2012-1638-Minutes for Meeting May 07,2012 Recorded 6/18/2012DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL
NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL
1111111111111111111111111111111
RECORDS
CLERK Q 2012'1638
06/1812012 08:26:32 AM
Do not remove this page from original document.
Deschutes County Clerk
Certificate Page
DESCHUTES COUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL
~~J1 ES CO^
r. <
MINUTES OF MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 7, 2012
Barnes Room, County Administration Building, 1300 NW Wall, Bend, OR
Present were Judge Michael Sullivan; Commissioners Anthony DeBone and
Tammy Baney; Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator; Ken Hales,
Community Justice; Scott Johnson, Health Services; Jacques DeKalb,
defense attorney; Patrick Flaherty, District Attorney; Sheriff Larry Blanton;
Dave Tarbet, Redmond Police Chief- Scott Ramsay, City of Bend,- Jeff Sale,
Bend Police Chief- Scott McGuire, citizen member; Eileen Stein, City of
Sisters; and Marc Mills, Sunriver Police Chief/DCSO.
Also present were Denny Kelley, Black Butte Ranch Police Department;
Tanner Wark, Parole & Probation; Donna McClung, Oregon Youth Authority;
Karen Tamminga, Behavioral Health; Debbi Wise and Kendra Aper, Victims'
Assistance; Trish Meyer, Saving Grace; Deanna St. Germain and Shelly Smith,
KIDS Center; Greg Delgado, Causa Oregon; Marilyn Burwell, Immigrant
Family Advocates; and Roger Olson, NAMI of Central Oregon.
1. Call to Order & Introductions
Judge Michael Sullivan opened the meeting at 3:35 p.m., at which time
the attendees introduced themselves.
2. April Minutes
Ken Hales moved approval; Commissioner DeBone seconded. The
minutes were unanimously approved.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 1 of 9
3. Public Comment
Marilyn Burwell of Immigrant Family Advocates asked the Council to
pay attention to the Governor's announcement regarding accepting
Mexican identification cards. She said that the Oregon State Police will
work with local law enforcement to get this process going at the county
and city levels. She asked if anyone had been in contact with the OSP in
this regard; and if not, to please do so. She will request an update at a
future date.
The Police Chiefs indicated there has been no contact yet. Judge
Sullivan added that it takes a while to implement a program. He feels
that law enforcement will want to see what the proposal entails before
developing a local program.
Sheriff Blanton said that he has not been contacted by the OSP regarding
this program. It was the Governor's idea for the OSP to accept matricula
consular cards, which are not much more than a driver's license. Locally
they can accept the matricula cards for identification purposes, but it does
not give them the right to drive a vehicle. Oregon has identification cards
also. They did extensive research on the matricula cards regarding the
photographs. They assess all information uniformly regarding of the
situation.
He added that this would need to be instituted into law before his
department can take action or change how they operate. Only the OSP
takes direction from the Governor. They can review the information,
however.
Chief Kelley stated that he wants to know what is meant by "accepting
the card". Chief Sale replied that it needs to be able to identify someone
if they are stopped for some reason. That is the primary use.
Judge Sullivan added that information should be sent out by the OSP for
review and comment. It is up to the individual agencies to decide how or
if they will implement the Governor's recommendations.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 2 of 9
4. Community Corrections Plan Update
Tanner Wark presented the Community Corrections Plan for Year 2 of
the biennium. He said it is no different than the previous year and the
budget numbers are the same. Previously, those involved in the
legislative session were concerned and had asked for a one-year plan. (A
copy is attached for reference.) He went over the division of the
department.
Under the Measure 57 program, there is some State money targeting high
to medium risk drug addicted offenders, in an effort to identify and treat
them. The target is a caseload of 75, and they have reached 90.
Under the ISP domestic violence program, this involves intensive
supervision of the highest risk offenders. His department works with the
Sheriff's Office, police departments and the State Police on these. They
do curfew checks, and coordinate with Saving Grace and victim
advocates.
The work crew program is successful, involving hard to place offenders
such as sex offenders. They can also intervene with sanctions.
They are working on a domestic violence deferred sentencing program
with the District Attorney, trying to get these individuals into treatment
programs within 30 days.
In regard to the budget, felony supervision is the most costly, followed by
custodial beds. Case banking occurs if a Parole Officer has 500
offenders; this means no home visits and the individuals are not
monitored as well.
Chief Tarbet observed that they now oversee 1,400 felons and 160
misdemeanor offenders.
Sheriff Blanton said his department has a good working relationship with
Parole & Probation. It is difficult business, dealing with supervised
offenders and felons; and they do a good job putting jail beds to the best
use. Essentially they try everything as alternatives but there is an
ongoing 24/7 management issue. They are not perfect but are doing the
best they can with what they have available.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 3 of 9
Jacques DeKalb commended Tanner for an excellent, concise
presentation.
Judge Sullivan said he has had twenty-five years on the bench. This
department does an excellent job managing. He wishes misdemeanor
offenders could be better supervised to help keep them from becoming
felons. The resources are there for some, especially regarding domestic
violence. A lot of people have gone into treatment and are doing better
because of it. He recommended people pay close attention to the Parole
Officers; if they say someone is not meeting standards, they know.
Eileen Stein asked how this report stacks up against others. Mr. Wark
replied that every county has to do one. Deschutes County has support
and is unique in this way. This provides a better umbrella. Most
counties do not supervise domestic violence cases. There are some bad
ones on ISP that are being supervised more heavily.
Chief Tarbet said his department works well with Parole & Probation.
He asked how the caseload impacts their work. Mr. Wark answered that
they have 60 to 80 on street crimes; 45 sex offenders; and about 50
domestic violence offenders. Much depends on the mix in the caseload
as far as how many visits can be conducted, motivating factors and field
work. They learn a lot more when they conduct a home visit.
Donna McClung stated there were changes in OYA procedures last year.
Cases are now being assigned to the OYA Juvenile Office for
monitoring. When the person is released, he or she then goes under local
supervision. She is not involved in this transition. It would be useful if
they could work on this to share knowledge and resources.
Judge Sullivan added that he used to go to statewide meetings as the
Presiding Judge, and heard a lot of good things regarding how domestic
violence is addressed in this area.
BLANTON: Move approval.
FLAHERTY: Second.
VOTE: Unanimously approved.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 4 of 9
5. Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee
Trish Meyer, the Assistant Director of Saving Grace and co-chair of the
Domestic Violence Council subcommittee explained the work the
committee does. They work to improve services to keep them seamless,
and prevent further crime. They developed a lethality assessment
program and arranged for funding for an intensive supervision probation
(ISP) officer.
The violence lethality team is now in ORS; the committee can establish a
fatality review team. Some homicides relate to this issue. Multnomah
has a model program and there are others. The Attorney General is
establishing one statewide. They considered whether to hand cases over
to the statewide team, but decided to handle them locally. They are close
to establishing protocols.
In this process, they can choose to look at which fatalities. Those on the
Domestic Violence Council have spoken to agency heads about this.
Sheriff Blanton said that his department is on board with this, and Eric
Utter will track this as well as possible. They have signed a letter
supporting this process.
Mr. Flaherty indicated the D.A.'s Office is fully supportive. They are
also working on finalizing protocols for elder concerns, which is another
good concept.
Shelly Smith added that through the KIDS Center's work, they know
children witnessing domestic violence in the home are greatly impacted.
It is best to get to those situations sooner.
Karen Tamminga indicated they have the support of Health and Mental
health.
Sheriff Blanton said that the early stages might be a verbal dispute, but an
immediate response might give them the help they need before there is
domestic violence and assault. They offer parenting and relationship
skills, anger management, and how individuals should handle themselves
later. It makes a big difference.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 5 of 9
There are about 40 to 50 deaths annually statewide due to domestic
violence; a few in Deschutes County. They respond to death
investigations and often there is a direct connection to domestic issues.
Sometimes it is the result of ongoing continual effects of bad
relationships. Young people are affected long-term by what they grow
up around.
Judge Sullivan noted that Mary's Place helps avoid domestic violence
situations. The parties can exchange children visits but avoid direct
contact. Mr. Flaherty said that this program is losing funding. The
components of a good program are the review committee, Parole &
Probation, Mary's Place and intervention programs.
