Loading...
1989-03-28 - Ballots A OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 -1,2,4,.6,7.$,9,10,11,12,13,20,25, 27,32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. _ - '-- 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 4-year term JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 BEND METRO PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT AA Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NOD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M.BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D.FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.6 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DENNIS R.STAINES 15 CLOVERDALE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 MIA SCHRAEDER 60 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRANK I.PETERSON 61 _ 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E.PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L.BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5.THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%.This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions.The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include:rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of$165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per $1,000 assessed value in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- YES 98 mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. NO 99 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C.HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W.BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G.DAVIDSON 106 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means,unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT AB , Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD Deschutes Count y 9 No. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTOR, FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 POSITION 5, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE --��-_- i DENWIS R.STAINES 15 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT AC PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CORD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALCON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25,27, 32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FAR OP:€ ----- - - -- -- - DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION CARD Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NO. CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%. This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions.The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989190 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- NO 99 mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 LOYD PETERSEN 108 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 ROBERT C. BROADDUS 109 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 LOYD PRIDAY 110 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO AC PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote In any particular. manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT AC PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.6.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBE_RT P. HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board'Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. _ 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service. We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint. That is that I don't agree with them. 1 am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy & Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,1 feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO AC PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly Influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. AD OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM __--ViDT-E FOR ONE - _K-EN COX -- - -- DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE MARK H. HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 ROBERT PETERS 33 BEND METRO PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE'FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. AE OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NO EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DENNIS R.STAINES 15 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION: Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%. This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per $1,000 assessed value in fiscal year 1989/90. YES 98 The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. NO 99 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. AF OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25, — -z7;32,�5,37,4 ,45;46 and 47:-- - -- —-- - -- --- - 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 JON CORBIN SR. 30 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT AG Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD PAGE 1 y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25,27, 32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%.This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. _ It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO AG PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular.manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. r a OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT AG Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD PAGE 2 y 9 N.O. 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am gommitted to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process.The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint. That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy & Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities I believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NOD 9.10.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2.1 are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel 1 have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED. YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO AG PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. 4 OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT A H Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CNOD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M.BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D.FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2,4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 1-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 SISTERS-CAMP SHERMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GREG BROWN at 53 DIRECTORS HAROLD(HAL)COE AT-LARGE BARBARA K.HAYNES 55 VOTE FOR FIVE ALBERT MCKENZIE 56 STEPHEN S.SPEAR 57 OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1,DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. - 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA,DIRECTOR,POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD,POSITION 2,DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,DIRECTOR,POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives,past and present,have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded,competent young adults,within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board,1 have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators,fellow Board Members,and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals,we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member,I have always worked with the