The URL can be used to link to this page

1998-11-03 - Voters Pamphlet - State \r� d ll�f, c. mow wdr ot, ,.+11;7;,■�•�• ail.• , , 5, �.`�' .G. �...�1��• `` .\, f.;. om OF PHIL KEI8LING �� STATE OF OREGON SECRETARY of STATE SECRETARY OF STATE MICHAEL GREENFIELD ': Z 136 STATE CAPITOL DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE SALEM,OREGON 97310-0722 (503)986-1500 Dear Oregonian: THIS IS VOLUME 1 OF A 2 VOLUME 1998 GENERAL ELECTION VOTERS' PAMPHLET. As in the 1996 General Election, a high number of referred and initiated measures on the ballot, combined with numerous measure arguments filed for and against those measures, makes it more efficient to separate the State Voters' Pamphlet into two parts. Volume 1 contains the ballot titles, text, fiscal impact and explanatory statements, and arguments in sup- port or opposition for the 14 state measures on the ballot:It also contains important information about registering to vote, updating your voter registration and obtaining absentee ballots from your county elec- tions official. If you, or any eligible member of your household, are not now registered to vote, please seriously consider doing so.With the critical decisions facing our national, state and local communities this election, your personal participation will increase the probability that the right choices are made and will strengthen the safeguards provided by an informed and active electorate. Volume 2 of the 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet will contain the list of state measures and can- didates, polling place locations, voting instructions, political party statements and the;statements filed by individual candidates.Your version of Volume 2 might also contain ballot measures, measure arguments and candidate statements for counties and the Metropolitan Service District (Metro), and candidate state- ments for cities with a population greater than 50,000. In addition, your county might have chosen to pub- lish its County Voters' Pamphlet in combination with Volume 2. Some counties might mail a County Voters' Pamphlet separately. Volume 2 will be mailed to every Oregon household next week. As you acquaint yourself with the measures in this volume, you will read fiscal impact statements that have been prepared by a committee of state officials. Under state law, the committee is allowed to esti- mate only the "direct impact" on state and local governments.These are estimates based on the best information readily available; indirect consequences or costs that.are too conjectural are not included. Other potential impacts—to businesses, families, the economy, etc.—are not included in these estimates. You will need to derive that information from the arguments of the proponents and opponents and from your own calculations. Please make sure you are registered to vote by October 13 and then make sure you vote on November 3 or that your absentee ballot is received by your county elections official by 8 p.m. November 3. Best, i) / � G Phil Keisling M' Secretary of State On the Cover:Timberline Lodge, constructed on Mount Hood in 1937 as a Works Progress Administration(WPA)pro- ject, is the crown jewel of lodge architecture in Oregon. The cover of this voters'pamphlet is a WPA drawing from the Friends of Timberline Archives, courtesy of Friends of Timberline, PO Box 40580, Portland OR 97240-0580. Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Information GENERAL Your official 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet is divided The explanatory statement is an impartial statement explaining into two separate volumes.This is a result of having 14 statewide the measure.Each measure's explanatory statement is written by measures on the ballot and 248 arguments filed in support of or a committee of five members, including two proponents of the in opposition to these measures.The amount of information to be measure, two opponents of the measure and a fifth member included in the voters'pamphlet was too large to be bound into appointed by the first four committee members, or, if they fail to one book in a cost-effective manner. agree on a fifth member, appointed by the Secretary of State. Explanatory statements can be appealed and may be changed by This is Volume 1 and contains information on the statewide ballot the Oregon Supreme Court. measures, as well as information on registering to vote and obtaining an absentee ballot.Volume 2 will include the list of state Citizens or organizations may file arguments in favor of, or in measures and candidates, statements submitted by state candi- opposition to, measures by purchasing space for$300 or by sub- dates, political party statements, polling place locations, voting mittin.g a petition signed by 1,000 voters.Arguments in favor of a instructions and other miscellaneous voting aids. It may also measure appear first, followed by arguments in opposition to the include your county voters' pamphlet if your county chooses to measure,and are printed in the order in which they are filed with produce a voters'pamphlet in combination with the state.Volume the Secretary of State's office. 2 will be mailed the week of October 16. Additionally, measures 54 through 56 were referred to Oregon For each of the 14 statewide measures in this voters'pamphlet voters by the 1997 Legislature and you will find a "Legislative you will find the following information: Argument in Support" for each of these measures. Oregon law (1) the ballot title; allows the Legislature to submit,at no cost, an argument in sup- port of each measure it refers to the people. (2) estimate of financial impact; The Voters' Pamphlet has been compiled by the Secretary of (3) complete text of the proposed measure; State since 1903,when Oregon became one of the first states to provide for the printing and distribution of such a publication.One (4) explanatory statement;and copy of the Voters'Pamphlet is mailed to every household in the (5) arguments filed by proponents and opponents of the state. Additional copies are available at the State Capitol, local measure. post offices,courthouses and all county election offices. The ballot title is drafted by the Attorney General's office.It is then distributed to a list of interested parties for public comment.After review of any comments submitted, the ballot title is certified by the Attorney General's office. The certified ballot title can be appealed and may be changed by the Oregon Supreme Court. The estimate of financial impact for each measure is prepared by F a committee of state officials including the Secretary of State,the State Treasurer, the Director of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services and the Director of the Department of Revenue.The committee estimates only the direct impact on state and local governments. ATTENTION: The State of Oregon prints measure arguments as submitted by the author. The state does not correct punctuation, grammar, syntax errors or inaccurate informa- tion.The only changes made are attempts to correct spelling errors if the word as originally submitted is not in the dictionary. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page AbsentVoter.................................................................. 161 State Measure No.61.................................................... 69 State Measure No.54.................................................... 4 State Measure No.62.................................................... 78 State Measure No.55.................................................... 7 State Measure No.63.................................................... 89 State Measure No.56.................................................... 12 State Measure No.64.................................................... 96 State Measure No.57.................................................... 20 State Measure No.65.................................................... 123 State Measure No.58.................................................... 34 State Measure No.66.................................................... 135 StateMeasure No.59.................................................... 42 State Measure No.67.................................................... 148 State Measure No.60.................................................... 61 Voter Registration.......................................................... 163 ELECTION DAY IS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. 3 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 54 House Joint Resolution 71—Referred to the Electorate of Oregon incurred to refund the school district,education service dis- by the 1997 Legislature to be voted on at the General Election, trict or community college district general obligation bonded November 3, 1998. indebtedness. SECTION 3.The Legislative Assembly may provide that reimbursement to the state shall be obtained from,but shall BALLOT TITLE not beep programs ited to,moneys that otherwise would be used for the support of the educational of the school dis- trict,the education service district or the community college district that incurred the bonded indebtedness with respect �'( /#fidN COI�STNTtJIi 101V:ItUTMfi}RIES STATE to which any payment under the state's guaranty is made. "IDS C TEE BQPll3EQ tN HTE13tYE5 t F SECTION 4.The State of Oregon may issue bonds Wand as necessary to provide funding to satisfy the state's guaranty CEfTA1N EiiCATIQt+I I?IT4tCTS obligations undertaken pursuant to this Article.In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article VIII of this REStIrT© "Y "tfT :"YES vote authttizes stete tc3 guaraCt Constitution, the state may borrow available moneys from >klt*genrt�bilgttn txindS issued byte rtein edu+ation districts.! the Common School Fund if such borrowing is reasonably Rt SA) T O "I'�1fQ7 E:°"No" tote retains prohibition against necessary to satisfy the state's guaranty obligations under- state•gttatrl csf enrol cbligit#icsn bonds issued by education taken pursuant to this Article.The State of Oregon also may cltStrs issue bonds if and as necessary to provide funding to repay the borrowed moneys, and any interest thereon, to the Anstttutlon now nerafly prcftibtts state front cre-' Common School Fund.The bonds shall be payable from any or 16Cidlflg its credit,Measure stTtandS! moneys reimbursed to the state under section 3 of this op6SttttrCstt. lr�rtf#ting s #e trt; guarantee general 611 1' Article, from any moneys recoverable from the school dis- bcindecl Int tf drfess of Scftgcl CfIS#rtctS,l edtaGt3tir3n SE?rvice dfsS trict,the education service district or the community college trios,66mmu nt t odllege di #riots.Limits amount to#e can,tJuar- district that incurred the bonded indebtedness with respect antee to 1le of one:p, of#ru z Cash value of taxable prcrPer#y' to which any payment under the state's guaranty is made, IM State.State may Issue btsnds' rrow'from Common School any other funds available for these purposes and,if 0,400 0 obltgatiitt Legislature must enact StStttte$a�.ttho-' sary,from state ad valorem taxes. t lr�g state•ta recover,from district Payments made to satisfy SECTION 5. Bonds of the state issued pursuant to this �t� atntee of diStT[Gt dent Article shall be the direct obligations of the state and shall be in such form, run for such periods of time and bear such ISTIj1 ,llF FINANCIAL t1VPACT: Redueect interest and rates of interest as shall be provided by law.The bonds may i$ no casts can tndeb#edne�'s y participating 5cttorrt distridtS, be refunded with bonds of like obligation. educstign service districts and smmunity college districts are SECTION 6.The Legislative Assembly shall enact legisla- estimafed tai .r7£)million overate next 2#fytaars under this mea- tion to carry out the provisions of this Article,including pro- cure. W:.a #im4te is based on current levels of Ixand issuance. visions that authorize the state's recovery,from any school There is Q0 1f nciai effect ctrl State government,revenues or district,education service district or community college die expetltltturtS' • trict that incurred the bonded indebtedness with respect to , which any payment under the state's guaranty is made,any amounts necessary to make the state whole. This Article shall supersede all conflicting constitutional provisions and shall supersede any conflicting provision of any law, ordi- TEXT OF MEASURE nance or charter pertaining to any school district,education service district or community college district. Be It Resolved by the Legislative Assembly of the State of PARAGRAPH 2.The amendment proposed by this resolu- Oregon: tion shall be submitted to the people for their approval or PARAGRAPH 1. The Constitution of the State of Oregon is rejection at the next regular general election held throughout this state. amended by creating a new Article to be known as Article XI-K and to read: NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and ARTICLE XI-K italic]type indicates deletions or comments. SECTION 1.To secure lower interest costs on the general obligation bonds of school districts,education service dis- tricts and community college districts,the State of Oregon may guarantee the general obligation bonded indebtedness of those districts as provided in sections 2 to 6 of this Article and laws enacted pursuant to this Article. SECTION 2. In the manner provided by law and notwith- standing the limitations contained in sections 7 and 8,Article XI of this Constitution,the credit of the State of Oregon may be loaned and indebtedness incurred, in an amount not to exceed,at any one time,one-half of one percent of the true cash value of all taxable property in the state, to provide funds as necessary to satisfy the state guaranty of the bonded general obligation indebtedness of school districts, education service districts and comrnjunity college districts that qualify, under procedures that shall be established by law,to issue general obligation bonds that are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of this state.The state may guarantee the general obligation debt of qualified school districts,edu- cation service districts and community college districts and may guarantee general obligation bonded indebtedness 4 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures • r Measure No . 54 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT LEGISLATIVE ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT Measure 54 amends the Oregon Constitution by creating VOTE YES TO BENEFIT SCHOOLS AND Article XI-K related to the state's guarantee of general obligation TAXPAYERS bonds issued by local education districts for the purpose of secur- ing Measure 54 gives qualified districts the same bond rate as the lower interest costs on the bonds. state to: Measure 54 allows the state to guarantee the payment of Lower bond costs for many school districts;and general obligation bonds issued by qualified school districts, Save taxpayers money on bond interest costs. community college districts and education service districts.The Measure 54 applies to new voter approved bonds issued by state's guarantee would not alter a district's responsibility to repay School Districts. its own bonds.The measure would not change voter approval or Education Service Districts. other requirements districts currently have to meet to issue gen- eral obligation bonds. Community College Districts. The Oregon Constitution generally prohibits the state from Measure 54 lending its credit or creating debt or liabilities that exceed Allows the state to guarantee payment of bonds. $50,000.The measure creates an exception to these prohibitions. Limits total bonds guaranteed by the state. • Requires districts to qualify for the state guarantee. Measure 54 allows the state to pay the guaranteed indebted- ness by using available state funds,borrowing from the Common INTEREST RATES School Fund or issuing state bonds.The measure further allows the state to issue bonds to reimburse moneys borrowed from the VOTE YES ON MEASURE 54 Common School Fund. The measure limits the amount of the state bonds that may be issued to one-half of one percent of state Committee Members: Appointed By: taxable property value. Senator Verne Duncan President of the Senate Measure 54 allows for reimbursement to the state for any state Representative Randall Edwards Speaker of the House or district bond payments from: Representative Ken Strobeck Speaker of the House 1.State funds allocated to the district education programs; (This Joint Legislative Committee was appointed to provide the legislative 2. Recoverable district funds; argument in support of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.245.) 3.Any other funds available for these purposes;and 4. If necessary,a state property tax. Measure 54 directs the Legislative Assembly to enact legisla- tion to carry out the provisions of the Article. Committee Members: Appointed By: Senator Verne Duncan President of the Senate Representative Randall Edwards Speaker of the House Bridget Barton Secretary of State Senator Lenn Hannon Secretary of State Kathleen Beaufait Members of the Committee (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) NO ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THIS BALLOT MEASURE WERE FILED"WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE. 5 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 54 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Ballot Measure 54 Saves Schools and Community Colleges Money As Oregon school districts and community colleges attempt to deliver cost-effective services in an increasingly difficult revenue- raising environment, they are eagerly seeking savings and efficiencies.One example of increased efficiency is the Oregon School Bond Guaranty Act, which I introduced and was passed during the 1997 Legislative session. In my capacity as State Treasurer I have the opportunity to inter- act with other states and glean the best of the best in ideas from other states.Measure 54 is one of those ideas.If Measure 54 is approved, Treasury estimates Oregon school districts and com- munity colleges could save over$69 million in the next 20 years by allowing the state to pledge its full faith and credit to guaran- tee,voter approved,qualified general obligation bonds of partici- pating school districts,education service districts and community colleges. The Legislative Revenue office says: The Oregon School Bond Guaranty Act"Reduces property taxes due to savings on bond interest:' This Measure is before voters because the State Constitution must be amended to obtain the legal authority to allow the state to guarantee school districts', voter approved, general obligation bonds with the state's AA credit rating. The state's guarantee would not alter a district's responsibility to pay it's own bonds or would it change voter approval or other requirements districts cur- rently need to issue general obligation bonds.Treasury has no record of any school district or community college in Oregon ever j defaulting on a general obligation bond. This program is purely optional on the part of the district.It is a sound and responsible program to use voter approved tax dollars more efficiently.I urge your support. (This information furnished by Jim Hill,Oregon State Treasurer.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 6 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 55 House Joint Resolution 72—Referred to the Electorate of Oregon SECTION 3. Bonds of this state issued pursuant to this by the 1997 Legislature to be voted on at the General Election, Article shall be the direct obligations of this state and shall November 3, 1998. be in such form,run for such periods of time and bear such rates of interest as shall be provided by law.The bonds may be refunded with bonds of like obligation. BALLOT TITLE SECTION 4.The Legislative Assembly shall enact legisla- tion to carry out the provisions of this Article.This Article shall supersede all conflicting constitutional provisions. PARAGRAPH 2.The amendment proposed by this resolu 55.' AMENpS CONSTITUTION:PERMITS$TATI»TO tion shall be submitted to the people for their approval or GL1�lR NTEE EARNI ifiS qI�1 ItiIntomb TUl ION rejection at the next regular general election held throughout TfUSC'�N this state. RESULT OF"YEs"1t0TE:Mite"Yes"to f�ut#to ize st ate t4 guar- NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and antee eamings t,t!der tuition trust fund prggraCp, italic]type indicates deletions or comments. RE t c I IF"NCI"1tbTE: 11t3te "Nq"tR re#use auttlar€z ttiStl to guarantee earn�ns under tultitatt trust fu»d program. SUIIMARIf: A Canstiftart. Measure. approv2ra€tes' EXPLANATORY STATEMENT effe ttsta #h .Pcastrtse tndary.Educa. Expense, 'resgr2m ac#opted kay7 tegisi2ture.Program allows payrttent p#under This measure amends the Oregon Constitution by creating t t duete i€i 3 k bel t etltY!(ItTt nt at fpaverthert h€gho-t preya€(irtg,; Article XI-K related to higher education prepaid tuition plans. A t2tE?':at t€rrte tY etttfollrrtent;eStabllshes tritst#jtnd.Measure permits':' higher education prepaid tuition plan allows a contributor to pay stag toXOenst#tut€prtai tteiaf limit authorize it7r#ehtedness! for a beneficiary the cost of enrollment in a community college or at 1l2 0#tste' rCent t�f tr{te ash va€ut?of 211 properly in #rtt8 tp higher education institution in advance at a rate that is lower than guarantee a €tlmum benefits an tx�ntr buttone tit prepaid tuition the projected highest prevailing cost at an Oregon public commu #rust fund• to rn issue fiends; may borrow #COttt UUmirroft, nity college or university at the time of enrollment.If the contribu- 5chaolufltl if necessary. for pays the contracted amount,the state guarantees payment of t E3TIMiATE• FIN�#IUC:IAL FI4RI?ACT;! It is estimAtatl that this: the tuition of the beneficiary at the time of enrollment. measure wllf'reruirepprrltrtaly totel':start up;, The contract between the contributor and the state creates lia- Cost$'In&tat'fitr►ds,tier the f€rst fqur years of]t5 csperatlon. bilities and debt for the state.The Oregon Constitution generally prohibits the state from creating debt or liabilities that exceed $50,000.The measure creates an exception to this prohibition. The measure allows the state to lend credit and incur debt to sat- isfy guarantees made in connection with higher education prepaid TEXT OF MEASURE tuition trust funds. The measure allows the state to satisfy the state's obligations Be It Resolved by the Legislative Assembly of the State of to contributors and beneficiaries under prepaid tuition plans by N Oregon: issuing bonds and borrowing from the Common School Fund.The measure allows the state to issue bonds to repay borrowed mon- PARAGRAPH 1. The Constitution of the State of Oregon is eys and interest to the Common School Fund.The measure lim- amended by creating a new Article to be known as Article XI-K its the state bonds to one-half of one percent of the true cash and to read: value of all taxable property in the state. ARTICLE XI-K The measure allows the Legislative Assembly to provide for SECTION 1. In the manner provided by law and notwith- repayment of any state bonds issued from any funds available and,if necessary,from a potential state property tax.The state,in standing the limitations contained in sections 7 and 8,Article its history, has never defaulted on a general obligation bond nor XI of this Constitution,the credit of the State of Oregon may exercised its authority to collect a statewide property tax to pay off be loaned and indebtedness incurred in an amount not to bonds. exceed,at any one time,one-half of one percent of the true cash value of all taxable property in this state to provide The measure directs the Legislative Assembly to enact legisla- funds as necessary to satisfy state guarantees of minimum tion to carry out provisions of the Article. benefits or earnings derived from the contributions made to a prepaid tuition trust fund,which shall be created by law. Committee Members: Appointed By: The interests, as defined by law, regulation or contract, of Senator Tom Hartung President of the Senate contributors to, or beneficiaries designated by contributors Representative Peter Courtney Speaker of the House to,the prepaid tuition trust fund shall be guaranteed by the Tom Dennehy' Secretary of State full faith and credit of this state. Senator Lenn Hannon Secretary of State SECTION 2.The State of Oregon may issue bonds as nec- Craig Gabriel Members of the Committee essary to provide funding to satisfy this state's guaranty obligations undertaken pursuant to this Article. In addition, 'Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article Vill of this Constitution,this state may borrow available moneys of the (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the Common School Fund if such borrowing is reasonably nec- ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) essary to satisfy this state's guaranty obligations under- taken pursuant to this Article.The State of Oregon also may issue bonds as necessary to provide funding to repay the borrowed moneys,and any interest thereon,to the Common School Fund.The bonds shall be payable from any funds available for these purposes and,if necessary,from state ad valorem taxes. 7 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 55 LEGISLATIVE ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT ARGUMENT IN FAVOR A"Yes"vote on Ballot Measure 55 will: Oregon Needs More than Hope,Dreams Provide Oregonians and their children with a safe,simple and Good Intentions savings plan for education guaranteed by the State of As an instrumental partner in crafting the prepaid college tuition Oregon to protect against the rising cost of tuition program for Oregon, I urge your support of Measure 55.Sending Tuition at Oregon's public universities has risen more than 80% a child to college takes more than hopes,dreams and good inten- tions.1990 while personal incomes have risen only 49% and it takes planning. grant and scholarship spending has decreased.The Legislative Measure 55 will allow Oregon residents – parents, students, Assembly has created a prepaid tuition plan program that is effec- relatives and other individuals–to pay in advance for tuition at tive upon approval of BM 55.No matter how fast tuition costs rise, any accredited community college or not-for-profit institution of the State of Oregon guarantees that the plan,which you purchase higher learning.Under the program,individuals can purchase based on today's tuition rates,will pay the full tuition costs of any a future college education at today's prices. Oregon public community college or university when your student Tuition at Oregon's public universities has increased by 80%since enrolls. 1990. Income has risen only 49%. In the last six years,students The program works because the prepaid tuition plans are guar- have borrowed as much money as they did in the past three anteed by the full faith and credit of the State of Oregon and decades combined. The average Oregon student graduates because the plan's earnings receive favorable tax treatment.All $24,000 in debt.The actual cost of $24,000 borrowed at 8% is earnings of the plan are state tax exempt and federal tax deferred, $36,000.The actual cost of$24,000 saved at 7%is$16,000.This with federal taxes assessed at the student's tax rate. example demonstrates the power of saving versus borrowing, The program is safe. If a purchaser cancels the plan or the stu which is the premise of a prepaid tuition plan.Under the prepaid dent uses only a portion of the benefits,the original investment for plan, payment options will vary.You can purchase tuition in one any remaining unused benefits can be reclaimed. In some cir lump sum, based on today's tuition rates, or purchase it over a cumstances, the original investment with interest may be specified period of time,possibly as a monthly payroll deduction. reclaimed. Measure 55 was crafted so the full-faith-and-credit backing of the Create a prepaid tuition plan purchased with monthly state will provide parents the peace of mind that escalating tuition or lump sum contributions for use at any public or private costs or a bad investment will not jeopardize their child's educa- community college or university in Oregon or out-of-state lion. This l similar to the guarantee provided the state's general obligation state bonds, which finance critical state projects The program offers flexible contribution options that work for a such as schools and road construction. The state has never J purchaser who wants to invest a lump sum or make small pay- defaulted on a general obligation bond nor has it had to collect ments each month,even through payroll deduction. statewide property taxes to pay off bonds.The state's guarantee is solid. The program is designed to cover the full tuition costs of an Oregon public community college or university.The tuition bene- The earnings from the prepaid tuition plans are state tax-exempt fits can be applied to enrollment at any accredited public or and federally tax deferred and payable at the students'rate. private educational institution in Oregon or out-of-state. As we move closer to the 21st century,there is no greater asset to Oregon than that of our children.That's why I am Committee Members: Appointed By: supporting Measure 55.It will give our children a head start Senator Tom Hartung President of the Senate on achieving their dreams. Representative Peter Courtney Speaker of the House Representative Mark Simmons Speaker of the House (This information furnished by Jim Hill,Oregon State Treasurer.) (This Joint Legislative Committee was appointed to provide the legislative argument in support of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.245.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 8 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 55 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR VOTE YES ON BALLOT MEASURE 55 PARENTS SAY YES TO Measure 55 Helps Make College More Affordable TUITION SAVINGS PLAN Skyrocketing tuition costs are making it more and more difficult for All parents want a better life for their children--a good job,a nice Oregonians to send their children to college.Since 1990, tuition home,a safe community.These are the things at the heart of the at Oregon's public universities has nearly doubled.Oregon fami- American Dream, and a college education is what makes that dream come true for most people today. lies must find new ways to save for college costs. Ballot Measure 55 will help make college more affordable by But as parents,we are worried about what will happen when our allowing families to safely invest in a new college savings Ii children are ready to go to college.The average student loan debt for Oregon public university students is more than $17,000 at Under the pre-paid tuition plan set up by Measure 55,Oregonians graduation.What will it be tomorrow? will be able to buy college tuition at today's prices.The plan allows That is why we urge every parent and every person to vote"Yes" families to invest their money in a college fund that guarantees on Measure 55. The children and grandchildren of this state future tuition payments to any state university or community deserve their chance at success, and this measure provides a college.The money saved can also be used to pay private college way for Oregon families to see that they do. tuition. Ballot Measure 55 ensures Oregonians can lock in colleg tuition Measure 55, the Pre-Paid Tuition Plan, lets Oregon families put small amounts of money in ty account for their children for use at today's rates and avoid staggering increases in tuition costs. when they go to a community college, public universit)4.or inde- Measure 55 Reduces Your Taxes pendent college.The money grows on a tax-deferred basis, and Under the new college savings program established by Measure is there when the students are ready for college. 55,Oregonians will be able to defer state and federal taxes owed The most important feature of the Pre-Paid Tuition Plan is that on income earned'in the program.And,when the tuition is paid, Oregon families can pay for tuition at the rates changed today,for the income is taxed at the student's rate. use years later. Small amounts of money that grows over the Measure 55 Guarantees a Safe Investment years,with today's tuition rates"locked in"--that's a graduation gift every Oregon family can start saving for right away,if we just vote Ballot Measure 55 protects any individual's investment in the pre- "Yes"on Measure 55. paid tuition program by guaranteeing it fully by the State.Families Connie Rush Liz Becker will not have to worry about losing their money when investing to save for college. (This information furnished by Grattan Kerans,Committee to Make College Dear Voter: Affordable.) Ballot Measure 55 is a chance to help many Oregon parents fulfill their dream of having their children go to college. Passing Measure 55 is a critical part of a new college savings program that passed overwhelmingly during the 1997 leg- islative session. As a father of three young children,I know how important it is to start saving early for a college education.Please join me in supporting Measure 55. Sincerely, Randall Edwards I State Representative (This information furnished by Randall Edwards.) 4 (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 9 1 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 55 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Ballot Measure 55 creates MAKE COLLEGE AFFORDABLE AGAIN Oregon's Pre-Paid Tuition Program FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF Measure 55 will create a safe, simple college savings plan for OREGON STUDENTS Oregon's families. Oregon' pre-paid tuition program allows When college students went off to campus 20 years ago, they Oregon residents to pay in advance for college tuition at any could work all summer at the minimum wage and have enough to accredited community college or not-for-profit institution of higher pay for tuition with some left over.Today,Oregon students have to learning.Oregon families will be able to purchase a future college work seven or eight months full time at the minimum wage to save education at today's prices. enough to pay tuition,with none left over. In 1997 the Oregon Legislative Assembly created Oregon's Pre- So most students work part-time---and borrow the difference. Paid tuition program. Ballot measure 55 will guarantee the plan Students like us are caught in this trap--take years longer to get with the"full faith and credit"of the state of Oregon. By offering your degree and delay you career, or graduate on time with big the full faith and credit of the State, Oregon's Pre-Paid Tuition student loans to repay.Neither choice is a good one. Program will be able to unequivocally guarantee that anyone who There's a better way to have the next generation of Oregon stu- participates in the program will receive the benefit they paid for. dents graduate from one of Oregon's community colleges,public A College Savings Plan for ALL Oregonians!!! universities, or private colleges, and Measure 55 makes it possi- Oregon's Pre-Paid Tuition Program provides students and their ble. If it had been available when we were growing up,we could parents protection against the rising cost of tuition by locking in have pre-paid tuition at a much lower rate,and it would have been today's tuition rates.Oregon's plan will let families buy up to four there when we arrived as freshman. years'worth of tuition at today's prices, either in monthly install- By voting yes on Measure 55,we will give Oregonians that oppor- ments or as a lump sum. Oregon's plan guarantees that your tunity in the future:buy tuition at today's price,for use years later investment will cover tuition, no matter how much it has risen! when their children are ready to go to college. It's a simple Oregon's Pre-Paid Tuition Program is State Tax Exempt! process:Buy all or part of one year's tuition in a calendar year at the price charged today,and it pre-pays all or part of the tuition 15 All earnings on Oregon's Pre-Paid Tuition Program are tax exempt or 18 years from now. from the State of Oregon. Federal taxes on the earnings are Today's children can avoid delayed graduation or big student loan deferred until the year of use and the tax rate is at the student's payments.Your vote can make a difference--vote yes on measure level of income. 55! To keep Oregon's economy growing and to prepare all our chil- MAKE COLLEGE AFFORDABLE AGAIN--VOTE YES ON dren for the next century, there is nothing more important than MEASURE 55 education. Ballot Measure 55 will make college more affordable for Oregon's working families! Kelly Koski,OSU' Eric Van Haggen,Student Body President VOTE YES on Ballot Measure 55 Willamette University' State Representative Mike Caudle Ed Dennis Peter Courtney 'Titles used for identification purposes only,and do not constitute an endorsement of the measure by the institutions (This information furnished by State Representative Peter Courtney) (This information furnished by Grattan Kerans,Committee to Make College Affordable.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 10 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 55 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON HIGHER EDUCATION LEADERS If you're in the habit of co-signing notes for strangers, guaran- URGE A"YES"VOTE ON MEASURE 55 teeing payment on the notes by putting up your property as col- Dear Fellow Oregonians: lateral, then you'd probably have no problem voting for Ballot Measure 55. The future of Oregon depends upon a well-educated society,with On the other hand, if you think only suckers would guarantee workers able to succeed in the knowledge-based industries that the payments for a product someone else purchases, no matter will dominate our economy in the next century, or applying the ,,,chat the product costs, then you'll certainly vote against Ballot latest research in our natural resource businesses. Measure 55. But Oregonians have to prepare financially for the cost of acquir- Don't be a sucker.Measure 55 creates more than a billion dol- ing higher education for their children and grandchildren.That is jars in new potential property tax liability why we are urging your yes vote for Measure 55, the Pre-Paid Tuition Program.This simple but valuable tuition pre-payment plan Read Measure 55 carefully,then you'll vote No. will allow Oregonians to set aside some or all of the cost of tuition at the rate charged now,a substantial savings over what the price (This information furnished by Don McIntire.) may be 15 years or more in the-future. Every Oregon student can gain from this tuition pre-payment plan: -Community college students -Public university students -Independent college and university students Oregon will gain by approving this forward-looking plan. The future is coming at us at an accelerated rate, and we're banking on our children to be prepared to succeed in that complex world. So jet's help Oregon families bank the funds needed to pay tuition when their children are ready to go to college, by voting yes on Measure 55. David Frohnmayer President, University of Oregon* Paul Risser President,Oregon State University* Joseph Cox,Chancellor Oregon University System* *Titles used for identification purposes only,and do not constitute an endorsement of the measure by the institutions. (This information furnished by Grattan Kerans,Committee to Make College Affordable.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251,255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 11 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . - 56 House Bill 2515—Referred to the Electorate of Oregon by the at least 20 days but not more than 40 days before the date of the 1997 Legislature to be voted on at the General Election, first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to rezone property, November 3, 1998. the governing body of a county shall cause a written individual notice of land use change to be mailed to the owner of each lot or parcel of property that the ordinance proposes to rezone. BALLOT TITLE quire (5y subsection )oindividual( o notice land use change required b subsection 2 b or c 3 or 4 of this section shall be approved by the governing body of the county and shall describe in detail how the proposed ordinance would affect the use of the property.[The notice shall be mailed by first class mail to the affected owner at the address shown on the last available % t AND tiSE ' ' complete tax assessment roll.]The notice shall: (a) Contain substantially the following language in bold- fFtiL7 € guires cctverrtments to faced type extending from the left-hand margin to the right ice lancfovwners regarding ohantes to Brad us9 IWs. hand margin across the top of the face page of the notice: 'currer nolicwi qu�r t erg wttd4 not require t�riailed rto#€Ce iq InCicbvners, This is to notify you that(governing body of the county)has proposed a land use regulation that will affect the permissi- � i t gLfires 'eit s to rriatl notices tt5• ble uses of your land. rtdownerrding cFtes ....o etate�kci,or metropolitan ser i+t i t •1 WW.AF regulations that•ilmEt or prohib t (b) Contain substantially the following language in the tt sfi t�ilowect.do ter iaWouwtaers' property A.,q res body of the notice: rat tcf rem ft3Ltritte e r it for costs of rrrat �rautfrng frc)rrt+-riges to date statutes•or adm�n istraiiv �i t iir , ttt8trb cil�ten &e�vioe districts to in On (date of public hearing), (governing body) will hold a btrse Cltntk8kc(ti ,tor,C43St of maifitg notice'resultirtgfrorn' public hearing regarding the adoption of Ordinance Number Ghartge3)f1 dislItftd Lase regU# f{ot1S PYSCrIbeS ksrrtY of,@ach The(governing body) has determined that adoption notice of this ordinance will affect the permissible uses of your property and may reduce the value of your property. � kCI» twtNAtsttytltfii1T tatgowernmentecp8ndt' Ordinance Number is available for inspection at ettmctted to ,, ,iQQ ririTtu�ii}! in: ncttioe posts, the County Courthouse located at .A k«d >svr3rrrrttent e p rtdttiares, rtlsi td1n9 those of" the copy of Ordinance Number_ also is available for pur- llelt� entlre tis#tct,are;esti�natd tt t147,Qf?ft a. chase at a cost of Meal For additional information concerning Ordinance Number hk set 1 ksetl sin T,£}t#t mind use actione per year, of you may call the (governing body) Planning �1twt�Ltld gitlre srtrne r no.tice �€nde this measure, Department at_- 1 �t€�r�s �v�r based oia such verta�sies as ttie. [rtnd use actsria� number of action`s included (6)At least 30 days prior to the adoption or amendment of 6rt Ottl8 ost5iEe a comprehensive plan or land use regulation by the govern- ing body of a county pursuant to a requirement of periodic review of the comprehensive plan under ORS 197.628 to 197.636,the governing body of the county shall cause a writ- ten individual notice of the land use change to be mailed to TEXT O F MEASURE the owner of each lot or parcel that will be rezoned as a result of the adoption or enactment.The notice shall describe in detail how the ordinance or plan amendment will affect the AN ACT use of the property.The notice also shall: (a) Contain substantially the following language in bold- Relating to notice of proposed land use action by local govern- faced type extending from the left-hand margin to the right- ment; creating new provisions; amending ORS 215.503; hand margin across the top of the face page of the notice: repealing ORS 215.508; and providing that this Act shall be referred to the people for their approval or rejection. This is to notify you that(governing body of the county)has Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: proposed a land use that will affect the permissible uses of SECTION 1.ORS 215.503 is amended to read: your land. 215.503.(1)As used in this section,`owner"means the owner (b) Contain substantially the following language in the of the title to real property or the contract purchaser of real prop- body of the notice: erty, of record as shown on the last available complete tax assessment roll. As a result of an order of the Land Conservation and (2)[Except as otherwise provided by county charter:] , [(a)] All legislative acts relating to comprehensive plans, land Development Commission, (governing body) has proposed use planning or zoning adopted by the governing body of a county Ordinance Number . (Governing Body) has deter- shall be by ordinance. mined that the adoption of this ordinance will affect the per- [(b)](3)Except as provided in subsection(6)of this section missible uses of your property and may reduce the value of and in addition to the notice required by ORS 215.060,at least 20 your property. days but not more than 40 days before the date of the first hear- Ordinance Number will become effective on(date). ing on an ordinance that proposes to amend an existing compre- Ordinance Number is available for inspection at hensive plan or any element thereof or to adopt a new compre- the County Courthouse located at .A hensive plan,the governing body of a county shall cause a writ- copy of Ordinance Number also is available for pur- ten individual notice of land use change to be mailed to each chase at a cost of owner whose property would have to be rezoned in order to com- For additional information concerning Ordinance Number ply with the amended or new comprehensive plan if the ordinance you may call the (governing body) Planning becomes effective. Department at_ [(c)](4)In addition to the notice required by ORS 215.223(1), 12 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 (7) Notice provided under this section may be included Ordinance Number is available for inspection at with the tax statement required under ORS 311.250. the _ City Hall located at (8)Notwithstanding subsection(7)of this section,the gov- A copy of Ordinance Number also is available for pur- erning body of a county may provide notice of a hearing at chase at a cost of any time provided notice is mailed by first class mail or bulk For additional information concerning Ordinance Number mail to all persons for whom notice is required under sub- you may call the (city) Planning Department sections(3)and(4)of this section. at (9)For purposes of this section,property is rezoned when the governing body of the county: (6)At least 30 days prior to the adoption or amendment of (a)Changes the base zoning classification of the property; a comprehensive plan or land use regulation by a city pur- or suant to a requirement of periodic review of the comprehen- (b)Adopts or amends an ordinance in a manner that limits sive plan under ORS 197.628 to 197.636,the city shall cause or prohibits land uses previously allowed in the affected a written individual notice of the land use change to be zone. mailed to the owner of each lot or parcel that will be rezoned (10)The provisions of this section do not apply to legisla- as a result of the adoption or enactment.The notice shall tive acts of the governing body of the county resulting from describe in detail how the ordinance or plan amendment will action of the Legislative Assembly or the Land Conservation affect the use of the property.The notice also shall: and Development Commission for which notice is provided (a) Contain substantially the following language in bold- under section 5 of this 1997 Act,or resulting from a decision faced type extending from the left-hand margin to the right- of a court of competent jurisdiction. hand margin across the top of the face page of the notice: (11)The governing body of the county is not required to provide more than one notice under this section to a person This is to notify you that(city)has proposed a land use that who owns more than one lot or parcel affected by a change will affect the permissible uses of your land. to the local comprehensive plan or land use regulation. (12) The Department of Land Conservation and (b) Contain substantially the following language in the Development shall reimburse the governing body of a county body of the notice: for all usual and reasonable costs incurred to provide notice required under subsection(6)of this section. SECTION 2. Section 3 of this Act is added to and made a As a result of an order of the Land Conservation and part of ORS 227.160 to 227.185. Development Commission, (city) has proposed Ordinance SECTION 3.(1)As used in this section,"owner"means the Number . (City) has determined that the adoption of owner of the title to real property or the contract purchaser this ordinance will affect the permissible use's of your prop- of real property, of record as shown on the last available erty and may reduce the value of your property. complete tax assessment roll. Ordinance Number will become effective on(date). (2) All legislative acts relating to comprehensive plans, Ordinance Number is available for inspection at land use planning or zoning adopted by a city shall be by the City Hall located at . A copy of I ordinance. Ordinance Number also is available for purchase at a q (3)Except as provided in subsection(6)of this section,at cost of { least 20 days but not more than 40 days before the date of For additional information concerning Ordinance Number € the first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to amend an , you may call the (city) Planning Department at existing comprehensive plan or any element thereof, or to adopt a new comprehensive plan,a city shall cause a written individual notice of a land use change to be mailed to each (7) Notice provided under this section may be included owner whose property would have to be rezoned in order to with the tax statement required under ORS 311.250. comply with the amended or new comprehensive plan if the (8) Notwithstanding subsection (7) of this section, a city ordinance becomes effective. may provide notice of a hearing at any time provided notice (4)At least 20 days but not more than 40 days before the is mailed by first class mail or bulk mail to all persons for f date of the first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to whom notice is required under subsections(3)and(4)of this i rezone property,a city shall cause a written individual notice section. of a land use change to be mailed to the owner of each lot or (9)For purposes of this section,property is rezoned when parcel of property that the ordinance proposes to rezone. the city: (5) An additional individual notice of land use change (a)Changes the base zoning classification of the property; required by subsection (3) or (4)'of this section shall be or Y approved by the city and shall describe in detail how the pro- (b)Adopts or amends an ordinance in a manner that limits posed ordinance would affect the use of the property.The or prohibits land uses previously allowed in the affected notice shall: zone. (a) Contain substantially the following language in bold- (10)The provisions of this section do not apply to legisla- faced type extending from the left-hand margin to the right- tive acts of the governing body of the city resulting from hand margin across the top of the face page of the notice: action of the Legislative Assembly or the Land Conservation and Development Commission for which notice is provided This is to notify you that(city)has proposed a land use reg- under section 5 of this 1997 Act,or resulting from a court of ulation that will affect the permissible uses of your land. competent jurisdiction. (11)The governing body of the city is not required to pro- , (b) Contain substantially the following language in the vide more than one notice under this section to a person who body of the notice: owns more than one lot or parcel affected by a change to the local comprehensive plan or land use regulation. date of public hearing), (12) The Department of Land Conservation and On ( p g),(city)will hold a public hearing Development shall reimburse a city for all usual and reason- regarding the adoption of Ordinance Number .The able costs incurred to provide notice required under subsec- (city) has determined that adoption of this ordinance will tion(6)of this section. affect the permissible uses of your property and may reduce SECTION 4. Section 5 of this Act is added to and made a the value of your property. part of ORS chapter 197. 13 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 SECTION 5.(1)At least 50 days prior to the effective date For additional information, contact the Metropolitan of a new or amended administrative rule of the Land Service District at(telephone number). Conservation and Development Commission or a new or amended land use planning statute enacted by the (3)A local government that receives notice under this sec- Legislative Assembly,as described in subsection (3)of this tion shall cause a copy of the notice to be mailed to every section, the Department of Land Conservation and owner of real property that will be rezoned as a result of the Development shall cause a written notice of land use adoption of the ordinance.Notice to a landowner under this change,in substantially the form described in subsection(2) subsection shall be mailed at least 30 days prior to the effec- of this section,to be mailed to every local government that tive date of the subject ordinance. exercises land use planning authority under ORS 197.175. (4)The district shall reimburse the local government for all (2)The notice shall contain substantially the following lan- usual and reasonable costs of providing notice required guage in the body of the notice: under subsection(3)of this section. SECTION 8.ORS 215.508 is repealed. (a)On(date of rule adoption),the Land Conservation and SECTION 9.This Act shall be submitted to the people for Development Commission adopted administrative rule(num- their approval or rejection at the next regular general election ber).The commission has determined that this rule will affect held throughout this state. the permissible uses of property in your jurisdiction and may .NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and reduce the value of subject property. italic]type indicates deletions or comments. Rule (number) is available for inspection at the Department of Land Conservation and Development located at(address).A copy of the rule(number)also is available for purchase at a cost of EXPLANATORY STATEMENT For addi tional information, contact the Department of Land Conservation and Development at(telephone number); or This measure requires cities and counties to provide individual (b) On (date of enactment) the Legislative Assembly written notice to every landowner when the city or county pro- adopted(House/Senate bill number).The Department of Land poses a new or amended zoning ordinance if the proposed ordi- Conservation and Development has determined that enact- nance will limit or prohibit the uses of the landowner's prgperty. ment of(House/Senate bill number)will affect the permissi- This notice must be mailed to the landowner between 20 and 40 ble uses of property in your jurisdiction and may reduce the days prior to a local hearing on the proposed zoning ordinance. value of subject property. The measure requires individual notice for proposed changes to A copy of (House/Senate bill number) is available for a city or county comprehensive land use plan that will require inspection at the Department of Land Conservation and changes to existing zoning designations. Development located at(address).A copy of(House/Senate The measure also requires the Department of Land bill number) also is available for purchase at a cost of 'Conservation and Development to notify cities and counties when For additional information, contact the Department of the legislature enacts a new law or the department adopts a new Land Conservation and Development at(telephone number). administrative rule that limits or prohibits permissible land uses. Cities and counties that receive notice from the department are required to forward a copy of the notice to each landowner (3)The provisions of this section apply to all statutes and affected by the new rule or statute. administrative rules of the Land Conservation and Development Commission that limit or prohibit otherwise The measure also requires that individual written notice be pro- permissible land uses. vided to every landowner affected by a new or amended land use (4)A local government that receives notice under this sec- planning ordinance adopted by a metropolitan service district tion shall cause a copy of the notice to be mailed to every (Metro) if the new or amended ordinance will require changes to owner of real property that will be rezoned as a result of the local zoning designations in a manner that limits or restricts land adoption or enactment of the rule or statute. Notice to a uses in the affected area. landowner under this subsection shall be mailed at least 30 The Department of Land Conservation and Development is days prior to the effective date of the subject rule or statute. required to reimburse cities and counties for all costs of providing (5)The department shall reimburse the local government notice of changes in state land use statutes or state agency rules for all usual and reasonable costs of providing notice regulating land use. required under subsection(4)of this section. SECTION 6.Section 7 of this Act is added to and made a Committee Members: A part of ORS chapter 268. Appointed By: SECTION 7.(1)At least 50 days prior to the effective date Senator Veral Tarno President of the Senate of a new or amended land use planning ordinance of a met- Representative Leslie Lewis Speaker of the House ropolitan service district, the district shall cause written Representative Chris Beck Secretary of State notice of the new or amended ordinance to be mailed to Arthur J.Schlack Secretary of State every government located within the district that exercises Roy Burns Members of the Committee land use planning authority under ORS 197.175. (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the (2)The notice described in this section shall contain sub- stantially the following language in the body of the notice: On(date of ordinance adoption),the Metropolitan Service District adopted ordinance(number).The district has deter- mined that this ordinance will affect the permissible uses of NO ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THIS BALLOT property in your jurisdiction and may reduce the value of MEASURE WERE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE. subject property. Ordinance (number) is available for inspection at the Metropolitan Service District offices located at(address).A copy of the ordinance(number)also is available for purchase at a cost of 14 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 LEGISLATIVE ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT ARGUMENT IN FAVOR A"Yes"vote on Ballot Measure 56 will: VOTE YES ON MEASURE 56 Ensure that property owners have a"right to know" Ask yourself this question: and receive notice when adverse zoning changes the If your state or local government was considering changing the allowable use of your property zoning laws on your land... For many Oregonians, home and land are the most valuable Changes that would affect the value of your land... property owned.Currently, local governments are not required to Changes that would restrict what you could do on your own provide notice to individual landowners when comprehensive plan property... or land use and zoning changes affect allowable uses of their Wouldn't you want to know about it? land.Restrictions on allowable uses often have tremendous finan- That's all Measure 56 requires... cial effects on landowners. BM 56 requires written notice to A postcard to inform you in writing that the rules on your land are affected landowners prior to the effective date of state, local or changing. metropolitan service district changes in land use and zoning Nothing more, nothing less. regulations. Save taxpayer money and needless lawsuits It's fair...It's good government...It's long overdue Each year, lawsuits are filed by taxpayers against state and local Please Vote Yes on Measure 56. governments as a result of comprehensive plan or land use and If you would like more information on Ballot Measure 56, please zoning changes.These lawsuits costs individual citizens and local call Citizens For an Informed Public at(503)620-0258. governments thousands of dollars.BM.56 will reduce these law- suits by providing people with information about proposed land (This information furnished by David Hunnicutt, Citizens for An Informed use changes and an opportunity to react to those changes before Public.) they take effect. Increase citizen involvement in and governmental accountability for land use planning Currently, counties are required to publish notice of planned changes in" a local newspaper, and affected landowners may learn of land use changes only after the decision has been made. Individual notice prior to the proposed change means landowners can participate in the decision-making process.Government ben- efits from greater citizen involvement. Provide funding to local governments for the costs of mandated notice When proposed changes in the comprehensive plan or land use and zoning ordinances are mandated by the state or a metropol- itan service district, the state or district must reimburse affected cities and counties for the costs of notice incurred. Provide cost effective options for individual notice BM 56 authorizes local governments to reduce costs associated with individual written notice to landowners by using bulk mail or including notice in property tax statements. Committee Members: Appointed By: Senator Vera]Tarno President of the Senate Representative Mike Fahey Speaker of the House Representative Leslie Lewis Speaker of the House (This Joint Legislative Committee was appointed to provide the legislative argument in support of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.245.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement.made in the argument. 15 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR SUPPORT LOCAL PLANNING AND CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT I lost my land and life savings. The Oregon Association of Realtors@ asks you to Vote Yes on And I didn't even know it was happening. Ballot Measure 56. It started in 1986, when I bought 40 acres of land in Central We believe that local citizens should be allowed to participate in Oregon designing their own communities. Too often, important zoning Filled with stone,sage and juniper,the land was divided into three changes are made in communities and neighborhoods, without buildable lots. citizen involvement. I planned to build my retirement home there one day. But how can citizens be involved if they don't know that changes But my life changed on a dime one day when I was injured on the are being proposed?Ballot Measure 56 will help fix this problem. job and was unable to work as a heavy equipment operator. Ballot Measure 56 will ensure that you receive a notice of pro- A year later, I put one of the parcels up for sale, posed changes to the zoning laws before the uses on your prop- hoping to use the proceeds to pay for job re-training and living erty are restricted or eliminated. expenses while I continued to look for work. In most instances, notices could be included in the yearly tax Within days,I had an offer of$150,000 for just one of the parcels. statement,eliminating the cost of a separate mailing. But I soon learned that the year before, the rules governing my land had changed,and I could no longer build on my property Too often Oregonians purchase property unaware of zoning My land is now worthless. changes made by local government. Proper notification will help I was never notified the rules governing my property had reduce expensive litigation. changed. That's why we support Ballot Measure 56, and urge you to Vote I was never notified that I could no longer build on my land. Yes on this important measure. I never had the chance to register my concerns or complaints. I never had the chance to be involved in the process that (This information furnished by John F.Scott,President,Oregon Association stripped my land of all its value. of Realtors.) That's why I support Measure 56. All Measure 56 does is make•sure state and local governments notify landowners in writing that changes to their land are being 1 considered,that the use of their property may be restricted. It's that simple. All I wanted was a chance to state my case. If Measure 56 had been law back then, I would have had the chance to speak my piece. Please...Vote Yes on Measure 56 Protect Your Land. Protect Your Future. Jim Watts (This information furnished by Jim Watts.) r (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 16 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The Oregon State Grange Asks You to Vote The Oregon AFL-CIO urges you to vote yes on Ballot Measure Yes on Measure 56 56. The Oregon State Grange is the largest grassroots, rural-based IT'S ALL ABOUT FAIRNESS fraternal organization in Oregon. We support Measure 56 because it's fair and simple. Grange members throughout Oregon support Ballot Measure 56. Like all other Oregonians, our members deserve to know that Ballot Measure 56 will increase citizen involvement and participa- laws are being changed that will affect their homes and property. tion with state and local government, and will cut down on need- They deserve the opportunity to participate with their elected off i- less litigation and taxpayer spending. cials in creating the new rules and regulations.They deserve the An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure! right to be involved in the decision making process. Every year,average Oregon landowners spend thousands of dol- Ballot Measure 56 will help guarantee these rights.Written notifi- lars in legal fees to fix zoning mistakes made by state and local cation of pending changes to your property gives everyone the governments. At this same time, state and local governments right to be a part of the process. spend thousands of tax dollars in these cases. We appreciate the hard work and efforts of our state and local In many instances, these mistakes could have been avoided for governments. the cost of a postcard.A postcard which informed the landowner But our system won't work unless all Oregonians are entitled to that the zoning laws on his property were being changed,and giv- be heard. ing the landowner a telephone number to call for additional infor- That is why Ballot Measure 56 is important. mation. The cost to mail these postcards is less than twenty-five cents, Please Vote Yes on Ballot Measure 56. but the savings to the landowner and to state and local govern- Sincerely, ments can be tremendous. Iry Fletcher Is a simple postcard too much to ask for? President,Oregon AFL-CIO We don't think so,and neither should you. (This information furnished by Iry Fletcher,President,Oregon AFL-CIO.) Do we as taxpayers have a right to know when government is changing the zoning of our property? Yes,of course we do;and by voting yes we can reclaim that right! Ballot Measure 56 is about fairness and good government. Vote"Yes"on Measure 56. (This information furnished by Edward L.Luttrell,Oregon State Grange.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 17 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 56 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR From the Desk of State Senator Veral Tarno Oregonians In Action is an organization representing individual Dear Voter: home and landowners.Oregonians In Action asks that you Vote Yes on Ballot Measure 56,a measure designed to encourage cit- I ask you to join me in voting"Yes"on Ballot Measure 56. izen participation and opens lines of communication between Ballot Measure 56 is a simple measure.It requires state and local landowners and state and local government. governments to notify landowners in writing that changes to zon- PROTECT YOUR HOME AND LAND ing laws affecting their land are being considered. If you are like most Oregonians,your home and your land are the I believe very strongly in Ballot Measure 56.As a member of the most valuable asset you own. Ballot Measure 56 will protect the Oregon legislature, I believe that we have an obligation to every value of your home and land by requiring that you receive a post- Oregonian to keep you informed of changes we make that will card before the state or local government restricts the uses that affect your home and property.The same goes for state agencies you can make on you property. and local governments. DOESN'T GOVERNMENT ALREADY DO THAT? As the Chairman of the Senate Water and Land Use Committee, Under our current laws, state and local governments are not I heard all of the arguments concerning Ballot Measure 56.During required to notify you before they make changes to their zoning this time, not one person argued that it was a bad idea to notify laws that affect your property.This is unfair.All of us have the right landowners of changes that affect their property.Not one. to know that changes are being proposed that will affect what we If we are going to change the law,the least we can do is let you can do with our property. know about it. BALLOT MEASURE 56 REQUIRES MAILED NOTICE i Please join me in voting"Yes"on Measure 56. Ballot Measure 56 does not change any zoning laws. Very Truly Yours, It doesn't make it easier or more difficult to use your property. Veral Tarno What it does,however,is tremendously important.Ballot Measure State Senator, District 24 56 ensures that you are informed of changes to zoning laws that (This information furnished by Senator veral E.Tarno.) affect your property, before the changes take effect. If you are notified,you can participate in any meetings on the proposed zon- ing changes,and you can join together with friends and neighbors who share your concerns. i Ballot Measure 56 is about fairness. It's about citizen involvement. It's about good government. If you would like more information about Ballot Measure 56, please contact Oregonians In Action at(503)620-0258. Vote Yes on Ballot Measure 56. (This information furnished by Larry George,Oregonians In Action.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 18 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 56 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Goal #1 of Oregon's Land Use Planning System is Citizen Twenty years ago,I spent$60,000 on a 2 acre parcel of land Involvement. in Multnomah County.Today,that land is worthless. The founders of our land use planning system believed in the That is the reason I support Measure 56-the landowner notifica- preservation of our resource lands. In order to achieve success, tion measure. they granted the government power to influence the way in which Back then,$60,000 was a lot of money for anyone to spend, people use their land. Their intention was to have those who especially for a recently retired Army Major. owned the land work in partnership with the government for the benefit of all. I did everything I could to be careful before I bought the property. Oftentimes it is argued that involving the public is too cumber- I checked with the county and made sure that they would let me some and takes too much time.Measure 56 will help put an end build a home there.I was assured that I could. to the rush decisions made by government officials behind Three years ago,1 decided to sell my land. closed doors. Measure 56 was designed precisely to involve It was then I discovered that the county had changed the zoning those citizens in our land use process who will be most affected on my property without my knowledge by the decisions of our government. It was then that I learned for the first time I could no longer build Measure 56 merely states that if our government wishes to alter a home on the land I had owned for almost two decades. the way in'which we currently are able to use our property, they Worst of all, I was never notified the rules on my land had must inform us.Period.Simple,logical,reasonable.That is what changed. Measure 56 really is.A plain and simple, common sense adjust- It would have been a simple matter to send me a postcard telling ment to help citizens become involved and knowledgeable me the county was considering changing the rules. partners in our land use planning system. • I deserved the right to know the county was changing the Please join me in helping pass Measure 56, the cornerstone zoning on my property. necessary to make Goal #1 of our planning system something * I deserved the right to participate in the hearings when the more than mere words on a piece of paper.Citizen involvement is something for which we should strive in all areas of government. county rezoned my property. Make it part of our land use system. • But I didn't get that right...and now my land is worthless. Vote Yes on Measure 56 Vote YES on 56 Senator Thomas Wilde Measure 56 will guarantee that every landowner receives Portland written notice if the rules governing their land are about to (This information furnished by Senator Thomas Wilde.) change. It will guarantee your right to be involved when govern- ment is making decisions about your property. I'm not a politician...and I don't represent any special interest groups. I'm just an average Oregon who fell victim to an unfair practice. Ballot Measure 56 is about fairness. That's why I support it. hope you will too. Sincerely, Bill Hackett (This information furnished by Bill Hackett.) j E (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 19 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 57 Proposed by referendum petition to be voted on at the General TEXT OF MEASURE Election,November 3, 1998. AN ACT BALLOT TITLE Relating to controlled substances; amending ORS 135.907, 135.919, 419C.443, 475.992 and 809.410; and appropriating money. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 1IIj11ANi4a.AS ,GIrf1 � AfF SECTION 1.ORS 475.992 is amended to read: 475.992.(1)Except as authorized by ORS 475.005 to 475.285 `YE$ and 475.940 to 475.995,it is unlawful for any person to manufac- ture or deliver a controlled substance. Any person who violates 1fa laandz of€narljua a Mass C€ra€sdelraeanr this subsection with respect to: frt� `)Pti"YL?Tl }tOt@ rc� { stattf ri1a�g (a)A controlled substance in Schedule I, is guilty of a Class A Rki an one,qty Of rrtattj a uk3lat� felony. ltder cut-ant tip 43tt iaw,;�sesMon�less� (b)A controlled substance in Schedule II,is guilty of a Class B d€t e � €E sari aria Is 1 i tiph p€trtisl�ti kty t p felony. filar�ha► a s1 (c)A controlled substance in Schedule 111,is guilty of a Class C $estlifst1e €fterdefsnlayttedlSMta felony. won (3b11ttn rrtriEtafla.t(tYerlt am. (d)A controlled substance in Schedule IV,is guilty of a Class B talPs IN of lei tfaarti 'ours tt?tt uan misdemeanor. �� '.ttt€ttistta}{+a 30 iMpttstOrtxtt (e)A controlled substance in Schedule V,is guilty of a Class C 5t3�'its r fire.Meultst�rrt kes failtr #Crmpl All,tt gr eme€t1, gro1� ;fit alx- €€rs)(t st r> rt ian f misdemeanor. tIt�S�ffhrlr€g prlrffeas Allrtates$600,q{M}fqr�nforcrim €i (2) Notwithstanding the placement of marijuana in a schedule of controlled substances under ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 11 A (� Off`S,NAf+�GtAL llt kfr"1 CJirect�tat8 �it�P�a 475.940 to 475.995: ercament,€nd�attf dense cctc€rt oper�tt€cuts£€ad f€try, (a) Any person who delivers marijuana for consideration is � }t" rQ r3tr»atf !at�, trtrtt€al#y A fttlt east all.; guilty of a Class B felony.. go �( a r gttli €d f R�CjV and,,Plld oo Ugl'ftcli _v (b) Any person who delivers, for no consideration, less than 9010 t pt� rrim[r Stag nd€ti res dtl ki lV V. ttt one avoirdupois ounce of the dried leaves, stems and flowers of �f f ntlfng'ort t1. t1��cf;000 prv�01. d,A. the plant Cannabis family Moraceae is guilty of a Class A misde- rtt Yslta{ . nterf( 'dlitrslit ttgtBeflarta, meanor, except that any person who delivers, for no considera- t��t fai7dant51€g t{#X GgUrt appolnteCl +ttftsei tion, less than five grams of the dried leaves, stems and flowers of the plant Cannabis family Moraceae is guilty of a violation, �r + titt Qxtaacld[tures t kscal latl beds era asttraated ktt' punishable by a fine of not less than $500 and not more than nually We i expand€ 1 .76 faal�asa ar: $1,000:Fines collected under this paragraph shall be forwarded 1.� �dn;tft aea�a to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine and rnrger�t tt6Cfsiorts bf lil °' Assessment Account established in ORS 137.300. aE3fil,rana$efrrr€t Cr$ dffet€d� n prdratlpn;fir �frels upewuf €dl1 (3) Except as authorized in ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.940 to 475.995, it is unlawful for any person to create or State ftna re deliver a counterfeit substance.Any person who violates this sub- annually section with respect to: (a)A counterfeit substance in Schedule I,is guilty of a Class A Ma;4r pssumptl€t€ts ttt tl taee 8a > €nblude felony. + � atrsl f yg (b)A counterfeit substance in Schedule II, is guilty of a Class B felony. + U•pa€aent ts€attests wilt be.prc sa lte as Crflssfert tlEar p! (c)A counterfeit substance in Schedule III, is guilty of a Class perantt€ti,b ( tat€d as 1t1#iaaE#ta , ald,ltt pitwt#t C felony. �uttn a tietstc€ngilnnert (d)A counterfeit substance in Schedule IV, is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. merit all ar�e3ta alulif xlt an veage b(today t€f (e)A counterfeit substance in Schedule V,is guilty of a Class C ��ttrfae misdemeanor. arresfs',prtecited as arislticftSrl £ p�€ tt (4) It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to afzdttprciseCUtadf"&smiscfemeanr�rsCllletlr€cECtrtla;' possess a controlled substance unless the substance was * eta.:f trft tt>rt f€ns a $fly,i�lil be'asses> t for atk l�tfsda- obtained directly from,or pursuant to,a valid prescription or order meartorrrartbtttans attd itra�€trl7ufn ftrtta" of. >3 avtll ,! of a practitioner while acting in the course of professional practice; assessed feC all viotatiit7s cceiy€Cti[€t€5 ' or except as otherwise authorized by ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.940 to 475.995.Any person who violates this subsection + 4U moat cf#he-Po,a", to rftis amts r€gr a idtta i c# with respect to: f{pertral t sf fines r s e$41 sew at€t },br€tttrl l tin€I(I t' (a)A controlled substance in Schedule I, is guilty of a Class B oetl felony. (b)A controlled substance in Schedule II,is guilty of a Class C felony. (c)A controlled substance in Schedule III,is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (d)A controlled substance in Schedule IV,is guilty,of a Class C misdemeanor. (e)A controlled substance in Schedule V,is guilty of a violation. (f)Notwithstanding the placement of marijuana in a schedule of controlled substances under ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.940 to 475.995,any person who knowingly or intentionally is in unlawful possession of less than one avoirdupois ounce of the 20 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 dried leaves, stems and flowers of the plant Cannabis family the youth shall pay the cost of the youth's participation in the pro- Moraceae is guilty of a(violation,punishable by a)Class C mis- gram based upon the ability of the parent to pay.The petition shall demeanor. In addition to any other sentence it may impose be dismissed by the court upon written certification of the youth's for a conviction under this paragraph,the court shall include successful completion of the program from the designated in the sentence an order to pay a fine of not less than$500 and agency or organization providing the information and treatment. not more than$1,000.Fines collected under this paragraph shall (2)Monitoring the youth's progress in the program shall be the be forwarded to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the responsibility of the diagnostic assessment agency or organiza- Criminal Fine and Assessment Account established under ORS tion. It shall make a report to the court stating the youth's 137.300. successful completion or failure to complete all or any part of the (5) In any prosecution under this section for manufacture, program specified by the diagnostic assessment.The form of the possession or delivery of that plant of the genus Lophophora report shall be determined by agreement between the court and commonly known as peyote, it is an affirmative defense that the the diagnostic assessment agency or organization. The court peyote is being used or is intended for use: shall make the report a part of the record of the case. (a) In connection with the good faith practice of a religious (3)The court is not required to make the disposition required belief; by subsection (1) of this section if the court determines that the (b)As directly associated with a religious practice;and disposition is inappropriate in the case or if the court finds that the (c) In a manner that is not dangerous to the health of the user youth has previously entered into a formal accountability agree- or others who are in the proximity of the user. ment under ORS 419C.239(1)(i). (6) The affirmative defense created in subsection (5) of this (4)If the youth fails to complete the program specified by section is not available to any person who has possessed or deliv- the diagnostic assessment,the court shall send notice to the ered the peyote while incarcerated in a correctional facility in this Department of Transportation of the youth's failure to com- state. plate the program. SECTION 2.ORS 135.919 is amended to read: SECTION 4.ORS 809.410 is amended to read: 135.919.(1)At any time before the court dismisses with preju- 809.410. This section, ORS 813.400 and 813.403 establish dice the charge of possession of less-than one ounce of mari- grounds for the suspension and revocation of driving privileges juana,the court on its own motion or on the motion of the district and commercial driver licenses by the Department of attorney may issue an order requiring the defendant to appear Transportation, whether the suspension or revocation is manda- and show cause why the court should not terminate the diversion tory or permissive, the length of time the suspensions will be agreement.The order to show cause shall state the reasons for effective and special provisions relating to certain suspensions the proposed termination and shall set an appearance date. and revocations. Hearing and administrative review procedures (2)The order to show cause shall be served on the defendant for this section,ORS 813.400 and 813.403 are established under and on the defendant's attorney, if any.Service may be made by ORS 809.440.The following apply as described: first class mail, postage paid, addressed to the defendant at the (1) Any degree of murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent mailing address shown on the diversion petition and agreement or homicide or assault resulting from the operation of a motor vehi- at any other address that the defendant provides in writing to the cle constitutes grounds for revocation of driving privileges.The court. following apply to this subsection: (3) The court shall terminate the diversion agreement and (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense continue the offense proceeding if: described in this subsection, the department shall revoke the (a)At the hearing on the order to show cause, the court finds driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the reasons for (b)The revocation shall be for a period described in this para- termination described in this section exist;or graph except that the department shall not reinstate any driving (b)The defendant fails to appear at the hearing on the order to privileges to the person until the person complies with future show cause. responsibility filings.The period of revocation shall be: (4) If the court terminates the diversion agreement and contin- (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B)of this paragraph, ues the offense proceeding,the court: eight years from the date the person is released from incarcera- (a)On the defendant's motion and for good cause shown,may tion, if the sentence includes incarceration. If the sentence does reinstate the diversion agreement at any time before conviction, not include incarceration, the period of revocation shall begin on acquittal or dismissal with prejudice. the date the department receives the record of conviction. (b) If the defendant is convicted,may take into account at time (B) One year if the revocation is for an assault that is not of sentencing any partial fulfillment by the defendant of the terms punishable as a felony.The period of revocation shall begin on the of the diversion agreement. date the person is released from incarceration, if the sentence (c)Shall send a notice of the failure to complete diversion includes incarceration. If the sentence does not include incarcer- to the Department of Transportation. ation,the period of revocation shall begin on the date the depart- (5)The court shall terminate a diversion agreement under this ment receives the record of conviction. subsection for any of the following reasons: (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a revocation (a)If the defendant has failed to fulfill the terms of the diversion under this subsection. agreement. (d)The provisions of this subsection do not apply to a person (b)If the defendant did not qualify for the diversion agreement. whose driving privileges are ordered revoked under ORS SECTION 3.ORS 419C.443 is amended to read: 809.235. 419C.443. (1) Except when otherwise provided in subsection (2) Any degree of recklessly endangering another person, (3)of this section,when a youth is found to be within the jurisdic- menacing or criminal mischief resulting from the operation of a tion of the court under ORS 419C.005 for a first violation of the motor vehicle constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privi- provisions under ORS 475.992 prohibiting delivery for no con- leges.The following apply to this subsection: sideration of less than five grams of marijuana or prohibiting (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the court shall described in this subsection, the department shall suspend the order an evaluation and designate agencies or organizations to driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. perform diagnostic assessment and provide programs of informa- (b)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension tion and treatment. The designated agencies or organizations under this subsection. must meet the standards set by the Assistant Director for Alcohol (c) A suspension under this subsection shall be for a period and Drug Abuse Programs.Whenever possible, the court shall described under Schedule I of ORS 809.420, except that the designate agencies or organizations to perform the diagnostic department shall not reinstate any driving privileges to the person assessment that are separate from those that may be designated until the person has complied with future responsibility filings. to carry out a program of information or treatment.The parent of (3) Perjury or the making of a false affidavit to the department 21 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 under any law of this state requiring the registration of vehicles right to apply for driving privileges. or regulating their operation on the highways constitutes grounds (b) The suspension shall be for a period described under for revocation of driving privileges. The following apply to this Schedule I of ORS 809.420 except the department shall not rein- subsection: state any driving privileges to the person until the person com- (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense plies with future responsibility filings. described in this subsection, the department shall revoke the (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. under this subsection. (b)The revocation shall be for a period of one year from the (9)Failure to file accident reports required under ORS 811.725 date of revocation except that the department shall not reinstate or 811.730 constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privi- any driving privileges to the person until the person complies with leges.The following apply to this subsection: future responsibility filings. (a)The department shall suspend the driving privileges or right (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a revocation to apply for driving privileges if the person fails to make the under this subsection. required accident reports. (4)Any felony conviction with proof of a material element involv- (b)The suspension shall continue until the person makes the ing the operation of a motor vehicle constitutes grounds for revo- required reports and complies with future responsibility filings or cation of driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: for five years from the date of suspension,whichever is sooner. (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense (10)Failure to make future responsibility filing described in this described in this subsection,the department shall revoke the dri- subsection constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privi- ving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. leges.The following apply to this subsection: (b)The revocation shall be for a period of one year from the (a)The department shall suspend the driving privileges or right date of revocation except that the department shall not reinstate to apply for driving privileges of a person who fails to comply with any driving privileges to the person until the person complies with future responsibility filings whenever required under the vehicle future responsibility filings. code or to provide new proof for future responsibility filings when (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a revocation requested by the department. under this subsection. (b) The suspension shall continue until the person complies (5) Failure to perform the duties of a driver to injured persons with future responsibility filings. under ORS 811.705 constitutes grounds for revocation of driving (c) A person whose initial obligation to make future responsi- privileges.The following apply to this subsection: bility filings is not based upon a conviction or other action by a (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense court is entitled to a contested case hearing prior to a suspension described in this subsection,the department shall revoke the dri- under this subsection.A person whose obligation to make future ving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. responsibility filings is based upon a conviction or other action by (b) Except as provided in paragraph (c)of this subsection,the a court is entitled to administrative review of a suspension under revocation shall be for a period of one year from the date of revo- this subsection.A person whose suspension under this subsec- cation except that the department shall not reinstate any driving tion is based on lapses in filing after the initial filing has been privileges to the person until the person complies with future made is entitled to administrative review. responsibility filings. (11)Failure to settle judgments as described in this subsection (c) If the court indicates on the record of conviction that a per- constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privileges.The fol- son was killed as a result of the accident,the revocation shall be lowing apply to this subsection: for a period of five years.The period of revocation shall begin on (a)The department shall suspend the driving privileges or right the date the person is released from incarceration,if the sentence to apply for driving privileges if a person has a judgment of the includes incarceration.If the sentence does not include incarcer- type described under ORS 806.040 rendered against the person ation,the period of revocation shall begin on the date the depart- and the person does not settle the judgment in the manner ment receives the record of conviction. described under ORS 809.470 within 60 days after its entry. (d)A person is entitled to administrative review of a revocation (b)A suspension under this subsection shall continue until the under this subsection. person complies with future responsibility filings and does one of (6) Reckless driving constitutes grounds for suspension of dri- the following: ving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: (A) Settles the judgment in the manner described in ORS (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense 809.470. described in this subsection, the department shall suspend the (B) Has an insurer which has been found by the department driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. to be obligated to pay the judgment provided that there has been (b)The suspension shall be for the periods of time described no final adjudication by a court that such insurer has no such under Schedule I of ORS 809.420 except that the department obligation. shall not reinstate any driving privileges to the person until the (C) Gives evidence to the department that a period of seven person complies with future responsibility filings. years has elapsed since the entry of the judgment. (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension (D) Receives from the court that rendered the judgment an under this subsection. order permitting the payment thereof in installments. (7) Failure to perform duties of a driver when property is dam- (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension aged under ORS 811.700 constitutes grounds for suspension of under this subsection. driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: (12) False certification of financial responsibility requirements (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction of an offense constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privileges. The described in this subsection, the department shall suspend the following apply to this subsection: driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges. (a)The department shall suspend the driving privileges or right (b)The suspension shall be for the periods of time described to apply for driving privileges if a person falsely certifies the exis- under Schedule I of ORS 809.420 except the department shall tence of a motor vehicle liability insurance policy or the existence not reinstate any driving privileges to the person until the person of some other means of satisfying financial responsibility require- complies with future responsibility filings. ments or if a person,after certifying the existence of a motor vehi- (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension cle liability insurance policy or other means of satisfying the under this subsection. requirements, allows the policy to lapse or be canceled or other- (8) Fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer under ORS wise fails to remain in compliance with financial responsibility 811.540 constitutes grounds for suspension of driving privileges. requirements. The following apply to this subsection: (b)The department shall only suspend under this subsection if (a)Upon receipt of a conviction for an offense described in this proof of compliance with financial responsibility requirements as subsection,the department shall suspend the driving privileges or of the date of the letter of verification from the department under. 22 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ORS 806.150 is not submitted within 30 days after the date of the conditions the department determines necessary. mailing of the department's demand therefor under ORS 806.160. (18)A conviction under ORS 811.700 or 811.705 for failure to (c) The suspension shall continue until the person complies perform the duties of a driver while operating a commercial motor with future responsibility filings. vehicle or any conviction of a crime punishable as a felony involy- (13) Failure to take examination upon request of the depart- ing the operation of a commercial motor vehicle constitutes ment under ORS 807.340 constitutes grounds for suspension of grounds for commercial driver license suspension.The following driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: apply to this subsection: (a) The department shall suspend the driving privileges or (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense right to apply for driving privileges of a person if the department described in this subsection,the department shall suspend the requests the person to submit to examination under ORS 807.340 commercial driver license or right to apply for a commercial driver and the person fails to appear within a reasonable length of time license of the person convicted. after being notified to do so or fails to satisfactorily complete the (b)The suspension shall be for a period of time according to required examination. the following: (b) The suspension shall continue until the examination (A)If the person's commercial driver license has not previously required by the department is successfully completed. been suspended under this subsection,ORS 813.403 or 813.410 (c) Upon suspension under this subsection, the department (2) and the person was not driving a commercial motor vehicle may issue an identification card to the person for identification containing a hazardous material at the time the offense was com- purposes as described under ORS 807.400. mitted,the suspension shall be for a period of one year. (14) Failure to obtain required medical clearance under ORS (B)If the person's commercial driver license has not previously 807.070 or 807.090 upon request by the department constitutes been suspended under this subsection,ORS 813.403 or 813.410 grounds for suspension of driving privileges.The following apply (2)and the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle con- to this subsection: taining a hazardous material at the time the offense was commit- (a)The department shall suspend the driving privileges of the ted,the suspension shall be for a period of three years. person if the department requests the person to obtain medical (C) If the person's commercial driver license has previously clearance described by this subsection and the person fails to do been suspended under this subsection,ORS 813.403 or 813.410 so. (2),the suspension shall be for the lifetime of the person. (b)The suspension under this subsection shall continue until (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension the required medical clearance is received by the department. under this subsection. (15)Causing or contributing to an accident resulting in death or (19)Use of a commercial motor vehicle in the commission of a injury to any other person or serious property damage through crime punishable as a felony involving the manufacturing,distrib- incompetence, recklessness, criminal negligence or unlawful uting or dispensing of a controlled substance constitutes grounds operation of a motor vehicle constitutes grounds for suspension of for commercial driver license suspension.The following apply to driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: this subsection: (a)The department immediately may suspend the driving priv- (a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction for an offense ileges of any person without hearing and without receiving a described in this subsection, the department shall suspend the record of the conviction of such person of crime if the department commercial driver license or right to apply for a commercial driver has reason to believe that the person may endanger people or license of the person convicted. property if not immediately suspended. Any suspension under (b)The suspension shall be for the lifetime of the person. this paragraph shall be subject to a post-imposition hearing under (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension ORS 809.440. under this subsection. (b) A suspension under this subsection shall continue for a (d)"Controlled substance"has the meaning given that term in period determined by the department and be subject to any con- ORS 475.005(6). ditions the department determines necessary. (20)Incompetence to operate a motorcycle constitutes grounds (16)Incompetence to drive a motor vehicle because of a men- for revocation of a motorcycle indorsement.The following apply to tal or physical condition rendering it unsafe for a person to drive a this subsection: motor vehicle upon the highways constitutes grounds for suspen- (a)Whenever the department has reason to believe an individ- sion of driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: ual with a motorcycle indorsement under ORS 807.170 comes (a)The department immediately may suspend the driving priv- within the grounds described in this subsection, the department ileges of any person without hearing and without receiving a may revoke the indorsement. record of the conviction of such person of crime if the department (b)Upon revocation under this subsection,the license shall be has reason to believe that the person may endanger people or surrendered to the department. property if not immediately suspended.A suspension under this (c) Upon surrender of the indorsed license, the department paragraph shall be subject to a post-imposition hearing under may issue a license without indorsement for the unexpired period ORS 809.440 except that a person who has submitted a certifi- of the license. cate of eligibility under ORS 807.090 is entitled only to adminis- (21)The department forthwith shall suspend the driving privi- trative review of a suspension. leges of any person for a period of time required by this subsec- (b) A suspension under this subsection shall continue for a tion if the person is involved in a motor vehicle accident at any period determined by the department and be subject to any con- time when the department determines the person has been ditions the department determines necessary. operating a vehicle in violation of ORS 806.010.A suspension (17) Habitual incompetence, recklessness or criminal negli- under this subsection shall be for a period of one year except that gence of a driver of a motor vehicle or committing a serious vio- the department shall not reinstate any driving privileges to the lation of the motor vehicle laws of this state constitutes grounds person until the person complies with future responsibility filing for suspension of driving privileges.The following apply to this requirements. subsection: (22)Upon notification by the superintendent of a hospital under • (a)The department immediately may suspend the driving priv- ORS 807.700 that a person should not drive,the department shall ileges of any person without hearing and without receiving a immediately suspend the driving privileges of the released record of the conviction of such person of crime if the department person.A suspension under this subsection is subject to admin- has reason.to believe that the person may endanger people or istrative review and shall continue until such time as the person property if not immediately suspended. Any suspension under produces a judicial decree of competency or a certificate from the this paragraph shall be subject to a post-imposition hearing under superintendent of the hospital that the person is competent or ORS 809.440. establishes eligibility under ORS 807.090. (b) A suspension under this subsection shall continue for a (23) Upon notification by a court under ORS 153.625 that a period determined by the department and be subject to any person charged with a traffic offense has been found guilty except 23 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 for insanity and committed to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric under this subsection if the suspension is based upon a convic- Security Review Board, the department shall immediately sus- tion. If the suspension is based upon a determination by the pend the driving privileges of the person.A suspension under this department, the person is entitled to a hearing as described in subsection is subject to administrative review and shall continue ORS 809.440. until such time as the person establishes eligibility under ORS (32) Upon receipt of a first notice indicating that a person has 807.090. 1 violated an out-of-service order issued under ORS 813.050 or (24) The department shall suspend driving privileges when has knowingly violated any other out-of-service order or notice, provided under ORS 809.290.The suspension shall continue until the department shall suspend the person's commercial driver the earlier of the following: license or right to apply for a commercial driver license for a (a)The person establishes to the satisfaction of the department period of 90 days. For purposes of this subsection, "notice" that the person has performed all acts necessary under ORS includes, but is not necessarily limited to, a record of conviction 809.290 to make the person not subject to suspension. and a record of a determination by a state or federal agency with (b)Five years from the date the suspension is imposed. jurisdiction to make such determinations that the person has vio- (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension lated an out-of-service order or notice. A person is entitled to under this subsection. administrative review of a suspension under this subsection. (25) Criminal trespass under ORS 164.245 that involves the (33) Upon receipt of a second or subsequent notice indicating operation of a motor vehicle constitutes grounds for suspension of that a person has violated an out-of-service order issued under driving privileges.The following apply to suspension on grounds ORS 813.050 or has knowingly violated any other out-of-service described in this subsection: order or notice, the department shall suspend the person's com- (a)Upon receipt of a conviction for an offense described in this mercial driver license or right to apply for a commercial driver subsection,the department shall suspend the driving privileges or license for a period of not more than five years.The department by right to apply for driving privileges of the person convicted for a rule may establish a suspension period of less than five years if period of six months from the date of suspension. the department determines that it would be in the public interest to (b)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension do so and relevant laws or rules of the United States authorize under this subsection. such a lesser suspension period.For purposes of this subsection, (26) Agreements entered under ORS 802.530 may establish "notice"includes,but is not necessarily limited to,a record of con- grounds and procedures for the suspension of driving privileges. viction and a record of a determination by a state or federal agency (27)Violation of restrictions placed on driving privileges under with jurisdiction to make such determinations that the person has ORS 807.120 or 809.310 constitutes grounds for suspension of violated an out-of-service order or notice.A person is entitled to driving privileges.The following apply to this subsection: administrative review of a suspension under this subsection. (a)The department immediately may suspend the driving priv- (34) Upon receipt of a record of a person's conviction of reck- ileges of any person without hearing and without receiving a less endangerment of highway workers under ORS 811.231 (1), record of the conviction of such person of crime if the department the department shall suspend the person's driving privileges or receives satisfactory evidence that the person has violated right to apply for driving privileges.The suspension shall be for restrictions placed on the person's driving privileges. Any sus- periods of time described under Schedule I of ORS 809.420 pension under this paragraph shall be subject to a post-imposition except the department shall not reinstate any driving privileges to hearing under ORS 809.440. the person until the person complies with future responsibility fil- (b) A suspension under this subsection shall continue for a ings.A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension period determined by the department, but in no event for longer under this subsection. than one year,and shall be subject to any conditions the depart- (35) Upon notification by a school superintendent or a school ment determines necessary. district board under ORS 339.254,the department shall suspend (28)(a)The department shall suspend driving privileges as pro- the driving privileges of a person or the right to apply for driving vided under ORS 809.405. . privileges.The suspension shall be for the amount of time stated (b)The suspension shall continue until the person reaches 18 in the notice.A person is entitled to administrative review of a sus- years of age or until the suspension is terminated as provided in pension under this subsection. ORS 809.405. (36)Failure to satisfactorily complete a possession of mar- (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension ijuana diversion agreement under ORS 135.907 and failure to under this subsection. complete a program under ORS 419C.443 constitute grounds (29) Upon receipt of a record of a person's second conviction for suspension of driving privileges.The following apply to of a serious traffic violation within a three-year period,the depart- this subsection: ment shall suspend the person's commercial driver license or (a)Upon receipt from a court of a notice that a person has right to apply for a commercial driver license if the convictions failed to complete a diversion agreement or a program arose out of separate incidents.A suspension under this subset- described in this subsection,the department shall suspend tion shall be for a period of 60 days.A person is entitled to admin- the person's driving privileges or right to apply for driving istrative review of a suspension under this subsection. privileges. (30)Upon receipt of a record of a person's third or subsequent (b)The suspension shall be for six months. conviction of a serious traffic violation within a three-year period, (c) A person is entitled to administrative review of a the department shall suspend the person's commercial driver suspension under this subsection. Notwithstanding ORS license or right to apply for a commercial driver license if the 809.440(2)(b),it is not a defense in an administrative review convictions arose out of separate incidents.A suspension under under this paragraph that the offense on which the suspen- this subsection shall be for a period of 120 days. A person is sion was based did not involve a motor vehicle. entitled to administrative review of a suspension under this SECTION 5.ORS 135.907 is amended to read: subsection. 135.907.(1)The court shall inform at arraignment a defendant (31)(a) Upon receipt of a record of conviction of an offense charged with the offense of possession of less than one ounce of described in ORS 809.310, the department shall, or upon deter- marijuana, that a diversion agreement may be available if the + mination by the department that the person has committed an act offense for which the defendant is before the court is the defen- that constitutes such an offense, the department may suspend dant's first offense of possession of less than one ounce of any driving privileges,any right to apply for privileges or any iden- marijuana and files with the court a petition for a possession of tification card of the person convicted or determined to have marijuana diversion agreement. committed the act. (2)The petition form for a possession of marijuana diversion (b) A suspension under this subsection shall continue for a agreement shall be available to a defendant at the court. period of one year. (3)The form of the petition for a possession of marijuana diver- (c)A person is entitled to administrative review of a suspension sion agreement and the information and blanks contained therein 24 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures d Measure No . 57 shall be determined by the Supreme Court under ORS 1.525.The EXPLANATORY STATEMENT petition form made available to a defendant by any state court shall conform to the requirements adopted by the Supreme Court. (4)In addition to any other information required by the Supreme Ballot Measure 57 makes possession of less than one ounce Court to be contained in a petition for a possession of marijuana of marijuana a Class C misdemeanor crime,punishable by up to diversion agreement,the petition shall include: 30 days in jail and a fine of$500 to $1,000. Under current law, (a)A waiver by the defendant of the right to speedy trial or sen- possession of less than one ounce of marijuana is a non-criminal tencing in any subsequent action upon the charge; violation,punishable upon conviction by a fine of at least$500 but (b) An agreement by the defendant to complete at an agency not more than$1,000. or organization designated by the state court a diagnostic assess- Current law allows an adult charged with possession of less ment to determine the possible existence and degree of a drug than one ounce of marijuana to have the charge dismissed by abuse problem; completion of a diversion program if it is the person's first offense. (c)An agreement by the defendant to complete,at defendant's This measure also allows diversion, but requires, as a condition own expense based on defendant's ability to pay,the program of diversion, that the person charged stipulate that the person treatment indicated as necessary by the diagnostic assessment;, of was in possession of marijuana.Current law also requires a juve- (d)An agreement by the defendant to comply fully with the laws nile who is found to have committed the same act to enter a pro- of this state regarding controlled substances; gram for information or treatment.This measure provides that.if a (e)A notice to the defendant that the diversion agreement will person enters one of these programs and fails to complete the be considered to be violated if the court receives notice that the program,the person's driving privileges will be suspended for six defendant at any time during the diversion period committed a months. violation of the controlled substances laws of this state; (f)An agreement by the defendant to keep the court advised of The measure appropriates $600,000 for the biennium out of the defendant's current mailing address at all times during the the General Fund to the Emergency Board, for allocation to the diversion period;[and] Judicial Department and the Department of State Police for pur- (g) A waiver by the defendant of any former jeopardy rights poses of carrying out the provisions of the measure. under the federal and state constitutions and ORS 131.505 to The text of Ballot Measure 57 was enacted by the Legislative 131.525 in any subsequent action upon the charge or any other Assembly in 1997 as House Bill 3643 and was referred to the offenses based upon the same criminal episode;and voters in accordance with the referendum power reserved to the (h)A stipulation by the defendant that the controlled sub- stance the defendant possessed was marijuana. people by section 1,Article IV of the Oregon Constitution. SECTION 6. In addition to and not in lieu of any other appropriation,there is appropriated to the Emergency Board, Committee Members: Appointed by: out of the General Fund,for the biennium beginning July 1, Representative Jo Ann Bowman Chief Petitioners 1997,the sum of$600,000 for allocation only to the Judicial Representative Floyd Prozanski Chief Petitioners Department and the Department of State Police to address Senator Eileen Qutub Secretary of State costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the purposes Representative Ben Westlund Secretary of State of this Act. Any such moneys that remain unallocated and Representative Lane Shetterly Members of the Committee unobligated by the Emergency Board on November 1,1998, become available .for any lawful purpose for which the (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the Emergency Board may lawfully allocate funds. ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and italic]type indicates deletions or comments. 25 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR YES ON 57 OREGON MARIJUANA LAW NEEDS FAIR CONSEQUENCES TO PROTECT OREGON TEENAGERS. http://www.focc.ora • Marijuana use by Oregon eighth graders has tripled since 1990 When marijuana was decriminalized in 1977, it actually attracted and is 36% above the national average. Oregon's extremely criminals to the state.Decriminalization,sent a mixed message to permissive marijuana law contributes to this problem. our children and though marijuana is especially damaging to children,Oregon students,soon led the nation in the use of mar- • Teenagers who use marijuana are: ijuana.Today, marijuana is 5 to 30 times more potent, and far • 6 times more likely to bring guns to school. more dangerous than it was in the 70's. Recriminalizing will • 4 times more likely to attack another person to hurt them. impose meaningful penalties,act as a deterrent for use and pos- • 3 times more likely to engage in sex (and far more likely to session,and end attracting drug users to Oregon. do so with no protection against disease and pregnancy). 1 • 2 times more likely to attempt suicide. • Marijuana is a gateway drug!Those who use marijuana 100 . 85 times more likely to use cocaine. times or more,are 85 times more likely to use cocaine! "It's our children who are a the greatest risk of substance Marijuana is addictive and affects the brain in ways similar to heroin, cocaine, tobacco, or alcohol.Teenagers are twice as abuse, and tragically, this substance abuse occurs while likely as adults to become addicted to marijuana. In Oregon, their central nervous systems are still developing. In a very marijuana is now the# 1 problem drug for teenagers entering real sense,the onset of substance abuse occurs when it is drug addiction treatment programs. the most detrimental to their psycho-social development" David Smith, M.D., Founder, Haight Ashbury Free Clinics Using marijuana damages health,coordination,thinking,mem The Commonwealth',Vol.90,#5,January 29, 1996 ory, learning,judgment, and self management abilities. • Measure 57 would require teenagers who use marijuana to • Marijuana is addictive;when a substance is legal, like alcohol have a professional evaluation of their drug problems and to and tobacco, use,particularly by children,escalates! complete a drug education or treatment program.This would "Applying the same measures to alcohol, it turns out that provide early intervention for youths with drug problems before marijuana is just as addictive as alcohol for adults and even it is too late to help.Parents of these youths would pay for the more so for teenagers..Kids may be unusually"sensitive"to programs according to their ability to pay.Youths who fail to marijuana for biological as well as social reasons;the reason complete these programs would lose their driving privileges for we have so many alcoholics is simply that there are so many six months. people drinking" • Permissive marijuana laws encourage more drug use and cre- Denise Kandel Columbia University, ate more drug problems for all Oregonians.Measure 57 would From:"New Scientist",2/21/98 create fair and helpful consequences for Oregon teenagers who may have a serious drug problem. • When a woman smokes marijuana during pregnancy, THC j passes through the placenta into the fetus. Her babies have: PROTECT OREGON TEENAGERS FROM THE HARM OF lower birth weight, trouble focusing on an object, increased MARIJUANA AND OTHER ADDICTIVE DRUGS. tremors, increased sleep disturbances, and more startle VOTE YES ON MEASURE 57. responses. d By school age, these same children exhibited: highly inferior (This information furnished by Roger Burt,MS.) 1 verbal skills,lower intelligence,and memory problems i Their mothers rated them as: more impulsive, more hyperac- tive,and more problematic(behavior). Fried, P.A., Published in"Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology"36:319-337, 1993 (This information furnished by John E.English,Director,For Our Children's Children.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 26 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ' ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON POLICE CHIEFS FOR SAFER Argument Against Ballot Measure#57 COMMUNITIES URGES YOU TO NO PRIVACY,NO HOME VOTE YES ON MEASURE 57 SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE TO OREGON'S CHILDREN This bill erodes everybody's privacy. By placing marijuana in the same category as cocaine, heroin,and prostitution,the State It's time we send a clear message to the children of Oregon that can require forfeiture of cars, assets and home. Professional the use of marijuana is not acceptable.We cannot expect young licenses could be revoked.Loss of children to CSD is also a pos-, people in Oregon to believe our message about the danger of sibility. If marijuana is suspected to be present, the police may drugs,if we continue to treat possession of marijuana as a minor also presume guns to be present, thereby allowing swat team offense worth no more than a violation. entry. A NO vote protects the Fourth Amendment from dilution For the past several years,Oregon's children have been receiving and predatory interests! conflicting messages about the acceptability of drugs. These The Fourth Amendment provides:The right of the people to be mixed messages leave children more vulnerable to drug use than secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against ever before.Increased marijuana usage by our children results in unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated,and no significant social impacts which deeply impact our schools and Warrants, shall (be) issued(d), but upon probable cause, sup- our communities. More children in Oregon are using marijuana ported by Oath of affirmation, and particularly describing the than ever.Here are the facts: place to be searched and the person or things to be seized. • The Oregon Biennial Student Drug Use Survey, reported Since 1986, over forty million dollars worth of property has marijuana use by eight-graders more than tripled since been seized in Oregon. Ballot Measure#57 allows the police to 1990,rising 4.5%to 15.3%. search the suspected marijuana criminal's car, house, computer • The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study found from 1995 files,and personal effects.Imagine if a friend who was a tobacco, to 1996 trial use of marijuana doubled among elementary coffee,or alcohol user was subjected to such inquisition by a sim- lar bill! The proposed punishments for using small amounts of school children aged 9 to 12. An increase from approxi- i mately 230,000 children experimenting with the drug in marijuana are extreme, especially in comparison with the penal- 1995 to 460,000 children in 1996. ties for alcohol abuse.Ballot measure#57 is an expensive assault on all privacy issues and one's home. • The 1996 Oregon Public School Drug Survey found that CHERISH PRIVACY RIGHTS!THEY ARE THE REAL marijuana,alcohol,tobacco,and other drug use not only BASIS UPON WHICH ALL OF OUR OTHER FREEDOMS REST. affects a student's scholastic performance but is often KEEP EVERYONE'S HOME A LEGAL CASTLE. related to their willingness to remain in school as well. Vote NO on Ballot Measure#57! WE CANNOT STAND BY AND WATCH THIS HAPPEN. ORE- Written by Toby Grant Occupation-Landlord GONIANS HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN. MEASURE 57 WILL SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE Registered as Republican TO OUR YOUTH THAT MARIJUANA IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. (This information furnished by Toby Grant.) YES ON MEASURE 57. (This information furnished by Mike Cahill,Oregon Police Chiefs For Safer Communities.