the regional models (11 facilities) would have been reduced by 47% to 475 beds. They are closing 425 secure beds, which are for the highest risk of criminal behavior; youth sentenced as adults. The Governor has since added 200 back in, with 225 beds being eliminated. Currently 370 are Measure 11, youth sentenced as adults. There are 79 in the region, with 24 for Deschutes County. They will have to determine which youth to release. They have increased community residential placements to about 100. However, there will still be more individuals in the community that are higher risk. The OYA will work closely with law enforcement once hard numbers are known. They are currently doing RFP's for new residential beds, based on a mapping standard. There is pass-through funding for diversion purposes to cover basic services. The OYA research department is working on a recidivism risk assessment, and they hope to eventfully be able to determine the risk level of those who are released. Once the numbers are known, by October they may have to start laying off staff. If they lose a lot of beds, there is a question as to whether a regional model will still work. This will result in more work for Parole & Probation Officers in the communities. Jack Blum asked if going back three years is the right amount of time for a risk analysis. Because of the age of the individuals, there could be differences based on age. Ms. McClung replied they are doing a pilot study to test the accuracy. They started with 100 variables and then narrowed those down. They test against a score. It is hard to go back too far, since services and the community change over time. They already do a risk assessment at first contact, but this does not predict future behavior. They cannot change the given process. Sheriff Blanton asked at what age they stop tracking these youth. Ms. McClung said they track youth in custody up to age 25. She added that the definition of recidivism can be different depending on the agency, grants, and so on. Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 3 of 8 Pages Ken Hales asked if this puts public safety reserve beds against discretionary beds. Ms. McClung replied that this is forecast each year, as they have to predict the number needed for Measure 11 since those beds are protected. The OYA has to request additional beds. Discretionary beds are very limited. You have to use local community resources first. The national trend is to decrease the use of closed, lockup facilities. Mr. Hales observed that there are kids who commit violent crimes, and the counties try to handle commitments accordingly. If they go over the limit, some have to be rotated out. Traditionally Deschutes County is good at coming in under the cap. This is harder for more rural areas. Judge Sullivan said that it is important to keep enough good programs to deal with kids in other ways. Mr. Hales stated that functional family therapy, treatment foster care and other intervention programs help a lot. 6. Lethality Assessment Project At this time, an update was given on the implementation of the project. The report is the result of work done by the Domestic Violence Council, and many agencies collaborated. They received a grant for two years, for $300,000 in October 2010. It involved Saving Grace, Parole & Probation, hot line advocates, and others. Trish Meyer of Saving Grace said that the intent was to put more effort into high risk domestic violence cases, where there is the highest probability of severe injury or death. This was based on twenty-five years of domestic violence research. A lethality assessment is done at the scene by the officer. If it screens in high, the officer encourages the victim to talk with the Saving Grace hotline. They have already gotten a lot of calls that way. Deschutes County predicted 142 calls a year, but so far they have averaged two calls a day, so it is likely to be more like 500-600 calls per year. It is bad to know this goes on out there, but it is good that more help can be given. Advocates are trying to do referrals as well. Re-assaults are reduced by 60% or more if the victims get into an appropriate shelter. Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 4 of 8 Pages The other consideration is the perpetrators. The focus is on probation level, strangulation and other offenders. Ms. Hobold stated that there were 238 domestic violence offenders on supervision at the time the grant was written. They narrowed it down to the highest risk, which has been very effective. For the last six months, they averaged a caseload of fifty to fifty-five. The average is higher now because positions were lost. There have been 2,800 contacts with offenders. There needs to be more contact with the victims. Officer LaChance said that it was an honor to work with this steering committee. Some programs work well because all of the agencies work together. This makes a big difference. Law enforcement, defenders, the District Attorney, and others benefit. This was based on a model from Maryland and all agencies are using the same form. Officer Darling noted that they are on the right track. There were 31 assessments during March 14 through 31, and 19 