students'best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means,unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. M;...... - - ---------- r OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT CARD Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NO. 9.8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD,POSITION 3,DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER,DIRECTOR,POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years;in an unpaid position.I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few.I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives In a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year,some extremely difficult decisions had to be made:whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence In education and the best possible education for our students within our resources.I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD,POSITION 4,DIRECTOR. Our reasons fof reoaB of the Board Members of Distric4 2J are: -- 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON,DIRECTOR,POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process.The expressed reasons are untrue,and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy&Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our chlldrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 9.10.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD,POSITION 5,DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public Input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS,DIRECTOR,POSITION S. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member.I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me 1 am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests.We have,indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing.We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and,as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.in short,I feel 1 have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction,to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. B OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D.FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NOA DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK I+BOON - _--- - _ 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 --- - BEND,-METR0+ARK-ia"—RECREATION DISTRICT - - DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 ©IVtQi�f3"SCHOOL`DtSTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9-5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%. This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO C PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD 9.6.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made:whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy& Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation 4. Extra-curricular activities YES 144 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO C PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT D Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE - KENCOX _ 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE, MARK H. HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS T 33_ LAPINE ATTENDANCE AREA LOCAL COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBER PAUL E.JACKSON 34 THREE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LAPINE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 9-3. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall LaPine Fire District levy $247,126.00 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION:The funds requested would allow the district to have a fully funded emergency medical care operation. Insurance and patient billings would not be continued. All patient services would be maintained at the current level. If both funding alternatives are approved, the one that has the highest number of votes will be enacted by the Board. This levy will only be in effect YES 41 for the tax year 1989-90. NO 42 9.4. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY, PARTIAL FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall the LaPine Fire District levy$115,000 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION.-This levy wilt be for partial funding of Emergency Medical-Transport;Services:-The levy will only be in effect for the tax year 1989-90. The balance of funding will come through Fire Med memberships, insurance payments, and the billing of non-members. All patient services would be maintained at their cur- rent level. Without some tax support this present level cannot be maintained. If both of the funding alter- natives are approved, the Board will enact the one with the highest number of votes. YES 44 NO 45 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 DONALD L. BELL 47 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE BRUCE WOODWORTH 48 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 JAMES S.(JIM)MURA 49 4-year term HOWARD A. PURDEN 111 50 VOTE FOR ONE CHERYL RIDDLE 51 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT E Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 _DIRECTOR,ZONE 4 JACKH,BOON--- — — - -- —____ _ 2 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6, AT-LARGE, DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FJRE_PROTECTIONAnSTRIGT NO.2__ DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 REDMOND SCHOOL DIST-FUGT 2.1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L.BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9-5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%.This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss_ plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 LOYD PETERSEN 108 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 ROBERT C.BROADDUS 109 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 LOYD PRIDAY 110 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO F PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NAORD _F 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds haves not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. _ _ YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P. HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals,we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made:whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9-9.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DiREETOR:Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy& Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation 4. Extra-curricular activities YES 144 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9-10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO F PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. G OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25, 27,32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. _- 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE, MARK H. HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE __ LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 JON CORBIN SR. 30 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT , Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD Deschutes Count y g NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 _ CENTRAL OREGON-COMMUNITY COLLEGE - DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25,27, 32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.11 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. _ 1. I feel the levy failures_are_more aresult of high h taxes and the taxing mgihod rather than the low