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 27 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57, 'ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Five Good Reasons To Vote No on Measure 57: Former Governor Tom McCall Measure 57 costs too much: signed the legislation that decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana 25 years ago. At least$1.5 million each year. Here's what Governor McCall said: That's what the Legislative Fiscal Impact Committee estimates Measure 57 will cost taxpayers. "The Legislature determined that the existing penalties for mere But the true cost could go much higher. possession or use of small amounts of the substance were dis- The cost of taxpayer-funded,court-appointed lawyers could proportionately severe. exceed$1 million a year alone.. "All of us recognize the widespread use among our young people, Measure 57 would increase costs to state and local and most of us disapprove of the custom. governments for jail time and court costs. And it would reduce state revenues by at least$638,000 per year. "There is recognition however,that if we are correct in assuming The Legislature only appropriated$300,000 annually to pay for marijuana to be a socially undesirable substance,the solution is the increased costs. not to toss youthful offenders in jail. Where will that additional$1.2 million come from? "We long ago recognized alcoholism as a disease and Measure 57 sends the wrong message to our kids: abandoned efforts to treat alcoholics by simply locking them up." By re-criminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana Former Governor Tom McCall we tell our kids one thing:We'll pay for your lawyers and jail 7/22/73 cells, but we won't pay for your education. Salem Statesman Journal Measure 57 will increase the release of criminals Vote No on Measure 57. from our jails: There are better ways to spend our tax dollars. In an Oregon State Bar Bulletin editorial in June, 1997,the Tom McCall knew that back in 1973. Honorable Judge Frank Bearden had this to say about the It is more true today. Legislature's efforts to re-criminalize possession of small (This information furnished by State Rep.Floyd Prozanski.) amounts of marijuana: "With our Sheriff releasing around 500 criminals per month on matrix...our revolving door will soon spin like a top! Measure 57 Won't Reduce Drug use among juveniles or adults: Experts agree treatment programs are far more effective in reduc- ing casual use of marijuana,yet the Legislature has underfunded treatment programs for years. Now Measure 57 will send people who use small amounts of mar- ijuana to jail.At a cost of$1.5 million or more per year.There are better ways to spend our tax dollars. Police Should Worry About Violent Criminals, Not People Who Use Marijuana. Why waste law enforcement's time and money on these non- violent individuals when property and violent crimes continue to rise and people continue to be scared in our streets. Keep law enforcement working where they belong. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 57 (This information furnished by David Srnigelski,No on 57.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 28 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Index of Facts on Measure 57• DON'T TURN BACK THE CLOCK! Sources listed in parenthesis VOTE NO ON MEASURE 571 State estimate of cost of Measure 57: $1.42 million The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oregon urges (Ballot Measure Fiscal Impact Committee) you to consider why Oregon was the first state to decriminalize Potential cost of Measure 57 to taxpayers possession of less than an ounce of marijuana in 1973.It wasn't annual) because most Oregonians thought using marijuana was a good Y $18 million idea. We didn't then—and we don't now. It was because we Amount Legislature appropriated annually in thought police had more important things to do with their time and current budget: $300,000 our tax dollars. (Legislative record) IT MADE SENSE THEN; Amount Legislature left unfunded that will IT MAKES EVEN MORE SENSE NOW have to come from other programs Thirty years ago, police, prosecutors and the courts were like schools: $1.2 to$17 million spending too much time arresting and prosecuting young people State Sen.Eileen Cutub's response to whose only offense was the possession of small amounts of mar- cost of M57:� "Startled" ijuana. Then, as now, marijuana was the most frequently used (Eugene Register Guard,August 6, 1998) illicit drug. Number of prisoners released EARLY EACH Police, prosecutors and the courts shouldn't waste their MONTH in Multnomah County: 500 time and our tax dollars arresting and prosecuting minor (Oregon State Bar Bulletin,June 1997) drug offenses. Their first priority should be catching and con- victing murderers,rapists,sex offenders,armed robbers,burglars, drunk drivers and dangerous drug dealers. marijuana possession in 1999: 6,000 (Legislative Fiscal Impact Committee) MEASURE 57 GOES TOO FAR! Potential cost per person for taxpayer-funded Before 1973,someone caught with less than an ounce of mar- defense lawyers: $280 ijuana could end up in jail and saddled with a criminal record for (Oregon State Bar Bulletin,June 1997) the rest of his or her life. If Measure 57 is approved, that could Total cost if each person arrested receives happen again—but there's more. taxpayer-funded defense lawyer: $1.68 million In recent years, lawmakers have given police and prosecutors powerful new tools that weren't available in 1973.Among those is Minimum cost per day to jail people the right to seize property from people suspected of committing arrested for using marijuana: $76.20 drug crimes.Under these"forfeiture"laws,it's up to property own- (Ballot Measure Fiscal Impact Committee) ers to prove their innocence if they want their property back. Annual cost if every possession case resulted One of the effects of Measure 57 will be to allow police to in maximum jail stay: $13.7 million seize cars,cash and even the homes of people suspected of Governor who signed law decriminalizing possessing less than an ounce of marijuana. Do we really marijuana possession in 1973: Tom McCall want to give police and prosecutors this kind of power in minor (1973 Legislative Record) marijuana cases? (This information furnished by Geoff Sugerman,No on 57 Committee.) LET'S KEEP OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT! VOTE NO ON MEASURE 57! (This information furnished by Jann Carson,American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the meet by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 29 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION A Respected Judge Argues Even Top Brass in the War on Drugs Agree: The Legislature's Effort to Re-Criminalize Marijuana Use Treatment Works Better than Jail Time.... Will Result in More Prisoners Being Released "It is time to make education,prevention and drug treatment a From Our Jails. priority for funding if we hope to make a lasting impact on Excerpts from an editorial by the Honorable alcohol and drug abuse.' Judge Frank Bearden: Studies show that prevention and treatment work and save Oregon State Bar Bulletin,June 1997 money.A recent study by the Oregon State office of Alcohol and "Like pouring gasoline on an out-of-control fire, the Legislature Drug Abuse Programs clearly shows that each dollar spent on passes more laws in the name of public safety without coming alcohol and drug abuse treatment results in a savings of$5.60" close to funding the product through to completion. "...I am convinced that expanding prevention and drug treatment "One small example is the proposed bill to re-criminalize mari- programs will help us make greater gains in eliminating alcohol juana to a Class A misdemeanor,with a conservative estimate of and drug abuse.' an additional 1,000 misdemeanor cases in Multnomah County(to -Portland Police Chief Charles Moose go with our 20,000 plus). Source:July 12,1996 cover letter as Chair of the 'This would mean approximately $250,000 or more in indigent Regional Drug Initiative Task Force. defense costs (in Multnomah County alone) and no additional "We are not going to arrest our way out of the drug prosecutors or judges or courts to handle those cases... problem....The drug issue is going to get solved in the home and "With our Sheriff releasing around 500 people a month on in the home room of a school, not on the streets of America" matrix because of overcrowding, our revolving door will U.S.Drug Czar,General Barry McCaffrey soon spin like a top:' Source:Speech before the National Sheriffs'Association, NOTE: Judge Frank Bearden is the chief criminal judge for Portland,Oregon--June 4,1996 Multnomah County Circuit Court. This statement is The Salem Statesman Journal Agrees... excerpted from an article written by Judge Bearden which appeared in the June 1997 edition of the Oregon "...We don't have the police, prosecutors, prison space and pro- State Bar Bulletin. bation resources to combat major crime now.By burdening them with more small time offenders,we will be diverting law enforce- (This information furnished by Leland R.Berger,No on 57 Committee.) ment from effectively targeting drug suppliers, violent criminals and other high-priority offenders.' Source:"Tougher Marijuana Penalties Won't Curb Substance Abuse:' Salem Statesman Journal editorial,April 26,1997 Vote NO on Measure 57–Let's not waste our tax dollars. (This information furnished by Amy K.Klare,No on 57 Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 30 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Vote No on Measure 57 Vote NO on Measure 57 There are better ways to spend our tax dollars. There are better ways to spend our tax dollars. For 25 years,since Tom McCall was Governor,Oregon has used For 25 years Oregon has used treatment and prevention pro - casual treatment and prevention programs to fight the problems of ms to fight the problems caused treatment the casual use of casual marijuana use.Compared to other states,especially those marijuana. Our rate of marijuana usage is similar to states that with costly incarceration programs,our rate marijuana usage is impose even more costly incarceration penalties. Oregon does similar. We do better than many states with h the most severe penalties. better than many states in treating severe offenders. Measure 57 won't cut use... But it will cost taxpayers millions of Measure 57 won't cut usage, but it will cost taxpayers millions of dollars each year...And it will force us to release more criminals dollars each year to punish those who use small quantities. onto our streets. Under our present law, we require those caught with small Under current law, we require those caught with small quantities of marijuana to pay a hefty fine-a minimum of$500 amounts of marijuana to pay a hefty fine–a minimum of$500 up to$1000.Under measure 57,fines will actually be reduced in up to $1000–when they are caught. Under Measure 57, fines 40%of the cases. would actually be reduced in 40%of cases. Under Measure 57 certain politicians want to spend millions Now the politicians want to spend millions each year to send of your tax dollars each year to send their political message. a political message. But, it is the wrong message; especially for young people.The But it's the wrong message,especially for young people Because message our youth will hear is that we are willing to pay for more what our young people hear is that we are willing to pay for their jail cells and expensive lawyers, but we are not willing to pay for lawyers and jail cells,but not willing to pay for their education,pre- their education or marijuana prevention and treatment programs. vention or treatment programs.In fact,Measure 57 makes it more In fact,Measure 57 will make it more difficult for those arrested for difficult for people arrested for first time to enter diversion pro- first time offenses to enter diversion programs. grams. Measure 57 will also require the release of more prisoners Measure 57 also requires us to release more prisoners from from our over-crowded jails. our over-crowded jails. Prisoners who commit property crimes and theft are often Criminals in jail for theft or property offenses are often released released when jails become full.In Multnomah County,up to 500 early to make room for other offenders.In Multnomah County for prisoners are released each month.. example, up to 500 prisoners are released each month. Do we really want to release more criminals just to send a Do we really want to release more criminals just to send an costly and ineffective message to our children? expensive and ineffective message to our youth? Measure 57 is a political tool that will: Measure 57 is a political tool that will: • Cost taxpayers millions. • Cost taxpayers millions each year. • Cause more prisoners to be released early. • Cause more prisoners to be released early. • Do nothing to prevent or treat casual drug use. • Do little to prevent or treat the casual use of drugs. Vote No on Measure 57. It's a bad law that will cost us millions and make our streets less Vote NO on Measure 57. safe. It's a bad law,will cost us millions,and make our streets less (This information furnished by Charles E.Grossman,MD.) safe. (This information furnished by George Eighmey,State Representative,No on 57 Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 31 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION M.A.M.A.Says Measure 57 Sends the Wrong Message to Kids MARIJUANA AND REASON Do we not see that it is senseless to My name is Sandee Burbank.I have lived in Oregon for 24 years, throw a man in jail for drinking a beer, or to declare a woman a 1 have a deep love for this state, not only because of its natural criminal for lighting a cigarette. Yet this is just what Measure 57 beauty,but also for the wonderfully diverse and progressive peo- proposes for the one who holds a marijuana cigarette.This would ple who live here. be a step entirely in the wrong direction.No doubt it is difficult to put aside the fearful emotions that have been attached to the For the last 17 years, I have served as the executive director questions of marijuana, but let us calm ourselves and examine Mothers Against Misuse and Abuse, a nationally recognized the facts from a rational perspective. parents'organization concerned about preventing the misuse and IS MARIJUANA DANGEROUS? The thoughtful answer can abuse of all drugs.MAMA believes we must seek a more inclusive only be"Compared to what?"Nothing is entirely safe;dangers are approach to our current drug policies beginning by judging all to be found in everything under the sun.Two comparisons are drugs by the same standard. Drug policy should be based on particularly useful: marijuana versus alcohol and tobacco, the sound science and reason-not political posturing. legal adult "recreational" (mood-altering) drugs; and regulated Measure 57 sends a misguided message to our children – marijuana versus prohibited marijuana. telling them that our state would rather pay for more jail cells than ALCOHOL is mind-and mood-altering; t causes birth defects for parks or school books. g' and many other physical ailments; it impairs judgment, learning, • Wouldn't you rather fund education and training programs that memory, and physical control; it induces violent behavior. It is give people the help and social skills they need to find happi- physically addictive and psychologically habit-forming.(Alcohol is ness in life,without resorting to substance abuse? addictive to 10-20 percent of its users, roughly the same propor- tion as cocaine and heroin;each of these is much less addictive • Wouldn't you prefer our tax dollars be spent on programs that than tobacco.)TOBACCO is,without question,the most addictive treat and prevent all drug misuse and abuse? and lethal drug around. • Wouldn't you rather see our police and courts spend their time MARIJUANA use, by contrast, simply is not a major public stopping violent crime and property crime? health or safety issue. No one dies from a marijuana overdose, Think Smart for Our Kids--Vote NO on 57. nor from marijuana poisoning;while marijuana affects driving abil- ities, it is demonstrably safer than alcohol; it does not induce Sandee Burbank violent behavior; it is no more addictive nor more habit-forming Mosier,OR than coffee. (This information furnished by Sandee L.Burbank.) When compared objectively, alcohol and tobacco are each much more dangerous than marijuana.And yet we do not prohibit their use and sale by adults to adults, because we know the effects of prohibiting alcohol or tobacco are more dangerous than the effects of the drugs themselves. Instead, we regulate. The same should be true for marijuana. . PROHIBITION may or may not reduce absolute consumption, but it guarantees that all production,distribution,and use will be illegal and away from effective social control. Here is the true 'gateway' effect, due to prohibition itself: prohibiting marijuana brings the user into contact and collusion with our dark side, the criminal world. Prohibition breeds crime and corruption by creating the sky-high profits of the black market, where illegal marijuana sells for one hundred times the price of legal,regulated tobacco. PROHIBITION LOSES CONTROL While no form of regulation can be perfect, marijuana prohibition is wildly imperfect, a delu- sional fantasy: what prohibition pretends and what it actually delivers are two very different things.Prohibition pretends to offer control and safety, but instead gives us "unintended conse- quences"; it pretends to keep marijuana away from children, but actually makes it more available and completely uncontrolled. (Studies consistently show that school children can get marijuana more easily than alcohol.) Prohibition pretends to prevent crime while actually creating more. Only by regulating adult marijuana commerce can we eliminate the black-market profits that are the real cause of crime and cor- ruption.Then we can directly address the comparatively small social, medical,and public safety concerns about marijuana,and more effectively keep marijuana away from children,and children away from crime. (This information furnished by Barry Smith.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space'purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument, accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 32 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 57 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION VOTE NO ON MEASURE 57 Ballot Measure 57 will dramatically increase government intrusion and loss of privacy.It will give the police even more legal power to invade our homes at will. It is totally at odds with the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. This bill is NOT about possession of marijuana(a nonviolent and victimless act). It IS about increasing police search and seizure, the forfeiture of property,vehicles and cash,the loss of commer- cial and professional licenses, and CSD taking our children. Oregon's whole climate of freedom and pursuit of happiness will be compromised,if not destroyed.The police are very supportive of this draconian bill(its original sponsor in the Oregon legislature was a policeman/representative).The police will benefit greatly, on numerous levels,from the latitude it will allow them. This so-called War on Drugs (really a war on our personal free- doms)is an unmitigated disaster,and Measure 57 will only make things worse.When marijuana prohibition was initiated with the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937,there were supposedly 55,000 users. Now in the U.S., after 60 years of prohibition and several trillion dollars,there are seventy million users.Our prison population has grown tenfold over the last 20 years.It is the highest in the world. On the average we have ten times the number of prisoners per capita than do most European countries. If Measure 57 passes,there will instantly be a quarter of a million new"criminals"in the state of Oregon.What will we do with them? Bill Conde (This information furnished by Bill Conde.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 33 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Election, November 3, 1998. This measure changes existing law to allow an adopted person BALLOT TITLE 21 years of age or older to obtain a copy of the person's original birth certificate. Current Oregon law prohibits the release of an original birth certificate to such an adopted person without a court order.The law currently requires that upon receipt of a decree of adoption or a report of adoption from a court, the state registrar !W"4'COPY O ORG-NAl�-f)REG�IV shall issue a new birth certificate unless the court, the adoptive � V, TO:A130 _ parents or the adopted person requests otherwise. z `YES/4 YOB "'Yes "vtate'requiiee tsstnng eopy of This measure requires that upon receipt of a written application � n 4irth certftot 16#00 t adb tees [ ah re #test the state registrar shall provide a copy of the original birth p P• certificate to an Oregon born adopted person 21 years of age or 1 "I�tf3" C21 a" utite r&t�strtS"cort#identjat#y af: older.This measure requires that the procedures,filing fees and 1 tigfrt + birtfl e8rtiftW t O#ad tees,ttfll s6 urt nt3el `.' waiting periods for certified copies of original birth certificates be Cigsttr+t the same for requests by adopted persons as for non-adopted > � Gs�rrBnt 4r8 'taw rrzuid8s #hat sport ., persons. t#9W lath ert9j# at9.gerterafly,: This measure applies to persons adopted in the past or in the kt #tip l...... trth eeii ficate, `R' ih8 to"rlgtt l eetttfica#e hOwtrfg future.There are no exceptions to this measure. j� Ml 64 tti( c�tSe sut�je8f to tnaectttn, nf8s disclosure moa,sore would Members: Appointed by: e 8 t t� �irxy t3•C1C1gs3tii i 1 CeCt>ftGa # arty Crei}C�rf bfstrl,' Helen Hill Chief Petitioners e� 1 yea' ea atsi�r,.lsibliaes sasrte,prgg8. a wati Shea Grimm Chief Petitioners B prirsds frr c�biriftiit #frClt o8rtafiCS#8; Catherine Dexter Secretary of State si8d aersorts for rignr agg dperSOns Jim Wheeler Secretary of State r=�iNAi CIAi } Noflhandw el 4�rt Mat Michael Schrunk Members of the Committee it� rtiCflBnt expendlfrs or revenues, ' : (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215. The statement written by the committee was modified and certified by the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon pursuant to ORS 251.235.) TEXT OF MEASURE Upon receipt of a written application to the state registrar, any adopted person 21 years of age and older born in the state of Oregon shall be issued a certified copy of his/her unaltered, original and unamended certificate of birth in the custody of the state registrar, with procedures, filing fees, and waiting periods identical to those imposed upon non-adopted citizens of the State of Oregon pursuant to ORS 432.120 and 432.146. Contains no exceptions. 34 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Passage of measure 58 would grant adult adoptees the same Supporters of Measure 58 have heard concern over the possi- right as the rest of the population enjoys,namely access to a doc- ble loss of privacy to birthparents.There are complex issues in ument that truthfully states the names of the biological parents. adoption that require compassionate consideration but are As the original birth certificate would only be available to the adult beyond th@ scope of the simple civil rights issue this measure adoptee, the issue of"privacy and confidentiality"should not be addresses. an issue. The sealing of the original birth certificate provides irrevocable Although the adoption process severs the responsibilities of the legitimacy and a legal bond with the adoptive family that cannot birthparents, it should not relieve them of the moral obligation of be challenged on grounds of kinship or inheritance.The confi- providing accurate family history and medical information to an dentiality of birthparents is a secondary effect.The surrender form adult adoptee.The sealing of birth records was created and justi- signed.by birthparents deals with the transfer of custody and fied for the purpose of protecting the adoptee from the stigma of rights from the birthparents to the adoptive parents. Nowhere is illegitimacy, to allow the birth mother get on with her life, and birthparent identity concealment alluded to in the forms signed by enable the adoptive parents the freedom to raise the child without the birthparents. The fact that the birthmother gave birth on a interference from the birthparents.This is reasonable as it per- specific date remains on state documents and hospital records tains to a minor,but should not restrict the rights and needs of the even after the amendment of a birth certificate to replace the adult adoptee to access their biological information. birthparent names with the adoptive parent names.Searches are I applaud the birthmother's decision to give the child up for routinely conducted through such archival evidence.There is no adoption, but I think that if she would put herself in the child's ultimate legal protection of privacy. Many birthparents have place, she would understand the importance of providing this waived confidentiality and signed up with registries.Members of information. our group believe in statistical and powerful anecdotal evidence that over 90% of birthmothers do not object to an adoptee's Adult adoptees had access to their original birth certificates prior knowledge of birthfamily identification. to 1957,when the records were sealed,even for prior adoptions. Some adoptees grow up with such knowledge.Others have to Sealed birth certificates do not serve the interests of birth parents jump through hoops to obtain even a scrap of vital medical infor- or adult adoptees.Statistics have not shown a higher rate of abor- mation.Measure 58 would provide consistency and equality.We tion in those states and countries with open records. understand the concern of the few who want to conceal knowl- The passage of this measure would restore the rights of adult edge, but privacy does not equate with secrecy. As a group adoptees that were taken away in 1957. including birthmothers,we seek to remove obstacles from access to original birth certificates by adult adoptees. We support the (This information furnished by Berry T.Price.) measure on behalf of adoptees and their birth and adoptive families. (This information furnished by Carey Mercer and Other Members of The Circle,A support and information group for all involved or interested in the relations of the adoption circle.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 35 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Citizens deserve to know the Facts Hidden Roots Support Group of Bend, Oregon believes it is All Adults have the right to know the true facts unconstitutional for the State of Oregon to regulate who gets a regarding their birth,except Adoptees. true birth certificate and who gets a falsified one. Give Adult Are you adopted?Are you sure? Adoptees the right to choose whether they would like to have access to their original birth certificate by voting Yes on Measure Vote for the right of All Adults to receive upon request 58.Thank you. a copy of their original birth certificate. (This information furnished by JoAnne Wildman, Birthmother; Victoria Vote to restore a constitutional right denied Seaton,Adult Adoptee;Hidden Roots Support Group of Bend,Oregon.) by the state in 1957. EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL ADULTS. Vote YES for Measure 58. (This information furnished by Donna Martz.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 36 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The year was 1957-the peak year of the baby boom and a time Imagine two Oregon neighbors, Bill Jones and Sam Smith.They with the most teen pregnancies per capita in history. It was the are the same age;as a matter of fact, they were born the same year Senator Joe McCarthy died,the Russians launched Sputnik day at the same hospital in Corvallis.They both became grandfa- and Oregon closed adoption records to adult adoptees, the thers the same year and fought in World War IL Bill can go down people to whom they had always been open previously.Those to the county registrar and pay twelve dollars for a certified copy who oppose Measure 58 will argue that the 1957 sealed records of his original birth certificate.Sam,on the other hand,cannot.His law was meant to protect birthparents. Untrue. It was a move birth certificate is sealed.The only difference between Bill and designed to protect the adoptee and the adoptive parents from Sam?Sam was adopted in Oregon. the alleged shame of an adoptee's often "illegitimate" birth. It's time to get the State of Oregon off the backs of its adult Secrecy in the adoption process was something forced on birth parents,not something they asked for or were promised.. adopted citizens. Measure will finally put to rest the failed social experiment of hiding and obscuring the most fundamental Opponents will attempt to scare you by claiming that pregnant information any of us possess:the facts of our birth.The present women in Oregon will choose abortion if records are open to adult "sealed records law,a remnant of the McCarthy Era philosophy of adoptees.This is false.In states and countries where records are "Government Knows Best",has been judged a failure by the very open to adult adoptees, the abortion rate is no higher than in people it was designed to"protect":the adopted adult citizens of states like Oregon,which seal such records. Oregon. Opponents will argue that people who relinquish a child have a Governments make poor referees in the affairs of law-abiding right to privacy that opening records will violate.We ALL have a people.Measure 58 would allow all of Oregon's citizens the abil- right to privacy.However, privacy does not equal anonymity.The ity to access the documentation concerning their birth without the U.S.Supreme Court upheld an appellate court decision just last interference of disinterested bureaucrats and expensive,cumber- year that reiterated this fact. (Doe v. Sundquist 1997 FED App. some procedures. 0051 P(6th Cir)). When you mark your ballot, consider whether you would like the The opponents of Measure 58 shamelessly use the specter of state to decide whether you could know the facts of your birth or birthparents allegedly promised anonymity, or young women not.Consider that is not a large leap from sealing birth certificates choosing abortion, to further their own agendas, which in many to withholding other personal,vital information from the citizens to cases is simply to cover up and hide their own illegal and unethi- whom such information belongs. Consider that something of cal activities with regard to these very same birthparents they YOURS could be next.Then Vote Yes on Measure 58. now claim to care about. The not-so-honorable past of some adoption agencies and attorneys may come back to haunt them if (This information furnished by Shea Grimm,Marley Greiner,CK Bertrand discrepancies are revealed once records are unsealed. On Holub,Ron Morgan,Damsel Plum;Bastard Nation.) November 3rd vote YES on Measure 58.Vote for Truth. (This information furnished by Shea Grimm, Ian Hagemann, Mary Hunt, Arletta Gustafson, Judy Kennett, Julie Dennis, Terri Leber, Rhonda Bradeen;Washington state Open'98.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of,Oregon, nor does the state warrant the_ accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 37 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Oregon born adult adoptees should have the same civil right as Please, I need your help to find my sister and two brothers. non-adopted Oregonians-the right to access the true historical Vote Yes on Measure 58 document that records their own birth. The voters of Oregon are my only hope,and the only hope for The Oregon Bill of Rights states:"No law shall be passed grant- thousands of others like me.My name is Jonathan Wexler, I was ing to any citizen or class of citizens privileges or immunities, born here in Portland on April 12th of 1958 at Wilcox Memorial, which upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citi- now Good Samaritan Hospital. zens".The State of Oregon currently violates it's own Bill of Rights When I was born, I may have had another name, but unlike by denying adoptees the right to access their own original birth you,I have no legal right to know what it was.I have no legal right certificate(OBC)while allowing anyone not adopted to do so. to see my own unaltered birth certificate,to know what diseases Many countries allow adoptees easy, unrestricted access to their may run in my family and most painfully, no right to know what own records of birth. Every human being deserves the right to happened to my two older brothers and sister. access these records which help them to define their genetic, Unlike them, I was lucky.Through a private adoption, I ended ethnic and cultural heritage. The Oregon State government up with Simon and Joy Wexler. I had the most wonderful, loving should not regulate who can and who cannot access their own parents anyone could ever wish for.My adopted sister,Marci,and OBC. I were truly blessed. Medical science stresses the importance of knowing one's ances- tors'medical histories.It is impossible for adoptees obtain this and my mom.died on my birthday last year.I applied to the state vital medical information without allowing them access to their for what most Oregonians consider their most basic human right; OBC. to know who they are and where they come from. I can only say Adoptees are forbidden access to their OBC due to archaic laws that what I found broke my heart. which mandate that adoptee birth certificates be falsified by the The State,which is so desperate to"protect"us from ourselves, State and the original sealed by the courts at the time of adoption. had adopted out my two brothers and my sister into different These laws were enacted allegedly to protect adoptees from the homes,but only after leaving them in foster care for seven years. shame of their "illegitimate" heritage, not to protect the birth They were two;three and four when I was born.I never knew they mother's privacy.Birth parents not sign a contract upon relin existed.They still have no idea I exist, and the State will not tell quishing a child for adoption guaranteeing them anonymity. me their names. I don't have the same right in Oregon that any Studies show that the overwhelming majority of birth mothers wel- other citizen has.I can't call and ask,"are you alright?" come reunion with their children. Many birth parents support Ever since I was a boy, when I g o to the doctors, apply for a Measure 58. pp y loan,apply for health or life insurance or for a job, I have to leave The creation of a falsified birth certificate implies there is some- the page on my family medical history blank. Not because there thing shameful about adoption and must therefore be kept secret. is no one to ask, unlike you, the State of Oregon has decided I Adherence to the fundamental principles of truth and honesty have no right to ask. advances the interests and goals of a free, open and democratic Please don't buy into the nonsense that those who are not society. A birth certificate falsified by the State is incompatible adopted tell you about the"rights"to privacy that birth and adop- tive these principles. tive parents have. It is not their birth certificate that was been The State should set an example for it's citizens - freedom to taken away.I never agreed to have my rights taken from me,and know the truth. it is not the States business to assume that my birth mother wouldn't like to hear from me, that she made the right decision (This information furnished by Dale Bender,Birthfather,Karen Thomas.) and that I'm happy and healthy.It's our decision. I am a human being.I have a right to know the same details of my birth as any other citizen of Oregon. I have a right to care about and meet my own brothers and sister,and they should have the same right to know I exist. You are my only hope.I beg you,please,vote"yes"on measure 58. (This information furnished by Jonathan 1.Wexler.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 38 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Through the course of this past year, since the day I filed the Adults should have the right to the truth about themselves.The paperwork to begin the process of certifying Measure 58 to the state shouldn't be deciding what truths some adult citizens can be statewide_ ballot, I've been contacted by thousands of people allowed to see,and what others cannot.This is the wrong job for throughout Oregon and the country.These people came from all the state.Keeping true facts of birth away from an adult citizen is walks of life, they were young, old, rich, poor, Democrat, not within the mandated purpose of a state government. Republican and unaffiliated.They were a diverse group of artists, The State of Oregon expects us to be honest and report our teachers, retired construction workers,college students,lawyers, income exactly the way it is,insurance companies expect us to be prison inmates and homemakers. Together they comprised a seemingly complete cross section of America with one unifying honest and report accidents exactly the way they happened,the element:they had been touched in someway by adoption. courts demand that we account for our actions truthfully.So much in our society hinges on each and every citizen remaining truthful I was contacted by adoptive parents who expressed such uncon- and responsible to each other.Why then does the state, in this ditional love and concern for the deepest needs of their children instance,hold that it is legally appropriate to seal an original,his- that I was uplifted by their spirit for many days afterward. I was torical document and deny an adult the true facts about when, contacted by birth mothers whose lasting concern and love for a where,and to whom they were born? child relinquished twenty,thirty or forty years ago led them to work The CHOICE to know the true facts about ourselves should passionately for this measure. And of course, there were the belong to all of us as adult citizens.Vote Yes on Measure 58. adoptees.As an adoptee myself, I knew well the complex emo- tions in their hearts.Some were angry and frustrated at the road (This information furnished by Patricia Champ.) blocks to the unanswered questions of their lives, while others supported this effort in quiet solidarity.Still others were bed ridden or dying from an undiagnosed illness;that was a shock to me.We don't see those people,we don't realize they're there. Perhaps this isn't an argument in favor of Ballot Measure 58 so much as it is a tremendous and heartfelt thank you to the initia- tive process and to the State of Oregon,and to all those who con- tacted and helped with this campaign, thank you for the most incredible year of my life. Helen Hill Chief Petitioner:Ballot Measure 58 (This information furnished by Helen Hill,Open 98.) . (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 39 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . , 58 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Before 1957, an adult adoptee was guaranteed the right to see We, the undersigned adoption professionals, urge all his or her original birth certificate by an act passed in 1941 by the Oregonians to vote no on Ballot Measure#58. State of Oregon.For over HALF of all adult adoptees alive today, Until the 1960's, women faced with an unplanned pregnancy Measure 58 represents A RETURN TO THE STATUE IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF THEIR BIRTH! Vote Yes! A wrongful law is a were shunned by their friends and families. The deep shame wrongful law no matter how long it has been in effect.This mea- associated with the prospect of bearing an"illegitimate"child and sure is about truth and accountability.The right to the truth,for an the disgrace heaped upon"unwed mothers"made it nearly impos- adoptee,it is a right that has been abrogated.We all have a right sible for these women to consider parenting their children.Those to the truth, and the wisdom of countless religions and philoso- who made the wrenching decision to plan an adoption for their phers through the ages holds that in the presence of truth,there babies did so with the clearly expressed expectation that their is the greatest potential for healing.Let's move into the year 2000 identities would always be kept confidential. with this very human right and just step towards the light.Vote By keeping the secret,they hoped to"start over,"begin a new YES on Ballot Measure 58. life without the risk of being discovered. These women were (This information furnished by Donna Harris.) encouraged to "forget this ever happened:' Many birthparents took,or intended to take,this secret to their graves. Adoption agencies, seeking to honor their relationships with birthparents and adoptive families as well as respect their wishes for privacy,assured each party confidential services. Over the years, adoption practice has changed and evolved. There are now many options that address the freedom of rela- tionships among adoptees, birthparents,and adoptive parents: • A wide range of opportunities for openness between birth and adoptive families • A process for the release of non-identifying information by any party • A process for assisted search for both birthparents and adoptees with the support of a trained social worker • The freedom and power for all parties to decide whether and when they might choose to disclose their identities. We oppose Ballot Measure #58 because there are no provi- sions in this measure allowing birthparents to veto either the dis- closure of their identities or potential contact from the adult adoptee.There is also no way for birthparents to access current identifying information about the children for whom they planned adoptions. We believe that birthfamilies, adoptive families, and adoptees deserve equal respect and courtesy. Services offered to one of these parties should also be offered to the others. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 58 Nancy P.Simpson, MA;Lauren Greenbaum, MSW;Claudia Hutchison, MA;Gayle Dukart-Hardy, LCSW;Kathleen Moore, LCSW;Kathy Astle;Susann B.Finnegan;Lori Mason Namba; Paula Reents;Lynne Schroeder;Sherry Steele (This information furnished by Nancy P.Simpson,MA,Concerned Adoption Professionals.) (This space purchased for with a petition containing the signatures of 1,000 voters eligible to vote on the measure in accordance with OAS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 40 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 58 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Measure 58 would destroy a critical part of Oregon's adoption The initiative to identify birthparents simply by request of laws.Oregon and almost all other states know from long experi- adoptees is seriously flawed.This initiative seeks to create a new ence that in some adoptions confidentiality—tempered with flex- "right" by destroying established rights of privacy and personal ibility—is necessary. choice. A pregnant woman wanting to surrender a child for adoption Contrary to the claim by sponsors of this initiative that the Oregon may choose one of two systems. If she chooses open adoption, State Legislature has not been responsive to their requests to she will maintain contact with the adoptive family. If she chooses essentially open confidential adoption records automatically a confidential adoption,the adoptive family will receive essential when adoptees reach a certain age,the Legislature has, in fact, medical information,but the biological and adoptive families have given a great deal of consideration to all sides of the adoption no contact. records question in recent years. Legislation has been passed In extreme cases parental rights are terminated by courts.The and implemented to make information available to adoptees,and biological parents may be child abusers or have other serious to aid those adults who are interested in finding birth families to do so. problems.When that happens there will ordinarily be no contact between the biological and adoptive families, but State officials While some who support this initiative state their goal is not will still provide medical information to the adoptive family. search and identification of biological relations, many others say To allow confidential adoptions, Oregon law seals adoption that is their intent.In Oregon,this initiative is unnecessary for pur- poses of search and reunification of biological relations. Under records—original birth certificates, court records, and adoption current Oregon law,adoptees have access to medical,social,and agency records.Measure 58 would destroy that system of confi- genetic information in their adoption files. Identifying information dentiality, breaking promises made to women over many years about birthparents may be obtained when all parties are adults that an adoption would help permanently put behind them acts and consent to exchange such information. The State even ranging from rape to a moment's indiscretion. administers an "assisted search" program through Services to The initial decision to make an adoption confidential can be Children and Families to help those parties to adoption wishing to changed. Oregon law (ORS 109.425-109.507) requires the cre- reunite. By requiring that all parties consent before identifying ation of voluntary adoption registries in which biological parents information is revealed, the Legislature recognized that the indi- and adult adoptees can register their wish to meet.If both regis- viduals who will be most affected by release of such information ter, they are introduced with the help of trained social workers. are the ones to determine if,or when it should be released. The law gives voluntary adoption registries access to sealed The flaw in this initiative is that control of private information is adoption records.They will track down necessary medical infor- removed from the parties involved.It is wrong to assume that any mation and contact biological parents for an adult adoptee to see one individual has a greater right to information in adoption than if the biological parents wish to meet the adoptee. another.The current carefully crafted law puts all parties in an Confidentiality gives some pregnant women considering adop- adoption on equal footing and requires that all be contacted and tion a choice they need.It protects them and adoptees from pub- give consent prior to personal information being released.This ini- lic disclosure of information on the unfortunate circumstances that tiative removes protection of personal choice and right to privacy. sometimes lead to adoption.Oregon should preserve that choice. (This information furnished by Steven Dahl,Friends of Adoption.) VOTE NO ON MEASURE 58. Warren Deras,J.D. (This information furnished by Warren Deras.) i (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 41 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General (5)No public entity shall collect or assist in the collection of Election, November 3, 1998. funds for any purpose for a person or organization,if,after the effective date of this Amendment,the person or organi- zation has: (1) used for political purposes any of the funds collected for it by a public entity after the effective date of BALLOT TITLE this Amendment, or (ii) co-mingled non-political funds col- lected by a public entity after the effective date of this Amendment with political funds. G.tW.a�!#TUT#ON:PF30H#13#T'S U'S#N'ra (6)If any phrase,clause,or part of this section is found to be #?E31D5;0 COLLECT IIr#ONEY FOR unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the OICITICAL iPf,1RPOSES remaining phrases, clauses, and parts shall remain in full force and effect. �Jk� `1r8'> YQTE "Ys" vote prohibita using public tXy((60 political funds. NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and italic]type indicates deletions or comments. , fULC OP"t±f3 UtTE "Itilo"vote re]ec fs prohlErition qn using!, public resources to c ll t or help collect political funds. ironsUtulkim F'rohit iis.:using:*public runW EXPLANATORY STATEMENT tb ooltect o€ assist iii,eolfectirlg "politicak funds" "Pubtie#unds" ttr public empf,ye tithe,€aablic property or equip- #b� t sta�ti es.*PolIUCal ftiMe'defined to include any'expen- This measure adds a new section to the Oregon Constitution '� e£ip]�titig or, 0 pp0a1ng'e'eaiididate, ballot measure or that prohibits any person or organization from using public Trtti ) � : Prohikait[on applies evert if public entities are resources to collect or help collect political funds. Public rettlhbt rsed tI''use a#Diu 10 ftrricis for collection.Measure would' resources that cannot be used to collect political funds include tttptoyee payroll tledp. for for any entity that uses public moneys, public employee time, public property and public anyuttde cfedtteted for polattcaf #,urposes or that cor€tmingles equipment and supplies. Political funds include any money con- tt ah �politicsk#ands.''' tributed to candidates or political committees and any money spent supporting or opposing a candidate, ballot measure or ini IF#NANCIA# # ►ACT:Thls measure is 00m, d" tiative petition.A public body is prohibited from using its resources to Cedt s�"e pendi#tr84 for'vgterS patnphl t'public0pn by to collect political funds even if it is reimbursed for the cost. � 0i mar t d In subsequent ern-n nu d �t � rtu 'a'#rom f ling,fees MR,stimated to decrease An organization violating this measure by using non-political .�tri"Etta year 2f€t30 and In subsequent evert-nomberad, funds(collected for it by a public body)for.a political purpose will lose the right to payroll deductions by any public body for all ar purposes. Tt�Cd11taI isttt:frr,rt►Blirpinating candidates'eta€eiritts a�ft �Ce r7( WOW in the 1d16 Voters'pamphle t, This measure prohibits several activities currently allowed tneaS4tta ylti!)tiave':nq finaniaial effect on local rfclvernment under Oregon law.For example: eXperiditttrt3s or Ceyenues. 1)To use public property, including public buildings, to collect or help collect political campaign funds. 2)To recognize a public employee's request to payroll deduct part of the employee's wages and transfer that deducted money to 1 TEXT 0 F MEASURE an organization that uses all or part of that money to support or oppose candidates, initiatives or ballot measures. 3)To include in the voters'pamphlet any paid statement support- BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ing or opposing candidates, initiatives or ballot measures. OREGON: The Constitution of the State of Oregon is amended by adding the Committee Members: Appointed by: following section to Article XV, which section shall be appropri- Representative Steve Harper' Chief Petitioners ately numbered and shall read: Bill Sizemore` Chief Petitioners Roger Gray Secretary of State Section 10 (1) No public funds shall be spent to collect or Greg Hartman Secretary of State assist in the collection of political funds. Kathleen Beaufait Members of the Committee (2) For purposes of this section,money shall be deemed to *Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) be"political funds"if any portion of the money,including in- kind contributions,is Contributed to a candidate or political (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the committee, or spent, including independent expenditures, ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.The statement written by the supporting or opposing a candidate for public office or a committee was modified and certified by the Supreme Court of the State of ballot measure, including efforts to collect signatures to Oregon pursuant to ORS 251.235.) place a measure on the ballot,and any efforts,including but not limited to direct mail and media campaigns, to solicit signatures for initiative petitions or to discourage electors from signing initiative petitions. (3) For purposes of this section, public funds shall include public employee time,public property,and public equipment and supplies. (4) Public entities are prohibited from providing a service prohibited by this section even if reimbursed for the cost of doing so. 42 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR MEASURE 59 PRESERVES WORKERS'RIGHTS I am a public school teacher.I love to teach. My name is Harry Beck.In the 1980s I filed a lawsuit to prevent a I became a teacher because I care about kids and because I want labor union from forcing me to contribute money to their political to help them learn.Nothing is as thrilling as watching a light come agenda against my will. on in a young mind. My case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The In recent years, though, my job has become politicized. I have Supreme Court ruled in my favor; saying no worker should be been forced to participate in political battles that are not of my forced to contribute to political campaigns he or she doesn't per- choosing. Every month, money is taken from my paycheck and sonally support. used to support the agenda of an increasingly political teachers' The Beck decision is now the nation's landmark case defending a union.Money is taken from me and contributed to the campaigns of candidates who hold views I oppose.Money is taken from me worker's right to not contribute to political campaigns they don't personally believe in. and used to oppose ballot measures I support. Even though 1 won my case,the abuse I suffered continues today. This is not right. Public school teachers should have the same right as anyone else to support or oppose political candidates or Millions of workers across America are still having money causes we choose. deducted from their paychecks and spent on a union's pglit_ ical agenda without the employees' permission. The union Thomas Jefferson once said, "To compel a man to furnish simply confiscates the money from the employee's paycheck contributions of money for the propagation of opinions before the employee is paid. which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical:' Jefferson's In Oregon, tens of thousands of public school teachers, police statement should apply to teachers the same as every other citizen. officers, fire fighters, clerks, secretaries,'prison guards, etc. are still having money deducted from their paychecks and transferred Measure 59 gives public school teachers and other public to a union's political coffers. employees the same freedom of political expression others Measure 59 makes it illegal to deduct money from any public already enjoy by preventing our employers from deducting money employee's paycheck and use then that money for a political pur- from our paychecks against our will and depositing that money pose.Of course,public employees will still be free contribute into a political fund. to any cause they_Mrsonally choose. But rather than the If I am going to be involved in politics,then I want the freedom to money being deducted from their paychecks with or without their choose how,when and where I will be involved.That's only right. • permission, they will simply write out a check to the cause they Please vote YES on Measure 59. Many hard-working dedicated personally support,just like the rest of us do. teachers, who simply want to be left alone to teach,will appreci- There will be tremendous labor union opposition to Measure 59. ate your support. Union bosses know if workers have the right to not con- (This information furnished by Tim Rohrer.) tribute to the union's political funds,most will not. I support Measure 59 because it gives workers the right to choose for themselves the political causes they will support. No worker should be forced to contribute money to a politi- cal campaign they don't personally support.Not in America. Please vote"Yes"on Measure 59. (This information furnished by Harry E.Beck.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 43 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR As Oregon's largest business association, Associated Oregon STATEMENT OF INTENT Industries believes everyone should support candidates and Measure 59 will prevent the use of tax dollars to collect political issues of their own choosing.It is healthy for the political process funds. to have broad participation. Measure 59 says simply that tax dollars should not be used to col- It is not a legitimate function of government to collect political lect or process political contributions.People pay taxes to support funds for either side of a political debate. Government should important and essential government services. They should not remain neutral in elections,favoring no-candidate over another, have their taxes used for political purposes or to help some and favoring no particular side of a ballot measure. Neutrality is groups collect political donations. essential to ppen and fair elections. Measure 59 does not affect contributions to United Way or other Currently,however,government is not acting as a neutral party in charitable organizations. It only affects funds used for political our elections. Government is helping one side of the public campaigns. debate. Every year, public resources are used to collect millions of dollars of political campaign funds, but only for Measure 59 does not affect private payrolls.It only affects public the side of the debate that supports higher taxes and bigger payrolls that are processed with tax dollars, and government government. employees who are paid with tax dollars. Every year, our tax dollars and our publicly-owned buildings and Measure 59 does not prohibit participation by anyone in the polit- equipment are being used to collect millions of dollars in political ical process.It allows people to choose on a direct and voluntary campaign funds for public employee unions, but no one else. basis if,when,and where they want to participate. Certainly,public employees should be free to contribute money to Measure 59 closes the door on potential abuses.It provides free any political campaign they choose. But public employee unions choice for people to decide for themselves what issues and can- should not be free to use our publicly-owned buildings, equip- didates to support.And it stops the use of tax dollars for collect- ment,and supplies to collect their political campaign funds.They ing political funds. should raise political money the way everyone else does–with- People---not tax dollars---should write personal checks to what- out the use of public resources. ever group, issue or candidate they wish to support. Following are two things Measure 59 will not do: Vote YES on Measure 59. Measure 59 will not end the voters pamphlet as some have Submitted by claimed.The only effect the measure would have on the voters Associated Oregon Industries pamphlet, if any, would be to require those who buy paid adver- ' tisements in the Voters Pamphlet pay to the publisher the full cost (This information furnished by Richard M. Butrick, Associated Oregon of their advertisement.Currently they pay,only about 10 percent Industries.) of the actual cost.Taxpayers pay the other 90 percent. Measure 59 will not affect Oregon's political tax credit, because no public resources are used to collect those funds. Those funds are collected directly by the organizations receiving the money,not by the state. Measure 59 will,however,make government once again neu- tral in Oregon elections. Like it should be. (This information furnished by Bill Sizemore,Oregon Taxpayers United.) F (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 44 Ir Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Let me tell you what Measure 59 is not about. It's not about STOP USING TAX DOLLARS TO COLLECT Republicans against Democrats.It's not about corporations against POLITICAL FUNDS unions.It's not about rich fat cats against poor working folks. Who do you suppose are the top contributors to the election It is not about charities like the United Way or Boy Scouts.It's not campaigns of those politicians who want to increase taxes and about the Voters Pamphlet. expand the size of government? Measure 59 is about stopping government from using your tax When a measure to increase taxes appears on the ballot, who dollars to collect political funds for certain select groups who sup- spends the most money trying to pass the measure? port bigger government and higher taxes.And it's about stopping unions from deducting money from employees'paychecks for pol When a ballot measure would reduce taxes,who spends the most itics without the employees'permission. money trying to defeat the measure? Why is it important to state what Measure 59 is not about? The answer to all three questions is the same:Public employee Because the primary opponents of Measure 59 are public unions, employee unions who never discuss what a measure is really Public employee unions spend millions of dollars every election about. They always campaign about something else, because cycle trying to elect politicians who will expand government and they know if you discover what the issue really is, you will vote increase taxes because that's good business for them.The more against them. money the rest of us pay in taxes,the more money government So this election you will hear and see ads attacking Bill Sizemore. has available for hiring public employees.More public employees You will hear or see ads attacking Newt Gingrich or some guy means more unions dues for their unions.That's why increasing back East named Norquist.Why? Because the public employee taxes is a top priority of public employee unions unions don't want to talk about what they are doing with your tax But the victims of this cycle are the taxpayers.Their tax dollars are dollars,i.e.using them to raise your taxes. being used to collect political campaign funds for those whose And they don't want to talk about what they are doing to school primary goal is to increase taxes. teachers and police officers and fire fighters, i.e., taking money Why do the public employee unions have what seems like an end- out of their paychecks without their permission, and then using less supply of political campaign funds? Because they have an that money to run political campaigns. advantage no one else has. Government collects their cam- Read Measure 59 for yourself. It's not complicated. It has no paign funds for them by taking political contributions out of secret agenda. Its goal is simply to prevent the use of public public employees'paychecks before the em Ip_oyees even see resources to collect political funds, and to give public employees a dime of their own money.(And they don't even have to have the same right the rest of us enjoy,to give or not give to political the employee's permission.) causes as they see fit. Of course, public employees have as much right to contribute to Don't let the public employee unions throw sand in your eyes. political campaigns as anyone else.And under Measure 59,pub- Don't let them distract you from the real issue of Measure 59.It's lic employees will still be free to contribute to any cause they an honest straight forward measure. personally believe in by simply writing out a check;just like every- one else does. (This information furnished by Bill Sizemore, Executive Director, Oregon Measure 59 applies equally to everyone. It doesn't favor Taxpayers United.) Democrats,Republicans,Independents,liberals or conservatives. Under Measure 59, government simply will not collect political campaign funds for anyone.Period. That's the way it should be. (This information furnished by Bill Sizemore,Oregon Taxpayers United.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 45 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEE UNIONS HAVE TAKEN OVER THE Public employee unions are using your tax dollars to collect mil- SYSTEM lions of dollars in political campaign funds.And they are spending Here in Oregon, democracy is being undermined by the public that money–which you paid to collect–on tax-and-spend candi- dates and political efforts that are making our government bigger, employee unions. Because of their enormous political check- more intrusive, and more expensive. books, filled at taxpayer expense, public employee unions have become the most powerful force in politics. Taxpayers are unwillingly financing the fund-raising machine Why do the public employee unions have so much political for political organizations that are spending millions of dol- money? Under current law, unlike other groups, public employee lars each year to raise your taxes and limit your freedoms. unions are allowed to use public employee time and other tax- In recent years public employee unions have spent millions of payer owned resources to collect their political funds. dollars – which you paid to collect –to support candidates for And what do they do with all that campaign money?They use it public office who: to raise our taxes-to elect politicians who will increase taxes and - Favor increasing property taxes to support ballot measures that increase taxes.We're literally aiv- - Favor keeping your income tax refund – known as the ing them the money the use to raise our taxes. "kicker' - Favor eliminating phonics – a proven method for teaching Remember when the measure to slow down the growth of prop children to read–from the classroom erty taxes appeared on the ballot?Who spent most of the money - Favor increasing gas taxes and vehicle registration fees trying to stop the people from slowing the growth of property taxes?The public employee unions.Why?Because when we pay Favor loosening sentencing laws and giving more rights to criminals more taxes, it's more money for them. - Favor placing even more regulations on small businesses Why doesn't the legislature stop this abuse from occurring? - Favor adding a sales tax in Oregon Because legislators are afraid of the public employee unions, Additionally, the public employee unions have spent millions of because these unions have so much money to spend opposing dollars opposing pro-taxpayer measures and filing lawsuits to them. overturn laws passed by voters. Why doesn't the governor stop this abuse from occurring? Doesn't it make you mad that political organizations with a Governor Kitzhaber's largest contributors are public employee big-government high-tax philosophy are the ONLY groups unions.They give him large campaign contributions,and he gives that get their political money raised at taxpayer expense–or them large pay raises.It's a pretty sweet thing they have going. rather.at YOUR expense? ' As usual, it falls to the people to deal with this problem through It's time to level the playing field.Measure 59 will make public the initiative process.Measure 59 is on the ballot because it is the employee unions raise their money like everyone else does– only way we can stop the use of our tax dollars to collect political without the use of our tax dollars. campaign funds for the public employee unions. Your vote is needed to prevent the use of your tax dollars, and (This information furnished by Becky Miller, Executive Assistant, Oregon your public buildings,computers and supplies,to raise the politi- Taxpayers United.) cal funds they use to increase your taxes! Please vote YES on Measure 59. (This information furnished by Becky Miller, Executive Assistant, Oregon Taxpayers United.) r (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 46 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION MEASURE 59 IS FAIR FOR EVERYONE THIS IS A PAID POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENT Measure 59 is one of the most fair, even-handed campaign (and you're the one paying for it.) finance reforms ever. Unlike most campaign finance reforms, That's right.What you're reading right now is a paid political ad.It Measure 59 does not favor any one group over another.It applies is not official information;just my opinion, brought to you at tax- equally to everyone. payer expense. Measure 59 prohibits using public resources to collect political This ad costs the taxpayers of Oregon about$3,000 to pint and funds.Period.It treats Republicans,Democrats,Independents and distribute.But I only have to pay$300 for the ad.Taxpayers pay minor political parties all the same. It applies equally to liberals, the rest.Such a deal. moderates, and conservatives. It applies equally to corporations I can say m y and unions. y rett p y much what ever I want in this ad.I may be a rea- sonable person giving you sound political advice, or I may be a Measure 59 simply prohibits government from collecting political total crackpot.No matter, under current law,taxpayers pick up 90 funds for anyone or any group, no matter what their political percent of the tab for printing and distributing my opinion. stripe. For example,I can say that I oppose Measure 59 because it ends Under current law,publicly owned buildings,computers,and sup- the 90 percent taxpayer subsidy of political ads placed in the plies are being used to help collect political funds for certain Voters Pamphlet by total crackpots. Or I can say I oppose groups.Currently,it is even legal for public employees to use time Measure 59 because if Measure 59 passes public employee on the job,while they are being paid,to help collect money that is unions will lose millions of dollars in political campaign funds. used for political purposes. I can even say I oppose Measure 59 because "59" is my least This is an abuse of public resources and taxpayer dollars.Our tax favorite number.Actually"59"is one of my most favorite numbers dollars should never be used to collect someone's political funds. because if you add 5 and 9 together you get 14, which is two Period. Collecting political funds is not a legitimate function of times seven,and seven is everybody's lucky number. government. The point is this:Measure 59 will have no effect on the rest of the Let's pass Measure 59 and let everyone collect their own political Voters Pamphlet, but it will probably end the huge taxpayer sub- funds from now on,without the use of public resources.That's the sidy of ads like this one,and all the other ads for pages and pages way it should be. on both sides of this ad. If Measure 59 passes, people like me, Please join me in getting government out of the business of who place paid ads in the Voters Pamphlet,could be required to collecting political campaign funds. Kee pay the actual cost. 9 P p your tax dollars out of political campaigns. Just think of it.Every ad in the Voters Pamphlet costs the author VOTE YES ON MEASURE 59 only$300,and costs the taxpayers$2,700. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 59 (This information furnished by Bill Sizemore,Oregon Taxpayers United.) (so I can keep running ads like this one for only$300) (This information furnished by Adelia Stewart.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS•251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 47 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION A NURSE'S VIEW OF BALLOT MEASURE 59 The Former Deans Committee As Registered Nurses, we care about what happens to our We believe Measure 59 raises serious issues under the First patients and the care they receive at the bedside.When we see Amendment to the United States Constitution.This measure may trends in our health care system that put people at risk we feel an prohibit state and local Governments from collecting "Funds"to obligation to take action. Bills like the Patient Bill of Rights are be spent for political purposes. important to us as professional and compassionate people. Notwithstanding the intent of the drafters,we believe Measure Nurses and other health care providers must be involved in the 59 is vague and unclear in its meaning.As Measure 59 is written, political process so that laws are passed to protect patients from it appears to limit free expression of political ideas and concepts those who would put profits first and quality patient care second. by elected officials and governmental officials by placing a chilling We recognize that in politics,to have an effective voice you need effect upon the exercise of"free speech".It also appears to pro- to raise money to be heard in political campaigns and in the hibit the production of the Oregon Voters Pamphlet by the legislature. Secretary of State in its present form. Ballot Measure 59 will eliminate our option to have a voluntary "Public funds" are defined to include public property and political contribution deducted from our paychecks. Ballot employee time. Therefore the Measure seems to prohibit the Measure 59 will make it very difficult for our professional associ- rental or use of traditional public forums such as schools,plazas ation–the Oregon Nurses Association–to help elect people who or parks for political gatherings.It also seems to forbid the use of care about how the "business" of health care treats you as a public law enforcement to direct traffic or provide public safety at patient. such events.Officials may be forced to guess when to allow free H speech and assembly.The Measure appears to limit all levels of However, Ballot Measure 59 will not effect HMO's and insurance government from communicating with their citizens concerning companies who oppose safeguards in our health care system.In fact,by silencing nurses HMO's will have even more influence on political issues of community interest. the quality of care you receive. We provide this information to help fellow voters in under- standing this measure. Our comments are designed only to Ballot Measure 59 is unfair and unnecessary.Nurses have been provide objective and careful constitutional analysis of the mea willingly making contributions through their paychecks for years. sure.Collectively we take no position on the other merits of this We also willingly use payroll deductions to contribute to other wor- thy causes like United Way.Having these important contributions measure. deducted from our paycheck is efficient and inexpensive. Prof.Leroy Tornquist(Chair), Former Dean Willamette College of Law Please,ask yourself this question: Rennard Strickland,Dean University of Oregon Law School "Why are the proponents of Ballot Measure 59 trying to stop us Prof.Robert Misner,Former Dean Willamette College of Law from voluntarily spending our own money to have a voice in the Robert Ackerman, Dean Willamette College of Law public debate about health care issues?" David Frohnmayer, Former Dean University of Oregon Law School (This information furnished by Kathleen Sheridan RN,Neta Courcey RN, Bruce Brown RN,Pamela Kirk RN,Patrice Boose RN,Cynthia Mosser RN, (This information furnished by Bob Cannon,Treasurer,The Former Deans Linda Pesanti RN, Susan King RN, Chris O'Neill RN, Oregon Nurses Committee.) Association.) I I f (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse-. 1 The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 48 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION VOTE NO ON MEASURE 59! MEASURE 59 GUTS THE OREGON VOTERS'PAMPHLET The American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU)of Oregon asks you Big Money Wants to Keep Oregon Voters in the Dark to consider the serious flaws in Measure 59 before you vote. about ALL Candidates and ALL Ballot Measures IT'S NOT ABOUT SAVING TAX MONEY Oregon voters created the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet by an Section 4 of Measure 59 makes that crystal clear: even if it overwhelming vote of the people in 1908. Now Bill doesn't cost the government one thin dime, the restrictions of Sizemore's Measure 59 would destroy it by deleting 90%of Measure 59 would still apply its content. IT'S OVERBROAD Every neutral legal analysis of Measure 59 has concluded that it will remove from the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet: because its language e is Because Measure so sweeping—it will affect all a constitutional amendment—and . all information about the qualifications,beliefs,or poli- Oregonians, not just government employees. Among its likely ties of any candidate consequences are: • all arguments on why voters should accept or reject bal- • An end to voter's pamphlet statements by candidates, and lot measures arguments for and against ballot measures (because the Among those who agree are Oregon's Legislative Counsel (who measure prohibits spending any public funds to"support or prepared the Draft Explanatory Statement) and the State of oppose"candidates and ballot measures); Oregon Financial. Impact Committee, which includes the • Eliminating government payroll deductions for United Way Secretary of State and the State Treasurer. and charities like the American Lung Association of Oregon Politics is corrupted by big money.Candidates and ballot measure and American Cancer Society (because many charities sponsors (and opponents) get huge contributions from the big occasionally take positions on ballot measures—like the corporations and wealthy people who want special treatment from tobacco tax approved by voters two years ago);and government.They use this money to buy ads on TV, radio, bill- • Eliminating government payroll deductions for home mort- boards,and newspapers. gage payments(because banks use some of their profits to Now Big Money wants to destroy the Oregon Voters' engage in"political"activity). Pamphlet --the only way for candidates and those inter- IT'S UNNECESSARY ested in ballot measures to reach all Oregon voters without begging the Big Money barons for cash. Oregon law already prohibits public employees from doing any- If Big Money wins on Measure 59,they will have more power than thing while they're on the job to support or oppose candidates or ever before: ballot measures.(ORS 260.432) Measure 59 is also unnecessary to protect public employees • power to raise your taxes,while cutting their own who disagree with the political activities of their union. Public • power to raise your utility bills employees already have the right and ability to opt out of paying the portion of union dues that supports their union's political • power to pollute the air and water activities. • power to tell you how to live your life IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL because they will control what you see and hear about all candi- Even if the only target of Measure 59 were public employees,their dates and all measures. rights to participate in the political process are clearly protected Let's keep the lights on... by the First Amendment. by keeping the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 5911 Daniel Meek IT'S OVERBROAD dan.meek@usa.net IT'S UNNECESSARY law.view.org IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL For more information:www.voters.net (This information furnished by✓ann Carson,American Civil Liberties Union (This information furnished by Daniel Meek.) (ACLU)of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$3004n accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. I accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 49 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures � 1 Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION SIZEMORE'S MEASURE 59 DESTROYS THE OREGON SAVE THE OREGON VOTERS PAMPHLET BY VOTING VOTERS'PAMPHLET! NO ON 591 on all levels:State,County,City,District Don't Let Bill Sizemore put Voters in the Dark Oregon voters created the Oregon Voters' Pamphlet in a 1908 about All Candidates and All Ballot Measures initiative to reform corrupt politics. The initiative directed the Coalition for Initiative Rights Urges"NO"Vote on Measure 59 Secretary of State to distribute the Voters'Pamphlet to all regis- Measure 59 would gut the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet,deleting from tered voters and that it include fee-based statements supporting it ail statements supporting or opposing any candidate or any or opposing candidates for public office. ballot measure.That's about 90%of the Pamphlet. For 90 years, the Oregon Voters' Pamphlet has served as the Under Measure 59,the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet will contain: best way for candidates or those with opinions about ballot mea- sure to get their views to all Oregon voters without needing • no information about the qualifications, beliefs, or huge amounts of money and becoming obligated to the special policies of any candidate interests. • no arguments on why voters should accept or reject Every published legal analysis of Measure 59 has concluded that ballot measures it will remove from the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet: What's left is a list of candidate names,a list of the ballot titles for • all information about the qualifications, beliefs, or the measures,a list of polling places,an absentee ballot coupon, policies of any candidate and some"general"information about voting. • all arguments on why voters should accept or reject The chief sponsor of Measure 59, Bill Sizemore, has said that any ballot measure, including state, county,city,and gutting the Oregon Voters' Pamphlet was not his intention district measures [Oregonian, August 23, 1998], but Sizemore has also stated Today, a candidate for state office can print in the Voters' that "paid advertisements in the Voters' Pamphlet could Pamphlet a statement of her background,beliefs,policies.This be affected because they are about 90 percent taxpayer- costs$300 for a full page or$100 for a half page. subsidized:'(Oregonian,August 9,1998].All of the candidate statements and all of the ballot measure arguments are"paid"for Today, a person or group can print in the Voters'Pamphlet an by the candidates, by the argument authors, and by the taxpay- argument for or against a ballot measure.This costs$300 (or ers.Measure 59 would delete them all. 1000 signatures of voters)for a half page. The Oregon Voters'Pamphlet was created by voter initia- Measure 59 will make it illegal to print any of this in the tive in 1908.Measure 59 would turn back the clock on polit- Voters'Pamphlet. ical reform by 90 years! Experienced election law attorneys,including Warren Deras,have Don't put Oregon voters in the dark about all candidates concluded that Measure 59 would also eliminate the Oregon polit- and all ballot measures! ical tax credit, which credits a taxpayer for up to$50($100 for a Join us in saving the Oregon Voters'Pamphlet. married couple)per year to offset the cost of contributions to polit- ical causes in Oregon.This tax credit allows the campaigns for VOTE NO ON MEASURE 59 candidates and initiatives to receive support from those of us who The Coalition for Initiative Rights is a group of volunteers dedi- don't have the big money: Gated to protecting the rights of Oregon voters to use the initiative Daniel Meek and referendum. dan.meek @usa.net law.view.org Email:coalition.rights @usa.net For more information:or.voters.net More Information:www.voters.net;www.teleport.com/-dweezil/cir (This information furnished by Lloyd Marbet,Coalition for Initiative Rights.) (This information furnished by Daniel Meek.) i (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 50 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION From the desk of John A.Kitzhaber,M.D. A Republican Says Vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59 In my twenty years of public life, I have seen the importance I have never written a statement for the Oregon voters'Pamphlet, Oregonians place in the ability to make the right choice on issues but Sizemore-Norquist 59 has compelled me to do so. From that matter to us.We may not always agree on the issue,but we where I stand as a Republican activist and union members, it's all want the right to make a choice through the use of our political deceptive and unnecessary, voice. I am public employee who serves Oregonians as a corrections That's why I am asking you to join me in voting NO on Ballot officer at the Columbia River Correctional Institution in Portland. Measure 59. In that role, I am a union member represented by Local 3941 of Ballot Measure 59 isn't fair to Oregonians.It denies some of your the American Federation of State, County and Municipal friends and neighbors who happen to be union members the right Employees(AFSCME). to voluntarily choose a dues deduction -- giving them political And, as a Republican, I am also the chair of the statewide voice like citizens in any other organization in Oregon.These are AFSCME Republican Caucus.We are a group of registered union the men and women of Oregon who are firefighters, police offi- members who work with out political action committees to ensure cers,nurses and teachers.They save lives,protect our communi- that our viewpoint is heard on both issues and candidate endorse- ties and educate our children.They are our friends and neighbors. ments.It's a democratic process,and we participate fully. What else does this ballot measure do? It silences every We also have the legal and voluntary right to"opt out"if we feel. Oregonian by making it illegal to include political statements in the strongly about the political decisions of our union,and many of my voters'pamphlet.It sounds ridiculous,but it is true.If this measure co-workers do so. When you "opt out," you are rebated the passes, no statement supporting or opposing candidates, initia- percentage of your dues that AFSCME spends on political activ- tives or ballot measures would be allowed to appear in the voters' ity.You simply fill out a form and receive your rebate. pamphlet.I don't think that is good for democracy and I don't think Bill Sizemore wants you to believe that public employee unions its good for Oregon. have money forcefully taken from them and spent on issues they Why do I feel so strongly about Ballot Measure 59?Because it is don't believe in..I know first hand that's simply not true. deceptive; it isn't being honest with Oregonians about how it Tomorrow, if Sizemore Norquist 59 isn't defeated by Oregonians, changes our political future. I think it is unfair to a small group of my right to choose will be denied and my right to speak through Oregonians;it denies them an equal voice in the political process. my union will disappear.That isn't fair. And I believe it takes the heart right out of the voters'pamphlet;it silences the ability of Oregonians to see and hear about all of I am convinced that Sizemore-Norquist 59 is aimed at me and all their choices on the ballot. of my fellow public safety workers throughout the state who work I hope you'll consider these facts and join me in voting NO on hard to protect Oregonians. Just as you, we are entitled to the Ballot Measure 59. same rights and protections about how we participate in Oregon's political future. Sincerely, Please join in me saying no to this deceptive and unfair ballot John A.Kitzhaber, M.D. measure.Vote no on Sizemore-Norquist 59. (This information furnished by John A.Kitzhaber.) (This information furnished by Hermann Green, American Federation of State,County and Municipal Employees.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 51 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Secretary of State Advises Oregonians to Seniors Say Sizemore-Norquist 59 Will Destroy the Vote No on Measure 59 Voters'Pamphlet Keep the Voters'Pamphlet Available to Oregonians As senior citizen advocates, we are often overwhelmed by the As your Secretary of State, one of my jobs is to make sure that amount of political information that arrives with every election.We every Oregonian has the chance to learn about the candidates get a mountain of mail asking us to vote one way or another.We and issues before their votes are counted on election day. hear radio spots and see television commercials trying to per - and us on the issues. Without question,the best tool we have to assist Oregonians as For us, however, the voters' pamphlet is different. Like many they decide on the candidates and issues is the Voters'Pamphlet. Oregonians, seniors trust the voters'pamphlet.It's really the one Everywhere I go, Oregonians tell me that they support this valu- opportunity every Oregon voter has to read good information and able resource as an important way to keep them informed about arguments on both sides of every issue.It comes to us free from every election.That's why I am asking you to join me and citizens the Secretary or State before we vote, and anyone can use the throughout Oregon in voting no on Measure 59. voters'pamphlet to make their best case to vote for or against a As the current explanatory and fiscal impact statements on this candidate or a ballot measure.Then informed Oregonians,includ- measure note,there is a real danger that Measure 59 will make it ing senior citizens,can make their decision. illegal to include in the Voters'Pamphlet any paid statement sup- Sizemore-Norquist 59 would change the voters'pamphlet forever. porting or opposing candidates, initiatives or ballot measures. Because it prohibits the use of public resources for political This could be the last Voters' Pamphlet that really helps purposes, the voters' pamphlet could no longer include any Oregonians be informed citizens on the most important task they arguments or statements supporting or opposing candidates, have--electing our leaders and shaping the state's future. initiatives, or ballot measures. It's true.Just read the explanatory statement for Measure 59. Because Measure 59 amends the constitution, any effort to cor- rect this obvious flaw may require an additional vote, potentially The voters'pamphlet is an important election tradition for senior costing taxpayers up to one million dollars. citizens in Oregon.Many of us review it with families and friends before making our decisions on election day. Of course, many As Oregon's chief elections officer, I urge you to reject Measure seniors use a vote-by-mail ballot,so for us the pamphlet is a great 59. tool to help mark their ballots at home. (This information furnished by Phil Keisling.) As a senior citizen, I know that without the voters'pamphlet it will be more difficult to determine the truth about candidates and ' measures.Without it, every citizen will be less informed and find it much harder to make good choices for Oregon's future. Please join Oregon's senior citizens in voting no on Sizemore- Norquist 59.The voters'pamphlet is too important to lose. (This information furnished by Jim Davis, Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 52 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure - No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Oregon's Business Community Advises a No Vote on League of Women Voters of Oregon Urges a No Vote on Measure Sizemore-Norquist 59 59 Voters'Pamphlet Guides Oregonians on Election Day 'The League of Women Voters of Oregon is asking Oregonians to As a member of Oregon's business community, I am concerned vote"no"on Measure 59. about Sizemore-Norquist 59.This measure really goes too far. Measure 59 is unfair.It denies some union members the right to Oregon's business community cares about our employees and choose a payroll deduction to have a political voice like any the choices we offer them. Sizemore-Norquist 59 really reduces citizen.These are the men and women of Oregon who are fire- fighters,fighters, police officers, nurses and teachers. They save lives, he choices we offer our employees for voluntary participation through payroll deductions. protect our communities and educate our children. Like you, many of our employees choose to have money Measure 59 is unnecessary. Right now in Oregon, unionized deducted directly from their paychecks for savings and retirement workers already have the legal right and protection to choose not plans, charitable contributions, health care and disability cover- to participate in the voluntary political deduction. In some local age, as well as college savings programs and family emergen- unions, as many as 1 in 5 choose not to participate.Measure 59 cies. These are important choices for people to make, and doesn't protect these workers.It takes away their right to choose. valuable benefits for everyone. Measure 59 threatens the voters'pamphlet.Today in Oregon,the We also understand the essential value of the voters'pamphlet for voters'pamphlet is the most important tool we have to ensure that giving every Oregonian,as employees and employers,the right to every voter has access to all of the information and arguments speak about issues important to them.This tool is often every they need to make an informed choice on election day.If Measure citizen's best chance to inform voters about how their election 59 passes,according to legal interpretation,the pamphlet you are decisions affect them. reading right now would contain no election information,no argu- ments for and against issues, and no explanation of what a As a result, every Oregonian is threatened by this impact of measure's consequences might be.The use of public funds for Sizemore-Norquist 59: it will be illegal to include in the voters' providing this information could be prohibited. pamphlet any paid statement supporting or opposing candidates, Measure 59 is unfair, unnecessary, and an attack on Oregon initiatives or ballot measure. public employees such as firefighters, nurses,teachers,and oth- Sizemore-Norquist 59 threatens the voices and choices of every ers.The Oregon League of Women Voters of Oregon strongly Oregonian because it goes too far.As a fellow citizen, I ask you recommends voting"no"on Measure 59. It's a matter of protect- - to reject Sizemore-Norquist 59. ing individual rights. (This information furnished by Fred D.Miller) (This information furnished by Paula D.Krane,League of Women Voters of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 53 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Common Cause Asks Oregonians to Vote No A Police Officer Says Vote No on Sizemore on Measure#59 Norquist 59 As Oregonians,we know the importance our citizens place on Say No to 59 Because It's Not Fair to Oregonians making the right choices for Oregon's future. In any election,we Let me put it on the line for you:Sizemore-Norquist 59 isn't may not all agree on the issues, but we all want the right to fair to me and my fellow officers.Why?Because every day we participate and make an informed,fair decision.That's why we're put our lives on the line protecting and serving Oregonians.We asking you to join citizens throughout Oregon in voting no on Measure#59. protect your communities. We need your help to assure our protection as equal citizens in Oregon.That's why I am asking you Measure #59 is unfair. It denies some Oregonians, who are to join me in voting no on Sizemore-Norquist 59. union members,the voluntary right to choose dues deduction as Why am I a Target for Sizemore-Norquist 59? Because it a way to have a political voice, and participate like any citizen. makes important changes in my right to choose how I participate These people are firefighters, police officers, nurses and teach- in the political process. ers.They saves lives, protect our communities and educate our children. Sizemore-Norquist 59 denies my right of choice through contribu- Measure#59 is unnecessary.Right now in Oregon, unionized tions to candidates or campaigns by payroll deduction.Today I workers already have the legal right and protection to choose not have a choice.If 59 passes I won't.As a union member, it's very to participate in voluntary political deductions. In some local important to me to continue my voluntary participation in its work unions, as many as one in five choose not to participate.This through a payroll deduction program. measure takes away'their right to choose. What Else does Sizemore-Norquist 59 deny me? The same s ed. Its sponsors call it "paycheck thing it will deny you and every Oregonian:our voices in the elec- Measure #59 is but its actually underhanded. effort to deny one group, public tion process.It makes it illegal to include in the voters'pamphlet employees,the political participation of their choice. any paid statement supporting or opposing candidates,initiatives or ballot measures. Measure#59 threatens the voters'pamphlet.Today in Oregon, Why am I opposing Sizemore-Norquist 59? Because it's a the voters'pamphlet is the most important tool we have to ensure mean-spirited effort aimed at me and my colleagues. Every day, that every voter has access to all the information and arguments while I and my fellow officers protect your communities,this mea- they need to make an informed choice on election day. If #59 sure challenges our place as citizens in Oregon. passes it might mean that the pamphlet you are reading right now would have no information, no arguments for and against candi- Let me put in on the line again: that isn't fair to me, my fellow dates and measures,and no explanations of what we are voting officers,or any Oregonian. on.We need to protect the Voters Pamphlet. On November 3.please vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59. Measure #59 is unfair, unnecessary, and an underhanded attack on participation and information in our electoral system. (This information furnished by Bryon Beaulieu, Lt., Winston Police Dept.; Please join Oregon Common Cause in voting no on measure#59. Don Sheldon, Winston Police Assoc.; Joe Felix, Winston Police Association;Scott Gugel, President, Winston Police Association;Brandon (This information furnished by David Buchanan,Oregon Common Cause.) Sarti,Winston Police Association;Mary Forney,Secretary, Winston Police Association;Ronald Sanders, Winston Police Assoc.;Kent Grant, Winston Police Association.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- , ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 54 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measureft . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION A Teacher Says Vote No Sizemore-Norquist 59 ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON OPPOSES I teach high school in Portland.I love working with my students. MEASURE 59 My classroom is where I want to put all my energy. But, Bill MEASURE 59 Sizemore, the sponsor of Measure 59, has crafted a DISCOURAGES VOTER PARTICIPATION Constitutional Amendment that takes away my personal right to Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon calls upon all citizens to study choose how to spend my own money. I urge you to vote NO on Sizemore-Norquist 59. the issues to become aware of their implications for equality and social justice and their impact on individuals and society. The The fact is Measure 59 is unfair. It targets a certain group of Voters'Pamphlet has been a major source of information for this individuals–teachers,firefighters,nurses and other public employ- in-depth analysis. Measure 59 denies us This common base of ees–and says we don't have the same rights as individuals who balanced information. are employees of private businesses and big corporations.It's not MEASURE 59 right. It's not fair. And, it certainly has no place in Oregon's Constitution. LIMITS CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT What does Measure 59 do? It changes how I can participate in Measure 59 denies public employees the right to voluntarily the political process – the process that decides how Oregon's participate in the democratic process through a payroll deduction. public school system will be funded, what kind of educational It singles out Oregon workers who happen to be public employ- reform is needed in my school district, even how many students ees and says they can't collectively and efficiently fund citizen may be placed in my classroom. participation through payroll deduction. Measure 59 is unfair to Oregonians who serve all of us as teachers,police officers,librar- Why would anyone want to make it more difficult for me to ians,firefighters and public health providers. participate in the decisions that impact my classroom and MEASURE 59 my school? Those who work in Oregon's schools should cer- THREATENS CHARITABLE GIVING tainly be able to have a voice in the decision-making process. After all,who knows our educational system best? Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon provides housing, health care, Measure 59 is unnecessary. Right now I have the choice hospice, nutrition services,parent mentoring, resettlement assis- whether or not to participate in the political system through pay- tance and addiction services to many of Oregon's most vulnera- roll deduction. Measure 59 would remove that right –for other ble citizens. Many public employees contribute to this work Oregonians and myself. I ask that you join me in voting no on through a voluntary charitable payroll deduction. Because Measure 59. advocacy is integral to this work, a charitable payroll deduction would be illegal under Measure 59. Many Oregon community VOTE NO ON SIZEMORE-NORQUIST 59 based services find themselves in similar circumstances. (This information furnished by Julie Laut.) Measure 59 discourages charitable giving by public employees. MEASURE 59 VIOLATES CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY Measure 59 introduces into Oregon's constitution language that affects individuals rather than the basic framework of governance. A state constitution is supposed to provide protection for citizens' rights.Measure 59 violates the rights of public employees. SAFEGUARD EQUAL ACCESS TO THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS PLEASE VOTE NO ON MEASURE 59 (This information furnished by Ellen C. Lowe, Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 55 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Environmentalists Say Vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59 Who is Really Behind Measure 59? Sizemore-Norquist 59 is bad for Oregonians and Oregon's There's a lot of things about Measure 59 that I don't know. It Environment. seems deceptive and unclear, and if you're like me, you're not Oregonians care about the environment.Our environmental land- sure how many get hurt and how badly.But one thing I do know: marks-the Columbia River Gorge, high desert country,spectac- The people pushing this on us are Bill Sizemore and Grover ular and accessible beaches - are there because citizens got Norquist. involved in our political process. By writing letters, attending Bill Sizemore's running for governor of Oregon even though he public hearings and making payroll deductions to support envi- ran his own business into bankruptcy.The measures he's written ronmental organizations or green candidates,citizens made their in past elections have caused lawsuits that every Oregon tax- voices heard about the rhetoric of out-of-state money and special payer still pays for. interests. Now, special interests are trying to silence some of us. Bill Grover Norquist registers himself as a foreign lobbyist and refers Sizemore and Grover Norquist,an advisor to Newt Gingrich,want to himself as a close advisor to Newt Gingrich. He gets paid to to take away the political voices of the men and women of Oregon try and get American taxpayer dollars sent to foreign countries. who enforce our environmental regulations,who help protect our Norquist takes credit for the Gingrich agenda to give tax forest, rivers and wild salmon, and who keep our communities breaks to the wealthy,cut education,and put Social Security and healthy. Medicare at risk. Sizemore-Norquist 59 would deny Oregonians who are union Now Norquist is going around the country, paying for measures members the voluntary right to choose a dues deduction.They like this one,just like he did in California,so that he can advance would no longer have the choice to take part in election activities his anti-worker movement. It's political payback for everyone important to every citizen and currently allowed under Oregon who fought the Norquist-Gingrich attack in Congress and tried to law. protect children and seniors. Sizemore is using Norquist's money and agenda. That's not fair to Oregonians. That's who is behind Measure 59 This extreme measure not only silences some Oregonians, it The list of people opposing Measure 59 is a lot longer. It begins reduces the ability of every Oregonian to cast an informed vote. with our Governor and includes nurses, firefighters, police offi- Sizemore-Norquist 59 would make it illegal to include in the cers,teachers,senior citizens,and religious leaders. voters'pamphlet any statement supporting or opposing candi- dates, initiatives or ballot measures. Please vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59. That's not fair to Oregon's electoral process. (This information furnished by Susan C.Remmers,Oregon Action.) Today,where special interests outspend Oregonians who are union members by eleven to one,we need more fairness-not less- in our elections.Today,when out-of-state dollars are used to undermine the laws protecting our environment and to elimi- nate the public workers enforcing those laws,we need more-not less-participation in politics by all Oregonians. Oregonians who care about a healthy environment and fair elec- tions in Oregon should beware. Sizemore-Norquist 59 is about taking away political choice and voice.Let your voice be heard by voting No on Sizemore-Norquist 59. (This information furnished by Maureen Kirk, Executive Director, Oregon State Public Interest Research Group.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 56 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION A Health Professional Says Vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59 is Deceptive Sizemore-Norquist 59 On the surface, it looks like Measure 59 is about taxpayer money Do you know that 59 is sponsored by Bill Sizemore? Does being used for politics, but it's already illegal to use taxpayer that scare you,too?As a psychiatric social worker in Salem for 10 money for campaigning.Measure 59's deceptive language is just years„I know the value of public service in my community.That's an attempt to deceive the voters of Oregon. why I am asking you to join me and citizens throughout Oregon in voting no on Sizemore-Norquist 59. Bill Sizemore and Grover Norquist, a registered foreign lobbyist and advisor to Newt Gingrich,wrote Measure 59 for another pur- Why am I opposing Sizemore-Norquist 59? Because it's a pose--to support their national anti-worker movement.Oregon is mean-spirited effort aimed at the men and women of Oregon who just the latest state they have tried to trick into passing this kind are firefighters,policemen, nurses and educators. of law. What does Sizemore-Norquist 59 do? It makes it illegal to Like so many politicians today,they are trying to fool the voters by include in the voters'pamphlet any paid statement supporting or obscuring the real issue. And like so many politicians today, all opposing candidates, initiatives or ballot measures. Doesn't that they are doing is creating a big mess. challenge our constitutional protection on the matter of freedom They're trying to deceive us about the consequences of Measure of speech. 59. It also makes important changes in my right to chose how I What are the consequences of Measure 59? participate in the political process. Sizemore-Norquist 59 denies my right of choice through contributions to candidates or The Secretary of State says it will gut the voters'pamphlet. campaigns by payroll deduction. Today I have a choice. If 59 passes I won't.As a union member, it's very important to me to It will make this deceptive language a permanent part of Oregon's continue my voluntary participation in its work through a payroll Constitution. deduction program. It will cause dozens of lawsuits,ending up in court and costing us Why do I feel so strongly about Sizemore-Norquist 59? all money. Because it's Deceptive, Unfair Unnecessary and Silences Sizemore-Norquist 59 is deceptive, dishonest and misleading. It working families in Oregon. has major,expensive and severe consequences. Please exercise your voice on November 3. Vote No on Please vote No on Sizemore-Norquist 59. Sizemore-Norquist 59. (This information furnished by Rich Rohde, Progressive Coalition of (This information furnished by Jackie Pierce.) Southern Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 57 7 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Ballot Measure 59 has earned a No Vote! Measure 59 doesn't make sense.While its supporters argue that The Oregon State Building and Construction Trades people shouldn't have to contribute to campaigns, Measure 59 Council asks for your No Vote on Ballot Measure 59. doesn't address this issue. Measures that unfairly pit one group of Oregonians against Instead, it targets one type of organizations.As such, it is highly another aren't in Oregon's best interest. discriminatory. We are the men and women who build your homes, schools, What's even more puzzling is that these organizations do give bridges, hospitals,and repair the roads.We have worked hard to their employees a choice whether to contribute to these political build Oregon utilizing skills acquired through years of training. campaigns.Any employee can opt out. While most of us aren't directly targeted by this ill-conceived mea- So Measure 59 isn't about freedom or fairness. sure,we strongly believe it's wrong and should be defeated. The sponsors of Ballot-Measure 59 are promoting a decep- Measure 59 is petty and irrelevant. Don't waste your time: vote tive measure.Clever ballot titles that divert attention from.the real °no° consequences of a measure need to be exposed.If Measure 59 (This information furnished by Jason Reynolds, Oregon Consumer passed it would: league.) • Change the voters pamphlet without thorough public discussion. • Silence groups of voters without reason. • Violate the rule of political fairness and participation. • Give an unfair advantage to one group over another. The Oregon State Building and Construction Trades Council is a private organization whose members support our activity.We are,as our name implies,from Oregon,interested in Oregon.We are dedicated to promoting a strong economy and livable com- munities.While we don't think it's illegal that out-of-state special interests are purported to be the financial backers of Measure 59, we do wonder why these out-of-state interests are so committed to silencing the citizens of Oregon. If Measure 59 is truly in the best interest of Oregon,shouldn't Oregonians be leading the fight , to pass it? Measure 59 is about choice.An Oregonians choice to partici- pate in the political process.While we may not always agree with their individual decisions,we should always fight for their right to participate.Measure 59 begins to erode that protection and par- ticipation. Make the right choice,Vote No on Ballot Measure 59. (This information furnished by Bob Shiprack, Oregon Building Trades Council.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 58 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 WES, ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Measure 59 is a proposal shrouded in deception,sponsored by HUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF OREGON a man who is a tool for unscrupulous malefactors of great wealth OPPOSES MEASURE 59 who want to destroy Oregon's democracy as we know it.They are MEASURE 59 not content to limit their unsavory efforts to attempts to destroy DISCRIMINATES AGAINST WORKERS organized labor's political influence,which provides some limited balance to the millions of dollars spent by big business, multina- Measure 59 is not fair.It says public employees should be denied tional corporations and secret political contributors.They want to the right to participate in the public process through a voluntary destroy the very fabric of Oregon's democratic system created payroll deduction. It separates Oregon workers into first and almost 100 years ago by our great progressive leaders. second class citizens. At a time when citizen participation is June 1, 1908, the people adopted Oregon's first Corrupt declining,Measure 59 creates barriers to citizen involvement.The Election Practices Act.This Initiative was designed to curb the Human Services Coalition of Oregon includes more private and abuses being practiced by the forces of evil of the time,similar to non-profit groups and individuals than public,but we have discov- those who are sponsoring this measure. It included a section ered our need to work together to ensure that the basic needs of creating Oregon's first Voters'Pamphlet which made it possible for all Oregonians will be met.Measure 59 creates barriers to these ordinary people, not just a few millionaires to influence public partnerships. opinion. MEASURE 59 Adoption of this measure would destroy that instrument of THREATENS COMMUNITY SERVICES democracy and establish a government of the wealthy, by the Many Oregon charitable groups not only provide basic human wealthy and for the wealthy,a government with no concern for services health, child care, food boxes, housing, alcohol and ordinary Oregonians. It would eliminate the Oregon Voters' drug treatment and child and adolescent treatment services, but Pamphlet for all practical purposes. It would destroy the right of they also work for changes in public policy that will lessen the ordinary people to have their views about a measure published for need for those services.To assist low-wage Oregonians move out a modest fee in the Voters'Pamphlet. of poverty and to assure health care services, many community Measure 59 would eliminate the right of a citizen to submit an service groups supported the successful 1996 measures increas- argument for or against a school or municipal bond or tax ing the minimum wage and the tobacco tax.Many of these same proposal. It would eliminate the right of a candidate for school community groups receive donations from public employees board director, city councilor, legislator, state office, congress or through voluntary payroll charitable deductions. Measure 59 will president to insert a statement in the Voters' Pamphlet setting make these voluntary payroll contributions illegal. forth his/her qualifications for office and stands on the issues MEASURE 59 involving those candidacies. DISCOURAGES CITIZEN INITIATIVES This is the most recent of a long list of bad legislation financed The Voters' Pamphlet has provided citizen groups access to all by greedy special interests.It must be defeated. Oregon voters.Measure 59 will take away this relatively inexpen- Vern Cook,former state senator sive campaign literature.Voters will receive expensive sound bites (503)665-8143;FAX(503)665-8145 rather than in-depth discussions by their fellow Oregonians. Measure 59 sponsors say the elimination of the Voters'Pamphlet (This information furnished by Vern Cook,former State Senator.) arguments is an unintended consequence.But since Measure 59 is a constitutional amendment, the legislature can not remedy their mistake. ALLOW ALL OREGONIANS TO WORK TOGETHER PLEASE VOTE NO ON MEASURE 59 (This information furnished by Jerry Bieberle,Human Services Coalition of Oregon(HSCO).) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 59 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 59 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION A School Bus Driver Urges Your NO Vote on#59 THESE GROUPS OPPOSE MEASURE 59 FOR THE I wonder why Bill Sizemore and his Washington D.C.friends FOLLOWING REASONS want to take away my right to personal choice when it comes SIZEMORE/NORQUIST 59 IS to how I participate in political activity? UNCLEAR As a school bus driver at Cascade Union High School in Turner UNFAIR for a number of years, I've never considered myself such a politi- cal threat to these big money special interest groups, that they UNNECESSARY would spend millions of dollars trying to fool Oregon voters into UNDERHANDED taking away my right to choose how and when to participate in politics.But apparently they think I am,because that's what BM59 TAKES AWAY PEOPLE'S VOICE&CHOICE is all about.It's about taking away my right as a citizen to par- ticipate as 1 choose in politics. PLEASE JOIN US IN VOTING NO ON SIZEMORE/NORQUIST 59 And apparently,Bill Sizemore and his D.C.cronies don't think you would agree with them if they,wrote BM59 in a straightforward Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon manner that would allow you to see all of it's intent and conse- Human Services Coalition of Oregon quences.So,they wrote it so vaguely that,if it passes,we won't know all of it's ramifications until we have spent a lot of our tax League of Women Voters of Oregon dollars in the courts trying to figure it out. Oregon Action One thing is certain though. Ballot Measure 59 takes away my Oregon AFSCME,Council 75 right to choose how to participate in politics - and that decision should be my personal choice. Oregon Consumer League Please don't be fooled by Bill Sizemore. Please don't take Oregon Council of Police Associations away my personal choices.Please vote NO on BM59. Oregon Education Association (This information furnished by Jon Wimmer.) Oregon Nurses Association Oregon Public Employees Union/SEIU Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens • Oregon State Public Interest Research Group Portland Rainbow Coalition Progressive Coalition of Southern Oregon Rural Organizing Project (This information furnished by Roger Gray,Oregonians for Open and Fair Elections.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 60 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Election, November 3, 1998. This measure requires that the primary and general elections BALLOT TITLE be conducted by mail.The primary and general elections are held in May and November of even-numbered years. Current law prohibits conducting the primary and general elections by mail. Under current law,the following rules apply: � �By MA 1.The primary and general elections may not be conducted by 4ll+flF~ 1! ll*GTIAIS mail. §`V ot arnentsg taw is 2.Voters may sign up to become permanent absentee voters regialre ate by i7t�tfiI i rennia€i pritriar.y,genera[elections and receive all ballots by mail. fit L ++ Pet to current lew pro�l.1 In, ' 3.The presidential primary election in March of presidential Yot ter ill in btenl pnrrleCy or ttrei eleGtlotla.- election years is required to be conducted by mail. .�"U)liltMdkif$W Gttrrent'.lit prof ilb1s note by Mill tpr#liennlai P�- 4.Special state.elections and local elections may be con mart'or.gonoral ele (pne Tlti prcipo5al 61EtrrW t ihi, -prottlbitivn ducted by mail and,;regtatres vpte txy rrttttf for btenniai prfrrtaty or general eiec- Currently,voters may vote by going to a polling place on elec ions.. C#te propasal dctae no#i atlect exisling W parr tong t� tion day or by some form of absentee voting,including permanent Secretary'.of;Mate attd county clerk to conduct other elections absentee or single-election absentee. either at tPB pokls or iiy Mall. This measure would eliminate polling places for primary and AS -t OF FMMtEANC1At.IMPACT.:iwpunty g rnn2eut eXpert�: general elections.Voters could return their ballots by mail or drop diWree�, atlniait to"hem Ptlr ftX+ enBr&I' them off at designated sites. tkrt� a ta1W This measure would not affect the current law that allows voters to obtain absentee ballots or to vote at the elections office. It would also not affect the current laws that allow the Secretary of State to decide whether to conduct special state elections by TEXT OF MEASURE mail,or that allow the county election officials to decide whether to conduct local elections by mail. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: Committee Members: Appointed by: SECTION 1.ORS 254.465 is amended to read: Vicki Ervin Chief Petitioners 254.465.The following rules apply to elections conducted by Paula Krane Chief Petitioners mail: Harry Demarest Secretary of State (1) A presidential preference primary election described in Representative Lynn Snodgrass* Secretary of State ORS 254.056 shall be conducted by mail in all counties,under the Michael Schrunk Members of the Committee supervision of the Secretary of State. *Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) (2) [Except as provided in subsection (1) of this section,] An election held on the date of the biennial primary or general elec- (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the tion shall[nofJ be conducted by mail. ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) (3) A state election not described in subsections (1) or(2) of this section may be conducted by mail.The Secretary of State by rule shall direct that a state election authorized to be conducted by mail under this subsection be conducted uniformly by mail or at polling places. (4) A county clerk may conduct an election not described in subsections(1)to(3)of this section by mail in the county,in a city or in a district defined in ORS 255.012, under the supervision of the Secretary of State.In deciding to conduct an election by mail, the county clerk may consider requests from the governing body of the county,city or district and shall consider whether conduct- ing the election by mail will be economically and administratively feasible. (5) The Secretary of State shall adopt rules to provide for uniformity in the conduct of state elections by mail. NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and italic]type indicates deletions or comments. 