Judge Sullivan was asked if there is anything that can be done. He said
that sometimes committees look for fault or on ways to improve. The
emphasis should be on ways to improve. Chief Tarbet added that they
need to implement best practices.
6. Other Business
Scott Johnson said Health is working on certification for mental health
program in Deschutes County. This involves a visit from the State, audit
charts, interviewing, etc. He has part of the schedule available. There
are three sessions around the interface of mental health, law enforcement
and the courts. He wants to invite participation.
On Wednesday, May 23, they will address crisis intervention training;
mental health and the jail, meetings on civil commitments, PSRB or
treatment courts. They will have many meetings over three or four days.
Sheriff Blanton said his department will participate. They are often the
initial responders to mental health issues, domestic or otherwise.
Commissioner Baney said there were some discussions at the last PSCC
meeting regarding budget cycles. It appears there have been some
changes in the City of Bend. She asked about mutual aid and the
consequences to the community.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 6 of 9
Mr. Flaherty said he read about this in the newspaper. He has some
concerns about not getting a heads-up. They are all on the same team
and each is impacted when one agency takes steps to change something
with a doomsday approach. He heard that the YES program is in
jeopardy. This would impact the D.A. Office and Juvenile, and perhaps
the Courts. It is helpful to have that kind of discussion before hearing
about it on the news.
With the County, sometimes they can resolve funding issues without
having to cut programs. The intensive supervision program was one of
them. He is open to dialogue regarding any proposed changes.
Scott Ramsey said that if funding is not sufficient, there will need to be
cuts. The Council wants to know what they will look like. An outline
was given for five years and it is a little sobering. It is important to have
this feedback. As a Council, they have other roles in the community and
need full information. Sometimes they may not realize the ripple effect.
He will take back the comments from here to the rest of the Council. He
does not want to take a burden off the City and put it on someone else.
Chief Sale said he would be willing to present this to the group at the
next meeting. Judge Sullivan said that they need to know how things
impact others as they are very much interrelated.
Ms. Stein stated that if the City of Bend cuts back, they will have to rely
on the Sheriff's Office for some things. So they already know there may
be patrol officers pulled from Sisters to elsewhere. The Sheriff backfills
for the cities, so this affects them as well
Chief Sale said he does not plan to use the Sheriff's Office to backfill.
Mr. Flaherty stated that he hopes the City can avoid making these kinds
of cuts. Revenue may go up. The D.A. has a problem if the City's police
decide they are not going to do follow-up investigations on thefts. They
would have to call the Sheriff, who will do what he needs to do. But that
might impact other things they are doing. This discussion needs to
happen. They can't afford to lose any public safety aspects.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 7 of 9
Mr. Ramsay said he told Finance to be conservative, but he hopes for
extra funds to put in the right places. They are happy with Chief Sale's
impact in a short period of time, with savings already brought to the
table.
Commissioner Baney indicated that this offers an opportunity. They all
face budget issues, but need to figure out a way to fund things that are not
mandated but those that the community feels strongly about.
Sheriff Blanton stated that on Easter Sunday they will begin renting beds
from Jefferson County, ten for now. They have to use the contingency in
the budget for this. There are definite immediate needs to impact safety
of the community and the use of hard beds. A good group is meeting on
this, trying to do the best they can long- and short-term. They started a
jail needs assessment eight years ago.
The situation has not improved. They continue to do what they can, and
are not officially matrixing but are doing some through adjusting
sanctions. This is not a good situation. They need more space to manage
inmates, handle health and mental health issues, etc. They need to pay
close attention to things when they are small and need to be proactive
before they become bigger issues. They are looking at the potential for
remodeling or using other buildings.
Judge Sullivan said that someone had a couple of days left on sanction
and acted out. The Judge and the D.A. were contacted. A defense
attorney was contacted. It is costing about $73 a day at Jefferson County
for a bed and meals. The County is still tasked with medical and other
needs. He is not sure if they offer mental health care in Jefferson County.
Judge Sullivan noted that there is a significant additional cost to bring
prisoners back and forth.
Mr. Ramsay asked if there are any statistics on this. The Sheriff said
there are no increases across the board. They are spending a lot of time
on investigative issues, and things that did not used to be on the books
such as predatory activities and technology issues. These are
complicated and are taking up more time. A wildland fire issue is one
call, no matter how much time it takes.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 8 of 9
Judge Sullivan added that, for instance, in regard to child pornography,
they need a search warrant and then a computer expert, and this can take
hours of time. The Sheriff's Office has one expert now. Forensics are
very different now.
Mr. Ramsay asked why the jail bed numbers are increasing. Sheriff
Blanton said that this has been ongoing for a long time, but they have just
dealt with it. They have A and B felons in the work center and they
should not be in there. Those are `players' and need to have
consequences for their behavior. The worst of the worst are in the
facility.
Commissioner Baney noted that when the Courts have reduced funding,
they sit in the jail and this affects everyone. All is interconnected.
Chief Kelley added that in regard to the elder program, they have to
provide more education and more reports. This impacts the Courts and
the jails, too.
Judge Sullivan said the when they put the SRO in the schools, the reports
of sex abuse and other issues went up due to more education and more
opportunities to talk about the problem.
Being no other items discussed, the meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bonnie Baker
Recording Secretary
Attachments
Exhibit A: Agenda
Exhibit B: Sign-in sheets
Exhibit C: Statement regarding Matricula Consular Cards
Exhibit D: Community Corrections Annual Plan
Exhibit E: Domestic Violence Fatality Review Teams Document
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Monday, May 7, 2012
Page 9 of 9
DESCHUTES COUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL
WCYIt ~.O`T
c <
MONDAY, MAY 7, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Bames Room, County Administration Building, 1300 NW Wall, Bend, OR
Agenda
I Call to Order & Introductions
Judge Sullivan
II April Minutes Attachment 1
Judge Sullivan
Action: Approve March minutes
III Public Comment
Judge Sullivan
IV Community Corrections Plan Update Attachment 2
Tanner Wark
Action: Approve year two revisions to the current plan
V Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee Attachment 3
Trish Meyer
Apprise Council members of fatality review committee
IV Other Business
Judge Sullivan
z
V
H
LU
H
4
w
J
CL
N
0
N
O
d0
N
V
v
CL
CL
v~
II
c J
v s
19
-\A >
o,
R
z
L
AI
I
III W
_-nn
~I <al
4 °
~I
S ~ ~I!
ul,
I
J
J
v
c
0
m
0
C
N
d
v
o.
z
u
H
W
4
W
J
CL
N_
O
N
n
G II
0
b0
c
N
a~
V
V
a
I
vI
N
1
I
\ I I
II I
I I v' '
12
~ I II I
v I~
IU' I~
r
2
II,~a
~ i r`1 l J
IIJ~I
I~
v
0
m
0
v
v
m
d
6
Statement to LPSCC, May 7, 2012
Marilyn Burwell, Immigrant Family Advocates
On May 1 ' at a May Day celebration in Salem, Oregon's Labor Commissioner, Brad
Avakian, read a letter from Governor Kitzhaber.
The letter made two important announcements:
1) The Governor is working with others in state government to support some kind of
drivers' license for undocumented immigrants.
2) The Oregon State Police will soon begin to accept the Mexican Matricula
Consular Card. State troopers are currently being trained to verify these cards.
Technology upgrades will allow state troopers to process High Security Mexican
Consular Identification Cards. Oregon State Police officials are working with
local law enforcement agencies to develop a better administrative and training
process that will allow officers to use identification other than a driver's license to
verify people's identities.
I leave the following questions:
Has the Oregon State Police contacted any local law enforcement in Deschutes County
about accepting the Matricula Consular Card?
Can a future LPSCC meeting be devoted to implementing the use of the Matricula
Consular Card in Deschutes County?