of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P. HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals,we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall-which-will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. - SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9-9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process.The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy &Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DENNIS R.STAINES 15 SISTERS-CAMP SHERMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GREG BROWN 53 DIRECTORS HAROLD(HAL)COE 54 AT-LARGE BARBARA K. HAYNES 55 VOTE FOR FIVE ALBERT McKENZIE 56 STEPHEN S.SPEAR 57 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE -__DIRECTOR, ZQNE_4,Pr-ecin 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20;25, 27,32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE MARK�� H.HENRY , _v _ 28 UNEXPIR 1-WO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 JON CORBIN SR. 30 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 BEND METRO PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTO-R, POSITION 5--- -NO CANDIDATE-FILE-D--- -- 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 1 PAUL CONVERSE 11 Deschutes Co. Prec. 18 and portion of Jefferson &Wasco Co. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE JIM RAMSEY 12 REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE ---- DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%. This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to elimate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. NO 99 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 LOYD PETERSEN 108 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 ROBERT C. BROADDUS 109 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 LOYD PRIDAY 110 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO K PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts. We went with the majority. -_ YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals,we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made:whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOAFtD,POSiTiOt",-OtRECT-OR--- Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy& Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not. I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO K PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT -- SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County,Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 7 EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M.BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D.FALLON 3: 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE' JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, 20NE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 - QOI1I REC - - 4 4-y ! t� 4 VOTE'FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 2� DIRECTOR,,ZONE 5 TERRY L.RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE MARK H.HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN?SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an olector,to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN. VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D.FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DENNIS R.STAINES 15 CLOVERDALE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 MIASCHRAEDER 60 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRANK I. PETERSON 61 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. N OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CA EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE - DIRECTOR, ZONE 1 PAUL CONVERSE 11 Deschutes Co. Prec. 18 and portion of Jefferson &Wasco Co. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE JIM RAMSEY 12 REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y s NO. CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%.This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES -in-fiscal-year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. NO 99 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 LOYD PETERSEN 108 4-year term: VOTE FOR ONE -- -- DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 ROBERT C.BROADDUS 109 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 LOYD PRIDAY 110 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE TERREBONNE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 RICHARD E.SAWDYE 111 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE KAY WALTERS 112 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 KAREN McBRIDE 113 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE BILL TITTLE 114 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 HENRY F. BOSCHMA 115 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO N PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT N PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD 9.6.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds hays not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. --- - - _YES -124 - -. SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.11 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.11 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.11 SCHOOL -- - BOAfIB, POSITION _-_- Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and,use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint. That is that I don't agree with them. 1 am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy &Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD Y 9 NO. 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS, A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO N PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT 0 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M.BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 SISTERS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FARREL ROTHAUGE 14 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DENNIS R.STAINES 15 BLACK BUTTE RANCH RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 DAN W.NORDHILL 63 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 JACK D.SWANER 64 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 KARL A.SCHALKA 65 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A.MILLER 8 - _ CENTRAL OREGON-COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25, 27,32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 9.6.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL'OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds haves not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's writterrpoftcies. .— -- 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made:whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9-9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process.The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy&Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation 4. Extra-curricular activities YES 144 I believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITIONS, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 -- - --------_._CENTRAL ORECONI_CQMMUNITY CO EGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25,27, 13 32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE LAIDLAW WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 NO CANDIDATE FILED 2-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB ROBERTSON 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE 121 DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 2-year term. VOTE FOR ONE OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds haves not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts. We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9-7.