61 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Vote By Mail-An Idea Whose Time Has Come A.Peterson's Statement: Measure 60- Vote By Mail came about because 11,000 A Letter to My Fellow Oregonians Oregonians from all walks of life: Republicans, Democrats and I have been involved in the Oregon political scene since 1948. Independents, college students and senior citizens, community I have seen many ideas come and go in my 81 years and once in leaders and housewives stepped forward and volunteered their awhile an idea comes along in politics that is so simple and so time.Vote By Mail was able to submit over 100,000 signatures popular that it makes you wonder why we waited so long. collected entirely by citizen volunteers -the only all-volunteer measure to qualify. Since 1981 1 have seen Vote By Mail grow until all elections in Vote By Mail transcends the typical partisan battles seen so Oregon are Vote By Mail except for the biennial primary and often in our initiative process because it is an idea that makes general elections.The time has come to expand Vote By Mail sense: it increases voter participation, saves money and makes to all elections. democracy more convenient for everyone.The following is a short I have always been proud of the State of Oregon and its nation- list of individuals, companies and organizations that have wide recognition as a forerunner of political firsts. endorsed Measure 60(Due to space requirements we apologize for not listing everybody). • The first state to pass the Bottle Bill in 1971. • Innovative land-use laws under Governor Tom McCall. Organizations • The first state to successfully conduct a US Senatorial election League of Women Voters by mail in 1996. Oregon League of Conservation Voters As an Oregonian, I support Vote By Mail for three main reasons: AARP of Oregon American Association of University Women 1) It Increases Voter Turnout! Oregon Common Cause Election after election has shown that more people vote AFL-CIO Oregon when.they receive their ballots in the mail.Over 50%of all OSPIRG those who vote are now absentee voters! These same NW Oregon Labor Council elections have shown that neither party benefits from Vote Oregon Education Association by Mail.We all benefit from more people voting! Special Districts Association of Oregon 2) It Saves Money-Over 3 Million in Local CountyTax Dollars! National Association of Letter Carriers, Branch 82 In an age where every tax dollar is being stretched, the Oregon NARAL elimination of our costly dual election system would save Oregon Woman's Rights Coalition over 3 million in local county tax dollars. Oregon Public Employees Union,SEIU Local 503 Oregon Fire District Directors Association 3)Convenience! As you sit here in the comfort of your home, reading this Individuals voter pamphlet statement and making an educated, Governor John Kitzhaber informed choice think about the alternative. A recent Secretary of State Phil Keisling national poll showed the number one reason that people Former Secretary of State,Governor and US Senator Mark Hatfield do NOT vote is that they are too busy.Vote By Mail is the Former State Treasurer and Secretary of State Clay Myers common sense alternative-and it works! Brian Booth I urge you to vote YES on Measure 60! It's about time! Ivan Gold Curt Gleaves (This information furnished by'A"Peterson.) John Gray Jim Wright Paul and Alice Meyer Businesses Salem Area Chamber of Commerce PGE Gibson Enterprises Neil Kelley Company Russell Development Company Medford Fabrication In the following pages, you will find arguments from individuals and organizations.We urge you to read them carefully, make an informed choice and we hope we have earned_ your support for Measure 60-Vote By Mail! (This information furnished by Jeremy Wright, Vote By Mail Initiative Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 62 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Ballot measure 60 makes sense: The American Association of Retired Persons(AARP) sense sense supports Ballot Measure 60, Voter sense....Taxpayer VOTE BY MAIL. The people who conduct your local, state and federal elections, We support Vote By Mail for all primary and general elections the election officials of Oregon, ask for your YES vote on Ballot because it enhances the fundamental right to vote, increases measure 60,which brings the Primary and General elections into voter turnout, has greater protections against fraud and gives the same system as all other Oregon elections. Passage means more convenient access for everyone to vote. that all elections can be conducted by mail. It is the common sense thing to do.Why?Our 16 year history with Measure 60 Vote By Mail is a non-partisan issue that enjoys conducting elections by mail shows that voter turnout improves bipartisan support. with elections by mail, tax dollars are saved when elections are • The Right to Vote conducted by mail and elections by mail help keep our voter reg- Most basic of all political rights is the RIGHT TO VOTE.We feel istration files among the cleanest in the nation. that one of the most important aspects of a democracy is voter participation and citizen involvement in the democratic process. If you could improve voter turnout, save up to$4 million in prop e The essence of a democracy is that citizens exercise their civic rty tax dollars, make voting more convenient for everyone, why wouldn't you do it? responsibility by voting. The act of voting is what is valuable, regardless of where one does it. You can by passing measure 60. • Increases Voter Participation No longer will you need to wonder if your ballot will be sent to you We support the efforts to promote and enhance the ability of all or if you need to go to the polls. Oregonians to vote.Vote By Mail assures greater voter participa- tion. AARP favors increasing the number of citizens voting in No longer will you need to worry about finding the time in your 'elections. Our system of government depends on a mamority of busy schedule on a Tuesday during limited hours to get to your citizens voting. polling place to cast your ballot. • Higher Safeguards Against Fraud Your ballot will be mailed to you for every election and you can Retired persons do not take the privilege of voting lightly. It return it by mail,deposit it at a secure official ballot dropsite,or go is important to retired persons to vote their own convictions and to a site designated by your elections office and vote in a voting make their own decisions when voting on issues and candidates. booth if that is what you prefer.The options are yours. Over 15 years of conducting elections by mail in Oregon has ' Meanwhile you will have your ballot,at your home with your voter proven that Vote By Mail does not deny privacy nor does it pamphlet and be able to vote at your own pace.You will have your encourage fraud. In fact, higher safeguards against fraud and ballot in time to call and ask questions of candidates or ballot intimidation exist in Vote By Mail elections then in•a traditional measure campaigns. polling place election. As those you have elected and chosen to oversee your elections - More Convenient process,we recommend a"YES"vote on measure 60. Vote By Mail gives more convenient access to everyone to It just makes common sense. vote.It provides convenient access for employed persons to vote. It also enables the frail, elderly and persons with disabilities to The Election Officials of Oregon vote-people whom otherwise may not make it to the polls. (This information furnished by Al Davidson,Marion County Clerk,Oregon AARP URGES YOU TO VOTE YES ON MEASURE#60- Election Officials Committee.) VOTE BY MAIL! (This information furnished by Marion Esty, Chair, State legislative Committee,Oregon Association of Retired Persons.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 63 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The Time Has Come to Expand Vote By Mail OREGON'S TEACHERS SUPPORT VOTE BY MAIL As current and former Governors and Secretaries of State, Vote Yes on Measure 60 both Republicans and Democrats alike,we urge you to Vote Yes on Measure 60. In an age where good ideas unfortunately Why would the Oregon Education Association,representing more become bogged down in partisan politics, we all agree that Vote than 40,000 public school employees,urge you to VOTE YES ON By Mail-Measure 60 is an idea whose time has come. MEASURE 60,the vote by mail initiative?It's as easy as 1,2,3: Oregon has always led the country in new and innovative 1. Measure 60 would end the confusion around Oregon's ideas, and Vote By Mail is another step in that proud tradition. election process.Unfortunately,in an effort to make elections Vote By Mail began in Oregon over 15 years ago and we have easier, they've actually gotten more complicated. Is the next personally seen it progress to the point that all elections are now election by mail ballot only?Or is this one the one where you're conducted by mail except for the biennial primary and general, supposed to show up at your polling location?Where is your The time has come to expand Vote By Mail to all elections. polling location?What hours can you vote?Did you sign up as a permanent absentee voter or didn't you?Get the picture?No Oregon also has a proud tradition of active citizen involvement wonder Oregonians aren't turning out to vote in the numbers in their political process and high voter turnout when compared they've done before. with the rest of the country. Sadly, we are seeing this tradition 2 Measure 60 would likely increase voter participation slowly disappearing. are now saddled with a costly and con because it's convenient. If you are a registered voter, you fusing dual election system that drives down voter turnout while increasing costs. simply receive your ballot in the mail.You vote.You put it back in the mail. End of story. No more juggling your schedule. No Most of us grew up voting at a polling place.While some of us worries about the weather.No questions about polling location. may miss the polling place experience, we understand that the No hassle. question now is not polling places�Vs voting by mail.Rather it is 3 Measure 60 saves money.It doesn't take a mathematician to replacing our current dual election system - one that c costly, .figure that vote by mail costs less. It's expensive to set up confusing and drives down voter turnout-with the simplici ty,con- polling places statewide. venience and efficiency of Voting By Mail. Obviously every Oregonian should be concerned about fraud, This November, please join Oregon's public school employees coercion and intimidation in any election.However,over 15 years and me.VOTE YES on MEASURE 60. of conducting elections by mail in Oregon have proven that Vote James K.Sager,president By Mail elections can be conducted with the highest standards of Oregon Education Association integrity. (This information furnished by James K. Sager, Oregon Education As leaders we have seen that Oregonians value ideas that Association.) make sense,improve our government and increase civic involve- ment.The time has come to expand Vote By Mail to all elections. We urge you to vote Yes on Measure 60! Governor John Kitzhaber Secretary of State Phil Keisling Fmr Secretary of State,Governor and U.S.Senator Mark Hatfield Fmr Secretary of State and State Treasurer Clay Myers (This information furnished by Jeremy Wright, Vote By Mail Initiative Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 64 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR VOTE-BY-MAIL IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST BEFORE YOU CAST YOUR BALLOT ON MEASURE 60, Vote Yes on Measure 60 WETHOUGHTYOU SHOULD KNOW... OSPIRG urges the passage of Measure.60.As a public interest * ELECTIONS ARE NOT FREE. watchdog organization with 25,000 citizen members, OSPIRG Every time there is an election in Oregon someone has to Day for has a history of supporting policies that would enhance public it. Voting booths, election employees, even the ballots them- participation in the political process. Efforts such as campaign selves,all have a price. finance reform, motor voter, and defense of the initiative process WHO PAYS THE BILL? do this,and so does Vote-by-Mail.Simply put,when more people participate in our democracy,the true public interest will be more While taxpayers are not directly charged for the cost of these likely to prevail. elections, you still end up with the bill.When a local govern- Vote-by-Mail increases turnout. ment,such as a special district,holds an election,it must pay for Compared with polling place elections, voter turnout is dramati- it.But,where does that money come from. You,the taxpayer! cally higher with Vote-by-Mail.Rapidly rising use of absentee bal- • WHY VOTE-BY-MAIL? lots in recent years indicates that voters prefer to vote by mail. Even though there is a nostalgia about going to the polling place, When it comes to vote-by-mail elections,less really is more.Mail in the reality is that we currently have a costly and complicated dual ballots have consistently increased voter participation in the state system of elections.The dual system is confusing for many vot- of Oregon, but, more importantly, they also cost significantly ers.Vote-by-Mail gets more people to vote. less than traditional polling place elections. Vote-by-Mail is convenient for Oregonians. • AN EASY CHOICE! With Vote-by-Mail,citizens will be able to vote without the barriers Oregon's special districts would rather spend YOUR money on of work schedules, child care, transportation and other time or the quality services YOU deserve–fire, police, parks, water, lifestyle constraints.We'll have the opportunity to vote at home-- sewer– not elections! That is why we support vote-by-mail in with ample time to read over each issue. Oregon.That is why we support Measure 60. Vote-by-Mail has overwhelming public support. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 601 With so many opportunities in politics today for the public to be cynical or angry, it's nice to have a measure we can all feiel good (This information furnished by Sally Smith, President, Special Districts about.Measure 60 has been brought forward by a broad coalition Association of Oregon.) ` of citizens and civic organizations.This inspiring effort is in the proud tradition of Oregon's citizen initiative process. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 601 Submitted by Maureen Kirk Executive Director, Oregon State Public Interest Research Group (This information furnished by Maureen Kirk,Oregon State Public Interest Research Group.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 65 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR VOTE-BY-MAIL:MYTH AND REALITY The extension of Oregon's Vote by Mail statute to the biennial As a supporter of Vote-by-Mail,I have heard a number of objec primary and general elections is not only a good idea who time has come it is tions to this innovation.These have failed to deter the growing long overdue. Oregonians favor Vote by Mail. Thousands already support for Vote-by-Mail. However there is also such a hodge- have registered for permanent absentee voter podge of mythology about this process that additional information status and more are doing so daily.In some counties 70 percent is needed. of registered voters Vote By Mail in every election as absentees. The permanent absentee ballot for anyone was enacted by the • First myth:that voting is a"social function".The act of voting is 1995 Legislature. not a meet-and-greet gabfest.It is the noblest expression of the Vote by Mail is convenient for all people-those with various phys- democratic process and it is so wherever you do it,in a kitchen ical challenges, those who work, those who want to study the or a campground or a courthouse.In fact Vote-by-Mail doesn't issues and vote at home,those who don't want to be harassed by even deprive the polling place fan. They can drive to their late smear campaigns,those who like saving the cost of the cur- clerk's office election day and vote with all the ceremony rent dual polling place/absentee system.It is an idea whose time and camaraderie they want. has come.Vote"YES"on Ballot Measure#60. • Second myth:fraud. Fraud is less possible in mail elections, Paula Krane where every signature is verified, than in poll elections where they are not. president, League of Women Voters of Oregon • Third myth: coercion. People who have looked for it haven't (This information furnished by Paula Krane, League of Women Voters of found it.But anyone who has the slightest fear of coercion can Oregon.) prevent it. Designate on your registration card to send your ballot to a place where you feel safe and free from coercion.If someone tries to interfere with your vote, destroy your ballot. Later, report the action to your clerk, receive a new ballot and vote unhindered. • Fourth myth:Vote-By-Mail voters miss out on"late revelations about candidates:' The "late revelations" just before election day are really just"attack ads"and mudslinging. In a Vote-by- Mail election the ads have to come three weeks early and can be effectively rebutted. The voter can vote or wait for more information,whichever he or she prefers. To believe that voting in a public setting is somehow superior to voting in a private setting puts too high a value on ostentation.No, with voting, as with prayer,what matters is what is in your heart and your head and not where you happen to be standing at the time. David Buchanan Executive Director, Oregon Common Cause (This information furnished by David Buchanan,Oregon Common Cause.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of,Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 66 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 � Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Eliminating"Election Day Voting"at local polls, officials would Let's call it what it is:an elimination of your ability to choose how mail out ballots far ahead of"Election Day"to all registered voters, to vote and new opportunity for corruption to our election process. whether or not they request ballots.Recipients then must dispose Mandatory vote by mail does not assure the sacred agreement of the ballots, whether or not interested in voting. Such casual that the state must uphold with its citizens;one ballot, one vote, broadcast of blank ballots to people who have not requested them assurance of privacy,and the freedom to choose how your ballot invites more vote scams fosters corruption trivializes voting and is cast. deprives everyone of the option of casting a secret ballot in a pro- Facts: tected and secured voting place. Broadcast mailing of ballots far ahead of time surrenders the Saving dollars !s not the answer every problem. I would no state responsibility for providing citizens access to ballots and more ask for substandard materialis s fora bridge to save money than I would to jeopardize the voting system for the sake of sav turns this solemn duty over to a semi-privatized federal agency.It increases chances of delay intrusion loss theft premature vot- ing. ing money. and low turnout. We do not have a statewide-computerized voter registration Broadcast mailing already in a previous state-wide mail-only system. A single voter can be registered in more than one election led to accumulations of numerous unopened ballots in county and receive more than one ballot.Counties verify sig- unsupervised places,including public wastebaskets and commu- natures, however, they do not automatically talk to 35 other nity mailrooms of apartment complexes,campus residence halls, counties to see if someone is.registered in multiple jurisdic- and other living groups where registered voters had moved away, jurisdic- tions.Therefore, multiple casting of ballots can occur. died,or failed to pick up their mail. Proponents state that no fraud exists because there are no Return of ballots to collection boxes led to overflow of reports of fraud.It will exist and the reporting process won't be unguarded ballots vulnerable to loss or theft with no safe uard to used.What family member would report to authorities another verify the actual number of votes cast. Forged signatures have for tampering with a voting decision? We must not quickly occurred,likely more often than detected by hard-pressed clerks. brush aside the issue of"domestic coercion"simply because it Collection by unofficial "ballot herders"can't guarantee delivery is not being reported. and counting of all ballots. Requests to bring your ballots to the church, union hall, Broadcast mailing of ballots can encourage un-informed voting employee meetings, senior luncheon, so that individuals can on impulse when people mark ballots between sweepstakes "`rote as a unified group"or"get questions answered"will be offers and packets of junk mail,not waiting to consider legitimate highly intimidating situations. arguments emerging after ballots arrive.This bad practice does Intimidation, coercion, thousands of ballots sent from inaccurate not occur in jury trials,so why encourage it for the important busi- and outdated registration lists,counties lacking the ability to daily ness of balloting on laws and electing people to make and admin- and accurately exchange or compare data with each other, and ister laws?Early mailing of ballots will foster premature voting. lack of privacy all potential for dramatic corruption. Depriving all voters of the private refuge of the polling place While some suggest that mandatory vote by mail will encourage eliminates the truly secret ballot,exposing many voters to undue voter participation, the fact is, the most responsible way to pressures and promptings while actually voting. Mail-out ballots encourage voter participation is to deliver what was promised on facilitate"helpers" intruding and dominating voting by recipients the campaign trail.Mandatory vote by mail will not guarantee that unlikely to vote independently. result. Secure,secret,intentional,and accurate voting might cost a bit Vote NO on Mandatory Vote by Mail. more than indiscriminate broadcast mailings of official ballots later collected as rubbish. Shouldn't a voter's security in voting (This information furnished by Representative Lynn Snodgrass.) have greater worth than a recycling effort?Don't vote us back to the mess of corrupted elections that Americans reformed by adopting the secret ballot a century ago! Don't deprive voters of the option of the secret ballot! (Updates:www.corvallis.com/sixtyNO) (This information furnished by Fred IN Decker, Treasurer, Citizens For Choice of Voting.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 67 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 60 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION STATEMENT PART 1 STATEMENT PART 2 When in 19941 began learning the details of a plan to conduct all Continued from Statement part 1. elections by mail it soon became clear that the lunatics are in Further proof of the corruption inherent in voting b mail was charge of the asylum. given by the mayoral election in Miami,Florida in 1998.The elec- We have been told by Mr.Keisling that millions of dollars will be tion was challenged and the courts found the mail-in absentee saved by his system but no cost/benefit analysis has been pro- ballots so filled with illegal and non-existent voters that they threw vided to prove his claim, and every citizen who has ever paid out ALL absentee ballots,stating that eligible persons have a con- taxes knows that not a single elections office in Oregon will stitutional right to vote but do not have a constitutional right to reduce their annual budget request if this measure passes.While vote by mail. advancing unproved claims of cost savings, Keisling has also Other states have also found fraud in mail voting.For example,in been proposing a statewide computerized registration system California recently it was discovered that dead people had voted that will cost several million dollars to install and who-knows-how- much to operate every year. by mail in a ballot measure for a new sports stadium. But the overriding concern about mail voting is not cost or conve- None of these fraudulent activities were detected by elections nience, it is vote FRAUD. officials,they had to be caught by disappointed candidates and/or the press. Under the current system,anyone may register by mail any name Oregon voters need to know that Secretary Keisling has been to vote in Oregon.Elections officials never verify that the person less than truthful about his efforts a get this initiative on the actually exists,that they are a U.S.citizen,that they are over 18 ballot,Contrary to his statements that signatures were gathered al that they actually live at the address claimed.Elections officials by a "grass roots" effort, most of the signatures were obtained also allow a registered voter t specify an address other than their through an expensive mailing effort.Over$110,000 were spent, residence to have their ballot t sent to, even if that address is in another state or country. or more than$1.00/signature.It is disturbing to see where all that money came from:Less than 10%came from small contributions When people are allowed to vote through the mail as well as reg- of under $50, 20.2% came from unions, 29.7% from business ister through the mail, all control over.elections is lost. It will be interests, 7.4% from lawyers and 4.6% ($5,041) from elections possible for a person to register and to vote from anywhere in the employees. world without ever having been to Oregon.Just as an example:In We need to know from Mr. Keisling why businesses, unions and the 1996 special election for U.S. Senator a person with a Chinese name registered to vote lawyers are trying to take away our right to vote at the polls. Lane County, but had their mail ballot sent to a province in the People's Republic of China. Keisling should also try explaining who "The New Democrat That ballot was returned and counted.Indeed,printouts of regis- Network"is and why that Washington DC PAC sent$1,000 to this tered voters in Lane County show hundreds of registered voters campaign.Why did a union PAC in Kalispell, MT send $1,000? with addresses in other states and countries. Why did the postal workers union send$1,000 from Wash.DC? Why did a nursing home send $500 from Vancouver, WA?Why It will also be possible for non-existent persons to be registered did two individuals send hundreds of dollars from Rhode Island and voted.While Mr.Keisling has pooh-poohed this argument by and New York? saying that there have never been any instances of vote fraud in Obviously, Keisling is amassing money from special interests Oregon,the fact is that he has no idea if vote fraud is being com miffed nside and outside Oregon to try to force us into a voting system ffed because none of his elections officials are looking for it. without any controls and which will be wide open to corruption(as Cont'd Statement Part 2. proven in other states).If you like to vote by a mail(or absentee) system in which you can't even be sure your ballot was received (This information furnished by Neale Hyatt.) and counted by the election office that is your choice, but please don't force the rest of us to give up our right to the secure voting system that is the foundation of our democracy. VOTE"NO"ON MEASURE 60. (This information furnished by Neale Hyatt.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 68 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure Igo . 61 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General TEXT OF MEASURE Election, November 3, 1998. REPEAT OFFENDERS INITIATIVE SECTION 1.The purpose of this Act is to protect the public BALLOT TITLE by imposing tougher sentences on criminals who repeatedly violate major criminal laws and to ensure that all criminals are held accountable and punished for major crimes includ- � � g� ing for killing people while driving intoxicated. SECTION 2:(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of law,when a person is sentenced for a major crime,and the person has been convicted of a major crime, aggravated murder, or murder, the court shall impose the sentence under the sentencing guidelines or any greater sentence permitted or mandated by law and, in ' f trlllti� iB)bE addition, shall impose a consecutive period of imprisonment as follows: A.An additional one year imprisonment for one previous conviction for a major crime occurring within ten years prior to g the commission of the major crime or prior to sentencing. �:� artftirlprtl � or � B.An additional two years imprisonment for two previous a � I� # �prttoll)t convictions for a major crime occurring within ten years prior to 60, ftltt the commission of the major crime or prior to sentencing. C. An additional three years imprisonment for three or more previous convictions for a major crime occurring within � f crf� � � ijr• ten years prior to the commission of the major crime or prior to 13v)� 4 �� tt�rtl "� ll d � tattttt sentencing. rfCtt �_ '�� ftttrSfEtFz ��'; (2)A conviction for a major crime shall include any prior sen- tence imposed during the same proceeding provided that the prior sentence is based on a crime committed in a separate crim- inal episode. Post prison supervision shall be as determined by the sentencing guidelines and shall follow the additional period of imprisonment. SECTION 3: If the conviction is for Criminally negligent homicide and the crime involved the use of a vehicle any prior conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants shall be counted as a t)t�� 1f � tirt + ft* 1difC previous major crime under Section 2. tAtart£ �� ItCtIC SECTION 4. For purposes of this Act,a major crime includes: Robbery in the first,second or third degree, Burglary in the first or second degree, kt �� Assault in the first,second or third degree, Arson in the first degree, Compelling prostitution, Promoting prostitution, Aggravated theft, � Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle committed by taki operating or exercising control over a motor vehicle, Theft by extortion, fat;+ ��1tIilaCeltltf� Criminal mistreatment in the first degree, Felon in possession of a firearm,where the felony is an A or B felony, „ Ir tr Criminally negligent homicide, Conspiracy,attempt or solicitation to commit aggra- vated murder or murder, Manslaughter in the first or second degree, Rape in the first,second or third degree, ftlti� €111ftrar z Sodomy in the first,second or third degree, Unlawful sexual penetration in the first or second degree, Sexual abuse in the first or second degree, Escape in the first degree, Bribe giving,bribe receiving, bribing a witness, Perjury, Criminal mischief in the first degree where the aggregate value of the damage or destruction of property exceeds$10,000,and Any attempt, conspiracy or solicitation-to commit aggravated murder,murder,or a Class A or B felony listed in this section. SECTION 5: The sentence for a major crime committed on or after January 1, 1999 shall be no less than fourteen months and within thirty days after the passage of this Act the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission shall so provide. 69 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 SECTION 6: Whether a person has another conviction under EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Section 2 of this Act shall be determined by the sentencing court of current conviction. The court shall make this determination accurately and no district attorney shall fail to disclose or conceal This measure creates a statute that sets minimum sentences knowledge of or otherwise negate such a conviction.Other con- for "major crimes;' as defined in this measure. In addition, the victions need not be pled in the charging instrument,but shall be measure requires the imposition of an additional sentence of one disclosed to the defense by the district attorney as soon as is rea- to three years of imprisonment for any offender who is convicted sonably practical.No challenge to the validity of a conviction shall of a"major crime"and who was convicted of one or more"major be permitted except to the extent constitutionally required and crimes"within the previous 10 years. upon written notice by the defendant to the district attorney seven The measure requires that a presumed sentence of at least 14 days in advance of sentencing. months imprisonment be imposed for"major crimes"committed SECTION 7:Notwithstanding any other provision of law,the addi- on or after January 1, 1999. A court may impose more or less tional period of imprisonment imposed under Section 2 may not than the presumed sentence only upon a finding of substantial be reduced for any reason whatsoever and the person sentenced and compelling reasons. shall serve the entire period of additional imprisonment without any release on post-prison supervision or any form of temporary The measure also provides that when an offender is convicted leave from custody. of one of the "major crimes," and before sentencing the court SECTION 8:The convictions under Section 2 of this Act include determines that the offender was previously convicted of a"major convictions for major crimes, aggravated murder, murder, and crime," murder or aggravated murder, the court must impose a juvenile court adjudications for offenses which if committed by an sentence to serve a period of imprisonment that is in addition to adult would constitute aggravated murder, murder or a major the sentence imposed under sentencing guidelines or other law. crime. Out-of-state adult convictions and juvenile adjudications The mandatory additional sentence is imposed only if the other shall constitute a conviction under this Act if the offense would crime was committed within 10 years before the commission of constitute a major crime, aggravated murder, or murder under the"major crime;'or within 10 years before the date of sentenc- current Oregon law. ing.The mandatory additional sentence is one year if the offender SECTION 9: Imprisonment means time in secure prison custody has one previous conviction for one of the specified crimes within and does not allow any form of release, leave, or furlough as to that period, two years if the offender has two previous the additional period of imprisonment under Section 2. convictions for the specified crimes within that period and three SECTION 10:The sentences set by this Act apply to all crimes years if the offender has three or more previous convictions for committed on or after January 1, 1999.Other convictions under the specified crimes within that period. Section 2 of this Act include convictions for crimes occurring The mandatory additional sentence for previous convictions before,on,or after January 1, 1999. may not be reduced for any reason.The mandatory additional SECTION 11: Notwithstanding Section 2 of this Act, imprison- sentence must be served in secure prison custody and the ment under this Act shall not exceed the maximum indeterminate offender serving the sentence may not be released for furlough, sentence under ORS 161.605 in effect on July 1,1997.Nothing in post-prison supervision or any form of temporary leave. this Act shall be construed to reduce any mandatory minimum sentence or any other sentence previously enacted.The sentence For the purposes of the mandatory additional sentence for or pdrtion of the sentence under Sections 2 and 5 of this Act, previous convictions, juvenile court adjudications are treated as other than the additional period of imprisonment shall be subject previous convictions. Previous convictions for driving under the to modification under the sentencing guidelines rules for depar- influence of intoxicants are treated as"major crimes"for purposes tures and Section 14 of Senate Bill 936(1997),unless it is other- of the mandatory additional sentence if the offender is thereafter wise prohibited by law including,but not limited to,ORS 137.700 convicted of criminally negligent homicide and the crime involved and ORS 137.707. the use of a vehicle.The validity of any previous conviction may SECTION 12: These sections shall supersede any other provi- be challenged by an offender only to the extent that there is a con- sion of the Oregon Revised Statutes with which they conflict. If stitutional requirement that the offender be allowed to make that any subsection, clause or part of these sections is held invalid challenge. under the United States Constitution or Oregon Constitution,the The mandator additional sentence for previous conviction remaining subsections, clauses and parts shall not be affected y p and shall remain in full force and effect. applies to the sentencing for all "major crimes"committed on or after January 1, 1999. In imposing a mandatory additional sen- tence for a"major crime"committed after that date, the court is required to consider previous convictions for "major crimes," murder or aggravated murder committed before January 1, 1999. Committee Members: Appointed by: Steve Doell Chief Petitioners Kevin Mannix Chief Petitioners Ingrid Swenson' Secretary of State John Tyner" Secretary of State Tom Clifford" Secretary of State 'Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) "5th member appointed by Secretary of State because committee members could not agree on selection. (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) 70 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR When someone breaks into your home, and steals your jewelry, Measure 61 protects your neighborhood.Are you worried about family heirlooms, and other prized personal possessions, insur- people breaking into houses?You should be.Under current sen- ance may cover the cost of replacing some or all of the property. tencing laws, these kinds of serious"property"criminals are set But insurance will never replace the personal mementos. free after they are convicted.Are you worried about having your Insurance will never restore your sense of personal security.That business broken into?You should be. Criminals who burglarize sense of security will be taken away forever.Yet current sentenc- businesses also are set free.Somehow the sentencing laws pre- ing laws assume that it is no big deal for someone to break into a tend that property is not owned by real people. house and steal everything, break into a business and vandalize Do you worry that someone will trash your house, doing thou- it completely;or steal a car.Oregon's current sentencing laws say sands of dollars worth of damage?Do you worry about someone that these kinds of criminals,after conviction,should be set free. stealing your car?Yes,you do,and if you can afford it,you spend The theory seems to be that giving them a break, sending them increasing amounts on insurance to try to protect yourself from back out the streets will somehow cause them to stop preying the losses.Imagine your feeling when you find out that,under cur- on innocennt t citizens. rent sentencing laws, a criminal can do over $10,000 worth of Measure 61 will change all of that. It will impose a basic tough vandalism to your house–and be set scot free.A criminal can sentence of 14 months in prison for first convictions for major steal your car,get caught,get convicted–and be set free. crimes, and higher sentences, with mandatory minimums, for This"catch and release"system may be great for fly fishing,but it repeat convictions. On the very first conviction, Measure 61 does not work in the criminal justice system. Remember, when allows the Judge some leeway to reduce the sentence–even to you engage in catch and release in fly fishing, you are trying to probation. For repeat offenders, however, tougher mandatory increase the fish population. When you engage in catch and minimum sentences are needed,because these serious criminals release in regard to serious crime, you are contributing h the obviously did not get the message the first time. increase in the population of criminals on the streets. A vote for Measure 61 is a vote to protect your personal security, A vote for Measure 61 is a vote to protect our homes, our busi- and to give victims of crime true justice by holding criminals nesses,our neighborhoods,our communities–and our families. accountable.Vote yes on Measure 61. Vote yes on Measure 61. (This information furnished by Kevin L.Mannix,Justice for All,Director.) (This information furnished by Dana C.Baugher.) s (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 71 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . .61 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Some opponents of Measure 61 say that we should apologize to TOP TEN REASONS TO VOTE criminals because they had a bad childhood,and their bad child- YES ON MEASURE 61 hood is what turned them into criminals.However,those us who 10. Oregon is ranked ninth in the nation for property crime support Measure believe that everyone needs be held accountable for their r decisions--decisions that hurt other (Testimony; Professor James Heuser, Ph.D., Portland State er people. So called"property"crimes involve real victims--innocent people University, July 22, 1995, Oregon Criminal Justice Commission). who own homes that are burglarized,businesses that are broken into,and cars that are stolen. 9. Oregon property crime rates have risen 25.6% since 1991 When you leave your home in the morning and find that your car (Oregon State Police,LEDS). isn't where you left it„ do you stop to analyze the motives of the 8. Losses to Oregonians since 1991 have exceeded $1.25 criminal and sympathize with them? or do you want the is crimi- billion(OSP, LEDS). nal caught and put in prison? 7. Since the voters approved Measure 11 in 1994, violent Once these major property criminals are put in prison,we can try crime has decreased 11%, while property crime has to address the"root causes"of their problem.We can try to reha- increased. bilitate them from drug and alcohol addictions, and give them a basic education, all as part of the prison work program, which 6. Serious property crimes are felonies.Real victims have their teaches criminals responsibility,work ethic and makes them help security and family heirlooms stolen in home burglaries,and pay for their keep. transportation taken in car thefts. The answer to serious property crimes is not to apologize to the 5. Property criminals currently receive Probation (no prison criminals for their past,but to hold them responsible and put them time) for breaking into your homes, stealing your posses- somewhere where there is no opportunity to victimize property sions, and stealing your automobiles. The message- "Go owners, and there is some opportunity for rehabilitation:Prison. ahead,you won't go to prison!" Vote yes on Measure 61. 4. Oregon is among the nation's leaders in taxpayer money spent on social programs---yet we still have increases in (This information furnished by Ronda L.Buffington.) felony property crimes. Social spending is not the only answer., 3. The American Civil Liberties Union doesn't want you to vote for Measure 61 because they consider the liberty and rights of criminals more important than yours. 2. The Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association doesn't want you to vote for Measure 61 because they make more money revolving their clients through the system so they can offend again. 1. Politicians who are weak or cheap on the criminal justice' issues don't want you to approve Measure 61 because they want to scare you into thinking we are spending too much on prisons. However, in the current state budget we are spend- ing 58%of the state budget on education, that's$58 out of every$100 you pay in state income tax.The Department of Corrections is currently funded with only $7 out of every $100 you pay in state income tax. Vote yes on Measure 61 for a safer Oregon and better qual- ity of life for our communities. (This information furnished by Steve Doell,Crime Victims United.) J R (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 72 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Measure 61 means less business for criminal defense attorneys. Some critics of Measure 61 say it will cost a lot of money.They Why?They are appointed to represent people who steal from you ignore the fact that it costs innocent citizens much more if gov- and, ironically, you,the taxpayers, are required to pay for them. ernment fails to incarcerate these hardened,repeat criminals who When their clients are found guilty, set free only to commit more prey on our society.An auto thief will steal 10 to 20 cars before he crimes, you pay again.This is big business for criminal defense is caught.Right now,when he is caught and convicted,he will be lawyers.No wonder they oppose Measure 61. set free, only to steal more cars. Each one of those cars repre- What is good for the criminal defense lawyers is not good for soci sents the property of an innocent citizen who may or may not ety.We need to stop criminals,such as car thieves and burglars, have insurance – and who pays for these crimes through high insurance rates,deductibles on insurance,or,worse yet,the cost from repeating their crimes by imposing tougher sentences on of immediate replacement of th them.Measure 61 will do that.First offense:the criminal receives e car. a presumptive sentence of 14 months(giving the judge discretion When you count up the tremendous cost to society of letting peo- to•go as low as probation, i.e., no prison). After that, for a first ple break into houses,burglarize businesses,and steal cars,and repeat offense involving a major crime, the criminal will get a compare it to the cost to the state to pull these serious, repeat mandatory minimum additional sentence of one year. For a sec- offenders off the street,the equation is simple:For every dollar it and repeat major crime, the criminal will get a mandatory mini- may cost the government to incarcerate these criminals, we are mum sentence of two years.For three or more prior major crimes, saving citizens several dollars. the criminal will have a mandatory minimum sentence of three The cost to government to implement Measure 61 is a great ben- years added to his sentence. efit to all citizens in our society. We are not simply spending These mandatory minimum add-on sentences cannot be reduced money to put away serious criminals;we are spending the money for any reason. This means that criminals will no longer be to protect all of our society. allowed to continue committing crimes with no accountability. Consider this: At present, 58 cents out of each state budget Stopping, rather than encouraging, criminal behavior is the only dollar go to education, and 24 cents go to human resources pro- solution for a workable society.Don;t allow those who encourage grams. Only 7 cents go to the Department of Corrections. and financially benefit from criminal behavior fool you any longer. Measure 61 will probably increase this 7 cents to almost 8 cents Our society has pretended for too long that we know how to pre- per dollar. Juveniles are not affected by Measure 61; we will vent crime by not holding criminals accountable. Incarceration continue to allow county juvenile departments and the Oregon with treatment is a more responsible way to protect the public and Youth Authority to deal with juvenile property offenders.It is worth deter crime. one penny out of the budget dollar to achieve justice. Vote Yes on Measure 61 A vote for Measure 61 is a vote to hold criminals accountable,to Bob and Dee Dee Kouns give justice to victims,and give justice to all Oregonians. Crime Victims United (This information furnished by Steve Doell,Crime Victims United.) (This information furnished by Bob & DeeDee Kouns, Crime Victims United.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does,the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 73 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Oregonians be on the alert!Measure 61 is the latest attempt by a The Oregon Association of Community Corrections Directors is a small,but vocal group of individuals with special interests to con- professional organization comprised of County leaders in proba- trol criminal justice policies in this state. Having failed to get the tion and parole. Collectively, we supervise more than 30,000 Legislature to accommodate their extreme views, they are once offenders.We have dedicated our careers to the public safety of again trying to sell Oregonians a wolf in sheep's clothing. our communities.We ask you to cautiously weigh all factors con- Supporters of 61 want you to believe that by passing this mea- cerning Measure 61.Our organization opposes this measure for sure, which requires mandatory minimum prison sentencing, it the following reasons: will address the problem of property crimes in Oregon.What they 1.Similar legislation has been enacted within the last three years. don't say is that only 7 listed are property crimes and the major- In 1995 Measure 11 dramatically increased sentences for per- ity of the other 35 plus ALREADY require mandatory minimum son to person offenders. In 1997 House Bill 3488 imposed sentencing.We don't need this law. longer sentences for property offenders.This legislation has The likelihood that someone will needlessly or unjustly be sent to not been in existence long enough to determine its effect on reducing crime in our-communities.sentences Measure 61 proposes to prison increases with every mandatory minimum sentence further increase the sentences of many of these same offender Oregonians create because a judge is UNABLE to consider the circumstances of the crime and make the punishment fit. and add mandatory sentences for some additional crimes. Before Oregonians approve Measure 61, let us be sure this Parents Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment (PAC-UP) con- strategy is effective. sists of thousands of individuals who have watched mandatory studies well as statewide with show such laws DO 2 The cost of Measure 61 is extremely high, an estimated$470 Oregon's Measure 11, and believe st minimum sentencing nationwide, million over the next eight years,for construction and operation NOT LOWER CRIME RATES. of prisons. Finally,there is a cost impact this measure will have on Oregon. 3.No money has been allocated to fund Measure 61.Therefore, Measure 61 will require more judges, more prisons, more prison the estimated $470 million may come at the expense of edu- guards etc. This money will be used to warehouse NON- cation, transportation, mental health, and economic develop VIOLENT, FIRST TIME OFFENDERS. ment,which are already inadequately funded. Please do not assist them in the creation of bad and costly laws. 4. Limited tax dollars need to be invested in programs that pre- SAVE taxpayers money. Support prevention and treatment pro vent crime.Today, when children have increased exposure to grams which CAN lower the crime rate, not more prisons which drugs, alcohol, sexual experimentation, and violence, we pro- will not. vide them with less supervision than at any time in our nation's history.We support funding for mentoring, after school activi- VOTE No on Measure 61. ties, and other prevention programs that we believe will allow more youth to avoid criminal activity and live productive, (This information furnished by Cathi Lawler, Parents Against Cruel & healthy lives. Unusual Punishment.) 5.Will Measure 61 reduce crime? Longer sentences provide a legitimate strategy for punishment and incapacitation. However, they have not proven effective in altering criminal behavior.We owe it to ourselves, as judicious tax payers, to invest in strategies that will reduce crime. (This information furnished by Bob Grindstaff, Oregon Association of Community Corrections Directors.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 74 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION From the Desk of John A.Kitzhaber,M.D. Vote NQ on Measure 61 1 urge you to vote"NO"on Measure 61.It isn't the kind of pub- MEASURE 61 IS A BAD INVESTMENTI lic safety investment Oregon needs. The cost is staggering,over$1 BILLION in the next ten years for This measure costs too much. If Measure 61 passes, more prisons.This is ONE BILLION additional dollars for prisons Oregon will spend $1.4 billion more on prisons over the next 10 beyond the prisons already being built or waiting to be sited. years--funds taken from other efforts that truly would make us We need to invest in PREVENTING CRIME.We need to KEEP safer.The $83 million this measure costs in the next two years KIDS IN SCHOOL,not prison.We need to HIRE MORE TEACH- could be used to add 500 State Troopers,tri I juvenile crime pre- ERS,not guards.We need to HELP.FAMILIES,not hurt them. vention funding or teach 9,000 students. This measure means putting another new prison in Dollar for dollar, money spent on education is the most effective crime prevention strategy available. (1996 Rand Corporation another Oregon community. Nobody wants a prison in their study) community, but we must site new prisons if we increase sen- tences. I have sited 13 adult and juvenile prisons during my Oregon already has the harshest"one strike"law in the country, administration.Isn't that enough? known as Measure 11.We are already sentencing kids to long This measure isn't necessary. A new law increasing sen- terms in prison with no time off for good behavior.We are already tences for repeat property offenders took effect last July,and has in the midst of the largest prison building boom Oregon has ever sent hundreds of repeat offenders to prison. seen. Crime already is going down in Oregon without building We don't need more prison, we need more schools.We don't more new prisons. There were 16,000 fewer serious crimes need tougher sentences,we need more teachers.We don't need between 1995 and 1996,the most recent year for statewide sta- to spend ONE BILLION dollars unwisely. tistics.That includes 3,200 fewer burglaries, 5,500 fewer thefts MEASURE 61 IS A BAD INVESTMENTI and 5,300 fewer car thefts. Vote NO on Measure 61 Oregon's burglary rate is at a 25-year low.Your chances of becoming the victim of a burglary are the lowest they have been Michael Dugan in 25 years. Deschutes County District Attorney This measure isn't well thought out. Measure 61 would Chris Beck increase sentences for Ballot Measure 11 crimes, already the State Representative toughest"one strike and you're out"law in the country.We need JoAnn Bowman to be more than tough on crime,but we need to be smart too. State Representative We can reduce crime without building prisons. New York Dan Gardner State has led the nation in reducing its crime rate.They did it by State Representative putting more police on the street–not by increasing sentences or building prisons.We should do the same. Sid Lezak Former U.S.Attorney for Oregon Let's prevent crime and not just punish criminals. Avel Gordly Let's spend money wisely to reduce crime. State Senator Please vote NO on Measure 61. Bryan Johnston (This information furnished by John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.) State Representative Beverly Stein Portland (This information furnished by Ingrid Swenson.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 75 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION IF YOU CARE ABOUT OREGON'S KIDS AND OREGON'S MEASURE 61 IS BAD FOR SCHOOLS! SCHOOLS,VOTE"NO"ON MEASURE 611 VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61 When fully implemented, Measure 61 will require the State to spend an additional$250 million per biennium on prison operat Measure 61 will require a $1.4 billion increase in state general ing costs and debt service. Where will this money come from? fund spending over the next 10 years.That's money that could be Schools and other state services?Higher taxes? used to improve Oregon's schools. DO WE WANT TO BUILD MORE PRISONS OR IMPROVE OUR MEASURE 61 ROBS MONEY FROM OREGON'S SCHOOL SCHOOLS? CHILDREN! Oregon has adopted higher academic standards for our students VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61 to meet. How will our children meet these high standards if we Measure 5 and Measure 47 moved most funding for Oregon's ele- continue to drain resources from the school system? mentary and secondary schools from the local property tax to the We need smaller classes,'better teacher training and more state general fund. Any new mandated spending requirements, resources in the classroom.These improvements to our educa- like Measure 61, takes available money away from schools and tional system will help reduce and prevent crime. Uneducated, services for children and their families. neglected children are more likely to commit crimes as adults.A MEASURE 61 IS BAD FOR OREGON! quality educational system is the foundation for crime prevention. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61 -Do we really need more prisons? Here is what Measure 61 may mean to education: State support for K-12 schools now takes up 45 percent of the state's general fund and lottery resources.Measure 61's$1.4 bil- • Overcrowded classrooms lion increase in state spending will cause a disproportionate • Teacher layoffs amount of spending for prisons - taking money away from • Lower academic performance schools! Education should be our top priority now, not more prisons. IMPROVE OREGON SCHOOLS! Measure 61 locks more prisons into our Constitution as a top pri- VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61 ority above education, the environment, and health and human services. Reducing class size, raising student achievement and making schools clean and safe are all important goals for Oregon DO YOU WANT THE STATE TO BUILD A PRISON IN YOUR schools.These goals can be achieved. But only with adequate NEIGHBORHOOD? Or, do you want more teachers, smaller and stable funding.Measure 61 will divert money to criminals and class sizes,and better schools? away from Oregon's school)m prove m ent efforts! NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS OR NEIGHBORHOOD PRIS- DON'T HARM OREGON SCHOOLS! ONS?THE CHOICE IS YOURS.VOTE"NO"ON MEASURE 611 VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61 (This information furnished by William R.Hallmark, Linda Olson, George Mardikes,Scott Bailey.) (This information furnished by Ingrid Swenson.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 76 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 61 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION VOTE NO ON MEASURE 61! 1 support efforts to improve public safety.I oppose Measure 61.As a public safety measure, Measure 61 is expensive, impractical, complicated and unnecessary. As Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1995, 1 helped to implement the voter approved "Tough on Crime" initiatives.The State legislatures heard the voters'message on crime loud and clear. In Oregon, if you do the crime, you will do the time. However,as Chair of the Senate Budget Committee,I have come to realize--we do not need and cannot afford Measure 61 for the following simple reasons: • Measure 61 requires spending an additional $1.4 Billion over the next ten years with no new money to pay for this expense. The funds will come from other State budgets or new revenue taxes. • A better investment for your tax dollars would be prevention or education. Do you really want to build another prison at the expense of educating our children? • Where will we put another prison?The State is still trying to site the additional prisons needed because of the"Tough on Crime" initiative.If Measure 61 passes,the State will be looking again. • Measure 61 is not needed. Effective July 1, 1997, repeat car thieves, burglars and other thieves are sentenced under tough new standards.These new laws set minimum prison sentences for property offenders with prior convictions for similar crimes. We must continue to work on reducing crime and not simply ware- housing criminals once they have broken the law. Increasing prison sentences may look like a quick, easy solution, but the solutions that Measure 61 offers are confusing and unnecessary and would cost more than a billion dollars. I want to be tough on crime,but I also want to be smart on crime. Please join me in voting"No"on Measure 61. Sincerely, NEIL R.BRYANT Senator,District 27 Chair,Senate Judiciary Committee 1995 Chair, Interim Budget Committee 1998 (This information furnished by Neil Bryant, State Senator, Former Chair, Senate Judiciary Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 77 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 62 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General (2) Before any entity receives a contribution or makes an Election, November 3, 1998. expenditure for the purpose of influencing the collection of signatures on a proposed statewide initiative or referendum petition,that entity shall file a statement of organization with BALLOT TITLE the Secretary of State, form a petition political committee, and thereafter disclose contributions and expenditures as required in subsection(1)herein. Section 3. Making Signature Gatherers Be Registered fySfi�fiGTN.REGtliti: G` r1iAIQAf Oregon Voters, Permitting Regulation of Payment for S L.A. Signatures, and Specifying Effective Date of This Constitutional Amendment f ?1fRitFfilhiffilC)tfS Section 1, Article IV of the Constitution of the State of Oregon, is amended by adding a new subsection, and the sl"S=' C7 E lea" vote r8c}uie8 addlt�ont3l Constitution of the State of Oregon is amended by creating � y0 d�scltsure5,'�utates aignetd new Sections 1b and 1c to be added to and made a part of Article IV and to read: lfft8n srtt�bui�Dods A person gathering signatures on an initiative or referen- dum petition shall be registered to vote in this state in the r d� ureG,• tirig 'signifurtflettt #, manner provided by law. �d� ktei#1 (ttft��tl#1fltftodS, Section 1b. The Legislative Assembly may pass laws which prohibit or regulate payment for gathering signatures + I : lttteftff& pnstit ► t� Xisf�ng statutes regt+ diS- for initiative or referendum petitions on a per signature basis tfi c�ftfft rarnpaicn fatet8sure adtls onsfitutriI. if the Legislative Assembly finds that the practice has m�y fQ� proriterie � of opntrixaio or caused fraud or other abuses. m0 �antes cost{ btslexpeilttis Section 1 c.(1)The amendment to section 1 of Article IV of rtC8t1�Ylitttattve Rec} tre dtsctoatng" nfty this measure applies to any initiative or referendum petition a f P},kt10 that,if filed with the Secretary of State with the required num- .8if8m afters it A d...... ber of signatures of qualified voters,will be submitted to the BSe �* r abut` itditfidu8i 'ril3t t4 rbak people at a general election occurring after November 3, o tlip f #t cola ions gs rt method ,Secretary of to 1998,regardless of when the prospective petition for the ini- must � }tutsiistt s` trohfbl5`PaYmenfa tiative or referendum petition is filed. $�tinI �npetitial � �pertalf{ 9erpr�sne` (2)This section 1c is repealed December 31,2000. � � �� ( This r4teeisut@ t tKeted Section 4.Licensure of Businesses that Hire Paid Signature ffs o �eti3 expfzrittturea ?� �I,Ot3(Y year u+h ar addi» Gatherers itattai txaniy serf up odsf #o ttte tfto # 1 ,dttfl, (1)The Secretary of State shall provide for the licensure of �ttfife" Gout clt4btidnS fiiirtg of(ipr af1r#oTbe any individual,business,service,firm,organization,associa- �fttaed, t trs ifuff�cit data lion, labor union or club which for a fee hires or procures individuals who receive pay or anything of value to gather signatures on initiative or referendum petitions. (2)The Secretary of State shall require all license holders TEXT p to report at least once each month the names and addresses TEXTOF MEASURE of individuals it hires or procures to gather signatures on initiative or referendum petitions, the amount of any pay- ments made to such individuals, the name and address of individuals or entities who paid the license holder to gather The following sections are added to and made a part of the signatures on initiative or referendum petitions, and any Constitution of the State of Oregon: amount paid or accounts receivable to the license holder for Section 1.Disclosure of Large Contributions this service. In addition to any,other disclosures required by law, the Section 5.Individuals'Right to Participate recipient of aggregate political contributions of$500 or more Individuals protected by this Constitution have a funda- from one contributor during any one calendar year shall dis- mental right to participate in the political process by express- close such contribution and any subsequent contributions ing their support for a candidate or cause through payment from that contributor to the Secretary of State or other appro- of political funds used for political purposes by any method priate reporting authority within seven days of receipt. identified in this sub-section. Protected methods of partici- During the period two weeks prior to a primary or general pation include but are not limited to pledges of,payment for, election, such disclosure shall occur within two business collection of,or assistance in collection of political funds by days of its receipt. check, credit card, electronic transfer, automatic payment through a financial institution,and payroll deduction by pub- Section 2. Disclosure of Contributions During Petition lic or private employer which agrees to such deduction or if Signature Gathering payroll deduction is available to the employer's employees (1)The chief petitioner(s) on all petitions for a statewide for any other purpose. Such methods of participation shall initiative or referendum shall be responsible for disclosing to not be prohibited or restricted by any law or regulation the Secretary of State all contributions received and expen- enacted after November 1, 1998. If an individual authorizes ditures made in support of the petition, including expendi- political payments through electronic transfer, automatic tures made for the purpose of collecting signatures or payment,or payroll deduction,such authorization shall be in paying signature gatherers. The disclosure obligation writing.An employer may be reimbursed for the reasonable, imposed by this section shall commence upon the filing of actual and identifiable costs of the payroll deduction the prospective petition for a statewide initiative or referen- described in this section.This sub-section is not intended to dum with the Secretary of State, and shall include the create any new rights.Any political committee or other entity amount and source of any assets on hand at the beginning which receives political funds by any of the methods of this reporting period.These disclosure reports shall be described in this sub-section shall be entitled to use such filed no less than once each month thereafter. funds. A recipient of political funds described in this sub- 78 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures I Measure No . 62 section shall not co-mingle political with non-political funds. 6.The Legislative Assembly shall enact penalties for viola- For purposes of this provision,it shall not be considered co- tion of Section 8 of the Act. mingling if,promptly upon receipt,the recipient segregates Section 10.Administrative. political and non-political funds. If any phrase, clause, section, part or application of this Section 6.Disclosures of Paid Political Advertising Article is declared unconstitutional or otherwise unenforce- (1) In addition to other requirements provided by law, no able by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining political committee or other entity shall cause any written phrases, clauses, sections, parts and applications shall material, photograph or broadcast supporting or opposing remain in full force and effect. any candidate or measure for any election to be printed, posted,broadcast,mailed,circulated or otherwise published NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and to the general public unless it states the name and address italic]type indicates deletions or comments. of the political committee or other entity authorizing or pay- ing for the costs of the publication, including a statement that the publication was authorized by that committee or entity. (2)Whenever a political committee or other entity makes an independent expenditure on a political communication to the general public that advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, or which uses a candidate's name or image within 60 days prior to an election,such com- munication shall include a statement which identifies by name and address any political committee or other entity that authorized it,and any political committee or other entity that paid for it.It shall also clearly state that the communica- tion is not authorized by the candidate or the candidate's principal campaign committee. Section 7. Disclosure of Contribution and Expenditure Reports Within one business day of receipt,the Secretary of State shall disclose and make available to the public all contribu- tion and expenditure reports.The Secretary shall establish rules allowing electronic filing of contribution and expendi- ture reports and the electronic dissemination of such infor- mation to the public. Section S.Protecting Petitioning Process It is unlawful to offer,pay or provide money or other valu- able consideration to another individual to sign or refrain from signing an initiative,referendum or recall petition,and for the other individual to accept or agree to accept money or other valuable consideration for signing or refraining to sign an initiative,referendum or recall petition. Section 9.Penalties In addition to any other penalties prescribed by law, the following penalties apply for violation of this Act: 1.The Secretary of State may assess a penalty of up to $3,000 per occurrence or three times the amount not prop- erly and timely disclosed, whichever is greater, against an individual or entity that fails to make the disclosures required by Section 1 of this Act. 2.The Secretary of State may assess a penalty of up to $1,000 per occurrence or three times the amount not prop- erly and timely reported,whichever is greater,for violation of Section 2 of this Act. In addition to any individual or entity responsible by law,the chief petitioner(s)and the treasurer of chief petitioner's political committee shall be jointly and severally liable for the penalty. 3.The Secretary of State shall revoke the license of any licensee which fails to timely or accurately file the reports required under Section 4 of this Act, or for other reasons provided by law. 4.The Secretary of State may impose a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per occurrence against any individual or entity which is not validly licensed under Section 4 of this Act and which pays or attempts to pay or provide anything of value to individuals for gathering signatures on initiative or referen- dum petitions. 5.The exclusive penalty for co-mingling political and non- political funds shall be a requirement that the recipient return all of the co-mingled political funds to the contributor(s). 79 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ARGUMENT IN FAVOR This measure would amend the Oregon Constitution to add A NURSE'S VIEW OF BALLOT MEASURE 62 several provisions relating to election finance. The Oregon Nurses Association have worked hard in the creation The measure would require the recipient of political contribu- and defense of the Oregon Health Plan. In 1996 voters passed tions aggregating $500 or more from any contributor in .a Ballot Measure 44 to expand health care coverage,to more of calendar year to disclose it within seven days of receiving the Oregon's uninsured children.This expansion was created by rais- contribution. During the two weeks prior to a primary or general ing the tax on tobacco products.In the support of that campaign election, the disclosure would be required within two business we learned a great deal about why our election process must be days of receiving the contribution. reformed. The measure would require chief petitioners for statewide Opponents of Ballot Measure 44 did not run a fair and,open elec- initiative or referendum petitions to disclose each month all con- tion.The opposition campaign spent million of dollars in deceptive tributions received and expenditures made in support of the peti- television ads that sounded like they were supported by health tion.Any other political entity must file a statement of organization professionals.As nurses we were appalled. and form a political committee before receiving a contribution or The voters and the press had no way of knowing who was really a statewidid making expenditure to influence the collection of signatures on paying for those ads.And the worst part of it was that the giant e initiative or referendum petition.The entity would be tobacco companies were following the law even as they were required to disclose contributions and expenditures each month. attempting to trick Oregon voters. The measure would allow only persons registered to vote in That is why we support Ballot Measure 62. Oregon to gather signatures on initiative or referendum petitions. It would allow the Legislative Assembly to prohibit or regulate pay- It opens the election process by disclosing who really pays for the ing signature gatherers on a per-signature basis if the legislature political advertising. Now we'll know who buys the television ads finds that the practice has caused fraud or other abuses. during the election season. The measure would require anyone who hires individuals who Another aspect of Measure 62 that appeals to nurses is the quick are paid to gather signatures on initiative or referendum petitions reporting of all contributions and expenditures by political cam- to obtain a license from the Secretary of State and to report each paigns in Oregon. month to the secretary. As Nurses we are proud to be recognized as advocates for the The measure would prohibit enactment of laws or regulations issues we support.We feel that these campaign finance reforms after November 1, 1998,restricting the right of individuals to make are only a threat to organizations who would rather avoid public campaign contributions through methods such as payroll attention. deduction by public or private employers, electronic transfer or automatic payment through a financial institution. (This information furnished by Susan E. King, RN, Oregon Nurses Association.) The measure would require published material supporting or opposing a candidate or measure to state the name and address of the political committee or other entity which authorized or paid for the publication, including a statement that the publication was authorized by that entity.Certain communications advocating the election or defeat of a candidate and paid for with independent expenditures would be required to include a statement identifying the entity which authorized and paid for the publication and to state that the communication was not authorized by any candidate. The measure would require the Secretary of State to make contribution and expenditure reports available to the public within one business day after the secretary received the reports.It would also direct the secretary to allow electronic dissemination of and filing of contribution and expenditure reports. The measure would prohibit any person from paying or accept- ing payment to sign or not to sign an initiative, referendum or recall petition. The measure would allow the Secretary of State to assess civil penalties for violations of provisions of the measure. Committee Members: Appointed by: Paul B.Garrison Chief Petitioners Susan C.Remmers Chief Petitioners Jack Kane* Secretary of State Senator Eileen Qutub Secretary of State Jacob Tanzer** Secretary of State *Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) **5th member appointed by Secretary of State because committee members could not agree on selection. (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 80 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR From the desk of John A.Kitzhaber,M.D. Senior Citizens Support Measure 62 Dear Fellow Oregonians: Open and Fair Works in Oregon I care about Oregon, and I know that you do too.As a citizen of It's important for Oregonians to know that Measure 62,the Open this great state, I have studied its history and worked hard to and Fair Elections Act,will be good for senior citizens in Oregon. make it the kind of place we can proudly call home. That's why, as senior advocates and fellow citizens, we are ask- ,T ing you to join us and citizens throughout Oregon who support Today, as your Governor, i am one of many Oregonians working this important measure. to leave a legacy of a fairer political system for future generations. That is why I am asking you to join me in supporting Ballot Why does Measure 62 work for Seniors in Oregon?Because Measure 62,the Open and Fair Elections Act. it means a cleaner and clearer opportunity for Oregon's voters to help shape the state's future in a much more open political Why am I supporting Measure 62? It means a cleaner, clearer process.It tells the state's senior citizens who is behind signature and fairer opportunity for Oregon's next generation of voters to shape their future in a much more open political process. It gathering,negative campaigning and politicians in Oregon. reveals who is behind signature gathering efforts and negative How will Measure 62 work for Seniors in Oregon? Well, it campaigns in Oregon. mandates the timely disclosure of large contributions of out-of- It mandates the timely disclosure of large contributions by out-of- state and special interest money to political campaigns.Like you, senior citizens want to know who is writing the checks to influence state and special interests to political campaigns. This allows e decisions on election day and paying for the political advertising very Oregon voter to know who is writing the checks to influence on television, radio and in the newspaper. decisions on election day.It clearly explains who is paying for the political advertising on television, radio and in the newspaper. Where will Measure 62 work for Seniors in Oregon? On the Ballot Measure 62 makes important changes in how signatures street,where it also makes important changes in how signatures gathered in the petition process. First, it requires the disclo are gathered in the petition process.It requires the disclosure of are g sure a who is paying for signature collection.It also makes sure who is paying for signature collection and makes sure that people who collect your signature are really registered vote in Oregon, that people who collect your signature are really registered to vote state. in Oregon. and regulates the way they do business in our state. What's Finally,Ballot Measure 62 protects your right--and that of every ne Oregonian--to participate in our political process through cam- in Oregoon?. It t w will ill of how Measure 62 will work for Seniors p rotect your right and that of every Oregonian p to participate in voluntary payroll deductions at work for every- paign contributions. For a union member in Oregon, it continues thing from retirement plans to political participation. That's the the very important opportunity to make voluntary contributions right of choice for seniors, many of whom continue to work hard through payroll deductions at work. in Oregon. I believe Measure 62 will help give Oregon's political system back Vote Yes on Measure 63 on November 3. It will be good for to Oregonians.It does so by disclosing who contributes to politi- Seniors in Oregon. cians and to ballot measures. I hope you'll join me in voting YES on Ballot Measure 62. (This information furnished by Jim Davis, Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens.) John Kitzhaber,M.D. (This information furnished by John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 81 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Vote Yes on 62. A Police Officer Talks about the Importance of Measure 62 Common Cause asks Oregonians to vote yes on Measure #62, Like many Oregonians, I go to work every day. I am a Portland the Open and Fair Elections Act.Measure#62 requires a candi- police officer who has served the community for 6 years.My job date or initiative campaign to promptly make public any contribu- is to protect our citizens, and while doing so I have watched our tion of$500 or more. If a candidate takes $500 from a tobacco community debate the issues important to every Oregonian's company,you'll know about it. future. That is why I am supporting a future of Open and Fair • Measure #62 requires disclosure of contributions during the Elections. signature-gathering phase of an initiative. If an out-of-state or Why am I supporting Measure 62?Because it protects my right special interest group is paying signature gatherers to put and that of every Oregonian to choose to participate in our politi- something on Oregon's ballot,we will know about it before the cal process through campaign contributions.As a union member, measure is submitted. For the first time,Oregonians will be it's very important to me to continue my choice for voluntary par- able to make a truly informed decision about whether to sign a ticipation in its work through a payroll deduction program. petition. Why do I care about Measure 62? Because it means a better • Measure #62 make disclosure reports available to the public opportunity for Oregon's next generation of voters to address the quickly.We'll know BEFORE the election who's footing the bill continuing, critical matter of public safety.Tomorrow's voters can for any campaign. be better citizens on election day. • Measure#62 requires signature gatherers to be registered vot- And, it requires the disclosure of large campaigns contributions ers in Oregon.Instead of importing out-of-state professionals, before election day. If on election day you are being asked to this measure will ensure that these signature-gatherers are decide on public safety measures that would make our streets Oregonians. safer,shouldn't you know who is supporting your community and • Measure#62 guarantees our Right to Know who is paying for who wants to put all of us at risk? political campaigns before it is time for us to vote. Measure 62 also opens the election process by disclosing who pays for political advertising.Now we'll know who buys the televi- (This information furnished by David Buchanan,Oregon Common Cause.) sion ads during the election season. Another aspect of Measure 62 that appeals to me is the quick reporting of all contributions and expenditures by political cam- paigns in Oregon.This measure mandates a one day disclosure by the Secretary of State. Remember, every day I go out to protect and serve Portlanders. My fellow officers throughout Oregon do the same.Our future and yours depends on an open and fair elections process.Make your voice heard.Please vote for Measure 62 on November 3. (This information furnished by Liz Cruthers.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with OR$251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 82 Official 1998 General Election'Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR An Educator Writes on the Value of Measure of 62 We need to Know I care about Oregon,and know that you do,too.As an elementary If you're like me,when you vote,you want to know"who"and teacher in Bend for 17 years, I also know the value of preparing you want to know"how much."That's why I'm voting for Ballot our children for a fairer political future.That is why I am asking you Measure 62--the Open and Fair Elections Act. to join me and citizens throughout Oregon who support a future I want to know who's behind the politicians. I want to know of Open and Fair Elections. who's paying whom to gather signatures for ballot measures. I I am supporting Measure 62 because it means a cleaner,clearer want to know as much as possible. opportunity for Oregon's next generation of voters.Today's stu- Measure 62 will help me know what 1 need to know. dents are tomorrow's voters. Here's how: Measure 62 will make elections cleaner and clearer by man- I'll know much more quickly who's behind the 'curtain' dating the prompt disclosure of large contributions.It allows every Oregon voter access to a campaign's books,so that you will Measure 62 will require quick disclosure of any campaign contri- know who is funding any candidate or ballot measure campaign. bution of$500 or more.Currently, we don't find out about large contributions until expense reports are filed after the election. I It also makes important changes in how signatures are gath- want to know who's paying before I vote. ered in the petition process. First, it requires the disclosure of . I'll know, much more quickly, how much money someone is who is paying for signature collection.Then it makes sure that spending on"buying"my vote and I'll know where the money is people who collect your signature are really registered to vote in coming from.In the past several elections we have learned,after Oregon,and regulates the way they do business in our state. the fact,that certain ballot measures have been largely funded by Measure 62 also protects your right and that of every out-of-state money.1 don't like that,and if Measure 62 passes, I'll Oregonian to participate in our political process through know before I vote. campaign contributions.As a union member,it's very important ' I'll know that anyone gathering petition signatures must be a to me to continue my voluntary participation in its work through a registered Oregon voter, since that's a requirement in Measure payroll deduction program in my district.Measure 62 would guar- 62.1 know,you probably thought that was already in our constitu- antee me--and every Oregon citizen--that right. tion, but it's not. Measure 62 would also regulated the way paid signature gatherers can do business in Oregon. I like knowing Measure 62 also opens up the election process by disclosing that. who pays for political advertising. Now we'll know who really . I'll know that everybody is following the same rules--Big busi- buys the television ads during the election season. ness,special interests and labor unions.I'm a union member,and Finally,Measure 62 demands quick reporting of all contribu- I fully support my union having to make these disclosures in a tions and expenditures by political campaigns in Oregon. timely manner,along with everyone else. This measure mandates a one day disclosure by the Secretary of Measure 62 is called the Open and Fair Elections Act.To State so that we will know before election day who is really back- me, it's about your right to know as much as possible. Please ing campaigns. join me in voting YES on Measure 62.1 know you should. Please help us make Oregon elections Open and Fair.Vote Yes (This information furnished by Leda Pugh.) on Measure 62. (This information furnished by Peggy J.Humphreys.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 83 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Oregon's ballots for sale in upcoming elections! Bring your Union Member on the Importance of Measure 62 checkbook! I live and work in Oregon because its a special place.One way What?Here in Oregon? that we can protect Oregon is by making our elections more open Every day our members are trying to educate and organize and fair through determining who is funding Oregon candidates people within our communities to promote or challenge initiatives. and causes.That is why I am asking you to join me in supporting Measure 62,the Open and Fair Elections Act. We do voter registration drives and work to"get out the vote".And too often we hear this same response, "why should I bother to Measure 62 will help prevent misleading and negative attacks. vote, my voice doesn't really count".They have a point: It's the Politicians and special interests slinging mud are no longer the same old obstacle -- money in politics.Often, big money corpo- exception -- they are the standard for campaign behavior. rate interests have bought and paid for candidates before one Measure 62 would help prevent that by forcing campaigns to vote is cast. Massive media purchases by big money interests promptly disclose any campaign contribution of$500 or more: leave the average Oregonian bombarded by vague messages that often serves only to further muddle issues or mislead voters. Measure 62 will make politicians accountable to the people for the positions they take. With the new disclosure laws Measure 62 Who's paying for these misleading messages?Who underwrites introduces,the public will know exactly who contributed to a politi- a candidate's ticket? Good questions... Without the Open and cian's campaign Fair Elections Act,we don't really know.The wealthy and big busi- ness interests don't have to disclose how much they spend to win an election or pass an initiative until after the election. Measure 62 requires disclosures of contributions during the sig- nature-gathering phase of an initiative so that we will know when The Open and Fair Elections Act takes a step to restore fairness out-of-state special interests are paying to put something on to the current election laws.It returns more power of the ballot to Oregon's ballot.It also regulates businesses that hire paid signa Oregonians by requiring big money interests to disclose contribu- ture gatherers in order to prevent fraud and abuse. tions of$500 or more allowing for voters to know who backs a par- ticular initiative or candidate before we cast our vote on election every re 62 protects right to contribute to the political process day. Let's face it, these days the only way to know who is really behind an agenda is to follow the money trail to the source. through payroll deduction, including Oregon's unionized workers. Open and Fair Elections will also preserve every Oregonian's Measure 62 will bring greater disclosure to Oregon politics, and fundamental right to contribute to the political process through that's good for all Oregonians. payroll deductions:Oregonians have a right to choose the method Please join me in voting Yes on 62. by which they contribute to the issues and candidates they support. (This information furnished by Timothy Welp.) Send a strong message to big money interests seeking to buy our ballots:Vote yes to Open and Fair Elections. Vote YES on 62.It's time to shine some light in the dark places of Oregon politics. (This information furnished by Susan C.Remmers,Oregon Action.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. t 84 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Measure 62 will help Oregonians who are concerned about cam- Yes on Ballot Measure#62 paign financing and political corruption can learn who is con- I take my right to vote seriously. Even though I am a high tributing to what politician's campaign. school special education assistant,not apolitical-big-wig, I know Every donation in excess of $500 must be reported, including my vote is important, so it's important that I make informed donations made during voter signature drives.This measure also choices.That includes knowing who is behind political campaigns. would make these reports available quickly,not after the election, Millions of dollars are spent every election year in Oregon to try as it is now. to sway me and my fellow Oregonians to vote a certain way. We have a right to know who is paying our politicians for what. Before I cast my vote, I want to know who is spending all that That's basic democracy. money. Ballot Measure 62 will require candidates and ballot measure campaigns to provide more disclosure to voters Please vote Yes on Measure 62 about who is funding them. (This information furnished by Jason Reynolds, Oregon Consumer DO you know who influences elections that impact yourself, League.) your family, friends and co-workers? I don't. And I want to know. It seems these days that more and more elections are decided based on who produces the best radio or t.v.commercial. I think it's important to know who paid for all those ads. Ballot Measure 62 requires that the identity of who paid for political advertising be disclosed right on the ad. By voting yes on Ballot Measure 62,we won't be kept in the dark any longer when it comes to who is shaping choices on election day. Ballot Measure 62 protects our citizen initiative process by taking it back from out-of-state special interests who use paid signature gatherers—many of whom who are not even Oregon citizens—to get their measures on the ballot.Ballot Measure 62 requires that all initiative petition signature gatherers be reg- istered Oregon voters. And Ballot Measure 62 requires that Oregonians be told who is paying those signature gatherers while we are being asked to sign petitions, rather than long after the measure has qualified for the ballot. Please vote YES on Ballot Measure 62 so that we have the information we need to make informed choices on election day. (This information furnished by Terry L.Christenson.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 85 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION THESE GROUPS SUPPORT MEASURE 62 FOR THE Plainly and simply put: FOLLOWING REASONS Measure 62 seeks to overturn the effects of Measure 59 by MEASURE 62 THE OPEN AND FAIR ELECTIONS ACT WILL requiring tax dollars to continue to be used for the collection of • REQUIRE STRICTER CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE political contributions. • IDENTIFY OUT-OF-STATE SPECIAL INTERESTS WHO Measure 62 requires tax dollars and public employees be used for ARE SPENDING MONEY IN OREGON AND GATHERING collection and processing of money that will be used in partisan SIGNATURES political activities.The measure is wrapped inside what appear to be laudable changes in Oregon law, but are really just a Please join us in VOTING YES on Measure 62 smokescreen. Coalition for a Livable Future As Oregon's largest business association, Associated Oregon Community Alliance of Tenants Industries supports strict campaign reporting laws, and Oregon has some of the strictest reporting laws in the nation.As a result, Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon Oregon has some of the cleanest elections in the nation. Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network There are two ways to destroy the excellent record of Oregon election reporting laws:repeal them or make them so complex as Human Services Coalition of Oregon to become unworkable.Measure 62 does the latter. Oregon Action Measure 62 loads up the State Constitution with complex and Oregon AFSCME,Council 75 onerous reporting requirements that serve no useful purpose. Oregon laws already require timely reporting of all political contri- Oregon Common Cause butions, laws which AOI strongly supports as a matter of good Oregon Consumer League public policy. Oregon Council of Police Associations Measure 62 purports to authorize the legislature to impose regulation on people who circulate initiative petitions,but the leg- Oregon Education Association islature already has the power it needs to regulate signature Oregon Employees Union/SEIU gatherers and to require reporting of expenditures.The Secretary of State already vigorously pursues any hint of fraud in the initia- Oregon Nurses Association tive process. Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens Vote NO on Measure 62 Oregon State Public Interest Research Group Submitted by Portland Rainbow Coalition Associated Oregon Industries Rural Organizing Project (This information furnished by Richard M. Butrick, Associated Oregon Industries.) Sisters in Portland Impacting Real Issues Together United Seniors of Oregon Workers Organizing Committee (This information furnished by Roger Gray,Oregonians for Open and Fair Elections.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The priming of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 86 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No .* 62 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION The Former Deans Committee THE COALITION FOR INITIATIVE RIGHTS OPPOSES We believe Measure 62 raises serious issues under the MEASURE 62 Oregon and United States Constitutions. The Measure would It Impairs Grass-Roots Use of the Initiative and Referendum allow only Oregon registered voters to collect signatures.Oregon The Coalition for Initiative Rights is a group of volunteers dedi- citizens who are not registered voters, those Oregon citizens Gated f protecting the rights of Oregon voters to use the initiative under 18 and non-Oregon residents could not gather signatures and ref for Oregon initiative petitions.The limitation raises serious issues referendum. under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Measure 62 would create a new bureaucracy for the"licensing"of Constitution.The Measure authorized the Oregon Legislature to all signature gatherers and directly authorize the Secretary of prohibit or regulate paying signature gatherers on a per-signature State to assess penalties of up to $25,000 per violation against basis if the Oregon legislature finds that paying signature gather- anyone who"provides anything of value to individuals for gather- ers on a per-signature basis causes fraud or other abuses.This ing signatures"without being licensed! limitation raises serious issues under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We oppose the creation of new obstacles to use of the initiative and referendum.The big money special interests can easily hire The Oregon Constitution requires an initiative measure full-time employees to collect signatures. But grass-roots cam- "embrace on subject matter and matters properly connected paigns that try to collect signatures with part-timers will be subject therewith:"The purpose of this provision is to prevent confusion to costly licensing and potentially devastating fines. when voters go to the polls.We believe Measure 62 appears to combine more that one subject in this initiative and fails the"one Measure 62 also purports to authorize the Legislature to ban per subject test' as defined by the Oregon Supreme Court. We signature payment for signature gathering and do so retroactively. believe the Measure to be an unnecessary amendment to the The U,S.Supreme Court has already ruled that such laws violate Oregon Constitution.We believe this Measure would clutter the the First Amendment to the U.S.Constitution. Constitution and, if adopted at all, should be considered as a Besides,the good features of Measure 62 are already exist- statute•rather than amendment to the Constitution. ing law.ORS 260.522 already requires all political advertising to We provide this information to help fellow voters in under- be identified as to source and requires disclosure of who autho- standing the measure.Our comments are designed pDly to pro- rized it.ORS 260.558 already bans payments to persons for sign vide objective and careful constitutional analysis of the measure. ing or not signing petitions.Measure 62 just copies the words Collectively we take no position on the other merits of this mea- of these existing statutes. sure. Measure 62 would speed up the reporting of contributions and Prof.Leroy Tornquist(Chair), Former Dean Willamette College of expenditures, but that is not enough to overcome its flaws. Law We also oppose Measure 59, which Measure 62 is intended to Rennard Strickland,Dean University of Oregon Law School partly negate. Under the Oregon Supreme Court's analysis in Armatta v.Kitzhaber(June 1998),Measure 62 is probably uncon- Prof.Robert Misner, Former Dean Willamette College of Law stitutional as involving more that"one amendment"to the Oregon Prof.Emeritus Chapin Clark, Former Dean University of Oregon Constitution. Law School The only way to stop Measure 59 from destroying the Prof. Maury Holland, Former Dean University of Oregon Law Oregon Voters'Pamphlet is to vote against Measure 59. School We urge voters to guard their precious "direct Robert Ackerman, Dean Willamette College of Law democracy"leverage and vote NO on Measure 62! David Frohnmayer,Former Dean University of Oregon Law School Coalition for'Initiative Rights coalition.rights @ usa.net (This information furnished by Bob Cannon,Treasurer,The Former Deans www.teleport.com/-dweezil/cir Committee.) (This information furnished by Lloyd Marbet,Coalition For Initiative Rights.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 87 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 62 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION MEASURE 62 HAS MAJOR CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS I am a public school teacher.I am angry because my union,the Why would anyone want to add to the Oregon Constitution sev- Oregon Education Association, used my money to help put eral provisions the U.S.Supreme Court and other federal courts Measure 62 on the ballot. have already ruled are unconstitutional? This underhanded measure was written specifically to undo Measure 62 includes one provision that limits petition signature the will of the voters,who are expected to support Measure 59,in the very same election. 'gathering.The federal courts have already ruled that those limits are unconstitutional.Even if Oregon voters approve it,this provi- My union used my money to trick you into giving them con- sion will ultimately be thrown out in the courts. stitutional authority to take money out of my Mycheck every Measure 62 includes another provision that prohibits distributing month and use it to advance political causes with which I dis- campaign literature without stating who paid for it. The U.S. agree.It's that simple. Supreme Court has already ruled that such a requirement is I became a teacher because I care about kids and because I want unconstitutional. to help them learn.That is why I am in the classroom.The politi- Why place all these unconstitutional provisions in the constitution cal causes and politicians I choose to support or oppose are my when everyone knows they will be tossed out in the court later? business, not my union's. But the teachers'union drags me into the political arena every month when they use money they took Here's why:Those provisions are only there to distract your atten- from my paycheck to affect the political process in Oregon. tion from the one provision the public employee unions are really This is not right. Public school teachers should have the same after.That provision guarantees public employee unions the abil- right as anyone else to support or oppose political candidates or ity to use public employee time and public buildings, equipment, causes we choose. and supplies to collect their political funds from public employees' paychecks. Thomas Jefferson once said,"To compel a man to furnish con- Yes, they want to be sure that they can continue to raise money tributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he for political campaigns while on the job at taxpayer expense. disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical:' Jefferson's statement They wrote the measure so that when the other provisions are should apply to teachers the same as every other citizen. thrown out by the courts the one they really want would remain. Please don't write into the constitution that the public employee Those other provisions are only there to entice you to vote for the unions can take money out of my paycheck and the paychecks of measure. my fellow schoolteachers to support the unions'political agenda. A first-year law student would easily recognize the fatally-flawed They're welcome to their political opinions, but I should be wel- drafting of Measure 62.For example;provision 4 of Measure 62 come to my own. says the purpose of the measure is to disallow what the measure please vote NO on Measure 62. itself does in provision 1.Pretty screwy. If Measure 62 passes, large parts of it will be thrown out in the (This information furnished by Tim Rohrer.) courts.The result of that will be even greater voter apathy and discouragement. Vote NO on Measure 62.You might as well,it will be ruled uncon-, stitutional anyway. (This information furnished by Bill Sizemore, Executive Director, Oregon Taxpayers United.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute=endorse The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the aaccuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 88 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 63 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Election, November 3, 1998. This measure adds a new section to the Oregon Constitution BALLOT TITLE relating to ballot measures that propose to establish greater-than- BALLOTvoting requirements. Currently, the Oregon Constitution allows ballot measures to be passed by majority vote.Under this amendment, any new measure that proposes to require more than a majority of the votes cast to change a law or government action must receive at least that same percentage of votes to � IIVICAJIFIIfYVf1iP# tCC�UtIAEf#S become effective.For example,a measure proposing to impose a RC �1I ;xliN 1*SUI�Afl 1 t filfY 19 RX AQ two-thirds voting requirement would itself require a two thirds majority to pass.This measure applies to ballot measures starting f tJt»TQF`iY M"Y "M0, AttCstM3) S�ijf gf@1tt with the November 1998 general election.This measure states f[i,tt-ma f iy irot ft quir !rtfg t1fy a ((y r rn jt�l#y that its purpose is to prevent greater than majority voting require ments from being imposed by only a majority of voters. ��4T`��"��'td€s"vgtq aiow�&tmpt�r rrt4flty to easuitfat fa grey# WttBrt�ftjirtt)r t�ktf(t rg%jttirttS Committee Members: Appointed by: $t e a Am�fids ccrm-P.tttt �tres.inch re€fuf Jim Coon Chief Petitioners Ertl f ti tY=A(najlb y cf vat s oast"by#I t ~at (O; Tim Nesbitt Chief Petitioners 8j t 41tt fft IaW, r gGueff ?tt3rtt at?tldrt Jack Kane Secretary of State dp 4 ppt 13 t least Sal a j� CCet3t t_t Bill Sizemore Secretary of State erf �(I !iYt that ytotrtcj•t +fittiitt8ta;' Duncan Wyse Members of the Committee measure(��9� frtttj+�rity vcsttrtp t`�ggir�rertt#rf c#t�ft (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) F 'n I �' f f*lfttw}�kL'�tMl?�'f':'. f7ifie'Ct'gft 'tG: Qf pCai•• S 8iT3Ttt it F0-00 i#,.Ftt S to 1`atl t}# TEXT OF MEASURE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY ACT The following section is.added to and mace a part of the Constitution of the State of Oregon: (1)Any measure that includes any proposed requirement for more than a majority of votes cast by the electorate to approve any change in law or government action shall become effective only if approved by at least the same percentage of voters specified in the proposed voting requirement. (2)For the purposes of this section,"measure"includes all initiatives and all measures referred to the voters by the Legislative Assembly. (3)The requirements of this section apply to all measures presented to the voters at the November 3,1998 election and thereafter. (4)The purpose of this section is to prevent greater-than- majority voting requirements from being imposed by only a majority of the voters. NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and italic]type indicates deletions or comments. 89 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Secretary of State Asks Oregonians to Common Cause Asks Oregonians to Vote Yes on Measure#63 Vote Yes on Measure 63 Oregon Common Cause believes that Measure#63 is good for Measure 63 is a simple and fair measure that will help protect Oregon.That's why we are voting yes on Measure#63, and ask- and defend a fundamental principle of Oregon democracy. ing our fellow Oregonians to do the same. That principle is majority rule. Measure 63 is necessary and Measure #63 means two important things for our political important today because this basic principle is under increasing future:fairness and protection. attack. It returns fairness to Oregon elections by requiring that all bal- For 135 years in Oregon,majority rule applied to every law voted lot measures play by the same rules.If a measure seeks a super- on,and enacted by, legislators and citizens alike. majority requirement to change the laws, it must pass with an But since 1994,Oregon's constitution has now been amended on equal super-majority of voter support. four separate occasions, to override this principle. Each time, It preserves the protection of Oregon's democracy, election some type of "super-majority" voting requirement has been laws, initiative process, majority rule and school elections from imposed. special interests with a hidden majority. In some cases,a 2/3 or 3/5 vote of the Legislature is now required Measure#63 recognizes that changing a voting requirement to to enact certain laws. In others, a "double majority" of voters more than fifty percent is a very important decision an. So it voter approval plus more than 50%turnout of registered voters makes sure that any ballot measure proposing greater than is now the standard. majority requirements meets the same standard of voter While"super-majority"provisions may seem attractive;they set in approval. motion new and often dangerous dynamics. Suddenly, a vocal Measure#63 really preserves your opportunity to participate in minority has new powers, able to"veto"the clear will of a major- the democratic process in Oregon.Your support on election day ity. Political consultants have a new strategy for"victory": if they preserves majority rule as a cornerstone of our democracy for can't persuade voters to say"no,"they'll try to make them not cast future generations of Oregonians and keeps Oregon's election votes.Don't reward the politics of cynicism and apathy.Your vote laws the same on all issues. right now should count more than those who are refusing to par- Vote yes on Measure#63 because it protects the principle of ticipate.. majority rule and returns the ballot measure process to you and Measure 63,does not prohibit the enactment of additional"super- me,the citizens of Oregon.We say fair is fair.If you want to mess majority" requirements. Rather, it simply requires advocates of with democracy,you better play by the same rules. "super majorities"to live by the exact same rules. Please join Common Cause in defending democracy on If advocates believe a 2/3 vote should be necessary for the November 3 by voting yes on Measure#63. Legislature or voters to enact certain laws--say,approving a bud get or passing a school bond--then such a Constitutional amend (This information furnished by David Buchanan,Oregon Common Cause.) ment must also be approved by a 2/3 vote. Measure 63 is simple--and it's only fair.Help protect democracy in Oregon.Vote yes on Measure 63. (This information furnished by Phil Keisling.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 90 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR A Senior Citizen Supports Measure 63 The Oregon PTA believes that majority rule and the respon- As a Senior citizens advocate,I have seen much of Oregon's his- sibility and privilege of voting are cornerstones of our tory and care deeply about its future.That's why I am voting yes democracy. on Measure 63,and asking my fellow citizens to do the same. The Oregon PTA supports Ballot Measure 63 because it is only 63 is vital to Oregon because it means a political future fair that Ballot Measures that propose changes to voting require- Measure should have to meet those same requirements. of fairness and protection. How does Measure 63 improve our political process?Most impor- But now we're seeing more and more proposals to change major- tant, it returns fairness to Oregon elections by requiring that any ity rule through ballot measures. ballot measure play by the same rules.That means if a measure The Oregon PTA has always believed in fairness in elections and seeks a super-majority requirement to change a law,it must pass political decision-making.We believe that any ballot measure that with an equal super-majority of voter support.As a senior advo- tries to establish a greater-than-majority voting requirement cate, I say fair is fair. should pass only if it meets the same required greater-than- Then,it preserves the protection of Oregon's democracy,election majority standard. laws,initiative process,majority rule and school funding from spe- THE OREGON PTA SUPPORTS BALLOT MEASURE 63 cial interests with hidden agendas.This is so important to our abil- BECAUSE IT PRESERVES MAJORITY RULE– ity as citizen activists of all ages to play the essential role we A CORNERSTONE OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY. should in Oregon elections. (This information furnished by Kathryn Firestone, Vice-President of Measure 63 also does other important things,all of which defend legislation,Oregon PTA.) our opportunity to participate in the democratic process in Oregon.Your support.on election day preserves majority rule as a cornerstone of our democracy for future generations of Oregonians and keeps Oregon's election laws the same on all issues. As a senior advocate, I know how important a political legacy is to the future of our state. And when you vote yes on Measure 63, you're protecting Oregonians from special irterests who use deceptive ballot mea- sures to change our voting laws. What is so valuable about Measure 63 is it recognizes that chang- ing a voting requirement to more than fifty percent is a very impor- tant decision.So it makes sure that any ballot measure proposing greater-than-majority voting requirements meets the same standard for voter approval. I am voting yes on Measure 63 because it protects the principle of majority rule and returns the ballot measure process to you and me,the citizens of Oregon. Please join me and my senior friends in defending democracy on November 3 by voting yes on Measure 63. (This information furnished by Jim Davis, Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 91 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 � Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Oregonians for Tax Fairness Supports Measure 63 Keep Oregon's Elections Fair,Vote Yes on Measure 63 Oregonians for Tax Fairness is supporting Measure 63 because When we vote on ballot measures,there's only one standard for it's about two things that are fundamental to our election process: our decisions.It's called majority rule.It's a good standard for our Fairness and Protection. elections -- and the only one we've ever used in Oregon. We Measure 63 returns fairness to Oregon elections because it should be extremely careful about changing something as funda- requires any ballot measure to play by the same rules.It requires mental as majority rule. that a measure seeking a super-majority requirement to change That's why,as chief petitioners,we helped draft Measure 63. a law must pass with an equal super-majority of voter support. Measure 63 is our answer to this threat to majority rule.Measure If that isn't fair, I don't know what is. 63 says simply that any measure which proposes to change Measure 63 also preserves the protection of Oregon's democ- majority rule should live by its own rules.If an initiative proposes racy, election laws, initiative process, majority rule and school to establish a two-thirds vote on any issue,it should get two-thirds funding from special interests with hidden agendas. So much of of the voters to agree.We think that's only fair. our politics today is misleading, and this is a way to ensure that Measure 63 is a good way to protect the integrity of our elections. any ballot measure proposing greater-than-majority voting Special interest lobbyists who draft initiatives to benefit their requirements meets the same standard for voter approval. clients will think long and hard before they try to sneak through Oregon's political history is based on the premise of majority rule. changes in our election laws--once they know they have to live It's been a cornerstone of our democracy,and must remain so for by their own rules. future generations of Oregonians. When it comes to voting on how we vote,let's make sure we keep Best of all,Measure 63 recognizes that changing a voting require- it fair. ment to more than fifty percent is a very important decision.Think Vote Yes on Measure 63. about it this way: it protects Oregonians from special interests who use deceptive ballot measures to change our voting laws by (This information furnished by Steven Berman,Drew Heywood.) returning Oregon's election process to its citizens. Please join Oregonians forTax Fairness in voting yes on Measure 63. (This information furnished by Phil Dreyer,Oregonians for Tax Fairness.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 92 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Measure 63=Fairness&Protection I live in a small Oregon town. Schools and other public ser- I am voting for Measure 63 because it means two important vices,like fire and police are very important here.If 65%of my fel- things to the future of Oregon's elections: Fairness and low Independence citizens vote yes for a new elementary school, Protection. then that school should be built.But some people want to change the rules,so that the school would not be built.Passing Measure First, it ensures fairness for our elections by requiring that 63 will help protect that process. any ballot measure play by the same rules.That means if a How would I explain Ballot Measure 63, the Defense of measure seeks a super-majority requirement to change a law, it Democracy Act? In some ways it looks like a complex measure, must pass with an equal super-majority of voter support. but here's my simple explanation for it: Second, it preserves the protection of Oregon's democ- racy. Measure 63 is really about fairness and playing by the same rules. How? We all accept that a basic tenet of democracy is "majority It protects election laws. rules." But some people with hidden special agendas have said It protects the initiative process. they want to change that most basic of rules.They say they will It protects majority rule. eventually put a measure on the ballot to require a two-thirds It protects school funding from special interests majority vote to pass money measures. Here in Independence,we often say`what's good for the goose This is so important to our ability as citizen activists to play the is good for the gander.' essential role we should in Oregon elections. Measure 63 is really very simple. It says, if you want atwo- The key for me on Measure 63 is it recognizes that changing a thirds majority for money measures,just make sure your measure voting requirement to more than fifty percent is a very important passed by a two-thirds majority first. If you want measures that decision. So it makes sure that any ballot measure proposing need 75%to pass, get 75%of the voters to agree with this con- greater-than-majority voting requirements meets the same stan- cept.Strip away all the rhetoric and half-truths, and Measure 63 dard for voter approval. is an easy concept to understand. When you vote yes on Measure 63, you're protecting Remember,"majority rules"That's a concept we learn early in Oregonians from special interests who use deceptive ballot this country. Here in Independence, we also learn early, 'what's measures to change our voting laws, while also protecting good for the goose is good for the gander."Fair is fair. majority rule for school funding decisions in Oregon. I'm voting YES on Measure 63.Please'join me. Voting yes on Measure 63 protects the principle of majority rule and returns the ballot measure process to you and me, the citi- (This information furnished by Anthony Douris, American Federation of zens of Oregon.That's only fair. State,County and Municipal Employees.) Please join me in defending democracy on November 3 by vot- ing yes on Measure 63. (This information furnished by Susan C.Remmers,Oregon Action.) i (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 93 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR A'yes"on Measure 63 is a vote for simple democracy. THESE GROUPS SUPPORT MEASURE 63 FOR THE Measure 63 states that if voters are going to require two-thirds of FOLLOWING REASONS people to vote to change a law, two-thirds of the voters should MEASURE 63 THE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY ACT IS have to vote in favor for setting this higher requirement. ABOUT MAINTAINING Without this change,voters can, with a simple majority, demand FAIRNESS that future voters need 2/3 of the vote to change the law.A sim- PROTECTION ple majority should not be able to close the door on future voters. It's mean-spirited and undemocratic. DEMOCRACY To lock something up by making the subsequent voting require- VOTE YES ON MEASURE 63 ment nearly impossible will handcuff future voters and legislators. Coalition for a Livable Future Let's keep it simple,a simple majority,and untie the hands of our children and grandchildren.If they don't know how to vote,it's our Community Alliance of Tenants fault, but let's not take away their right to fashion the government Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon as they please. Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network (This information furnished by Jason Reynolds, Oregon Consumer Human Services Coalition League.) Multnomah County Democratic Central Committee Oregon Action Oregon Common Cause Oregon Consumer League Oregon Council of Police Associations Oregon Education Association Oregon Employees Union/SEIU Oregon Nurses Association Oregon PTA Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens Oregon State Grange Oregon State Public Interest Research Group Oregonians for Tax Fairness Portland Rainbow Coalition Rural Organizing Project Sisters in Portland Impacting Real,Issues Together United Seniors of Oregon Workers Organizing Committee (This information furnished by Roger Gray, Oregonians for Open and Fair Elections.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 94 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 63 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION MEASURE 63 UNDERMINES MAJORITY RULE MEASURE 63 IS,UNDEMOCRATIC Measure 63 is a sneaky, back-door attempt to undermine the The entire political system of America is based on majority rule. democratic process, and Oregon's long-standing initiative Measure 63,however,is a blatant attempt to prevent a majority of process. P P 1 Y Oregonians from passing a law. If Measure 63 passes, 60% of The whole idea of Oregon's initiative process is to insure that Oregon voters could vote for an amendment to the Oregon con- issues important to the majority of Oregonians are put before stitution and it still would not pass. them in a democratic way. This measure is really about as anti-democracy as it gets. Measure 63, though, would undo the power of the initiative Let me give you an example:A measure could be placed on the process and rob the people of their right to enact laws they care about by majority vote. ballot to make it more difficult to increase taxes.That measure could get 60% of the vote, but it would still not pass. Not if The sponsors of Measure 53, public employee unions, want to Measure 63 is on the books. keep law-making power in the hands of politicians. They don't want the people to be able to pass laws. Measure 63 undermines majority rule.It takes from the people the It's all about control. power to pass laws that a majority of Oregonians support. You also might be interested in knowing that Measure 63 was Measure 63 is intended to take away from the people the power placed on the ballot by the public employee unions specifically to to be self-governing, and place more of that power in the hands make it as easy as possible to increase taxes.That alone should of the public employee unions and the politicians they elect. make one suspicious. Oregon is a special place to live for a lot of reasons.One of those If Measure 63 passes,there are going to be a lot of upset voters reasons is the right we have to pass laws by a majority vote of the the next time we pass a law and it does not go into effect, even people. Measure 63 takes away a big part of that right. It gives though a majority of voters approved it. more power to politicians and takes power away from the people. Let's maintain the system of majority rule the founding fathers It's a bad idea. Y j Y g gave us.It's worked for more than 200 years.Let's give a very big FOR THE SAKE OF DEMOCRACY thumbs down to this ill-advised proposal. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 63 Vote NO on Measure 63. (This information furnished by Becky Miller, Executive Assistant, Oregon Taxpayers United.) (This information furnished by Becky Miller, Executive Assistant, Oregon Taxpayers United.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 95 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 Measure No . 64 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General [2]Clearcut logging substantially increases the likelihood of larg Election, November 3, 1998. landslides and severe flooding. These human-caused distu bances have been shown to result in loss of wildlife habita personal property, and human life. BALLOT TITLE [3] Clearcut logging displaces thousands of forest products jot by requiring machine-intensive technologies and discouragin investment in highly skilled labor. [4] Chemical herbicide and pesticide use on forestlands Oregon is an ecologically destructive forest practice which unnec essarily puts humans,fish, and wildlife at risk of toxic exposun destroys the nutrient and organic content of forest soils, an RGttL�►T[fil threatens the health and safety of forest products workers. [5]Clearcutting and the use of chemical herbicides and pesticide RESULT OF``YES'°1ftT "Yen' s pp#a t�Cdt3t3r 1mbsr;' in forest operations has resulted in serious degradation of Oregon tivcst prtlCESS ►riC[rrd'rn f8rta1 F�ilptt, 6[gYVts €tiEtt-SUifi' surface and ground water supplies by increasing sedimentatic p #p {„ and turbidity,adversely altering the chemical composition of suc waters,introducing toxic pollutants,and killing aquatic organism; RESUI:`� �� r ttafrta � t ] s [6] Labor-intensive alternatives to herbicide and pesticide use c ncerrtrrt% r harv�ast Oregon's forestlands have and will continue to create thousanc SUMMA Prhrb�s e� ttr har+rt prctt :• of new job opportunities in ecologically sustainable fore; ctaerCriCat hettrre s,pe try f.tr rasf.,U—ifts«ixe of tfs 1h .' management. 00 bs hOMSted. Caufrs tk edr raf fCrtl;aitaticfs. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: tmp000$,rrsurr fiarvesi regu[atf Ir Ctudfng f dsr t,r 9afatit�rr f%r s s E Section I: Restriction of Clearcutting Herbicide and Pesticic rrtt ttfft +fts •rnthcads a)td,ttirt� Use on Oregon's Forestlands to rttaat nsw'requrrem , mss state to bit nevit Imes [1]That, in order to safeguard the long-term productivity of or rand i�lai8r quafrty p1af ftfti .fvnvrrorarrtrttaf 1?retst~tt+axr forests, maintain clean water, support viable populations of fis t? *stk � # rrltrrlg,tcsgtrtg.Auh�fl�8s �'' and wildlife, provide for biological diversity, protect econom ItttS,sutf8 t , ##tzr n �utstrPttan pl t1t3rtCtn4 opportunities available to forest dependent communities, an tTf maximize the labor and skills of our forest products workforce �TtN1A ? `F11�AtL lidt>G $ tra eus clearcutting shall no longer be a lawful forest practice on federe 11€tate�fb tcreas � ,tr y� #tis sstrYt� & �5 state,and private forestlands in Oregon. 