The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-1186-Minutes for Meeting September 25,2013 Recorded 10/2/2013COUNTY OFFICIAL RECOA! NANCYUBLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERKS COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL IIII I 111 10/02/013 10;33;57 AM II I~IIII~~ I I III (I II 201 - 185 Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page i Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 Present were Commissioners Alan Unger and Anthony DeBone; Commissioner Tammy Baney was out of the office. Also present were Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Wayne Lowry, Finance; Judith Ure, Administration; Nick Lelack and Peter Gutowsky, Community Development; Chris Doty, Road Department; Senator Tim Knopp; and seven other citizens including representatives of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Justin Rainey of Public Affairs Counsel, Senator Tim Knopp, and Susanna Julber of Senator Merkeley's office. Chair Unger opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Finance Update. Wayne Lowry explained the investment report. Most investment is in the pool, which is overseen by the State Treasurer. The return is better than most, but it is about 50% corporate debt, with higher risk. He would like to see this investment changed to a lower percentage. Rates are up significantly from a year ago, so any change should be gradual. The County and the Advisory Committee are developing a new investment policy for Board consideration. The County may or may not want the services of an investment advisor. He presented actual figures for 2013, and year to date for this fiscal year. Revenue is seasonal while expenditures are more or less straight-line. There are a lot of unfilled FTE's at this time that were budgeted. There will be a lag in wages and benefits. The general fund balance is down due to paying back part of the Solid Waste loan. Community Development is having a strong year so far. This shows a trend for the area overall. They may exceed their revenue estimates in the long run. The general fund transfer will not happen, as it will be diverted to Solid Waste. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 1 of 9 The Road Department fund has had a change in its balance, but that is due to approved but unanticipated expenses and revenue. Solid Waste revenue is a little ahead at this point. They anticipate a 4% increase in revenue overall. The Health Benefits fund is getting closer to revenue covering expenses. The fund had been losing from its balance but that amount is narrowing, and is approaching equilibrium. Last year the Fair & Expo budget was upside down, but that should change this year. The annual County fair typically contributes to the Fair & Expo in the amount of $250,000 for use of the facilities. It is more around $180,000 this time, so probably will not meet the amount. Recent changes to room tax criteria should help. Most capital projects funds have been around for a while, with no updates. The jail remodel project is fully funded at this point, and on track. Chair Unger said that one contractor complained about the CMGC process and feels it is unfair, due to the way the individual companies manage their numbers. Mr. Lowry said they use the same type of process for schools, such as the Sherwood school project. New construction is easier than a remodel that could be fraught with hidden problems. Most contractors are experienced in this bidding process. The contractor has not gone out to the sub-contractors yet but is locked in to a specific amount, so they have to be careful. The contingency is only $280,000, low for a project this size. Mr. Kropp said they had value engineered this up front. 2. 2013 Legislative Session Wrap-Up. Justin Rainey of the Public Affairs Counsel said that there is a special session of the legislature next week. The leaders have agreed to the framework. They will likely address PERS overall, but especially cost of living increases for retirees, and a variety of tax and small business issues, as time allows. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 2 of 9 By conference phone, Mark Nelson of the PAC joined in. He said the Governor indicated he would veto the bills as presently written and which are being discussed by the legislature. There is another bill meant to take legislators out of PERS. The corporate tax rate bill may pass, as might the small business tax credit, coupled with an export tax credit that benefits only certain companies. They may also pass the tobacco tax, although they might make some changes first. Bill 633, prohibiting counties from the GMO, is questionable. The only real question is PERS. There are hearings this week, but no one has seen any language. They are planning to handle the rest on Monday. Senator Knopp stated that the votes do not exist for the package today. It has been agreed to in general, but the details are holding things up, such as a small business income threshold and whether it should be adjusted for inflation. There is the question as to whether service prior to being a legislator gets counted towards PERS. They met for many hours, but are moving forward with hearings. There is a basic lack of agreement prior to a vote. No one has seen a legislative bill yet, just legislative concepts. Mr. Rainey said that there is a $16.9 billion lottery fund budget, an increase from before with the potential additional funds. The State forecast is stable. Mr. Nelson stated that this does not count the $850 million from a third source of general fund, the possible savings on PERS. Mr. Rainey said that a priority one bill was HB 3130, with Senator Knopp and Representative Whisnant watching it, regarding the La Pine signal light. There has been a lot of focus on special issues. Bills have to be submitted by November 22. Public Affairs Counsel wants to be sure they are tracking all that are important. The Cyrus appeal was spearheaded by Sen. Huffman, along with the program for low-cost septic systems in counties that cannot afford to meet all the requirements of the DEQ. Mr. Lelack said that regarding the Cyrus situation, Representative Clem informed all that it needs consensus to be successful. Ms. Ure indicated there should be a way to streamline the update process and narrow the focus to specific issues. Some departments may have different priorities and can track bills themselves. She suggested referencing a link to the information as it is submitted rather than printing out a lot of documents. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 3 of 9 Mr. Rainey stated they are monitoring various issues. Health care is the big one; the CCO's implementation, and expanding mental health, as well as the health insurance exchange and `cover Oregon'. They need to consider education, the ELC transition and the new hubs, and the youth development council to make sure appropriate funds are delivered. Public safety is an ongoing discussion, as to whether reduced jail sentences result in true savings. They are discussing increasing the 9-1-1 tax and County administrative issues such as changes in voting, which would be a burden on the Clerks. Regarding land use, there are the Cyrus project, EFU and agriculture zoning issues, and details regarding Deschutes basin water. Mr. Nelson said they are very involved with health reform. He advised that his firm also represents HeadStart, and he is concerned the State may try to consolidate or eliminate this budget. There are a lot of discussions regarding the merging of CCO's with the hubs. His firm also represents Linn County-on a number of things. He feels there are no conflicts of interest in all of this, but just wants all to be aware. 3. Discussion of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Proposal to Protect the Oregon Spotted Frog under the Federal Endangered Species Act. Jennifer O'Reilly and Nancy Gilbert of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service came before the Board. They referred to oversized map of local areas that could be affected. They put out a press release on August 29 and scheduled two public meetings; these are 6 to 8 PM on October 8 at the SHARC in Sunriver, and October 16 at the La Pine Senior Center. They indicated the proposed listing of the frog as threatened or endangered sets off a 60-day public review period, which has been extended to November 12. Chair Unger said that this could affect a lot of people who live where there are wetlands. He asked if conversations have been lively, or are people calm about it. Ms. Gilbert stated that they are trying to get full information out. They expect to hear concerns and questions. They have not yet had a large number of calls. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 4 of 9 There will be a second comment period when the economic analysis comes out. If there are possible exemptions included, there will be another comment period. This process might take the rest of the year. Nick Lelack stated that work on the south County wetlands inventory helped to get significant access to properties. One way of looking at the critical habitat is to recognize that property owners have been good stewards, and these programs have been effective. This species depends on the wetlands that are there. At this time a PowerPoint presentation was given. (A copy is attached for reference) It was explained that cattle actually help by chewing down the grass that is not desirable. Significant predators include the bullfrog, which is more prolific now and found as far north as Gilchrist. Non-native fish are also a factor. Much of this is occurring due to overall climate change. Critical habitat in specific geographic areas may require some special management or protection. There are 14 critical habitat units across the range; this area has units S and 9. Some of the area is County owned; some is in La Pine State Park. Deep water areas (over 20 feet deep) are not included. There are 4,509 acres (1,563 tax lots) in the proposed area. Mr. Lelack noted that regarding non-federal land, there have been good laws and regulations in place already, but some things cannot be changed, such as regulated water. They have to work with the irrigation districts. Ms. Gilbert said that early discussions mean planning ahead. They have also looked at other species to maybe deal with those at the same time. There could be a downstream effect. They are working with representatives of the Old Mill District, the Sunriver Nature Center and others, as it is a good educational opportunity and these are highly visible areas. Chair Unger asked if using vector control is a threat. Jennifer O'Reilly replied that the chemicals now being used are not a threat. The biggest need is providing water in the winter to help the frogs. There is a stronger population in Sunriver due to this. In fact, the vector control people helped provide important information. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 5 of 9 Planning ahead now while the spotted frog is just a candidate, and utilizing conservation plans with many groups, may will help them try to avoid a listing. People would have to get permits for activities if a those activities are a potential detriment. Owners can agree to a conservation plan. Things like this may keep it from being listed. Mr. Gutowsky added that they are on a similar track with the Sage Grouse in Harney County. The Soil & Water Conservation District can issue permits if there are cooperative efforts. There is an educational component that comes into play if someone is going to build or develop property. The Deschutes River Coalition will help disseminate information, and the schools are also involved. There are some restoration opportunities, an example of which is Ryan Ranch, which includes a historic 70-acre site that they are trying to bring on line. Additional information can be obtained through the U.S. Fish & Wildlife website, www.fws.gov/wafwo/osf.html. Commissioner DeBone asked if the spotted frog would be introduced or reestablished in other areas or states. Ms. Gilbert replied that there has been no other critical habitat designated other than where they are now. They probably used to be in a lot of other places. They would have to evaluate what habitat is presently suitable. Chair Unger asked if the bullfrogs are being managed. Ms. O'Reilly responded that at this point, they are not sure what is effective other than destroying them outright. Ms. Gilbert stated that there could be exclusions through the economic analysis. When a species is listed as threatened or endangered, decisions are made regarding risk factor for extinction, and weigh in other factors such as economics. Chair Unger said that it sounds as if it can be managed and mitigated. Few people transcend between the forest and water collaborative work. Ms. Gilbert replied that with the Endangered Species Act was enacted, it was meant to conserve habitat since that is what was being destroyed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 6of9 The frogs like other species represent the overall health of the ecosystem. The reason the Deschutes basin has some of these frogs is because of protection of the land. The Deschutes River is important to the overall community. In so many other areas, the viability of the river systems is gone. Mr. Lelack noted that regulations have done a good job of protecting habitat. Some development had to be eliminated. They have to connect the dots, considering how this affects road building, bridges, sewer systems and other factors. It is a big overall issue. Mr. Gutowsky added that if an exception is granted, for instance for a cluster system, they can use the local land use process. The federal government does not have a role in this review. The cost of a centralized sewer system will increase due to the federal permitting process and installation factors, which will have a bearing on this type of development. Ms. Gilbert said that the permitting process allows for some variance. The Corp of Engineers would have to analyze the proposed project. There are clearly some mitigation opportunities and various tools that can be used, but it would involve more process and more time. Nancy: permit process allows for some. Corp of Engineer would have to analyze the proposed project. Commissioner DeBone asked if this involves all of the properties along the river. Mr. Gutowsky responded that it would be parcels designed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service as having habitat, less public rights of way. Ms. O'Reilly said that some parcels might just touch the critical habitat line. So developing that parcel may not be a problem. This is part of a large-scale GIS report. Mr. Gutowsky stated that this is a proposed listing, and there may be changes as the state and federal processes address this issue. He hopes that especially in view of potential sewering, that they will build upon coordination between agencies. Citizen Ellen Curry said that the community worked a long time on Goal 11, as a cluster or sewer system is the best way to deal with waste. When there are conflicts between drinking water, waste water systems and the spotted frog, she asked who decides which is the most important. Mr. Gutowsky replied that there is a permitting process and other ways that they deal with this type of thing on a regular basis. All impacts will be measured. They always try to come up with something that is a win-win for all. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 7 of 9 4. Discussion of Support Letter for H.R. 1526, the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act. DEBONE: Move approval nunc pro tunc of a support letter to Rep. Greg Walden regarding the mentioned Act. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Chair votes yes. 5. Other Items. Mr. Kropp said that the Sheriff wishes to participate in the Equitable Sharing Program, whereby proceeds from seized property or funds can benefit local agencies; in this case, the Sheriff's Office. This request is for $960 worth of computer equipment. DEBONE: Move approval of Document No. 2013-548. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Chair votes yes. Mr. Kropp stated that a citizen contacted the Board with concerns about the cost of emergency air transport. The question was, why do people have to sign up for both carriers. This should be a competitive situation with perhaps a reciprocal agreement. The Board, as the governing body of the Ambulance Service Area Advisory Committee, should look at this issue, or ask the Committee to weigh in on this. Perhaps they could invite both companies in for discussion, or at least contact both to find out more about it. He explained that this is part of the ASA calls. Funding is through charging private insurance or by citizens buying memberships. However, it appears they have to buy two memberships to have full coverage since they don't have a choice when the provider is called. Chair Unger suggested a letter be written to both providers stating the concerns of them double-charging citizens. They should work out some kind of reciprocity. Otherwise, the Board may have to address the situation. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 8 of 9 Being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 4:05 p.m. 5J ' Day of LLB 2013 for the DATED this Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. Alan Unger, Chair ATTEST: IP,4~1 z4e,~-- Recording Secretary Tammy Baney, Vice Chair "W~- Anthony DeBone, Commissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page 9 of 9 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 1. Finance Update - Wayne Lowry 2. 2013 Legislative Session Wrap-Up - Judith Ure 3. Discussion of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Proposal to Protect the Oregon Spotted Frog under the Federal Endangered Species Act - USFWS and Peter Gutowsky 4. Discussion of Support Letter for H.R. 1526, the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act 5. Other Items PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues. Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. 1f you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. for deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the stale transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. L c 0 H h N H L i v I~ I y J I 0 ` ~ ~ II M 00 ~ ~ ~i ICI 4 v+ , gl n ~I v L r ~i ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~I V c VI i I I ~ y ~ I I I I I i I ~ I v~ s ~I III V v O ~ CI I I I~ I ,a Monthly Meeting with Board of Commissioners Finance Director/Treasurer AGENDA September 25, 2013 (1) Monthly Investment Report (2) August 2013 Financials N M CD U13 O O C C a M 0 r n O V C C N r+ ~ Cc 69 fR d r E ~ H N N It CO IL C C CD O r ~ ~ N CA a 6R b? N N _ _ N h O E N N 0 C 3 r r 64 w N C d E Z LL 0 CD 0 C r- E C Q U EE e ~ m tlj Gi QI 7 C C: 0 E LL d! yy i m s w E C H d C C 0) c~ e e e eee° o N CO W O O O ti 0 O ~[f0Oa00G C N. In a Q C; U O r M ~ N CO N o~°I . CO n to 0 M L QDD CO CD N M O) N 'IN OI N r r U3 140 w U .r N D (D U L d 0 E D Z N ¢ ~ to a U 0 C n a> 1 v N WYLL !C O O E N CO O ~UH=) lim - H C CO N M 0 H 0 c r- 0 0 22 CO a r N Document Repr®dkces Poorly (Archived) e e e a e e e e o OWOW 0 0 N O CM 1-- N N N r T T M H Cn a) E rn n CL U E U D d C 7 w L U 0 C6 E C C ro 0 En a) O 2 ro U a E N d ~d m c . E O T m H r2 V ~ -i H d CL a" it C O E V! m O ,O it O CL a U a° m rn H ru a "m c~ U J d T 2 0 0 La. O O U m awe y to C O o b - U w U UU i UU UU U;U UU UI I UU'U'UII I 1 I Nl co OD D 3E Olio = 14 ; 6 4 z Z;Z Z,z ZIZ Z'IZ ZZ I ZI ZIzZZ' IQ ao clr: OR a ui'c o o o o 6Q ao Z . ~ + i ' 4 O 4 C7 Cl) m m n 4 tD O 4 b O O 11. O N O t0 . _ O 0 co Cl) M to r+ 0 6) O cq n n r M' dl ~ r M m co II C a N O ' b Ctf N OD : co to OO i co 4 V N n b M 4 O ti CO N r co r M nI~ O C•7 ' CO C M M n r n co ~ O O!uQ ' d' co, U) co O t r I m` m CO O O OI 431 401, toIO O co m .O NjI ' O m Q I E 7 O 4 0 C61 N m M V I NV m tP 4 4: mO m OV NO t~O7 ON OO n O V n 3 N O m LCj tD LL7 co > r 4 N I t0 N ' N: N CD O 'N r, L'i Cli r l w I N r N 'I o N I ! V' 1~ r= p N "t V N t0 ~ t0 ' rn N i r O 4 . r O cN~ - I - . l r ' w to I r w i I I i , ♦ . _ I 11 Lq "l Lq 4 ' . r r O u]O O O O n ti N tD 7 M I V d N 4 tD' m 0; CO u7 O N 4 co ~o CO CID co O o o O 4 tD O rM N CO M o O i V N in m N m n O N A ' r d: N N tD r l tp 4 b m O T U> CO t) I ' m O O to V C1 r tD: N V'V tD b 410 V ~o n'b O 00 VO O O 0 0 n n OV n m m SC 0 0 tD N N to ; O c j tq - r N 0 1 r l n N r to N N r N NIr N N 1 Oo V CN ~ . ..i...- - - - I - 1 o CD CD CD Q~ C) c 4 010 o V 0 O' O V O 'n ' O N ! 4 0 0 O' b o O C Dl 0 0 4 O V O O O V O ti I 1 ° U 1O C 0 O O 0 v co - 4 O O o!o I b u7 0 nl,o V C 4 1 to CD u7 II O: b O n , O M O O O C3 I O 4'I O O' C', 7 : 07 m m O V m I!- o Ki tO to 0 4 0 , 0 04 O I 1 O 1 0 I V 4' N ll C) O 0 O b: n N of ~ A OD C O V O O rm i r: CD V V 141 C1 O o O !l o O O r l L V 7 r r 4 r C 4 N C, M n t N ! N l j W M •4 N N! -IN NIr C %i ti1C, 1.iV ,N ! U Q W + I • N U) U 9 73 ~ 3Q'o a o 0 0 o I 3E .2 ~ aE t3E aE O z m U ~ 'O d 10 ~ O O tP 44 n M 0 Ill b (O0 O,o N I 0 COO O'O h N I' 0 0 N 0 O aa tOO 11 t0 off a 04 O 3 8 a wl V N T1 U N Q 0 m I 7j } ~r 4 0 0 0 C7 Cf Cf O C) O' 0 1 01 0 O: O o 4 1 4 0 C N ELL al Y 1 dI m 1 . ° Em C m Uly i ~ Q U LL ' m J' F" c 0 0 e I I o 0 m 4 OO 0 0 b ° O ti o' ~r 'I m m c U! al l F al I I L t I , ~ y ' I I I I I 1 M o m ~ ~'I m C v ❑ I O c m O 0. 3 w I E O ~ O'C O - L I I I ' I II _ ° C ~'LO V r o 1 O Lon It o 0 olio 1 fly a ~ W M M V u7 n N u7 rn M , m , n m V V N O N m M N C to CD tri n tD I n n 1 I i I 1 II ~ i I_.... I j I 7, w I m r m: V rr _V , d d r I V I r, V LO Lo O 1 r~rr O O b in~tn : b 1 , 4) 7' `rrrrl,rn'I I(D I i O T Y 'I O O d1 . n ' tp 47 . ; O O rn 4 O. q) e' E g ❑ 1 C o O OO N r o 0' 4 a CD O 4 . 4 ii 4 (D 0 4n l , A o. N N 4o 1 O O O 1 t` E ' `O. Q N !R I C I R N' M to O O,O C',a 0I0 j • r T ' 1 I U N N N M NI N m co r m M _M m m M m I. t 'I C7l In to V tD N tD O l° N ` n b ' I . ~ i 3 d, ~ Q 1 CII 4 0 O N N r, bl 1 ~V Q CB io o b /D O 0 P O 0 1 0 ; n O;.O r ~V R: n 0. 4. `O OO Q ~V O N m, to. n 4'. 4,8 b 0 ; a I I U a It LL OD Y1 a a l r' > L'':a d , lZ ' ! LL I, I ~ H'H ~ + ' eaAl 0 UP 1❑ ~ I ❑ F- ❑ z UI- z z, U U + pl © Hz U I H I - . I ' ue9' 11 LL = M I LL a Z LnI aI LL ❑ I z m m z m all LL LL l Z G ZIw° =N. toNj C,4 C0 O cn m C7 tND ao tall da 22 NIN 7 CO ! 1 E CL 7+ 1 = V O1 _ ..r ~ - U C (7 a I. Ila I 0 a j N h y CC Y c N: C a)CQ ' CD U C I C O ° U d Q. U Cy U . ~p C U mm tO m C m I U a7 m all 0.1 N y 1 N to •a V Q7 CD I Ci m o Y.1 I C co 0 op U U U) ' C a~ n O a ❑1 U 'I ~i O U U M co p V V am O f6 YI C. O ml rv~ LO O Y cl fC m; ~II cp', a) U1; N a)'' Ui ~ f~a U I C) U 1U) t+.. to U' I N tC co _ N C W N C =U, , UCn l0'C/JI C ~.I 7 m U) Z - N C LL a C m D a [1 t~~7 U tCC3U~ ¢ o ` f6 1 CL ` N D Z UI C 1 O a N U_ N = l U U) f p m Y ~ c m t U Y c c Fi c . m cm s1 I U ~ I Y LL ca' c o O o I a) fa aLL m E: ~ m 2 f6l O7 ❑ 4) i c C =3 ~ ~ LL m; m L Ui~ _ c m Co m a m L) C m o 1 co m °D co .T LIJ 51 C, En 0 C, rnm Ci ~ m lit m m 0Jao1 =1 cp t_. 