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to aIT6W community-input and-particiliAtion-In-school board decision making. ------I - ­ I As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions. As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9-8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our ---YES 140 SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9-9.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process.The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint.That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy &Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities I believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 9-10.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not. I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and, in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING., TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. k- OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRCTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 LAPINE ATTENDANCE AREA LOCAL COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBER PAUL E.JACKSON 34 THREE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LAPINE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 9.3. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall LaPine Fire District levy $247,126.00 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION:The funds requested would allow the district to have a fully funded emergency medical care operation. Insurance and patient billings would not be continued. All patient services would be maintained at the current level. If both funding alternatives are approved, the one that has the -- highest number of votes will be enacted by the Board. This levy will only be in effect YES 41 for the tax year 1989-90. NO 42 9-4. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY, PARTIAL FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall the LaPine Fire District levy$115,000 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION: This levy be for partial funding of Emergency Medical Transport Services. The levy will only be in effect for tfie tax year 1989-90.The_ aTance oTfundmg will came t -rougTi'Fire-M-edmeMGefs-hips, - insurance payments, and the billing of non-members. All patient services would be maintained at their cur- rent level. Without some tax support this present level cannot be maintained. If both of the funding alter- natives are approved, the Board will enact the one with the highest number of votes. YES 44 NO 45 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 DONALD L. BELL 47 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE BRUCE WOODWORTH 48 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 JAMES S.(JIM)MURA 49 4-year term HOWARD A. PURDEN 111 50 VOTE FOR ONE CHERYL RIDDLE 51 LAPINE SPECIAL SEWER DISTRICT DIRECTORS JAMES L.NEWTON 67 , VOTE FOR TWO STANLEY M. RUSSELL 68 WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD —S NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON __ 24_ 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE MARK H. HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 — —BEND METRO PARK AND RE-CREATION-DISTRICT - DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE SUNRISE VILLAGE SANITARY DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT , Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD Deschutes Count Y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE_ KEN COX — - 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 JON CORBIN SR. 30 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 LAPINE ATTENDANCE AREA LOCAL COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBER PAUL E.JACKSON 34 THREE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LAPINE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 9.3. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall LaPine Fire District levy $247,126.00 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION:The funds requested would allow the district to have a fully funded emergency medical care operation. Insurance and patient billings would not be continued. All patient services would be maintained at the current level. If both funding alternatives are approved, the one that has the highest number of votes will be enacted by the Board. This levy will only be in effect YES 41 for the tax year 1989-90. NO 42 9-4. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY, PARTIAL FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION:Shall the LaPine Fire District levy$115,000 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANTATfON.This levy wUl be f r partial funding of Emergency Medical Transport Services.The levy will only be in effect for the tax year 1989-90. The balance of funding will come through Fire Med memberships, insurance payments, and the billing of non-members. All patient services would be maintained at their cur- rent level. Without some tax support this present level cannot be maintained. If both of the funding alter- natives are approved, the Board will enact the one with the highest number of votes. YES 44 NO 45 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 DONALD L. BELL 47 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE BRUCE WOODWORTH 48 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 JAMES S.(JIM)MURA 49 4-year term HOWARD A. PURDEN III 50 VOTE FOR ONE CHERYL RIDDLE 51 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NO. OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT II SANITARY DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 GEORGE M. FORSYTH 70 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 THOMAS P.GIBBONS 71 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE 9.2. INCREASE BOARD MEMBERS OREGON WATER WONDERLAND-UNIT II SANITARY DISTRICT. QUESTION: Shall Oregon Water Wonderland-Unit II Sanitary District increase the number of board members? EXPLANATION: If a majority of the votes case are in favor of the increase, the District Board of Oregon Water Wonderland-Unit II Sanitary District will be increased from three members to five members. YES 73 NO 74 DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CLAUDEEN R.COLLINS 75 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 JAMES D. MILLER 76 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 LAPINE ATTENDANCE AREA LOCAL COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBER PAUL E.JACKSON 34 THREE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LAPINE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 9-3. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION: Shall LaPine Fire District levy $247,126.00 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION:The funds requested would allow the district to have a fully funded emergency medical care operation. Insurance and patient billings would not be continued. All patient services would be maintained at the current level. If both funding alternatives are approved, the one that has the highest number of votes will be enacted by the Board. This levy will only be in effect YES 41 for the tax year 1989-90. NO 42 9.4. ONE YEAR OPERATING LEVY, PARTIAL FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. QUESTION:Shall the LaPine Fire District levy$115,000 outside the tax base for operating purposes for 1989-90? EXPLANATION: This levy will be for partial funding of Emergency Medical Transport Services. The levy will only be in effect for the tax year 1989-90. The balance of funding will come through Fire Med memberships, insurance payments, and the billing of non-members. All patient services would be maintained at their cur- rent level. Without some tax support this present level cannot be maintained. If both of the funding alter- natives are approved, the Board will enact the one with the highest number of votes. YES 44 NO 45 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 DONALD L. BELL 47 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE BRUCE WOODWORTH 48 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 JAMES S.