Attachment 2
Community Corrections Plan
12-13
Tanner Wark
Administrator Parole and Probation
12/13 Community Corrections Plan Divisions
A. Administration and Support
1. Management of overall department
2. Support staff
B. Felony Supervision
1. Street Crimes
2. Sex Offender
3. Case-bank
4. Domestic Violence
5. Felony offender treatment
C. Misdemeanor Supervision
1. Sex offender
2. Domestic Violence
3. Mental Health
D. Community Programs
1. Electronic Monitoring
2. Community Service
3. Cognitive Instruction
4. Job Search
E. Custodial Beds and Sanctions
Felony offender sentence 12months and less and revocations
II. Community Corrections Demographics
A. Felony offenders
1. Sex Offenders 15%
2. DV Offenders 9%
3. Mental Health 12%
4. Street Crimes 33%
5. Case-bank 25%
6. Local Control & Jail Revocations 2%
B. Misdemeanor Offenders
1. Sex offenders 14%
2. DV Offenders 81%
3. Mental Health 5%
III. Success over the past year
A. M57 Program for drug addicted offenders
1. Close supervision with compliance with treatment and random UA's.
2. Increased the accessibility to treatment for this population.
1
Attachment 2
B. ISP Domestic Violence program
1. ISP officer works closely with Deschutes County Sheriffs Office, Bend Police
Department, Redmond Police Department, and Oregon State Police providing
offender accountability.
2. ISP officer also works closely with victim advocates in providing back and forth
communication regarding victim safety issues.
C. Community Service / Work Crew
1. Provides alternative sanctioning option for offenders.
2. Provides means for hard to place offenders, such sex offenders, or other
offenders who need more supervision.
D. Domestic Violence Deferred Sentencing Program.
1. Provides offender supervision to deferred-sentenced domestic violence
offenders. DVDSP PO's work with the Courts and the District Attorney's office,
increasing system response to domestic violence cases.
2. DVDSP PO's get offenders engaged in BIP treatment sooner than non-DVDS
offenders, due to the nature of the program.
IV. Community Corrections budget summary
A. Administration and Support $704,830
B. Felony Supervision $2,938,667
C. Misdemeanor Supervision $476,492
D. Community Programs $332,094
E. Custodial Beds and Sanctions $1,479,991
Attachment 2
Deschutes County
2012-2013 Community Corrections Budget Summary
Release
Other
Program Name
Grant in
Aid Fund
Subsidy
Funds
Total
Fund
and Fees
$122,098
$582,732
$704,830
Administration and Support
Felony Batterer & Family Violence Offenders
$439,236
$439,236
$739,758
$739,758
Felony Sex Offender s
$968,739
$149,240
$1,117,979
Felony Street Crimes Offenders
$155,180
$155,180
Felony Mental Health Offenders
$303,415
$303,415
Felony Case-bank Offenders
$20,130
$52,969
$73,099
Felony Sex Offender & BIP Treatment
$70,000
$70,000
Felony Substance Abuse T Treatment
$113,674
$113,674
Misdemeanor Sex Offender s
$172,302
$172,302
Misd. Domestic Violence Deferred Sentencing
$172,616
$172,616
Misd. Batterer & Family Violence Offenders
$12,900
$12,900
Misdemeanor Sex Offender & BIP Treatment
$5,000
$5,000
Misdemeanor Substance Abuse Treatment
$53,383
$53,383
Community Service Program
$206,765
$206,765
Electronic Monitoring
$13,826
$26,174
$40,000
Transitional Housing Scholarship
$71,946
$71,946
Moral Recognition Therapy
$1,479,991
$1,479,991
Custodial Beds
$4,228,547
$13,826
$1,689,701
$5,932,074
Total
Deschutes County Community
Corrections Annual Plan
July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013
Board of County Commissioners
Tony DeBone, Chair
Alan Unger, Vice-Chair
Tammy Baney, Commissioner
Department of Community Justice
J. Kenneth Hales, Director
Division of Adult Field Services
E. Tanner Wark, Administrator
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section I Introduction
Community Corrections Plan Cover Sheet
Departmental Overview
Sections II Submittals
LPSCC Recommendation ..............................................................................................................................4
Board of County Commissioner's Resolution ................................................................................................5
Section III Organization
Public Safety Coordinating Council Membership .....................................................................6
Community Corrections Organizational Chart .........................................................................7
Sheriff's Office / Jail Organization Chart ...............................................................................8
Section IV Programs
Administration and Support
9
Felony Offender Supervision
Felony Batter Intervention / Family Violence
...............................10
Felony Sex Offender
11
Felony Street Crimes
.........................12
Felony Mental Health
.........................13
Felony Casebank/Restitution
...............................14
Felony Sex Offender & BtP Treatment
.........................15
Felony Substance Abuse
.........................16
Misdemeanor Offender Supervision
Misd. Sex Offender
Misd. Domestic Violence Deferred Sentencing
........................17
1g
Misd. Batterer Intervention / Family Violence
.........................19
Misd. Sex Offender & BIP Treatment
.........................20
Misd. Substance Abuse
Treatment ....................................................................................21
Communit
Service
y
.........................22
Electronic Monitoring
.........................23
Transitional Housing
24
Moral Reconation Therapy/Cognitive Programs
........................25
Custodial and Sanction Beds
........................26
Section V Budget
Monthly Sanctions & Services ........................................................................................27
Budget Summary
t
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Deschutes County
2012-2013 Community Corrections Annual Plan
Department of Corrections
For Office Use Only
2575 Center Street NE
Salem, Oregon 97310 Date Received.
Address: 63360 Britta St. Bldg #2, Bend OR, 97701
Telephone: 541-330-8260
Fax: 541-385-1804
Community Corrections Director/Manager: Ken Hales
Address: 63360 Britta St. Bldg #2, Bend OR 97702
Phone: 541-317-3115 Fax: 541-385-1804 Email:
Ken_Hales@co.deschutes.or.us
Sheriff: Larry Blanton
Address: 63333 Highway 20 West, Bend OR 97701
Phone: 541-317-3118 Fax: 541-389-6835 Email:
Larry_Blanton@co.deschutes.or.us
Jail Manager: Mike Espinoza
Address: 63333 Highway 20 West, Bend OR 97701
Phone: 541-388-6667 Fax: 541-389-6835 Email:
Mike.Espinoza@co.deschutes.or.us
Supervisory Authority: Larry Blanton
Address: 63333 Highway 20 West, Bend OR 97701
Phone: 541-317-3118 Fax: 541-389-6835 Email:
Larry_Blanton@co.deschutes.or.us
Supervisory Authority: Ken Hales
Address: 63360 Britta St. Bldg #2
Phone: 541-317-3115 Fax: 541-385-1804 Email:
Ken_Hales@co.deschutes.or.us
LPSCC Contact: Ken Hales
Address: 63360 Britta St. Bldg #2, Bend OR 97701
Phone: 541-317-3115 Fax: 541-385-1804 Email:
Ken_Hales@co.deschutes.or.us
Annual Budget
State Grant-in-Aid Fund:
4,228,547
Inmate Welfare R lease
Subsidy Fund: 13,826
County General Fund:
400,328
Supervision Fees:
190,000
Other Fees:
152,500
Other:
946,873
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Section I
Department Description
Community corrections services in Deschutes County are provided by the Deschutes County Parole and
Probation Department which is a division of the Deschutes County Department of Community Justice. On
any given day the division has 1,550 offenders under supervision of which approximately 11% are
misdemeanor offenders. Sixty seven percent of the population supervised is on court ordered probation,
33% on post-prison supervision, and 2% under the authority of the local supervisory authority board.
The division's main office is in the city of Bend with satellite offices in the cities of Redmond and La Pine.
The division provides probation, parole, and post-prison supervision to felony offenders, assault IV
domestic violence offenders and misdemeanor sex offenders. The division supervises offenders on deferred
prosecution for felony and Assault IV domestic violence offenses. The division also provides community
services work coordination and electronic monitoring services to the county and court for offenders under
and not under division supervision.
For FY 2012-2013 Deschutes County community corrections service plan is organized around five general
program categories. The direct service categories are comprised of sixteen sub categories. The general
program categories are:
• Administration
• Felony offender supervision
• Misdemeanor offender supervision
• Other programs
• Custody
The direct service programs of sex offender, substance abuse, mental health, and batterer's intervention
treatment are not presented as separate programs but tracked as expenditures within the above listed
programs.