0 c Q m Y co U m m - U m a lt z 21 m Ln ~ ~ ~ a DI c 3: M ED , C) e U c ~I! Z) L 1 . l z _ d 0 EIn ~ 0 rLn ~I nE ' a) c 1 zI O O ' E, ~ Q L m W - I _ H! - L 7 C U a ` a) 704 m' _ OII O. EI Ia a W N ~ I ~ ~ ~ Ll C) fn'71~ Z 7iU~~1 1 J m __L i F Memorandum Date: September 16, 2013 To: Board of County Commissioners Tom Anderson, County Administrator From: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director RE: Monthly Financial Reports Attached please find August 2013 financial reports for the following funds: General (001), Community Justice - Juvenile (230), Sheriffs (255, 701, 702), Public Health (259), Behavioral Health (275), Community Development (295), Road (325), Community Justice - Adult (355), Commission on Children & Families (370-399), Solid Waste (610), Insurance Fund (670), 9-1-1 (705), Health Benefits Trust (675), and Fair & Expo Center (618). The projected information has been reviewed and updated, where appropriate, by the respective departments. Cc: All Department Heads GENERAL FUND Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 Revenues Property Taxes - Current Property Taxes - Prior Other General Revenues Assessor County Clerk BOPTA District Attorney Tax Office Veterans Property Management Grant Projects Total Revenues Expenditures Assessor County Clerk BOPTA District Attorney Finance/Tax Veterans Property Management Grant Projects Non-Departmental Total Expenditures Transfers Out Total Exp & Transfers Change in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) 11/0 Actual Actual Budget 20,734,019 1,108, 377 2,683,531 866,121 1,710, 900 16,419 174,794 252,869 74,348 100,249 2,000 27,723,627 3,439,127 1,299,189 58,401 5,034,333 779,725 250,880 275,329 122,139 1,221,749 12,480,872 13,930,307 26,411,179 1,312,448 9,059,394 $ 10,371,843 FY 2014 Budget Projection $ Variance 0% ok) 21,031,062 21,031,062 215,909 30% - 720,000 720,000 - 603,143 31% b) 1,955,900 1,955,900 - 220,693 27% 0) 812,421 812,421 - 281,168 20% .0) 1,415,487 1,415,487 - 4,469 29% 0), 15,200 15,200 - 4,149 2% 184,194 184,194 - 64,080 31% 0), 208,750 208,750 - 10,150 14% 70,920 70,920 - 15,167 17% 91,000 91,000 - 333 17% 2,000 2,000 - 1,419,261 5% 26,506,934 26,506,934 - 577,958 16% 3,687,131 3,687,131 - 188,963 13% 1,500,045 1,500,045 - 12,553 16% 76,901 76,901 - 852,185 15% 5,638,777 5,638,777 - 108,677 13% 846,733 846,733 - 47,350 16% 299,163 299,163 - 40,636 16% 258,807 258,807 - 20,937 16% 129,951 129,951 - 137,651 9% 1,492,993 1,492,993 - 1,986,909 14% 13,930,501 13,930,501 - 2,000,696 15% d:) 13,015,578 13,515,578 (500,000) 3,987,605 15% 26,946,079 27,446,079 500,000 (2,568,344) (439,145) (939,145) 10,371,843 109% 9,500,000 10,371,843 871,843 7,803,499 $ 9,060,855 $ 9,432,698 $ 371,843 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 9,060,855 a) Current year taxes due November, February and May b) PILT received in July - $500,941 c) A & T grant - 1 st Quarter payment received in July d) Transfer to Jail Project Fund for repayment of inter-fund loan (Solid Waste Closure Reserve Fund) Page 1 COMM JUSTICE-JUVENILE Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 Revenues Federal Grants SB #1065-Court Assess. Jail Funding HB #2712 Discovery Fee Food Subsidy OYA Basic & Diversion Inmate/Prisoner Housing Contract Payments Interest on Investments Leases Grants - Private CFC Interfund Grant Interfund Grant - Gen Fund Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures Personnel Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Total Expenditures Revenues less Expenditures Transfers In-General Fund Change in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance FY 2013 Actual 8,606 101,659 8,703 24,650 354,583 113,760 90,765 6,343 1,200 1,729 120,595 20,000 790 853,383 4,878,315 1,086,677 50.400 FY 2014 - Year to Date (17% of Year) Actual I Budget FY 2014 Budget Projection $ Variance 7,090 167% fit)` 4,254 11,715 7,461 367 6% 6,000 6,000 - 9,142 25% 36,568 36,568 - 1,855 22% 8,300 8,300 - 1,909 8% 24,000 24,000 - - 0% .K 364,268 359,149 (5,119) 1,050 1% j. 125,000 125,000 - 0% ',d 120,000 5,000 (115,000) 1,175 20% . 6,000 6,000 - 300 25% ' 1,200 1,200 - 122 10% 1,250 1,250 - - n/a - - - - 0% ` 20,000 20,000 - - 0% 650 650 - 23,010 4% 717,490 604,832 (112,658) 799,366 16% 5,109,496 5,109,496 - 146,410 13% d) 1,085,433 970,433 115,000 - 0% 100 - 100 - 0% 3,660 3,660 - 945,776 16% , 6,198,689 6,083,589 115,100 (5,162,008) (922,766) 995,051 1,177, 566 5,344,523 $94,724 182,515 (28,042) $ 1,117,566 $ 1,149,524 (5,481,199) (5,478,757) 2,442 17% 5,368,346 5,368,346 - (112,853) (110,411) 2,442 105% 1,125, 000 1,177, 566 52,566 * $1,012,147 $1,067,155 $ 55,008 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 1,012,147 a) Received late payment for FY 13 grant which increases amount received for FY 14 b) Minimal adjustment from states final figures, received after budget process closed c) $9,300 billing outstanding d) BRS/Maplestar program discontinued, funding eliminated--associated expenditures also reduced by $115,000 Page 2 SHERIFF - Fund 255 Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues Law Enf Dist Countywide 18,708,928 3,386,701 14% 24,478,462 21,161,510 3,316,952 Law Enf Dist Rural 12,206,355 2,134,353 15% 14,525,221 12,556,982 1,968,239 Total Revenues 30,915,283 5,521,054 16% 39,003,683 33,718,492 5,285,191 Expenditures Sheriffs Division 2,263,061 436,236 18% 2,401,838 2,401,738 100 Civil 723,704 182,435 16% 1,110,175 1,110,175 - Automotive/Communications 1,837,849 469,087 29% 1,643,912 1,643,912 - Investigations/Evidence 1,425,223 260,891 18% 1,472,678 1,472,578 100 Patrol/Civil/Comm Supp 8,174,690 1,322,347 15% 8,544,952 8,544,952 - Records 685,178 120,890 16% 774,452 774,352 100 Adult Jail 12,850,417 2,160,372 15% 14,384,459 14,384,459 - Court Security 298,060 48,989 18% 275,852 275,752 100 Emergency Services 185,439 53,250 24% 223,273 223,173 100 Special Services Division 1,236,781 246,821 16% 1,498,298 1,498,298 - Training Division 481,717 66,398 13% 527,979 527,879 100 Other Law Enforcement Svcs 667,913 139,722 18% 779,623 779,523 100 Non-Departmental 85,253 13,617 17% 81,701 81,701 - Total Expenditures 30,915,283 5,521,054 16% 33,719,192 33,718,492 700 Revenues less Expenditures - - 5,284,491 - 5,285,891 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 5,284,491 Page 3 SHERIFF -Expenditure Detail Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 ] Actual Actual Budget ` Budget _r Projection $ Variance - Expenditures Sheriffs Services_ Personnel 1,311,042 233,185 17% 1,411,820 1,411,820 - Materials & Services 952,019 203,051 21% 989,918 989,918 - Capital Outlay - 0% . 100 - 100 Total Sheriff's Services 2,263,061 436,236 18% 2,401,838 2,401,738 100 Civil / Special Unitq Personnel 637,830 172,070 17% 1,009,306 1,009,306 - Materials & Services 85,874 10,365 11% 95,769 95,769 - Capital Outlay - 0% 5,100 5,100 - Total Civil 723,704 182,436 16% 1,110,175 1,110,175 - Automotive/Communications Personnel 413,153 65,062 16% 404,407 404,407 - Materials & Services 1,406,033 398,234 33% 1,202,505 1,202,505 - Capital Outlay 18,663 5,790 16% 37,000 37,000 - Total Automotive/Communications 1,837,849 469,087 29% 1,643,912 1,643,912 - Investi atio / vidence Personnel 1,283,221 220,455 16% 1,338,593 1,338,593 - Materials & Services 142,001 40,436 30% 133,985 133,985 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Investigations/Evidence 1,425,223 260,891 18% 1,472,678 1,472,578 100 Patrol/CiviVCo[Dm Support Personnel 7,325,801 1,234,779 16% . 7,723,459 7,723,459 - Materials & Services 613,033 87,568 16% 563,921 563,921 - Capital Outlay 235,856 - 0% ' 257,572 257,572 - Total Patrol/Civll/Comm Supp 8,174,690 1,322,347 15% 8,544,952 8,544,952 - Records Personnel 583,461 115,000 17% 665,327 665,327 - Materials & Services 101,717 5,890 5% 109,025 109,025 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Records 685,178 120,890 16% 774,452 774,352 100 Adult Jail Personnel 10,934,201 1,918,322 16% 12,060,079 12,060,079 - Materials & Services 1,879,643 233,100 12% 1,947,790 1,947,790 - Capital Outlay 36,573 8,950 12% 76,590 76,590 - Transfer Out - Jail Debt Service - 0% 300,000 300,000 - Total Adult Jail 12,850,417 2,160,372 15% 14,384,459 14,384,459 - Court Security Personnel 285,997 44,949 17%' 265,966 265,966 - Materials & Services 12,063 4,040 41% 9,786 9,786 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Transport/Court Security 298,060 48,989 18% 275,852 275,752 100 Emergency Services Personnel 175,729 49,622 25% 196,825 196,825 - Materials & Services 9,710 3,628 14% 26,348 26,348 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Emergency Services 185,439 53,250 24% 223,273 223,173 100 Special Services ^Personnel 1,024,967 221,991 18% 1,251,196 1,251,196 - Materials & Services 175,717 24,830 12% 211,502 211,502 - Capital Outlay 36,096 - 0% 35,600 35,600 - Total Special Services 1,236,781 246,821 16% 1,498,298 1,498,298 - Training Personnel 345,417 57,972 15% 384,725 384,725 - Materials & Services 136,300 8,426 6% 143,154 143,154 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Training 481,717 66,398 13% 527,979 527,879 100 Other Law Enforcement services Personnel 607,877 123,512 18% 705,392 705,392 - Materials & Services 60,035 16,210 22% 74,131 74,131 - Capital Outlay - 0% 100 - 100 Total Other Law Enforcement Svcs 667,913 139,722 18% 779,623 779,523 100 Non-Department Materials & Services 85,253 13,617 17% ` - 81,701 81,701 - Total Non-Departmental $5,263 13,617 17% 81,701 81,701 - Total Expenditures 30,915,283 5,521,054 16% 33,719,192 33,718,492 70$a9e 4 SHERIFF 701 Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 I Date (17% of Year) i I FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection ariance Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 15,812,544 - 0% a) 16,103,377 16,103,377 - Tax Revenues - Prior 817,322 160,644 32% 507,902 507,902 - Federal Grants 24,510 - 0% 25,500 25,500 - State Grant 158,199 - 0% 115,524 115,524 - Jail Funding HB 2712 101,659 9,142 20% 46,143 46,143 - Transp. of State Wards 3,289 - 0% 5,000 5,000 - SB 1145 1,479,991 369,998 23% 1,584,991 1,628,947 43,956 Prisoner Housing 284,189 - 0% 80,000 80,000 - Des. Cty Gen Fund Grant - - 0% 4,762 4,762 - Des. Cty Video Lottery Grant 5,000 - 0% 5,000 5,000 - Grants 20,640 - n/a - - - Des Cty Court Security 116,646 - 0% 'd) 99,318 45,632 (53,686) Des Cty Juvenile Contract 12,051 - 0% 10,000 10,000 - Title III Reimbursement 39,916 - n/a - - - Inmate Commissary Fees 29,756 2,349 16% 15,000 15,000 - Work Center Work Crews 53,237 6,741 13% 50,000 50,000 - Concealed Handgun Classes 8,050 550 16% 3,500 3,500 - Inmate Telephone Fee 97,403 7,731 10% 80,000 80,000 - Soc Sec Incentive-Fed 14,600 3,200 64% 5,000 5,000 - Medical Services Reimb 20,461 - 0% 13,000 13,000 - Sheriff Fees 314,668 64,494 26% 250,000 250,000 - Interest 44,629 5,270 16% 32,000 32,000 - Donations-"Shop with a Cop" 31,717 25,573 49% 51,897 51,897 - Miscellaneous 21,599 4,664 16% 28,849 28,849 - Total Operating Revenues 19,512,075 660,356 3% 19,116,763 19,107,033 (9,730) EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS DC Sheriffs Office 18,708,928 3,386,701 16% 24,478,462 21,161,510 3,316,952 DC Comm Systems Reserve 80,000 - 0% 80,000 80,000 - Transfer to Reserve Fund 100,000 - 0% 100,000 100,000 - Total Expenditures 18,888,928 3,386,701 16% 24,658,462 21,341,510 (3,316,952) Change in Fund Balance 623,147 (2,726,345) (5,541,699) (2,234,477) 3,307,222 Beginning Fund Balance 5,883,963 6,507,110 5,541,699 6,507,110 965,411 Ending Fund Balance $ 6,507,110 $ 3,780,765 $ - $ 4,272,633 $4,272,633 * Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attributable to countywide services a) Current year taxes due November, February and May b) 1145 inmate reimbursement will exceed budget amount for the year c) State OJD distributions will be less than planned for the year Page 5 SHERIFF 702 Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to Date FY 2013 (17% of Year) FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Budget T Projection $ Variance Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 7,698,340 - 0% 91) 7,839,932 7,839,932 - Tax Revenues - Prior 404,894 78,828 30% 263,858 263,858 - Federal Grants 53,818 - 0% 14,500 14,500 - Federal Grants-BLM 20,881 - 0% 25,000 25,000 - US Forest Service 78,750 19,688 26% 76,500 76,500 - Bureau of Reclamation 40,580 - 0% 26,000 26,000 - State Grant 274,465 10,392 6% 169,000 169,000 - SB #1065 Court Assessment 8,606 367 1% 55,000 55,000 - Marine Board License Fee 143,724 - 0% 150,000 150,000 - Des Cty General Fund Grant 136,735 - 0% 375,703 375,703 - Des Cty Transient Room Tax 2,513,265 379,050 17% 2,274,297 2,274,297 - Asset Forfeiture 11,760 - n/a - - - City of Sisters 468,060 81,113 17% 486,678 486,678 - Des Cty CDD Contract 54,366 9,878 17% 59,270 59,270 - Des Cty Solid Waste Contr 54,366 9,878 17% 59,270 59,270 - School Districts 46,212 - 0% 40,000 40,000 - Claims Reimbursement 860 - n/a - - - Seat Belt Program 5,390 1,610 16% 10,000 10,000 - Sheriff Fees 9,617 1,745 17% 10,000 10,000 - Court Fines & Fees 120,247 23,741 19% 125,000 125,000 - Interest 20,654 2,052 17% 12,000 12,000 - Grants-Private 6,500 - n/a - - - Donations 11,650 - n/a - - - Miscellaneous 44,728 10,887 21% 53,000 59,669 6,669 Total Revenues 12,228,468 629,229 5% 12,125,008 12,131,677 6,669 EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS DC Sheriffs Office 12,206,355 2,134,353 15% 14,525,221 12,556,982 (1,968,239) DC Comm Systems Reserve 120,000 - 0% 120,000 120,000 - Transfer to Reserve Fund 100,000 - 0% 100,000 100,000 - Total Expenditures 12,426,355 2,134,353 17% 14,745,221 12,776,982 (1,968,239) Change in Fund Balance (197,887) (1,505,124) (2,620,213) (645,305) 1,974,908 Beginning Fund Balance 3,244,571 3,046,683 2,620,213 3,046,683 426,470 Ending Fund Balance 3,046,683 ,541,560 - 2,401,378 401,378 Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attributable to countywide services a) Current year taxes due November, February a nd May Page 6 PUBLIC HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 °o Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection Lariance Revenues Medicare Reimbursement 68 - n/a - - - Federal Grant 630 - n/a 4,000 86,085 82,085 Federal Grant (ARRA) 212,500 - 0% 85,000 85,000 - State Grant 2,700,025 430,642 16% a) 2,655,897 2,660,571 4,674 Child Dev & Rehab Center 38,154 - 0% b) 39,609 39,609 - State Miscellaneous 248,176 1,646 1% W 163,310 83,110 (80,200) OMAP 578,042 84,451 14% . 612,400 747,400 135,000 Family Planning Exp Proj 519,121 43,359 8% 550,000 550,000 - Grants (Intergovern & Pvt) 40,214 - 30,915 164,924 134,009 Environmental Health-Water 95,224 - 0% 94,200 94,200 - Contract Payments 174,624 2,913 2% 151,316 156,316 5,000 Patient Insurance Fees 214,544 30,040 16% 184,200 184,200 - Health Dept/Patient Fees 95,108 17,474 15% 119,400 119,400 - Vital Records-Birth 32,475 6,345 15% 41,000 41,000 - Vital Records-Death 112,235 17,660 18% 100,000 100,000 - Environmental Health-Lic Fac 755,693 33,731 4% 753,750 753,750 - Interest on Investments 6,262 957 16% 6,000 6,000 - Donations 19,366 10,025 557% 1,800 10,025 8,225 Interfund Contract 162,757 - 0% c). 180,426 91,691 (88,735) Miscellaneous 3,425 418 30% 1,400 1,587 187 Total Revenues 6,008,643 679,661 11% 5,774,623 5,974,868 200,245 Expenditures Personnel Services 6,344,766 1,036,676 16% 6,495,548 6,495,548 - Materials and Services 2,036,535 237,835 11% 2,070,058 2,070,058 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Transfers Out 157,200 - 0% 157,320 157,320 - Total Expenditures 8,538,501 1,274,511 n/a 8,723,026 8,722,926 100 Revenues less Expenditures (2,529,858) (594,850) (2,948,403) (2,748,058) 200,345 Transfers In-General Fund 2,349,357 450,246 17% 2,701,475 2,701,475 - Transfers In-PH Res Fund 62,136 - 0% 33,000 33,000 - Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 65,100 - 0% 65,100 65,100 - Total Transfers In 2,476,593 450,246 16% 2,799,575 2,799,575 - Change in Fund Balance (53,265) (144,604) (148,828) 51,517 200,345 Beginning Fund Balance 1,327,199 1,273,934 92% 1,385,592 1,273,934 (111,658 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,273,934 $ 1,129,330 $1,236,764 $ 1,325,451 $ 88,687 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 1,236,764 a) Oregon Health Authority grant projected at amended contract amount b) Received quarterly in arrears c) Interfund contract reduced due to elimination of F.T.E. Page 7 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 °o Actual Actual Budget Budget T Projection $ Variance Revenues Marriage Licenses 5,650 1,945 30% 6,500 6,500 - Divorce Filing Fees 122,971 21,413 15% , 140,600 140,600 - Federal Grants 252,331 - 0% 252,349 252,349 - Federal Grant (ARRA) 63,750 - 0% 25,500 25,500 - State Grants 7,552,648 1,321,414 17% 7,893,477 7,893,477 - State Miscellaneous 62,361 5,155 8% 61,860 61,860 - Adult Mental Health Initiative 229,038 - 0% 230,000 230,000 - Title 19 121,876 34,821 24% 144,246 144,246 - Liquor Revenue 144,595 - 0% 137,000 137,000 - School Districts 23,317 - n/a - - - Patient Fees 110,491 49,827 32% 158,082 158,082 - Interest on Investments 19,900 2,925 14% 20,500 20,500 - Rentals 16,625 1,500 8% 18,500 18,500 - Administrative Fee 5,224,877 1,116,441 13% 8,318,643 8,318,643 - Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 127,000 - 0% 127,000 127,000 - Miscellaneous 17,482 1,845 96% 100 1,930 1,830 Total Revenues 14,094,911 2,557,286 15% 17,534,357 17,536,187 1,830 Expenditures Personnel Services 10,916,057 2,005,513 15% 13,082,340 13,082,340 - Materials and Services 5,970,799 646,754 9% 6,828,913 6,828,913 - Capital Outlay 26,965 - 0% 10,000 10,000 - Transfers Out 204,000 - 0% 204,900 204,900 - Total Expenditures 17,117,821 2,652,267 13% 20,126,153 20,126,153 - Revenues less Expenditures 3,022,909 94,981 (2,591,796) (2,589,966) 1,830 Transfers In-General Fund 1,307,787 229,550 17% 1,377,302 1,377,302 - Transfers In-OHP-CDO 484,494 - n/a - - - Transfers In-Acute Care Svcs 264,631 48,932 17% 293,593 293,593 - Transfers In-ABHA 524,039 - n/a - - - Total Transfers In 2,580,951 278,482 1,670,895 1,670,895 - Change in Fund Balance (441,958) 183,501 (920,901) (919,071) 1,830 Beginning Fund Balance 3,113,095 2,671,137 77% 3,461,651 2,671,137 790,514 Ending Fund Balance $ 2,671,137 $ 2,854,638 $ 2,540,750 $1,752,066 $ (788,684) * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 2,540,750 Page 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 Revenues Admin-Operations Admin-GIS Admin-Code Enforcement Building Safety Electrical Contract Services Env Health-On Site Prog Planning-Current Planning-Long Range Total Revenues Expenditures Admin-Operations Admin-GIS Admin-Code Enforcement Building Safety Electrical Contract Services Env Health-On Site Pgm Planning-Current Planning-Long Range Transfers Out (D/S Fund) Total Expenditures Revenues less Expenditures Transfers In General Fund - Gen Ops General Fund - UR Planning A&T Reserve (D/S assistance) Other Total Transfers In Change in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) °o Actual Actual Budget 31,848 778 239,264 1,563,938 336,210 166,428 340,564 798,221 348,545 3,825,796 1,311,935 117,502 208,357 599,764 200,596 163,822 160,291 581,155 356,807 179,155 3,879,383 FY 2014 Budget Projection $ Variance 7,787 14% 56,243 56,243 - 148 10% 1,500 1,500 - 45,004 25% 178,000 178,000 - 319,464 26% 1,247,359 1,247,359 - 72,700 26% 283,073 283,073 - 26,088 13% 204,800 204,800 - 96,803 34% , 288,484 288,484 - 141,187 22% 634,602 634,602 - 65,225 24% ` 274,527 274,527 - 774,405 24% 3,168,588 3,168,588 - 319,403 20% 4) 1,610,396 1,610,396 - 20,195 16% 124,246 124,246 - 46,017 17% 275,515 275,515 - 99,615 15% 672,796 672,796 - 36,624 17% , 218,300 218,300 - 35,785 22% 162,658 162,658 - 31,436 18% 171,529 171,529 - 103,527 16% 665,901 665,901 - 53,590 12% 450,498 450,498 - - 0% 179,035 - 179,035 746,191 16% 4,530,874 4,530,874 - (53,586) 28,214 (1,362,286) (1,362,286) - 854,872 - 0% b) 465,121 - (465,121) 495,360 82,560 17% 495,360 495,360 - 89,577 - 0% b) 89,518 - (89,518) - - 0% 100 - (100) 1,439,809 82,560 8% 1,050,099 495,360 (554,739) 1,386,223 110,774 (312,187) (866,926) (554,739) 192,482 1,578,705 227% 696,290 1,578,705 882,415 1,578,705 $1,689,479 * $ 384,103 $ 711,779 $ 327,676 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 384,103 a) Includes $63,891 for the Computer Software b) FY 14 revenues are projected to be sufficient to cover FY 14 expenditures Page 9 ROAD Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Budget 7 Projection $ Variance Revenues Federal Grant (ARRA) 7,335 - n/a - - - Mineral Lease Royalties 140,591 2,132 2% 140,000 140,000 - Forest Receipts 1,265,279 - 0% a) 356,270 356,270 - Federal - PILT Payment - 1,064,365 n/a b) - 1,064,365 1,064,365 State Miscellaneous 542,290 - 0% 773,452 773,452 - Motor Vehicle Revenue 10,495,426 1,732,074 16% 10,554,500 10,554,500 - City of Bend 45,486 19,887 6% ) 310,000 310,000 - City of Redmond 11,554 3,328 1% c) 370,000 370,000 - City of Sisters 1,861 3,624 36% ) 10,000 10,000 - City of La Pine 10,000 - 0% o} 10,000 10,000 - Interest on Investments 32,342 6,259 35% 18,000 18,000 - Interfund Contract 526,110 - 0% ) 562,000 562,000 - Equipment Repairs 255,369 17,979 8% 220,000 220,000 - Vehicle Repairs 82,542 - 0% 90,000 90,000 - Vegetation Management 49,503 - n/a d) - - - Forester 24,628 - 0% d) 1,500 1,500 - Other Inter-fund Services 30,387 1,601 13% 12,500 12,500 - Inter-Fund Sales - Fuel 623,074 57,841 11% 550,000 550,000 - Sale of Equip & Material 287,313 3,005 1% 270,000 270,000 - Miscellaneous 35,018 3,325 13% 23,200 25,200 2,000 Total Revenues 14,466,108 2,915,420 19% 14,271,422 15,337,787 1,066,365 Expenditures Personnel Services 5,303,241 906,106 17% 5,385,717 5,385,717 - Materials and Services 7,277,398 947,453 9% 10,306,609 10,306,609 - Capital Outlay 67,987 - 0% 2,882,108 2,882,108 - Transfers Out 275,000 - 0% 450,000 450,000 - Total Expenditures 12,923,627 1,853,559 10% 191024,434 19,024,434 - Revenues less Expenditures 1,542,481 1,061,861 (4,753,012) (3,686,647) 1,066,365 Trans In - Solid Waste 276,272 - 0% d) 282,148 282,148 - Trans In - Transp SDC - - 0% 400,000 400,000 - Trans In-Road Imp Res - - 0% 1,000 1,000 - Total Transfers In 276,272 - 683,148 683,148 - Change in Fund Balance 1,818,753 1,061,861 (4,069,864) (3,003,499) 1,066,365 Beginning Fund Balance 4,723,852 6,542,605 109% 6,014,368 6,542,605 528,237 Ending Fund Balance $ 6,542,605 $ 7,604,466 $ 1,944,504 $ 3,539,106 $1,694,602 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 1,944,504 a) Payment received annually in January b) One-time PILT payment. Not anticipated at the time the FY 2014 budget was adopted. c) Billed upon completion of work d) Payments to be received in June 2014 from other Road Department funds Page 10 ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 0o Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues DOC Measure 57 219,240 - 0% ) 219,240 219,240 - State Miscellaneous 4,301 - 0% b) 4,301 4,301 - Alternate Incarceration 7,408 49% G) 15,000 15,000 - State Subsidy 22,329 3,457 25%, 13,826 13,826 - SB 1145 2,748,555 687,139 23% 2,951,504 2,951,504 - Probation Work Crew Fees 14,136 1,280 10% 13,376 13,376 - Claims Reimbursement 6,997 n/a 0) - 6,997 6,997 Miscellaneous 4,648 18 0% 4,500 4,500 - Electronic Monitoring Fee 177,947 35,736 23% 156,000 156,000 - Probation Superv. Fees 189,330 31,855 18% 175,000 175,000 - Interest on Investments 5,743 1,076 18% 6,000 6,000 - Interfund - Sheriff 50,000 