Loading...
2012-1792-Minutes for Meeting August 29,2012 Recorded 9/14/2012COUNTY NANCYUBLANKENSHIP,F000NTY CLERKpS CJ 7011.119 111 plij~iiiniiim ~„"m1, 08:15:44 AM i Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2012 Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney. Also present were Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator; and, for a portion of the meeting, Tom Anderson, Nick Lelack and Terri Payne, Community Development; Timm Schimke, Solid Waste; Ed Keith, Forester and Katie Lighthall, Project Wildfire; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; Marty Wynne, Finance; and media representative Erik Hidle of The Bulletin. Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. FEMA CDC Foundation Grant Request. Ed Keith asked for approval of a grant request. They were invited to participate in a Whole Communities program given to existing programs. The deliverable is to handle the project and show other communities how it is done. Katie Lighthall said they have a Facebook page meant to educate a portion of the population on the role of Project Wildfire. Someone from the CDC (Center for Disease Control) responded and said they wanted to find out more about Project Wildfire. The grant would be for $50,000 and the application process is not that challenging. It can be used to expand outreach or provide equipment. The focus is on natural disasters such as wildfire, but it could be used towards emergency preparedness in general. No match is required. It is for one year and no FTE's would be needed; about 90% of the funds are disbursed up front. Mr. Keith said that Project Wildfire has traditionally been funded through Title III money, but that has been diminishing. UNGER: Move support of this application, to be signed by the Interim County Administrator. BANEY: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 1 of 8 VOTE: UNGER: BANEY: DEBONE: Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. Regarding previous FEMA grants that are under review, Commissioner Baney wants to keep the heat on to get some resolution. They will send a letter to the congressional delegation and a letter pointing out what still needs to be done, and a schedule for doing so. UNGER: Support Commissioner Baney moving this process forward as needed. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: BANEY: DEBONE: Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. 2. Landfill Gas to Energy Update. Timm Schimke said he has been in contact with the Waste Energy Group, which has gotten funding and has a project going forward in El Dorado County, California. He also was in Washington DC for an annual conference where new technology is often discussed. The use of landfill gas to power vehicles is something that is taking off. There is a county in Virginia that made this change, and it has gone well. They put it in the pipeline of the natural gas company, and use fueling stations. The Sheriff and Road Department are interested in this since the cost is less than the current rate for gasoline or diesel. They heard there are concerns from the school (a couple of parents). Mr. Schimke has been in touch with their facilities manager as well as the school board president. They have said they do not have any problem with this process as long as they are kept informed. Staff and teachers at the school do not seem concerned but Mr. Schimke will work with them to make sure they are comfortable with the project. He said that sometimes a third party review would take place. He does not know the cost but it would not hurt to have this, regarding whether it is safe and makes sense, and the end use of the product. He will explore the review process and the cost. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 2 of 8 Mr. Kropp is looking towards additional hearings and media coverage so that when the issue is decided; all aspects would have been addressed. Commissioner Baney stated they are in this for the long haul and more input would be better for all concerned. Mr. Schimke will contact the Chamber of Commerce and other entities. Chair DeBone said they do not want to miss getting the third party to remain involved. Mr. Schimke said he thinks they want to get what they can done before the weather gets cold. Therefore, it would have to be in the spring if this is delayed by additional public meetings. Nick Lelack said he could work with Mr. Schimke to work this out. Mr. Kropp said that it needs to be clear how any revenue is used. He feels it needs to remain with Solid Waste. Chair DeBone stated that COCC now has a teacher who works with compressed fuel ideas. Commissioner Baney asked questions about how the revenue would be shared. Mr. Schimke stated they like the idea of a fixed amount each month, which makes budgeting easier. However, it might take advantage of rising markets. The company may also be hesitant to perhaps make less or to open their books, and this would be required if the County gets a percentage; 10% of the net is typical. Mr. Schimke might want to utilize a facilitator for any public meetings who can set parameters. Mr. Kropp wants the Board to be able to say they have done all they could to be fully informed on the project, and obtain as much public awareness and participation as possible. Commissioner Unger asked if there is a way to utilize biomass from the forests to do the same thing. It is not economical to handle it in other ways at this point. It has no real value at this time, which makes it hard to clean up the forests. Mr. Schimke said the FireFree program generates a lot of material that is often used for a variety of purposes to enhance soil. He said it can go into the landfill, but that is not the best use of the landfill. There are other processes but it is not known what would be done with what is left over. There is a concern that once you start pulling your landfill gas off and generate money, people stop composting or recycling. It is a huge savings to keep the landfill available for things that cannot be reused or processed otherwise. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 3 of 8 3. Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(b), a personnel issue. After executive session, the Board took action. UNGER: Move approval of Order No. 2012-034, with the changes as discussed during executive session. BANEY: Second. VOTE: UNGER BANEY: DEBONE: 4. Other Items. Yes. Yes. Chair votes yes. Regarding the process for selecting a County Administrator, dates were set for interviews of candidates. Panels need to be decided now. A total of four panels are preferred, one being the Board in executive session. Normally six or seven people are put on each panel, but the Board wants more participation. He asked the Board to decide on the panels and the makeup of each. (See attached draft.) He recommended 15 spots for County staff and Department Heads. Some of course will not be able to make it due to scheduling. Commissioner Baney suggested sending out the dates and times to all, giving a date to let Mr. Kropp know if they are able to attend. That will eliminate some. Ten seems like a lot of people since there will not be ten questions, unless some are just going to observe. The Commissioners suggested eight on each panel. Commissioner Unger suggested skipping the Chambers, let the cities decide who should represent them, and the same for the other groups. Chair DeBone likes the idea of an open invitation to those on the list, and letting that narrow down naturally, then going from there, with the caveat to all that they have to do this as space is available. No ODOT, no Chambers, ask someone from the Courts (probably the administrator). Commissioner Baney left the meeting at this point. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 4of8 5. South County Plan Update. Terri Payne said the official name now is the "Newberry Country Plan". It became available last week to the public. The parties have been through numerous meetings, with focus groups, interviews, presentations before various committees and groups, and put it all together into a draft set of goals and policies. More input was obtained and the document was finalized. The goals and policies are the heart of the document, and raise awareness on things that may not be Countywide but are important to the area. There has been a lively debate on the role of County government and defensible space policies. It is more of an art than a science. It was a challenge figuring out which ideas to leave in and which to eliminate. They feel it now reflects what they have been hearing for the past year. It will be adopted into the Comprehensive Plan. However, it is not considered comprehensive because it does not address agriculture, which is not a big issue in that area. It addresses issues that are only loosely connected with land use. However, these are included because they are important to the community. It is guided by themes that came up during the process. The Planning Commission is to schedule this soon, if the Board is comfortable with what is before them. Also, she wanted to know if notice should go out beyond the traditional requirements. Absentee property owners would not necessarily see a notice in the newspaper. The Department does not have the funds for this type of extensive mailing, and needs to know how to handle it. A postcard can go out quickly; including it with the tax bill will delay the process. Commissioner Unger likes the postcard idea and the Board should find the funds for this. Outreach to the absentee landowners is important. Chair DeBone agreed. Commissioner Unger asked whether it addresses high river water levels as is being experienced this year. The County has no control over this, the rivers change their flow and channels, and people have to know they live in a flood zone. Mr. Lelack stated there is a meeting set with various water entities in a few weeks, to plan for a public meeting to address this situation. Ms. Payne said the County can help facilitate the discussion but cannot correct the problem. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 5 of 8 Mr. Lelack said having a postcard go out enables Planning Commission meetings to take place in October, and some can be held in La Pine. The Planning Commission may then be in a position to make recommendations to the Board by the end of the year. Chair DeBone stated that the smaller lots in a rural area, and groundwater issues, are always a problem, and asked how this has been addressed. Mr. Lelack said it is generally handled through a State program called Regional Problem Solving. Ms. Payne said the residents do not like the idea that there is a problem. This will be incorporated into the Plan. Chair DeBone said it is still an issue; people bought land many years ago and now want to build but there are a lot of obstacles, including septic approval and groundwater issues. Ms. Payne stated there are still a lot of things to be addressed, and there will be a process for this. 6. Tax/Finance Update. Marty Wynne said they are still closing the fiscal year out. The beginning of the year is important after you get past July. Investment reports are about the same. The feds are talking about stimulus programs. Rates cannot be much lower but may stay the same for up to two years. The 0.6 interest the County now gets is better than budgeted. The pool might decrease but has stayed up thus far. The pool can invest differently. The important part of July's report is the comparison of the beginning net and the Health Benefits Trust fund. When they project to the end of the year, they use current experience and carry it forward. At this point, it can be distorted. A six-month average is more accurate. They had a bad July so the costs shown are extreme. Projections for 2013 show that if this level of expenditures continue, they would drop down significantly by the end of the year. They were almost 30% higher this July compared to the last. August may be bad as well. However, two months do not make a trend, and he does not take it too seriously until they have six months behind them. An imbalance has been created to draw down the fund, but at some point, it has to even out. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 6 of 8 Regarding PERS, the rate is drawing down and is solid. However, even with reserves they may have to raise the PERS rate next year. The future of PERS is unknown but costs could go up. If the stock market improves, this could be stable. PERS is almost all based on stock investments. Year-end comparisons show the general fund coming in higher than budgeted for beginning net working capital. The only one that is off is Health Services. The financial systems and programs the County has in place are doing what they are supposed to do. They are accurate and timely. Commissioner Unger asked about the Court Security numbers. Mr. Wynne said it seems to be a large percentage, but is just $18,000. Commissioner Unger said some places are cutting current retirees paychecks. Assets needed to fund into the future is $70 billion but they only have $60 billion. If all contributions were taken into one pot, it would equal about $1 billion. Earnings are everything in this regard. Commissioner Unger said that the 8% that some are getting paid is a big hit. Mr. Wynne stated that this has been discussed by many, but no one is interested in change. It is based on historical stock market figures over 28 years. About 20% of the amount is not being considered as they hope the stock market will fill it in eventually. Commissioner Unger mentioned that there was a proposal for the County to purchase Evergreen School but the State may not be a partner. He told someone at the City they would have to run the numbers. If it is does not make sense, they need to talk about next steps. Mr. Kropp stated that next week's executive session might need to be used for executive session to discuss jail project contracting and real property negotiations (North County Campus). It is time to talk about the different contracting methods and pros and cons of each for the jail project. Chair DeBone said he attended a meeting regarding the La Pine land conveyance issue. Teresa Rozic attended with others from the BLM. She is picking up the direct connection with BLM for the next year. There will be some staff time involved. Mr. Kropp stated it is appropriate for staff to take the lead, as the County is a partner, and come back to the Board when appropriate with ideas of who pays for what. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Page 7of8 Commissioner Unger asked about the process. When there are costs involved, is there the wherewithal of the players to come up with that kind of money. Chair DeBone said the others might be able to come up with $40,000 total. The cost is unknown at this point. Commissioner Unger asked if there is an opportunity for the County to be a banker in this regard, to get the work done that the BLM is not getting around to, and maybe hire someone who knows how to write a NEPA and arrange for inspections, and the other particulars. Mr. Kropp said he would check with Community Development and prepare the Board with some talking points. Being no further items discussed, the meeting adjourned at 4:40 p.m. DATED this oL Day of 2012 for the _ 14,ko-&~ Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. zAZC-1L,-, ATTEST: Recording Secretary Anthony DeBone, Chair 44--- Alan Unger, Vice Chair r Tammy Baney, mmissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Page 8 of 8 Wednesday, August 29, 2012 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.om WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2012 1. Tax/Finance Update -Marty Wynne 2. FEMA CDC Foundation Grant Request - Ed Keith 3. Landfill Gas to Energy Update - Timm Schimke 4. South County Plan Update Terri Payne 5. Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(a), employment of a public officer or employee 6. Other Items PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues. Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. lfyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6571. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Overview & Instructions BACKGROUND The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Office of Policy and Program Analysis (OPPA) has requested that the National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Foundation), in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response (OPHPR), contribute to the development and implementation of its Whole Community approach to emergency management. The Whole Community approach states that preparing for, mitigating, responding to, and recovering from a disaster requires a method in which the entire community is empowered to work together as partners within government, non-profit, and the public and private sector (see http://www.fema.gov/whole- community). Through a contract with FEMA, the CDC Foundation and CDC's OPHPR have identified examples of existing community efforts that exemplify a Whole Community approach to emergency management. As a result, several of these communities are invited to apply for subcontracts up to $50,000 to continue existing program efforts and/or enhance current preparedness initiatives. The CDC Foundation and the CDC will award, publicize, and evaluate these select community initiatives that reflect and embody key principles of a public engagement strategy to build emergency preparedness and resilience Upon completion of the contract, it is expected that not only will promising examples of community engagement within the context of emergency preparedness and resilience be identified and publicized, but their lessons learned will be synthesized to provide recommendations for duplication of similar efforts within other communities. It is expected that all of these activities will build and strengthen partnerships, empower local action, celebrate community work, and ultimately create a collective body of knowledge among the emergency management team nationally that supports a Whole Community approach to emergency management. For more information on the CDC Foundation, please visit: http://www.cdcfoundation.org/ For more information on the CDC, please visit: http://www.cdc.gov/ PERIOD O RMAN E The period of performance will be six months up to one year (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2013). Expectations of the funded program: • Utilize the funds to accomplish stated program objectives; • Communicate regularly with the CDC point of contact; • Host one or more site visit(s) for CDC Foundation and CDC staff to learn more about the project; and • Provide a final report. Expectations of the CDC Foundation and the CDC: • To distribute 90% of the award by October 15, 2012 and the final 10% upon receipt of the final report; • Collect detailed programmatic information to help build a learning community for disaster preparedness and response with the intention of informing recommended methods for other communities; • Share information about the program with FEMA; and • Publicize and celebrate the project on partner websites. APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS I . Complete Part A (Cover Sheet), B (Agency Description), C (Program Proposal), & D (Budget). 2. Submit the completed application with any attachments electronically by August 31, 2012. Please send applications to Bernice Bronson at bbronson@cdcfoundation.ore. 3. Please send a hard copy of the cover page (with signatures) to Bernice Bronson, CDC Foundation, 55 Park Place, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30303, by September 7, 2012. 4. If you have any questions, please contact Bernice Bronson at bbronson@cdcfoundation.org. August 10, 2012 Appendix A. FEMA's Whale Comm Principles and Stra c Themes A Whole Community approach attempts to engage the full capacity of the private and nonprofit sectors, including businesses, faith-based and disability organizations, and the general public, in conjunction with the participation of local, tribal, state, territorial, and Federal government partners (FEMA, 2011). Principles • Understand/meet the actual needs of Whole Community • Engage/empower all parts of the community • Strengthen what works well in communities on a daily basis Strategic Themes • Understand community complexity • Recognize community capabilities/ needs • Foster relationships with community leaders • Build/maintain partnerships • Empower local action • Leverage/strengthen social infrastructure, networks, assets Reference: Federal Emergency Management Agency. A Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management: Principles, Themes, and Pathways for Action. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Department of Homeland Security, 2011. Page 1 of 1 Part A• Cover Pa e Program Title: Please provide a concise title that is descri tine and meaningful to people outside the program.) Agency Name: Mailing Address: city: State: Zip: What a of entity is the agency? MI c3, business, government, other Website: Point of Contact Name: Point of Contact Title: Phone: Email: Check Should be Made Payable To: Mailing Address: if different than agency) Ci State: Zi : By sigming below, the signatories verify having read the application and that the information in the application is correct and supported by the fiscal adrninistrator. Name of Applicant: Title: Signature of Applicant: Date Signed: Name of Fiscal Administrator: Fiscal Administrator's Title: I Signature of Fiscal Administrator: I Date Siened: I Subcontract Application 2012 Page 1 of 4 Part B: A enc Descri tion 1. A enc Purpose: Describe the ur ose o the agency. 12. Azencv Services: Describe the services that the agency provides. Subcontract Application 2012 Page 2 of 4 Part C: Program Proposal 1. Program Objectives: Describe objectives that will be accomplished during the period of performance with this funding. Objectives should relate to the principles and strategic themes of FEMA's Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management (See Appendix A and htt ://ww►v. ema. avfwhole-communi . Objectives should be specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and time-sneciftc (SMART). P . Approach: Provide an overview of the approach that will be used to meet the stated program objectives. (i.e., identifv the sequence ofsteps to be completed) 3. Partners: Identify the program's communi partners and describe their ro am-related role. 4. Site Visit(s): CDC Foundation and CDC anticipate conducting site visits to achieve a greater understanding of the program. Please list any upcoming dates for events, exercises, trainings, meetings, etc. that may provide an opportunity for the CDC Foundation and CDC to learn more about the program and its impact. S. Evaluation & Measures of Success: Describe how accomplishments of the proposed program objectives will be measured and documented (i. e., outputs and outcomes of the use of funding). Examples may include increases to the number of participants, individuals served, etc. Subcontract Application 2012 Page 3 of 4 Part D: Budget Please outline the program's proposed hudget_for the period ofperformance in the table below (or attach an Excel spreadsheet). Examples gf'budgret categories could include personnel, equipment, materials/supplied, space rental fir an event, marketing, etc. BUDGET DESCRIPTION AND CATEGORY I JUSTIFICATION O COST' I COST TOTAL Subcontract Application 2012 Page 4 of 4 Community Development Department Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Soils Division 117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon 97701-1925 (541)388-6575 FAX(541)385-1764 http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ MEMORANDUM DATE: August 21, 2012 TO: Board of County Commissioners Deschutes County Planning Commission FROM: Terri Hansen Payne, Senior Planner Peter Gutowsky, Principal Planner Nick Lelack, Planning Director MEETING: August 29, 2012 (Board of County Commissioners at 1:30 p.m.) August 30, 2012 (Planning Commission at 5:30 p.m.) RE: Draft South County Plan SUMMARY Deschutes County has prepared a draft plan for the South County area (south of Lava Butte, excluding Sunriver and La Pine). The draft Plan is structured to be a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, consistent with state law. It will address the area's unique land development pattern, abundant natural resources and community priorities. Since January, residents and stakeholders have utilized an assortment of public outreach opportunities to identify and prioritize important local issues, and develop goals and policies. The draft Plan will be provided to the BOCC and Planning Commission on Thursday, August 23, and posted online at www.deschutes.oM/southcountyplan. The purpose of these meetings is to present and discuss the draft Plan and seek direction from the BOCC and Planning Commission on the next steps. DIRECTION Planning staff seeks the following direction from the BOCC and Planning Commission: 1. Is the draft Plan ready for public hearings as presented or modified by either body; or 2. Is additional work necessary prior to initiating the public hearing and review process and, if so, what areas of the draft Plan require additional attention? Board of County Commissioners' Direction Staff also seeks direction from the BOCC on the preferred public notices for the forthcoming public hearings. Quality Services Performed with Pride The minimum notice requirements include a 35-day notice to the Department of Land Conservation and Development and a notice published at least 10 days prior to each public hearing. In addition to the minimum requirements above, planning staff will: • Post all notices on the County's website; • Send emails to all individuals and stakeholders who have participated in the process to date as well as all partner organizations - public, private and non-profit, encouraging them to forward the notices to their members; and, Issue press releases and work with local media to publicize the public hearing process. Though not required for legislative plan amendments, staff is seeking direction from the BOCC on whether individual notices should also be sent. Individual notices may be sent in one of the following ways: • Mail a postcard to all property owners in South Deschutes County. The estimated cost for such notices is $3,500, which is not currently included in the CDD budget. • Provide a fall tax bill insert for all South Deschutes County property owners. The estimated cost for the tax bill insert is approximately $550, and also not currently included in the CDD budget. Planning Commissioners Direction Staff seeks direction from the Planning Commission regarding how it prefers to conduct this work session to review and discuss the draft Plan. Specifically, does the Commission prefer to: 1. Allow public comments on any section of the draft Plan prior to or during the Commission's review and discussion of the document? 2. Conduct the review and discussion by the eight themes identified in the goals and policies or section by section of the draft Plan? 3. Enable staff to provide an overall presentation and then open the discussion to items identified by the Commission? 4. Other? -2- A Pl,aw for 5outh2Yw D2SGhu.tCS CDU.wtu Newberry cou.vvtru 2012-20.32 TE'S Deschutes County Community Development Department Planning Division AL,coutst 23, 2012 Document Reproduces Poorly (Archived) Abzvx.owLeolg mevuts Preparation of the South County Plan was made possible through the cooperative efforts of many public and private residents and stakeholders. Deschutes County extends its appreciation to all those that participated and contributed to this process, including the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, La Pine Senior Center, Deschutes Public Library-Su n river Branch, citizens, property owners, City of La Pine, state and federal agencies, and other community organizations. Board of County Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Chair Alan Unger, Vice Chair Tammy Baney Planning Commission Bill Raney, Chair (Sisters) Christen Brown, Vice Chair (At Large) Ed Criss (South County) Matt Lisignoli (Redmond) Hugh Palcic (South County) James Powell (Bend) Todd Turner (Bend) Form QC. mt iioners Merle Irvine, (Bend, 2008-2012) Richard Klyce (Redmond, 2008-2012) Planning Staff Nick Lelack, AICP, Planning Director Peter Gutowsky, AICP, Principal Planner Terri Payne, AICP, Senior Planner Peter Russell, Senior Transportation Planner Tim Berg, GIS Analyst Programmer Jenni Whelan, Planning Intern Newberry Country NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY - 2012 To 2032 Newberru CoRo tru : A Pia , for SoIxthero, Deschutes Gou.wntu 20.2-2032 Introduction Context Project Background 2 Scope of Work 3 Community Engagement Techniques 3 Issue Identification and Analysis 4 Policy Formation 5 Plan Organization 5 How to Use this Plan 6 Vision Statement, Plan Goals and Policies 8 Vision Statement . 8 Plan Goals and Policies . 8 Community Involvement and Partnerships . 8 Land Use . 