of the victims talked with Saving Grace. They need to get into programs and learn about the resources available to them. Officer Edwards stated that there have been several domestic violence related homicides the last few years. This type of training should help. Mr. Hales asked if there is a follow-up call to the victims who do not call Saving Grace. Officer LaChance replied that they put together a packet with information on Saving Grace. The sheer volume of calls would not allow for follow-up calls. Saving Grace also has good brochures available that can be placed for people to pick up. Judge Sullivan observed that this is a serious problem, and a unified approach should help. However, it does not mean they can rest. 7. Proposed LPSCC Bylaws Mr. Hales discussed the aspects of the bylaws as presented. In response to some comments received, a few changes were made and the outcome is reflected in the current document. Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 5 of 8 Pages The term of those who are not members by statute has been limited to two years. Individuals can be reappointed and there is no limit on how many times someone can serve. The Board has to ratify the bylaws and appoint the citizen members. Jacques DeKalb asked how the citizen members are nominated or chosen. Mr. Hales said it is at the pleasure of the Board of Commissioners; however, they may ask LPSCC for recommendations. Jack Blum objected to the bylaws for the reasons he stated at the last meeting. He asked if the committee is trying to change State law regarding the group. Judge Sullivan stated that LPSCC has no authority to adopt, but can recommend. State law trumps all. However, they can add members. Mr. Hales said that this was reviewed by Counsel. Certain parameters were specified, and they can work within those. Discretionary powers are identified. Mr. Blum stated that nothing has been added to what 1145 has done in the past; it is just flowered up. 1145 has been good for many years. The only change seems to be restricting language on citizen members and adding the Court Administrator and 911. He does not see a need to change or restrict the way things have been done. The group approved the bylaws, with Mr. Blum dissenting. 8. Other Business Judge Sullivan noted that Chief Sandi Baxter is retiring at the end of June, and they are searching for a replacement. They would like LPSCC members to participate on the oral boards when those come up. Chief Baxter said that she would like to have someone selected before she leaves office. Chief Baxter was asked if staffing levels are acceptable. She replied that they are down three from last year. The population is somewhat less but calls for service have gone up. The types of cases are the main problem. These are often domestics, homicides, and serious accidents that are very time- consuming. The Detective Division has been hit the hardest. Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 6 of 8 Pages Interim Police Chief of Redmond, Dave Tarbet, said that the application process for filling the Redmond Police Chief position has ended. They hope to narrow the pool by mid-April and do interviews in May. Staffing is down by three. Officer Lachance is also retiring, so this will help move people up. Calls for services have increased, with more citizen assists and domestic calls. Sheriff Blanton stated that his department has had a hard year with budget cuts. They are short by four, in corrections and patrol. Their funding depends on the assessed value of property, which is down. They have to look closely at every position that becomes vacant. Sheriff Blanton asked about the status of the Mental Health Court. Scott Johnson replied that the proposed budget has not yet been reviewed. They may have to consolidate staffing to keep the Court. Sheriff Blanton noted that this is an important program. Judge Sullivan said that funding is down by 7.5%, and the Governor proposed a 20% cut. He is trying to keep important functions that improve the quality of life. Family Court reunites families at a great level. The same is true with Drug Court, which helps to cut back on police work. This makes a big difference. Eileen Stein asked if they have a police officer and a mental health worker in the same vehicle. Mr. Johnson replied that this has been tried in larger communities. It is an expensive investment and controversial. Shelley Smith reminded everyone that April is Child Abuse Prevention Month. The KIDS Center kicked off technology training to help kids navigate the internet safely. CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) is hosting a run on April 17th and a half-marathon in May. Rob Poirier said that 911 is hosting an open house on April 12th from 3:30 to 6 p.m., in conjunction with National Telecommunicators Week. minuies or LFNUU Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 7 of 8 Pages Being no further discussion or items presented, the meeting adjourned at 4: SS p. m. Respectfully submitted, 6nW.A-L Bonnie Baker Recording Secretary Attachments Exhibit A: Agenda Exhibit B: Sign-in Sheets Exhibit C: Youth Gang Assessment Findings Exhibit D: Oregon Youth Authority Brief Exhibit E: Domestic