8,333 17% 50,000 50,000 - Sale of Equipment 250 - n/a - - - Crime Prevention Grant 50,000 - 0% 6) 50,000 50,000 - CFC-Domestic Violence 63,906 - 0% 73,938 73,938 - Total Revenues 3,550,384 783,299 21% 3,732,685 3,739,682 6,997 Expenditures Personnel Services 2,956,034 533,809 16% 3,326,077 3,326,077 - Materials and Services 912,384 137,722 14% 955,003 955,003 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Expenditures 3,868,418 671,532 16% 4,281,180 4,281,080 100 Revenues less Expenditures (318,034) 111,767 (548,495) (541,398) 7,097 Transfers In-General Fund 435,328 75,198 17% 451,189 451,189 - Change in Fund Balance 117,294 186,965 (97,306) (90,209) 7,097 Beginning Fund Balance 630,226 747,520 106% 707,953 747,520 39,567 Ending Fund Balance $ 747,520 $ 934,485 $ 610,647 $ 657,311 $ 46,664 w FY 2014 Contingency-$ 610,647 a) M57 contract not finalized b) Payment usually not received until 3rd quarter c) Utilization of AIP funds trending higher that expected d) One time only revenue event e) Payments received quarterly Page 11 CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 °o Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues Federal Grants 252,020 - 0% ai 402,044 299,930 (102,114) Title IV - Family Sup/Pres 39,533 - 0% 19,767 19,767 - HealthyStart Medicaid 80,557 - 0% 30,000 30,000 - Youth Investment 196,053 - n/a - - - State Prevention Funds 65,270 - n/a - - - HealthyStart /R-S-G 219,950 _ 0% 119,539 119,539 - OCCF Grant 392,440 - 0% b) 89,475 26,146 (63,329) Charges for Svcs-Misc 5,148 50 3% 2,000 2,000 - Program Fees 5,645 - n/a ' - - - Court Fines & Fees 73,959 12,848 17% '0) 75,034 77,086 2,052 Interest on Investments 3,659 515 52% 1,000 1,000 - Donations 13 - n/a - - - Interfund Grants 358,343 - o% d) 350,375 337,593 12,782 Total Revenues 1,692,590 13,413 1% 1,089,234 913,061 (176,173) Expenditures Personnel Services 570,985 94,438 16% 573,849 573,849 - Materials and Services 1,424,002 26,103 3% d) 1,093,135 998,038 95,097 Total Expenditures 1,994,987 120,541 1,666,984 1,571,887 95,097 Revenues less Expenditures (302,397) (107,128) (577,750) (658,826) (81,076) Transfers In General Fund 275,984 46,456 17% 278,739 278,739 - General Fund - Other - - 89,350 89,350 - Total Transfers In 275,984 46,456 13% 368,089 368,089 - Change in Fund Balance (26,413) (60,672) (209,661) (290,737) (81,076) Beginning Fund Balance 574,985 548,572 146% 375,704 548,572 172,868 Ending Fund Balance $ 548,572 $ 487,901 * $ 166,043 $ 257,835 $ 91,792 W FY 2014 Contingency-$166,043 a) DFC #11 Grant of $93,750 was not received, CDS #2 grant was reduced by $8,364 b) Relief Nursery grant of $63,329 was not received c) Grant award was higher than budgeted d) Revised based on actual grant award Page 12 SOLID WASTE Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Operating Revenues Miscellaneous 19,127 3,363 15% 22,000 22,000 - Franchise 3% Fees 209,076 5,508 3% 4k) 200,000 200,000 - Commercial Disp. Fees 971,213 175,028 18% 954,100 954,100 - Private Disposal Fees 1,376,005 316,406 24% 1,309,350 1,309,350 - Franchise Disposal Fees 3,980,498 740,397 18% 4,095,525 4,095,525 - Yard Debris 107,801 20,760 24% b) 85,000 85,000 - Special Waste 73,568 11,400 46% 0) 25,000 25,000 - Interest 8,118 1,546 19% 8,000 8,000 - Leases 10,801 2,700 25% d), 10,801 10,801 - Recyclables 47,033 8,189 18% 45,000 45,000 - Miscellaneous 3,131 - n/a - - - Total Operating Revenues 6,806,370 1,285,297 19% 6,754,776 6,754,776 - Operating Expenditures Personnel Services 1,651,419 298,095 16% 1,868,124 1,868,124 - Materials and Services 2,808,337 355,927 11% 3,311,993 3,311,993 - Debt Service 946,711 - o% 9) 930,157 930,157 - Capital Outlay 76,335 - 0% ff 55,000 55,000 - Total Operating Expenditures 5,482,802 654,022 11% 6,165,274 6,165,274 - Operating Rev less Exp 1,323,569 631,275 589,502 589,502 - Transfers Out Road 276,272 - 0% 9) 282,148 282,148 - Capital Reserve 630,000 - 0% h) 545,000 545,000 - Total Transfers Out 906,272 - 0% 827,148 827,148 - Change in Fund Balance 417,297 1,285,297 0 - (237,646) (237,646) - Beginning Fund Balance 807,470 1,224,767 148% 825,655 1,224,767 399,112 Ending Fund Balance $1,224,767 $ 2,510,064 $ 588,009 $ 987,121 $ 399,112 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 588,009 a) Due April 15, 2014 b) Seasonal c) Unpredictable-revenue mainly from clean-up projects d) Sept rent received and posted e) Payments made November and May f) No capital purchases made yet g) Paid quarterly h) Transfers will be made quarterly Page 13 RISK MANAGEMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 00 Actual Actual Budget Budget Projectio Projection T $ Variance Revenues Inter-fund Charges: General Liability 262,333 45,471 17% Property Damage 313,480 54,421 17% Vehicle 173,635 27,358 17% Workers' Compensation 1,448,553 252,031 17% Unemployment 254,165 51,701 17% Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property 34,401 13 0% Process Fee-Events/Parades 1,300 140 6% Miscellaneous 76 9 11% Skid Car Training 23,060 1,080 8% Interest on Investments 12,226 2,187 18% TOTAL REVENUES 2,523,228 434,411 16% 2, Direct Insurance Costs: GENERAL LIABILITY 5201 Settlement / Benefit 382,659 91,518 5202 Defense 50,919 5,459 5203 Professional Service 85,751 85 5204 Insurance 148,035 149,983 5205 Loss Prevention 8,790 - 5206 Miscellaneous 3,290 1,825 5207 Repair / Replacement 200 - Total General Liability 679 645 248,869 62% PROPERTY DAMAGE 5204 Insurance 159,171 166,668 5207 Repair / Replacement 54,449 2,029 Total Property Damage 213,620 168,697 67%' VEHICLE 5204 Insurance 366 354 5205 Loss Prevention 16,030 1,165 5207 Repair / Replacement 54,919 2,694 Total Vehicle 71,316 4,213 4% 120,000 110,000 (10,00 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5201 Settlement / Benefit 367,051 68,129 5204 Insurance 141,960 90,469 5205 Loss Prevention 36,000 7,408 5206 Miscellaneous 46,366 - Total Workers' Compensation 591,376 166,006 21% 5201 UNEMPLOYMENT - Settlement/Benefits 137,082 - 0% Total Direct Insurance Costs 1,693,039 587,786 Insurance Administration: Personnel Services 308,508 49,919 15% Materials & Srvc, Capital Out. & Tranfs. 131,414 22,039 11% Total Expenditures 2,132,961 659,744 Change in Fund Balance 390,267 (225,333) Beginning Fund Balance 2,240,791 2,631,057 Ending Fund Balance 2,631,057 2,405,724 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 2,871,279 272,823 272,$23 - 326,52fi 32fi,526 - 164,150 164,150 - 1,512,188 1,512,188 - 310,203 310,203 - 4D,D00 40,000 2,300 2,300 - 80 80 - 14,000 14,000 - 12,050 12,050 - 654,320 2,654,320 - 400,000 450,000 50,000 250,000 250,000 - 800,000 750,000 (50,000) 200,000 180,000 (20,000) 1,770,000 1,740,000 (30,000) 333,327 333,327 - 197,193 197,093 100 2,300,520 2,270,420 29,900 353,800 383,900 30,100 2,517,479 2,631,057 113,578 2,871,279 3,014,957 143,678 Page 14 DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to Date FY 2013 (17% of Year) % o Actual Actual Budget Revenues Property Taxes - Current 6,323,533 Property Taxes - Prior 319,349 Federal Grants 46,514 State Reimbursement 35,066 Telephone User Tax 767,453 Data Network Reimb. 64,247 Jefferson County 30,755 User Fee 69,012 Police RMS User Fees 229,103 Contract Payments 11,885 Miscellaneous i 10,084 Claims Reimbursement 46,760 Interest 54,324 Total Revenues 8,008,083 Expenditures Personnel Services 3,982,162 Materials and Services 1,929,460 Capital Outlay 81,515 Total Expenditures _ 5,993,138 Revenues less Expenditures 2,014,945 Transfers Out - Reserve Fund 500,000 Change in Fund Balance 1,514,945 Beginning Fund Balance 8,883,086 Ending Fund Balance $ 10,398,030 0% 7,800,000 7,800,000 - (6,984,834) (6,984,834) - 6% 9,800,000 10,398,030 598,030 $ 2,815,166 $ 3,413,196 $ 598,030 w FY 2014 Contingency-$ 2,815,166 a) Current year taxes due November, February and May b) Reimbursement grant for CAD to CAD Capital Expenditures. No Capital expenditures made to date c) Payments received quarterly - October, January, April and July d) Billed annually FY 2014 Budget Projection $ Variance - 0% a) 5,947,600 5,947,600 - 62,332 28% 219,007 219,007 - - 0% b) 200,000 200,000 - 3,008 8% 36,000 36,000 - - 0% C) 750,000 750,000 - - 0% 30,000 30,000 - 250 1% 30,000 30,000 - 27,197 50% 54,000 54,000 - - 0%0) . 256,791 256,791 - - 0% 137,000 137,000 - 2,450 27% 9,000 9,000 - - n/a - - - 8,692 14% 60,600 60,600 - 103,929 1% 7,729,998 7,729,998 - 844,285 19% 4,432,356 4,432,356 - 422,175 20% ; 2,132,476 2,132,476 - - 0% 350,000 350,000 - 1,266,461 18% 6,914,832 6,914,832 - (1,162,532) 815,166 815,166 - (1,162,532) 10,398,030 10 Page 15 Health Benefits Trust Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 % of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues: Internal Premium Charges Part-Time Employee Premium Employee Monthly Co-Pay COIC Retiree / COBRA Co-Pay Prescription Rebates Claims Reimbursements Miscellaneous Interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Personnel Services (all depts) Materials & Services Admin & Wellness Claims Paid-Medical Claims Paid-Prescription Claims Paid-DentalNision Claims Refunds Stop Loss Insurance Premium State Assessments Administration Fee (EMBS) Preferred Provider Fee Health Impact Other - Administration Other - Wellness Admin & Wellness Deschutes On-site Clinic Contracted Services Medical Supplies Equipment Other Total DOC Deschutes On-site Pharmacy 12,874,815 30,280 643,918 1,405,518 963,987 99,330 50,493 1,240 70,959 16,140,540 197.101 11,985,615 1,059,923 1,728,916 (131,375) 336,407 194,510 334,141 50,841 52,224 101,616 15,762,814 804,311 33,155 2,170 46,715 886,351 2,380,515 2,791 104,150 258,413 179,400 33,755 50 50 10,215 2,969,339 2,039,247 175,492 291,536 (11,032) 73,286 42,436 83,438 12,856 4,331 6,609 2,720,491 16.7% 14,269,138 14,269,138 - 7.0% 40,000 17,000 (23,000) 10.6% 980,000 800,000 (180,000) 16.2% 1,592,750 1,592,750 - 18.7% 958,333 1,050,000 91,667 66.9% 50,493 50,493 - N/A - 50 50 N/A - 50 50 17.0% 60,000 60,000 - 16.5% 17,950,714 17,839,481 (111,233) 13.6% 209,676 209,676 16.6% a) 16.5%&) 16.0%4) N/A 19.5% 19.7% 25.3% 23.4% 7.9% 11.0% 3.0% 16.6% 12,321,732 1,064,841 1,825,442 375,000 215,000 330,000 55,000 55,000 60,162 76,739 16,378,916 12,321,732 1,064,841 1,825,442 (11,032) 375,000 215,000 330,000 55,000 55,000 60,162 76,739 16,367,884 11,032 11,032 108,741 11.9% 915,000 915,000 4,103 41.0% 10,000 10,000 - - 0.0% 250 250 - 3,225 8.4% 38,310 38,310 - 116,068 12.0% 963,560 963,560 - Contracted Services 24,620 8.5% 289,004 289,004 _ Medication and Drugs 1, 133,641 8.9% 1,500,000 1,500,000 - Other 2,003 16.9% 11,876 11,876 - Total Pharmacy 1, 160,265 8.9% 1,800,880 1,800,880 - Total Expenditures 18, 025,358 L n/a _ 19,353,032 19,342,000 11,032 _ Change in Fund Balance (2, (56,019) (1,402,318) (1,502,519) (100,201) Beginning Fund Balance 14, ,967,822 102% $ 11,700,000 $11,967,822 267,822 Ending Fund Balance $ 17 911 803 $11 $ 10,2971682 $100465 302 $ 167,620 /o of x covered by Rev 86.2 0 98.1% 92.8% 92.2% k FY 2014 Contingency-$ 10,297,682. Page 16 FAIR AND EXPO CENTER Statement of Financial Operating Data Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date (17% of Year) FY 2014 % of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues Miscellaneous $ 4,102 $ - 0.0% $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - Vending Machines - - 0.0% 1,500 1,500 - Telephone Fees - Events 255 - n/a " - - - Special Events Revenues 383,339 35,214 8.9% 395,000 395,000 - Interest 76 148 N/A - - - Storage 35,283 - 0.0% 54,000 54,000 - Camping at F & E 16,700 - 0.0% 11,000 11,000 - Horse Stall Rental 48,036 1,440 4.8% 30,000 30,000 - Concession % - Food 139,006 3,808 2.5% 152,000 152,000 - Rights (Signage, etc.) 85,338 6,000 7.5% 80,000 80,000 - Interfund Rentals 2,400 400 16.7% 2,400 2,400 - Annual County Fair (net) 245,000 - 0.0% , sa) 250,000 185,000 (65,000) Interfund Contract 45,000 - n/a - - - Total Revenues 1,004,534 47,010 4.8% 980,900 915,900 (65,000) Expenditures: Personnel Services 821,293 146,227 16.5% . 887,593 887,593 - Materials and Services 580,396 38,593 8.0% 483,533 483,533 - Debt Service 114,117 - 0.0% 112,974 112,974 - Capital Outlay 9,000 - 0.0% 100 - 100 Total Expenditures 1,524,806 184,820 12.5% 1,484,200 1,484,100 100 Revenues less Expenditures (520,272) (137,809) (503,300) (568,200) (64,900) Transfers In General Fund 320,000 62,364 16.7% 374,186 374,186 - Room Tax - 6% 25,744 4,290 16.7% 25,744 25,744 - Room Tax - 1 % 82, 800 31,526 16.7% 189,156 189,156 - Fair & Expo Reserve 50,000 - 0.0% 100,000 100,000 - Total Transfers In 478,544 98,180 14.2% 689,086 689,086 - Change in Fund Balance (41,728) (39,629) 185,786 120,886 (64,900) Beginning Fund Balance 35,055 6,673 48,827 6,673 55,500 Ending Fund Balance 6,673 46 303 234,613 114,213 120,4 0 * FY 2014 Contingency-$ 234,613 a) Revenues and Expenses for the annual fair recorded in a separate fund and the available net income is transferred to the Fair & Expo Center Fund Page 17 H U W h O Poll o. a H a v U ~ o ~ a o o U a ~ o U U a~ a~ N .1 Deschutes County Bethlehem Inn (Fund 128) FY 2013-Actual; FY 2014-Year to Date Actual, Budget and Projection Through August 31, 2013 FY 2014 - Year to FY 2013 Date 0 7% of Year) FY 2014 of Actual Actual Budget ; Budget Projection $ Variance Revenues Grants - Private - - 0.0% 2,700,600 - (2,700,600) Lease Payments 24,408 4,068 16.7% 24,408 24,408 - Total Revenues 24,408 4,068 16.7% 2,725,008 24,408 (2,700,600) Expenditures Debt Service: Interest Expense 14,617 2,384 9.8% 24,408 16,000 8,408 Total Expenditures 14,617 2,384 9.8% 24,408 16,000 8,408 Change in Fund Balance 9,792 1,684 2,700,600 8,408 (2,692,192) Beginning Fund Balance 2,710,173 2,700,381 100.0% (2,700,600) (2,700,381) 219 Ending Fund Balance $ 2,700,381 $ 2,698,698 $ - $ (2,691,973) $ (2,691,9 a) Interest on August 2013 negative cash balance: $1,180.36. b) Inception through July 31, 2013: Revenues - Lease Payments $ 77,292 Expenditures: Land/Building (Amertitle) - July 2007 2,241,313 Hickman Williams 17,578 City of Bend - May 2008 250,000 KN EX CO 5,289 Kleinfelder 3,732 Total expended on facility 2,517,913 Interest on Negative Cash Balance 258,077 Total expended 2,775,990 Net $ (2,698,698) Deschutes County Jail Project (Fund 456) Phase II - Beginning July 1, 2012 Through August 31, 2013 Resources Interest Transfers In: General County Projects (142) General Capital Reserve (143) General Fund (001) Jamison Acq & Remodel (457) (Note 2) Bond Issuance, net Total Resources Expenditures Architect Engineering Environmental Surveying Consulting Building & Grounds Fees & Permits SDCs (water & sewer) Insurance Internal Service Fund Charges Miscellaneous Administrative Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment Construction - Expansion & Remodel Construction Contingency Total Expenditures Actual Through Project Budget August 31, (Note 1 2013 Committed Pro'ected Total Variance $ 26,157 $ 9,855 $ - $ 16,302 $ 26,157 - 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 - 1,250,000 1,250,000 - - 1,250,000 - 750,000 750,000 - - 750,000 - 540,939 540,939 - - 540,939 - 8,400,000 8,400,000 - - 8,400,000 - 11,067,096 11,050,794 - 16,302 11,067,096 - 820,000 662,515 151,885 5,600 820,000 - - 2,935 - - 2,935 (2,935) - 593 - - 593 (593) - 500 - - 500 (500) 35,000 - 13,332 21,668 35,000 - - 9,127 - - 9,127 (9,127) 130,000 8,432 - 121,568 130,000 - 180,000 - - 180,000 180,000 - 40,000 7,938 - 32,062 40,000 - 33,700 7,311 31,667 26,389 33,700 - 30,000 5,561 - 24,439 30,000 - 50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 - 9,448,396 - - 9,448,396 9,448,396 - 300,000 - - 286,846 286,846 13,154 11,067,096 704,911 196,884 10,196,968 11,067,096 (0) Net - 10,345,883 196,884 70,180,666 ~0) Note 1: The project includes the Jail expansion and a remodel for the Medical Unit Note 2: The resources remaining in the "Jamison Acqusition and Remodel Fund" were transferred to this Capital Project Fund M Q r C O m U) U m Q D m O D U C L •Q L. CL O Z U C i . „i. O v Q QOQ O TM O r O Q Q O Q O C? O N LO O O P- O O N O 1O h U7 d' I,- 417 ~ ti CS, D C_7QQQM O Q Q Q c tic! ONU)CD Q 1- 40 0 N O L0 ~ U7 r I r M O O r r Q Q LO ' O O O N N N 4n C) I-- V Q Q N Q 0 CO) r N i I i I i 0 M Q Q r r 0040 ' Q O Q N N Cq L6 : .4i O N 4O ~ M \►J tL r N y In O ~ U CL R Co o r r O C C NN C r C LL LL p N C (D W Z - j 5 Co o m " W o C 00.23 U) c- U) 'n Io LU at O 0 0 A Izm_3 wwF- SF- N N N 1 i CO (D tp T r ~ r QC~OCD M ti McD Q tD t- O Q N Q Q N I r N M oo cm C C f~ 0 0 ti Q N V ' T W U7 O r O CD (D N r M G tO NQMQN ti OCD OD to r M r N co IIrr co w I- -7 U7 cD t-: I 00 v Mco Cb QM OONQQ N rN M V) 7, O Q fl 0 C ' ti Q •M " CD O ' U7 Q T Q Q Q N ~ CM (D I N M N r- CD 00 co cM N (D OD r V-7 U7 (O M Q Q C M P- M Q C'7 d Lf) ('7 IT N I- N O r M ~r V N f- ' N V 1:2 OD Q N N ' T (0 CO r OD N N N in CD T r C> r C) r T- T v- C) CD N N N N co N IT CV) p- ce) Q ce) !R to M N M r ( 7 ~ t N N' NIrr It co C N N ' - T r (D r CD h N N O 10 r r co CD C) G) CD C) G) N L 0) E y co J-- O w U rn ~ tip C: cc ad O) O LL f Ql 0) Cl) 0 ('Z ~ U O O - , 'C a r 3 ~ OO Q~ C cC 0 O AO O r r A 0 O C O E -a U) a) C t - 0 75 0 O (0 N O N a f -(D, , O t 0 m 700 S l W v O) N O ~ > C y m c E O u C . L C O + IL ► x (O Q LU c LL D Imp J w U p Qt LU g U F- Z M r Q N Q r i Q r- Q N C ~ 7 r LL -0 O C i LL O C LL 0) ( U "O N - . ~ C O v ~ d ~ C 7+ Q (D 7 O -5 E CL O U m N (D W } 0 LL U Q1 C O E (p li O M y r N 0 ~ } ryl O LL U 0 7 N O L o 3 ~ T U- 3 Q N O r c: ¢ LL _ N C 0 LL 0 O C w U N (d (D (D I_- L w o O. 3 a L 0) a o a L6 F- C ~ Deschutes County Campus Improvement (Fund 463) Inception through August 31, 2013 RESOURCES: Transfer in (Note A) $ 796,617 Transfer in - General Fund 150,000 Oregon Judicial Dept Payment 12,750 Interest Revenue 7,322 Total Resources 966,689 EXPENDITURES: Basement Jail/Boiler Demolition .1131 168,105 Basement Public File View J82 141,862. 1st Floor Public File View 117,980 1st Floor Restrooms/Haslinger Court J84 401,231 1st Floor DeHoog Court/Jury Room JB5 55,623 Acct Area Open Workspace JB6 9,543 Courthouse DA Offices JOY ,34,348 Hearing Room Justice Building 2 JB8 37,809 "Stone Building" 720 Internal Service Fund Charges 5,177 Total Materials & Services 972,401 Net $ 5,713 Notes: A. Remaining proceeds from the FF&C borrowing for the OSP/911 Building _ M O N p r M C L in U .E C O Q cnU~ ~ O L 7 O D N ❑ ch C o W D nom' U 4) O a` O(DOCeD O N n 0 N 0CD CD co N O ~ O CD 0) Ln T cv to O (D O Ln N ONO O O O d C7 00 ";;r 0 r r I I I I 0 O co O LO N O N O It H ocDOVo o coo O er It ~r O co T r 3 m U c '0 N LL C N N W z c E O : ~ 3 C C7 Of (D o :3 c 0 o W d~ U) o WMLL 2 ~H51-` r- Q 0) CD CD C) M Q Q LO ~ r- r- c p ' O OOM CAO N N M N co iO N LO LO ~ Ul) 0) 04 ~ Cl) co 00 M CD N ~N N CDN Lf) M T' T O O ' m N f• f~ N N N 06 N LO ~ Cp t 1t7 LO T T 03 0) N C ~ N CF) N L T T ' T O O 4C) ' m N M M CG r CV CV (e] 00 Lf V I17 N co t0 u7 N d rn ~ U UU~ ea O a~i E a)~ °vH o od CL uj C U E CD 00) co Q) 76 ) ro e Ham' me'D a m~ oV O~ c cn o U ro LU ro L 5) c 2 N O 3 m .0 CL 0 (g H C H W ~Q WCL0 E LL a (D Z N C ' N Ical GlI '121 Q1Ii O r ego V ' ~ ee9 to el an- V 1w r 7+-p U ~ C eu a~ es rnx U env 0 f- d z N T LL C D LL N U N .O i a 010 U ~ (0 O ~ O O C Q U .v :3 0 O C Ch N N L L •3 ~ N r Q O N 4L L C C L ~ o ro ~ m ~ o U Q o c¢ (U L Deschutes County General Support Services - BOCC Conference/Seminar, Education/Training and Travel Expenditures County College Expenditures FY 2014 FY 2014 BOCC Conference & Travel Jul Aug Total Tammy Bane - - Conf/Sem & Educ/Training - 35 35 Travel Meals - - - Accommodations - - - - - Airfare Mileage reimbursement 478 478 Ground Transport/Parking - - - Total Baney - 513 513 Alan Unger Conf/Sem & Educ/Training Travel Meals Accommodations Airfare Mileage reimbursement Ground Transport/Parking Total Unger - Tonv DeBone 397 - 397 Conf/Sem & Educ/Training 520 - 520 Travel Meals - 82 82 Accommodations 618 164 781 Airfare 65$ 50 708 Mileage reimbursement - 105 105 Ground Transport - 74 74 Total DeBone 1,795 474 2,269 Total - BOCC Department Conf/Sem & Educ/Training 725 35 760 Travel Meals - 82 82 Accommodations 810 164 973 Airfare 658 50 708 Mileage Reimbursement - 583 583 Ground Transport - 74 74 Total - BOCC Department 2,192 987 _ 3,179 9/5/2013 VUBLI L AFFArRS C t~ 1i ta, 5 E L Deschutes County Legislative Report September 25, 2013 1:30pm -Allen Room 1-866-279-1568, *8678842* Special Session Update a. September 30, 2013 b. PERS/Taxes-Grand Bargain c. Columbia River Crossing II. 2013 Legislative Recap a. General Session Overview i. Budget- $16.9 Billion GF/LF b. Enacted - Deschutes County Priority 1 Support Legislation i. House Bill 3130- La Pine Stoplight c. Enacted - Deschutes County Priority 2 Support Legislation i. Education ii. County Administrative Issues iii. Public Safety Health Care/Public Health iv. Energy/Environment/Natural Resources III. Interim Activities Underway a. Interim Days i. November 20-22 ii. January 15-17 b. 2013 Legislatively Authorized and Statuary Task Forces i. List of Legislative Appointments IV. 2014 February Session Timelines/Process a. February Session i. Feb 3 - Opening Day ii. March 9th - Last Day iii. Total: 35 Days iv. 260 Bills b. Committee Bill Limits i. Chair 2 - Legislative Drafts ii. Vice-Chair- Legislative Drafts c. Member Bill Limits i. 2 - Legislative Drafts d. Committee Filing Timelines i. Committee Introductions by January 17, 2013 e. Member Bill Filing Guidelines i. Submit to LC by November 26, 2013 ii. Returned to Legislators by January 13, 2013 iii. Bills filed by January 21St will be Publically Available for Review V. 2014/15 Issues a. Health Care i. Implementation of the CCOs 1. Expansion of Mental Health ii. Health Insurance Exchange (Cover Oregon) iii. Task Force on the Future of Public Health Services (HB 2348) b. Education i. Early Learning Council Transition - Pilot Projects (HB 2013 and HB 3234) ii. Regional Educational Services Workgroup (HB 2013 and HB 3401) iii. Youth Development Council Transition c. Human Services/Housing i. Housing Transformation Transition Plan ii. Task Force on the Delivery of Human Services (SB 450) d. Public Safety/Judicial Branches i. Task force on Public Safety (HB 3194) ii. Department of Corrections Transition Programs iii. 911 Tax e. County Administration i. Task Force on Minority Language Voting Materials (HB 3506) 2 ii. Public Contracting (SB 805) f. Land Use/Water i. Water Storage/Water Grants - Implementation of SB 839 ii. Cyrus Heritage Ranch 1. Huffman Workgroup iii. EFU/AG Zoning Issues (SB 538) iv. DEQ Onsite Water Fees (SB 5520) VI. Deschutes County Department Updates a. Issues for PAC to Monitor Legislative Fiscal Office Ken Rocco 900 Court Street NE Legislative Fiscal Officer H-179 State Capitol Daron Hill Salem, Oregon 97301 Deputy Legislative Fiscal Officer 503-986-1828 Budget Information Brief / 2013-3 2013-15 Legislatively Adopted Budget General Fund/Lottery Funds - Summary The Oregon Legislature adopted a 2013-15 budget comprised of planned expenditures of $15.6 billion General Fund, $0.8 billion Lottery Funds, $26.6 billion Other Funds, and $16.8 billion Federal Funds. The total state budget for the 2013-15 biennium of $59.8 billion is a 4.6% increase from the 2011-13 legislatively approved budget, excluding Oregon University System Other Funds and Federal Funds which are no longer part of the state budget. After each session of the Legislature, the Legislative Fiscal Office (LFO) produces publications that summarize the overall state budget and that provide details on individual state agency adopted budgets. This process normally takes several weeks and is ultimately dependent upon Governor final actions on bills and the official close-of-session forecast. However, in light of public interest in details of the adopted budget, LFO has prepared this Budget Information Brief to provide preliminary data on the General Fund/Lottery Funds budget adopted for the 2013-15 biennium during the 2013 regular session of the Legislature. Additional detail will be provided in the next two months on this component of the budget as well as the total budget, including Other Funds and Federal Funds. The budget display on the page 3 shows the General Fund and Lottery Funds revenues and expenditures as approved during the 2013 regular session. The basic revenue numbers are representative of the May 2013 economic and revenue forecast. Lottery Funds are split between regular Lottery Funds and Measure 76 Lottery Funds; this is done since Measure 76 (M-76) Lottery Funds are dedicated to specific natural resource uses and cannot be used as flexibly as General Fund and regular Lottery Funds. The attached table is broken into three sections - resources, expenditures, and ending balances. Resources: • Resources are based on the May 2013 forecast, but are adjusted with beginning balance and agency specific interest earnings that are ultimately included in expenditures. • The General Fund resources from the forecast are adjusted by the estimated amount of interest costs for the use of Tax Anticipation Notes by the Treasury. • Lottery Funds are reduced by projected distributions for county economic development and transfers to the Education Stability Fund, which are not part of the adopted budget. • Additional resources approved by the Legislature during the session are identified including the legislation responsible for the resource change. LPgf lzt e F l office _ 1 3Og-2nl-3 • Includes the amount of additional tax credits beyond current law as approved by the Legislature. • Actual final resources will be officially presented in the close-of-session forecast in September. Expenditures are identified as approved in all budget actions taken by the Legislature during the 2013 regular session for the 2013-15 biennium. Ending Balances- • Regular ending balances include $150 million General Fund and $15 million Lottery Funds (another $3.9 million Lottery Funds represents specific agency cash flow needs). • The supplemental ending balance created due to uncertainty regarding the state's overall economic situation totals $154.9 million General Fund and $1.4 million Lottery Funds. • The Measure 76 Lottery Funds ending balance ($10.1 million) is for cash flow and debt service requirement of the Parks and Recreation Department. L~ i5lativE Fecal Offwc lily M1 5 2013-15 Legislatively Ad May 2019 Forecast Revenues BegmnnzR Balance .497-2 ~S 500 L.E =M-Fbalance Rainy bay fund bepostt (13° 3) I Carryforward_..