During the current biennium the division was able add volunteers to the restitution program to help defer the
adverse impact the economy has had on the collection of restitution payments made to the victim. In
addition, the division acquired a domestic violence grant to supervise high risk domestic violence offenders
on an intensive supervision caseload. A community service work crew was added to the division's resources
to aid in providing alternatives to jail sanctions.
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Section II
LPSCC Recommendation
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
4
Section II
Board of County Commissioner's Resolution
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Deschutes County Public Safety Coordinating Council Membership
Name
Title
Organization
Tammy Baney
Commissioner
Deschutes County
Lary Blanton
Sheriff
Deschutes County
Ed Boero
Councilman
City of Redmond
Dave Cook
Citizen Member
NA
Jacque DeKalb
Attorney at Law
DeKalb and Associates
Patrick Flaherty
District Attorney
Deschutes County
J. Kenneth Hales
Director
Deschutes County Community Justice Department
Scott Johnson
Director
Health & Mental Health Departments
Erik Kropp
Interim County Administrator
Deschutes County
Ernest Mazorol III
Court Administrator
Trial Courts
Robert Poirier
Director
9-1-1 County Service District
Donna McClung
Field Services Supervisor
Oregon Youth Authority
Lt. Carl Rhodes
Station Commander
Oregon State Police
Dave Tarbet
Chief of Police
City of Redmond
Hillary Saraceno
Director
Commission on Children & Families
Jeff Sale
Chief
Bend Police Department
Shelly Smith
Citizen Member
NA
Eileen Stein
City Manager
City of Sisters
Michael C. Sullivan
Presiding Judge
11th Judicial District
Anthony DeBone
Commissioner/alternate
Deschutes County Commissioner
6
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Community Corrections Organizational Chart
Deschutes County
Citizens
Board of County
Commissioners
County
Administrator
Community Justice
Director
Parole and Probation
Administrator
Public Safety
Coordinating Council
Programs
P&P Supervisor
Manager
Bend & La Pine
Support Staff.
-
P&P Officers
8.25 FTE
Administrative &
Casebank
Data Entry
Community Service 1
i
I
Street Crimes
~
I
Cognitive Instruction',
Sex offender
Electronic Momtonngi
Domestic Violence
P&P Supervisor
Bend & Redmond
P&P Officers
10
Street Crimes
Sex offender
Domestic Violence
Mental Health
7
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Deschutes County Sheriffs Office/Jail
Citizens
sheriff
Jail Supervisory
Authority Board
Custodial Sanction
Beds I I Supervisory
Authority Board
Incarceration
Programs
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Administration and Support
Program Category:
Administration
Program Description:
The Administrator of the Department is responsible for the overall management of the
department and reports to the Community Justice Director. There are 3.0 FTE supervisory
staff, 2 parole and probation supervisors who are responsible for the daily supervision of 21
parole and probation officers, and 1 administrative manager who over sees all non-certified
staff totaling 8.25 FTE.
To provide leadership, policy development, financial oversight and supervision of staff to
insure compliance with department policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative Rules,
Oregon Revised Statutes and Intergovernmental Agreement with DOC.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Department operates in compliance with all requirements and within budget.
Monthly Average to be Served: N/A Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
❑ Probation
❑ Felony
❑ Male
❑
High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
❑ Female
❑
Medium
❑ Local Control
❑
Low
❑
Limited
Which Treatment Providers Will You Use Within This Pro ram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N?
If Yes; Overall Score
(W. Myer Mmagw wt Caiyftm w, aw
aewore, So oeenaer. k"w
Ab~ W WStAKWM ADwe
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund $122,098
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
® Supervision Fees $12,732
❑ Other Fees
® Other $570,000
Additional Comments:
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Batterer Intervention / Family Violence (Felony)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Assessment, supervision and case management services will be provided using a team
approach; combining the efforts of parole and probation officers, therapists, polygraphers
and victim advocates. Department staff will receive ongoing training specific to supervising
this population and understanding evidenced-based batterer intervention program protocol.
Victim safety will be considered paramount; any decision to allow offender/victim contact will
be made according to established protocol including input from victim advocates. The BIP
treatment/supervision team will meet monthly to discuss and establish protocol and to staff
cases. Decisions regarding an offender's community conduct will be made as a team.
Polygraphs will be used to gather information regarding an offender's behavior in the
community and progress in treatment. Cognitive classes or Moral Reconation Therapy may
be used to address needs for this population or violations. Included in this population is the
Intensive Supervision Program for the county's highest risk domestic violence population.
This program reports out the number of victim contacts made with the commuity corrections
staff, as well as, use of the domestic violence Leathality Risk Assessment Tool.
Program Objectives:
To increase community safety by reducing offenders' criminal and battering behavior and
increasing their pro-social thinking and behavior; to enforce Court and Board orders; to
provide reparation to victims.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
State DOC recidivism data - State DOC positive case closure data - Employment status
reported by PO at case closure - Status of restitution payments reported by PO at case
closure - Treatment referrals and completion stats - Annual reviews to insure offenders
are supervised in accordance with division policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative
Rules and Laws
Monthly Average to be Served: 160 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
®
High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
® Local Control
®
Low
❑
Limited
Which Treatment Pmvidertsl Will You Use Within This Program?
Provider Name
-
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
(Ia. AnWMx99W&&00W&M DV, DUN
oiaaW.,smof ncw.xpriexswsuac.
a ea81Le1rioaAbua
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund $439,236
❑ Inmate welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
10
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Sex Offender (Felony)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Assessment, supervision and case management services will be provided utilizing a team
approach; combining the resources of parole and probation officers, treatment providers and
polygraphers. Parole and probation officers will use Department of Corrections-approved
risk tools to determine candidacy for predatory designation and supervision levels.
Predatory sex offender notifications will be completed in accordance with division policy.
Polygraphs will be used to gather information regarding offenders' sexual histories and
compliance to mandated conditions of supervision and treatment. The supervision/treatment
team will meet monthly to staff cases and discuss statewide and local protocols. Decisions
regarding offender privileges and accountability will be decided by the team. Cognitive
classes or Moral Reconation Therapy may be used to address needs for this population or
violations.
Program Objectives:
To increase community safety by reducing offenders' criminal and sexually deviant
behaviors and increasing their pro-social thinking and behavior: to enforce orders of the
Court and Board: to provide reparation to victims; to adhere to statutory requirements
specific to supervision of sex offenders.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
State DOC recidivism data - State DOC positive case closure data - Employment status
reported by PO at case closure - Status of restitution payments reported by PO at case
closure - Treatment referrals and completion stats - Annual reviews to insure offenders
are supervised in accordance with division policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative
Rules and Laws.
Monthly Average to be Served: 225 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
® High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
® Medium
® Local Control
® Low
® Limited
Which Treatment Providedsl Will Ynu ttse Within This Pmnram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N?
If Yes, Overall Score
(is, AW Mwwgwnmb CoDuY"w. w. Dual
DmWMK Su Off~, VOSIIWt Subslan
« des,tar.~
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund $739,758
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments
11
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Street Crimes (Felony)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Assessment, supervision and case management services will be provided to all felony
offenders including those supervised under the terms of Interstate Compact. Assessments
will be completed in order to identify offenders' criminogenic risk factors which, when
combined with a case plan, will establish the framework for the supervision of each
individual offender. Parole and probation officers will provide treatment and resource
referrals, urinalysis testing, rewards and sanctions and will encourage offenders to move
through the Stages of Change and access treatment, if appropriate, to after thinking and
behavior. In conjunction with casework, information will be entered into various computer
programs as required by the Division, Deschutes County and DOC. Cognitive classes or
Moral Reoonation Therapy may be used to address needs for this population or violations.