Violence Lethality Assessment Documents Exhibit F: LPSCC Bylaws Minutes of LPSCC Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 Page 8 of 8 Pages DESCHUTES COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL @r Monday, April 4, 2011 - 3:30 pm Allen Room, County Administration Building, 1300 NW Wall, Bend, OR Agenda I Call to Order & Introductions Judge Sullivan II March Minutes Attachment 1 Judge Sullivan Action: Approve March minutes III Public Comment Judge Sullivan IV Gang Assessment Follow Up Attachment 2 Deevy Holcomb Brief Council on updated data VII OYA Update Attachment 3 Donna McClung Update Council on agency changes VIII Lethality Assessment Project Attachment 4 Hillary Saraceno Update Council on project implementation IX Proposed LPSCC Bylaws Ken Hales Attachment 5 Action: Approve bylaws IX Other Business Judge Sullivan Z Z V LLJ H 4 W ..J a r- O " N a N ~ . en _ 00 ~ C cy _ v 16 L N a N CL z z u H W H 4 W J a i 0 N I C N ^ i vo ~o L of 'c c 0 m v N ~o v a 2011 Youth Gang Assessment Follow-Up Findings January 2011 Local Public Safetv Coordinating Council Fehnjarv 7 gm 1 Question 2008 Finding 2011 Finding Are there youth Emerging Level 1 gang activity in each city with ■ Little to no continued existence of gangs in Redmond very little verified criminal activity. same level 1 gangs / affiliates / and Bend? members as 2008. ■ Low level Redmond middle school "DOC" and "MOB" tagging and representing, but no associated criminal activity. What problem Intimidation, bullying, group based retaliation. ■ Sporadic gang affected graffiti or behaviors are Sporadic gang affected graffiti. Isolated tagging. presented by youth incidents of assault, generally between groups gangs? or members of different groups. What is community Community residents and parents interviewed ■ Police, schools see lower levels in perception? do not feel there is a gang problem. 64% of 2011. Community members not re- public safety system officials believe there is a assessed. an problem. What is school Both teachers and students perceive very little ■ Schools report lower levels in 2011. perception? gang activity. 36% of Redmond high school staff ■ Schools proactively working toward believe there is a gang problem at school; 23% of cultural integration and tolerance. Bend high school staff do so. Are there any General high-crime areas in each city were ■ Police report no further community / identified by residents, students and police. deterioration of any particular demographic risk Limited apparent community risk factors. communities, even with poor factors for gang Citizens report faith in the police. economy. Anecdotal reports that activity? Central Oregon is not an easy place for individuals interested in gang activity to gain traction. What are current 1. Interagency discussion: Safe School Alliance ■ Safe School Alliance - standing prevention / - informal / in progress agenda item intervention 2. Graffiti-removal - Police and JCJ ■ Graffiti removal - Police and JCJ strategies? 3. Gang-risk family treatment: Juvenile ■ Functional Family Therapy - JCJ Community Justice - grant funded ■ Required / improved data entry - 4. Improving information gathering / Bend PD and ESIS (Schools) documentation- Bend PD - in progress ■ No tolerance criminal activity by 5. Coordinating prosecutorial response - in gang-affiliated individuals - PD's progress (Both) ■ Dedicated cultural integration efforts - Schools (Both) 2008 Recommendations 1. Develop and use Definition, Continuum If completed 2. Provide PD, School and Juv Dept training on Definition, Continuum 3. Improve ability to note whether a crime is gang-related If in progress 4. Improve documentation / observations about stated or observed gang-affiliated behavior # If not started through RICO / DOJ standards / practices. 96 Oregon Youth Authority Issue Brief February 2011 Governor's Balanced Budget for 2011-2013 11 Overview Number of OYA close The Governor's Balanced Budget (GBB) reduces the Oregon Youth Authority's close- custody facilities custody capacity by 47 percent, from 887 to 475. 887 A The GBB adds 103 community placements for youth offenders. Number of youth A The GBB eliminates $9.1 million in Juvenile Crime Prevention (JCP) Basic funds for offenders in close counties, and increases diversion funding for counties from $7.7 million to $11.1 million. custody for which OYA is budgeted in the Start date 2009-2011 Legislatively Under the GBB, staffing reductions take effect Oct. 1, 2011. This requires OYA to begin issuing Approved Budget layoff notices July 1, 2011, and to phase-in layoffs over the next 90 days. During the next few months OYA will be working closely with the Governor and Legislature to determine which fa- 475 cilities and programs would need to be closed to achieve this level of reduction. However, the Governor has noted that 425 may be too severe, and that addbacks to the budget may occur. Number of youth offenders in close Impact on juvenile courts custody for which OYA is budgeted in the Approximately 370 close-custody placements during 2011-2013 are anticipated to be needed 2011-2013 Governor's for youth offenders sentenced as adults and/or under Measure 11. These offenders have de- Balanced Budget terminant sentences and cannot be released early. The GBB leaves just 105 placements avail- able for youth offenders committed by juvenile courts. 