6Qx':ttlrv8t [clj in Ott sntl Crst [2]That, in order to preserve the genetic diversity of native tre � rOit�r��sle �xn$ � �[ fb- species and to enhance the ecological health of Oregon's fores � s ( lands, it shall no longer be a lawful forest practice on federe G1C;bit stlt sttdllurtrtlats�f t�ctetse state, and private forestlands in Oregon to harvest a tree th; exceeds a measurement of 30 inches diameter at breast height c± tE3 t (tr1 Ifrttjtt fa$B [3]That,in order to maintain the productive potential of forest soi 8xpsnditurs rta � r i � and eliminate unnecessary risks to humans,fish,and wildlife froi ratec€�n,artt3"retJltprr,t�rt�ertcxeYafrfrs �� contamination of air,soils,and waters of the State, use of then ! ; rrfrrrttrr � t isrtr Ittllgctt F ical herbicides and pesticides on forestlands.shall no longer be ATE, ��sra �r �rrlgt rstttU C� lawful forest practice in Oregon. t#o ri+c eEf Pt1r t} �' t8t8 � {� - €�; [4] That, one year from enactment of this Act, the Board r3[tirr3fIra �� Qt �r pngg, slate Forestry shall, for each of the forest communities found in th eXstsftfesgf1,�� frlt #trett State of Oregon, prescribe a list of lawful timber harvestin methods which: a. do not involve clearcutting as defined by subsection (6) c drersase ?`.f7lr ff this Section. b.do not involve use of chemical herbicides or pesticides fc t8rer�uea� :�� {Cr ffit OrfYrt1�<�ri Sehtt t�?(y!#t regeneration of forest cover or protection of forest health. Cectarw # jry ,�� ptrhfst •tft tt�tet ', c.maintain or maximize development of sufficient numbers< dsCr?rse rn f1 # m prt�rtt111t3>1' hKk7f! Irttt�S, 3 , large, live trees, standing dead trees, and large, downed log in tlrrn �+{1l;ti n r Ut b i€ thth `taltt iab�lAC3 f=t d to provide habitat for species dependent upon the structun prit}oif;for ctlstrf[xrtfil 'f sC15 and compositional diversity such stands provide on at lea: 50%of each harvest unit. d.prohibit on-site burning of slashing. e.minimize the use of heavy equipment and roads to prever TEXT OF MEASURE soil compaction and erosion. MEASURE f.maximize the potential for natural regeneration of native tre species. AN ACT BEFORE THE PEOPLE OF OREGON g.maximize the replanting of a diversity of native tree specie: TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE, LABOR INTENSIVE FOREST h. encourage the use of highly skilled forest managemer PRACTICES AND PROTECT FOREST ECOSYSTEMS BY staff in planning, implementation, and monitoring of fore: RESTRICTING CLEARCUT LOGGING AND USE OF CHEMI- operations. CAL HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES ON FORESTLANDS OF No timber harvesting in Oregon shall, upon adoption of fin, THE STATE,AMENDING ORS 527.610-527.992. timber harvest methods by the Board, be inconsistent with suc methods. FINDINGS [5]That,until the Board prescribes lawful timber harvest practice [1]Clearcut logging in Oregon is an unsustainable forest practice, pursuant to subsection(4)of this Section,no timberland owner c incompatible with long-term forest productivity and detrimental to operator shall conduct timber harvest operations which result i fish, wildlife,water quality and the sustained yield of high-quality lands being cearcut on any acre of forestland in the State. wood products. 96 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 [6]That,for the purposes of this Act,clearcut shall be defined as: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT any harvest unit in western Oregon that leaves on any acre of the unit fewer than 70 well-distributed trees that measure at This measure amends Oregon law by imposing new restric- least 11 inches diameter at breast height or that leaves less tions on management of private,state and federal forest lands in than 120 square feet of basal area. In eastern Oregon, a Oregon.The principal requirements of the measure are: clearcut means any harvest unit which leaves on any acre of the unit fewer than 60 well-distributed trees that measure at Prohibits clearcutting as defined in this measure, which least 10 inches diameter at breast height or that leaves less requires leaving,on each acre in western Oregon, no fewer than 80 square feet of basal area.For the purposes of this sub- than 70 well-distributed trees of at least 11 inches in diame- section,no tree shall be counted unless the top one-third of the ter and 120 square feet of basal area,*and no fewer than 60 bole of the tree supports a green,live crown.For the purposes such well-distributed trees and 80 square feet of basal area* of computing basal area,trees larger than 20 inches diameter on each acre in eastern Oregon.A tree is not counted unless at breast height shall be considered 20 inch trees. the top one-third of the bole of the tree supports a green,live crown.Any tree that is more than 20 inches in diameter is [7]That, no timber harvest operation in the State shall be com- counted as a 20-inch tree for purposes of computing basal menced until filing of a notice and written plan.Notice and written area; plans shall document compliance with provisions of this Act, in addition to all other substantive requirements of law. • Prohibits the harvest of any trees more than 30 inches in [8]That, provisions of this Section shall supplement or replace, diameter;and where appropriate, requirements of the Oregon Forest Practices . Prohibits the use of chemical herbicides and other pesticides Act,ORS 527:610-527.770,527.990(1),527.992. for regeneration of forest cover or for protection of forest [9]That,for purposes of this Act,all waters of the State where tim- health. ber harvest occurs or could potentially occur shall be deemed navigable waters which,without the action proposed by this Act, In order to implement the measure,one year from enactment, cannot reasonably be expected to attain or maintain applicable the Board of Forestry is required to prescribe timber harvest water quality standards or the nonpoint source goals and require- methods that conform with the requirements noted above, and ments of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act[33 USC 1329]. that also: (a) provide habitat for species dependent on structural [10]That,requirements of this Section shall supplement Oregon's and compositional diversity on at least 50 percent of each harvest Water Quality Management Plan for nonpoint source water pollu- unit;(b) prohibit the on-site burning of slash; (c) minimize use of tion on forestlands provided in OAR Chapter 340,Division 41,and heavy equipment and roads; (d) maximize natural regeneration shall supplement the Best Management Practices identified by and replanting of a diversity of native tree species; and (e) the Board pursuant to ORS 527.765 for meeting water quality encourage the use of highly skilled forest management staff in standards set by the Federal Water Pollution Prevention Act, [33 planning, implementing and monitoring forest operations. U.S.C.1329]. The measure expands existing written plan requirements to all [11] That,-the Governor and State agencies shall promptly timber harvest operations. modify existing management programs to conform with the requirements of this Act, and shall promptly seek approval from For purposes of this measure, any waters of the state where the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection timber harvest occurs or could occur are deemed navigable Agency (EPA) for the modified nonpoint source water pollution waters, thereby subject to the water quality standards and program. requirements of the federal Water Pollution Control Act and the [12]That,prior to approval by the EPA Administrator,nothing shall federal Water Pollution Prevention Act. diminish the force and effect of the requirements of this Act. The state must modify its existing water quality management Section II:Severability programs to be consistent with this measure and request approval If any provision of this Act, or the application of that provision to of the modifications from the United States Environmental any person or circumstance, is held invalid,the remainder of this Protection Agency. Act, or the application of that provision to persons or circum- The measure allows any United States citizen to sue in state stances other than those as to which it is held invalid, is not court to enforce the requirements of the measure. The citizen affected thereby. plaintiff is not liable for attorney fees, damages, or penalties Section III:Citizen Suit Provision unless the court finds the action frivolous. If the citizen plaintiff prevails, the court is required to award attorney fees, expenses, Any citizen of the United States may bring suit in.State court to and any other costs and damages to the citizen plaintiff. enforce any provision of this Act,and shall not be liable for attor- ney *Basal area is the cross-sectional area of the tree 4.5 feet grounds fees, damages, any other financial penalties unless above the ground.For example,the cross-sectional area of an 11- grounds for the suit have been determined to be of a frivolous nature by the court of jurisdiction. Citizens who prevail in such inch tree is 0.66 square feet. suits shall be awarded attorney fees and any other damages or expenses incurred in the preparation of legal documents, expert Committee Members: Appointed by: testimony, participation in administrative appeals or other admin- Gary Kutcher Chief Petitioners istrative processes, and all other reasonable costs associated James Musumeci Chief Petitioners with necessary legal actions, as determined by the court of John Beuter Secretary of State jurisdiction. Howard Sohn Secretary of State Kathleen Beaufait Members of the Committee (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) 97 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR CONSERVE OREGON'S HERITAGE Over 100 Members of the U.S.Congress Vote YES on Ballot Measure 64! Want to Ban Clearcutting Sadly,Oregon continues to suffer from massive clearcutting of 5 U.S. Senators and over 100 U.S. Representatives support our native forests.Dozens of native species of fish,including coho legislation in the U.S. Congress, the Act to Save America's salmon and steelhead,may not survive the latest onslaught Forests,which would ban clearcutting on all the National Forests. of forest destruction. Senator RobertTorricell!,Congressional sponsor of the Act to A broad panel of scientists empowered to investigate threats to Save America's Forests wrote: native fish, plants and wildlife have called for an end to further "Roadbuilding and clear-cutting destroys the delicate fabric of destruction of Oregon's native forests and wildlife,Yet,clearcut- plant and animal life found in the forests.The devastating result is ting on private,state and federal forests in Oregon continues species extinction, soil erosion, flooding, declining water quality, at a drastic pace. and mudslides. In many states, the last runs of wild trout and There is a better way to manage Oregon's forests.Forward-think- salmon, so important to our recreational and commercial fishing ing Oregonians who care about conserving the beauty of Oregon, industries are also threatened, as are the last wild grizzly bears have shown that wood products can be produced without and 1,000 year-old Douglas fir trees. needlessly destroying our forests. "To stop this destruction and reestablish the priorities of the Foresters using SELECTIVE LOGGING have proven that we can Forest Service—from destroying the public's resources to pro- achieve a WIN-WIN SOLUTION by ECONOMICALLY PRODUC- tecting our natural forest resources—I have introduced the Act to ING FOREST PRODUCTS WHILE KEEPING OUR FORESTS Save America's Forests.This legislation would ban clear-cutting HEALTHY.They have learned to do so WITHOUT THE USE OF in all federally owned forests and prohibit all logging on 17 million DANGEROUS AND DESTRUCTIVE PRACTICES like clearcut- acres of Ancient Forests and other designated areas... ting or the use of toxic chemicals. "As the world's leader in protecting the environment, it is the Oregonians do NOT have to decide between jobs and the duty of the United States to set an example by preserving the last environment. This fall, Oregonians can choose to have vestiges of our historic forest resources.As one of the wealthiest forestry jobs AND healthy forests by voting YES on Ballot nations on earth, how can we call upon developing countries to Measure 64. preserve their rainforests when we cannot protect the last fraction of our own forest heritage?We should lead the world by example, By passing Measure 64, we can provide protection for clean d not embarrass ourselves with hypocrisy." (The Record, New drinking water, abundant fish and wildlife, unsurpassed recreational opportunities AND support a sustainable forest Jersey,July 13, 19 97 ) products industry.Oregon voters can choose to maintain--and To end clearcutting on our National Forests, tell your U.S. pass on to future generations--the quality of life that we cherish. Representative and U.S.Senators Ron Wyden and Gordon Smith We can promote safe jobs in the woods AND healthy forests to to SUPPORT THE ACT TO SAVE AMERICA'S FORESTS. work in. We can conserve and restore what we love best To end clearcutting in Oregon's forests, VOTE YES ON about Oregon--OUR NATIVE FORESTS! BALLOT 64. OREGONIANS CAN CONSERVE OREGON'S MAGNIFICENT The national coalition leading the campaign to pass the Act to OLD GROWTH FORESTS FOR OUR CHILDREN TO ENJOY. Save America's Forests is: Thousands of Oregonians helped put Measure 64 on the ballot. Save America's Forests We are tired of seeing hillside after hillside devastated by the 4 Library Court, SE outmoded practice of clearcut logging. We know that selective Washington, DC 20003 logging works. We know that in order for Oregon to avoid www.saveamericasforests.org massive soil erosion,mudslides and flooding,we must main- tain and restore our native forests. The Oregon organization promoting YES on BALLOT 64 is: Ballot Measure 64 allows Oregonians to place stronger require- OLIFE ments on logging and to prohibit outmoded forest practices, like 454 Willamette St.,#211 clearcutting. STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT SELECTIVE LOG- Eugene,OR 97401 GING PRODUCES MORE JOBS THAN CLEARCUTTING AND IS HEALTHIER FOR OREGON'S FORESTS AND WILDLIFE. (This information furnished by Carl Ross, Executive Director, Save America's Forests.) YOU CAN SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY AND HELP CONSERVE OREGON'S THREATENED AND ENDANGERED FISH AND WILDLIFE. Vote"YES"on Ballot Measure 64! (This information furnished by Gary A. Kutcher, Oregonians for Labor Intensive Forest Economics.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 98 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR HERBICIDES POLLUTE OUR WATER We need to be aware of the fact that we"all live downstream," How we manage our forest affects our water,health,fish,wildlife, and that chemical poisons we use in our forests eventually make air quality, flood and landslide prevention, recreation, and more. their way into our topsoil and drinking water and thus into All these are essentials of Life! our bodies. Already,according to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, over one half of Oregon's streams Our Northwest forests are some of the richest ecosystems in the are too polluted to support aquatic life!We can not afford to world--rich in what Robert Costanza and colleagues define as wait while the cumulative effects of these chemicals in our earth, "free ecologic services provided by nature," or"natural capital." water and bodies continues to take their toll. (Nature,magazine,5/15/97)The authors estimate the world value After an area has been clearcut, the replanting of trees is of these natural assets at 3 TRILLION DOLLARS, or twice the accompanied by the application of chemical herbicides to sup- gross world product.We tend to think that a dead tree is worth press competing vegetation.As soil erodes, these toxins enter more than a live one.It is not;deforestation is expensive. the watershed, streams and rivers,where they contribute to the For example, every time a log truck emerges from a clearcut, destruction of native fish.The chemical poisons become lodged in leaving an ugly scar on the land and silt in our waterways, the the topsoil of farms and hence in the foods that we eat.They also salmon are diminished. pollute our reservoirs, and thus our drinking water, since significant amounts of these chemicals evade the best Forests filter water, ancient forests most perfectly, saving mil- efforts of our water treatment systems. lions of dollars in treatment.Portland's Bull Run watershed has been protected by an Act of Congress for this reason. If these herbicides are dangerous, then why is their widespread When the assault of clearcutting is compounded by the shocking use allowed? Unfortunately, even after studies demonstrate that these substances are hazardous to humans, the Environmental abuse of herbicide"treatment,"water,fish animals and people Protection Agency still allows their use if the benefits of such use all stand to be sickened. Many of these herbicides can cause outweighs the"economic,social and environmental costs." cancer, birth defects, mutations, neurological damage, hormone disruption and/or contamination of breast milk. (Although DDT Forest Service studies have shown that manual methods of was banned in 1972, it was still found five years later in all 15100 managing competing vegetation are at least as effective as samples of breast milk tested in a 1977 EPA study. chemical means,are environmentally viable,and of course, There is no new water.It is continuously recycled through various provide jobs in our forests. stages of the hydrologic cycle. When groundwater is contami- If you place a frog in boiling water, it will immediately jump out.If, nated, it may never be cleaned up. Like our bloodstream, the however,the frog is put in cool water which is then slowly brought oceans, rivers and streams are Earth's arteries,veins and capil- to a boil,the frog will not notice the change and will remain until laries,carrying nourishment(and poison?)to every cell. it boils to death.Even though we as individuals may not notice personal symptoms of environmental poising, we can read When Secretary of State Phil Keisling was a reporter for the the early warning signs and save ourselves before it is to Willamette Week, he wrote a six-part expose of herbicide use in late. Oregon called "The Spraying of Oregon" (12/3//79 through 1/14/80)He concluded that the questionable safety of herbicides "Civilization exists by geological consent,subject to change with- rests with the politicians and the voters.This ballot Measure gives out notice" us a chance to assume that responsibility. --Will Durant Vote Yes on Measure 64! For life, (This information furnished by Gavin McComas,Sundance Natural Foods.) Barbara Kelley, Director Save Our ecoSystems, Inc.(SOS) (This information furnished by Barbara Kelley, Save Our ecoSystems (SOS).) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 99 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR MEASURE 64 STIMULATES ECONOMIC DIVERSITY PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY SUPPORT MEASURE 64 Has anyone calculated how many jobs would be gained by the passage of Measure 64?Oregon has already started to shift from Once a big family was given a farm.The Giver said,"Take care of a monolithic economy, dependent upon timber, to a healthier, this place and it will take care of you.' This farm had everything: more diverse economy.The economic picture shifts continually, fertile fields and forests,clear lakes and rivers.The people loved like a kaleidoscope, as some businesses fail and new ones start their farm, worked hard, and made a decent living.They fished, up. cut trees to build homes and boats, and planted crops, keeping Enterprising Oregonians have started and sustained businesses some fields and forests fallow--for the future. requiring an intact environment such as wilderness expeditions, Years went by. The times changed. Everything became faster. environmental camps,country inns and restaurants,wildlife pho- Cars, machines, communications, business. Everyone hurried. tography, river guiding,and more. The children's children were impatient and wanted gold.Now. Imagine the thrill of children from the inner city on seeing herons "Let us get our gold.Time is dead.There may be no future'"They feeding their young high in the trees or salmon spawning in a wild plowed all the fields.They cut all the trees,selling the cros and scenic river.They don't want to see our ugly clearcuts. logs to people far across the sea.They received gold.Weather became fickle--dust storms, floods and drought. Fields and Tourism is now Oregon's third largest industry and is closing forests that had held the soil and water in the ground were gone. in on second. The river ran muddy and fish died.The people went to the store Other related jobs on the increase:brush control to replace toxic with their gold but there was little food,fish,water or wood left. herbicides, the recycling of paper and the manufacture of recy- "Let us plant some food and trees;'they said,and they did.Seeds cled papers and paper products, greeting cards and calendars shriveled in the ground and the saplings were eaten by starving printed on recycled paper,the list goes on... animals. The grandchildren tried again. Floods washed their We are sure to hear that less clearcutting will mean less tax efforts away.Soon nothing was left to eat.Nothing was left to cut. money for education. It is bad policy that extracts funding for A little girl suggested,"Let's make gold soup...We have plenty of schools from clearcutting,selling our children's birthright(healthy that!" forests)to the highest bidder. Scientist Carl Sagan wrote. "It is perilous and foolhardy for the With Measure 64,selective logging will continue to fund edu- average citizen to remain ignorant about global warming,...ozone cation and will result in healthier,more sustainable forest. depletion, air pollution, toxic and radioactive wastes, acid rain, topsoil erosion,...deforestation,...How can we affect national pol- Another source:fundraising for schools could be the province of icy--or even make intelligent decisions in our own lives--if we don't non-profit organizations that would give tax write-offs for dona- grasp the underlying issues?" tions for education. Consider bettering our forest practices and returning more jobs to Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt reported that "fully a the forest. quarter of the world's wild mammals are now considered threatened with extinction:'He stated that we face"a looming Please vote YES on Measure 64, catastrophe of almost biblical proportions,"and that"habitat MG Hudson loss and degradation are primarily responsible of this threat:'(Internet, 10/3/96) (This information furnished by M. G. Hudson, Oregonians for Labor Additionally, nearly 34,000 ferns and seed producing species of Intensive Forest Economics.) plants now face extinction, according to the World Conservation Union. Ask any schoolchild if s/he wants her or his education supported by habitat destruction.Please vote for their futures,and ours. Vote YES on 64! For life, Barbara Kelley Save Our ecoSystems(SOS) (This information furnished by Barbara Kelley, Save Our ecoSystems (SOS).) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 100 1 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR NUCLEAR POWER We can not sit by and wait for the timber corporations to mod- DEVELOPED ify their practices.Our public lands are being cut,and 97%of the DURING THE 1950'S cutting is clearcutting.People are outraged and surprised when I DDT tell them state law requires that we leave only two trees standing USED EXTENSIVELY per acre. Many Oregonians are under the impression that DURING THE 1950'S clearcutting has stopped.Don't believe the lies. RAW INDUSTRIAL WASTE The timber corporations have alarmed forest product workers DUMPED INTO RIVERS by saying Measure 64 will put the timber industry out of business. DURING THE 1950'S On the contrary, Measure 64 is about sustainable forestry. Selective logging is labor intensive. While clearcutting provides BLACK AMERICANS only one job for every 550 acres, selective logging provides one DENIED CIVIL RIGHTS job per 25 acres. DURING THE 1950'S If we are going to acknowledge the importance of logging in our FEDERAL AID FOR NATIVE AMERICANS state's economy, we also need to acknowledge the damaging TERMINATED effects the practice of clearcutting has played. Deforestation is a DURING THE 1950'S key factor in the decline of wild native salmon in the Pacific HUNDREDS OF FISH-KILLING DAMS Northwest.Clearcutting is a major cause of soil erosion and tur- BUILT bidity, which in turn, cover and suffocate salmon eggs.Chemical DURING THE 19501S herbicides and pesticides in our watersheds are another major factor in the decline of our native fish. CLEARCUT LOGGING The timber corporations need to own up to their role in the loss DEVELOPED of 72,000 fishing jobs in this region, over the past 30 years. DURING THE 1950'S Clearly, the issue for the timber corporations is not sustainable CLEARCUTTING IS NOT jobs for Oregonians.The issue is cash to line their pocket books. STATE-OF-THE-ART If the timber corporations were truly concerned about the econ- FOREST SCIENCE omy of our state, they would voluntarily stop exporting our raw VOTE YES logs. They would voluntarily stop the clearcutting, in favor of ON BALLOT MEASURE 64 responsible, sustainable logging.They are not.It is our responsi- bility as the citizens of Oregon,to take control of our beautiful and (This information furnished by Richard I.Bowden, Oregonians for Labor valuable natural resources.Vote Yes on 64. Intensive Forest Economics.) (This information furnished by Jill Krymkowski.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) [The printing of this argument does not constitute�ran The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse t by the State of Oregon, nor does the stat ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the racy or truth of any statement made in the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 101 r Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR God's beauty is for sale in Oregon. Industrial logging has I support the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (Measure 64) become the norm, and God's forests pay the price. I have post- because I see that it is a way for us to get a message through to poned my personal goal of studying environmental law to fight for a timber industry that has been irresponsible in its forest practices Oregon's beautiful natural heritage; our forests and our fish.We and unresponsive to feedback to that effect.When corporations must all join in the fight to end the decimation of our land. work in our state,they have a responsibility to serve our commu- nity--not just their shareholders and customers.This state is our The Oregon Forest Practices Act was passed in 1971, before home, and when the timber industry is turning our forests into the advent of the scientific evidence linking landslides to irre- desert as well as eliminating good jobs(not only within the timber sponsible forest practices.This outdated legislation only requires industry itself, but also in the fishing and tourism industries) it is leaving two trees standing per acre,be they dead or alive.That's time for us to send a clear message of discontent and a specific it.Two trees.Appropriately, 94% of all landslides in Oregon are plan for reform. See for yourself that Measure 64 fits the bill on directly linked to this practice of clearcut logging. both counts. Measure 64 requires leaving 60-70 well-distributed trees per I have spent three and a half months going door to door organiz- acre.This will keep the root systems intact, holding,the soil in ing and raising thousands of dollars for Measure 64 and helping place, thereby relieving the conscience of the logging industry collect 99,420 signatures to get it on the ballot.I have seen first- for the adverse effects that landslides cause; i.e. human death hand that the issue of clearcutting is one of the most visible and destruction of private property.. Eroded soil covers salmon symptoms of what has happened to our community as we've lost eggs, ultimately suffocating them,and aiding in the decline of our touch with our responsibilities as stewards of the environment and fishing industry. leaders for social justice.We need to overcome the misinforma- Another important factor in the decline of Oregon's signature tion and reclaim these responsibilities to keep the short-sighted, fish is the indiscriminate use of herbicides and pesticides on our money-hungry few from destroying our lands and sabotaging the forested lands.These chemicals wind up in our streams,causing availability of decent,honorable work.We need to take a stand for salmon to move more sluggishly, making them more susceptible "speaking and having our voices heard. to predators. These chemicals have also been found in every It's been difficult to get the straight story on the effects of current watershed in Oregon.We drink those chemicals."Fewer than 10% logging practices, and harder to have dissenting feedback con- of the approximately 70,000 chemicals now in commercial use sidered seriously.l strongly encourage you to find out for yourself have been tested for their potential adverse effects on the ner- how we have been mislead,and then make some noise with let- vous system and only a handful have been evaluated thoroughly, ters to the editor, street art, and talking up the issue.Each of us according to the National Research Council"(Bodies in Protest: counts. Environmental Illness and the Struggle over Medical Knowledge, 1997).A healthy forest needs no chemical sprays.A healthy for- (This information furnished by Matthew Pffantzbaum.) est is not a Douglas Fir farm.A healthy forest needs no chemi- cals,and neither does a healthy person. Vote Yes on 64.It is the clearcut alternative. (This information furnished by Faith Baitland.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorsee printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 102 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The first time I saw a clearcut I was driving to the Oregon coast. BALLOT MEASURE 64 WILL HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON I was appalled at the destruction.The Pacific Northwest's richly THE ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT! diverse forests are being devastated by the irresponsible practice The Estimate of Financial Impact prepared by the State of Oregon of clearcut logging,creating big profits for the timber corporations for Ballot Measure 64 is inaccurate and incomplete.The State's with no regard for the effects everybody suffers. Clearcutting financial estimate makes the following unrealistic assumptions: depletes our soil,contributes to landslides,degrades water qual- ity with unsafe pesticides, and destroys habitats of endangered it grossly underestimates the rate of harvest under Measure species. 64 The timber corporations have not created sustainable employ- it fails to consider positive price effects that will add to State revenues ment for Oregon's timber workers. They blame environmental it fails to disclose cost savings associated with Measure 64's concerns for employment decline, when realistically more jobs improved forest practices are lost to raw log exports and the automation of new mills. ; it fails to account for productivity gains associated with According to the Oregon State Department of Employment, improved forest practices advances in technology cost a direct work force reduction of • it fails to account for increased income tax revenues result- 13,800 jobs from 1980 to 1988,while output grew by almost 20%. ing from more labor intensive forest practices produced by Some claim they work for forest health,when really they work for Measure 64 forest wealth. it fails to account for increases in tax revenues associated Another mistruth is that timber corporation's replant "forests" with higher rural property values and increased tourism after a clearcut.Timber corporations replace diverse forests with receipts from Measure 64 over planted monoculture Douglas Fir tree farms.A tree farm is Assumptions regarding the rate of harvest--There is no credi- not a forest;it is intended to be clearcut and replanted again and ble.basis for the Department of Forestry's assumptions that result again for maximum profit,yielding low quality wood.Overplanting in a predicted 60-65%reduction in harvest volume.With favorable forces as many as 900 trees per acre to compete for the nutrients prices, harvesters will simply increase the acreage selectively nature provided for 300 trees per acre.This depletes and over- logged to get equal timber volume. Revenues to Oregon works the soil, causing more erosion.Trees planted at the same schools and counties should remain about the same. time grow at the same rate, resulting in 100%canopy above the There is NO basis for the Department of Forestry's assumption forest,creating a biological desert on the forest floor where noth- that the measure prohibits thinning. Measure 64 actually pro- ing grows.This is not a forest.This is not a sustainable logging metes thinning and selective logging as alternatives to clear practice.This is profit. cuttina.The measure DOES NOT EXCLUDE"clumping"of leave Ballot measure 64 creates a sustainable forest through trees,leaving adequate small openings to facilitate natural regen- selective logging techniques. It insures the move to responsible eration of trees. logging, protecting the 3% remaining old growth, and bans the The State's analysis fails to account for significant cost say use of unsafe pesticides.This is not too much to ask. Enough inns associated with more responsible forest practices damage has been done at everyone's expense. required by Measure 64--Clearcutting passes on huge external- VOTE YES ON 64! ized costs to the public to restore the environmental damage to roadways, clean water supplies, watershed condition, and fish. (This information furnished by Jenn Rawling.) The worst stream conditions in Oregon are found in heavily logged areas,while the best stream conditions are in wilderness streams or lands using selective logging techniques like those required under Measure 64. The 1996 storms affected areas that have been subject to very high levels of logging and roadbuilding in recent decades,particu- larly the 1980s.The results of clearcutting have been devastating. Federal,state and county governments had to pay millions of dollars to clear roads of mudslides and debris from clearcuts. By eliminating clearcutting and chemical herbicide use,Measure 64 will significantly reduce expenditures by federal, state, and municipal agencies related to water quality management, fish- eries restoration, reservoir dredging, and other costs associated with repairing ecological damage.The State's economic analysis of Measure 64 completely overlooks these cost savings. Many individuals, municipalities and businesses suffered finan- cially because of clearcut landslides. For example, the city of Salem, also located in Oregon, had to spend $700,000 on tem- porary pretreatment facility, and $200,000 treating turbid water and implementing water-use restrictions when high levels of tur- bidity from cutover watersheds shut their water delivery down. Private industry suffered as well. Mitsubishi Corporation, which relies on pure water for its processes,spent over$2 million when the city's water system shut down. (This information furnished by John Talberth,Director,Forest Guardians.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 103 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OREGON:DEFENDING OUR LIBERTY The Oregon Sierra Club notes the following facts as reasons to Our children and grandchildren have a right to"life,liberty,and the vote for Measure 64: pursuit of happiness:'Does this not include clean air, pure water, Mudslides and landslides in early 1997 occurred mainly under and fertile soil? Healthy forests, rivers, and streams guarantee or in clearcut or overcut slopes. Those slides caused six essential rights for future generations of Americans. deaths, injured others, and caused millions of dollars in dam- age.Studies have pointed out that land is much more likely to How much longer will we allow the timber industry to steal our slide in areas overcut or clearcut. forests and watersheds at taxpayers' expense? A few corpora- tions and property owners are depriving us of our property rights: Clearcutting is allowable and commonly practiced by timber the right to sources of clean water, protection from flooding, and extraction corporations under current Oregon law on state and quality of life. And, the right to fishing, hunting, and camping in private lands. Oregon's living forests and wilderness. Clearcut slopes erode,the silt from them killing young salmon, A majority of Oregonians are paying for the profits of the corpo- damaging salmon streams, and threatening drinking water rate timber minority: supplies as well as diminishing the productivity of forest soils. –Paying with a decline in property values. Current Oregon forest law has not been upgraded or reformed –Paying with higher proportional taxes, landslide and flood in several decades. With knowledge gained about mud and insurance costs. landslides, declining salmon runs and a federal mandate to –Paying through lost fisheries and recreation, protect our salmon, and a need for clean, reliable drinking –And,sometimes,paying with their lives. water. Measure 64 is a good first step to accomplish these How much more desecration can we tolerate? Even the experts goals. cannot predict the probability (let alone the certainty) that our • Measure 64 is an initiative which proposes to reform existing species will survive current levels of environmental destruction. state forestry law. It is not a state constitutional amendment, and may be amended or changed by the state legislature.This LIKE BIG TOBACCO,BIG TIMBER HAS SOLD US A PACK OF is noteworthy as various economic objections to Measure 64 LIES have been noted, and some changes in this initiative may be They told us: necessary in the interest of economic justice and the continu- ing knowledge being gained from scientific monitoring of our –They would be forced out of business if we banned the wig- forest,streams,salmon populations,and quality of our drinking wam burner. water. –Logging has nothing to do with erosion,flooding or landslides. –They are planting six trees for every one that they cut. The Sierra Club has endorsed Measure 64 as its protections –Exporting raw logs is good for Oregon's economy. for Oregon's forests,salmon runs,drinking water,and human life –They are cutting sustainably. are timely and appropriate proposals in the public interest of all –It's a renewable resource. citizens of Oregon. –Clearcutting is necessary. (This information furnished by George B.Hutchinson,Oregon Sierra Club.) –They never cut and run. –They care about jobs. NONE OF THESE IS TRUE! Measure 64 is not perfect but it's a step in the right direction.We can always improve it later. We'll be back with another bill. A stronger bill. But if we fail to protect ourselves now from further devastation, we will lose something irreplaceable in the interim. We will lose another piece of our future. Save our constitutional rights, and the rights of our children.Vote yes on 64. (This information furnished by Tim Hermach,Native Forest Council.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitut=argument. The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon,nor does the sta ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 104 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR LOGGING PUBLIC LANDS DESTROYS WILDLIFE Weed tree?A weed is an unwanted plant in a garden or a field CLEARCUTS ALSO IMPACT RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES even if it tastes good or has beautiful flowers. Madrone or dog- In the Diamond Lake Ranger District of the Umpqua National wood or oak as weeds? A forest doesn't have weed trees Forest, 10,000 log trucks of public timber is being sold at bargain because it isn't a garden or a field.But the idea of weed tree does go with clearcutting,the deliberate destruction of forest. prices, much of it from Roadless Areas that Oregonians use.for recreation. The Umpqua National Forest is selling 48 million Clearcutting takes out everything.It strip mines the mountains board feet of timber(that's approximately 10,000 logging trucks) for trees— bulldozing, burning, poisoning. Just get out what is as part of the Upper North and Warm Springs Timber Sales. immediately wanted and clear the land for tree plantation. Not Similar,giant logging operations are going on across public lands reforesting, but tree plantationing—with all the hazards of a sin- in Oregon. gle species crop,and with the extermination of other species that mayor may not become wanted in the future. It devastates the This particular area contains numerous roadless areas over forest and the food web in the soil. It gets rid of the forest and 1,000 acres, in close proximity to one another.These roadless forest workers'jobs. It has produced immediate short term eco- areas are near the wilderness areas of the Oregon Cascade nomic gain for a few at the expense of the long term economic Recreation Area, Mt. Thielsen Wilderness, Mt. Bailey roadless and biological health of the rest of us. area and Crater Lake National Park, all popular recreation desti- nations in the Umpqua National Forest. One example.The Pacific Yew was a weed tree.The wood was If the Forest Service succeeds,every one of these small but sig- valued only by builders of wooden'yachts.They would try to sal- nificant roadless areas will be gone in just a few years.The two vage a tree or two before it was cut and burned as slash.Then proposals just released, Warm Springs and Upper North timber somebody found that the bark has a compound that is effective in s treating cancer. The frog was kissed. Pacific Yew, weed tree, ales, will log within the Upper Mountain Meadows, Calapooya Ridge, Dread and Terror Ridge, and White Mule Creek roadless became a valuable resource. Lesson: Forests have frogs. Clearcuts don't. areas. Logging will occur right over two recreational hiking trails, trail Measure 64 will change the way forest products are obtained #1461 on Dread and Terror ridge, and trail #1442 that climbs up and used so that Oregon's forest will again become a selectively the Calapooya ridge.Another area will be logged next to the North cut, living mix that will preserve forests, jobs, and health. It will Umpqua hiking trail,the most popular trail on the forest. extend to forest lands the provisions of existing federal and state water quality laws that have been applied to urban,industrial,and Both Warm Springs and Upper North timber sales log within farm land for decades to protect water quality there and for down- Critical Habitat for the Northern Spotted Owl,effecting numerous stream users.It will make a better life for all Oregonians. owl nesting sites. The sales will also degrade habitat for the Vote yes on measure 64.Your grandchildren will thank you. American Martin and Pileated Woodpeckers,indicator species for old-growth habitat. But what the Forest Service doesn't want to (This information furnished by Colin King, Corvallis Organic Gardening admit is the impact on the Wolverine. Club.) The wolverine is a very rare, State of Oregon Threatened Species, and VERY SENSITIVE TO HUMAN DISTURBANCE.In the winter of 1997,a Wolverine den was discovered within the Mt. Thielsen wilderness, next to the timber sale project areas. On March 23, 1998, an Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Biologist, wrote:"This is the second year of helicopter den sur- vet's for wolverine on the Umpqua National Forest. Last year we were successful in locating tracks and a den in the Mt.Thielsen Wilderness the first week in March....This year we found wolver- ine type tracks but no den was located..." However, "just west/northwest of Mt.Thielsen"tracks were discovered, and the biologists were "sure they were wolverine:' The entire Warm Springs timber sale area is likely within the home range of this wolverine. This is the beginning of the end for these rare roadless areas and the many species of wildlife that live there.These are PUBLIC LANDS PLANNED FOR CLEARCUTTING.These pristine lands are likely to be completely logged within just a couple of decades. IT'S TIME TO PROTECT THE LAST OF OUR SCENIC LANDS AND THE WILDLIFE THAT DEPEND ON THEM FOR HABITAT. CONSERVE OREGON'S FORESTS AND WILDLIFE! VOTE"YES"ON MEASURE 64! (This information furnished by Matthew Watkins, Oregonians for Labor Intensive Forest Economics.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 105 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide.Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Each year our summer vacation takes us to a lake for a few The Green Party of Oregon supports and endorses Ballot days of living by the fire,of watching the wild birds and of paddling Measure#64. across the still water at dawn.How full of life is the lake:trout leap This ballot measure will help guarantee a future for our for insects,osprey hover and dive for fish,fishermen and women forests,and the forest industry. cast in the falling light of dusk.Reassuring is the great blue heron, prehistoric and majestic, in its flight over the marshes. We The present timber harvest practices are contributing to the Oregonians seek nature as an unguent to our plastic lives extinction of the logging industry itself, as well as a multitude of ; whether it is hiking in a wilderness area,strolling in the city park species, including salmon, the contamination of our drinking or planting in our backyard garden. water, and the destruction of ancient forests which have been Traveling through Oregon also requires passage through some evolving for thousands of years. For too long short-term profit of the most ruined and blasted landscapes in the country.That gains for the logging industry have outweighed long-term effects these lands are public or private does not matter.The practice of for us all. clearcutting uniformly scars and wounds the land from which 1 A well researched and comprehensive sustainable system must avert my eyes, like the sight of a maggot-filled gash on a needs to be implemented and we believe measure 64 is that dying dog. Recently a family from France vacationing in the system. United States asked me what was this scene? Had there been a violent, catastrophic storm? This couldn't have been wrought Clear-cutting and chemical spraying destroys our quality of life as intentionally? A clearcut does startle the sensibilities when eco- well as the forest creatures lives. Destroying the last and most nomics aren't the driving mentality magnificent ancient forests in our country is akin to killing our- selves.The diversity of life in the old-growth forests is astounding It is my hope, if this bill passes,the non-toxic,environmentally and of boundless benefit to us.A single tree in the ancient forest sound program will replicate what I have seen in places like may shelter as many as 1,500 invertebrates.These forests may Vermont,where you can drive hours at a time and never see one hold the clue to an important scientific discovery because of the hillside stripped for the timber harvest. Forest land is more than vast storehouse of genetic information that have evolved for mil- tree farms.A forest is an ecosystem providing habitat for birds, lions of years.They also help regulate the earth's climate and pro- insects, mammals - the web of mutual dependence that is life tect watersheds. itself.The land sustains us in so many ways.It provides food,shel- ter and recreation, yes, but it revives and teaches us as well. It A single acre of temperate forest gives off more than 6 tons lives in our consciousness as what we are truly part of. Let of oxygen every year.Common sense tells us it's important selective cutting and it's valuable,life sustaining properties be the to save these forests from destruction. foundation for the next century of Oregon history. Time is of the essence. Don't expect the legislators to come up (This information furnished by Kimberly Kauffman.) with a sustainable plan.There is too much pressure from the log- ging industry. Sustainable forestry is profitable, and is the only way to ensure a future for us and for the forest products industry. The time is now.Help save Oregon's beautiful forest and our qual- ity of life! Beware of slick ads with misinformation against this measure! Listen to your heart and do what's right. Vote YES on 64! (This information furnished by Pam Driscoll,Green Party of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 106 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The word"PROFIT"has been replaced by the word"GREED". CLEARCUTTING IS BAD FOR RECREATION AND TOURISM. Big business keeps getting bigger and it's"GREEDY NEED FOR SUPPORT BALLOT MEASURE 64 FOR HEALTHY FORESTS "MORE" is ever expanding. When will it end? Just when is AND A HEALTHY ECONOMY enough? Is it necessary to destroy everything to make a buck?...forests, animals, birds, plant life, water ways, our Tourism employs more people than does the timber industry. In health....just so some'OUT OF FOCUS GREEDY GROUP'can 1996 travelers in Oregon spent over $4.5 billion, a 36% keep expanding it's need for "MORE'? MORE MONEY, MORE increase since 1991. Although Oregon ranks just 30th among POWER........MORE, MORE,MORE. the 50 states in state park acreage,Oregon ranks fifth nationally And so, after it's all over and the"GREEDY ONES"die what in day-use attendance at state parks.Also,the number of out-of- can they take with them?(nothing)On the other hand when they state visitors has increased 46%since 1991,and Oregon has the die what will they leave?(something?) It apparently doesn't mat- highest ratio of visitors per state park acre.We don't need more ter that they will leave a planet in very serious trouble.A planet clearcuts,we need more parks and recreation opportunities. that, with intelligent careful planning, could have supported the It's been estimated that by the year 2000, hunting, fishing, and 'PROFIT'necessary for the needs of the ever expanding popula- recreation will provide 32 times more revenue and 37 times more tion...But it cannot support the "GREED".!!! Wake up......Grow jobs in national forests than logging will. Yet logging takes a up......Pull your act together! Look up the words"SHARE,CARE, larger share of federal expenditures! ENOUGH, PATIENCE, RESPECT, HONOR, HONESTY (ESPE- CIALLY HONESTY) in the Dictionary. At the same time that unprecedented numbers of people want to experience wilderness, wilderness is shrinking. Currently, in Remember...........ONLY A MAD DOG WOULD FOUL IT'S Oregon, less than 5% of our old growth forests are still OWN BED"And since we only have ONE planet to foul.....THEN standing, approximately half of what we had 10 years ago. WHAT? The devastation continues daily as logging companies are subsi- (This information furnished by Doak Roberts, Oregonians for Labor dized by taxpayer money to clearcut public lands. Intensive Forest Economics.) Each year,the U.S.Forest Service loses hundreds of millions of dollars in its timber program. Not only are trees being sold below cost, but also the Forest Service typically reimburses timber companies for building logging roads.Let's stop these tax- payer subsidies for wealthy corporations. According to a 1995 study by Voice of the Environment(VOTE), "More than$100 million worth of public's trees are stolen every year.Yet despite repeated reprimands from Congress,the glare of negative press and an out cry from the environmental community, the Forest Service has failed miserably to reduce timber theft, according to several U.S.Forest Service employees" THE COMBINATION OF TIMBER THEFT AND CLEARCUTTING IS NOT ONLY DESTROYING OREGON'S FORESTS, IT IS ALSO THREATENING VITAL INDUSTRIES--LIKE TOURISM, RECREATION AND FISHING--AT THE COST OF TAXPAYERS MONEY. Measure 64 will insure the health of our forests, the pros- perity of the industries dependent on our natural resources and a future with old growth forests for everyone to enjoy. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 64! (This information furnished by Trisha Dehen, Oregonians for Labor Intensive Forest Economics.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 107 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Position of the Oregon Society of American Foresters My family has managed forestland in southern Oregon since the Ballot Measure 64 mid 1940s using selective cutting on a'sustained-yield basis. The Oregon Society of American Foresters strongly opposes These 48,000 acres in the Lakeview area have recently been Measure 64.It is unneeded,excessive and,in large part,con- audited by the leading international forest overview agency trary to the interests of Oregonians. (Scientific Certification Systems) and are certified as a well- managed forest.Along with other serious flaws,ballot measure 64 The 1,200 Oregon Society of American Foresters members doesn't have the flexibility for the wide variety of forestlands in the include the field foresters, researchers, administrators and edu- state and is incompatible with the independent audit process. cators who help manage the 29.5 million acres of public and Clearcut doesn't mean what you think: The meaning of the private forests in Oregon.We work for federal,state or local gov- word clearcut as defined in this measure is very different from the ernments;for universities;for small and large landowners;and for one commonly understood. Most people visualize a clearcut as small business and large corporations.We hold a variety of pro- an area of land mostly or entirely cleared of trees.According to fessional viewpoints,but our opposition to Measure 64 is virtually subsection 6 of this measure, an acre of land west of the unanimous. Cascades having 69 trees greater than 11 inches in diameter is We oppose Measure 64 because it: considered a clearcut.East of the Cascades it's 59 trees greater than 10 inches in diameter. In practice, acreage with even more • Prescribes only one management regime for all forests.The trees can fall into this category because of the basal (cross- science of forestry requires a wide range of options•for sectional) area requirements. There are areas of forestland in managing forests in order to meet the varied objectives of Oregon where the soil and climate won't support the minimum landowners, society's need for wood products, wildlife habitat density required by this measure,yet such land can still ecologi- requirements and a healthy environment. cally yield timber in smaller quantities. • Takes away all incentive to invest in forestry. Sustainable Trained forester judgment is lost: The east- and west-side forestry must be a forestry that is economically viable, stocking levels, as defined in section 6, are arbitrary.The forest ecologically feasible,and socially acceptable. density supportable on an acre of land is dependent on soil type • Dramatically reduces the productivity of Oregon's forests, and quality, terrain, micro-climate, and tree specie mix. Only by whether measured by timber output or species diversity and understanding the specific characteristics of a location can a does not sustain forests in the long term. trained forester determine how best to manage it for biodiversity and timber production. It is senseless to lump all the land in the • Restricts the natural resource professional's ability to manage state into two categories because doing that ignores the variety for healthy and productive ecosystems. The single manage- and diversity of Oregon's many forests. ment regime proposed does not recognize that ecosystems are dynamic and varied, not homogenous. (continued) The Oregon Society of American Foresters believes that (This information furnished by Truman Collins Jr.,Collins Pine Company.) active professional management of Oregon's forests can produce the forest products,fish,wildlife, clean water, and healthy environment that Oregonians desire. Measure 64 Is an irresponsible and excessive proposal that moves Oregon away from,not toward,sustainable forestry practices. For more information, contact us at http://www.forestryorg or at 4033 SW Canyon Road, Portland,OR 97221. (This information furnished by Julie Stangell, Chair, Oregon Society of American Foresters.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 108 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Incentive to cut larger trees:Measure 64 bans cutting trees 30 Measure 64 is bad for Oregon's forests. This measure is not inches or larger in diameter.It also disallows counting trees larger designed to enhance the sustainability of Oregon's forest.This than 20 inches for their full basal area.This will result in an incen- measure will not lead to healthy forest ecosystems. It will only tive to cut trees after they reach 20 inches but before they reach take the care and nurturing of our forests from scientists and 30 even if it is to the benefit of both the ecosystem and the trained professional foresters and transfer it into the court system. landowner to let them grow. Forests are unique,no two are alike.Many have differences which Punishes environmentally responsible landowners: This can be quite apparent or quite subtle.Differences in soils,species measure applies to privately owned land as well as public. It is mix, topography, and climatic conditions can have varying unfair to outlaw the harvest of any tree over 30 inches because it degrees of impact upon any forest. It takes trained, experienced penalizes those who have managed their land ecologically. professionals to scientifically analyze conditions within any forest Modern environmental forestry practice, particularly in pine to determine how it should be managed. Sustainable forestry is forests,involves harvesting trees as they reach old age when they the goal,the methods used to achieve that goal must be based are often over this size limit.If this measure passes,ecologically upon scientific analysis,not legislation.Arbitrary standards ignore motivated landowners will have that investment taken away from the uniqueness and individual characteristics of a forest. The them and will be discouraged from letting trees age in the future. number of trees required for a sustainable forest on one acre may Applicable areas not clearly defined: Although required tree be decidedly different on another. Sound science should deter- density per acre is clearly spelled out, how the boundaries of an mine this, not legislation. acre are determined is not.There are many ways to partition an Measure 64 does not allow the flexibility to properly care for the irregular piece of land into acre-sized chunks.Since this measure forest.A case in point would be when a forest is attacked by a bug provides for lawsuits against owners not following its require- infestation.A landowner, attempting to stop bug damage by har- ments, it is important that they be able to determine if they are vesting the affected trees(as a surgeon might perform surgery to in compliance. Even if clarified, all the trees in an area would remove a cancer to save a life)could end up with fewer trees than have to be measured before any could be cut, resulting in time- prescribed in Measure 64,thus violating the law and risking loss consuming,unnecessary work. of the forest.Sound science should determine what the landowner Labor and safety problems:Measure 64 suggests that its pas- does,not legislation. sage would effect an increase in skilled labor due to a reduction Measure 64 is not good for the people nor the forests of Oregon. in automation. The reverse is likely true along with a marked It will not insure proper forest management,it will only add more decrease in safety.Before the availability of machinery, maiming regulation.Keep the care of the forests the responsibility of prop- injuries were relatively common among workers preparing logs for erly trained resource professionals.Use science,not legislation to transport.While it may seem appealing to employ more people conserve Oregon's precious forest resource. and use fewer machines,it would be more costly and more work- ers would be put at risk for injury. (This information furnished by Truman Collins Jr.,Collins Pine Company.) (This information furnished by Lee Fledderjohann,Forester;Ken Kendrick, Forester.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 109 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE The Former Deans Committee Oregon Women for Agriculture is an all-volunteer group of We believe some provisions of Measure 64 raise serious Oregonians dedicated to educating ourselves and the public issues under the Supremacy Clause of the United States about the value of farming and ranching to the economy and the Constitution.States are limited by the United States Constitution environment., from enacting laws in conflict with Federal laws.This Measure We strongly oppose Measure 64,the Anti-Logging measure on pertains to forest practices and water quality standards on a state the November 1998 ballot for the following reasons: wide basis. 1.The measure is an attempt at micro management that has To the extent Measure 64 changes,limits,or attempts to super- sede federal laws pertaining to the forest practices on Federal no place in public policy or state law. Its forest management lands and water quality standards, the measure may not be provisions and requirements do not constitute responsible stewardship of the land and forests. enforceable under the United States Constitution. 2. The unsound forestry practices outlined in the measure Additionally, Measure 64 is broadly worded, and the precise would actually cause harm to our forests. application of the measure would have to await court action.Thus, we believe the application of this Measure would be unpre- 3.The measure's requirements clearly constitute a taking of dictable. If this Measure passed there would be substantial private property with no compensation. litigation concerning the constitutionality of the Measure. 4.The measure, if approved,would devastate the Oregon tim- We provide this information to help fellow voters in under- ber industry,decrease school funding and cause serious dam- standing this measure. Our comments are designed gnly to age to all other segments of the Oregon economy. provide objective and careful constitutional analysis of the mea- sure.Collectively we take no position on the other merits of this 5.The measure,if approved,would further damage timber fam- measure. ilies by taking away their right to,log timber from family-owned lands. Prof.Leroy Tornquist(Chair), Former Dean Willamette College of Law We believe, and history shows, that free markets and protec- Rennard Strickland, Dean University of Oregon Law School tion of private property rights are the best way to preserve our Prof.Robert Misner, Former Dean Willamette College of Law land and forests. Prof. Emeritus Chapin Clark, Former Dean University of Oregon We believe that our land and forests are best managed by Law School those who are trained in forest and land management and whose Prof. Maury Holland, Former Dean University of Oregon Law livelihoods depend on that management. School Robert Ackerman, Dean Willamette College of Law We urge voters to vote no on this radical, unworkable, expen- David Frohnmayer, Former Dean University of. Oregon Law sive,and useless measure. School OREGON WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE (This information furnished by Bob Cannon,Treasurer,The Former Deans Working together to communicate the story of today's agriculture. Committee.) P.O.Box 481 -Dayton Oregon 97114-503-243-FARM (243-3276) (This information furnished by Jo McIntyre,Oregon Women for Agriculture.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the.argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 110 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures • Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION The Oregon State Grange Asks You to Vote Measure 64 will take away the incentive to invest in sustain- NO on Measure 64 able forest management on private lands. The Oregon State Grange is the largest grassroots, rural-based In 1921,David T.Mason opened one of the first Pacific Northwest fraternal organization in Oregon and has been active in protecting forestry consulting firms. He became an early and vigorous Oregon for 125 years. proponent of sustainable forest management. At his urging, a Grange members have always advocated good stewardship of number of far-sighted private timberland owners made long-term our natural resources. However, Grangers recognize that good investments to ensure that Oregonians would enjoy the benefits stewardship includes the wise use of our renewable resources, of a second generation of productive forests. such as our forests. Forest investments differ from other investments in that they typi- Measure 64 is Bad Management for Oregon's Forests cally take a very long time to mature. A decision to plant new trees,for example, means investing money today that will not be Every year, Oregon landowners spend millions of dollars in repaid for fifty years. Long-term forestry investments on private improving the health of their forest and woodlands. Habitat for property only make sense if the landowner has some certainty wildlife is created and maintained,watersheds are protected,and that the timber will be available for harvest when it matures. By our economy benefits.Measure 64 will end these benefits. limiting future timber management opportunities, Measure 64 O removes that certainty, and private timberland owners will have Oregon already has some of the strongest laws in the Nation on no incentive to make the investments needed to support sustain- forest management practices. Measure 64 will remove many of able forest management. the benefits of these existing laws. In short,Measure 64 would take away the economic certainty,the Measure 64 is Poor Stewardship of Our Forests management flexibility and the financial incentives required to Federal and State Forests will be affected by Measure.64,and so practice sustainable forest management. will all private forests and woodlands regardless of size. Seventy-seven years after David T. Mason first began practicing Oregonians have depended on our forests for recreation,building forestry, we at Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. remain proud advo- materials,and jobs. cates of sustainable, scientific forest management.We will vote Measure 64 will stop us from protecting our Oregon forests for our NO on Measure 64, and urge you to do the same. children.The future of Oregon requires common sense protection (This information furnished by Glenn A.Zane,Mark L.Rasmussen,David of our natural resources,not radical measures. R.Cox,Kenneth M.vroman,Bradford R.Seaberg;Mason,Bruce&Girard, Measure 64 Will Hurt Oregon Inc.) Read Measure 64 and you will agree with the 24,000 plus mem- bers of the Oregon State Grange and vote"NO"on Measure 64. (This information furnished by Edward L.Luttrell,Oregon State Grange.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 111 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION VOTE NO ON MEASURE 64 Ed Schroeder Measure 64 is an attempt by radical extremists to destroy the Oregon State Forester,retired wood products industry of Oregon.Measure 64 means more lost Chief Forester,Tillamook Burn jobs and poor forest health.Here's why: Rehabilitation Project Measure 64 is more than a ban on clearcutting, it's a ban on I've devoted my life to improving Oregon's forestlands and I'm almost all timber harvesting in Oregon proud of the role I played as State Forester overseeing the restora- tion of the Tillamook Burn,Oregon's most catastrophic wildfire.We • No tree over 30 inches in diameter could be cut, even if it's mobilized an entire generation of young Oregonians to embrace dead. the forests.We all can be proud of our accomplishment. • On average,no tree could be cut if it is further than 25 feet from That's why I'm urging you to join me in'voting NO on Measure another tree. 64• Measure 64 will keep private property owners from logging even Measure 64 poses a serious threat to the health of Oregon's one acre forests and our economy.Harvest reductions caused by the mea- sure would cost 28,000 Oregonians their timber industry • The ban applies equally to both public and private lands jobs–nearly half of all those employed in the industry today.It is regardless of how small the acreage. poor forest management that would undo all the good things the • The ban will cost Oregon's private landowners $1.93 billion a people of Oregon have done over the years. year in lost income and property value. One reason I am gravely concerned about Measure 64 is its ban Measure 64 will cripple Oregon's economy on cutting any tree in the state that is over 30 inches in diameter, even if it is diseased or dead.It would impose a single statewide • Timber harvests in Oregon will drop more than 60 percent. forestry formula,ignoring Oregon's tremendous diversity of sites, . • At least 28,000 Oregonians will lose their jobs. soils and conditions. • The cost to Oregon's economy will exceed$1.6 billion a year. Measure 64 would take forest practices out of the hands of scientists,professional foresters and wildlife biologists and Measure 64 bans the use of pesticides for any reason put them in the hands of bureaucrats and the courts. • Oregonians will not be able to use pesticides in their forests In the name of banning clear cutting, Measure 64 actually bans even if there is a major epidemic of disease or insects - no much more. exceptions. It would ban the use of pesticides–even in cases of major forest • Wild fires will increase with more dead and dying trees to feed epidemics or insect attacks.Tragically,it would allow forests to be on. devoured by insects that eat and kill trees, or destroyed by dis- Measure 64 will rob landowners of their private property rights eases that can be controlled. Moreover, banning the harvest of dead trees and brush-clearing pesticides would increase the size • All rivers and streams within forests,even streams that only run and intensity of wildfires. a few months out of the year,will be open to the public regard- The Tillamook Burn taught an earlier generation the price Oregon less of their location on private property. pays for poor forest management that increases fire danger. Measure 64 will encourage endless lawsuits against private Measure 64 is a virtual ban on all timber harvesting. More than landowners 28,000 forest industry workers – men and women who have • Everyone is encouraged to sue private landowners for any rea- devoted their lives to nurturing and protecting Oregon's forest– son because they will be immune from paying attorney fees or would lose their jobs.Families who carefully have managed their damages if they lose. forest lands for generations would suddenly be left with nothing. • Private landowners have no similar protection and will have to That's not good for our forest lands and certainly not good for our pay attorney fees and damages if a lawsuit is successful. state.For the sake of Oregon's forests,I urge you to vote NO Measure 64 is bad for Oregon's citizens and bad for Oregon's on Measure 64. environment (This information furnished by Ed Schroeder.) (This information furnished by Brad J.Harper, State Coordinator&Legal Counsel,Oregon Lands Coalition.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 112 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION The Oregon Small Woodlands Association is a non-profit organi- Iry Fletcher zation with thousands of private landowner members who own Oregon AFUCIO and manage small tracts of forestland in Oregon. We strongly As representatives of Oregon's working men and women, the urge a NO vote on Measure 64. Oregon AFUCIO strongly encourages you to vote NO on According to the Oregon State University Extension Service,43% Measure 64. of private forestland in Oregon is owned not by the big tim- Measure 64 is an extreme initiative that would hurt our economy ber corporations, but instead by 166,000 individual private and threaten the health of Oregon forests.It would hurt the work- family woodland owners. ing families of this state by taking away tens of thousands of jobs. Measure 64 is simply too extreme.It's not just a ban on clearcut- Measure 64 actually is a ban on almost all timber harvesting in ting. It's actually a ban on almost all timber harvesting in Oregon,not just clearcutting. Oregon. Measure 64 will destroy the life-long investments and savings of thousands of small private woodland owners in Under the measure, state officials estimate harvests in western Oregon. Oregon would be cut by 60 percent. In eastern Oregon, harvest After years of investing in their property—working hard to plant would drop by 65 percent. trees,enhance wildlife habitat and protect water quality,Measure These harvest reductions would cost more than 28,000 64 would make it impossible for family woodland owners to Oregonians their forest industry jobs. manage their own private property—wiping out decades of per sonal sacrifice and hard work. As a result of Measure 64, the economic struggles rural Oregon has been enduring for much of the past decade would get even Measure 64 would allow outsiders to dictate what Oregon worse.Since 1980,213 sawmills and panel plants in Oregon have landowners can and cannot do on their own private property. been closed permanently. If Measure 64 passes, even more Measure 64 invites and encourages any person in the United would close. States to file lawsuits against private family forestland owners. It The men and women who have devoted their lives to protecting makes it easy for those who sue to collect.But even if an Oregon and nurturing Oregon's forests would be left jobless. small private woodland owner wins in court, that family likely would not be reimbursed even for their defense costs. That's But the consequences of Measure 64 would be felt in every wrong!That's unfair. community. Experts estimate the measure would cost Oregon's economy$1.6 billion dollars per year in lost payroll alone.That's While we believe initial assessments are far too low—state money that will no longer be circulated at grocery stores, shop- officials estimate harvests in Oregon will be reduced by a ping centers or gas stations. Some families would miss their massive 60%to 65%.That's too extreme.The measure 64 bullet mortgage payments and risk losing their homes. shot at the timber industry by extreme preservationists will mor- tally wound tens of thousands of Oregon small woodland owner Unfortunately, the economic devastation caused by Measure 64 families. also would force many of Oregon's working families to pack up and move somewhere else in hopes of putting their lives back The Oregon Small Woodlands Association urges you to vote together. NO on Ballot Measure 64. Measure 64 takes forestry practices out of the hands of scientists, John Rounds, President professional foresters and wildlife biologists and puts them in the Oregon Small Woodlands Association hands of bureaucrats. Under the measure, pesticides could not ever be used in Oregon forests, even in times of a major insect (This information furnished by John Rounds, President, Oregon Small epidemic.This would threaten the health of Oregon forestlands. Woodlands Association.) The consequences of Measure 64 are extreme.It would ruin the lives of tens of thousands of working men and women and hurt the state's economy.Vote NO on Measure 64. (This information furnished by Irvin H. Fletcher, President, Oregon AFL- CIO.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 113 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet-Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Measure 64 directly attacks Oregon's economy, school funding John Rossner–Farmer and President and the livelihood of thousands of men and women. Oregon Farm Bureau The proponents of this ill-conceived measure obviously have no More than 100,000 families in Oregon own forest lands and idea or care about forest science.They apparently don't care that Measure 64 could change their lives. Measure 64 would have a terrible impact on the health of please vote NO on Measure 64. Oregon's forests and would reduce funding for education by$42 million a year. Measure 64 takes away from private landowners their rights Measure 64 basically is a ban on almost all timber harvesting in to cut and sell trees they have been growing on their land for Oregon, not just clearcutting. It virtually would put the entire decades. forest industry out of business.A state analysis determined that The measure would prohibit these families from ever harvesting harvests in western Oregon would be reduced by 60 percent. most of their timber which would cost them$1.93 billion a year Harvests in eastern Oregon would be cut by 65 percent ... and and cost Oregon's economy $1.6 billion a year in lost per- that's just a beginning. sonal income.Taking personal property without compensation is Those harvest reductions caused by Measure 64 would wrong, cause more than 28,000 Oregonians to lose their forest They have worked hard to tend their forests and keep them industry jobs.This measure impacts all of Oregon, particu- healthy.For many families the forests are their life blood.For oth- larly rural Oregon. ers,they are savings for college or retirement. The statistics are staggering. Measure 64 would cost Oregon's Measure 64 ignores the good forest practices already in economy$1.6 billion per year in lost income.State officials esti place.We are already protecting Oregon's forests with stringent mate state and local governments -- including schools -- would laws through Oregon's Forest Practices Act.Banning responsible lose$74 million per year in tax revenue.That doesn't include the forest practices risks harming the health and productivity of our income taxes that would be lost. forests. The ripple effect of this measure also will negatively affect the Oregon forests would be in danger if Measure 64 passed.It takes broad business community and all who are employed therein. forestry practices out of the hands of scientists, professional Under the measure,an additional 31,000 Oregon jobs outside the foresters and wildlife biologists and puts them in the hands of forest industry would be lost. For example: banking, insurance, bureaucrats and the courts. auto sales, retailing, communications, and manufacturers, all Pesticide use would be completely would be hit hard by Measure 64. P Y banned even in the case of a major infestation in which bugs are killing the forests. This measure richly deserves a strong NO on 64 vote from all voters throughout the state. Banning pesticides would increase the risk of wild fires.Dead and diseased trees couldn't be harvested and slash from harvests Submitted by: couldn't be burned on site.These factors increase the danger of Richard M.Butrick forest fires by increasing fuel loading. In addition, the dramatic President reduction in timber harvest revenues sharply reduces funding that Associated Oregon Industries landowners pay for fighting forest fires. As if the loss of control of their land wasn't enough, Measure 64 (This information furnished by Richard M.Butrick, President,Associated actually encourages activists to file enforcement suits. Anyone, Oregon Industries.) anywhere in the United States could bring a suit against a private land owner to enforce the measure and would not have to pay attorney fees – even if he or she loses. It's unfair and it's lopsided. Measure 64 is unnecessary and has no benefit for Oregon. Vote NO on Measure 64. (This information furnished by John Rossner, President, Oregon Farm Bureau.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 114 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Neil Goldschmidt Governor Vic Atiyeh Former Governor I am concerned about the impact Measure 64 would have on our As governor I worked to restore Oregon's fisheries and to keep state.I urge you to vote NO. Oregon's forest lands healthy.Creation of the watershed enhance- Measure 64 has serious economic consequences for ment program, support for the volunteer led Salmon Trout Oregon.State officials estimate Measure 64 would force harvest Enhancement Program, passage of a new State Forestry Act reductions of 60 percent in western Oregon and 65 percent east mandating improved logging practices near streams and rivers of the Cascades. were all things I was proud to have a part in. I was just as proud of our effort, by overwhelming statewide The dramatic drop in harvests would cause more the 28,000 ballot, to stop exporting logs from state owned lands to foreign Oregonians who work in the forest products industry to lose their countries. jobs.In addition,more than 100,000 families would lose control of the land they worked so hard to tend. There remains much to be done and current efforts by our The measure would cost Oregon's economy: Governor, legislature, public and private land owners will bring $1.6 billion a year in personal income enormous resources to bear on opportunities to restore our fisheries. $127 million a year in Oregon income taxes • $74 million a year in Oregon harvest taxes which includes$42 Measure 64 masquerades as a supporter of that effort. But it is million for schools not. Measure 64 is portrayed as a ban on clearcutting by its propo- Measure 64 would force harvest reductions of 60% in western nents and the media.That seriously oversimplifies the scope and Oregon. complexity of the measure and seriously understates its impact. Measure 64 would force harvest reductions of 65% east of the The measure goes far beyond merely prohibiting clearcutting. Cascades Measure 64 is actually a ban on almost all timber harvesting, Measure 64 would mostly take control of the private land of more including thinnings and salvage harvesting. than 100,000 citizens. Measure 64 would cost 28,000 of our fellow citizens their jobs. Additionally, Measure 64 ignores what already is being done, Measure 64 would cost Oregon's treasury over$200 million annu- including existing regulatory and voluntary protection. ally-funds needed for our local schools. Oregon timber land is subject to state forest practices laws,regu- After these extreme invasive measures on state and private land, lations and monitoring.Already,forest land owners participate in which ignore the existing restrictions on logging and requirements Oregon's Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative. Several land for re-forestation, and ignore the best environmental forestry owners have developed Habitat Conservation Plans approved by research in the world, what does Measure 64 guarantee about federal agencies as a long-term commitment to protect and the quality of our forests or the restoration of our fisheries? develop habitat for a wide variety of species. Nothing.To the contrary,it would reduce forest diversity and sus- There is no reason to believe Measure 64 would benefit tainability of Oregon forests. forests,forest workers or our state,as purported by its propo- There is a better way for Oregonians-a way that doesn't put our nents.To the contrary, it would certainly be harmful because its neighbors out of work,doesn't destroy natural resource values or restrictions would reduce forest diversity,timber supplies and the harm our ability to support our schools. Let's continue working sustainability of Oregon's valuable forest resources in the long with our scientists, foresters, and grass roots community leader- run. ship-with one another-to build our watersheds&fisheries back As governor, I worked hard to keep Oregon's economy and forest to hpalth.It's the Oregon way. lands healthy. Measure 64 would hurt Oregon. Vote NO on Vote No on Measure 64-its bad news for Oregon. Measure 64. (This information furnished by Governor Neil Goldschmidt.) (This information furnished by Governor Vic Atiyeh.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 115 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 � Measure No. 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION We need experienced foresters managing and guiding Oregon's Woodworkers District Lodge 1 forests.Measure 64 will NOT do the job.That's why I am opposed International Association of Machinists and asking you to review this bill carefully and then vote no. and Aerospace Workers Protection for rivers and streams, wildlife habitat and scenic As representatives of Woodworkers District Lodge 1,International buffers of trees along our highways has already been enacted into Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers who have law by previous legislation. devoted their lives to protecting and nurturing Oregon's forests, Measure 64 goes too far. It reduces timber harvests in Oregon we are asking you to vote NO on Measure 64. and would be a real hardship on desperately needed revenues for Measure 64 would cost more than 28,000 Oregonians their schools.Oregon schools would lose$42 million indirect revenue forest industry jobs.The measure would have its greatest neg- including losses to the Common School Fund. ative impact on rural Oregon. Measure 64 goes far beyond dealing with clearcutting. It would We know all too well how much it hurts Oregon's timber- also ban.many of the responsible practices that have helped make dependent communities when an extreme initiative like Measure Oregon forests among the healthiest and most productive in the 64 is enacted. Since 1980, 213 sawmills and panel plants in world. Oregon have been closed permanently.Measure 64 would be the Furthermore,this measure absolutely prohibits the cutting of any nail in the coffin for many of these communities. tree over 30 inches in diameter on any acre of land in Oregon, More mills and plants would close.28,000 men and women would even those trees that are diseased. lose their jobs. Thousands of Oregon families would be left to I do not like the leeway measure in Measure 64 which permits any wonder how they would put their lives back together. person living anywhere in the United States to file lawsuits Jn Oregon's timber-dependent communities would not be the only Oregon courts against a timber land owner without the risk of pay- areas of the state to feel the pain inflicted by Measure 64.Every ing attorney fees. Oregon community would feel it. An examination of the eco- Measure 64 ignores the wisdom accrued through many years of nomic impact of the measure revealed Oregon's economy would experience managing forestlands. It would ban the use of some lose$1.6 billion dollars per year in lost payroll alone. tools used to benefit the growth of trees. Measure 64 actually is a ban on almost all timber harvesting I'm really concerned about the damage.Measure 64 would do. in Oregon,not just clearcutting. Please vote NO. State officials estimate harvests in western Oregon would be cut Bob Straub by 60 percent.In eastern Oregon,harvests would drop by 65 per- Former Oregon State Governor cent.And those estimates are low. Measure 64 also would threaten the health of Oregon's forest- (This information furnished by Bob Straub,Former Governor,Oregon.) lands. Under the measure, pesticides could not ever be used in Oregon forests, even in times of a major insect epidemic or emergency. It may sound impossible, but it's true. Measure 64 would make it illegal to fight back an insect epidemic with pesti- cides. Measure 64 is an extreme initiative that would hurt our econ- omy and threaten the health of Oregon forests. It would hurt the working families of this state by taking away tens of thousands of jobs. Vote NO on Measure 64. Chuck Macrae, President Woodworkers District Lodge 1, IAM and AW (This information furnished by Chuck Macrae, Woodworkers District Lodge 1,IAM and AW.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 116 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION How you vote on Measure 64 will dictate whether tens of thou- Terry Witt and Paulette Pyle, sands of Oregon workers will keep their jobs and the state's Oregonians for Food and Shelter forests will remain healthy and vibrant, or almost all timber har- Oregon forests are among the healthiest and most productive in vesting in Oregon will be banned forever. the world thanks in part to the responsible use of pesticides.This Presented as a ban on clearcutting, Measure 64 actually bans is a technology we proudly play a role in and have knowledge much more.It's an extreme plan that would prohibit many of the about. Measure 64 bans all pesticide use on all forestland in responsible forest practices that protect and nurture the health Oregon. and productivity of the forests. "Pesticide"is an umbrella term covering any product used to con- Measure 64's definition of a clearcut is so broad that almost all trol insects,vegetation, diseases, rodents or other pests. It even timber harvesting in Oregon, not just clearcutting, would be includes disinfectants and mosquito repellents. Banning use of banned.State officials estimate harvests in Western Oregon will these important tools will have serious consequences for all be reduced by 60 percent. In eastern Oregon, harvests would Oregonians,not just foresters. drop by 65 percent.And those estimates are conservative. Anyone who has traveled across Santiam Pass has seen how Harvest reductions caused by Measure 64 would have a devas- devastating an insect attack like the spruce budworm or pine tating impact on Oregon's economy and working families.It would beetle can be.Imagine what Oregon would look like if pesticides cost more than 28,000 Oregonians their forest industry jobs -- could no longer be used to control insect epidemics, tree dis- about half of those employed in the industry today. All told, eases or invasive and poisonous weeds? Measure 64 takes Measure 64 would cost Oregon's economy$1.6 billion per year in these safeguards away from forestland managers, both public lost personal income. and private. The greatest negative economic impact would hit rural Oregon. While many benefits will be lost if forest pesticides are banned, Our rural communities would have to absorb the economic and two that directly affect human lives should be mentioned. First, emotional strain experienced by tens of thousand out-of-work dead or dying trees from insects and disease create a heavy fuel families. load in forests.This promotes massive fires resulting in loss of Additionally, Measure 64 would also threaten the health of property and lives. Second, utility rights-of-ways, like telephone and electric lines, depend on herbicides to maintain service Oregon forests by banning the responsible use of pesticides and prohibiting the harvest of an tree over 30 inches in diameter on access through forestlands. Lose these lifelines and again we P 9 Y lose lives. any single acre of land,even if it's diseased or dead.As a result, insect epidemics would go unchecked and forest fires would Insects don't know the difference between forests,farms and your increase in both size and intensity. backyard. To them they're all food. With more than half of That's right, Measure 64 would dictate what private landowners Oregon's land classified as forests, banning insecticide use will 9 P also provide safe harbor for pests like the Japanese beetle or can do and not do on their own property. It lets government Asian gypsy moth.These insects can plague a state, attacking bureaucrats come in and take away from private landowners the private property from forests,to crops in rural agriculture,to roses right to cut and sell trees they have been growing on their land for and grass in residential areas. decades. Take a careful look at Measure 64 and join us by voting NO and A ban on pesticides doesn't make economic, environmental or encouraging others to do the same. common sense.We urge you to vote no on Measure 64--it's senseless and extreme. Tim Wigley President,Oregon Forest Industries Council (This information furnished by Terry Witt, Paulette Pyle;Oregonians for Food and Shelter.) (This information furnished b)! Tim Wigley, Oregon Forest Industries Council.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any Statement made in the argument. 117 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON'S FAMILY-OWNED FOREST BUSINESSES URGE You've never clear-cut anything. No one in your family works in OREGONIANS TO VOTE NO ON BALLOT MEASURE 64! the timber industry and you can go for months without seeing a 2 The measure actually is a ban on almost all timber harvest- by 4.You don't know a Douglas Fir from a Japanese Maple, and ing in Oregon,not just clearcutting;even on all private forest don't really care.So why should you vote against Measure 64? land. BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORK IN THE WOODS TO BE State officials estimate harvests in western Oregon will initially be HURT BY MEASURE 64. cut by 60 percent. In eastern Oregon, harvests will drop by 65 The measure absolutely prohibits cutting any tree over 30 inches percent.And those estimates are conservative.Eventually,timber in diameter on any single acre of land in Oregon, even if it's harvest in Oregon would approach zero. diseased or dead.Any tree, including that one that keeps threat- Unnecessary: Oregon's industry operates under strict regula- ening to blow down onto your garage.Or the one that is standing tions.The Forest Practices Act limits the size of clearcuts and right where your new bedroom or deck would go.Or the one next requires that trees be left to protect rivers and streams, supply to the road that the county needs to remove to put in a sidewalk. wildlife habitat and provide buffers for highways. The Act also Measure 64 actually is a ban on almost all timber harvesting in requires that the remaining harvested area is quickly reforested Oregon, not just clearcutting.State officials estimate harvests in with at least 200 young trees per acre. Oregon's forests are western Oregon will be cut by 60 percent. In eastern Oregon, well-protected. harvests will drop by 65 percent. And those estimates are con- Extreme: Measure 64 would define prime forests as clearcuts servative.If Measure 64 passes,Oregon will have to import most that couldn't ever be harvested.It also would: of its wood products from another country because we could no • Cost more than 28,000 Oregonians their forest industry jobs; longer harvest and replant Oregon forests. • Ban forever the use of forest pesticides, even in the event of Importing lumber would cost you more money.It would cost more insect epidemics or emergencies; when you remodel your house, rents would be higher for the • Absolutely prohibit the harvest of any tree over 30"in diameter apartment your son or daughter will be moving into,and costs for on any acre of forest land in Oregon, even if it's diseased or construction of houses,schools,stores and offices will increase. dead; T • Allow any person in the United States to bring a lawsuit to The measure requires that 70 11-inch diameter trees be left on enforce any provision of Measure 64 and generally not be liable every single acre (60 10-inch trees in eastern Oregon). In other for attorney fees;and words,before the highway department could widen a road,they'd • Prohibit the type of clearing harvests that provide habitat for a have to figure out how to leave the necessary number of trees. healthy deer and elk population. The power company wouldn't be able to run its lines through the forests unless it could leave the minimum number of trees Vote"NO"to keep Oregon's forests healthy, productive and untouched. sustainable! And forget about any more farmland being created. Measure 64 This statement has been endorsed by these family-owned essentially would prohibit taking the trees off so that crops could Oregon forest businesses: be planted. Bond Starker, Starker Forests, Inc.Corvallis The measure encourages the use of farmland for development. Larry and Nat Giustina,Giustina Land&Timber, Eugene Active farms are about the only land in Oregon without trees. If Dan Giustina,Giustina Resources, Eugene Measure 64 passes, those active farms will be the first place to Howard Sohn, Lone Rock Timber Co., Roseburg consider for new development, since there is no realistic way to Aaron and Marie Jones,Seneca Jones Timber, Eugene clear land for housing while leaving 70 11-inch diameter trees on Paul Cole, Rosboro Lumber, Springfield every acre(60 10-inch trees in eastern Oregon). Gordon Culbertson, Rosboro Lumber Springfield v Dan Dutton,Stimson Lumber Forest Grove/Portland In a war, it's called collateral damage when innocent non- John Shelk,Ochoco Lumber Company, Prineville combatants are killed or wounded.Measure 64 will cause collat- Steve Swanson, Swanson Superior,Glendale/Noti eral damage in every part of Oregon. J.H.Gonyea II,Timber Products,Springfield Vote NO on Measure 64. Joe Gonyea III,Timber Products,Springfield Phil and Don-Lee Davidson, Davidson Ind.,Mapleton (This information furnished by Jon Chandler, Oregon Building Industry Lew Krauss, Rough&Ready Lumber Co.,Cave Junction Association.) Lynn Herbert, Herbert Lumber,Riddle Donna Wooley, Eagle's View Management Co., Eugene (This information furnished by a Bond Starker,Starker Forests,Inc.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- Th7printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the meState of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. actruth of any statement made in the argument. 118 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION The Oregon Chapter of the Association of Consulting Foresters of Doug Caffall,President and CEO,Caffall Brothers Forest Products America urges you to vote"NO"on Measure 64.The Association President,Pacific Rim Trade Association is a national organization dedicated to promoting high profes- Rolf Glerum,Executive Director,Pacific Rim Trade Association sional and ethical standards in the management of forest lands. Pacific Rim Trade Association is a Portland-based organization We find Measure 64 to be contrary to the prudent practice of whose members are engaged in the export of forest products and forestry for the following reasons: agricultural commodities to the Pacific Rim. Our membership Measure 64 actually is a ban on almost all timber harvest includes large and small timber companies, tree farmers, steve methods, not just clearcutting. The measure's definition of doring and towboat operations,shipping companies,labor unions clearcutting is so broad that methods such as shelterwood,group and other entities related to this vital segment of Oregon's selection,sanitation salvage,and in many cases,thinning would economy. be prohibited.These techniques all allow sunlight to reach the for- So what is a trade association doing speaking out in opposi- est floor so that tree species with high light requirements,such as tion to Ballot Measure 64? Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine,can reproduce.In addition,they Oregonians are fair-minded people:We have a well-deserved rep- often are used to slow insect and disease infestations.The ban utation nationwide for our practical, middle-of-the-road approach will result in a severe decline in the health and productivity of to business and politics, healthcare and education, the environ- Oregon's forests. ment and the workplace,and most other activities that involve our Measure 64 bans sound forest management practices that people. maintain forest health and productivity. Under this measure, Any reasonable person would have to agree that Ballot for example, proven,safe chemical pesticides could not be used Measure 64 is simply not fair. in Oregon's forests, even in an emergency. Farmers and home- We'll leave it up to others more closely aligned with the timber owners use these tools to control damaging pests. However, industry to argue the more technical aspects of this measure.We Measure 64 would ban their use on forest lands to control out- would like, instead,to focus on two extremely important,but eas- breaks of harmful insects or to control weeds that compete with ily overlooked, provisions of Ballot Measure 64, and show how tree seedlings. grossly unfair these provisions are. Measure 64 will stifle investment in forestry.The inability to 1. Private landowners would lose the right to manage their use techniques that allow for growth of new trees and that control property for the greatest good. No tree farmer in his right harmful insects and diseases will reduce incentive to invest in mind would intentionally injure, abuse or neglect the trees he forestry.About 37 percent of Oregon's forest lands are privately harvests to make a living.The healthier they are when they are owned.Of the private land,about one third is managed by small, cut,the higher price they will command, and the more likely it non-industrial landowners. Without the prospect of adequate will be that the farmer will replant and reinvest for the future. future returns,private owners will be unable to fund practices that Measure 64 would dictate almost completely how a privately protect and renew the forest. owned forest is to be managed.This is simply not fair. As professional foresters, our goal is to safeguard the long-term 2.Oregon tree farmers can be sued by any other person in productivity of Oregon's forests. Measure 64 will do just the the U.S.to enforce this measure,and not have to risk paying opposite. attorney fees-- even if he or she loses...but those sued can't recover the costs of defending themselves-- even when they (This information furnished by Jerry Witler,Oregon Chapter,Association of win the case.This is simply not fair. Consulting Foresters of America,Inc.) PLEASE JOIN US AND OTHER FAIR-MINDED OREGONIANS IN VOTING NO ON BALLOT MEASURE 64. Pacific Rim Trade Association 526 NW Marlborough Portland,OR 97210 (503)241-4259 Rolf Glerum, Ex.Dir. (This information furnished by Doug Cahall, President, Rolf Glerum, Executive Director;Pacific Rim Trade Association.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 119 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Measure 64 is an initiative that prohibits most forest practices and "in the first place, then, men should guard against the begin- goes well beyond banning clear-cutting.Its severe restrictions on ning of change,and in the second place they should not rely upon the number of trees harvested, ban on removing trees over 30", the political devices invented only to deceive the people,for they and lawsuit provision are bad for the environment and bad for are proved by experience to be useless'' Oregon's economy. On private lands in Oregon, about 8 billion Aristotle, POLITICS,circa 320 b.c. board feet are over 30".Trees in this category are valued at$4 bil- lion dollars,an appalling loss for private timber owners.Under 64, only 16% of the total non-federal timberland in eastern Oregon ics natures as closely as possible.Thousands of acres of planted would be available for harvest. In western Oregon, about 24% forests are indistinguishable in appearance, structure and com- would be available.Its passage will further reduce state and local position from natural forest. governmer)t revenue, costing them a loss of $75 million/year, For the past decade in Western Oregon, we have been using when county offices are already burdened with reduced staffs and what are called new forestry techniques. In a typical clearcut shortened hours.Measure 64 goes far beyond banning what one plenty of defective trees,snags and rotting logs remain for wildlife normally thinks of as a clear-cut. By its definition, a clear-cut is habitat. any harvest in eastern Oregon that leaves fewer than 60 trees that measure 10"on any acre.In some eastern Oregon sites,tim- One of the most objectionable results of a ban on clearcutting bered stands in this condition would actually be overstocked. It would be the adverse effects it would have on wildlife habitat. bans the use of all pesticides.No matter how dreadful the insect According to the requirements of this deceptive proposal,which is infestation, no use of pesticides would be allowed. Under actually an attempt to stop all logging,only a small percentage of Measure 64, anyone, living anywhere, could sue a timberland a stand would be eligible for harvest. owner and risk nothing.Even if the claimant loses,he/she will not In fact,on a typical second growth stand,a forester would prob- have to pay attorney or court fees.The landowner risks everything ably be able to make only one entry. On some stands no entry and cannot recover the cost of defending themselves,even if they would be permitted,perhaps forever. win the case. On those stands that could be entered,forest managers would Not many people like the look of a recent clear-cut, but Measure have to partially cut 10 times the area of a single clearcut to get 64 goes far beyond banning them. The size of clear-cuts is the same volume of timber.The first trees cut would be the defec- already regulated by the Oregon Forest Practices Act, and re- tive trees, snags, windfalls and the suppressed trees. In effect, planting is required within two years. Measure 64 will harm the managers would be forced to remove all the best wildlife habitat, health of our forests and valued resources such as fish, wildlife only from a much larger area. habitat,and water quality.Thousands of Oregonians will lose their jobs if this measure passes, resulting in even higher unemploy- Whereas on a clearcut, the best wildlife habitat is retained as ment in rural areas.Vote No on 64. an essential part of the composition of the new forest. PAID FOR BY WALLOWA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Robert Mahaffy PO BOX 427 1987 Oregon Tree Farmer of the Year ENTERPRISE,OR 97828 (This information furnished by Robert Mahaffy.) (This information furnished by Eve Sheehy, Wallowa County Chamber of Commerce.) a (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 120 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Vote"No"on Measure 64 VOTE NO ON MEASURE 64 Oregon has the strongest Forest Practice Act of any place in Measure 64 is wrong for Oregon.Claiming to restrict clearcutting the World!To commercially cut even one tree. . .you must get a and the use of herbicides and pesticides on forestlands,Measure permit from the State Forester...you will need that permit num- 64 is really about taking away landowner rights and stopping tim- ber when you sell that tree. . .you are required to do everything ber harvesting on private lands.Measure-64: according to regulations.One of the strongest rules is,"it must be • Prohibits the cutting of any tree over 30 inches and prohibits replanted" within two years. The State Forester monitors and harvesting under a defined level of stocking.This means that enforces these rules.The slanderous charges about"cut and run" 60% or more of the timber that could now be harvested in have no been true for many years now. Oregon would no longer be harvestable. Douglas fir is the finest framing lumber in the world. It is the most desirable and brings a higher price than most other wood.most the use of pesticides and herbicides on forestlands in Oregon is the best place in the world to grow Douglas fir.Douglas Oregon. Currently, herbicides and pesticides are used spar- fir will not grow in the shade of other trees.Clear cutting is a vital use d for a management tool.In Western Oregon,herbicides are tool in managing Douglas fir.We can grow a good merchantable used brush abatement. In Eastern Oregon, herbicides are crop of Douglas fir in 40 to 70 years,depending on the site.This used to fight invasion noxious weeds into forestlands is a very short time in the history of the world.Very much of our Eliminating the use herbicides and pesticides prohibits timber growing land is not suited for anything else. landowners from effectively h h vely managing their timber. The very base core of our economy starts with the"land"and Deems all waters where timber harvest occurs or could poten- what the "land"produces. . . agriculture, farming, cattle, mining, tially occur as navigable waters.While attempting to ensure the and timber.As valuable as"tees"are,it is the"land"that is forever. measure's requirements will apply to harvest on federal lands, How we"manage"that land to"produce"is vital to our economy. it legalizes access of private land to anyone staying within the The federal government owns or controls over 50% of Oregon legal confines of the stream. In simple terms, Measure 64 land. The State of Oregon owns another 5% of Oregon. That legalizes trespass. means that less than 40%of Oregon is private property.With the Requires State agencies to seek approval of their management Federal lands"producing"very little toward our economy,and the programs from the EPA for nonpoint source water pollution. State lands cutting way back on their support of our economy,we This means that all timber harvesting and cattle grazing on pri- are relying far more on private property...or if you will...40%of vate land in Oregon would come under the control of the our land to provide revenue enough to run Oregon!This measure Federal government. will be a death blow to private land owners who are managing tim- ber growth. Measure 64 takes forest management out of the hands of private landowners and professional foresters and puts it in the hands of Now. . . I am 71 years old. . . and no matter what you do, I bureaucrats.Brush and noxious weeds could not be cleared with earned enough from managing timber to live on until I die.But you herbicides. Logging slash could not be burned on site. Dead, young people out there. . .this is your future.How are you going damaged and diseased tress could not be harvested. These to make a living?You are the ones who should be hostile!Get out factors increase the danger of forest fires and contribute to an there and vote! overall decline in forest health.Keep the management of Oregon's Dan Kirkpatrick forest where it belongs, in the hands of the landowners and pro- 4880 Shinglehouse Road fessional foresters.Vote no on Measure 64. Coos Bay,Oregon 97420 James Todd, Resource Manager (This information furnished by Dan Kirkpatrick.) Woodward Companies, Prineville,Oregon (This information furnished by James Todd,Resource Manager,Woodward Companies,Prineville,Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with DRS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 121 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 64 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Stan Bunn and Margaret Carter Measure 64 would hurt Oregon's public schools. Timber harvests and forest land taxes supply more than $125 million a year for Oregon local governments and schools.This measure risks cutting that revenue in half. According to the official Estimate of Financial Impact from the Office of the Secretary of State, revenues to schools are esti- mated to decrease by more than$33 million per year.Additionally, revenues that contribute to the Common School Fund would be reduced by$8.7 million. Our top priority is working to ensure that every public school stu- dent in Oregon has access to a top quality education.We cannot support a measure that cuts millions in funding for schools at a time when we are committed to raising academic standards. (This information furnished by Representative Margaret Carter and Stan Bunn.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the he by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 122 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General adjournment sine die of the legislative session in which the Election, November 3, 1998. bill is introduced. (4)(a)Disapproval of a rule or part of a rule under subsec- tion(3)of this section does not prevent a state agency from BALLET TITLE thereafter adopting another administrative rule pertaining to the issue or issues addressed by the disapproved rule. If a state agency adopts an administrative rule or rules address- €ng the same issue that was the subject of a rule that was � klill NDS CONSTITIfTIOM;oRSATES Rt OCESS disapproved under subsection (3) of this section, the Rf�ivIWRlNfai L:EC316LATURE T0• 7EW President of the Senate shall cause to be prepared and intro duced a bill approving the administrative rule or rules.The A l l[STRATIVE AU,LIES ! bill shall be introduced at the next following regular session of the Legislative Assembly after the effective date of the RSSUIMT "Y�"voti; Y16s"vole creates ,Process for pet€- rule.If the rule becomes effective during a regular session of tt4rlfl r lei€s{ {b require its rev,ow,of administrative rules. the Legislative Assembly,the bill required by this subsection i�tJL `a }„YtY[IE "Mo"VoTe iceps system not requiring must be introduced at the regular session of the Legislative legislature aa�iroval fo r!administrative rules to remain in'efect. Assembly next following the session during which the rule becomes effective. 5ltlllfA�AR1t: rllen4S connstitution.Current law does not require (b)The Legislative Assembly may amend a bill introduced feislattve review of ad[ninistratre rules.:Measure allows waters to under this subsection in the same manner as provided for rare Je lsre review of administralive rules at next:regular bills introduced under subsection (3) of this section. Any Sstor#l#ffert!petitiEaan, Sigrted,by Spec Pied numtaer taf voters, is administrative rule or part of a rule not approved by the flif#(sflEt afeeted ruses.Rule remains effective until reviewed by passage of the bill has no further force or effect after �Iur ,kaizt"rote ceases to tae in effect unless approved. If adjournment sine d€e of the legislative session in which the srernor vat(aes bill, rule Is disapproved unless iegislature over- bill is introduced.If an administrative rule or part of a rule is riltveto tf rule€s not approved, state)agency',may,adopt new disapproved under the provisions of this subsection, any rule firs afro.issue,taut legislative review is required. administrative rule adopted by a state agency that addresses lST11i�A'�f FINA[+[C[AL IMPACT:Na financial effect on State the same issue that was the subject of the disapproved rule flr ltscal g4vlitrent expenditures or revenues, is of no force and effect until such time as the Legislative Assembly by law approves the rule. (c)Any person may seek judicial review of a determination made by the President of the Senate on whether an adminis- trative rule addresses the same issue that was the subject of a rule that was previously disapproved under subsection(3) TEXTOF MEASURE of this section.Any person may seek a judicial determination as to whether an administrative rule adopted by a state Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: agency after disapproval of a rule under this subsection addresses the same issue that was the subject of the disap- PARAGRAPH 1. The Constitution of the State of Oregon is proved rule.In any proceeding for judicial review under this amended by creating a new section 34 to be added to and made subsection,the court shall liberally construe the language of a part of Article IV and to read: a rule in favor of a finding that the rule addresses the same SECTION 34.(1)The people reserve upon themselves the issue that was the subject of a previously disapproved rule. power to require that the Legislative Assembly review and The Legislative Assembly shall by law provide a process for approve any administrative rule in the manner provided by seeking judicial review under this subsection. this section. (5)Any bill introduced under this section is subject to veto (2)The Legislative Assembly shall be required to review by the Governor in the manner provided by section 15b, and approve an administrative rule upon the filing of a peti- Article V of this Constitution. If the Governor vetoes a bill tion with the Secretary of State that has been signed by a introduced under this section,the administrative rule or part number of qualified voters equal to two percent of the total or a rule specified in the bill shall be considered disapproved number of votes cast for all candidates for Governor at the for the purposes of this section unless the Legislative election at which a Governor was elected for a term of four Assembly overrides the veto in the manner provided by years next preceding the filing of the petition.A petition filed section 15b(2),Article V of this Constitution. under the provisions of this subsection shall specify the (6)Nothing in this section affects any right of a person to specific administrative rule or rules that the Legislative seek judicial review of any rule as otherwise provided for by Assembly is required to review. law. (3)(a) Upon receiving a petition that meets the require- (7)As used in this section: ments of subsection(2)of this section,the Secretary of State (a)"Administrative rule"means any state agency directive, shall cause written notice to be given to the President of the standard, regulation or statement of general applicability Senate.The President of the Senate shall thereafter cause to that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or be prepared and introduced at the next following regular that describes the procedures or practices of a state agency, session of the Legislative Assembly a bill approving the but does not include: administrative rule or rules. If the petition is filed with the (A)Executive orders;or Secretary of State during a regular session of the Legislative (B) State agency internal management directives, regula- Assembly,the bill required by this subsection must be intro- tions or statements if those directives, regulations or state- duced at the regular session of the Legislative Assembly ments do not substantially affect the interests of members of next following the session during which the petition is filed. the public. (b)The Legislative Assembly may approve the administra- (b)"State agency"means any elected or appointed state tive rule or rules specified in the bill introduced under this officer, board, commission, department, agency or institu- subsection by passing the bill.The Legislative Assembly by tion,except those in the legislative and judicial branches. amendment of the bill may approve only some of the speci- fied rules,or may approve only part of a specified rule.Any NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and administrative rule or part of a rule not approved by the italic]type indicates deletions or comments. passage of the bill has no further force or effect after 123 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ARGUMENT IN FAVOR This measure would amend the Oregon Constitution to create Did You Know That Unelected Government Officials Can: a review and approval process of state agency administrative * Raise fees and cost you money rules by the Legislative Assembly. Currently, no such process * Allow polluters to foul our air and water exists.This process is triggered when a petition signed by a spec- * Stop you from voting on local issue ified number of qualified voters is filed with the Secretary of State. Administrative rules are rules and regulations adopted by state The sad truth is that new rules are made every day. agencies, boards and commissions that generally have the full And our elected officials are powerless to do anything about it. force and effect of law. They're called administrative rules. The number of qualified voters who must sign the petition is Currently, numerous boards, commissions, and state agencies equal to two percent of the total number of votes cast for all create administrative rules. The average voter doesn't know candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election.The where they come from,who made them up,or even why we don't petition must specify the administrative rule or rules that the have some control over the agencies we created. Legislative Assembly is required to review. That's why we need to pass Measure 65. Upon being notified by the Secretary of State that a petition Measure 65 is About Citizen Involvement meeting the requirements of the measure has been filed, the President of the Senate must prepare a bill that would approve Measure 65 simply allows citizens to gather signatures on a peti- the administrative rule or rules specified in the petition. The tion.If enough signatures are gathered,the legislature is required President of the Senate must then introduce that bill at the next to review administrative rules we think are unfair, unwise, too following regular session of the Legislative Assembly. If the peti- weak or too costly. tion is filed with the Secretary of State during a regular session, Like the rule that allow companies to dump toxic sludge in our the bill must be introduced at the next following regular session. rivers. After the introduction of the bill,the Legislative Assembly may Or the one that says a barber can't let his dog lie in the corner of amend the bill to approve only part of a specified rule.If the peti- his shop. tion specifies more than one rule, the bill may be amended to Measure 65 Doesn't Change One Single Rule that Already approve fewer than all of the specified rules.Any rule or part of a Exists rule that is not approved by the passage of a bill has no further force or effect after the session is adjourned. But it does give citizens a voice... A chance to tell the Legislature that our beliefs and feelings are Disapproval of a rule under the measure does not prevent an being ignored... agency from adopting another rule pertaining to the same issue. A chance for average citizens to take control away from special However, if the agency does adopt another rule addressing the interest groups. same issue,the President of the Senate must introduce a bill for approval of the new rule.Once again, the new rule will have no Vote Yes on Measure 65 further force or effect after the end of the legislative session in Vote Yes for More Citizen Involvement which the bill is introduced if the bill is not passed.If the new rule (This information furnished by Lawrence B. George, Citizens for or any part of the new rule once again fails to gain approval,the Accountability in Administrative Rules.) measure requires that any rule adopted thereafter by a state agency to address the same issue that was the subject of the dis- approved rule must be approved by the Legislative Assembly before the rule can take effect.The measure authorizes judicial review of the question whether a new rule addresses the same issue that was the subject of a previously disapproved rule.The measure directs courts to interpret a new rule in favor of a finding that it addresses the same issue as a disapproved rule. The measure provides that bills introduced under the mea- sure's provisions are subject to veto by the Governor,and that any such veto may be over-ridden in the same manner provided for other bills. Committee Members: Appointed by: Larry George Chief Petitioners David Hunnicutt Chief Petitioners Ron Cease Secretary of State Professor Bill Funk Secretary of State Professor Jim Huffman Members of the Committee (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 124 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR VOTE YES FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FROM: Vote Yes on Measure 65: Senator Thomas Wilde-Democrat Accountability and Openness in State Government Senator Sill Fisher Republican Citizen Involvement We are from different political parties,different parts of the state, Reduce The Influence of Special Interests represent very different constituencies, and have very different What is Measure 65? views on a number of issues. Simply stated, Measure 65 is a citizen involvement issue. However,both of us believe that Measure 65 is important to Numerous boards, commissions, and other state agencies can every Oregonian. create administrative rules(laws)without the review and approval Whether you are Democrat,Republican, Independent,or a mem- of our elected legislators. Measure 65 creates an initiative ber of another party,having access to state government is vital. process which allows citizens to force their elected representa- Measure 65 gives more power to the voters, because it allows tives to review state agencies'administrative rules. voters to require the legislature to review new laws adopted by What are Administrative Rules? state agencies.Measure 65 makes both the legislature and state Administrative rules are laws passed by non-elected state agen- agencies more accountable to the people of Oregon. cies.They have the same force and effect as state laws passed by our elected officials. State agencies can impose regulations, Measure 65 is not a partisan issue, it is about good government. raise fees(taxes),and levy fines through administrative rules. Only Voters Can Change This Process. Currently, there is no process for citizens to challenge adminis- Measure 65 gives the citizens more power in state government, trative rules or to require elected officials to review and approve therefore Measure 65 must be a"constitutional amendment" them.Ballot Measure 65 corrects this problem. We strongly respect the integrity of Oregon's Constitution, and Why do we need Measure 65? upon our thorough review,we believe Measure 65 deserves your Over the last 30 years,state agencies have begun using admin- support. istrative rules, not to implement actions of the legislature, but y you g We urge to vote es and support Measure 65. rather to create public policy themselves. y pp In contrast to the legislative system that is safeguarded by checks Sincerely, and balances,state agencies are empowered to adopt and imple- Senator Thomas Wilde Senator Bill Fisher ment administrative rules and regulations that have the full effect Democrat Republican of law,as if adopted by the Legislature,but without review by the Portland Roseburg elected officials. (This information furnished by Senator Thomas Wilde (D - Portland), If you have any questions concerning Measure 65 please feel Senator Bill Fisher(R-Roseburg.)) free to call Citizens For Accountability In Administrative Rules at (503)620-0258. (This information furnished by Lawrence B. George, Citizens for Accountability In Administrative Rules.