9 Economic Development Public Facilities 12 Transportation 13 Natural Hazards 15 Natural Resources 15 Recreation 16 Policy Topics 18 Public Involvement and Partnerships 18 Stakeholder Groups 20 Website and Survey 20 Community Response 21 Land Use and Economic Development 22 US Census 22 Bend-La Pine School District Enrollment 24 Land Use Designations 24 Economic Development Initiatives 28 Community Response 28 Public Facilities and Transportation 28 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY - 2012 To 2032 ii Water and Wastewater Emergency Services Transportation Community Response Natural Environment Geology Water Resources Surface Water Quality Groundwater Quality Wetlands Fish and Wildlife Wildland Urban Interface . Community Response Recreation Figures 28 30 30 32 ......I 32 32 33 35 36 36 36 38 40 Figure I, Outdoor Amenities Proximate to South County Figure 2, Issue Identification to Policy Formation Figure 3, Developing and Implementing an Area Plan Figure 4, Partnerships Figure 5, Survey Question Tables 40 4 7 19 21 Table 1, 2010 Census 23 Table 2, South County Population Estimate at Build Out 23 Table 3, Build Out for South County Occurs in 2027 23 Table 4, South County Land Use Designations 24 Table 5, South County Zoning District and Associated Acreages 25 Table 6, Public Water Systems in South County 29 Table 7, Domestic Wastewater Systems 30 Table 8, 303(d) Listed Sections of the Upper Deschutes River in South County 35 Table 9, 303(d) Listed Sections of the Little Deschutes River in South County 35 Appendix Appendix 1 - Issue Identification Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies Appendix 4 - Policy Formation Appendix 5 - Maps 5.1 - Vicinity 5.2 - Bend-La Pine School Student Boundary 5.3 - Comprehensive Plan Designations 5.4 - Zoning 5.5 - Wildlife Overlay Zone 5.6 - Destination Resort Eligibility Areas 5.7 - Public Water Systems 5.8 - Lo Pine Rural Fire Protection District 5.9 - Oregon Conservation Strategy 5.10 - Domestic Wastewater Systems 5.11 -Special Road Districts 5.12 - La Pine Park & Recreation District 5.13 - South County Bikeways iii NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY - 2012 To 2032 vutrool uot%ow Context Located south of Lava. Butte, south Deschutes County has long been a destination choice for visitors and full time residents relocating from other parts of the United States. As illustrated in Figure 1, people settle in this region because of the outdoor amenities and range of housing options offered in Sunriver, La Pine, and the rural unincorporated area. This area is renowned for its recreational amenities. It offers a vast array of sights and activities stemming from Newberry National Monument, Deschutes National Forest, and the Deschutes, Little Deschutes and Fall rivers. The South County Plan encompasses the rural areas south of Lava Butte with two exceptions: Sunriver and La Pine are governed separately. Sunriver is recognized by Deschutes County and the state as an Urban Unincorporated Community. Section 4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan contains specific land use goals and policies for the resort. La Pine incorporated in 2006 and as a municipality adopted its own Comprehensive Plan in 2012. Figure 1 - Outdoor Amenities Promote to South County MryY - 11EenPd parks ,..a...._.. Elk. Lake `t■~ ~ r. " } Lava 2 ' Lak:c . t, Lava L~Ir1dS VI$iiQr Cei°dr~r , Snr" ,r Lova River Ca ?a t s I L7va C7st Forest Lake Croon L4.. Prone ,i Reservoir Newberry National ftli Volcanic Monument ;~c I q Pine y State Pur East Pr7~lin Lake j ~ wig F _ Lak,r^~ Davis ("r Luk? i to P NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY The 1990 U.S. Census reported 9,854 people living in south Deschutes County. Twenty years later, the 2010 US Census identified 15,319, a 61 % increase. While the South County Plan only contains goals and polices for the rural unincorporated area, it recognizes the influence of La Pine and Sunriver. According to the 2010 US Census, La Pine's population is 1,653. This municipality is known for its commercial businesses along Highway 97, a 327-acre industrial park led by the community-based La Pine Industrial Group, and Frontier Days, an annual 4th of July celebration. Sunriver adjoins the Deschutes River on 3,300 acres. The 2010 US Census recognized Sunriver as a Census Designated Place, with a population of 1,343. It is considered by many to be the premier Northwest destination for vacationers, golfers, and outdoor recreationalists with 63 holes of world-class golf, clubs, pools, spas, lodging, and restaurants. Sunriver Village, located within the resort, offers retail and commercial stores and an ice rink in the winter. Project Background Deschutes County in November 2011 updated its Comprehensive Plan and during that process residents South Deschutes County supported an area-specific plan to replace one, titled Regional Problem Solving Project Regional Problem Solving for South Deschutes County, which had been in existence since the late 1990s. Deschutes Engaging south cowity citi7.ens and local. state and federal stakeholders in I County and the Oregon Department of Land coordinated problem solving to find "locally appropriate solutions" Conservation and Development recognized in 1996 that unintended consequences could occur from rural subdivisions platted in the 1960s and 1970s. As a result they initiated a collaborative project known as Regional Problem Solving (RPS). The RPS project area encompassed approximately 42 square miles between Sunriver and La Pine, and included thousands of small-subdivided lots. The RPS project involved all aspects of the community, including property owners, interest groups, and public agencies at the local, state and federal levels. Deschutes County presented a Final RPS report to the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission in 1999. The report listed policy recommendations, ultimately adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, that Deschutes County then utilized to implement the RPS program. The following list summarizes some of the County's achievements pertaining to groundwater protection, transferable development rights, wildlife protection, and the development of a mixed use Neighborhood Planning Area located in the La Pine Urban Unincorporated Community, now the city of La Pine. RQGIONAL PROBLEM SOLVING FOR SOUTH OESCHVTFS COUNTY FINAL REPORT Fnu THE OREGON LAND CONSERVATION 8 DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION iuty 19% DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2 NEWRERRY COUNTRY; A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY • Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and Deschutes County receive a $5.5 million dollar grant to test innovative nitrogen reducing onsite systems. • County adopts a Transferable Development Credit Program to reduce residential density in rural areas to meet the carrying capacity of onsite sewage disposal systems. • County identifies areas where existing community sewer systems can be expanded or relocated (La Pine Sewer District, Oregon Water Wonder Land Unit #2). • County adopts deer migration priority area map that prohibits the siting of destination resorts. • County acquires from the Bureau of Land Management and master plans a 540 acre Neighborhood Planning Area. Scope of Work MPUMNSM The Deschutes County Board of C wlt# a tea, Commissioners approved an eighteen month scope of work in December 2011 to develop South County tn~y an area-specific plan for South County that UTM Deni s Scope of ~ upon completion, can be adopted into the I TM I pox Comprehensive Plan. Revising the RPS Chapter sewers 5 MQ q - ensures that the South County Plan continues to address the area's unique assets, community pbUF1ES YUFti11,4[ID UIUTAN IAri'EFZF m" -wide issues, and planning efforts being ~OPPO8Tl1 M", rlygC,W~"tr~t-"r. . OHM SP" ws" m%,GwwwATa undertaken by La Pine, Sunriver, La Pine Park s 9ODNOWC DEWRLOM"` NECOMMDOAAM and Recreation District and state and federal agencies. By reengaging residents and stakeholders, the County's intent is to create a plan that reflects local values and preferences for growth and development, the environment, natural hazards, transportation and more. Community Engagement Techniques The following discussion of the public outreach process provides context for the development of the Plan goals and policies. The key was interacting with as many people as possible. Spanning eight months, from January to August 2012, the County employed techniques designed to promote inclusive and meaningful public involvement. The County's outreach efforts are summarized below: • Community Meetings: Conducted nine evening meetings in La Pine and Sunriver, allowing residents and stakeholders to provide recommendations and suggestions about growth and development issues. • Website: Regularly updated a website at www.deschutes.arg/southcountyl2lan • Survey Monkey: A twenty question land use survey was posted from March I to April 30. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 3 • Schools: Staff coordinated with the Bend-La Pine School District and Parent Teacher Associations (PTA), culminating in meetings with the Three Rivers Elementary School PTA. • Organizations: Staff met with non-governmental and governmental organizations that have a regular presence in South County. • Interviews: Staff conducted fifteen minute telephone interviews with South County community leaders. • Homeowner Associations and Road Districts: Staff made presentations at annual homeowner association and road district meetings. • Frontier Days Booth: Staff attended La Pine Frontier- Days on July 4. • Focus Groups: Three focus groups consisting of community leaders and interested residents reviewed initial drafts of the South County Plan goals and policies. • Planning Commission Work Sessions. Commission held eight work sessions to provide direction to staff. • Other: Staff utilized press releases, radio interviews and newspaper articles to encourage public participation. Issue Identification and Analysis Based on the public participatory techniques summarized above, over 70 issues were raised in south Deschutes County by residents, property owners, and other stakeholders. These issues help inform the construction of this Plan's policies. Figure 2 shows the linear progression from issue identification, analYsis to policy formation. Figure 2 - Issue Identification to Policy Formation South County Issues E* Analysis Policy Formation Issues and concerns gathered through these public participation techniques are presented in Appendix I, Issue Identification. This appendix organizes land use issues under four general categories: Land Use/Economic Development, Transportation, Natural Resources /Natural Hazards, and Recreation/Other. A close examination of the issues reveal several converging themes. As shown in Appendix 2, fourteen themes emerge. Six of them strike a collaborative theme, underscoring opportunities for public, private, and community partnerships. The other eight focus on economic development, wildlife habitat, water quality, wildfire prevention, 4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY transportation, parks and recreation, public outreach, and minimizing the role of government. Policy Formation Deschutes County can only address the multitude of issues mentioned earlier through partnerships with residents, property owners, the private sector, non-profits, and public agencies. However, as shown in Appendices I and 2, there is some sentiment in South County to minimize the role of government so residents can pursue greater self-sufficiency. Today, many residents are satisfied with existing service levels. Nonetheless, those perspectives are not shared universally. While public outreach techniques highlight some reluctance to pay for expanded services, others involved in community organizations see emerging opportunities to improve the region's social, economic, and environmental conditions. This intersection of competing values are pervasive in the formation of any community planning process. The balancing act is to ensure that partnering agencies and community organizations use their scarce resources in the smartest, most effective way possible. Each can ill-afford to misuse public and private funding because the opportunity costs are so high. Appendix 3 provides a detailed list of partnering agencies and organizations that have a presence in South County. This Plan is intended to be practical, measured and strategic in order to get more from existing budgets by identifying projects that generate multiple benefits. The key is to improve the alignment and coordination among public, private and community partners so South County can develop new approaches, harness community initiative, and build greater capacity on planning and investment. Appendix 4, while not exhaustive, identifies potential partners as they pertain to formulating policy, culled from the issues and themes in Appendices I and 2. Appendix 5 contains a series of land use maps. Plan Organization A South County Plan represents a legal framework for implementing a vision for building stronger, more resilient rural communities by managing growth in this region to 2032. This is a Plan that recognizes the realities facing rural Deschutes County, while acknowledging what governments can and cannot influence. It demonstrates leadership for improving the ways in which collaboration can occur among all sectors: government, businesses, non-profits, and residents to achieve a shared vision. This Plan presents the results of the planning process that led to the development of the its goals and policies. It has a similar format to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan and other community plans, by containing the following five sections: NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 5 • Introduction: This section describes the project background, Plan organization, and application. Visign. Plan Goals and Policies: This section provides a policy framework to guide rural growth and development and address other community issues in South County. • Polio Topics: This section summarizes five topics that galvanized residents. It describes Deschutes County's public outreach techniques, including agency and organizational partners that have an integral role in contributing to South County's quality of life. It also discusses land use designations and economic development opportunities, public facilities transportation, the natural environment and recreation. Plan policies are based in part on information contained in this section. • Appendices : Five appendices contain information describing issue identification and analysis, partnering agencies, policy formation, and maps. How to Use the Plan An area plan is an integral part of the Comprehensive Plan and upon adoption by the Board of County Commissioners (Board) constitutes an official chapter that can only be changed though a plan amendment. As a component of the Comprehensive Plan, it has more geographically specific goals and policies. It also contains a vision statement conveying the expectations of a specific community, an inventory of existing conditions, and the results of the public involvement process. These three elements shape the establishment of goals and policies, which then provide a guide to decision making for preferred land uses that support local development objectives and capital improvements during a twenty year period. Figure 3 - Developing and kyWiemendng an Area Plan Vralkiipbg 00 Anw, Introduction Community Input Vision Statement Land Use and Population Facilities and Services Surrounding Land Uses Goals and Policies Implenwa ft an Ana Pir Community Plan Adopted by the Board As illustrated in Figure 3, once adopted, an area plan can be implemented using regulatory and non-regulatory tools. One set consists of zoning, subdivision, and related land use ordinances. Others promote intergovernmental coordination and public-private partnerships to collectively achieve the preferred future. It is Planning Division Drafts Annual 11k Work Plan Public Testes During Spring Budget Hearings Board Adopts Planning V Division Work Plan Staff Initiaties Implementation Measures 6 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY important to note that these types of approaches must be consistent with Oregon's Land Use Program and 19 Statewide Planning Goals. The Board establishes an annual work plan every fiscal year for the Planning Division. Citizens and stakeholders can engage the Board in the spring during the development of the budget to endorse Planning Division work tasks and implementation measures that directly relate to south Deschutes County. Generally, area plans focus solely on land use issues. This Plan however, addresses land use and a wide array of additional issues raised by the public. The result is a comprehensive area plan for South County. It is an umbrella document comprised of goals and policies capturing this area's desired future over the next twenty years. It should be used to guide decision making for Deschutes County and other public agencies as well as non-profit and private organizations actively involved in South County. N~ NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 7 V%s1.DV, stateMe0tt, PLa w C oa Ls a KA POU' Ues Vision Statement The intent of this vision, developed in cooperation with South County residents and stakeholders, is to ensure that with vigilance and foresight, the unique rural character can be maintained and enjoyed by present and future generations. South Deschutes County will retain and enhance its high quality of life as a collection of diverse, rural neighborhoods tied together by outstanding natural and recreational amenities. Residents and land owners will enjoy excellent educational opportunities for all ages, a safe and efficient transportation system, healthy environment, thriving economy, access to quality health care, strong community organizations and partnerships, respect for private property rights, and active involvement in decisions that shape the area. Plan Goals and Policies Community Involvement and Partnerships Goal I Involve and engage the South County community in land use planning. Policy 1. 1 Conduct an annual meeting in South County with the Board of Commissioners and Deschutes County Planning Commission. Policy 1.2 Reassess through a public process, the South County Plan as needed, but at least every three to five years, and analyze: a. Population growth; b. Effectiveness of plan implementation; and c. New issues or emerging opportunities. Policy 1.3 Maximize public participation on locally significant issues by establishing, where appropriate, technical or citizen advisory committees, and encouraging federal and state agencies to do the same. Policy 1.4 Share information and communicate with residents, community organizations and absentee landowners through: a. Hosting town hall meetings with all South County partners; b. Utilizing internet and social media; c. Distributing, through a variety of avenues, outreach and education materials that provide information on locally-led efforts promoting social, economic and environmental programs; and d. Encouraging government agencies, community organizers and leaders to write articles for local newspapers. 8 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Goal 2 Support public, private and non-profit partnerships. Policy 2.1 Foster a sense of shared identity and pride in South County through community projects, such as a beautification program to enhance the area for tourists, businesses and residents. Policy 2.2 Partner with the community to retain and improve South County's high quality of life. Policy 2.3 Support the community on projects that promote self-reliance, such as community greenhouses or gardens that increase the local food supply. Policy 2.4 Work with homeowner associations, road districts, community groups, government agencies, and non-profits to collectively address land use and natural resource issues, such as code enforcement or responsible animal husbandry. Policy 2.5 Encourage organizations like La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce, and Central Oregon Visitors Association to maintain and enhance webpages highlighting South County's regional amenities and community resources. Policy 2.6 Partner with the real estate community and others to provide education materials for new residents and/or property owners about rural lifestyles, including: a. Non-urban levels of public services (e.g. unpaved roads); b. Fire prevention; c. Noxious weeds; d. River and groundwater management; and e. Preservation of wildlife habitat. Policy 2.7 Collaborate with Lake and Klamath counties on regional issues that affect South County, such as groundwater quality, economic development, adult education, social services, transportation, and recreation, including trails. Land Use Goal 3 Provide County assistance to address existing and emerging land use issues and opportunities. Policy 3.1 Collaborate with the South County community and City of La Pine to address: a. Business expansion and recruitment, including adding another grocery store and a movie theater; b. A 24-hour health care facility; c. Coordination among health care providers and clinics; d. Community greenhouses; e. Affordable senior housing and/or aging in place programs; NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 9 f. Trail development suitable for walking, biking and equestrian use;; g. Farmer's markets; h. Public transportation; i. La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area (the area bounded by Burgess Road, US 97, 1 st Street and Huntington Road); j. Post-high school education, employment retraining, adult learning, and vocational programs; k. Meeting locations allowing for remote teleconferencing, such as Skype; and 1. Other projects as identified. Policy 3.2 Initiate amendments to County Code to address demographic trends or community concerns, such as the need for accessory housing units, within the parameters of state law_ Policy 3.3 Where federal or state government lands are surrounded by subdivisions, work with the affected government agency to retain them in public ownership for public use. Goal 4 Manage County-owned lands to meet community objectives. Policy 4.1 Evaluate and manage County-owned lands as follows: a. Properties meeting the County criteria for park lands as cited in Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.14, may be designated by the Board of County Commissioners as such to be retained for public ownership; b. Properties recognized in a park district master plan may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for a park designation to be retained in public ownership; c. If a property does not meet the criteria for park lands, consider auctioning the property to place it in private ownership; d. If a property does not meet the criteria for park lands, but is within a wildlife overlay zone, consider maintaining the land as open space; and e. Use for other community needs, such as social services, centralized sewer, or low income housing as allowed by ORS 271.330. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with local park and recreation districts or other qualified organizations to transfer County designated park lands into their ownership for park and recreation purposes, as allowed by State Statue, ORS 275.330. Policy 4.3 Use all the proceeds derived from the La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area to protect the groundwater in South Deschutes County, such as funding septic system repairs and upgrades to qualifying low-income homeowners. 10 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Policy 4.4 In conjunction with the City of La Pine, evaluate and revise as needed, the Transfer of Development Credit and Pollution Reduction Credit programs by considering, at a minimum, the following: a. Reconvening the Transfer of Development Credit Advisory Committee; b. Analyzing the results of the program; c. Understanding existing market trends and land development constraints in the rural area and La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area; and d. Exploring, if necessary, different alternatives for developing the La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area that maximize revenues from the sale of property to fund groundwater protection efforts. Goal 5 Address high groundwater lots and zoning and surveying issues. Policy 5.1 Develop a work plan with affected stakeholders to determine the future development and conservation potential of approximately 1,500 high groundwater lots. The work plan will need to incorporate the potential for an unknown number of lots to be served by centralized sewer or other methods of collection in the future, which would make them developable, where that possibility may not currently exist. The work plan shall, at minimum, analyze: a. The impact of the newly permitted development on roads, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and wetlands; and b. Acquisition options such as purchasing the lots, land transfers or other ideas. Policy 5.2 Develop a work plan, in coordination with property owners, to update the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to reflect the land use and development patterns in Section 36, Haner Park and other applicable areas with long-standing issues, while protecting ecologically significant natural areas or resources. Policy 5.3 Develop economically viable strategies to address surveying errors including those in the Lechner Estates area. Economic Development Goal 6 Foster a healthy economic and employment base in South County, while retaining the rural character. Policy 6.1 Promote La Pine as a regional commercial and employment center, through concepts such as: a. Maintaining and supporting La Pine's representation on Economic Development for Central Oregon's (EDCO) Board; NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY b. Coordinating as needed with EDCO, La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce, Sunriver, the City of La Pine, and others to promote economic development opportunities; and c. Collaborating with Klamath County, Gilchrest and Crescent. Policy 6.2 Facilitate South County tourism by: a. Supporting organizations like Travel Oregon, Central Oregon Visitors Association, and La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce's efforts to promote the area as a tourist destination; b. Promoting the Upper Deschutes, Little Deschutes, and Fall rivers for low- impact activities such as fishing and canoeing; and c. Marketing the Cascade Lakes Highway as a defining South County asset and gateway. Goal 7 Diversify the rural economy. Policy 7.1 Adopt zoning for small destination resorts, as defined in ORS 197.445. Policy 7.2 Encourage telecommunications companies to develop high-speed internet access to support local businesses. Policy 7.3 Assess the feasibility of rural development initiatives, including potential amendments to County Code, such as: a. Forest product businesses; b. Extractive industries; c. Energy facilities; and/or d. Neighborhood oriented commercial development. Public Facilities Goal8 Sustain public facilities and services commensurate with South County's unique development pattern. Policy 8.1 Support local, state, and federal law enforcement and fire protection agencies. Policy 8.2 Support agencies and organizations like the Deschutes Public Library, Bend-La Pine School District, Little Deschutes Grange Hall and La Pine Park and Recreation District's missions that provide: a. Services and programs for the community, and b. Meeting spaces and educational resources. Goal9 Partner with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to protect groundwater and public health. 12 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Policy 9.1 Explore opportunities for Goal I I exceptions and the full range of advance wastewater treatment opportunities, including but not limited to, the use of onsite alternative treatment technology, centralized sewer systems and cluster systems. Policy 9.2 Support DEQ's efforts to evaluate and communicate the costs and benefits of wastewater alternatives such as centralized wastewater systems and sewer district formation, by considering pilot projects or potential case studies. Transportation Goal 10 Expand transportation options. Policy 10.1 Support the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) and community organizations in their efforts to: a. Expand regional public transit options for residents living in Sunriver, La Pine and outlying rural neighborhoods, b. Expand park and ride lots where there is an identified need; c. Explore commute options such as private ride share or shuttles; d. Expand mobility options for persons with disabilities and/or medical needs; e. Involve user groups such as students, elderly, and disabled residents in public transit discussions; and f. Provide information about existing transit opportunities. Policy 10.2 Explore the long-term potential for passenger rail. Policy 10.3 Create a regional trail plan in coordination with the City of La Pine, Sunriver, Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), La Pine Park and Recreation District, U.S. Forest Service, special road districts, and homeowner associations, considering at minimum: a. Adequate rights of way; b. Appropriate locations and designs to provide connectivity; c. Public safety; d. Access to schools, parks, employment and other popular destinations; and e. Funding sources, including bicycle licenses. Policy 10.4 Support the trails identified in the County Transportation System Plan and, when requested, evaluate proposed trails such as: a. U.S. Forest Service efforts to improve non-motorized connections that either use or parallel USFS # 41 Road from Spring River Road just west of Sunriver to Cascade Lakes Highway by the Inn of the 7th Mountain. b. U.S. Forest Service proposal for a paved path from Sunriver to Lava Lands Visitor Center. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DFscHUTES COUNTY 13 Policy 10.5 Evaluate emerging trail opportunities that include: a. Partnerships with other public trail planning processes and trail development groups with technical experience; b. River corridor or river trails such as those promoted by the Bend Paddle Trail Alliance; and c. A regional trail connecting Central Oregon communities such as La Pine, Sunriver and Bend. Policy 10.6 Request BPAC to amend their bylaws to require at least one at-large member be from South County. Policy 10.7 Support local initiatives to create a South County trail alliance organization. Policy 10.8 Work with affected jurisdictions to acquire, develop, connect, and maintain a series of trails along the Deschutes River and surrounding public spaces. Policy 10.9 Work cooperatively with City and parks and recreation districts to support grant applications to build or maintain trails in the rural County. Goal I 1 Maintain and improve the public road system. Policy 1 1.1 Support the voluntary formation of special road districts. Policy 11.2 Partner with special road districts, the County Road Department and neighborhood associations to determine the best ways to maintain roads that provide primary thoroughfares or emergency egress. Policy 11.3 Identify potential funding options for road maintenance. Policy 1 1.4 Post a clear explanation of which roads are maintained and why on the Road Department website. Goal 12 Partner with Oregon Department of Transportation, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Sunriver and La Pine to address regional transportation issues. Policy 12.1 Coordinate solutions for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles to cross Highway 97. Policy 12.2 Evaluate a north-south alternative to Highway 97 on the western edge of South County, extending from Burgess Road to Spring River Road. Policy 12.3 Coordinate with Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of La Pine on the La Pine Transportation System Plan. Policy 12.4 Work with the U.S. Forest Service to address maintenance of Forest Service roads that provide access to rural subdivisions, such as USFS # 44. 