353 This lowered capacity will significantly reduce the number of placements available for juvenile Total funds, in millions court commitments to state close-custody facilities, and will impact the amount of treatment of dollars, of the cost provided for various classifications of youth offenders. Courts, counties and OYA will need to of continuing current determine how youth offenders will receive priority for placement in close-custody versus legislatively approved community settings. programs into the 2011-2013 biennium Impact on counties 279 The GBB eliminates the $9.1 million in Juvenile Crime Prevention (JCP) Basic funds distrib- uted to counties. These funds are used by county juvenile departments to provide basic Total funds, in services aimed at reducing juvenile crime. The GBB invests an additional $3.4 million in fund- millions of dollars, in ing to counties to help divert youth from further penetration into the juvenile justice system, OYA's 2011-2013 strengthening the resources for diverting youth and easing the impact of the reduction in Governor's Balanced close-custody capacity. Diversion funding increases from the $7.7 million provided during Budget 2009-2011 to approximately $11.1 million in 2011-2013. However, the overall funding to coun- ties is reduced. Funding for Multnomah County gang programs and individualized services continues at the 2009-2011 levels. Oregon Youth Authority 530 Center Street NE Salem, OR 97301-3765 Reception: 503-373-7205 En Espanol: 503-373-7434 Web: www.oregon.gov/OYA A Mission The Oregon Youth Authority protects the public and reduces crime by holding youth offenders accountable and providing opportunities for reformation in safe environments. A Vision Youth who leave OYA lead crime-free lives. A Core Values Integrity Professionalism Accountability Respect A Director Colette S. Peters A Deputy Director Fariborz Pakseresht A Assistant Director for Business Services Jean Straight A Assistant Director for Community Services Philip Cox A Assistant Director for Facility Services Karen Daniels Assistant Director for Health Services Marcia Adams, M.D. Impact on communities The GBB allows for an increase of 103 community placements for youth offenders, based on projected growth forecast by the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis. This increases the number of community placements from 555 in 2009-2011 to 658 in 2011-2013. It is important to note that youth offenders in community placements receive federal match moneys. Approximately 45 percent of the funding for all community placements is fed- eral match through Behavioral Rehabilitation Services programs. The projected number of youth offenders in OYA's custody in 2011-2013 will remain the same (approximately 2,000) regardless of the number of funded close-custody beds. OYA still will need to serve all the youth who are adjudicated to the agency's custody. Ad- ditional beds in the community and additional funding for diversion programs will help minimize the public safety risk to some degree. Impact on OYA In preparation for a significant lower close-custody capacity, OYA has been develop- ing ways to streamline agency processes to save time and money while continuing to protect public safety and deliver quality services. The agency has been conducting a "mapping" analysis that will enable OYA to more quickly and cost-effectively place youth offenders in appropriate treatment programs, a staffing analysis to more efficiently match staffing resources to youth management requirements, and a treatment review to shift resources to better meet identified treatment needs and optimize length of stay for youth offenders based on assessments of risk and need. OYA will continue to develop these and other methods for improving cost-effectiveness and efficiency, working with counties and community providers to ensure Oregon is able to maintain a strong, sustainable juvenile justice system. OYA also will continue to advocate on behalf of OYA to ensure partners and the public understand the importance of the services the agency provides and OYA's role in the larger statewide juvenile justice and public safety systems. Youth offender release process In anticipation of reduced funding for the 2011-2013 biennium, OYA has created an as- sessment tool called the OYA Recidivism Risk Assessment (ORRA). This tool will be used to help OYA and county juvenile departments determine which youth offenders may be released to the community. Release decisions will be made jointly by OYA and county juvenile departments. ORRA will be used to help inform the decision-making process, but will not be the sole deter- minant. Each youth offender will receive an individual review by a team consisting of OYA and county partners. Youth released from close-custody facilities will be placed in transition or residential treatment programs, or paroled to communities, based on such factors as risk to reof- fend as indicated by ORRA, familial resources, need for continued correctional