__.. lb 7l 21.. { AcnCy n a ncd P us tntarst Interest Farnins _ LU 1 0 Prujret d Pevemies 15,485-7 R; 8 I a ; 16,541.6 TOW Resources 15,845 i 910.4 174,7 16930 _ ...c.._. . Anticipated Administrative. Actions (18.2). :ANSPMjcctcd imtemsl costs _.__T _ TotalAVailable Resources 15,82733 910,4 174,7 16,912.4 ; Dedicated DiS ributi t Lons ~~:Rts'\~COnOrinr Jleveloprucnt (33.5) - (338) .Adjustrd fox Rcgiona] Soluti ons bd,u:a*gnytabdrtyFurd (1$9.8). - t~b9.z~ Net Current Law Resources - 19 8..7 3 086.$ 174.7 - 16. 68g.^ Additional Resources , Emerl enc y FundwBal3nce su 4 Su 4 HP 5008 DOR Tax Amnesty Fiord 5.7 lib, 2322 nRc] ASSessmcr x Ucletral Loan Prp .............1 ^ ' - 1 ' I}M 2322 1;nvloymenr Department SEDAF 10 0 : n u IB P DAS Insurance Fund 10.0 U it Hid 2322 DOJ Protection and Education Fund 50 u FiB 232? e. R fees 4 n - 4 u llt 2322 L 1 (C Bottle surc'jarge. 143 - 14 t HB 2322 C n-•~Mate Tax ExrrrvinF 1 0 - " u 1T- '477 Tax Conrlrliance 1.0 - i 0 Jib 2464 Federal Tax Connc -tO7 (0 T - 1 - 11B 24J2 Offshore Cm eratlnn Tax E..... 15 11 _ .1 I& D -1-.111111111 H82460 Fire Insurance Premium Tax ~1-41 HB2084 170RCollections Pa_rage I 331: 585538 Cma nal Fines A ccounl 11B 256 ..m.".... .:.n' ° CharU^ Cents} Cn,vcmrrcn. ~ ~ _ UI (3.f1 HB2322 Total Additional Resnnrecs 135.E - - 139.' Tax C'redtts (53.2) l FM: Uu i NetRcs--8 - 15,913.7 6$6.8- 1 _ 174.7 16,175.1 - 2013.1] Ftpenditures b. Pro^rrrn arc. General Fund r ~ Lottery Funds Lo[lery - Funds-M76 Total GF/LF _m__... _ F-ducati m (All Exce r SSF P. ) 1,843 85.7 ! 197.9 7 State School Fund (SSr) 6 22 327.4 6,55U U - HtunanServices 4;>>h 105 42366 Pubhc Safety lu±l ' 6.9 20381 , 1... Judicial 63x.9 - - - - 638.9 . . Ttanspottariou 21 94 n 960 . EconOmcbweioPrnent 26.3 4-9 . 1]1 4atu e1 P.esnu , °s 10, 0 - 157.6 _ 330'c, ular lFu lonerv hood debt srnxce ~...R.....eg.. .........b Constnmr and Business Services 11- _ .A~nuu;7ainn 1'1;,n 1'.k - 1144 LcplalP:e Bruucn 88 U _ 155.1'. c ❑cr~l :'u._ _..S3n untlu~nl rlnV cngs...._ pose( In" 2011 1~ It udee ted FTpe nditures 15,605.8 666.5 164.6 161439.8 Supplemental Endin>; Balance.. ..154.9 res torcd to agencies in February 2014 Pm c[ed Rei;ularEndiq. _Salanrr . 150 0 18 9 ! 1 U 1 179.1 M76 OPRD crib flow/debt service - Int- r 51 SM i•TIP .nxt a..nnr~ m,d For additional information, contact: Legislative Fiscal Office, Ken Rocco, 503-986-1844 This brief is available on the Legislative Fiscal Office website at www.leg.state-or.us/comm/ifo Leg 5lafive ~rsral Office 3 - +uly 2{~ 13 77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2013 Regular Session Enrolled House Bill 3130 Sponsored by Representatives MCLANF., WHISNANT (at the request of Deschutes County) CHAPTER AN ACT Relating to allowable use of moneys in industrial development revolving funds of individual counties; amending ORS 275.318. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SEC'T'ION 1. ORS 275.318 is amended to read: 275.318. (1) When the governing body of a county sells or leases real property acquired in any manner by the county, if that property is located in an area planned and zoned for industrial use under an acknowledged comprehensive plan of the county, the governing body may order all the moneys paid to the county under the terms of the sale be deposited with the county treasurer and credited to a special fund created by the governing body and designated the Industrial Development Revolving Fund of the county. (2) The county treasurer shall disburse the moneys in the Industrial Development Revolving Fund of the county only upon the written order of the county governing body and only for the purposes set forth in subsection (3) of this section. (3) The governing body of a county may expend moneys in an Industrial Development Re- volving Fund created under this section [by a county governing body shall be expended] only for: (a) The engineering, improvement, rehabilitation, construction, operation or maintenance, in whole or in part, including the preproject planning costs, of any development project authorized by ORS 271.510 to 271.540 [and] or 280.500 that is located in the county and that could directly result in one of the following activities: [(a)] (A) Manufacturing or other industrial production; I(b)I (B) Agricultural development or food processing; [(c)] (C) Aquacultural development or seafood processing; 1(d)) (D) Development or improved utilization of natural resources; [(e)] (E) Operation of convention facilities [and] or trade centers; WA (F) Operation of transportation or freight facilities; and [(g)] (G) Other activities that represent new technology or types of economic enterprise the county governing body determines are needed to diversify the economic base of the county. (b) Construction of off-site transportation or utility infrastructure that is necessary or appropriate to serve the development project. (4) If moneys from the sale of county property located in an area planned and zoned for indus- trial use are not credited to the Industrial Development Revolving Fund of the county, those moneys shall be distributed as provided in ORS 275.275. Enrolled House Bill 3130 (HB 3130-A) Page 1 (5) The governing body of a county may sell, lease or convey the real property described in this section, including any part thereof or interest therein, at public or private sale, with or without advertisement, and do all acts necessary to the accomplishment of the sale, lease or conveyance. Passed by House March 27, 2013 Ramona J. Line, Chief' Clerk of House Tina Kotek, Speaker of House Passed by Senate May 20, 2013 Peter Courtney, President of Senate Received by Governor- M- 2013 Approved: M............................ 2013 John Kitzhaber, Governor Filed in Office of Secretary of State- - M - 2013 Kate Brown, Secretary of State Enrolled House Bill 3130 (HB 3130-A) Page 2 8 pUBLCC AFFAIRS C © p.t 5 DESCHUTES COUNTY SUPPORTED PRIORITY 2 BILLS Education/Youth Services House Bill 2013: The Early Learning Council (ELC), under the Oregon Education Investment Board (OEIB), was created through legislation in 2011. The Council guides efforts to "integrate and streamline" state programs for at-risk youth and ensures that children are prepared to learn when they enter kindergarten. Out of every 10 children in Oregon, at least four are not ready for kindergarten. Goals of the Oregon Early Childhood System include, and are not limited to: 1) the prevention of child abuse and neglect; 2) linking and integrating system programs and supports; and 3) parental braces in providing supportive environment for young children. HB 2013 directs the Early Learning Council (ELC) and Department of Education to assist school districts in implementing kindergarten readiness assessments for children and establishes a related grant program. Legislation requires standardized screening and referral services for voluntary statewide early learning system. Requires a permanent professional development and labor management committee be established for child care providers. Changes the program name for "Healthy Start Family Support Services" to "Healthy Families Oregon" and sets goal for program to target more than just first birth families and expands assessments to include children from zero to three years of age. HB 2013 directs the Oregon Health Authority and the ELC to develop performance metrics for prenatal care, delivery and infant care. Legislation instructs the Oregon Health Authority and the ELC to establish a grant program to support strategies that align voluntary statewide early learning systems and health systems to improve developmental outcomes for children from zero through three years of age. Requires preschool child with disability have comprehensive communication plan by the age of three years. Directs ELC to establish Early Learning Hub Demonstration projects, capping the number of projects at 7 in the first fiscal year of the 2013-15 biennium and at 16 in the second fiscal year. The bill appropriates an indeterminate amount of General Fund for demonstration projects. House Bill 2689: House Bill 2689-A establishes a streamlined, collaborative, project-based process, whereby public bodies may enter into agreements with youth job development organizations allowing youth participants (age 13 to 22) to work on public resource projects for job training, experience, or as part of an academic program. The measure also adds youth job development programs to the types of entities eligible to receive funding through the Career and Technical Education Revitalization Grant Program, in partnership with educational entities. Countv Administrative Issues House Bill 2140. ORS 293.728 establishes the Oregon Short Term Fund, a pool of state and local government funds, as the investment vehicle for funds not authorized for discrete investment. The State and Local Government Efficiency Task Force, established by House Bill 2855 in 2011, recommended allowing local governments the option to invest in the Intermediate Term Pool, a separate investment pool. The measure provides express legal authority for local governments (cities, counties, school districts, community colleges, and special districts) to invest in the Oregon Short Term Fund (OSTF) though the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP). The measure also allows local governments to invest in "...any other commingled investment pool established by the State Treasurer." For example, this would include the Oregon Intermediate Term Pool (OITP), which is a non-statutory account. By allowing local governments to invest in these additional Treasury products, the local governments would be able to invest amounts beyond the statutory limit provided by ORS 294.810. House Bill 2698: The Legislative Assembly created a pilot program with the passage of House Bill 3462 (2009) for the purposes of cross-training building inspectors so that an inspector could perform an inspection in more than one specialty code. These inspectors are referred to as specialized building inspectors. The pilot program, scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2016, was designed to address the shortage of building inspectors in some regions of the state, particularly in certain specialty codes. House Bill 2698-A eliminates the sunset date on the program to continue the training, qualification and certification of specialized building inspectors. Legislation clarifies the authority of the Director of Department of Consumer and Business Services to appoint building inspectors in multiple specialty codes. It allows the Director to appoint building inspectors to perform inspections throughout different geographic region. HB 2689 allows the Director to consider factors specific to geographic regions when determining qualifications of inspectors. It grants the Director the authority to initiate rules to promote clarity in state building code and in licensing requirements House Bill 2739: When a person registers to vote, updates voter registration information, or when the boundaries of a voter's precinct change, the county clerk is required to send to the voter a memorandum card of convenient size containing the name and residence address of the elector (person qualified to vote), the name or number of the precinct in which the elector resides, and a brief statement of the circumstances under which the elector is required to register or update a registration. House Bill 2739A renames the memorandum card to "voter notification card" and makes indicates that the county may, rather than shall, mail notification cards to voters when precinct changes occur. House Bill 2829: Existing law requires each county governing body to publish a monthly schedule of expenditures exceeding $500 and a statement of proceedings reflecting actions taken by the body at public meetings. Currently, such reports are required to be posted on bulletin boards at the county courthouse and in all public libraries in the county. In addition, notice advertising the availability of the posted information must be published in a general circulation newspaper in the county at least once each month. House Bill 2829 A adds the Internet as a posting location and notice method and allows 10 counties to use one or more of the specified posting locations and notice methods to comply with the law. Legislation allows a county to comply with posting requirements by publishing a monthly schedule of expenditures and county actions at county courthouse, library bulletin boards, or on Internet. SB 562: The Building Codes Division (BCD) of the Department of Consumer and Business Services provides code development, administration, inspection, plan review, licensing, and permit services to the construction industry. Staff located in five regions around the state partner with other state and local government entities to help facilitate local construction projects, and assist local governments with other services such as e-permitting, best practices, and dispute resolution. Local programs are required to submit a report every four years and apply for renewal every four years. When a local provider chooses or is unable to execute plan review or permit services, the BCD provides these services. Legislation allows DCBS, at request of affected municipalities, to enter into agreement, combine resources, and share fee revenue with local government for DCBS to assist local government to administer and enforce all or part of building inspection program for specified period or project. It directs DCBS to adopt rule that the Department will charge the same fees and hourly rate for services that were charged by county before assumption of services by Department if Department assumes administration and enforcement of county manufactured dwelling services, building inspection program or part of building inspection program when county abandons or is unable to administer programs due to budget constraints resulting from reduced or eliminated federal timber payments. Legislation authorizes the Director to take action necessary to ensure efficient and responsive state building code system, including utilizing and hiring municipal or Department personnel and expending resources for purposes of carrying out administrative and enforcement duties according to agreement. Public Safet House Bill 2234: Currently, Oregon has over 3,000 offenders under local control post-prison supervision. Offenders may be placed on inactive status when they comply with the terms and conditions of their supervision and require less intensive supervision. The offender's probation or parole officer may return an offender to active supervision if the officer finds it necessary to do so. Inactive supervision was included in House Bill 3508 from the 2010 session. This provision sunsets on July 1, 2013. Offenders are placed under local control after release from serving a sentence of 12 months or less in the local jail. House Bill 3508 allowed for offenders to be placed on inactive supervision status after serving half of his or her sentence. Legislation eliminates the sunset on provisions that allows offender on post-prison supervision to be placed on inactive status. House Bill 3194: In February of 2012, legislative leadership requested that the Governor continue the work done by the previous iteration of the Commission on Public Safety. In response, Governor Kitzhaber reconvened and reconstituted the Commission on Public Safety. After nearly six months of hearings (http://www.oregon.gov/CJC/Pages/2012ComPubSaf.aspx), the Commission issued a final report, which was the basis for discussions of the Joint Committee on Public Safety. 11 The measure impacts five areas of Oregon criminal law: 1) Sentencing; 2) Offender Incentives; 3) Offender Supervision; 4) Program Assessment; and 5) Correctional Resources. It reduces presumptive sentence for repeat offenders convicted of Identity Theft and Robbery III; eliminates prohibition on probation for offenders convicted of multiple drug offenses; modifies sentencing for marijuana offenses and driving while suspended or revoked; modifies crime of harassment. Increases maximum length of short-term transitional leave Department of Corrections (DOC) may grant; authorizes reduction in supervision term for certain offenders. Legislation authorizes supervisory authority to propose modifications to special conditions of probation. HB 3194 establishes Task Force on Public Safety. The bill directs the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission (OCJC) to collect best practices applicable to specialty courts. House Bill 3317: The current emergency communications tax is set to expire on January 1, 2014. There have been six sunset extensions of this tax since 1981. The tax rate is $0.75 cent per month per device capable of accessing 9-1-1 services, with the exception that federal, state, and local governments are tax exempt. The tax rate is set in statute and has been unchanged at $0.75 since 1995. The tax is collected by phone companies and wireless providers each month and then remitted to the Department of Revenue. The tax is used to pay for the Department of Revenue's collect costs (up to one half of one percent), the Military Department's - Office of Emergency Management program's administrative costs and 9-1-1 training conducted by the Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (up to 4%); and statewide equipment and circuit charges (3590. The remaining revenue is distributed primarily to cities and counties on a quarterly basis to fund over 45 Public Safety Answering Points across the state (60.5%). Funds are distributed on a per capita basis; however, each county must receive a minimum of one percent of the net account balance. HB 3317 extends sunset date for emergency communications tax from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2022. SB 93: Ajuvenile convicted of a Measure 11 offense is sentenced to the legal custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections, but placed in an Oregon Youth Authority facility. Most of these youth have difficulty readjusting to life outside the institution when released. Many do not have a place to live. Research shows that providing services, including housing, substantially reduce the chances of these youth re-offending. The cost savings associated with the reduction of recidivism is significantly greater than the costs of the re-entry program. Legislation allows the Oregon Department of Corrections to make grants to counties for the purposes of providing reentry services to youth under 19 years old. The bill establishes that the services may include transitional housing. Senate Bill 598: Public safety communications infrastructure has not kept pace with rapid advancements in communications technology generally, resulting in inconsistent ability to transmit information from a 9-1-1 caller's phone into the 9-1-1 reporting system. Ideally, an incoming 9-1-1 call should immediately and automatically transmit an accurate callback number and the specific location of the emergency, without undue reliance on conversation with a caller. When emergency responders are 12 delayed due to incomplete and/or inaccurate information, the consequences can be grave. Senate Bill 598A requires that certain multiline phone systems comply with requirements of the automatic location identification database accessed by public safety answering points, to provide immediate, accurate information to emergency responders. SB 598 requires operators to enable public safety answering points (PSAPs) to obtain street address and building name, at minimum, from automatic location identification database (ALID) for 9-1-1 calls. It exempts operators of key telephone systems, wireless telecommunications, and multiline systems serving single level, single tract structures of 10,000 square feet or less. Legislation requires diligent efforts by managers to ensure user awareness of 9-1-1 call procedure and requires operators to arrange ALID update upon installation of new phone system to enable PSAPs to obtain 9-1-1 caller address and callback number. Health Care/Public Health House Bill 2348: The Oregon public health system is comprised of state, federal and local agencies, private