Part of the street crimes program is the Family Drug Court PO who participates in weekly
intensive treatment meetings with several partner agencies.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal behavior, enforce Court and Board orders and to assist offenders to
change. Supervision will comply with department policies, Administrative Rules and Oregon
Law.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
State DOC recidivism data - State DOC positive case closure data - Employment status
reported by PO at case closure - Status of restitution payments reported by PO at case
closure - Treatment referrals and completion stats - Annual reviews to insure offenders
are supervised in accordance with division policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative
Rules and Laws
Monthly Average to be Served: 460 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
®
High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
® Loral Control
®
Low
®
Limited
W61n4, Yre~f nenr Prn.drlarl Ql Will Yrnj I Ise Within This Program?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N?
If Yes, Overall Score
pa: A1WUWW "%K 007dba. OV. OUd
oiwmm so QW4W wwvwtstftwc
a &dd+ MM
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund $988,869
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
® Other $129,110
Additional Comments:
12
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Mental Health
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Supervision and case management services will be provided using a team approach that
combines the resources of a mental health caseworker with a parole/probation officer who
has specialized skills and training in working with mentally ill offenders. The caseworker will
work with offenders prior to their release from our county jail and "bridge" services between
incarceration and the community. This team will meet regularly in order to staff cases,
provide updates regarding medication and make decisions as to the appropriate method of
holding offenders accountable when a violation occurs. The department facilitates
enrollment of mentally ill offenders in the Oregon Health Plan, if eligible. The mental health
PO is a member of the county's Crisis Intervention Team.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal behavior and assist offenders to change by providing supervision specific
to the criminogenic needs of our mentally ill population; to enforce Court and Board orders;
to provide reparation to victims.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
100% of supervised felony and misdemeanor offenders identified as having significant
mental health issues receive supervision and related services annual caseload audits will be
conducted to insure program integrity maintained.
Monthly Average to be Served: 50 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
®
High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
® Local Control
®
Low
®
Limited
Which Treatment Provider/sl Will You use Within This Prnnramo
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
W raga Uffopm nt Corrlw. UV, Dual
D Sex DRaoEer, NgaMN SubsWm
Ah~wOuWw*Substea Abm
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
$155,180
13
Program Name:
Casebank Restitution (Felony)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
All low and limited risk offenders, with the exception of family violence and sex offenders, will
be assigned to case bank for the purpose of monitoring them for compliance with conditions
of supervision. When appropriate, given offenders' risk factors, they may be referred to
programs designed to assist them in changing. All low and limited risk offenders who have
an open restitution case will be assigned to the restitution caseload for the purpose of
supervising their compliance with conditions of supervision. When appropriate, given
offenders' risk factors, they may be referred to programs designed to assist them in
changing. Cognitive classes or Moral Reconation Therapy may be used to address needs
for this population or violations..
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal behavior, to enforce Court and Board orders, to assist offenders to
change, if appropriate, and to provide reparation to victims.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
100% of low and limited risk offenders will receive monitoring services.
Monthly Average to be Served: 600 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
❑
High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
❑
Medium
® Local Control
®
Low
®
Limited
Which Treatment Provider(s) Will You Use Within This Program?
Provider Name Treatment Type CPC YIN? if Yes, OverallScore
(ia, A1W MMOW094 CupnW^ w,. uar.
aswo.m.saonmar hmdws
Ab o M stStb"MMM
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
$303,415
14
Program Name:
Sex Offender & BIP Treatment (Felony)
Program Category:
Sex Offender Services
Program Description:
Deschutes County sex offender treatment programs address sexual assault cycles, thinking
errors and defense mechanisms, victim empathy, victim clarification, arousal control and
reconditioning, social competence, development of healthy relationships and reunification of
family when applicable. Treatment groups meet weekly, in addition to individual sessions as
required. Each offender signs a contract delineating the requirements for compliance to
treatment. Offenders are required to submit to periodic polygraph testing by a private
,
licensed polygrapher that is skilled and trained in testing sex offenders as an objective
means of validating behavior in the community and progress in treatment. Deschutes
County Batterer Intervention Programs address the tactics offenders use to justify battering
behavior, increase the offenders' recognition of the criminal aspect of their thoughts and
behaviors, increase their acceptance of personal responsibility and accountability, increase
their empathy and awareness of the impact their behavior has on others, and help them
identify how they use alcohol and other drugs to support their battering behavior. BIP
treatment groups are a minimum of 48 weeks in duration in accordance with draft OAR's,
followed by at least 3 months of aftercare. Offenders are required to sign a treatment
contract outlining rules and expectations. Offenders are required to submit to disclosure and
maintenance polygraph examinations by a private, licensed polygrapher who is skilled and
trained in testing batterers. The polygraph is used as an objective means of validating
behavior in the community and progress in treatment.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal and sexually-deviant behavior and promote pro-social change in sex
offender and domestic violence by using evidenced-based sex offender & BIP treatment
modalities.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Correctional Program Checklist rating of satisfactory or better.
Monthly Average to be Served: 175 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
® High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
® Medium
® Local Control
® Low
❑ Limited
Which Treatment Providerls) Will You ttse Within This Prnnram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
41MW tcowdkwOv,owl
aag ,su MOW WVMWd SubM e
Mum a Oullwlmt Subslz c MUm
CPC Y/N?
If Yes, Overall Score
Fred Saporito
Sex Offender
® Yes ❑ No
82
Dan Early
Sex Offender
® Yes ❑ No
40
Maxine Hogan
Sex Offender
❑ Yes ® No
Allen Gibson
BIP
® Yes ❑ No
38
Rick Baska
BIP
❑ Yes ® No
Lamount Boieua
BIP / Sex Offender
❑ Yes ® No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
® Other Fees
Additional Comments:
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
$73,100
15
Program Name:
Substance Abuse Treatment (Felony)
Program Category:
Substance Abuse
Program Description:
Approximately 85% of offenders under our supervision struggle with substance abuse
addiction issues. Many of these offenders are indigent and/or do not qualify for Oregon
Health Plan. For these high and medium risk offenders, services are available through a
local treatment provider with whom the department contracts, Pfeifer and Associates.
Offenders are placed into treatment groups based on their risk level. Length of treatment
varies according to assessed needs. Random urine tests are conducted by the provider,
and progress reports are submitted to the supervising probation officer on a regular basis.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal behavior which is a direct result of substance abuse/use and to promote
pro-social change, using a treatment modality that is evidenced-based.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Correctional Program Checklist rating of satisfactory or better.
Monthly Average to be Served: 70 T pe of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
Probation
® Felony
® Male
® High
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
® Medium
® Local Control
❑ Low
❑ Limited
Wkd k Trn.lmnnf Prnvidarrsl Wili Ynu I Ise Within This Pmgram?
Provider Name
TreatmentType
"
CPC YtN7
If Yes, Overall Score
.
Is.a~r.rworac~+aw.uw
.
aa,m a sjmlrkauus.
Phefer & Associates
A&D
® Yes ❑ No
46
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
® Other M57 $70,000
Additional Comments:
16
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Sex Offender (Misdemeanor)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Assessment, supervision and case management services will be provided utilizing a team
approach; combining the resources of parole and probation officers, treatment providers and
polygraphers. Parole and probation officers will use Department of Corrections-approved
risk tools to determine candidacy for predatory designation and supervision levels.
Predatory sex offender notifications will be completed in accordance with division policy.
Polygraphs will be used to gather information regarding offenders' sexual histories and
compliance to mandated conditions of supervision and treatment. The supervision/treatment
team will meet monthly to staff cases and discuss statewide and local protocols. Decisions
regarding offender privileges and accountability will be decided by the team. Cognitive
classes or Moral Reconation Therapy may be used to address needs for this population or
violations.
Program Objectives:
To increase community safety by reducing offenders' criminal and sexually deviant
behaviors and increasing their pro-social thinking and behavior: to enforce orders of the
Court and Board: to provide reparation to victims; to adhere to statutory requirements
specific to supervision of sex offenders.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
State DOC recidivism data - State DOC positive case closure data - Employment status
reported by PO at case closure - Status of restitution payments reported by PO at case
closure - Treatment referrals and completion stats - Annual reviews to insure offenders
are supervised in accordance with division policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative
Rules and Laws
Monthly Average to be Served: 30 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
❑ Felony
® Male
®
High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
❑ Local Control
❑
Low
❑
Limited
Which Treatment Providerfsl Will You Use Within This Prnaram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N?