interven- tion (treatment), and county and local sensitivity and willingness to accept that youth back into the community. A balance will be sought with counties to release youth some- what proportionally to each county's allocation of close-custody discretionary beds. As youth who are released and placed in residential programs displace the youth already in those programs, similar risk-based considerations will be used to determine which youth should be transitioned to communities. Factors going into these decisions will include treatment needs, community and family resources, and similar issues. Youth released into the community will remain on parole until their commitment to OYA termi- nates, and will continue to be supervised by juvenile parole and probation officers. Date: April 8, 2011 Time: 9:00 am--4:00 pm With Lunch Break Cost: Free Location: Bend Police Dept. 555 NE ISth St., Bend ACCREDITATION REGISTERED NURSES AND NURSE PRACTITIONERS: Application for CEU credit has been filed with the California Board of Registered Nursing. Determination of credit is pending. SOCIAL WORKERS. Application for CEU credit has been filed with the Oregon Chapter, NASW. Determination of credit is pending. COUNSELORS: Application for CEU credit has been filed with the National Board for Certified Counselors. Determination of credit is pending. Register online by: April 1, 2011 http://www.deschutes.orZLdange rassess Registration confirmation will be sent via email For More Info: Trish Meyer, Saving Grace S41.015.9821 trish _ saving_grace.org DANGER ASSESSMENT A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT TRAINING The challenge for those who encounter abused women is to identify those with the highest level of danger. For 25 years, the Danger Assessment, developed by Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD, RN, has been utilized in a variety of settings including criminal justice, health care, and domestic violence program settings. This multi-disciplinary training will help participants understand: • Homicide in battering relationships and the need for lethality assessment • Currently used domestic violence risk and lethality assessment instruments • The difference between risk assessment and lethality assessment • Overlap of child abuse and domestic violence, and their implications for risk assessment • The process of lethality assessment using the Danger Assessment tool • Safety planning based on use of the Danger Assessment • How to develop protocols for use of Danger Assessment at your workplace PRESENTER Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD, RN, IRAAN (see CV below) WHO SHOULD ATTEND Medical & Mental Health Professionals, Social Services Professionals, Criminal justice Professionals, Criminal & Civil Law Attorneys, Batterer Intervention Providers, Advocates, and Court Staff i~ Sponsored py q OF Bt, DESCHUTES COUNTY r (NILDREN & FAMILIES ~oN 14 1 S S 1 0N Ste Charles TOGETHER WE RNO SOLUTIONS } -11EIXLT1f -SYSTEM SAVI NGGRACE Imagine Life without Violence DANGER ASSESSMENT PRESENTER www.dangerassessment.ore Jacquelyn C. Campbell, PhD, RN, FAAN Anna D. Wolf Chair & Professor National Director, Robert Wood Johnson Nurse Faculty Scholars Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing Education • PhD, University of Rochester • MSN, Wright State University • BSN, Duke University Areas of Scholarly Expertise and Interest Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD, RN Is the Anna D. Wolf Chair and a Professor in the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing with a joint appointment in the Bloomberg School of Public Health as well as being the National Program Director of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program. Since 1980, Dr. Camp- bell has been conducting advocacy policy work and research in the area of violence against women and women's health, publishing more than 220 articles and seven books. She has been Principal Investigator on 10 major NIH, NIJ or CDC research grants and Co-Chaired the Steering Committee for the WHO Multi-country Study on Violence Against Women and Women's Health. Her honors include election as a member of the Institute of Medicine and membership on its Board of Global Health, three honorary doctorates, election to the American Academy of Nursing, chairing the Board of Directors of the Family Violence Prevention Fund, and receiving the Friends of the National Institute of Nursing Research Pathfinder and the American Society of Criminology Vollmer Awards. Dr. Campbell also was a member of the con- gressionally appointed US Department of Defense Task Force on Domestic Violence and served on the Hoard of Directors of the House of Ruth Battered Women's Shelter and three other shelters. - - -111 is X L.X_lF -2 111 a IF Al- a -111 iff It This project was supported by Grant No. 2010-WF,AX-0038 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommenda• tions expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are those of the author(s) and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the Department of justice, Office on Violence Against Women. REPORT TYPE: REDMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE # OFFENSE _ FELONY 777 SW Deschutes Avenue CONNECTING # - - MISDEMEANOR INCIDENT _ INFRACTION Redmond OR 97756 (541) 504-3400 PAGE OF W C0 OFFENSE/INCIDENT I CLASSIFICATION I TYPE ot V LOCATION OF OCCURENCE: RPT OFCR. WEAM/DIST. DATE/TIME OCCURED DATE: RANGE: TIME: RANGE: DAY OF WEEK OFFICER DATE/TIME REPORTED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LETHALITY SCREEN Victim: Address: D.O.B. Phone: Offender: Address: D.O.B. Phone: aClieck fiere i :vlcfirtr d d: airsair ` a ihe' uestivns: . ► A'Yes" res onse [Q>arr : o uestions #I-3 watorirutrcall ,tri ers._the rotocale errk' 1. Has he/she ever used a weapon against you or threatened you with a weapon? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 2. Has he/she threatened to kill you or your children? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 3. Do you think he/she might try to kill you? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. Negatr►~e responses to Qreslroris #I 3, Lut positive responses fo at ledsl four ofQues"tioris.#4-ll; y - tri er the: rot9c41 re Qrral = ` - , " r - ~ - 4. Does he/she have a gun or can he/she get one easily? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 5.. Has he/she ever tried to choke you? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 6. Is he/she violently or constantly jealous or does he/she control most of our daily activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 7. Have you left him/her or separated after living together or being married? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 8. Is he/she unemployed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 9. Has he/she ever tried to kill himself/herself? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 10. Do you have a child that he/she knows is not his/hers? ❑ Yes. ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. 11. Does he/she follow or spy on you or leave threatening messages? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Ans. ► A~±:ocer-Wray trigger the prntocvl refer.ral, rf not alreddy triggered aT;ove, as a_`result offhe victrnr's , ~ res .pn W4 4-6 Below uestron,' or wjigneyer the:o rcerhelreves.tite_1~rctirr: rs rn a ntentiall lelhaLsicrra#pn : ° : . Is there anything else that worries you about your safety? (If 'des') What worries you? Che-kolne Vtet m sereenedfin'actor"~i eRto-theprotocol _ , s❑ Victim screened in;based on the beLef of officer Victim slid :not screen in = If victim screened rn After advising lrer/him of a_high danger assessmen_ Yes ❑ •No ❑ ' drd.the victim s eak nth :the hotline counselors = SUMMARY OR SHORT NARRATIVE: e OFFENSE STATUS: OPEN/PENDING UNFOUNDED SUSPENDED CLEARED/ARREST CLEARED EXCEPTIONALLY ROUTING: DA MUNI JUV YES P&P CSD OTHER REPORTING OFFICER / DATE REVIEWING OFFICER / DATE Do~rresfic YiolenceTnformtion Sheet '.REDMOND:POLICE DEPARTMENT Case Victim Name/DOB: Suspect Name/DOB: Was Domestic Violence Info Sheet Given to Victim? Yes No Did Child Witness Assault? Yes No Who/Where? Were Witnesses Present? Yes No Who Called 911? Re7ahonshi Between sVicim ahd;Arrestee. , ; Spouse Former Spouse Cohabitant Former Cohabitant Dating/Engaged Formerly Dating Family Member Emancipated Minor Parent of Joint Child Length of Relationshi : Date Relationship Ended if a licable Restrain Order.Info / Hisfor of Domestic Abuse Restraining Order: Yes No Current Expired Dismissed Unknown History of Domestic Violence: Yes No Unk Documented: Yes No Unk Convictions: Yes No Unk. Number of Prior Incidents: Reported Not Reported Investigating Agencies: Arrestee/:V~efifn Disa.:ed the Followin Arrestee Victim Arrestee Victim Angry Complained of Pain Apologetic Bruise(s) Crying Abrasion s Fearful Minor. Cut(s) Hysterical Laceration (s Calm- ` Fractures Afraid Concussion Irrational Pre ant # Months Nervous Intoxicated Alcohol Th eatemn Intoxicated Drugs Victim Arrestee Victim Arrestee Victim Arrestee G Victim Arressttele G Describe Injuries: -777 1VIeca7 Treatment, Medical Treatment: None. Will Seek Own Doctor First Aid Given Paramedics Hospital Refused Medical Aid Paramedics On Scene: Yes No Unit/Names: Taken to Hospital: Yes. No Physician(s): Evidence Collected.. , _ Photos Include: Victim Injuries Suspect Injuries Weapon Used Crime Scene Other: Evidence Collected From: Crime Scene Hospital Other: Recorded Statement From Victim Suspect Witness 911 Officer: BYLAWS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COODINATING COUNCIL Article I. NAME and PRINCIPAL OFFICE The name of this group shall be the Deschutes County Public Safety Coordinating Council ("Council") and its principal office shall be Suite 200, Deschutes County Services Building, 1300 Wall Street, Bend, Oregon 97701. Article II. PURPOSE Section 2.01 The Council shall perform the duties prescribed in ORS 423.560 and ORS 426.565. Section 2.02 The Council shall develop and recommend to the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners a plan for use of state resources to service the local offender population and the use of state and local resources to serve the needs of that part of the local offender population who are at least 15 years of age and less than 18 years of age. Section 2.03 The Council shall develop and recommend