14 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Natural Hazards Goal 13 Minimize the threat of wildfire in the Wildland Urban Interface. Policy 13.1 Assist fire districts and community organizations in fire prevention activities, such as: a. FireFree spring and fall events; b. Debris clearing and/or drop off and pick up sites; c. Ladder fuel reductions; and d. Updating Community Wildfire Protection Plans. Policy 13.2 Encourage neighbors and residents to become Firewise, a national recognition for fire-adapted communities. Policy 13.3 Amend County Code to require landowners to maintain defensible space. Policy 13.4 Encourage the formation of an organization within the Greater La Pine Community Wildfire Protection Plan area with a fire fighting and river corridor protection focus similar to the Upper Deschutes River Coalition. Policy 13.5 Support the productive use of materials removed during fuel reduction efforts. Policy 13.6 Work with homeowners, the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Department of Forestry to ensure all subdivisions have adequate evacuation routes and signage. Goal 14 Prepare for other natural hazards. Policy 14.1 Evaluate emergency shelters to ensure that alternates are available if primary shelters are inaccessible. Policy 14.2 Provide information on noxious weed regulations and effective weed control. Goal 15 Promote individual self-sufficiency while recognizing community interdependence. Policy 15.1 Promote personal responsibility in preparing for natural disasters. Policy 15.2 Encourage families to become self-sufficient for the first three days after a major disaster by taking, at minimum, the following steps: a. Make a plan; b. Build a three-day emergency supplies kit; and, c. Get trained in CPR and first aid. Natural Resources Goal 16 Support environmental stewardship and natural resource protection. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 15 Policy 16.1 Coordinate with non-profit organizations that have technical expertise and an active presence in South County such as Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District, Deschutes River Conservancy, Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, and Trout Unlimited. Policy 16.2 Facilitate or support public processes to enhance community understanding on issues that may impact the natural environment, such as pesticide/herbicide use or geothermal energy development. Policy 16.3 Support an accessible web-based directory or rural handbook describing local organizations specializing in environmental issues so citizens can easily identify points of contact. Policy 16.4 Track the air quality impacts from potential sources of pollution, such as unpaved dirt roads. Policy 16.5 Encourage responsible alternative energy initiatives that recognize South County's energy potential. Policy 16.6 Maintain a South County representative on the Deschutes County Weed Control District Board. Policy 16.7 Support efforts to expand recycling opportunities, including woody debris and curbside recycling, if feasible. Policy 16.8 Assess the feasibility of forming a South County wetlands mitigation bank. Policy 16.9 Coordinate with homeowner efforts to address stagnant water in side channels draining to the Deschutes River. Policy 16.10 Coordinate with state and federal agencies on significant natural resource issues, including new threatened or endangered species listings. Policy 16.11 Participate in the Deschutes River Conservancy efforts to work with all partners in the upper Deschutes Basin on a comprehensive water management plan that restores flows in the upper Deschutes River while meeting the needs of users. Policy 16.12 Coordinate with the Oregon Water Resources Department, Bureau of Reclamation, and Deschutes Basin Board of Control to regularly engage riverside property owners to discuss peak summer water releases from Wickiup Reservoir. Recreation Goal 17 Encourage a variety of parks, trails and recreation options for South County residents. 16 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DEscHUTES COUNTY Policy 17.1 Support parks and recreation facilities and services by: a. Engaging the neighborhoods not served by a park district as of 2012 in a discussion of park district options.; b. Supporting the expansion of outdoor amenities, such as public or private campgrounds; and c. Supporting agencies, schools and organizations, such as the La Pine Parks and Recreation District or Bend La Pine School District, that provide a variety of youth facilities and programs. Policy 17.2 Collaborate with the La Pine Park and Recreation District, community organizations, Sunriver and La Pine to provide safe and convenient river access, including: a. Improving existing sites including those at or near Harper Bridge and Maxwell Veterans Memorial Bridge; and b. Assessing options for new or improved public locations. Policy 17.3 Work with the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to maintain and improve access to recreation activities including hunting, fishing, hiking and off-road opportunities. Policy 17.4 Ensure that the trails policies under the Transportation section of this Plan consider also multi-use and specialized recreational trails. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 17 Pol,icU ToP%cs The South County Plan is adopted as a chapter of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan, which was updated in 2011. Like the overall Comprehensive Plan, this Plan must comply with Statewide Planning Goals and regulations. The Oregon planning program was initiated in the 1970s to protect rural lands, including farms, forests and natural resources, by promoting growth in urban areas. Within those parameters, this Plan is intended to address unique conditions as well as provide a voice for what matters to the South County community. This Plan differs from many Oregon land use plans because most plans include data and analysis for each Statewide Planning Goal. However, since this information is provided in the Comprehensive Plan update and the 2012 Transportation System Plan, it is not repeated here. Goals and policies cited in this Plan complement those in the Comprehensive Plan. They are specifically tailored to address South County's issues and perspectives, stemming in large part from the area's rural development pattern. Together the Comprehensive Plan and South County Plan can guide future programs and actions for the area. Several goals and policies indirectly relate to land use, such as the need for adult education and vocation training, tourism promotion, or development of high-speed internet. For many of these policies, County government will take a minor role, if any, in implementation. But these policies are included to provide visibility for issues that received considerable community support. The following five sections provide context for understanding South County Plan goals and policies. Many of the policies propose specific projects or actions that will ultimately require a thorough public process when they are initiated. Public Involvement and Partnerships During the three year period culminating in the Comprehensive In:W . Plan update, county residents noted the importance of involving the community in local decision-making. Policies in the COMMUNITY Comprehensive Plan recognize the need for using a variety of Meetings public outreach methods. The South County Plan process SOUTH COUNTY needs incorporated several techniques. Starting in January 2012, two kick-off meetings were held to introduce the project and begin identifying community expectations. In February, Deschutes County brought together over 20 representatives from local, state and federal agencies to staff tables and give presentations. To complement their presentations and resource materials, the County also provided handouts to attendees summarizing the region's existing demographic and land use conditions. 18 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Deschutes County held the partnership meeting at the La Pine High School. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce residents to agencies and organizations that are actively involved in the region. These relationships can provide opportunities to share resources that enhance the region's overall capacity to implement land use policies within this Plan. They also highlight challenges facing the area by acknowledging what public agencies can and cannot influence. Figure 4, while not exhaustive, illustrates the extraordinary level of local knowledge and expertise that can be leveraged to effectuate positive change in south Deschutes County. Appendix 3 provides a detailed list of partnering agencies and organizations that have a presence in south Deschutes County, and a short synopsis of their respective expertise. This information can serve as a clearinghouse that residents and stakeholders can utilize to coordinate and implement projects in their neighborhoods and the region as a whole. Again, this list is not exhaustive. Local Government Serra-L a Pare School District City of Lo Pine Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council O Deschutes County Deschutes Soil & Water Conservation District La Pine Park & Recreation District La Pine Rural Fire Protection District Project Wildfire Road Districts H omeowner Associations Figw.e 4 - Fa b--hips State Government Environmental Quality Residents Business & Indust Central Oregon Builders Central Oregon Realtors 0 Central Oregon Visitors Association Economic Development for Central Oregon La Pine Chamber of Commerce 0 La Pine Industrial Group property Owners Sunriver Resort, LLC Sunriver HOA Community_Organizations Deschutes County Citizen Action Group La Pine Senior A cHvi ty Center March meetings relied upon a series of table exercises to enable participants to first discuss, then identify, and later prioritize their respective land use issues under four categories: Land Use/Economic Development, Transportation, Natural Resources/Natural Hazards, and Recreation/Other. As a starting point for these discussions, staff summarized land use issues Fish & Wildlife Forestry Land Conservation & development Parks State Lands Transportation Non- Governmental organizations © Deschutes River Cons ervancy Trout Unlimited Trust for Public Lands Upper Deschutes River coalition Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Federal Government Bureau of Land Management Deschutes National Forest Fish and Wildlife NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 19 identified in RPS, the High Groundwater Project (2009), and the Comprehensive Plan update. Meetings in May focused on reviewing a draft vision for South County and examining land use solutions, potential obstacles, and opportunities to collaborate with the region's local, state, and federal agencies. Draft goals and policies were prepared and reviewed at focus groups and community meetings in July and early August. Stakeholder Groups Deschutes County also reached out to a number of organizations, ultimately conducting meetings with the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, Deschutes County Citizens Action Group, Trout Unlimited, Project Wildfire, Upper Deschutes River Coalition, Lions Club, and Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District to listen to their specific perspectives. County staff also contacted the Bend-La Pine School District and its PTAs, leading to subsequent discussions with the Three Rivers Elementary School PTA and an informational booth at the school to promote the Plan and receive feedback from parents and students. Homeowner associations and road districts were also invited to participate. In May, June, July, and August, the County engaged Deschutes River Recreation Home Sites 6 and 9, Fall River, Haner Park, Ponderosa Pines, Oregon Water Wonder Land Unit #I, Special Road District I/ Deschutes River Recreation Home Sites 1-6, River Forest Acres, Spring River, and Wild River at their annual meetings. Phone interviews were also employed. Seven community members shared their visions and expectations for the region. They represented: • A third generation family from La Pine and current business owner • La Pine Chamber of Commerce • Newberry Eagle • Volunteer • Klamath County resident who owns property in south Deschutes County • La Pine Planning Commissioner • Rancher Website and Survey Deschutes County regularly updated its website (www.deschutes.org/sauthcou_ntvalan) to provide residents and stakeholders with: • Project schedule and Scope of work • Contact information • Maps • Outreach opportunities, meeting announcements and results • On-line survey • Summary sheets describing existing conditions and demographics • Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioner work session and hearing materials 20 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTE5 COUNTY Released for two months between March and April 2012, the informal survey provided through the website, represented another tool to capture community input. Fifty-four people responded to 21 questions. As demonstrated in Figure 5, respondents were asked their opinions about the quality of life in south Deschutes County, opportunities for growth, consequences of unplanned rural development, land use priorities, and topics making the most difference in ones neighborhood. Figure S - Survey Question 2. Please ctroose ONE of the fallowing that best descrrilm your opinion on the quality of life in South aesoles Gory over the past free years. Vffy CAM - _ -I Reepon ReaparM pagmt count te.5% to Good _..q i 4&3% 2s Average I 24.1% 13 pw „ 74% 4 Very Pw t e 1 L"Mm t 1 Community Response Partnership discussions led to conversations about the role of County rcners government. Some people expressed a preference for minimal involvement, noting "rc that they moved to the area in search of personal freedom. Others stated a preference for the County government to partner with the community to achieve common goals or facilitate with other government agencies to address wider issues. It was acknowledged that County government can assist efforts through many avenues. Facilitating meetings, donating land, supporting grant funding requests or entering private- public partnerships are just some of the methods that can be used to work together to retain and improve the rural character that attracts people to the area. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 21 Land Use and Economic Development Southern Deschutes County spans more than 125 square miles and is bounded by federal lands managed by the Deschutes National Forest and Bureau of Land Management. Approximately 12,000 lots were platted in the 1960s and 1970s, prior to the enactment of Oregon's land use planning laws. As of 2012, there are 7,403 housing units in the rural county, excluding Sunriver, recognized as a Census Designated Place and La Pine. Approximately 5,125 or 70% of those lots are occupied. Many of the lots are proximate to floodplains, wetlands, riparian areas, deer migration routes and lodgepole pine forests. Most lie within tracts that extend roughly 25 miles south of Sunriver, adjacent to the scenic Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers and contain small I to 2 acre parcels. Only a limited number are serviced by sewer or water districts, or paved roads. Other distinct areas include rural residential properties in Newberry Estates, near Paulina Creek, northeast of La Pine, and tracts in Section 36, near Highway 31. The water table in many places is shallow - less than six feet for most properties and less than two feet for approximately 1,500 privately owned lots. These "high groundwater" lots experience groundwater rising to within 24 inches of natural ground surface. Each lot must be evaluated to determine if there is 24 inches of separation. If not, under Oregon Department of Environmental Quality rules, no septic system can be installed in these conditions (OAR 340, Division 71), thereby prohibiting residential development. US Census _ States, The US 2010 Census provides demographic data for Sunriver, La Pine and rural unincorporated area. Table I summarizes South County's C ensus 2010 2010 population, housing units, and occupancy status for these particular areas. The 2010 population for the rural portion of South County is 12,273. As Table 2 illustrates, a vacant lands inventory performed in 2011 identified the potential for 2,708 dwelling units. The estimate is based on 2010 Assessor data, potential land divisions, vacant lots (excluding high groundwater properties), and the number of units per acre allowed in each zone. It excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs Resort, a portion of Vandevert Ranch, and a majority of Crosswater Resort, which are recognized as a Census Designated Place. If all 2,708 lots develop and household unit size remains at 1.9 persons, South County's rural population will increase by 5,145 people, bringing its total to 17,418. Under this scenario, Table 3 shows that full build out would occur in Year 2027. It is important to note that the population estimate assumes all buildable lots are developed, but 22 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY does not account for potential population growth from second homes, which could become primary residences. It also does not account for the potential development of the approximately 1,500 high groundwater properties. Table I - 2010 Census Sunriver City of Rural So. 2010 Census CDP La Pine z County Total Population 1393 1,653 12,273 15,319 Total Housing Units 4,568 942 7,403 12,913 occupied 725 698 5,125 6,548 Housing Unit/ Occupancy Status vacant 3 3,843 244 2,278 6,365 %vacant 84% 26% 31% n/a i Census Designated Place includes Sunriver, Caldera Springs and Crosswater 2 Includes all areas outside of Sunriver, Crosswater, Caldera Springs and City of La Pine 3 Vacant could include second homes, short-term rental homes, homesfor sale, foreclosure, etc Table 2 - South County Population Estimate at Build Out 2010 Census Potential Dwelling Coordinated Population Future Population Build Out Population 2 Forecast Based on Undeveloped Population Units 3 Estimate (Household Unit sae) Lots Estimate 12,273 2,708 1.9 5,145 17,418 Population estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs, and Crosswater, which are recognized as a Census Designated Place; and City of La Pine 2 Dwelling unit estimate based on 2010 Assessor's data, land divisions, vacant lots (excluding high groundwater properties), and the number of units per acre allowed in each zone. Estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs Resort, a portion of Vandevert Ranch, and a majority of Crosswater Resort, which are a Census Designated Place a Coordinated Forecast uses housing unit size of 1.9, calculated using the total population count for the unincorporated county in the 2000 Census and dividing it by the total number of housing units in the unincorporated county. Table 3 - Build Out for South County Occurs in 2027 Average Annual Build Out Population Population Forecast 2010 Population i 2 Growth Rate Estimate Year 12,273 2.20% 17,418 Year 2027 Deschutes County Population Forecast (Ordinance 2004-012) 2 Population estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs, and Crosswater, which are recognized as a Census Designated Place, and City of La Pine NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 23 Bend-La Pine School District Enrollment R. , , , R - , For the 2011/2012 academic year, a total of 1,735 students B E N p A L A P, N F from South County attend Three Rivers Elementary School, s r 6 n n t , Rosland Elementary School, La Pine Elementary School, w . , v - n C . t Three Rivers Middle School, La Pine Middle School, and La Pine High School. All of these schools are in the Bend-La Pine School District. The school boundary for Three Rivers K-8 School encompasses Sunriver and properties south of the resort, bordering South Century Drive as it intersects with Huntington Road and extends westward towards the Little Deschutes and Upper Deschutes rivers. Fall Rivers Estates is also in the Three Rivers K-8 School boundary. Land Use Designations Land Use is governed by 19 Statewide Planning Goals, but particularly Goal 2, Land Use Planning. Refer to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Section 1.3 for further details. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan designations identify general land uses and provide a legal framework for establishing zoning districts. Zoning regulates land uses that are allowed in each respective district with development standards. Table 4 lists the predominant comprehensive plan designations and corresponding zoning districts for South County. Table 5 shows the acreage associated with the districts. Table 4 - South County Area Land Use Designations Comprehensive Plan Designations Zoning Districts Agricultural Exclusive Farm Use Zone Destination Resort Destination Resort Overlay Zone Floodplain Floodplain Zone Forest Forest Use I & 2 Zone Open Space and Conservation Open Space and Conservation Zone Rural Commercial Rural Commercial Zone Rural Residential Exception Area Rural Residential 10 Zone Surface Mining Surface Mining Zone, Impact Combining Zone Unincorporated Community Unincorporated Community - Rural Service Center Other Relevant Districts Landscape Management Combining Zone Wildlife Combining Combing Zone 24 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Table 5 - South County Zoning District & Associated Acreages Zoning Districts' Acres 2 Percent' Exclusive Farm Use La Pine 5,706 3% Flood Plain 4,974 3% Forest 1 135,827 76% Forest 2 4,392 2% Open Space and Conservation 8,979 5% Rural Residential 10 17,596 10% Other (Unincorporated Community, Surface Mining, Rural Commercial) 149 0% Total 177,623 100% Overly and Combining Zones Wildlife Combining 99b55 56% Destination Resort Overlay 2,000 1 % Landscape Management Combining 8,274 5% Zoning districts, combining and overlay zones exclude Sunriver and La Pine 2 Acres include roads, right-of way, lakes, rivers 3 Rounding may not add to 100% _ Described below in greater detail are South Deschutes County's Comprehensive Plan designations. An "Agricultural Lands" designation and EFU zone protects farmlands in Deschutes County pursuant to Statewide Planning Goal 3 (Agricultural Lands). As discussed in the Agricultural Lands Section of the Comprehensive Plan, protecting agriculture is one of the primary goals of the Oregon land use system. A 1992 study identified seven agricultural subzones. For each subzone, standards determine minimum parcel sizes for farm divisions to protect the commercial agricultural land base. The subzone applicable to south Deschutes County is EFU - La Pine (EFULP). Its specifically noted for riparian meadows, grazing and meadow hay. The minimum acreage for this subzone is 37 irrigated acres. Refer to Section 2.2 of the Agricultural Lands section of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. Statewide Planning Goal 8, the recreation goal, was amended in 1989 to specify a process for locating destination resorts i" on rural land without taking an exception to Goals 3, 4, 11 and 14. This was followed by legislation incorporating Goal 8 into Oregon's land use statutes. By these actions, the State of Oregon recognized destination resorts as a legitimate rural land use. In order to allow destination resorts, Goal 8 requires that Deschutes County adopt a "Destination Resort" map NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHuTEs COUNTY 25 showing which lands are eligible for destination resort development. Although a property is mapped as eligible for a destination resort, a destination resort may not be permitted outright in that location. In order to be approved, a proposal for a resort must be processed as a conditional use and comply with the specific standards and criteria established by the county. In 2010, the Board of County Commissioners adopted new criteria and procedures for updating its Destination Resort Maps. One year later the Board officially updated them. In south Deschutes County, 573 properties, encompassing 2,000 acres are designated as eligible for siting a destination resort. Refer to Section 3.9 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. A "Flood lain" designation protects public and private property from hazards associated with floodplains; conserves important riparian areas along rivers and streams for fish and wildlife resources; and preserves significant scenic and natural resources. Floodplains are defined as the lowland and relatively flat areas adjoining inland waters including at a minimum, that area subject to a one percent (100-year recurrence) or greater chance of flooding in any one year. The areas of special flood hazard are identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a report titled, Flood Insurance Study for Deschutes County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas. This report was revised in September 2007, and includes accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Floodplains in Southern Deschutes County are adjacent to the Deschutes, Little Deschutes and Fall rivers. The Flood Insurance Study is on file at the Deschutes County Community Development Department. Refer to Section 2.5 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. Maintaining strong protections for forest land is another primary goal of the Oregon land use planning system. Statewide Planning Goal 4 sets forest identification and protection standards which must be met by local governments. The Goal requires forests to be designated on a comprehensive plan as "Forest Lands" and protected primarily for the growing and harvesting of trees. The key concept is local governments must inventory forest lands and protect them through local regulations. In 1992, as part of State mandated Periodic Review, Deschutes County revised its forest designations and associated regulations to two (F- I and F-2). As shown in Table 5, the vast majority of lands in South County are zoned for forest uses. Refer to the Section 2.3 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. 26 NEWBERRY COUNTRY, A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY An "Open Spate and ConseoazOn" designation protects views either through the Landscape Management Combining Zone or Open Space and Conservation Zone. Open spaces are generally undeveloped areas that are being maintained for some other purpose, such as parks, forests or wildlife habitat. Besides the value that stems from the primary use of the land, open spaces provide aesthetically pleasing undeveloped landscapes. Because these areas are undeveloped they also provide additional benefits such as water recharge and safety zones from natural hazards like flooding. Refer to Section 2.7 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. The majority of private land in South County is designated "Rural Residential Exception Area." Rural Residential Exception Areas and corresponding Rural Residential (RR-10) zone are so named because the County had to follow a process under Statewide Goals 2, 3 or 4 to explain why these rural lands were excepted from State farm or forest designations. The minimum lot size for new subdivisions in the RR-10 zoning district is ten acres. Refer to Section 3.3 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. Besides the above designations there are other Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Districts relevant to south Deschutes County. " Uninc rated Communities" include "Rural Service Centers " pre-existing areas of minor commercial and residential development. The "Surface Mining" designation provides regulations for non-renewable resources, such as pumice, cinders, building stone, sand, gravel and crushed rock. The "Rural Commercial" designation refers to areas of pre-existing commercial development that do not meet the standards for Rural Service Centers. Refer to the Sections 2.10, 3.4, and 4.8, of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. There are also a number of overlay or combining zones. The "Wildlife Combining Z&n " provides additional regulations to protect deer migration corridors and elk habitat Limits are placed on fencing, building location, and new subdivisions. The "Landsc e Management Combining Zone" provides additional regulations to protect viewsheds from development along rivers and certain roads. Refer to Sections 2.6, 2.7, and 3.9, of the Comprehensive Plan for more details. Lastly, Deschutes County also administers a Transferable Development Credit (TDC) Program. Adopted in 2002 and modified in 2006, it contributes to the goal of reducing groundwater contamination from septic systems in south Deschutes County by minimizing the number of new septic systems. A TDC is acquired when the County pays a private property owner to record a restrictive covenant on their property. The restrictive covenant prevents the installation of a septic system. The purchased TDCs are necessary to transfer potential development to the Neighborhood Planning Area, a master planned neighborhood on county NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 27 owned property within La Pine. This property is served by community sewer and water systems. In 2006, the County modified the program to include Pollution Reduction Credits (PRCs) that would be created when an existing onsite wastewater treatment system is upgraded to a nitrogen reducing system. Pollution Reduction Credits, like TDCs would be accumulated as a requirement of developing in the Neighborhood Planning Area. Economic Development Initiatives There are many groups working on economic development initiatives in Deschutes County. Economic Development for Central Oregon (EDCO) is a private non-profit organization with the mission of diversifying the regional economy in the tri-county region (Deschutes, Crook and Jefferson counties). The La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce promote economic vitality in their respective communities. Travel Oregon and Central Oregon Visitors Association promote tourism. Please see the Comprehensive Plan Section 3.4 for further details on Deschutes County's rural economy. Community Response Predominant land use issues raised by the public emphasized the importance of coordinating with the City of La Pine to support their economic development interests, reforming Deschutes County's TDC Program, clarifying the disposition of County-owned lots, and resolving conflicts associated with high groundwater lots, surveying errors, and zoning. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through these public participation techniques are presented in Appendix I, Issue Identification. Public Facilities and Transportation Water and Wastewater There are approximately 12,000 lots, a majority of which are two acres or less, that were platted in the 1960s and 1970s, prior to the enactment of Oregon's land use planning laws. Without an understanding of the high water table or the aquifer's water quality, and with no promise of infrastructure, these lots were marketed nationally. Most of these areas lie within a tract adjacent to the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers that extends roughly 25 miles south of Sunriver. With a few exceptions noted later, existing homes now use individual, onsite wastewater (septic) systems for wastewater disposal and shallow wells for water supply. At least 50 percent of these wells draw groundwater from the upper 50 feet of the aquifer that underlies the area. Deschutes County's Comprehensive Plan and 28 NEWBERRY COUNTRY. A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY zoning regulations restrict parcel size and the type and intensity of allowed uses to those that can be served by an approved wastewater treatment system. Furthermore, State onsite wastewater system rules (OAR 340-071-0290) specify a minimum separation distance of 24 inches from natural ground surface to the groundwater table for the absorption area (drainfields) to ensure that onsite systems do not contaminate the groundwater. Due to this requirement, approximately 1,500 privately owned lots are not approved for an onsite wastewater system that can then serve residential development. Table 6 lists public water systems in South County, excluding those serving campgrounds, resorts on public lands, and properties in Sunriver or La Pine. In Oregon, a public water system is defined as having greater than three hookups or serving more than 10 people year-round. The Oregon Drinking Water Program administers and enforces drinking water quality standards for public water systems in the state through a partnership with Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Oregon Health Authority. Table 7 lists domestic wastewater systems in South County, excluding those in Sunriver and La. Pine. The DEQ requires public and private domestic wastewater systems to have their systems under responsible control and direction of certified operators. Table 6 - Public Water Systems in South County Name Connections Academy Lodge I Avion - Wild River 109 Cascade Meadows RV Park 103 Fall River Water Company 7 Glenwood Acres Homeowners Association 24 Hidden Pines RV Park 25 High Lakes Christian Church I Ponderosa Pines Water Company 450 Quail Run Golf Course Inc. 6 River Meadows Home Owners Association 141 Riverview Trailer Park 36 Thousand Trails Inc. 320 Troy Mathews Mobile Home Park 9 Water Wonderland Improvement District 1 200 Water Wonderland Improvement District 2 720 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTEs COUNTY 29 Table 7 - Domestic Wastewater Systems in South County Name # of Tax Lots Oregon Water Wonderland Unit No. 2 996 Stage Stop Meadows 248 River Meadows 251 Caldera Springs * 411 Cross water * 161 Vandevert Ranch * 7 * Note: Sunriver collects and treats wastewater from Caldeaa Springs, Crosswater and Vandevert Ranch, Emergency Services The La Pine Rural Fire Protection District is bordered on the north by the community of Sunriver and receives mutual aid protection from the Sunriver Fire Department. It is bordered on the east by federal lands, generally following the TransCanada gas line; the south by Klamath County with Old Howard Estates and Wagon Trail Ranch of Klamath County included; and the West by federal lands generally following the lines of demarcation of the inhabited and uninhabited lands. The Fire District also provides emergency medical services, including advanced cardiac life support transport. The Fire District covers approximately I IS square miles of area; the ambulance service area in both Deschutes and Klamath counties covers more than 1,000 square miles. Transportation South Deschutes County has a wide variety of roads ranging from ' ~tJ a PAR. dirt tracks to multilane modern highways. There are multiple public agencies and organizations that maintain these roads, including the US Forest Service (USFS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Deschutes County, and several special road districts. Many of the paved roads are used by bicyclists. While the Burlington Northern-Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway mainline runs through South County, the trains do not stop. The closest passenger rail depot is at Chemult in northern Klamath County. The USFS and BLM roads are primarily to provide aid in the economic development of natural resources or provide access to recreational sites. These roads can range from two-lane paved roads such as USFS #42 between Cascade Lakes Highway and South Century Drive, to well-graveled roads to two-wheel tracks. ODOT operates and maintains US 97, the major north-south trucking route on the east side of the Cascades. US 97 also serves as the major link for commuters and shoppers traveling between La Pine, Sunriver, and Bend. In 2010 on an average day, the highway traffic volumes varied 30 NEWBERRY COUNTRY. A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY from 16,100 at the south of Bend, to 9,800 at Vandevert Road, to 9,100 at First Street in La Pine, to 5,900 at Oregon (OR) 31. The latter highway links South County to Lakeview and northwest Nevada. At the Deschutes/Klamath county line, OR 31 carried an average of 1,500 vehicles. Deschutes County operates and maintains several key roads in South County. The traffic volumes are lower than on the State highways. The highest volume County roads in 2008-2010 were Burgess Road east of Day Road (7,709 vehicles); South Century Drive south of the Sunriver Business Park (4,881 vehicles); La Pine State Rec Road (2,776 vehicles); and Huntington Road (1,773). Most of the roads in South County have fewer than 1,000 vehicles a day and many are even less than 500. While the County Road Department maintains approximately 900 miles of roadway, there are roads maintained instead by the property owners abutting it. Called special road districts, these public roads are maintained by a separate entity, not Deschutes County. The roads are typically low volume and are related to rural subdivisions. Special road districts are governmental bodies formed by property owners who then tax themselves to maintain their local roads. State law, ORS 371.305 to 371.385 sets out how to form these districts and what they can do. There are 14 special road districts within South County. The residents forming the road district agree to pay property taxes to support it. Road District Commissioners are appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. The special road district improves and maintains its roads to a level agreed to by the residents of the district. Roads can be graveled or paved. Maintenance can include paving, repairs, blading, or snow plowing. Typically, the traffic volumes are fairly modest, although as these roads are public rights of way, any one can travel them. Cascades East Transit (CET), operated through Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council offers weekday passenger service between La Pine and Bend six times a day. The bus stops are at the South Deschutes County Services Building, which is on the east side of US 97 just south of Sixth Street, and the Wickiup Junction Park and Ride Lot, which is at the northwest corner of US 97/Burgess Road. CET buses operate throughout all of Central Oregon. CET is public transportation providing local on demand bus service in the Redmond, Prineville, Madras, La Pine and Sisters communities. The County is developing a system of designated bikeways in coordination with advice from area cyclists and the Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC). NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 31 The intent is to widen roads and/or shoulders during road improvement projects, provided no right of way or significant cut and fill operations are required. The bikeways are identified in the County's Transportation System Plan, which is a 20-year plan to improve and manage the County transportation network for all modes. Community Response Predominant public facility and transportation issues raised by participants included improving public safety, extending wastewater facilities to underserved areas, improving transit options for seniors and people with disabilities, mitigating dust from unpaved roads, and establishing trails from Sunriver to La Pine. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public participation techniques are presented in Appendix I, Issue Identification. The Comprehensive Plan Sections 3.6 and 3.7 also provide further detail on public facilities and services and transportation systems in rural Deschutes County. Natural Environment Geology South Deschutes County's landscape contains a geologic history that produced sediments of volcanic origin that were deposited in a basin over past eons. These conditions are the result of lava flows from the Cascade Mountains and Newberry Crater that periodically dammed and shifted the course of the Deschutes River, creating the La Pine Basin, where the deposition of sediments has occurred, sometimes burying older forests. Volcanic eruptions such as the one at Mt. Mazama (Crater Lake) approximately 6,800 years ago have contributed significantly to the volume of sediment deposited in the basin. The Mt. Mazama eruption is the source of volcanic material that has formed the predominant soil in the area. Groundwater flows eastward from the Cascade Range through permeable volcanic rocks out into the basin and then generally northward. Approximately one-half of the groundwater flowing into the Cascade Range discharges to spring-fed streams along the margins of the range. 32 NEW13ERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DFscHUTES COUNTY Water Resources State and federal agencies, including the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ,(DEQ), have a primary role in monitoring and enforcing water quality standards. The Oregon Water Resources Department (WRD) oversees the amount of water flowing through, and being diverted from Oregon's water bodies. The appropriation and use of water is regulated under state law. Under Oregon law, all water is publicly owned. With some exceptions, cities, farms, factory owners, and other water uses must obtain a permit or water right from the WRD to beneficially use water from any source - whether it is underground, or from lakes or streams. The water resource management process occurs outside the state land use planning system. Oregon land use and water management system are therefore not integrated. There are no overarching administrative rules that consider statewide water management in conjunction with land use planning. Stream flows in most of the upper Deschutes River basin are controlled by the influence of reservoir regulation and irrigation diversions in Bend. Storage reservoirs were constructed by irrigators for the purpose of storing water from the river during the non- irrigation season to serve as a supplement to the natural flow of the river during the irrigation season. Three reservoirs, Crane Prairie, Crescent Lake, and Wickiup were constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation in the 1920s and 1940s, financed by loans secured and repaid by the irrigation districts. Nearly 90% of the stream flow from the Deschutes River in Bend is diverted through irrigation canals during the irrigation season which typically runs from April through October. Irrigation districts divert twice the amount of water they need to serve their patrons due to porous volcanic soil. These seasonal flow disruptions have contributed to a decline in the overall health of rivers and streams including degraded fish habitat and poor water quality. Flow alterations are a major contributor to water quality problems in the upper Deschutes River basin, resulting in sections of the river being listed as water quality impaired under the federal Clean Water Act. In addition, increased water temperatures in Crane Prairie due to its shallow pool affects water quality in the river. The operations of Wickiup and Crane Prairie reservoirs for winter storage and summer irrigation have significantly altered flows, and consequently water quality in the upper Deschutes River. Wickiup Reservoir is located two miles downstream of Crane Prairie and is the primary supplemental storage facility for North Unit Irrigation District (NUID). Wickiup holds 200,000 acre-feet (AF) at full capacity, all of NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 33 which is permitted for NUID to use for irrigation. Wickiup receives numerous inputs from springs in and around the reservoir, with spring in-charge being measured at close to 500 cubic feet per second (cfs). Reclamation holds the title to Wickiup, and NUID is the operator. In contrast to Crane Prairie, Wickiup is only authorized for irrigation water uses. Crane Prairie Reservoir is situated a few river miles downstream from the headwaters of the Deschutes River. Local irrigation districts built the reservoir originally and Reclamation rehabilitated it in 1940. Crane Prairie is a relatively shallow lake that holds 55,300 AF at a maximum and has water rights for the storage of 50,000 AF. Wickiup operations contribute more to flow alterations than Crane Prairie because the storage supply, allocation, and demand is significantly greater. Under natural conditions, summer flows below Wickiup Reservoir averaged 730 cfs and winter flows averaged 660 cfs. Currently, during the storage season from October through March, the minimum flow is set at 20 cfs, or 3% of natural low-flow levels. During the irrigation season, storage releases from the reservoirs, most prominently Wickiup Reservoir, increase the flow of the Deschutes River to approximately 200% of what would have flowed naturally. Between the 1940s and 1970s, flows below Wickiup reached 2,000 cfs. More recently, the flow from Wickiup Reservoir peaks at 1,500 cfs in the middle of July through the middle of August. Irrigation needs influence flows in the Little Deschutes River to a lesser extent than they drive flows in the upper Deschutes River. Releases from Crescent Lake Reservoir in Klamath County and Paulina Lake regulate discharge in the Little Deschutes River and its tributaries. Crescent Lake stores water for Tumalo Irrigation District and modulates flows in Crescent Creek, a major tributary to the Little Deschutes River. Reservoir operations contribute to high irrigation season flows and low winter flows in Crescent Creek and the Little Deschutes River. While the releases from Paulina Lake generally do not affect discharge in the Little Deschutes River, they do in one of its tributaries. Paulina Lake stores water for multiple purposes and modulates flows in Paulina Creek. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife works with WRD to maintain water levels in the lake to balance storage, irrigation releases, and recreation and fisheries objectives. Its operation does not actively increase or decrease flows in the Little Deschutes River, since flows in Paulina Creek below the dam do not always reach the Little Deschutes River. Paulina Creek does not have enough flow in most years to reach the river as it dissipates into Paulina Prairie. DEQ regulates water quality permits, administers onsite sewage system programs, implements (jointly with Department of Health Services) the state-wide drinking water source assessment and protection program, certifies drinking water protection plans for public water supply 34 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY systems, and administers an underground injection control and an underground storage tank program. It issues Water Pollution Control Facilities permits that regulate discharge to non- navigable waters and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that govern point source discharge to navigable waters. The DEQ is also responsible for carrying out the State's obligation under the federal Clean Water Act. Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires states to identify and list water bodies that do not meet water quality standards. The state will set a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for water bodies that do not meet the quality standards, and the TMDL will calculate the maximum amount of pollutants that can be discharged into the water body while still meeting statutory standards. The Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers are identified on the federal Clean Water Act 303(4) List for not meeting water quality standards for several parameters. Surface Water Quality Tables 8 and 9 cite Oregon's Clean Water Act, Section 303(d) List of water quality impaired waters in the Upper Deschutes sub-basins. The 303(d) list is produced periodically by the DEQ that compares water quality data against federally-approved water quality standards. Table 8 - 303(d) Listed Sections of the Upper Deschutes River in South County River Mile Parameter Season Year Listed 189.4 to 222.2 Turbidity Spring/ 1998 Summer 189.4 to 222.2 Dissolved September 1998 Oxygen 1-June 30 189.4 to 222.2 Sedimentation I n 1998 so Source: DEQ 2002 Note: River mile 191.7 is Harper's Bridge Table 9 - 303 (d) Listed Sections of the Little Deschutes River in South County River Mile Parameter Season Year Listed 0 to 54.1 Dissolved September I - 2002 Oxygen June 30 0 to 54.1 Dissolved July I - August 2002 Oxygen 31 54.1 to 78 Temperature Summer 1998 54.1 to 78 Temperature September I - 2002 June 30 Source: DEQ 2002 Note: River mile 25 is Rosland Park NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 35 Groundwater Quality The DEQ, the US Geological Survey and Deschutes County have determined ^r.. that the safety of the groundwater in southern Deschutes and northern Klamath counties is threatened by nitrate contamination from traditional onsite septic wastewater treatment systems. The groundwater aquifer provides the drinking water source for most residents in this area. Most wells tap into an aquifer within 50 feet of the ground surface. The aquifers have no natural barriers to the ground surface and are very vulnerable to contamination from the surface. Groundwater in the southern Deschutes and northern Klamath aquifer is becoming contaminated with the nitrate at unsafe levels. Infants and pregnant or nursing women are especially vulnerable to increased nitrate levels. High levels of nitrate may also cause other health problems. To protect the quality of the drinking water in the aquifer, Deschutes County passed an ordinance in 2008 requiring upgrades on all septic systems; voters overturned the ordinance in a special election in March 2009. Deschutes County asked DEQ to take the lead to resolve the issue. Since 2010, DEQ has assembled a steering committee of community members to discuss and make recommendations to improve groundwater protection in southern Deschutes and northern Klamath counties. Wetlands The Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) in July 2011 approved a South County Local Wetland Inventory (LWI) and incorporated it into the Statewide Wetland Inventory. The LWI replaces a National Wetland Inventory (NWI) developed in the 1980s. State law requires Deschutes County to use the South County LWI in place of the NWI for notifying DSL of land use applications affecting mapped wetlands and other waters. A total of 114 wetlands, a 0.5 acre or larger were recorded within an 18,937 acre study area, south of Sunriver. In addition, 71 "probable wetlands" less than 0.5 acre and 29 artificial wetlands were identified. Most of the 114 mapped wetlands in the Upper Deschutes are currently capable of performing all functions commonly attributed to wetlands except for providing habitat to anadromous fish and nesting water birds habitat. The wetland functions having the highest value in the project area are: phosphorus retention, aquatic invertebrate habitat, and nitrate removal. The Board of County Commissioners adopted the LWI in September 2011. Fish and Wildlife South Deschutes County is known for its wildlife diversity. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife recognize the following keynote species and habitats. The first two are recognized in Deschutes County's Wildlife Habitat Combing Zone. 36 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY • Parallel to the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers, the Bend/La Pine Deer Migration Corridor is approximately 56 miles long and 3 to 4 miles wide. The corridor is used by mule deer migrating from summer range in the forest along the east slope of the Cascades to the North Paulina deer winter range. • Of the six key elk habitat areas in Deschutes County, one is located near Fall River, between the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers. This area is recognized by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife as providing critical habitat for calving, winter or summer range. • Oregon spotted frogs are currently only known to occur in Deschutes, Klamath, and Lane counties. In Deschutes County, Oregon spotted frogs occur within bodies of water on the Deschutes National Forest, Prineville District Bureau of Land Management and private land. The Oregon spotted frog is considered a Candidate species by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). The FWS is currently revisiting the status of the Oregon spotted frog for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Upper Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers and associated wetlands are key habitat for the frog. Riverine oxbows that contain permanent standing water but are no longer connected to the river provide essential overwintering and breeding habitat. The rivers and associated floodplains are connectivity corridors allowing populations of frogs to interbreed. Small ponds and isolated wetlands with emergent or floating aquatic vegetation and perennial water also provide habitat for the species, particularly those that are devoid of predatory fish and bull frogs. Historically, the upper Deschutes River and its tributaries supported healthy populations of redband and bull trout. Stream flows were naturally stable and the river supported resilient wetlands and verdant riparian areas. Over the past 100 years however, fish and wildlife have suffered as a result of basin-wide habitat degradation. Explosive population growth in the region and associated impacts - municipal and residential development, irrigation of agricultural lands, logging, and recreation - have all contributed to a decline in habitat quality throughout the Deschutes Basin. Native fish species of importance in the Upper Deschutes River Basin are redband trout, bull trout, and mountain whitefish. Introduced species of importance are brown trout, brook trout, kokanee salmon, coho salmon, and largemouth bass. In the lower portion of the upper basin, bull trout is listed as threatened under the federal ESA. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 37 In 2006 the Oregon Conservation Strategy (OCS) was adopted by `~`°RE~°" UJt~SERVATI°ry STRATEGY Oregon's Fish and Wildlife Commission for the state of Oregon. The OCS celebrates Oregon's natural heritage by articulating goals and identifying actions that conserve and restore Oregon's species, habitats and ecosystems. It is not a regulatory document but instead presents issues, opportunities, and recommended voluntary actions that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation in Oregon. Deschutes County is identified in the East Cascade Ecoregion. One of the Conservation Opportunity Areas is located in South County. The Little Deschutes River Basin (EC-07) has experienced rapidly expanding urban and rural residential development, resulting in development within riparian zones, the loss of big game winter range, and water diversions to support development. Along with this development, Highway 97 traffic volume continues to increase, creating a major barrier to wildlife movement. Habitat fragmentation and increasing recreational use is of concern in this ecoregion. Its aquatic and riparian habitat support Oregon spotted frog, Black Swift, Sandhill Crane, Bull Trout, and Redband Trout. Wildland Urban Interface Wildland fire is ranked as the #1 priority in the 2010 Deschutes County National Hazard Mitigation Plan. It is especially acute in south Deschutes County. Today, with less stand management, logging activity and highly effective wildland fire suppression, the forestland is predominantly dense lodgepole pine with some mixed stands of lodgepole and ponderosa pine. Much of the understory consists of dense bitterbrush and manzanita with some areas of native bunchgrasses. Due to the lack of disturbance, these stands continue to become more and more overcrowded and at increasing risk for extreme fire behavior. Recent state and federal legislation provide resources and incentives to residents. The Oregon Forestland-Urban Interface Fire Protection Act, often referred to as Senate Bill 360, enlists the aid of property owners toward turning fire-vulnerable urban and suburban properties into less-volatile zones where firefighters may more safely and effectively defend homes from wildfires. Basically, the law requires property owners in identified forestland-urban interface areas to reduce excess vegetation which may fuel a fire, around structures and along driveways. In some cases, it is also necessary to create fuel breaks along property lines and roadsides. In 2003, Congress passed historical bi-partisan legislation: the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA). This legislation directs federal agencies to collaborate with communities in developing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP), which includes the identification and prioritization of areas needing hazardous fuels treatment. It also provides guidance to 38 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY authorities for expediting the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for fuels reduction projects on federal lands. The HFRA defines wildland urban interface as an area within or adjacent to an at-risk community that has been identified in a CWPP. Communities are at risk due to hazardous vegetation, wood roofing, insufficient water supply, poor road conditions, and inadequate access, signage and evacuation routes. Once a CWPP is in place, community groups can apply for federal funding and other grants to treat hazardous fuels and address special concerns to reduce the risk of catastrophic loss as a result of wildland fire. The Healthy Forest Initiative and the HFRA define a "community at risk" as one that: ♦ is a group of homes and other structures with basic infrastructure and services in or adjacent to federal land; ♦ has conditions conducive to large-scale wildland fire; and ♦ faces a significant threat to human life or property as a result of wildland fire. There are two CWPPs for south Deschutes County. The first applies to the Upper Deschutes River Coalition. The Upper Deschutes River Coalition is a non profit organization whose membership consists of 26 neighborhoods south of Sunriver and northeast of Wickiup Reservoir. There are approximately 2,784 homes in the Coalition. According to their CWPP, 7 neighborhoods are considered "at risk" for wildfire: * Three Rivers * Little Deschutes Corridor * Big River * Foster Road Corridor * Wild River * Honer Park * Fall River The second is covered by the Greater La Pine Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Its Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) boundary is marked at the southern edge of the Deschutes County line. The northern edge is the Upper Deschutes River Coalition CWPP. According to their CWPP, there are approximately 6,900 homes in La Pine and the unincorporated area. Nine neighborhoods are considered "at-risk" to wildfire: * Wickiup Acres * Newberry Estates * 6th & Dorrance Meadow * Ponderosa Pines * Masten Road * Day Road Corridor * Little Deschutes River * Huntington South * Section 36 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 39 Community Response Predominant environmental issues raised by participants highlighted the importance of wildlife habitat, maintaining defensible space for wildfire protection, monitoring geothermal activity on Newberry Crater, eliminating noxious weeds, and establishing a non-profit organization to promote the La Pine Community Wildfire Protection Plan similar to the Upper Deschutes River Coalition (UDRC). The UDRC is an active non-profit organization consisting of over twenty-five homeowner associations along the Upper Deschutes River focusing on fire prevention and river health. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public participation techniques are presented in Appendix I, Issue Identification. The Comprehensive Plan Sections 2.4 through 2.9 and 3.5 also provide further detail on natural resources, open space and natural hazards in rural Deschutes County. Recreation South Deschutes County offers a vast array of sights and activities for residents and visitors. The following descriptions, while not exhaustive, describe local amenities, annual events and regional destinations that are promoted by Central Oregon tourism associations and chambers of commerce. Each one emphasizes the proximity of forests, lakes, wilderness areas, trails, streams and rivers seemingly at ones door step. The La Pine Park and Recreation District (District) was . established in 1990 as a special service district under ORS - Chapter 198. It was created to provide park and recreation services to area residents. The District covers 85 square miles, which includes La Pine, residential development to the north of the city and large holdings of federal lands owned by Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service that surround rural residential development. The District owns two parks, Audia and Leona, the White School Complex, used for community wide, special events, Rosland Campground, Finley Butte Road Park Complex, and several under developed parcels. District voters approved a new permanent rate levy of $0.30 (per $1,000 of taxable assessed value) in May 2009. It generates approximately $180,000 a year in revenues. La Pine State Park makes the most of its scenic location on trout-filled Upper opEGOH Deschutes and Fall rivers. Its 10 miles of trails afford plenty of views for sightseers and wildlife watchers. And, its campground and cabins are next door STATE to a fascinating landscape of past volcanic activity and Cascade mountain PARKS wilderness. The park is also home to Oregon's largest ponderosa pine. Nicknamed "Big Red," the tree is 162' tall, 28.9' around and may be in excess of 500 years old. 40 NEW13ERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY DE9GMUTEG The Deschutes Paddle Trail includes the navigable sections of the r r a L E T R A ft Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers. The river portion for South County includes 26 miles of the Little Deschutes River, from La Pine to the river's confluence with the Deschutes River near Sunriver and 26 miles of the Deschutes River, from Wickiup Reservoir to Sunriver. Portions of the Upper Deschutes River are recognized as a State Scenic Waterway and National Wild and Scenic River from Wickiup Dam to Sunriver. Sunriver, nestled next to the Deschutes River on 3,300 acres of high desert, meadows and pine forests, is recognized as one of the premier Northwest destination for vacationers, golfers, and outdoor enthusiasts. With the Cascade Mountains to the west Dow- and the Newberry Volcanic National Monument to the east, Sunriver boosts boasts an array of world class amenities such as golf, tennis, swimming, horseback riding, kayaking, canoeing, white water rafting, fly fishing, biking, hiking, bird watching, spa and fitness centers, music and art festivals, and a variety of restaurants from fine dining to casual. Deschutes National Forest extends for about 100 miles along the east side of the Cascade Mountains, encompassing more than 1.6 million acres. A wide variety of recreational and scenic opportunities are available on national forest land, including: Nine resorts, most notably Mt. Bachelor 1,400 miles of trails, catering to hiking, mountain biking and off highway vehicles (OHVs) Cascade Lakes Scenic Byway 157 lakes and reservoirs • 5 wilderness areas covering approximately 200,000 acres Newberry National Volcanic Monument, created in 1990, is managed by r' the U.S. Forest Service. It provides a unique opportunity to view the Y. lava lands of Central Oregon consisting of 55,000 acres of lakes, lava flows and spectacular geologic features. Notable attractions include: Newberry Crater, a five-mile wide caldera containing two popular fishing lakes (East Lake and Paulina Lake), obsidian fields, waterfalls and unique lava formations, east of La Pine. NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DEsc"uTES COUNTY 41 + Lava Lands Visitor Center, between Bend and Sunriver provides interpretive exhibits and a trail at the summit of Lava Butte, a 500-foot-high cinder cone. Lava Cast Forest, the world's largest formation of its kind. + Lava River Cave, a one-mile lava tube formed by a lava flow from Mt. Newberry. LA FINE nono The La Pine Frontier Days is La Pine's largest event, celebrating community I~T PUcz heritage and culture during the 4th of July weekend. During that weekend, Sr4rs ji~u La Pine hosts an annual pro rodeo sanctioned event. The La Pine Rodeo Association has been in existence for over 30 years. The City of La Pine, in concert with other community leaders, successfully worked with its Congressional delegation, to obtain lands for public rodeo grounds and an equestrian center on a 150- acre parcel of BLM-administered lands adjacent to the southwest border of the city. The "La Pine Land Conveyance Act," approved by Congress and signed by the President in 2012 conveys this land to Deschutes County. Community Response Participants noted the proximity of outdoor activities as one of South County's defining features. Residents advocated expanding recreational opportunities for underserved areas in the Three Rivers area as well as establishing new access points for the Little Deschutes and Deschutes rivers. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public participation techniques are presented in Appendix 1, Issue Identification. The Comprehensive Plan Section 3.8 also provides further detail on recreation amenities in rural Deschutes County. 42 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appev ol'x l - lssu.e Iolevut%fbcatibovu Appendix 1 - Issue Identification Land Use and Economic Development Category Ensure South County representation at Economic Development for Central Oregon Establish a South County economic and/or tourism board Explore opportunities for an intergovernmental agreement with Klamath County for revenue sharing to ad- dress regional issues Explore opportunities with Central Oregon Community College for adult learning opportunities in La Pine Promote economic development opportunities in La Pine, including the industrial park Promote commercial and industrial development in La Pine and Sunriver Promote opportunities for neighborhood commercial uses Invest in programs that promote job creation for adults and teenagers Establish a 24-hour health care facility in La Pine Extend and improve internet service throughout the region Permit small destination resorts Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots Reinvest proceeds derived from the Neighborhood Planning Area located in La Pine into future improvements for the city or South County that include, but are not limited to roads, parks, open space development and maintenance, public buildings, and on-site and off-site water and wastewater facilities Revise the Transferable Development Credit program given the current local economics Ensure zoning codes, including height restrictions are business friendly Reconcile those areas that experience property line disputes or code enforcement issues such as Section 36 Collaborate with the Ford Foundation which currently provides leadership training with small, rural communi- ties to assist in implementation Provide services for an aging population Provide more opportunities for senior housing Support La Pine Comprehensive Plan Balance growth while retaining the rural character of South County NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 1-1 Appendix 1 - Issue Identification (continued) Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to wildlife habitat, water quality and water quantity Provide outreach and education materials to raise awareness about natural resource issues Define and protect channel migration zones Protect wildlife habitat, including wetlands and floodplains Retain and increase native fish populations Explore opportunities for wetland mitigation banking to protect wetlands Improve and stabilize Upper Deschutes River stream flow Engage property owners about the benefits of improving stream flow on the Upper Deschutes Protect surface and groundwater quality Support the leadership of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality in working with the community to address groundwater protection issues Collaborate with the community to expand the range of tools available to protect groundwater quality by reviewing new technologies Support amendment to state regulations to permit centralized sewer systems in areas with high levels of existing or potential development or identified water quality concerns Expedite actions such as legislative amendments allowing sewers or similar infrastructure if a public hazard is declared in rural Deschutes County, Continue evaluating means to reduce nitrate loading from on-site wastewater systems by exploring innovative on-site sewage treatment and disposal technology, retrofitting of existing substandard or inappropriately located disposal systems, expansion of sewer systems, or other measures Control and maintain livestock manure on-site to protect water quality Reduce the threat of wildfire hazards Require absentee property owners to maintain defensible space to minimize their risk and their neighbor's risk to wildfire hazards Consider adopting an ordinance that requires absentee landowners to manage their properties with defensible space so they are not at risk to the threat of wildfire Inform residents when defensible space projects and Community Wildfire Protection Plans are being implemented Expand the Upper Deschutes River Coalition boundary to include the entire South County area Prevent the proliferation of invasive weeds Maintain rural neighborhoods with plenty of open space Appendix 1-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix I - Issue Identification (continued) Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category Coordinate with federal and state land management agencies and environmental non-governmental organizations Address stagnant water adjoining the Upper Deschutes River near Island Loop Way Transportation Category Collaborate with Oregon Department of Transportation and City of La Pine to address pedestrian and vehicle crossing issues and access along Highway 97 Provide roads with adequate right-of-way for bicycling Expand public transit opportunities Explore partnerships that allow for constructing and paving local roads Establish more park and ride lots near Highway 97, State Recreation Road, and Sunriver Establish partnerships with road districts to improve and maintain roads that serve as primary thoroughfares to other neighborhoods or provide egress for emergencies Increase connectivity in such places as Lazy River South Maintain and improve egress Establish bike shoulders on Huntington Road Pave sections of Foster Road, Huntington Road, and Pine Crest Improve Forest Service Road 41 from Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain Discourage biking on Highway 97 Recreation and Other Category Promote La Pine as a tourist destination separate from Sunriver Expand the La Pine Park and Recreation District into the Three Rivers area Explore opportunities for Deschutes County to provide park services for those areas in South County not served by a park and recreation district Provide additional parks and trails Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots for open space, recreational and economic development purposes Establish more pathways along river corridors Establish a trail system that links Sunriver to La Pine Improve river access along the Little Deschutes and Deschutes rivers NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTE5 COUNTY Appendix 1-3 Appendix 1 - Issue Identification (continued) Recreation and Other Category Improve and expand parking at Maxwell Veterans Memorial Bridge, a common access point for the Little Deschutes River Improve river access at Harper Bridge Expand recreational opportunities for the disabled Establish community greenhouses Promote food self-sufficiency Expand recycling centers in South County Improve communication with the Board of County Commissioners and their staff by regularly attending or hosting meetings in South County so residents gain a better understanding of any emerging issues taking place in the region Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes County's own website Protect the outdoors and South County's small town feeling Engage residents who do not maintain the appearance of their property since it can reduce property values in a neighborhood Maintain a network of neighborhood, homeowner associations, community organizations and similar groups Educate new residents moving into South County about rural lifestyles and lower levels of public services Protect property rights Pursue self-sufficiency with minimal government or neighborhood interaction Recognize the minimal role of government in South County when compared to a municipality Appendix 1-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY AppewdL'x 2 - issue AwaLUs~s Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis Themes Land Use and Economic Development Category Establish an economic and/or tourism board Ensure South County representation at Economic Development for Central Oregon Permit small destination resorts Support Central Oregon Community College branch in La Pine Promote Economic Establish a 24-hour health care facility in La Pine Development Extend and improve internet service throughout the region Revise the Transferable Development Credit program given the current local economics Ensure zoning codes, including height restrictions are business friendly Reconcile those areas that experience property line disputes or code enforcement issues such as Section 36 Reinvest proceeds derived from the Neighborhood Planning Area into future improvements for the city or South County Collaboraft on Explore revenue sharing between Deschutes and Klamath County to address regional issues die Develo ment hues Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots p Support La Pine Comprehensive Plan Collaborate with the Ford Foundation which currently provides leadership training with small, rural communities to assist in implementation Theme Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category Prevent the proliferation of invasive weeds Protect Wildlife Protect wildlife habitat, including wetlands and floodplains Habitat Retain and increase native fish populations Improve and stabilize Upper Deschutes River stream flow Collaborate on Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to wildlife habitat Wildlife habitat lams Explore opportunities for wetland mitigation banking to protect wetlands NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 2-1 Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued) Themes Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category Control and maintain livestock manure on-site to protect water quality Expedite actions such as legislative amendments allowing sewers or similar infrastructure if a public hazard is declared in rural Deschutes County Support amendment to state regulations to permit centralized sewer systems in areas Protect Water with high levels of existing or potential development or identified water quality Quality concerns Continue evaluating means to reduce nitrate loading from on-site wastewater systems by exploring innovative on-site sewage treatment and disposal technology, retrofitting of existing substandard or inappropriately located disposal systems, expansion of sewer systems, or other measures Support the leadership of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality in working with the community to address groundwater protection issues Collaborate on Water Quality Collaborate with the community to expand the range of tools available to protect Projects groundwater quality by reviewing new technologies Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to water quality and water quantity Require absentee property owners to maintain defensible space to minimize their risk Reduce Risk to and their neighbors risk to wildfire hazards Wildfire Inform residents when defensible space projects and Community Wildfire Protection Plans are being implemented Collaborate with Expand the Upper Deschutes River Coalition boundary to include the entire South Community County area Organizations and Coordinate with federal and state land management agencies and environmental non- Agencies governmental organizations Themes Transportation Category Provide roads with adequate right-of-way for bicycling Establish more park and ride lots near Highway 97, State Recreation Road and Sunriver Improve the Increase connectivity in such places as Lazy River South Transportation System Maintain and improve egress Establish bike shoulders on Huntington Road J Pave sections of Foster Road, Huntington Road, and Pine Crest Appendix 2.2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued) "Themes Transportation Category Improve the Improve Forest Service Road 41 from Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain Tr n ortation sp a system Discourage biking on Highway 97 Collaborate with Oregon Department of Transportation and City of La Pine to address pedestrian and vehicle crossing issues and access along Highway 97 Colaborpte on Expand public transit opportunities Transportation PjtCts Explore partnerships that allow for constructing and paving local roads Establish partnerships with road districts to improve and maintain roads that serve as primary thoroughfares to other neighborhoods or provide egress for emergencies Themes Recreation and Other Category Provide additional parks and trails Improve river access along the Little Deschutes and Deschutes rivers Invest in Pork and Recreation Improve and expand parking at Maxwell Veterans Memorial Bridge, a common access point for the Little Deschutes River Programs and Improve river access at Harper Bridge Expand recreational opportunities for the disabled Establish community greenhouses Expand recycling centers in South County Promote La Pine as a tourist destination separate from Sunriver Expand the La Pine Park and Recreation District into the Three Rivers area EstabNsh Pork and Recreation Explore opportunities for Deschutes County to provide park services for those areas in Partnerships South County not served by a park and recreation district Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots for open space, recreational and economic development purposes Improve communication with the Board of County Commissioners and their staff by regularly attending or hosting meetings in South County so residents gain a better MoXirnire Public understanding of any emerging issues taking place in the region Outreach Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes County's own website Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes County's own website NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 2-3 Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued) Themes Recreation and Other Category Protect property rights Educate new residents moving into South County about rural lifestyles and lower levels of public services Minimize Role of Recognize the minimal role of government in South County when compared to a Government municipality Pursue self-sufficiency with minimal government or neighborhood interaction Promote food self-sufficiency Appendix 2-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY AppeoAL'A 3 - Partvver%wg Agevuc%es Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies & Organizations in South County Name Expertise Bend-La Pine School District 7th largest school district in Oregon Central Oregon Association of Realtors Real estate organization promoting its industry, values, and ethics Central Oregon Builders Association Non-profit trade organization promoting & improving the building industry Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Council of government offering training and economic development services Central Oregon Visitors Association Non-profit tourism destination marketing association City of La Pine Incorporated in 2006, one of four municipalities in Deschutes County Deschutes County Created in 1916, offers a number of government services and programs to residents Deschutes County Citizens Action Group Non-profit organization encouraging active citizen participation in county-wide issues Deschutes Soil & Water Conservation District Certified to provide natural resource technical assistance & research to property owners Deschutes River Conservancy Non-profit organization focused on restoring stream flow and improving water quality Economic Development for Central Oregon Private non-profit organization dedicated to diversifying the regional economy by recruiting new companies and helping existing traded sector companies expand La Pine Chamber of Commerce Advocacy organization for La Pine area businesses promoting commerce and tourism Lo Pine Community Action Team Non-profit organization with facilitators promoting partnerships through collaboration La Pine Industrial Group Community organization promoting a 327 acre industrial park in Lo Pine La Pine Park & Recreation District Serves an 86 square mile area providing affordable recreation programs & facilities La Pine Rural Fire Protection District Fire district covers more than 100 miles, offering fire & emergency services to residents Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Regulatory agency whose job it to protect the quality of Oregon's environment Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Agency responsible for protecting and enhancing all Oregon fish & wildlife Oregon Department of Forestry Agency responsible for all matters pertaining to forestry Oregon Department of Land Conservation & Development Agency responsible for the statewide land use planning program, which protects farm & forest lands, conservation of natural resources, & orderly & efficient development Oregon Department of State Lands Administrative agency of State Land Board, which manages land and other resources dedicated to the common school fund Oregon Department of Transportation Agency responsible for providing safe, efficient state transportation systems Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Provides natural, historic, & recreational sites including La Pine State Park Project Wildfire County effort & organization creating long term wildfire-resistant communities Sunriver Resort LLC Planned private residential & resort community encompassing 3,300 acres Sunriver Homeowners Association Not-for-profit corporation maintaining common areas & local government for Sunriver Trout Unlimited National organization with a Deschutes chapter focusing on fisheries & watersheds Trust for Public Land National non-profit with Central OR. office conserving land for parks, & natural places U.S. Department of Agriculture, Deschutes National Forest Manages Deschutes National Forest, one of the most popular recreation forests in the Pacific Northwest. Forest attracts 8 million people every year U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Land Management r anages public lands, including the Deschutes Wild & Scenic River. Riparian improvement, grazing management, & fisheries habitat are some of their emphases NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN 13ESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 3-1 Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies & Organizations in South County (continued) Name Expertise U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Enforces federal wildlife laws, protects endangered species, restores significant fisheries and conserves wildlife habitat for the continuing benefit of U.S. citizens Upper Deschutes River Coalition Non-profit organization focusing on healthy fire resistant forests & watersheds Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Non profit organization protecting & restoring local rivers through collaboration projects Appendix 3-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY .4ppewdix 4 - PoUcu Forvu.attow Appendix 4 - Policy Formation Economic Development Issue Policy Formation Partnering Agencies and Organizations Central Oregon Community College Explore establishing a COCC City of La Pine Adult Education presence in La Pine Community Organizations Deschutes County La Pine Chamber of Commerce Modify Transferable Development Community Organizations Credit program; allow small Deschutes County Code Amendments destination resorts; rectify property Oregon Department of Land Conservation and line and code enforcement disputes: Development and establish business friendly zoning Economic & Explore establishing separate Tourism Board economic and tourism organizations Representation for south Deschutes County Central Oregon Visitors Association City of La Pine Community Organizations Deschutes County Economic Development for Central Oregon La Pine Chamber of Commerce La Pine Industrial Group City of La Pine Health Care Explore establishing a 24-hour health Deschutes County Facility care facility in La Pine Health Care Professionals and Service Providers La Pine Chamber of Commerce High Groundwater Explore opportunities to acquire, Community organizations Lots develop or transfer high groundwater Deschutes County lots La Pine Park and Recreation District Support efforts to extend and Community organizations Internet Service improve internet service throughout Deschutes County the region Internet service providers NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 4-1 Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued) Wildlife Habitat Community Organizations Support efforts that Improve and Deschutes County Instream Flow stabilize Upper Deschutes River Deschutes River Conservancy stream flow Irrigation Districts Community Organizations Invasive Weeds Support efforts that minimize the Deschutes County spread of invasive vegetation Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District Community Organizations Deschutes County Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Native Fish Support efforts that retain and 'T'rout Unlimited increase native fish populations Upper Deschutes River Coalition Upper Deschutes Watershed Council U.S. Fish and Wildlife Community Organizations Deschutes County Wetlands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Floodplains, Support efforts that protect wildlife Trout Unlimited Migratory habitat Upper Deschutes River Coalition Corridors, etc. Upper Deschutes Watershed Council U.S. Fish and Wildlife Water Quality Expedite actions such as legislative Advanced Community Organizations amendments allowing sewers or Wastewater Deschutes County similar infrastructure if a public hazard Treatment Options Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is declared in rural Deschutes County Groundwater Work with the community to address Community Organizations Protection groundwater protection issues Deschutes County Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Support efforts to control and Community organizations Livestock Runoff maintain livestock manure on-site to Deschutes County protect water quality Deschutes Soil & Water Conservation District Appendix 4-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued) Wildfires Issue Policy Formation Inform residents when defensible Defensible Space space projects and Community Projects Wildfire Protection Plans are being implemented Leading and Supporting Partners Bureau of Land Management Community Organizations Deschutes National Forest Oregon Department of Forestry Project Wildfire Upper Deschutes River Coalition Consider requiring absentee property Community Organizations Defensible Space owners to maintain defensible space Deschutes County Requirements to minimize their risk and their Oregon Department of Forestry neighbor's risk to wildfire hazards Project Wildfire Consider establishing a coalition for Organizations Upper Deschutes the Greater La Pine Community Deschutes Community County County River Coalition Wildfire Protection Plan similar to the Project Wildfire Upper Deschutes River Coalition Transportation System Forest Service Improve Forest Service Road 41 from Community Organizations Road 41 Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain Deschutes County Deschutes National Forest Consider establishing more park and Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Park & Ride Lots Community Organizations ride lots Deschutes County Explore opportunities to provide Community Organizations Right-of-Way Way for roads with adequate right-of-way for Deschutes County Bicycling bicycling Road Districts Establish partnerships with road districts to improve and maintain Community Organizations Road Districts roads that serve as primary Deschutes County thoroughfares to other Project Wildfire neighborhoods or provide egress for Road Districts emergencies NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 4-3 Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued) Transportation System Issue Policy Formation Leading and Supporting Partners Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Community Organizations Transit Explore expanding public transit City of La Pine Deschutes County Sunriver Recreation Community Promote establishment of community Community Organizations Deschutes County Greenhouses greenhouses La Pine Park and Recreation District Explore opportunities to acquire, Community organizations High Groundwater develop or transfer high groundwater Deschutes County Lots lots for open space, recreational and La Pine Park and Recreation District economic development purposes Parks, Trails, River Consider expanding the La Pine Park Community Organizations Access and and Recreation District into the La Pine Parks and Recreation District Recreation Three Rivers area Deschutes County Recycling Centers Consider expanding recycling centers Community organizations Deschutes County La Pine Park and Recreation District Wilderness Garbage Public Outreach Improve communication with the Board of County Commissioners and their staff by regularly attending or Communication hosting meetings in South County so residents gain a better understanding of any emerging issues taking place in the region Educate new residents moving into Education South County about rural lifestyles and lower levels of public services Community organizations Deschutes County Community Organizations Deschutes County Appendix 4-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 5.1 - Community Plan Vicinity Map QI 97 Bpd 4P F; r^r , v La)Pine i Klamath County Legend Railroad Community Plan Vicinity State Highway Unincorporated Community Rivers & Lakes L TT La Pine City Limit Newberry Country DMQ AIWR nw,aV«nmllon on M mee was AcrenM II«II diglld des on DeulNes Coatlye G.1 S. care was mlmn n tlMt aealoe a tl imp. Wl a k prgeM1O•es oesnxrtasC Iy mnaaereul ~N,.P-nWry 1« «nn, oeae'fkan, «µr~aluW etturery n ale "W d «ft undwVMp we There ere no xrerreales, expesa «YrpleO, IncMbrd tlIe MeneraY d meftllBaeeMy a IrrlOesi«e peroCaer papme, ecmnV•MrV tln MaAa-1. HoWBMBf, noaf~eYUn d erry ert«s rAl De epp«feb d. August 22, 2012 V V I' + 1.75 mi. Appendix 5.2a - Elementary School Attendance Areas a i LOS Rd j La Pine Finley au* Rd Klamath County Legend Railroad Elementary School Attendance Area State Highway Jewell Elementary School Rivers & Lakes La Pine Elementary School Unincorporated Community Rosland Elementary School La Pine City Limit Three Rivers Elementary School Newberry Country OI5CLNI,ER'. iTe'wYnmiWOn on m mep wes Uemed Pam aio+dPle6sws m Oas Jvw G I S. care wes W nyN'.q.-bry r« mrs meo. ou n a vwided a"aaa~Rd o o ad. c'. V - 'fged a .uPPx ft a r respnnn.ly mere amps,em~asiorw,« xWW.- I erearc,s,Mubsy X. ere now«mrnec, exue~o< inivbd. :nM" .w.e.ry a m«arer~alry «nmess r« a p«PC~er nPOOSe, xmavaran on waded rpawd, aaer awn a any «r«s rn m ea«enaeen. August22,2012 Appendix 5.2b - Middle School Attendance Areas Railroad Middle School Attendance Area State Highway High Desert Middle School Rivers & Lakes La Pine Middle School Unincorporated Community Three Rivers Middle School La Pine City Limit Newberry Country ~lSC1NhER: IS TM xdgReeon on Msnrep N'fls Oemed h«ndgtd duletasgsan De Jx Cr--y csewa "me respnemmere m nrs mep. dartrs«wnoan^ns~^ waoP rwdw U. W w.