organizations and other partners working together to protect and promote the health of Oregonians. The Oregon Health Authority asserts that a strong public health system is necessary to achieve better health outcomes at lower costs and to continue the transformation of health care delivery. House Bill 2348-A creates a task force to study the future of public health in Oregon. The task force is directed to develop recommendations for legislation to continue providing public health services efficiently and effectively and to submit a final report before the 2016 regular session of the Legislative Assembly. It requires task force report to interim committee no later than October 1, 2014. SB 132: According to the Oregon Public Health Division, for the last decade, Oregon's non-medical exemption to the school immunization rate for kindergartners has increased from less than 2 percent in 2001 to 5.8 percent in 2012. In some counties, the rate of non-medical exemption is as high as 12 percent. Oregon has the highest non-medical exemption rate for one or more immunizations in the United States, and some Oregon schools have an exemption rate as high as 70 percent. Senate Bill 132-A requires parents to sign a document declining immunizations on behalf of the child. The document may include reasoning for declining the immunizations, such as for religious or philosophical belief. The document must include a signature from a health care practitioner verifying that the parent has reviewed information about the risks and benefits of immunization or include certification verifying that the parent has completed an online educational video approved by the Oregon Health Authority. SB 436: Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs) have been directed by the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) to reduce the health care cost curve by 1 percent next year and 2 percent per year over the following 3 years. Many of the efforts to achieve these savings will be focusing on individuals who over- utilize emergency rooms, and/or adults with serious chronic or mental health conditions. Supporters assert that many prevention programs and children's health programs have been in place for a long time 13 and have a proven record of success, and are concerned that these programs will not be a focus of the CCOs in many areas. SB 436 requires coordinated care organization (CCO) and community advisory council to adopt health improvement plan. The bill specifies that strategies are to be included in plan. Legislation authorizes Oregon Health Authority (OHA) provide incentive grants, and directs CCOs submit report to OHA, and OHA to compile information and present to Legislative Assembly by December 31, 2014. Energy/Environment/Natural Resources 5B 839: The Subcommittee recommended appropriated $30,000 General Fund to the Water Resources Department (WRD). Senate Bill 839-B establishes a Water Supply Development Account and sets expectations for making loans and grants from the account. It also makes a one-time appropriation of $30,000 General Fund to support two task forces established by the bill. The $30,000 General Fund appropriation will pay for the actual and necessary travel and other expenses of task force members. The major provisions of the bill are as follows: It establishes the Water Supply Development Account which is continuously appropriated to the Water Resources Department (WRD). WRD will operate the Water Development Supply program and is charged with evaluating applications for loans and grants and for recommending project funding. The Water Resources Commission is directed to adopt rules as well as set operative and repeal dates for certain sections in the measure by January 1, 2015. Costs associated with rule making are assumed to be absorbable within the parameters of the agency's legislatively adopted budget. A technical review team to score and rank projects will include: Department of Agriculture, Business Development Department (Business Oregon), Department of Environmental Quality and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. These agencies will absorb the workload within their regular budgets. Lottery-backed bonds have been requested in Senate Bill 5533 to provide $10 million for which the agency anticipates utilizing to carry out the capital grant and loan provisions of the bill. 14 Public Affairs Counsel From: Capitol Club <oregoncapitolclub@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 10:13 AM To: Public Affairs Counsel Subject: Senate Rule Amendments, Interim Calendar, Draft Concurrent Resolution Attachments: Proposed Senate Rule Revisions-2013 Sine Die.pdf; ATT00001.htm; Interim Calendar.pdf; ATT00002.htm; Draft Concurrent Resolution.pdf; ATT00003.htm Dear Capitol Club Members: Attached are the proposed amendments to the Senate Rules before we sine die. These are the amendments circulated with each caucus earlier today. Under SR 2.05, we will also place a copy at the Senate floor desk and the Reading Clerk will read the proposed amendments this afternoon. The rules can then be voted on tomorrow. Also attached is the Interim Calendar and Draft Concurrent Resolution circulated earlier. In summary: Fact-Finding Missions: SR 14.15 establishes a procedure to officially approve fact-finding missions by Senators paid for by outside groups. An application would be submitted to the Secretary of the Senate along with an itinerary for the trip and a written opinion from the Ethics Commission approving the trip. After the trip, the trip's organizer would then confirm who participated in the trip, the actual expenses, and the activities on the trip. Approved applications and the follow-up documentation will be posted on the Secretary of the Senate's website. Any reporting requirements with the Ethics Commission continue to apply. For a frame of reference, we used this process for the Wallowa County Tour earlier this session by Sen. Hansell and Sen. Dingfelder. 2. Updated Budget: SR 15.20 is updated to reflect members' budgets for the Interim and Short Session. 3. Updated Bill Limits: SIR 213.20(2) reflects that interim committees will have three measure drafting requests. The chair is allocated two requests and the chair and vice-chair in agreement are allocated one request. Members will have two drafts each under the Concurrent Resolution to be adopted. 4. Deadline for Interim Committees to Vote: SIR 213.20(4) sets January 17, 2014, as the deadline for interim committees to vote on measure introductions. This is the last day of the January 2014 Legislative Days. 5. Deadline to Drop Bills & Procedure for Confidentiality: The Concurrent Resolution to be adopted will set November 26, 2013, as the deadline to submit drafting requests to Counsel. The Resolution then requires Legislative Counsel to return your drafts by January 13, 2014. The Resolution then sets January 21ST as the deadline to file measures with the Secretary of the Senate. Senate Interim 213.20(5) then provides that all measures filed by January 21, 2014, will not be confidential and will be released publicly before the Short Session. This will allow staff and the public to review the bills before the Short Session and will give your bill the best chance of success in the session. If you would prefer to keep you bill confidential until session, then you may file the bill after January 2151 and no later than February 3, 2014. Those bills will be kept confidential until February 3rd, when they will be processed in the regular course for First Reading. 6. Legislative Days: The attached calendar also shows important dates in the interim. Notably, Legislative Days are scheduled for: a. September 16-18, 2013. 1 15 b. November 20-22, 2013, c. January 15-17, 2014. d. May 28-30, 2014. If you have any questions, please let me know. Jolene Bynum Capitol Club, Lobby Message Center 900 Court St. NE, 60-G Salem, OR 97301 oregoncapitolclub.org P: 503-378-9800 2 16 77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2013 Regular Session Enrolled House Concurrent Resolution 37 Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON RULES Be It Resolved by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon: (1) This resolution constitutes a rule of proceeding of the Senate and the Clouse of Represen- tatives of the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly. (2) The Senate and the House of Representatives agree to the following limitations for the 2014 regular session: (a) Each Senator and each Representative may request the Office of the Legislative Counsel to prepare, and may submit for introduction, no more than two drafts of measures. (b) Each interim committee of the Senate and each interim committee of the House of Repre- sentatives may request the Office of the Legislative Counsel to prepare, and may submit for intro- duction, no more than three drafts of measures. (c) The Governor may request the Office of the Legislative Cou?lsel to prepare, and may submit for introduction, no more than live drafts of measures on behalf of the executive branch of state government. (d) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court may request the Office of the Legislative Counsel to prepare, and may submit for introduction, no more than five drafts of measures on behalf of the judicial branch of state government. (3) The limitations on introduction of measures in subsection (2) of this resolution do not apply to: (a) The Joint Committee on Ways and Means, with respect to appropriation or fiscal measures; (b) Measures requested and approved for introduction by the President of' the Senate; or (c) Measures requested and approved for introduction by the House Committee on Rules, (4) All requests to prepare drafts of measures must be accompanied by a brief summary of the problem sought to be addressed, the proposed solution to the problem and any other relevant infor- mation about the proposed measure. (5) The Senate and the IIouse of Representatives shall adhere to the following schedule and deadlines for the 2014 regular session of the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly: (a) Members, committees, the Governor and the Chief Justice shall submit requests for drafts of measures to the Office of the Legislative Counsel on or before 5 p.m. on November 26, 2013. (b) The Office of the Legislative Counsel shall deliver drafts of measures to requesters on or before 5 p.m. on January 13, 2014. (c) Requesters shall submit drafts of measures for introduction to the Senate Desk or the House Desk no later than 5 p.m. an January 21, 2014. (6) The President of the Senate, the House Committee on Rules and the Joint Committee on Ways and Means are not subject to the deadlines described in subsection (5) of this resolution. (7) The rules of the Senate and the House of Representatives apply to matters not specified in this resolution. Enrolled House Concurrent Resolution 27 (HCR 87-INTRO) Page 1 17 Adopted by IIouae July 7, 2013 Ramona J. Line, Chief Clerk of House Tina Kotek, Speaker of House Adopted by Senate July 8, 2013 Peter Courtney, President of Senate Enrolled Housp Concurrent Raw1ution 37 (FICR 37-INTRO) Page 2 18 2013 SENATE I.N`I`FRTM COMMITTEES Business and 'Frans s tation Joint Ways & Means committee (Senatemember~ ) Sen. Lee Beyer, Chair Sen. Richard Devlin, Co-Chair Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice Chair Sen. Betsy Johnson, Co-Vice Chair Sen. Chris Edwards Sen. Alan Bates Sen. Rod Munroe Sen. Chris Edwards Sen. Chuck Thomsen Sen, 1'ili7,ahcth Steiner Ilayward Sen. Fred Girod Sen. Rod Monroe Sen, Jackie Winters Lducation and Workforce Dc clo me Sen, Fred Girod Sen. Mark Hass, Chair Sen. Doug Whitsett Sen. Tim Knepp, Vice Chair Sen. Chuck Thomsen Sen. Lee Beyer Seri. Bill Harlsell Sen. Arnie Roblan Sen. Jeff Kruse Capital Construction Sub-Committee Sen. Fred Girod, Co-Chair Enyir.onmcnt ai d Natural Resources Sen. Richard Devlin Sen. Jackie Dingfcidcr, Chair Sen. Peter Courtney Sen. Alan Olsen, Vice Chair Sen. Mark Hass Education Sub-Committee Sen. Alan Bates Sen, Rod Monroe, Co- liair Seri, Bill llansell Sen. Chris Edwards Sen. Fred Oirod Finance and R v nue Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair General Government Sub-Committee Sen. Larry George, Vice Chair Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, Co-Chair Sen. Mark Hass Sen, Betsy Johnson Sera Diane Rosenbaum Sen. Doug Whitsett Sen. Herrnan AaertsGhiger Alman Services Sub-Committee Genera Government, Consumer Sen. Alan Bates, Co-Chair Sma1l.Busines rotection And Scri. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward _ Sen. Chip Shields, Chair Sen. Jackie Winters Sen. Larry George, Vice Chair Sell. Laurie Mormes Anderson Natural. Rc5purces Sub-Committee. Sen. Floyd Prozanski Sen. Chris Edwards, Co-Chair Sen. Herman Baer schigei Sen. Jackie Dingfelder Sen. Chuck Thomsen I Iealth Care and Human Services Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Chair Public S fety S b-Commi " Sen. Jeff Kruse, Vice Chair Sen. Jackie Winters, Co-Chair Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward Sen, Richard Devlin Sen. Chip Shields Sen. Doug Whitsett Sen. I'im Knopp franSOOrtatiOn and Economic Judiciary Development iuL-Larnmittee Sen. Floyd Prozanski, Chair Sen. Betsy Johnson, Co-Chair Sen. Betsy Close, Vice Chair Sen. Chip Shields Sen. Jackie Din~fcldcr Sen. Bill Hansell Sen, Arnie Rublan Sen. Jet'l' Kruse Public Education Appropriation (Senate membership) Sen, Rod Monroe, Co-Chair Rules Sen. Mark Hass T Sen. Diane Rosenbaum, Chair Sen. Fred Girod Sen, Ted Ferrioli, Vice Chair Sen. Ginny Burdick Legislative Audits, hdbnnalion Management Scn. i.ce Beyer And Tyuliaology (Senate membership) Sen. Bruce Starr Sen. Richard Devlin, Cu-Chair Sen. Lee Beyer Veterans and Emer criC Preparedness Sen. Alan Olsen Sen. Brian Boquist, Chair Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Vice Chair Legislative Administration (Senate mcrnbcrship) Sen. Peter Courtney Scn. PcICr Courtney, Co-Chair Sen. Alan Olsen Sen. Betsy Johnson Sen. Diane Rosenbaum Rural Communities and Economic Development Sep. Ted Ferrioli Sen. Arnie Roblan, Chair Sen. Bruce Starr Sen. Heenan Bacrtschirv.(, Vice Chair Sen. Fred Girod Sen. Ginny Burdick Sen. Lee Beyer (alternate) Sen. Floyd Prozanski Sen. Betsv Close Lugislarivc Counsel (Syrmtu membership) Sen. Peter Courtney, Co-Chair C'onduLl Sen. Floyd Prozanski Sen. Floyd Prozanski, Chair Sen. Ginny Burdick Sen. Jackie Winters, Vice Chair Sen. Tell Fe:niuli Sen. Ginny Burdick Sen. Brian Boquist Sen. Bill Hansel] 19 2013 Interim House Committees Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee Brad Witt, Chair Caddy McKeown, Vice Chair Sal Esquivel, Vice Chair Brian Clem Wayne Krieger Jeff Reardon Jim Thompson Ben Unger Gail Whitsett Business and Labor Committee Margaret Doherty, Chair Brent Barton, Vice Chair Bill Kennemer, Vice Chair Sheniia Fagan Tim Freeman Paul Holvey Greg Matthews Kim Thatcher Jim Thompson Jim Weidner Brad Witt Consumer Protection and Government Efficiency Committee Paul Holvey, Chair John Lively, Vice Chair Dennis Richardson, Vice Chair Margaret Doherty Mark Johnson Alissa Keny-Guyer Greg Smith Kim Thatcher Jessica Vega Pederson Education Committee Sara Geiser, Chair Jeff Reardon, Vice Chair Sherrie Sprenger, Vice Chair Shemia Fagan David Gomberg Chris Gorsek John Huffman Julie Parrish Gene Whisnant Energy and Environment Committee Jules Bailey, Chair Deborah Boone, Vice Chair Mark Johnson, Vice Chair Cliff Bentz Michael Dembrow Jeff Reardon Jim Weidner Gail Whitsett Jessica Vega Pederson Health Care Committee Mitch Greenlick, Chair A] issa Keny-Guyer, Vice Chair Jim Thompson, Vice Chair Brian Clem Jason Conger Chris Harker Bill Kennemer John Lively Jim Weidner Human Services and Housing Committee Carolyn Tomei, Chair David Gomberg, Vice Chair Andy Olson, Vice ('hair Joe Gallegos Sara. Geiser Vic Gilliam Alissa Keny-Guyer Gene Whisnant Gail Whitsett Higher Education and Workforce Development Committee Michael Dembrow, Chair Chris Harker, Vice Chair John Huffman, Vice Chair Vic Gilliam Joe Gallegos Chris Gorsek Mitch Greenlick Mark Johnson Gene Whisnant 20 Judiciary Committee Rural Communities Committee Jeff Barker, Chair Brian Clcm, Chair Chris Garrett, Vice Chair Lew Frederick, Vice Chair Wayne Krieger, Vice Chair Kevin Cameron, Vice Chair Brent Barton John Davis Kevin Cameron Paul Holvey Wally Hicks Kim Thatcher Andy Olson Ben Unger Carolyn Tomei Jennifer Williamson Transportation and Lconomic Development Committee Revenue Committee Tobias Read, Chair Phil Barnhart, Chair Chris Gorsek, Vice Chair Jules Bailey, Vice Chair Cliff Bentz, Vice Chair Vicki Berger, Vice Chair Kevin Cameron Cliff Bentz John Davis Jason Conger Margaret Doherty John Davis John Lively Sara Gelser Caddy McKeown Tobias Read Nancy Nathanson Jessica Vega Pederson Julie Parrish Mules Committee Veterans and Emergency Preparedness Committee Chris Garrett, Chair Greg Matthews, Chair Val Hoyle, Vice Chair 5hemia Fagan, Vice Chair Wally Hicks, Vice Chair Julie Parrish, Vice Chair Phil Barnhart Deborah Boone Vicki Berger Sal Esquivel Michael Dembrow John Huffman Bob Jenson Brad Witt Paul Holvey Bill Kennemcr Task Force on Small Business Brent Barton, Co-Chair Tim Freeman, Co-Chair Cliff Bentz David Gomberg Caddy McKeown Kim 'Thatcher Legislative Conduct Committee Carolyn Tomei, Chair Phil Barnhart Vicki Berger Bob Jenson 21 2013 Interim Joint Committees Joint Ways & Means Committee Peter Buckley, Co-Chair Nancy Nathanson, Vice Chair Dennis Richardson, Vice Chair Jeff Barker Lew Frederick Tim Freeman Bruce Hanna John Huffman Bob Jenson Betty Komp Mike McLane Tobias Read Greg Smith Carolyn Tomei Jennifer Williamson Capital Construction Subcommittee Tina Kotek, Co-Chair Val Floyle John I luffrnan Nancy Nathanson Greg Smith Education Subcommittee Betty Komp, Co-Chair Lew Frederick Sherrie Sprenger General Government Subcommittee Greg Smith, Co-Chair David Gomberg Nancy Nathanson Health Human Services Subcommittee Nancy Nathanson, Co-Chair Tim Freeman Joe Gallegos Natural Resources Subcommittee Ben Linger, Co-Chair Jules Bailey Bruce Hanna Public Safety Subcommittee Jennifer Williamson, Co-Chair Jeff Barker Bruce Hanna Transportation and Economic Development Subcommittee Bob Jenson, Co-Chair Caddy McKeown Tobias Read Joint Legislative Audits and Information Technology Committee Chris Harker, Co-Chair Kim Thatcher Jessica Vega Pedersen Joint Public Education Appropriation Committee Betty Komp, Co-Chair Lew Frederick Sherrie Sprenger Joint Legislative Administration Committee Tina Kotek, Co-Chair Vicki Berger Chris Garrett Val Hoyle Mike McLane Nancy Nathanson Greg Smith Joint Legislative Counsel Committee Tina Kotek, Co-Chair Brent Barton Cliff' Bentz Chris Garrett Denis Richardson 22 x . 41 h: Office of the Senate President MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Taylor, Secretary of the Senate FROM: Peter Courtney, President of the Senate DATE: August 19, 2013 RE: Appointments to Interim Task Forces and Work Groups F..tfective immediately, I am making the following appointments: Elder Abuse Work Group (House Bill 2205, 2013) Senator Tim Knopp Senator Arnic Roblan Task Force on School Funding (House Bill 2506, 2013) Senator Richard Devlin Senator Fred Girod Task Force on Primary and Mental Health Care Reimbursement (House Bill 2902, 2013) Senator Tim Knopp Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson Task Force on Community College Child Care Services (House Bill 3149, 2013) Senator Rod Monroe Justice Reinvestment Grant Review Committee (House Bill 3194, 2013) Senator Floyd Prozanski Senator Jackie Winters Task Force on Public Safety (House Bill 3194, 2013) Senator Floyd Prozanski Senator Jackie Winters Regional Education Services Work Group (House Bill 3401, 2013) Senator Lee Beyer Senator Jeff Kruse 900 Court St NES-203, Salem, Oregon. 