If Yes, Overall Score
Qa., Nqr Mwagw t COW"". UV, Duel
asq~sWOWKW. mpwansubu =
a suesb~nane
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
® County General Fund $113,674
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments
17
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Domestic Violence Deferred Sentencing Program (Misdemeanor)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
A family violence diversion program where offenders have entered a guilty, no-contest or
Alford plea on a domestic violence offense and sentencing has been deferred for 18 months.
Offender has scheduled court appearances to monitor progress. Assessment, supervision
and case management services will be provided using a team approach; combining the
efforts of parole and probation officers, therapists, polygraphers and victim advocates.
Department staff will receive ongoing training specific to supervising this population and
understanding evidenced-based batterer intervention program protocol. Victim safety will be
considered paramount; any decision to allow offender/victim contact will be made according
to established protocol including input from victim advocates. The BIP treatment1supervision
team will meet monthly to discuss and establish protocol and to staff cases. Participants will
adhere to strict court ordered program guidelines.
Program Objectives:
To increase community safety by reducing offender's criminal and battering behavior by
'
s intervention program; to
decreasing the time it takes for the offender to enter into a batter
enforce Court orders; to provide reparation to victims.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Monthly data collection and review.
Information sharing with partner agencies such as the courts, and district attorney's office.
Monthly Average to be Served: 70 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category: Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
❑ Felony ® Male
®
High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor ® Female
®
Medium
❑ Local Control
❑
Low
❑
Limited
Xnr61r6 Tronfmcrnf P,n.irleds) Will Ynu Use W ithin This Proaram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N?
If Yes, Overall Score
(a. Arew Mwagwn.N. Cw"M w. our
mw sswosepr, kwab"abBlu B
Ah~mOyoafttSubdn Abm
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
® County General Fund $172,302
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
18
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Batterer Intervention/Family Violence (Misdemeanor)
Program Category:
Supervision
Program Description:
Assessment, supervision and case management services will be provided using a team
approach; combining the efforts of parole and probation officers, therapists, polygraphers
and victim advocates. Department staff will receive ongoing training specific to supervising
this population and understanding evidenced-based batterer intervention program protocol.
Victim safety will be considered paramount; any decision to allow offender/victim contact will
be made according to established protocol including input from victim advocates. The BIP
treatment/supervision team will meet monthly to discuss and establish protocol and to staff
cases. Decisions regarding an offender's community conduct will be made as a team.
Polygraphs will be used to gather information regarding an offender's behavior in the
community and progress in treatment. Cognitive classes or Moral Reconation Therapy may
be used to address needs for this population or violations. Included in this population is the
Intensive Supervision Program for the county's highest risk domestic violence population.
This program reports out the number of victim contacts made with the commuity corrections
staff, as well as, use of the domestic violence Leathality Risk Assessment Tool.
Program Objectives:
To increase community safety by reducing offenders' criminal and battering behavior and
increasing their pro-social thinking and behavior; to enforce Court and Board orders; to
provide reparation to victims.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
State DOC recidivism data - State DOC positive case closure data - Employment status
reported by PO at case closure - Status of restitution payments reported by PO at case
closure - Treatment referrals and completion stats - Annual reviews to insure offenders
are supervised in accordance with division policy and procedure, Oregon Administrative
Rules and Laws.
Monthly Average to be Served: 40 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
❑ Felony
® Male
® High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
® Medium
❑ Local Control
❑ Low
❑ Limited
Which Treatment Provided s) Will Ynu I lce Within Thie Prnnmrn?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
(I0.. A19W MWWgWW*,. CaWdh*, UV. Dual
D MWi So Oftndw WfabWd Subgfmne
Npn a OUZWJart SuDWnM AIXe .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
® County General Fund $114,352
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
® Other $58,264
Additional Comments:
19
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Sex Offender & BIP Treatment (Misdemeanor)
Program Category:
Sex Offender Services
Program Description:
Deschutes County sex offender treatment programs address sexual assault cycles, thinking
errors and defense mechanisms, victim empathy, victim clarification, arousal control and
reconditioning, social competence, development of healthy relationships and reunification of
family when applicable. Treatment groups meet weekly, in addition to individual sessions as
required. Each offender signs a contract delineating the requirements for compliance to
treatment. Offenders are required to submit to periodic polygraph testing by a private,
licensed polygrapher that is skilled and trained in testing sex offenders as an objective
means of validating behavior in the community and progress in treatment. Deschutes
County Batterer Intervention Programs address the tactics offenders use to justify battering
behavior, increase the offenders' recognition of the criminal aspect of their thoughts and
behaviors, increase their acceptance of personal responsibility and accountability, increase
their empathy and awareness of the impact their behavior has on others, and help them
identify how they use alcohol and other drugs to support their battering behavior. BIP
Treatment Groups are a minimum of 48 weeks in duration in accordance with draft OAR's,
followed by at least 3 months of aftercare. Offenders are required to sign a treatment
contract outlining rules and expectations. Offenders are required to submit to disclosure and
maintenance polygraph examinations by a private, licensed polygrapher who is skilled and
trained in testing batterers. The polygraph is used as an objective means of validating
behavior in the community and progress in treatment.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal and sexually-deviant behavior and promote pro-social change in sex
offenders and domestic violence offenders by using evidenced-based sex offender treatment
modalities.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
90% of indigent medium and high risk sex offenders will receive treatment
Monthly Average to be Served: 30 Type of Offender(s) served:
unme Uateyui y:
toenuel.
M eve :
® Probation
❑ Felony
® Male
®
High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
❑ Local Control
❑
Low
❑
Limited
r o....,iA-,f.% 1AINI vn:. I Ica Within This Pmnram?
YYI„NI I IGP
Provider Name
,o, , ,v• ~v. v .
TrestmentType
pa, Anger MV*g ffd, CQWAtl w. ou8i
plaVm Sw O%nft, Iryatlent&ftWce
Pblae a eM91a6atanne/~EUSa
CPC Y7/?
If Yes, Overall Score
.
Fred Saporito
Sex Offender
® Yes ❑ No
82
Dan Early
Sex Offender
® Yes ❑ No
40
Maxine Hogan
Sex Offender
❑ Yes ®No
Allen Gibson
BIP
® Yes ❑ No
38
Rick Baska
SIP
❑ Yes ®No
Lamount Boieua
BIP / Sex Offender
❑ Yes ® No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
® Other Fees
Additional Comments:
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
$12,900
20
Program Name:
Substance Abuse Treatment (Misdemeanor)
Program Category:
Substance Abuse
Program Description:
Approximately 85% of offenders under our supervision struggle with substance abuse
addiction issues. Many of these offenders are indigent and/or do not qualify for Oregon
Health Plan. For these high and medium risk offenders, services are available through a
local treatment provider with whom the department contracts, Pfeifer and Associates.
Offenders are placed into treatment groups based on their risk level. Length of treatment
varies according to assessed needs. Random urine tests are conducted by the provider,
and progress reports are submitted to the supervising probation officer on a regular basis.
Program Objectives:
To reduce criminal behavior which is a direct result of substance abuse/use and to promote
pro-social change, using a treatment modality that is evidenced-based.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
80% of high and medium risk indigent offenders with substance abuse issues will receive
assessment and treatment services.
Monthly Average to be Served: 5 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
❑ Felony
® Male
®
High
❑ Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
❑ Local Control
❑
Low
❑
Limited
Which Treatment Provider(s) Will You Use Within This Pro ram?
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
(re:. higm MVrepmnm t Capntl M W. Dem
DWWMK sex OftlAW VV86WK&Adwm
Atx s a mil %*b =Am
Pfiefer & Associates
A&D
® Yes ❑ No
46
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
® Other $5000
Additional Comments:
21
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Community Service
Program Category:
Community-Based Custodial Alternatives
Program Description:
Community service is provided as one of many intermediate sanctioning options.
Community service is also an integral part of enforcing court orders. Offenders are afforded
the opportunity to perform community service at a variety of locations, such as Habitat for
Humanity, the Humane Society, and other various non-profit organizations. Methods of
referral are through the Courts and Parole and Probation Officers as a means to enforce
court orders or as a sanction in lieu of jail. Community service also provides a work crew
option for offenders two days out of the week..