~d *y nnry for eR«s, eRwssnns, «fixp o y n me dgiw aaawu.w.y..a~«m rn«a enp~ « v miea,:K+.Wgme .w~wrr a v f4wna nw a pemcaer pwpoee, eccmq«rtnnp tln pwYxt. rioeww, wer 4AWa a+v ~ a1 e. epplemmo. August 22, 2012 Legend Appendix 5.2c - High School Attendance Areas - Railroad High School Attendance Area State Highway Bend High School Rivers & Lakes Bend / Summit High School Choice Area Unincorporated Community ® La Pine High School = La Pine City Limit NewherryCeuntry DISCUAER: lire XYOrrnerGn an.xs meo was nerneO mom ngld neleaesesan UeeGxiles l:auxy's ti ~ 5 care wreopt R mre uemona ms m~p.amnapra~men °ep g° oes<fxxes rdna eeeep emresponsdny oor Bo ars.""ea°R`.ar ooswion~ .°nM do mre a me um reruns. ere no wgrerwes, express a wrOW nnnanrn ft -kO wwreiry d memraMdaly amress for a pup[Varpxpase, ecmmperpinp On Ms Wredcr. rwewwr. nourn~on a any emxs xa m eppremmn. August 22, 2092 Legend Appendix 5.3 - Comprehensive Plan Designations Klamath County Legend Comprehensive Plan Designations Railroad M AG -Agnougure State Highway F - Forost Rivers & Lakes OS&G - Open Space s Conservation Unincorporated Community RREA - Rural Residential Exmptian Area La Pine City Limit SM - Surface Mining Newberry Country DWA.AIW.R The W"Mun an rss man Mss dsrlwd aan dgto 40mesesun Damhtes Ca m*'s G.I.S. CaeneskAwn 6 aw0-dlt:s rrep.hd'Ae portlee-esW Deepxe.G m wrest accept ern mwaa~ifN for arras, m:Nwn,n pW W-ray n ft "M mte a ew urAwygv wards. Thee as m -ALA etflxeee a mgren. rrcM W ew wwmW of rrwrdwrse6+iy a fhr rme paecukr wP-, ecmryetsto ass and - Ilerever, no0fi[aY0n daryerrors Ml tie apprera4d Augus122,2012 V V I- = 1.75 ml. Appendix 5.4 - Zoning i Klamath County Zoning Designations Legend EFU- La Plne Subzale - Railroad - FP -Flood Plain - State Highway Ft - Forest Use 1 Rivers s Lakes F2 - Forest Use 2 Unincorporated Community OSBC - Open Space It Conservation La Pine City Limit RR1t1 - Rural Residential 10 Acre Minimum SM - Surfaoe Mining NewberryCountry DISCLAIMER Thp'v+pr 0-p i1iismrp roes d-W rmmdg4 does-m Drsd C-4 ,G I5 c--W_n0.-,0 n d On neP. dw it a pv.: w,.W 0.0". C* -...w," mrpveLifly tr-, pew . a pfde¢v=r n" dad dare a ft uMSlr~g -Is Ti- se m xamkc, m~r.s a ^~ied. _Ad3 h rerrsrcyW_&-deelay a a-we P• P q_.~tlis Pradnd noweaer.Imrc nonweny enas wloe maxneem. August 22. 2012 (f~ Appendix 5.5 - Wildlife Overlay Zone fol N.. Sunriver m iv ,roM46~""" Nd Paulin, Lake Rd Klamath County Legend Railroad Wildlife Overlay Zone - State Highway ® Elk Range Rivers R Lakes ® Deer Winter Range Unincorporated Community Deer Migration Range La Pine City Limit NewberryCountry DWC JWR' The in<u~mtnn wasdedw,d han doudwAb-m Dexlx Cafxye c.i.s. ce~w wee mwmnme Hamma MR .wnKoronoea•eeW ~c (V m~naecceq eery resom9dky arerms, awns, oruosenrm eaurecy n me opal aaaama aidery.n rewrds. mere ere nawmemes, mawsamawu, .wanno me -mmaky Ik ,n IXe wdlceeaop-~ied°~0~.eca.romwrgmrs weoi«~. August 22, 2012 Appendix 5.6 - Destination Resort Eligibility Areas ` Sunriver catbnwWd Rd S v State Rec Rd N~yy IR r a i Apr h Hd F "T f IM l G~W f _,g I OF i r,. La Pine ! ikr' ^ ...a Finley Butte Rd la!r i Masten Rd Klamath County Pauli, Lake Rd Legend Railroad La Pine City Limit State Highway Unincorporated Community Rivers & Lakes Destination Resort Eligibility Area NewberryCountry 06(].AM R Tha m tis m4f xm dashed I duw dwamseam DesAKiles Cwly%G I S C eu mmnn tlIe vemon d M d .Wdmprmided"n ie OardMes Cway a Wau.M aIn resvn bft Warms, mxsums, a wciliolM.ui..n tti dgM aam a Ina mmrn.q recaps. rn.e as noe®rr.e~aa. a a:ml.d, naaetlg n,e warmp a • a r~.s ~ a 1~ ww+a. eccamuemxgms wdexl. Wrpvor, rgif ebn of sry emus MI W eppretleBed. August 22. 2012 Appendix 5.7 - Public Water Systems r~ 97 Cottonwood Rd Sunriver SPOA River Rd 1 SoMI. been Fd ~r State Reo Rd IMr I Ai „ ~ 97 x° ,tivi Q I ° x I i PauGna La1ce Rd 111 ry.,. ._..t f La Pine ! 9tlr St ! i 1 - ! Finley ButhD Rd Masten Rd Klamath County Legend r- Railroad Unincorporated Community State Highway mi La Pine City Limit Rivers & Lakes I Public Drinking Water System NewberryCountry f14C(XNhF.R me xramEblon on m map was nemea Imm dig" aeleneses on Oe«leles C«nly's 0.1.5. care was swan n me aemon a ms meo. w n is aonaea •es g• oesnxnes c«em rema « ft me «n erw respnnnwq for arms. ornaelorm, exK rw rnpW, n me rig oaemy.p rac«os. mere ere m werrel,ms. exaese « xlnwnp me wermlN d mermervmry «eress r«e oeruc~ar ramose. ecmrnoemvn ms oranun. Rowewx, mnlranen a erry mars rl m enpreraleo. August 22, 2012 Appendix 5.8 - La Pine Rural Fire Protection District 240 Z$ Sunriver Cottonwood Rd a YoM ! W t, f 5) H ~ ~ - C1~V j a - r r oars, , i i c~ Jam'` 97 a ~7 [ a r-~ La Pine Finley Butte Rd 97 31 Klamath County paining Lake Rd Legend Railroad La Pine City Limit State Highway Unincorporated Community Rivers & Lakes La Pine Rural Fire Protection District Newberry Country OL5f1AM£R. ll~e eMOmxilm m txs mep-s Unwd pq~q ds~esm Ges/NC CwAy*s G.I.S. c:ae.a perm dms m,o. o-A a a vv+ip oue.a+ca ,e«ea,emresopM*Np•mm *p* ~r rp~ayw wsrwy d mermenmry a rmessmre odxrrp.oose, ec~ In omdud. n..wwr, nmrcemn d airy e,m,s.n oe ewreuerea. August 22, 2012 Appendix 5.9 - Oregon Conservation Strategy - l~ S / i I La Pine ! 97 I Paulin Lake Rd Rd / Legend Railroad Unincorporated Community State Highway La Pine City Limit Rivers & Lakes [=Oregon Conservation Strategy Newberry Country M~R: Tna wYam~onm h.n"p was Aenueo fmm dqu databases-Oexh" Cw"y's G.I.S. ~°feMwre"~R~."e~.d~"R~,a""~ •es"• ~estl""es(:a"g darn Nw Ow .Yd_^➢~acnY a da . Ti W- pp wMN a0.0 V dy ~ wv~a el ^ b a pWP-, 6 Hoxawr. no!lretion of ary errors Mil bM ~periMled. August 22. 2012 rn; Appendix 6.1 0 - Domestic Wastewater Systems Klamath County Legend Railroad Unincorporated Community State Highway La Pine City Limit k? f : Rivers & Lakes Domestic Wastewater Systems Newberry Country 06aAWR' TM uiwnmlrn on M mBp was d.IMld Nan dqw dllebasN6 nn ONadaoas r ways ri.l s Cae xm mlann M de dtl W. Ma5Pd '%W DmdM C-4y [allntl N[upl rry raspmvdlry Wrams,aassms,aNNSioad emN Y1n tllB duw ~Me ur NrB wr0erlyYp racarda TNene Ye a1YrB1IB1.P; NMNre[a n milled, ~rckrOr9 YrY xredddy d mdmer.m.ry a oo-rNSSmr a a.NCr.ar aNwee. Nccmwry~rn d:s pMup noweya, nsma.NOn d sn arras wAl Ne mvedded. August 22. 2012 Appendix 5.11 - Special Road Districts ~ V paulina Lake M Klamath County Legend Railroad DRRH Special Road District Unit #8 - Ponden-a Pines East Road District State Highway DRRH Unit #8 Part 3 Road DisVici River Forest Road District Rivers 8 Lakes Fall River Estates Road District - Special Road District #1 Unincorporated Community Forest View Road District ,i.special Road District #8 j _ La Pine Clry Limit - Lary River Road District -Spring River Road District Special Road District - Newberry Estates Road District - Vandevert Acres Road Disvich Beaver Road District _ Pinewood Country Estates Special Road District Newberry Country ~tSGIJA£R Thn irdornu~r m I:s.w wen dnriwd wom d'qM drAnwaresm UesG..las CnNykG 15 tact was rowan i,tb a.es~nws ~.witcvwidwt'm is o.=dva.~r:a.ry rvrnaarcep, rry rrywmioary M "IVM fer arts, ar~n, n ~y a ~ wrr~ l-1. W we prig w~aalaMr ,n awn bwv u ~ nmessroroaroctasr -S aP puposa, re. ettmioerrnnp tlxs woo n. tloesrer, mwFreem CO W arv enas unit oe-pxre0an. Augusl22,2012 Appendix 5.12 - La Pine Park & Recreation District 10 Va ;x Sunriver C *t.....d Rd v 3~~0 9 River Rd toM~. ~yeved G I~p d',~•^'tl "1kA P-.HA idSf- tl:. ry ~ a ~ i a y. - La Pine P LI Yl+~ Finley Butte Rd Klamath County PauGna Lake Rd Legend Railroad La Pine City Limit State Highway Unincorporated Community Rivers & Lakes La Pine Park & Recreation District Newberry Country O6UAI .FR TM ~ un Mm was dart ada 0a1M.uYdws.sm Ovrdelm Cwtr'f G.I.S. G.-m ntlre[Temond ft. map, MO A a poriLd'.lY. oeeaYtas G..ft arnol.cCW"reW-6Mr br nnnrz, Rrri~lvn, d P.worr.ccuiexv n me our .idea VieunderlVFM mds. Th-M..e+rcnm%.aKP-ff uM..KWM#W a aarvmrt.irrr a Rr-sI a wKiVer pumo5e,.c[mpaaae dts eradW -ty Hanauer, n0f,~ d wry- WI b -W-W. August 22, 2012 Appendix 5.13 - South County Bikeways l-= 1.75 W Rd Pauline Ln Sunriver I i 6 - i i ~r La Pine ! 8tl1 St j Finley Butte Rd Masten Rd Klamath County Legend South County Bikeway Rivers & Lakes Railroad Unincorporated Community 1 La Pine City Limit State Highway h Newberry Country f16IXAMER. Tr ggVgnWlOnds Meapw dpl'Ad ftMdOW ddlft W pascmtis CM*V's C 1S C Matl 1810en it Iltl aeetlm J Ves rrxp, EW it a paWdnd'ed a' nastlsAes Carly -anmrM T err ~n+wredday, ael'p.ed, naua,g me H-dd-h-d v R.~ra a pstraWr wrap. 9 tlrsti August 22, 2012 Monthly Meeting with Board of Commissioners Finance Director/Treasurer AGENDA August 29, 2012 (1) Monthly Investment Report (2) July 2012 Financials (3) FY 2011-2012 Preliminary Financial Reports (4) Year End Working Capital !9 4 t4 d r r Y d ~ M N 41. CO ~ 4 M C CD N N YJ ~A T ~ T T N N LL ~ V LL. C ~ M 1$°4,156 .emAO m ti ~ w ti 8 a C~ N IR 4 C4 _ ~ n CO N 140 C L tU P LL W -j P U ti 1109000 CD N 4 M L y}m~L aY ~ C C i U O C 4.. 1-UU ~ N O. c ~ l1 O1 CC N d a) ca 7 U C T y ° - O apc v O az U ~D 2 N CL r J ~ O I U I r U I I UlU I U I I U U U 1 U'U! UIU i I I Il I I o m A ❑ l z 1~ L, UI 11 Z Zi U U U!U Z'Z Z-ZI _ UI Zi 1 z 11 1 ZIZ Z 1 ; 1 ZI Z'. Z _ 1 1 I i ZI ZI 7 Z Z l 1. 41 CO Go c' 'r Q ~ M co M C , C4 C" 1 l 1 I I, ; ! i OIL pp il4 f► 4I1~ 4 r Z 'I I II I li 1 1 II I, I I I I 1 ~ ~ 1 r 0 d OR r~ p° OI Qi r-I n (p M O, col I ODI P' M'i U) CA W ' W O lt7 C0 'qr R N M I N1 ! cl I ~ O Oj' O! I 1 OI O CD O' h r R r i00 Q I N N Of CA 00 I- N OI -CD O ti N QI i O Q Op V O 00 I lry O O N NIS , CO m' d N O : ODI N I Co I O aD NI I M I (D 1 <D 0 N I N 'CQ 0) cv Op O 1--1 N I~ ' M 0 I ~co M1 . , O <D,O (0 47I N O N' co tnll MOD rll ~:N ~ ~t7 O'Q I ~D N Cl) 00 OO N ~ r- r 'I 00 M UA I~ r1 O ' O M : I- M r I r r 7 lt7 4f O y,, y W n O M O I N O I O r , fN OO O Cl CIO NA : N 0' r rI r b r LO 00 N l0 CA r I Lo O N to, N; O O E 11 N i CA (D N ' r ~ V V r Q Q I N N M(D O: rD N f~ I- (D O C O Nri M C M Ch 1 O N b L 0 M W on (A' M 4 l > N l ' N N. N, N N; N r N C -J' N NIN I O Cl) M ~ M N O! CI N r Ol I. m Of Q i - I.. A I . m CD O CD C? . r--. CO i O' 0 O O ~ Q o l 0, O' r ~ . 0 CD 1 O' O LO ( M V' CD O l- mol-1Q I m l0, O fD; O M r- N'.R M O N Of w ► O ~ N O 00 N1 CD! R (D N (01 Q Q 9 ww M 0 O''. O I N; co n N N I~ r I~ Q r N O b (D (D O ti r 61 O O O R CD : 0 aOO 1 0 (p M M~ Q N O r r N, (D IN P. LO m j 0 CO N M !,00 N typ O ' J rN O 0 O _ !0 M{ O' N : r: L N', ~ ~ I CD N V Rf~ N'i O (O (D 'O'. CAI O O N O O O1 O1 'r 'l. ! ti! (D 10 1I- (D O M' (t] 1 : 1 I, !1 1 .~C 0 N O NI O.r N! O O1 N N O:, Ol NI r r . OD.O •-11N N O O OI N N, N 0 0 N Ni' N: N M,f~ Q1M a 0 ~M N r CD l 1 I I 1 N n 1 4 1 ....y... I I ~ 4 a ♦ ~ ~ O O O O O : O O{ O O O CO, O 1 4 i OI (Di l Q O a O r- CD O O ' O1 O Q 0 O O 0! O O OI O 1 0 O 1 01 O'Ol O O' a0 r '.r ti N It lKD I j N p V O (p 0' fD O O O b O O 7i 01 ~ 1 Q 00 LOR 0 O O O 1 1 er 1 0 Q 4 O O 1 O O O dI OI O , O 0 0 O O d O! O O1 O'.: aD 0 l N' (D N. (I) Cl) !co OD CO D. : 1 1 G d~ r O O i, 0; Q O I ' o O O V (O r M UD cci'I !r O. O CA O o O o O I 1l 0 f- v CA N O o 0 O O! 0 O oM, 0 t0 Q1 O'1 (Ol O C3 1' "1 oI DSI oI o1 O CAI O c i Q '~,OO I N cD 1r~ 'r O O O C' EEqq V' 1 Q'I O N O N r OI N f r N r! O,1 Qi N N! N j r rj m r -I N N O Ol r N N CV r, C-1 ~I, Ni Ni I 1 N r l 00 N n O O n M I N f(DD .6 1 , (n al U CL 11 1 1 U) I 1 N1 Ul . C r m 41) 0. L U O O .~o O c O ~I ° I ~ IM IQ G O 1 41 ~ ~ C : w (n LO R .O O (O (D (O 0 O CD O O O 1 N 0 CD b l0 00 00 16] (D LO ti l v- O M n 010 LO O l0 (D (N7 ! r OI C,)!0 O I. O N O O R 1 0 CD O cc! iO 6 47 (Cl CO N 1 CO 1 1 3 N N j Om : C 0 010 r r r r O O O r r 011 0rl 0,' OI OI O O I o 4 14 14 G p- E ` mI H N - d_: ld ~ 1 1 • I QI Q V V EIU) H1 ❑ LL co U O COJ F f C e.. 47 O f O a o O O O 1 a 10 1,o 0 0 ° O o L_ 4 1 ..+......Y p Ci p1 l ' N (D 7 O O 11 1 LO ti 1 (O O: (O N' 0: V Ln 1 ' d 10 Lt7 7 1 i O I~ j O yy O 1, dr C r : ~ LL) C LO l (f C 1 (O 1 O C U I 1 lo a m I 1 1 I ~ I 1 I I ~ q> O 'lY O l (n I 1 I rt I 1 O ! > u I 3 h« IO ~ C ^ G ~I { t 1 c O Y p0 . O w O A O N CCpp (D 1 P71 M I 1-- 11 ~I N (0 i r-- j N (DI IT M ~ I r M I~ M N N n (n ~rI M r~ I I~ n (O co 1 P, Lo l (3 M r~ I 0 I ml 0 ! 0 U'3 l 1'- 1-1 ~ } 1 4 i ~ m v ~ I"~ l j~' I C44 N N; NI NI l r 2 ~ y.7 O 10 m 1 ' O O NI OI L 1 W D's ml m iDl i r.!r r O O r rl5 1 ~ O IV Q ~ G ~ ~ 01 O O O N 1 NI 0:4 ~ aI 1 i i iz I ! W! m s+I0 1 1. b 0 O 0 6 O I CA b 0 d j ) rl O O O M 01 v1, LnI 0. 01 O 0 C I~ O 0O Q i (D M d b d I I :Q 0 0:0 IJ m I~ 1 ' 1 I _ r o olo N r r~ _ ~I _ ~ NI N t N M O .1- O M r V m N 00 OD N O M O M ODI r N N• O N . ~ 0] C~ I N Nl ; (O O 0 O ~1~(I r oI Q'I 1, ` O ❑ N I 0 O O I O I O' O O Q O r O O < u Q LL m I M Z LL IL Q R Z 0 4 O O p 0 r r I O O O 0 i !m m U U 2 Y 1m LL m m > m H U)D m 0 aLL Ui o r - 6 ¢ QI ❑ ❑ ZIZ Z IZ C] C] Q z ❑ ❑1❑IZ ❑ ❑ Q❑❑ _ : 1 ad ~ 1 H H UIU U U 0 0 U LL F O, r U H H LL t 1 a 1 1 a U) U)J ~ 1 tl1 E X 0) 00: 0 M I 't M INI co ~t CO O M mI I 1 I II ti l C9 Ca, ca'l I ao Z CL • fh M 1 N 1 M.(01 r. O N 1 N (011 CDl 0 CA : Q co nj N CA l co IN CA t• M1 : 1 I 1 VJ r M cn d, lD C9, -l 0I O K MI I V N! 1 1 N 1 I r C"! I i e 1 I I I U I I 1 1 a C UIUi1 - U Ul ~ 1 U 1 I U U D U I (n ~ Y m CI co te ~i r U) . Y -Ne m coil ~ `I ' of 1 U i I Q~ OI Y m 1 (p N m c i c y ' n (n ~ y V ! ❑ c ro I o m C di j I U Y' C, [2 ml'0 O A co AI U a`> U ! m y 7 N m ~ 7 Y tp O C1 co I 47 •cS N y (D to Q Y m U U LL I U U 'C U U 'c m co m. I LL ;z (0 LYI UI ( O Y U UI. U m • Y Y I I I O g CO -0 L C (6 l l co N _ Z (0 7 m (n m co 0 ¢ ` B •O W r0. N (A (6 N r+ C M T CU C6 U 2 Q) U Ci c M (pl C C +-';I ~5~ ca 1 ' , O I j E 0) m M E I ❑ ~Y i c o y _ Y E O1 Uj , H I ' W c l i n w 'T ) , I ~ ! N m I m " mI 111 ( 9 CJ U 2 X CL a CD ` ~ a c n I(n n ~ I ~ m U O UILL - ~ 1_.. Y U, I j B4 a LL E ICl co m l E a1 2 a i o Y 7 j t , ~ LL - a 1 , _ ~ CI m iO : J Z , WY ~ . . _ . o. ttt m' 1 U LL J 2 E' o 51 m, cl mi c m O ~ O 1 .`:(C Q I E lIDI 1 I pIP- 'E1vjl W (col l LL LL 2 U 4L to wnZ) 71 Ui7iLL'D a l J m I H Memorandum Date: August 22, 2012 To: Board of County Commissioners Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator From: Marty Wynne, Finance Director RE: Monthly Financial Reports Attached please find July 2012 financial reports for the following funds: General (001), Community Justice - Juvenile (230), Sheriff's (255, 701, 702), Public Health (259), Behavioral Health (275), Community Development (295), Road (325), Community Justice - Adult (355), Commission on Children & Families (370-399), Solid Waste (610), Insurance Fund (670), 9-1-1 (705), Health Benefits Trust (675), and Fair & Expo Center (618). The projected information has been reviewed and updated, where appropriate, by the respective departments. Cc: All Department Heads GENERAL FUND Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date 13 7 Year End $ Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budqet Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 8,700,000 $ 9,050,168 $ 350,168 100% 104% $ 8,700,000 $ 9,050,168 $ 350,168 Revenues Current & Prior Taxes 1,739,763 186,431 (1,553,332) 8% 1% a) 20,877,160 20,877,160 - Gen. Rev. - excl. Taxes 198,478 739,067 540,589 8% 31% b) 2,381,731 2,381,731 - Assessor 62,386 202,220 139,834 8% 27% c) 748,626 748,626 - County Clerk 115,002 124,494 9,492 8% 9% 1,380,023 1,380,023 - BOPTA 1,033 4,117 3,084 8% 33% c) 12,398 12,398 - District Attorney 15,391 1,370 (14,021) 8% 1% 184,694 184,694 - Finance/Tax 16,575 51,054 34,479 8% 26% c) 198,900 198,900 - Veterans 5,700 75 (5,625) 8% 0% 68,400 68,400 - Property Management 8,270 7,854 (416) 8% 8% 99,244 99,244 - Grant Projects 167 167 - 8% 8% 2,000 2,000 - Total Revenues 2,162,765 1,316,849 (845,916) 8% 5% 25,953,176 25,953,176 - TOTAL RESOURCES 10,862,765 10,367,017 (495,748) 8% 30% 34,653,176 35,003,344 350,168 REQUIREMENTS: Exp. °i° Expenditures Assessor 295,102 263,295 31,807 8% 7% 3,541,227 3,541,227 - County Clerk 122,303 87,527 34,776 8% 6% 1,467,638 1,467,638 - BOPTA 6,032 3,793 2,239 8% 5% 72,385 72,385 - District Attorney 439,556 409,580 29,976 8% 8% 5,274,667 5,274,667 - Finance/Tax 69,489 48,595 20,894 8% 6% 833,865 833,865 - Veterans 21,749 16,957 4,792 8% 6% 260,992 260,992 - Property Management 22,669 21,360 1,309 8% 8% 272,027 272,027 - Grant Projects 10,196 9,754 442 8% 8% 122,349 122,349 - Non-Departmental 132,056 82,257 49,799 8% 5% d) 1,584,671 1,584,671 - Contingency 680,559 680,559 8% n/a 8,166,703 - 8,166,703 1,799,711 943,118 856,593 8% 4% 21,596,524 13,429,821 8,166,703 Transfers Out 1,088,054 1,087,548 506 8% 8% 13,056,652 13,056,652 - TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,887,765 2,030,666 857,999 8% 6% 34,653,176 26,486,473 8,166,703 NET (Resources - Requirements) 7,975,001 8,336,351 361,351 - 8,516,871 8,516,871 a) Current year taxes not due until November b) Includes annual payments: PILT $730,983 c) A & T Grant received quarterly-July, October, January & April. d) Budget includes $576,736 payment to LED#2. Will not be expended until June 2013. Page 1 COMM JUSTICE-JUVENILE Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Federal Grants SB #1065-Court Assess. Discovery Fee Food Subsidy OYA Basic & Diversion Inmate/Prisoner Housing Inmate Commissary Fees Contract Payments Miscellaneous Program Fees MIP Diversion Fees Interest on Investments Leases Grants - Private CFC Interfund Grant Interfund Grant - Gen Fund Total Revenues Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll, % Budget Pro'ection Variance $ 1,010,415 $ 995,051 $ (15,364) 100% 98% $ 1,010,415 $ 995,051 $ (15,364) 500 - (500) 4,167 1,343 (2,824) 1,083 770 (313) 1,750 - (1,750) 31,279 (31,279) 5,000 5,520 520 8 - (8) 10,167 - (10,167) 17 - (17) 4 - (4) 83 150 67 667 581 (86) 100 100 - 42 143 101 10,472 - (10,472) 1,667 - 1,667 67,006 8,607 (58,399) 8% 0% 6,000 6,000 - 8% 3% 50,000 50,000 - 8% 6% 13,000 13,000 - 8% 0% 21,000 21,000 - 8% 0% a) 375,347 375,347 - 8% 9% 60,000 60,000 - 8% 0% 100 100 - 8% 0% b) 122,000 122,000 - 8% 0% 200 200 - 8% 0% 50 50 - 8% 15% 1,000 1,000 - 8% 7% 8,000 8,000 - 8% 8% 1,200 1,200 - 8% 29% 500 500 - 8% 0% c) 125,661 125,661 - 8% 0% c) 20,000 20,000 - 8% 1% 804,058 804,058 - Transfers In-General Fund 445,378 445,377 (1) 8% TOTAL RESOURCES 1,522,799 1,449,035 (73,764) 8% REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Community Justice-Juvenile Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) 8% 5,344,523 5,344,523 - 20% 7,158,996 7,143,632 (15,364) Exp. 422,918 427,565 (4,647) 8% 8% 5,075,017 5,075,017 - 99,497 70,604 28,893 8% 6% 1,193,960 1,193,960 - 8 - 8 8% 0% 100 100 - 4,200 - 4,200 8% 0% 50,400 50,400 - 69,960 - 69,960 8% n/a 839,519 - 839,519 596,583 498,169 98,414 8% 7% 7,158,996 6,319,477 839,519 926,216 950,866 24,650 - 824,155 824,155 a) Payments received quarterly b) Contract payment reimbursement requests submitted monthly, receive 1-2 months in arrears c) Grants received quarterly Page 2 SHERIFF - Fund 255 Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended JL11y 31, 2012 RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Law Enf Dist Countywide Law Enf-Dist Rural Total Revenues I Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget actual Variance FY Coll. % nud et. Projection Variance 1,880,136 1,546,495 (333,641) 8`a 1,203,474 1,160,388 (43,086) 811/0 3,083,610 2,706,883 (376,727) 8% nla $ - $ $ - 7% 22,561,626 18,999,656 (3,561,970) 8% _ 14,441,692 12,432,967 (2,008,725) 7% 37,003,318 31,432,623 (5,570,695) TOTAL RESOURCES 3,083,610 2,706,883 (376,727) 8% 7% REQUIREMENTS; EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Sheriffs Division 188,636 222,271 (33,635) 8% 10%, Civil 66,582 52,068 14,514 8%, 7% Automotive/Communications 137,088 398,598 (261,510) 80/,, 240% Investigations/Evidence 125,682 134,574 (8,892) 8% 9% Patrol/Civil/Comm Supp 689,113 653,509 35,604 8% 8%, Records 59.801 47,276 12,525 8%, 7%: Adult Jail 861,839 738,556 123,283 8`%n 7% Court Security 25,250 23,545 1.705 8% 8%. Emergency Services 16,211 '16,063 148 8% 80% Special Services Division 111,609 '141,852 (30243) 8% 11%. Regional Work Center 221,923 189,016 32,907 81/1, 70/,, Training Division 42,079 29,339 12,740 8`Y° 6`io Other Law Enforcement Svcs 53,625 53,111 514 8% 8% Non-Departmental 7,104 7,104 - 8% F)% Contingency 477,066 - 477,066 8%, n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 3,083,608 2,706,882 376,726 80/, 7% NET (Resources - Requirements) - - - x Revenues from LED #1 & LED #2 adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures 37,003,318 31,432,623 (5,570,695) 2,263,630 2,263,530 100 798,989 798,889 100 1,645,050 1,800,050 (155,000) 1,508,180 1,508,080 100 8,269,358 8,269,358 - 717,617 717,517 100 10,342,072 10,342,072 - 303,001 302,901 100 194,533 '194,433 100 1,339,308 1,339,308 - 2,663,078 2,662,978 100 504,950 504,850 100 643,504 643,404 100 85,253 85,253 - 5.724.795 - 5,724,795 37,003,318 31,432,623 5,570,695 Page 3 Fund 701 LED-Countywide Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 I Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget Pro ection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $4,507,352 $ 5,863,246 $ 1,355,894 100% 130% $ 4,507,352 $5,863,246 $ 1,355,894 Tax Revenues - Current 1,282,145 - (1,282,145) 8% 0% a) 15,385,740 15,385,740 - Tax Revenues - Prior 36,667 137,505 100,838 8% 31% 440,000 440,000 - Federal Grants $ Reimb 2,500 - (2,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000 - State Grant 6,167 - (6,167) 8% 0% 74,000 74,000 - Transp. of State Wards 417 - (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - SB 1145 123,333 - (123,333) 8% 0% 1,479,991 1,479,991 Prisoner Housing 4,167 - (4,167) 8% 0% 50,000 50,000 - Des. Cty Video Lottery Grant 417 - (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - Des Cty Court Security 20,083 20,009 (74) 8% 8% 241,000 241,000 - Des Cty Juvenile Contract 348 - (348) 8% 0% 4,180 4,180 - Transport 42 - (42) 8% 0% 500 500 - Other 292 6,500 6,208 8% 186% 3,500 6,500 3,000 DC Fair & Expo Center 333 - (333) 8% 0% 4,000 4,000 - Inmate Commissary Fees 833 - (833) 8% 0% 10,000 10,000 Work Center Work Crews 4,167 268 (3,899) 8% 1% 50,000 50,000 - Concealed Handgun Classes 292 850 558 8% 24% 3,500 3,500 - Inmate Telephone Fee 6,667 - (6,667) 8% 0% 80,000 80,000 - Soc Sec Incentive-Fed 417 - (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - Miscellaneous 417 744 327 8% 15% 5,000 5,000 - Oregon Mentors 83 _ (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000 - Debit Card Fee 8 39 31 8% 39% 100 100 - Medical Services Reimb 1,083 - (1,083) 8% 0% 13,000 13,000 - Restitution 417 - (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - Sheriff Fees 20,833 21,587 754 8% 9% 250,000 250,000 - Interest 2,361 3,183 822 8% 11% 28,333 28,333 Interest on Unsegregated 294 31 (263) 8% 1% 3,533 3,533 - Donations - "Shop with a Cop" 4,325 11,288 6,963 8% 22% 51,897 51,897 - Sale of Reportable Assets 417 - 417 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - Total Revenues 1,519,525 202,004 1,317,521 8% 1% 18,234,274 18,237,274 3,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 6,026,877 6,065,250 38,373 8% 27% 22,741,626 24,100,520 1,358,894 REQUIREMENTS: Bxp Rio Fund 255 Departments: Sheriffs Services 176,105 207,506 (31,401) 8% 10% 2,113,257 2,113,164 93 Civil 66,582 52,068 14,514 8% 7% 798,989 798,889 100 Auto/Comm 50,551 146,983 (96,432) 8% 24% 606,612 663,768 (57,156) Adult Jail 861,839 738,556 123,283 8% 7% 10,342,072 10,342,072 - Court Security 25,250 23,545 1,705 8% 8% 303,001 302,901 100 Emergency Services 16,211 16,063 148 8% 8% 194,533 194,433 100 Special Services 77,227 98,153 (20,926) 8% 11% 926,721 926,721 - Work Center 221,923 189,016 32,907 8% 7% 2,663,078 2,662,978 100 Training 25,723 17,935 7,788 8% 6% 308,676 308,615 61 Other (CODE, Forensic) 53,625 53,111 514 8% 8% 643,504 643,404 100 Non Dept - ISF Charges 3,559 3,559 0 8% 8% 42,712 42,712 - Contingency 301,539 - 301,539 8% n/a 3,618,471 - 3,618,471 Total to Fund 255 1,880,136 1,546,495 333,641 22,561,626 18,999,656 3,561,970 Transfer to Reserve Fund (703) 8,333 - 8,333 8% 0% 100,000 100,000 - Non Dept - Comm System Res 6,667 - 6,667 8% 0% 80,000 80,000 - Total Requirements 1,895,136 1,546,495 348,640 8% 7% 22,741,626 19,179,656 3,561 970 , Net 4,131,742 4,518,755 387,013 - 4,920,863 4,920,863 a) Current year taxes not due until November * Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attributable to countywide services. Page 4 Fund 702 LED Rural Statement of Financial ;D,perating Data One Month Ended July 31 2012 I Year to Date Y2013 I `!ear End Bud et Actual Variance FY o% Coll. % I BudGet 1 Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $2,859,915 $3,240,358 S 380,443 100 % 113% $2,859,915 $3,240,358 ~ 380,443 Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 629,167 - (629,167) 8IX, 01% a) 7,550,000 7,550,000 - Tax Revenues - Prior 19,167 67,555 48,388 8o/r, 290% 230,000 230,000 Federal Grants & Reimb 1,250 - ('1,250) 8%, 00% 15,000 15,000 Federal Grants-BLM 2,167 (2,167) 3% 0% 26,000 26,000 US Forest Service 6,250 (6,250) 8% 00X0 75,000 75,000 Bureau of Reclamation 2,167 (•2.,•167) 8`/,, 0% 26,000 26,000 State Grant 15,766 - (•15,766) 8°% oo% '189,194 '189,194 SIB #1065 Court Assessment 4,583 1.343 (3,240) 8%. 2orD, 55,000 55,000 Marine Board License Fee 11,841 - (11841) 80% 00/, 142,091 142,091 Des Cty General Fund Grant 48,061 (48,061) 8% 0% 576,735 576,735 Des Cty Transient Room Tax 172,772 (172,772) 8% 0% 2,073,265 2,073,265 Des Cty Tax Office Contract 42 (42) 8% 0% 500 500 - City of Sisters 38,997 38,997 - 8% 8% 467,960 467,960 - Des Cty CDD Contract 4,531 4,531 8% 8% 54,366 54,366 - Des Cty Solid Waste Contr 4,531 4,531 8% 8°% 54,366 54,366 - Des Cty Clerk/Election 83 - (83) e°% 0110 1,000 1,000 - School Districts 3,333 - (3,333) 8%, 0% 40,000 40,000 - Security & Traffic Reimb 417 - (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000 - Seat Belt Program 833 280 (553) 8% 3% 10,000 10,000 - Miscellaneous 500 749 249 s,% 12°/, 6,000 6,000 False Alarm Fees 167 - (167) 8°% 00/1, 2,000 2,000 Restitution 417 25 (392) 8%, 1% 5,000 5,000 Sheriff Fees 833 538 (295) 80% 5% 10,000 10,000 Court Fines & Fees 10,000 10,224 224 a% 9% 120,000 120,000 Impound Fees 333 800 467 8% 2001,) 4,000 4,000 Restitution - Street Crimes 42 - (42) 8% 00% 500 500 Seizure/Forfeiture 83 - (83) 8% 0°% 1,000 1,000 Interest 833 1,210 377 8% 12% 10,000 10,000 Interest on Unsegregated '150 16 (134) 8`% 1I% 1,800 1,800 - Donations - 2,500 2,500 8,9o n/a - 2,500 2,500 Sale of Equip & Material 833 - (833) so/, 00/ 10,000 '10,000 - Sale of Reportable Assets 3,333 (3.333) 8% o% 40.000 40,000 - Total Revenues 983,482 133,299 (850,183) 50%. 