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 125 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR The Oregon State Grange Asks You To Vote Help Protect The Family Farm Yes On Measure 65. Vote Yes on Measure 65 The Oregon State Grange is the largest grassroots, rural-based Measure 65 will help small farmers have a voice in state govern- fraternal organization in the state with 245 local Granges.Grange ment,a voice we do not currently have. members believe that an open and responsive state government Measure 65 creates a process that should already be the law and is vital for good government and that is why we are urging you to that most other states already adopted. vote yes on Measure 65. No matter what issues you care about,the environment, educa- Measure 65 will help in several important ways: tion, or crime and punishment, Measure 65 gives average 1)Measure 65 would make state government more account- Oregonians more power through their state government. able to Oregonians 2)Measure 65 would counteract special interests' and lobby- Citizens Should Have The Right To Petition Their ists'influence Government. 3)Measure 65 would open-up state government Oregon was the first state to give its citizens the right to circulate Administrative rules are laws, just like those laws passed by a petitions to change state law.The Grange was the first organiza- majority of our state senators, state representative, and eventu- tion to fight for this important right in Oregon. Direct democracy ally approved by the governor, except for one important require- has been a proud Oregon tradition for over 90 years. ment:administrative rules do not go through the careful"checks Over the past 30 years we have seen a substantial growth in and balances"of the legislative process. "administrative rules". Administrative rules are laws passed by Simply put: state agencies are writing laws. State agencies are non-elected state bureaucrats who work in state agencies. lobbied and influenced by special interests and there are very few Currently no process exists for citizens to petition their state gov- ways that the average citizen can influence this process.Measure ernment to change administrative rules. Measure 65 corrects 65 fixes this problem. this problem. Family farmers have found that state agencies react to special Measure 65 will require the Legislature to review"administrative interest lobbying and protect moneyed interests, many times to rules"when citizens disagree with the actions of bureaucrats and our detriment. then take action. Rules have even been written to specifically limit small family Measure 65 is about giving you more say over what happens in farms.This must stop. It is not fair, and it not good public policy. Salem. The Oregon State Grange urges your "Yes" vote on Measure 65 will help fix this problem. Measure 65. Lane County Farm Bureau urges you to vote Yes on Measure 65. (This information furnished by Edward L.Luttrell,Oregon State Grange.) (This information furnished by Lafona Jensen,Lane County Farm Bureau Federation.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 126 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR FROM THE DESK OF STATE SENATOR GARY GEORGE Vote Yes for Quality Education Dear Voter: Vote Yes for Ballot Measure 65 Measure 65 will fix a serious problem in our state government. "Oregonians For Excellence In Education"was formed to be an advocate for constructive educational reform. Our goal is to All too often we hear outrageous(but true)stories about problems allow parents to have more involvement in their child's education. with state government--problems which illustrate a simple lack of Measure 65 would give parents and local communities a stronger common sense from government bureaucracies. voice as Oregon reforms its educational system. In fact, most of the calls I receive are from Oregonians seeking With the passage of Ballot Measure 5 in 1990, a greater portion help solving problems they have with state agencies and bureau- of education funding now comes from the state,while local school cratic administrative rules. Unfortunately, state legislators, like districts have less control over how children are educated. myself, are seldom able to effectively change these situations. Why? Because the problems are caused by "administrative Measure 65 gives parents and local districts a tool to regain some rules:'Literally thousands of these rules are created each year by local control of education lost with the passage of Measure 5. the agencies themselves, and they have the power of law. Measure 65 simply creates a process where parents can be Measure 65 will empower citizens by giving Oregonians an effec- heard.Measure 65 is a constructive and positive way to actualize tive tool to streamline state government by cleaning up or getting "excellence in education." rid of the rules that create unnecessary problems. Measure 65 is important for our state's educational future and that Measure 65 will: is why we are asking you to vote yes on Measure 65. • Give more power to the voter • Make state agencies and legislators more accountable to (This information furnished by Richard Meinhard, Oregonians for the people Excellence in Education.) • Restore the"checks and balances"in state government • Streamline state government Please join me in voting"Yes"on Measure 65. Sincerely, Gary George State Senate, District 2 (This information furnished by Gary George,State Senator District 2.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 127 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Don't Let Special Interests Mislead You VOTE YES ON BALLOT MEASURE 65 How can any ballot measure that gives the people the power to Citizens for Accountability in Administrative Rules asks you to petition their state government be anything but good? Vote Yes on Ballot Measure 65. Measure 65 gives power back to the citizens BALLOT MEASURE 65 WAS CAREFULLY PREPARED AND Measure 65 can save the taxpayers money REVIEWED BY BOTH PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS Measure 65 restores the checks and balances in state Ballot Measure 65 was drafted and prepared jointly by both pri- government vate and government attorneys.It was carefully reviewed for com- Measure 65 breaks the partisan`log-jam"in state pliance with both the United States and Oregon Constitutions. government Ballot Measure 65 complies with both the United States and Thirty-three other states have now adopted review of state Oregon Constitutions. agency laws, because it is good public policy. Other groups may argue that Ballot Measure 65 is unconstitu- tional.They have no legal authority to back those claims.Their Special interests know that Measure 65 would break their monop- claims may be interesting to talk about in law school, but they oly on state agency lawmaking. If you hear outrageous claims have no bearing in the real world. against Measure 65, remember, special interests have a great deal to lose when we allow and encourage citizen involvement IF YOU DISAGREE WITH A MEASURE,JUST COME OUT in state government. AND SAY IT Please Vote Yes for Citizen Involvement Other groups may claim that Ballot Measure 65"clutters up"the Please Vote Yes on Measure 65. Oregon Constitution.This is silly. (This information furnished by Kay Finney.) Ballot Measure 65 is an amendment to the Oregon Constitution because that is the only pace that the Measure could be located. It did not fit anywhere else. We all respect the Oregon Constitution, and do not amend it lightly.Ballot Measure 65 will amend the Constitution in the same section where Oregonians reserve the right to challenge laws passed by our state legislature. All Measure 65 asks is that average Oregonians be given the same right to challenge rules passed by unelected state government officials. If you want additional information on Ballot Measure 65,please call (503) 620-0258. We will be happy to answer all questions which you have about the Measure,including any legal questions. (This information furnished by Dave Hunnicutt,Citizens For Accountability In Administrative Rules.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251,255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 128 NEW Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION I'll bet that you didn't know that people who weren't elected can The Former Deans Committee - write laws in Oregon.Until recently, I didn't know it,either. We believe Measure 65 raises serious issues under the Administrative rules are laws written by unelected bureaucrats. Oregon Constitution and Fourteenth Amendment to the United These unaccountable bureaucrats sit in their offices and make up States Constitution. This Measure proposes to establish a laws,and Oregonians have no recourse to challenge those laws. Constitutional initiative process for review of Administrative Rules. We can't vote the bureaucrats out.We can't refer the laws to the Administrative Rules are made after the Legislature adopts a voters.We can't even demand that the Legislature intervene. statute.Many times the Legislature does not have time or exper- The private lives of Oregonians have become increasingly gov- tise to draft details of a statute, so the Legislature gives this erned by administrative rule–rules that regulate everything from authority to a State Board, Commission or Department to carry the kind of health care our insurance will pay for to the kinds of out the intention of the Legislature. plants we can put in our yards. This proposal allows for an initiative petition to refer an Every healthy society recognizes the need for rules to protect its Administrative Rule to the Oregon Legislature.If the Legislature, citizens'freedoms and safety.But on those occasions when gov- for any reason,takes no vote concerning the Administrative Rule ernment gets carried away and becomes overly-intrusive, the legislative Session, the Administrative Rule is Oregonians deserve to have some ve,e way of challenging those repealed.We believe the measure raises serious concerns under rules. the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution for it may allow a small group of petitioners to frustrate the imple- When unelected bureaucrats wrote rules that hindered parents mentation of a statute. from reviewing the curriculum being taught in the children's We believe the Measure to be an unnecessary amendment to schools,parents had no way to force another look at those rules. the Oregon Constitution.We believe this Measure would clutter When unelected bureaucrats wrote rules that said the Oregon the Constitution,and,if adopted at all,should be considered as a Health Plan might pay for sex change operations,but not for ton- statute rather than amendment to the Constitution. sillectomies,the public had no recourse. We provide this information to help fellow voters in under- Measure 65 is one of the most important government reforms we standing this measure. Our comments are designed gDly to can make. It makes even unelected bureaucrats accountable to provide objective and careful constitutional analysis of the mea- the citizens. It gives the citizens a process whereby they may sure.Collectively we take no position on the other merits of this force the Legislature to vote up or down on administrative rules. measure. Measure 65 is needed to protect the private lives and freedoms of Prof.Leroy Tornquist(Chair), Former Dean Willamette College of Oregonians.Please vote YES on Measure 65. Law (This information furnished by Becky Miller, l=kecutive Assistant, Oregon Rennard Strickland,Dean University of Oregon Law School Taxpayers United.) Prof.Robert Misner, Former Dean Willamette College of Law Prof. Emeritus Chapin Clark, Former Dean University of Oregon Law School Prof. Maury Holland, Former Dean University of Oregon Law School Robert Ackerman, Dean Willamette College of Law David Frohnmayer, Former Dean University of Oregon Law School (This information furnished by Bob Cannon,Treasurer,The Former Deans Committee.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of ar)y statement made in the argument. 129 Official 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No ., 65 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION WHAT COULD MEASURE 65 DO? THE UNDERSIGNED FARMERS, RANCHERS AND TREE RUIN THE OREGON WE LOVE! FARMERS RESPECTFULLY ASK OUR FELLOW OREGONI- ANS TO VOTE NO ON MEASURE 65 TO PROTECT OREGON'S Oregon has the nation's strongest program to plan its growth. It FARMLANDS, RANCH LANDS, AND FOREST LANDS AND TO protects farmland and forest lands.It stops urban sprawl.It helps ALLOW US TO CONTINUE TO GROW FOOD, RAISE LIVE- guarantee public beaches and makes building affordable housing STOCK AND PRODUCE WOOD. easier.All these statewide planning goals are administrative rules. We are Oregonians who make our living by growing crops, live- (The Legislature itself decided to use rules instead of laws to stock and timber.Oregon's land use planning rules are what has assure good planning.) Measure 65 would make it easy for a protected our land from urban sprawl and from rural homesite small group of extremist to repeal these goals without a vote of development.These laws has been essential to maintaining the the people or action by the Legislature. basic livelihood of thousands of Oregon families who earn their MEASURE 65 ALLOWS A TINY,UNDEMOCRATIC,MINORITY living in agriculture and timber. TO OVERRULE THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS,WITHOUT AN The sponsor of Measure 65 have made it very clear that they ELECTION OR ANY ACTION BY THE LEGISLATURE. intend to use the Measure to weaken or repeal the rules that The opponents of planning for growth tried to repeal Oregon's protect farm, range and forest lands. land use planning program by initiative three times and were deci- Please vote no on Measure 65. sively defeated each time.If Measure 65 passes, it would require only 25,000 people and a single State Senate Committee Bob&Ken Bailey Barb Iverson Chairman to repeal the planning goals that are the heart of the Cherries Horticultural Products planning program. Wasco County Clackamas Counties MEASURE 65 WAS WRITTEN BY AN EXTREMIST ORGANI- Sydney&Richard Blaine Lois and Clif Kenagy ZATION THAT HAS NEVER BEEN ALE TO CONVINCE THE Pears, Cherries,Apples&Cattle Row Crops LEGISLATURE OR COURTS TO OVERTURN THE PLANNING Hood River County Benton County RULES AND LAWS IT OPPOSES. Judson&Diana Parsons Ambrose&Susan McAuliffe Oregonians In Action is working to weaken Oregon's land use Pears,Timber Cattle&Calves planning laws. They tried to persuade the Legislature and Jackson&Marion Counties Klamath County Supreme Court to weaken, abolish, or invalidate land use plan- ning rules and they failed.Now they are trying to create a special Christmas Trees, Hay,Timber Wine Grapes way to overturn all of the rules without a vote of the people,action Washington County Marion County by the Legislature or review by the courts. LOVE OREGON?VOTE NO ON 65 Gary L.Harris Ron R.Olson Onion&Carrot Seeds Grass Seed, Garlic, Mint Jackson County Citizens League Jefferson County Jefferson County Friends of Linn County Michael McCarthy Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition Friends of Eugene Cattle,Timber, Hay,Apples, Pears 1000 Friends of Oregon Hood River County Friends of Yamhill County Hood River Valley Residents Committee (This information furnished by Robert L.Liberty, 1000 Friends of Oregon.) Alliance for Responsible Land Use in Deschutes County (This information furnished by Robert L.Liberty, 1000 Friends of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State.of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 130 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). Planned From the desk of John A.Kitzhaber,M.D. Parenthood.the Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens and oth- Dear Oregon Voter: ers who care about health care sal MEASURE 65 COULD BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH I am writing to ask you to oppose Measure 65--an unnecessary and burdensome measure which is really just a back-handed There is a lot the supporters of Measure 65 won't tell you. assault on Oregon's quality of life.Measure 65, like Measure 27 Perhaps they are just interested in avoiding some of the rules they which we overwhelmingly defeated in 1996 by more than 70 per- don't like. But in doing that, they will destroy a system that is cent,would allow the rejection of administrative rules.These rules absolutely critical for a safeguarding the health of Oregonians. are vital tools to protect kids,provide for clean air and water,pre- Just about everything to do with protecting health and safety in serve farm land, prevent sprawl and protect health and safety. Oregon comes through the administrative rules process.There is Let me cite a few examples of the kinds of rules which would be a good reason for that:these rules must be developed by profes- at risk: sionals in health care, public health and other specialties. But if . Rules which allow us to protect abused children Measure 65 passes.anyone can try to overturn rules such as: . Rules which set standards for clean air and clean drinking • Communicable Disease Control in Day Care Facilities water • Rabies Control • Statewide planning rules which allow us to protect our • Which Diseases Must be Reported and to Whom beaches,manage growth and preserve farm and forest land by establishing urban growth boundaries • Restaurant or Food Pushcart Inspections • Statewide health and safety rules which protect workers at 4 Tuberculosis Screening and Control the worksite • Immunization Requirement • Statewide building codes which protect the safety of our • Public Swimming Pool Regulations homes and commercial building • Certification of Public Drinking Water Systems If passed,Measure 65 would allow any special interest which can • Privacy of Medical Records pay to collect about 25,000 signatures(less than 1.3%of voters) to place any of these rules in jeopardy.Then, if the legislature It is easy to imagine those who wish to increase their profits simply fails to act on these rules they are rejected.That is not the or reduce their responsibility challenging these rules and hun- right way to challenge rules implementing democratically passed dreds like them. It is also easy to imagine those with religious or legislation. ideological agendas using this measure to force their beliefs on others -- including trying to limit or disrupt access to family We all know how easy it is for a single powerful committee chair planning or other services that should be a matter between an or a special interest to block a measure from even being consid individual and their doctor. ered.As 1 stated in 1996, that's not accountable.The legislature already has oversight over agency rulemaking. If the legislature This is not a scare tactic:Measure 65 poses a direct threat to the doesn't like a rule,it can change or clarify a statue so the agency system that protects the public's health in Oregon.It doesn't mat- must correct its regulations. ter what the authors intended–this is what it actually could do. Oregon faces many challenges in the coming year:juvenile crime Please don't be reckless with the health and safety of you prevention, education, managing growth. Let's focus on meeting and your neighbors. these challenges instead of this unnecessary measure. Vote NO on Measure 65 Please join me in voting no on Measure 65. James A.Davis,Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens Marion Esty,American Association of Retired Persons(AARP) Sincerely, Mary Nolan, Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette John A.Kitzhaber,M.D. (This information furnished by James A Davis,OR State Council of Senior (This information furnished by John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.) Citizens.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon,nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 131 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Oregon's Business Community Urges You to STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION BY Vote NO on 65 FORMER OREGON APPELLATE JUDGES As members of Oregon's business community, we are proud of MEASURE 65 IS UNNECESSARY: our role in making Oregon work. Oregon succeeds when busi- COURTS CAN ALREADY TEST RULES FOR COMPLIANCE ness, government and citizens can work in a partnership, creat- WITH LAWS PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE ing an environment that makes our state a great place. The Oregon Legislature often assigns to state agencies the task For business,a critical part of that environment is a stable, ratio= of interpreting and carrying out laws,sometimes by administrative nal system for making rules we must follow on a day-to-day basis. rules. Agencies can adopt permanent rules only after public That includes health and safety rules,tax accounting procedures, notice and giving any citizen the.opportunity to comment on the air and water pollution control,food growing and packaging stan- proposed rule.An oral hearing must be held if requested by ten or dards, and just about anything to do with employees'insurance more people or an association having at least ten members. coverage. Anyone affected by a rule who believes that it is unauthorized or Right now, these rules are made by Departments, Boards and contrary to a law passed by the Legislature can have it reviewed Commissions that have expertise in their respective area. And in court. there is a process for us to work with those officials as rules are We heard many challenges to rules when we were active judges. drafted.We may not always agree with them.But there is also a Oregon courts invalidate rules that are not authorized or are process to appeal.Most important,the system is stable and pre- dictable. inconsistent with the law. Without that stability, it could be difficult–or nearly impossible– THE LEGISLATURE CAN ALREADY REPEAL OR AMEN11 to manage our businesses.And it's precisely that stability which AGENCY RULES Measure 65 would destroy.It is a threat to every Oregon business, Anyone can ask the Legislature to repeal or amend any rule that those who are employed by them and those who depend on our departs from the Legislature's policies,without collecting 24,000 products and services. signatures. Imagine playing a game where the rules changed whenever A FEW PEOPLE SHOULD NOT someone decided they didn't like them. Imagine having to make BE ALLOWED TO STOP STATE AGENCIES FROM CARRYING massive investment decisions based on rules that could be put in OUT THE LAW limbo for almost two years.It would,create an intolerable mess.It would also turn Oregon from a state with an attractive business To permit a few people to stop agencies from administering exist- environment and strong economy into a place in which any ing statutes would be a radical and harmful departure from prudent person would have serious concerns about locating a Oregon's constitutional separation of powers. business.. George M.Joseph Hans Linde Whatever the proponents thought Measure 65 would do, it will Chief Judge&Judge Justice harm Oregon's economy.We urge you to defeat this measure. Oregon Court of Appeals Oregon Supreme Court 1977-1992 1979-1990 Vote NO on 65. Bad for Business.Bad for Oregon. William L.Richardson Betty Roberts Chief Judge&Judge Justice Fred Miller,Senior Vice President Oregon Court of Appeals Oregon Supreme Court Portland General Electric 1976-1997 1982-1986 Ron E.Timpe Chairman, President and CEO Jacob Tanzer Standard Insurance Company Justice (This information furnished by Fred D.Miller,Portland General Electric.) Oregon Supreme Court 1980-1983 (This information furnished by Robert Liberty.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the I ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 132 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION The Oregon Environmental Council A MESSAGE FROM OREGON LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Urges You to Vote NO on Ballot Measure 65 Measure 65:A Recipe for Legislative Chaos With Measure 65 a few wealthy special interests are threatening The Oregon League of Women Voters is dedicated to making Oregon's clean air and water.They think that developers and pol- luters shouldn't have to play by the same rules as the rest of us. sure our political process is open,fair and effective.For that rea- Seventy five percent of Oregonians rejected a similar measure in son,we urge Oregonians to vote NO on Measure 65. 1996,but these special interests are at it again.Here is what's at The time and resources of the legislature are already strained by stake: efforts to deal with the critical issues facing Oregon,such as edu- Clean Water- Measure 65 threatens Oregon's rules that imple- cation, public safety and others.Measure 65 would make it easy ment the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, limiting for groups or individuals to literally paralyze the legislative the pollution allowed into our rivers,streams,and even our house- process by referring large numbers of administrative rules. hold tap water.Under Measure 65, polluters could simply exempt There are good reasons that we have an administrative rules sys- themselves from these rules,taking us back to the days when our tem.Please Vote NO on Measure 65. rivers flowed with raw sewage and toxic waste.Rules adopted to A MESSAGE FROM OREGON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION protect Oregon's declining runs of salmon and steelhead would be likely targets for repeal,as well AND AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN Clean Air-Oregon's rules implementing the federal Clean Air Act Measure 65:Unnecessary and Dangerous and other clean air programs have successfully reduced field Oregon's administrative rules system is based on a sound princi- burning, toxic industrial emissions, and summer smog that can ple: those with expertise in an issue should make the rule gov- cause asthma, lung disease, and cancer. Under Measure 65, erning it.And there is nothing wrong with improving it. massive field burning could quickly return,along with a toxic stew of other pollutants like mercury,dioxin,and lead. But Measure 65 doesn't seek to improve the system: it will destroy it.That poses a serious threat to Oregonians. Clear Thinking-Oregon's rules to protect the environment are the result of years of.research, thoughtful negotiation among all Any organization or individual, no matter how extreme, can put stakeholders, and public meetings.Measure 65 would allow any any rule into the hands of politicians to decide.That means politi- well-funded group with a bone to pick to destroy all that hard work cians deciding technical,detailed rules about: and shift these decisions from experts to politicians. Throwing . How your medical doctor treats you. problems back to our citizen legislators, who already have over . Whether water is safe for you to drink. 3,000 bills to review when they meet every other year, will add . Building and fire safety codes. nothing but delay,confusion and bad law. • The curriculum of your local schools. Measure 65 is a back-door attempt to let special interests re-write • What textbooks your children are allowed to use. the rules that protect Oregon's clean air,clean water, and quality • What kind of medicines can be prescribed for you. of life for their own private benefit. This is just a sample of rules that could be decided by politicians Don't let them do it! Please vote no on Measure 65. in the legislature instead of experts. This message furnished by the Oregon Environmental Council The people who put Measure 65 on the ballot may only be trying and is supported by the Oregon League of Conservation Voters. to take control of Oregon's land use planning system.But whether or not it's their intention, their measure is reckless, and a recipe (This information furnished by Jeff Allen, Executive Director, The Oregon for legislative chaos.It is a bad idea that would be an even worse Environmental Council.) reality. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 65 (This information furnished by Alice M. Bartelt, Oregon - American Association of University Women;Paula Krane, League of Women Voters of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 133 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 65 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION HUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF OREGON OPPOSES MEASURE 65 MEASURE 65 ENDANGERS CITIZEN PROTECTIONS Many Oregon rules exist because citizens have asked their legis- lators for laws that protect abused children, safeguard the devel- opmentally disabled, provide services to the mentally ill, expand health care services to the working poor,establish patients'rights and create standards for child care.If any of these or other rules receive the required number of signatures under Measure 65 and the legislature fails to act, the rule implementing the law loses its force and effect. Inaction by the legislature could also mean inaction by the state in protecting and serving our most vulnera- ble citizens. MEASURE 65 DISCOURAGES CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Oregon has a history of citizen involvement in its rule making process.There are public notices and hearings with opportunity for written comments. Also many agencies have citizen boards and commissions that are responsible for adopting the rules. History demonstrates that this citizen involvement does result in rule modification.Measure 65 could well encourage special inter- ests who don't want a rule to wait and channel their energies into petition gathering rather than reshaping the rules during the adoption process. MEASURE 65 DISTORTS SEPARATION OF POWERS Measure 65 doesn't meet the tests for constitutional integrity. It doesn't distribute power among the branches of state government with equity. Rather legislators are being placed in the position of being micro-manager. Oregon law currently provides for court challenges if a rule is thought to violate legislative intent.And if the legislature believes a rule is inappropriate, it can change the enabling statute. CURRENT LAW DISTRIBUTES POWER WITH EQUITY PLEASE VOTE NO ON MEASURE 65 (This information furnished by Ellen C.Lowe,Human Services Coalition of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 134 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General protecting Oregon's parks,beaches,watersheds and critical Election, November 3, 1998. fish and wildlife habitats. (4)(a)The State Lottery Commission shall be comprised of five members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate BALLOT TITLE who shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor.At least one of the Commissioners shall have a minimum of five years experi- ence in law enforcement and at least one of the Commissioners shall be a certified public accountant.The Commission is empow DS X0 FU'FIE3�To DEDItAtE Wt: ered to promulgate rules related to the procedures of the Commission and the operation of the State Lottery. Such rules � F�Y FI� I3ffTi}RARK�a,BEAGHIwS#'' and any statutes enacted to further implement this article shall M�1I1TA�,WAFRSHC? inTt=CIC?i� insure the integrity,security, honesty, and fairness of the Lottery. The Commission shall have such additional powers and duties as R 'SULTC "Y.E "11flt E."`les"x #ededicates'sapercerttlottery! may be provided by law. tt rrd'tng 1,Q teaches; SaimorS, wftdlit 1l abitt t,'wsterahed'!' (b)The Governor shall appoint a Director subject to confirma pt p# Ctioh, • tion by the Senate who shall serve at the pleasure of the f�ES4JLT i4?1~ `"tQ"i€}ii=: "t�l "'�tpte retainsytem r8striCtint ` Governor.The Director shall be qualified by training and experi State lottery'funding to job creaticrn economjc etevel4pment3? ence to direct the operations of a state operated lottery. The public edttl:at(cirf Director shall be responsible for managing the affairs of the Commission.The Director may appoint and prescribe the duties Stl'MitIC; l1C.�1lnerids constltutii3n.State lottery pr o ceeds cufrentiy!! of no more than four Assistant Directors as the Director deems ftCijF#o #p Job,pro s#iart economic devWd-meat,public#�duca#ipn ' necessary.One of the Assistant Directors shall be responsible for t tfre dedicates is pergertt taf net lettefy proc0ads t ,rsewfund' a security division to assure security, integrity, honesty, and fair }tarE€ , `beaches; salrn�n, wildlife hsl5itat, watershed; Hess in the operations and administration of the State Lottery.To Yt3t3cttt5ft:C *dlcates half of fund to cr8ete,malntajn strife parks,' fulfill these responsibilities,the Assistant Director for security shall acean slttW,re&;pttbiic'beach sgcess areas, hfStoric sites, t�tCrB-', be qualified by training and experience, including at least five atk r as. edicates cithef h if for single agency t: admfrifstef years of law enforcement experience,and knowledge and experi- tur #s tip prc>tt nature salmon,wildlife habitat,watersttede,using ence in computer security. at least S percefif for capital expenditures, equtr€SS fatefrnlal (c)The Director shall implement and operate a State Lottery b6do ve#ei enewal#n 2014:father pry visions, pursuant to the rules,and under the guidance,of the Commission. The State Lottery may operate any game procedure authorized FifIANEIAt_tMPAGT:An es#tmtett$4 . irttflion by the commission, except parimutuel racing, social games, and tf.statk lettkYr}!prtceeds w111 b8 directed each year to parlts and;! the games commonly known in Oregon as bingo or lotto,whereby natlrral resrsutces until the year 20i,"'shen there is&n•slitofrtatic'' prizes are distributed using any existing or future methods among tevs a )ktt8tltly the dregon ltrggtsiA.We allocat8s those,fttrfdS tEt'j adult persons who have paid for tickets or shares in that game; a unety # progranris lrictuditfg, but not Ilrnited te, educatiaff,,, provided that, in lottery games utilizing computer terminals or ecotttrrtte ei1d oommunity development, natural fesources arid,',', other devices, no coins or currency shall ever be dispensed trartorttlor) Flits estimate t5 based on 1999-2 0 ons directly to players from such computer terminals or devices. of loitry,preseedS- (d) There is hereby created within the General Fund the Oregon State Lottery Fund which is continuously appropriated for the purpose of administering and operating the Commission and the State Lottery. The State Lottery shall operate as a self-supporting revenue-raising agency of state government and TEXTOF MEASURE no appropriations,loans,or other transfers of state funds shall be made to it.The State Lottery shall pay all prizes and all of its expenses out of the revenues it receives from the sale of tickets Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: or shares to the public and turnover the net proceeds therefrom PARAGRAPH 1.Section 4,Article XV of the Constitution of the to a fund to be established by the Legislative Assembly from State of Oregon,is amended,and the Constitution of the State of which the Legislative Assembly shall make appropriations for the Oregon is amended by creating new sections 4a and 4b to be benefit of any of the following public purposes:creating jobs,fur- added to and made a part of Article XV,such sections to read: thering economic development, [orj financing public education in Sec.4.(1)Except as provided in subsections(2),(3),(4),[and] Oregon or restoring and protecting Oregon's parks,beaches, (5)and(6)of this section, lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets, watersheds and critical fish and wildlife habitats. Effective for any purpose whatever, are prohibited, and the Legislative July 1,1997,15%of the net proceeds from the State Lottery shall Assembly shall prevent the same by penal laws. be deposited,from the fund created by the Legislative Assembly (2) The Legislative Assembly may provide for the establish- under this paragraph,in an education endowment fund.Earnings ment, operation, and regulation of raffles and the lottery on moneys in the education endowment fund shall be retained in commonly known as bingo or lotto by charitable,,fraternal,or reli- the fund or expended for the public purpose of financing public gious organizations.As used in this section, charitable, fraternal education in Oregon as provided by law.Moneys in the education or religious organization means such organizations or founda- endowment fund shall be invested as provided by law and shall tions as defined by law because of their charitable, fraternal, or not be subject to the limitations of section 6, Article XI of this religious purposes.The regulations shall define eligible organiza- Constitution. The Legislative Assembly may appropriate other tions or foundations, and may prescribe the frequency of raffles, moneys or revenue to the education endowment fund. The bingo or lotto, set a maximum monetary limit for prizes and Legislative Assembly shall appropriate amounts sufficient to pay require a statement of the odds on winning a prize. The lottery bonds before appropriating the net proceeds from the Legislative Assembly shall vest the regulatory authority in any State Lottery for any other purpose. At least 84% of the total appropriate state agency. annual revenues from the sale of all lottery tickets or shares shall (3) There is hereby created the State Lottery Commission be returned to the public in the form of prizes and net revenues which shall establish and operate a State Lottery. All proceeds benefiting the public purpose. from the State Lottery, including interest, but excluding costs of (5)Effective July 1,1999,15%of the net proceeds from the administration and payment of prizes,shall be used for any of the State Lottery shall be deposited in a parks and natural following purposes: creating jobs, furthering economic develop- resources fund created by the Legislative Assembly. ment, [or]financing public education in Oregon or restoring and Of the moneys in the parks and natural resources fund,50% 135 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 66 shall be distributed for the public purpose of financing the EXPLANATORY STATEMENT protection, repair, operation, and creation of state parks, ocean shore and public beach access areas, historic sites and recreation areas, and 50% shall be distributed for the Ballot Measure 66 amends the Oregon Constitution to allow public purpose of financing the restoration and protection of money from the State Lottery to be used for restoring and pro- native salmonid populations, watersheds, fish and wildlife tecting Oregon's parks,beaches,watersheds and critical fish and habitats and water quality in Oregon. The Legislative wildlife habitat. Assembly shall not limit expenditures from the parks and Currently, lottery money may be used only for creating jobs, natural resources fund.The Legislative Assembly may appro- furthering economic development and financing public education priate other moneys or revenue to the parks and natural in Oregon. resources fund. [(5)](6)Only one State Lottery operation shall be permitted in This measure requires that 15 percent of net proceeds from the the State. State Lottery be deposited in a newly-created parks and natural [(6)] (7)The Legislative Assembly has no power to authorize, resources fund.The money in the fund will be divided equally with and shall prohibit,casinos from operation in the State of Oregon. half of the money spent for creating, protecting and operating SECTION 4a.Any state agency that receives moneys from state parks, ocean shore and other natural recreation areas and the parks and natural resources fund established under sec- half of the money spent for restoring and protecting native salmon tion 4 of this Article for the public purpose of financing the runs,watersheds,water quality and fish and wildlife habitat. protection, repair, operation, creation and development of The money for state parks and other natural recreation areas state parks, ocean shores and public beach access areas, may be allocated and spent by a variety of state and local agen- se the is sites and recreation areas shall have the authority to cies.However,the measure requires that the money for restoring use the.moneys for the following purposes: and protecting native salmon runs,watersheds,water quality and (1) Maintain, construct, improve, develop, manage and fish and wildlife habitat must be administered by a single state operate state park and recreation facilities, programs and areas. agency.That state agency must spend at least 65 percent of the(2)Acquire real property,or interest therein,deemed nec- money available to the agency for capital expenditures. essary for the creation and operation of state parks,ocean The state agencies that administer or receive money from the shores,public beach access areas, recreation and historic parks and natural resources fund are directed by this measure to sites or because of natural, scenic, cultural, historic and spend the money for specified activities, including but not limited recreational values. to creating and improving state parks, providing grants to local (3) Operate grant programs for local government entities government for parks and natural resource programs,assessing, deemed necessary to accomplish the public purposes of the managing and monitoring habitat conservation activities, imple- parks and natural resources fund established under section menting watershed and water quality improvement plans, 4 of this Article. obtaining interest in private property from willing owners to pro- SECTION 4b.Moneys disbursed for the public purpose of tect watersheds, and for enforcing fish and wildlife and habitat financing the restoration and protection of wild salmonid protection laws. populations,watersheds,fish and wildlife habitats and water quality from the fund established under Section 4 of this The Legislative Assembly may not limit expenditures from the Article shall be administered by one state agency. At least parks and natural resources fund, under this measure. 65% of the moneys will be used for capital expenditures. Periodic audits of the effectiveness and performance of agen- These moneys,including grants,shall be used for all of the cies receiving money from the parks and natural resources fund following purposes: are required. (1) Watershed, fish and wildlife, and riparian and other native species,habitat conservation activities,including but The measure requires the legislature to submit to a,vote of the not limited to planning, coordination, assessment, imple- people at the November 2014 general election the question of mentation, restoration, inventory, information management keeping the provisions of this measure in the Oregon and monitoring activities. Constitution. (2)Watershed and riparian education efforts. (3)The development and implementation of watershed and Committee Members: Appointed by: water quality enhancement plans. Pat Amedeo** Secretary of State (4)Entering into agreements to obtain from willing owners Patricia McCaig** Secretary of State determinate interests in lands and waters that protect water- Harold Haugen* Secretary of State shed resources,including but not limited to fee simple inter- Mike McArthur* Secretary of State ests in land,leases of land or conservation easements. Jim Ross Members of the Committee (6)Enforcement of fish and wildlife and habitat protection laws and regulations. *Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) SECTION 4c.Any state agency that receives moneys from **Proponents of measure appointed by Secretary of State the parks and natural resources fund established under sec- because chief petitioners did not make appointments by tion 4 of this Article shall secure an independent audit,pur- deadline. suant to section 2,Article VI of this Constitution,to measure the financial integrity,effectiveness and performance of the (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the agency receiving such moneys. Each agency shall submit ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) the audit to the Legislative Assembly as part of a biennial report to the Legislative Assembly. SECTION 5a.The Legislative Assembly shall submit to a vote of the people at the November 2014 general elections the question of continuation of this amendment.This Section is repealed on January 1,2015. NOTE: Boldfaced type indicates new language; [brackets and italic]type indicates deletions or comments. 136 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR For many years, we Oregonians have been creating parks and It is time for us to protect Oregon's legacy. open spaces-protecting places that inspire and enrich our lives. Oregon has a great history of bold action to save our natural her- Parks,wild and scenic rivers,trails and greenways have fostered itage. From Oswald West claiming our beaches as a treasure a set of values that we treasure as Oregonians: appreciation of belonging to all Oregonians in 1914, to Tom McCall and other ' the outdoors, caring for our natural and cultural heritage, providing opportunities for personal challenge and adventure, leaders passing the bottle bill,land use planning and cleaning up the Willamette River in the 60's and 70's, Oregonians have risen conserving our environment, and bringing together families and communities to foster mutual understanding and respect. to the challenge. These values, these benefits, are not trivial additions to the Today,we need to rise to perhaps the greatest challenge of course of our lives. If the gates of every park, beach and boat all. launch were closed, if families were unable to use a favorite Our state parks, our fish and wildlife and the watersheds and picnic grove or campground, we would as a state feel an over- waterways we all depend on are in trouble.A combination of the whelming sense that an essential part of our lives was being lost. pressures of growth and a lack of adequate investment, has Recreation and parks are essential to quality of life.Parks are sig- brought us near a point of no return.We haven't opened a new nificant economic generators-they attract businesses to the state park or campground in 28 years,and 65 of the ones we have are as prime economic development and relocation magnets.And,of threatened with closure. Fish and wildlife are becoming threat- course, parks are major attractions that draw tourism, one of ened and endangered at an alarming rate, while 30,000 miles of Oregon's top industries.Parks,open space and natural areas are Oregon streams and rivers, including the Willamette,are polluted essential to ecological survival.Outdoor recreation is one of the or degraded. best approaches to environmental education-a key to long term These are some of the reasons we have joined the Campaign for sustainability. Parks and Salmon, and are urging our fellow Oregonians to vote As Oregon's economy has boomed, support for our natural her- Yes on Ballot Measure 66.We believe the measure's dedication itage has stagnated since 1980 when gasoline tax revenues were of 15%of the lottery is fair,accountable and will make a tremen- discontinued for state parks funding.Now,our parks system is in dous difference.And it will not increase taxes of any kind. distress.Critical repairs and vital operations have been delayed or But beyond the specific problems, and the details of the solution discontinued for many parks. Measure 66 provides are far more basic questions: Measure 66 does not create a new tax,but shares our existing lot- • Will we honor the legacy entrusted to us by those who came tery resources to fund the repair and restoration of our parks and before us? to prevent closures.Measure 66 will also help restore threatened fish runs, protect wildlife habitat and improve water quality in our ' Will we pass that legacy to our children and grandchildren? rivers and streams--all things that make Oregon one of the last . Will we protect the things that make Oregon special? great places. Earlier we said that it is time to protect Oregon's legacy.In fact, it Vote YES on Measure 66 to protect our parks and wildlife! is past time.Please join us in voting Yes on Ballot Measure 66. (This information furnished by Frank Jagodnik,Executive Director,Oregon Senator Mark Hatfield Governor Neil Goldschmidt Recreation&Park Association.) (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 137 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR MESSAGE TO VOTERS What does the Parks and Salmon measure do? As the Chief Petitioners of Measure 66 we are proud to have If passed,the measure will: worked together with over 144,000 Oregonians who signed our Prevent the closure of state parks; initiative to put this measure on the November ballot. Like so . Make urgent repairs state deteriorating arks and improve many of you, we are committed to preserving Oregon's unique g p g p p qualities.This measure provides an excellent and rare opportunity maintenance; to do so.Measure 66 provides a dedicated source of funding • Improve and maintain access to ocean beaches; for the repair,maintenance and operation of our state parks, • Acquire and protect critical fish and wildlife habitat and/or and the protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife new park land; habitat. This measure does not call for any new taxes; it does • Reduce illegal hunting, fishing and poaching by restoring require an independent audit every two years,and in 15 years the cuts to Oregon State Police Fish and Wildlife Officers; measure will be returned to you,the voters,to decide if it should • Protect and improve water quality; continue. • Increase educational and recreational opportunities. The measure sets aside 15%of lottery proceeds to: Where does the money to do this come from? • Prevent the possible closure of state parks; The Oregon Lottery.The Parks and Salmon measure dedicates • Make urgent repairs to deteriorating parks and improve main- 15%of lottery proceeds,approximately 1%of the state budget, tenance; to the purposes outlined above. • Improve and maintain access to ocean beaches; How much will the measure raise? • Acquire and protect critical fish and wildlife habitat, new park land, and beach access; Using current estimates,the measure will raise between$35- • Protect and improve water quality; $45 million a year. • Reduce illegal hunting,fishing and poaching by restoring cuts How will the money be distributed? to Oregon State Police Fish and Wildlife officers; • Increase educational and recreational opportunities. • Half the money(the part dedicated to parks)will be distrib- Measure 66 provides an opportunity to leave a legacy to our chil- uted and overseen by the Oregon Parks Commission. dren and grandchildren: and Oregon with clean, safe and open • Half the money(the part dedicated to fish,wildlife and water parks; public beaches with convenient access; clean air and quality)will be distributed through grants to non-profit orga- water; and healthy and abundant fish and wildlife.We hope that nizations,watershed councils,local governments,local park you will join us in supporting Measure 66. providers, soil and water conservation districts, and others involved in fish and wildlife habitat protection. Brian Booth State Parks Commission, Former Chair What accountability is there for how the money is spent? L.L."Stub"Stewart The measure requires an independent audit every two years. Parks Commissioner Additionally,voter approval will be required again in 15 years. Geoff Pampush (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Oregon Trout, Director Salmon.) (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 138 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR TEN GOOD REASONS TO SUPPORT MEASURE 66: During my time as Oregon's State Park Director, from 1964 to 1. Public ocean beaches and beach access. 1992, the Oregon Legislature acted to eliminate dedicated state support for Oregon's parks.As a result of a 1980 ballot referral, 2. Improved park facilities. state parks stopped receiving money from the gas tax and state 3. New parks to preserve scenic places and provide recreation. funding virtually disappeared. Although the Legislature promised general fund replacement dol- 4. Hiking,biking and horseback trails. lars,the money was never allocated and today state parks receive 5. Access for fishing,boating,canoeing and windsurfing. just one tenth of one percent of the state budget.As a result of this lack of funding Oregon's parks are suffering. 6. Historic sites and lighthouses. The following illustrate a few examples of how parks are being 7. Protected fish and wildlife habitat. effected: 8. Camping sites and picnic areas. • We haven't added a new campground in 30 years; 9. Wildlife viewing areas. • We haven't added a significant new park in 28 years; • We have over 110 million dollars in deferred maintenance 10. Clean streams. needs; HELP SAVE THE BEST OF OREGON • We have been forced to impose new day use fees in a num- FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS ber of parks over the last 10 years; PLEASE VOTE YES ON MEASURE 66 • Many of our park facilities are 30 to 40 years old and are faced with dry rot, leaky sewers, and corroded electrical Brian Booth systems. Gwyneth Gamble Booth In Central Oregon, where I live, many state parks are in need of Portland additional resources for basic maintenance and repairs. (This information furnished by Brian Booth,Gwyneth Gamble Booth.) • Smith Rock State Park:Improve trail system for climbers. • LaPine State Recreation Area: Complete renovation of campground and day use areas; • Deschutes River Recreation Area: Repair river recreation access areas and repair river trail system; • The Cove Palisades State Park:Renovate and add camping areas to reduce over-crowding. With up to 65 state parks on the brink of closure and over 41 mil- lion visitors each year,it's time to make the investment necessary to preserve Oregon's Parks. Dave Talbot Former Oregon State Parks Director Chair,State Parks Trust (This information furnished by David G.Talbot,Oregon Stato Parks Trust.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 139 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 � Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR MEASURE 66 PROTECTS OUR WATER QUALITY POTENTIAL PROJECTS Oregon is the last great place in the lower 48 states where salmon OREGON COAST are still caught downtown in our largest city. It's a place where Measure 66 provides a source of funding–15%of the lottery anyone can experience the quiet solitude of a free flowing river for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the within a 30 minute drive.It's a place where salmon are as much a part of our history and culture as our forests or Mt.Hood. protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following But for those statements to remain true,we must act now.And the is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 best thing we can do is to pass Measure 66. passes. Measure 66:Preserving our Rivers,Streams and • BEVERLY BEACH: Repair and maintenance; improve recre- Watersheds ational opportunities. Oregon has approximately 100,000 miles of river. Right now, • DEVIL'S PUNCH BOWL STATE NATURAL AREA:Repair and nearly 30,000 miles are polluted.The good news is that we know maintenance;improve recreational opportunities. how to solve the problem. Small, strategic investment -- one FOGARTY CREEK STATE RECREATION AREA: Repair and watershed at a time--can reverse this trend.There is no question maintenance. that we can clean up our water. The only question is,are we willing to do it? Passing Measure 66 ' FORT STEVENS:Repair and maintenance. will provide the desperately needed funds to make it happen. • GLENEDEN BEACH STATE RECREATION SITE: Repair and Measure 66:Protecting Our Fish maintenance. Our native salmon, trout and steelhead are in trouble through ' JESSIE M. HONEYMAN: Repair and maintenance; improve their entire range in Oregon.That is not only an ecological crisis, recreational opportunities. it is an economic one as well. Oregon's commercial and sport- . LOST CREEK STATE RECREATION SITE: Repair and fishing industry forms the livelihood of thousands of Oregonians. maintenance Beyond that,the survival of our native fish is much like the"canary in the coal mine"the extinction of a salmon run is an indicator of ' OREGON COAST TRAIL:Acquisition. things to come. • SOUTH BEACH STATE PARK:Acquisition. Once again,there are many things we can do to stop the destruc- . TIERRA DEL MARK, CAPE BLANCO, SISTERS ROCK, tion of the fish and wildlife that are so much a part of Oregon's YOAKUM POINT, SOUTH BEACH, FLORAS LAKE: identify.But Measure 66 is the only thing on the horizon that offers Acquisition. a way to accomplish it. • YACHATS STATE RECREATION AREA: Repair and PROTECT OUR WATER.SAVE OUR FISH. maintenance. VOTE YES ON 66! • YAQUINA BAY STATE RECREATION SITE: Repair and (This information furnished by Jason O.McKain,Oregon Trout.) maintenance. For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 140 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR POTENTIAL PROJECTS POTENTIAL PROJECTS * MULTNOMAH COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY Measure 66 provides a source of funding– 15%of the lottery-- Measure 66 provides a source of funding–15%of the lottery for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks;and the protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 passes. passes. • BLUE LAKE PARK(local park): Improve recreational opportu- • BANKS-VERNONIA:Repair&maintenance. nities. • BROWNS FERRY PARK (local park): Improve recreational • BROUGHTON BEACH (local park): Improve recreational opportunities;acquisition. opportunities. • CHERRY GROVE:Protect and restore fish&wildlife. • CROWN POINTNISTA HOUSE (Columbia Gorge): Improve • GALES CREEK:Protect and restore fish&wildlife habitat. recreational access;acquisition;repair and maintenance. • LEWIS AND CLARK: Repair & maintenance; improve recre- HAGG LAKE (local park): Improve recreational opportunities; ational opportunities. protect and restore fish&wildlife habitat. HAZLEBROOK/ties. opportunities. SPARK (local park): Improve recre • OXBOW REGIONAL PARK (local park): Improve recreational ational opportunities. • ROOSTER ROCK STATE PARK:Repair&maintenance. METZGER PARK(local park):Improve recreational opportuni ties. • SAUVIE ISLAND:Protect&restore fish and wildlife habitat. . TUALATIN RIVER(local park):Improve recreational opportuni- • TRYON CREEK: Repair& maintenance; improve recreational ties;acquisition. opportunities. • TUALATIN RIVER GREENWAY(local park):Acquisition. • TUALATIN RIVER(local park):Improve recreational opportuni- • TUALATIN RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: Protect ties. and restore fish&wildlife habitat;acquisition. • WILLAMETTE ISLAND LANDING:Create recreational access. For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 141 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR POTENTIAL PROJECTS POTENTIAL PROJECTS CLACKAMAS COUNTY MARION COUNTY Measure 66 provides a source of funding– 15%of the lottery-- Measure 66 provides a source of funding– 15%of the lottery - for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 passes. passes. • CLEAR CREEK:Protect& restore fish and wildlife habitat. • CHAMPOEG STATE PARK: Repair & maintenance; improve • COOKS BUTTE PARK, WALUGA PARK, FREEPONS PARK, recreational opportunities. IRON MOUNTAIN (local parks) Protect & restore fish and • DETROIT LAKE STATE PARK:Repair&maintenance. wildlife habitat;improve recreational opportunities. . ELDRIDGE BAR LANDING: Repair & maintenance; create • KELLOGG LAKE/WILLAMETTE RIVERFRONT (local park): recreational access. Create recreational access. • MARY • HALL'S FERRY ACCESS:Create recreational access. access.S.YOUNG BUFFER PROPERTIES:Create recreational • NORTH SANTIAM STATE REST AREA: Repair & mainte- nance. • MAUD WILLIAMSON: Repair & maintenance; improve recre- SIDNEY LANDING ACCESS:Protect and restore fish&wildlife ational opportunities. habitat. • MILO McIVER: Repair & maintenance; improve recreational SILVER FALLS STATE PARK:Repair&maintenance;improve opportunities. recreational opportunities;acquisiton.p • MOLALLA RIVER STATE PARK: Repair & maintenance; WILLAMETTE MISSION STATE PARK:Repair&maintenance; improve recreational opportunities. P improve recreational opportunities; protect & restore fish & • PARK PLACE PARK (local park): Improve recreational oppor- wildlife habitat. tunities. For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign • SPRINGBROOK CREEK: Protect & restore fish and wildlife for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. habitat. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and • WILLAMETTE GREENWAY(between Lake Oswego and West Salmon.) Linn):Acquisition. • WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN LANDING: Create recreational access. For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the merit by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. I accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 142 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR POTENTIAL PROJECTS POTENTIAL PROJECTS LANE COUNTY JACKSON COUNTY Measure 66 provides a source of funding- 15%of the lottery-- Measure 66 provides a source of funding–15%of the lottery-- for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the for the repair, maintenance and operation of our parks; and the protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local protection of our water quality, fish and wildlife habitat. Local parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants. Following parks and communities are eligible to apply for grants.Following is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 is a partial list of projects eligible for funding if Measure 66 passes. passes. • BAKER PARK (local park): Repair & maintenance; improve • CASEY STATE RECREATION SITE: Repair & maintenance; recreational opportunities. improve recreational opportunities. • CARL G.WASHBURNE MEMORIAL STATE PARK: Repair& • EMIGRANT LAKE & UPPER ROGUE REGIONAL & CEN- maintenance;create recreational opportunities. TRAL BUCKLEY (local park): Improve recreational opportuni- • ELIJAH BRISTOW: Repair & maintenance; improve recre- ties. ational opportunities.Protect&restore fish and wildlife habitat. • GIVAN PARK (local park): Acquisition; improve recreational • FERN RIDGE WILDLIFE AREA: Protect & restore fish & opportunities. wildlife habitat. • JOSEPH H.STEWART STATE RECREATION AREA:Repair& • HECETA HEAD LIGHTHOUSE: Repair & maintenance; maintenance. improve recreational opportunities. • PROSPECT STATE SCENIC VIEWPOINT: Repair & mainte- • HOWARD BUFORD RECREATION AREA(local park):Protect nance. and restore fish&wildlife.habitat;create recreational opportu- • ROGUE RIVER VALLEY: Protect and restore fish & wildlife nities. habitat. • JESSIE M. HONEYMAN: Repair & maintenance; improve • TOU VELLE STATE RECREATION SITE: Repair & mainte- recreational opportunities. nance. • MCKENZIE RIVER:Protect and restore fish&wildlife habitat. • UPPER ROGUE REGIONAL PARK (local park): Repair & • RICHARDSON PARK (local park): Improve recreational maintenance;acquisition. opportunities • VALLEY OF THE ROGUE:Repair&maintenance. • STONEFIELD BEACH: Repair & maintenance; improve For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign recreational opportunities. for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. • JASPER PARK:Create recreational opportunities. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and For additional projects in your area please contact the Campaign Salmon.) for Parks&Salmon at 503-279-8343. (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 143 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR A message from The Nature Conservancy: If You Love the Great Outdoors VOTE YES ON MEASURE 66 Measure 66 is for You! PROTECT OREGON'S LAST GREAT PLACES A big part of what makes Oregon great can only be seen outside MEASURE 66 IS THE ANSWER... of four walls.As Oregon sportsmen and sportswomen,we believe ..to many of Oregon's most urgent habitat protection needs: that is the best reason to vote for Measure 66. • Restore wetlands,native grasslands,streams, rivers and other There are so many great experiences to share in Oregon's great priority habitats for migratory and nesting birds,fish and other outdoors: wildlife. • Backpacking through a forest. • Acquire, from willing sellers, the most important parks and natural areas for long-term protection of Oregon's natural • Fly fishing on a pristine river. diversity. • Camping on the high desert. • Help ranchers, farmers and other private owners voluntarily restore salmon spawning areas, control invasive weeds, pro- • Rafting down roaring rapids. tect streams. • Hunting elk in the first chill of autumn. • Provide practical, site-specific research on Oregon's most endangered habitats – and the most cost-effective means to • Even enjoying a picnic with family and friends in one of protect and restore them. Oregon's wonderful state parks. MEASURE 66 IS A POSITIVE SOLUTION... Because these things are so much a part of what we understand .because it is non-regulatory, voluntary, cooperative, provides to be Oregon, we tend to assume they will always be there.But full accounting for funds,and imposes no new taxes. unless we act today, we could lose them sooner than you could PROTECTING OREGON'S NATURAL HERITAGE. imagine. ...is something we owe to future generations.With Measure 66, If you enjoy—or hope to enjoy—any of those activities, Measure we all benefit, because preserving biological diversity: 66 may be the most important vote you cast this year. – keeps ecosystems healthy, including our air and drinking You cannot open a newspaper without reading about a park that water is threatened with closure, a species of fish or wildlife that is in – improves farm and forest products trouble,or a river that is becoming polluted.As people who spend – provides new and useful products,including many medicines an important part of our lives outdoors,we can testify that it is all – enriches our lives through connection with nature. true. Measure 66 is the best chance in decades to protect the THE NATURE CONSERVANCY... Oregon we all love—and that we want to pass on. ...is a non-profit membership organization that safeguards the Please join us in saving what's best about Oregon.Vote Yes on natural diversity of native plants, animals and ecosystems. In the Parks and Salmon Measure. cooperation with partners and communities,we buy and manage natural areas and restore habitats to prevent extinctions and to The Oregon Sportsmen's Political Victory Fund preserve Oregon's outstanding natural diversity.Please join us in (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and support of Measure 66! Salmon.) Russell Hoeflich,Vice President and Oregon Director – Robert L.Ridgley,Chair, Board of Trustees (This information furnished by Stephen Anderson, The Nature Conservancy of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not bonstitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 144 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR With all of the noise and confusion of competing ballot measures INVESTING IN THE OREGON COAST and campatgn rhetoric, it's easy to lose sight of what some of &CREATING A LEGACY... these issues are really all about. THE COAST&DEVELOPMENT... Measure 66 is about saving parks and salmon and natural areas The future of the Oregon Coast will depend on the immediate to support Oregon's native wildlife.But more than that, it's about preservation of additional coastal land before it disappears saving some of the things that make Oregon special. through increasing development.What we value about the coastal The Western Meadowlark, our state bird, was once a common experience may be lost forever if we don't do something now! sight in the fields of western Oregon.Salmon and steelhead were Let's keep the coast for everyone! abundant and fishing was a way of life for many Oregonians.Our We need to fund parks now to preserve a legacy for future state parks were a point of pride,and we felt sorry for residents of generations. other states that had shown less foresight in protecting part of BEACHES&TRAILS... their natural heritage. Over the past few decades, Oregon has lost much that we once The Oregon Coast Trail gives the public access to explore and took for granted.Some of the changes, like the loss of the mead- enjoy the entire coast. It stretches across our beaches and owlark in the Willamette Valley,occurred so gradually that most of through many of our coastal parks.Thank you Oswald West and us never noticed. Other changes, like the explosion of suburbs Tom McCall for giving us the beaches of Oregon! into former farmlands,seemed to happen overnight. Now it's your turn to create another legacy by funding parks and salmon. Measure 66 will help protect key pieces of our natural her- itage that are rapidly slipping away. ECONOMIC&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT... We have in place many of the elements needed for a concerted Parks provide value-added attractions for tourism and their pres- effort to restore Oregon's salmon and watersheds, rebuild our ence generated$560 million to Oregon's local economies in 1996 parks and protect habitat for native wildlife. Private land owners, alone! Acquiring new park land and developing new facilities for government agencies and industry and conservation groups are recreation means investing in sustainable economic develop- working together to begin to reverse the decline of our natural ment,job creation,and enhancing the quality of life for everyone. ecosystems. Measure 66 gives you the opportunity to invest in Oregon But good intentions won't be enough.We need to back them up by funding parks and salmon. with real money and a commitment to long-term investment in PUBLIC EDUCATION&THE OUTDOORS... habitat for fish and wildlife,parks and healthy watersheds. Education takes place both inside and outside of the classroom. Measure 66 asks us to choose: do we care enough about Education not only includes reading books,using computers,and Oregon to act now--before it's too late? studying at desks. It also means walking barefoot along a sandy beach, watching seagulls dive, and visiting a historic lighthouse. Please join us in voting YES on 66. It's one thing to read about salmon swimming upstream -- its SARA VICKERMAN another to actually see them leap out of the water!The educa- tional value of such experiences is immeasurable. Defenders of Wildlife We need to'fund parks and salmon! 1637 Laurel Street Lake Oswego,OR 97034 THE FUTURE&MEASURE 66... 503/697-3222 Let's keep and restore enough of Oregon's natural beauty as a (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and legacy for future generations.Measure 66 is the best route we've Salmon.) got right now to ensure a future for parks and salmon. Vote to fund Parks and Salmon! Submitted by the National Coast Trail Association (This information furnished by Al LePage, Executive Director, National Coast Trail Association(NCTA).) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 145 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT 1N FAVOR ORGANIZATIONS ACROSS OREGON SUPPORT Teach Your Children Well.Protect our Parks. MEASURE 66 By Jim Schuld In the last 20 years Oregon's population has grown 22%.And in What does it mean to educate our children? the next 15 years, it is expected that another 500,000 people will st resses of growth–more people, more subdivisions, As a father, grandfather and former teacher, I have an opinion ences the stresses be added the Portland metro area alone. As Oregon exons about that, and it is why I urge you to vote Yes on Measure 66. , more highways,more cars and traffic,we are losing opportunities When you get to the heart of it, education is about preparing our to preserve Oregon's quality of life:clean water;access to ocean kids to be successful adults. beaches; parks that are safe, clean and open; rivers filled with salmon and abundant with fish and wildlife. • To be good citizens. Measure 66 is our opportunity to invest in Oregon,preserving our ' To exemplify the best values of our community. natural heritage for the next generation. • And to be good stewards of the natural treasures that define Join us in supporting Measure 66 for Oregon's parks and salmon. Oregon as one of the great places on earth. 1000 Friends of Oregon Obviously, strong schools are vital. But education means much Association of Northwest Steelheaders more than what happens inside a classroom.Young people are Audubon Society of Portland molded by every moment of their experience,whether in a class- Defenders of Wildlife room, at the family dinner table, or out among Oregon's forests, Friends of Kellogg Creek streams and beaches. Friends of the Columbia Gorge The loss of any of these educational opportunities hurts our chil- Friends of Tryon Creek State Park Staff dren and our future.That is why I believe it is so important of National Coast Trail Association Oregon voters to approve Ballot Measure 66-the Campaign for The Nature Conservancy Oregon's Parks and Salmon. Oregon Building Industry Association The ability to directly experience the natural world is indispens- Oregon Chapter,American Fisheries Society able in teaching our children to protect it. Our system of sate Oregon Environmental Council parks, public beaches and the vitality of our fish and wildlife are Oregon Forests Industry Council irreplaceable features of how we encounter the natural world - Oregon League of Conservation Voters and they are under tremendous pressure.The good news is that Oregon Natural Desert Association a relatively modest investment-- 15% of lottery revenues--can Oregon Natural Resources Council Action turn this situation around.That is what Measure 66 is all about. Oregon Recreation and Park Association What we get for that money is priceless.And no one has more of Oregon Sportsman Political Victory Fund a stake in this measure than kids in school today and tomorrow. Oregon Trout Dedicating these funds will help save an invaluable part of their Oregon Wetlands Joint Venture education. Pacific Rivers Council So if you care about how we educate our children, help pass Sierra Club of Oregon Ballot Measure 66.There are things we must teach them that you Trust for Public Land can't learn from a book. Tualatin Riverkeepers (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Salmon.) Salmon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 146 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Stop Poaching and Enforce the Law ISN'T IT TIME FOR OREGON TO TAKE THE HIGH ROAD One of the critical parts of preserving fish, wildlife and water AGAIN? quality is to enforce the laws that protect them. Right now, that Vote NO on Measure 66! enforcement is in crisis. For 25 years I have lived on the Clackamas River. I love this There has never been a time in the history of Oregon when fish river, and from my travels throughout Oregon I know why it is and wildlife law enforcement has been more important.The Fish important to protect Oregon's watersheds.I am also a member of and Wildlife Division of the Oregon State Police is the single entity the Clackamas River Basin Council, and I understand the des- designated by law to protect these resources,and they have a big perate need to adequately fund watershed councils. I agree with job,enforcing laws for: Governor Kitzhaber: • Poaching "If we are to restore our watersheds and the salmon, steel- Commercial fishing head and trout dependent on healthy watersheds, it will • Environmental protection take the participation of every Oregonian."(12/18/97 • Land use letter to Oregon Plan Partners.Emphasis added.) • Boating The goals of Measure 66 are noble, but do these noble ends jus- • Livestock tify the means? Measure 66 further legitimizes state run gam- Forest practices bling. Not only does it provide added justification for preying on But while Oregon's population has increased, and the need to those addicted to gambling, but gambling revenue is becoming a closely monitor and enforce the law has become critical, and major addiction for Oregon.According to a Time Magazine article there have been devastating funding cuts to the Fish and Wildlife entitled"They call it Video Crack": Officers responsible. "In Oregon, between 1995 and 1997,the state budget In fact,in the last year alone there have been 14 officer vacancies relied for 9%of its revenue on the lottery system, most of it that haven't been filled for lack of money. from video poker.An effort to get rid of video gambling there evaporated this year.'The state is overwhelmingly We have reached a point where it is impossible to adequately dependent'says Peter Bragdon,a lawyer who helped the enforce the law—with a terrible impact. No matter what kind of Governor study the problem:'(Time,6/1/98) programs we pursue to enhance our fish and wildlife,it will be lost Regardless of whether Measure 66 passes or fails, we will still if we cannot protect them. have state run gambling.But, if we are truly serious about repair- Measure 66 will provide desperately needed funding to restore ing our parks and restoring fish and wildlife habitat,then financ- our ability to enforce the law and stop poachers, polluters and ing must come from all Oregonians, not from Oregon's gamblers. other who destroy or steal our precious natural resources.Without To prey on the weak is to abdicate the moral responsi- the passage of Measure 66,the cuts will continue,and likely even bility of all citizens to protect the precious gift of our get worse. life support systems and our community.We send the Fish and wildlife law enforcement may not be the best known part wrong message to ourselves and our children by using of our efforts to protect what's best about Oregon.But if we don't gambling to finance government.I urge all Oregonians fix this problem now, we will see the results the results in the to vote no on Measure 66 and continue the noble effort forests, rivers and beaches of Oregon. to stop state run gambling. Lee Roy Hyder,Oregon State Police Major,(Retired) Respectfully, Fish and Wildlife Division Director Lloyd Marbet (This information furnished by Patricia McCaig, Friends of Parks and Oregon Conservancy Foundation Salmon.) cnsrvncy@teleport.com (This information furnished by Lloyd Marbet.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 147 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure -No . 67 Proposed by initiative petition to be voted on at the General (2)"Debilitating medical condition"means: Election,November 3, 1998. (a) Cancer, glaucoma, positive status for human immunodefi- ciency virus or acquired immune deficiency syndrome, or treat- ment for these conditions; BALLOT TITLE (b)A medical condition or treatment for a medical condition that produces,for a specific patient,one or more of the following: (i)Cachexia; (ii)Severe pain; (iii)Severe nausea; (iv) Seizures, including but not limited to seizures caused by �� E�ERI�IIT'.r�YaTll epilepsy;or (v) Persistent muscle spasms, including but not limited to 1 �' €� 1#m� edtcat txYt < spasms caused by multiple sclerosis;or t �[ttXt � ( tshest #e b#atlft+�118c jt� (c) Any other medical condition or treatment for a medical condition adopted by the division by rule or approved by the divi sion pursuant to a petition submitted pursuant to section 14 of this I " t I��* rgarirtiat, t Act. s � (3)"Delivery"has the meaning given that term in ORS 475.005. mrjt 'x (4) "Designated primary caregiver" means an individual eigh- teen years of age or older who has significant responsibility for managing the well-being of a person who has been diagnosed t1 �t1t ,� ��1 t�► �i with a debilitating medical condition and who is designated as such on that person's application for a registry identification card "' or in other written notification to the division."Designated primary caregiver"does not include the person's attending physician. (5) "Division" means the Health Division of the Oregon Department of Human Resources. �� idrt1 trtjlta (6) "Marijuana" has the meaning given that term in ORS � �itt8(cafefefFl3E t11 # # 475.005. (7)"Medical use of marijuana"means the production, posses- k�it5 �itt# O �r1r� le,t' 1iif4afl8i sion, delivery, or administration of marijuana, or paraphernalia I1E3t ts��& used to administer marijuana,as necessary for the exclusive ben efit of a person to mitigate the symptoms or effects of his or her debilitating medical condition. (8)"Production"has the same meaning given that term in ORS till 1 € rrt� Itttra r 475.005. (9)"Registry identification card"means a document issued by the division that identifies a person authorized to engage in the medical use of marijuana and the person's designated primary caregiver,if any. (10)"Usable marijuana"means the dried leaves and flowers of the plant Cannabis family Moraceae,and any mixture or prepara- TEXTOF MEASURE tion thereof, that are appropriate for medical use as allowed in sections 1 to 19 of this Act."Usable marijuana"does not include The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act the seeds,stalks and roots of the plant. (11)"Written documentation"means a statement signed by the SECTION 1.Sections 1 through 19 of this Act shall be known attending physician of a person diagnosed with a debilitating as the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act. medical condition or copies of the person's relevant medical SECTION 2.The people of the state of Oregon hereby find records. that: SECTION 4.(1)Except as provided in sections 5 and 11 of this (1)Patients and doctors have found marijuana to be an effective Act, a person engaged in or assisting in the medical use of treatment for suffering caused by debilitating medical conditions, marijuana is excepted from the criminal laws of the state for pos- and therefore,marijuana should be treated like other medicines; session, delivery or production of marijuana, aiding and abetting (2) Oregonians suffering from debilitating medical conditions another in the possession,delivery or production of marijuana or should be allowed to use small amounts of marijuana without fear any other criminal offense in which possession, delivery or pro- of civil or criminal penalties when their doctors advise that such duction of marijuana is an element if the following conditions have use may provide a medical benefit to them and when other rea- been satisfied: sonable restrictions are met regarding that use; (a)The person holds a registry identification card issued pur- (3)Sections 1 to 19 of this Act are intended to allow Oregonians suant to this section, has applied for a registry identification card with debilitating medical conditions who may benefit from the pursuant to subsection (9) of this section, or is the designated medical use of marijuana to be able to discuss freely with their primary caregiver of a cardholder or applicant;and doctors the possible risks and benefits of medical marijuana use (b)The person who has a debilitating medical condition and his and to have the benefit of their doctor's professional advice;.and or her primary caregiver are collectively in possession of,deliver- (4)Section 1 to 19 of this Act are intended to make only those ing or producing marijuana for medical use in the amounts changes to existing Oregon laws that are necessary to protect allowed in section 7 of this Act. patients and their doctors from criminal and civil penalties, and (2)The division shall establish and maintain a program for the are not intended to change current civil and criminal laws gov- issuance of registry identification cards to person who meet the erning the use of marijuana for nonmedical purposes. requirements of this section.Except as provided in subsection(3) SECTION 3.As used in sections 1 to 19 of this Act: of this section,the division shall issue a registry identification card (1) "Attending physician" means a physician licensed under to any person who pays a fee in the amount established by the ORS chapter 677 who has primary responsibility for the care and division and provides the following: treatment of a person diagnosed with a debilitating medical (a) Valid, written documentation from the person's attending condition. physician stating that the person has been diagnosed with a 148 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 debilitating medical condition and that the medical use of mari- (7)(a) A person who possesses a registry identification card juana may mitigate the symptoms or effects of the person's shall: debilitating medical condition; (i) Notify the division of any change in the person's name, (b)The name,address and date of birth of the person; address, attending physician or designated primary caregiver; (c)The name, address and telephone number of the person's and attending physician;and (ii)Annually submit to the division: (d)The name and address of the person's designated primary (A) updated written documentation of the person's debilitat- caregiver,if the person has designated a primary caregiver at the ing medical condition;and time of application. (B) the name of the person's designated primary (3) The division shall issue a registry identification card to a caregiver if a primary caregiver has been designated for the person who is under eighteen years of age if the person submits upcoming year. the materials required under subsection (2) of this section, and (b)If a person who possesses a registry identification card fails one of the person's parents or legal guardians signs a written to comply with this subsection,the card shall be deemed expired. statement that: If a registry identification card expires, the identification card of (a)The person's attending physician has explained to the per- any designated primary caregiver of the cardholder shall also son and to one of the person's parents or legal guardians the expire. possible risks and benefits of the medical use of marijuana; (8)A person who possesses a registry identification card pur- (b)The parent or legal guardian consents to the use of mari- suant to this section and who has been diagnosed by the person's juana by the person for medical purposes; attending physician as no longer having a debilitating medical (c)The parent or legal guardian agrees to serve as the per- condition shall return the registry identification card to the division son's designated primary caregiver;and within seven calendar days of notification of the diagnosis.Any (d)The parent or legal guardian agrees to control the acquisi- designated primary caregiver shall return his or her identification tion of marijuana and the dosage and frequency of use by the card within the same period of time. person. (9) A person who has applied for a registry identification (4)A person applying for a registry identification card pursuant card pursuant to this section but whose application has not yet to this section may submit the information required in this section been approved or denied, and who is contacted by any law to a county health department for transmittal to the division. A enforcement officer in connection with his or her administration, county health department that receives the information pursuant possession, delivery or production of marijuana for medical use to this subsection shall transmit the information to the division may provide to the law enforcement officer a copy of the written within five days of receipt of the information.Information received documentation submitted to the division pursuant to subsections by a county health department pursuant to this subsection shall (2)or(3)of this section and proof of the date of mailing or other be confidential and not subject to disclosure, except as required transmission of the documentation to the division.This documen- to transmit the information to the division. tation shall have the same legal effect as a registry identification (5) The division shall verify the information contained in an card until such time as the person receives notification that the application submitted pursuant to this section and shall approve or application has been approved or denied. deny an application within thirty days of receipt of the application. SECTION 5. (1) No person authorized to possess, deliver or (a)The division may deny an application only for the following produce marijuana for medical use pursuant to sections 1 to 19 of reasons: this Act shall be excepted from the criminal laws of this state or (i)The applicant did not provide the information required pur- shall be deemed to have established an affirmative defense to suant to this section to establish his or her debilitating medical criminal charges of which possession, delivery or production of condition and to document his or her consultation with an attend- marijuana is an element if the person,in connection with the facts ing physician regarding the medical use of marijuana in connec- giving rise to such charges: tion with such condition,as provided in subsections(2)and(3)of (a)Drives under the influence of marijuana as provided in ORS this section;or 813.010; (ii)The division determines that the information provided was (b) Engages in the medical use of marijuana in a public place falsified. as that term is defined in ORS 161.015,or in public view; (b)Denial of a registry identification card shall be considered a (c)Delivers marijuana to any individual who the person knows final division action, subject to judicial review. Only the person is not in possession of a registry identification card;or whose application has been denied, or, in the case of a person (d)Delivers marijuana for consideration to any individual,even under the age of eighteen years of age whose application has if the individual is in possession of a registry identification card. been denied, the person's parent or legal guardian, shall have (2) In addition to any other penalty allowed by law, a person standing to contest the division's action. who the division finds has willfully violated the provisions of sec- (c) Any person whose application has been denied may not tions 1 to 19 of this Act or rules adopted under sections 1 to 19 of reapply for six months from the date of the denial, unless so this Act may be precluded from obtaining or using a registry iden- authorized by the division or a court of competent jurisdiction. tification card for the medical use of marijuana for a period of up (6)(a)If the division has verified the information submitted pur- to six months,at the discretion of the division. suant to subsections (2) and (3) of this section and none of the SECTION 6.(1)Except as provided in sections 5 and 11 of this reasons for denial listed in subsection (5)(a) of this section is Act,it is an affirmative defense to a criminal charge of possession applicable, the division shall issue a serially numbered registry or production of marijuana,or any other criminal offense in which identification card within five days of verification of the informa- possession or production of marijuana is an element,that the per- tion.The registry identification card shall state: son charged with the offense is a person who: (i)The cardholder's name,address and date of birth; (a)Has been diagnosed with a debilitating medication condition (ii) The date of issuance and expiration date of the registry and been advised by his or her attending physician the medical identification card; use of marijuana may mitigate the symptoms or effects of that (iii)The name and address of the person's designated primary debilitating medical condition; caregiver,if any;and (b) Is engaged in the medical use of marijuana;and (iv)Such other information as the division may specify by rule. (c) Possesses or produces marijuana only in the amounts (b)When the person to whom the division has issued a registry .allowed in section 7(1)of this Act,or in excess of those amounts identification card pursuant to this section has specified a desig- if the person proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the nated primary caregiver, the division shall issue an identification greater amount is medically necessary to mitigate the symptoms card to the designated primary caregiver.The primary caregiver's or effects of the person's debilitating medical condition. registry identification card shall contain the information provided (2) It is not necessary for a person asserting an affirmative in subsection 4(6)(a)(i)-(iv). defense pursuant to this section to have received a registry 149 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 identification card in order to assert the affirmative defense estab- documentation is based on the attending physician's personal lished in this section. assessment of the applicant's medical history and current med- (3) No person who claims that marijuana provides medically ical condition and the physician has discussed the potential necessary benefits and who is charged with a crime pertaining to medical risks and benefits of the medical use of marijuana with such use of marijuana shall be precluded from presenting a the applicant. defense of choice of evils, as set forth in ORS 161.200, or from SECTION 10. No professional licensing board may impose a presenting evidence supporting the necessity of marijuana for civil penalty or take other disciplinary action against a licensee treatment of a specific disease or medical condition,provided that based on the licensee's medical use of marijuana in accordance the amount of marijuana at issue is no greater than permitted with the provisions of sections 1 to 19 of this Act or actions taken under section 7 of this Act. by the licensee that are necessary to carry out the licensee's role SECTION 7.(1)A person who possesses a registry identifica- as a designated primary caregiver to a person who possesses a tion card issued pursuant to section 4 of this Act may engage in, lawful registry identification card issued pursuant to section 4 of and a designated primary caregiver of such a person may assist this Act. in, the medical use of marijuana only as justified to mitigate the SECTION 11.Nothing in sections 1 to 19 of this Act shall pro- symptoms or effects of the person's debilitating medical condition. tect a person from a criminal cause of action based on posses- Except as allowed in subsection (2) of this section, a registry sion,production,or delivery of marijuana that is not authorized by identification cardholder and that person's designated primary sections 1 to 19 of this Act. caregiver may not collectively possess, deliver or produce more SECTION 12. (1)The division shall create and maintain a list than the following: of the persons to whom the division has issued registry identifi- (a) If the person is present at a location at which marijuana is cation cards pursuant to section 4 of this Act and the names of not produced, including any residence associated with that loca- any designated primary caregivers. Except as provided in sub- tion,one ounce of usable marijuana;and section (2) of this section, the list shall be confidential and not (b) If the person is present at a location at which marijuana is subject to public disclosure. produced, including any residence associated with that location, (2)Names and other identifying information from the list estab three mature marijuana plants, four immature marijuana plants lished pursuant to subsection(1)of this section may be released and one ounce of usable marijuana per each mature plant. to: (2) If the individuals described in subsection (1)of this section (a)Authorized employees of the division as necessary to per- possess, deliver or produce marijuana in excess of the amounts form official duties of the division;and allowed in subsection (1)of this section,such individuals are not (b) Authorized employees of state or local law enforcement excepted from the criminal laws of the state but may establish an agencies, only as necessary to verify that a person is a lawful affirmative defense to such charges, by a preponderance of the possessor of a registry identification card or that a person is the evidence,that the greater amount is medically necessary to miti- designated primary caregiver of such a person. gate the symptoms or effects of the person's debilitating medical SECTION 13.(1)If a person who possesses a registry identifi- condition. cation card issued pursuant to section 4 of this Act chooses to (3)The Health Division shall define by rule when a marijuana have a designated primary caregiver,the person must designate plant is mature and when it is immature for purposes of this the primary caregiver by including the primary caregiver's name section. and address: SECTION 8.(1) Possession of a registry identification card or (a)On the person's application for a registry identification card; designated primary caregiver identification card pursuant to (b) In the annual updated information required under section 4 section 4 of this Act shall not alone constitute probable cause to of this Act;or search the person or property of the cardholder or otherwise sub- (c)In a written,signed statement submitted to the division. ject the person or property of the cardholder to inspection by any (2)A person described in this section may have only one des- governmental agency. ignated primary caregiver at any given time. (2) Any property interest possessed, owned or used in con- SECTION 14.Any person may submit a petition to the division section with the medical use of marijuana or acts incidental to the requesting that a particular disease or condition be included medical use of marijuana that has been seized by state or local among the diseases and conditions that qualify as debilitating law enforcement officers shall not be harmed, neglected, injured medical conditions under section 3 of this Act.The division shall or destroyed while in the possession of any law enforcement adopt rules establishing the manner in which the division will eval- agency.No such property interest may be forfeited under any pro- uate petitions submitted under this section. Any rules adopted vision of law providing for the forfeiture of property other than as pursuant to this section shall require the division to approve or a sentence imposed after conviction of a criminal offense. deny a petition within 180 days of receipt of the petition by the Marijuana and paraphernalia used to administer marijuana that division. Denial of a petition shall be considered a final division was seized by any law enforcement office shall be returned imme- action subject to judicial review. diately upon a determination by the district attorney in whose SECTION 15.The division shall adopt all rules necessary for the county the property was seized, or his or her designee, that the implementation and administration of sections 1 to 19 of this Act. person from whom the marijuana or paraphernalia used to admin- SECTION 16. Nothing in sections 1 to 19 of this Act shall be ister marijuana was seized is entitled to the protections contained construed to require: in sections 1 to 19 of this Act. Such determination may be evi- (1)A government medical assistance program or private health denced,for example,be a decision not to prosecute,the dismissal insurer to reimburse a person for costs associated with the of charges,or acquittal. medical use of marijuana;or SECTION 9.No attending physician may be subjected to Civil (2)An employer to accommodate the medical use of marijuana penalty or discipline by the Board or Medical Examiners for: in any workplace. (1)Advising a person whom the attending physician has diag- SECTION 17.The division may take any actions on or before nosed as having a debilitating medical condition,or a person who the effective date of this Act that are necessary for the proper and the attending physician knows has been so diagnosed by another timely implementation and administration of sections 1 to 19 of physician licensed under ORS chapter 677, about the risks and this Act. benefits of medical use of marijuana or that the medical use of SECTION 18.Any section of this Act being held invalid as to marijuana may mitigate the symptoms or effects of the person's any person or circumstance shall not affect the application of any debilitating medical condition,provided the advice is based on the other section of this Act that can be given full effect without the attending physician's personal assessment of the person's med- invalid section or application. ical history and current medical condition;or SECTION 19. All provisions of this Act shall apply to acts or (2)Providing the written documentation necessary for issuance offenses committed on or after December 3, 1998, except that of a registry identification card under section 4 of this Act, if the sections 4, 12 and 14 shall become effective on May 1, 1999. 150 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ARGUMENT IN FAVOR This measure changes current law to allow a person with a My name is Stormy Ray.I am a grandmother of five.One day debilitating medical condition, verified by written proof from a in 1985, my legs stopped*working. I sat down in the street and physician,to engage in the medical use of marijuana.Current law dragged myself to my car. prohibits possession, delivery or production of marijuana. This I endured nearly a year of frantic testing before doctors diagnosed measure allows for the medical use, possession, delivery and production of limited amounts of marijuana,without pharmaceuti- my multiple sclerosis.To treat my fatigue, nerve pain, and diges- cal control (due to federal regulation), to alleviate the symptoms tive problems, my doctor prescribed numerous drugs. or effects of debilitating medical conditions, including cancer, For years, I lived my life in a haze from all of the different drugs.I glaucoma,AIDS, HIV,and other conditions. could not function. My self-esteem plummeted and I became This measure establishes a state registration system that bedridden, a recluse from life for Six years. After 31 years of a issues cards to persons eligible to use marijuana for medical healthy,active lifestyle, I felt my life was over. purposes.This measure also allows a person who qualifies to use By 1991, 1 was dying. Doctors were unable to treat the chronic marijuana for medical purposes to designate as a primary care- migraine headaches that were killing me. My constant pain giver a person who has significant responsibility for managing his caused severe vomiting.This led to numerous trips to the emer- or her care.A designated primary caregiver is authorized to assist gency room where I was pumped full of morphine, Demerol, and the qualified person in the use, possession,delivery and produc- other mind-altering drugs. tion of limited amounts of marijuana for authorized medical pur- poses. The designated primary caregiver must be identified on Medical marijuana is the only medicine that has helped to the identification card provided to the qualified person.For minors restore my dignity and quality of life. the designated primary caregiver must be a parent or guardian. If not for medical marijuana, I would be residing in a nursing Current criminal penalties for the possession, delivery or pro- home-unable to function,suffering unbearable pain. duction of marijuana, and for aiding and abetting another in the Now,I face a dilemma.The choice is to live in unbearable possession, delivery or production of marijuana, remain in effect. pain or fear arrest if I use marijuana as medicine. A person who qualifies or has applied for medical use of mari- juana is excepted from these state laws.This measure creates an That's not a choice I should have to make. affirmative defense to state criminal charges of possession or I have a lot to live for...my daughter...my family...all my hopes and production or marijuana for a person who is diagnosed with a dreams. Medical marijuana may be the only medicine that gives debilitating medical condition, is engaged in the medical use of me a fighting chance. marijuana and possesses marijuana in an amount permitted under this measure. I am not alone.There are thousands of patients like me--people A suffering from cancer, AIDS, glaucoma, epilepsy, and a host of person authorized to engage in the medical use of marijuana other diseases or illnesses that threaten their lives. under this measure remains subject to criminal prosecution if he or she drives under the influence of marijuana, engages in the Patients should have the right to use any medical means medical use of marijuana in a public place or in public view,deliv- necessary to control our diseases.We should be able to talk to ers marijuana to any person not in possession of an identification our doctors about whether or not marijuana will help us. card or delivers marijuana to any person for money or other Please vote YES on MEASURE 67. consideration. This measure also prohibits any professional licensing board Stormy Ray from taking disciplinary action against or imposing a civil penalty Chief Petitioner upon a licensee based upon the licensee's authorized medical (This information furnished by Stormy Ray,Oregonians for Medical Rights.) use of marijuana or actions taken by the licensee as the desig- nated primary caregiver of a person authorized to use marijuana for medical purposes. It also prohibits penalizing or disciplining any attending physician for advising a person diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating condition about the risks,bene- fits and possible effects of the medical use of marijuana if the advice is based upon the physician's personal assessment of the person's medical history and current condition. In addition, this measure prohibits penalizing or disciplining any attending physi- cian for providing the written documentation necessary for issuing a registry identification card under this measure. This measure does not require governmental medical assis- tance plans or private health insurers to reimburse a person for the costs resulting from the medical use of marijuana. Committee Members: Appointed by: George Eighmey Chief Petitioners Todd Olson Chief Petitioners Sheriff Dan Noelle* Secretary of State Dr.Cornilia Taylor Secretary of State Representative Lane Shetterly Members of the Committee 'Member dissents(does not concur with explanatory statement) (This committee was appointed to provide an impartial explanation of the (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) ballot measure pursuant to ORS 251.215.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the aQcuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 151 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR "The examination room is a sanctuary...the war on drugs FACTS ABOUT THE OREGON MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT: does not belong there:' Protect Patients...Vote Yes on Measure 67 —Richard E.Bayer,M.D.,FACP The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act allows patients suffering from I have seen many patients benefit from the medical use of mari- cancer,glaucoma,AIDS,multiple sclerosis,and other serious dis- juana.If it were legal to do so,physicians would recommend mar- eases–with physician written approval–to use marijuana to relieve ijuana to suffering patients, many of whom are terminally ill. their symptoms. ' Today,the law prevents us from helping patients who could ben- Measure 67 Requires Physician Approval to Use efit from this treatment option.The examination room is for treat- Medical Marijuana ing patients–it should not serve as the battlefield for the war on Not just anyone can use marijuana and claim a medical need.To drugs.The decisions of dying and suffering patients should be respected. use medical marijuana legally in their treatment,patients must get their medical doctor's approval in writing. Such approval entitles That's why I am a chief petitioner of Measure 67–The Oregon patients to receive a permit from the state health division. Medical Marijuana Act. This moderate proposal exempts This permit will also inform law enforcement officials that the patients with serious illnesses from Oregon criminal law when using marijuana under doctor supervision. patient has a legitimate medical need for marijuana, preventing unnecessary arrests of dying and suffering patients. Patients with cancer find marijuana controls their vomiting,allow- What the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act Does Not Allow: ing them to continue chemotherapy.Patients find marijuana helps the "wasting syndrome" that often characterizes AIDS. Patients • DOES NOT allow medical use of marijuana in a public place or with spinal injuries and multiple sclerosis find relief from severe in public view. muscle spasms (spasticity) that complicate nerve damage. Patients with glaucoma have derived benefit from marijuana - DOES NOT allow the sale of marijuana under any circum- when conventional treatments have failed. stances. Dying and suffering patients should not be arrested for using ' DOES NOT allow minors to use for medical purposes without medical marijuana under doctor supervision.This simple state- the written consent of a parent or guardian. ment can be agreed upon by most of you, who like me, are not . DOES NOT change any other existing criminal laws with experts in the"politics of marijuana"or"drug policy reform,"and regard to the illegal use of marijuana. do not support the legalization of marijuana for recreational use. VOTE YES ON MEASURE 67 Measure 67 is about the rights of dying and suffering patients. Protect Dying and Suffering Patients. Patients and their physicians should be able to discuss every treatment option. Measure 67 simply allows patients with debili- (This information furnished by Amy K. Ware, Oregonians for Medical tating illnesses to use a medicine that may help their Rights.) condition–free from fear of arrest and incarceration. Measure 67 is a moderate law with clear safeguards designed to protect dying and suffering patients and allow the use of medical marijuana under a doctor's care. Please join me In Voting YES on 67. Richard E.Bayer,M.D.,FACP Chief Petitioner (This information furnished by Richard E. Bayer, M.D., Oregonians for Medical Rights.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. . accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 152 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 67 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR New England Journal of Medicine VOTE YES ON MEASURE 67! Supports the Medical Use of Marijuana IT'S A REASONABLE RESPONSE TO "The advanced stages of many illnesses and their treatments are AN UNREASONABLE SITUATION often accompanied by intractable nausea, vomiting, or pain. Did you know that under current state and federal law mari- Thousands of patients with cancer, AIDS, and other diseases juana is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance and may report they have obtained striking relief from these devastating not be prescribed for medical use by doctors?Did you know that symptoms by smoking marijuana." more dangerous drugs—such as morphine,cocaine and amphet- "...I believe that a federal policy that prohibits physicians from alle amines—are available for medical use because they are classi- fied as Schedule II controlled substances or lower? viating suffering by prescribing marijuana for seriously ill patients is misguided, heavy-handed,and inhumane." Despite mounting evidence that marijuana can help patients "...It is also hypocritical to forbid physicians to prescribe marijuana with glaucoma,AIDS,cancer,multiple sclerosis,and other condi- tions,permitting them to use morphine and meperidine to relieve block the federal Drug Enforcement Administration continues to extreme dyspnea and pain:' b research on the beneficial effects of marijuana. Oregon can't change federal law, but we can decide how state and local "...Federal authorities should rescind their prohibition of the med- law enforcement officials will treat the medical use of marijuana. ical use of marijuana for seriously ill patients and allow physicians MEASURE 67 WILL EASE HARASSMENT OF PATIENTS to decide which patients to treat.The government should change marijuana's status.....and regulate it accordingly." Patients whose medical conditions are eased by marijuana Some physicians will have the courage to challenge the con- should not be arrested and sent to jail.That's why the American proscription of marijuana for the sick. Eventually, their Civil Liberties Union(ACLU)of Oregon helped write Measure 67. tinu o actions will force the courts to adjudicate between the rights of And that's why we urge you to support this initiative. those at death's door and the absolute power of bureaucrats MEASURE 67 IS A SAFE,MODERATE LAW whose decisions are based more on reflexive ideology and politi- cal Here are some of the important safeguards included in correctness than on compassion." Measure 67: REFERENCE:Editorial by New England Journal of Medicine Editor Dr.Jerome Kassirer,Jan.30,1997 The exceptions for medical use of marijuana will only be available for patients who need it[See Section 3(2), def!ni- (This information furnished by Geoff Sugarman, Oregonians for Medical tion of"debilitating medical condition"]; Rights.) • While Measure 67 will allow medical use of marijuana, it will not allow anyone to sell marijuana[See Section 5(1)(d)];this is intended to prevent the type of"cannabis buyers'clubs" which have popped up in California since the approval of a medical marijuana measure there; • Measure 67 will not affect Oregon laws that already make it a crime to drive a motor vehicle while under the influence of marijuana[See Section 5(1)(a)]; • Measure 67 specifically prohibits any medical use of mari- juana in a public place or within public view {See Section 5(1)(b)]• VOTE YES ON MEASURE 671 IT'S A REASONABLE RESPONSE TO AN UNREASONABLE SITUATION (This information furnished by Jann Carson,American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)of Oregon.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 153 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Nurses Standby Their Patients By Supporting Measure 67 Physicians Support Measure 67 Nurses are compassionate healers who care deeply for our dying As medical professionals,we support the rights of our patients to and suffering patients. We are also advocates for our patients' use medicines that might help them treat their debilitating ill- medical needs. nesses.That's why we urge you to vote YES on Measure 67,the That is why many nurses support Measure 67. Oregon Medical Marijuana Act. There Are Volumes of Data That Prove Medical For many centuries, patients have used marijuana(cannabis)as Marijuana Works. medicine, achieving positive results for the treatment of a variety of conditions. Even as medical technology has improved, many A vast and ever-expanding body of medical knowledge details the dying and suffering patients are afflicted with debilitating condi- many medicinal benefits of marijuana.Many more volumes speak tions for which the responsible use of marijuana as medicine of widespread,safe use by patients with the quiet understanding might help. and tacit approval of doctors and nurses everywhere. Many patients with cancer, glaucoma, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, Unfortunately,science and ethics have taken a back seat to polit- spinal cord injuries and other serious illnesses report significant ical posturing.Patients and their families are the losers when pol- relief from their symptoms`by using marijuana as medicine. itics replaces public policy. Numerous articles in respected medical journals such as the New Today,Our Patients Must Live in Fear. England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association point to the same conclusions:Marijuana as Today,dying and suffering patients live in fear.Under current law, medicine works for many patients (see Measure 67, Oregon medical marijuana patients are arrested, prosecuted, fined and Medical Marijuana Act,web site at http://www,teleport.com/-omr). even jailed for using a safe medicine which relieves pain,spastic- ity, nausea and a host of other debilitating conditions. This is However,at this time,the federal government has classified mar- wrong! , ijuana as a substance that cannot be prescribed by physi- As nurses, we stand beside our patients by supporting Measure cians...even though we can prescribe powerful drugs such as 67 to allow dying and suffering patients the right to use medicinal morphine. The editor in chief of the New England Journal of marijuana. Medicine (1/30/97), Dr. Jerome Kassirer wrote "a federal policy that prohibits physicians from alleviating suffering by prescribing Measure 67 Ends the Injustice Patients Face marijuana for seriously ill patients is misguided, heavy-handed Measure 67 begins to address this tragic social injustice by allow- and inhumane."We agree. ing seriously ill Oregonians the right to legally use marijuana as Measure 67,the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act,allows dying and medicine if they register with the Oregon Health Division and are suffering patients the right to use marijuana as medicine under under the care of a physician.By passing Measure 67,voters will doctor supervision. It does not change other drug laws.Measure acknowledge that this safe and effective medicine should be avail- 67 simply provides a safe harbor to protect seriously ill patients able for medical use. from arrest if their physician states marijuana "might help"their It also represents an awareness by the people of Oregon that debilitating condition. turning patients into criminals is inconsistent with the ethics we Please join us in voting yes on Measure 67. live by. Charles M.Grossman;M.D. For the sake of our patients,please join nurses across Oregon in David M..Smith,M.D. supporting the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act. Michael J.Veverka, M.D. Please Vote Yes on Measure 67. Richard E.Bayer, M.D. Stephen R.Enloe, M..D. Edward Glick, RN Karen Hughes, RN Dana McGlohn, RN Euan Horniman, M.D. Donna Heavrin, RN Cameron Lowder, RN Kerry Self, RN Karen Daley, RN Linda Lindsey, RN Bruce Penner, RN (This information furnished by Richard E. Bayer, M.D., Oregonians.for Dianne Cassidy, RN Medical Rights.) (This information furnished by Edward Glick,RN.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 154 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures � r Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT IN.FAVOR ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION In 1982,1 was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. "Medical Marijuana Scam" For 12 years the disease remained in remission, focc.org/ allowing me to continue my work as a nurse, a profession I had Who's lying?Snake-oil salesmen,wanting to get high, ....or us? worked in for 20 years. "Adults"confuse children calling smoked marijuana, "medicine", used those 12 years to enjoy life–climbing mountains, rafting implying it's good for you. Oregon's rivers, living an active life – because I knew any,day things could change. Speaking of legalizing marijuana for chemotherapy patients,Keith Stroup,founder,twice executive director of National Organization In 1994,my disease worsened. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws,said: I began to lose the ability to function free from pain and the crip- « pling spasms of MS. we'll be using the issue as a red herring to give marijuana a I had to quit my job and go on social security disability. good name. It was during this time I began to use medical marijuana.The interview (2/6/79) with the "Emory Wheel", ("Normal benefits were immediate. Chairman Keith Stroup on Pot Issues) It was the only medicine I could take that significantly relieved the Dick Cowen, National Director of NORML, while at a conference muscle spasms. celebrating the anniversary of LSD,stated: As a nurse and a patient, I can tell you with certainty that the "The key to it [legalization of marijuana, for personal use] is debilitating conditions of my disease would be unbearable if I did medical access.Because,once you have hundreds of thousands not use marijuana as medicine. of people using marijuana medically under medical supervision, am not alone. the whole scam is going to be bought....then we'll get medical, I have known many other patients who have successfully used then,we'll get full legalization." this medicine to help control their disease or illness. Videotape, `Medical Marijuana:A Smokescreen" hope Oregonians pass Measure 67,if only to send a message GO Media Companies, P.O.Box 32786, Phoenix,AZ 85064 to the federal government: Doctors should be allowed to pre- • Synthetic marijuana, Marinol, is already available. scribe medical marijuana to their patients. • Proposition 200 ("medical marijuana") Arizonans believe it 1 do not want to live in fear of arrest or prosecution because the created dangerous, unintended consequences. Polls show government has political reasons to arbitrarily outlaw the medical 60%of registered voters support repealing it. use of marijuana. • Glaucoma - wide fluctuations in intraocular pressure, and I don't want to have to buy the only medicine that helps me from numerous other factors affect the course of this disease; underground drug dealers in back alleys. doctors agree: using marijuana as a treatment is likely to Please Vote Yes on Measure 67. mask problems increasing the risk of blindness. Patients like me are counting on your support. • Fetal Marijuana Symptoms are similar to those of Fetal Thank you. Alcohol Syndrome,both,preventable. Jeanelle Bluhm • Mental Illness- marijuana has long been known to`trigger' mental illnesses, such as bipolar (manic-depressive) psy- (This information furnished by Jeanelle Bluhm, Oregonians for Medical chosis 2nd schizophrenia. Marijuana users are six times Rights.) more likely to develop schizophrenia than non-users. • Benzopyrene, a carcinogen, is more prevalent in marijuana than tobacco.Holding smoke in,4 joints equal 30 cigarettes. Smoke is not a medicine;it damages the brain, heart,lungs and immune systems, impairs white blood cells' fighting infection,as well as resistance to diseases like AIDS. Don't Legitimize Marijuana! Vote NO! (This information furnished by John E.English,Director,For Our Children's Children.