97301 * (503) 98(-1600 vwse * (503) 986-1004 fox * sen.petercnurtne)~0qstate.or.us 23 Task Force on Minority Language Voting Materials (House hill 3506, 2013) Senator Diane Rosenbaum Department of Human Services Planning Committee (Senate Bill 21, 2013) Senator Jeff Kruse Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson Shipping Transport of Aquatic Invasive Species Task Force (Senate Bill 116, 2013) Senator Jackie Dingfelder Accelerated Learning Committee (Senate Bill 222, 2013) Senator Mark Hass Senator Bruce Starr Task Force on the Delivery of Human Services (Senate Bill 450, 2013) Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward Senator Jackie Winters Task Force on Resolution of Adverse Health Care Incidents (Senate Bill 483, 2013) Senator Jeff Kruse Senator Floyd Prozanski Task Force on Capital Construction Budget Process (Senate Bill 551, 2013) Senator Fred Girod Task Force on State Budget Process (Senate Bill 552, 2013) Senator Doug Whitsett Work Group on Corrections Health Care Costs (Senate Bill 843, 2013) Senator Alan Bates Senator Jackie Winters (as recommended by Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli) If you have any questions, please contact my office at (503) 986-1600. m State Senators Speaker of the 4louse Senate Democratic office Senate Republican Office House Democratic OfGcc House Republican Office Legislative Administration Committee SCrvices L.eglslalive Counsel Legislative Fiscal Legislative Revenue Governor's office 24 Tina Kotek 900 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301 - Oregon Legislative Assembly MEMORANDUM TO. Ramona Kenady Line, Chief Clerk of the House FROM: Tina Kotek, Speaker of the House -"~7c~ RE: Appointments to Statutory Task Forces and Committees DATE: August 16, 201'3 Effective immediately, I am making appointments to the following task forces and committees created by legislation passed in the 2013 session: Department of Human Services Planning Committee (SB 21, Chapter 590 2013 Laws) Representative John Davis Representative Nancy Nathanson Asset Forfeiture Oversight Committee (SB 27, Chapter 9 2013 Laws) Representative Jeff Barker Representative Andy Olson Task Force on Resilience Plan Implementation (SB 33, Chapter 512 2013 Laws) Representative Deborah Boone Representative Jim Weidner Shipping Transport of Aquatic Invasive Species Task Force (SB 116, Chapter 594 2013 Laws) Representative Caddy McKeown Special Committee on University Governance and Operations (SB 270) Representative Peter Buckley Representative Michael Dembrow Representative Greg Smith Representative Gail Whitsett Task Force on the Delivery of Human Services (SB 450, Chapter 599 2013 Laws) Representative Tim Freeman Representative Carolyn Tomei 25 Task Force on Resolution of Adverse Health Care Incidents (SB 483, Chapter 5 2013 Laws) Representative Chris Garrett Representative Wally Hicks Task Force on Capitol Construction Budget Process (SB 551, Chapter 716 2013 Laws) Representative Greg Smith 't'ask Force on State Budget Process (SB 552, Chapter 601 2013 Laws) Representative Bob Jenson Task Force on Apprenticeship in State Contracting (SB 782, Chapter 606 2013 Laws) Representative Michael Dembrow (Co-Chair) Representative Mark Johnson Work Group on Corrections Health Care Costs (SB 843, Chapter 538 2013 Laws) Representative Kevin Cameron Representative Jennifer Williamson Oregon Elder Abuse Work Group (HB 2205, Chapter 352 2013 Laws) Representative Vic Gilliam Representative Val Hoyle Oregon Innovation in Infrastructure Task Force (1113 2345, Chapter 621 2013 Laws) Representative Cliff Bentz Represcntative Tobias Read Task Force on the Future of Public Health Services (HB 2348, Chapter 609 2013 Oregon Laws) Representative Jason Conger Representative Mitch Greenlick Task Force on School Funding (HB 2506, Chapter 577 2013 Laws) Representative Betty Komp Representative Sherrie Sprenger Task Force on Procuring Through Small and Local Businesses (HB 2667) Representative David Gomberg Representative Kim Thatcher Task Force on High School Transition Success for Students with Disabilities (HB 2743, Chapter 654 2013 Laws) Representative Sara Geiser Representative Sherrie Sprenger Task Force on Individual Responsibility and Health Engagement (HB 2859) Representative Alissa Keny Guyer Representative Jim Thompson Task Force on Primary and Mental Health Care Reimbursement (HB 2902, Chapter 4310 2013 Laws) Representative John Lively Representative Julie Parrish 26 Task Force on Community College Child Care Services (HB 3149, Chapter 586 2013 Laws) Representative Chris GOTSek Justice Reinvestment Grant Review Committee (HB 3194, Chapter 649 2013 Laws) Representative Wayne Krieger Representative Jennifer Williamson Task Force on Public Safety (HB 3194, Chapter 649 2013 Laws) Representative Chris Garrett Representative Andy Olson Work Group on Regional Educational Delivery Systems (HB 3401) Representative Nancy Nathanson Representative Gene Whisnant Task Force on Minority Language Voting Materials (HB 3506) Representative Joe Gallegos Accelerated Learning Committee (SB 222) Representative Lew Frederick Representative John Huffman If you have any questions please contact Tim Inman in my office (503-986-1200). cc: House Speaker Office House Majority Leader House Republican Leader Senate President's Office Senate Majority Leader Senate Republican Leader State Representatives State Senators Governor's Office Treasurer's Office Legislative Administration Committee Services Legislative Counsel Legislative Fiscal Legislative Revenue 27 Office of the Senate President MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Taylor, Secretary of the Senate FROM: Peter Courtney, President of the Senate DATE: August 26, 2013 RE: Appointments to Interim Task Forces and the Special Committee on University Governance and Operations Effective immediately, I am making the following appointments: Oregon Innovation in Infrastructure Task Force (House Bill 2345, 2013) Senator Lee Beyer Senator Bill Hansel]. Task Force on the Future of Public Health Services (House Bill 2348, 2013) Senator Bill Hansell Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson Task Force on Procuring Through Small and Local Businesses (House Bill 2667, 2013) Senator Herman Bacrtschiger Senator Chip Shields Task Force on High School and Transition Success for Students with Disabilities (House Bill 2743, 2013) Senator Betsy Close Senator Chris Edwards Task Force on Individual Responsibility and Health Engagement (House Bill 2859, 2013) Senator Brian Boquist Senator Betsy Johnson Task Force on Resilience Plan Implementation (Senate Bill 33, 2013) Senator Alan Olsen Senator Arnie Roblan 900 Court SINES-203, Salem, Oregon, 97.301 * (503) 986-1600 voice * (503) 986-1004fiix * sen.petercouriney(a.ctote.or.uc 28 Special Committee on University Governance and Operations (Senate Bill 270, 2013) Senator Peter Courtney Senator Richard Devlin Senator Fred Girod Senator Bill Hansell Task Force on Apprenticeship in State Contracting (Senate Bill 782, 2013) Senator Chip Shields Senator Chuck Thomsen if you have any questions, please contact my office at (503) 986-1600. cc: State Senators Speaker of the House Senate Democratic Office Senate Republican Office House Democratic Office House Republican Office Legislative Administration Committee Services Legislative Counsel Legislative Fiscal Legislative Revenue Governor's Office 29 20 1 FACT SHEET 2014: Opening the Oregon Health Plan to more people What is happening In January 2014, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) will be available to more low-income adults. Many of these adults are uninsured and work part time or in low-wage jobs without access to health insurance. People can begin applying for 2014 coverage in October, 2013. What it means More low-income Oregonians will have access to health care coverage, providing them better access to care and more financial stability. Medical debt to providers will be reduced. 1. No more waiting list for the Oregon Health Plan. 2. Income limits are changing. Today the income limit to qualify for the Oregon Health Plan is very low. A person's income must be at or below 100 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) to qualify, Starting in January, coverage will be available to people who earn up to 138 percent of FPL. That's about $1.5,800 a year for a single person or $32,500 a year for a family of four. Why this is happening This is happening because Oregon is opening the Oregon Health Plan to more people, as allowed under the federal health care law. For all types of coverage: Cover Oregon is one-stop shop cover Oregon is an online marketplace where Oregonians can apply for health coverage. Beginning in October 2013, anyone regardless of income can apply online at www.coveroreon.com. Cover Oregon will include the Oregon Health Plan, Healthy Kids and private insurance plans that begin in January 2014. Paper applications will be available in multiple languages, and community partners will be available to help people with the application if needed. Help is also available by calling 1-S55- CoverOR (1-855-268-3767) or at all Department of Human Services offices. www.health.oregon.gov 30 Fast-track enrollment If eligibility screening for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program shows that adult SNAP recipients are under the income limit and meet residency requirements, they quality for fast-track enrollment for the Oregon Health Plan. Parents with children currently enrolled in the Healthy Kids Plan meeting eligibility requirements will also qualify for fast-track enrollment. The Oregon Health Authority will contact them directly to let them know how to enroll. They do not have to go through Cover Oregon or a paper application process. Coordinated care - the Oregon difference In Oregon we have taken a bi-partisan approach to improve the health care system. Most people on the Oregon Health Plan are served by a local coordinated care organization. These organizations bring together all aspects of care: doctors, hospitals, dental care, mental health care and public health. Coordinated care organizations work for better health, better care and lower costs by focusing on prevention, chronic disease management, earlier interventions, and reduction of waste and inefficiency in the health system. Improved care Coordinated care organizations are required to meet quality standards or "metrics" that are posted publicly four times a year. The Oregon Health Authority uses these metrics to assess CCOs on how well they are doing in key areas such as access to care, prevention and health screenings, mental health care, and many other metrics. Cost containment under an innovative agreement with the federal government, Oregon will reduce waste and inefficiency in health care and create a more sustainable system. This will allow us to hold down per capita costs while providing better care. Financial assistance to pay for health care coverage For people who earn too much for the Oregon Health Plan, there may be assistance paying for health insurance through Cover Oregon. Go to www.coveroregon.com to learn what options are available. 31 Page 1 of 3 'rith OREGON LEGISLATWE ASSF.MELY_2013 Regala Session Enrolled House Bill 2348 Sponsored by Representative GREENLICK, Senator STEINER HAYWARD (Presession Wed.) CHAPTER........ AN ACT Relating to regional public health autboriries; and declaring an emergency. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SECTION 1. (1) The Task Force on the Future of Public Health Services is established, consisting of 1.5 members appointed as follows: (a) The President of the Senate shall appoint from among members of the Senate one member from the majority party and one member from the minority party. (b) The Speaker of the House of Representatives shall appoint from among members of the House of Representatives one member from the majority party and one member ,from the minority party. (c) l7he Governor shall appoint: (A) One member who is a county commissioner; (11) Two members who are county public health officials; (C) One member with expertise and experience in locx+l health care; (1D) Two moinbers who represent loeal nonprofit entities that regularly work with public health departments; and (E) One member who is an academic professional specializing in public health. (d) The Director of the Oregon Health Authority shall appoint three at large members. (e) The Director of Human Services shall appoint one at large member. (2)(a) The task force shall study the regionalization and consolidation of public health services and the future of public health services in this state in order to make recommen- dations for legislation, (b) The task force shall focus on recommendations that., (A) Create a public health system for the fntar e. (II) Frpiore the creation of regional structures to provide public health services that are consistent with the distribution of population and established patterns of delivery of health rare services. (C) Enhance efficiency and effertivAness in the provision of public health services. (D) Allow for appropriate partnerships with regional health care service providers and. community organizations. (E) Consider cultural and historical appropriateness. (F) Are supported by best practices, (3) The task force may inform its deliberatione with the opinions and practices of na- tionally recognized experts and programs. Enrolled House BM 2348 (11B 2348-A) Page 1 https;llolis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013R1/Measures/Text/HB2348/RadPdf axd?rt=c&dk=00073.., 9/20/201.3 32 Page 2 of 3 (4) A majority of the voting members of the task force ennstitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. (5) Official action by the task force requires the approval of a majority of the voting merLbers of the task force. (6) The task farce shall elect one of its members to serve as chairperson. (7) If there is a vacancy for any cause, the appointing authority shall make an appoint, ment to become immediately effective. (8) The task force shall meet at times and places specified by tho eall of the chairperson or of a majority of the voting members of the task force.. (9) The task force may adopt rules necessary for the operation of the task force. (10)(a) No later than Oal:ober 1, 2014, the task farce shall submit, in the manner provided by ORB 19k.245, to an interim committee of the Legislative Assembly related to public health, a report relating to the future of public health services, including an exploration of the regionalization and consolidation of public health services. (b) If the task force determines that legislation is necessary, the report shall contain recommendations for legislative concepts. (1.1) The Oregon Health Authority shall provide staff support to the task force. (12) Notwithstanding OWS 171.072, members of the task force who are members of the Legislative Assembly are not entitled to mileage expenses or a per diem and serve as volun- teers on the task force. Other xnembers of t1+e task force are not entitled to compensation or reimbursement for expenses and serve as volunteers on the task farce. (13) All agencies of state government, as defined in OWS 174.111, are directed to assist the task force in the performance of its duties and, to the extent permitted by laws relating to confidentiality, to furnish such information and advice as the members of the task force consider necessary to perform their duties. SECTION 2- Section I of this 2013 Act is repealed on the date, of the convening of the 20.16 regular session of the Legislative Assembly as specified in ORS 171,010, SECTION 8. This 2018 Act being, necessary for the immedi3ta preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and two 2018 Act takes effect on its passage. Emvfied Houses Sill 2348 (BB 2348-A) Pate 2 https:llolis.leg.state.or.usIli7)2013R1/Measures/TextlHB2348IRadPdf axd?ft=-c&d1,-Q0073.-- 9/20/2013 33 Page 3 of 3 Passed by House ApW 23, 2013 R-A- J. Line, Chief Clerk of H.I Tina Kotek, Speaker of Huuec Received by Cmvernm- 2913 Approved-- 2013 Passe4 by Senate June 26, 2013 John Mt7haber, Go,,em r FiW in A1rioc Secretary of Stake: Peter Courtney; Rxsident of Seuate ............M....... 20.13 Kate 3-wn, Secretary of State Emvl]ad House Bill 2348 (1113 9-W-A7 page 5 littps://olis.leg.state.or.us/ii5~J2013Rl /Measures/Text+M2348/RadPdf.axd?rt=c&dk=00073.: 9/20/201.3 34 ~u; EPIW AiCommunity Development Department Q U A" Plannina Division • Buildinn Safew Division • Environmental Soils Division P.O. Box 6005 • Bend, Oregon • 87708-6005 117 NW Lafaye-Me Avenue • Bend, Oregon • 97701 (541) 388-6575 - FAX (541) 365-1754 April 16, 2013 http: //www, deschuWs _ org/cdd/ TO: Senator Arnie Roblan, Chair Senate Committee On Rural Communities and Economic Development FROM. Nick Lelack AICP, Deschutes County Interim Community Development Director RE: Senate Bill 538 Deschutes County Testimony on SB 538 `thank you for the opportunity to testify over the telephone this afternoon in support of SB 538. Deschutes County has implemented Statewide Planning Coal 3 Ag twice, by adopting EFU zones and land use regulations, first in 1979, and later, during periodic review, in 1992. In both instances, several challenges were identified with local commercial farming. The challenges include: a. Poor soil quality and depth, b. Limited water due to: 1. Low rainfall (less than 12 inches per year), 2. Limited water rights for irrigation (laws of prior appropriation; surface water rights fully allocated; new groundwater uses require mitigation), 3. Increased demands of irrigated water for non-agricultural uses (urban and rural development, river); c. High elevation (2700-4000 feet) which contribute to a short growing season (88-100 days, the fewest frost free days in Oregon, and the possibility of frost every month of the year), and d. Distance to major markets, among others. However, Goaf 3 only uses soil as the EFU determining factor. All other factors identified above need to be a part of the regional definition of agriculture. These challenges continue to impact farming in Deschutes County today. Farm income is negative for Deschutes County according to the United States Department of Agriculture:, National Agricultural Statistics Service 2007 Census of Agriculture. Deschutes County updated its Comprehensive flan for the first time in over 30 years in 2010. One of the main issues raised throughout the mutt(-year process was the need for the county to update its agricultural land definitions based on regional characteristics to ensure they accurately identify viable farm land. Over the past 4 years, Deschutes County has supported and participated in legislative discussions and hearings to pass measures or participate in programs to re-evaluate agricultural land designations. Specifically, we have: Qualify Services Performed with Pride 35 a, Supported HB 2229 in 2009, the Big Look Bill, and asked DLCD to work with us to re-evafuate resource land designations and correct errors. DLCl7 was on the verge of embarking on this effort fast year when Executive Order 12-07 was issued to initiate the Southern Oregon Pilot Program. Please know we support this effort, are closely monitoring it, and understand it is requiring significant state and local resources. b. Supported HB 3615 in 2011 and HB 4095 in 2012 to provide an opportunity for Deschutes County to work with at least one adjacent county to establish a regional definition of agricultural land, and then to apply that new definition throughout applicable areas of the county andtor region. While we recognized these bills were aimed at authorizing the Southern Oregon Pilot Program, Deschutes County's interest was in gaining certainty that we would eventually be able to initiate our own program in the future, c- Adopted a project on our Planning Division work plan to create a Non-Resource Lands Program, which' evaluates resource land designations based on current definitions. We recognize the Southern Oregon Pilot Program is underway and state agencies participating in this effort do not have additional resources to commit to another regional effort. Our request is simple, Please adopt SB 538. It provides a guarantee that two or more counties may work together and petition LCDC in the future to initiate a collaborate process with several state agencies, cities, and our citizens to consider the adoption of regional definitions of farm and forest lands. If necessary, make it mandatory that such petitions may only be submitted to LCDC after the Southern Oregon Pilot Program is completed. But, please provide certainty that future regional resource land definition efforts will be legally allowed. We can then plan ahead for such efforts and budget accordingly, If SB 538 Is enacted and Deschutes County initiates such a program, an extensive evaluation of land characteristics, land use patterns, commercial farming and forestry practices, water availability, among other factors would be conducted in the preparation of the definitions, Accurately designated resource lands would retain their Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations. Lands proposed for re- designation would be limited to rural non-resource land uses consistent with the Statewide Planning Program, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments in support of SB 538. Sincerely, Nick Lelack, AICP Interim Community Development Director, Planning Director CC_ Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Alan Unger, Chair Tammy Baney, Vice Chair Anthony DeSone, Commissioner Tom Anderson, County Administrator 36 I- 5 ward of County Commissioners p AKA"Y ` . P.O. Box C-005 - Bend, OR 97708-6M5 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 206 • Bend, OR 97701-19BO (541 1 3t38-6570 • Fax (541) 385-32012 April 8, 2013 www.co.deschutes.or.us board Coco. deschutes. or. us Tarnmy Baney TO; Senator Chris Edwards, Co-Chair Anthony DeBone Representative Ben Unger, Co-Chair Alan Unger Ways and Means Subcommittee on Natural Resources FROM: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners RE: Senate Bill 66528 Deschutes County Testimony on SB 5528 The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners is concerned about the proposed increase in surcharges on permits required by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for onsite wastewater treatment system applications in SB 5520. Deschutes County understands the need to raise fees and surcharges to cover the cost of services, and values its partnership with DEQ. However, Deschutes County cannot support the proposed $40 surcharge increase frorn $60 to $100 for the following reasons' • Deschutes County's goal to protect groundwater quality and public health are partially achieved by subsidizing the cost of permits for repairing and replacing failing septic systems. This additional surcharge runs directly counter to this goal. It imposes a significantly higher financial burden on customers (typically individual property owners) already experiencing challenges due to septic system failures or, worse, needing to replace a septic system. • The substantial size of this surcharge increase would impact some of our customers' decisions to purchase permits for septic systems. The reason is that this proposal would result in an increase of at least 10% in total fees paid on several applications. This surcharge increase passes the cost of running DEQ's on-site program in direct service counties (counties in which DEQ provides services directly) to customers in agent/contract counties (counties that implement DEQ's regulations as an agent of the state or a contractual basis). • Deschutes County has lengthy experience in the administration of fee-based services. We believe that a 67% increase in fees in one year is not only fiscally irresponsible, but shows a profound lack of recognition of the impact that such a change would have on the customers seeking service from the County and the State. Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner 37 Please know Deschutes County appreciates the technical assistance provided by DEQ in permitting septic systems in the Groundwater Protection areas in southern Deschutes County and the costs associated with this service. We urge the Committee to work with DEQ to create a fair and balanced budget that may include smaller or phased-in surcharge increases or possibly other funding options to cover the important services the agency provides. "thank you for this opportunity to provide you with information about SB 5520 Sincerely, Deschutes County Board of Commissioners aja4" UA~ Alan Unger, Chair Tammy Baney, Vice C it Anthony DeBone, Commissioner 38 - V E'1`3 Community Development Department Gi!! &A planning Division - Building Safety Division • Environmental Solis Division NWF P.Q. Box 6005. Fiend, Oregon - 977078-BM5 117 NW Lafayette: Avenue • Bend, Oregon • 97701 (541) 3SM575 • FAX (541) 365-1764 April 10, 2013 http://www.deschutes.org/cdd/ TO: The Honorable Jeff Barker, Chair The Honorable Chris Garrett, Vice Chair The Honorable Wayne Krieger, Vice Chair House Judiciary Committee FROM: Nick Lelack, Interim Director, Deschutes County Community Development Department RE: House Bill 3087 Deschutes County Testimony on HB 3087 Deschutes County joins the Association of Oregon Counties and League of Oregon Cities in opposing HB 3087 which limits the amount of appeal fees that a county or city may charge for quasi-judicial review of a land use decision for the following reasons: Disparity in Appeal Fees. There is significant disparity in costs between counties' appeal fees. The reason is that planning services are funded differently by county. Some counties charge fees to cover the actual cost of services (ACS) and other counties subsidize their services resulting in lower fees. Fee-based organizations, such as Deschutes County, will have higher appeal fees than those that are subsidized. Appellants pay the appeal costs in fee-based counties. Tax payers pay all or most of the appeal costs in counties who subsidize their planning services. _ The key point is that local jurisdictions decide haw to fund tannin services including the fees. HS 3087 requires tax payers to cover 90% of appeal fee costs in all counties similar to the state imposed $250 appeal fee cap for administrative decisions. The outcome of HB 3087 in Deschutes County would be to increase application fees to cover this additional cost or shift the cost to County tax payers. Real and Significant Appeal Costs. Deschutes County requires applicants to submit a $3,000 deposit to cover public hearing costs. Public hearings are conducted by a Hearings Officer - a land use attorney and independent arbiter (not a county employee) who represents a neutral third party in interpreting laws and rules and rendering decisions. Hearings Officers charge $150 per hour and bill the County following the issuance of the decision. Any unexpended funds are returned to the applicant. Therefore, applicants pay a significant amount for the public hearing. If a Hearings Officer's decision is appealed, the appeal fee to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is $2,480 plus 20% of the original application fee. If the SOCC declines to hear an appeal, 75% of the appeal fee is refunded. The reasons the appeal fee is $2,490 plus 20% of the original application fee include the following: Qualify Services Performed with Pride. 