1% 11,801,777 11,804,277 2,500 TOTAL RESOURCES 3,843,397 3,373,657 (4697740) 50% 23% 14,661,692 15,044,635 382,943 REQUIREMENTS: exp. `%n Fund 255 Departments. Sheriff's Services 12,531 14,765 (2,234) 8% 10% 150,373 150,366 7 Auto/Comm 86,536 251,615 (165.079) 8% 24% 1,038,438 1,136,282 (97,844) Investigations 125:682 134,574 (8:892) 8% 9% 1,508,180 1,508,080 100 Patrol 689,113 653,509 35,604 8% 8°/% 8,269,358 8,269,358 - Records 59,801 47,276 12,525 8% 7% 717,617 7'17,517 100 Special Services 34,382 43,699 (9,317) 8% 11°% 412,587 412,587 - Training 16,356 11,404 4,952 8% 6% 196,274 196,235 39 Non Dept - ISF Charges 3,545 3,545 0 8°l 8% 42,541 42,54.1 Contingency 175,527 - 175,527 8% r./a 2,106,324 - 2,106.324 Total to Fund 255 1,203,474 1,160,387 43,087 14,441,692 12,432,967 2,008,725 Transfer to Reserve Fund (704) 8,333 8,333 Non Dept - Comm System Res 10,000 - 10,000 Total Requirements 1,221,808 1,160,387 61.420 Net 2,621,589 2,213,270 (408.319) a) Current year taxes not clue until November 8% 0°% 100,000 '100,000 8% 0% '120,000 120,000 Q0% 8°% 14.661,692 12,652,967 2,008,725 - 2,391,669 2,391,669 Page 5 Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attri'outable to rural services. PUBLIC HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget - Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $1,336,051 $ 1,327,199 $ (8,852) 100% 99% $1,336,051 $1,327,199 $ (8,852) Revenues Medicare Reimbursement 83 - (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000 - Federal Grant - 5,000 5,000 8% n/a - 5,000 5,000 Federal Grant (ARRA) 16,667 - (16,667) 8% 0% 200,000 200,000 - State Grant 217,931 - (217,931) 8% 0% a) 2,615,168 2,615,168 - Child Dev & Rehab Center 3,301 - (3,301) 8% 0% 39,609 39,609 - State Miscellaneous 8,469 - (8,469) 8% 0% 101,630 101,630 - OMAP 52,299 22,771 (29,528) 8% 4% 627,588 627,588 - Title 19 29 - (29) 8% n/a 352 352 - Family Planning Exp Proj 45,833 - (45,833) 8% 0% 550,000 550,000 - Local Grants 14,160 - (14,160) 8% 0% 169,920 169,920 - Environmental Health-Water 7,683 - (7,683) 8% 0% 92,200 92,200 - Contract Payments - 10,000 10,000 8% n/a - 10,000 10,000 Miscellaneous - 700 700 8% n/a - 700 700 Patient Insurance Fees 16,100 10,088 (6,012) 8% 5% 193,200 193,200 - Health Dept/Patient Fees 8,592 6,288 (2,304) 8% 6% 103,100 103,100 - Vital Records-Birth 3,417 2,160 (1,257) 8% 5% 41,000 41,000 - Vital Records-Death 8,333 11,130 2,797 8% 11% 100,000 100,000 - Environmental Health-Lic Fac 60,004 29,912 (30,092) 8% 4% 720,050 720,050 - Interest on Investments 1,000 563 (437) 8% 5% 12,000 12,000 - Donations 442 17,160 16,718 8% 324% 5,300 22,277 16,977 Interfund Contract 13,219 - (13,219) 8% 0% 158,629 158,629 - Administrative Fee 67 67 - 8% 8% 800 800 - Total Revenues 477,629 115,839 (361,790) 8% 2% 5,731,546 5,764,223 32,677 Transfers In-General Fund 195,780 195,780 - 8% 8% 2,349,357 2,349,357 - Transfers In-PH Res Fund 5,011 - (5,011) 8% 0% 60,136 60,136 - Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 5,425 - (5,425) 8% 0% 65,100 65,100 - TOTAL RESOURCES 2,019,896 1,638,818 (381,078) 8% 17% 9,542,190 9,566,015 23,825 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Exp. 530,297 502,000 28,297 8% 8% 6,363,560 6,363,560 - 159,768 90,936 68,832 8% 5% 1,917,220 1,917,220 - 5,417 - 5,417 8% 0% b) 65,000 - 65,000 13,100 - 13,100 8% 0% 157,200 157,200 - 86,601 - 86,601 8% n/a 1,039,210 - 1,039,210 795,183 592,936 202,247 8% 6% 9,542,190 8,437,980 1,104,210 - 1,128,035 1,128,035 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,224,713 1,045,882 (178,831) a) State grant for July will be received in August b) Capital Outlay expense for the OCHIN System expended in FY 2012 Page 6 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to ate FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Bud et Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 3,320,968 $ 3,113,095 $ (207,873) 100% 94% $ 3,320,968 $ 3,113,095 $ (207,873) Revenues Marriage Licenses 542 900 358 8% 14% 6,500 6,500 - Divorce Filing Fees 13,333 10,468 (2,865) 8% 7% 160,000 160,000 - Domestic Partnership Fee 4 30 26 8% 67% 45 45 - Federal Grants 21,029 - (21,029) 8% 0% 252,349 252,349 - Federal Grant (ARRA) 5,313 - (5,313) 8% 0% 63,750 63,750 - State Grants 644,217 168,482 (475,735) 8% 2% 7,730,599 7,730,599 - State Miscellaneous 5,155 - (5,155) 8% 0% 61,860 61,860 - Adult Mental Health Initiative 16,667 - (16,667) 8% 0% 200,000 200,000 - Title 19 22,454 14,514 (7,940) 8% 5% 269,446 269,446 - Liquor Revenue 11,792 - (11,792) 8% 0% 141,500 141,500 - School Districts 5,750 - (5,750) 8% 0% 69,000 69,000 - Miscellaneous - 69 69 8% n/a - 5,000 5,000 Patient Insurance Fees 7,294 8,881 1,587 8% 10% 87,532 87,532 - Patient Fees 79 204 125 8% 21% 950 950 - Interest on Investments 2,083 1,913 (170) 8% 8% 25,000 25,000 - Rentals 1,542 375 (1,167) 8% 2% 18,500 18,500 - Administrative Fee 441,044 431,044 (10,000) 8% 8% 5,292,527 5,292,527 - Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 10,583 - (10,583) 8% 0% 127,000 127,000 - Total Revenues 1,208,881 636,880 (572,001) 8% 4% 14,506,558 14,511,558 5,000 Transfers In-General Fund 108,982 108,982 - 8% 8% 1,307,787 1,307,787 - Transfers In-OHP-CDO 40,375 40,375 - 8% 8% 484,494 484,494 - Transfers In-Acute Care Svcs 22,053 22,053 - 8% 8% 264,631 264,631 - Transfers In-ABHA 43,670 43,670 - 8% 8% 524,039 524,039 - TOTAL RESOURCES 4,744,929 3,965,055 (779,874) 8% 19% 20,408,477 20,205,604 (202,873) REQUIREMENTS: Exp. Rio Expenditures Personal Services 930,426 902,559 27,867 8% 8% 11,165,114 11,165,114 - Materials and Services 549,520 213,882 335,638 8% 3% 6,594,235 6,594,235 - Capital Outlay 8 - 8 8% 0% 100 - 100 Transfers Out 17,000 - 17,000 8% 0% 204,000 204,000 - Contingency 203,752 - 203,752 8% n/a 2,445,028 - 2,445,028 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,700,706 1,116,441 584,265 8% 5% 20,408,477 17,963,349 2,445,128 NET (Resources - Requirements) 3,044,223 2,848,614 (195,609) - 2,242,255 2,242,255 Page 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 10,000 192,982 $ 182,982 100% 1930% $ 10,000 $ 192,982 182,982 Revenues Admin-Operations 1,841 3,894 2,053 8% 18% 22,090 22,090 - Admin-GIS 104 65 (39) 8% 5% a) 1,250 1,250 - Admin-Code Enforcement 13,850 19,985 6,135 8% 12% 166,200 166,200 - Building Safety 106,131 138,569 32,438 8% 11% 1,273,575 1,273,575 _ Electrical 21,333 41,411 20,078 8% 16% 256,000 256,000 - Contract Services 9,300 7,264 (2,036) 8% 7% 111,600 111,600 - Env Health-On Site Prog 26,081 24,213 (1,868) 8% 8% 312,971 312,971 - Planning-Current 53,113 52,062 (1,051) 8% 8% 637,350 637,350 - Planning-Long Range 18,868 26,438 7,570 8% 12% 226,421 226,421 - Total Revenues 250,621 313,901 63,280 8% 10% 3,007,457 3,007,457 - Transfers In General Fund - Gen Ops 71,239 71,239 - 8% 8% 854,872 854,872 - General Fund - L/R Planning 41,280 41,280 - 8% 8% 495,360 495,360 - A&T Reserve (D/S assistance) 7,465 - (7,465) 8% 0% 89,577 89,577 - Other 8_ - (8) 8% 0% 100 - (100) TOTAL RESOURCES 380,613 619,402 238,789 8% 14% 4,457,366 4,640,248 182,882 REQUIREMENTS: Exp. EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Admin-Operations 112,766 115,159 (2,393) 8% 9% b) 1,353,189 1,353,189 - Admin-GIS 9,815 9,205 610 8% 8% 117,778 117,778 - Admin-Code Enforcement 19,077 17,520 1,557 8% 8% 228,925 228,925 - Building Safety 51,757 51,739 18 8% 8% 621,087 621,087 - Electrical 16,936 15,361 1,575 8% 8% 203,231 203,231 - Contract Services 11,812 11,411 401 8% 8% 141,745 141,745 - Env Health-On Site Pgm 13,303 11,174 2,129 8% 7% 159,636 159,636 - Planning-Current 53,526 46,595 6,931 8% 7% 642,315 642,315 - Planning-Long Range 38,617 36,393 2,224 8% 8% 463,401 463,401 - Transfers Out (D/S Fund) 14,930 - 14,930 8% 0% 179,155 179,155 - Contingency 28,909 - 28,909 8% n/a 346,904 - 346,904 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 371,448 314,557 56,891 8% 7% 4,457,366 4,110,462 346,904 NET (Resources - Requirements) 9,165 304,845 295,680 - 529,786 529,786 Revenues 313,901 3,007,457 3,007,457 - Expenditures 314,557 4,457,366 4,110,462 346,904 Net from Operations (656) (1,449,909) (1,103,005) 346,904 a) GIS revenue is sporadic based on the frequency of customer requests b) Expenses are higher than YTD due to a large (budgeted) software license payment in July Page 8 ROAD Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll- % Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 4,719,551 $ 4,940,444 $ 220,893 100% 105% $ 4,719,551 $ 4,940,444 b 220,893 Revenues Federal Grant (ARRA) 583 - (583) 8% 0% 7,000 7,000 - Mineral Lease Royalties 3,333 - (3,333) 8% 0% 40,000 40,000 - Forest Receipts 33,069 - (33,069) 8% 0% a) 396,826 396,826 - State Miscellaneous 45,191 - (45,191) 8% 0% 542,290 542,290 - Motor Vehicle Revenue 899,170 880,851 (18,319) 8% 8% 10,790,043 10,790,043 - City of Bend 2,083 - (2,083) 8% 0% b) 25,000 25,000 - City of Redmond 29,167 - (29,167) 8% 0% b) 350,000 350,000 - City of Sisters 833 - (833) 8% 0% b) 10,000 10,000 - City of La Pine 833 - (833) 8% o% b) 10,000 10,000 - Admin Recovery (SDC) - 388 388 8% n/a - 1,000 1,000 Miscellaneous 1,667 125 (1,542) 8% 1% 20,000 20,000 - Road Vacations 83 - (83) 8% o% 1,000 1,000 - Interest on Investments 1,250 2,826 1,576 8% 19% 15,000 15,000 - Interfund Contract 57,500 - (57,500) 8% o% C) 690,000 690,000 - Equipment Repairs 18,333 - (18,333) 8% o% 220,000 220,000 - Vehicle Repairs 7,500 - (7,500) 8% 0% c) 90,000 90,000 - LID Construction 833 - (833) 8% 0% c) 10,000 10,000 - Vegetation Management 2,083 - (2,083) 8% 0% c) 25,000 25,000 - Forester 2,083 - (2,083) 8% 0% C) 25,000 25,000 - Car Washes 333 - (333) 8% 0% 4,000 4,000 - Car Rental 83 - (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000 - Sale of Equip & Material 60,300 594 (59,706) 8% 0% 723,600 723,600 - Total Revenues 1,166,310 884,784 (281,526) 8% 6% 13,995,759 13,996,759 1,000 Trans In - Solid Waste 23,023 - (23,023) 8% 0% 276,272 276,272 - Trans In - Transp SDC 20,833 - (20,833) 8% 0% 250,000 250,000 - Trans In-Road Imp Res 1,000 - (1,000) 8% 0% 12,000 12,000 - TOTAL RESOURCES 5,930,717 5,825,228 (84,656) a% 31% 19,253,582 19,475,475 221,893 REQUIREMENTS: Exp. Rio Expenditures Personal Services 447,100 443,710 3,390 8% 8% 5,365,202 5,365,202 - Materials and Services 786,555 489,800 296,755 8% 5% 9,438,662 9,438,662 - Capital Outlay 169,775 200 169,575 8% 0% 2,037,300 2,037,300 - Transfers Out 22,917 - 22,917 8% 0% 275,000 275,000 - Contingency 178,118 - 178,118 8% n/a 2,137,418 - 2,137,418 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,604,465 933,710 670,755 8% 5% 19,253,582 17,116,164 2,137,418 NET (Resources - Requirements) 4,326,252 4,891,518 586,099 a) Payment received annually in January b) Billed upon completion of work c) Payments to be received in June 2013 from other Road Department funds - 2,359,311 2,359,311 Page 9 ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 570,000 $ 630,226 $ 60,226 100% 111% $ 570,000 $ 630,226 $ 60,226 Revenues DOC Measure 57 18,270 - (18,270) 8% 0% a) 219,240 219,240 - State Miscellaneous 358 - (358) 8% 0% b) 4,301 4,301 - Alternate Incarceration 1,250 - (1,250) 8% 0% c) 15,000 15,000 - State Subsidy 1,152 - (1,152) 8% 0% a) 13,826 13,826 - SB 1145 229,045 - (229,045) 8% 0% a) 2,748,556 2,748,556 - Probation Work Crew Fees 1,875 2,180 305 8% 10% 22,500 22,500 - Miscellaneous 375 342 (33) 8% 8% 4,500 4,500 - Electronic Monitoring Fee 10,833 12,959 2,126 8% 10% 130,000 130,000 - Probation Superv. Fees 15,833 14,351 (1,482) 8% 8% 190,000 190,000 - Interest on Investments 750 337 (413) 8% 4% 9,000 9,000 - Interfund - Sheriff 4,167 4,167 - 8% 8% 50,000 50,000 - Crime Prevention Grant 4,167 - (4,167) 8% 0% 50,000 50,000 - CFC-Domestic Violence 6,236 - (6,236) 8% 0% 74,832 74,832 - Total Revenues 294,311 34,336 (259,975) 8% 1% 3,531,755 3,531,755 - Transfers In-General Fund 36,277 36,277 - 8% 8% 435,328 435,328 - TOTAL RESOURCES 900,588 700,839 (199,749) 8% 15% 4,537,083 4,597,309 60,226 REQUIREMENTS: Exp. Expenditures Personal Services 257,608 243,060 14,548 8% 8% 3,091,291 3,091,291 - Materials and Services 72,891 46,254 26,637 8% 5% 874,687 874,687 - Capital Outlay 8 - 8 8% 0% 100 - 100 Contingency 47,584 - 47,584 8% n/a 571,005 - 571,005 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 378,091 289,314 88,777 8% 6% 4,537,083 3,965,978 571,105 NET (Resources - Requirements) 522,497 411,525 (110,972) - 631,331 631,331 a) Contracts recently submitted, expecting payment mid-September b) Annual allocation normally received by end of calendar year c) State invoiced quarterly Page 10 CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 13 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Federal Grants Title IV - Family Sup/Pres HealthyStart Medicaid Level 7 Services State Prevention Funds HealthyStart /R-S-G OCCF Grant Charges for Svcs-Mist Court Fines & Fees Interest on Investments Grants, Private Interfund Grants Total Revenues $ 511,994 $ 574,985 $ 62,991 100% 112% $ 511,994 $ 574,985 $ 62,991 16,620 - (16,620) 8% 0% 3,294 - (3,294) 8% 0% 7,083 - (7,083) 8% 0% 16,408 - (16,408) 8% 0% 4,010 12,031 8,021 8% 25% 18,329 - (18,329) 8% 0% 34,983 - (34,983) 8% 0% 667 - (667) 8% 0% 6,624 6,281 (343) 8% 8% 83 397 314 8% 40% 167 - (167) 8% n/a 26,740 - 26,740 8% 0% 135,008 18,709 (116,299) 8% 1% Trans from General Fund 23,003 23,000 (3) 8% 8% Total Transfers In _ 23,003 23,000 (3) 8% 8% TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency 670,005 616,694 (53,311) 8% 26% l=xp. 199,441 199,441 - 39,533 39,533 - 85,000 85,000 - 196,898 196,898 - 48,122 48,122 - 219,951 219,951 - 419,796 419,796 - 8,000 8,000 - 79,485 79,485 - 1,000 1,000 - 2,000 2,000 - 320,874 320,874 - 1,620,100 1,620,100 275,984 275,984 - 275,984 275,984 - 2,408,078 2,471,069 62,991 53,956 48,506 5,450 8% 7% 647,474 647,474 - 123,000 10,144 112,856 8% 1% 1,475,997 1,475,997 - 8 - 8 8% 0% 100 - 100 23,709 - 23,709 8% n/a 284,507 284,507 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 200,673 58,650 142,023 8% 2% NET (Resources - Requirements) 469,332 558,044 88,712 2,408,078 2,123,471 284,607 - 347,598 347,598 Page 11 SOLID WASTE Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 700,513 $ 807,470 $ 106,957 100% 115% $ 700,513 $ 807,470 $ 106,957 Revenues Miscellaneous 1,833 1,683 (150) 8% Franchise 3% Fees 16,667 2,500 (14,167) 8% Commercial Disp. Fees 71,667 81,917 10,250 8% Private Disposal Fees 109,500 142,596 33,096 8% Franchise Disposal Fees 333,333 354,960 21,627 8% Yard Debris 6,083 12,096 6,013 8% Special Waste 2,083 534 (1,549) 8% Interest 625 629 4 8% Leases 900 1,800 900 8% Recyclables 3,750 6,467 2,717 8% Total Revenues 546,441 605,182 58,741 8% TOTAL RESOURCES 1,246,954 1,412,652 165,698 8% REQUIREMENTS Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Transfers Out-Road Trans Out-Capital Res Contingency 144,443 136,332 8,111 8% 249,109 66,065 183,044 8% 78,893 - 78,893 8% 6,917 - 6,917 8% 23,023 - 23,023 8% 52,500 - 52,500 8% 49,933 - 49,933 8% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 604,818 202,397 402,421 NET (Resources - Requirements) 642,136 1,210,255 568,119 a) Due April 15, 2013 b) Seasonal item-Fall and Spring c) Dependent on special clean-ups such as asbestos and contaminated soil d) Purchasing will pick up as year progresses e) To be expended in November and May f) In the process of contacting bidders g) Semi-annual payments in December and June h) As needed 8% 1% a) 10% 11% 9% 17% b) 2% c) 8% 17% 14% 9% 19% Exp. 22,000 22,000 - 200,000 200,000 - 860,000 860,000 - 1,314,000 1,314,000 - 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 73,000 73,000 - 25,000 25,000 - 7,500 7,500 - 10,801 10,801 - 45,000 45,000 - 6,557,301 6,557,301 7,257,814 7,364,771 106,957 8% 1,733,321 1,733,321 - 2% d) 2,989,313 2,989,313 - 0% e) 946,713 946,713 - 0% f) 83,000 83,000 - 0% g) 276,272 276,272 - 0% h) 630,000 630,000 - n/a 599,195 599,195 8% 3% 7,257,814 6,658,619 599,195 706,152 706,152 Page 12 RISK MANAGEMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date Year End Budget Actual Variance % of FY % Coll. Bud et Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beginning Net Working Capital $2,000,000 $2,240,791 $240,791 Revenues Inter-fund Charges: General Liability 21,861 21,861 (0) Property Damage 26,123 26,123 (0) Vehicle 14,470 14,470 0 Workers' Compensation 120,015 120,015 0 Unemployment 20,833 20,846 13 Claims Reimb-Workers' Compensation 42 - (42) Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property 5,000 - (5,000) Process Fee-Events/Parades 167 105 (62) Miscellaneous 4 - (4) Skid Car Training 1,333 250 (1,083) Interest on Investments 1,250 1,116 (134) Other Interest 4 - _-(,q TOTAL REVENUES 211,102 204,786 6,316 TOTAL RESOURCES 2,211,102 2,445,577 234,474 Appropriations/Expenditures Direct Insurance Costs: GENERAL LIABILITY Settlement / Benefit - Defense - Professional Service - Insurance 135,600 Loss Prevention 763 Repair / Replacement - Total General Liability 25,000 136,363 (111,363) PROPERTY DAMAGE Insurance 158,562 Repair / Replacement - Total Property Damage 20,833 158,562 (137,729) VEHICLE Professional Service - Insurance - Loss Prevention - Repair / Replacement 598 Total Vehicle 8,333 598 7,736 WORKERS' COMPENSATION Settlement / Benefit 26,516 Professional Service - Insurance 69,009 Loss Prevention 13,125 Miscellaneous - Total Workers' Compensation 83,333 108,650 (25,316) UNEMPLOYMENT - Settlement/Benefits 20,833 - 20,833 Total Direct Insurance Costs Insurance Administration: Personal Services Materials & Service Capital Outlay Total Insurance Administration Transfers Out TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET 158,333 404,172 (245,839) 25,658 23,373 2,285 14,083 10,284 3,798 8 - 8 39,749 33,657 6,092 600 - 600 198,682 437,829 239,147 2,012,420 2,007,748 46673 a) Annual premium paid in July 2012 100% 112% $2,000,000 $2,240,791 $240,791 8% 8% 262,333 262,333 - 8% 8% 313,480 313,480 - 8% 8% 173,635 173,635 - 8% 8% 1,440,176 1,440,176 - 8% 8% 250,000 250,000 - 8% 0% 500 500 - 8% 0% 60,000 60,000 - 8% 5% 2,000 2,000 - 8% 0% 50 50 - 8% 2% 16,000 16,000 - 8% 7% 15,000 15,000 - 8% 0% 50 50 - 8% 8% 2,533,224 2,533,224 - 8% 54% 4,533,224 4,774,015 240,791 % Ex . a) 8% 45% 300,000 300,000 - a) 8% 63% 250,000 250,000 - 8% 1% 100,000 100,000 - a) 8% 11% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 8% 0% 250,000 250,000 8% 21% 1,900,000 1,900,000 8% 8% 307,896 307,896 - 8% 6% 168,990 168,990 - 8% 0% 100 - 100 8% 7% 476,986 476,886 100 8% 0% 7,200 7,200 - 8% 18% 2,384,186 2,384,086 100 2,149,038 2,389,929 240,891 Page 13 " Contingency is $2,149,038. DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date FY 2013 Year End [ __Budget Actual Variance % of FY % Coll. Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $8,000,000 $ 8,874,091 $ 874,091 100% 111% $8,000,000 $8,874,091 $ 874,091 Revenues Property Taxes - Current 545,641 - (545,641) 8% 0% a) 6,547,687 6,547,687 - Property Taxes - Prior 15,417 53,031 37,614 8% 29% 185,000 185,000 - Federal Grants 20,000 - (20,000) 8% 0% 240,000 240,000 - State Reimbursement 3,000 - (3,000) 8% 0% 36,000 36,000 - Telephone User Tax 62,500 - (62,500) 8% 0% 750,000 750,000 - Data Network Reimb. 2,500 - (2,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000 - Jefferson County 2,500 - (2,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000 - User Fee 3,667 - (3,667) 8% 0% 44,000 44,000 - Police RMS User Fees 23,246 - (23,246) 8% 0% 278,950 278,950 - Contract Payments 2,583 - (2,583) 8% 0% 31,000 31,000 - Miscellaneous 750 565 (185) 8% 6% 9,000 9,000 - Interest 3,333 4,467 1,134 8% 11% 40,000 40,000 - Interest on Unsegregated Tax 50 13 (37) 8% 2% 600 600 - Total Revenues 685,187 58,076 (627,111) 8% 1% 8,222,237 8,222,237 - TOTAL RESOURCES 8,685,187 8,932,167 246,980 8% 55% 16,222,237 17,096,328 874,091 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 358,900 355,924 2,976 8% 8% 4,306,797 3,800,000 506,797 Materials and Services 170,850 94,637 76,213 8% 5% 2,050,202 2,050,202 - Capital Outlay 46,833 23,257 23,576 8% 4% 562,000 562,000 - Transfers Out 41,667 - 41,667 8% 0% 500,000 500,000 - Contingency 733,603 - 733,603 8% n/a 8,803,238 - 8,803,238 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,351,853 473,818 878,035 8% 3% 16,222,237 6,912,202 9,310,035 NET (Resources - Requirements) 7,333,334 8,458,349 1,125,015 - 10,184,126 10,184,126 a) Current year taxes not due u ntil November Page 14 Health Benefits Trust Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 RESOURCES Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues: Internal Premium Charges P/T Emp - Add'I Prem Employee Prem Contribution COIC Retiree / COBRA Co-Pay Medical Services Reimb Interest Total Revenues TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS Expenditures: Personal Services (all depts) Altaterials 8 Services Claims Paid-Medical/Rx Claims Paid-Dental/Vision Refunds Insurance Premiums State Assessments Administration Fee Preferred Provider Fee Health Impact Other - Administration Other - Wellness Admin & Wellness Deschutes On-site Clinic Healthstat Medical Supplies Equipment Miscellaneous Total DOC Deschutes On-site Pharmacy Contracted Services Medication and Drugs Miscellaneous Total Pharmacy capital outlay Contingency Year to Date FY 2013 FY 2013 Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Bud et Projection Variance $13,800,000 $14,518,223 $ 718,223 100% 0 * $ 13,800,000 $14,518,223 718,223 1,066,250 1,065,326 (924) 4,167 2,748 (1,418) 52,500 52,585 85 108,333 115,031 6,698 62,500 73,290 10,790 - 323 323 6,667 7,250 583 1,300,417 1,316,554 16,138 15,100,417 15,834,777 734,360 8% 8% 12,795,000 12,795,000 - 8% 5% 50,000 50,000 - 8% 8% 630,000 630,000 - 8% 90/0 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 8% 10% 750,000 750,000 - 8% n/a - 323 323 8% 9% 80,000 80,000 - 8% 8% 15,605,000 15,605,323 323 92% 1050/. 29,405,000 30,123,546 718,546 Exp. 16,731 16,064 667 8% 8% 200,772 200,772 - 996,150 1,317,889 (321,739) 8% 11%8) 11,953,800 12,165,439 (211,639) 148,850 142,312 6,538 8% 8% a) 1,786,200 1,480,046 306,154 - (5,534) 5,534 8% rVa - (5,534) 5,534 29,167 29,911 (744) 8% 90/0 350,000 350,000 - 13,333 - 13,333 8% 0% 160,000 160,000 - 26,667 26,485 181 8% 8% 320,000 320,000 - 4,167 4,107 60 8% 8% 50,000 50,000 - 4,583 4,318 265 8% 8% 55,000 55,000 - 5,446 1,744 3,702 8% 3% 65,353 65,353 - 8,750 1,120 7,630 8% 1% 105,000 105,000 - 1,237,113 1,522,353 (285,240) 8% 10% 14,845,353 14,745,304 100,049 57,000 - 57,000 8% 0% 684,000 684,000 - 2,500 532 1,968 8% 2% 30,000 30,000 - 83 - 83 8% 0% 1,000 1,000 - 1,786 1,853 (66) 8% 90/0 21,433 21,433 - 61,369 2,384 58,985 8% 0% 736,433 736,433 - 25,691 - 25,691 8% 0% 308,287 308,287 83,333 - 83,333 8% 0% 1,000,000 1,000,000 11380 1,380 (0) 8% n/a 16,559 16,559 - 110,404 1,380 109,024 we n/a 1,324,846 1,324,846 - 8 - 8 8% n/a 100 - 100 1,024,791 1,024,791 8% n/a 12,297,496 - 12,297,496 TOTAL EXPEND/REQUIREMNTS 2,340,013 1,542,181 908,235 8% 5% 29,405,000 17,007,355 12,397,645 NET (Resources - Requirements) 12,760,404 14,292,595 1,642,595 - 13,116,191 13,116,191 * Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures could be recorded. This will result in a change to Beginning Net Working Capital. a) Projection based on annualizing 5 weeks of claims paid. YTD actual is an average of $290,934 per week Page 15 RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Receipts: Special Events Revenues Interest Storage Camping at F & E Horse Stall Rental Concession % - Food Rights (Signage, etc.) Interfund Contract Miscellaneous Total Receipts Transfers In General Fund (001) Room Tax (160) Welcome Center (170) Annual County Fair (619) Total Transfers In TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures: Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Total Expenditures Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) Deschutes County - Fair and Expo Center YTD-Budget Basis Commissioners Statement of Financial Operating Data One Month Ended July 31, 2012 Year to Date Budget (1/12 of annual) Actual Variance FY % Coll. % Year End FY 2013 Budget Pro'ection Variance $ 46,373 $ 35,055 $ (11,318) 100% 76% $ 46,373 $ 35,055 $ (11,318) 50,632 15,949 (34,683) 8% 3% 607,578 599,527 (8,051) 125 33 (92) 8% 2% 1,500 1,408 (92) 4,787 - (4,787) 8% 0% 57,441 57,441 - 500 - (500) 8% 0% 6,000 6,000 - 2,500 16,262 13,762 8% 54% 30,000 46,262 16,262 15,833 2,483 (13,350) 8% 1% 190,000 189,483 (517) 7,917 16,000 8,083 8% 17% 95,000 95,000 - 1,667 200 (1,467) 8% 1% 20,000 20,000 - 567 6 (561) 8% n/a 6,800 6,806 6 84,527 50,932 (33,594) 8% 5% 1,014,319 1,021,926 7,607 14,167 14,167 - 8% 8% 170,000 170,000 - 2,145 2,145 - 8% 8% 25,744 25,744 - 6,900 6,900 - 8% 8% 82,800 82,800 - 22,022 - (22,022 8% 0% 264,259 264,259 - 45,234 23,212 (22,022) 542,803 542,803 - 176,133 109,199 (66,934) 8% 7% 1,603,495 1,599,784 (3,711) E=xp. 69,324 66,828 2,496 8% 8% 831,882 829,392 2,490 42,185 26,744 15,441 8% 5% 506,223 511,882 (5,659) 9,510 - 9,510 8% 0% 114,119 114,119 - 1,188 - 1,188 8% 0% 14,259 14,259 - 122,207 93,572 28,635 1,466,483 1,469,652 (3,169) 11,418 - 11,418 8% n/a 137,012 - 137,012 133,625 93,572 40,052 8% 6% 1,603,495 1,469,652 133,843 42,509 15,627 (26,882) - 130,132 130,132 Page 16 H U W ti O a a. a H a, v U 0 0 z a~ a~ i O N H O•2t V~ C ov.~ ~ m 0 2 2 th co t•! CO) t7 • tt7 tr7 T M ~ t7 prGOe oo CD coo tQ oo40r-r• ONU]CD CV)0 40NOr u)u] N/- t+]u]O OD r1-N to PO NpN 400 t lh r- O ~ N O 0) V) Cf) Q N m I w_ r . cr) r - r 1 +I 0 O 'O N V N co CD CD 40 p p tpA~ ~j CD p p O 4000 a p p 8 ' ~ CO) CO 4b4 40 4]ID 1%- C? 4) ~ ~ p4GC~ rl~ [V •t] 0 Cl) 0 u] u7 r O (n u) 4 QDD cm $ !V o m r) F. C 'O O LL NOT CV) rrN r- d tr1~ th r lt4 tq q N Q' 7 A _ LL LL Q 030p0p~O ' p4p 0 ' ' OAhCV) C44 CF) ( u]G N N_)0m cv) 4NN CD ' N 10 on ~ 00i?4 tOCL N u] C~ r' C> N t7 LO N 0 m r t0 N N 40 own ~1 C to V CL e 14t ! W Ol N r N r r r U co M ao ~ do a coo a m m N • N C %i W N K Z c!) ~a E m u m Cy) C4 10 r- CV) N Ot tOO 4N ' +f _ r O cso le I- m r- ~ N C7 ~ N v w f _ to 7r T. N T T U- N C CD U. V p LL Lcc..?» f71 Z m C L U A tr l to tll 40 U) 0 co an Y ! 1 0 b •q CO) OD m Cl O eWLL tl 1 p y.52 O a w 0 9 ai to t0 0 O LUZ a W o Z) to m i U s mm c'i 0 c 3 to toC M c 'D 'm v ,10~ z~0V °'0. a O h c c r ~:4 CD W a~ C 0 2 A ~ r V N IL m l~0 F 40 H O a 41 y [t w i W~~ O 0 o to ~ Wa y. L L D I tl1 -A V a O F' : 1CF5F WI _ 1 c Wi V H Z . tom Deschutes County Bethlehem Inn (Fund 128) One Month Ended July 31, 2012 RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Grants - Private Lease Payments Total Revenues Transfers In: Project Development (140) Gen Capital Res (143) TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Debt Service: Interest Expense Interest Payment TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Budget Actual Variance F Coll. % l Budget t Projection I Variance $(2,710,000) $(2,710,173) $ (173) 100% 100% $(2,710,000) $(2,710,173) $ (173) 8,383 - (8,383) 8% 0% 100,592 100,592 - 2,034 4,068 2,034 8% 17% 24,408 24,408 - 10,417 4,068 (6,349) 8% 3% 125,000 125,000 - 137,500 - (137,500) 8% 0% 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 88,333 - - (88,333) 8% 0% 1,060,000 1,060,000 - (2,473,750) (2,706,105) (232,355) 8% -2165% 125,000 124,827 (173) Exp. 2,083 1,406 677 8% 6% a) 25,000 17,000 8,000 8,333 - 8,333 8% 0% 100,000 100,000 - 10,417 1,406 9,010 8% 1% 125,000 117,000 - NET (Resources - Requirements) (2,484,167) (2,707,511) 223( ,345) a) Interest on July 2012 negative cash balance: $1,4063.45.. b) Inception through July 31, 2012 Revenues - Lease Payments $ 52,884 Expenditures: Land/Building (Amertitle) - July 2007 2,241,313 Hickman Williams 17,578 City of Bend - May 2008 250,000 KN EX CO 5,289 Kleinfelder 3,732 Total expended on facility 2,517,913 Interest on Negative Cash Balance 242,483 Total expended 2,760,395 b) - 7,827 (173) Net $ 2,7( 07,511) Deschutes County General Support Services - BOCC Conference/Seminar, Education/Training and Travel Expenditures and BOCC - County College Expenditures FY 2013 BOCC Conference & Travel Jul YTD Total Tammy Baney Conf/Sem & Educ/Training 30 30 Travel Meals - - Accommodations - - Airfare - - Mileage reimbursement - - Ground Transport/Parking - - Total Baney - 30 30 Alan Unger Airfare Mileage reimbursement Ground Transport Total Other Total - BOCC Department Conf/Sem & Educ/Training Travel Meals Accommodations Airfare Mileage Reimbursement 30 125 Ground Transport - Total - BOCC Department 125 FY 2013 Budget Percent of FY 2013 Budget Expended 30 125 125 14,750 0.8% BOCC County College Office/Copier Supplies - Meeting Supplies - Total BOCC County College - - 8/9/2012 GENERAL FUND Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll, % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 7,300,000 $ 8,245,725 $ 945,725 100% 113% Revenues Property Taxes 20,100,967 21,506,937 1,405,970 100% 107% Gen. Rev. - excl. Taxes 2,382,321 2,439,103 56,782 100% 102% Assessor 790,996 781,874 (9,122) 100% 99% County Clerk 1,468,707 1,463,090 (5,617) 100% 100% BOPTA 12,398 14,788 2,390 100% 119% District Attorney 298,669 325,968 27,299 100% 109% Finance/Tax 193,900 211,650 17,750 100% 109% Veterans 61,341 69,574 8,233 100% 113% Property Management 96,200 96,200 - 100% 100% Grant Projects 2,000 2,000 - 100% 100% Total Revenues 25,407,499 26,911,184 1,503,685 100% 106% TOTAL RESOURCES 32,707,499 35,156,909 2,449,410 100% 107% REQUIREMENTS: xp Expenditures Assessor 3,405,300 3,296,722 108,578 100% 97% County Clerk 1,423,965 1,142,435 281,530 100% 80% BOPTA 72,402 62,668 9,734 100% 87% District Attorney 4,879,296 4,663,981 215,315 100% 96% Finance/Tax 813,648 768,469 45,179 100% 94% Veterans 267,415 255,677 11,738 100% 96% Property Management 262,214 258,528 3,686 100% 99% Grant Projects 118,715 118,480 235 100% 100% Non-Departmental 1,816,962 1,561,172 255,790 100% 86% Contingency 5,165,880 - 5,165,880 100% n/a 18,225,797 12,128,131 6,097,666 100% 67% Transfers Out 13,978,610 13,978,610 - 100% 100% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 32,204,407 26,106,741 6,097,666 100% 81% NET (Resources - Requirements) 503,093 9,050,168 8,547,076 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 8,700,000 Page 1 COMM JUSTICE-JUVENILE Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Federal Grants SB #1065-Court Assess. Discovery Fee Food Subsidy OYA Basic & Diversion Inmate/Prisoner Mousing Inmate Commissary Fees Contract Payments Miscellaneous Program Fees MIP Diversion Fees Interest on Investments Leases Grants - Private Behavioral Health CFC Interfund Grant Gen Fund Grant-Crime Prev Total Revenues $ 1,101,374 $1,099,010 $ (2,364) 100% 100% 10,000 9,676 (324) 100% 97% 50,000 52,957 2,957 100% 106% 15,000 13,628 (1,372) 100% 91% 25,000 25,157 157 100% 101% 217,498 342,512 125,014 100% 157% 88,490 76,320 (12,170) 100% 86% 100 220 120 100% 220% 70,000 106,017 36,017 100% 151% 60 359 299 100% 599% 40 - (40) 100% 0% 300 1,065 765 100% 355% 7,500 7,986 486 100% 106% 2,400 1,200 (1,200) 100% 50% 500 934 434 100% 187% 6,000 2,905 (3,095) 100% 48% 154,128 149,852 (4,276) 100% 97% 20,000 20,000 - 100% 100% 667,016 810,789 143,773 100% 122% Transfers In-General Fund 5,321,459 5,321,459 - 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES 7,089,849 7,231,258 141,409 100% 102% REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Community Justice-Juvenile Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency Exp. 5,109,069 4,958,175 150,894 100% 97% 1,219,733 1,204,632 15,101 100% 99% 40,100 23,000 17,100 100% 57% 50,400 50,400 - 100% 100% 670,547 - 670,547 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,089,849 6,236,206 853,643 100% 88% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 995,051 995,051 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 1,010,415 Page 2 SHERIFF _ Fund 255 Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital - S - $ - 100% n/a Revenues Law Enf Dist Countywide 22,084,821 18,483,539 (3,601,282) 100`/0 84% _ > t Ural 14,4416 T'K,693EQ5 ~,~~i491 W 100% 81% Total Revenues 36,533,516 30,177,303 (6,356,213) 100% 83% TOTALRESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Sheriff's Division Civil Automotive/Communications Investigations/Evidence Patrol/Civil/Comm Supp Records Adult Jail Court Security Emergency Services Special Services Division Regional Work Center Training Division Other Law Enforcement Svcs Non-Departmental Contingency Transfers Out - D/S Fund TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) 36,533,516 30,177,303 (6,356,213) 100% 83% Exp- % 2,583,941 2,473,759 110,182 100% 96% 824,095 746,004 78,091 100% 91% 1,709,925 1,568,717 141,208 100% 92% 1,734,218 1,527,082 207,136 100% 88% 8,004,704 7,853,027 151,677 100% 98% 720,710 686,502 34,208 100% 95% 10,506,527 9,680,930 825,597 100% 92% 286,602 275,256 11,346 100% 96% 192,925 175,658 17,267 100% 91% 1,335,161 1,153,546 181,615 1001% 86% 3,018,466 2,887,831 130,635 100% 96% 324,265 266,759 57,506 100% 82% 632,256 609,000 23,256 100% 96% 73,231 73,231 - 100% 100% 4,386,490 - 4,386,490 100% n/a 200,000 200,000 100% 100% 36,533,516 30,177,303 6,356,213 100% 83% Page 3 Fund 701 LED-Countywide Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PR eSUR Date Final Budget Actual Variance F-Y % Coll. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 5,108,671 $ 6,090,734 ~ 982,063 100% 119% Tax Revenues - Current 14,306,841 15,070,363 763,522 1oo% 1o5% Tax Revenues - Prior 501,000 747,899 246,899 10o% 149% Federal Grants & Reimb 35,200 30,784 (4,416) i00% 87% State Grant 48,475 56,577 8,102 100% 117% Transp. of State Wards 5,000 6,304 1,304 10o% 126% SB 1145 1,537,663 1,479,991 ;57,672) 100% 96% Prisoner Housing - 224,535 224,535 100% n/a Des. Cty Video Lottery Grant 5,000 5,000 100% 100% Des Cty Court Security 91,000 39,739 (1,261) 100% 99% Des Cty Juvenile Contract 4,180 12,768 8,588 100% 305% Title ill Reimbursement 150,000 110,084 139,916) 100% 73% Transport 1,000 2,183 1,183 100% 218% Other - 4,971 4,971 100% n/a DC Fair& Expo Center 3,825 1,796 (2,030) 100% 47% Inmate Commissary Fees 6,600 16,866 10,266 100% 2560% Work Center Work Crews 50,000 55,002 5,002 10o% 11o% Concealed Handgun Classes 3,500 3,650 150 100% 104% Inmate Telephone Fee 48,000 105,100 57,100 100% 219% Soc Sec Incentive-Fed 5,000 9,600 4,600 100% 192% Miscellaneous 5,000 8,371 3,871 100% 177% Oregon Mentors 15,000 9,039 (5,961) loo% 6o% Debit Card Fee - 287 287 loo% n/a Medical Services Reimb 16,000 14,710 (1,290) 100% 92% Restitution 5,000 1,747 (3,253) 100% 35% Sheriff Fees 200,000 778,754 28,754 100°/ 114% Interest 28,333 49,323 20,990 1oo% 174% Interest on Unsegregated 3,533 1,525 (2,008) 100% 4$% Donations - "Shop with a Cop" - 734 734 100% n/a Donations - 250 250 loo% n/a Sale of Reportable Assets 1,000 7,599 6,599 100% n/a Total Revenues 17,076,150 18,356,050 1,279,900 100% 107% TOTAL RESOURCES 22,184,821 24,446,784 2,261,963 100% 11o% REQUIREMENTS: Exp. Fund 255 Departments: Sheriff's Services 2,423,711 2,320,362 103,349 100% 96% Civil 824,095 746,004 78,091 100% 91% Auto/Comm 639,837 586,998 52,839 100% 92% Adult Jail 10,506,527 9,680,930 825,597 100% 92% Court Security 286,602 275,256 11,346 100% 96% Emergency Services 192,925 175,658 17,267 100% 91% Special Services 928,217 801,957 126,261 100% 36% Work Center 3,018,466 2,887,831 130,635 100% 96% Training 197,961 162,854 35,107 100% 82% Other (CODE, Forensic) 632,256 609,000 23,256 100% 96% Non Dept - ISF Charges 36,689 36,689 - 100% 100% Non Dept - Jamison D/S 200,000 200,000 - 100% 100% Contingency 2,197,536 - 2,197,536 100% 0% Total to Fund 255 22,084,821 18,483,539 3,601,282 Transfer to Reserve Fund (703) 100,000 100,000 - 100% 100% Total Requirements 22,184,821 18,583,539 3.6011281 100% 84% Net - 5,863,246 5,863,246 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 4,507,352 Page 4 Fund 702 LED Rural Staternent of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRE ` Yea'r` o Date Budget ACtual VarlanCe FY % GOII. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $2,936,523 53,004,533 S 68,010 ioo% 102"/m Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 7,348,125 7,578,675 230,550 100% 103% Tax Revenues - Prior 257,000 371,487 114,487 100% 145% Federal Grants & Reimb 12,000 32,343 20,343 100% 270% Federal Grants-BLM 25,000 23.510 (1,490) 100% n/a US Forest Service 78,750 59,063 (19,688) 100% 75% State Grant 200,972 175,720 (25,252) 1000% 87% SB #1065 Court Assessment 60,000 52,957 (7,043) 100% 88% Marine Board License Fee 142,332 125,136 (17,196) 100% 88% Bureau of Reclamation - 23.871 28,871 100% n/a Des Cty General Fund Grant 576,144 434,144• 142,000) 100% 75% Des Cty Transient Room Tax 2,073,856 2,215,856 142,000 100'/ 107% Des Cty Tax/Fin Contract - 540 540 100% City of Sisters 449,961 449,961 - 100% 100% Des Cty CDD Contract 54,366 54,366 100% 1000/, Des Cty Solid Waste Contr 54,366 54,366 - 100`/0 100% Des Cty Clerk/Election 2,000 595 (1,406) 100% 30'i> School Districts 80,000 35,545 (44,455) 100-% 4.4% Claims Reimbursement - 24,719 24,719 100% n/a Security & Traffic Reimb 5,000 7,675 2,675 100% 153% Seat Belt Program 12,000 7,595 (4,405) 100% 63% Miscellaneous 8,000 4,018 (3,982) 100% 50% False Alarm Fees 2,000 1,500 (500) 100% 75% Restitution - 2,239 2,239 100% n/a Sheriff Fees 10,000 9,895 (105) 100% 99% Court Fines & Fees 115,000 136,084 21,084 100% 118% Impound Fees 7,000 4,900 (2,100) 1oo°/, '70% Restitution - Street Crimes 500 13,365 12,865 100% 2673IN, Seizure/Forfeiture - 1,324 1,324 100% n/a Interest 10,000 22,877 12,877 100% 229% Interest on Unsegregated 1,800 769 (1,031) 100% 43% Grants-Private 7,000 7,000 10o% n/a Donations - 13,755 13,755 100% n/a Sale of Equip & Material 6,000 12,253 6,253 100% 204% Sale of Reportable Assets 20,000 66,490 46,490 100% 332% Total Revenues 11,612,172 12,029,590 417,418 50% 104% TOTAL RESOURCES 14,548,695 15,034,123 485,428 50% 103% REQUIREMENTS: exp. Fund 255 Departments: Sheriffs Services 160,230 153,398 6,832 100% 96% Auto/Comm 1,070,088 981,719 88,369 1 oo% 92% Investigations 1,734,218 1,527,082 207,136 100% 88% Patrol 8,004,704 7,853,027 151,677 1oo% 98% Records 720,710 686,502 34,208 100% 95% Special Services 406,944 351,589 55,354 100% 86% Training 126,304 103,905 22,399 10o'/o 82% Non Dept - ISF Charges 36,542 36,542 - 100% 100% Contingency 2,188,954 - 2,188,954 10011% 0% 7°uf'255 14I,44 111;893.765 2,7j4 Transfer to Reserve Fund (704) Total Requirements Net 100,000 100,000 - 100% 100% 14,548.695 11,793,765 2,754,930 100% 81% - 3,240,358 3,240,358 Page 5 Beg NWC per Fir 2013 Budget 2,659,915 PUBLIC HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PR IMINAKY AS T OF o Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 1,596,918 $ 1,702,129 $ 105,211 100% 107% Revenues Medicare Reimbursement 600 814 214 100% 136% State Grant 2,710,144 2,654,460 (55,684) 100% 98% Child Dev & Rehab Center 24,607 37,401 12,794 100% 152% State Miscellaneous 224,829 240,288 15,459 100% 107% OMAP 523,850 602,733 78,883 100% 115% Title 19 - 352 352 100% n/a Family Planning Exp Proj 520,000 521,744 1,744 100% 100% Local Grants 45,000 120,930 75,930 100% 269% Water Program-Base Fee 42,000 37,544 (4,456) 100% 89% Contract Payments - 65,376 65,376 100% n/a Water Program-Field Work 55,817 50,555 (5,262) 100% 91% H2O Sys Insp-Priv Wells 200 - (200) 100% 0% Miscellaneous - 4,529 4,529 100% n/a Patient Insurance Fees 135,380 178,556 43,176 100% 132% Health Dept/Patient Fees 118,770 101,505 (17,265) 100% 85% Vital Records-Birth 30,600 36,530 5,930 100% 119% Vital Records-Death 100,000 101,745 1,745 100% 102% Environmental Health 704,350 764,027 59,677 100% 108% NSF Fee - 60 60 100% n/a Interest on Investments 12,000 10,169 (1,831) 100% 85% Donations 26,030 14,626 (11,404) 100% 56% Interfund Contract 198,387 182,914 (15,473) 100% 92% Administrative Fee 15,056 15,056 - 100% 100% Total Revenues 5,487,620 5,741,915 254,295 100. 105% Transfers In-General Fund 2,317,765 2,317,765 - 100% 100% Transfers In-PH Res Fund 30,000 30,000 - 100% 100% Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 65,100 65,100 - 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES 9,497,403 9,856,908 359,505 100% 104% REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) Exp. 6,190,732 6,101,477 89,255 100% 99% 2,098,694 2,048,445 50,249 100% 98% 131,500 93,788 37,712 100% 71% 286,000 286,000 - 100% 100% 790,477 - 790,477 100% n/a 9,497,403 8,529,710 967,693 100% 90% 1,327,199 1,327,199 Page 6 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 1,336,051 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 3,268,759 $ 3,108,163 $ (160,596) 1oo% 95% Revenues Marriage Licenses 5,500 5,775 275 100% 105% Divorce Filing Fees 133,000 144,427 11,427 100% 109% Domestic Partnership Fee 100 75 (25) 100% 75% Federal Grants 276,647 268,784 (7,863) 100% 97% State Grants 6,964,202 7,822,336 858,134 100% 112% State Miscellaneous 124,173 63,452 (60,721) 100% 51% ABHA - 164,728 164,728 100% n/a Title 19 282,297 223,654 (58,643) 100% 79% Liquor Revenue 105,000 137,168 32,168 100% 131% School Districts 75,600 87,200 11,600 100% 115% Miscellaneous 14,000 8,571 (5,429) 100% 61% Patient Insurance Fees 113,700 201,869 88,169 100% 178% Patient Fees 1,807 1,026 (781) 100% 57% Interest on Investments 25,000 25,179 179 100% 101% Rentals 13,100 17,375 4,275 100% 133% Donations - 108 108 100% n/a Administrative Fee 4,429,689 4,390,059 (39,630) 100% 99% Sheriff 20,000 - (20,000) 100% 0% Forfeitures - 12,825 12,825 100% n/a Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 127,000 127,000 - 100% 100% Comm. on Children & Fam - 1,450 1,450 100% n/a Total Revenues 12,710,815 13,703,061 992,246 100% 108% Transfers In-General Fund 1,263,515 1,263,515 - 100% 100% Transfers In-OHP-CDO 271,402 396,077 124,674 100% 146% Transfers In-Acute Care Svcs 252,515 252,515 - 100% 100% Transfers In-ABHA 300,863 387,473 86,610 100% 129% TOTAL RESOURCES 18,067,869 19,110,804 1,042,934 100% 106% REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) Exp. 10,428,186 9,566,359 861,827 100% 92% 5,805,749 5,975,457 (169,708) 100% 103% 390,000 169,892 220,108 100% 44% 286,000 286,000 - 100% 100% 1,157,934 - 1,157,934 100% n/a 18,067,869 15,997,709 2,070,160 100% 89% - 3,113,095 3,113,094 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 3,320,968 Page 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Admin-Operations Admin-GIS Admin-Code Enforcement Building Safety Electrical Contract Services Env Health-On Site Prog Planning-Current Planning-Long Range Year to Date Final Bud et Actual Variance FY % Coll. % $ 229,822 131,776 $ (98,046) 100% 57% 24,350 27,689 3,339 100% 114% 1,000 1,721 721 100% 172% 166,700 180,096 13,396 100% 108% 1,200,880 1,063,788 (137,092) 100% 89% 259,150 236,706 (22,444) 100% 91% 160,200 135,053 (25,147) 100% 84% 280,400 312,500 32,100 100% 111% 674,900 555,131 (119,769) 100% 82% 253,726 251,3666 (2,360) 100% 99% Total Revenues 3,021,306 2,764,051 (257,255) 100% 91% Trans In-GF 729,625 849,625 120,000 100% 116% Trans In-GF for Lng Rng Ping 495,360 495,360 - 100% 100% Trans In-Other 100 - (100) 100% 0% TOTAL RESOURCES 4,476,213 4,240,812 (235,401) 100% 95% REQUIREMENTS: Exp. pia EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Admin-Operations 1,411,818 1,400,848 10,970 100% 99% Admin-GIS 127,755 122,676 5,079 100% 96% Admin-Code Enforcement 204,570 210,021 (5,451) 100% 103% Building Safety 562,032 554,966 7,066 100% 99% Electrical 261,450 214,298 47,152 100% 82% Contract Services 165,689 170,523 (4,834) 100% 103% Env Health-On Site Pgm 143,108 153,457 (10,349) 100% 107% Planning-Current 619,002 594,812 24,190 100% 96% Planning-Long Range 478,806 452,343 26,463 100% 94% Transfers Out (D/S Fund) 173,885 173,885 - 100% 100% Contingency 328,098 - 328,098 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,476,213 4,047,830 428,383 100% 90% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 192,982 192,982 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 10,000 Page 8 ROAD Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES. Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues System Development Charge Federal Reimbursements Federal Grant (ARRA) Mineral Lease Royalties Forest Receipts State Grant State Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Revenue City of Bend City of Redmond City of Sisters City of La Pine Admin Recovery (SDC) Miscellaneous Road Vacations Interest on Investments Parking Fees Interfund Contract Equipment Repairs Vehicle Repairs LID Construction Vegetation Management Forester Car Washes Car Rental Sale of Equip & Material Total Revenues Trans In - Solid Waste Trans In - Transp SDC Trans In-Road Imp Res TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) $ 3,417,158 $ 3,417,158 $ 0 100% 100% - 1,617 1,617 100% n/a 600,000 600,000 - 100% 100% 20,000 20,000 - 100% 100% 40,000 143,712 103,712 100% 359% 1,311,162 1,322,661 11,499 100% 101% - 849,110 849,110 100% n/a 500,041 502,659 2,618 100% 101% 11,340,000 10,409,094 (930,906) 100% 92% 275,000 30,783 (244,217) 100% 11% 350,000 322,507 (27,493) 100% 92% 10,000 1,135 (8,865) 100% 11% 10,000 - (10,000) 100% 0% 1,000 2,439 1,439 100% 244% 20,000 40,841 20,841 100% 204% 1,000 2,000 1,000 100% 200% 20,000 20,488 488 100% 102% 144 - (144) 100% 0% 730,000 673,014 (56,986) 100% 92% 200,000 278,684 78,684 100% 139% 90,000 77,560 (12,440) 100% 86% 10,000 - (10,000) 100% 0% 71,500 60,667 (10,833) 100% 85% 25,000 28,991 3,991 100% 116% 3,500 5,162 1,662 100% 147% - 1,020 1,020 100% n/a 633,000 979,884 346,884 100% 155% 16,261,347 16,374,028 112,681 100'/e 101% 285,773 285,773 - 100% 100% 250,000 250,000 - 100% 100% 12,000 - - (12,000) 100% 0% 20,226,278 20,326,959 100,681 100% 100% Exp. 5,615,323 5,344,597 270,726 100% 95% 10,755,112 9,366,630 1,388,482 100% 87% 1,236,691 75,288 1,161,403 100% 6% 600,000 600,000 - 100% 100% 2,019,152 - 2,019,152 100% n/a 20,226,278 15,386,515 4,839,763 100% 76% 4,940,444 4,940,444 Page 9 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 4,719,551 ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Bud et Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 560,000 $ 634,125 $ 74,125 100% 113% Revenues DOC Measure 57 217,350 219,240 1,890 100% 101% State Miscellaneous 4,301 4,301 - 100% 100% Alternate Incarceration 30,918 - (30,918) 100% 0% State Subsidy 13,000 13,826 826 100% 106% SB 1145 2,855,659 2,748,556 (107,103) 100% 96% Probation Work Crew Fees 24,000 19,120 (4,880) 100% 80% Miscellaneous 4,100 2,882 (1,218) 100% 70% Electronic Monitoring Fee 170,000 133,523 (36,477) 100% 79% Probation Superv. Fees 200,000 185,864 (14,136) 100% 93% Interest on Investments 9,000 6,161 (2,839) 100% 68% Interfund - Sheriff 50,000 50,000 - 100% 100% Crime Prevention Grant 50,000 50,000 - 100% 100% CFC-Domestic Violence 74,832 74,834 2 100% 100% Total Revenues 3,703,160 3,508,307 (194,853) 100% 95% Transfers In-General Fund 338,292 338,292 - 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES 4,601,452 4,480,725 (120,727) 100% 97% REQUIREMENTS: Xp. Expenditures Personal Services 3,168,688 3,053,235 115,453 100% 96% Materials and Services 886,890 768,464 118,426 100% 87% Capital Outlay 100 - 100 100% 0% Transfers Out 28,800 28,800 - 100% 100% Contingency 516,974 - 516,974 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,601,452 3,850,499 750,953 100% 84% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 630,226 630,226 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 570,000 Page 10 CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 467,111 $ 556,143 $ 89,032 100% 119% Revenues Federal Grants 299,488 290,393 (9,095) 100% 97% Title IV - Family Sup/Pres 39,329 39,534 205 100% 101% HealthyStart Medicaid 95,000 64,197 (30,803) 100% 68% Level 7 Services 257,982 196,898 (61,084) 100% 76% State Prevention Funds 24,500 92,301 67,801 100% 377% HealthyStart/R-S-G 311,838 258,203 (53,635) 100% 83% OCCF Grant 545,203 509,825 (35,378) 100% 94% Program Fees - 5,813 5,813 100% n/a Charges for Svcs-Misc 8,000 2,887 (5,113) 100% 36% Court Fines & Fees 78,000 86,656 8,656 100% 111% Interest on Investments 5,000 4,517 (483) 100% 90% Donations - 71 71 100% n/a Interfund Grants 120,875 320,874 199,999 100% 265% Total Revenues 1,785,215 1,872,169 86,954 100% 105% Trans from General Fund 272,964 272,960 (4) 100% 100% Total Transfers In 272,964 272,960 (4) 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES 2,525,290 2,701,272 175,982 100% 107% REQUIREMENTS: Exp. °i° Expenditures Personal Services 605,119 590,181 14,938 100% 98% Materials and Services 1,686,979 1,536,106 150,873 100% 91% Capital Outlay 100 - 100 100% 0% Contingency 233,088 - 233,088 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,525,286 2,126,287 398,999 100% 84% NET (Resources - Requirements) 4 574,985 574,981 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 511,994 Page 11 SOLID WASTE Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 1,092,508 $ 1,141,691 $ 49,183 100% 105% Revenues Miscellaneous 22,000 19,405 (2,595) 100% 88% Franchise 3% Fees 200,000 209,954 9,954 100% 105% Commercial Disp. Fees 860,000 871,580 11,580 100% 101% Private Disposal Fees 1,314,000 1,319,273 5,273 100% 100% Franchise Disposal Fees 4,000,000 3,881,491 (118,509) 100% 97% Yard Debris 73,000 92,652 19,652 100% 127% Special Waste 25,000 5,752 (19,248) 100% 23% Interest 7,500 10,430 2,930 100% 139% Leases 1 9,494 9,493 100% n/a Donations - 2,880 2,880 100% n/a Sale of Reportable Assets - 16,494 16,494 100% n/a Recyclables 30,000 78,473 48,473 100% 262% Bond Issuance 5,034,300 5,044,437 10,137 100% 100% Premium 158,434 148,507 9,927) 100% 94% Total Revenues 11,724,235 11,710,820 (13,415) 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Transfers Out-Road Trans Out-Post Closure Trans Out-Equip Reserve Trans Out-Capital Res Contingency 12,816,743 12,852,511 35,768 100% 100% Exp. 1,671,598 1,605,396 66,202 100% 96% 3,086,472 2,913,661 172,811 100% 94% 6,075,547 5,992,804 82,743 100% 99% 202,000 173,407 28,593 100% 86% 285,773 285,773 - 100% 100% 400,000 400,000 - 100% 100% 250,000 250,000 - 100% 100% 424,000 424,000 - 100% 100% 421,353 - 421,353 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 12,816,743 12,045,041 771,702 100% 94% NET (Resouroes - Requirements) - 807,470 807,470 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 700,513 Page 12 RISK MANAGEMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINA Year to Date Final Bud et Actual Variance % of FY % Coll. RESOURCES: Beginning Net Working Capital $2,100,000 $2,039,937 ($60,063) 100% 97% Revenues Inter-fund Charges: General Liability 250,855 250,855 - 100% 100% Property Damage 311,633 311,633 - 100% 100% Vehicle 178,310 178,310 - 100% 100% Workers' Compensation 1,473,944 1,477,736 3,792 100% 100% Unemployment 252,433 254,862 2,429 100% 101% Claims Reimb-Workers' Compensation 5,000 548 (4,452) 100% 11% Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property 20,000 65,338 45,338 100% 327% Process Fee-Events/Parades 1,500 2,295 795 100% 153% Miscellaneous 50 - (50) 100% 0% Skid Car Training 18,000 14,140 (3,860) 100% 79% Interest on Investments 15,000 13,844 (1,156) 100% 92% Other Interest 50 - (50) 100% 0% TOTAL REVENUES 2,526,775 2,569,562 42,787 100% 102% Transfers In-General Fund 200,000 200,000 - 100% 100% TOTAL RESOURCES 4,826,775 4,809,498 (17,277) 100% 100% Appropriations/Expenditures Direct Insurance Costs: GENERAL LIABILITY 5201 Settlement / Benefit 123,280 5202 Defense 218,523 5203 Professional Service 11,750 5204 Insurance 131,691 5205 Loss Prevention 6,506 5207 Repair / Replacement 5,517 Total General Liability 475,000 497,268 (22,268) 100% 105% PROPERTY DAMAGE 5204 Insurance 116,418 5207 Repair/ Replacement 71,292 Total Property Damage 300,000 187,710 112,290 100% 63% VEHICLE 5203 Professional Service 157 5204 Insurance 376 5205 Loss Prevention 17,252 5207 Repair/Replacement 84,146 Total Vehicle 100,000 101,932 (1,932) 100% 102% WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5201 Settlement / Benefit 939,522 5203 Professional Service 5,000 5204 Insurance 108,993 5205 Loss Prevention 49,204 5206 Miscellaneous 44,357 Total Workers' Compensation 1,200,000 1,147,075 52,925 100% 96% 5201 UNEMPLOYMENT - Settlement/Benefits 250,000 215,051 34,949 100% 86% Total Direct Insurance Costs 2,325,000 2,149,035 175,965 100% 92% Insurance Administration: Personal Services 294,357 274,762 19,595 100% 93% Materials & Service 169,425 137,711 31,714 100% 81% Capital Outlay 100 - 100 100% 0% Total Insurance Administration 463,882 412,472 51,410 100% 89% Transfers Out 7,200 7,200 - 100% 100% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2.796,082 2,568,708 227,374 100% 92% NET 2,030,693 2,240,791 210,098 Page 13 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 2,000,000 DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance % of FY % Coll. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 6,400,000 $ 7,559,639 $ 1,159,639 100% 118% Revenues Property Taxes - Current 5,983,773 6,253,780 270,007 100% 105% Property Taxes - Prior 200,000 288,923 88,923 100% 144% Federal Grants - 184,578 184,578 100% n/a State Reimbursement 54,000 29,717 (24,283) 100% 55% Telephone User Tax 750,000 774,298 24,298 100% 103% Grant - Sunriver Serv Dist - 22,500 22,500 100% n/a Data Network Reimb. 27,200 34,698 7,498 100% 128% Jefferson County 35,000 29,809 (5,191) 100% 85% User Fee 52,000 8,625 (43,375) 100% 17% Police RMS User Fees 199,000 209,196 10,196 100% 105% Contract Payments 32,000 33,061 1,061 100% 103% Miscellaneous 9,000 10,712 1,712 100% 119% Contracted Training - 4,943 4,943 100% n/a Interest 35,000 54,780 19,780 100% 157% Interest on Unsegregated Tax 800 633 (167) 100% 79% Donations - 750 750 100% n/a Total Revenues 7,377,773 7,941,002 563,229 100% 108% TOTAL RESOURCES 13,777,773 15,500,641 1,722,868 100% 113% REQUIREMENTS: % Exp. Expenditures Personal Services 4,240,834 3,824,724 416,110 100% 90% Materials and Services 1,927,356 1,750,150 177,206 100% 91% Capital Outlay 1,134,620 551,676 582,944 100% 49% Transfers Out 500,000 500,000 - 100% 100% Contingency 5,974,963 - 5,974,963 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 13,777,773 6,626,550 7,151,223 100% 48% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 8,874,091 8,874,091 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 8,000,000 Page 14 Health Benefits Trust Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Final Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES Beg. Net Working Capital $15,500,000 $ 15,829,888 $ 329,888 100% 0 Revenues: Internal Premium Charges 12,015,711 12,070,571 54,860 100% 100% P/T Emp - Add'I Prem 50,000 30,821 (19,179) 100% 62% Employee Prem Contribution 630,000 602,405 (27,595) 100% 96% COIC 1,260,000 1,230,390 (29,610) 100% 98% Retiree / COBRA Co-Pay 500,000 835,024 335,024 100% 167% Fees for Clinic Services - 200 200 100% n/a Federal Payment (ERRP) 150,431 150,431 100% n/a Prescription Rebates 127,342 127,342 100% n/a Claims Reimbursements 654,056 654,056 100% n/a Vending Machines (Wellness Rebate) - 111 111 100% n/a Interest 80,000 99,992 19,992 100% 125% Total Revenues 14,535,711 15,801,344 1,265,633 100% 109% TOTALRESOURCES 30,035,711 31,631,233 1,595,522 92% 105% REQUIREMENTS Exp. % Expenditures: Personal Services 151,218 142,448 8,770 100% 94°% Materials & Services Claims Paid-Medical/Rx 13,518,284 12,954,554 563,730 100% 96°% Claims Paid-Dental/Vision 2,019,974 1,912,285 107,689 100% 95% Refunds - (149,503) 149,503 100°% n/a insurance Expense 350,000 355,451 (5,451) 100% 102% State Assessments 150,000 155,263 (5,263) 100% 104°% Administration Fee 320,000 318,485 1,515 100 % 100% PPO Fee 50,000 48,922 1,078 100°% 98°% Health Impact 55,000 51,621 3,380 100% 94% Other - Administration 62,318 113,432 (51,114) 100% 182% Other - Wellness 78,844 28,852 49,992 100% 37% Admin & Wellness 16,755,638 15,931,810 823,828 100% 95% Deschutes On-site Clinic Healthstat 957,200 736,901 220,299 100% 77% Medications/Drugs/Vacc 325,000 141,871 183,129 100% 44% Medical Supplies 3,000 23,888 (20,888) 100°% 796°% Equipment 4,000 150 3,850 100% 4% Miscellaneous 5,450 10,795 (5,345) 100% 198°% Total DOC 1,294,650 913,604 381,046 100% 71% Deschutes On-site Pharmacy Medications/Drugs/Vacc - 115,439 (115,439) 100°% n/a Remodeling Costs - 152,157 (152,157) 100% n/a Total Pharmacy 267,596 (267,596) 100°% n/a Capital Outlay 200 - 200 100% n/a Contingency 11,985,223 - 11,985,223 100% n/a TOTAL EXPEND/REQUIREMNTS 30,035,711 17,113,010 12,931,471 100% 57°% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 14,518,223 14,5266,993 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 13.800.00 Page 15 Deschutes County - Fair and Expo Center YTD-Budget Basis Commissioners Statement of Financial Operating Data Year Ended June 30, 2012 (PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012) Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 75,000 $ (40,601) $ (115,601) 100% -54% Receipts: Special Events Revenues 605,000 530,870 (74,130) 100% 88% Interest 1,500 158 (1,342) 100% 11% Storage 58,000 37,015 (20,985) 100% 64% Camping at F & E 6,000 19,240 13,240 100% 321% Horse Stall Rental 30,000 27,116 (2,885) 100% 90% Concession % - Food 220,000 141,940 (78,060) 100% 65% Rights (Signage, etc.) 112,000 124,000 12,000 100% 111% Grants - 33,424 33,424 100% n/a Interfund Contract 47,000 47,000 - 100% 100% Miscellaneous 6,807 10,491 3,684 100% n/a Total Receipts 1,086,307 971,254 (115,053) 100% 89% Transfers In General Fund (001) 170,000 370,000 - 100% 218% Room Tax (160) 25,744 25,744 - 100% 100% Welcome Center (170) 82,800 82,800 - 100% 100% Annual County Fair (619) 220,000 220,000 - 100% 100% Reserve Fund (617) 100 100,000 99,900 100% Total Transfers In 498,644 7981544 99,900 GF Appropriation Transfer 97,295 TOTAL RESOURCES 1,757,246 1,729,197 (28,049) 100% 98% REQUIREMENTS: Exp. Expenditures: Personal Services 846,018 819,339 26,679 100% 97% Materials and Services 786,060 751,109 34,951 100% 102% Debt Service 115,068 113,695 1,373 100% 99% Capital Outlay 100 - 100 100% 0% Total Expenditures 1,747,246 1,684,142 63,104 Transfers Out - Reserve Fund' 10,000 10,000 - 100% 100% Contingency - - - 100% n/a TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,757,246 1,694,142 63,104 100% 99% NET (Resources - Requirements) - 35,055 35,055 Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 46,373 Page 16 Deschutes County and CSDs Comparison of Actual and Budgeted Beginning Net Working Capital July 1, 2012 PRELIMINARY, as of 8/10/2012 - Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures WILL BE recorded Reserve for Future Exp & Fund # Fund Name BUDGETED ACTUAL $ Difference % Difference Unappropriated OPERATING FUNDS - 270 - ABHA 2,695,684 _ 4,054,700 _ _ 1,359,016 - . - 50.4% 914,296 - 701 I Law Enforcement-County - 4,507,352 5,863,246 1,355,894 30.1% 1 705 ' Des Co 911 8,000,000 8,874,091 874,091 10.9% 8,803,238 675 Health Benefits Trust 13,800,000 14378,128 578,128 12,297,496 001 General Fund 8,700,000 : 9,090,070 : 390,070 4.5% 8,127,812 702 Law Enforce menk Rural 2,859,915 3,240,358 380,443 13-3% ' - - 670 Risk Management - - 2,000 000 2,240,791 240,791 12.0% 2,149,038 325 Road 4,719,551 4,940,444 220,893 4.7%0 2,137,418 295 CDD 10,000 192,982 182,982 1829.8% 1 346,904 666 Information Tech 568,550 731,330 162,780 28.6% 11 298,297 661 IT Reserve 365,593 480,196 114,603 - - 31.3% - - 379,493 610 - - Solid Waste 700,513 807,470 - 106,957 15.3% I 599,195 329 Public Land Comer 476,252 569,657 93,405. 19.6% I 231,252 340 Vehicle Mamt & Res 976,698 1,046,901 _ 70,203 - - 7.2% , 820,198 625 Administrative Services 140,00 0 1395 6 9 6 9 ,56 9 49.7% 134 271 619 Deschutes County Fair 31,716 106, 68,811 _ . 220 T T Comm on Child & Fa m 511,994 574,985 1 62,991 I 12,39/6 507 : 284,507 350 _ _ i Do Control 200,000 282,900 62,900 31.5% ' 88,299 205 r. Land l 92,000 151,845 59,645 I _ 64 8% ~ 245 DC Comm natation System 128,1124 181,200 53,076 41.4% 1 133,249 355 - ,Adult P & P - 570,000 617,726 _ 47,726 .4% _ 592,378 326 (Natural Resource Protection 49,346 94,724 - 45,378 92.0%', 111,372 630 Finance 540,000 1 583,527 43,527 8.1% 250,727 640 Legal 150,000 188,093 38,093 25-4% : 98,504 650 'Personnel 290,060 327,178 37,178 12.86% 111,513 601 RV Park 28,725 28,725 N/A 123 Justice Courts 77,000 ; - 104,925 27,925 36.3% 51,177 218 _ Clerk's Records 310,600 330,514 19,914 6.4% 169,971 327 - Forest Title III 219,220 237,808 18,588 8.5% 30,220 165 r- :Video Lottery - 100,000 116,562 16,562 - 16.6% , 63,823 305 GIS Dedicated 91,000 101,871 10,871--- ---11 9% : 59,637 ~3o Road P Building Eq uI 8 684 361 9,050 1, 3% 649,293 ! 15 _ . ry Law Libra Library 400 OOD 407 097 7,097 ' 0 . 1.8/ 0 30,49$ 235 Asset tune - 25,060 29,783 4,783 19.1% 1 - 620 Building Services 415,000 - 418,759 - - - - 3,759 - 360,671 200 Industrial Development 7,700 9,326 1,626 21.1% 4,114 145 County School - - 15 15 - N/A 255 Sheriffs Office - - N/A ' 5,724,795 297 Newberry Neighborhood 421,605 421,296 (309)._ _ -0.1% 187,159 328 Surveyor 31,809 30,835 (974) =3.1% 33,809 _ 276 Acute Care Services 943,664 942,138 (1,526) - 0.2% - ' 909,201 208 Liquor Enforcement 25,124 22,910 (2,214)! - -8.8% ' 29,780 260 HealthyStart 338,701 330,495 (8,206 2.4/0 ° - 259,374 . 720 ,Extension 4-H , 259,578 250,880 ? 698), _3.46X. 59,07 259 Public Health 1,336 051 _ _ _ 1,327,199 1 (8,852) 7% 0.7% ! - , 1,039,210 618 - I Fair & Expo Center 46,V_3_ 6 37 3 ,055 35 : ( 11,318) - ° 24.4 /o - 137,012 230 'Juven 1 - 10,41 - - 1 ,0 _ 95 051 - (15,364)- 1 •5% 39,519 240 Secunty Court 46 000 ( ) - 39.7% l 212 I Victims Assistance . 90,654 72,178 - (18,476) -20.4% 1 39,417 8 O (22,093) -36.8/° 58,892 1 05 Bu si ess Loan - 225,000 184205 T 40,795) -18.1% 275 1 Behavioral Health 3,320,968 - - 113,095 - (207,873) -6.3% 2,445,028 280 OHP-CDO 2,452,674 2,228,930 (223,744)' -9.1% ' 2,336,981 I Deschutes County and CSDs Comparison of Actual and Budgeted Beginning Net Working Capital July 1, 2012 PRELIMINARY, as of 8/10/2012 - Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures WILL BE recorded Reserve for Future Exp & 142 General County Projects 1,400 000 1,770 480 370,480 26.5% 1,605,036 462 North Co Svc Building 300,000 - 570,090 - - 270,090 90.0%' 313,513 613 Solid Waste Cap Projects 1,279,463 1,469,073 189,610 14.8% 223,839 143 General Capital Reserve 1,711,000 41 - 1,711,395 395 0.0% 222,281 430 Local Impr District 169,872 169,846 (26) 0.0%° 135,272 457 Jamison Acq & Remodel 590,000 540,764 - (49,236) -8.3% - 463 ,Campus Improvement 750,000 629.750 (120,250) -16.0%°1 312,783 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 590 Fairgrounds DS 250,000 313,431 _ 63,431 25.4/° - 100,000 - 0 - - - -Ru- blic safe- 3013- 371,950 58,950 18.8°/a 1 150,000 731 DS 145,000 169,379 -24,379 - _ - 16.8_%1 - - 58,200 575 PERS D/S_ - 98,833 11,833 13.6%! 87,000 524 LID 2007 (BOTC) 7,861 7,851 NSA, 48,277 525 LID 2009 (BOTC) - 6,955 5,955 N!A' 22,725 751 Sunriver Library DS 15,000 17 308 8 - - 2,308 15.4%. 8,000 530 _ _ CDD Bldg DS 3 000 _ T3700-C-_ 5,237 ' ,237 7.2% 2,600 539 Full Faith & Credit 2008 121,000 122590. 1,590 -_t 1.3% - 535 I Full Faith & Credit 2003 45,666 46,318 ' 1,318 2-9% 32,413 541 Full Faith & Credit, 2010 168,000 169,238 1,238 0.7% 1.90,868 536 Full Faith & Credit 2005 3,600 4,146 546 ' 15.2% 3,200 540 HHS/BJCC DS 8,_5_00 8,930 ) 430 ~ 5.1% 8,050 538 Full Faith & Credit 2007 300,000 273,287 ' ( 26,713 o -8.9/a 258,000 i Fund # Fund Name BUDGETED ACTUAL $ Difference I_% Difference Unapl PROJECT FUNDS OTHER 296 CDD-TD C 103,545 110,882 7,337 7.1%' 100,000 160 _ Transient Room Tax-- ax - 4,459 4,459 N/A' - 125 La Pine Industrial - 3,818 3,818 N/A 130 Park Acquisition & Devel 25,100 27 764 2,664 0_6% 11 - 170 Welcome Center - . - - 950_ 1, 1,950 . N/A', - 155 Taylor Grazing 16,000 536 16, 536 3.3% 120 Grant Projects 6,000 5,940 - (60) - - -1.0W - - - - NO Code Abatement 96,265 96,202 (54)- -0,1% - 128 _ _ Bethlehem Inn (2,710,000) (2,710,173) (173)1, 0.0% 132 Park Development Fees I 124,000 122,357 (1,643) -1.3%1 - 150 Special Transportation 15,000 - 9,241 (5,759) -38.4%! - 114 A & T Reserve 535,000 535,351 351 0.1W 346,923 710 Des Co 911 -Equip Res 1,800 000 1,800,170 170 0.0% 2,304,000 335 Road Improvement Res 12,184 12,190 6 0.0%, 10,284 261 Health Department Reserve 427,135 426,754 381 0.1% 370,139 704 LED Rural Capital Reserve 1,162 351 1,161 777 (574) 0 0% 111 Court Technolo9 Y R eserve 1,707 61,016 . 6 . 9 . 7 1,707 336 - e Trans SDC _~Countywi 455 790 454,125 (1,665)+ 0.4/°' 583,290 617 Center Reserve Fair & Expo 650 082 ' 554,744 (95,338 14.7°/o ~ 578,082 256 (Communication Syst Res - - N/A 201,000 - Total 92,917, . 704.00 100,085,289 7,167,585 1 75,638,473 611 Landfill Closure 911,158 973,731 62,573 6.9% 340,158 614 - Solid Waste Equip Res 101,429 _ 149,766 ~ 48,337 47.7% 103,324 46 Project Development - 2,953,581 . 2,996,914 ' 43,333 1.5%% _ 1,438,687 703 _ 'LED County Capital Reserve 319,854 321,031 1,177 - 0A%I, 612 Landfill 5ostGosure 512,203 512,707 504 6.1 514,203 135 PERS Reserve 11,390,000 11,390,491 491 ' 0.0%1 9,664,000 721 Extension 4-H Bldg Res 277,150 277,593 , 443.-.._. 0.2%I, 377,800 RESERVE FUNDS 8/10/2012 DRAFT - August 28, 2012 County Administrator Interview Panels 4 panels: BOCC as one panel, 3 other panels (8-10 members each). Elected De artment Heads 1. Larry 2. Patrick 3. Marty 4. Scot 5. Nancy 6. Charles Non-Elected Department Heads 1. Timm 2. Tom 3. Chris 4, Mark 5. Debbie 6. Susan 7. Scott 8. Ken 9. David Givans 10. Joe S. 11. Dan 12. Hillary 13. Ed 14. Keith Other Key Staff I. Erik 2. Dave 1. 3. Anna Community/Other Partners I . Bend Chamber and other chambers? 2. Rep. from Redmond 3. Rep. from La Pine 4. Rep. from Sisters 5. Rep. from Bend 6. COVA 7. EDCO 8. COBA 9. Mike Maier 10. ODOT - Bob Bryant 11. Courts -judge or Jeff Hall 12. Health care representative Others to consider: Dennis Luke, Brad Bailey, Tim Moore, Bonnie Baker, 911 E board chair (Chief Sale).