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 155 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT 1N OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION My name is Stanley Fields and I am a recovering Addict.I've been MEASURE 67 WOULD PREVENT POLICE AND PROSECU- in recovery for over 13 years and we,that have have attained long TORS FROM DOING THEIR JOB–FIGHTING CRIME. term recovery from addiction, understand this issue as good, if • Measure 67 would make it easier for children and adults to pos- not better than most Oregonians.I was almost dead at the age of sess and use marijuana. This measure would make mari- 27 from chronic substance abuse. Juana growers practically immune from prosecution. It will It started with marijuana and I was a frequent marijuana be difficult to determine whether a person is growing marijuana smoker for more than a decade...It robbed me of everything for"medicinal"or illegal purposes. Suddenly, possession of a good in life.Some say that marijuana is a soft drug and it really dangerous drug would be none of the police force's business. doesn't cause much harm and I say how would you feel about the MEASURE 67 IS NOT ABOUT SICK PEOPLE OR WHETHER airline pilot, flying your plane, that just smoked a little harmless MARIJUANA QUALIFIES AS MEDICINE. IT IS AN ATTEMPT marijuana?Or the bus driver taking your children to school?The TO LEGALIZE A VERY DANGEROUS DRUG. OUT-OF-STATE message I received,as a kid was that drugs like marijuana,were BACKERS WHO WANT TO LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS ARE illegal and they would mess up my life.The people that gave me PLAYING UPON OREGON'S COMPASSION FOR SERIOUS that message were dead right ... schoolteachers and leaders in ILLNESS. my community all sent that message and unfortunately I didn't lis- ten. UNDER MEASURE 67, YOUR NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR This measure sends the message to our children that smoking WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW MARIJUANA FOR marijuana is ok, that it's a harmless herb used for centuries and SELF-MEDICATION. THIS IS NOT ABOUT A MARIJUANA that it has medicinal use.Not one credible scientific organiza- PRESCRIPTION FROM THE PHARMACY. THERE ARE NO tion has deemed marijuana useful.Can you think of one med- EFFECTIVE LIMITS OR CONTROLS ON HOW MUCH MARI- ically useful drug that has ever had to go to a vote of the JUANA IS GROWN. people for approval?There are some well meaning but evs erelX • The permit system outlined in Measure 67 is nothing more than misguided people who believe that we should legalize drugs and ruse.use•With a doctor's recommendation, people can apply for they are using the medical issue to further that cause. If drugs the permit.The simple act of completing the application makes would have been legal when I was growing up I would be users and growers immune from prosecution. dead now. • Children will be allowed to smoke marijuana for pain,leading to Don't let marijuana rob our children's growing and develop- dependency and addiction at an early age.This will drastically ing minds the opportunity to be as healthy as they can be. affect their achievement levels and overall quality of life. Don't be fooled by a well-financed campaign of misinforma- TODAY'S MARIJUANA IS MUCH STRONGER THAN POT tion.I urge you to vote NO on Measure 67. SMOKED IN THE 60's or 70's. Stanley Fields The THC content in marijuana today is 10 times greater than Recovering Addict in 1960. It is a highly addictive, mind-altering drug that needs to be taken seriously. (This information furnished by Stanley Fields.) MEASURE 67 INCLUDES PROTECTION FOR USERS IN THE WORK PLACE AND IN SCHOOLS. • Employees will have freedom to smoke marijuana wherever and whenever they want.It will be discriminatory to tell employ- ees they can't use their"prescription"in the workplace.When employees are on drugs,they have poor judgment.This leads to more work-related accidents, increased absenteeism and lowered productivity on the jqb. I BELIEVE THAT MARIJUANA IS BAD MEDICINE FOR OREGON. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67. (This information furnished by Dan Noelle,Multnomah County Sheriff.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 156 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures 1 � Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION MEASURE 67—NO LIMITS,NO CONTROLS THE STRAIGHT FACTS ABOUT MARIJUANA. • Measure sets no age limitation on smoking marijuana. • Marijuana is addictive and affects the brain in ways similar to Children will have access to marijuana and be allowed to heroin, cocaine, tobacco, or alcohol.Teenagers are twice as smoke it under this measure.Do Oregonians want a law that likely as adults to become addicted to marijuana. allows juveniles to get illegal street drugs in the name of med- • Children born to women who use marijuana during pregnancy icine. The answer is NO. are apt to have lower birth weight, lower intelligence, more • Do you know that your neighbors will be growing pot? behavior problems,and a ten times greater chance of develop- Measure 67 allows people to grow marijuana in their home for ing leukemia. '.medicinal"use.The measure requires no prescription and no • Using marijuana damages health, thinking, memory, learning, trip to the pharmacy.What"medical supervision"will there be for the children climbing over the fence? and self management abilities. Marijuana smokers should not drive because marijuana erodes their driving abilities much as We do not want our neighbors next door growing pot for the alcohol does. whole family.This is unacceptable.Measure 67 is unaccept- able. Marijuana is a dangerous drug and we should treat it 6 times more likely to bring guns to school. accordingly. • 4 times more likely to attack another person to hurt them. • Medicine is not smoked.We do not need to allow our children • 3 times more likely to engage in sex (and far more likely to to smoke marijuana to treat medical conditions when there are do so without protection against disease and pregnancy). myriad prescription medicines approved by the FDA and • 2 times more likely to attempt suicide. proven safe and effective. • 85 times more likely to use cocaine. We do not want children becoming dependent on drugs— Marijuana use by Oregon 8th graders has tripled since 1990 legally or otherwise. and is 36% above the national average. Measure 67 would Measure 67 sends the wrong message to our children.How allow Oregon children to smoke marijuana legally. do we tell children marijuana is bad when we label it Out-of-state marijuana promoters paid for Measure 67 in hopes' medicine? of making marijuana more available.Marijuana promoters want • From 1995 to 1996 trial use of marijuana doubled among to eliminate all restrictions on drug use. elementary school children.aged nine to 12 -- increasing The main active ingredient in marijuana is available in synthetic from 230,000 children experimenting with marijuana in 1995 to form with a doctor's prescription (brand name Marino]). 460,000 in 1996(Partnership Attitude Tracking Study). Research shows it is safe and effective for appetite stimulation • From 1996 to 1997 use of marijuana by the same group and nausea reduction. increased by another thitd.The number of 12-15 year olds Smoked marijuana has never been shown to be safe and effec- using marijuana increased from 7.1%in 1996 to 9.4%in 1997 tive treatment for any medical condition.Twenty-five years of (1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse). scientific research and more than 12,000 published studies SMOKING MARIJUANA INHIBITS BOTH INTELLECTUAL AND confirm only harm and health damage from smoked marijuana. PHYSICAL GROWTH IN YOUNG PEOPLE. SMOKING MARIJUANA CIGARETTES IS NOT GOOD • The 1996 Oregon Public School Drug Survey reported that MEDICINE FOR ANYONE. drug use not only affects a student's scholastic performance VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67. but is often related to their willingness to remain in school. (This information furnished by Roger Burt,MS.) LEGALIZING MARIJUANA IS BAD FOR OREGON. ENCOURAGING YOU TO DO IT IN THE NAME OF MEDICINE IS DECEPTIVE, IT IS NOT ABOUT MEDICINE,IT IS ABOUT LEGALIZING DRUGS! VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67 (This information furnished by Terry Hensley, Save Our Society from Drugs.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 157 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure. No . 67 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION Oregonians care about people;they are compassionate.But ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION TO MEASURE 67 Measure 67 is not about compassion and marijuana is not The Board of Directors for Southern Oregon Drug Awareness medicine. (SODA)oppose Measure 67 for the following reasons: Oregon voters can show they care for those who are suffer- 1 There are over 400 chemicals in marijuana, many of them ing without voting to legalize marijuana. Voting against harmful.Scientific research has found only one,THC, has any Measure 67 doesn't mean you don't care. Voting against medicinal value. ; Measure 67 means YOU DO CARE ABOUT: OUR SCHOOLS: 2.Synthetic THC, Marinol, is already available and can be pre- scribed by physicians. SODA has no problem with medically Marijuana use by Oregon 8th graders has tripled since 1990, sound drugs. For example, Oregon has a high per capita use and is 36%above the national average.Research shows mar- of prescribed morphine.This means we are working to relieve ijuana users have more problems with learning, memory, pain. As a drug, marijuana has no similar scientific validity. concentration,and behavior. Marijuana has been rejected as medicine by several noted Measure 67 will make marijuana even more available to health organizations including the American Medical Oregon's youth. Association, American Cancer Society and the Multiple Sclerosis and Glaucoma Societies. OUR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: 3.The measure permits 3 mature and 4 immature plants, much Measure 67 allows children to smoke marijuana. Smoking more than what would be necessary for the use of one person, marijuana affects the brain and leads to impaired short-term medicinal or otherwise. On the average, one plant produces memory, perception,judgement and motor skills. Research in 3-4 pounds;one joint is one-half gram.28 grams equal 1 ounce Oregon shows marijuana is now the #1 drug of abuse for for a potential 896 joints per pound. teenagers entering drug treatment programs. 4.The THC content of marijuana is 1400% stronger today than Measure 67 will increase everyone's access to mari- the 1960s. Smoked marijuana interferes with functions in the juana,young and old alike. brain causing memory, learning, perception and judgment OUR WORKPLACES: problems. 5. Research .documents that when a drugs use is perceived as The#1 reason Oregon employees fail drug tests is marijuana. being high risk, usage of the drug goes down.When a drugs Currently 73%of all users of illegal drugs,including marijuana, use is perceived as being low risk, usage of the drug goes up. are employed. We want to decrease use by kids; passage of Measure 67 Measure 67 will increase drug use in the workplace cre- would send the wrong message to youth. ating significant safety hazards. 6. Research shows that among the conditions which put youth OUR HEALTH: at-risk for drug use are community standards which are toler- ant of use and adult attitudes that are favorable toward use. Lung damage from smoking one marijuana cigarette is equal to Passage of Measure 67 would send the wrong message to the damage from 14 tobacco cigarettes. The American Lung youth. Association reports that marijuana contains at least 50% more cancer causing agents than cigarettes. FDA approved prescrip- Measure 67 isn't good public health policy.It isn't good medicine. tion medications are proven safer and more effective than mari- It isn't good social policy.SODA opposes Measure 67. juana for treating any medical condition. (This information furnished by Stephanie Scares Pump,Executive Director, Measure 67 allows people to smoke marijuana in any Southern Oregon Drug Awareness.) amount, any potency, any time, without a written pre- scription. IF YOU REALLY CARE,VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67 (This information furnished by Jennifer Hudson, Oregonians Against Dangerous Drugs.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the I ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 158 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No. 67 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON POLICE CHIEFS FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES URGE Oregonians have always been concerned with providing good YOU TO REJECT MARIJUANA AS THE DANGEROUS DRUG medicine to meet the medical needs of its citizens.However,bal- j THAT IT IS,BY VOTING NO ON BALLOT MEASURE 67. lot measure 67 which attempts to legalize marijuana as a • Measure 67 would change Oregon law,making it legal for medicine does not meet the medical needs of Oregonians people with"debilitating medical conditions"to grow their nor does it qualify as good medicine. own marauana for self-medication, with minimal medical Claims of benefits pale when compared to real data.The NIH supervision. "Debilitating medical conditions" is not strictly Institute on Allergy and Infectious Disease doesn't feel marijuana defined,but would include persistent back spasms. is effective due to problems with drug absorption from smoking, MARIJUANA IS A NOT MEDICINE. present of carcinogenic compounds and contamination due to MARIJUANA IS A DANGEROUS DRUG. salmonella and fungal spores.The National Eye Institute reports, "there is no scientifically verifiable evidence that marijuana or its • Measure 67 requires that marijuana be exempt from the derivatives are safe and effective in the treatment of glaucoma:" approval of the U.S.Food and Drug Administration,which gov- Their research shows no evidence that it can safely lower intraoc- erns all prescription drugs. ular pressure in order to prevent optic nerve damage. VOTE NO ON 67TO MAINTAIN SAFE,LIVABLE COMMUNITIES President Harmon J. Eyre of the American Cancer Society has commented regarding treatment of nausea from cancer treatment • Common sense tells us that if cultivation and possession of with marijuana.He states that there is"no reason to support the marijuana is allowed for medical use, illegal use will increase legalization of marijuana for medical use"Joanne Schellenback as well. Law enforcement officials and medical profes- of the American Cancer Society says that,"there are ample legal sional overwhelmingly reject measures such as this, pharmaceuticals available... which don't present the medical which will increase young people's access to dangerous problems caused by inhaling." drugs. In a 1994 study published in Clinical Pharmacology and • Measure 67 actually allows a legal defense for persons who Therapeutics, multiple sclerosis patients who smoked a single use, deliver and grow marijuana without possessing a state marijuana cigarette experienced increased posture problems, permit if they claim to suffer from a debilitating medical condi- decreased response speed and further impaired posture and bal- tion.With the exception of large commercial operations,it ance.The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke will be impossible to prosecute persons who use,deliver stated,"There is no evidence that marijuana is effective in modi- or grow marijuana for illegal purposes. fying the course of MS" OREGON DOES NOT NEED MARIJUANA AS MEDICINE. The biggest mistake of this policy is that it ignores the many JOIN OREGON POLICE CHIEFS FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES resources and valid treatments available to Oregonians for IN TELLING THOSE OUT-OF-STATE MILLIONAIRES THAT their medical pain and suffering.Ballot Measure 67 attempts OREGON WON'T STAND FOR LEGALIZING DANGEROUS to replace sound and effective therapies with a mythological DRUGS. substitute. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67. What Oregonians want is real medicine for their real medical problems. We urge all Oregonians to pursue good treatments (This information furnished by Mike Cahill,Oregon Police Chiefs For Safer from the time tested halls of medicine.Let's not make the mistake Communities.) of using the ballot box to fashion bad medicine. VOTE NO ON BALLOT MEASURE 67 (This information furnished by Mike Howden,Oregon Physicians Resource Council.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 159 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Statewide Measures Measure No . 67 ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OREGON PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION URGES YOU TO Measure 67 is not about caring for sick and dying people REJECT MARIJUANA ASTHE DANGEROUS DRUG THAT IT IS Measure 67 is about legalizing dangerous drugs BY VOTING NO ON BALLOT MEASURE 67. Oregon must just say"No"to this ill-conceived concept.When you Measure 67 would change Oregon law,making it legal for people read the measure,you won't be fooled. with"debilitating medical conditions"to grow their own marijuana Oregon wants to fight crime. So why create an environment for self-medication, with minimal medical supervision. where drugs will be readily available for "medicinal" and other ; "Debilitating medical conditions" includes anything that consti uses? Instead of stopping crime, Measure 67 would be encour- aging criminal activity and eroding the fabric of our society. Marijuana is not medicine. Marijuana is a dangerous drug. It is not a question of compassion.Oregonians care deeply about Measure 67 requires that marijuana be exempt from the approval our neighbors and friends.There is no question that we want crit- of the U.S.Food and Drug Administration,which governs all pre- ically ill patients to get the best care available.That is why we scription drugs. This would set a very dangerous precedent, must reject Measure 67,for the fact that there are FDA approved undermining the FDA's safe and effective guarantee system that safe and affective drugs on the market to treat pain.None of these Americans have relied upon for decades. need to be smoked. Since when does the responsibility fall on Common sense tells us that if cultivation and possession of mar- voters to decide which drugs work? ijuana is allowed for "medical" use, illegal use will increase as Just look at the supporters of this measure.The majority of their well. Law enforcement officials and medical professionals money is from out-of-state donors who are known drug legaliza- overwhelmingly reject measures such as these, which will increase young people's access to dangerous drugs. mill advocates (per state in & E reports).They will be spending millions of dollars, and in the process destroying lives and Measure 67 actually allows a legal defense for persons who use, families. deliver and grow marijuana without possessing a state permit if We cannot afford to gamble with our children's future by they claim to suffer from a debilitating medical condition.With the making drugs more accessible. exception of large commercial operations, it will be impossible to prosecute marijuana violations. SAVE OUR CHILDREN,SAVE OUR FAMILIES,SAVE OUR WAY 67 is a poorly drafted measure which appears to set rules and lim- OF LIFE. its as to the possession, delivery, and cultivation of marijuana, VOTE"NO ON MEASURE 67 however there are broad exceptions written into key provisions of the measure. These exceptions, some of which are detailed (This information furnished by Lou Beres, Executive Director, Christian above, cancel out the rules and limits, thereby making enforce- Coalition of Oregon.) ment of any marijuana laws not only impractical, but virtually impossible. MEASURE 67 DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.DON'T LET THE OUT- OF-STATE PRO-LEGALIZATION MOVEMENT MAKE ITS MARK IN OREGON. VOTE NO ON MEASURE 67. (This information furnished by Pat Harmon, Oregon Peace Officers Association.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) (This space purchased for$300 in accordance with ORS 251.255.) The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- The printing of this argument does not constitute an endorse- ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the ment by the State of Oregon, nor does the state warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. 160 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General'Information Absent Voter APPLYING FOR ABSENTEE BALLOT The U.S. Department of Defense provides standard form 76 that complies with these requirements. It is recommended that long term absent voters use this form—available at embassies You may apply for an absentee ballot from your county clerk and military installations—whenever possible. if: Special absentee voting instructions and a ballot return enve- 1.You are a registered voter;and lope will accompany each absentee ballot. 2.You have reason to believe an ou will be unable,for Y Y reason, Special Absentee Ballots:Any long term absentee voter may to vote at the polling place on election day. obtain a special absentee ballot for a primary or general elec- Your application must be in writing and must include- tion if the voter believes that: 1.Your signature. (This is required,for comparison to your voter 1.The voter will be residing,stationed or working outside the ter- registration card.) ritorial limits of the United States and the District of Columbia; and 2.Your residence address. 2.The voter will not be able to receive,vote and return a regular 3.The address to which the ballot should be mailed, if different absentee ballot by normal mail delivery within the period pro- from your residence address. vided for absentee voting. While you may apply for and receive an absentee ballot up to If you feel you may need a special absentee ballot,you should 8:00 p.m. on election day, if your application is received by the contact your county elections officer for details. county clerk after October 30, 1998, the county clerk is not required to mail your ballot.If your ballot is not mailed,you must obtain it in person from the county clerk.Therefore, if you apply for an absentee ballot by mail, you must allow enough time to REMEMBER,YOUR VOTED ABSENTEE BALLOT receive the ballot, vote, and return the ballot to the county clerk by 8:00 p.m.on election day. MUST BE RECEIVED IN YOUR COUNTY If you wish to become a permanent absentee voter,you can do ELECTIONS OFFICE BY 8:00 P.M.THE DAY OF so by checking the appropriate box on the absentee ballot appli- THE ELECTION, NOVEMBER 3, 1998. cation form.If you check the permanent absentee voter box,you are considered a permanent absentee voter for every subsequent election until you notify your county clerk or you move out of the county. LONG TERM ABSENT VOTER i ABSENTEE BALLOT j i . APPLICATION I You may apply for long term absent voter status with your county clerk or the Secretary of State if: ( I 1.You are a resident of this state,absent from your place of res- PRECINCT NAME/NUMBER j I idence;and I I 2.You are serving in the armed forces or merchant marine of the j TODAY'S DATE ELECTION DATE United States;or 3.You are temporarily living outside the territorial limits of the j I . United States and the District of Columbia;or I PRINT YOUR NAME CLEARLY I 4.You are a spouse or dependent of a long term absent voter. A I I spouse or dependent of a long term absent voter, not previ- ously a resident of this state who intends to reside in this state, I RESIDENCE STREET ADDRESS I is considered a resident for voting purposes and may vote in the same manner as a long term absent voter. I I Your application must be in writing and must include: j CITY COUNTY ZIP I 1.Your name and current mailing address. I I IX I 2.A statement that you are a citizen of the United States. j SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(HANDWRITTEN) j 3.A statement that you will be 18 or older on the day of the I I election. I IF YOU WISH TO BECOME A PERMANENT ABSENTEE VOTER, I 4.A statement that your home residence has been in this state for I CHECK THIS BOX. j more than 20 days preceding the election; and giving the j I address of your last home residence. I MAIL BALLOT TO: I 5.A statement of the facts that qualify you as a long term absent I I voter. I I 6.A statement that you are not requesting a ballot from any other I STREET ADDRESS I state and are not voting in any other manner than by absentee I I ballot. I I 7.A designation of your political affiliation if you wish to vote in a CITY STATE ZIP I primary election. I I j MAIL THIS APPLICATION TO THE COUNTY CLERK OF THE j COUNTY IN WHICH YOU MAINTAIN YOUR HOME RESIDENCE L-------------------------------------------J 161 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Absent Voter Baker Hood River Polk Wallowa Julia Woods Sandra Berry Linda Dawson Charlotte McIver Baker County Clerk Dir.Assess/Rec. Polk County Clerk Wallowa County Clerk 1995 3rd St.Suite 150 Courthouse,309 State St. Courthouse, Room 201 101 S.River St.,Rm 100,Door 16 Baker.City OR 97814-3398 Hood River,OR 97031-2093 Dallas,OR 97338-3179 Enterprise,OR 97828-1335 541-523-8207 TDD 541-523-8208 541-386-1442 503-623-9217 TDD 503-623-7557 541-426-4543,Ext.15 Benton Jackson Sherman Wasco James Morales Kathy Beckett Linda Cornie Karen LeBreton Elections Division Jackson County Clerk Sherman County Clerk Wasco County Clerk 120 NW 4th St. Courthouse, 10 S.Oakdale Ave. PO Box 365 Courthouse,511 Washington St. Corvallis,OR 97339 Medford,OR 97501-2902 Moro,OR 97039-0365 The Dalles,OR 97058 541-757-6756 TDD 541-757-5646 541-776-7181 TDD 541-774-6719 541-565-3606 541-296-6159 TDD 541-296-6159 Fax 541-565-3312 Clackamas Jefferson Washington John Kauffman Elaine L.Henderson Tillamook Ginny Kingsley Clackamas County Clerk Jefferson County Clerk Josephine Veltri Elections Division Elections Division Courthouse,75 SE"C"St. Tillamook County Clerk 150 N.1 st Ave.,MS3 825 Portland Ave. Madras,OR 97741 201 Laurel Ave. Hillsboro,OR 97124 Gladstone,OR 97027-2195 541-475-4451 TDD 541-475-4451 Tillamook,OR 97141 503-648-8670 TDD 503-693-4598 503-655-8510 503-842-3402 Clatsop Josephine Wheeler Lori Davidson Georgette Brown Umatilla Marilyn Garcia Josephine County Clerk Patti Chapman Wheeler Count Clerk Clatsop County Clerk P y PO Box 178,749 Commercial PO ox 69 Director of Elections Box Astoria,OR 97103-0178 Grants Pass,OR 97528-0203 PO Box 1227 Fossil,OR 97830-0327 503-325-8605 TDD 503-325-9307 541-474-5243 Pendleton,OR 97801 541-763-2400 TDD 541-763-2401 TDD 1-800-735-2900 541-278-6254 TDD 541-278-6257 Columbia Yamhill Elizabeth(Betty)Huser Klamath Union Charles Stern Columbia County Clerk Bernetha G.Letsch R.Nellie Bogue-Hibbert Yamhill County Clerk Courthouse Klamath County Clerk Union County Clerk Courthouse,535 NE 5th St. St.Helens,OR 97051-2089 305 Main St. 1001 4th St.Ste"D" McMinnville,OR 97128-4593 503-397-3796,Ext.8444 Klamath Falls,OR 97602 LaGrande,OR 97850 503-434-7518 TDD 503-434-7519 TDD 503-397-7246,Ext.8445 541-883-5134 TDD 541-883-5157 541-963-1006 Coos Lake Dorothy Taylor Karen Swank Coos County Clerk Lake County Clerk Courthouse 513 Center St. Coquille,OR 97423-1899 Lakeview,OR 97630-1579 541-396-3121,Ext.301 541-947-6006 TDD 541-947-6007 F-----"-------------------"-----"-----"—" TDD 1-800-735-2900 Lane ABSENTEE BALLOT 1 Crook Annette Newingham I I Deanna(Dee)Berman Chief Deputy County Clerk ; APPLICATION i Crook County Clerk 135 E.6th Ave. 300 E.Third,Room 23 Eugene,OR 97401-2671 1 I Prineville,OR 97754-1919 541-682-4234 TDD 541-682-4320 ; 1 541-447-6553 TDD 541-447-6553 Lincoln I PRECINCT NAME/NUMBER 1 Curry Dana Jenkins Renee Kolen Lincoln County Clerk Curry County Clerk 225 W.Olive St.,Room 201 I I PO Box 746 Newport,OR 97365 I TODAY'S DATE ELECTION DATE I Gold Beach,OR 97444 541-265-4131 TDD 541-265-4193 541-247-7011,Ext.223 I I TDD 541-247-6440 Linn j I Deschutes Steven nmiller I PRINT YOUR NAME CLEARLY I Mary Sue(Susie)Penhollow Linn County unty Clerk Deschutes County Albany Clerk SW 4th Alban OR 97321 Deschutes Services Bldg. g I 1 T 41- 7-3833 1340 NW Wall St. 541-967-383 DD 5 96 Bend,OR 97701 Malheur I RESIDENCE STREET ADDRESS I 541-388-6546 TDD 541-385-3203 I I Deborah R.DeLong Douglas Malheur County Clerk 1 I I Doyle Shaver,Jr. 251 "B"St.W.,Suite 4 ; CITY COUNTY ZIP Douglas County Clerk Vale,OR 97918 PO Box 10 541-473-5151 TDD 541-473-5157 1 I Roseburg,OR 97470-0004 i X I 541-440-4252 TDD 541-440-6092 Marion SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(HANDWRITTEN) Alan H.Davidson I I Gilliam Marion County Clerk Rena Kennedy Elections Division Gilliam County Clerk 4263 Commercial St.SE,#300 I IF YOU WISH TO BECOME A PERMANENT ABSENTEE VOTER, I PO Box 427 Salem,OR 97302-3987 ; E] CHECK THIS BOX. j Condon,OR 97823-0427 503-588-5041 /1-800-655-5388 541-384-2311 TDD 503-588-5610 I I Grant Morrow I MAIL BALLOT TO; Kathy McKinnon Barbara Bloodsworth I I Grant County Clerk Morrow County Clerk 201 S.Humbolt St.#290 PO Box 338 Canyon City,OR 97820 Heppner,OR 97836-0338 1 STREET ADDRESS I 541-575-1675 TDD 541-575-1675 541-676-9061 TDD 541-676-9061 j 1 Harney Multnomah 1 I Maria Iturriaga Director of Elections j CITY STATE ZIP I Harney County Clerk 1040 SE Morrison Courthouse,450 N.Buena Vista Portland,OR 97214-2495 Burns,OR 97720 503-248-3720 MAIL THIS APPLICATION TO THE COUNTY CLERK OF THE ; 541-573-6641 Fax 503-248-3719 COUNTY IN WHICH YOU MAINTAIN YOUR HOME RESIDENCE 162 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Voter Registration The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires states to Where to Obtain a Voter Registration Card: meet new standards of accessibility in election administration, making it easier for citizens to register and to vote.Now,citizens Voter registration cards can be obtained from any county elec- who are already registered to vote may update information on tions office, most banks and post offices, some state agencies their registrations, such as residence address, through election and many telephone directories. day and still be able to cast a ballot. If you have moved to a new residence within the same Additionally, the Act is designed to increase the number of county where you are currently registered,your new voter reg- Americans registered to vote by requiring many public agencies istration card must be received by October 26, 1998, in order for to provide registration opportunities to their clients simultaneously you to be eligible to vote a full ballot.If you do not complete a new 4 with other services. registration card by this deadline and wish to vote on election day, you may go to your county elections office or to your polling place to receive a ballot containing federal and statewide offices and I You may register to vote if: statewide measures only. I 1.You are a citizen of the United States; If you have moved to a new residence in a different county 2.You will be at least 18 years old by November 3, 1998;and than where you are currently registered,your new voter regis- tration card must be received or postmarked by October 13,1998. 3.You are a resident of Oregon. If you fail to meet this deadline,you must go to the elections office in your new county by election day to be eligible to vote. To register to vote: If you are changing your political party affiliation, you must complete a new voter registration card and mail it to your county Your completed voter registration card must be received or elections office. A card that contains a change in political party postmarked by October 13, 1998. affiliation must be received or postmarked by October 26, 1998. If you are currently registered to vote in Oregon, you IMPORTANT! Even if there is no record of your voter registration must update your registration by filling out a new voter at your polling site on election day, you can be issued a registration card if: ballot containing federal and statewide offices and statewide measures only.The county elections office will then review your 1.You change your residence address; registration information and determine your voting eligibility. 2.You change your mailing address; Disabled Voters: 3.Your name is changed by marriage or court order, If you are unable, because of a disability, to sign your name on 4.You want to change your political party affiliation;or your voter registration card or other election document (such as 5.Your registration has been canceled. an absentee ballot), you may use a signature stamp or other device to represent your signature. In order to use a signature stamp you must complete a form attesting to the fact that you are disabled and cannot sign your name by hand. This form must be filed before, or at the same time as, your voter registration card.The form may be obtained from any county elec- tions office. 163 SECRETARY OF STATE BULK RATE Phil Keisling CAR-RT SORT State Capitol U.S.Postage Salem, Oregon 97310-0722 Portland,OR Permit No.815 RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER ' voters' pamphlet OF 0 VOLUME 1 OF 2 W * * Z * * * iH ' MEASURES ****** ****** *** j8 59 State of Oregon General Election November 3, 1998 Please RECYCLE this pamphlet with your newspapers 1 \n, p r r UrJi e' _� .--rte '' _��'^~•� a Y S Y '`• a"7 lK 4411' • - • • �.`._w rir �.�,� — - - F fr •11 , • � 11•/1• �J i OF O PHIL KEISL.ING �� STATE OF OREGON SECRETARY OF STATE �� . SECRETARY OF STATE SUZANNE TOWNSEND N 7 136 STATE CAPITOL DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE SALEM,OREGON 97310-0722 (503)986-1500 Dear Oregonian: THIS IS VOLUME 2 OF A 2 VOLUME 1998 GENERAL ELECTION VOTERS' PAMPHLET. Earlier this month you should have received Volume 1, relating to statewide ballot measures. If you have not received Volume 1, please call the Oregon Elections Division at 503-986-1518. Volume 2 of the Voters' Pamphlet contains the list of state measures and candidates, polling place locations, voting instructions, political party statements and the statements filed by individual candidates. For the first time since 1992, your edition of this General Election Voters' Pamphlet might also include ballot measures, measure arguments and candidate statements for counties and the Metropolitan Service District (Metro), and candidate statements for cities with a population greater than 50,000. In addition, local candidates and measures might also appear in optional local voters'pamphlets.Your county might have chosen to publish its County Voters' Pamphlet in combination with this volume. If so, it is inserted in the middle and contains your polling place locations and voting instructions. Some counties might mail a County Voters' Pamphlet separately and some counties might have decided not to publish and distribute a County Voters' Pamphlet. By state law, all voters—except those receiving absentee ballots—should vote at their designated polling site between 7 a.m.and 8 p.m. on November 3. If you vote by absentee ballot please do not vote again at the polls, and make sure your absentee ballot is received by your county elections official by 8 p.m. November 3. If you are not sure where your polling site is located,see the list in this Voters' Pamphlet, check your newspaper, or contact your county elections office. I urge you to vote on November 3—Oregon will be better for it. Best, / � G �l Phil Keisling Secretary of State On the Cover:Timberline Lodge is a masterful blend of art and architecture, combining craft with stone and timber to inspire visitors from around the world. Works Progress Administration drawing, circa 1937, courtesy of Friends of Timberline. Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Information GENERAL RANDOM ALPHABET Your official 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet is divided While the candidates'statements appear in alphabetical order by into two separate volumes.This is a result of having 14 statewide their last name in this Voters'Pamphlet, you will notice that they measures on the ballot and 248 arguments filed in support of or appear in a different order on your ballot. in opposition to these measures.The amount of information to be included in the Voters' Pamphlet was too large to be bound into Pursuant to ORS 254.155, the Secretary of State is required to one book in a cost-effective manner. complete a random order of the letters of the alphabet to determine the order in which the names of candidates appear on This is Volume 2 and contains information on candidates only.You the ballot. should have already received Volume 1,containing information on the statewide ballot measures.If you have not received Volume 1, The alphabet for the 1998 General Election is: please call the Oregon Elections Division at(503)986-1518. P, U,J,O,Z, E, B,W, I,T,C,S,A, D, M, R, L,V,G, K, F,O, N,Y, In this volume, partisan candidates appear before nonpartisan X, H candidates.All space is purchased;statements and photographs are submitted by the candidates or their designated agents.The information required by law—pertaining to occupation, occupa- tional background,educational background and prior governmen tal experience—has been certified by each candidate. Miscellaneous voting aids, including district maps, precinct and Due to the passage of Measure 9 in the 1994 General Election,a polling place lists,voting instructions, and a complete list of state candidate for statewide office (excluding judges) or the office of measures and candidates are also a part of Volume 2. If your state Senator or state Representative may file to voluntarily limit county has chosen to produce a Voters',Pamphlet in combination their campaign expenditures.A candidate who chooses to do so with the state, the above listed voting aids will appear in your files a"Voluntary Declaration of Limitation on Expenditures"with county Voters' Pamphlet. Another page, "Voting Accessibility for the Secretary of State. Elderly and Individuals with Physical Disabilities;'contains infor- Candidates running for statewide office, state Senator, or state mation about provisions made for elderly or physically disabled Representative will have a disclaimer at the bottom of their state- voters. ment.This statement indicates whether or not that candidate has The Voters' Pamphlet has been compiled by the Secretary of voluntary limited their campaign expenditures. State since 1903,when Oregon became one of the first states to The limits for these candidates for the 1998 General Election are provide for the printing and distribution of such a publication.One as follows: copy of the Voters'Pamphlet is mailed to every household in the state. Additional copies are available at the State Capitol, local Office Limit post offices,courthouses and all county election offices. Governor $1,000,000 Remember,the 1998 General Election is a polling place election. All Other Statewide Offices $400,000 Unless you have received an absentee ballot,plan to vote at your (except for judges) designated polling site between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. Designated polling sites are listed in this volume. .State Senator $ 60,000 State Representative $ 40,000 ATTENTION: The State of Oregon prints measure arguments and candidate statements as sub- mitted by the author. The state does not correct punctuation, grammar, syntax errors or inaccurate information. The only changes made are attempts to correct spelling errors if the word as originally submitted is not in the dictionary. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Candidate Statements–Nonpartisan.............................. 26 Index to Candidates....................................................... 39 Candidate Statements–Partisan.................................... 4 Political Party Statements.............................................. - 34 Congressional Map........................................................ 22 Voting Accessibility for Elderly and District Map.................................................................... 23 Individuals with Physical Disabilities.......................... 28 ELECTION DAY IS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. 3 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates • United States Senator DEAN M. 3.Socialists believe in COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.Socialists oppose the profit-driven health care BRAA and insurance industry that dominates our current system.This system has made health care unaffordable to over 40 million a� Socialist Americans!This is a national tragedy and disgrace.Americans currently spend nearly a trillion dollars a year on health care in z the United States.Experts agree that this amount would more OCCUPATION: than fund a NATIONAL SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM that could Professor provide comprehensive and universal health care benefits. OCCUPATIONAL 4.Socialists support the right of all Americans to a QUALITY BACKGROUND: EDUCATION in safe, well-equipped public schools that are �4 Construction Worker; staffed by fairly compensated professionals working closely Ranch Hand;College with parents. We believe that our public school systems are 'Instructor;Researcher inadequately and unequally funded. Funds for education should be increased using a progressive individual and corpo- rate income tax.We are OPPOSED TO VOUCHERS because EDUCATIONAL the result would be a public subsidy for wealthier families that BACKGROUND: can afford the total costs of exclusive private schools. Ph.D.University of Kansas;M.A. 5. Housing is a serious problem for millions of Americans.We all University of Kansas; know that real incomes have not kept pace with the incredible B.A.University of increases in the cost of housing,especially in Oregon and the Northern Colorado Northwest. This "affordability gap" continues to grow making 00 ,,,,,,„ descent housing ever more problematic for many Americans. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Faculty Union Socialists support a large-scale public investment in President and VP;Tenants Association VP;Member of Task Force the DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE, HIGH-QUALITY on Economic Development,University of Kansas HOUSING throughout the state. The formation of housing cooperatives, land trusts, and public housing programs that WHAT IS SOCIALISM? take advantage of"sweat equity"could dramatically increase The Socialist Party of Oregon is dedicated to DEMOCRACY as a the number of affordable homes. Major tax incentives should The of life. t P believe e n is dedicated be used to encourage the development of quality "starter" y participatory y political democracy and homes and public grants could be provided for the improve- economic democracy.Socialists argue that"true"political democ- ment of existing low-income housing units. Socialists support racy must be built on a foundation of economic democracy.In our the use of federal block grants for a new, major "affordable society,where wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few cor- housing"program. porate elites, democracy has not been realized. Even Aristotle knew that the basis of power is wealth and that great disparities 6.The present TAX SYSTEM in the United States is REGRES- in wealth would result in great disparities in political power. SIVE, with the heaviest proportional tax burden on those citi- zens who can least afford to pay, the working and middle Socialists are NOT COMMUNISTS! Socialists are critical of the classes.These two classes pay on average just over 20% of Soviet experience and Communist China. Our commitment their income in taxes.Rich Americans and corporations average to democracy, with a focus on the empowerment of all workers, about half this rate.The corporate share of total federal taxes fell is the basis of our opposition to communism and corporate from around 39%in 1960 to around 17%in 1990,and it contin- capitalism. ues to fall. In Oregon, for every dollar paid by corporations in POSITIONS AND OPPOSITIONS: excise and income taxes, individuals pay an average of$9.35! The government has created a two-class tax system with the 1.Socialists believe that WORKERS SHOULD SHARE IN THE rich and corporations the clear winners.We support a federal OWNERSHIP OF CAPITAL.There are over 200 businesses in and state tax overhaul that would result in a PROGRESSIVE the United States where workers either own or share in owner- tax system. Residential property taxes should be made pro- ship/management.Job security and productivity will ultimately gressive by using"circuit-breakers"such as household income depend on empowering American workers. Worker pensions and longevity in residence: lower household incomes and and government loans could be used as the basis of Employee greater longevity would be used incrementally to lower property Stock Ownership Plans.The key to these plans is to make sure taxes.The goal is to create a progressive income and property that workers actually share in ownership/management. Living tax system.Socialists are opposed to sales taxes because of wages, full benefits, and full employment are goals of the their regressive structure. IT IS TIME TO END TAX BREAKS Socialist Party of Oregon. FOR THE RICH AND CORPORATIONS. t 2. Political democracy is yet to be realized in the United States. VOTE FOR REAL CHANGE,VOTE SOCIALIST! Socialists believe that two developments would provide greater political representation for a larger number of constituencies: (This information furnished by Dean M.Braa.) MULTIPLE PARTIES AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTA- TION.Are you frustrated by the lack of real choices offered by the Republicrats?Then support the development of third par- ties and support representation in our various legislative branches based on actual votes cast for each party.This would result in a more open public debate on the great issues of the nation and also result in a more representative political system. The political "strangle-hold"of the Republicrats is contrary to anyone's definition of democracy!The Socialist Party also sup- ports the limitation and standardization of campaign financing. 4 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates United States Senator JIM We Libertarians believe that, in a free society, the government 4ylpkl �y,� 4 should be held to the same standard. George Washington once BREWSTER wrote;"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master" Libertarian Unfortunately, the "servant"is! become "master" in our once great nation...and fearful it is The federal government has proven itself to be a monster with an insatiable appetite for the property t OCCUPATION: and God given rights of the people.We work five months in twelve Internet Consultant to feed the beast and year after year it demands a higher per centage of the nation's wealth. Professional politicians must be OCCUPATIONAL stopped before we cross the line to tyranny! ° 33» BACKGROUND: Navy Cameraman; Samuel Adams said; "If ever time should come when vain and News Cameraman; aspiring men shall hold the highest seats of government, our �u" Multi media producer/ country will stand in need of it's experienced patriots to prevent Y= director/writer; it's ruin"I think that time has come. ESL teacher. We have been remiss in our duty as citizens of a free society.We 6> have not been vigilant while standing our watch. It's time to call z EDUCATIONAL the government to account! BACKGROUND: .a BA, Film/Video What have they accomplished with such a huge portion of our Production.- wealth? Have they ended poverty? Have they stopped our chil- University of dren from using drugs? Have they protected our homes? Have Southern California they insured stable international relations?The answer to these questions is,of course,NO! PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:U.S.Navy, 1979-1986 Since Johnson declared his"War on Poverty",the percentage of Community Service:Little League Coach, 1972-1974 Americans living below poverty level has exploded. Are you a Libertarian? In the past few years, millions of Since Nixon's "War on Drugs" began in the sixties,'drug use Americans have heard the Libertarian message and stopped among our youth has grown steadily while the average starting voting for the "lesser of two evils". Conservatives and Liberals age has declined. ' alike,are finding that they can now vote FOR rather than against a candidate. Our homes are invaded by drug addicts trying to support their habits at black market prices.Our stolen property has corrupted For decades, those who believed in social tolerance voted for law enforcement officials, made wealthy men of thugs and per- Democrats.Those who were concerned with fiscal responsibility suaded inner city children to sell drugs to their friends for a share supported Republicans.Neither got what they wanted. of the"easy money".Those children protect their turf in drive-by The Libertarian Party is the "Party of Principle". The ideals shootings'and gang wars that terrorize our neighborhoods. embodied in our platform haven't changed since its founding Our international relations have never been more precarious nor more than 25 years ago.In brief,Libertarians believe in social tol- have American citizens ever been more desirable as terrorist tar- erance AND fiscal responsibility. gets.We have become the "neighborhood bully!"We push and I believe that the men who signed the Declaration of shove our agenda on foreign governments and flex our economic Independence in 1776 were some of the most intelligent,fearless and military muscles when they resist. and honest men in history.They began the great experiment that The time has come to remind our government of it's rightful posi- put power in the hands of the governed for the first time.They tion as servant rather than master.The time has come to end the understood human nature and planned a society based on the "force" our federal government is "instigating" at home and rights of common man.A government that was limited in its power, abroad.The time has come to support the ONLY party which truly allowed man to be truly free from harassment and tyranny. believes in the limited federal government envisioned by the great Our limited government and free market system resulted in the men who began this experiment in human liberty.The time has highest standard of living ever! Millions of individuals, each pur- come to support the FASTEST GROWING party in America.The suing a better life for themselves and their families,made America time has come to vote Libertarian! strong.Today however, an expanded federal government threat- (This information furnished by Jim Brewster.) ens our freedom and prosperity. Republicans say they want smaller government.When they con- trolled the White House during the eighties, our budget deficits blossomed.They claimed that without control of Congress, they couldn't cut spending.Then in`94,they took control of Congress and this year passed the largest spending bill in the history of the nation. I joined the Navy in 1979 and spent much of the next seven years overseas.After that, I moved to Tokyo where I worked for CNN and other networks as a news cameraman for nine years.When I returned, in 1995, 1 was shocked by the degree our government has infringed on our Bill of Rights,supposedly for our own good. Most Americans experienced the changes incrementally and many don't seem to realize the kind of all powerful government we are creating for our children. When someone joins the Libertarian Party,they are asked to sign a simple statement;"I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals." 5 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates United States Senator MICHAEL A. sustains them after they've gotten sick. Only 1% of our health budget goes to prevention.Yet,according to estimates in The New CAMPBELL England Journal of Medicine,50%of deaths and 70%of diseases ' �+ in this country are essentially self-inflicted—caused by an epi- $ Natural Law demic of unhealthy habits. Proven, cost-effective prevention programs can cut health care OCCUPATION: costs in half,save the nation hundreds of billions of dollars annu- Manager for ally and prevent untold human suffering.Such programs already mortgage loan broker exist, but Congress, lobbied heavily by those with a vested inter- est in the status quo, has largely ignored them. -= OCCUPATIONAL CRIME:Another area where effective prevention programs could BACKGROUND: create enormous savings.Crime costs America about$450 billion Attorney;founder of annually. We have 1.2 million citizens in several Oregon prison and another 500,000 in local jails-6 to 10 times the incarceration rate of other businesses, including industrialized nations. Legal Research Databases. Despite years of "get tough" policies, violent crime is still high. Violent offenders represented 50%of the rise in state prison pop- EDUCATIONAL ulations between 1990 and 1996. One cost-effective crime pre- BACKGROUND: vention strategy would be to offer effective rehabilitation programs J.D.and B.A., to these inmates,90%of whom will be released from prison. University of Southern Example:a five-year Harvard study investigated the effects of the California Transcendental Meditation technique in a maximum-security j PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Legislative analyst for prison. Inmates who learned the practice experienced signifi- California Gov.Jerry Brown;law clerk for U.S.District Court judge cantly decreased stress, aggression and mental disorders. Violence throughout the prison decreased,and the rate of return PRINCIPLES and policies of the Natural Law Party will protect to prison among participating inmates was 30-35% less than in j those ideals that Oregonians hold most dear. Costs will be cut, four other treatment groups. which will make it possible to fund important initiatives to improve The savings generated from such programs the lives of all Americans. 9 9 prevention-oriented ro rams could be reinvested in education,job training,environmental pro- The Natural Law Party stands for prevention of problems,conflict- tection and other critical areas to safeguard the progress and free politics,and implementation of solutions to bring national life prosperity of all our citizens. into harmony with natural law: EDUCATION:Reform is needed to develop the whole person.The • Fund natural programs to prevent disease,promote health and Natural Law Party promotes educational programs proven to cut health care costs by 50%. Results: save Medicare and directly increase intelligence and creativity,moral reasoning,self- Social Security;provide real health care to all. reliance, physical health and mental well being. America's most • Implement educational curriculum innovations that develop Stu- precious natural resource is the creative potential of our 260 mil- dents'inner creative genius and boost educational outcomes. lion citizens.The Natural Law Party advocates educational, job Results: reduced violent tendencies, less demand for drugs, training and apprenticeship programs that develop intelligence students realize their full potential. and creativity,bringing life into accord with natural law. • Adopt effective,field-tested crime prevention and rehabilitation ENVIRONMENT:America needs to clean up pollution and protect programs to improve'the quality of life for everyone. Results: natural resources. Our nation should lead the global effort to reduce cost of law enforcement and cut back the massive prevent the destruction of the earth's forests, the decimation of prison population created by our failures. the diversity of species and potential damage from depletion of the ozone layer and global warming:However,I could not support • Promote sustainable agricultural practices to increase crop initiatives that create economic destruction for thousands of yields and profitability without chemical fertilizers and pesti- Oregonians without offering viable alternative options.The rev- cides. Results: preserve the environment, family farms, our enues generated by our party's prevention-oriented approach to health and the quality of our food supply. governing can support the transitions necessary to preserve both • Protect organic standards through a moratorium on genetically lobs and the environment. engineered foods. Result: no irreversible genetic disasters Among political parties,only the Natural Law Party offers such a released upon an unsuspecting population. comprehensive approach to governance.I invite you to join me in this endeavor to bring national life into accord with natural law. • Promote energy conservation and renewable energy Your vote for me and for other Natural Law Party candidates is a production. Results: reduce pollution and create national vote for a higher quality of life in Oregon and in America--on a energy self-sufficiency. realistic financial basis. • Balance the budget while cutting taxes responsibly and fairly through cost-effective solutions to America's problems—not by (This information furnished by The Natural Law Party.) i eliminating essential services. Result: prosperity now and for future generations. • Eliminate government waste and special interest control of pol- itics.Result:return ownership of our country to us. Let's consider how some of these approaches will work. HEALTH:American health care costs are spiraling out of control. The U.S.spends$1 trillion annually on health care, but we have some of the worst health outcomes of any industrialized nation. We don't have a"health care"system;we have a"disease care" system. Our approach doesn't create healthy citizens; it only 6 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates United States Senator JOHN *Eliminate the 1993 tax increase on social security benefits. LAM *Eliminate marriage and death taxes. � 1, Balanced Budget: Republican *Take balancing the budget out of the politicians hands and require a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. %f OCCUPATION: *Require that any budget surpluses be divided between Small businessman restoring social security, national debt reduction, and targeted OCCUPATIONAL tax cuts. BACKGROUND: *Require budgets be passed on time or Senators and While working Congressmen forfeit their pay. his way through college and support- ing a family,John Lim *Give back more control to locally elected school boards. worked as a janitor and painter. *Support Merit Pay for teachers. For the twenty-five � *Give our children a 21st Century education with computers avail- years since then, able to all students. John has sold real estate and owns *Increase amount parents can put into an Educational IRA for a: = retail properties. their children's'college expenses. John currently owns Safe Neighborhoods,Safe Schools: �. :,... ARJ Company,a distributor of health and beauty products. *Increased funding for local police agencies. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Doctor of Humane Letters; *Mandatory prison time for any adult who sells illegal drugs to our Master of Divinity Degree,.Western Evangelical Seminary, children. Portland; B.A.Religion, Seoul Theological College;Yeoju School *Enhance school safety by eliminating firearms from schools. of Agriculture. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Elected State *Reform of habeas corpus laws that allow for endless appeals for Senator, 1992; Re-elected as State Senator 1996; Chair of convicted prisoners on death row. Senate Trade and Economic Development Committee;Vice Chair Social Security: of Senate Business and Consumer Affairs Committee;Governors Advisory Committee on DUII; Commission on Children and *Put future budget surpluses into preserving social security Families, Multnomah County; Multnomah County Honorary benefits. Deputy Sheriff. *Allow future generations to put a portion of their social security Values: into private investments. John Lim learned at an early age that life can take some tough *Make Social Security trust fund a sacred fund and require it to turns. Because the Korean War made attending school too be"off budget". - dangerous, John educated himself by memorizing the 7,500 National Defense: Korean-American dictionary. His father was an early casualty of the war,leaving John the"man of the house".This instilled in John *Maintain defense spending to meet current challenges. the values of hard work and family. He grew up with a keen *New focus on fighting terrorism. instinct for competition,cooperation,and a willingness to do what is right no matter what the cost.Giving up was never an option for *Enhance Pacific Basin Security. John."You deal honestly with people and work hard.You never Cancer and AIDS Research: give up doing the right thing" John Lim Scholarship Foundation: *Increase funding for cancer and AIDS research in order to pre- vent the spread of these diseases and to work toward finding In 1990,John Lim created the John Lim Scholarship Foundation their cures. to give money to high school students and single mothers who =Make cancer and AIDS medications be affordable. wish to further their education.John has personally spent thou- sands of dollars of his own money to ensure that Oregon students Endorsed by: get the education they desire and deserve. "John Lim is the new voice we need. He has the experience, Principles: dedication and commitment it will take to bring change." You will always know where John Lim stands on issues if you Former Governor Vic Atiyeh know his philosophy of government.He believes our taxes are too "John Lim is an independent thinker with a proven record,in the high,we need a balanced budget,criminals should be punished, Oregon Senate.Oregon is a better place because of John's gen- our children deserve an education that is competitive internation- erosity, leadership, and service to his fellow citizens. I am proud ally,we need a strong military,and most of all,you deal with peo- to support John Lim for U.S.Senate" ple honestly.This may seem to be a simple philosophy, but it is U.S.Senator Gordon Smith one that has carried John Lim through a life of hard work and made him a senior citizen with real, life experience. "John lives by his convictions. He doesn't always take the easy way. I respect him for his courage.This is the type of person we Lower Taxes: need to represent us in the United States Senate." *Reform the current,complicated and cumbersome tax code and Oregon Senate President Brady Adams replace it with one that is lower and more simple. (This information furnished by Committee to elect John Lim for U.S. *Reduce the capital gains tax to encourage investment. senate.) 7 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates United States Senator KARYN As your Senator, I will fight to end this system of legal bribery by supporting real campaign finance reform.I will work tirelessly for MOSKOWITZ publicly-financed campaigns and to make TV and radio available to all candidates.After all, the airwaves do belong to the public. Pacific Voters deserve to hear the candidates with the best ideas,not just those with the big bucks. OCCUPATION: Protect Workers'Rights Economic Analyst In a downsizing, job-exporting global economy, we need to pro- `- tect the rights of American workers.A global market that ends job OCCUPATIONAL security, reduces pay and benefits,endangers worker safety,and BACKGROUND: Scientific research, sacrifices environmental standards,cannot be truly free. sales and marketing I join Oregon's farm workers and labor organizations in opposing for small and large the Guestworker's Bill, introduced this year by both of Oregon's businesses,and Senators. This bill would replace local workers with imported research into govern- "guest"laborers forced to work for lower wages under conditions ment and corporate that don't meet government standards. Instead of undercutting environmental American workers,we need to stop subsidizing private employers &} policies. who pay low wages and no benefits so that truly ecologically and 'y socially responsible businesses can compete. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Create The Future Our Children Deserve MBA in Environmental Even in our recent booming economy,America's children are get- Management, ting poorer.I will fight for living wages,health care,childcare,and University of Washington Graduate School of Business and Ecole quality education for everyone. Superieure de Commerce de Paris, France; BA Biology, Boston University. Over 20 percent of our nation's children - over 14 million - are being raised in poverty, including 17 percent of the children in PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None. Oregon. Meanwhile, instead of helping our children create a Maintain Our Quality of Life positive future, nearly half of United States Federal Budget for 1999 will go to pay for current military activities and past military Our tax dollars subsidize the desecration of our national forests.I buildups, even though the Cold War is long over. In contrast, will fight to preserve the quality of life for ourselves and for future 9 percent of the budget is directed toward education ,and generations. 20 percent toward other health and human services. To waste Over 60 percent of Oregon's magnificent forests are federally money on a bloated military while starving our social services is owned. Properly managed, these native ecosystems could pro- poor public policy. vide pristine drinking water,clean air, important medicinal plants As your Senator, I will fight to invest in our families and our com- and foods,jobs and recreation forever. Instead,the Federal gov- munities.I will support the creation of public jobs with living wages -ernment doles out over$430 million tax dollars a year to large, and health benefits in community-based services like senior pro- private timber companies to build roads and clearcut the forests grams,quality childcare,and before-and after-school programs.I that belong to all of us. Mismanagement of our public lands will shift the tax burden for social services from personal to cor- causes landslides, pollutes drinking water, depresses property porate taxes. values, and wipes out our native fish runs. As Federal policy degrades our forests it sacrifices our quality of life - even future Vote for Karyn Moskowitz and the Pacific Party, jobs in the fishing, timber and recreation industries all at a huge Oregon's Green alternative. cost to taxpayers. Send a message to Washington that you are not satisfied with This is why I will work alongside both Republicans and Democrats politics as usual. If we continue to vote for Democrats and to introduce a Senate version of the National Forest Protection Republicans,both bought and paid for by the same special inter- and Restoration Act.This Act will provide training to dislocated ests, our voices will never be heard.Throughout America's his- timber workers,fund local governments,and restore our national tory, third-party candidates have introduced many of our most forests so they may benefit us all forever.The Act now enjoys the important social and political reforms, including social security bipartisan support of over 30 congressional representatives, but and women's suffrage.Cast a vote that counts. not the support of either Senator from Oregon. Vote for the Clearcut Alternative.Vote for Karyn Moskowitz. "...trying to straddle the chasm between the radical "If you're as fed up with the present system as I am,join genteel s Sierra the Casosko Forest Defenders and the me in voting for a progressive voice of integrity,Karyn genteel Sierra Ciub,Moskowitz could be the proverbial bridge:' Moskowitz:' -Willamette Week,August 19,1998 -Harry Lonsdale Enact Real Campaign Finance Reform (This information furnished by Karyn Moskowitz for U.S.Senate.) A political system of"legal bribery"is selling out the public good to special interests. I will fight to restore accountability and integrity to the US Senate and power to the people. Money, in the form of campaign contributions and lobbying, runs our political system.Over 80 percent of that money comes from corporations. As a result, politicians place corporate interests above the needs of tax paying and voting citizens."Our' repre- sentatives eliminate hard-earned environmental protections and social programs that benefit the people while increasing sense- less corporate welfare programs.No wonder so many Oregonians feel cut out of the decision-making process. 8 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates United States Senator RON writing and passing a bill that keeps kids who bring guns to school from being put right back out on the streets. WYDEN I've also taken a common sense approach to balancing the fed- eral budget while cutting federal spending and taxes. I've authored a balanced budget amendment that will both balance F D @t11oCYat the federal budget and stop the Congress from raiding the Social s Security Trust Fund.I've worked to make it tougher for Congress OCCUPATION: U.S.Senator to raise your taxes and my Internet Tax Freedom Act prohibits dis rc criminatory taxes on Internet consumers and businesses. This year,the non-partisan Taxpayers for Common Sense ranked me OCCUPATIONAL third among all Senators for my efforts to hold down taxes and dM=" BACKGROUND: eliminate waste. Former Director, Oregon Legal "Sen. Ron Wyden is pushing ...actually reforming Medicare Services for the instead of just talking about it." Elderly;Cofounder, Editorial,Salem Statesman Journal,4/8/97 Oregon Gray STANDING UP FOR ALL OF OREGON Panthers;University Instructor I recognized a long time ago that the more I heard from III Oregonians, the better I would do my job in the Senate. So I EDUCATIONAL became the first US Senator in Oregon's history to set up offices BACKGROUND: in both ran and rural areas – including Eugene, Medford, J.D., University Portland,Bend,Salem,and La Grande.And I've kept my promise Oregon School of to hold town meetings in every Oregon county,every year. Law;A.B.,Stanford University By listening to you, and following up on what I heard, I've been PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Congressman, 1981- able to make a difference in every corner of our state.In Medford, 1996; Oregon Board of Examiners of Nursing Home my office helped to bring new telecommunications jobs and Administrators, 1977-79 improve Medicare reimbursements. In Bend, I've worked with local law enforcement officials to make sure they have the STANDING UP FOR OREGON resources they need to halt the flow of illegal drugs.In Portland, I wrote legislation to help preserve clean drinking water by banning When I first ran for the U.S.Senate, I promised to stand up and to polluting activities in the Bull Run watershed. In Southwest fight for all the people of Oregon. your Senator, I've Oregon,I teamed up with Congressman DeFazio to protect Social worked hard to keep that promise.I've listened ed to your concerns, Security and help rural counties fund their schools and roads.I've taken your ideas with me back to Washington, DC, and done my stood up for fishing families on the coast and farmers in the east. best to give the people of Oregon a strong voice in their federal And all across Oregon,I've defended the right of women to make government. their own health care choices,without government interference. Standing up for Oregon sometimes means taking on powerful "Ron Wyden is making good on his promise to be"available to interests...and I've taken on some of the toughest.I've stood up all Oregonians–regardless of whether they live near the dunes to the HMOs and demanded that doctors be allowed to tell you all on the southwest coast, in the foothills of the Cascades, or in of your medical options, not just the cheapest ones.I'm standing the Blues of Eastern Oregon." up to the tobacco companies to stop them from selling cigarettes Editorial, La Grande Observer,5/29/96 to our kids while they lie to us about nicotine addiction. When an Air Force C-130 crash took the lives of 10 Oregon "Wyden listens and follows up Beyond simply listening, Wyden follows up with active support and commitment:' Guardsmen,.)took on the Pentagon,blocking the promotion of the Editorial, The Dalles Chronicle,5/3/98 top General in the military, until they agreed to start giving the families some straight answers. I battled discriminatory practices Representing Oregon in the US Senate has been the greatest in the Senate when a young disabled woman was barred from privilege of my life.I'm proud that you've asked me to stand up for bringing her guide dog on the Senate floor.And because 1 believe you,and now I'm asking you to stand with me in this election. that Senators should live by the same rules as everyone else,I'm Thank you for taking the time to read the Voters Pamphlet.Please fighting to end the tradition that allows individual Senators to stop make your voice heard by voting. legislation secretly,without ever telling the public. If you honor me with your vote this year, I'll continue these fights (This information furnished by Ron Wyden.) until they're won. "Wyden has managed to distinguish himself in the U.S.Senate by taking on some powerful adversaries..." Editorial, Willamette Week,5/6/98 COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS We've got to make government work better for people and,while that sounds like simple common sense here in Oregon, in Washington it can be a real battle.I'm proud to say that by stay- ing away from partisan bickering and focusing on the things that matter, I'm winning some important battles. My initiative to cut waste and fraud in Medicare would save tax- payers billions, according to the National Taxpayers Union, and I developed a bipartisan plan that empowers local school districts to cut school bureaucracy and put the resources in the class- room,where they belong.I'm also working to make schools safer, 9 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Representative In Congress 2ND DISTRICT KEVIN M. We have deferred our responsibilities to our parents and children far too long.. IF there is ANY excess money in the Federal bud- CAMPBELL get, it must be used to pay back the Social Security system.It is time to stand up and make Social Security a solvent program Democrat again. s "Dr.choice is essential for health care consumers" yap.. OCCUPATION: Kevin Campbell Small business The choice of who will provide your medical care should not be a owner, Kevin M. privilege for those who can afford it, but a right we all share. y Campbell Consulting Patient rights must be our highest priority. Services inc. Ok I believe: OCCUPATIONAL * Expanding opportunities means ensuring viable work for our BACKGROUND: youth so they do not need to move away to earn a living Grant County Judge, * Small business provides the economic backbone of our com- Canyon City, Oregon; munities and must be supported $ -x Store owner, Howard * problems are best solved close to home with the input and Mercantile, Kimberly, involvement of local citizens Oregon;Rancher, * Natural resources are best protected and enhanced with a Campbell Livestock, community based approach Inc., Kimberly, * Schools are the heart and soul of our communities Oregon;Ground * Young people must be included in creating solutions to com- Operations Manager, munity issues G&.H Aircraft, * We must be allowed to choose our own health care providers El Monte, CA; Area Credit and Collections Manager, General * Social Security must be maintained and safeguarded Electric Credit Corp., San Diego, CA; Journeyman Boilermaker, * Our children must have the opportunity to stay in the area to go FMC Corp.Portland,Oregon to school,work and raise families. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Bachelor'of Science,Business "Democrats found a fine candidate for 2nd District race" Administration, University of Portland, 1973; Graduate, East Oregonian 4/30/98 Monument High school, Monument,Oregon 1969 "Kevin Campbell, a former Grant County Judge has a distinct PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: County Judge; advantage over his competitors. He has a wealth of experience President, Oregon Youth Conservation Corps; President, with local government in Oregon and, as a native Oregonian, he Association of Oregon Counties; Chair, Northeast Oregon Area knows the 2nd District well.A conservative Democrat, Campbell Health Education Center; Member, Oregon Health Sciences was raised on a ranch near Kimberly in Northwestern Grant University AHEC Program Advisory Committee;Member,Oregon County." Transportation Policy Committee; Member, Oregon Aeronautics Baker City Herald,4/28/98 Advisory Committee; Chair, Monument Soil and Water Conservation District; Vice-Chair, Oregon Soil and Water "Rural Democrat has important message" Conservation"Commission;Vice-Chair,John Day Basin Council Eugene Register-Guard,6/12/98 Community Involvement: I have the experience and the ability to be the independent Kiwanis; Monument School Budget committee; Commission on Congressman the 2nd district deserves.Throughout my career as Children and Families; Elks; Grant County Federal Credit Union a rancher, businessman, and public.servant, I have worked to Supervisory Committee bring people together to find solutions to our challenges.That's how we do things out here-we're practical, independent people "Kevin Campbell will be a strong advocate for the people of the who work together for the good of our communities.That's what I 2nd District.Kevin has my highest respect and I urge you to join will continue to do as your member of Congress. me in supporting him: AN OLD FASHIONED CAMPAIGN Governor John Kitzhaber It used to be that when someone wanted your vote for Congress, "We are exporting way to much of our most valuable resource they'd come up to you and ask. But, in these days of polls and -our children" television commercials,we aren't getting better candidates,we're Kevin Campbell just getting candidates that are a bit slicker. Because economic opportunity is not as great here as it is in I've never believed that the best way to solve a problem is to throw Portland area,many of our youth are not able to make a living and money at it, and 1 won't run a campaign for Congress that way raise our grandchildren here.The 2nd District contributes to the either.That's why, when my opponent is spending his time at a prosperity of the state and should benefit proportionately. We desk raising record amounts of dollars from special interest must expand our economic opportunities and protect our quality groups, I've challenged him to a debate in every one of the 2nd of life.I will expand opportunities for-working families,small busi- District's 20 counties.So far,he hasn't accepted even one. ness owners,farmers, ranchers and students. But even if my opponent won't agree to come to your county for a "Let's roll up our sleeves and get to work" debate, I can still be there to listen to your ideas.If you don't see Kevin Campbell me soon in your area, please call me at (541) 388-4800. If I am It is time to end the petty partisan bickering that reduces the not available when you call, I WILL get back to you promptly. effectiveness of Congress and discourages citizen participation in (This information furnished by Kevin Campbell for Congress.) the electoral process.It is time to ask REAL people in the district to come up with REAL solutions to the problems we face every day. I have experience bringing diverse people together for ground-up solutions.The people of this District want participation and ownership. "Let's put the`security'back in social security" Kevin Campbell 10 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Representative In Congress 2ND DISTRICT ;,)y¢a��i,�a,orPee,i73ffif,K;, GREG "Greg understands that we need to make the tax system better, simpler,and a lot more fair.Whether it is through WALDEN eliminating the inheritance tax or the marriage penalty, Greg is always looking for ways to help families keep more of their hard-earned money." Republican U.S.Senator Gordon Smith OCCUPATION: Family Values Matter. Small Business Greg Walden shares our values. He and his wife Mylene have 4 Owner-(Radio always put their family first. Greg and Mylene help with their son Stations:KIHR, Anthony's Cub Scout den.Mylene volunteers in the classroom each K105.5, KACI AM week,and Greg serves on the board of the local hospital.He is a &FM);Columbia lay reader in his church,and a member of Rotary and the Elks Club. River Bank Board Director "Time and again we've called on Greg to help us solve OCCUPATIONAL problems, and he's always come through, promptly and BACKGROUND: effectively. He cares about people.We need him working for us in Congress:' Press Secretary,Chief Bev Rowland,Democrat, of Staff:Congressman Chairman,Hood River County Commission Denny Smith; Press Assistant: Safer Communities,Matter. Atiyeh for Governor. Walden helped pass some of the nation's toughest penalties on Radio announcer; drug dealers who prey on kids,and he backed efforts to build pris TV News Director. ons so that penalties finally meant something to those who break EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Journalism Degree, University the law.Walden has earned the support of Sheriffs of Oregon and of Oregon;Hood River Valley High School graduate. the National Association of Police Organizations. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: State Representative, "As a legislator,Walden didn't just talk about being com- 1989-1995;State Senator, 1995-1997 mitted to public safety.He went to Salem,and pushed leg- Greg Walden:Tested and Trusted in Public Office islation to make our communities safer and to stop the The Kind of Representative We Need in Congress revolving door in our prisons." Carl R.Burkhart, Experience and Effectiveness Matter. Klamath County Sheriff s We need a congressman who has the credibility and experience to Water and Natural Resources Matter get things done.Republicans elected Greg Walden Oregon House Growing up on a cherry orchard in The Dalles, and representing Majority Leader in 1991 and 1993.Senator Gordon Smith named people from the Sandy River to the Snake River, Walden has a Walden Assistant Senate Majority Leader in 1995. Greg Walden proven record of supporting people who make their living off the has proven he can earn the support of his colleagues and deliver land.As our Congressman, he will fight the federal government for his constituents.This is not the time for on-the-job training.That's when it tries to take away our water rights or when it runs why Congressman Bob Smith asked Greg to run for Congress. roughshod over the industries that sustain our communities. He "Greg Walden has the right philosophy and ability to carry supports Congressman Smith's efforts to bring common-sense on my work in Congress.In the legislature,he stood up for management to our forests and grazing lands. our way of life.I've known Greg for 27 years.He has what "Greg Walden did an outstanding job working on behalf of it takes to effectively represent us in Congress. He will farmers and ranchers while he was in the Legislature.We make you proud of your vote:' couldn't find a better replacement for Congressman Bob Congressman Bob Smith t Smith:' Walden"served nearly a decade in the Legislature,where Doug Breese,Prineville he was House majority leader for two sessions. He was Past president,Oregon Farm Bureau Federation well-regarded by both Democrats and Republicans for his Other endorsements Walden has earned: integrity and effectiveness:' The Bulletin(Bend),May 3,1998 Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens-PAC Sheriffs of Oregon Quality Education Matters. Gilliam County Judge Laura Pryor Walden helped pass legislation that helps families send their kids U.S.Chamber of Commerce to college.Walden supports local control of schools—not federal Associated Oregon Loggers control.He believes we need parents more involved in their child's Former Governor Vic Atiyeh education,smaller class sizes and top-notch teachers. Oregon Small Business Coalition Former House Speaker Bev Clarno "Besides representing and protecting his district's agri- National Rifle Association-Political Victory Fund cultural and forestry interests,Walden also was a cham- Oregon Association of Hospitals&Health Systems pion for locally controlled educational issues..." Oregon Senate President Brady Adams Hood River News,April 21,1998 Oregon House Speaker Lynn Lundquist Tax and IRS Reform Matter. ...and many more. Walden helped write legislation that sent refund checks worth Dear voter, hundreds of millions of dollars to Oregonians. He also helped As your Congressman,I'll work hard to make sure your voice write legislation to reduce personal property and capital gains is heard in Washington,D.C.Working together we can make taxes,and he fought the sales tax. a real difference for the people of this district.I ask for your The National Federation of Business(NFIB)has twice presented vote.Thank you. Greg Walden Walden with their Guardian of Small Business award for his work against higher taxes and more regulation. (This information furnished by Walden For Congress,Inc.) 11 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Representative In CongreSS 2ND DISTRICT ROHN • Human rights for all people, both internationally and domesti- cally;end the practice of bestowing"Most Favored Nation"sta- (GRANDPA) tus to nations with human rights violations. WEBB • Put"social" back into social work. Government agencies that work with families and children must be adequately funded and Socialist accountable. • Shift emphasis to education rather prison construction. OCCUPATION: Sustainable natural resource policy that includes a ban of Foster Parent, clearcutting on both public AND private land;the creation of a Malheur County, "Superfund"for workers dislocated due to environmental tran- Oregon State Office sition; end the practice of locating unsustainable industrial for Services to production in minority communities. Children and Families(SOSCF) Universal, single-payer health care. Quality health care is a BASIC right of all people; it should not be reserved solely for OCCUPATIONAL the rich and powerful BACKGROUND: Our nation is being held hostage by Corporate America. Retired from Idaho They tell us what to think,what to eat,what to buy and what Department of Health to believe.They have corrupted the principle of government and Welfare;Family by,of,and for the people. Case Manager/ Developmental As'citizens, we have two choices: We can continue to allow Specialist transnational corporations to usurp our democratic power or we (SPEC. ED.),"Payette, Idaho Child Development Center (CDC); can fight back.I am running for Congress because I believe that Long Term Substitute Teacher, Milwaukee,WI; U.S.Postal Clerk, democratic power BELONGS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE. Milwaukee; Psychiatric Aid/Attendant Milwaukee County Mental If you too are tired of having your democratic rights misappro- Health Center; "Shop" Union Steward, Local 1055W, American priated by non-democratically elected Corporate CEOs and spe- Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Shift cial interest lobbyists,then I urge you to send me to Washington- Supervisor and Developmental Specialist, Idaho State School to serve as your representative.You and I can truly make a dif- and Hospital at Nampa; Organizer, Charter Member and First ference;we can create positive,progressive change.Help me President of Idaho Service Employees Union, ISEU/SEIU #687, start the process of genuine democratic renewal by marking your AFL-CIO;Charter Member,Alliance of Service Employees(ASE) Idaho,Oregon. ballot Rohn"Grandpa"Webb. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin, WHEN YOU CAST YOUR VOTE Milwaukee; Wisconsin State Teaching Certification; Continuing THINK DEMOCRACY VOTE SOCIALIST Education, Special Education, and Social Work Credits from For more information about any candidates for the Boise State University; University of Southern Utah; Treasure Socialist Party of Oregon contact: Valley Community College, Ontario; Eastern Oregon State Socialist Party of Oregon University, La Grande. 333 State St. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: U.S.Senatorial Clerk Salem,OR 97301 for U.S.Senator William Proxmire(Wis.);Congressional.Clerk for (503)378-7812 sporego U.S.Rep.Henry S.Reuss(5th District,Milwaukee,WI),candidate o for Milwaukee District 13 House seat (lost by 5 votes); received htt�//socciaiailisst t aoc o or sn over 45,000 votes spending less than $300 for Wisconsin State To Contact the Webb for Congress Campaign: Treasurer(1972 Democratic Primary);Active in Presidential cam- 1 (541)881-1722 paigns for Henry A. Wallace, Estes Kefauver, Adlai Stevenson, Eugene McCarthy,John&Edward(Ted)Kennedy,Gary Hart,Dr. (This information furnished by Rohn"Grandpa"Webb.) Benjamin Spock, Jesse Jackson, Mary Cal Hollis, and Ralph Nader. Drafted grandparent's rights plank of Socialist platform, initiated and supports grandparent rights for adoption especially after ter- mination of parental rights.Candidate for State Senate District 30 (1996). MEMBER: American Association of Retired Persons (AARP); Sierra Club;Malheur County Foster/Adoptive Parents Association; Coalition of Parents and Educators (COPE); Co-Founder Rohn Webb's Network for Grandparent Rights. As your Congressman I will work for: • Model legislation that would consider grandparents and other relatives in adoption of children in parental termination cases. • The creation of a progressive tax system;an end to corporate welfare. • Repeal of Taft-Hartley& Hatch Act, amend labor laws to pro- hibit hiring of permanent replacement workers, strengthen collective bargaining rights. • Repeal NAFTA and GATT,oppose MAI. 12 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Governor BLAIR BLAIR BOBIER:CREATING JOBS AND PROTECTING OUR RESOURCES BOBIER Blair Bobier knows that restoring our forests will provide Oregonians with good paying jobs for as long as there are forests. Pacific Blair Bobier supports the National Forest Protection and Restoration Act, and Ballot Measure 64, which will protect our OCCUPATION: resources while providing assistance to timber dependent com Executive Director, munities.John Kitzhaber's environmental record is terrible:a Northwest Democracy judge ruled that Kitzhaber's plan to save our salmon was unac Institute ceptable. Kitzhaber also supports logging Which threatens Eastern Oregon's last wild salmon run on the John Day River. OCCUPATIONAL Sensible and Simple Solutions BACKGROUND: Traffic and air quality are getting worse and worse in our cities. Community Activist, Trucks account for 43%of Portland's air pollution.Trucks and cars Lawyer leave oily residues on our streets which wash into our rivers when EDUCATIONAL it rains.Environmental regulations which are supposed to protect BACKGROUND: our air and water are too weak and are poorly enforced. Using Northwestern School existing rail lines to move goods instead of trucks and providing of Law, Lewis&Clark inexpensive public transportation will help clean the smog and J.D. haze out of our valleys and keep pollution run-off out of our rivers. College, University D.Maryland "Pollution taxes;'taxing industries by the amount of pollution they at College Park,B.S. spew into our environment, provide incentives for industries to clean up their acts and work better with less bureaucracy than our PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Environmental Law current laws. Specialist, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality; "Blair Bobier is known for his innovative ideas and volunteer Pacific Party lobbyist in Salem;member of the Oregon dedication in protecting Oregon's rivers and streams:' State Bar. Paul Loney, President,Oregon Wildlife Federation PAC THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT OREGON'S FUTURE. Fair Taxation and Health Care for All Oregon, the most beautiful place in the world, is at a cross- Blair Bobier supports expanding the Oregon Health Plan to roads.Down one path,the future is bleak.Traffic clogs streets and cover all Oregonians. Blair Bobier knows that our tax system highways, schools run out of money, prisons dot the landscape; places an unfair burden on working people and believes that cor- salmon,ancient forests,and pure,clean drinking water all disap- porations and the wealthy should pay their fair share. pear.That path is paved by Republicans and Democrats alike. Blair Bobier is Smart on Crime The other path leads to a healthy future for ourselves and our Our tax dollars must be spent wisely to keep violent criminals children.Trains,trolleys,bikes and busses reduce congestion and off our streets. John Kitzhaber wants to waste our money by pollution. Sensible and sustainable development replaces ugly locking up hundreds of thousands of peaceful Oregonians for urban sprawl. School construction outpaces prison construction. possession of small amounts of marijuana. Kitzhaber signed a Healthy forests provide endless sources of pristine drinking water bill to re-criminalize the possession of small amounts of mar- and a basis for economic security.This path is here right in front puana, subjecting 300,000 otherwise law-abiding adults to of us.All we need is the courage to take it.This is the path of the imprisonment and their homes and cars to forfeiture. Our Pacific Party and Blair Bobier. prison system is already over-burdened. Kitzhaber, like Richard Economic Security Requires A Healthy Environment Nixon who started the"War on Drugs,"is willing to lock up scape- goats for political gain: Pure,clean water from healthy forests is the basis of a number of critical industries in Oregon, including the billion dollar salmon An Honest,Grassroots Campaign industry,high-tech,and tourism and recreation.These industries, Blair Bobier supports campaign finance reform and walks and our drinking water, are threatened by the state and federal his talk. Blair's campaign is being run on a fraction of the hun- governments who allow companies to log on our public lands for dreds of thousands of dollars pouring into the Sizemore and private profit.What's worse is that the taxpayers subsidize this Kitzhaber campaigns. Isn't this legalized bribery? Don't those destruction.Blair Bobier,a well-respected,long-time environ- contributors of huge sums of money expect something in return? mental activist,opposes subsidizing corporations who rav- A BETTER WAY age our public lands.John Kitzhaber,at best, has stood by idly while Oregon's resources are devastated. At worst, John In a democracy, we get the kind of government that we Kitzhaber has actively aided and abetted the destruction of our deserve. Don't we deserve the best for ourselves and our chil- economic base. dren? Listen to words of David Brower the founder of the "We found Bobier to be considerate and intelligent. modern American conservation movement: We encourage him to run for office...:' "Republican leadership that actively erodes the ecological Willamette Week, 10/22/92 basis for human survival is little different from Democratic leader- "Blair Bobier is a man of integrity,a friend of ship that moves toward the same fate through negligence and working people,and the best hope for our future compromise. and our kids:' A vote for Blair Bobier is a call for fundamental change Teresa Keane, Nurse Practitioner and mother of two teen-agers and true leadership In creating our collective future." "Blair Bobier believes in true democracy,where every (This information furnished by Committee to Elect Blair Bobier Governor.) citizen counts.If you're tired of both Democrats and Republicans,join me in voting for Blair Bobier." Blair Bobier has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General Harry Lonsdale,former Democratic candidate for U.S.Senate Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable spending limit. 13 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Governor RICHARD P. per pupil expenditures without new taxes. Charter schools $. improve academic achievement in many states.They increase BURKE parental involvement and reduce crowding.Our schools stem « s needs to evolve.Oregon's children deserve the right to choose f Libertarian schools as diverse as they are. 3 TAXES OCCUPATION: My proposed budget will allow us to lower income taxes by Self-employed small 40%. I also support completely eliminating property taxes, computer, network replacing lost revenue through a capped 5%consumption tax. ry � s and internet A portion of the tax would go to the state,the rest would go to consultant. your local government, restoring local control. I oppose "sin � x gg�'J � �, taxes"which unfairly discriminate against the poor and socially I OCCUPATIONAL unpopular groups. BACKGROUND: x Small business PERSONAL CHOICES owner,computer As an adult, you should be able to own yourself-it is the ulti- programmer, ballot mate property right. I support Oregon's "Death with Dignity" initiative information director and retail law. I support a person's right to use marijuana for medicinal store manager. purposes.Though never desirable, access to abortion should remain safe and legal during the first two trimesters of preg- EDUCATIONAL nancy. I oppose mandatory seat belt and helmet laws for BACKGROUND: adults. I oppose government censorship of the internet and Bachelor of Science, other media. No tax dollars should be used to subsidize per- Social Science, Portland State University, 1989.Teacher Training, sonal choices or their ramifications. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1983-84. CRIME AND PRISONS PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Local School Most violent crimes, and the "need"for new prisons, can be Committee,Sunset High School,Beaverton School District, 1997- traced to the black market for drugs.Drug trafficking has made Present.Local School Committee,Terra Linda Elementary School, our schools unsafe and plagued our streets with violence. Beaverton School District, 1994-1997. Secretary, Washington Rather than regulating access to drugs, which creates black county citizens' land use committee, Citizens' Participatory markets, we should put society in control by regulating their Organization' #1, 1991-1992. Finalist, Better Government use. Breaking the black market will move drugs from the Competition sponsored by the Cascade Policy Institute, 1998. schoolyard to the pharmacy. It will dramatically reduce street Chair, Libertarian Party of Washington County, 1997-Present. crime.Our police will spend more time protecting our families State Chair,Libertarian Party of Oregon, 1993-1994, and prison space will be freed to keep violent criminals behind OREGON'S"INDEPENDENT"CHOICE bars. Our churches, communities and families will be free to fight drug abuse in a less violent setting.Those who take drugs If you are a non-affiliated voter, or a Republican or Democrat must bear the responsibility for the harm they cause them- who votes across party lines,my candidacy could be for you:I am selves.Ineffective drug laws help nobody and hurt society. the only candidate for governor who is both fiscally conservative and socially tolerant. I want more of the money you earn to stay ' .SOCIAL SECURITY in your pocket.I want the personal decisions you face in life to be I will seek the federal waivers needed to implement the Oregon under your control. "Opt-Out" plan, endorsed by the 1997 Oregon legislature. YOUR CHANCE TO MAKE A STATEMENT Under the plan,funds from your paycheck normally sent to the Social Security Retirement Trust Fund become available for Virtually every pollster and pundit considers the outcome of investment in a Personal Retirement Account(PRA).The"Opt- this race to be a foregone conclusion.Even if true,voting can still Out"plan ensures that current retirees will continue to receive be a meaningful act. I am running to provide you with a way to benefits.It also allows those still in the workforce to take con- send a message to Salem.By voting for me you tell Republicans trol of their future by investing in a system that provides true and Democrats you are tired of having to choose between your security. money and your personal liberty. I am running to bring up the important issues which the major parties tend to avoid.By voting VOTE FOR RICHARD BURKE for me you can direct the course of public discussion.Your vote is "Use the Landslide to Change the Landscape" an investment in political innovation. FRIENDS OF RICHARD BURKE GOVERNOR FOR THE WHOLE STATE 515 N.W.Saltzman#751 •Portland,OR 97229 -By the time you read this I will have campaigned in every Phone:(503)531-8976•Fax:(503)533-9021 Oregon county and logged over 10,000 miles on the road.I do this Email:rpb4gov@rpb.com•http://www.rpb.com/rpb4gov because I realize that no region of Oregon can be taken for granted.Though we need to move forward as a state, we must (This information furnished by Richard Burke.) restore local control to communities.The ideas of limited govern- ment and individual liberty resonate across every part of Oregon. Richard P.Burke has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this • EDUCATION General Election under ORS 260.180. Parents should control the educational direction of their chil- dren.To that end I support the establishment of true charter schools to exist alongside traditional schools.Charter schools are public schools run by parents and teachers.They have vir- tual autonomy over faculty selection and curriculum.Under my plan,80%of the money currently being spent on each child will follow that child into his or her charter school.The remaining 20% will remain in the traditional school system, increasing 14 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates E Governor g,�ij 4�911i9�h,V� it a JOHN Second,it is a commitment not to lose any more of our chil- dren to juvenile crime. KITZHABER Over the past three years we have nearly doubled our prison capacity -- but the real challenge is to keep our children out of Democrat trouble in the first place.We know who the at-risk kids are, we know how to help them--we have a moral obligation to do so. E�y OCCUPATION: To achieve these goals,The Oregon Challenge proposes to: Governor 1. Improve our Domestic Violence Prevention Efforts. OCCUPATIONAL 2. Expand Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs. a BACKGROUND: 3. Establish the Oregon Juvenile Crime Prevention Partnership Emergency Room which will: Physician, Roseburg 1974-1988 a)Identify At-Risk Youth using well-recognized risk factors. b)Target Funding to At-Risk Youth--with a$30 million appro EDUCATIONAL priation which I will include in my budget. BACKGROUND: c)Implement Proven Programs and Measures. Graduate,South Eugene High School, Third,it is a commitment to protect Oregon's unique quality 1965;B.A.Dartmouth of life. College, 1969; Half a million people have come to Oregon since 1990 and University of Oregon another 500,000 will come in the next ten years. I am not willing' Medical School, 1973. to let our state grow at the expense of our livability, especially when we're smart enough to have both. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:State Representative, 1979-1980; State Senator, 1981-1993; Senate President, To achieve these goals,The Oregon Challenge proposes to: 1985-1993;Governor, 1995-Present. 1.Strengthen Land Use Laws--to protect farm and forest land, Like you, I never forget how lucky I am to live in Oregon.And I'm make it easier and more affordable to build inside the urban thankful to past generations of Oregonians for thinking ahead, growth boundary,and to preserve Oregon's special places and refusing to be selfish, and for making the choices that have kept public access to our ocean beaches. this such a special place. 2. Discourage Commercial Strip Development that increases Today it is our turn.Today we face new challenges--and how we traffic congestion. meet them will determine what Oregon will be like in the future 3. Invest in a Balanced Transportation System that maintains and what kind of place we will pass on to our children. existing roads and highways, reduces congestion through access management and well-planned expansions, ensures This September, I released a detailed plan -- The Oregon efficient freight movement,and promotes easy access and reli- hC allenae--that sets forth how we can meet these challenges.It able transit options for all Oregonians. focuses on children: strengthening and improving our public schools, and preventing juvenile crime so that all kids have a This election isn't just about electing a governor -- it's about bright future.And, it preserves our quality of life for future gener- choosing a future.The Oregon Challenae represents a vision of aligns of Oregonians. that future.And the challenge doesn't end on election day--that's when the real challenge begins. The Oregon Challenge is built around three commitments. We need to send a clear message--not just on November 3,but First, it is a commitment to give our children the education long after--that Oregon is too precious, too special to leave to they need to succeed in the 21st Century. chance or to short term interests.And I need your help. We must ensure that our children enter school ready to learn. Please join me and other Oregonians who want to make this Once they start school, we must offer them a public education vision of Oregon's future a reality.To find dut what you can do to that is the best in the nation.We must demand that our children help call my campaign at 1-877-4CHALLENGE. Together we'll master the basics, and that they can demonstrate the ability to make Oregon even better. apply what they have learned.We must provide every high school graduate who has demonstrated these abilities the opportunity for (This information furnished by Kitzhaber for Governor.) a college education. John Kitzhaber has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General To achieve these goals,The Oregon Challenge proposes: Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has 1. Increased attention to the Early Childhood Years--expanding exceeded the applicable spending limit. programs for young children who may need help to enter school healthy,well adjusted,and ready to learn. 2.Hioh Student Performance in the Basics -- with statewide standards and testing to ensure that students can effectively apply what they have learned. 3.Performance-based Fundina -- which ties school funding to increased student performance. 4.College Scholarships to Those Who Earn Them -- by implementing a program to ensure college access for all high school graduates who meet these standards. 15 GovernorOfficial 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates BILL Bill Sizemore supports making all federal income taxes deductible on taxpayers' state income tax returns to prevent SIZEMORE double taxation. John Kitzhaber supports requiring taxpayers to pay state income Republican taxes on their federal income taxes. Bill Sizemore opposes increasing gas taxes. f " OCCUPATION: John Kitzhaber has promised, if reelected, to seek a nine-cent Executive Director, per gallon gas tax increase,a doubling or tripling of vehicle regis- tration fees, and a month) transportation "access"fee added to Oregon Taxpayers Y P United,a 19,000- each telephone bill. �IW member taxpayer Bill Sizemore opposes taxing motorists for each mile they drive. u.ta organization dedi- John Kitzhaber has proposed a brand new odometer tax,to tax cated to lowering Oregonians for each mile they drive. taxes and eliminating government waste. Bill Sizemore supports constructing additional.highways to relieve congestion. OCCUPATIONAL John Kitzhaber opposes building new highways, but rather sup- BACKGROUND: ports more money for a bus and light rail system used by less than small business three percent of the population. owner/operator Bill Sizemore believes real problems in schools are not related to a EDUCATIONAL money. He supports limiting money spent on administration, BACKGROUND: restoring discipline to the classroom,and requiring kids to perform college graduate at grade level before moving to the next grade. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Governor Atiyeh's John Kitzhaber believes schools need more money.Has taken no task force on workers compensation reform;petition coordinator steps to restore discipline in schools. for initiative to reinstate capital punishment; chief petitioner for Bill Sizemore supports using phonics to teach children to read. ballot measure to limit property tax increases and initiative to John Kitzhaber vetoed a bill to.make phonics material available reduce state income taxes. to teachers who wanted to use it. Family: Married to Cindy Sizemore. Five children: Ryan, 14; Bill Sizemore believes welfare recipients should be required to work. Jeffrey,8;Becky,7;Kristin,5;and Ashley,4. John Kitzhaber blocked bill requiring that welfare recipients work. Bill Sizemore has sponsored several ballot measures which have Bill Sizemore has stated that he will discipline or fire any state reduced taxes in Oregon by hundreds of millions of dollars. His employee who dumps money left over at the end of the year just success of reducing taxes has made him some very powerful so they can ask for more. enemies,primarily the public employee unions and big city news- John Kitzhaber has not disciplined state managers for dumping paper editors,who together have waged an inaccurate and unfair end-of-the-year budget surpluses, even though doing so is campaign to discredit him personally. Those who know Bill common practice. Sizemore, however, know him to be not only an articulate Bill Sizemore supports mandatory sentencing for violent and spokesman, gifted leader, and advocate for the everyday tax- repeat offenders. payer,but also a decent and honest person,a loving husband and John Kitzhaber opposes "three strikes you're out" and voter- an extraordinarily dedicated father. approved mandatory sentencing for violent offenders. As you read the following, we hope you will discover what Bill Bill Sizemore opposes additional restrictions on law-abiding Sizemore is really all about-and that his views are much closer gun owners. to yours than are John Kitzhaber's. John Kitzhaber supports placing additional restrictions on Bill Sizemore: no new taxes; discipline restored to our -law-abiding gun owners. schools; school curriculum clearly focused on academic Bill Sizemore supports paying just compensation to property own- achievement;local control of land use policy;swift and sure ers when government regulations reduce the value of their property. sentencing for criminals;well-maintained roads;and govern- g g John Kitzhaber opposes paying compensation when government ment that treats taxpayer dollars like real money,or regulations reduce the value of someone's property. John Kitzhaber: higher taxes; merely throwing money at Bill Sizemore has pledged not to accept campaign contributions revolving-door criminal justice system; congested high-- problems in our schools;state control of land use policy; from public employee unions because the governor negotiates pay ways;and continued government waste. raises with those same unions.John Kitzhaber has accepted huge contributions from public Following is a comparison of the views and policies of Bill employee unions and then gives them huge pay increases. Sizemore and John Kitzhaber on a wide variety of issues. We Bill Sizemore supports honoring those who have fought our suggest you place a checkmark by the name of the candidate with nation's battles wherever they have been sent. which you agree,and then total the checkmarks when finished. John Kitzhaber: led a black armband, anti-Vietnam demo'nstra- Bill Sizemore has sponsored several ballot measures to save tion, would have been a conscientious objector if drafted, and Oregonians hundreds of millions of dollars per year in property taxes. vetoed a recent bill to build a nursing home for veterans. John Kitzhaber opposed Bill Sizemore's property tax limitation When even the facts,the choice real) is quite clear.Please join measures. g y' q j us in voting Bill Sizemore for governor. Bill Sizemore sponsored a measure placing a three-percent cap For more details contact Sizemore for Governor:(503)655-1395; on future property tax increases to prevent taxing everyday Oregonians out of their homes. www.sizemore.org. John Kitzhaber actively opposed the three-percent cap measure. (This information furnished by People for Sizemore.) Bill Sizemore worked to insure that surplus income taxes were Bill Sizemore has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General returned to taxpayers as required by law. Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because John Kitzhaber asked the legislature to Change the kicker law and an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has keep the income tax surplus rather than returning it to the taxpayers. exceeded the applicable spending limit. 16 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates 1�01 PIP Governor TREY HOW THINGS ARE Across the nation over 40 million Americans have no health insurance.In Oregon,we only provide basic cov- �` SMITH erage to a portion of the poor.Working families are too often left to fend for themselves;only one health care crisis away from an SOCIaIISt economic catastrophe. HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Quality health care would be_g BASIC right of every Oregonian. Oregon would establish state- OCCUPATION: based, single-payer universal health insurance that will provide 5 Membership maximum flexibility. Coordinator,Oregon 4M PeaceWorks; HOW THINGS ARE Because of voter approved property tax lim Assistant Editor, The itations and an income tax system which allows corporations to Oregon PeaceWorker. avoid paying their rightful share of taxes, far too many school F districts are starved for funds.To deal with this shortage of funds, OCCUPATIONAL teachers must be laid off, programs must be cut or reduced and BACKGROUND: many student needs must go unmet. ' Children's Services HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Under the Socialist Party's progres Worker;Mitigation sive tax system more money will be available for education. Investigator;Disc Teachers will be better trained and compensated, needed Jockey programs will be improved and expanded and students will have a better future because of a stronger educational foundation. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.A. HOW THINGS ARE Urban Growth Boundaries and other land in Sociology,Ouachita use issues are written for the benefit of developers and builders. Baptist University; Far too often,citizen participation is stifled.Environmental issues B.A. in Journalism, Arkansas Tech University; M.S. in Social are swept under the rug. Science, Pittsburg State University. HOW THINGS SHOULD BE All land use discussion will be opened up to foster full citizen participation.Environmental safe- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None. guards will be a major part of the discussion.Strong efforts will be Which kind of Oregon do YOU want?If you like how things are, made to prevent urban sprawl. then you should cast your vote for one of my worthy opponents. HOW THINGS ARE Oregon operates a state-run gambling However, if you support progressive change,then vote for me. house. The State Lottery office spends our taxpayer dollars to Take a look. Which set of ideas represents the Oregon you induce more and more people to part with their hard-earned want to live in. money.Not only has this fueled a gambling addiction problem,but the lottery is nothing more than a backdoor tax on the poor and HOW THINGS ARE Under Oregon's unjust tax system,for every middle class. $1 you and I pay in state income taxes,wealthy corporations pay HOW THINGS SHOULD BE The State of Oreaon would not be only 8.8 cents in income/excise taxes(less than one dime). in the gambling business,the legal fleecing of the poor and mid- HOW THINGS SHOULD BE CorQorate tax rates will be doubled. dle class.The state will not lose any revenue because the tax sys- Personal income tax brackets will be weighted heavier near the tem will be more progressive. top and lighter near the bottom. HOW THINGS ARE Voter apathy is near an all-time high.People HOW THINGS ARE Under Oregon's economic development are tuning out professional politicians because they continually laws,corporations are eligible for a cornucopia of tax abatements, refuse to discuss substantive issues.Our antiquated winner-take- taxpayer guaranteed loans,and tax-free bonds.Communities pay all electoral system in combination with low voter turnout means for infrastructure improvements (our taxpayer money) to lure that most candidates who win races are not supported by the companies to locate in their area only to see many of these com- majority of eligible voters in their district.The current system also panies later ship jobs to developing countries. does not give minority perspectives any voice at all. HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Corporate welfare will be eliminated. HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Legislative elections would utilize Corporations will be required to pay their fair share of taxes. proportional representation.Under this system,every vote counts (Currently, when they don't pay, either you and I make up the which would increase voter interest and participation. difference or important services simply are eliminated.) Proportional representation allows a variety of political ideas to be HOW THINGS ARE Many workers are paid as little as legally not only discussed but represented.More and better represent possible and too many farmworkers are paid less than that.Many tion is what democracy is all about. workers are discouraged from exercising their legal right to orga- When you cast your vote nize through economic and physical intimidation. THINK DEMOCRACY VOTE SOCIALIST HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Workers (including farmworkers) would be paid a LIVING wage of at least $10 Der hour with (This information furnished by trey Smith.) increases tied to the Consumer Price Index. Workers would be Trey Smith has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General encouraged to organize through unions and works councils.Any Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because form of intimidation would be prosecuted to the fullest extent an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has of the law. ' exceeded the applicable spending limit. HOW THINGS ARE Oregon taxpayers subsidize corporations by allowing them to pollute and degrade our environment. If a land- slide wipes out a highway,our rivers are contaminated with chem- icals or noxious fumes create air quality problems,you and I are expected to foot the clean-up bill, not the business that created the problem in the first place. HOW THINGS SHOULD BE Clearcutting would be banned on both public AND private land in Oregon.Environmental standards would be strengthened and offending parties would be made to clean-up their own messes at their--not the public's--expense. 17 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Governor PATTI Sadly, though, Americans are not getting healthier. Despite the rB�� ut1 a annual$1 trillion spent on U.S.health care,too many Americans STEURER are in poor health:100 million suffer from at least one chronic dis- ease.Yet recent research shows that 50%of deaths and 70%of Natural Law disease in America are self-inflicted--caused by an epidemic of unhealthy habits, including improper diet, inadequate exercise, smoking,and alcohol abuse.Thus,the vast majority of disease is OCCUPATION: preventable. Alternative health care educator Proven,effective,cost-effective preventive programs already exist and entrepreneur and could cut our spiraling health care costs by 50%, but these s� in the nutriceutical programs have been largely ignored by government. Implemen- industry ting such programs in Oregon could save billions of dollars annu- ally--funds that could immediately be invested in other statewide OCCUPATIONAL and local initiatives to improve the quality of life. i' BACKGROUND: Preventive approaches also apply to environmental issues.I live Peace Corps in Lincoln City on the coast of Oregon,and I adore this state with ` Volunteer in its beautiful ocean and mountains, its gorgeous seasons, and its South Korea as K clean, fresh air. The Natural Law Part programs ro rams to a teacher bring life into accord with natural law, and Oregon's on's nvi- students and Korean English to Korean ronment testifies to the wisdom of this approach. g English teachers; Among environmental health issues, I am especially concerned teacher of the about genetically engineered foods. Many leading scientists Transcendental believe that bioengineered DNA could have profoundly negative Meditation Program since 1977 impacts on the,environment and on human life.Yet many foods EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.S. in Speech Pathology have already been genetically engineered with pig, insect,virus, from Pacific University in Forest Grove (1970), with a minor in or bacteria genes and are currently being sold in supermarkets-- Education without being labeled.No research currently examines the long- term effects that genetically engineered foods might have on our PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None bodies; moreover, genetically engineered organisms, once My life has been devoted to education education that provides released into the environment, can never be recalled. Given current health conditions in America, I feel we should demand both practical knowledge and improved quality of life.I'm running for Governor of Oregon with the Natural Law Party because I feel labeling it such foods and declare a moratorium on planting such that this party's crops until rigorous safety tests are done. p y programs can truly secure lasting health, , progress,and prosperity for all Oregonians.Here's why. To protect the environment, we must 1) implement sustainable The Natural Law Party stands for prevention-oriented govern- agriculture to reduce the use of chemical pesticides and fertiliz- The conflict-free politics, and ers,which pollute soil and groundwater and pose real threats to p proven solutions that bring wildlife and human health; 2) reduce fossil fuel usage by national life into harmony with natural law, including developing alternative, sustainable energy sources that can * Natural health care programs to prevent disease, promote stimulate the economy (e.g., cleaner air reduces the medical health,and cut health care costs by 50% costs of respiratory disease); and 3) lead the global effort to prevent the destruction of the earth's forests, the decimation of Proven educational initiatives and curriculum innovations that the diversity of species, and the potential damage from ozone develop students' inner creative genius and boost educational depletion and the greenhouse effect. But such initiatives will outcomes inevitably fail if they threaten the economic security of thousands * Effective, field-tested crime prevention and rehabilitation of families without providing alternatives.Therefore,we also need programs to protect jobs and boost the economy through education to har- ness our greatest resource--the unlimited creativity of our * Sustainable agriculture practices to increase crop yields and citizens. profitability without chemical fertilizers and pesticides As a life-long educator, I feel that education should be for enlight- * Protecting organic standards through a moratorium on geneti- enment—the full development of mind, body, and behavior.The cally engineered foods Natural Law Party promotes proven eduoational programs ' Renewable energy production and energy conservation to that directly increase intelligence and creativity and simultane- reduce pollution and create national energy self-sufficiency ously improve moral reasoning, self-reliance, and mental and physical health. These programs include sound approaches to * Cutting taxes deeply and responsibly while simultaneously bal- nutrition;natural, preventive health measures;effective drug pre- ancing the budget through cast-effective solutions to America's vention programs; and innovative curriculum development.This problems-not by eliminating essential services consciousness-based approach to education develops full human * Reducing government waste and special-interest control of potential while providing mastery of the technical skills necessary politics to compete in today's job market,thereby developing knowledge- able, highly creative citizens who can fulfill their`own goals while I am a passionate alternative health care educator and an entre- simultaneously promoting the interests of society. preneur with a home-based business in the nutriceutical industry. For years I have educated Oregonians to protect their health and Please join me in creating a better Oregon.Your vote for me will prevent disease through diet, exercise, meditation, and dietary usher in a higher quality of life for all our citizens. supplements:My success?A major health care plan now actual ly (This information furnished by Patti Steurer.) pays its enrollees to take the dietary supplements I market-- Patti Steurer has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General recognizing that when people take recourse to prevention, they Election under ORS 260.180. won't use their insurance as often. 