39 o The County's Community Development Dept. (CAD) is primarily a fee supported department. Fees are intended to fund 100% of the department's services. o County Legal Counsel is directly and significantly involved in an appeal of a Hearings officer decision. Legal Counsel is generally not involved in the land use decision making process until an appeal is filed. Legal Counsel coordinates with the applicant and appellant and/or their attorneys, planning staff, attends the BOGC work sessions and public hearings, and participates in the drafting of the final BOCC decision. Legal Counsel bills CDD for time spent on appeals. n CDD staff perform nearly all the same functions associated with the initial application including acceptance of appeals, review, coordination with the applicant and public (appellant), the preparation of staff reports, public notifications, and facilitating the public hearing process for the appeal process. The only efficiency is that the issues to be addressed on appeal are often narrower than in the original application o The reason only 75 percent is refunded and not 100 percent is that staff must perform all necessary functions to accept an application, prepare staff reports in consultation with County Legal Counsel, and conduct a work session and/or public hearing with the BOCC to determine whether it will hear the appeal or not. Economic Impact to Deschutes County. Since 2004, 127 land use decisions have been appealed in Deschutes County, most of which are Hearings Officer decisions following public hearings. A recent 2012 example illustrates the economic impact of HB 3087 to Deschutes County. The appeal fee was $2736. Under the HB 3087, the appeal fee would have been $126. The County would be required to subsidize this appeal in the amount of $2,510. Some appeal fees are higher. For example, a Conditional Use Permit(Site Plan Review application for a new development is be $3,472. This hypothetical example would reduce the appeal fee to $491 and result in an appeal fee subsidy of $2,981, The consequence is that Deschutes County would be required to raise fees or rely on General Fund transfers to subsidize appeal fees. In addition, the proposed appeal fee cap could invite additionai appeals resulting in higher subsidies or fees for all applications. Fee Waivers. Deschutes County offers fee waivers for financial hardships or public benefits at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. This policy applies to appeal fees. I appreciate the opportunity to provide the Committee with information regarding Deschutes County's planning services, fees, and position on HB 3087. 1 have coordinated with the Board of County Commissioners on this testimony. Please let me know if l can be of further assistance by contacting me at (541) 385-1708 or N ick.Lelack[c-d_eschutes.9m, cc, Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Alan Unger, Chair Tammy Baney, Vice Chair Anthony DeBone, Commissioner Tom Anderson, County Administrator 40 ~7. Community Development Department C t Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Soils Division P.O. Box 6005 117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend, Oregon 97708-6005 (541)388-6575 FAX (541)385-1764 http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ DATE: September 17, 2013 TO: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners FROM: Peter Gutowsky, Principal Planner MTG: September 25, 2013 Work Session RE: Oregon Spotted Frog / Proposed Listing / Endangered Species Act FWS Presentation The purpose of the September 25 work session is to enable the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to discuss their proposal to protect the Oregon spotted frog as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) (Attachment 1). The FWS opened a 60-day public comment period on August 29 to allow the public to review and comment on the proposal and provide additional information. All relevant information received from the public, government agencies, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested parties by October 28, 2013, will be considered and addressed in the agency's final listing determination for the species. The FWS will have up to one year to determine whether the proposed listing and proposed critical habitat should become final. On September 16, the FWS mailed notices to all affected property owners in Deschutes and northern Klamath counties and alerted them to public meetings scheduled on the following dates: • October 8, 2013 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Sunriver Homeowner Aquatic & Recreation Center, Dillon Hall, 57250 Overlook Road, Sunriver, Oregon; and • October 16, 2013 from 6:00 to 8:00 .m. at the La Pine Senior Center, 16560 Victory Way, La Pine, Oregon. Habitat The FWS proposes to designate 68,192 acres and 23 stream miles as critical habitat for the Oregon spotted frog throughout Washington and Oregon. In Deschutes County, their habitat extends along the Upper Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers, terminating in Bend at the Old Mill. Maps of the proposed critical habitat in Deschutes County are shown in Attachment 2. A large, parcel scale map will be provided at the work session. Table 1 identifies the number and acreage of tax lots affected by critical habitat in rural Deschutes County and the Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB) of Bend and La Pine. Quality Services Performed with Pride Table 1- Proposed Critical Habitat for Oregon Spotted Frog /Affected Deschutes County Tax Lots' Federal Pro parties Private Pro ertles Total Acres of Jurisdiction Tax Lots Acres Tax Lots Acres Critical Habitat Bend UGB 0 0 49 23.75 23.75 La Pine UGB 0 0 91 135.05 135.05 Rural Deschutes County 35 1,222.32 1,563 4,509.16 5,731.48 Total 35 1222.32 1,703 4,667.96 5,890.28 The maps depicting proposed critical habitat are conservative. According to the FWS Proposed Rule designating critical habitat for the Oregon spotted frog (Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 168), • Critical habitat areas identify those physical and biological features essential to the conservation of the species (such as space, food cover and protected habitat). • Primary constituent elements are those specific elements of the physical and biological features that provide for a species' life-history processes and are essential to the conservation of the species.2 The Proposed Rule states that at least one of these primary constituent elements needs to be in existence to be considered critical habitat: • Primary constituent element 1 - Non-breeding (N), Breeding (B), Rearing (R), and Overwintering Habitat (O). Ephemeral or permanent bodies of fresh water, including, but not limited to natural or manmade ponds, springs, lakes, slow-moving streams, or pools within or oxbows adjacent to streams, canals, and ditches, that have one or more of the following characteristics: o Inundated for a minimum of 4 months per year (B-R) (timing varies by elevation but may begin as early as February and last as long as September); o Inundated from October through March (O); o If ephemeral, areas are hydrologically connected by surface water flow to a permanent water body (e.g. pools, springs, ponds, lakes, streams, canals, or ditches) (B-R); o Shallow water areas (less than or equal to 30 centimeters (12 inches), or water of this depth over vegetation in deeper water (B-R); o Total surface area with less than 50 percent vegetative cover (N); o Gradual topographic gradient (less than 3 percent slope) from shallow water toward deeper, permanent water (B-R); 1 Data listed in Table 1 excludes water bodies and rights-of-way. 2 http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/species/osf/OSF nCriticalHabitat FR_pdf -2- o Herbaceous wetland vegetation (i.e. emergent, submergent, and floating-leaved aquatic plants), or vegetation that can structurally mimic emergent wetland vegetation through manipulation (B-R); o Shallow water areas with high solar exposure or low (short) canopy cover (B-R); and o An absence or low density of non-native predators (B-R-N). Regulations Designation of critical habitat does not affect land ownership, establish a refuge or preserve and has no impact on private landowners taking actions on their land that do not require federal funding or permits. If a landowner needs a federal permit or receives federal funding for a specific activity, the agency responsible for issuing the permit or providing the funds would consult with the Service to determine how the action may affect a listed species or its habitat. In Deschutes County, regulations have been in place for over twenty-five years protecting wetlands and riparian habitat in the upper Deschutes River basin. A majority of the critical habitat along the Upper Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers is identified as wetlands on the County's Local and National Wetland Inventories. Along both rivers, a riparian setback of 100 feet is required, measured from ordinary high water. Attachments. 1. FWS News Release 2. Proposed Critical Habitat in Deschutes County for Oregon Spotted Frog -3- News Release Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish & Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Suite 100, Portland, Oregon 97266 Phone: 503-231-6179 Fax: 503-231-6195 nfwo/ hftp://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/ August 29, 2013 Contact: Washington: Taylor Goforth, (360) 753-4375 Oregon: Elizabeth Materna, (503) 231-6912; Nancy Gilbert, (541) 383-7146 Klamath Falls: Matt Baun, (530) 340-2387 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes to Protect Oregon Spotted Frog under the Endangered Species Act Agency Seeks Information from the Public, Scientific Community Before Making Final Decision As part of an effort to keep the Oregon spotted frog from becoming extinct in the foreseeable future, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposed today to protect the frog as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The Service also proposed to designate 68,192 acres and 23 stream miles as critical habitat for the Oregon spotted frog throughout Washington and Oregon. The Service now has up to one year to determine whether the proposed listing and proposed critical habitat in today's announcements should become final. Of the proposed designated (acres plus stream) critical habitat, 67 percent is Federally owned, 3 percent is state owned, 30 percent is under local municipality or private ownership, and less than 1 percent is under county jurisdictions. No Tribal lands were proposed as critical habitat. "Aquatic species are good indicators of our water quality and wetland health, and because the Oregon spotted frog is the most aquatic native frog in the Pacific Northwest, it is particularly important that we pay attention to its plight." said Ken Berg, manager, Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Historically, the Oregon spotted frog ranged from the lower Fraser River in British Columbia to the Pit River drainage in northeastern California. It was known from at least 48 watersheds (three in British Columbia, 13 in Washington, 29 in Oregon, and three in California) and currently occupies 31 watersheds. Oregon spotted frogs currently have a very limited distribution west of the Cascade crest in Oregon, are considered to be extirpated from the Willamette Valley in Oregon, and may be extirpated in the Klamath and Pit River basins of California. They are known to exist in five counties in Washington (Whatcom, Skagit, Thurston, Skamania and Klickitat) and five counties in Oregon (Jackson, Lane, Wasco, Deschutes and Klamath). Page 1 of 2 The Service first identified the Oregon spotted frog as a candidate for ESA protection in 1993 due to the threat posed by ongoing habitat destruction, curtailment of the species range and introduction of exotic predators such as bullfrogs. The frog's historic range has been reduced by at least 76 percent and maybe as much as 90 percent, and habitat continues to be impacted and/or destroyed by human activities that result in the loss of wetlands, hydrologic changes, reduced water quality, and vegetation changes. The final decision whether or not to protect the Oregon spotted frog under the Federal Endangered Species Act will be based on the best scientific and commercial data available. The Service will open a 60-day public comment period on Aug. 29, 2013, to allow the public to review and comment on the proposal and provide additional information. All relevant information received from the public, government agencies, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested parties by Oct. 28, 2013, will be considered and addressed in the agency's final listing determination for the species. Comments and information must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Oct. 28, 2013. They may be submitted electronically at http://www.rcgzilations.gov or in writing at Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-RI-ES-2013-0013; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042-PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. Requests for public hearings must be received, in writing, by Oct. 13, 2013, at the same mailing address noted above. More information on submitting comments is available online at http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/. For more information about the Oregon spotted frog and the Federal Register notice, visit httj2://www.fws.gov/wafwo/osf.html. The mission of'the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats,for the continuing benefit of'the American people. We are both a leader and trusted partner in fish and wildlife conservation, known.for our scientific excellence, stewardship of lands and natural resources, dedicated professionals, and commitment to public service. For more information on our work and the people who make it happen, visit www;fws.gov. Connect with our Facebook page at www,fwebook. com/us(ws, , follow our tweets at www. twitter. com/usfwshq , our You Tube Channel at http://www.Wyoutube.com/usfws and download photos.from our Hickr page at http: //wwwlickr. com/photo.s/usfivshq Page 2 of 2 122"50"W 122°0'0"W 121 °55'0"w 121 °50'0"W 121 "45'0"W 121`400"W 121°35.0"W oQo~p Critical Habitat for Oregon Spotted Frog (Rana pretiosa) z Q~ Unit 8B: Upper Deschutes River (Above Wickiup Dam), Oregon (Deschutes/Klamath County) 0 22031 Acres / 8916 Hectares 0 I ~ v I Z 0 0 N Z I N V 1011 00 'N ;k " Pre eSE C] O V V Why ' V q ZI 0 N M V 13 Oregon 122°5122"0'0"W 121°55'0"W 121"50'0"W No warranty is made by the U S Fish arid Wildlife Service as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for Jjjj~ individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were _ compiled from various sources. Spatial information may not meet F Natipnal Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be ~ `'a , ,r'' updated without notice. Critical Habitat (Occupied) z a N N V z 0 O V P 2 7 1:250,000 0 2 4 6 8 Miles 121"S., W 121 "40'0"W 121 °35'0"W Proposed Critical Habitat for the Z~' Oregon Spotted Frog e2013 rvi U.S Fish and Wildlife Service No warranty is made by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ` o.& Proposed Critical Habitat for the "I-&WnnuE¢ as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were A Oregon Spotted Frog 2013 ' . - i Wildlife Service +r compiled from various sources Spatial information may not meet U S. Fish and - National Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be A „ updated without notice a WWI' i[i DUu vv i[1 vna vv i2i"4Uu vv 1111":ibu vv 121"90'0"W 1 i"25'0"W 121'20'0"W 122°6'o"W 122°0'0"w 121'55'0"W 121 `5o'0"W 121'45'0"W 121 °40'0"W 121 °35'0"W 121 °30'0"W 191 °9c; n••1nf 0 z r I'. i c c r I ~ v I z N V I a 0 q 'l.2 UU Vv 121 00U vv I2, ODU vv 171"45U W H - ,ur No warranty is made by the U S Fish and Wildlife Service as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were _ compiled from various sources Spatial information may not meet 'A F- National Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be updated without notice. 121`406'W 121"35'0"W 121'300"W v Proposed Critical Habitat for the 6& Oregon Spotted Frog 2013 U S. Fish and Wildlife life Service ~M1r DES 1(t `~1 0 VA ?'AA -C September 18, 2013 Honorable Rep. Greg Walden House Natural Resources Committee Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 RE: H.R. 1526 Dear Representative Walden: Board of Country Commissioners P.0. Box 6005 • Bend, On 97708-6005 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 206 • Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 • Fax (541) 385-3202 www. co. deschutes. or. us board@co. deschutes. or. us Tammy Baney Anthony OeBone Alan Unger The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners wishes to express support for H.R. 1526, the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act. This proposal renews the federal government's commitment to manage federal forests, improve forest health and prevent catastrophic wildfires. Deschutes County applauds the commitment to addressing job creation and enhancement of rural forest economies. The management provisions in H.R. 1526 will provide a long term solution to ensuring sustainable revenue sharing with forested counties. Deschutes County, Oregon supports the preservation of healthy forests. We support HR 1526 and its aim to put people back to work in the woods, reduce litigation, and provide certainty for counties so that we can provide services to our citizens. We also support the management of the forests to prevent catastrophic wildfires and believe that there are forested lands that are suitable for timber harvest and management to be resilient against fire. For these reasons, we support the passage of H.R. 1526. Sincerely, Anthony DeBone, Commissioner For the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner DC 2013.536 TALKING POINTS FORESTRY LEGISLATION • Before leaving DC, however, the Natural Resources Committee moved one step closer to putting people back to work in the woods and to building strong communities and healthy forests. • The committee approved the "Restoring Healthy Forests for Communities Act" (H.R. 1526), of which Rep Greg Walden is a cosponsor (no current Democrat cosponsors). • HR 1526 aims to put people back to work in the woods, reduce litigation, provide certainty for counties so that they can provide essential services, lift families out of poverty, and prevent catastrophic wildfires that we have been experiencing. • Rural forested counties across the country and in Oregon, like Josephine County, are facing bankruptcy because of the constant litigation that keeps Oregon families out of the woods. • This bill would help provide the certainty of timber supply that mills in Oregon need to stay in business and employ families in our rural forest communities. • This bill includes the O&C Trust Act, the bipartisan proposal Rep DeFazio, Rep Schrader, and Rep Walden developed that creates or protects over 3,000 jobs, generate millions in revenue for essential county services, and make our forests healthy again. (OFRI-2011 Study) • According to the Governor's O&C Report, our proposal would provide $120 million for local counties. Funds that are desperately needed to provide police officers, teachers, and other essential services like roads. • This comprehensive proposal secured broad support across the state including members of the Oregon State House and Senate, fifteen Oregon county boards of commissioners, State Sheriff's Association, and other labor and industry groups. • Oregonians have been successfully managing forests since the time of the Oregon Trail, which is why the O&C Trust would be managed by a board of trustees including 2 local foresters, 1 representative of the public, a forest scientist, and 2 local county commissioners, and one statewide elected official. • O&C Trust Act stewards timber production through the Oregon Forest Practices Act, the first in the nation progressive forest management legislation rooted in 1941. Provisions include (from Oregon Department of Forestry website): o Activities near streams, lakes, and wetlands must include water quality protection. o Wildlife trees and down logs must be left in most large clear-cut areas. o Clear-cut size is usually limited to 120 acres. o Sensitive bird nesting, roosting, and watering sites require protection. o Activities on slopes must include erosion and landslide control. a Replanting or land use changes must be completed within two years after harvesting. o Road and skid trail use must prevent erosion into streams, lakes, and wetlands. © Harvesting adjacent to designated Scenic Highways requires special practices. • Oregonians in our forested communities are facing extreme poverty, systemic unemployment, and thousands of children on free and reduced lunch; Oregon can't afford for any more mills to close, like Rough & Ready Lumber. • We know that litigation is a main cause of the current gridlock on our federal forests, so this legislation limits litigation to 1 lawsuit within the first 60 days. and it has to be in DC Circuit Court, avoiding 9`s Circuit Court of Appeals. • The Trust prohibits designation of monuments on O&C Trust Land, preventing abuse of the Antiquities Act by any Administration. • This will return management to nearly 50% of the BLM Medford District and Rogue- Siskiyou National Forest "controverted lands". This is compared with less than 6% of BLM lands in the Medford district that are currently manageable. • To provide revenue for counties and put people back to work in the woods, HR 1526 requires the Forest Service to put up for sale half of the annual growth each year on forest land that is suitable for timber production. (Approximately 11 billion board feet). • To cut through that red tape, this bill limits environmental assessments to 100 pages and requires agencies to complete them within 180 days. • Overstocked, bug infested and diseased forests surround our communities, putting them at risk of catastrophic fire. Oregonians like our forests to be green, not black. • That's why this bill provides (HFRA style) exemptions and processes to expedite thinning and grazing projects in areas local states and counties identify as high risk for wildfires, giving local communities more control. (Gosar and Tipton) • This bill provides states like Oregon and opportunity to manage a 200,000 forest pilot project on federal land to increase harvest, and show how land can be effectively managed under state forest practices. (Labrador) • These changes won't take place overnight, so this bill includes a 1 year extension of Secure Rural Schools funding to keep counties above water while we put people back to work in the woods. Oregonians have been successfully managing forest land since the time of the Oregon Trail. We get back to work in the woods, pull families out of poverty, and have healthy forest when we provide certainty of active forest management. FORESTRY: BACKGROUND ON JACKSON COUNTY (each county could have similar statistics pulled and organized) r Jackson County currently faces 9.6% unemployment. 