Program Objectives:
To make maximum use of non-custody resources to hold offenders accountable for their
offenses.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Monthly reports identify positive and negative case closures.
Monthly Average to be Served: 1025
Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
® Probation
® Felony
® Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Local Control
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Male
®
High
® Female
®
Medium
®
Low
®
Limited
. a111:LL.:~. T6:n Or....r~m9
vY11RA111GO4I
Provider Name
ICYl, v rU•+•••^
Treatment Type
CPC YN?
if Yes, Overall Score
(1e MIYS tcWAwVJ, 01W
awmis,saoendw.lrodwtSubd e ;
ft~ a sw
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
® Supervision Fees $11,383
® Other Fees $22,500
® Other $19,500
Additional Comments:
22
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Electronic Monitoring
Program Category:
Community-Based Custodial Alternatives
Program Description:
The electronic monitoring program is one of the many intermediate sanctioning options.
This program is also used to provide surveillance/ intensive supervision for the department's
high risk sex offenders and domestic violence offenders. The Courts also use this program
as an alternative to jail for those offenders with medical issues. It is a valuable program for
monitoring DUII offenders. The Courts have also used this program for pre-trial services for
offenders who are awaiting trial. Methods of referral are through Courts, Local Supervisory
Authority, and Parole and Probation Officers.
Program Objectives:
To make maximum use of non-custody resources to hold offenders accountable for their
offenses and to increase community safety.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Monthly statistical data tracking demographics of program usage.
Monthly Average to be Served: 36 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
®
High
® Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
® Local Control
®
Low
®
Limited
Which Treatment Prnvidor(s) Will Yrni I lee Within Thic Drnnrern9
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
(W. /viper Wnagamnt, Ooly* e, w. Da
sm~°rtem
~
s
n A
W
S
h
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
® Supervision Fees $76,765
® Other Fees $130,000
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
23
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Transitional Housing Scholarship Program
Program Category:
Transition Services
Program Description:
The integration of offenders into the community from a custody situation is enhanced when
services are available to help them meet basic needs. Whenever possible, transitional
services will be initiated prior to release from incarceration and will be available for a
maximum of up to 28 days. Transitional services are the result of coordination between jail
program staff, prison counselors, mental health workers and parole and probation officers.
Some subsidy funds are available for those offenders who are not appropriate for transitional
housing. Offenders are required to report weekly to their PO, to insure compliance and
progress with supervision. At which time the offender is approved for an additional week of
subsidy housing. This plan also subsidizes a large population of AIP offenders from DOC
providing transitional housing to AIP participants at local motels and Oxford Houses.
Program Objectives:
To enhance offenders' opportunity for success in transitioning from incarceration to the
community and to increase community safety by providing pro-social housing.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Monthly data collection on those offenders who enter the program will be tracked to manage
success rates of the program.
Monthly Average to be Served: 6 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
h
® Hi
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
g
® Parole/Post-Prison
❑ Misdemeanor
® Female
®
Medium
® Local Control
®
Low
❑
Limited
d Will You Use Within This Pro ram?
Which Treatm
Provider Name
ent Provi e s
Treatment Type
CPC YIN?
If Yes, Overall Score
pa. AW r~WTwR C*g M. EX nw
A- wouwalfttsubvwft~)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
® Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund $13,826
❑ County General Fund
® Supervision Fees $17,174
❑ Other Fees
® Other $9,000
Additional Comments:
24
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Moral Reconation Therapy & Cognitive Thinking
Program Category:
Other Programs
Program Description:
Moral Reconation Therapy, (MRT®), is a 12 step cognitive behavioral treatment strategy
designed to promote the growth of a positive self image and to facilitate the development of
higher stages of moral reasoning. MRT® focuses on seven basic treatment issues:
confrontation of beliefs, attitudes and behaviors, assessment of current relationships,
reinforcement of positive behavior and habits, positive identity formation: enhancement of
self-concept, decrease in hedonism and the development of frustration tolerance. Cognitive
thinking class is an evidence-based program that offers a cognitive-behavioral curriculum
that promotes pro-social thinking and behavior. Research has demonstrated that antisocial
thoughts and cognitive skill deficits support criminal behavior. The program targets these
areas by using a behavioral approach that includes modeling, rehearsing and rewarding.
Job search class is offered monthly to offenders. The class covers the basics of how to look
for work and how to use local resources for assistance such as the employment department
and Work Source. In addition, advice on the application and interview processes are
addressed.
Program Objectives:
Reduce offender recidivisim and enhance pro-social change.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
Correctional Program Checklist
Monthly Average to be Served: 60 Type of Offender(s) Served:
Crime Category:
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Probation
® Felony
® Male
® High
® Parole/Post-Prison
® Misdemeanor
® Female
® Medium
® Local Control
❑ Low
❑ Limited
Which Treatment Prnviderrcl Will Yn., I ice Within Thic Drnnre,n9
Provider Name
Treatment Type
CPC Y/N? _
If Yes, Overall Score
091 tugs MWW9VemR COON". DV. oi¢I
olawm smcoaeem,k0awt&,m.mnw
Abuse "Ou &ubeb AW
Deschutes County Parole and
Cognitive
❑ Yes ® No
Probation
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
❑ State Grant-In-Aid Fund
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
® Supervision Fees $71,946
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
25
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Program Name:
Custodial and Sanction Beds
Program Category:
Custodial/Sanction Beds
Program Description:
Offenders sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year or less, as well as those serving
sanctions of 31 plus days, will be housed in our adult jail. Offenders serving these kinds of
sentences will be assessed upon admission to the jail and their needs determined. During
the period of their incarceration, they will be programmed for services designed to reduce
their risk to re-offend in accordance with their ability to comply with facility rules, sentence
length and program availability. Services available to offenders in custodial beds include
cognitive classes, anger management, family/parenting skills, AA, NA A&D treatment and
GED classes.
Program Objectives:
To hold offenders accountable, to reduce criminal behavior and to assist offenders to
change.
Method(s) of Evaluation:
100% of SB 1145 inmates and offenders serving jail sanctions of 31 or more days will be
booked into the Deschutes County Jail.
Monthly Average to be Served: 39
Type of Offender(s) Served: Crime Category:
® Probation ® Felony
® Parole/Post-Prison ❑ Misdemeanor
® Local Control
Gender:
Risk Level:
® Male
®
High
® Female
®
Medium
®
Low
®
Limited
VVnlcll I Itlalll
Provider Name
lOnt r VV,
Treatment Type
. _
CPCY/N?1 1,
If Yes, Overall Score
(!n, AVV Molugama6 cown", W. Dual
aaam swamrtlnk""M&bow"
a~ a suoamaa..wlaa
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Funding Sources
® State Grant-In-Aid Fund $1,479,991
❑ Inmate Welfare Release Subsidy Fund
❑ County General Fund
❑ Supervision Fees
❑ Other Fees
❑ Other
Additional Comments:
26
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Deschutes County
2012-2013 Sanctions and Services
Please indicate the monthly average number of offenders that participate in the sanctions/services listed
below; regardless of the funding source or how the sanction/service is paid for.