18 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates Governor ROGER G. judges involved. By filling the courtrooms with angry and concerned citizens I have noticed a marked improvement in the WEIDNER behavior of judges and public officials in dealing with the citizens of this state. Reform I believe the primary reason for the corruption in our government is lack of accountability. Accordingly, as your Governor, I would k OCCUPATION:State make it a top priority of my administration to place the control of Director of THE all public services under the supervision of the county commis �z CONSTITUTIONAL sioners in the respective counties.By so doing the public service DEFENDERS. agencies would be directly accountable to the commissioners and the commissioners would be directly accountable to the people. P OCCUPATIONAL The different state agencies would be primarily involved in assur _� . . BACKGROUND: ing that the county agencies are complying with state law in E,Rl 1949 to 1954 dealing with the citizens of Oregon. I promise the voters that if I Paperboy for the am elected your Governor this November the corruption in our Oregonian and the courts and state government will end the day I am sworn into Oregon Journal. office. 1954 to 1956--- TOP PRIORITIES IF ELECTED GOVERNOR: Delivery boy for Jacob Miller Barber 1. Repeal Senate Bill 100 (LCDC). Citizens have an absolute and Beauty Supply. right to lawfully use their property as they see fit. Private lands 1957 to 1959---U.S. cannot be taken for public use without just compensation. Army 101st Airborne 2. Abolish SOSCF and return that function to the respective Division, Honor Guard counties. Platoon. I was selected one of the two outstanding trainees in a 3. Create the Oregon Judicial Commission to oversee and disci- class of 250 in my Advanced Airborne Infantry Training Company. pline attorneys and judges.The Commission would be made up 1959 to 1961---Clerk for R.W. Conroy Co.; 1961 to 1973--- of 10 members (not-attorneys), two from each Congressional Portland City Fireman. 1976 to 1987---Private Practice of Law. District. 1987 to 1988---Sabbatical. 1988 to Pres.---State Director of The Repeal the Scenic Gorge,Act. Constitutional Defenders, Actively engage in fighting the 4. Re P corruption in the courts and state government. 5. Abandon Outcome Based Education (goals 2000) and the Oregon Shine Benchmark Goals Program currently being used in EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: I graduated in 1952 from our public schools. Creston Grade School and in 1956 from Cleveland High School in Portland Oregon. In high school I lettered in football and was 6• I endorse home schooling and a voucher system that allows the president of a 60 member fraternity.l attended Brigham Young Parents the right to send their children to the school of their University from 1956 to 1957.1 won the light heavy weight boxing choice. championship while at Brigham Young. I graduated in 1963 from 7. 1 favor the passage of the 2.5%Single Flat Tax(gross receipts Portland State University with a degree in business administra- tax) which would replace the state income tax, property tax and tion.I graduated in 1968 from Lewis and Clark Law School with a sales tax. The Single Flat Tax would guarantee funding of all J.D.degree. essential public services. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: 1973 to 1976--- 8 Modify Measure 11 so that non-violent teenagers are not given long prison sentences for non-violent or victimless crimes. Multnomah County Deputy District Attorney. 1975 to 1976--- id Dam.Rapid a Director of the Consumer Fraud Department in the Mult.Co.Dist. 9. Preserve the Savage p Attorneys Office. 10. 1 will work for the passage of The Family Preservation Act. Under the act, children could not be permanently removed from RESUME the home of the biological parents without a jury finding of child I am a single father of three grown children.] was born June 1, abuse. 1938 in Portland Oregon, the third of four sons, to Leo and THE REFORM PARTY SUPPORTS: Frances Weidner. Leo Weidner retired in 1969 as the Deputy Chief of the Portland Fire Department. My parents have lived in 1. Strict observance of the limitations placed on government by the same house at 3526 S.E.Franklin St.Portland Oregon since the Federal and State Constitutions. July of 1937. 2. Term limits-two terms in the Senate three in the House of I AM RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR TO RESTORE TO THE Representatives. CITIZENS OF OREGON THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 3. Lobbying Reform- which would require that Elected and TO"EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW"AND"DUE PROCESS appointed public officials could not be allowed to lobby their for- OF LAW". mer colleagues for five years after leaving office. As the State Director of THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENDERS 4. Withdrawal from encumbering treaties such as NAFTA and for the past ten years I have become shockingly aware of thou- GATT•• sands of citizens who have had either their children wrongfully (This information furnished by Roger Weidner.) taken from them by State Offices for Services to Children and Roger G.Weidner has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this Family (SOSCF), or their lands wrongfully taken by Land General Election under ORS 260.180. Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC), or other property wrongfully taken from them by corrupt attorneys,judges and bureaucrats. As a former attorney and public prosecutor I have,along with hun- dreds of other concerned citizens in this state, been fighting for the last ten years to bring this intolerable corruption in our courts and state government to an end. For attempting to publicly expose this corruption I have been repeatedly ordered arrested, prosecuted and jailed, on groundless charges, by the corrupt 19 Official 1998 General Erection Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates State Representative 54TH DISTRICT TIM CURT ff i!'I KNOPP WAGONER Irr s Republican Libertarian OCCUPATION: OCCUPATION: Small business owner. Small business owner OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: BACKGROUND: '. s Congressional cam- a Landscaping;Timber paign aide;Insurance worker;Home $ l and securities; construction; Laborer,field trainer, Professional musician. petroleum industry; ' Timber worker. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: EDUCATIONAL Torrance High School. BACKGROUND: PRIOR Center for GOVERNMENTAL Professional Studies, EXPERIENCE: continuing education Co-founder and courses;Graduate of j4- former Vice Chair of York Community High School, Illinois;Bend public schools. the Libertarian Party of Deschutes County. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: United States Senate FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE AND SOCIALLY TOLERANT Deschutes County Council, appointed by U.S. Senator Gordon Smith;Oregon Delegate, 1996 Republican National Convention; People should have the control over the money they earn, the Precinct Committee Person. manner in which they choose to educate their children and every TIM KNOPP...MAKING EDUCATION HIS other decision that effects their lives. NUMBER ONE PRIORITY I support an individual's right to live their life and use their prop- We must fund education first and we need to get more out of erty as they see fit as long as they are not harming or violating the tax dollars we currently spend. That's why I support moving rights of another individual. more money into the classroom to keep class sizes down. The greatest threat to our personal safety,individual liberties and Our academic focus should be on the basics--reading, writing, our private property rights is the War on Drugs.A person does not science and math. Teachers should be given the authority to have to favor drug use in order to be in opposition to drug remove unruly and disruptive students from the classroom. prohibition. Education is about the future and I don't want to see one child fall through the cracks. Alcohol prohibition was a disaster. Drug prohibition has given us the same effects as alcohol prohibition. It has caused a TIM KNOPP...FIGHTING FOR LOWTAXES dangerous increase in crime, gang related violence and wide I support returning over-collected income taxes ("the Kicker") to spread corruption that touches all levels of our society. their rightful owner, taxpayers. I will also work to make sure that any overcharge on property taxes is returned to you.We need I support honest and truthful drug education along with the more family wage jobs, not more taxes. de-criminalization and regulation of drugs for adults While main TIM KNOPP...WORKING TO MAKE OUR taining stiff penalties for those who furnish drugs to children. NEIGHBORHOODS SAFE The more responsibility we allow the government to take,the less "Tim is a strong supporter of law enforcement. He believes in responsible we become as a society. mandatory minimum sentences and trying violent juvenile offend- Families, churches, charities and community organizations are ers as adults.He has been endorsed by the Oregon State Police better sources for help and guidance than government run social Officers'Association that's important to me°' programs. Daren Parker Captain and 27 Year Veteran If you truly want lower taxes, safer neighborhoods and more of the Oregon State Police-Ret. personal freedom then I am offering you the chance to vote for it TIM KNOPP...STRONGLY SUPPORTED BY SENIORS NOW! "Tim Knopp cares about senior health care, retirement and VOTE-CURT WAGONER! VOTE-LIBERTARIAN! transportation issues that are important to us. He will be a solid Learn more about the Libertarian Party at 1-800-elect-us advocate for our seniors in Salem and he has my vote" Mrs.Robert H.Foley (This information furnished by Curt Wagoner.) 79 year resident of Central Oregon. Curt Wagoner has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this TIM KNOPP...LISTENING AND LEADING. General Election under ORS 260.180. Endorsed by: National Federation of Independent Business Oregon State Police.Officers'Association I would appreciate ypur vote! (This information furnished by Tim Knopp for State Representative. Committee.) Tim Knopp has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General Election under ORS 260.180. 20 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates State Representative 54TH DISTRICT ELLI WORK Democrat OCCUPATION: Small Business Owner, Blueprinting; Officer,Oregon Army National Guard OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Executive Director, non-profit corporation; ' 20 year US Armed Forces Veteran EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Central Oregon Community College; University of Maryland;Regents College, BA Program. Graduate, Officer Candidate School (1990);Graduate,Officer Basic Course(1991) PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon Community Service Commission, 1996-Present; United States Armed Forces, 1978-Present Community Experience: Member, Central Oregon Builders Association; Conservation Fund; Oregon Women's Political Caucus;Bend Riverway Project Elli Work:A Caring Community Leader Who Shares Our Values Elli Work believes that the only way leaders can understand our needs and solve problems is to get out from behind a desk and into the community.She is a dedicated local leader,a small busi- ness owner,and a tireless volunteer who has worked to show that the best solutions to our problems come from local communities, not government. Fighting Crime Elli Work has taken a strong stand to help fight and prevent crime. She supports tough consequences for first-time offenders,includ- ing making young criminals apologize and pay their victims back directly. She will also crack down on scam artists who prey on senior citizens. Improving Education Elli Work knows there's more to solving Oregon's education prob- lems than just more money.She believes we must hold students to higher standards, make sure money is spent in the classroom and give teachers more help in dealing with discipline problems. Growing Smart Elli Work is committed to protecting the quality of life we have in ' Central Oregon through smart,well-planned growth. Sharing Our Values More than anything, Elli Work has dedicated herself to standing up for Central Oregon families.She supports restoring basic fair- ness to Oregon's tax system.And Elli Work is a moderate, pro- choice candidate who will work to represent our views in the Legislature--not just extremist groups or special interests. IT'S TIME FOR WORK! Contact Elli Work at(541)385-3084 or by e-mail at ElectElli @aol.com WEB SITE:www.teleport.com/-odcsn/elli/index.shtml (This information furnished by The Committee to Elect Elli Work.) Elli Work has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable spending limit. 21 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Congressional Map Poo < � 0 Cr _ ' w J 1 1 ' � � � z rr �• Y I Q Q j o 4 • z h f5----•-------------------- _ I J 5 f < z •U� I z —�-'� Qi I • C+ I I I p ry x I a 0 t, " W I Q LL- o I N I I w -------- n ♦ U I `-I r-J f- I , Z O Lij 0.Y� fn I w•99 I— "_I � I i O N 1 4 -F— o> 1 w I Ll I . I I fC N Q l z I I J F N ''- 'I < 10 z L z e ,^ I �I Y �1/� ----------- g v < I • J `� J % 0 i ✓ f/ J N • •nr' S} y z I U y a rt I Q I < < C J _.�± ��I = N•Y = I I Ian p O < so = 1 rl 0 ` 7. j –a J W I �fJ fl - I • �n Y u _ •� I -- � O I __.f L_ Ji �W y 1 I N y o Qo w � I aZ am o O 1, ZO Zj Z • o f� , N Om°Z 0 U I (n�- U)�- m U M Z WU WU >.w Cr Cr¢ '' "' of 6 0 J UO 0 U❑ U I O I 22 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information District Map �P DISTRICTS 1 fJ HOUSE SENATE 1 54 & 55 27 HOOD RIVER WASCO Tygh CONGRESSIONAL = 2 Valley 216 Maupin i 5 W 197 ^�--- N apinitia W A S C 0 Shaniko N J s � 26 218 ' -- Antelope Warm Springs O J E F F R S 0 NW Mietolius MADRAS W ' JEFFERSON Culver CROOK 20 55 26 Redmond —_ Sisters 126 20 97 20 N BEND 20 54 Brothers Le Pine D E S C H U T E DESCHUTES DESCHUTES -------- KLAMTH I _ LAKE O LEGEND _ HOUSE DISTR ICT BOUNDARY JEFFERSON & DESCHUTES DISTRICT DISTRICT ❑ HOUE � DISSRICT NUMBER -- COUNTY BOUNDARY COUNTIES MAID 23 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates State Representative 55TH DISTRICT MICHAEL T. RALPH MCGINNIS a THOMAS Socialistg� Libertarian NR E= OCCUPATION: .' 3 OCCUPATION: teacher Personal financial p, ` $ analysis;Part owner- OCCUPATIONAL plant nursery BACKGROUND: . E mill worker; OCCUPATIONAL county maintenance; BACKGROUND: meter reader Horticulture;Financial u EDUCATIONAL analysis;Experience in sales at the retail BACKGROUND: and wholesale levels. BS Physical Education'73; g . BS Elementary EDUCATIONAL Education'78 BACKGROUND: Pennsylvania State Bend High School, University 1970. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: U.S.Army 1974-76 PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Vice-Chair of the Political Statement Libertarian Party of Deschutes County. 1 am a Socialist because l believe in Democracy. As a person with deep roots in this state(In Oregon since 1845; The corporately financed democrats and republicans use the in Central Oregon since 1883), 1 am very concerned about the media to equate capitalism with democracy.In truth,capitalism is constant and escalating intrusion into our private lives. anti-democratic because control of the economy is in the hands Individual rights and liberties, and personal freedoms, choices, of a few.Socialism brings democracy into the field of economics. and responsibilities are the most important things we can have. The USSR was NOT socialistic. It was a bureaucratic form of Unfortunately, it is a constant battle to keep these things close to capitalism.The people had no voice. Socialism gives people a us when there are state and local agencies around every corner voice in the economy.When people control the economy, people attempting to legislate them away. will become more important than profits. Political Agenda When asked what I will do for you, I can assuredly say that I will do my best to LEAVE YOU ALONE!And when elected, I will fight Everyone has the right to a job that pays a livable wage.I will work for your right to be free from government intrusion as much as for full employment, using the government, if necessary. I will possible. work for a minimum wage of$10.00 per hour for all workers. Most politicians will do three things to citizens: All members of our society have a right to health care.I will work They get them emotional,get them confused,and get them fear- for a government run single payer health plan, f Then it becomes easy to come in and say"Oh we know what's Environmental health is crucial to the wellbeing of the state.I will best for you..."As much as possible, I want YOU to decide what's work to strengthen environmental laws using a tax on polluters for best for you! clean up. * The decriminalizing of victimless crime laws. A sound education system is vital for economic and democratic * The divesting of special-interest government agencies. strength of the state. I will work for adequate, stable funding for * The elimination of unneeded regulatory government agencies. public elementary and secondary schools and for the state * The drastic reduction and/or elimination of taxes: income, funded colleges and universities. property,"sin",and many others deserve close scrutiny. The present tax system is unfair to the middle and lower classes. * The opening up of the free-market system on everything I will work to shift the tax burden to corporations and to those who possible; Education, agriculture, transportation, garbage collec- can better afford to pay.I will work to eliminate property taxes on tion, recreation and much, much more. owner occupied houses.I will not support a sales tax. These are some ideas that I would like to start with.1 would very Public utilities should be non-profit. I will work to turn all public much appreciate your vote, as I feel that I CAN DRIVE...55!... utilities into co-operatives or community owned and operated Back into a state of Freedom and Liberty!!! enterprises. (This information furnished by Ralph Thomas.) State Parks belong to the people.I will work to eliminate entrance Ralph Thomas has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this fees. General Election under ORS 260.180. THINK DEMOCRACY VOTE SOCIALIST (This information furnished by Michael T.McGinnis.) Michael T McGinnis has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable spending limit. 24 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Partisan Candidates State Representative 55TH DISTRICT BEN WESTLUND Republican OCCUPATION: I Agribusiness, Businessman gip+ OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Small businessman in agricultural enterprises EDUCATIONAL • * BACKGROUND: Whitman College, BA(Education& History) PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:State Representative, District 55; Joint Ways and Means Committee; Legislative Audit Committee COMMUNITY SERVICE: High Desert Museum sponsor; St. Francis School Board;Odyssey of the Mind coach;4-H and FFA supporter;Little League sponsor When Ben Westlund ran for office in 1996, he promised to follow these principles while representing us in the legislature: LEADERSHIP–COMMON SENSE– CENTRAL OREGON PRIORITIES When Ben Westlund ran for office in 1996, he laid out what he believed our priorities should be: • Support for schools and preparing our kids to meet the challenges of the workplace. • Strong law enforcement and tough sentencing. • Compassion for the truly needy without fostering dependence. BEN WESTLUND KEPT HIS PROMISES Ben became a legislative leader on the demanding and powerful Ways and Means Committee,responsible for the state budget.He made sure good local programs were funded, programs like the Deschutes County Juvenile Justice Program that is saving money and turning kids around. Ben supported expanded prison space to keep the violent offend- ers in jail and to stop the revolving doors of justice. Ben voted for record funding for local schools and equity for schools throughout Oregon. He voted for increased funding for Higher Education and supports the efforts to get a four-year college in Bend. Ben Westlund voted for strong spending priorities,without raising taxes;and he supported the return of the surplus tax collections to the taxpayers. "When all the dust settled following the legislative session, I am proudest of my recognition as Legislator of the Year by the Oregon Library Association! LEADERSHIP–COMMON SENSE–PRIORITIES ELECT–BEN WESTLUND-AGAIN (This information furnished by Committee to Elect Ben Westlund.) Ben Westlund has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an ropponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable spending limit. 25 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Superintendent of Public Instruction MMI STAN 1998-Endorsed for Superintendent of Public Instruction by: Oregon Education Association BUNN Oregon School Boards Association Confederation of Oregon School Administrators Non artisan Oregon Building and Construction Trades Council p Amalgamated Transit Union.Division 757 k Sheriffs of Oregon Committee • OCCUPATION:Small Brady Adams,Senate President R business owner; Lynn Lundquist,House Speaker community lawyer 1995 - Recognized by the Oregon Head Start Association for his support of Oregon's Pre-Kindergarten Program OCCUPATIONAL . 1993 - Honored with the Howard Cherry Award for sx BACKGROUND: "Outstanding Contribution to Oregon Community Colleges:' Adjunct professor, . 1993 - Selected as one of two national recipients of the �I George Fox Vocational Teachers Association Award of Merit University;Farmer; 1992 - Recognized by the Oregon Library Association as State Senator Legislator of the Year EDUCATIONAL 1992 - Honored with the Oregon Professional Technical BACKGROUND: Development Association Award of Merit Lafayette and Dayton 1991 - Received President's Award of the Confederation of Elementary Schools; Oregon_School Administrators for Outstanding Contribution Dayton High School; to Oregon Schools Willamette University, 1987 - Honored by the Oregon School for the Deaf for out- ,A B.A., Economics; standing service to hearing impaired children Willamette University Law School,J.D., (cum laude) STAN BUNN: BECAUSE NO VOTE YOU CAST THIS NOVEMBER WILL PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Chair, Oregon HAVE MORE IMPACT ON OUR CHILDREN Government Ethics Commission;Chair, Education Committee of "Stan Bunn...has earned his reputation as one of Oregon's most Legislative Ways and Means; Vice-Chair, Senate Education thoughtful and decent public officials:' Committee; State Senator; State Representative;,Chair, Health -The Oregonian,May 15, 1996 and Human Services Committee; Trade and Economic "Not all Oregon schools have the same problems. I'm convinced Development Committee; Agriculture and Natural Resources Stan Bunn will work equally hard for all of our schools." Committee -Congressman Bob Smith STAN BUNN: "Bunn is a long-time supporter of education, known for his con- servative but logical approach to fiscal issues....He has a reputa- • Stan Bunn wants dangerous and disruptive students tion as an open-minded advocate for education." removed from the classroom. -The Newberg Graphic May 16, 1996 • Stan Bunn insists on zero tolerance for weapons in our "...In 11 years as a legislator, Bunn has honed a reputation as a schools. bright,compassionate and principled lawmaker' • Stan Bunn supports education reform that gets back to -The Eugene Register-Guard,March 24,'l 991 basics. "I support Stan Bunn because he has clear goals for education in • Stan Bunn understands smaller class sizes are critical. Oregon which can truly make a difference in our children's lives. • Stan Bunn will fight for an-Oregon budget that funds schools He has been'a strong supporter of teachers and we are ready to first. work with him." , • Stan Bunn knows the value of early childhood programs,such _James K.Sager,President,Oregon Education Association as Head Start. A MESSAGE FROM STAN BUNN: "Stan Bunn stands out as the candidate who is best qualified to "Excellence in Education; Getting There Together," captures lead the Department of Education. I support and endorse his my belief that, together, we can offer our youth an excellent candidacy." education.No one person or group can do it alone,but together -Norma Paulus, we can.Having the right kind of leadership is tremendously impor- Oregon Superintendent of Public Instruction tant. My leadership skills will help all those concerned with edu- "I have worked with Stan Bunn over many years and urge his cation to focus on and accomplish our goals.I am excited about election as an outstanding choice for Superintendent of Public doing this job, and you have my commitment to work hard and Instruction.' give my best efforts to serve well. -The Honorable Victor,Atiyeh, Long before my role as a parent, educator, attorney,and legisla- Former Governor tor, I was an Oregon kid who went to school in Lafayette and Dayton,picked strawberries and beans in the summer,worked on STAN BUNN: our family farm and earned my State Farmer degree in FFA.I still BECAUSE WE'RE IN THIS TOGETHER have those deep Oregon roots and want current Oregon kids from As a parent, Stan Bunn understands Oregon's children face a every part of the state to have the educational opportunities that changing world. Their quality of life depends on whether our helped me.I want them to have what they need to step into their schools deliver the tools they need to compete and succeed.Stan world,and to be ready to lead it. Bunn believes parents,teachers,and the community must work I am ready to help make that happen.I ask for your support. together to make it happen.It will take work and commitment and Stan Bunn Stan Bunn will partner with those people,working for the good of EVERYONE IS FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION. our children. STAN BUNN IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WITH THE STAN BUNN: SKILLS AND A SENSIBLE PLAN TO GET US THERE. PROVEN AND TRUSTED IN THE FIGHT FOR BETTER SCHOOLS (This information furnished by Oregonians For Better Education.) • 1 Stan Bunn has agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this General 1 in 998 Chosen by more Oregonians than any other candidate the Primary Election for Superintendent of Public Election under ORS 260.180 but is not bound by that agreement because an opponent for this election has not agreed to limit expenditures or has Instruction exceeded the applicable spending limit. 26 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Superintendent of Public Instruction MARGARET MARGARET CARTER: III III �I BRINGING PEOPLE TOGETHER. CARTER As a Representative,Margaret Carter earned a reputation for get- ting people to work together for the common good -- labor and Nonpartisan management, urban and rural, Democrats and Republicans. "...Carter(a community college counselor) has the support 553 OCCUPATION: of Republican legislators such as John Waft, Lenn Hannon Community college and Bill Markham. That says a lot for her ability to work counselor and across the political divide" €�E faculty member. Medford Mail Tribune,5/15/98 �< "Margaret Carter has a history of bringing people together. OCCUPATIONAL She is able to blend the political process with the practical BACKGROUND: realities of education:' Rural music teacher. Barbara Ross,Corvallis Reading teacher, School Board member g. Albina School. �= Counselor and faculty "Margaret Carter understands the concerns of rural school y tp member, Portland districts.She is an education leader for the whole state.' Community College, Marc Kane,Klamath Falls 1973-present. "Margaret Carter is one of those rare leaders who inspires Y. EDUCATIONAL excellence and cooperation in others" BACKGROUND: Lee Beyer,Springfield B.S.in Elementary MARGARET CARTER:A REMARKABLE LEADER Education, Portland State University. Master's in Education As a State Representative, Margaret Carter helped create a per- Psychology,Oregon State University. manent Head Start in Oregon and helped found the Oregon PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon State Youth Conservation Corps. She was chief sponsor of the Representative, 1985 - present. Vice-chair, House Education; Oregon Workforce 2000 Act, bringing technology learning cen- member, Revenue and School Finance,Joint Ways and Means. ters into Oregon communities.Margaret served as Vice Chair of COMMUNITY SERVICE: American Red Cross, Board of the House Education Committee, helped balance the state's Directors; Meals on Wheels; Emanuel Hospital Foundation, for- budget as a member of Ways and Means and served on mer Board member; Governor's Task Force on Pregnancy and Revenue and School Finance. Substance Abuse;Governor's Council on Drugs and Alcohol "Margaret Carter understands how children learn and the MARGARET CARTER: challenges teachers face.She knows how our schools work" Bob Shook,Beaverton A LIFETIME COMMITTED TO EDUCATION. School Board member "...the candidate we like is Margaret Carter,also a legislator, MARGARET CARTER: but someone with a much longer and richer career in A POSITIVE VOICE FOR EDUCATION education than Bunn" `The greatest gift we can give our grandchildren is a top- Ashland Daily Tidings,517/98 notch school system.Margaret Carter will provide the hard Margaret Carter began her career as a music teacher in rural work and inspiration we need to achieve this goal" schools. She earned degrees in elementary education and Oregon State Council for Senior Citizens education psychology,and worked as a reading teacher.With remarkable energy, she raised nine children and took an active "It's time we started talking about what's working in educa- role in the community.As a mother, Margaret always made edu- tion. Margaret Carter will be the positive voice we need for cation a top priority. As an educator and counselor, she has education" helped thousands of young people. Jody Daniels Fischer,Woodburn School Board member "Margaret Carter is a mother, teacher and supporter of schools,who has the best interests of our children,teachers, "We support Margaret Carter.She has both a demonstrated families and communities at heart" ability to lead and a lifetime of working in education.' Lolita Darby,Teacher,Portland Former candidates for State Superintendent: "Carter...is very concerned about the American family and Ron Adams,College Administrator,West Linn education and keeping kids safe." Jack Bray,Education Consultant The Oregonian,1.1/7/94 Alan DeMeurers,Teacher,Salem Colin Karr-Morse,Retired Principal,Portland "Carter has a reputation for caring about children..." Michael Verhulst,Student Wilsonville Spokesman,12/10/97 ELECT MARGARET CARTER. "Margaret Carter is a lady who has been in a classroom.She A LIFETIME SPEAKING OUT FOR EDUCATION knows how children learn. She knows what we need from Salem is not more regulation,but more inspiration:" (This information furnished by Friends of Margaret Carter.) Arnold Coe,Baker City Margaret Carter has not agreed to limit campaign expenditures for this School Superintendent General Election under ORS 260.180. MARGARET CARTER: RECOGNIZED FOR HER CONTRIBUTIONS March of Dimes, 1987 Woman of Achievement League of Women Voters, 1995 Distinguished Service Award Oregon Community College, 1995 Outstanding Service Award Oregon Commission for Women, 1997 Woman of Achievement Oregon Alzheimer Association, 1997 Public Service Award 27 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Voting Accessibility for Elderly and Individuals with Physical Disabilities Pursuant to the federal "Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act," Public Law 98-435, the State of Oregon has made the following provisions for voters who are elderly or who have physical disabilities: 1. A cassette edition of the Voters' Pamphlet is available for Oregonians who cannot read standard print due to a visual or physical disability. To order a cassette edition of the Voters' Pamphlet, please contact Independent Living Resources at 503-232-7411. If you need information regarding where you vote, please call your county elections official. All other Voters' Pamphlet questions should be directed to the Office of the Secretary of State at 503-986-1518 or 503-986-1521 (hearing impaired). 2. Large-type voting instructions or hand-held magnifying glasses for the visually impaired will be provided at each polling place. 3. Telecom mu nication'devices for the hearing impaired will be available in each county elections office.The special telephone number for your county is included in the list of county elections officials that appears on the "Absent Voter" information page in Volume 1, or you may con- tact the Office of the Secretary of State by dialing 503-986-1521. 4. If an elderly or physically disabled voter's polling place is inaccessi- ble, the voter may request, in advance, to have a ballot brought from the polling place to the voter's car, or be assigned to an alternative polling place. 5. Any voter who is unable to mark or punch the ballot because of a physical disability or an inability to read or write shall receive, upon request, the assistance of two election board clerks of different par- ties, or some other person chosen by the voter. Under no circum- stances may assistance be given by the voter's employer, an agent of the employer, or by an officer or agent of the voter's union. 6. An absentee ballot may be requested by any elderly or physically disabled voter. Details concerning the nature of barriers present at polling places designated as inaccessible may be obtained by contacting your county elections official. 28 1 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Judge of the Supreme Court POSITION 4 j a1heag a,j[,tlig�lr'! h;la?IC,Ii'B`trl' SUSAN M. "For more than two decades,from Washington,D.C.,to Oregon,I Ipy��i I i have had the pleasure to know and work with Sue Leeson as she LEESON has progressed from university professor to United States Supreme Court fellow to appellate court judge. In each stage of her life,Justice Leeson has shown herself to be a committed pub- Nonpartisan lic servant, a model of integrity, and a demanding but compas- sionate legal scholar.Justice Leeson has worked tirelessly to turn ' OCCUPATION: her talents to the benefit of the community--as a local volunteer Associate Justice, for the Polk County Victim-Offender Program,through the count Oregon Supreme less hours she has spent nurturing young students, and through § Court.Appointed the substantial written contributions she has made to the law. 4" by Governor Voters should retain Justice Leeson's thoughtful voice on the John Kitzhaber, Oregon Supreme Court:' February 1998. -Mark O.Hatfield,U.S.Senator(Retired) OCCUPATIONAL "Justice Leeson has proven herself to be a hardworking, produc- BACKGROUND: tive,thorough judge who takes the law and her judicial responsi- Judge,Oregon Court bilities--but not herself--very seriously. She thinks and writes, of Appeals, clearly and treats litigants fairly. She also has a good sense of 1993-1998.Professor humor and brings a healthy dose of common sense to her work. of Political Science, Voters should retain Justice Leeson on the Oregon Supreme Willamette University, Court:' 1970-1992.Associate Professor of Law, -Hon.Betty Roberts,Senior Associate Justice, Willamette Oregon Supreme Court University, 1984-1992. Visiting Professor of Law, University of Bridgeport, Summer, 1985. Judicial Fellow, United States "Sue has a ,is sharp mind, speaks and writes plain English, lives modestly,is Supreme Court, 1983-84.Law clerk,Hon.Alfred T.Goodwin,U.S. as honest as the day is long,honors her mother, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1982-83. Intern, Senator is adored by her friends,works from sun up to sun down and has Mark O.Hatfield, 1967.Summer work during graduate school for both feet on the ground:' Daily Shipping News(Portland).Summer work during college at -Richard Breen,Professor of Law, radio station KPAM-FM and Tektronix. During high school, baby Willamette University sat,picked berries,and mowed lawns. "Sue Leeson is a smart,energetic judge who should be retained:' EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: J.D., Willamette University (1981 - cum laude); Ph.D in Government, Claremont Graduate -Jacob Tanzer,former Associate Justice, School (1971 -with distinction); M.A. in Government, Claremont Oregon Supreme Court Graduate School (1970); B.A. in Political Science, Willamette "In addition to writing clear, well-reasoned opinions (and a lot of University (1968 - magna cum laude). Graduate, Sunset High them),Sue Leeson has been a leader in bringing innovation to the School (Beaverton) (1964). Post-doctoral fellowships at Duke Oregon appellate courts. The appellate settlement conference University, Bowdoin College, Princeton University and Stanford program gives civil litigants an opportunity to resolve their dis- Law School. putes more quickly, comprehensively, and at less cost than PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon Criminal through protracted litigation. Justice Leeson saw the need for Justice Council, 1992(Chair-Committee on Probation Violations); such a program and spearheaded its creation.We need Justice Oregon Commission on the U.S.Constitutional Bicentennial, 1985- Leeson's hard work and creative spirit on the Oregon Supreme 1987; Marion-Polk Local Government Boundary Commission, Court:' 1972-1980;Salem Sister City Commission, 1974-1976. -Judy Henry,Director, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND SERVICE Appellate Settlement Conference Program; former president,Oregon State Bar Volunteer mediator, Polk County Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program and Marion County Neighbor-to-Neighbor Program; "I am confident[Justice Leeson]will be an exceptional and inval- Grant Neighborhood Litter Patrol;evaluator of North Salem High uable addition to the Supreme Court. Her academic rigor, School graduation projects;judge"We the People"competition for tempered by real-life experience,will serve Oregon well.' Classroom Law Project and Center for Civic Education;presenter, -Governor John Kitzhaber annual Classroom Law Project Summer Institute; Willamette (News conference statement,February 26,1998.) Valley Inns of Court;former board member,Oregon Law Institute. PUBLICATIONS (This information furnished by Retain Justice Leeson.) Co-author of texts on constitutional law and dispute resolution. Author and co-author of several law review and academic journal articles. PERSONAL Born in Salt Lake City, Utah, August 16, 1946.Moved to Oregon in 1961. Sunset High School representative to Girls' State and Oregon's representative to Girls'Nation (1963);winner, National Elks Leadership contest(1964).Married to Willamette University mathematics professor Richard S.Hall,Jr. 29 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Judge of the Supreme Court POSITION 7 s � ` WILLIAM "As police managers, we believe the State Supreme Court es� a :� needs a judge with a broad view of crime control and police k r RIGGS issues. [Judge Riggs'] demonstrated concern for the priori- ties of working law enforcement professionals has earned our support:' Nonpartisan r Portland Police Commanding Officers Association Keeping Politics Out of the Supreme Court OCCUPATION: Beyond being the only candidate with judicial experience, Judge Judge,Oregon Court Riggs is also the choice to keep politics out of our judicial system. of Appeals a He is not a politician.He has no personal or ideological agenda OCCUPATIONAL he wants to push. Judge Riggs will keep the Supreme Court impartial, fair and above olitics.And that is an important differ- BACKGROUND: encce in this race. p p Judge,Multnomah County Circuit Court; "The danger is in electing a politician rather than a qualified `ja f Attorney;farm worker; jurist...Far and away the best candidate in the race for cannery worker Supreme Court this time around is William Riggs.This is so because he is the only candidate with any experience as a EDUCATIONAL judge...Please join us in voting for Judge William Riggs:' BACKGROUND: Wallowa County Chieftain,May 14,1998 Univ.of Oregon,JD; Oregon's Overwhelming Choice Portland State Univ., Judge Riggs has earned the support of newspapers, organiza- B.S.;Willamette Univ.; tions, community leaders, elected officials and citizens in every Hillsboro Union HS part of Oregon.Rarely has there been such a dramatic difference in support between two candidates.There is a good reason for PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Judge, Oregon Court that:this may be the most important vote you cast this year.Just of Appeals, 10 years; Judge, Multnomah County Circuit Court, some endorsements include: 10 years; US Navy active and reserve for 30+ years, retired as "Riggs' record is one of common sense and objectivity. He captain. would bring a tough-on-crime approach to the bench, bal- FAMILY:Two children;two grandchildren anted by a legitimate concern for the rights of individuals Judge William Riggs and workers. His objectivity has won him the backing of a For Supreme Court wide variety of organizations and individuals that include Democrats and Republicans alike. Riggs is the clear choice The Only Judge for the Job for position 7 of the Oregon Supreme Court:' With 20 years distinguished experience as a judge (including 10 Hermiston Herald,April 29,1998 years on the Oregon Court of Appeals), a record of fairness, a "...we favor Riggs because of his demonstrated judicial com reputation for integrity and support throughout every part of petence and because (of) his background, which includes Oregon,there has never been a clearer choice for Supreme Court the handling of many criminal cases..." than Judge William Riggs. Eugene Register-Guard,May 5,1998 "Judge Bill Riggs is the only candidate with judicial experi- "Legal observers say[Riggs]is one of the best judges on the ence.He also has a record of fairness,and it is important that hard-working -- some might say overworked -- Court of justice stay above politics.That is why Judge Bill Riggs is the Appeals. Riggs would bring not only experience,but also a clear choice for Oregon State Supreme Court:' strong work ethic to the Supreme Court...The time he spent Governor John Kitzhaber,M.D. on the Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals has prepared him well for the decisions he would have to make on the "Judge William Riggs has 10 years of solid service on the Supreme Court:' Oregon Court of Appeals on top of 10 years as a circuit East Oregonian(Pendleton),May 5,1998 court judge in Multnomah County...Riggs is an intelligent, Governor John common-sense jurist who has the respect of the bar and a Wycl US Senator Ron Wyden legal briefcase full of endorsements:' Honorable,Phil Keisling Oregonian,April 29,1998 State Senator Neil Bryant He's Earned Our Trust Former Governor Neil Goldschmidt Judge Riggs has won the respect of those with whom he has Former Governor Barbara Roberts worked, including judges, attorneys and his shipmates in the Former Republican State Treasurer Bill Rutherford Navy, where he won several awards and medals, including the Honorable Norma Paulus Defense Meritorious Service Medal. Even candidates who ran Honorable Betty Roberts against him in the primary election have endorsed Judge Riggs. Honorable Mary Deits "As candidates for this seat during the primary, we urge Honorable Rex A r Oregonians to vote for the best-qualified candidate on the Honorable Virginia a Linde r ind ballot this November: Judge Bill Riggs. Judge Riggs will Jim Westwood, maintain the integrity and independence that is so important James Rice, Esq.. for Oregon's Supreme Court:' Jack Faust, Esq. Jim Westwood and James Rice Jake Tanner, Esq. Sheriffs of Oregon A Tough,No-Nonsense Approach to Crime Portland Police Commanding Officers Association Judge Riggs served for 10 years on the Multnomah County Circuit Multnomah.County Corrections Officers Association Court, during which time he sentenced hundreds of criminals to Oregon AFL-CIO hard time.Judge Riggs understands the impact of crime on our Northwest Oregon Labor Council communities. He is the candidate who has delivered justice for Oregon Education Association victims of crime first-hand. Judge Riggs was a Director of the American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees Oregon Judicial Foundation for Criminal Justice–an organization Council 75 that educates judges, attorneys, and citizens on the impact of Oregon Public Employees Union, SEIU, Local 503 crime on adult and child victims. (This information furnished by Judge Riggs for Supreme Court Committee.) 30 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Judge of the Supreme Court POSITION 7 BOB BOB TIERNAN THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE TIERNAN "Bob Tiernan's record speaks for itself. A man of integrity and courage, Bob led the fiaht to keep violent criminals behind bars, Nonpartisan keep children safe from child molesters, and give crime victims p more rights.Bob truly is a leader in the effort to keep Oregonians OCCUPATION: safe and to protect our quality of life Attorney;Personnel Steve Doell and Labor Relations President,Crime Victims United R Specialist;Lieutenant "Bob Tiernan represents a judge's best qualities.He is articulate, E^ s Commander, U.S. hard-working, compassionate, independent, and fair. He is not Naval Reserve. beholden to any special interest,but truly works for the people.' OCCUPATIONAL Sean Donahue Portland Attorney BACKGROUND: Small Business "Few,if any,have done as much to fight for tough criminal laws to Owner. protect Oregonians than Bob Tiernan.' Tom Cutsforth EDUCATIONAL District Attorney,Wheeler County BACKGROUND: "As the mother of two small children; I believe this is one of the Georgetown most important votes we will cast.We need Bob Tiernan on the University Law School (LLM);,University of Supreme Court because he will stand up for our children. He is <`` Puget Sound Law kind,compassionate, and fair.Too many judges let child pornog- School(JD);Oregon State University(B.SP raphers off the hook and violent criminals out on the street on technicalities..I want someone like Bob Tiernan who I can trust to PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon State keep my loved ones safe." Representative, 1993-1996. Chair, Crime and Corrections Lori Piercy Subcommittee; Judiciary Committee; Civil Law and Judicial Rainier Administration Subcommittee; Chair, General Government ,Bob Tiernan's qualifications are outstanding. I want a Supreme Committee;Commerce Committee;Labor Committee Court Justice who will work hard to make our justice system FAMILY:Bob and Sue Hart Tiernan have three children:Rob(17), work." Jenny(15),and Katie(12). John Minnis PAST COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Board Member, Oregon Chairman, House Judiciary Committee Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse; Board Member, United "Bob Tiernan will bring fairness and impartiality to the Supreme Cerebral Palsy; Little League Coach; Organizer, Leslie Meyers Court. He will not overturn voter passed initiatives for political or Home(raised money and built handicap accessible home for par- personal reasons" alyzed crime victim) Jim Greene BOB TIERNAN Lake Oswego PROVEN RECORD PROTECTING OREGONIANS Dear Voter, Bob Tiernan's leadership has made our communities safer. Bob I love Oregon and want to preserve our quality of life for our chil- sponsored the"Tough on Crime"initiatives: Measure 11 increas- dren and grandchildren. I believe in a fair, independent, and ing prison sentences for violent criminals,and Measure 17 requir- impartial judicial system free from the influence of special inter- ing prisoners to work. Bob supported Measure 40 giving crime ests. I am the candidate with a track record of fighting for every- victims more rights and bringing Oregon law into line with federal day folks, law-abiding citizens, and the most vulnerable. I would law, making the system work to hold criminals accountable. be honored to have your vote. BOB TIERNAN (This information furnished by Bob Tiernan for Supreme Court.) VOICE FOR THE VULNERABLE Bob Tiernan's leadership on the Crime Subcommittee helped make children,women, and the elderly safer. Despite opposition from special interest groups, Bob fought successfully for sex offender notification. anti-stalking_laws, and stiffer penalties for those who abuse the elderly and harm seeing eye dogs. BOB TIERNAN INDEPENDENT AND FAIR Bob Tiernan is fair, impartial,and independent.We need a judge free from conflicts, not one endorsed by special interests. We need a judge willing to uphold your right to vote on initiatives,not one backed by those trying to take that right away. BOB TIERNAN HARD WORKING,EXPERIENCED,HONEST Bob Tiernan is an experienced attorney working with small busi- nesses and everyday citizens.He is a Naval Reserve Intelligence Officer entrusted with our nation's most sensitive secrets. He helped evacuate civilians during the Liberian Revolution,worked against drug smugglers in Panama,and searched for our Vietnam War POW/MIAs. 31 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Judge of the Court of Appeals POSITION 4 VIRGINIA L. a1' LINDER o`f Nonpartisan �z OCCUPATION: `•, ;. Judge,Oregon Court of Appeals t OCCUPATIONAL _r__.. BACKGROUND: Oregon Solicitor General;Assistant Solicitor General; Attorney-in-Charge, E Education Section, General Counsel Division;Assistant Attorney General, Appellate Division EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Willamette University,JD,cum laude (1980); Southern Oregon State College, BA, summa cum laude(1975) PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon Department of Justice, 1980-1997 Judge Virginia Linder:Experienced "Virginia Linder's experience and skill make her an excellent addi- tion to the Oregon Court of Appeals.I am very pleased to be able to appoint a lawyer of her caliber to this position" -- Governor John A.Kitzhaber Judge Virginia Linder:Hard Working "Virginia is one of the smartest and most hard-working lawyers have ever known.She is the only person I know whose brief on the merits was so persuasive that the United States Supreme Court reversed the case without even scheduling oral argument. Virginia has a wonderful judicial temperament.She is courteous and collegial;and decisive without being abrasive.She will quickly emerge as a leader on a court beleaguered by one of the heavi- est caseloads in the nation"--Dave Frohnmayer,former Attorney General of Oregon(1981-1991) Judge Virginia Linder:Professional "I have known Virginia Linder since she became a lawyer in 1980. 1 was serving on the Court of Appeals at that time, and I was immediately impressed, as were my colleagues, at her skills as an appellate lawyer.When she presented cases to either appel- late court, the judges always knew her briefs would be well researched and well written. When she argued before either court, it was always with personal confidence, with professional respect for the court,and with a complete command of the details of the case. Virginia Linder will be one of the finest appellate judges we have ever had in Oregon" -- Betty Roberts, retired Oregon Supreme Court Justice (This information furnished by Committee to Retain Judge Virginia Linder.) 32 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—Nonpartisan Candidates Judge of the Court of Appeals POSITION 7 I91V iV',;i'I�IIi�Ii l a1,1�wG �ll�'I�Ij ROBERT "I've known Bob Wollheim for almost 30 years.He is an excellent R JJ, Court of Appeals Judge WOLLHEIM Sidney Lezak, Former United States Attorney for Oregon. "Before becoming a judge,Bob Wollheim was my choice to rep- Nonpartisan resent my clients before the Court of Appeals.He is an asset to the people of Oregon:' a' OCCUPATION: Kate Donnelly, Eugene Attorney. Judge,Court of "Bob Wollheim has the intellect and temperament to serve the f Appeals, Position 7. people of Oregon as a Court of Appeals Judge:' J.Robert Moon,Jr., Baker City Attorney. ht„ OCCUPATIONAL "I've known Bob Wollheim since law school. I've always been u b n BACKGROUND: impressed with his willingness to listen to people. He is a great Partner in the law firm choice for the Court of Appeals:' of Welch, Bruun, David Tilton,Coos Bay Attorney. Green&Wollheim, "Judge Wollheim is well known for his broad knowledge of the law Portland;Judicial and his ability to explain the law to both lawyers and clients.' tia Clerk, Oregon Court Viz Viz Viz Viz Viz of Appeals;Legal of Love, Lake Oswego Attorney. Assistant;Window "Bob Wollheim was a hard working attorney.He is well known for Washer;and Cab his sense of fairness and common sense" Driver. Arthur Stevens,Medford Attorney. js "Bob and his family have been my neighbors for ten years.Our EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Portland State University,B.S., kids have grown together.He knows what it takes to raise a fam- 1979; Northwestern School of Law, Lewis&Clark College, J.D., ily today. He knows what it takes to run a small business, I fully 1983. support him" Sue Ayers.Portland Small Business Owner and Homemaker. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Judge, Oregon Court of Appeals; Judicial Clerk, Oregon Court of Appeals; and RETAIN COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE ROBERT WOLLHEIM Committee Member, 24-Hour Health Care Advisory Committee, (This information furnished by Committee to Retain ,fudge Robert Workers'Compensation Division. Wollheim.) EXPERIENCED Judge Wollheim clerked for the Oregon Court of Appeals and then spent over 13 years arguing appeals before the Oregon appellate courts. "We agree Bob has the experience,temperament and knowledge from his years of experience to be an outstanding Court of Appeals Judge! Former Court of Appeals Chief Judge George Joseph and former Court of Appeals Judge John Warden. FAMILY BACKGROUND Bob and his wife,Karen,live in Portland with their children,Josh, age 14,Theo, age 10, and Nate, age 10.All the children attend public schools.For the past few years the entire family volunteers monthly at the Northeast Emergency Food Program. Last year Bob was the coach of Josh's 8th grade basketball team and the assistant coach of the twins'4th grade basketball team. INVOLVED IN THE COMMUNITY Judge Wollheim served on the Legal Services Program Committee, Oregon State Bar. Judge Wollheim served on the Board of Directors of the Multnomah County Legal Aid Service from 1993 to 1998, where he was Secretary from 1994 to 1995 and Board Chair from 1995 to 1997.Judge Wollheim was on the Board of Director's of the Labor's Community Service Agency from 1996 to 1998. Judge Wollheim was also on the Board of Directors of the Willamette Valley Law Project from 1989 to 1988, where he served as Vice-president and President. Previously Judge Wollheim volunteered with the Volunteer Lawyers'Project, representing low income clients for free. Judge Wollheim also serves as a volunteer judge for the Mock Trial program for high school students. RESPECTED THROUGHOUT OREGON "Bob Wollheim draws upon both a wealth of experience arguing before the Court of Appeals and a commitment to principled com- munity involvement and his appointment reflects the Court's tra- dition of efficiency and legal excellence" Governor John Kitzhaber, M.D, February 27, 1998. 33 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Libertarian Part y Statement The Libertarian Party stands for personal freedom and individual responsibility.We offer what the Republicans once did--lower taxes. We offer what the Democrats once did -- personal freedom. Unlike liberals, we want government out of your pocketbooks. Unlike conservatives,we want government out of your private choices.We are the home for independent minded voters,including those who have been abandoned by the Republicans and Democrats.We are winning more elections and we are changing public policy. The Libertarian Party is not driven by big money special interests;our strength comes from voters like you.We offer a new future of liberty,prosperity,and security.Libertarians believe that government should protect your property,civil liberties, and personal safety. The greatest threat to the security of your homes,schools,and neighborhoods is the black market created by the war on drugs.The black market brings gang violence,police corruption,and social decay. CRIME AND DRUGS Decriminalization of drugs will break the hold criminals and social predators have on our youth.Churches,families,and communities will compassionately help those who struggle with drugs,while teaching children that drug abuse is wrong.Decriminalization will free police to protect our streets,and free prison space to keep violent criminals locked up. TAXES As Harry Browne said in his book, Why Government Doesn't Work."Imagine paying only half the taxes you're paying now.You could move into a better home,finance a more comfortable retirement,send your children to the private school of your choice,support your favorite cause or charity in a way that would make a significant difference,or save up to go into business for yourself! Mr.Browne continued,"With lower taxes, your family could live well on the income of just one spouse--so the other parent could choose to stay home and raise your children in the values you believe, rather than leaving their moral training to strangers.' EDUCATION Libertarians believe as you do that the education of our youth is paramount to a healthy society. By expanding your choices, Libertarians make it possible for you to get the best education for your children. BALLOT MEASURES The State Committee of the Libertarian Party of Oregon supports or opposes the following statewide ballot measures: Measure 54--NO--Don't increase state debt.(Amends Constitution:Authorizes State To Guarantee Bonded Indebtedness of Certain Education Districts.) Measure 57---NO Don't make a bad problem worse.(Makes Possession of Limited Amount of Marijuana Class C Misdemeanor.) Measure 59--YES End welfare for politicians.(Amends Constitution:Prohibits Using Public Resources to Collect Money for Political Purposes.) Measure 61 NO--Leave sentencing choices to judges.(Changes Minimum Sentences For Listed Crimes,Including Certain Repeat Offenses.), Measure 62 -NO--Violates US Constitution.(Amends Constitution:Requires Campaign Finance Disclosures, Regulates Signature Gathering,Guarantees Contribution Methods.) , Measure 64--NO--Violates rights and destroys jobs.(Prohibits Many Present Timber Harvest Practices, Imposes More Restrictive Regulations.) Measure 65--YES -- Make the legislature do its job. (Amends Constitution:Creates Process For Requiring Legislature to Review Administrative Rules.) Measure 67--YES -- Leave medicine to patients and doctors. (Allows Medical Use of Marijuana Within Limits, Establishes Permit System.) For more information on our comprehensive program,call(800)829-1992 or in the Portland area please call(503)359-4003.Or you can visit our website at HTTP://WWW.TELEPORT.COM/--LPO Please support our candidates and read their Voter Pamphlet statements. Don't waste your vote on candidates who will not protect your rights.For principled representation and a real change from politics as usual,vote Libertarian. (This information furnished by Libertarian Party of Oregon.) 34 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Pacific Part y Statement The Pacific Party is an independent,grassroots political party dedicated to protecting our economic and environmental security.We have grown because of the inability or unwillingness of the major political parties to solve or address Oregon's real problems.The Pacific Party gives you a new and different voice in the political system.We need your support and your vote. The Pacific Party will work to end the continued centralization of political and economic power. We accept the challenge.of infusing the present system with future focus,ecological wisdom,and the accountability of office holders and corporations. Our vision is towards peace, justice, basic human equality, and personal self-determination. We strive to create and maintain an ecologically sustainable society. OUR PRINCIPLES The Pacific Party recognizes that inequality,militarism,poverty and pollution plague our society and government.We envision and strive to create a community-based grassroots democracy that will overcome these problems. Since 1991, the Pacific Party has been actively working in our communities to protect the beauty and livability of Oregon.We recognize that today's decisions will affect our children and our children's children. We know that what is in our best interest ecologically, is also in our best interest economically.Protecting Oregon's forests protects Oregon's economy. Our tourism and recreation industries depend on having healthy trees standing in our forests.Our clean drinking water comes from and requires healthy forests.Maintaining and restoring our forests is cheaper and makes more sense than building expensive water filtration plants. We strive to: * Ensure equal rights for all regardless of race, gender, ideology/philosophy/religion, sexual orientation, age or physical abilities: Ensure that basic human needs like healthy food, clean water, shelter,health care and education are met.Address the struggles of Native Peoples, Latinos,African-Americans and other ethnic communities who have suffered as a result of U.S.government policy. * Increase funding and ensure local control for all levels of education. Our schools should promote values of interdependence, cooperation,nurturing, mutual benefit, peace,creativity,and respect for diversity. •Ensure a living wage,decent working conditions,and the rights of all workers to organize. • Establish universal health care that includes preventative measures and mental health care reform. Increase standards for retirement facilities.Treat drug abuse as a health problem, rather than a criminal justice issue. *Develop alternatives to incarceration and reduce the need for expensive prison construction.Regulate and tax marijuana to protect children and provide revenue;treat marijuana in all legal respects as hard alcohol. •End violence,including the death penalty. • Convert Oregon's economy to long-term economic and ecological sustainability. Stop corporate welfare. Support local, sustainable businesses and cooperatives. Develop ecologically sustainable land-use by protecting agricultural space, promoting organic agriculture and family farms.Preserve and restore old growth forests and end clearcutting.Develop environmentally sound renewable energy, including solar,wind and biomass. *Establish"Pollution Taxes".Decrease taxes on individuals and increase taxes on pollution and waste. Promote alternatives to pollution-choking sprawl and automobile dependence.Develop safe, healthy, pedestrian communities,bike paths and public transit. *Establish meaningful campaign finance reform. Eliminate the corruptive influence of money in politics. Ensure representation for diverse communities through electoral reforms,such as proportional representation. *Ensure the right to privacy, including the right to reproductive freedom.Keep government and corporations out of private matters. * End corporate control of our publicly owned airwaves. Provide free radio and TV time for all ballot-qualified candidates. Promote grassroots alternatives to mass media, including public access broadcasting and micro-radio. Achieving peace,justice, and a sustainable environment will require that people work within present institutions while simultane- ously creating new ones.The Pacific Party respects the diversity of approaches necessary to attain these goals. VOTE PACIFIC FOR A BETTER OREGON The Pacific Party is a founding member of the Association of State Green Parties and represents the international Green Movement in Oregon.You won't be able to find us on a traditional"right to left"political spectrum because we are neither right nor left,we are out front,in the lead,creating the new mainstream of Oregon.We are your friends and neighbors,we are union members and small business owners,we are nurses,accountants and construction workers;we come from all walks of life. Pacific Party candidates,like our 1996 presidential candidate Ralph Nader,are proven leaders who will protect the public interest.Our candidate for Governor, Blair Bobier, is the Executive Director of the Northwest Democracy Institute and a long-time environmental activist.U.S.Senate candidate Karyn Moskowitz is an economist who has documented how taxpayers subsidize clear- cutting and environmental destruction of our public lands. Our local candidates have records of honest leadership,working for the public interest in their communities.We are proud of all our Pacific Party candidates and each deserve your vote.Please join us in voting for: Karyn Moskowitz, US Senate; Blair Bobier,Governor; Michael Donnelly,5th Congressional District; Deborah Howes, House District 17; Stan Kahn, House District 14; Jodi Robindottir, House District 20; Barry Joe Stull, House District 12;and, Dr.Eric Dover, Marion County Commissioner Seat#2 Vote Pacific for grassroots democracy!Vote Pacific for a healthy economy and environment!Vote Pacific for your children.Together we can create a better future.Keep Oregon Green in 1998 and in years to come.Vote Pacific! We encourage you to get to know us better. Have a question? Call us at 503.238.1856.Write to us at: PO Box 1223, University Station, Portland,OR 97207.Or visit our web site:www.pacificparty.org VOTE YOUR HOPES, NOT YOUR FEARS! VOTE PACIFIC! VOTE BLAIR BOBIER FOR GOVERNOR VOTE KARYN MOSKOWITZ FOR U.S.SENATE! (This information furnished by Pacific Party.) 35 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Reform Part y Statement, IF YOU WANT REFORM VOTE REFORM The Reform Party of Oregon asks you to put trust and integrity back into our political system by being a participant in our electoral process.Educate yourselves on the issues and candidates.Become involved and participate in the political system by registering Reform Party.Do not allow yourself to believe that a vote for a candidate other than the two major parties is a wasted vote.It is NOT.It is an influential and motivating vote.Independent voters and thinkers can and do change laws and legislators. REMEMBER,IF YOU WANT REFORM VOTE REFORM THE REFORM PARTY OF OREGON PLATFORM: • Calls for a diminished role of government in everyday life.Taxes should be reduced and less service should be provided. All government action should be taken as local as possible. • Calls for Oregon affairs to be decided in Oregon and not in Washington DC. • Calls for term limits in public office.An elected official should serve only three terms in the house and two terms in the senate or executive branch. • Calls for lobbying reform.Elected official and civil servants upon leaving office should not be allowed to lobby the legislature for five years.Lobbyists should be limited to giving information only. • Calls for citizen review committees to review all government services provided and to make recommendations to the legislature wherever agencies should be consolidated or abandoned.Government redundancy should be eliminated wherever appropriate. • Calls for a withdrawal from encumbering treaties such as NAFTA and GATT,and the elimination of fast-track authority. • Wants parents to be allowed to take responsibility for their own children.State agencies that interfere with parental responsibility, should be a service to counsel and assist families AT THEIR REQUEST unless evidence of criminal conduct affecting children exists,and must be closely regulated by a citizen's panel. • Calls for a significant improvement in the means of educating our children.The state should abandon outcome-based education and return to teaching children how to read, write and count.Teachers should be qualified by local school boards at the district level. • Calls for the second amendment to the US Constitution to be upheld-that all citizens have the right to bear arms. • Calls for strong support of the tenth amendment to the U.S.Constitution-that all powers not specified to the federal government by the constitution belong to the states. • Defends the rights of individual property owners to lawfully use their lands however they deem fit, without unconstitutional encumbrances from the state or federal government.We call for an immediate stop to illegal government seizure of property. • recognizes the absurdity of enforcement of consensual crimes in a free society.The police force should be protecting people from each other,not themselves. • calls for swift and assured punishment upon conviction of a major crime. • The Reform Party of Oregon calls for judicial reform.The constitution is the law of the land and must be followed by the judiciary. The legal profession's monopoly on law must be returned to the people in the form of justice. A law degree should not be a requirement;qualified laymen should be allowed to sit on a legal bench. • would like to see the law of the land rewritten to make sense to the average Oregonian.No administrative rules can be enforced without legislative approval. • calls for the United Nations to have no legal status in the state of Oregon and to remove all UN presence immediately. Micki Summerhays Vice Chairman, Reform Party of Oregon P.O.Box 26 Phoenix,OR 97535-0026 (This information furnished by Reform Party of Oregon.) 36 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Republican Party Statement REPUBLICANS WORKING TO MAKE GOVERNMENT WORK FOR YOU! Since the Republican Revolution of 1994,GOP lawmakers in Salem and Washington,DC,have worked diligently to keep our promise to you:To make government smaller, more efficient and more responsive. WE'VE ACCOMPLISHED A LOT...BUT THERE'S STILL A LOTTO DO! IN 1998,KEEP REPUBLICANS WORKING FOR BETTER OREGON AND A BETTER AMERICA! Because Republicans are working for you in Washington, DC: • Congress has passed the first balanced budget in a generation. • Positive steps have been taken to protect Social Security and Medicare. • Real welfare reform means many welfare families are being given a hand up-and a real chance tc succeed-not a hand out. • Clinton Administration plans for grandiose new government programs and accompanying new spending have been kept in check. Because Republicans are working for you in Salem: • Oregon taxpayers received$432 million in"kicker"income tax refunds. When John Kitzhaber and the Democrats tried to keep the"kicker"refunds of over collected state income taxes,Republicans kept faith with Oregonians and returned to taxpayers the money that rightfully belonged to the people. • John Kitzhaber's outrageous transportation spending plan was defeated. When Kitzhaber proposed a nine-cent per gallon gasoline tax increase - a tax that would have made Oregon's among the highest in the nation-Republicans said no way! When Kitzhaber proposed a$1.20 per line tax on every telephone line in Oregon-to pay for a study of rail transportation in the Willamette Valley-Republicans stopped it. When Kitzhaber proposed a truck weight-mile tax so high it threatened the survival of small Oregon trucking companies-not to mention family farms-Republicans shot it down. • A positive step was taken to get state government out of the lobbying business. When it was learned that one of every four lobbyists working in Salem was working for state agencies,and that one agency had spent $200,000 to hire an outside lobbyist to build support for a huge tax increase, Republicans passed a bill to limit lobby activity by state government. John Kitzhaber's response to this blow against bloated state government: He vetoed it, despite the fact that it allowed the governor's office to continue to run the biggest lobbying shop in Salem.In fact,in his four years as governor,John Kitzhaber has vetoed almost 100 bills passed by your representatives-many of them designed to reduce the size and cost of government. To learn more about how Republicans are working to return government to the people,visit our site on the World Wide Web: wwW.teleport.com/-orpgop/.There you'll find more information about how you can be a part of the Republican Revolution in Oregon and America. ON NOVEMBER 8TH KEEP A GOOD THING GOING VOTE REPUBLICAN! AND KEEP REPUBLICANS WORKING FOR YOU! Oregon Republican Party PO Box 1450 Beaverton,OR 97075-1450 Phone:(503)520-1996 Email:orpgop@teleport.com (This information furnished by The Oregon Republican Party.) 37 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Socialist Part y Statement OREGONIANS DESERVE GOOD GOVERNMENT This election year you may hear candidates talk about less government, big government or even no government.The candidates of the Socialist Party are committed to bringing good government to Oregon OREGONIANS DESERVE TO BE REPRESENTED You may hear discussion about a loss of confidence in the political process and apathy on the part of voters.Socialists are com- mitted to restoring that confidence by giving voters true choices and by running candidates that stand for more than 'ust muddled "bipartisanism" OREGONIANS DESERVE DEMOCRACY The media will likely marginalize Socialist candidates, but political diversity is crucial for a healthy democracy.The Socialist Party stands for democratizing the institutions,both political and economic,that affect the lives of each of us.We bring almost a century of collective political experience and our recent successes at the ballot box in several local elections. A vote for the Socialist Party is a vote for: • A progressive tax structure; homestead exemptions;higher earned income tax credits; unequivocal opposition to sales or flat taxes;and an end to corporate welfare. • Support for raising both the federal and state minimum wage to a LIVING wage of at least$10 per hour that will apply to ALL workers,including farmworkers. • Strengthening union and collective bargaining rights; repeal of the Hatch and Taft-Hartley Acts; a ban on the hiring of "permanent replacement"workers;and extension of collective bargaining rights to agricultural and temporary workers. • Staunch opposition to NAFTA,GATT and the MAI and replacement with transnational institutions which serve to bolster, rather than undermine,the interests of workers,consumers and the environment. • Reformulation of Oregon's corporate charter system; require corporations to utilize fair labor and environmental standards with adverse tax consequences for noncompliance. • Promotion of labor intensive sustainable forestry practices to protect both the environment and timber jobs,including a ban on clearcutting on both public AND private land;require fair market fees for grazing and mining. • A commitment to human rights;the legalization of same-sex marriages;and equal pay for equal work. • A universal,single-payer health care system.Good health care IS a basic right. • Strong support for public education through progressive taxation;oppose school vouchers;and place a higher priority on building strong universities and community colleges instead of building more prisons. • Municipally-owned utilities with ratepayers as owners;decisions to be made;jocally,not halfway across the country. • Enacting comprehensive political reform that gives voters real choices and true representation;promoting proportional representation which will make every vote count; public financing of elections so debating the issues, rather than fundraising,become the center point of the political process. The Socialist Party stands for the belief that a healthy economy with a,healthy environment goes hand in hand with creating healthy and stable communities. If you work for a living, we urge you to THINK DEMOCRACY--VOTE SOCIALIST! If you want to put real democracy and good government into the political process, THINK DEMOCRACY--VOTE SOCIALIST!And if you want candidates that you can count on to represent you and not big money,THINK DEMOCRACY--VOTE SOCIALIST! Socialist Party Candidates U.S.Senate:Dean Braa 1st Congressional District:John Hyrciuk 2nd Congressional District:Rohn"Grandpa"Webb 3rd Congressional District:Walter F.Brown 4th Congressional District:Karl Sorg 5th Congressional District:Ed Dover Governor:Trey Smith Oregon House District 6:Jonathan R.Axt Oregon House District 7:David W.Gillette Oregon House District 13:John Dukehart Oregon House District 40:Donna Frazier Oregon House District 55:Michael McGinnis Oregon House District 60:Darlene"Grandma"Webb Oregon Senate District 16:Della Smith Socialist Party of Oregon 333 State St. Salem,OR 97301 (503)378-7812 sporegon@igc.apc.org http://socialist.org/spo THINK DEMOCRACY VOTE SOCIALIST (This information furnished by Socialist Party of Oregon.) 38 Official 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet—General Information Index CANDIDATES Page Page Bobier, Blair.......................................................................... 13 Riggs,William....................................................................... 30 Braa, Dean M....................................... ............................... 4 Sizemore, Bill........................................................................ 16 Brewster,Jim........................................................................ 5 Smith,Trey............................................................................ 17 Bunn,Stan............................................................................ 26 Steurer, Patti......................................................................... 18 Burke, Richard P..................................................... ... .......... . 14 Thomas, Ralph........................................:............................. 24 ... Campbell,Kevin M......................... .................................... 10 Tiernan,Bob......................................................................... 31 Campbell,Michael A............................................................. 6 Wagoner,Curt....................................................................... 20 Carter, Margaret.................................................................... 27 Walden,Greg........................................................................ 11 Kitzhaber,John..................................................................... 15 Webb, Rohn(Grandpa)......................................................... 12 Knopp,Tim............................................................................ 20 Weidner, Roger G................................................................. 19 Leeson,Susan M.................................................................. 29 Westlund, Ben....................................................................... 25 Lim,John.............................................................................. 7 Wollheim,Robert.................................................................. 33 Linder,Virginia L.................................................................. 32 Work, Elli............................................................................... 21 McGinnis,Michael T.............................................................. 24 Wyden, Ron.......................................................................... 9 Moskowitz, Karyn.................................................................. 8 ATTENTION: Don't be alarmed if this copy of the 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet has one or two 1/4-inch flaps as illustrated.To reduce the cost Of this publication,the combination of pages and the type of printing press used may require the flap(s) to ensure proper binding. The Voters' Pamphlet is NOT missing any pages, the flap is only a product of the printing press used. Thank you. 39 SECRETARY OF STATE BULK RATE Phil Keisling CAR-RT SORT State Capitol U.S.Postage ID Salem, Oregon 97310-0722 P Portland,OR Permit No.815 1 a RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER V ters P m h et OF VOLUME 2 OF 2 CANDIDATES * = THE ®- State of Oregon General Election November 3, 1998 8 Deschutes Please RECYCLE this pamphlet with your newspapers mF sx% ... ............ ............. ..;:,. i' i G�y: Deschutes County Voters' Pamphlet Y3>`„ GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 3, 1998 MARY SUE "SUSIE" PENHOLLOW DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK y w ATTENTION This is the beginning of your county voters'pamphlet.The county portion of this joint voters'pamphlet is inserted in the center of the state portion.Each page of the county voters'pamphlet is clearly marked with a black bar on the ¢' outside edge.All information contained in the county portion of this pamphlet has been assembled and printed by your Deschutes County Clerk. r Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from County Clerk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-3 x Local Measures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-4 Local Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-22 Sample Ballot . . . . . . . . . . . . . p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-36 Polling Places . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-44 Voting Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-46 Index (Local Measures and Candidates for Deschutes County) . . . . . . . . . . .. Deschutes-47 ■ QUESTIONS ABOUT VOTING? Call your Deschutes County Clerk's Office S at 388-6547 REMEMBER! Absentee Ballots must be received in the Deschutes County Clerk's Office by 8:00 p.m., November 3, 1998 �R Deschutes-2 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters Pamphlet E s co 0 y Office of the County Clerk ` w mu Deschutes Services Bldg., 1340 N.W.Wall St. Bend,Oregon 97701 `$<5 Telephone:(541)388-6544 f Facsimile:(541)389-6830 a- Mary Sue"Susie"Penhollow,County Clerk .` 23 Dear Deschutes County Voter: 6., At the November 3, 1998 General Election, you will be asked to make many important choices. This Voters' Pamphlet is a cooperative effort between the Deschutes County =y Clerk and the Secretary of State. It is provided to help you become a well informed voter as you cast your ballot on November 3rd. In this pamphlet you will find a Sample Ballot, which lists all of the candidates and measures on the ballot, explanatory statements designed to provide you with impartial and fair information, and paid arguments for and against certain mea- sures. Each candidate had the opportunity to submit a picture and statement jy.. regarding his/her candidacy. The names of the candidates will appear in a random alphabet on your ballot. There is an alphabetical index of local candidates and measures for Deschutes County on Page Deschutes-47. Please remember, you will not vote on every office or measure in this pamphlet. Your ballot will contain only those issues for which you are eligible to vote— based on where you live. Feel free to take the sample ballot to help you at the polls. If you have any questions about the elections process, please call me at 388-6544. 3 Sincerely, Mary Sue "Susie" Penhollow <` Deschutes County Clerk Deschutes-3 ,E Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet x` DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT .b E' MEASURE 9-60 70 FARM LIE A1tRY DI$ 1>�T AND ARGUMENT I N FAVOR ESTABLISH PEfINIA�+tENT TAX Ia i,iMiTAT[tl , We Need Our Public Libraries fflJf STIgN Sfta..ti 8esrilues Ptfbfir L4brary k�strrc#bif fared and Our public libraries are precious institutions.They are the K €mpase$f3 5S pr1 GQO assessedaiue as pettannt rate Iftnit be» tools we use to teach our children,answer our questions, girfttitt ? and explore new fields of knowledge.A public library is a SfJfititiY This msasurauuili fcrrrmttte Descfties PulaitGLibrary. ts-! promise we make to ourselves that we will continue to seek #reteseitt+tes<Cat�ntyin#ends#Ittransfera111 aut#y I�braryservtf<es out new knowledge and obtain new insights long after we Nfio tfls ttistrct aYd cease irbrary fundrrrg frorrf its general fund have completed our last classroom assignment. G Tfte new lifirary tfjs#nit wi[f k> aepate frt�m Cieschute ttuuety the Vote Yes To Continue Library Funding riew distrrctyriiftays its cwn tax rate dedlcatett ttt ii6rry purp€�sas, Stable The Public Library District continues the same tax rate as Bead,La Pine,Radmttt►d,Sisters azr�f 8unriuer Fund+ng urifi prautde the September one-year library le vy..The Library District chitdrerr°s programs dut9 le new banks anri�xpantt afteo Ijc�rtrs. funding starts in the 1999-2000 fiscal year,after the library MR The nu>R tibrary disirlctuif be governed by an�ndapetiderrt slectetf levy expires. We need the library district to avoid future boartl.jThe five beard tceri3grs uiilibe eletei fxorrr zaesr. reductions and closures. , {Map of the prcpcsed t?istrtet�d xne beurrdarles vuiti aect3fpny Vote Yes To Protect Library Funding absen#$e bat ots and be pastedn ttie voting tooths. We have to face facts. Our public libraries have been an easy target for decades for budget officers seeking fund- EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ing for public health and safety. We need the library dis- Ah Insures Adequate,Long-Term Funding For Public Libraries trict to separate library funding and governance from Forming the Deschutes Public Library District provides a long term Deschutes County. solution for funding library services in Bend, LaPine, Redmond, Sis ` Libraries Are A Good Buy :.R1 ters,Sunriver,and rural Deschutes County. It separates library opera- ' bons from the County and establishes dedicated library funding: Li The total cost for an average homeowner will be about$6 X brary funding can only be used to provide public library service. No monthly-less than the price of a paperback novel!Using #N city, county, or state agency can take library funds for any other pur- the public library results in real savings for every house- : 3;, pose. hold. Library District Operates Five Libraries Supported by hundreds of community leaders across Starting in the 1999/2000 Fiscal Year Deschutes County, including: The proposed library district would establish a dedicated library tax rate %a of fifty-five cents which would begin in the 1999/2000 fiscal year.This Alan J Pinckney,LaPine Kathleen E.St.Clair,LaPine would continue the same rate as the one-year library levy submitted to t voters on the September ballot.The Library District would not collect Ardyce R.Swift,Terrebonne Ken Cooper,Bend any taxes until after the 1998/99 one-year levy has expired. Barbara Wade,Sunriver Lann y Fredricks,Redmond Improves Library Services Bill A.Kopacz,LaPine Margaret&Bart Queary,Bend >;f The public library district will provide the funding needed to upgrade Bill Jayne,Bend Mark Halvorsen;Sunriver "< y library services.Each of the branch libraries will meet Oregon Library Bob Woodward,Bend May Fan,MD Sisters Standards.Improvements will include: Expand&Update Book Collections:The new Library District will under—Carol Brewer,LaPine Melissa Ward,Sisters take an intensive six-year campaign to expand and update the collec- tions of books and other materials at each branch library.In the fol- Charles Beith,Sunriver Nellie Zook,Sisters lowing years,each collection will be updated annually to insure that Elton Gregory,Redmond Oran Teater,Bend libraries remain current.Additional copies of high demand titles will be purchased to reduce waiting lists. George C.Riser,Sunriver Peggy Spieger,LaPine Increase Services to Children:A professional children's librarian will be Helen L.Lovell,LaPine Robert A.Ricketts,Terrebonne "4 assigned to each branch library. Librarians will work directly with James A.Diegel,Redmond Ruth Burleigh,Bend local service organizations and daycare providers to advocate read- Jane F.Schroeder,Redmond Shirley Walton,Sunriver ing and literacy in all communities. Jerome Colonna,Redmond Steve Swisher,Sisters Open Libraries Dam:All five branch libraries will be open daily,includ- Jerry Andres,Redmond Steve Wilson,Sisters rig evening and weekend hours. Jill Phillips-McLane,LaPine Tim Finch,LaPine Increase Senior Outreach:Staff and volunteers will expand services to senior housing centers and homebound residents. Removes Layer of Government The public library district will be governed by an elected library board. Library board members will be elected from zones to insure that all 6; areas are represented. The County Commissioners will no longer be involved in governing library operations. `S (This information furnished by Kay Coyner) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement� 9 9 dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in r, the argument. NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS (This information furnished by Michael K. Gaston, MEASURE WERE FILED x Library Director) ugo3 ld; Deschutes-4 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT MEASURE 9-60 t. y. E y. DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT BOUNDARY AND ZONE BOUNDARIES FOR DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS STATE HIGHWAYS ZONE 11 NZONE BOUNDARIES rka. \ wdNV� +� RE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY SISTERS /DISTRICT BOUNDARY iORS.Z01.090) ZONE 2 - ZONE BEND DESCHUTES COUNTYs yg ;c ZONE 3 ZONE 4 3 a 01 1 ZONE 1: Precincts 17,18,28,29,31,369 48,60,61,69,70,and 73. One Year Tenn. g. ZONE 2: Precincts 10,12,13,14,15,19,20,22,30,37,41,49,51,53,57,58,59,and 63. Three Year Term. ZONE 3: Precincts 5,16,24,26,38,39,40,42,50,52,62,and 72. Three Year Term. ' ZONE 4: Precincts 2,3,21,23,25,27,33,34,43,44,45,55,56,64,67,and 71. One Year Tenn. ZONE 5: Precincts 1,4,6,7,8,9,11,32,35,46,47,54,65,66,and 68. One Year Term. t< w '¢y. Deschutes-5 ^ Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF BEND IM MEASURE 9-64 9xi4I MI1UM i I #EECi Cl' ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Annexation:What's It All About? It's about Equity! Qt3ESTlt31� 9ftttlf tie Iit}+artnex territtr in t lend Irban growth People residing outside the city limits,but within the Ur- C€�untfary(tIGB)as prflviftadneenAnnexatn Pliny ban Growth Boundary (UGB), rely upon the public sys- tems currently provided by city residents.Traveling to the , eratly begrrts at t�1 f�7 ah€t Cttrna Matt � ;+peat t�tt!e pss�utaa r River,#bent t Century Arfye arclunti firet cth a Hill anit 8rken 7p store,work,or for recreation,UGB residents must use city 5ubdtu€sitrttstttSkytinters Rda f,f4!Inwtn{#i3;£I sirtsarQUd lfltii streets -- kept clean and maintained in good travelable P, He� hts and Av+brey Glen 8tibdrvislrts tc Punam Rttati,then allttg repair by Bend citizens and protected by City police paid Tt€trraia Irrtiart an trr $selttates Rner tl�nn#ptl �vn OCt stgrFa for exclusively by City residents. These costs should be rn H 97 � racs pfjjt � ° spread over the larger population base. c� to taoniey fcad,:Plot t3utEe ttal, etsetarl fited,ldtt t kfrlit Canal, It's about being Counted! lie5chetes Market 8�ad titter ft Rtlad ate l arrd Whether you reside in the city or in the UGB territory, R Rtaari tcc i IGi3 signs arsa Hwy ail trr gear Ck iaaI's � erts y Rtratl 27th ireet Fen usaft ttpad artrut!Ctlnt3�Plt (ie tpr ;to you are likely paying taxes on gasoline, and perhaps li- Mannite tae,aiurdartltavrEta#esflltiyyr !3 € sigairtrtt; quor,and cigarettes.Cities receive these monies from the Road,:hert tit Cttirtaat Rail attd 1kvY`f 9 '« State,based upon the total population.These monies are ( faprfppose(fareaWtllaccornpanyabsetttaltutsndePttstl! a significant source of municipal revenue.By adding UGB �n vat�llg bttttth), residents to the city,additional revenue can be returned to MM this area at no cost to area residents.Annexation brings EXPLANATORY STATEMENT � this money back home where we need it the most.This This measure asks voters to decide whether to annex all property DOES NOT reduce the amount of funds received by «, within the unincorporated area of the Urban Growth Boundary(UGB) Deschutes County! into the City of Bend effective July 1, 1999.A majority of all votes It's about Participation! cast by voters residing in the City and the UGB will be required for Residents of Bend have the opportunity to vote on is- annexation. sues that have long range impacts regarding the services, Currently the City of Bend provides the following services to resi- policies and laws we rely upon.This also allows the ability dents within the urban growth boundary. to participate on advisory committees and run for City 1. Land use planning, building code administration and permit- Council ting,and certain code enforcement responsibilities.The City has IT'S ABOUT TIME! assumed this responsibility through an intergovernmental agree- The territory of the Urban Growth Boundary is recog- ..« ment with Deschutes County. nized b g boundary y the State of Oregon as the bounda to which the 2.Street construction and maintenance. This is also provided city will expand. Recent State law provides for a new through an intergovernmental agreement with Deschutes County. mechanism to incorporate the UGB into the city limits of 3. Fire and EMS services.This is provided through a contractual Bend,instead of cost) inevitable piecemeal annexations. g Y' p ' arrangement with Deschutes Rural Fire Protection District#1. This will provide the opportunity for all residents to plan 4.Water and sewer services to those residents who have re- and build toward an urban standard that Bend WILL BE- quested this service and pay for such services. COME.Because of greater resources available to the City ;r< The City does not collect or receive property taxes,franchise fees, of Bend, we can continue to provide stable services and or state shared revenues from the residents who live outside the continue to address the needs of our city at the least pos- city limits, but within the urban growth boundary. The City does Bible cost to all. $i receive from Desctwtes County funds for street construction and Vote Yes-Annexation is about Bend's Future! maintenance within the UGB.This transfer from the county will di- minish to zero in 2003. .g Annexation will result in a property tax increase for newly incorpo- rated citizens. Newly annexed residents should expect to pay an s- additional $136 to $170 in property taxes on a home valued at $100,000.This range is dependent upon the results of the Septem ber special election.The City does collect franchise fees on utility and cable services provided to City residents.Newly annexed resi- dents can expect to also pay these franchise fees.Annexation will also provide additional state shared revenues to the City of Bend. ,§ Newly annexed residents will receive: 1.A stable urban level of police services.Officers will be added . to meet the expanded area of responsibility. The City of Bend Patrol Division will be co located with fire/EMS personnel in new This information furnished b Allan Bruckner fire/police substations scheduled for construction in 1999 in the (This ) east,west,south,and north sections of Benda n The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- the th Broader civic participation and voting power in the affairs of dorsement b Deschutes County, does the count Y ty, Y the City of Bend. warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in 3. Newly annexed water customers will receive a decrease in wa the argument. ter rates as unincorporated customers pay a higher water rate ` than city residents.Newly annexed customers will pay the same rate as city residents. NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS "?T<y (This information furnished by Bob Woodward, Mayor MEASURE WERE FILED City Council, City of Bend) a-i Deschutes-6 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF BEND MEASURE 9-64 4 y City of Bend Proposed Annexation Effective July 1, 1999 r ' i r-- r I E <>z ,S ) r i F I ✓ N 9 y / / City of Bend Area of Proposed Annexation (Urban Growth Boundary) Deschutes-7 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet f CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR REQUIRE FULL SHARE SDCs J ' System Development Charges(SDCs)are the means by which the pro- LO.-F vision of services such as water systems,sewage systems,parks,and QU�StN Sl roads to new developments are paid for by the people benefited. opme > cFtarges ip 8et!€ t8ll + #!#� ) itftt# steferzdar ' Historically,most new developments pay less than half of the costs of inert providing services.Sisters,at this time,only has an SDC for water which, UMtA1y Ad cfty St fortunately,does recover the full cost of providing the service at present. char eS to yr;8 rtitut� � uf city However,Sisters c government has been dragging deVerj tttett Tfrft �ri5 y g its feet for years p � td8 ( in enacting SDCs,although there has been much handwringing and dec- #drnstS asSttdltd wltltt nidtog d # tt# #}# jttf EFti larations that"We ought to do something about it,"and"We're working prcr�a..... Re ffit�s rn hstdc € y<t!8&1(rtetl r,�f i t 1#E cle-< on it." ue(crprrtt Fitt cf stlriggr ftrfpt i rtlef t aSSibidfeBUBtapfr fgtt ff�U &#�f ttirf This measure will force the city to act at something exceeding a snail's LIMlfs:d6 pace(passage of this initiative will require the city to come up with a Limits deferred gdeftt tp n#1atBr tftfl U�tfBf rir#rWt new schedule in 180 days)in developing SDC charges for parks,roads, pcctipancy #eutres inlrnerftSt�€�rs witht # e o -.09 i and sewers.Additionally,it will force each development to pay its Em dote UPtfftpsge,ttt8sst&i Gt�erfefetflCecturlt SHARE of the costs of providing required services. �t t as s1 I tlt� lfat�ttf< tarra�rt ft� ' x Vrrfers' &Ipt#et You the taxpayer,will pay all charges for services that new develop- ments do not pay.With all the new developments being proposed for EXPLANATORY STATEMENT the City of Sisters,these could be plenty.Residential development plans ?v for 375 homes(Bend Bulletin,August 15,1998)will automatically bring System Development Charge Amendment as presented by Initiative wear and tear on existing services and demands for additional ones. Sponsors Citizens for Fair Development Charges. Unfortunately,you cannot avoid subsidizing new development when it hn CHARTER AMENDMENT TEXT SHALL READ: comes to the matter of schools.SDCs are not allowed for schools. Section 1. The purpose of this charter provision is to insure that new Avoid paying for some of the costs of new development by voting for development bear the full cost of existing and future capital improve- this FULL SHARE SDC measure. ments affected by the development. Section 2. The City of Sisters shall impose system development charges upon new development associated with public capital improvements, including connections to such improvements,to the extent allowed by State law and subject to any limitations provided by federal and state R constitutions and the laws of the State of Oregon.System development q= charges shall include reimbursement fees to the City of Sisters for the costs of increased usage of existing capital improvements by new de- ` velopments.System development charges shall also include improve- ment fees for an equitable share of projected capital improvements re- k= quired to increase the capacity of improvements associated with new developments.Applicants for new development permits shall pay Sys- tem development charges determined in accordance with a methodol- ogy designed to allocate to new development the full cost of existing and proposed capital improvementsrto the extent associated with the new development. Payment of system development charges may be deferred at the discretion of the city to no later than issuance of a cer- tificate of occupancy.The system development charges and the meth- odology for their determination shall be periodically updated to reflect amendments to the City of Sisters capital improvement plan and other relevant factors. Section 3. The City of Sisters may waive system development charges for affordable housing provided by non-profit organizations.In exchange for a waiver,the housing shall be affordable for a period of fifty(50) years.Violation of this agreement shall require full payment of system development charges. '' Section 4 As used in this provision,all definitions of terms shall be as defined by the laws of the State of Oregon,and,in addition,"develop- ment"means: (1) The first establishment of a use involving the construc- tion or the placing of structure upon a parcel of land that was not occupied by any structure prior to that event; or (2) Any construction, alteration or change of occupancy f'ys which increases the usage of any capital improvement or which creates additional demand upon existing capi- tal improvements. (This information furnished by Gordon Petrie, Treasurer, at Section 5: If any part of this charter provision violates the Constitution 'n Citizens For Fair Development Charges) of the United States,or the Constitution of Oregon,or the laws of either, P 9 ) it alone will be invalidated,and the remainder of this charter provision shall remain in force. Section 6. The City of Sisters shall implement this charter provision within 180 days of its passage. The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- :r dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county ' warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in (This information furnished by Barbara J. Warren, the argument. °x City Administrator) a? Deschutes-8 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR At this time of rampant growth it is important that the citizens of Sisters A yes vote on measure 9-62 will ensure that new development pays it's protect themselves from the high costs of that growth by voting for this "Fair Share"on costs to the city of Sisters that will occur because of the measure which shifts the costs of providing new services from the citi- increased cost of providing services to new developments. zens of Sisters to the developer or buyers who receive the benefits thus There are currently 3 new developments that have been proposed that if keeping our taxes lower,our sewer and water rates down. built will add 400 homesites to Sisters.(Bend Bulletin,August 28,1998. SDC's will allocate the burden of increased costs of sewers,water sys- If these new developments are annexed into the City of Sisters,the cur- tems,parks and transportation that become necessary with ALL new rent residents and taxpayers will subsidize these developments with growth to ALL users of these capital improvements.Citizens of Sisters increased property taxes and possibly new bond measures. especially those on fixed incomes should not have to subsidize new This is not a tax on current homes and businesses. growth. Why it is important to establish SDC formulas and procedures ahead of Vote YES on 9 62 so that new growth pays it's fair share of develop - Why costs. projected impacts: 3 new proposed housing developments could impact Sisters city facili- ties in the near future.We must be ready for them with firm and fair charges.This takes time to implement.A yes vote on 9-62 will set the stage for this to occur.A general guideline only requires full costs and no deferment of payments.All details of dollar amounts,individual as- sessments and cost formulas will be established by the City Adminis- tration and the City Council. It is important that this be implemented as a Charter Amendment.This will make it firm,lawful and even handed.All developments to be treated equally.The alternative(an ordinance)is weak,flexible,and subject to changes based on favoritism.This could lead to abuse,developer dis- content,and at the worst,possibility of future graft. As has been urged so many times in the past DO THIS ONE RIGHT! VOTE YES ON 9-62 and we will all pay our fair share!!! 9 j. 3 (This information furnished by Virginia Groom, (This information furnished by Kenneth D. Emmrich, Citizens For Fair Development Charges) Citizens For Fair Development Charges) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. the argument. Deschutes-9 ft Official Deschutes County+1998 General Election+Voters' Pamphlet � .Y' CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-62 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR What are System Development Charges(SDCs)? "Who pays for GROWTHT' System Development Charges (SDCs) have been established by the (Bend Bulletin,10-26-97) Oregon State Legislature to help communities cover some of the costs The above headline is a common theme in newspaper stories daily around of growth and development.The SDC Act was jointly proposed by gov- ernment the State.Costs of growth are cause for concern as rapid growth and units and homebuiltlers associations, passed by the legisla development places increased demands for City and County services ture and signed into law,effective July 1,1991 (ORS 223.297-314). on residential taxpayers.Numerous studies reveal what citizens already What do SDCs pay far?What costs of growth do you pay for? know--growth is not paying its way,so taxpayers are subsidizing de- Currently,Oregon law only allows SDCs to be collected from new level- velopers. opments,to pay for their fair share of impacts on water and sewer sys- All growth costs the City something for its impact on the community. tems,storm drainage,streets,and parks.Additional costs of new growth, Systems Development Charges can be charged for roads,parks,water such as schools,libraries, public safety, increased maintenance and and wastewater systems,although other public services such as schools, more city administration are not paid for by new development. Most libraries,and law enforcement are exempt.SDCs,as allowed by State M., costs of growth and development are still subsidized by the community law, help to offset at least some of the infrastructure costs for new through higher taxes,bonds,and service rates. growth and development. How does Sisters compare? New developments are being planned and built in and around Sisters. The City of Sisters currently collects less SDCs than many other Or- As new growth inevitably occurs,this measure makes sure that devel- egon cities. Many rapidly growing Oregon cities have much higher opment must take responsibility for paying its fair share for the impact E SDCs than Sisters.For example,SDCs per new house:Sisters$2,867, it causes on City services paid for by Sisters taxpayers. Madras$4,000,Tualatin$6,965,and Wilsonville$8,655.That means VOTE YES ON MEASURE 9 62! Sisters residents and taxpayers pay morethan their fair share of costs to subsidize new growth and development. In other words, bigger profits for developers at the expense of Sisters taxpayers! Why this SDC amendment? r Citizens for Fair Development Charges has put this measure on the ballot by initiative petition to ensure that some of the costs of growth- -those SDCs allowed by law--shall be collected by the City of Sisters. This measure simply requires Sisters to do what state law already au= thorizes it to do--enact fair SDCs.According to section 3 of the pro- posed amendment,the City of Sisters may waive SDCs for affordable housing P rovided by non-profit organizations,anizations,such as Habitat for Hu- manity. .x Make Growth Pay its Way Within the Law! t Let's be fair -Vote YES for Fair SDCs. 'sy7 yrf ..y 4p �g x e� (This information fumished by Joseph Bottero, (This information furnished byAsher B.Royce Yaffee) Citizens for Fair Development Charges) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. the argument. Deschutes-10 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet s: CITY OF SISTERS 3 MEASURE 9-62 fi ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION High SDC's do not control growth! SDC's are NOT paid by a developer. SDC's are paid by the end user; home-builders and buyers,and new commercial building owners. Our water SDC is already the second highest in Oregon.If this measure passes,we jeopardize losing our reasonable$1000 sewer hookup fee! With it's ambiguous language,all NEW hookups would be charged maxi- mum SDC's.That could mean charges of$2500 to$3000! The state has specific guidelines for calculating SDC's.A NO vote will not prevent the city from charging maximum SDC's.Instead,a NO vote retains the city councils flexibility to lower SDC's as an incentive to attracting industry,and raising SDC's for transportation to businesses that create high traffic. Our water plan would have to be reviewed at a high cost to the city,and our sewer plan cannot be determined until all of the grants have been secured.We have no park or transportation plan. Developing plans is time consuming and costly($15,000-$20,000 EACH).They should be developed as time and the city budget allow.Under the measure,THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN 180 DAYS OF PASSAGE. This measure has a provision for waiving the SDC for housing provided by non-profit groups.This sets the city up for lawsuits from for-profit builders wanting to create affordable housing. THE MEASURE PRO- MOTES GENTRIFICATION! It would make Sisters one of the most ex- pensive places in the state to build and becomes nearly impossible for affordable housing inside of Sisters! It will lock Sisters future into be- coming another Aspen,with the wealthy in town and affordable hous- ing outside the city,contributing to sprawl! Vote NO on this measure.We don't need a bad amendment to the city's charter.The language is open to any number of interpretations and pos- sible litigation.The state already provides us with guidelines,there is • no reason to waste the city's time and money with this unnecessary burden. ADDITIONAL CITY OF SISTERS MEASURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES 3 (This information furnished by Melanie R. Curry Citizens for Cooperative Urban Planning) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. Deschutes-11 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-63 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR Frank&Marie Conklin own and operate the Conklin's Guest House,a bed&breakfast inn,located on 4.61 acres of property at 69013 Camp tilt]J4ffatJ tf€e1�ret 1jC£Rid � Polk Road.The large house also serves as their residence.The Conklins n11r are requesting annexation of that property into the City of Sisters.The k �2� 8 wttrPrrayJ�s1irtt�. property currently adjoins,on its south border,Jand which is within the � l� ` city of Sisters and zoned general commercial and upon which a motel is �rflpttits � Jttff# i: 1�Ir� frttt planned. ttt l 1rd t 5f� i� aitfla 1�m 04%7- Over the past eleven years the Conklins restored the old run-down ranch jta� 1 # iTir €& tfeCtf # .6 house and made it into a known,respected,and popular B&B establish- t,. ment serving Central Oregon's expanding tourist industry.At the time #f h h �8i# r# I�rS I3 tf r��t}/1 111 that state land use rules were established for Deschutes county in 1976 ant�Jrtfwtfftl1t?tfr �t8tttP the property and all adjoining land surrounding it were designated EFU kk P P Y I9 g 9 fh� erua f€tttrth� �ty�fJetttirfcfffrfr dtQ � (Exclusive Farm Use). Since 1989 The Conklins have been operating afxl� art JrttttflttitlJtt the B&B under a conditional use permit on the EFU designated land. There are a number of modifications planned for the business to better t!f � etfllttt<ttf f;wJfl 8iiilhy }fiIt�B #S' serve its clientele which would be difficult to implement under the ex- isting county EFU land use rules.One involves addition of a sixth bed- EXPLANATORY STATEMENT room with private bath utilizing unused storage space in the main house. Frank and Marie Conklin residing at 69013 Camp Polk Road are re- A second would involve replacing the one room cottage,which has no questing annexation of their 4.61 acre property into the City of Sisters. facilities,with an expanded cottage complete with kitchen, bathroom, The property currently adjoins,on its south border,land which is within living area,and bedroom for the caretakers.The third change would be the city of Sisters and zoned general commercial. to provide an exclusive,reservation only,dinner house utilizing the ex- The Conklins own and operate the Conklin's Guest House,a bed and isting solarium where breakfasts now are served. All three modifica,- breakfast inn, on the property. Over the past eleven years they have tions would plan to utilize the Sisters sewer system when installed. restored the ranch house and made it into a bed and breakfast inn serv- ing Central Oregon's tourist industry.At one time the property was the homesite for the Barclay ranch,with all of the ranch property desig- nated EFU (Exclusive Farm Use) by Deschutes County in 1976. The Conklin's have been operating the bed and breakfast inn under a condi- tional use permit with the Deschutes County since 1989 on the EFU designated land. There are a number of modifications the Conklin's would like to make to their business.One involves addition of a sixth bedroom with a private bath utilizing unused storage space in the main house.A second would involve replacing the one room cottage,which has no facilities,with an expanded cottage complete with kitchen,bathroom,living area,and bed- room for the caretakers.The third change would be to provide an exclu- sive,reservation only,dinner house utilizing the existing solarium where breakfasts now are served.The Conklin's plan little,if any,modification to the main house. If the property is annexed to the City,the owners would be required to obtain a conditional use permit from the City of Sisters for their planned uses under the RH(High Density Residential) designation. The subject property is currently outside the Sisters Urban Growth Boundary and would need to be brought within that boundary to com- ply with the Sisters Urban Area ter Comprehensive Plan and ORS Chapter p 92.The site is currently connected to the city water system and would s be required to connect to the proposed sewer system when completed. (This information furnished by Frank S. Conklin Conklin's Guest House) Y The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. (This information furnished by Barbara J. Warren, NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS MEASURE WERE FILED City Administrator, City of Sisters) Deschutes-12 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-67 f S# CI€ 1ie �,£Era#tf�r by the 8isi$re hdcfi p�i3tr'iot,>��enrrex�� tlflrf�annex ej3j�rux3rrtaiaty�acres�t �. 5��' prcveE wt7ptd al�tt�rtze rile t�fEy to�t�ltrs ptdtttg�th add# � �1e;�rstters t3rbatt&r�wCtt 8a�lr;��aht' e�to�€tnex at,afi at�tr � Jt�ble` tewlde gtaflmnga 5 at►d tie�� tf#�1er�ro q�eedan�le�nrt��,fan�tt �rtges.areet� � �esst�i � 5tlJrbattAreaZrxiit €trdrtt�an �n afraid w{t(1 Stele otrraheh5lve The trrefi#ttr of:'�tstel woltld Irtefude arld 4i�1ndt1�# hicf le €frre wry sft sc I stn#r #Id �coi 1striet��f'ettl3Yt�the�t rts4�e,geraeratCt cre�ect e�ttaxrnussta��Ctty i. Nltap rsf.prcrpt�e�a;1€�axat�arn ar�e.+�ill e�cP�afrn�ts e .. rn vain both} e jkD818d �_ EXPLANATORY STATEMENT The Board of the Sisters School District is requesting electorate autho- rization for the annexation of approximately 30 acres of School District property at 69030 North Pine Street into the City of Sisters.This prop- erty,which is the old"Lundgren Mill Site",currently adjoins the Mount View Industrial Park on its south border,land which is within the City of Sisters and zoned light industrial.The subject property represents ex- cess land to the Sisters School District. The District envisions retaining one to two acres of the property for the purpose of facilitating educational projects such as student run busi- nesses,school-to-work coordination,and other industrial arts applica- tions. The remainder of the property would be sold to generate revenue for facility enhancements for the Sisters School District.Sale of the prop- erty would return the property to the tax rolls and generate increased property tax revenue for the City. The City would also gain revenue through systems development charges to the eventual purchasers.They would also be required to connect to the proposed sewer system,when MAP O F completed. The subject property is currently outside the urban growth boundary and would need to be brought within that boundary,through the Plan Amendment process,to comply with the Sisters Urban Area Compre- hensive Plan,ORS Chapter 92,and Sisters Ordinance#281. PROPOSED ANNEXATION FOLLOWS ON PAGE 14 (This information furnished by Barbara J. Warren, City of Sisters, City Administrator) NO ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THIS MEASURE WERE FILED Deschutes-13 t. Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS MEASURE 9-63 AND MEASURE 9-67 u R PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS TO CITY OF SISTERS Frank.&Marie Conklin w _ Sisters School District <2 - a' Measure 9- Sisters School District 69030 North Pine Street i Measure 9-63 Frank&Marie Conklin 69013 Camp Polk Road RG Y V � QI _0 n1 J Y N Of -i i -� C33 C9 ��J `- _� ASCADE ST ® Proposed Annexation Date: 09/01/98 .aw•.r.a.+a«e-w [� Sisters City Limits 500 0 soo Feet F Deschutes-14 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES & RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-68 QUSfteil a Reereattnnt►etrict be#firmed and tmpse$(1.22 pe��,fl€fU assessed vaitre as;perrrtans�t rate lirrfifi>beg3nninff 1998- Slkll�lfil #tlf� fftis m ascire will fartri the Sisters 0rg0:11 atit n ft�r Ac tf8 {{ f1r8�titttt fi!4sfirfot 'C ne'�dtrr vrrit have its a�+1 tax rate limit d�lltcated to#undtng ,. ranrtfQ€ai tnties within tha d�strlct Tlts,dietriot is Iniendsd to ctt€'Irttta asr 's sf the exfsting non°prtfiit a€AR r�rgartizat"an. Ap rn a)x lffi%e tkte 8f€ect t f creatingi the dlstri t once the siectloo ,. is tx rtfffetf ff apprc d the tax rate IIm will hscdnte Me for the 19 Zf3ftt)flax ys�t , Tha rreastrlet vti1 beerned by arl�nde#rsrtdent bnart rtf direr-. tars e�dtsif�t fad w �fibs rfistriet, ap£r pedcwf atrmparty akrsaritee hallrts andtre pasted ................. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT This measure,if approved,would form the Sisters Organization for Ac- tivities and Recreation District. The purpose behind formation of the Sisters Organization for Activities and Recreation District is to create a taxing district to provide funding for recreational programs currently carried on by the existing non-profit SOAR organization(Sisters Orga- nization for Activities and Recreation). If approved,the new district would have a tax rate limit of$.22 per thousand dollars of valuation.This proposed level of funding will per- , mit the continuation of current programs as well as expanding to make more activities available to people of all age groups within the district boundaries.Currently the SOAR programs are limited to the funds avail- able through grants,donations and minimal user fees. Approval of the district will have the effect of creating the district once the election is certified.If approved,the tax rate limit will become effec- tive for the 1999-2000 tax year. If approved,the new district will be governed by an independent board of directors elected at large within the district. MAP OF SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES & RECREATION FOLLOWS ON PAGE 16 (This information furnished by Robert L. Nipper, Board of County Commissioners for Deschutes County, Oregon) Deschutes-15 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES & RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-68 nr • •E Proposed Boundary of the Sisters Organization for Activities and Recreation District R 8 E R 9 E JEFFERSON COUNTY R 10 E R11E i i BIACIt BBTTE Q RANCH Z "---T-0-11101 IN BISTRICT e z 5 '1 LL Q SAS; •� it %. Not Included in District a� -sEemf�lr Recreation District Boundary NITINCtIkN1NI1ST11CT ta %` Creek N Highway Urban Growth Boundary ; S 8 :g '3 Deschutes-16 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-68 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR When I was a lonely only child there was baton,drama and folk We have a choice to make. Do we.follow the national trend and dance.As a pre-teen the swimming pool was my summer friend support growing prisons or do we work as a community to im- as both parents worked.As a confused & restless teen I found prove self-esteem in our children and honor our elderly. solace in guitar &guided hikes.The fact that I reached adult- The facts are simple.Our prison population increased by more hood safely is due in no small part to the Parks&Rec Dept.in than 61,000 last year to 1.25 million prisoners, both state and my town. federal.The U.S incarceration rate is 6 to 10 times greater than Over the years I've continued to use these wonderful &afford- most industrialized nations.We currently have 5.7 million men 9> able programs to improve my life,have fun&make new friends. and women in prison,jail,probation or on parole. I always feel a little thrill when a new schedule of activities is The fact that our children have a 6 to 10 times greater chance of printed& I peruse it like a kid in a candy store,picking out my being incarcerated than any other industrialized nation is very next adventure. I look forward to sharing that excitement with disturbing. The emotional and financial costs of our children my son. making bad choices are immense. The cost of their violent I am so impressed with the year-round, all age inclusive pro- crimes,the cost of the judicial process,the cold reality of the grams that SOAR offers! What a remarkable achievement... small concrete cells with thick iron bars, are all facts that we they've"soared"on a wing&a prayer-now it's time to create a must begin to face.We must realize that when a young person stable&steady foundation.With a solid base we may one day enters our prison system their life is in ruin. They become a find ourselves cheering at our kids'swim lessons&sharing tea number in an institution that provides little in the way of self at a senior center... but these things are built on a foundation, esteem.Worse yet they become part of a system and a culture one we can provide with a simple YES vote. I love our commu- that perpetuates itself with a high re-incarceration rate. nity and I know you do too, let's show our commitment to our Lack of after-school programs expose our youth to loitering, COMMUNITY with a resounding YES vote for SOAR (and our- smoking,drugs,and vandalism.Sixty per cent of juvenile crime selves!) is committed between 3:00 p.m.and 6:00 p.m.Our greatest hope in this battle to provide self-esteem to the children-of our com- Endorsed by: munity is S.O.A.R.Sisters Organization for Activities and Recre- ation has been honored by the Commission on Children and Pat Page Families as the organization in Deschutes County that has served Bob and Maxine Wood more children per dollar than any other program. Marna and Dave Parman Terry Denzer We,as a community,must support S.O.A.R,as well as contrib- uting personal time and energy to our youth.With the children of our community goes our hope for a better future. Please join us in voting Yes for S.O.A.R. Endorsed by: Jan and Bill Reed Lori and Curt Kallberg Julia and Hort Hammond Warren and Nancy Seward (This information furnished by Karly Drake Lusby) (This information furnished by Bill and Zoe Willitts) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. the argument. Deschutes-17 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-68 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR ARGUMENT IN FAVOR As a professional in the field of parks and recreation for over SOAR twenty-five years, I am in support of the Sisters Organization IT'S ABOUT LOVE AND CARING.IT'S ABOUT YOU.ITS for Activities and Recreation District.The benefits of parks and ABOUT TIME. recreation services are far-reaching and are a life-long invest- Anthropologist Margaret Mead once said,"What the world. ment for every member of a community.Recreation programs needs is not romantic lovers who are sufficient unto them- offer a pro-active approach that provides the necessary tools selves,but husbands and wives who live in communities, and intervention model for at-risk youth and adults.Investing in relate to other people,carry on useful work and willingly recreation is far more cost effective than investing in juvenile give time and attention to their children. and adult prisons. You know kids:When they're bored,when they have nothing to RECREATION IS "PREVENTATIVE MEDICINE" FOR EVERYONE do,no place to go,they can be very'inventive.They go some- RECREATION COMMUNITY! place.They get into something.SOAR should be that"place." SOAR should be that"thing." Sometimes when mom works,her son needs a place to place Endorsed by: to flip,tumble and cartwheel.Soar is that place. z Traci Tandy When school's out and a kid needs help with his homework,or Susan Fulhard his home life,he ought to be able to walk someplace safe,where Shelly and Jim Cristiano there are smiles, and team sports,and a responsible adult to Tammy Haynes supervise him.Yep,SOAR. Anne Seile =� And how about when dad travels out-of-state on business for a week, his daughter needs a place to walk to after school.You got it--SOAR. Sisters is a small town. But just like kids in the big city, our children want to saw wood blocks and build them into treasure chests.They want to weave baskets and paint sailboats and learn Taekwando and drill that soccer ball into the net.Sisters kids aren't much different from kids in Bend who have a parks and recreation department.Sisters may be small,but our kids can have their own parks and rec with SOAR--Sisters Organi- zation for Activities and Recreation. The world doesn't need any more red-hot Titanic lovers. We need SOAR and a caring community to support it.Show your love. Endorsed by: v Pattie and Dan Little Gayle and Erik Hoagland Carmelita and Lee Anderson Ellen Wood and Ron Gregg s (This information furnished by Alan Guggenheim) (This information furnished by Judy Kell) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- the argument. dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. MEASURE WERE FILED Deschutes-18 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet T. LA PINE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-65 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR I-f � N t' &t�IrAItI fl(Siilti7 RECREATION..... R�ptl�lklv#ItAltEl#AI� HI�iPI .....Who needs it? How about toddlers, young children, fltttr�ct rr _ �1 �r1,tff' teenagers, young adults, middle age folks or seniors? It va artltrtt ft Irit betnnirt ft�t year 19 :193 looks like we all do. �� ffptl tttia €rtr©ytlesfttftis3}isantRtti YES...BUT WHAT KIND..... 7 par f ttasse ra € as arrttalent iii the r�#�#f�it�" t�1 � �t�ftgy�trt�f�yt1C►��tr€��ts�- .....can I expect to find at the La Pine Park& Recreation a ° �ff� �A(ttt l Xf of tfle fgnn Guttituttt District facilities and programs.Would you believe, Little League games, Frontier Days celebration, Halloween R£ EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Maze,Basketball,Dances,Playgrounds,Volleyball,Christ- mas Bazaar, Fashion Shows, Picnics, Swimming, Nature INSURES ADEQUATE LONG-TERM FUNDING FOR PARK& walks,New Year's Eve celebration,Club activities and Fam- RECREATION OPERATIONS. ily reunions to name a few. Do we need to expand these La Pine Park&Recreation District was formed on March 27,1990 with- opportunities?YES.But adequate funding is needed. out a tax base.Since that time the District has acquired land and build- ings on Finley Butte Rd and the old White School facilities on Hunting- ton Rd.,next to the Library.The White School Building has been rebuilt. &PROGRAMS? The District also operates a campground and Day Use area at Rosland Are they adequate for the La Pine area recreation Campground on Burgess Rd on the Little Deschutes River.This District needs? The Finley Butte Rd. Park & Little League corn is also committed to developing other needed recreation facilities,neigh boct as desired ed a recreation approved programs y the community.es throughout the Dis badly n need of repairs remodel and expansion. ever,it is FINLEY BUTTE RD.PARK THE WHITE SCHOOL PARK BUILDING Presently the land and facilities at this park are being utilized by the &COMPLEX..... South County Little League,various organizations,youth groups and ...,,needs completion inside, a one story addition to the k. others for meetings and recreational purposes.This facility is mam- east,:...d total completion of the surrounding grounds.The tained&operated by many volunteers with limitations. exterior plans include new playground equipment, safety WHITE SCHOOL PARK RECREATION CENTER fencing,outdoor sport courts,parking and complete land- This facility consists of a large shell building utilized for gatherings and scaping.Rosland Campground and Day Use area will need community activities, a small playground, a large playing green and minor improvements to maximize a variety of recreational associated parking areas.A new mobile men&women bathrooms were p recently installed. opportunities. Neighborhood Parks are needed to ad- ROSLAND CAMPGROUND equately meet the recreation needs of our vast district. This 40 acre U.S.FS facility is operated by the District with a Special Recreation Programs expansion is greatly needed to serve Use Permit.A current Land Swap Proposal will result in Rosland Camp- all age groups. ground being donated to the District.This facility is being improved and BUT HOW?..... maintained by many volunteers. .....District volunteers,fundraisers,grants,User Fees,do- OPERATIONAL FUNDING nations & community service workers are simply not The District has severe limitations on its ability to provide the scope of enough to meet minimum levels of resources needed.We recreation programs,activities&facilities needed by the total La Pine community.District operation is presently dependent upon grants,fund- need a full time paid staffer to coordinate volunteers,pro- raisers,donations and volunteers.This requested Permanent Rate Limit grams,facilities&financing.We still need additional fund- will provide$150,000 per year.This will provide additional badly needed ing and resources. We have a pledge of funding & re- funds to enable us to hire a person to manage the District operations sources from the Boys&Girls Club to help complete the and programs and meet the District expenses,including maintenance, White School Park complex.The District will share this fa- utilities,supplies,programs and coordinate the many volunteers. cility with the Boys&Girls club.Arrangements will be made with interested youth and adult organizations.We will still . need Tax Rate Revenue and General Obligation Bonds to adequately fund the District. 3'. (This information furnished by John D. Taylor 11, Recreation for all Ages Committee) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS (This information furnished by John D. Taylor fl, MEASURE WERE FILED La Pine Park&Recreation District) Deschutes-19 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters,Pamphlet LA PINE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-66 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR RECREATION..... .....Who needs it? How about toddlers, yourfg children, V1. . teenagers, young adults, middle age folks or seniors? It �V 10 looks like we all do. YES...BUT W HAT K I N D..... . .....can I expect to find at the La Pine Park& Recreation District facilities and programs. Would you believe, Little League Games, Frontier Days celebration, Halloween Maze,Basketball,Dances,Playgrounds,Volleyball,Christ- mas Bazaar, Fashion Shows, Picnics, Swimming, Nature walks,New Year's Eve celebration,Club activities and Fam- v:, T ily reunions to name a few. Do we need to expand these opportunities?YES.But adequate funding is needed. HOW ABOUT THOSE PARKS FACILITIES EXPLANATORY STATEMENT I&PROGRAMS? The La Pine Park and Recreation District needs to complete the large •••••Are they adequate for the La Pine area recreation shell building and exterior recreation facilities at the White School Park needs? The Finley Butte Rd. Park& Little League com- next to the Library.The District also badly needs to remodel and im- plex has served La Pine well for many years.However,it is prove the Finley Butte Rd.Park facility,which has served the cOmmu' badly in need of repair,remodel and expansion. nity for many years. WHITE SCHOOL PARK PROBLEMS THE WHITE SCHOOL PARK BUILDING 0 Grants, User Fees, Fund-raisers and Donations have been insuffi- &COMPLEX.......,,.needs cient to complete this complex. .....needs completion inside, a one story addition to the • The shell building its present state is greatly limited in legally& east,and total completion of the surrounding grounds.The safely accommodating needed recreation and other community ac- exterior plans include new playground equipment, safety tivities. fencing,outdoor sport courts,parking and complete land- • County Building Department has laced a development moratorium scaping..Rosland Campground and Day Use area will need on this building until we secure a long range Architectural-Engineer- minor improvements to maximize a variety of recreational ing design and complete construction plans. opportunities. Neighborhood Parks are needed to ad- Theexterior site has grossly inadequate facilities such as playground equately meet the recreation needs of our vast district. equipment,recreation courts,safety fencing,parking and landscaP- Recreation Programs expansion is greatly needed to serve g. • The La Pine Chapter of the Boys&Girls Club has an urgent need for all age groups. permanent facilities. BUT HOW?..... • The District is greatly in need of adequate office space and improved ....*District volunteers,fundraisers,grants,User Fees,do- facilities for the communities annual celebration.(Frontier Days) nations & community service workers are simply not FINLEY BUTTE RD.PARK PROBLEMS enough to meet minimum levels of resources needed.We • This park facility,originally developed by the La Pine Lions Club,has need a full time paid staffer to coordinate volunteers,pro- served the community for many years. grams,facilities&financing.We still need additional fund- The main building has had a lot of wear and tear. It is long overdue in and resources. We have a pledge of funding & re- N. for a remodel. sources from the Boys&Girls Club to help complete the • The Little League facilities are the same story.There is no playground White School Park complex.The District will share this fa- equipment at this facility. cility with the Boys&Girls club.Arrangements will be made PROPOSED SOLUTIONS with interested youth and adult organizations.We will still • Adequate funding to complete the White School Park facilities and need Tax Rate Revenue and General Obligation Bonds to remodel the Finley Butte Rd. Park facilities.This would enable the adequately fund the District. District to provide adequate facilities for recreation opportunities for all ages$.24/$1000 assessed valuation. • A partnership with the Boys&Girls Club to complete the White School Park facilities and provide space and programs for a good cross- section of the Youth of the District residents (This information furnished by John D. Taylor/l, Recreation for all Ages Committee) The printing of this argument does not constitute an en- dorsement by Deschutes County, nor does the county warrant the accuracy or truth of any statement made in the argument. NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST THIS (This information furnished by John D. Taylor ll, MEASURE WERE FILED La Pine Park&Recreation District) Deschutes-20 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet R . BLACK BUTTE RANCH RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEASURE 9-69 MEASURE 9-70 t 11C ft L1> tf ��n f Alttf�i 9-7f1 nE tERAi.Ct0C.t6ATl0III Do tW Af �ttlftf litf�l�IF�i Bt�� " ttatl Brit>�tt a�tf�ttrai I+rre drat #lava f�€atria t BtiT7'E tt>�I�CF1 itfPfrt �� ,�f #gtfSirrr years frkr�pt�rat�4rra taep'!ri;nrng,n 1�� QB�T#©H Siali ffiacft Butte RanrEf tt ''9 be er�f'a �f`t�k��Gt��' e�y Cause�rr� rty taxe�'€ta frffrr8�rrt�rre.ti�an tttree erai otrii atron handarl indebtedtrees irr X13'ala�tnt dot�sr 1a �e�t � �,, ' ,�©�i�rl�"If tt�tronrfs aru ap�ri>ved,tiaeyi bs payable ffro�n'#�cea iiii�VF�°'��ae t1�arrt�wr ## reload ra $lr•�i)f� $a1C Is f��pa��property:o�tners#ftp tffat are not 5tlbf 1ib`t to ttie ir�ri�of 1 b A i f tsargt 4s TitB frrst year ttte is ttti ntaata is Baoons 11 grid 17 , rkioe Xt tt the tlreguri i >a#t#ration, �ts i la taeedtra rlra► up tQr Irtssea Inourted by itle BIiAM1I�t 3his measure wl�uid let the disfirot issueetral otrliatitrn ;. �;ifstt iaaure�Et,snd�r#rd�s furrd�tra anat�tarn trurrarrt �rn an asntrtrnt not#ta exceed 1,UOt'1,Ot1ft Tiny wlti rrret�€ra s�riafly � � ��r�� `.�ia is��#Irrtr�Eitilr of tits ttti�r�- ear icrca�c�ti�ri t ten�1U}yaar'a from issue, Funds will: used��prrr�hase arr� '�� 1�tai lad�ir#ived trt�rw eptamtrar ' �aleriort. rep#aoe ptrtrlrc!safety weliicfes,inciurfin�a Mutt oombiitatron strfa�fre enrrtelladsr tnlelc which t arries uatsr far the rn�tial attaf*i arre'itaavy EXPLANATORY STATEMENTru5fa, resouefarbulanca and onearnb#€ioefurrdalialso The 4 year Local Option Tax is a replacement for the 2 year Local Option h9 lssd frrr bind ecsts and prtrfessadnal fees Tax that was passed last year.The tax will raise$170,000 per year for EXPLANATORY STATEMENT four years and would cost approximately$.46 per$1,000 of assessed A 10 year General Obligation Bond,in the amount of$1,000,000,will be value,starting in fiscal year 1999/2000. used to purchase fournew vehicles.Three will replace vehicles that are This levy is needed to make up for the losses incurred by the passage of at the end of their useful lives and do not meet new Federal require- Measure 50,and to maintain our current level of service.This also will ments.The fourth piece would be a new"Interface Engine".This Bond enable the District to purchase much needed safety equipment and the will be approximately$.37 per$1,000 of assessed value starting in fis- most up to date medical,fire,and rescue equipment. cal year 1999/2000. ' Both our 1981 and 1990 ambulances would be replaced with two new s four wheel drive units,one being an ambulance and the other a combi- nation ambulance/rescue vehicle that would have the capability to carry one patient and combat a vehicle fire.These vehicles would be built on a truck chassis rather than a light van chassis,thereby allowing them to safely carry their weight. Our 1979 structural pumper would be replaced with a"Quint".This is a multiple use vehicle.It's a structure engine that carries a water supply, the standard compliment of hose,and is equipped with a 75'attached ladder.The ladder has remote control nozzle that gives it the ability to establish an elevated water stream.This would be extremely useful in several areas of the ranch,the condos,the different sets of cluster homes, large buildings or homes,and areas where there are clusters of build- ings. In any fire it could be used to cool the thermal column,thereby cutting down on the burning brands that can spread fire down wind of the original fire. The Interface Engine would be new to the district.It's sized between the I. pickup size brush unit and a full sized structure engine, is four wheel drive, has a short wheel base, and off road capability if needed.The main function would be to provide structure protection during the time of a wildfire.This unit could be critical in the time of heavy snow when a structure engine would have trouble maneuvering. , z x i (This information furnished by Dave Douthit, Chairman, Black Butte Ranch RFPD) NO ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST (This information furnished by Dave Douthit, THIS MEASURE WERE FILED Chairman, Black Butte Ranch RFPD) Deschutes-21 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMISSIONER POSITION #1 I BILL HAUSE k . DENNIS R. DEMOCRAT �{ 4 LUKE REPUBLICAN OCCUPATION:Human Resources Specialist;Writer OCCUPATION:Small Businessman,Construction. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Sales Associate&Customer Service Clerk,Fred Meyer,Inc.1990-97 OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Third generation carpenter. Technician/Technical Writer,Apple Computer,Inc.1982-90 Dennis is proud to have started a contracting business specializ Teaching Assistant,Linfield College 1994-96 ing in medium priced homes in Deschutes County. Program Assistant COCC 1994 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:North Salem High School,at- rant Proposal Writer:COCC/AmeriCorps 1994 tended COCC's University Center,graduated Oregon State Uni- ? Writer/Correspondent:Sunriver Sun,Bend Lookout,Bend Bulletin Technical/Grant Proposal Writer,Playwright Clerk/interviewer, versify. Alcoholism Information&Referral Center;Adrian,MI 1976-77. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:State Representative, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Masters Candidate,Portland District 54 1993-Present. Legislative Committees:Chair Educa- State University,Public Administration,1998 tion Committee 1997, Education&Human Resources&Interim Bachelor of Science,Linfield College,Social&Behavioral Science, 1996 Education 1995, Public Contracting Task Force; Member Chil- COCC, 1994-95,Business Mgt.,Computer Learning Center, 1993 dren&Family Committee, Natural Resources Committee, Envi- Associates degree,Washtenaw Community College,Liberal ronment & Energy and Agriculture & Forestry subcommittees, Studies,1984 Growth Management Task Force,Low Income Housing Task Diploma,BETS Technical Center,Electronic Technology,1979 Force,and Interim Commerce Committee.Gubernatorial Appoint- Certificate,Empathic Listening Skills,Call Someone Concerned ments to Oregon Seismic Advisory Committee and Prevailing <' Inc.,1976 Wage Advisory Committee. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:US ARMY 1968-70 (Vietnam 1969-70) FAMILY:Married Central Oregon native,Joanne Copley in 1968. CA National Guard 1981-88 Two sons: Matthew(deceased), and Brian, a Navy Lieutenant, MI National Guard 1978-80 one grandson. VOLUNTEER/COMMUNITY SERVICE: Cascade Children's Festival (Co-Chair: 1997,98);Central Oregon Battering&Rape Alliance,South COMMUNITY:Memberships:Bend,LaPine,Redmond,Sunriver w Central Oregon Domestic Violence Coalition,Victim's Assistance,Depart- Chambers of Commerce;Deschutes County Farm Bureau;Cen- ment of Human Resources,Disability Services Advisory Council,VFW, tral Oregon Builders Association; Oregon Hunters Association; Vietnam Veterans of America,Dramatists Guild,San Lorenzo Valley Little Director:,Boys& Girls Club of Bend, and Youth Challenge Pro- League Association(Board of Directors,1984-86);Mountain Community gram Advisory Board Volunteer:Scoutmaster 10 years. Theater of San Lorenzo Valley 1985-90(Vice President,1990;Produc- tion Manager,1988,89.)S.M.A.R.T FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY/COMMON SENSE:Dennis listens to Rapid Urban Growth is threatening Central Oregon's UNIQUE CHAR- people and uses a common sense approach to solving our region's ACTER and QUALITY OF LIFE.We must be ever vigilant in the protec- Problems.Government must work smarter and more efficiently to tion and wise use of ourvital Natural and Human Resources.The citizens provide essential services to people. and taxpayers are the stockholders of Deschutes County government. EDUCATION:Our future is our children. We must continue our They are entitled to a greater voice and larger return on their investment. efforts to r p programs y I am dedicated to provide positive ro rams for our youth and families. "HOME RULE"SYSTEM OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT CRIME: Dennis supports the need for adequate jail space. He PRESERVING THE SOCIAL AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT believes violent offenders should not get out of jail early. ENSURING VITAL SERVICES COUNTYWIDE DEVELOPING"FAMILY WAGE EARNER"JOBS SENIORS:Our senior citizens have worked hard for their retire- SUPPORT FOR EDUCATION AND LIBRARIES ment.We must protect their quality of life with cost-effective gov- CLEAN WATER AND WASTE DISPOSAL RESOURCES ernment. LONG TERM,COST-EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS RECOGNITIONS:Legislator of the Year Award from Oregon As- VOLUNTEER CITIZEN TASK FORCES sociation for Home Care 1995, and Oregon Dental Hygienists "Economic Development with a Community Conscience." 1 997 for his exceptional leadership on health care issues. FOR THE PEOPLE p p FOR THE ENVIRONMENT DENNIS LISTENS,WORKS HARD FOR YOU,and COMMUNI- FOR THE GREATER DESCHUTES COMMUNITY ATES with the people he serves. BILL HAUSE for Call Dennis at(541)389-5877, E-mail:Iukebuil@transport.com COUNTY COMMISSIONER POSITION ONE ELECT DENNIS LUKE, DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMIS- (541)593-1298 or CMSH1 @AOL.COM SIONER,POSITION 1. (This information furnished by William H. (Bill)Hause) (This information furnished by Dennis R. Luke) Deschutes-22 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMISSIONER POSITION #3 us y sR. Q' TOM DEWOLF r. DENNIS LANDWEHR REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT �$ i co d gi;; rya s OCCUPATION:Small Businessman;Writer,Cascade Arts OCCUPATION:Mechanical/Electrical Engineer OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Owner,Westside Video,1984- OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Energy-use monitoring 98;Owner,Pat&Mike's Cinema/Restaurant,1981-86;City Man- and conservation research, 1984-Present ager,Luxury Theatres,1978-81. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:University of Oregon,Bachelor EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: of Science, 1978;Northwest Christian College,Bachelor of Sci- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Solid Waste Ad- ence,1978;Small Business Management,COCC,1989. visory Committee,1989-97, PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Current Vice-Chair, Long an involved citizen, I entered this race to bring a fresh Oregon Arts Commission;C.O.Economic Development Council, 1997;Bend City Council,1993-97. perspective and new ideas to the table.My issues-based cam- paign will concentrate on growth management and cost-ef- COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS:S.M.A.R.T.Reading Program; Greater Bend Rotary Club; Deschutes United Way;Tower The fective government. I am reasonably intelligent, logical, fru atre Foundation;Sheriff's Advisory Committee;C.O.Leadership gal,and honest. I humbly ask for Y our vote,and your help in Council;Bend Parks Foundation;Chamber of Commerce Mem- forging a county we can all be proud and happy to call home. ber in Bend,LaPine,Redmond,Sisters,Sunriver. Growth management is THE issue facing Deschutes County. TOM DEWOLF WILL WORK FOR Central Oregon's population will grow as long as life here is THE PEOPLE:You are my highest priority.I know how intimidat- affordable and desirable.My top priorities will be planning for ing and frustrating it can be to approach Government.I'll be readily orderly growth, and funding infrastructure improvements re- available. I'll return your calls promptly. I'll always remember I quired. Existing property owners have already built schools, work for you! libraries,jails, roads,and fairgrounds. New residents should LOWER TAXES,FEES AND SPENDING: I'll oppose all fee in- substantially fund the services they require.I favor higher sys- creases that exceed inflation unless shown an extraordinary need. tem development charges on new construction and will seek I'll encourage government agencies to coordinate and communi- other was s to relieve existing homeowners of the direct costs cate long-term plans so voters understand future costs before Y voting on bond measures.Government must live within its means. of growth. SMALLER,MORE EFFICIENT,EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT:We Tax bills and levy requests should reflect capital as well as should reduce the number of departments and streamline opera- annual costs, and property owner should have the option to tions..Performance audits for departments should insure highest pay their share of capital expenses up front to reduce future quality at lowest cost. tax bills. MORE CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT:More meetings should be tele- vised and held in the evenings when working people can attend. 9 Citizen Advisory Committees should be formed to help depart- vided collectively rather than individually.At the county level, ments operate better. these include roads,law enforcement,public health,land-use STRONGER FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES:Government bu- planning,libraries,and fairgrounds.We must provide required reaucracy cannot provide the answers.If we truly want lowertaxes, services efficiently and economically. In Solid Waste alone, we must volunteer more for community organizations that enrich tens of millions of dollars can be saved over the next several lives.Together,we will improve Deschutes County. decades by obtaining private-sector bids for disposal capac- 'Tom DeWo/f is the best choice for County Commissioner. He'll ity. Collection and transfer services should also be competi- be a strong leader and he'll be fair.He has the determination to tively bid at the earliest opportunity. follow through with good ideas and get things done." -Barry Slaughter,County Commissioner, 1992-96. Partisan politics has little to do with the commissioner's job-- � you are choosing a member of a management team. I am a TOM PUTS PEOPLE FIRST! lifelong Democrat,proud of my party's victories for wage-earn- ELECT TOM DEWOLF ers. Help my fellow Democratic candidates and me reclaim http://www.coinet.com/dewolf/ our party's position as the representatives of working Ameri- cans. (This information furnished by Tom De wolf) (This information furnished by Dennis Landwehr) Deschutes-23 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK DESCHUTES COUNTY TREASURER f'``41' 14, 14,11 ',• i Aug r ` z MARY SUE ' MARTIN F. ij "SUSIE" 3 WYNNE PENHOLLOW NONPARTISAN z NONPARTISAN Mg, s x � ZF OCCUPATION:Deschutes County Clerk OCCUPATION: Deschutes County Finance Director and Trea- s u rer BACKGROUND: Deschutes County Clerk, 1983 present; Deputy Clerk, 1970-82; Private Sector, 1966-70; OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Hired as Deschutes County City of Bend, 1963-64 Finance Director in January, 1996; appointed to the additional EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Graduate of Bend High School; position of County Treasurer in September,1997;Chief Financial Central Oregon Community College and Oregon State Univer- Officer,American Red Cross,Portland,Oregon(1984-1995);Fi- sity;Continuing education in records,elections and management. nance Director, City of Gresham, Oregon (1978 1984); worked PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Appointed b the for the City of Downey, California in various positions, including pp Y Finance Director(1973-1978);Management Trainee and subse- + Governor to the Asset Forfeiture Oversight Committee,1994,1997 quently Corporate Auditor with Union Oil Company of California and to the Historical Records Advisory Board, 1988; President (1971-73). Oregon Association of County Clerks, 1992; Serve on the Or- egon Association of County Clerks'Legislative Committee,1992- EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Bachelor of Arts in Business, present. with major in finance,California State University at Fullerton(1971) Selected as an Election Observer for the Albania Election June, PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:My first experience in 1997;selected as an election supervisor for the Bosnian Munici- government was with the City of Downey,California where I had <` pal Election,Sept, 1997. the opportunity to learn the basics of governmental finance from L` DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK SUSIE PENHOLLOW a number of perspectives in a fairly large and fully developed municipality.Over a period of five years with the City of Downey, IS WORKING FOR YOU! I held the positions of Senior Accountant, Manager of Financial Susie is working hard for you and will continue to provide an effi- Systems and Finance Director. My next governmental position, cient County Clerk's office while stressing QUALITY SERVICE as Finance Director with the City of Gresham,presented the chal- TO THE PUBLIC. lenges that go with a fast-growing city in need of a new organiza- tional structure and a new financial system.The conversion to a Susie is working to increase voter participation while reducing election costs. new financial system for the City of Gresham was successfully completed in a cost-effective and timely manner. Susie continues to use new technology to cut costs and increase the speed and integrity Participation in overnment-related organizations:Oregon Asso- p g ty in the election and recording systems of g 9 Deschutes County. ciation of County Treasurers/Finance Officers;Oregon Municipal Finance Officers'Association (current member and past board The unprecedented growth in Deschutes County has placed a member); Administrative Council for Accountable Behavioral tremendous work load on the County'Clerk's office. This chat- Health Alliance(ABHA)-a healthcare consortium for Deschutes, lenge has been met and we continue to provide a high level of Jefferson,Lincoln and Benton counties. professional service within our budget constraints. COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: Member of the Board of Di- My husband and I have two children and as a native of Deschutes rectors,Deschutes County Chapter of the American Red Cross County I strongly believe in community involvement.I am a char As County Treasurer, I will continue to work extreme) hard to ter member of the Boys and Girls Club and am active in Quota, Y Soroptimists,Assistance League of Bend,Deschutes County His- guarded insure that all funds received by Deschutes County are safe torical Society and the Pioneers Association. and managed in accordance with sound cash manage ment practices and in compliance with the Oregon State Stat- wish to thank the people of Deschutes County for the op- utes,and that Deschutes County taxes are properly distributed to portunity to serve you and ask for your ongoing support. I all taxing districts. am confident my professional experience and proven ability will continue to benefit Deschutes County. RE-ELECT DESCHUTES COUNTY CLERK SUSIE PENHOLLOW (This information furnished by The Committee to Re-Elect Mary Sue`Susie"Penhollow) (This information furnished by Marty Wynne) Deschutes-24 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet �a CITY OF BEND CITY COUNCIL ?Zi La WILLIAM JOHN FRIEDMAN HUMMEL ` NONPARTISAN NONPARTISAN oa a a :r OCCUPATION:Cascade Bookkeeping-Owner OCCUPATION: Attorney, Crabtree & Rahmsdorff, Bend, Or- (Selected one of"100 Best Places to Work in Oregon"by Or- egon. egon Business Magazine.1996/1997/1998.) OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Attorney,Garland Law COCC Business Development Center-Instructor(unpaid) Offices, Hillsboro,Oregon. (Teach "Getting Down to Business", "Complete Payroll Work- shop"and other seminars.) EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:University of Arkansas at OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:San Mateo County Transit- Little Rock School of Law,J.D.degree; Operations Manager Roanoke College,Salem,Virginia,B.A.degree. Dorsey Bus-VP Marketing/Operations United Van Lines International-General Manager PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:None. United Van Lines-VP Marketing/Human Resources Bend is a special place. Its natural beauty,friendly residents, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Louisiana State University-BS vibrant downtown,and tremendous recreational opportunities University of Missouri(StL)-M.Ed. are to be cherished. If I am elected to the Bend City Council I Southern Illinois University MBA will work hard to maintain the quality of life which attracts us all PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: City of Bend - City to Bend,while realistically managing the growth which a place Councilor;former Budget Committee Chairperson as unique as Bend,will inevitably experience. Half Moon Bay Fire District-President Like you,I have experienced all too often the frustration,and at City of Richmond Heights Planning Commisssion-Chairman times, disgust,that is felt when an elected representative lis- By election day,Bend's City Council will have adopted a new Ur- tens more to his or her financial supporters as opposed to his ban Area Comprehensive Plan.Almost five years in the writing, or her constituents.You have my word that if I am elected to the x and involving many Bend citizens,the plan sets the communities Bend City Council, I'll LISTEN TO YOU.We may not always economic,environmental,land use,and transportation goals.The agree,but I will ALWAYS treat you with respect. Council's next task is to adopt specific ordinances making these goals a reality.And to do so while maintaining high standards of As you begin the process of deciding whom to elect to the Bend fiscal responsibility. City Council,you may have questions regarding my position on Bend is only one of three Oregon cities,east of the Cascades,to certain issues or my vision for the future of Bend.If so,please be awarded a"Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting". do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached as follows: y Three years in a row!For the tenth consecutive year,the city is not asking voters for more money through a tax base increase or a • Between 8-5,Mon.-Fri.:(389-7723); bond issue.Bend is carefully managed fiscally. • After 5,Mon.-Fri.,and all day on weekends:(388-3966); Does this mean that nothing else remains to be done.No,there is still much to do. In addition to developing the ordinances to carry • e-mail:hummel@transport.com out the Comprehensive Plan,key tasks include: REMEMBER.......... Protecting the environment,so Bend remains a great place to work and live. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU Pursuing economic growth while restraining population growth. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU Maintaining the city's financial integrity: I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU Resolving key issues concerning signs,lighting,and transporta- tion. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU Enlarging our coordination with other governmental agencies. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU Completing downtown urban renewal. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I would like to continue to be a part of the process-by being re- turned to the Bend City Council. I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU I'LL LISTEN TO YOU �s (This information furnished by William Friedman) (This information furnished by John Hummel) 4 $i Deschutes-25 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet CITY OF BEND CITY COUNCIL CLARK W. JOHN s SATRE w SCHUBERT y NONPARTISAN ;£ NONPARTISAN �I .y OCCUPATION: General business manager,Pacific Power OCCUPATION`: St. Charles Medical Center Commute Options OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Employed b Pacific Coordinator 1996-98&Deschutes National Forest Trails Special- OCCUPATIONAL Y ist 1989-98. Power since 1971 in engineering and management positions OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Founding Director,Commute in Albany, Portland, Klamath Falls,and Coos Bay. Options for Central Oregon,1993-96;teacher;writer;scientist; EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Washington State Univer carpenter, sity, Bachelor of Science degree with distinction, electrical EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Middlebury College,VT;BA engineering. Environmental Studies(Phi Beta Kappa)1980. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:City of Bend Bud- *Bend Planning Commissioner 1997-98 get Committee, 1998. *Bend Design Review Advisory Committee 1997 We are fortunate to live in a well run city with one of the lowest 'Bend School Siting Advisory Committee 1997 tax rates in the state. Our community and surrounding area *Bend Trails Plan Advisory Committee 1996 are beautiful, and our economy is strong. But we must not *Deschutes County Transportation Committee 1996 relax. Our schools graduate more students each year than *Deschutes County Bicycle Committee 1991-94 the number of good quality jobs we create for them.City poll *U.S.Peace Corps Volunteer 1983-85 cies should encourage and support our local businesses so CENTRAL OREGON CIVIC INVOLVEMENT: that they can expand and create employment opportunities -for our next generation. *Old Mill District Adviso ry Committee 1995-97 �k *Director,Commute Options Week 1992-95 W We must also make sure that as our community grows and *Founder,Biking for a Better Community 1991-93 changes, it does not change from the attractive community *Founder,St.Charles Smart Cycling Program 1994-96 that we all enjoy. But a healthy economy and an attractive *Downtowners for Better Transportation 1993-94 community are not at odds, but rather go hand in hand.Our I have dedicated myself to improving our community by work quality of life makes it possible for businesses to attract and ing hard for safe streets,reduced traffic,healthy citizens,and retain good employees,brings in our tourists that support our clean air.l am a native Oregonian dedicated to preserving our public.services through motel room taxes they pay, and at- heritage and building a livable future for all Bend citizens." tracts retail business that keeps more of our shopping dollars John Schubert has received awards from the Bend Clean Air Com- in our community. Strong businesses support community mittee,Deschutes County Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee, events and charitable causes,and quality development is much and Sustainable Northwest.The following Bend citizens encour more desirable than boarded up store fronts. age you to"Vote for John Schubert"so that he can bring his experience and leadership to the City Council: I have lived in Bend since 1990,and am the Manager of Pa Michele McKay Karen Swirsky John Wujack cific Power.I am currently the President of the Bend Chamber Carolyn Tillia Larry Kimmel Peter Geiser of Commerce,serve on the Board of the Central Oregon Eco Aleta Nissen Dave Sheldon Tom Wykes nomic Development Council, and have served on the Board Ann Wheeler Peter Casey Ron Rosen,M.D. of the Central Oregon Visitor Association. I chaired the suc garb McAusland John Neilson Al Tozer cessful campaign to pass the 1998 Bend LaPine School Bond Measure.I am an avid runner and bicyclist.I am committed to Elayne Logan Currie David Savage Gary Beaudoin Bend, and as your City Councilor will make decisions that Tim Seeberg Maureen Sweeney Jan Auxier keep Bend healthy and attractive. Geoff Bartol (This information furnished by the Committee to Elect John Schubert (This information furnished by Clark W. Satre) Barbara Tyler, CPA, Treasurer.) Deschutes-26 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF BEND CITY COUNCIL €!f k u: S' ` iSO ,gas. ROD E. WYVETTAC. TOMCHO � .: WILSON NONPARTISAN , NONPARTISAN �F. f . $ 7` $g s, 5 x .. 3 OCCUPATION:Project Manager for Tennant Developments OCCUPATION:VOLUNTEER, SAINT CHARLES HOSPITAL OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Vice President and -Unpaid District Manager for US Bank,20 years OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:June 1986 to December EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Western Washington 1995, Community Development Manager, City of Vista, CA Paid University,MBA Program,No degree Colorado University,Bachelor of Science-Finance July 1983 to June 1986, Director/Administrator Community Development,Cities of Imperial,Calipatria,Westmorland,CA- { PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: City Councilor, Paid McMinnville(elected) 1979 to 1983,Director Economic and Community Development, Planning Commissioner,McMinnville(appointed) City of Brawley,CA-Paid School Board,Bend/La Pine(appointed) 1978 to 1979, Director Scioto Co. Program on Aging,Ohio- We have noticed a change in Bend in the last decade or two in Paid s the environment of our daily lives. Changes that stem from a EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BBA in Business Adminis- growing population and a new economy.Despite new and wider tration with emphasis on government and politics, National roads,traffic is worse than it used to be.All the changes and all University,Vista,CA-1989 the new choices-new houses, new shopping centers, new in- Merced College,Merced,CA, 1971-1974 dustry-leave us feeling vaguely unsettled,as if somehow,it could have been done better. Glenwood High School,New Boston,Ohio 1947 I am committed to"Smart Growth".The goal of smart growth PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Appointed To:Child starts with the,assumption that there will be growth, but it is Abuse Council-Ohio and California sensible growth that balances our need for jobs and economic Health Systems Agency Governing Body;San Diego County development with our desire to save our natural environment before it is forever lost. Most of the attributes of smart growth Board of Directors,Retired Senior Volunteer Program,Ohio can be found in older,pre-1950 Old Bend neighborhoods,many Board of Directors,Senior Citizen Employment Service,Ohio of which have held their value over decades as preferred places I am a widow of a career Air Force Sergeant. Married for 40 to live.These neighborhoods are laboratories of walkable,com- years,we raised three children of our own and two granddaugh- pact,mixed-use development. ters.I worked for over 28 years for various cities and counties in In the first half of this century,Bend was substantially different management positions.I am familiar with all aspects of govern- in its design.Street networks with small blocks connected neigh- ment. 3 borhood to neighborhood.Detached and attached housing of- If elected, I promise to listen attentively to the concerns of the ten stood next to,or within a block of each other. Local com- citizens of Bend.I believe in being honest and responsive and I mercial services and parks were dispersed within or at the edges will serve with integrity and fairness. of neighborhoods.The basic compatibility of building types al- lowed for easy proximity of diverse uses and densities. Build ings were designed to contribute to a harmonious streetscape, cerns of women and our Seniors to The Council.As a grand and parking played a secondary role.(Smart Development Code mother, I am deeply interested in the welfare of children. I am concerned about education,drug use,abuse and health issues. i Book,August 1997) e My past experience in business and government have prepared Being retired,I can devote full time in service To The Commu- me to understand the process, finance, and challenges of nity• growth. (This information furnished by Rod E. Tomcho) (This information furnished by Wyvetta C. Wilson) 1 Deschutes-27 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet i CITY OF REDMOND MAYOR F ED FITCH BOB GREEN a. v, NONPARTISAN :: NONPARTISAN u P ' i o s � � ,e �S K 3>�'.➢ I u'd OCCUPATION:Partner:Bryant,Emerson&Fitch OCCUPATION:Member of the Redmond City Council since Janu- OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Attorney ary 1st 1997(unpaid); EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Willamette University: JD 1978 General Contractor, Bob Green Contracting L.L.C. (owner)since Marquette University:MA 1975 1963 BA 1973 Residential excavation specialty. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: City Attorney:Redmond 1979-1998 OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Timber and sawmill-purchas- Assistant City Attorney:Bend 1979-1983 ing, construction, maintenance supervision and corporate pilot; General Contractor (owner); Logging company (owner);Aircraft Land Use Hearings Officer Deschutes County and Bend:1987-1993 sales;Logging and construction machinery sales;Eight years U.S. Deputy District Attorney(Douglas County):1978-1979 Naval Reserve Submarines. COMMUNITY SERVICE: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Roosevelt High School,Seattle, G; Overthe past 19 years,l have done volunteer work for Kiwanis,St. Wn.eleventh grade;Aviation,commercial,instrument,multi-engine Thomas Church,Redmond Little League,the Redmond Wrestling pilot. Club, Creative Kids Preschool, Start Here Preschool, Evergreen Elementary School,Redmond Youth Soccer,REDAP and the an- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Member,Redmond City nual Redmond Thanksgiving Dinner. Council since January 1 1997;council liaison to Redmond Airport WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT ED FITCH: Commission; Member, Redmond Standards and Specifications Ed Fitch is the outstanding candidate for Redmond's mayor. He Committee,past three years;Redmond Traffic Safety Committee; has the integrity, candor, and real caring for our community that Various other committees and sub committees too numerous to have made him a respected and forward-looking leader. mention. Bob Riggs,former Mayor of Redmond Thank you for the tremendous honor to serve you on your City Ed has both a sincere commitment to our communi and the knowl tl' Council these past two years. edge and integrity necessary to be a strong, effective city leader. Redmond stands at a crossroad,and Ed Fitch is a solid choice to There have been many important issues before the Council,which lead us into the future. I have championed in your behalf,including water well#5,oppos- -Mark Keener,DDS,President,Redmond Boys&Girls Club. ing city staff and engineering consultants, convincing Council to ;i Fairness and integrity are what we can expect from Ed Fitch.Ed is accept low bid of a local contractor, to save you approximately very interested in improving the quality of life we enjoy and has the $70,000.00.The job exceeded all expectations. skills to build consensus for the benefit of our community. Well#5 will produce more than twice the design capacity.To up- `" -Jane Schroeder,former Member,Redmond City ouncil. y grade equipment and related costs to take advantage of this in- creased capacity will cost less than the amount saved by accept- "Redmond has a lot going for it.The new fairgrounds,the ex- ing low bid.Thus you save approximately one half million dollars panded airport, and our industrial area will all help make needed for the next well. Redmond a great community.To maintain Redmond's livabil- ity, Upgrading our sewage treatment plant.Proposed to be in excess ru however,we need iz work hard for the construction of our of 16 million dollars.I challenged this amount,convincing Council truck bypass,reenergize our downtown area and protect our 9 9 neighborhoods from incompatible development."Ed Fitch. to request a second opinion,this resulted in an improved design ¢` and reduction in cost of approximately 2.5 million dollars. Consider my record as Councilor.Uncompromising on principals, accountable only to you,the Citizens of Redmond. Thank You,God Bless Bob Green Allow me to serve as your Mayor This information furnished by Ed Fitch) (This information furnished by Bob Green) Deschutes-28 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet CITY OF REDMOND MAYOR CITY OF REDMOND CITY COUNCIL r at 3 V x.. BRET PAULC. SHERLOCK HATHAWAY NONPARTISAN NONPARTISAN t �b H 7 5�k W OCCUPATION: Aircrew member/aerial refueling specialist, OCCUPATION:Administrative Specialist III United States Air Force Reserve. PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Account Executive, 1440.SE Lake Roadt` Dean,Witter, Reynolds Redmond,OR 97758 Certified Law Clerk, Multnomah County District Attorney OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Office Clerk-Hill's Law Clerk,Clackamas County District Attorney Cascade Office Equipment-Kennewick,WA s EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Northwestern School of Postal Clerk-Tri-Cities Mail Handling Facility-Pasco,WA Law,Lewis and Clark College,Juris Doctor EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Grade 1 -12 University of California, Santa Barbara, Bachelor of Arts Kennewick,WA School District PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:None Columbia Basin Jr.College-3/4 year-Pasco,WA • FAMILY-WAGE JOBS-Far too many of our families struggle PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Park Commis- to make ends meet because they lack jobs that pay a liv- sion-Kennewick,WA able wage.In recent years,Redmond has had a net loss of family-wage jobs.As mayor,my first priority will be to make Park Commission-Klamath County; Klamath Falls,OR Redmond an attractive place to do business. City govern- Park Commission-Redmond,OR ment will be responsive to the needs of business so that we Budget Committee-Redmond,OR can bring more family-wage jobs here. • ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT-Recent growth in Redmond Central Oregon Park&Recreation Board of Directors- g Redmond,OR "€ has reflected the interests of groups that have directly prof- ited from decisions made by our city government.As mayor, I will move to enact a Code of Ethics that will prohibit those ` who serve in city government from obtaining private finan- cial gain from their decisions. This code will include civil penalties for ethical violations. • QUALITY OF LIFE - Many people choose to live in Redmond because of its wonderful quality of life.As mayor, 1 will work to protect our quality of life.1 will oppose plans to develop the South Canyon Area into a golf course. "m The South Canyon Area has been zoned as open space and public parks since 1978. If it is developed, it should become a park,thereby providing all of our citizens access to one of our city's natural treasures. • SENIOR-CITIZENS AND CHILDREN-Senior citizens and children are sometimes without a voice in local government. We must all work to see that they have a voice in the affairs of our community.As mayor,I will work to see that the deci- sions made by our council will have a positive impact on our seniors and children. (This information furnished by Bret Sherlock) (This information furnished by Paul C. Hathaway) Deschutes-29 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet a CITY OF REDMOND CITY COUNCIL . " GARY LYNCH ROBERT"JAY" PATRICK 3v.. NONPARTISAN ors NONPARTISAN MON d � �ti.g� tFf s„ g OCCUPATION: Manufacturer of Automotive Products OCCUPATION:At present I am a full time college student Lynch Pro-Formance Products seeking a Computer Science degree. Professional automotive/industrial cleaners and lubricants. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:My last employment was OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: at Les Schwab Tire Centers Inc..I worked there a total of 16 Distributor of Automotive Products 1/2 years and decided to return to school to seek a profes- Racing Equipment sion which would provide growth for myself and my family. Professional Race Driver/Nationals Champion Previous to Les Schwab I worked at the Printing Post herein EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:High School Graduate/ Redmond as well as Bonneville Power. Business Courses EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: I attended the 1st grade Started first business at age 19 in Terrebonne,the rest of my Grade school as well as High Have been in business dealing with both small and large School education was completed within the Redmond School businesses for 30 years. District.I then attended Mt.Hood Community College as well PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL,EXPERIENCE: Member of as Central Oregon Community College to receive an Asso- REDAP ciate of Arts Degree in 1977.Am currently in my 3rd term of Redmond Fire Department/Volunteer Fire Inspector study at COCC working toward a Computer Science Degree. I have developed a strong desire to get involved with the <� City of Redmond for the betterment of it's future and the PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: No public office future of it's citizens. to this date. ' I am very interested in the future growth and how it is Being a part of the community since childhood I have wit- handled. I want to do things right the first time at todays nessed a tremendous amount of growth. And through the dollars, so that we do not have to do them over with to- years,with the work experience I've had,it has provided the a?S morrows more expensive dollars. I want to know and un- chance to watch growth and some techniques used to help it derstand the cost and expenses of every project before happen.My desire is to see Redmond's growth be surrounded hand to be sure it is affordable and cost effective for with a positive connotation. I will dedicate the time needed Redmonds tax paying citizens.Things have to make sense for this community service. fi to me!They have to pencil out as in any other business. I I have a freedom to objectively listen and make decisions am very concerned with whats best for every taxpayer, based on what's best and not having to excuse myself from not just a few groups of people. We all pay our percent- voting because of a "conflict of interest", not being tied to age. any particular business. >a Redmond has an unlimited future. Also, I am excited to be to be part of the decisions rather Help me do the jobs USING COMMON SENSE. than sitting outside of the arena and wondering why this or It's not who's right-It's whats right! 9 g y that was done.With my business and educational background yY Thank You Very Much Gary Lynch as well as the maturity that has come with age,I ask you the opportunity to serve the people of Redmond by being elected to the City Council Thank you, R.Jay Patrick This information furnished b Ga Lynch) This information furnished b Robert"Jay"Patrick ( Y rY Y ) ( Y Y" ) Deschutes-30 S' Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet so CITY OF SISTERS CITY COUNCIL eN REBECCA NO PHOTO TIM CLASEN ELIZABETH SUBMITTED (LIBBY) NONPARTISAN s$`° ' BOTTERO s NONPARTISAN im £, 3 %N. K� 9� OCCUPATION:Registered Nurse OCCUPATION:Self employed-Landscape contractor OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:25 ears experience in the OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Mt Bachelor seasonal I'fy health care field 25 y ears 1982-1986; Landsystem 1982-1986; Timber Ridge Homeowners Ass. 1985-1988; self employed 1988 - . . EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Associate degree, Linn- present a Benton Community College;San Francisco School for Health EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:St Cloud State Univer- Professions;College of Marin sity B.A. Liberal Arts. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:City of Sisters Bud- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Elected City of y5< get Committee;Parks Committee Sisters Councilor 1996-present. COMMUNITY-- I am running for City Council because I care Sisters is a special place.We are fortunate to be surronded about our community quality of life.Throughout my nursing ca by such incredible beauty. Clean air and water, mountain reer in hospitals,clinics,home health and public health,I have views, access to public lands and towering pines all help had a special interest iri human and social services.The Sis- to create our passion for living here. ters Community Action Team's Vision Statement recommends a community center, senior center, and youth center to serve With the passage of the sewer bond,Sisters will be enter- the social service needs for our community. I support these ing a new era.We can expect greater commercial, indus- community goals,along with schools,libraries,and the estab- trial and residential development.the key to maintaing Sis- lishment of a City government website with relevant internet ters'quality of life is how we plan for that growth.We must €o be active participants in that planning. 'F££ links to increase information access; communication and citi- p p P 9• zen participation. g I believe future planning should protect our opens spaces ENVIRONMENT--I am running for City Council because I care and mountain views; insure greater public land access; about our environmental quality of life.We all love the beautiful create walking and creek trails;and promote Sisters as a natural environment that surrounds Sisters.Protection of open >> walkable town. igM space,parks,adjacent forest land and the Squaw Creek water =-x shed is essential as growth and development occurs in our area. ME I support hiking/biking trails in our community,(pnvironmentally With the annexation policy, residents now have more re s responsible land use and wastewater treatment,recycling,and sponsibility to learn about and incorporate what we want ' ;A other efforts to protect our ecosystem and natural resources. into future development. City leaders should encourage and ask for that participation.the fact that we have so many DO ECONOMY -- I am running for City Council because I care good candidates for city council is indicative of residents R=y< about our economic quality of life. It is important to have a di- feelings for greater participation. verse economy,sustaining commercial and business needs in >' our community, while maintaining the unique qualities of our a ff tY 9 q q Another important part of growth planning is having fair y. small town.Our region has experienced rapid growth and de- system development charges.With that money available velopment in recent years,which has placed enormous stress from full system development fees,we can offer and plan 'l on infrastructure schools, roads, law enforcement,water and for a better product for future residents. sewer systems,etc.)at greatly increased costs to taxpayers. I support managed responsible growth,fair systems development We should continue to help fund and promote tourism for to charges as allowed by state law,and updating the City of Sis Sisters and seek more family wage jobs.As a Sisters City a ters Comprehensive Plan. Councilor, I will listen and encourage your ideas. My first NCO priority will be whats best for the folks that live here. '€SK< This information furnished b g Rebecca Elizabeth(Libby)Bottero) (This information furnished by Tim Clasen) ; Deschutes-31 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS CITY COUNCIL { 'S MARGARET LON 3 (MAGGIE) KELLSTROM HUGHES NONPARTISAN 5.' NONPARTISAN s 3 A G OCCUPATION: Co-owner, retail and mailorder business, OCCUPATION: L. Kellstrom Construction, Inc. 13 years. Located in Sisters. 1995-present OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Supervisor-Computer OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Programmer/Analyst Section,6 years;Computer Program- 1994 Quality Inns-Salem,Portland mer/Analyst, 7 years; Graduate Student Teaching Assis- General Manager tant,3 years. 1987-1993 Hotel Alternative-San Francisco,Seattle s EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Westmar College, Managing Director LeMars, Iowa, BA degree, math; Iowa State University, 1983-1987 Property g g Management Services Vancouver MS degree,botany. Director,Hospitality DN. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:None. 1980-1983 Basil Miaullis&Assoc-Portland Resident of Sisters since 1988. VP,co-owner 1969-1980 Westin Hotels-six cities Currently a member of these organisations and have Varied to General Manager served in the ways described: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Primary & secondary r grades-Klamath Falls Sisters Garden Club-have helped with planning;fund Graduate-Eugene, University of Oregon, 1964-1968 raising, and maintenance for each of the 4 garden 16th Grade n: sites in Sisters;served 2 years as Secretary-Treasurer Bachelor of Arts and 2 years as President. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Sisters School District Budget Committee, 1994-present M� Friends of Sisters Library-Secretary tyear.Have helped 9 p with fund raising. Forceful, Firm, Fair Sisters Area Chamber of Commerce-member of Retail Committee 0. e` <':f Ch:• (This information furnished by Margaret(Maggie)Hughes) (This information furnished by Lon Kehstrom) Deschutes-32 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet CITY OF SISTERS CITY COUNCIL DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT ZONE #4 NO PHOTO WAYNE RAYMOND SUBMITTED KIMBALL " ' MIAO NONPARTISAN ' NONPARTISAN OCCUPATION: Like many semi-retired Sisters, Oregon OCCUPATION: Independent Nikken Distributor. residents,I am available for Public Service.I currently teach Business Consultant. occasional classes for Central Oregon Community C01- OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Technology Source lege and serve as lay Pastor for the Chapel in the Pines, International, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer. Camp Sherman,Oregon. AGI Business Development; Business Consultants; y.. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:I am a retired US Army Principal. ' Officer and educator. In addition to commanding numer Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc.; Corporate Vice- ous active Army units,I directed a federal educational pro- President Operations. gram which enrolled over 100,000 high school students Hana Biologics, Inc.; Director Exploratory Research. nation-wide. Stanford Research Institute;Senior Biochemist. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: I graduated from high EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Duke University;Ph.D. school in Springfield,Oregon and earned a degree in chem- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Deschutes istry from the University of Oregon.I went on to earn gradu- County Library Board;Chairperson;Appointed. ate degrees in Public Administration and in Urban Plan- Bend Library Service District Board; Past chairperson; ning from the University of Colorado. Appointed. Bend High School Site Council; Elected. 0:1. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: As a native Oregonian, I feel a strong commitment to public service. Libraries are a reflection of the values and quality of life of ?' our community. Libraries embody our past, present and Since moving to Sisters, I have served as Planning Com future. -' missioner, Library Board Member, and Boy Scout Troop Committee Chairman. They are not just a collection of books.They are not just a storehouse of information.A quality library allows each of If elected to serve on the Sisters City Council, I will do my us to experience life to its fullest --from our first picture best to help,the city grow in a sane, sensible way while books, through our school years, our family years, our maintaining its unique 1880's small town character. working years,and well into our retirement years.A qual- ity library provides us with books,magazines,newspapers, videos, books on tape, large print books, computer sys- ` tems, the internet, and access to the resources in other s'. libraries.Libraries make it possible for us to keep learning and discovering.To be life-long learners.To become the best that we can be. The most important asset for our libraries is people the staff and community.We have an incredible staff that has managed to maintain our library system through some very difficult times. The citizens of Deschutes County have shown their support with new library buildings.Our Friends of the Library groups in each community have raised money and book donations for many years. Our library system needs stable, long-term funding in or- der to meet the needs of our communities.Now is the time to separate our libraries from the County government. Please vote YES to form the Deschutes Public Library Sys- tem. (This information furnished by Wayne Kimball) (This information furnished by Raymond Miao) Deschutes-33 4 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION DIRECTORS NO PHOTO MARIE BEN SUBMITTED CLASEN � EHRENSTROM NONPARTISAN NONPARTISAN f �e a. .2 E .. `r OCCUPATION: Family Service Worker - Head Start OCCUPATION:Owner-Ben's Cabinets 1986-Present Early Childhood Educator-Together For Children OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Dougs Cabinet OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Personnel Adminis- Shop 1977-1981 trator-Mt Bachelor Ski&Summer Resort 1985-1989 GJ Miller Const. Co 1981-1986 X-country Center Clerk-Mt Bachelor Ski&Summer Resort 1982-1985 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Graduated.McNary R High School-Salem OR <2 VISTA Volunteer-Self Help Enterprises-Visalia, Ca Small Business Administration-COCC 1980-1981 '> EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: BA Hood College- PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: None Frederick Md S.O.A.R. Diploma-Pope John XXIII H.S. Sparta NJ Sisters Organization for Activities and Recreation PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: COCC- S.O.A.R.was formed in the Sisters community three years Sisters Community Ed Board 1995-present ago, the result of a major voluntary undertaking by many <` Sisters Elementary School-Site Council 95/96 96/97 community minded citizens.At the time of it's formation, k school years an organization providing the benefits of S.O.A.R.was long Tumalo School- Parent Teacher Community- President overdue.Fundraising efforts brought about S.O.A.R.'s ini- 93/94 school year tial formation with continued funding coming from user fees, x contributions, rants and further fundraising efforts. With �' I am running for the SOAR board because families and 9 9 the benefits S.O.A.R. has ovided this community over children have been important issues to me for a long time. P tY I think SOAR has done an excellent job getting off the the past several years so obvious, the time has come to provide S.O.A.R.the stable funding it has earned. ground,offering diverse activities for different age groups. I would consider it an honor to be part of the board and Vote Yes for S.O.A.R. continue this progress. The tax base funding for S.O.A.R.will be generated from My goals would be to work towards more activities based within the Sisters community.Monies spent will benefit the k Sisters community direct) through the continued and im- ry around art and music. I would also like to see some pre- Y Y 9 school programs and more activities for teenagers.I would proved activities and programs offered through S.O.A.R. like to see some input from the middle school and high Should you elect me to the board of directors of S.O.A.R. school so we could do a better job serving this population. I will see to it that your hard earned tax dollars are counted for and well s ent. Providing ac- I believe that the strength of this organization is a direct p g the citizens of the reflection of the strength of families in our community. Sisters community quality recreational programming now E �.� Therefore, SOAR deserves all the support necessary to and in the future. maintain excellence in their programming. Thank You Ben Ehrenstrom (This information furnished by Marie Clasen) (This information furnished by Ben Ehrenstrom) Deschutes-34 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION DIRECTORS Z MAL, `$ JUDITH A. BONNIE ` = KELL MALONE 3 : NONPARTISAN : NONPARTISAN I � Z L�< r 3 a OCCUPATION:Retired OCCUPATION:Chiropractic Physician, 17 years in Sisters OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Tualatin Hills Park and OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:Fred Meyer Recreation District;1976-77;1980-1994 Albertson's Beaverton School District;Adaptive Physical Education Instructor 1977-1980 The Oregonian Portland Community College;Instructor EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Western States Chiroprac- Sunnyvale Parks and Recreation District;Recreation Specialists; tic College:Doctor of Chiropractic 1968-1975 California Community College;Instructor University of Oregon: BS Political Science Gulf Breeze Junior High School;Physical Education and BS Journalism Science instructor;Gulf Breeze,Florida PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Precinct Commit- EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:Portland State University; tee Person Graduate school-Special Education I feel that SOAR has far exceeded the expectations that it had Long Beach State University;BA Degree in Physical Education in the beginning. The continually growing number of people Orange Coast Junior College;A.A.Degree in Physical Education involved in SOAR activities is astounding,and new programs Newport Harbor High School;Newport Beach,Calif n . PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE:Oregon Park and are being added every season.SOAR has enhanced the life of Recreation Board Member this community for three years,giving youth and adults oppor Special Education Advisory Board Member,Beaverton School tunities for safe and fun ways to spend their leisure time.Assur- District 48 ing its existence as a recreation district will open the doors for Washington County Association for Retarded Citizens Board many more activities, lots more adult and senior scheduling Member and continuation of latchkey programs after school.Stabilizing Washington County Mental Health Board Member funding as a recreation district will also create access to grant California Park and Recreation Member programs that have previously been denied to SOAR.We are B Leadership,Community Service a great community that has the opportunity to be even greater. .: Oregon Park and Recreation Society Professional of the Year Vote yes for the SOAR District. Award National Aquatics Program Award Rotarian-Paul Harris Fellow Award ODOT-Adopt-A-Hiway Member O.S.U.Extension Member Sisters Rodeo Association Member Sisters Recreation District Task Force Volunteer;Election Committees,Scout Troops,U.S.O.,Hospital Auxilliary,4-H Leader National Park and Recreation Association I have been a Sisters resident for three years and a property owner for ten years.The community of Sisters is special to me and I want to contribute to its development by sharing my skills and knowl- edge of the park and recreation profession. If I am elected, I will devote my expertise to the continuing development of community based park and recreation programs that meet the needs of all those who reside in Sisters,from infant to senior adult.I am a strong advocate for community involvement to insure the future growth of Sisters is directed in a positive way.I hope I have the opportunity to .. assist in that process. 2 God bless you and thank you Judy Kell (This information furnished by Judith A. Kell) (This information furnished by Bonnie Malone) Deschutes-35 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON—NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT NATIONAL STATE REPRESENTATIVE,54TH DISTRICT NONPARTISAN STATE UNITED STATES SENATOR VOTE FOR ONE O ELLI WORK SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION VOTE FOR ONE Democrat VOTE FOR ONE a= Q JIM BREWSTER STAN BUNN Libertarian O CURT WAGONER O Libertarian MARGARET CARTER O DEAN M.BRAA Q Socialist O TIM KNOPP O RON WYDEN Republican Q --------------- Democrat O --------------- STATE JUDICIARY O MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL Natural Law STATE REPRESENTATIVE,55TH DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT,POSITION NO.7 O KARYN MOSKOWITZ VOTE FOR ONE VOTE FOR ONE Pacific O BEN WESTLUND BOB TIERNAN Republican O 's Q JOHN LIM Republican Q RALPH THOMAS O WILLIAM RIGGS Libertarian Q --------------- Q MICHAEL T. MCGINNIS O Socialist UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT,POSITION NO.4 IN CONGRESS,2ND DISTRICT Q _____________ _ VOTE FOR ONE VOTE FOR ONE O LINDSEY BRADSHAW couNTr Q SUSAN M. LEESON -y Libertarian Incumbent COMMISSIONER,POSITION 1-Vote for One p ROHN (GRANDPA)WEBB O Socialist O DENNIS R. LUKE GREG WALDEN Republican JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, O Republican O BILL HAUSE POSITION NO.4 O KEVIN M. CAMPBELL Democrat VOTE FOR ONE Democrat <:> O VIRGINIA L. LINDER Incumbent O ——————————————— COMMISSIONER,POSITION 3-Vote for One STATE ' O TOM DEWOLF Republican JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, gm GOVERNOR POSITION NO.7 VOTE FOR ONE Q DENNIS LANDWEHR VOTE FOR ONE RICHARD P. BURKE Democrat O ROBERT WOLLHEIM :::.:..... Libertarian Incumbent O BLAIR BOBIER O Pacific <=> ROGER G.WEIDNER NONPARTISAN COUNTY OFFICES Reform BILL SIZEMORE COUNTY CLERK Vote for One O MARY SUE SUSI PENHOLLOW Republican O O PATTI STEURER Natural Law Q _______________ O TREY SMITH TREASURER-Vote for One ' Socialist JOHN KITZHABER O MARTIN F.WYNNE O Democrat O O --------------- Deschutes-36 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet On SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON—NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT DESCHUTES SOIL&WATER CITY OF BEND CITY OF SISTERS CONSERVATION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL-4-YEAR TERM CITY COUNCIL-VOTE FOR THREE DIRECTOR ZONE 1-4 YEAR TERM Vote for One Vote for Three The two top vote receivers will serve four-year ' NO CANDIDATE FILED terms,C.WILSON terms,the third top vote receiver will serve atwo- O year term,all terms commence January,1999. O --------------- O ROD E.TOMCHO O REBECCA(LIBBY)ELIZABETH BOTTERO DIRECTOR-ZONE 4-4-YEARTERM-Vote for One O JOHN SCHUBERT NO CANDIDATE FILED O TIM CLASEN O CLARK W. SATRE ________ _____ p WILLIAM(DAVE)D.MOYER O ?` O WILLIAM FRIEDMAN O LONKELLSTROM DIRECTOR-AT LARGE-4-YEAR TERM-Vote for One CD R.L. FREEBORN O BOB NIPPER O GERALD WAYNE(WAYNE)KIMBALL --------------- O JOHN HUMMEL O O MARGARET(MAGGIE)S.HUGHES 'y O --------------- DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT <=> --------------- ______ DIRECTOR,ZONE 1-Vote for One O--------------- O PATRICIA J. LAWRENCE --------------- O O--------------- O ——————-———————- CITY OF REDMOND SEE TEXT OF MEASURE AND MAP ON SEPARATE SHEET OR DIRECTOR,ZONE 2-Vote for One MAYOR-2-YEAR TERM-Vote for One POSTED IN VOTING BOOTH <' BRET SHERLOCK O O SISTERS ORGANIZATION.FOR MARY BETH PEARL ; O BOB GREEN ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION O --------------- DIRECTORS-Vote for Five O ED FITCH The candidates receiving the 1 st,2nd&3rd high- DIRECTOR,ZONE 3-Vote for One est vote shall be elected to a term expiring June —————— 30, 2001. The candidates receiving the 4th & O GEORGE C. RISER O —————— 5th highest vote shall be elected to a term expir- ing on June 30,1999. O ——————————————— CITY COUNCILOR-4-YEAR TERM-Vote for Three O BEN EHRENSTROM DIRECTOR,ZONE 4-Vote for One O JAY PATRICK O RAYMOND MIAO O JOHN BUSHNELL O JIM DIEGEL MARIE CLASEN O b: O ------ --------- O GARY LYNCH O CAROLE ("CB") DAVIS DIRECTOR,ZONE 5-Vote for One O PAUL C. HATHAWAY -' O ANN H. EVENSEN O BONNIE MALONE u:. O --------------- O JOHN REUTERx r� O --------------- O --------- ------ O JUDITH A. KELL --------------- O ED FITZJARRELL O --------------- O --------------- O --------------- O --------------- ' ;!EF Deschutes-37 j Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet $' SAMPLE BALLOT k DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON-NOVEMBER 3, 1998 f ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT 33 STATE MEASURES 59 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:PROHIBITS 64 PROHIBITS MANY PRESENT TIMBER SEE TEXT OF MEASURES ON SEPARATE USING PUBLIC RESOURCES TO HARVEST PRACTICES,IMPOSES MORE COLLECT MONEY FOR POLITICAL SHEET OR POSTED IN VOTING BOOTH RESTRICTIVE REGULATIONS PURPOSES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" LEGISLATIVE Q YES OYES vote adopts restrictions on tim- vote prohibits using public re- ber harvest practices, including 54 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:AUTHORIZES STATE TO GUARANTEE BONDED sources to collect or help collect Q NO federal regulation,allows citizen- INDEBTEDNESS OF CERTAIN Q NO political funds. suit enforcement. EDUCATION DISTRICTS RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains cur RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" vote rejects prohibition on using public resources rent regulations concerning timber harvest prac- Q YES vote authorizes state to guaran- to collect or help collect political funds. ticcees. tee general obligation bonds is- 6o REQUIRES VOTE BY MAIL IN BIENNIAL 65 PROCESS MEN SCON REQUIRING CREATES ara sued by certain education dis v Q NO PRIMARY,GENERAL ELECTIONS tricts. LEGISLATURE TO REVIEW RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains Q YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" pro- hibition against state guarantee of general obli- vote amends existing law to re- ADMINISTRATIVE RULES gation bonds issued by education districts. quire vote by mail in biennial pri- YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" Q NO mary,general elections. vote creates process for peti- 55 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:PERMITS RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" tioning legislature to require its STATE TO GUARANTEE EARNINGS ON vote retains current law prohibiting vote by mail Q NO review of administrative rules. PREPAID TUITION TRUST FUND in biennial primary or general elections. RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No" Q YES RESULT OF "YES" VOTE: Vote C CHANGES MINIMUM SENTENCES FOR vote keeps system not requiring legislative ap- "Yes"to authorize state to guar 61 proval for administrative rules to remain in ef- �€ LISTED CRIMES,INCLUDING CERTAIN fect. antee earnings under tuition trust REPEAT OFFENSES Q NO fund program. YE AMENDS CONSTITUTION: RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" C RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: Vote O S vote changes minimum sen 6 DEDICATES SOME LOTTERY >: "No"to refuse authorization to guarantee earn- ings under tuition trust fund program. tences for listed crimes,includ FUNDING TO PARKS,BEACHES; d Q NO ing certain repeat offenses. HABITAT,WATERSHED PROTECTION 56 EXPANDS NOTICE TO LANDOWNERS RESULT OF "NO VOTE: "No" YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" REGARDING CHANGES TO vote retains present sentencing statutes and O vote dedicates 15 VOTE totter LAND USE LAWS guidelines for listed crimes,including repeat of P y RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" fenses. funding to parks, beaches; Q YES Q NO salmon, wildlife habitat, water- vote requires governments to -AMENDS CONSTITUTION:REQUIRES shed protection. mail notice to landowners re CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURES; RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains sys- Q NO arding changes to land use l REGULATES SIGNATURE GATHERING; tem restricting state lottery funding to job cre- laws. GUARANTEES CONTRIBUTION ation,economic development,public education. RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains cur- METHODS rent notice requirements,which do not require 67 ALLOWS MEDICAL USE OF °� mailed notice to landowners. RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" MARIJUANA WITHIN LIMITS; Q YES vote requires additional cam ESTABLISHES PERMIT SYSTEM REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY REFERENDUM PETITION paign finance disclosures;regu- fates signature gathering; guar- Q YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" w; Q NO antees certain contribution meth vote allows medical use of mari- MAKES POSSESSION OF LIMITED ods. juana within specified limits;es- AMOUNT AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" vote rejects re- O NO tablishes state-controlled permit CLASS C MISDEMEANOR quiring additional campaign finance disclosures, system. regulating signature gathering,guaranteeing cer- RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No"vote retains Or Q YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" tam contribution methods. egon criminal, civil forfeiture laws prohibiting 3 vote makes possession of less possession, delivery and production of mari- than one ounce of marijuana a 63 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:MEASURES juana. Q NO Class C misdemeanor. PROPOSING SUPERMAJORITY VOTING RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE SAME vote retains statute making possession of less than one ounce of marijuana a violation. SUPERMAJORITY FOR PASSAGE p YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes" PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION vote allows passage of greater- than-majority voting require 58 REQUIRES ISSUING COPY OF ONO ments only by equally large ma- g°F ORIGINAL OREGON BIRTH CERTIFI- jonty. CATE TO ADOPTEES RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote allows simple ' majority to ass measures that impose Q YES RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes'' 1 y P pose greater- vote requires issuing copy of than-majority voting requirements. original Oregon birth certificate NO to adult adoptees upon request. RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" vote retains confidentiality of original Oregon birth certificate of adoptees unless court orders disclosure. Deschutes-38 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT E DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON-NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ; ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT , COUNTY MEASURE CITY OF SISTERS 9-66 LA PINE PARK&RECREATION DISTRICT SEE TEXT OF MEASURES AND MAP GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT ON SEPARATE SHEET AUTHORIZATION OR POSTED IN VOTING BOOTH 9-60 TO FORM LIBRARY DISTRICT AND 9.62 CHARTER AMENDMENT REQUIRING YES QUESTION:Shall the District be ESTABLISH PERMANENT TAX RATE O �-. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES authorized to issue general obli- LIMITATION. gation bonds in an amount not ALLOWED BY STATE LAW. exceeding O YES QUESTION: Shall Deschutes NO g $950,000? If the Public Library District be formed O YES QUESTION:Shall city charter be bonds are approved,they will be and impose$0.55 per$1,000 as- amended to require systems de- payable from taxes on property or property own- NO sessed value as permanent rate velopment charges to extent ership that are not subject to the limits of sec- limit beginning 1998-99? O NO state law allows and limit de- tions 11 and 11 b,Article XI of the Oregon Con- SUMMARY: This measure will form the ferred payment? stitution. Deschutes Public Library District. Deschutes SUMMARY:If approved,this measure provides County intends to transfer all county library ser 9-63 A MEASURE AUTHORIZING funds to the District to finance the costs of Capi- > vices to the district and cease library funding ANNEXATION OF 69013 CAMP POLK ROAD tal construction and capital improvements, in- from its general fund. PROPERTY. cluding,but not limited to,providing funds to: The new library district will be separate from Site improvements and capital construction Deschutes County.The new district will have its O YES QUESTION: Shall the 4.61 acre at White School Park and Findlay Butte Park; own tax rate dedicated to library purposes.Stable 69013 Camp Polk Road property and ; funding will restore and expand services in ? Pay bond issuance costs. >: branch libraries in Bend,La Pine,Redmond,Sis- O NO be annexed. ters and Sunriver.Funding will provide children's The Bonds will mature in 20 years or less. programs,double new books and expand open N hours. 9 67 A MEASURE AUTHORIZING SEE TEXT OF MEASURE AND MAP The new library district will be governed by an ANNEXATION OF 69030 NORTH PINE STREET ON SEPARATE SHEET OR independent elected board.The five board mem- PROPERTY. POSTED IN VOTING BOOTH tiers will be elected from zones. SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR (Map of the proposed district and zone bound- O YES QUESTION: Shall the 69030 ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION aries will accompany absentee ballots and be North Pine street property,cur- posted in the voting booths) rently owned by the Sisters O NO School District,be annexed? 9-68 TO FORM A RECREATION DISTRICT CITY OF BEND AND ESTABLISH TAX RATE LIMITATION. LA PINE PARK&RECREATION DISTRICT O YES QUESTION: Shall a Recreation 9-64 A MEASURE EXPANDING THE BEND District be formed and impose CITY LIMITS BY ANNEXATION 9-65 LA PINE PARK&RECREATION DISTRICT $0.22 per $1,000 assessed PERMANENT RATE LIMITATION O NO value as permanent rate limit, O YES QUESTION:Shall the City annex AUTHORIZATION beginning 1998-1999? territory in the Bend Urban Growth Boundary(UGB)as pro- BLACK BUTTE RANCH RURAL FIRE O NO vided in the Bend Annexation YES QUESTION:Shall the District im- PROTECTION DISTRICT ?>so Plan? O pose $.47 per $1,000 of as- sessed value as a permanent rate SUMMARY:Approval will annex territory within P 9-69 FOUR-YEAR LOCAL OPTION TAX FOR the UGB,which generally begins at HWY 97 and O NO limit beginning fiscal year 1998- OPERATIONS China Hat Road;west to the Deschutes River, 1999• then to Century Drive,around First on the Hill SUMMARY:If approved,this measure provides and Broken Top Subdivisions to Skyliners Road; for the District to impose$.47 per$1,000 of as- O YES QUESTION: Shall Black Butte following UGB signs around Valhalla Heights and sessed value as a permanent limit on the rate of Ranch Rural Fire Protection Dis- Awbrey Glen subdivisions to Putnam Road;then ad valorem property taxes to be imposed by the trict impose$170,000 for four «` along Tumalo Irrigation Canal to Deschutes District pursuant to section 11(3)(c)(A),Article O NO years for operations beginning River,then following UGB signs to HWY 20; XI of the Oregon Constitution. in 1999-2000? This measure . along Hwy 20 to Cooley Road,and Hunnell Road may cause property taxes to increase more than s=. following UGB signs to HWY 97 and Railroad three percent. tracks;following UGB signs to Cooley Road,Pilot SUMMARY: The total amount to be raised is Butte Canal, Yeoman Road, North Unit Canal, $680,000. The tax is$170,000 per year for 4 Deschutes Market Road, Butler Market Road, years. The first year the levy will be made is Eagle Road,and Neff Road,to UGB signs;across 1999-2000. This levy is needed to make up for Hwy 20 to Bear Creek Road,Stevens Road,27th losses incurred by the passage of Ballot Mea- Street, Ferguson Road, around County Public sure 50 and provides funds to maintain current Works,to Magnolia Lane,around Tara View Es- levels of service. This is a continuation of the tates following UGB signs to Knott Road,then two-year local option safety services tax levy to China Hat Road and HWY 97. approved in the September 1997 election. (Map of proposed area will accompany absen- tee ballots and be posted in voting booth.) `' Deschutes-39 r . Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON—NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT 9-70 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 55 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:PERMITS REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE AUTHORIZATION FOR BLACK BUTTE RANCH STATE TO GUARANTEE EARNINGS ON BY REFERENDUM PETITION RFPD PREPAID TUITION TRUST FUND p YES QUESTION: Shall Black Butte RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:Vote"Yes"to autho 57 MAKES POSSESSION OF LIMITED Ranch RFPD be authorized to rize state to guarantee earnings under tuition AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA CLASS C contract general obligation trust fund program. MISDEMEANOR NO bonded indebtedness in an RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: Vote "No"to refuse RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote makes pos- amount not exceed authorization to guarantee earnings under to session of less than one ounce of marijuana a $1,000,000. If the bonds are approved, they ition trust fund program. Class C misdemeanor. will be payable from taxes on property or prop- erty ownership that are not subject to the limits SUMMARY:Amends,Constitution.Measure ap- RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains stat- of Sections 11 and 11 b,Article XI of the Oregon proval makes effective the Post secondary Etlu ute making possession of less than one ounce Constitution. cation Expense Program adopted by 1997 Leg- of marijuana a violation. SUMMARY:This measure would let the district islature. Program allows payment of under graduate tuition before enrollment at lower than SUMMARY:Under current Oregon law,posses issue general obligation bonds in an amount not highest prevailing rate at time of enrollment;es sion of less than one ounce of marijuana is a to exceed$1,000,000. They will mature serially highest p trust fund. Measure permits state to violation,punishable by 500 to 1000 dollar fine; over ten (10)years from issue. Funds will be charges against first-time offenders may be dis- used to purchase and replace public safety ve- exceed constitutional debt limit to authorize in-h missed upon completion of marijuana diversion hicles,including a Quint combination,structure debtedness at 1/2 of one percent of true cash agreement.Measure makes possession of less engine/ladder truck which carries water for the value of all property in state to guarantee mini than one ounce of marijuana a Class C misde initial attack;one heavy brush,one rescue/am- mum benefits on contributions to prepaid to meanor,punishable by up to 30 dayys imprison bulance,and one ambulance. The funds will also Ition trust fund. State may issue bonds; may ment,plus 500 to 1000 dollarfine.Measure also be used for bond costs and professional fees. borrow from Common School Fund, if neces- makes failure to complete diversion agreement sary. ground for six-month suspension of offender's ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT, It is esti- driving privileges. Allocates$600,000 for en- mated that this measure will require approxi- forcement. mately$1,200,000 in total start up costs,in state ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:Direct state FULL TEXT OF MEASURES funds,over the first four years of its operation. expenditures for law enforcement,indigent de- OFFICIAL BALLOTS WILL CONTAIN ONLY fense, court operation,and jury payments are estimated at$586,000 annually.A one-time cost THE MEASURE NUMBER,CAPTION, 56 EXPANDS NOTICE TO LANDOWNERS of$50,000 would be required for Driver and QUESTION AND YES NO REGARDING CHANGES TO Motor Vehicle Services computer programming. LAND USE LAWS State expenditures could increase or decrease REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE depending on the number of cases prosecuted, BY THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote requires the number of individuals entering diversion governments to mail notice to landowners re- agreements,and the number of defendants eli- 54 AMENDS CONSTITUTION: garding changes to land use laws. gibie for court-appointed counsel. AUTHORIZES STATE TO GUARANTEE RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains cur- Direct county expenditures for local jail beds are rent notice requirements,which do not require estimated at$229,000 annually.Local expendi- BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF CERTAIN mailed notice to landowners. tures could increase or decrease depending on EDUCATION DISTRICTS SUMMARY:Requires counties and.cities to mail the length of sentences imposed by the courts, RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote authorizes notices to landowners regarding changes to Population management decisions of jail com state to guarantee general obligation bonds is- state,local,or metropolitan service district land manor and management of offenders on pro sued by certain education districts. use laws and regulations that limit or prohibiT ation or r post release supervision. RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains pro- uses currently allowed on the landowners'prop- State fine revenues are estimated to be reduced hibition against state guarantee of general obli erty. Requires state government to reimburse by$638,000 annually. gation bonds issued by education districts. counties and cities for costs of mailing notice Major assumptions for these estimates include: resulting from changes to state statutes or ad- SUMMARY:Constitution now generally prohib- ministrative rules. Requires metropolitan ser- 6,000 arrests per year. its state from creating debt over$50,000 or vice districts to reimburse counties and cities 50 percent of arrests will be prosecuted as lending its credit.Measure amends constitution for costs of mailing notice resulting from misdemeanors,40 percent will be prosecuted permitting state to guarantee general obligation changes in district land use regulations. Pre as violations,and 10 percent will result in a bonded indebtedness of school districts,edu- scribes form of each notice. diversion agreement. cation service districts,community college dis- ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:State gov- 50 percent of all arrests will result in an av- tricts.Limits amount state can guarantee to 1/2 ernment expenditures are estimated to be erage of one day of county jail time. of one percent of true cash value of taxable prop $2,040,000 annually in notice costs.Local gov *r¢ erty in state. State may issue bonds, borrow ernment expenditures, including those of the 54 percent of arrests prosecuted as violations from Common School Fund to satisfy obliga Metropolitan Service District,are estimated to and 40 percent of arrests prosecuted as mis- :;:<, tion. Legislature must enact statutes authoriz demeanors will result in convictions. �.. be$1,547,000 a year. ing state to recover from district payments made The minimum fine of$500 will be assessed to satisfy state's guarantee of district debt. This estimate is based on 7,000 land use ac- for all misdemeanor convictions and maxi- ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:Reduced in tions per year, of which 3,900 would require mum fine of$250 will be assessed for all vio- terest and issuance costs on indebtedness by some notice under this measure.Actual expen lations convictions. ditures may vary based on such variables as participating school districts,education service the total number of land use actions,the num- 40 percent of fines assessed for misde- districts and community college districts are es- ber of actions included in each notice and the meanor convictions and 78 percent of fines timated to be$70 million over the next 20 years costs per notice. assessed for violation convictions will be col- under this measure.This estimate is based on lectetl. current levels of bond issuance.There is no fi- nancial effect on state government revenues or expenditures. Deschutes-40 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON-NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT NO PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION 60 REQUIRES VOTE BY MAIL IN BIENNIAL 61 CHANGES MINIMUM SENTENCES FOR PRIMARY,GENERAL ELECTIONS LISTED CRIMES,INCLUDING CERTAIN 58 REQUIRES ISSUING COPY OF REPEAT OFFENSES `h ORIGINAL OREGON BIRTH RESULT OF "YES"VOTE: "Yes"vote amends CERTIfICATETO ADOPTEES existing law to require vote by mail in biennial RESULT OF"YES"VOTE: "Yes"vote changes primary,general elections. minimum sentences for listed crimes, includ- F.. RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote requires RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains cur- ing certain repeat offenses. issuing copy of original Oregon birth certificate rent law prohibiting vote by mail in biennial pri- RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" vote retains to adult adoptees upon request. mart'or general elections. resent sentencing tatutes and uidelines for RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains con p g f ` SUMMARY:Current law prohibits vote by mail listed crimes,including repeat offenses. fidentiality of original Oregon birth certificate of for biennial primary or general elections.This SUMMARY:Establishes minimum sentences for s adoptees unless court orders disclosure. proposal eliminates the P rohibition and requires q crimes listed as"major crimes."Provides one SUMMARY: Current Oregon law provides that vote by mail for biennial primary or general elec- to three year proportionally increased sentences upon decree of adoption,a new birth certificate tions.The proposal does not affect existing law for major crimes, aggravated murder or mur- generally will be substituted forthe original birth permitting the Secretary of State and county der if person has one to three prior convictions y. certificate,and the original certificate showing clerk to conduct other elections either at the for major crime within )10 years. rior j y u- ;f birth parent information will not be subject to Polls or by mail. venile court adjudications involving major inspection, unless a court orders disclosure. ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:County gov- crimes apply to increase sentence.Treats prior Measure would require state registrar to issue ernment expenditures are estimated to be re- conviction for driving under influence of intoxi- : certified copy of original birth certificate to any duced each Primary and General Election year cants as major crime if current conviction is for Oregon born adopted person 21 years old or by$3,021,709. criminally negligent homicide using vehicle. older.Establishes same procedures,filing fees Prohibits temporary leave or other reduction in and waiting periods for obtaining birth certifi- additional prison time imposed under measure. cate copies for adopted persons as for non- ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:The man- adopted persons. datory and presumptive sentences imposed ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:No financial under this measure are estimated to require effect on state or local government expenditures 4,300 new prison beds by 2006,with direct state or revenues. expenditures for prison construction and start- up of$470 million by 2006. 59 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:PROHIBITS Direct state expenditures for prison operating USING PUBLIC RESOURCES TO costs and debt service are estimated at$21 mil- o COLLECT MONEY FOR POLITICAL lion in 1999-2000 and$40 million in 2000-2001, PURPOSES growing to $125 million in 2005-2006. Com- munity corrections payments from the state to RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote prohibits counties for probation and post-prison super- using public resources to collect or help collect vision are estimated to be reduced by$800,000 �`. political funds. in 1999-2000,$1.9 million in 2000-2001,and M. RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote rejects pro- $1.4 million in 2005-2006. hibition on using public resources to collect or Under this measure, direct state expenditures ;fi, help collect political funds. for court operations are estimated at$100,000 s SUMMARY:Amends constitution.Prohibits us in 1998-1999 and$176,000 in each of the next o; ing"public funds"to collect or assist in collect two years. State expenditures for indigent Be- ing"political funds.""Public funds"defined to fense are estimated at$350,000 in 1998 1999 include public employee time, public property and$900,000 in each of the next two years. or equipment and supplies."Political funds"de- Major factors affecting this estimate include: fined to include any expenditure supporting or Plea bargaining practices of prosecuting at- opposing a candidate,ballot measure or initia- torneys; tive petition. Prohibition applies even if public entities are reimbursed for use of public funds Prior criminal history of offenders; r for collection. Measure would prohibit public a. p p Sentencing practices of judges; employee payroll deduction for any entity that Numbers of arrests;and uses any funds deducted for political purposes ;n: or that commingles political and non-political • Type of prison bed, minimum or medium funds. security. ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:This mea- sure is estimated to reduce state expenditures a" for voters'pamphlet publication by$1,800,000 in the year 2000 and in subsequent even-num- bered years.State revenues from filing fees are estimated to decrease by$400,000 in the year 2000 and in subsequent even-numbered years. These reductions result from eliminating can- didates'statements and measure arguments in the State Voters'Pamphlet. ski% The measure will have no financial effect on lo- b< cal government expenditures or revenues. 112 Deschutes-41 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON—NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT 62 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:REQUIRES 64 PROHIBITS MANY PRESENT TIMBER 65 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:CREATES CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURES; HARVEST PRACTICES,IMPOSES MORE PROCESS FOR REQUIRING REGULATES SIGNATURE GATHERING; RESTRICTIVE REGULATIONS LEGISLATURE TO REVIEW GUARANTEES CONTRIBUTION RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote adopts re- ADMINISTRATIVE RULES METHODS strictions on timber harvest practices, includ RESULT OF "YES" VOTE: "Yes" vote creates RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote requires ing federal regulation, allows citizen suit en process for petitioning legislature to require its additional campaign finance disclosures;regu forcement. review of administrative rules. fates signature gathering; guarantees certain RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains cur RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote keeps sys- contribution methods. rent regulations concerning timber harvest prat- tern not requiring legislative approval foradmin- RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote rejects re- tices. istrative rules to remain in effect. quiring additional campaign finance disclosures, SUMMARY:Prohibits many present timber har- SUMMARY:Amends constitution. Current law regulating signature gathering, guaranteeing vest practices,chemical herbicides, pesticides does not require legislative review of adminis- certain contribution methods, in forest. Limits size of trees that can be har- trative rules. Measure allows voters to require SUMMARY:Amends constitution:Existing stat vested.Covers private,state,federal forestlands. legislative review of administrative rules at next utes require disclosing certain campaign fi Imposes new harvest regulations including fed- regular session when petition,signed by speci- nances. Measure adds constitutional require eral regulation by classifying forestland waters fied number of voters, is filed listing affected ments for prompter disclosure of contributions as "navigable." State Board of Forestry must rules. Rule remains effective until reviewed by $500 or more;more frequent disclosure of con-adopt new timber harvest methods and regula- legislature, but rule ceases to be in effect un- tributions/expenditures for referendum/initiative tions to meet new requirements.Requires state less approved. If governor vetoes bill, rule is petitions. Requires disclosing entity authoriz to submit new forestland water quality plan to disapproved unless legislature overrides veto. in / a in for political advertising.Legislature federal Environmental Protection Agency,seek If rule is not approved,state agency may adopt a p y g p g approval before permitting logging.Authorizes a g y y p may regulate,prohibit paying signature gather- citizens suits to enforce new harvest restrictions new rule on same issue, but legislative review >< ers if it finds practice has caused fraud, other is required. 'I abuses. Guarantees individuals' ri ht to make or other provisions of measure. 9 ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:No financial campaign contributions using certain methods. ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT: State rev effect on state or local government expenditures 'sl Secretar of State must promptly y p p y publish fi enues are estimated to decrease $25,000,000 or revenues. nance reports.Prohibits payments for signing/ per year.This estimate assumes a 60%harvest not signing petitions.Specifies penalties.Other reduction in western Oregon and a 65%harvest 66 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:DEDICATES provisions. reduction in eastern Oregon. These estimated SOME LOTTERY FUNDING TO PARKS, <R ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:This mea- decreases apply to private,local and state lands. a sure is estimated to increase state expenditures Current state expenditures are estimated to de- BEACHES;HABITAT,WATERSHED by$248,000 a year,with an additional one-time- crease by$25,000,000 because of the revenue PROTECTION x only start up cost to the state of$104,000.Ex- loss.Major annual state expenditure reductions penditures by county and city elections filing would occur in forest management,fire protec RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote dedicates officers cannot be calculated,due to insufficient tion,and regulation,timber tax revenue and ad 15 percent lottery funding to parks, beaches; data. ministration,and Common School Fund forest salmon,wildlife habitat,watershed protection. land management. '} 63 AMENDS CONSTITUTION:MEASURES Also,added regulations required by this mea- RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains sys- PROPOSING SUPERMAJORITY VOTING sure would increase the need for ongoing state tern restricting state lottery funding to job cre REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE SAME government expenditures above current require- ation,economic development,public education. SUPERMAJORITY FOR PASSAGE ments by$5,000,000 per year. One-time state SUMMARY:Amends constitution.State lottery expenditures of$1,400,000 would be required. proceeds currently limited to job creation,eco- RESULT OF"YES"VOTE:"Yes"vote allows pas- Revenues to schools are estimated to decrease nomic development,public education.Measure sage of greater than majority voting require dedicates 15 percent of net lottery proceeds to by$33,200,000 a year.County and special dis- ments only by equally large majority. tract revenues are estimated to decrease by new fund for parks, beaches; salmon,wildlife RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" vote allows $7,800,000 per year. habitat,watershed protection.Dedicates half of simple majority to ass measures that impose fund to create, maintain state parks, ocean p 1 y p p Revenues that contribute to the Common School shores,public beach access areas,historic sites, greater than majority voting requirements. Fund will be reduced by$8,700,000 primarily recreation areas.Dedicates other half for single SUMMARY:Amends constitution.Measures in- due to an estimated 84% decrease in harvest agency to administer funds to protect native cluding a requirement for more than a majority on Common School Fund Trust lands.This, in salmon, wildlife habitat, watersheds, using at of votes cast by the electorate to approve any turn,will mean reduced earnings on the Corn least 65 percent for capital expenditures. Re change in law or government action would be- mon School Fund principal for distribution to quires biennial audits, voter renewal in 2014. come effective only if approved by at least the schools. Other provisions. same percentage of voters specified in that pro ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:An estimated ~< posed voting requirement.For example,a mea $46.2 million of state lottery proceeds will be <1 sure imposing a 2/3 majority voting requirement w.yx to change law would require a 2/3 majority to directed each year to parks and natural re- pass.Applies to initiated,referred measures pre- sources until the year 2014, when there is an sented to voters on or after November 3,1998, automatic revote.Currently the Oregon legisla- including measures on same ballot. ture allocates those funds to a variety of pro- ESTIMATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT:No financial grams including, but not limited to,education, economic and community development, natu- effect on state or local government expenditures ral resources and transportation.This estimate or revenues. is based on 1999-2001 projections of lottery proceeds. Deschutes-42 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters' Pamphlet SAMPLE BALLOT DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON-NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ONLY THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES AND MEASURES FOR EACH PRECINCT WILL APPEAR ON THAT PRECINCT'S BALLOT u 67 ALLOWS MEDICAL USE OF 9-63 A MEASURE AUTHORIZING SISTERS ORGANIZATION FOR MARIJUANA WITHIN LIMITS; ANNEXATION OF 69013 CAMP POLK ROAD ACTIVITIES AND RECREATION ESTABLISHES PERMIT SYSTEM PROPERTY. RESULT OF "YES" VOTE: "Yes" vote allows QUESTION: Shall the 4.61 acre 69013 Camp 9-68 TO FORM A RECREATION DISTRICT medical use of marijuana within specified lim- Polk Road property be annexed? AND ESTABLISH TAX RATE LIMITATION. its;establishes state-controlled permit system. SUMMARY: Approval of this measure would QUESTION: Shall a Recreation District be RESULT OF"NO"VOTE:"No"vote retains Or- provide electorate authorization to annex ap- formed and impose$0.22 per$1,000 assessed egon criminal, civil forfeiture laws prohibiting proximately 4.61 acres to the City of Sisters. value as permanent rate limit,beginning 1998- possession, delivery and production of mari- Voter approval would authorize the City to ini- 1999? Juana. tiate proceedings to add the land to the Sisters SUMMARY:This measure will form the Sisters SUMMARY:Oregon statutes currently prohibit Urban Growth Boundary and then to annex it, Organization for Activities and Recreation Dis- ossession,delivery, production of marijuana. all according to applicable statewide planning trict. p y P I goals and the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the Measure allows engaging in,assisting medical 9 �� p The new district will have its own tax rate limit use of marijuana,within specified limits. proposed annexation and land use changes are I P dedicated to funding recreational activities successfully authorized and accomplished,zon Requires medical use be necessary to mitigate ing would be designated through the process within the district. The district is intended to ;. symptoms,effects of debilitating medical con outlined in Sisters Urban Area Zoning Ordinance continue the activities of the existing non-prof it dition,including cancer,glaucoma,AIDS,HIV, and in accordance with City of Sisters Compre- SOAR organization. multiple sclerosis,others.Establishes state per- hensive Plan. Approval will have the effect of creating the dis- mit system requiring physician's written proof. trict once the election is certified. If approved, Within specified limitations, exempts permit The benefit to the City of Sisters would include P P P the tax rate limit will become effective for the holder ora licantfrommari marijuana criminal an increased property tax revenue of approxi applicant I 1999-2000 tax year. utes; authorizes criminal charge defense for mately$382.06 per year and an increased hotel medical use without permit. room tax revenue of$6,400.00 per year. The new district will be governed by an inde- pendent amounts of usable marijuana,number of (Map of proposed annexation area will accom board of directors elected at large y: 1 within the district. plants that may be possessed.Other provisions. pony absentee ballots and be posted in voting > MATE OF FINANCIAL IMPACT: Direct an booth.) (Map of proposed area will accompany absen- ESTI ESTI state expenditures are estimated at tee ballots and be posted in voting booth.) nual$147,000, based on the assumption that 500 9-67 A MEASURE AUTHORIZING applicants will register with the Oregon Health ANNEXATION OF 69030 NORTH PINE STREET Division per year. Some or all of these costs PROPERTY. may be offset by fees to be established by the QUESTION:Shall the 69030 North Pine street s Health Division asaprovided in the measure. property,currently owned by the Sisters School District,be annexed? SUMMARY: Approval of this measure would provide electorate authorization to annex ap- CITY OF SISTERS proximately 30 acres to the City of Sisters.Voter approval would authorize the City to initiate pro- ceedings to add the land to the Sisters �rban 9-62 CHARTER AMENDMENT REQUIRING Growth Boundary and then to annex it,an ac- SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES cording to applicable statewide planning goals ALLOWED BY STATE LAW. and the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the pro- posed annexation and land use changes are suc- QUESTION: Shall city charter be amended to cessfully authorized and accomplished,zoning require systems development charges to extent would be designated through the process out- state law allows and limit deferred payment? lined in Sisters Urban Area Zoning Ordinance SUMMARY:Amends city charter.Requires sys- and in accordance with City of Sisters Compre- tems development charges to extent allowed by hensive Plan. x: state law and constitutions.Requires develop- The benefit to the City of Sisters would include ment permit applicants pay charges upon new added light industrial land which is currently in development for costs associated with,includ- very short supply. When this land is sold by ing connecting to public capital improvements. the School District,it will return to the tax rolls, 3 Requires methodology designed to allocate to generating increased property tax revenues for new development full cost of existing or pro- the City. posed improvements to extent associated with (Map of proposed annexation area will accom- new development.Requires reimbursement fees pany absentee ballots and be posted in voting for increased improvement use and increasing booth.) improvement capacity.Limits deferred payment to no later than issuance of certificate of occu- pancy.Requires implementation within 180 days of passage. Note: Upon passage, the Sisters City Charter shall include the Charter Amendment Text as stated in the Explanatory Statement for County Voters'Pamphlet. £. r� IN Deschutes-43 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet POLLING PLACES PRECINCT POLLING PLACE ADDRESS CITY 6, 01 Pepsi-Cola Bldg. 2440 NE 4th Street Bend 02 Bend Senior High School 230 NE 6th Street Bend 6. 03 Department of Public Works 61150 SE 27th Street Bend c 04 First Lutheran Church NW Broadway& NW St. Helens Place Bend 05 Romaine Village Rec Hall 19940 Mahogany Street Bend 6, 06 Hollinshead Center 1235 NE Jones Road Bend 6. 07 Kenwood Elementary School Gym 701 NW Newport Avenue. Bend 08 Kenwood Elementary School Gym 701 NW Newport Avenue Bend 6 09 Bend Villa Court 1801 NE Lotus Drive Bend 6, 10 Nazarene Church 1270 NE 27th Street Bend 11 Kenwood Elementary School Gym 701 NW Newport Avenue Bend 6 12 Nazarene.Church 1270 NE 27th Street Bend 13 Tumalo Elementary School Gym 19835 2nd Street Tumalo 14 Cloverdale Fire Hall 68787 Geo Cyrus Road Cloverdale 6, 15 Sisters Fire Hall. 301 S Elm Street Sisters 6 16 Sunriver Community Church #1 Theater Drive(57175 Theater Drive) Sunriver 6, 17 St.Thomas Parish Hall NW 12th Street& SW Evergreen Avenue Redmond _> 18 Terrebonne School Gym 1199 B Avenue Terrebonne 19 Assembly of God Church 1865 W Antler Avenue Redmond 6, 20 Welcome Center 63085 N Hwy 97 Bend 6 21 1 st Missionary Baptist Church 21129 Reed Market Road Bend 6 22 Christian Life Center 21720 E Hwy 20 Bend cox 23 Deschutes County Services Bldg 1340 NW Wall Street Bend 24 La Pine Fire Station#1 51550 Huntington Road La Pine 6- 25 Bend Senior High School 230 NE 6th.Street Bend 6, 26 Jewell Elementary School 20550 Murphy Road Bend 6. 27 Kingston Elementary School NW 12th Street& NW Kingston Avenue Bend 28 Redmond Armory 822 SW Highland Avenue Redmond & 29 Redmond Senior Center 325 NW Dogwood Avenue Redmond 6. 30 Sisters Fire Hall 301 S Elm Street Sisters 31 Hugh Hartman Middle School 2105 W.Antler Avenue Redmond 32' Masonic Temple 1036 NE 8th Street Bend 33 Bear Creek Elementary School 51 NE 13th Street Bend 34 New Hope Evangelical Church 20080 Pinebrook Blvd Bend 6 35 Kenwood Elementary School Gym 701 NW Newport Avenue Bend 36 Redmond Armory 822 SW Highland Avenue Redmond 6 37 Tumalo Elementary School Gym 19835 2nd Street Tumalo 38 La Pine Fire Station#2 55785 S. Century Drive Bend 39 La Pine Fire Station#3 15990 Burgess Road La Pine 40 La Pine Church of the Nazarene 15971 Mtn View Lane La Pine 41 Tumalo Elementary School Gym 19835 2nd Street Tumalo 6 42 Elk Meadow Elementary School 60880 Brookswood Blvd Bend �. 43 Nativity Lutheran Church Knott Road & Brosterhous Road Bend 6. 44 Bear Creek Elementary School 51 NE 13th Street Bend 6. 45 Bend Senior High School 230 NE 6th Street Bend 46 Pilot Butte Jr. High School 1500 NE Penn Avenue Bend 6, 47 First Lutheran Church NW Broadway&NW St. Helens Place Bend 6, 48 Community Presbyterian Church 529 NW 19th Street Redmond Accessible to individuals with physical disabilities. Deschutes-44 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet POLLING PLACES y PRECINCT POLLING PLACE ADDRESS CITY 6,49 Kenwood Elementary School Gym 701 NW Newport Avenue Bend 50 Assembly of God Church 52565 Day Road La Pine & 51 Black Butte Ranch Fire Hall 13511 Hawks Beard Blk Butte & 52 Nativity Lutheran Church Knott Road & Brosterhous Road Bend & 53 Nazarene Church 1270 NE 27th Street Bend & 54 Deschutes County Services Bldg 1340 NW Wall Street Bend & 55 Deschutes County Services Bldg 1340 NW Wall Street Bend & 56 Kingston Elementary School NW 12th Street& NW Kingston Avenue Bend & 57 Welcome Center 63085 N Hwy 97 Bend & 58 Sisters Fire Hall 301 S Elm Street Sisters 6, 59 Tumalo Elementary School Gym 19835 2nd Street Tumalo 60 Terrebonne School Gym 1199 B Avenue Terrebonne 61 Assembly of God Church 1865 W Antler Avenue Redmond & 62 Elk Meadow Elementary School 60880 Brookswood Blvd Bend g: & 63 Welcome Center 63085 N Hwy 97 Bend & 64 Romaine Village Rec Hall 19940 Mahogany Street Bend 6, 65 Deschutes County Services Bldg 1340 NW Wall Street Bend 6. 66 Mountain View High School 2755 NE 27th Street Bend 6, 67 Jewell Elementary School 20550 Murphy Road Bend & 68 Nazarene Church 1270 NE 27th Street Bend 69 Redmond 1st Baptist Church NW 10th Street&NW Cedar Avenue Redmond s, & 70 Community Presbyterian Church 529 NW 19th Street Redmond & 71 1 st Missionary Baptist Church 21129 Reed Market Road Bend & 72 La Pine Fire Station#2 55785 S.Century Drive Bend 73 Redmond Armory 822 SW Highland Avenue Redmond & Accessible to individuals with physical disabilities. ESy yi 'o THE POLLS ARE OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. LAS c3 Deschutes-45 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet z$ ,a VOTING INSTRUCTIONS f At the General Election of 1998 the voters of Deschutes County will cast their votes on the ballot illustrated below. This page has been inserted into the Voters Pamphlet as an aid for using this ballot. WHEN VOTING YOUR BALLOT AT THE POLLING PLACE: 1. USE ONLY THE PENCIL PROVIDED. ' 2. TO VOTE YOU MUST BLACKEN THE OVAL COMPLETELY! �) EXAMPLE PRESIDENT (VOTE FOR ONE) &z r R O JOHN ALLEN DOE •<u THOMAS JEFFERSON C� J.Q. PUBLIC �w- .4i 7M <_ -IN A NAME YOU MUST BLACKEN THE 3..TO WRITE OVAL (4M) AND WRITE-1N THE NAME ON THE DOTTED LINE, WHERE APPLICABLE. 4. DO NOT CROSS OUT - IF YOU CHANGE YOUR MIND, EXCHANGE YOUR BALLOT FOR A NEW ONE. 5. AFTER VOTING - INSERT BALLOT IN THE BALLOT SLEEVE. DO NOT FOLD THE BALLOT. w REMEMBER TO VOTE BOTH SIDES OF YOUR BALLOT <q3 1 2 Deschutes-46 Official Deschutes County 1998 General Election Voters'Pamphlet INDEX MEASURES Bend, City of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-6 Black Butte Ranch Rural Fire Protection District . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-21 v Deschutes Public Library District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-4 La Pine Park & Recreation District (Rate Limit) . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-19 La Pine Park & Recreation District (Bond Authorization) . . . . Deschutes-20 Sisters Organization for Activities & Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-15 Sisters, City of Charter Amendment Deschutes-8 Sisters, City of (Annexation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-12 Sisters, City of (Annexation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-13 CANDIDATES Bottero, Rebecca Elizabeth (Libby)( y) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-31 --� Clasen, Marie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-34 Clasen, Tim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-31 DeWolf,Tom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-23 Ehrenstrom, Ben . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-34 Fitch, Ed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-28 Friedman, William . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-25 tai: Green, Bob . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-28 Hathaway, Paul C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-29 'ry Hause, Bill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-22 Hughes, Margaret (Maggie) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-32 Hummel, John . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-25 Kell, Judith A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-35 Kelstrom, Lon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-32 Kimball, Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-33 Landwehr, Dennis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-23 Luke, Dennis R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-22 Lynch, Gary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-30 Malone, Bonnie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-35 Miao, Raymond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-33 Patrick, Robert (Jay) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-30 Penhollow, Mary Sue (Susie) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-24 Satre, Clark W. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-26 Schubert, John . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-26 Sherlock, Bret . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-29 Tomcho, Rod E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-27 Wynne, Martin F. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-24 Wilson, Wyvetta C: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deschutes-27 Deschutes-47 • 41 it it lk OL or -W fi