9 of the 20 counties I represent are facing double digit unemployment. • 59% of school children in Jackson county are eligible for Free or Reduced lunch pro rg ams. • Last week, Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilbertson described how he is down to 1 patrol deputy to cover 1642 miles. That'd be like one patrol deputy for all of Rhode Island. According to the Sheriff, burglary is up 1594% over last year. Auto theft 1714%.Theft---1435%. Domestic assault-1100%. • For several weeks now, the skies across here in southern Oregon have been choked with smoke from fires on overstocked federal forests. • Last year, the Forest Service only harvested timber on 208,000 acres nationwide. Only 0.14% of the total 144 million acres of the National Forest System. Less than 2 tenths of one percent! • Last year, 10 times as many Forest Service acres burned as were harvested. 2.8 million acres - a size equivalent to all of Grant County. • A lack of management on our federal forest lands has caused shortfalls for our communities, forcing counties to reduce essential services, laying off police officers and teachers. • One thing is clear. The status quo in our federal forest policy is not working for our forests, and it is certainly not working for the families in our rural communities. BE IT REMEMBERED, that at a regular term of the Board of Commissioners of the State of Oregon, for the County of Union, sitting for the transaction of County business, begun and held at the Joseph Building Annex in the City of La Grande, in said County and State, when were present: The Honorable Mark D. Davidson, Chairman Steve McClure. Commissioner William D. Rosholt, Commissioner WHEN, on Thursday the 12th day of September 2013, among others the following proceedings were had to wit: IN THE MATTER OF A ) Resolution RESOLUTION SUPPORTING } 2013-10 H.R. 1526, RESTORING HEALTHY } FORESTS FOR HEALTHY ) COMMUNITIES ACT ) NOW, the Union County Board of Commissioners recognize that Oregonians in our forested communities are facing extreme poverty, systemic unemployment, and thousands of children on free and reduced lunch. WHEREAS, Union County currently faces 8.3% unemployment; and WHEREAS, 53% of school children in Union County are eligible for Free or Reduced lunch programs; and WHEREAS, Union County's poverty rate is 16.6%; and WHEREAS, these negative economic conditions can be attributed to the reduction in timber harvests in our National Forests (80% reduction over the past 30 years) and corresponding mill closures; and WHEREAS, Union County cannot afford for any more mills to close and desire to recover our lost mill capacity; and WHEREAS H.R. 1526 is a bipartisan effort that aims to put people back to work in the woods, reduce litigation, provide certainty for counties so that they can provide essential services, lift families out of poverty, and prevent catastrophic wildfires that we have been experiencing. NOW THEREFORE the Union County Board of Commissioners HEREBY RESOLVE to support H.R. 1526, Restoring Healthy Forests For Healthy Communities Act, and urge all members of the U.S. House of Representatives to support the passage and implementation of this important legislation. DATED this day of September, 2013 Mark D. Davidson, CHAIRMAN Steve McClure, COMMISSIONER William D. Rosholt, COMMISSIONER DESCHUTES COUNTY DQgUMENT SUMMARY Date: September 25, 2013 Department: Sheriff's Office Type of Document: This is an Amendment to document 2013-426, the annual Agreement and Re-certification between Deschutes County, by and through its Sheriff's Office, and the U.S. Department of Justice. Goods and/or Services: Two adjustments were made to the original: 1) Line "o" on page 2 was amended to indicate that the Sheriff's Office received non-cash assets; and 2) Table "H" on page 3 was changed to list "Miscellaneous computer equipment" that the Sheriff's Office received from the Justice Department. This agreement and re-certification allows the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office to participate in the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program. Through this Agreement, the Sheriff's Office is entitled to receive funds from the federal equitable sharing program following the close of each fiscal year. The funds in this program are from forfeited cash, property and other proceeds. Background & History: Each year the Sheriff's Office submits an agreement and re- certification form for the Department of Justice Equitable Sharing Program. This is a Federal Asset Forfeiture program in which the Sheriff's Office receives funds from forfeited cash, property and other proceeds. The Sheriff's Office agrees to use the funds solely for drug-related investigations as mandated by statute as well as the strict guidelines set out by the Department of Justice. Annual Value or Total Payment: No funds were distributed to the Sheriff's Office during the 2013 fiscal year, but the Sheriff's office received some computer equipment from the Justice Department with a value of $960.00. Funding Source: (Included in current budget?) ® Yes ❑ No Is this a Grant Agreement providing revenue to the County? ❑ Yes ® No Departmental Contact and Title: Capt. Tim Edwards Phone 541-388-6656 Sheriffs Approval: Date 9/25/2013 M Distribution of Document: Call Pat Davis, Sheriffs Office Legal Assistant, x3367, when ready for pick up. Official Review: County Signature Required (check one): ® BOCC ❑ Department Director (if <$25K) ❑ Administrator (if >$25K but <$150K; if >$150K, BOCC Order No. Legal Review Date g`/a, 5IL3 Document Number 2013-548 9/25/2013 40 OMB Number 1123-0011 Equitable Sharing Expires 9-30-2014 Agreement and Certification 0 Police Department Sheriffs Office Q Task Force (Complete Table A) 0 Prosecutor's Office Q National Guard Counterdrug Unit 0 Other "Please All each required Held. Hover mouse overany fillable field for pop-up instructions. " Agency Name: Deschutes County Sheriffs Office NCIC/ORI/Tracking Number: O R A 0 9 0 10 0 0 Mailing Address: 63333 Hi hwa 20 West City: Bend State: OR Zip: 97701 Finance Contact: First: Tames Preparer: Same as Finance Contact Independent Public Accountant: Last FY End Date: 06130/2013 Last: Ross E-mail: jross@deschutes.org Last: Edwards Phone- 541-322-4819 First: Tim E-mail: time@deschutes.or E-mail: skatter@kkncpa.com Agency Current FY Budget: $39,003,683.00 Phone: 541-388-6656 O New Participant: Read the Equitable Sharing Agreement and sign the Affidavit. Q Existing Participant: Complete the Annual Certification Report, read the Equitable Sharing Agreement, and sign the Affidavit. Q Amended Form: Revise the Annual Certification Report, read the Equitable Sharing Agreement, and sign the Affidavit. Annual Certification Report Ctae ,maru n* Fnuifthiw Chsrinn Activity Justice Funds' Treasury Fundsx I Beginning Equitable Sharing Fund Balance (must match Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance from prior FY) 2 Federal Sharing Funds Received 3 Federal Sharing Funds Received from Other Law Enforcement Agencies and Task Forces (To populate, complete Table B) 4 Other income 5 Interest Income Accrued Non-Interest Bearing e Interest Bearing 0 6 Total Equitable Sharing Funds (total of lines 1 - 5) $0,00 $0.00 7 Federal Sharing Funds Spent (total of lines a - m below) $0.00 $0.00 8 Ending Balance (difference between line 7 and line 6) $0.00 $0.00 Justice Agencies are: FBI, DEA, ATF, USPIS, USDA, DCIS, DSS, and FDA. 2 Treasury Agencies Ire: I ) ICE, CBP, TTB, U5SS, and USCG. ~Ir~/Ics:~ 'f I (~Q Page 1 of 5 LICGrl. couNSEL October 2012 Version 2.1 13P. -2ni x- f; .P9o Summary of Shared Funds Spent Justice Funds Treasury Funds a Total spent on salaries under permitted salary exceptions b Total spent on overtime c Total spent on informants, "buy money", and rewards d Total spent on travel and training e Total spent on communications and computers f Total spent on weapons and protective gear g Total spent on electronic surveillance equipment h Total spent on buildings and improvements i Total transfers to other participating state and local law enforcement agencies (To populate, complete Table C) Total spent on other law enforcement expenses (To populate, complete Table D) k Total Expenditures in Support of Community-Based Programs (To populate, complete Table E) I Total Windfall Transfers (To populate, complete Table F) m Total spent on matching grants (To populate, complete Table G) En Total $0.00 $0.00 Did your agency receive non-cash assets? * Yes O No If yes, complete Table H. Please fill out the following tables, if applicable. Table A: Members of Task Force Agency Name NCIC/ORI/Tracking Number Table B: Equitable Sharing Funds Received from other Agencies Transferring Agency Name, City, and State Justice Funds Treasury Funds Agency Name: NCIC/ORI/Tracking Number: Table C: Equitable Sharing Funds Transferred to Other Agencies Receiving Agency Name, City, and State Justice Funds Treasury Funds Agency Name: NCIC/ORI/Tracking Number: Page 2 of 5 October 2012 Version Z.1 Y Table D: Other Law Enforcement Expenses Description of Expense Justice Funds Treasury Funds Justice Funds Table E: Expenditures in Support of Community-Based Programs Recipient Table F: Windfall Transfers Recipient justice tunas treasuryrunes IL I Justice Funds Treasury Funds Table G: Matching Grants Matching Grant Name Table H: Other Non-Cash Assets Received Source Description of Asset Justice Miscellaneous computer equipment valued at $960. Treasury Q Type of Discrimination Alleged L] Race [j Color National Origin Gender Disability Age Other PaRerwork Reduction Act Notice Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. We try to create accurate and easily understood forms that impose the least possible burden on you to complete. The estimated average time to complete this form is 30 minutes. If you have comments regarding the accuracy of this estimate, or suggestions for making this form simpler, please write to the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, 1400 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005. Table h Civil Rights Cases Name of Case Page 3 of 5 October 2012 Version 2.1 Equitable Sharing Agreement This Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement, entered into among (1) the Federal Government, (2) the above-stated law enforcement agency ("Agency"), and (3) the governing body, sets forth the requirements for participation in the federal Equitable Sharing Program and the restrictions upon the use of federally forfeited cash, property, proceeds, and any interest earned thereon, which are equitably shared with participating law enforcement agencies. By its signatures, the Agency agrees that it will be bound by the statutes and guidelines that regulate shared assets and the following requirements for participation in the federal Equitable Sharing Program. Receipt of the signed Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification (this "Document") is a prerequisite to receiving any equitably shared cash, property, or proceeds. 1. Submission. This Document must be submitted to aca.submit@usdoj.gov within 60 days of the end of the Agency's fiscal year. This Document must be submitted electronically with the Affidavit/Signature submitted by fax. This will constitute submission to the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. 2. Signatories. This agreement must be signed by the head of the Agency and the head of the governing body. Examples of Agency heads include police chief, sheriff, director, commissioner, superintendent, administrator, chairperson, secretary, city attorney, county attorney, district attorney, prosecuting attorney, state attorney, commonwealth attorney, and attorney general. The governing body's head is the person who allocates funds or approves the budget for the Agency. Examples of governing body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, county executive, county council chairperson, director, secretary, administrator, commissioner, and governor. 3. Uses. Any shared asset shall be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the statutes and guidelines that govern the federal Equitable Sharing Program as set forth in the current edition of the Department of Justice's Guide to Equitable Sharing for State and Local Law Enforcement (Justice Guide), and the Department of the Treasury's Guide to Equitable Sharing for Foreign Countries and Federal, State, and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (Treasury Guide). 4. Transfers. Before the Agency transfers cash, property, or proceeds to other state or local law enforcement agencies, it must first verify with the Department of Justice or the Department of the Treasury, depending on the source of the funds, that the receiving agency is a current and compliant Equitable Sharing Program participant. 5. Internal Controls. The Agency agrees to account separately for federal equitable sharing funds received from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. Funds from state and local forfeitures and other sources must not be commingled with federal equitable sharing funds. The Agency shall establish a separate revenue account or accounting code for state, local, Department of Justice, and Department of the Treasury forfeiture funds. Interest income generated must be accounted for in the appropriate federal equitable sharing account. The Agency agrees that such accounting will be subject to the standard accounting requirements and practices employed for other public funds as supplemented by requirements set forth in the current edition of the Justice Guide and the Treasury Guide, including the requirement in the Justice Guide to maintain relevant documents and records for five years. The misuse or misapplication of shared resources or the supplantation of existing resources with shared assets is prohibited. Failure to comply with any provision of this agreement shall subject the recipient agency to the sanctions stipulated in the current edition of the Justice or Treasury Guides, depending on the source of the funds/property. 6. Audit Report. Audits will be conducted as provided by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133. The Department of Justice and Department of the Treasury reserve the right to conduct periodic random audits. Page 4 of 5 October 2012 Version 2.1 Affidavit - Amended Form Under penalty of perjury, the undersigned officials certify that they have read and understand their obligations under the Equitable Sharing Agreement and that the information submitted in conjunction with this Document is'an accurate accounting of funds received and spent by the Agency under the Justice and/or Treasury Guides during the reporting period and that the recipient Agency is in compliance with the National Code of Professional Conduct for Asset Forfeiture. The undersigned certify that the recipient Agency is in compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements of the following laws and their Department of Justice implementing regulations: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d etseq.), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681 etseq.), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6101 etseq.), which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in any federally assisted program or activity, or on the basis of sex in any federally assisted education program or activity. The Agency agrees that it will comply with all federal statutes and regulations permitting federal investigators access to records and any other sources of information as may be necessary to determine compliance with civil rights and other applicable statutes and regulations. During the past fiscal year: (1) has any court or administrative agency issued any finding, judgment, or determination that the Agency discriminated against any person or group in violation of any of the federal civil rights statutes listed above; or (2) has the Agency entered into any settlement agreement with respect to any complaint filed with a court or administrative agency alleging that the Agency discriminated against any person or group in violation of any of the federal civil rights statutes listed above? O Yes O No if you answered yes to the above question, complete Table 1 Agency Head Signature: Name: Latty Bla ton I/ X Title: Sh riff Date: E-mail: I,arry.~lanton@)deschutes.org Governing Body Head Signature: Name: Alan Unger Title: County Commissioner Date: E-mail: Alan.Unger@deschutes. Subscribe to Equitable Sharing Wire: The Equitable Sharing Wire is an electronic newsletter that gives you important, substantive, information regarding Equitable Sharing policies, practices, and procedures. Final Instructions: Step 1: Click to save for your records I Step 3: E-mail the XML file to aca.submit@usdoj.gov Step 2: Click to save in XML format Step 4: Fax THIS SIGNED PAGE ONLY to (202) 616-1344 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Entered by Entered on 0 FY End: 06/30/2013 Date Printed: September 17, 2013 08:12 O NCIC: OR0090000 Agency: Deschutes County Sheriffs Office Phone: 541-322-4819 0 State: OR Finance Contact: James Ross E-mail: jross@deschutes.org Page 5 of 5 October 2012 Version 2.1 AirLink to get a competitor; Life Flight Network to open base at Redmond Airport I I The Page 1 of 2 bendbull tin.com The Baetila . . . . Life Flight plans Redmond base as area's 2nd medical air outfit By Scott Hammers / The Bulletin Published: Eebroary 1E. 2012 4:00AM PST A second medical air transport company plans to touch down in Central Oregon next week, providing the first-ever competition for AirLink, the region's sole provider for nearly 30 years. Life Flight Network, based in Aurora, is scheduled to open a base at the Redmond Airport on Feb. 22. Holly Love, the company's director of customer service, said the base will open with a single helicopter for emergency patient transport, and that fixed-wing craft used for less urgent flights could be added later. The company said it plans to station 14 people, including pilots, medical personnel and mechanics, in Redmond. Love said the company's decision to move into the Central Oregon market is largely driven by the rapid growth in the region since 1985, when AirLink began flying under the name Air Life of Oregon. While the population has doubled, AirLink has stayed the same size, she said. Life Flight already has helicopters based in Eugene, Ontario and La Grande, Love said, which occasionally fly missions in Central Oregon when AirLink's helicopter is unavailable. "This is sort of the hub of the wheel," Love said. "If we put a base in Redmond we've sort of surrounded Central Oregon. It's a great fit; it makes a lot of sense." Emergency dispatchers send the nearest helicopter to incidents requiring air transport, Love said, so she expects Life Flight will pick up many of the flights in the northern part of the region, while Bend-based AirLink will respond to incidents farther south. However, representatives of AirLink aren't convinced such an arrangement can work for either company. Owned by Cascade Healthcare Communities, AirLink flies approximately 40 helicopter flights and 30 to 35 fixed-wing flights a month, according to Bob Gomes, a CHH executive who oversees the program as well as St. Charles Redmond and Pioneer Memorial Hospital in Prineville. Gomes said AirLink, based at St. Charles Bend, has explored adding a second helicopter in the past, but hasn't seen the demand to support such a move. "The pie's not very big, and I'm not sure there's enough for two of us here," Gomes said. Gomes said the use of helicopter transports has been declining in recent years, even as the area's population has grown. Ambulance providers have been investing in the training of their emergency responders, Gomes said, improving the level of care a patient can expect to receive during a ground trip to a hospital. Additionally, hospitals in Madras, Prineville and http://www.bendbulletin.comlappslpbcs.dll/article?AID=/201202161NEWS01 /2021603 89/... 9/24/2013 AirLink to get a competitor; Life Flight Network to open base at Redmond Airport I I The Page 2 of 2 Redmond have much better trauma centers than they did 10 years ago, he said, diminishing the need to rapidly transport patients to St. Charles Bend. Flights on an AirLink helicopter cost $8,000 to $10,000 on average, Gomes said, and are typically billed to a patient's insurance provider. Cascade Healthcare Communities will need to reassess its business plans for AirLink once Life Flight is up and running, Gomes said, but he's expecting it will be difficult for a small market to support two providers. "It's like setting up a second hospital in Prineville," he said. "It's a puzzle, I guess I don't see the volume." Love said Life Flight will be flying a helicopter much like the one used by AirLink. Neither helicopter offers any significant advantage over the other in terms of speed or performance at high altitude or in adverse conditions. Flights from either company will transport patients to whatever medical facility is recommended by ground paramedics responding to an incident. Airt-ink and Life Flight operate under a similar business model, selling annual memberships that ensure individuals who are transported by air pay nothing out-of-pocket. Due to a reciprocity agreement between the companies, patients with a membership with either company are transported at no charge on the other company's aircraft. - Reporter: 541-383-0387, shammers@bendbulletin.com Published Daily in Bend Oregon by Western Communications, Inc. © 2011 www.bendbulletin.com httD://www.bendbulletin.comlapps/pbes. dll/article?AID=1201202161NEWS01 /2021603 89/... 9/24/2013 Bonnie Baker From: Jerry Thackery <jthack@bendbroadband. com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 2:45 PM To: Board Subject: Emergency Medical transport by air. Good afternoon Commissioners, The issue of two competing emergency air transports companies in central Oregon to causing citizens a lot of money. I am sure that you know that the injured person does not have a choice as to which company is called. If you are a member of the "other" company, there is no honoring membership, one to the other, and the patient is out several thousand dollars, without recourse. I truly believe that this is wrong. One should not have to pay membership to both companies. I do not know if the commission has dealt with this matter before but it is a significant annual cost to the citizens to have to a member of each company. Thank you, Jerry Thackery Redmond