to the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners a plan for use of state resources to serve the local youth offender population. Section 2.04 The Council shall coordinate local juvenile justice policy among affected juvenile justice entities. Section 2.05 The Council shall develop and recommend to the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners, a plan to prevent criminal involvement by youth, said plan to be developed and recommended to the Commissioners after consultation with the local Commission on Children and Families. Section 2.06 The Council shall coordinate a local criminal justice policy among affected criminal justice entities. Section 2.07 The Council may make other recommendations to the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners for the betterment of the Deschutes County criminal and juvenile justice systems. Article III. MEMBERS and TERMS of MEMBERSHIP Section 3.01 Council member ship will comply with ORS 423.560. Section 3.02 The members shall include: 1) The City of Bend Chief of Police; 2) The City of Redmond Chief of Police; 3) The Deschutes County Sheriff, 4) The Deschutes County District Attorney; 5) The presiding judge of the 11th Judicial District or a state court judge selected by the presiding judge; 6) A public defender or defense attorney appointed by the presiding judge of the 11th Judicial District; 7) The Court Administrator of the 11th Judicial District ; 8) The Deschutes County Community Corrections Director; 9) The Deschutes County Juvenile Department Director; 10) The Deschutes County Health Services Department Director, 11) A Deschutes County Commissioner selected by the Commissioners; 12) The Deschutes County Administrator or the Deschutes County Administrator's designee; 13) The Director of Deschutes County 911; 14) The Director of Deschutes County Children & Families Commission; 15) A City Councilor or Mayor selected by the cities in Deschutes County; 16) A City Manager or other city representative selected by the cities in Deschutes County; 17) A nonvoting Oregon Youth Authority representative selected by the Oregon Youth Authority Director; 18) A nonvoting Oregon State Police representative, selected by the Superintendent of the State Police; and 19) Three citizen members appointed by the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners one of which shall be a person involved in child abuse detection and intervention. Section 3.03 At the discretion of the Deschutes County Community Justice Department Director the Community Justice Department Director may serve in lieu of the Deschutes County Community Corrections and or the Juvenile Department Director. Section 3.04 Members shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority or until the member no longer holds the public office described. Citizen members shall serve terms of two years. Citizen members may serve more than one term. Section 3.05 The Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners may appoint additional citizen members for terms of "up to" two years. Article IV. OFFICERS and DUTIES Section 4.01 The officers shall be a Chair and a Vice-Chair. Officers shall be elected by a majority of members of the Council and shall hold office for terms of three years. Section 4.02 The Chair shall preside at meetings, form subcommittees, including the subcommittee required by ORS 423.565(4), and form task forces. The Chair shall, appoint subcommittee and task force members. The Chair shall perform all other duties necessary or incidental to the office. The Vice-Chair shall carry out the responsibilities of the Chair in the absence of the Chair. The Vice-Chair shall fill out the term of the Chair if the office becomes vacant. The Chair shall appoint a Vice-Chair to complete the term of Vice-Chair if the office becomes vacant. 2 Section 4.03 The Chair shall notify the relevant appointing authority in writing if at any time a member appears unable to serve, a position appears vacant, or upon the expiration of the term of any citizen member if the Chair has not received notice of reappointment. Article V. MEETINGS, VOITING and RECORDING Section 5.01 The Council shall meet no less than once per quarter. Special meetings may be called by the Chair or by 2/3 of the Council members. All proceedings of the Council shall be open to the public in accordance with and subject to the provisions of ORS 192.610 to 192.690. Section 5.02 All votes of Council members and minutes of the meetings shall be recorded and shall become matters of public record. A quorum for the transaction of official business shall consist of a majority of the current voting members of the Council. A member must be physically present at the meeting to be counted as part of the quorum. Article VI. BYLAWS Section 6.01 Except for section 3.03 and any other provision relating to Council membership, the Council may amend these bylaws. Section 6.02 A copy of all proposed amendments to these bylaws shall be mailed to each member of the Council at least ten days prior to the date at which action is to be taken on the amendment. An affirmative vote by a majority of the Council members shall be necessary to amend these bylaws.