(JIM)MURA 49 4-year term HOWARD A. PURDEN III 50 VOTE FOR ONE CHERYL RIDDLE 51 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NO. OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT 1 SPECIAL"ROAD DISTRICT 9.1. DISSOLUTION OF OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT 1 SPECIAL ROAD DISTRICT. QUESTION: Shall the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 1 Special Road District be dissolved? EXPLANATION: A "yes" vote on this measure will dissolve the Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 1 Special Road District. Dissolution is recommended by the district board because district electors failed to approve an operating levy (twice). The district lacks sufficient funds to continue providing road maintenance. If the district is dissolved, all remaining district funds will be transferred to Special Road District No. 1, which will provide road maintenance within Oregon Water Wonderland Unit 1 Special Road District until the transferred funds are exhausted. YES 79 NO 80 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y s NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 4, Precincts JIM LUSSIER 13 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,25, 27,32,35,37,41,45,46 and 47. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE KEN COX 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE MARK H. HENRY 28 UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 JON CORBIN SR. 30 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 BEND METRO PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 CATHIE GERLICHER 36 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 NO CANDIDATE FILED 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 2 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 AL MAHONEY 38 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHUCK STEIN 39 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 WM G.CUSTER 40 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RIMROCK WEST SANITARY DISTRICT DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 NO CANDIDATE FILED 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 CHESTER M. PAISE 82 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 HAROLD G. BRAINERD 83 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT PAGE 1 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NOD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIRECTOR, ZONE 1 PAUL CONVERSE 11 Deschutes Co. Prec. 18 and portion of Jefferson &Wasco Co. 4-year term. VOTE FOR ONE JIM RAMSEY 12 REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 CENTRAL OREGON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 KENNETH NOAH 85 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 BOB McWILLIAMS 86 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 MICHAEL E. PRICE 87 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 6 HARRY L. BRENDLE 88 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE VERLE(JACK)STRICKLER 89 DIRECTOR, POSITION 7 KAREN KRAMER 90 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT , Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD Deschutes Count Y 9 NO. CENTRAL OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 9.5. THREE-YEAR OPERATING LEVY. QUESTION:Shall Central Oregon Park and Recreation District Levy$165,196 for three years outside the tax base for operations beginning 1989/90? EXPLANATION:This measure will provide necessary funds for existing services and needed repairs and im- provements at the Cascade Swim Center. During the fiscal year 1988/89 the District cut the number of full-time employees by 12%. This levy does not reinstate lost positions nor will it create any new positions. The levy will allow the District to continue pool operations and recreation programs at current levels. The building repairs and improvements will include: rust treatment on roof truss plates, insulating exterior walls to eliminate condensation inside the building, and adding office space. The total amount of money to be raised by this levy will be $495,588 to be levied in equal proportions of $165,196 over the fiscal years 1989/90 through 1991/92. It is estimated this action will increase tax rates by 45 cents per$1,000 assessed value YES 98 in fiscal year 1989/90. The estimated tax cost for this measure is an estimate only based on the best infor- mation available from the County Assessor at the time of estimate. NO 99 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 BRUCE BURGER 101 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE RON LANE 102 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 PAUL C. HATHAWAY 103 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 GORDON DETZEL 104 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 5 FRED W. BALDWIN 105 2-year term VOTE FOR ONE DON G. DAVIDSON 106 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO IN PAGE 2. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote In any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT - RECALL ELECTION BALLOT W .PAGE 2 Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.6. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts. We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9-7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P. HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2.1 are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 9.8. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills. I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9-9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.1 SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint. That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy & Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. 9-10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. 1 do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that 1 have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not'be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN TO W PAGE 1. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly Influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 NO CANDIDATE FILED ZONE 3 1 year term VOTE FOR ONE — - BROTHERS SCHOOL DISTRUCT 140.45 DIRECTOR, POSITION 1 MICHAEL C.YOUNG 10 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 NOD EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY•DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE JOAN A.SILVER 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTOR, ZONE 3 CHUCK BRINK 22 UNEXPIRED ONE-YEAR TERM ____ VQT.E FOR ONE KFN COX _ _ 23 DIRECTOR, ZONE 4 JACK H. BOON 24 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE JACK RUBLE 25 DIRECTOR, ZONE 5 TERRY L. RAHMSDORFF 26 UNEXPIRED, TWO-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, ZONE 6 DAVID A. FREDSTROM 27 AT-LARGE UNEXPIRED TWO-YEAR TERM MARK H. HENRY 28 VOTE FOR ONE LANCE ALLEN LOY 29 JON CORBIN SR. 30 DIRECTOR, ZONE 7 AT-LARGE WARREN KLUG 31 FOUR-YEAR TERM JAN LaCHAPELLE 32 VOTE FOR ONE ROBERT PETERS 33 LAPINE ATTENDANCE AREA LOCAL COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBER PAUL E.JACKSON 34 THREE-YEAR TERM VOTE FOR ONE WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD y 9 NO. EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR, AT-LARGE KATHLEEN M. BONI 2 POSITION 5 DENISE D. FALLON 3 4-year term LAURIE INACY-DOTSON 4 VOTE FOR ONE, JOAN A.SILVER 5 DIRECTOR, POSITION 2 DONALD F.CHAPIN 7 ZONE 2, 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE GARTH A. MILLER 8 REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J DIRECTOR, POSITION 3 ANN LeSUER MILLER 16 4-year term VOTE FOR ONE DIRECTOR, POSITION 4 GENE CARTWRIGHT 17 one-year term DEAN KOETHKE 18 VOTE FOR ONE NEIL C.THOMPSON 19 OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 9.6.