Custody
CorrectionsNVork Center 5
Electronic Home Detention 45
Jail 80
Substance Abuse - Inpatient 1
Non-Custody
Community ServiceNVork Crew 830
Cognitive 50
Day Reporting Center 0
Domestic Violence 152
Drug Court 12
Employment 15
Intensive Supervision 30
Mental Health Services 30
Polygraph 2
Sex Offender 130
Subsidy 7.5
Substance Abuse -Outpatient 75
Transition Services 6
Urinalysis 100
Other program/service provided that does not fit into any of the above categories
27
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
Deschutes County
2012-2013 Community Corrections Budget Summary
Program Name
Grant in Aid Find
Reism
S Fund
Other Ftnds aW
Fees
TOW
Adnidstri im and Su;W
$122,098.00
$562,732.00
$704,830.00
Bah w InEe cation / Famiy
Violence (Felm)
$439,236.00
$439,236.00
Sex Olf dm (Feln)
$739,758.00
$739,758.00
Stieit Crimes
$968,739.00
$149 240.00
$1,117,979.00
-M Hearth F
$155180.00
$155,180.00
Casebaric (Fdn)
$303,415.00
$303,415.00
Six OAsnder & BIP Tmhent
F
$20,130.00
$52,969.00
$73,099.00
SubstaaAbuse Treatmint
ffskg)
$70,000.00
$70,000.00
Sex dbnder isd
$113,674.00
$113,674.00
Domestic Vioence Deterred
Swircing P Mis
$172,30200
$172,302.00
Bah m Inermfion 1 Family
Vidmoe isd
$172,616.00
$172,616.00
Six O6errder & BIP Treatment
(Misd)
$12,900.00
$12,900.00
Substance Abuse Trtmer t
Misd
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Commurity Service
$53,383.00
$53,383.00
Electronic Maratori
$206,765.00
$206,765.00
Transi6 W Housing
Sdtdans ' ftram
$13,826.00
$26,174.00
$40,000.00
Moral
$71,946.00
$71,946.00
Custodial Beds
$1,479,991.00
$1,479,991.00
T4
.00
$f
$10701.00
MAMA
28
Deschutes County 2012-2013
Community Corrections Plan
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FATALITY REVIEW TEAMS
418.714 Domestic violence fatality review teams. (1) A local domestic violence coordinating
council recognized by the local public safety coordinating council or by the governing body of
the county may establish a multidisciplinary domestic violence fatality review team to assist local
organizations and agencies in identifying and reviewing domestic violence fatalities. When no
local domestic violence coordinating council exists, a similar interdisciplinary group may
establish the fatality review team.
(2) The purpose of a fatality review team is to review domestic violence fatalities and make
recommendations to prevent domestic violence fatalities by:
(a) Improving communication between public and private organizations and agencies;
(b) Determining the number of domestic violence fatalities occurring in the team's county and
the factors associated with those fatalities;
(c) Identifying ways in which community response might have intervened to prevent a fatality;
(d) Providing accurate information about domestic violence to the community; and
(e) Generating recommendations for improving community response to and prevention of
domestic violence.
(3) A fatality review team shall include but is not limited to the following members, if available:
(a) Domestic violence program service staff or other advocates for battered women;
(b) Medical personnel with expertise in the field of domestic violence;
(c) Local health department staff;
(d) The local district attorney or the district attorney's designees;
(e) Law enforcement personnel;
(f) Civil legal services attorneys;
(g) Protective services workers;
(h) Community corrections professionals;
(i) Judges, court administrators or their representatives;
0) Perpetrator treatment providers;
(k) A survivor of domestic violence; and
(1) Medical examiners or other experts in the field of forensic pathology.
(4) Other individuals may, with the unanimous consent of the team, be included in a fatality
review team on an ad hoc basis. The team, by unanimous consent, may decide the extent to
which the individual may participate as a full member of the team for a particular review.
(5) Upon formation and before reviewing its first case, a fatality review team shall adopt a
written protocol for review of domestic violence fatalities. The protocol must be designed to
facilitate communication among organizations and agencies involved in domestic violence cases
so that incidents of domestic violence and domestic violence fatalities are identified and
prevented. The protocol shall define procedures for case review and preservation of
confidentiality, and shall identify team members.
(6) Consistent with recommendations provided by the statewide interdisciplinary team under
ORS 418.718, a local fatality review team shall provide the statewide team with information
regarding domestic violence fatalities.
(7) To ensure consistent and uniform results, fatality review teams may collect and summarize
data to show the statistical occurrence of domestic violence fatalities in the team's county.
(8) Each organization or agency represented on a fatality review team may share with other
members of the team information concerning the victim who is the subject of the review. Any
information shared between team members is confidential.
(9) An individual who is a member of an organization or agency that is represented on a fatality
review team is not required to disclose information. The intent of this section and ORS 418.718
is to allow the voluntary disclosure of information.
(10) An oral or written communication or a document related to a domestic violence fatality
review that is shared within or produced by a fatality review team is confidential, not subject to
disclosure and not discoverable by a third party. An oral or written communication or a document
provided by a third party to a fatality review team is confidential, not subject to disclosure and
not discoverable by a third party. All information and records acquired by a team in the exercise
of its duties are confidential and may be disclosed only as necessary to carry out the purposes of
the fatality review. However, recommendations of a team upon the completion of a review may
be disclosed without personal identifiers at the discretion of two-thirds of the members of the
team.
(11) Information, documents and records otherwise available from other sources are not immune
from discovery or introduction into evidence solely because the information, documents or
records were presented to or reviewed by a fatality review team.
(12) ORS 192.610 to 192.690 do not apply to meetings of a fatality review team.
(13) Each fatality review team shall develop written agreements signed by member organizations
and agencies that specify the organizations' and agencies' understanding of and agreement with
the principles outlined in this section. [2005 c.547 §2]
Note: See note under 418.712
418.712 Definitions for ORS 418.714 and 418.718. As used in ORS 418.714 and 418.718,
"domestic violence fatality" means a fatality in which:
(1) The deceased was the victim of a homicide committed by a current or former spouse, fiance,
fiancee or dating partner;
(2) The deceased was the victim of a suicide and there is evidence that the suicide is related to
previous domestic violence;
(3) The deceased was the perpetrator of the homicide of a current or former spouse, fiance,
fiancee or dating partner and the perpetrator also died in the course of the domestic violence
incident;
(4) The deceased was a child who died in the course of a domestic violence incident in which
either a parent of the child or the perpetrator also died;
(5) The deceased was a current or former spouse, fiance, fiancee or dating partner of the current
or former spouse, fiance, fiancee or dating partner of the perpetrator; or
(6) The deceased was a person 18 years of age or older not otherwise described in this section
and was the victim of a homicide related to domestic violence. [2005 c.547 § 1]
Note: 418.712 to 418.718 were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added
to or made a part of ORS chapter 418 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to
Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
418.715 [1961 c.621 §§2,5; repealed by 1989 c.786 §13]
418.718 Statewide team. (1) The Department of Human Services may form a statewide
interdisciplinary team to meet twice a year to review domestic violence fatality cases, identify
domestic violence trends, make recommendations and take actions involving statewide issues.
(2) The statewide interdisciplinary team may recommend specific cases to a local
multidisciplinary domestic violence fatality review team for review under ORS 418.714.
(3) The statewide interdisciplinary team shall provide recommendations to local fatality review
teams in the development of protocols. The recommendations must be designed to facilitate
communication among organizations and agencies involved in domestic violence fatality cases so
that incidents of domestic violence and fatalities related to domestic violence are identified and
prevented. The recommendations must include procedures relevant for both urban and rural
counties. [2005 x547 §31
i
a~
ta-~
v ~
s a
C
0
U
3
O
Aw
4.
O
U
i+
U
F
J~
rN
oj
x
e~
C ~
a>
e
E
°
o
N ~ Q
w x ~
U c6
w x
I
t~
~
.
~
~
03 ~
03
S
U
o
W O ~
U
W O
T
w
d
~
Vii
~ C'
~ ❑X 'd i. T Q
A O ~
~
C ~
T OT ~
~ •
O
~ ~
Gp p .x'
N
~
s.
^
~
~ c
'L"
d
Q~ W c~C ~ w
q~ T
W C W~
N N ci ra "U q
y T
m
C~
I ro rp
x
o o v°q
ti
°n
a>
o~ moo
o.
~a70
6n
G
CC
Y
Y
L
d
a
N
U
3
U
^
cz Cj
j
4.1
N o
° a
v o a~
U°
46
U
" U W 'O .b
!
•
dl
d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
v
W U
~
~ a
U U
M
~
N
I1
v
N
ej
~
O
M
p
M
~n
~b
y
~b
T U
~ Y
P: o
o ~
b'
°
3 ~
o
W
~
N
•
O
~
3
0
m N
a
~ v
x ti
o 'b
3 0
V
~ C
3 0
Y ~
°
~N
N
~
M
T
°
o y
G
Vl °
V
O ~
GL ~
75
t'
.'J-+ T
V Y
YV
.
i
.
+