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARK LATTA,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 1, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of fcllowing the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1. 1. 1 feel the levy failures are more a result of high taxes and the taxing method rather than the loss of public trust. 2. The job of the school board is to see that the students get the best education for the money available.There was a large turnout at the meeting when transportation and athletics were cut and the majority asked for these cuts rather than cut into the academic programs. 3. These funds have not been lost yet and there is a good possibility with the legislature trying to improve the school funding problem that they won't be lost. 4. 1 don't feel that I have failed to follow district policy. 5. The board had large turnouts for the meetings on the bussing and athletics cuts.We went with the majority. YES 124 SHALL MARK LATTA, DIRECTOR, POSITION 1, BE RECALLED? NO 125 9.7. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF ROBERT P.HAAK,JR.,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 2, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY ROBERT P. HAAK,JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2. As a member of the Redmond School District 2J Board of Directors,I have maintained and established district policies,and prioritized the programs and services provided within the law. My objectives, past and present, have been to best fulfill the educational needs of our students and the district's goals to develop well-rounded, competent young adults, within the financial limitations provided. As chairman of the Redmond School Board, I have represented and acted as liaison between District Administrators, fellow Board Members, and the Oregon School Boards Association. The board has always encouraged public participation in school activities.We have always provided open school board meetings to allow community input and participation in school board decision making. As a board and as individuals, we have never been involved in any illegal or unethical actions.As a parent and as a board member, I have always worked with the students' best interests at heart. SHALL ROBERT P. HAAK, JR., DIRECTOR, POSITION 2, BE RECALLED? YES 129 NO 130 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both. OFFICIAL BALLOT — RECALL ELECTION BALLOT Deschutes County, Oregon, March 28, 1989 CARD NO. 9.8.REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF MARIANNE WALKER,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 3, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. 6. Lack of adequate Board leadership. JUSTIFICATION OF HER COURSE IN OFFICE BY MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3. 1 have been elected three times by the voters of this District to provide a quality education for our children and have served for ten years in an unpaid position. I feel an obligation to represent the opinions and desires of the citizens of this District and not of just a vocal few. I am committed to excellence in education to prepare our children for more effective lives in a stronger America. Because of severe financial problems this year, some extremely difficult decisions had to be made: whether to cut about 25 to 30 teaching positions or to cut bus service.We chose to preserve the academic program for the children and to protect the classroom. Our school district is one of the best in Oregon because it provides a strong basic education without frills.I want our level of educa- tion to remain high and strong,to provide maximum excellence in education and the best possible education for our students within our resources. I will not be satisfied with mediocrity! I am proud of the Redmond School District. Please don't support an unjustified recall which will discourage future candidates from serving our YES 140 community. SHALL MARIANNE WALKER, DIRECTOR, POSITION 3, BE RECALLED? NO 141 9.9. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF NEIL THOMPSON,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 4, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4. The recall effort is a misuse of the recall process. The expressed reasons are untrue, and are being used to cover their real com- plaint. That is that I don't agree with them. I am guilty of not agreeing with them. My priorities for decision making as a school board director are: 1. Healthy & Safe environment 2. Quality in Class programs 3. Transportation YES 144 4. Extra-curricular activities 1 believe this to be a sound basis for deciding our childrens future. SHALL NEIL THOMPSON, DIRECTOR, POSITION 4, BE RECALLED? NO 145 9.10. REASON FOR DEMANDING THE RECALL OF STEVEN CROSS,A MEMBER OF REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J SCHOOL BOARD, POSITION 5, DIRECTOR. Our reasons for recall of the Board Members of District 2J are: 1. Loss of the public's trust and confidence resulting in levy failures. 2. Failure to adequately prioritize the schools needs. 3. Loss of transportation rebate funds. 4. Lack of following the District's written policies. 5. Failure to seek out and use public input. JUSTIFICATION OF HIS COURSE IN OFFICE BY STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5. This is a letter of rebuttal to the charges placed against me as a school board member. I do not feel I have lost the public's trust and confidence as twenty people tell me what a good job I am doing compared to one who tells me I am not.I think that I have adequately set priorities for school needs because I have placed educational interests above transportation interests. We have, indeed, lost transportation rebate funds for this year but that was a choice of the public not to continue busing. We have been accused of not following written policies for the district because we did not provide busing. This policy has never been stated in full publicly and, as the policy states,any major change in busing must be approved by the board.We have always used public input to make our decisions and,in fact,the decision to cut busing was made at a public meeting where public input demanded that we cut busing.In short,I feel I have completely fulfilled my responsibility as a school board member and should not be recalled. SHALL STEVEN CROSS, DIRECTOR, POSITION 5, BE RECALLED? YES 148 NO 149 TO CONTINUE VOTING, TURN PAGE OVER. WARNING Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an elector to vote in any particular manner OR TO REFRAIN FROM VOTING, is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment or to a fine, or both.